DOCSLIB.ORG

Chemical and Biological Recovery of Killarney Park, Ontario

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chemical and Biological Recovery of Killarney Park, Ontario CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL RECOVERY OF KILLARNEY PARK, ONTARIO LAKES (1972-2005) FROM HISTORICAL ACIDIFICATION by JUSTIN A. SHEAD A thesis submitted to the Department of Biology in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada September, 2007 Copyright © Justin A. Shead, 2007 i ABSTRACT Forty-five lakes in Killarney Provincial Park and the surrounding area in south- central Ontario, Canada, were sampled for crustacean zooplankton and water chemistry in the summer of 2005. For each of the lakes, we had historic data from peak- acidification in the 1970s and post-acidification periods in 1990 and 2000. Situated among the orthoquartzite ridges of the La Cloche Mountains in and near Killarney Provincial Park, many of these lakes were acidified during the mid-1900s owing to extensive mining and smelting activities in nearby (40-60 km) Sudbury, Ontario. There is large variation in the geochemistry of the soils and the bedrock within the park. As a result, these freshwater lakes have varying degrees of acidification, ranging from being heavily acidified (pH < 4.5) to others that were buffered from the effects of acidic deposition. With over 90% reductions in sulphur dioxide smelter emissions over the past 30 years and the present, many lakes in the Sudbury region are starting to show strong evidence of chemical recovery. Despite significant increases in lake water pH, there is limited evidence of biological recovery. A variety of univariate and multivariate metrics, as well as variation partitioning, were used to examine recovery on a lake-by-lake basis and on a regional scale. Our results revealed only moderate recovery of crustacean zooplankton communities despite improvements in water quality. Some lakes increased in zooplankton richness while others decreased compared to richness during peak acidification. Shifts in community composition from a damaged state toward those typical of circum-neutral lakes were observed for lakes that have chemically recovered. The lack of chemical recovery is believed to be impeding biological recovery of many lakes. Biological resistance and dispersal limitation do not appear to be hindering ii biological recovery. Other stressors such as the invasion by the predatory zooplankton Bythotrephes and climate change may delay biological recovery in the coming years. Future recovery of Killarney Park lakes will require further chemical recovery for biological recovery to become complete. iii CO-AUTHORSHIP This thesis conforms to the Traditional format as outlined in the Department of Biology Guide to Graduate Studies. Manuscripts that are to result from this thesis and their co- authors are listed below. Manuscripts directly from this thesis: Shead, J.A., S.E. Arnott, and A.M. Derry. In preparation for Ecological Applications. Limited biological recovery of Killarney Park Lakes (Ontario) from historical acid deposition despite chemical recovery: 1971-2005. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMNENTS First I would like to thank Shelley Arnott for giving me the opportunity to conduct this research and for allowing an “invasive species” into her lab. I would also like to thank her for her guidance throughout this process. I could not have asked for a better supervisor. Her passion for science and life is inspiring. Thank you to my committee members John Smol, Linda Campbell, and Paul Treitz for taking the time to be part of this process. Many thanks go to the staff at the Freshwater Cooperative Ecology Unit in Sudbury. In particular, Bill Keller, Jocelyne Heneberry, John Gunn, Shannon MacPhee, and Amanda Valois. Without their support this research could not have happened. I also would like to thank the staff at Killarney Park who helped with the logistics and to make this research possible. I cannot say thank you enough to my lab mates for being there for me through thick and thin. Thanks to Angela “A-Train” Strecker for sharing her infinite wisdom with me and having my back through this entire process. To Alison “Big Al” Derry, I too thank you for your endless support and advice throughout this journey. Big thanks go out to other members of Team Arnott - Jessica Forrest, Liz Hatton, Shannon MacPhee, Mike Pedruski, and Leah James for their support and making the lab a fun place to be. I also would like to thank all those that helped me in the field and the lab to whom I cannot say thank you enough. Thank you to my friends for your constant moral support, our “deep” conversations at the Secchi table, and for always being there. To my “French Brother” (a.k.a Le Moine), thank you for everything, you are a true friend. Last but certainly not v least, thank you to Isla for always being there, for sharing your tips as an “old pro”, and for being by my side through the good, the bad and the ugly. Finally, to my family I cannot thank you enough for being the pillar of support that you have been through this process. Thank you for always believing in my abilities and your words of wisdom. Although provinces apart, you have always been there for me. