DOCSLIB.ORG

Lake Superior Aquatic Invasive Species Complete Prevention Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lake Superior Aquatic Invasive Species Complete Prevention Plan Lake Superior Lake Superior Aquatic Invasive Species Binational Program Complete Prevention Plan Round Goby Eurasian Ruffe New Zealand Mudsnail Purple Loosestrife Zebra Mussels Sea Lamprey Eurasian Watermilfoil Prepared by The Lake Superior Work Group of the Lake Superior Lakewide Action and Management Plan January 2014 Cover photo credits, clockwise from left: Eric Engbretson, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Gary Cholwek, U.S. Geological Service; Amy Benson, U.S. Geological Survey; Alison Fox, University of Florida; Lee Emery, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Norman Rees, USDA Agricultural Research Service; and (center) Dan Gustafson, Montana State University. Suggested citation: Lake Superior Binational Program. Lake Superior Aquatic Invasive Species Complete Prevention Plan. January 2014. Available at http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/lakesuperior/index.html. Lake Superior Aquatic Invasive Species Complete Prevention Plan, January 2014 i TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTE TO READER ........................................................................................................ iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... vi LIST OF ACRONYMS ................................................................................................... viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE PLAN ......................................................................... 1 1.2 HISTORY OF THE PLAN .......................................................................... 2 2.0 BACKGROUND ON AIS IN LAKE SUPERIOR .................................................. 5 2.1 SPECIES ................................................................................................... 5 2.2 ECOSYSTEM EFFECTS ........................................................................... 7 2.3 ECONOMIC EFFECTS .............................................................................. 8 3.0 VECTORS AND PATHWAYS FOR AIS IN LAKE SUPERIOR ........................... 10 3.1 VECTOR AND PATHWAY DEFINITION ................................................. 11 3.2 PRIORITIZATION OF AIS PATHWAYS INTO LAKE SUPERIOR ........... 25 4.0 MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR INTERRUPTING THE PATHWAYS ...... 28 4.1 LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND AGREEMENTS ....................................... 28 4.2 INTERAGENCY COLLABORATION........................................................ 38 4.3 MANAGEMENT, MONITORING AND GUIDANCE ................................. 41 4.4 EDUCATION AND INFORMATION ......................................................... 43 4.5 SOURCES OF SUPPORT FOR AIS PROGRAMS .................................. 45 5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................... 47 5.1 RECOMMENDED STRATEGIES ............................................................ 47 5.2 REPORTING ........................................................................................... 60 5.3 FURTHER EFFORTS .............................................................................. 60 6.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................ 61 APPENDIX A: BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS IN THE GREAT LAKES ST. LAWRENCE SEAWAY SYSTEM .............................................................. A-1 APPENDIX B: U.S. AND CANADIAN FEDERAL STATUTES RELATED TO AIS ...... B-1 APPENDIX C: STATE AND PROVINCIAL CODES AND STATUTES RELATED TO AIS ............................................................................................................................. C-1 Lake Superior Aquatic Invasive Species Complete Prevention Plan, January 2014 ii Lake Superior Aquatic Invasive Species Complete Prevention Plan Note to Reader January 2014 The Lake Superior Aquatic Invasive Species Complete Prevention Plan (the Plan) is an expression of the best professional judgment of the members of the Lake Superior Task Force as to what is necessary to