DOCSLIB.ORG

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES): Specific Provisions Affecting Applications and Program Updates Final Rule: EPA’S Response to Public Comments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES): Specific Provisions Affecting Applications and Program Updates Final Rule: EPA’S Response to Public Comments United States Office of Water Environmental Protection Washington, DC 20460 December 2018 Agency National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES): Specific Provisions Affecting Applications and Program Updates Final Rule: EPA’s Response to Public Comments National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES): Specific Provisions Affecting Applications and Program Updates Final Rule: EPA’s Response to Public Comments TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................... iv Foreword .........................................................................................................................................v 1. General .................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.a - General – Support for Rulemaking ................................................................................ 1-3 1.b - General – Against Rulemaking.................................................................................... 1-55 1.c - General – Comments Outside Scope or Unrelated to Rulemaking ............................. 1-64 2. Permit Application Requirements ........................................................................................ 2-1 2.a - Purpose and Scope (40 CFR 122.1) ............................................................................... 2-2 2.b - NPDES Program Definitions - General (40 CFR 122.2)............................................... 2-3 2.b.i - NPDES Program Definition for Pesticide Applications to Waters of the United States (40 CFR 122.2) .......................................................................................... 2-4 2.b.ii - NPDES Program Definition for Proposed Permit (40 CFR 122.2) – Reserved . 2-29 2.b.iii - NPDES Program Definition for New Discharger (40 CFR 122.2) ................... 2-30 2.b.iv - NPDES Program Definition for Whole Effluent Toxicity (40 CFR 122.2) – Reserved ............................................................................................................. 2-31 2.c - Changes to Existing Application Requirements - General (40 CFR 122.21) .............. 2-32 2.c.i - Changes to Existing Application Requirements - NPDES Contact Information (40 CFR 122.21(a)(2)) ....................................................................................... 2-35 2.c.ii - Changes to Existing Application Requirements - NAICS Codes (40 CFR 122.21(f)(3))....................................................................................................... 2-36 2.c.iii - Changes to Existing Application Requirements - Latitude and Longitude (40 CFR 122.21) – Reserved ............................................................................................ 2-44 2.c.iv - Changes to Existing Application Requirements - New Discharger Data Submission (40 CFR 122.21(k)(5)(vi), 122.21(j)(4)(i), and 122.21(j)(5)(i)) .... 2-45 2.c.v - Changes to Existing Application Requirements - Data Age for Permit Renewal (40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(ix) ......................................................................................... 2-55 2.c.vi - Changes to Existing Application Requirements - Reporting of Electronic Mail Address (40 CFR 122.21) .................................................................................. 2-70 2.c.vii - Changes to Existing Application Requirements - Reporting Numbers of SIUs and NSCIUs (40 CFR 122.21(j)(6)(i))...................................................................... 2-71 2.c.viii - Changes to Existing Application Requirements - Cooling Water Intake Structure Indication (40 CFR 122.21(f)(9)) ...................................................................... 2-80 2.c.ix - Changes to Existing Application Requirements - Request for Variance Indication (40 CFR 122.21(f)(10) and 122.21(j)(1)(ix)) ..................................................... 2-84 i National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES): Specific Provisions Affecting Applications and Program Updates Final Rule: EPA’s Response to Public Comments TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 3. Water Quality-Based Permitting Process – Reserved ........................................................ 3-1 3.a - Antidegradation Reference (40 CFR 122.44(d)) – Reserved ........................................ 3-2 3.b - Dilution Allowances (40 CFR 122.44(d)) – Reserved .................................................. 3-3 3.c - Reasonable Potential Determinations for New Discharges (40 CFR 122.44(d)) – Reserved ..................................................................................................................... 3-4 3.d - Best Management Practices (40 CFR 122.44(k)) .......................................................... 3-5 3.e - Anti-backsliding (40 CFR 122.44(l)) – Reserved ........................................................ 3-11 3.f - Design Flow for Publicly Owned Treatment Works (40 CFR 122.45(b)) – Reserved 3-12 4. Permit Objection, Documentation, and Process Efficiencies – Reserved ......................... 