Duck-Like Birds Text Extracted from Gill BJ

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Duck-Like Birds Text Extracted from Gill BJ D .W . .5 / DY a 5D t w[ { wt Ç"" " !W5 í ÇI &'(' / b ù b a L w 5 ! ) " í"* " Ç t+ t " h " * { b ù" t* /'0/& 1 /20/3 Order ANSERIFORMES: Duck-like Birds This order is best placed within Galloanserimorphae after Ratitae following Knox et al. (2002). The higher taxonomy is based on Checklist Committee (1990) modified to reflect the common features of the relationships shown and / or taxonomies proposed in Madsen et al. (1988), Livezey (1989, 1990, 1991, 1996a–c, 1997a,b), Sibley & Ahlquist (1990), del Hoyo et al. (1992), McCracken et al. (1999), Sorenson et al. (1999), Donne-Goussé et al. (2002) and Callaghan & Harshman (2005). Anseriformes is taken to have three families: Anhimidae (screamers) confined to South America, Anseranatidae (magpie goose) monotypic of Australia, and Anatidae. Within Anatidae, it is traditionally considered that the whistling ducks Dendrocygna and Thalassornis are basal, and that the rest of Anatidae formed two major clades: Anserinae (swans and geese) and Anatinae (all other taxa). However, we follow Checklist Committee (1990) and Marchant & Higgins (1990), and in part Livezey (1997b), Dickinson (2003) and Callaghan & Harshman (2005), in treating shelducks and kin, sea ducks, and stiff-tailed ducks as subfamilies: Tadorninae, Merginae, and Oxyurinae respectively. To these is added the basal monotypic anseriform Stictonetta of Australia in Stictonettinae. Recent analyses, based on skeletal and plumage features resulting in a complete anseriform phylogeny (Livezey 1997b), found an association between Aythyini, Mergini, Oxyurini, Biziura and other modified diving ducks, in contrast to traditional taxonomies (e.g. Delacour & Mayr 1945, Johnsgard 1968) which had not so related these taxa. Recent DNA analyses (Madsen et al. 1988, Sibley & Ahlquist 1990, Sraml et al. 1996, Johnson & Sorenson 1999, McCracken et al. 1999, Sorenson et al. 1999, Donne-Goussé et al. 2002, McCracken & Sorenson 2005) indicated that these taxa have no close relationships to one another, and that their diving specialisations have resulted in morphological convergence that obscures phylogeny. The stiff-tailed ducks (Oxyura and allies) are considered more basal than Anatinae, following Madsen et al. (1988), Sibley et al. (1988), Sibley & Ahlquist (1990), Marchant & Higgins (1990), Sraml et al. (1996), Callaghan & Harshman (2005), Worthy & Lee (2008) and Worthy (2009), and so are placed after Dendrocygna and Anserinae. Recent genetic studies, e.g. Sraml et al. (1996) and McCracken et al. (1999), provided strong evidence that Biziura is not closely related to Oxyura, although both taxa lie outside Anatinae. Callaghan & Harshman (2005) did not allocate Biziura to a subfamily, leaving its position in the phylogeny of Anatidae as incertae sedis. Worthy (2009) found it to be a member of Oxyurinae. So, pending resolution of its higher relationships, Biziura is retained in Oxyurinae. Cereopsis is accepted as a member of Anserinae following Livezey (1989, 1997b), Marchant & Higgins (1990), Donne-Goussé et al. (2002) and Callaghan & Harshman (2005). We have not placed Cnemiornis in its own monotypic family (Cnemiornithidae), as suggested by Livezey (1989) and followed by Callaghan & Harshman (2005), because later analyses failed to support this. The shelducks and sheldgeese form a monophyletic clade in most studies (e.g. Livezey 1997a,b; Sorenson et al. 1999; Donne-Goussé et al. 2002), which we place at the subfamilial level before Anatinae, following Checklist Committee (1990), Marchant & Higgins (1990), Livezey (1997b), Dickinson (2003) and Callaghan & Harshman (2005). Livezey (1997a,b) resurrected Casarca for the unbanded shelducks, restricting Tadorna to T. tadorna and T. radjah. In this scheme the paradise shelduck would be Casarca variegata in the subgenus Pseudotadorna Kuroda, 1917 with C. tadornoides and C. cristata. Here we follow the more conservative approach of allying all shelducks in one genus, as did Kear (2005). The placement of Malacorhynchus in the anatid phylogeny is problematic because it is monotypic, at least in the recent fauna, and poorly studied: it has been included in just one genetic analysis to date. We depart from the conservative placement of Malacorhynchus early in the sequence within Anatinae (e.g. Marchant & Higgins 1990, Livezey 1997b, Dickinson 2003, Callaghan & Harshman 2005), and accept the feather protein evidence (Brush 1976), genetic evidence (Sraml et al. 1996) and morphological and behavioural evidence (Frith 1977, Olson & Feduccia 1980, Worthy & Lee 2008 and Worthy (2009), that in sum suggest it should be classified outside Anatinae and before Tadorninae. Provisionally, we place it between Anserinae and Tadorninae. Fullagar (in Kear 2005: 442) considered this taxon to be part of the old endemic component of Australia’s avifauna with no close relatives elsewhere. Merginae is placed after Tadorninae, rather than after Anatinae, or as Mergini at the end of Anatinae, to reflect the relationships shown by mtDNA studies (Sorenson et al. 1999, Donne-Goussé et al. 2002). We follow the recommendation of Worthy & Olson (2002) that Euryanas finschi is listed as the sister taxon of Chenonetta jubata within Anatinae, contra Livezey (1989, 1997b), who had Euryanas as a monotypic tribe far removed from Chenonetta. Livezey (1997b), followed by Dickinson (2003), also suggested that Hymenolaimus lies within Tadorninae, but without supporting data for that position we leave it within Anatinae following Checklist Committee (1990) and Marchant & Higgins (1990). Authorship of family-group taxa is based on Rafinesque (1815), Leach (1819), Brodkorb (1964), Bock (1994) and Olson (1995). We follow Browning & Munroe (1991) for the publication date of Reichenbach (1853). Suborder ANSERES: Swans, Geese and Ducks Family ANATIDAE Leach: Swans, Geese and Ducks Anatidae Leach, 1819: Eleventh room. In Synopsis Contents British Museum 15th Edition, London: 67 – Type genus Anas Linnaeus, 1758. Subfamily ANSERINAE Vigors: Swans and Geese Anserina Vigors, 1825: Zoological Journal 2: 404 – Type genus Anser Brisson, 1760. INCERTAE SEDIS Tribe MALACORHYNCHINI Boetticher: Pink-eared Ducks Malacorhynchini Boetticher, 1950: Beitr. Gattungssyst. Vögel 2 – Type genus Malacorhynchus Swainson, 1831. Genus Malacorhynchus Swainson Malacorhynchus Swainson, 1831: Journ. Royal Inst. Great Britain 2: 18 – Type species (by monotypy) Anas membranacea Latham = Malacorhynchus membranaceus (Latham). Genetic evidence (Sraml et al. 1996; M. Sorenson pers. comm. to T. Worthy, 2006) places Malacorhynchus outside Anatinae, between Dendrocygna and Tadorna, thus supporting the evidence from feather proteins (Brush 1976) and morphology (Olson & Feduccia 1980). Recent morphological data suggest that Malacorhynchus is a member of the Oxyurinae (Worthy & Lee 2008, Worthy 2009). † Malacorhynchus scarletti Olson Scarlett’s Duck Malacorhynchus scarletti Olson, 1977: Emu 77: 132 – Pyramid Valley, North Canterbury. North, South and Chatham Islands (Worthy & Gill 2002). Known from Holocene fossils; rare; mainly from lacustrine deposits. It is a sister taxon of the Australian pink-eared duck M. membranaceus (Olson 1977, Worthy 1995). .