protect Lake Superior from new aquatic invasive species. The Plan is based on sound science and underwent extensive reviews, including an expert technical review involving external and agency experts, an agency review by agencies involved with Lake Superior, and a broad Great Lakes stakeholder review. The reviews generated a significant number of comments, which were taken under advisement and incorporated into the Plan, as appropriate. The Plan identifies recommended actions to prevent new aquatic invasive species from entering Lake Superior. We agree with these recommendations and encourage all stakeholders to pursue implementation actions as well as to report progress. A commitment to seek implementation of the Plan’s recommendations does not signify a commitment of resources to any specific action by any agency. Rather, it signifies a commitment to promote coordinated actions that will protect Lake Superior from the devastating effects of additional aquatic invasive species that can irrevocably harm the ecosystem. The role of the Lake Superior Lakewide Action and Management Plan and Program will be to: set common goals consistent with the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement; support local implementation; support public outreach and education; and report on current conditions, trends and progress. The success of the Plan and, thus, the protection of Lake Superior, will depend on the commitment from U.S. and Canadian agencies, organizations, stakeholders and jurisdictions. A draft of the Plan has been available since 2010, and implementation of the recommended actions has been ongoing. While not all parts of the Plan have been updated since the draft was published, the pathways for introduction and the recommendations for preventing invasions remain relevant. The Plan is now considered finalized. Lake Superior Aquatic Invasive Species Complete Prevention Plan, January 2014 iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Situated at the head of the Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway system, a 2,342 mile long (3,700 km) water navigation system connected to global trade, Lake Superior is at risk for continued invasion by aquatic invasive species (AIS), including plants, animals, and microscopic organisms. As of April 2010, 89 non-native aquatic species have been found in Lake Superior. These include Eurasian watermilfoil, sea lamprey, and most recently, the fish disease Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia (VHS). AIS have caused devastating economic and ecosystem effects that impart significant losses to the region in the form of damage and control costs, degraded water quality, job losses, declining property values, compromised native species, decreased biodiversity, and other negative impacts. This Lake Superior Aquatic Invasive Species Complete Prevention Plan outlines recommended actions that need to be newly implemented, in addition to existing efforts, to prevent new aquatic invasive species from entering and becoming established in the Lake Superior ecosystem. Through the process of developing this plan, Canadian and U.S. government agencies involved in the Lake Superior Lakewide Action and Management Plan (LAMP) have consulted broadly and have developed recommendations for consideration by each jurisdiction. However, citizens, organizations and government agencies in both Canada and the United States need to work together to implement the recommended actions and ensure that protecting Lake Superior from new invasive species is a top priority for all. The Lake Superior LAMP will utilize an adaptive management approach to monitoring implementation progress and overall effectiveness of this prevention plan. Key recommended actions for the United States and Canada include: Implement compatible, federal regulatory regimes for ballast water discharge that are protective of the Great Lakes for both the U.S. and Canada. Support the development, testing and implementation of effective ballast treatment systems that meet the operational characteristics of Great Lakes ships. Establish federal screening processes for organisms in trade to classify species into three lists: prohibited, permitted, and conditionally prohibited/permitted. o