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………………………………i CO-AUTHORSHP.……….……….…….……..………………………………...…..…iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS……......…………………………………………………..…iv TABLE OF CONTENTS……….………...………………………………………….…vi LIST OF TABLES…...……………….……………….………………………………..vii LIST OF FIGURES……..…………………………………………………………..…viii CHAPTER 1: GENERAL INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW.........1 Crustacean Zooplankton as Biological Indicator Species………..………………..1 History of Acidification…...…..……….……….…….…….…………………… .1 Effects of Acidification…...…….…………………………………………………2 a) Chemical…………………………………………..……………………3 b) Biological………..………………………….…….........………………3 Recovery……………….…...…..…………………………………………………4 Chemical Recovery……………..…………………………………………………6 Biological Recovery……....…….…………………………………………………7 Recovery Barriers…….......…….…………………………………………………7 Thesis Objectives……........….….……………………………………………….10 CHAPTER 2: METHODS ………………..……………………….…………………13 Study Site……………………………………..……….…….……….…………..13 Sampling Design…..……………..…………….….…………………………… .13 Lake Categories.……………………………………..…..………………………17 Statistical Analyses………..…………………………………………..…………17 CHAPTER 3: RESULTS……….…………………………………….………………23 Potential Drivers of Biological Recovery…..………………………………..… .29 Evaluation of Spatial and Environmental Factors….……………..….………….30 CHAPTER 4: DISCUSSION….……..…………………………….…………………57 Chemical Recovery……………..………………………………………………57 Biological Recovery…….......….………………………………………………58 Barriers to Biological Recovery………………..………………………………61 Implications…………………………………….………………………………69 SUMMARY…………………...…………………………………….…………………73 LITERATURE CITED…………………………………………….…………………76 APPENDICIES…………...…….……………………...…….……….….……………86 vii LIST OF TABLES Chapter 2 TABLE 1. Selected physical characteristics of the 45 Killarney Park study lakes. Lake surface areas from Sprules (1975). Zmax = lake maximum depth, Secchi = secchi disk transparency.……………………………………………………………..…33 TABLE 2. Selected chemical and biological characteristics of the 45 Killarney Park study lakes. Lake water sampled as 5 m tube composite samples during July and August of 2005. Lake status defined as described in methods; acid = pH always < 6, recovered = pH increased from < 6 to > 6, circum-neutral = pH always > 6. Cond = Conductivity. TP = average total phosphorus from two samples taken at the same time. DOC = dissolved organic carbon, Ca = calcium, chl. a = chlorophyll a. Bytho and Fish = presence/absence of Bythotrephes and Fish respectively, 0 = absence, 1 = presence. Fish data from Snucins and Gunn (1998)………….. ……………………………………………………………..…35 Chapter 3 TABLE 3. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (ρ) of year of study with recovery metrics in the 45 studied Killarney lakes in the three different lake categories. Evar = evenness. Lake ….……………………………………………………..…37 TABLE 4. Species names associated with ordination species code names. Arranged in alphabetical order of ordination code..………………………………………..…39 TABLE 5. Multiple regression of 1972 crustacean zooplankton species richness, diversity, evenness, and total abundance with predictor variables in all study lakes (n = 45). Predictor variables include pH, maximum depth, elevation, and total phosphorus. AIC = Akaike's Information Criterion, TP = total phosphorus....…40 TABLE 6. Multiple regression of 2005 crustacean zooplankton species richness, diversity, evenness, and total abundance with predictor variables in all study lakes (n = 45). Predictor variables include pH, maximum depth, elevation, and total phosphorus, dissolved organic carbon, and change in pH (measured as change in H+ concentration). AIC = Akaike's Information Criterion, TP = total phosphorus……...……………………………………………………………..…41 viii LIST OF FIGURES Chapter 1 FIGURE 1. SO2 emissions from the Sudbury, Ontario, area smelters (from Keller et al. 2007)……………………….….……………………………………………..12 Chapter 2 FIGURE 1. Killarney Park, Ontario, Canada. Shaded and black filled lakes indicate the lakes sampled within Killarney Park. Lakes Evangeline, La Cloche, Frood, and Charlton are located outside the park and therefore not shown on the map. Black lakes indicate previously observed presence of Bythotrephes. Shaded lakes have no previous Bythotrephes observations…………………………..42 Chapter 3 FIGURE 2. Linear regression between H+ concentration in 1972 (i.e., acidity) and chemical recovery (the change in H+ concentration between 1972 and 2005) for 45 Killarney Park lakes classified into three lake groups based on water quality improvements. Regressions are significant
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Status of Some Exotic Cladoceran (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) Species in the Belgian Fauna