4-1 4.a - Objection to Administratively Continued Permits (40 CFR 123.44) – Reserved ......... 4-1 4.b - Public Notice Requirements - General (40 CFR 124.10(c)) ......................................... 4-2 4.b.i - Public Notice Requirements - Public Notice on Websites (40 CFR 124.10(c)) ... 4-8 4.b.ii - Public Notice Requirements - Expansion to Non-major and General Permittees (40 CFR 124.10(c)) ............................................................................................ 4-41 4.b.iii - Public Notice Requirements - Ways to Post Permits and Fact Sheets Online/Linkage to ECHO (40 CFR 124.10(c)) .................................................. 4-50 4.c - Fact Sheet Requirements (40 CFR 124.56) – Reserved .............................................. 4-55 4.d. Deletion of 40 CFR 125.3(a)(1)(ii) ............................................................................... 4-56 5. Vessels Exclusion (40 CFR 122.3(a)) – Reserved ................................................................ 5-1 6. CWA Section 401 Certification Process (40 CFR 124.55(a)(2)) – Reserved ..................... 6-1 7. Overall Burden ....................................................................................................................... 7-1 8. Permit Application Comments Unrelated to Changes in Proposed Rule (Docket No. EPA-HQ-OW-2016-0146).............................................................................................. 8-1 8.a - Permit Application Comments - Form 1........................................................................ 8-2 8.b - Permit Application Comments - Form 2A .................................................................. 8-10 8.c - Permit Application Comments - Form 2B ................................................................... 8-15 8.d - Permit Application Comments - Form 2C ................................................................... 8-16 8.e - Permit Application Comments - Form 2D ................................................................... 8-30 8.f - Permit Application Comments - Form 2E.................................................................... 8-33 8.g - Permit Application Comments - Form 2F ................................................................... 8-36 8.h - Permit Application Comments - Form 2S ................................................................... 8-41 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES): Specific Provisions Affecting Applications and Program Updates Final Rule: EPA’s Response to Public Comments TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 8.i - General - Comments Outside Scope or Unrelated to Permit Applications .................. 8-44 9. Timeframe for States to Revise Regulations to Comply with Rulemaking ...................... 9-1 Attachment A – Crosswalk of Commenters and Response Codes ....................................... A-1 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES): Specific Provisions Affecting Applications and Program Updates Final Rule: EPA’s Response to Public Comments ACRONYMS BMP Best Management Practice CFR Code of Federal Regulations CIU Categorical Industrial User CWA Clean Water Act CWIS Cooling Water Intake Structure DCN Document Control Number ICR Information Collection Request NAICS North American Industrial Classification System NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NSCIU Nonsignificant Categorical Industrial User POTW Publicly Owned Treatment Works PGP Pesticide General Permit SIC Standard Industrial Classification SIU Significant Industrial User iv National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES): Specific Provisions Affecting Applications and Program Updates Final Rule: EPA’s Response to Public Comments FOREWORD This document provides responses to all significant comments submitted on the topics included in the EPA’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES): Specific Provisions Affecting Applications and Program Updates final rule. This rule finalizes a subset of revisions proposed on May 18, 2016 in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES): Applications and Program Updates proposed rule (81 FR 31343). As explained in the Spring 2018 Regulatory Agenda and the preamble to the final rule, the EPA is taking action on the proposed revisions in two separate but related final actions. Specifically, this first final rule includes revisions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2012 St. Louis River Summit Proceedings
    St. Louis River Estuary Science Summit 2012 March 8 & 9 University of Wisconsin - Superior Yellowjacket Union St. Louis River Estuary Summit (March 2012) Page 2 Acknowledgments Thanks are owed to many people and organizations for support of this very grass-roots event. Special thanks to the following organizations who provided funding and in-kind contributions: Lake Superior National Estuarine Research Reserve University of Wisconsin Extension University of Wisconsin – Superior Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. Barr Engineering Company US Environmental Protection Agency – Mid-Continent Ecology Division Enbridge Engineering Minnesota’s Lake Superior Coastal Program Wisconsin Coastal Management Program Wisconsin Sea Grant West Wisconsin Land Trust Limnotech Minnesota Sea Grant Organizing committee: Shon Schooler, Lake Superior NERR Sarah Johnson, Northland College John Jereczek, MN DNR Nick Danz, UW Superior Pat Collins, US FWS David Bolgrien, US EPA Rick Gitar, Fond du Lac Reservation Editors: Shon Schooler, Seth Bliss, Ralph Garono, and Patrick Collins Published by The Lake Superior National Estuarine Research Reserve, Superior, WI LSNERR Document number: 2012-R-1002 Cover photo by Sue OHalloran Interior Photos by Michel Anderson (www.singingcanoe.smugmug.com) St. Louis River Estuary Summit (March 2012) Page 3 Contents Introduction..................................................................................................................................6 Abstracts for Oral Presentations ..................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Superior Lakewide Action and Management Plan (LAMP) 2015-2019