Establish an immediate moratorium on the trade of prohibited species. o Consider the concept of a “Certified Pathogen-Free through Raising from Seed” category for plants sold through garden centers and nurseries. o Expand or implement education programs to increase consumer awareness of the risk of AIS. Require permits for shoreline restoration projects, which identify AIS introduction issues and include best management practices and restrictions that minimize the potential for introducing invasive species. o Implement education programs to raise awareness of the issue and promote compliance with prevention actions among contractors and residents. Ensure that existing laws prohibiting the sale of invasive species are enforced for on-line and mail order purchases of aquatic plants. Lake Superior Aquatic Invasive Species Complete Prevention Plan, January 2014 iv To prevent the illegal transport of bait across the U.S./Canadian border and on shared waters, ensure effective education and prevention efforts at border crossings and at retail bait shops, and conduct monitoring to gauge the effectiveness of such efforts. Make AIS prevention education, regulation, and enforcement a priority in all
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 38 Lake Superior 1925 1954 2017
    30 34 1954 35 24 8 4 5 7 3 9 21 36 17 KEWEENAW 25 20 38 32 HOUGHTON 19 10 18 29 28 37 6 39 13 14 15 16 ONTONAGON BARAGA 11 1 2 33 26 23 22 LUCE 31 12 27 GOGEBIC MARQUETTE ALGER CHIPPEWA IRON SCHOOLCRAFT DICKINSON MACKINAC DELTA 120 97 87 69 81 107 95 49 79 75 106 51 83 109 67 56 74 57 94 64 90 70 86 98 40 59 66 85 MENOMINEE 43 41 EMMET 89 78 53 1925 103 104 71 44 CHEBOYGAN PRESQUE ISLE 105102 63 48 CHARLEVOIX 96 73 58 112 60 ANTRIM OTSEGO MONTMORENCY ALPENA 82 LEELANAU 65 45 GRAND KALKASKA CRAWFORD OSCODA ALCONA 110 BENZIE TRAVERSE MANISTEE WEXFORD MISSAUKEE ROSCOMMON OGEMAW IOSCO 55 111 100 ARENAC 42 91 84 99 MASON LAKE OSCEOLA CLAREGLADWIN 54 HURON 92 BAY 108 52 OCEANA MECOSTA ISABELLA MIDLAND NEWAYGO TUSCOLA SANILAC 101 80 MONTCALM GRATIOT SAGINAW 61 MUSKEGON 62 GENESEE LAPEER 46 47 ST. CLAIR KENT SHIAWASSEE 88 OTTAWA IONIA CLINTON 93 50 MACOMB 119 OAKLAND 114 68 ALLEGANIBARRY EATONLNGHAM IVINGSTON 115 113 116 121 72 2017 VAN BURENJKALAMAZOO CALHOUNWACKSON WASHTENAW AYNE 118 76 77 117 BERRIEN CASS ST. JOSEPH BRANCH HILLSDALE LENAWEE MONROE tannard Rock S LAKE SUPERIOR 38 On August 26, 1835, while piloting the American Fur Company remote location. Coastguardsman gave the light station the nickname vessel John Jacob Astor, Capt. Charles C. Stannard blew off course “Stranded Rock” to underscore the isolation, and it was designated during a storm and discovered a previously unrecorded reef about a “stag station,” meaning no wives or other family members could be 25 miles from the Keweenaw Peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA Great Lakes Charts Catalog Reference
    Charts on the Great Lakes and Adjacent Waters 96° 94° Data On the Great Lakes System Chart Number Title Scale Chart Number Title Scale Chart Number Title Scale LAKE LAKE LAKE LAKE LAKE LAKE 14500 Great Lakes—Lake Champlain to Lake of the Woods 1:1,500,000 14847 Toledo Harbor 1:20,000 14915 Little Bay de Noc 1:30,000 GENERAL LAKE DIMENSION SUPERIOR MICHIGAN HURON ST. CLAIR ERIE ONTARIO ST. LAWRENCE RIVER Entrance Channel 1:40,000 14916 SMALL-CRAFT BOOK CHART Length in miles 350 307 206 26 241 193 14770 Morristown, N.Y. to Butternut Bay, Ont. 1:15,000 14848 Detroit River 1:30,000 Lake Winnebago and Lower Fox River (book of 34 charts) Various 14850 Lake St. Clair 1:60,000 14917 Menominee and Marinette Harbors 1:15,000 14500 Breadth in miles 160 118(1) 183(2) 24 57 53 14771 Butternut Bay, Ont., to Ironsides lsland., N.Y. 1:15,000 Length in coastline (including islands) 2,730 1,640 3,830(3) 257 871 712 14772 Ironsides lsland, N.Y., to Bingham lsland, Ont. 1:15,000 14852 St. Clair River 1:40,000 14918 Head of Green Bay, including Fox River below De Pere 1:25,000 Area in square miles 14773 Gananoque, Ont., to St. Lawrence Park. N.Y. 1:15,000 Head of St. Clair River 1:15,000 Green Bay 1:10,000 1450 Water Surface, United States 20,600(4) 22,300(5) 9,150(6) 198(7) 4,980 3,560(8) 14774 Round lsland, N.Y., and Gananoque, Ont., to Wolfe l., Ont.