Recommended publications
  • THE FAMILY ANATIDAE 43 Ernst Map
    March 1945 42 THE WILSON BULLETIN Vol. 57, No. 1 Biziura L lob&, Australian Musk Duck Aberrant Species Thalassornis leuconota, African White-backed Duck Heteronetta atricapilla, Black-headed Duck 7. TRIBE MERGANETTINI. TORRENTDUCKS Merganetta armuta, Torrent Duck GENERA RECOGNIZEDBY PETERS AND SYNONYMIZEDIHERE Arctonetta= Som&eria Metopiana= Netta Asarcornis = Cairina Nesochen= Branta Casarca = Tadorna Nesonetta= Anus Chaulelasmus= Anas Nomonyx = Oxyura Chen = Anser Nyroca= Aythya Cheniscus= Nettapus Oidemia = Melanitta Chenopis= Cygnus Phil&e= Anser Cygnopsis= Anser Polysticta= Somateria Dendronessa= Aix Pseudotadorna= Tadorna Eulabeia= Anser Pteronetta= Cairina Lophodytes= Mergus Salvadorina= Anus Mareca= Anas Spatula= Anas Mergellus = Mergus GENERA RECOGNIZEDHERE BUT NOT BY PETERS Amazonetta von Boetticher (for Anus brasiliensis) Lophonetta Riley (for Anus specularioides) COMPARISONOP CHARACTERS Our studies have shown that the waterfowl can be divided into about nine groups that are fairly well defined both morphologically and biologically. In addition, there are a number of species and genera that are either intermediate between the otherwise well- defined tribes (e.g. Coscoroba) or too poorly known for a safe classi- fication (e.g. Anus specularis, Anus leucophrys, Malacorhynchus, Tachyeres) ; others show peculiarities or a combination of characters that prevent them from fitting well into any of the existing groups. Such genera as the Australian Cereopsis, Anseranas, Stictonetta, and Chenonetta could either be made the sole representatives of so many separate tribes or each could be included in the tribe with which it shares the greatest number of similarities. For the sake of con- venience we have adopted the latter course, but without forgetting that these genera are not typical representatives of the tribes with which we associate them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Function and Evolution of the Supraorbital Process in Ducks
    THE FUNCTION AND EVOLUTION OF THE SUPRAORBITAL PROCESS IN DUCKS ROBERTJ. RAIKOW THE anteriormargin of the orbit in ducksis formedby the lacrimalbone, which articulateswith the anterolateralmargin of the frontal boneand the posterodorsalcorner of the maxillary processof the nasal bone. The evolu- tion of this bone in birds generally has been dealt with recently by Cracraft (Amer. Midl. Naturalist, 80: 316, 1968), whoseterminology for the parts of the lacrimal bone is followedhere. In many ducksthe postero- dorsalcorner of the lacrimal is marked by a small tubercle,which serves as the site of attachment of the anterior end of the orbital membrane,a sheetof connectivetissue that coversand protectsthe dorsalaspect of the eyeball. In some forms this tubercle has become elongated to form a stout, finger-like projection, the supraorbitalprocess. This appears to provide mechanicalprotection to the eyeball and salt gland (Figure 1). Table 1 lists the occurrenceand degree of developmentof this process in the skulls of all living generaof ducks. CORRELATION WITH FEEDING AND LOCOMOTOR HABITS In the following discussion,data on feeding habits are from Delacour (The waterfowlof the world,vols. 1-3, London,Country Life Ltd., 1954, 1956, 1959). Table 1 showsthat the supraorbital processis developed significantlyonly in certain groupsof ducks that feed underwater. It is absentor rudimentaryin the Tadornini, Cairinini, and Anatini, which are primarily surfacefeeders, but also in Merganetta arma.ta,the Torrent Duck, which feedsunderwater. In the Aythyini it is fairly well-developed in severalspecies of Aythya, which are excellentdivers, but is rudimentary in Netta peposaca,which is moreof a surfacefeeder. It is alsorudimentary in the Canvasback,Aythya valisineria,which dives for vegetation.Among the Mergini the supraorbitalprocess is highly developedin eiders (Poly- sticta, Somateria) , scoters( M elanitta) , and Long-tailed Duck ( Clangula byemalls), all of which feed mainly on invertebratestaken from the bottom.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTES on SUBFOSSIL ANAHDAE from NEW ZEALAND, INCLUDING a NEW SPECBES of PINK-EARED DUCK MALACORHYNCHUS STOR&S L. OLSON Recei