    BULLETIN DE L’INSTITUT ROYAL DES SCIENCES NATURELLES DE BELGIQUE BIOLOGIE, 72-SUPPL.: 87-88, 2002 BULLETIN VAN HET KONINKLIJK BELGISCH INSTITUUT VOOR NATUURWETENSCHAPPEN BIOLOGIE, 72-SUPPL.: 87-88, 2002 The status of some exotic cladoceran (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) species in the Belgian fauna L. DE MEESTER, L. FORRÓ, E. MICHELS, K. COTTENIE, G. LOUETTE & H.J. DUMONT Introduction prep.). The natural range of this species is situated in the Far East (GOULDEN 1968) but it has also been reported as We report the occurrence of some exotic cladocerans an exotic species from Southern and Eastern Europe. It is (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) in Flanders, Belgium. In ad- very likely that the species arrived in our region through dition to well-established exotics such as Daphnia ambi- fish stocking. Moina weismanni can easily be recognized gua and Daphnia parvula, we also report on the occur- from Moina micrura by the unique ornamentation of the rence of a previously unreported species from the Belgian surface of the resting egg capsule (ephippium). fauna, Moina weismanni. These reports on alien species add to the general observation that aquatic habitats seem The amount of exotic species in aquatic habitats is to be very prone to the invasion of exotic species, astonishing and obvious to all field workers. Sampling amongst others due to the construction of canals and ponds in the nature reserve De Maten, formerly used as the frequent and often uncontrolled translocations and fishponds, has revealed exotic species in a wide variety of stocking of fish. taxa (K. COTTENIE, E. MICHELS & S. DECLERCK, pers. obs.). In addition to the effects of the construction of canals, it is clear that the widespread and often uncontrolled transloca- Discussion tion of fish in relation to fish culture and angling results in a serious risk of contamination with exotic species.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop Manual: Aquatic Invasive Species
    AIS Workshop Workshop Manual: Aquatic Invasive Species An Introduction to Identification, Collection and Reporting of Aquatic Invasive Species in Ontario Waters AIS Workshop Copyright 2008 © MNR and OFAH Cover Photographs (left to right): Top row – Peter W. Bergstrom, Wasyl Bakowsky, Donald Sutherland Middle Row – Dale Westaby, Dave Britton, Steven Pothoven Bottom Row – John Lyons, Michael Butler, David Rieks 1 AIS Workshop Contents LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................... 47 LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................... 47 0 ABOUT THIS WORKSHOP.......................................................................... 57 A0 BOUT THIS WORKSHOP.......................................................................... 58 Learning5 Outcomes............................................................................. 68 O1 VERVIEW ............................................................................................... 78 Introduction to Aquatic Invasive Species ........................................... 78 Historical6 Perspective in Brief............................................................ 98 Pathways ............................................................................................. 98 Response7 to Aquatic Invasive Species.............................................. 128 National Strategy and Action Plan..........................................................128 8 Additional Information ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bythotrephes Longimanus), Native to Northern Europe and Asia Has Impacted Lakes Throughout the Great Lakes Basin
    State of Michigan’s Status and Strategy for Spiny Waterflea Management Scope The invasive spiny waterflea (Bythotrephes longimanus), native to Northern Europe and Asia has impacted lakes throughout the Great Lakes Basin. The goals of this document are to: • Summarize current level of understanding on the biology and ecology of the spiny waterflea. • Summarize current management options for the spiny waterflea in Michigan. • Identify possible future directions of spiny waterflea management in Michigan. Biology and Ecology I. Identification Kevin Keeler and Lynn Lesko - U.S. Geological Survey The spiny waterflea, formerly known as Bythotrephes cederstroemii, is a large planktivore of the suborder Cladocera and can have dramatic effects on zooplankton communities by altering the trophic structure in invaded waters (Yan et al. 2002). They can grow to lengths of 15 mm with females growing larger than males. The spiny waterflea has a large compound eye and well-developed abdomen with an extremely long tail twice the length of the body (Branstartor 2005, Kelly 2013); the tail has three to four spines and lacks a terminal loop. Lack of a terminal loop distinguishes the spiny waterflea from Cercopagis pengoi, another invasive species in the Great Lakes basin. Fully developed parthenogenetic individuals have three barbs while fully developed sexually reproducing individuals have four barbs. Adult females also have a distinctive brood pouch on their back (Liebig 2014). II. Life History Spiny waterfleas go through three instar phases and can reproduce both parthenogenetically and sexually, switching from parthenogenesis during the summer to gametogenesis during the fall. The resting eggs produced during sexual reproduction are thought to be essential for the species’ survival since the presence of its planktonic stage has never been reported during the winter months (Rivier 1998, Brown 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Atlas of the Water Fleas, “Cladocera” (Class Crustacea) Recorded at the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve and State Nature Preserve, Ohio