    [Show full text]
  • Life at Michigan Tech
    WELCOME A brief tour of the Michigan Tech campus and the greater community 1 mtu.edu 2 3 Sunrise on the Keweenaw Waterway Welcome to the banks of the largest Welcome to freshwater lake in the world. To Michigan national parks, deep history, and thousands of acres of forestland. Technological Welcome to four seasons, year-round University. adventures, and vibrant community. Welcome to the Copper Country. The community. The campus. Welcome home. Table of Contents Table of Contents The Copper Country 6 The Keweenaw Peninsula 8 The Climate 10 The Great Outdoors 11 The Community 14 Houghton and Hancock 18 Top-Tier Community Schools 19 Healthcare in the UP 20 Commitment to Families 21 Local Athletics 22 Travel 23 The Campus 24 Campus Map 26 Exploring Campus 28 Arts and Recreation 30 Michigan Tech: Beyond the Campus 32 The Copper Country 6 The view from here: Copper Harbor from the Brockway Mountain lookout. Brockway Mountain Drive is the highest paved road between the Rockies and the Alleghenies. Reaching into Lake Superior from the northernmost tip of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula is the Keweenaw Peninsula. Home to hardwoods, sandstone cliffs, and lake-effect snow, the Keweenaw’s beauty is unparalleled. 7 Map courtesy of the The Keweenaw Keweenaw Convention and Visitor’s Bureau Peninsula Pronounced kee-win-awe, the close view of “hawk highway.” Stay forest. Isle Royale boasts no roads peninsula was formed by ancient long enough to watch the sun of any kind—all travel is by foot or lava flows, giant ice sheets, and set and, if you’re lucky, catch the boat.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 St. Louis River Summit Proceedings
    St. Louis River Estuary Science Summit 2012 March 8 & 9 University of Wisconsin - Superior Yellowjacket Union St. Louis River Estuary Summit (March 2012) Page 2 Acknowledgments Thanks are owed to many people and organizations for support of this very grass-roots event. Special thanks to the following organizations who provided funding and in-kind contributions: Lake Superior National Estuarine Research Reserve University of Wisconsin Extension University of Wisconsin – Superior Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. Barr Engineering Company US Environmental Protection Agency – Mid-Continent Ecology Division Enbridge Engineering Minnesota’s Lake Superior Coastal Program Wisconsin Coastal Management Program Wisconsin Sea Grant West Wisconsin Land Trust Limnotech Minnesota Sea Grant Organizing committee: Shon Schooler, Lake Superior NERR Sarah Johnson, Northland College John Jereczek, MN DNR Nick Danz, UW Superior Pat Collins, US FWS David Bolgrien, US EPA Rick Gitar, Fond du Lac Reservation Editors: Shon Schooler, Seth Bliss, Ralph Garono, and Patrick Collins Published by The Lake Superior National Estuarine Research Reserve, Superior, WI LSNERR Document number: 2012-R-1002 Cover photo by Sue OHalloran Interior Photos by Michel Anderson (www.singingcanoe.smugmug.com) St. Louis River Estuary Summit (March 2012) Page 3 Contents Introduction..................................................................................................................................6 Abstracts for Oral Presentations ..................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • A Trip Down the Lakes in 1929
    A Trip Down the Lakes in 1929 On a warm, July afternoon in 1929, a crowd of well-dressed people mills about a dock of the Chicago, Duluth & Georgian Bay Transit Company on the bayfront near the heart of downtown Duluth. Many of the men are attired in white flannel trousers, crew-neck sweaters, blazers and deck shoes. The women wear print dresses and sensible block-heel shoes. Some have a sweater draped about their shoulders because of the cool breeze off the water. Most of the younger women are hatless, although several sport velvet headbands or a more rakish cloche. All are excitedly talking about their upcoming adventure, for looming above them is the silhouette of the South American, one of the two half-sisters of the Georgian Bay Line. The twin funnels belch smoke as the captain gets up steam in the scotch boilers for a 4 p.m. departure. 