    fM NOTES ON SUBFOSSIL ANAHDAE FROM NEW ZEALAND, INCLUDING A NEW SPECBES OF PINK-EARED DUCK MALACORHYNCHUS STOR&S L. OLSON Received 3 October 1976. SUMMARY OLSON, S. L. 1977. Notes on subfossil Anatidae from New Zealand, including a new species of pink-eared duck Malacorhynchus. Emu 77: 132-135. A new species of pink-eared duck, Malacorhynchus scarletti, is described from subfossil deposits at Pyra- mid Valley, South Island, NZ, and is characterized by larger size. Preliminary observations indicate that subfossil specimens of Biziura from New Zealand are larger and differ qualitatively from B. lobata; for the present, the name Biziura delautouri Forbes, 1892, ought to be retained for the New Zealand form. An erroneous record of Mergus australis is corrected. INTRODUCTION Locality. Pyramid Valley Swamp, near Waikari, During two visits to museums in New Zealand, I North Canterbury, South Island, NZ. examined remains of numerous fossil and subfossil Age. Holocene; the bone-bearing sediments at birds, including those of several extinct species of Pyramid Valley Swamp have been determined by ducks. Of these, the form known as Euryanas finschi radio-carbon dating to be about 3,500 years old was represented by thousands of specimens and I (Gregg 1972). plan to treat its osteology and relationships in a Etymology. I take pleasure in naming this new subsequent study. Three other species are the subject species for R. J. Scarlett, osteologist at the Canter- of the present paper. bury Museum, in recognition of his significant con- tributions to New Zealand palaeornithology. MALACORHYNCHUS Diagnosis. Much larger than M, membranaceus In a report on avian remains from Pyramid Valley (see Table I).
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Phylogeny of Anseriformes Based on Mitochondrial DNA Analysis
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 23 (2002) 339–356 www.academicpress.com A molecular phylogeny of anseriformes based on mitochondrial DNA analysis Carole Donne-Goussee,a Vincent Laudet,b and Catherine Haanni€ a,* a CNRS UMR 5534, Centre de Genetique Moleculaire et Cellulaire, Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 16 rue Raphael Dubois, Ba^t. Mendel, 69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France b CNRS UMR 5665, Laboratoire de Biologie Moleculaire et Cellulaire, Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon, 45 Allee d’Italie, 69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France Received 5 June 2001; received in revised form 4 December 2001 Abstract To study the phylogenetic relationships among Anseriformes, sequences for the complete mitochondrial control region (CR) were determined from 45 waterfowl representing 24 genera, i.e., half of the existing genera. To confirm the results based on CR analysis we also analyzed representative species based on two mitochondrial protein-coding genes, cytochrome b (cytb) and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (ND2). These data allowed us to construct a robust phylogeny of the Anseriformes and to compare it with existing phylogenies based on morphological or molecular data. Chauna and Dendrocygna were identified as early offshoots of the Anseriformes. All the remaining taxa fell into two clades that correspond to the two subfamilies Anatinae and Anserinae. Within Anserinae Branta and Anser cluster together, whereas Coscoroba, Cygnus, and Cereopsis form a relatively weak clade with Cygnus diverging first. Five clades are clearly recognizable among Anatinae: (i) the Anatini with Anas and Lophonetta; (ii) the Aythyini with Aythya and Netta; (iii) the Cairinini with Cairina and Aix; (iv) the Mergini with Mergus, Bucephala, Melanitta, Callonetta, So- materia, and Clangula, and (v) the Tadornini with Tadorna, Chloephaga, and Alopochen.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulmonary Pneumaticity in the Postcranial Skeleton of Extant Aves: a Case Study Examining Anseriformes
    JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY 261:141–161 (2004) Pulmonary Pneumaticity in the Postcranial Skeleton of Extant Aves: A Case Study Examining Anseriformes Patrick M. O’Connor1,2* 1Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, Ohio 45701 2Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794 ABSTRACT Anseriform birds were surveyed to examine flying lifestyle (Currey and Alexander, 1985; Bu¨ hler, how the degree of postcranial pneumaticity varies in a 1992). behaviorally and size-diverse clade of living birds. This Pneumaticity of the avian postcranial skeleton re- study attempts to extricate the relative effects of phylog- sults from invasion of bone by extensions from the eny, body size, and behavioral specializations (e.g., diving, lung and air sac system, a trait unique to birds soaring) that have been postulated to influence the extent of postcranial skeletal pneumaticity. One hundred anseri- among living amniotes (Duncker, 1989). Further, it form species were examined as the focal study group. has