    Taxonomic Atlas of the Water Fleas, “Cladocera” (Class Crustacea) Recorded at the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve and State Nature Preserve, Ohio by Jakob A. Boehler, Tamara S. Keller and Kenneth A. Krieger National Center for Water Quality Research Heidelberg University Tiffin, Ohio, USA 44883 January 2012 Taxonomic Atlas of the Water Fleas, “Cladocera” (Class Crustacea) Recorded at the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve and State Nature Preserve, Ohio by Jakob A. Boehler, Tamara S. Keller* and Kenneth A. Krieger Acknowledgements The authors are grateful for the assistance of Dr. David Klarer, Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve, for providing funding for this project, directing us to updated taxonomic resources and critically reviewing drafts of this atlas. We also thank Dr. Brenda Hann, Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Manitoba, for her thorough review of the final draft. This work was funded under contract to Heidelberg University by the Ohio Department of Natural Resources. This publication was supported in part by Grant Number H50/CCH524266 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve in Ohio is part of the National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS), established by Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act, as amended. Additional information about the system can be obtained from the Estuarine Reserves Division, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Zooplankton and the Phenology of the Spiny Water Flea, Bythotrephes, Following Its Invasion of Harp Lake, Ontario, Canada
    Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen 2341 Changes in zooplankton and the phenology of the spiny water flea, Bythotrephes, following its invasion of Harp Lake, Ontario, Canada Norman D. Yan, Agnes Blukacz, W. Gary Sprules, Paul K. Kindy, David Hackett, Robert E. Girard, and Bev J. Clark Abstract: The crustacean zooplankton community of Harp Lake, Ontario, Canada, has changed appreciably since the invasion by the spiny water flea, Bythotrephes. Crustacean species richness has declined, large-bodied Cladocera have replaced small-bodied ones, and there has been a downward trend in the total abundance of zooplankton because copepod abundance has remained stable while Cladoceran abundance has declined. Although the zooplankton community has now been stable for 4 years (1995–1998), the biology of the invader has changed dramatically. In particular, there have been 10-fold differences in the mean annual abundance of Bythotrephes in this 5-year period and substantial changes in the timing of population maxima. We attribute these changes to two factors: (i) transition from a summer to a fall switch from parthenogenesis to gametogenesis and (ii) interannual differences in the thickness of a warm, dark stratum in the lake. We hypothesize that this stratum provides a refuge for Bythotrephes from predation by lake herring, Coregonus artedii. Résumé : La communauté des crustacés du zooplancton du lac Harp, en Ontario, Canada, s’est modifiée de façon notable depuis l’invasion de la Puce d’eau épineuse, Bythrotrephes. La richesse en espèces des crustacés a décliné. Les cladocères de grande taille ont remplacé ceux de petite taille et il y a une tendance à la baisse dans l’abondance totale du zooplancton, car, bien que la densité des copépodes soit demeurée constante, celle des cladocères a baissé.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Aquatic Invasive Species Program Final Report
    2015 Aquatic Invasive Species Program Final Report Prepared for: The Lower Hudson Partnership for Regional Invasive Species Management Prepared by: Samantha Epstein Invasive Species Program Coordinator Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. December 2015 Hudson River Sloop Restoration, Inc. | 2015 Aquatic Invasive Species Program Report 1 Table of Contents Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Importance of an AIS Program……………………………………………………………………………………………….……….……….4 Watercraft Inspection Steward Pilot Program………………………………………………………………………………………5-7 Deliverables…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………….6-7 Education and Outreach Program………………………………………………………………….………………….……………..….7-8 Deliverables………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….….…………8 Volunteer Surveying Program…………………………………………………………………………………………………..….…… 9-10 Deliverables……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..…………10 Summary………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…….…. 10 Appendix A: Education and Outreach Event Details……………………………………………………………………….…11-12 Appendix B: Educational Materials…………………………………………………………………………………………………..13-67 This project was contracted by the Lower Hudson Partnership for Regional Invasive Species Management (PRISM) using funds from the Environmental Protection Fund as administered by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Hudson River Sloop Restoration, Inc. | 2015 Aquatic Invasive Species Program Report 2 Introduction Invasive species have become one of the biggest threats to our ecosystems,