1 From the 1920s to the 1940s, the Twin Ports hosted thousands of passengers each summer as a preferred port of call for more than a dozen Great Lakes cruise liners. The Juniata and Octorara of the Anchor Line were frequent callers at the Head of the Lakes, as were the Huronic, Noronic and Hamonic of Canada’s Northern Navigation Company. But the most frequent caller was the South American, which for 40-plus years featured round-trip voyages between Duluth and Buffalo. 2 From her launching in 1914 until 1923, the South American had one funnel, as depicted in this pen-and-ink drawing by the late Arvid Morken of Superior.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Some Exotic Cladoceran (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) Species in the Belgian Fauna
    BULLETIN DE L’INSTITUT ROYAL DES SCIENCES NATURELLES DE BELGIQUE BIOLOGIE, 72-SUPPL.: 87-88, 2002 BULLETIN VAN HET KONINKLIJK BELGISCH INSTITUUT VOOR NATUURWETENSCHAPPEN BIOLOGIE, 72-SUPPL.: 87-88, 2002 The status of some exotic cladoceran (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) species in the Belgian fauna L. DE MEESTER, L. FORRÓ, E. MICHELS, K. COTTENIE, G. LOUETTE & H.J. DUMONT Introduction prep.). The natural range of this species is situated in the Far East (GOULDEN 1968) but it has also been reported as We report the occurrence of some exotic cladocerans an exotic species from Southern and Eastern Europe. It is (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) in Flanders, Belgium. In ad- very likely that the species arrived in our region through dition to well-established exotics such as Daphnia ambi- fish stocking. Moina weismanni can easily be recognized gua and Daphnia parvula, we also report on the occur- from Moina micrura by the unique ornamentation of the rence of a previously unreported species from the Belgian surface of the resting egg capsule (ephippium). fauna, Moina weismanni. These reports on alien species add to the general observation that aquatic habitats seem The amount of exotic species in aquatic habitats is to be very prone to the invasion of exotic species, astonishing and obvious to all field workers. Sampling amongst others due to the construction of canals and ponds in the nature reserve De Maten, formerly used as the frequent and often uncontrolled translocations and fishponds, has revealed exotic species in a wide variety of stocking of fish. taxa (K. COTTENIE, E. MICHELS & S. DECLERCK, pers. obs.). In addition to the effects of the construction of canals, it is clear that the widespread and often uncontrolled transloca- Discussion tion of fish in relation to fish culture and angling results in a serious risk of contamination with exotic species.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Michigan
    MICHIGAN The Status of Lighthouses MICHIGAN’S LIGHTHOUSES November 1998 NAME S TATI O N LIGHT OTHER IMPORTANT DATES NATIONAL REGISTER COUNTY NEAREST SITING LOCATION DESCRIPTION OWNERSHIP LESSEE OPEN TO PUBLIC EST. CONST. CITY 1 Alpena Light Station 1877 1914 Determined eligible by USCG; Alpena Alpena Breakwater NE side of entrance to U.S.C.G. No SHPO concurs 2 AuSable (Big Sable) Light Station 1874 1874 1909-Addition to keeper’s house Listed 5/23/78 Alger Grand Marais Land based On AuSable Point, W U.S.C.G. Of Grand Marais 3 Beaver Island (Beaver Head) Light Station 1851 1858 1866-Keeper’s house const. Listed 12/29/78 Charlevoix St. James Land based S. Shore of Beaver Island Charlevoix P.S. 4 Beaver Island Harbor (St. James) Light Station 1852 1870 Determined eligible by USCG; Charlevoix St. James Land based N side of entrance to Beaver U.S.C.G. SHPO concurs Island Harbor 5 Bete Grise (Mendota) Light Station 1870 1895 Keweenaw Bete Grise Land based S. Side of entrance to Mendota Private No Canal 6 Big Bay Point Light Station 1896 1896 Listed 10/12/88 Marquette Big Bay Land based Big Bay Point, 24 miles Big Bay B & B Grounds (11-4) Tower NW of Marquette 1st Sunday, no Children 7 Big Sable Point (Grande Pt. AuSable) Light Station 1867 1867 1900-Tower encased in steel; 1905- Listed 8/4/83 Mason Ludington Land based Big Sable Pt. 8 miles NW U.S.C.G. Big Sable Pt. Light- watchroom encased of Ludington House Keepers Assoc.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Superior Lakewide Action and Management Plan (LAMP) 2015-2019