    Lake Superior Lakewide Action and Management Plan 2015 - 2019 The Lake Superior Partnership September 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was made possible by the many individuals and organizations working to restore and protect the Lake Superior ecosystem. The document builds upon many relevant local, tribal, state provincial, national and binational plans. Special thanks to all those involved in preparing A Biodiversity Conservation Strategy for Lake Superior (LSBP, 2015); to the Great Lakes Fishery Commission’s Lake Superior Technical Committee; to the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement Lakewide Management Annex (Annex 2) Subcommittee; to the numerous stakeholder groups that helped to refine the document through their review and comments at various stages of development; and to all the individuals of the Lake Superior Partnership who contributed to the LAMP’s development and who will be collaborating during the implementation of this plan. This document was prepared by the Lake Superior Lakewide Action and Management Plan Writing Team, co-chaired by Rob Hyde of Environment and Climate Change Canada (formerly Environment Canada) and Liz LaPlante of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Writing Team members included: Jen Ballinger (GLIFWC), Marilee Chase (MNRF), Faith Fitzpatrick (USGS), John Jereczek (MNDNR), Ann McCammon-Soltis (GLIFWC), Michelle McChristie (MOECC), Henry Quinlan (USFWS), Mike Ripley (CORA), Lisa Sealock (ECCC), Stephanie Swart (MDEQ), Brent Schleck (NOAA), Amy Thomas (Battelle), Michele Wheeler (WDNR) and Laurie
    [Show full text]
  • Water-Resources Investigations in Wisconsin, 2004
    Water-Resources Investigations in Wisconsin, 2004 Open-File Report 2004–1403 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations in Wisconsin, 2004 Compiled by Jennifer L. Bruce, Michelle M. Greenwood, and Susan Z. Jones Open-File Report 2004–1403 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2004 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Contents iii Contents Basic Mission and Projects ...................................................................................................................vii Wisconsin District Organizational Chart ...............................................................................................ix Cooperators ................................................................................................................................................x Summary of Hydrologic Conditions .......................................................................................................xi Surface-Water and Sediment Studies Team ...........................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • St. Louis and Lower Nemadji River Watershed
    Wisconsin St. Louis and Lower Nemadji Watersheds River Watershed 2010 Water Quality Management Plan Update Lake Superior Basin, Wisconsin August, 2010 The t.S Louis River, the largest U.S. tributary to Lake Superior, drains 3,634 square miles, entering the southwestern corner of the lake between Duluth, Minnesota and Superior, Wisconsin. The river flows 179 miles through three distinct areas: coarse soils, glacial till and outwash deposits at its headwaters; a deep, narrow gorge at Jay Cooke State Park in Minnesota; and red clay deposits in its lower reaches. As the St. Louis River approaches Duluth and Superior, the river takes on the characteristics of a 12,000 Contents acre freshwater estuary. The upper estuary has some Watershed Details 1 wilderness-like areas, while the lower estuary is character- Population and Land Use . 1 ized by urban development, an industrial harbor, and Ecological Landscapes . 3 a major port. The lower estuary includes St. Louis Bay, Other Details . 3 Map 1: St Louis River and Lower Nemadji Superior Bay, Allouez Bay, Kimball’s Bay, Pokegama Bay, River Watershed Invasive Species . 3 Howard’s Bay, and the lower Nemadji River. Historical Note . 4 Watershed Details Watershed Condition 4 Priority Issues . 4 Water Quality Goals . 4 Population and Land Use Overall Condition . 4 The watershed is dominated by Point and Nonpoint Sources . 5 forests (65%), agriculture (9%), Fish Consumption Advice . 5 followed closely by open water River and Stream Condition . 5 and open space (8%) (Figure 1). Lakes and Embayments . 16 Wetlands . 17 In 1987, the International Joint Waters of Note: . .22 Commission, an advisory com- mission on U.S-Canadian border Watershed Actions 23 Figure 1: Land Use in the St Louis and Lower Nemadji River Partnership Activities .