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Research Priorities for Lake Whitefish in the Upper Great
    DEVELOPING RESEARCH PRIORITIES FOR LAKE WHITEFISH IN THE UPPER GREAT LAKES: RESULTS OF A WORKSHOP SPONSORED BY THE GREAT LAKES FISHERY TRUST AND GREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSION Michigan State University February 27-28, 2018 Michigan Sea Grant Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 3 Workshop Proceedings ................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 Workshop Goals and Desired Outcomes ............................................................................. 4 Presentations ....................................................................................................................... 4 Impacts of Whitefish Decline on the Tribal Commercial Fishery ..................................... 4 Lake Huron Lake Whitefish Status and Trends ................................................................ 5 Lake Michigan Lake Whitefish Status and Trends ............................................................ 7 Lake Superior Lake Whitefish Status and Trends ............................................................. 8 Lower Trophic Levels ........................................................................................................ 9 Factors affecting recruitment to fisheries and management implications ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Current and Potential Aquatic Invasive Species in Ontario and the Great Lakes Region: a Compilation of Ecological Information
    Science and Research Information Report IR-16 Current and potential aquatic invasive species in Ontario and the Great Lakes region: A compilation of ecological information Science and Research Information Report IR-16 Current and potential aquatic invasive species in Ontario and the Great Lakes region: A compilation of ecological information Elizabeth C. Hatton1, Jeffrey D. Buckley1, Shannon A. Fera1,2, Samantha Henry1, Len M. Hunt3, D. Andrew R. Drake4 and Timothy B. Johnson1 1 Aquatic Research and Development Section, Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF), 41 Hatchery Lane, Picton, ON K0K 2T0 2 Current address: Fisheries Section, Species Conservation Policy Branch, MNRF, 300 Water Street, Peterborough, ON K9J 8M5 3 Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research, MNRF, 103-421 James St S, Thunder Bay, ON P7E 2V6 4 Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, ON L7S 1A1 2019 Science and Research Branch Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry © 2019, Queen’s Printer for Ontario Copies of this publication are available from [email protected]. Cette publication hautement spécialisée, Current and Potential Aquatic Invasive Species in Ontario and the Great Lakes Region: A Compilation of Ecological Information, n’est disponible qu’en anglais conformément au Règlement 671/92, selon lequel il n’est pas obligatoire de la traduire en vertu de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir des renseignements en français, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère des Richesses naturelles et des Forêts au [email protected]. Some of the information in this document may not be compatible with assistive technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiny Water Flea Bythotrephes Longimanus Kingdom: Animalia FEATURES Division/Phylum: Arthropoda the Spiny Water Flea Is Less Than One-Half Inch Long
    spiny water flea Bythotrephes longimanus Kingdom: Animalia FEATURES Division/Phylum: Arthropoda The spiny water flea is less than one-half inch long. Class: Branchiopoda This tiny crustacean has a long, sharp, barbed tail Order: Cladocera spine that often makes up more than 70 percent of the animal's length. Its head consists mainly of a Family: Cercopagididae large, single, black eye and a pair of jaws, or ILLINOIS STATUS mandibles. Four pairs of legs are present, the first pair longer than the others. A pair of swimming common, nonnative antennae are located behind the head. © Ted E. Snider BEHAVIORS The spiny water flea lives in Lake Michigan and possibly some inland lakes. It uses swimming antennae to move in the water. As it grows, it sheds the outer shell over its body, but not over its spine. The barbed tail spine makes it difficult for predators to swallow this organism, and, after attempting to eat it, they often spit it back out. The life span of the spiny water flea lasts several days to about two weeks. Adults are present in water bodies from late spring until fall. This crustacean may produce up to 10 offspring every two weeks. Most of the spring, summer and fall populations are comprised of females. These adult females produce unfertilized eggs that develop into female offspring which are adult identical to the mother. This cycle continues as long as the water temperature is not too hot or too cold ILLINOIS RANGE and food is plentiful. When the water temperature begins to cool in the fall, both males and females are produced, allowing sexual reproduction to occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Detection, Vectors, and Impact of Invasive Spiny Water Flea In