    Lake Superior Lakewide Action and Management Plan 2015 - 2019 The Lake Superior Partnership September 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was made possible by the many individuals and organizations working to restore and protect the Lake Superior ecosystem. The document builds upon many relevant local, tribal, state provincial, national and binational plans. Special thanks to all those involved in preparing A Biodiversity Conservation Strategy for Lake Superior (LSBP, 2015); to the Great Lakes Fishery Commission’s Lake Superior Technical Committee; to the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement Lakewide Management Annex (Annex 2) Subcommittee; to the numerous stakeholder groups that helped to refine the document through their review and comments at various stages of development; and to all the individuals of the Lake Superior Partnership who contributed to the LAMP’s development and who will be collaborating during the implementation of this plan. This document was prepared by the Lake Superior Lakewide Action and Management Plan Writing Team, co-chaired by Rob Hyde of Environment and Climate Change Canada (formerly Environment Canada) and Liz LaPlante of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Writing Team members included: Jen Ballinger (GLIFWC), Marilee Chase (MNRF), Faith Fitzpatrick (USGS), John Jereczek (MNDNR), Ann McCammon-Soltis (GLIFWC), Michelle McChristie (MOECC), Henry Quinlan (USFWS), Mike Ripley (CORA), Lisa Sealock (ECCC), Stephanie Swart (MDEQ), Brent Schleck (NOAA), Amy Thomas (Battelle), Michele Wheeler (WDNR) and Laurie
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop Manual: Aquatic Invasive Species
    AIS Workshop Workshop Manual: Aquatic Invasive Species An Introduction to Identification, Collection and Reporting of Aquatic Invasive Species in Ontario Waters AIS Workshop Copyright 2008 © MNR and OFAH Cover Photographs (left to right): Top row – Peter W. Bergstrom, Wasyl Bakowsky, Donald Sutherland Middle Row – Dale Westaby, Dave Britton, Steven Pothoven Bottom Row – John Lyons, Michael Butler, David Rieks 1 AIS Workshop Contents LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................... 47 LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................... 47 0 ABOUT THIS WORKSHOP.......................................................................... 57 A0 BOUT THIS WORKSHOP.......................................................................... 58 Learning5 Outcomes............................................................................. 68 O1 VERVIEW ............................................................................................... 78 Introduction to Aquatic Invasive Species ........................................... 78 Historical6 Perspective in Brief............................................................ 98 Pathways ............................................................................................. 98 Response7 to Aquatic Invasive Species.............................................. 128 National Strategy and Action Plan..........................................................128 8 Additional Information ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bythotrephes Longimanus), Native to Northern Europe and Asia Has Impacted Lakes Throughout the Great Lakes Basin
    State of Michigan’s Status and Strategy for Spiny Waterflea Management Scope The invasive spiny waterflea (Bythotrephes longimanus), native to Northern Europe and Asia has impacted lakes throughout the Great Lakes Basin. The goals of this document are to: • Summarize current level of understanding on the biology and ecology of the spiny waterflea. • Summarize current management options for the spiny waterflea in Michigan. • Identify possible future directions of spiny waterflea management in Michigan. Biology and Ecology I. Identification Kevin Keeler and Lynn Lesko - U.S. Geological Survey The spiny waterflea, formerly known as Bythotrephes cederstroemii, is a large planktivore of the suborder Cladocera and can have dramatic effects on zooplankton communities by altering the trophic structure in invaded waters (Yan et al. 2002). They can grow to lengths of 15 mm with females growing larger than males. The spiny waterflea has a large compound eye and well-developed abdomen with an extremely long tail twice the length of the body (Branstartor 2005, Kelly 