    [Show full text]
  • STATE-REGION7 FUTURE Great Lakes Region
    STATE-REGION7 FUTURE -'adeavailable under NASA sponsorWip Great Lakes Region in the interc-st of early and wide dis. sominiation of Earth Resources Survey - O Program inforration and without liability for any use m-Ue thereof." ft.14 /, a / 7 1'975 NationalWater Assessment ' E91O3) STAT' -REGIZONAI ]FUTU]RE GR /- N79-30594 ,LAKES REGION: IBM 1975 NIAfIONaL WATEE ,A.SESSHENIT (Great Liakes Basin Comm'ission) , /­ / / All / Juy 97 iE 1023\t6 •TT-EII c- # - I ~ . 7 NataJaonal Ws STATE-REGIONJ FUTURE Made available under NASA sponsorWip Great Lakes Region Ithe intercst of early and wide dis. ,minat,on of Earth Resources Survey if. - 1 ­ rograril Iqfcrtion and without liability I rany use m-Ude thereof." 4 ~~44of ,~~~ I Irlrf Ii :15 7' 1975 National Water Assessment '(E7~9jI0233) STAT' -REGIONA1 , < PUTU1E GRtEAT t r N79_30594/ LAKES REGION: THI 1975 11fICNAL flER 'ASSESSMENT (Great,ftakes Basin Commission) 119 p A~C A09/MP A01 / ) /"- C\sc/8l / Inclas - /fl" 'G3/43 00233, / / 1 I \ / iiI, I I I II I - - \fj i 1 \ Ii STATE-REGIONAL FUTURE GREAT LAKES REGION 1975 National Water Assessment Great Lakes Basin Commission July 1976 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION......................... 1 REGIONAL GOALS ........... ............... .......... 7 LAKE SUPERIOR REGIONAL GOALS . ................. 8 LAKE MICHIGAN REGIONAL GOALS ....... .................... 15 LAKE HURON REGIONAL GOALS ........ ...................... 22 LAKE ERIE REGIONAL GOALS . .............. 25 LAKE ONTARIO REGIONAL GOALS ...... 32 SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS........ ..................... 41 LAKE SUPERIOR REGION - ASA 01 ..... .. ..... 43 NORTHWESTERN LAKE MICHIGAN REGION - ASA 02 .... ........... 47 SOUTHWESTERN LAKE MICHIGAN REGION - ASA 03 . 47 EASTERN LAKE MICHIGAN REGION - ASA 04..... ........ .. 47 LAKE HURON REGION - ASA 05 .
    [Show full text]
  • Park Point Small Area Plan Are Contained in Appendix a 2 Park Point Small Area Plan TABLE of CONTENTS
    P P OINT ARK SMALL AREA PLAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Mayor City Planning Division Staff Don Ness Keith Hamre, Director John Judd, Senior Planner City Council John Kelley, Planner II Zack Filipovich Steven Robertson, AICP, Senior Planner Jay Fosle Kyle Deming, Planner II Sharla Gardner Jenn Reed Moses, AICP, Planner II Howie Hanson Jennifer Julsrud Small Area Plan Committee Linda Krug Sharla Gardner, City Council Emily Larson Heather Rand, City Planning Commission Barb Russ Thomas Beery, City Parks and Recreation Commission Joel Sipress John Goldfine, Business Representative Jan Karon, Resident Planning Commission Sally Raushenfels, Resident Marc Beeman Dawn Buck, Resident Terry Guggenbuehl Deb Kellner, Resident Janet Kennedy Kinnan Stauber, Resident Tim Meyer Garner Moffat Heather Rand Luke Sydow Michael Schraepfer Zandra Zwiebel City Council Resolutions for the Park Point Small Area Plan are contained in Appendix A 2 Park Point Small Area Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Assessment ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Purpose of the Plan ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • May 14, 2021 DOUGLAS COUNTY LAND
    May 14, 2021 DOUGLAS COUNTY LAND CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Tuesday, May 18, 2021, 10:00 a.m. Government Center, Boardroom 201 1316 North 14th Street, Superior, Wisconsin OR JOIN BY PHONE: (US) +1 252-584-0118 PIN: 782 923 307# OR VIDEO: https://meet.google.com/ffx-amnz-oki *Due to COVID-19 concerns, members of the committee and public may attend the meeting remotely. Please call the Chair or County Clerk’s Office (715-395-1569) if you are unable to attend. MEMBERS: Sue Hendrickson, Chair Mary Lou Bergman, Vice Chair Kathryn McKenzie Larry Luostari Jim Soyring, FSA Wendy Bong AMENDED A G E N D A (Committee to maintain a two-hour meeting limit or take action to continue meeting beyond that time.) 1. Roll call. 2. Approval of minutes from the March 16, 2021, meeting (attached). 3. Presentation: Manure storage facilities – Nathan Johnstad, Stacy Dehne, Jane Anklam. 4. Action items: a. Recommend creation of committee to review Ordinance #8.15 – Douglas County Animal Manure Storage (attached); b. Support creation of agriculture enterprise area(s) in Douglas County (attached); c. Wildlife Damage and Abatement Program: 1. Report; and 2. Resolution (attached). d. Aquatic Invasive Species Strategic Plan approval (attached); e. Environmental Reserve Fund: 1. Funding requests: a. $600 for 2021 rain barrel project (attached); b. $200 for Minong Flowage drawdown, including letter of support (attached); and c. $1,002.86 for Pleasant View Road community well abandonment (attached). 2. Application revision (attached). f. Grant account creation (attached): 1. Superior Bay and Pickle Pond Yellow Iris Response – 61429; and 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Superior National Estuarine Research Reserve LAKE SUPERIOR NATIONAL ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