been observed that the extent, or degree, of Methods included latex injection of the pulmonary appa- pneumaticity varies greatly between different ratus followed by gross dissection or direct examination of groups of birds (Crisp, 1857; Bellairs and Jenkin, osteological specimens. The Pneumaticity Index (PI) is 1960; King, 1966; McLelland, 1989). However, pre- introduced as a means of quantifying and comparing post- vious studies are necessarily limited in that they cranial pneumaticity in a number of species simulta- have 1) discussed pneumaticity in a relative, quali- neously. Phylogenetically independent contrasts (PICs) tative fashion (e.g., one group vs. another); 2) exam- were used to examine the relationship between body size ined only one or a few species; 3) examined domes- and the degree of postcranial pneumaticity throughout the clade.
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Characteristic of the Anatidae Mitochondrial Control Region – a Review* *
    Ann. Anim. Sci., Vol. 18, No. 1 (2018) 3–15 DOI: 10.1515/aoas-2017-0016 A MOLECULAR CHARACTERISTIC OF THE ANATIDAE MITOCHONDRIAL CONTROL region – A REVIEW* * Joanna Warzecha♦, Agnieszka Fornal, Maria Oczkowicz, Monika Bugno-Poniewierska Department of Animal Molecular Biology National Research Institute of Animal Production, 32-083 Balice n. Kraków, Poland ♦Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is a molecular tool that is very effective in genetic research, includ- ing phylogenetic analysis. The non-coding region is the most variable fragment of mtDNA, show- ing variability in length and nucleobase composition and containing three domains: two hyper- variable peripheral regions and the conserved domain (D-loop) in the middle. The Anseriformes are amongst the best studied avian groups, including approximately 150 species and containing geese, swans, ducks (Anatidae), the Magpie goose (Anseranatidae) and screamers (Anhimidae). The most numerous family is the Anatidae, appearing in close relationships within the phyloge- netic branches of the species. There are differences between the non-coding region of the Anatidae in comparison to other avian control regions. In the article presented below the control region sequences and the phylogeny of the Anatidae were reviewed. Key words: mitochondrial DNA, control region, Anseriformes, Anatidae, goose, swan, duck Phylogenetics and the molecular evolution of vertebrates have been widely in- vestigated, particularly by using mitochondrial DNA (Ramirez et al., 1993). Despite its quick evolution, mitochondrial DNA is conservative in length, gene content and organisation. Additionally, it is a commonly used molecular tool in biological identi- fication research, taxonomy and phylogeny in living organisms (Brown et al., 1982; Ramirez et al., 1993; Castro et al., 1998; Slack et al., 2003; Bucheli and Wenzel, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • A Natural History of the Ducks
    Actx^ssioiis FROM THE Accessions Fl!C).\l TlIK Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from Boston Public Library http://www.archive.org/details/naturalhistoryof01phil A NATUEAL HISTORY OF THE DUCKS IN FOUR VOLUMES VOLUME I THE DUCK MARSH A NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DUCKS BY JOHN C. PHILLIPS ASSOCIATE CUBATOR OF BIRDS EST THE MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY AT HARVARD COLLEGE WITH PLATES IN COLOR AND IN BLACK AND WHITE FROM DRAWINGS BY FRANK W. BENSON, ALLAN BROOKS AND LOUIS AGASSIZ FUERTES VOLUME I PLECTROPTERINM, DENDROCYGNINM, ANATINM (m part) BOSTON AND NEW TOEK HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY @D|)e Eitiereilie l^xtm CamiiTtlisc 1922 COPYRIGHT, 1922, BY JOHN C. PHILLIPS ALL EIGHTS RESERVED 16 CAMBRIDGE • MASSACHUSETTS PRINTED IN THE U.S.A. ACKNOWLEDGMENT To Mr. William L. Langer, whose knowledge of languages and bibliography- has been indispensable, I owe a lasting debt for many summers of faithful work. Major Allan Brooks and Louis Agassiz Fuertes have given much time and thought to their drawings and have helped me with their gen- eral knowledge of the Duck Tribe. Dr. Glover M. Allen has devoted val- uable time to checking references, and his advice has served to smooth out many wrinkles. To Frank W. Benson, who has done so much in teaching us the decorative value of water-fowl, I owe the frontispiece of this first volume. Lastly I must say a word for the patient and painstaking manner in which many naturalists and sportsmen have answered hun- dreds of long and tedious letters. John C. Phillips Wenham, Massachusetts November, 1922 COPYRIGHT, 1922, BY JOHN C.