    Oct. 2020 Wisconsin DNR AIS Research & Demonstration Grant Project EGAD # 3200-2020-46 Early detection, vectors, and impact of invasive spiny water flea in Wisconsin Lakes Spiny water flea Spiny water flea (Bythotrephes longimanus) are tiny non-native aquatic animals (zooplankton) which were first reported in the Great Lakes in the 1980s, and identified in a small number of Wisconsin inland lakes in the early to mid-2000s. They can negatively affect native species of zooplankton, which in turn may lead to impacts to fish, algae, water clarity, and other key components of lake ecosystems. Since the completion of this study, spiny water flea has been found in several more locations in Tleilaxu Wisconsin. Spiny water flea is listed as prohibited in Wisconsin under ch. NR 40. Research Methods Summary of Results • Researchers evaluated the • Spiny water fleas were found at the highest densities in Lake Mendota and ecological and economic occurred at lower levels in all the other study lakes. Peak densities of spiny water impacts of spiny water flea flea were consistently observed during late summer and fall. on lakes they have invaded; • Native zooplankton communities were observed to shift dramatically in response to including Yahara Chain of SWF invasion. Declines were observed in populations of Daphnia pulicaria, an Lakes (Mendota, Monona, ecologically important zooplankton species eaten by spiny water flea. Waubesa, & Kegonsa; Dane • Yellow perch were found to feed heavily on spiny water fleawhen they were Co.), Stormy Lake (Vilas Co.), abundant. Yellow perch diets examined prior to SWF invasion consisted of 60% Gile Flowage (Iron Co.), and Daphnia, while current diets were estimated at <1% Daphnia and 47% SWF.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of the Invasive Zooplankter Bythotrephes Longimanus on the Aquatic Food Web in Green Bay, Lake Michigan Arianna Neumeyer Lawrence University
    Lawrence University Lux Lawrence University Honors Projects 5-29-2019 Effects of the Invasive Zooplankter Bythotrephes longimanus on the Aquatic Food Web in Green Bay, Lake Michigan Arianna Neumeyer Lawrence University Follow this and additional works at: https://lux.lawrence.edu/luhp Part of the Biology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons © Copyright is owned by the author of this document. Recommended Citation Neumeyer, Arianna, "Effects of the Invasive Zooplankter Bythotrephes longimanus on the Aquatic Food Web in Green Bay, Lake Michigan" (2019). Lawrence University Honors Projects. 146. https://lux.lawrence.edu/luhp/146 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by Lux. It has been accepted for inclusion in Lawrence University Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of Lux. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Effects of the Invasive Zooplankter Bythotrephes longimanus on the Aquatic-Food Web in Green Bay, Lake Michigan By: Arianna Neumeyer A Thesis Submitted in Candidacy for Honors at Graduation from Lawrence University May 2019 Table of Contents Table of Contents i List of Figures iii List of Tables iv Acknowledgements v Introduction 1 Aquatic Invasive Species 1 Ecological Questions 5 Importance of the Great Lakes 6 Green Bay, Lake Michigan 7 Invertebrate Predation in Green Bay 10 Bythotrephes longimanus 13 Leptodora kindtii 15 Effects of Bythotrephes on freshwater ecosystems 17 Materials and Methods 18 Field Sites and Sampling Techniques 18 Laboratory
    [Show full text]
  • Spiny Water Flea US ARMY CORPS of ENGINEERS Building Strong®
    spiny water flea US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Building Strong® Common Name Spiny water flea Genus & Species Bythotrephes longimanus Family Cercopagididae Order Cladocera Class Branchiopoda Diagnosis: Bythotrephes longimanus is a cladoceran crustacean (water flea) recognizable with its straight tail spine averaging about 70% of its length. Adult individuals have three to four barbs on the spine while juveniles have only one pair. The animal has one large eye that is usually black or red. It also possesses a pair of swimming antennae and four pairs of legs, of which the first pair is used to catch prey. Mandibles are used for consumption of prey.The spiny water flea is similar to another introduced cladoceran of the same family, the fishhook waterflea Cercopagis pengoi, which has a more slender spine featuring a prominent loop-like hook at its end. Ecology: Reproduction The spiny water flea can reproduce quickly with upwards of ten offspring every two weeks. Since the crustacean is only active from late spring to fall, eggs may lie dormant for the winter and hatch when the body of water has warmed up. The eggs are resilient to weather conditions allowing the eggs to survive extremely cold conditions. Though the majority of the water flea's population is female, it is capable of asexual reproduction as well as sexual reproduction. Habitat & Distribution: The spiny water flea is native to northern Europe and Asia, and some parts of central Europe. However the water flea has spread in recent years to many areas throughout Europe including some ports and inland lakes outside its natural range.
    [Show full text]