    ManageMent Plan 2010 - 2015 Lake Superior National estuarine research reserve LAKE SUPERIOR NATIONAL ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2010-2015 Prepared by: University of Wisconsin-Extension September 2010 Prepared for: U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management Estuarine Reserves Division 1305 East West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 University of Wisconsin - Extension 432 North Lake Street Madison, WI 53706 This Management Plan has been developed in accordance with National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) regulations, including all provisions for public involvement. It is consistent with the congressional intent of Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, and the provisions of the Wisconsin Coastal Management Program. This publication is funded, in part, through a grant agreement with the Wisconsin Coastal Management Program and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management under the Coastal Zone Management Act, Grant # NA08NOS4200405. Cover photography by: Michael K. Anderson Interior photography by: Amy Elliot, Becky Sapper, Michael K. Anderson, Patrick Robinson, Lynelle Hanson and Frank Koshere - WDNR Graphic Design by: Amy B. Torrey - UW Extension Lake Superior NatioNaL EstuariNe RESEARCH RESERVe 2010-2015 i | Table of Contents Table of Contents LIST OF APPENDICES iii LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF MAPS iv LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF ACRONYMS v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 6 Purpose and Scope of the Lake Superior NERR Management Plan. 6 Description of the Lake Superior NERR. 7 Great Lakes Freshwater Estuaries. 7 Lake Superior NERR Key Attributes and Setting.
    [Show full text]
  • Print Cruise Information
    A Voyage along the Great Lakes – with Smithsonian Journeys From 9/18/2022 From Toronto Ship: LE BELLOT to 9/25/2022 to Milwaukee In alliance with Smithsonian Journeys. This cruise is part of a collection of PONANT voyages that are specially-tailored for English-speaking travelers who want to engage with the world. In addition to the usual elements of the PONANT experience, the listed price for these voyages includes transfers to and from the ship, talks and discussions aboard ship by world class experts, and a shore excursion or activity in each port of call that encourages guests to embrace the sights, sounds, tastes, and smells of the local environment and culture. Set sail with PONANT aboard Le Bellot for an 8-day cruise to discover the Great Lakes amidst the splendid colours of early autumn. You will leave from cosmopolitan and dynamicToronto, Ontario, on the shore of Lake Ontario. Canada’s largest city will charm you with its museums, parks, and gardens. Shore excursion in each port of call + transfers Le Bellot will then sail the canal connecting Lake Ontario andLake Erie. included From your call in Port Colborne, you will be able to see the impressive Niagara Falls. These three powerful waterfalls, renowned the world over, are an exquisite natural spectacle. Your next lake, Lake Huron, boasts myriad islands in its northern part, with white rocks capped with conifers plunging into the sapphire waters of the lake. Here you will discover the charming city of Parry Sound, in the heart of the fantastic UNESCO Biosphere Reserve of Georgian Bay, and the quaint town of Little Current, gateway to Manitoulin Island, the world’s largest freshwater island.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Superior Aquatic Invasive Species Complete Prevention Plan