    [Show full text]
  • Order ANSERIFORMES: Duck-Like Birds Text Extracted from Gill B.J
    D .W . .5 / DY a 5D t w[ { wt Ç"" " !W5 í ÇI &'(' / b ù b a L w 5 ! ) " í "* " Ç t+ t " h " * { b ù" t* /'0/& 1 /2 Order ANSERIFORMES: Duck-like Birds This order is best placed within Galloanserimorphae after Ratitae following Knox et al. (2002). The higher taxonomy is based on Checklist Committee (1990) modified to reflect the common features of the relationships shown and / or taxonomies proposed in Madsen et al. (1988), Livezey (1989, 1990, 1991, 1996a–c, 1997a,b), Sibley & Ahlquist (1990), del Hoyo et al. (1992), McCracken et al. (1999), Sorenson et al. (1999), Donne-Goussé et al. (2002) and Callaghan & Harshman (2005). Anseriformes is taken to have three families: Anhimidae (screamers) confined to South America, Anseranatidae (magpie goose) monotypic of Australia, and Anatidae. Within Anatidae, it is traditionally considered that the whistling ducks Dendrocygna and Thalassornis are basal, and that the rest of Anatidae formed two major clades: Anserinae (swans and geese) and Anatinae (all other taxa). However, we follow Checklist Committee (1990) and Marchant & Higgins (1990), and in part Livezey (1997b), Dickinson (2003) and Callaghan & Harshman (2005), in treating shelducks and kin, sea ducks, and stiff-tailed ducks as subfamilies: Tadorninae, Merginae, and Oxyurinae respectively. To these is added the basal monotypic anseriform Stictonetta of Australia in Stictonettinae. Recent analyses, based on skeletal and plumage features resulting in a complete anseriform phylogeny (Livezey 1997b), found an association between Aythyini, Mergini, Oxyurini, Biziura and other modified diving ducks, in contrast to traditional taxonomies (e.g. Delacour & Mayr 1945, Johnsgard 1968) which had not so related these taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taxonomy of the Anatidae—A Behavioural Analysis
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UNL | Libraries University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Paul Johnsgard Collection Papers in the Biological Sciences 1-1961 The Taxonomy of the Anatidae—A Behavioural Analysis Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska–Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/johnsgard Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "The Taxonomy of the Anatidae—A Behavioural Analysis" (1961). Paul Johnsgard Collection. 29. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/johnsgard/29 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Paul Johnsgard Collection by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in THE IBIS 103a:1 (January 1961), pp. 71-85. Published by British Ornithologists' Union. 1961 P. A. JOHNSGARD : BEHAVIOURAL ANALYSIS OF ANATIDAl! 71 THE TAXONOMY OF THE ANATIDAE-A BEHAVIOURAL ANALYSIS P. A. JOHNSGARD Received on 14 May 1960 Delacour & Mayr's (1945) classic revision of the Anatidae took waterfowl behaviour into account to a much larger degree than had any previous classifications of the group. However, their utilization of behavi~>ur was primarily at the tribal and generic levels, and no real attempt was made to :use behaviour for det!!rmining intrageneric relationships. Thus far only Lorenz (1941, 1951-1953) has seriously attempteq this with waterfowl, and his analysis of the relatiOnShips within the genus Anas (sensu De1acour & Mayr) has provided a remarkable insight into the evolution of this group.