2013); the tail has three to four spines and lacks a terminal loop. Lack of a terminal loop distinguishes the spiny waterflea from Cercopagis pengoi, another invasive species in the Great Lakes basin. Fully developed parthenogenetic individuals have three barbs while fully developed sexually reproducing individuals have four barbs. Adult females also have a distinctive brood pouch on their back (Liebig 2014). II. Life History Spiny waterfleas go through three instar phases and can reproduce both parthenogenetically and sexually, switching from parthenogenesis during the summer to gametogenesis during the fall. The resting eggs produced during sexual reproduction are thought to be essential for the species’ survival since the presence of its planktonic stage has never been reported during the winter months (Rivier 1998, Brown 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical and Biological Recovery of Killarney Park, Ontario
    CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL RECOVERY OF KILLARNEY PARK, ONTARIO LAKES (1972-2005) FROM HISTORICAL ACIDIFICATION by JUSTIN A. SHEAD A thesis submitted to the Department of Biology in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada September, 2007 Copyright © Justin A. Shead, 2007 i ABSTRACT Forty-five lakes in Killarney Provincial Park and the surrounding area in south- central Ontario, Canada, were sampled for crustacean zooplankton and water chemistry in the summer of 2005. For each of the lakes, we had historic data from peak- acidification in the 1970s and post-acidification periods in 1990 and 2000. Situated among the orthoquartzite ridges of the La Cloche Mountains in and near Killarney Provincial Park, many of these lakes were acidified during the mid-1900s owing to extensive mining and smelting activities in nearby (40-60 km) Sudbury, Ontario. There is large variation in the geochemistry of the soils and the bedrock within the park. As a result, these freshwater lakes have varying degrees of acidification, ranging from being heavily acidified (pH < 4.5) to others that were buffered from the effects of acidic deposition. With over 90% reductions in sulphur dioxide smelter emissions over the past 30 years and the present, many lakes in the Sudbury region are starting to show strong evidence of chemical recovery. Despite significant increases in lake water pH, there is limited evidence of biological recovery. A variety of univariate and multivariate metrics, as well as variation partitioning, were used to examine recovery on a lake-by-lake basis and on a regional scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Atlas of the Water Fleas, “Cladocera” (Class Crustacea) Recorded at the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve and State Nature Preserve, Ohio
    Taxonomic Atlas of the Water Fleas, “Cladocera” (Class Crustacea) Recorded at the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve and State Nature Preserve, Ohio by Jakob A. Boehler, Tamara S. Keller and Kenneth A. Krieger National Center for Water Quality Research Heidelberg University Tiffin, Ohio, USA 44883 January 2012 Taxonomic Atlas of the Water Fleas, “Cladocera” (Class Crustacea) Recorded at the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve and State Nature Preserve, Ohio by Jakob A. Boehler, Tamara S. Keller* and Kenneth A. Krieger Acknowledgements The authors are grateful for the assistance of Dr. David Klarer, Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve, for providing funding for this project, directing us to updated taxonomic resources and critically reviewing drafts of this atlas. We also thank Dr. Brenda Hann, Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Manitoba, for her thorough review of the final draft. This work was funded under contract to Heidelberg University by the Ohio Department of Natural Resources. This publication was supported in part by Grant Number H50/CCH524266 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve in Ohio is part of the National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS), established by Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act, as amended. Additional information about the system can be obtained from the Estuarine Reserves Division, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S.
    [Show full text]