    Lake Superior Lake Superior Aquatic Invasive Species Binational Program Complete Prevention Plan Round Goby Eurasian Ruffe New Zealand Mudsnail Purple Loosestrife Zebra Mussels Sea Lamprey Eurasian Watermilfoil Prepared by The Lake Superior Work Group of the Lake Superior Lakewide Action and Management Plan January 2014 Cover photo credits, clockwise from left: Eric Engbretson, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Gary Cholwek, U.S. Geological Service; Amy Benson, U.S. Geological Survey; Alison Fox, University of Florida; Lee Emery, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Norman Rees, USDA Agricultural Research Service; and (center) Dan Gustafson, Montana State University. Suggested citation: Lake Superior Binational Program. Lake Superior Aquatic Invasive Species Complete Prevention Plan. January 2014. Available at http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/lakesuperior/index.html. Lake Superior Aquatic Invasive Species Complete Prevention Plan, January 2014 i TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTE TO READER ........................................................................................................ iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... vi LIST OF ACRONYMS ................................................................................................... viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 1.1
    [Show full text]
  • The Wisconsin and Minnesota State Line Along the St. Louis River: Lake Superior to the State Line Meridian
    The Wisconsin and Minnesota State Line along the St. Louis River: Lake Superior to the State Line Meridian. The 1852 General Land Office “State Line Survey.” A Supreme Court Judicial Line Decided Oct. 1921. Report of Retracement of the State Line: January, 2018. Anthony Lueck, Land Surveyor License in Minnesota and Wisconsin Lives in Duluth, Minnesota Work Experience: U.S. Forest Service Engineers-Engineering Technician St. Louis County Surveyors Office-Survey Technician Krech-Ojard and Associates Consulng Engineer-Land Surveyor North Country Land Surveying-Land Surveyor USGS Map showing Minnesota-Wisconsin Boundary along the St. Louis River running southwesterly of St. Louis Bay & Superior Bay west of Lake Superior. The Minnesota and Wisconsin Boundary Line Surveys -1852 GLO Survey along St. Louis River: Lake Superior Entry [mouth] of the St. Louis River to the State Line in Township 48 North Range 15 West by the General Land Office Survey by U.S. Deputy Surveyor George R. Stuntz directed by Congress. -1861 Lake Survey Maps: The Twin Ports of Lake Superior Harbor and St. Louis River maps and charts from the Corps of the Topographical Engineers. -1916 to 1918 Hearings: 1916 Minnesota files complaint. 1917 Tesmony hearings. 1918 Briefs filed by Minnesota & Wisconsin to the Supreme Court for State Line. -1919 & 1920 U.S. Supreme Court on Boundary Dispute: September 1919 the Supreme Court heard the case. March 1920 Decree for the Boundary. October 1920 a Survey Commission appointed to survey the State Line. -1921 Commissioners Survey: Descripon of the Supreme Court surveyed along the St. Louis River between the States of Minnesota and Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleolimnological Investigation of the St. Louis River Estuary to Inform Area of Concern Delisting Efforts
    PALEOLIMNOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE ST. LOUIS RIVER ESTUARY TO INFORM AREA OF CONCERN DELISTING EFFORTS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Elizabeth E. Alexson IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE Dr. Euan D. Reavie August 2016 © Elizabeth Alexson 2016 Acknowledgements This work was made possible by two grants. (1) This work is the result of research sponsored by the Minnesota Sea Grant College Program supported by the NOAA office of Sea Grant, United States Department of Commerce, under grant No. R/CE-05-14. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for government purposes, notwithstanding any copyright notation that may appear hereon. (2) Project funding was made available by a contract with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency through USEPA grant #00E05302 and support from the Minnesota Clean Water Legacy Amendment. Thanks go to: Dr. Euan Reavie, Dr. Rich Axler, and Dr. Mark Edlund for their guidance in the development of my thesis; Dr. Pavel Krasutsky and Dr. Sergiy Yements of the Natural Resources Research Institute for completing pigment analysis; Lisa Estepp, Kitty Kennedy, Meagan Aliff, and the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa for their help with field and lab work; Dr. Daniel Engstrom of the Science Museum of Minnesota for completing 210Pb analysis and interpretation; Dr. Robert Pillsbury for completing diatom identification and enumeration for the core from western Lake Superior. Diane Desotelle and Molly Wick (MPCA) provided helpful reviews of earlier drafts of this manuscript. i Abstract The St.
    [Show full text]