    [Show full text]
  • Musk Duck Brood Parasitism on Black Swans
    Musk Duck brood parasitism 127 Musk Duck brood parasitism on Black Swans K. Kraaijeveld1 & R. A. Mulder2 'Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia. Current address: Department of Biology, Darwin Building, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK. 'Department of ZooLogy, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia. This paper describes incidences of brood parasitism of nests of Black Swans Cygnus atratus by Musk Ducks Biziura Lobata. Black Swans have a long incubation period, and as they are unlikely to exhibit egg rejection behaviour, they are potentially suitable as hosts for Musk Duck para­ sitism. Model eggs were used to test whether the success of brood parasitism in this system is constrained by host responses (egg recogni­ tion or nest abandonment), or egg shell strength. The results showed that Black Swans readily accept foreign eggs, even when they are very different from their own. However, there was a substantial loss of weak- shelled model eggs, thought to be accidentally crushed by the swans. The relation of this to the unusually thick shell of Musk Duck eggs is dis­ cussed. KeyWords: interspecific brood parasitism, egg recognition, egg rejection, model experi­ ments, shell thickness Interspecific brood parasitism, or 1992). The hosts of parasitic wildfowl females purposely laying eggs in the mostly involve other wildfowl, but also nests of other species, is relatively gulls (Laridae), Coots Fulica sp. and widespread among wildfowl (Anatidae). ibises (Threskiornithidae). The success The behaviour has been recorded in at of interspecific brood parasitism may least 36 out of Π 6 species (25%), and is be constrained by the timing of the par­ particularly common among the asitism, and by host responses, such as Oxyurini (stiff-tailed ducks; Sayler nest site defence, displacement of par- ©Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust W ild fo w l (2002) 53: 127-135 128 Musk Duck brood parasitism asitic eggs, egg rejection and nest a poorly-studied species, and it is not abandonment (Sayter 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Tracheal Anatomy of the Anatidae and Its Taxonomic Significance
    TRACHEAL ANATOMY OF THE ANATIDAE AND ITS TAXONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE Paul A. Johnsgard Summary T r a c h ea l and syringeal variations in waterfowl are summarized, based on a tracheal collection representing 84 out of the 143 species of Anatidae. Twenty seven species are illustrated with drawings, and photographs of 24 species are also included, comprising 29 of the 43 genera of Anatidae. The following major points are made : 1. The Magpie Goose (Anseranas semipalmata) is unique in its externally convoluted trachea, but the syrinx is small and simple in both sexes. 2. Species of the subfamily Anserinae have symmetrical tracheae in both sexes, which either lack bullae (Anserini) or have symmetrical bullae which are larger in males than in females (Dendrocygnini). 3. The Coscoroba Swan (Coscoroba coscoroba) and the Cereopsis Goose (Cereopsis novae­ hollandiae) have tracheae of the Anserini type, and the Freckled Duck (Stictonetta naevosa) has an extremely simple and primitive type of trachea and syrinx in both sexes. 4. Species of the subfamily Anatinae exhibit sexual dimorphism in the syrinx, and males of most species except stiff-tails (Oxyurini) possess asymmetrically enlarged syrinxes (bullae). 5. Enlargements of the tracheal tubes of male Anatinae occur in a few dabbling ducks (Anatini), most of the pochards (Aythyini) and most sea ducks (Mergini). Tracheal air sacs occur in some stiff-tails, and extra-tracheal sound production is also typical of this group. 6. Although males of most Anatinae possess entirely osseous bullae, partially membranaceous (fenestrated) bullae are found in all pochards and most sea ducks. The Marbled Teal (Marmaronetta angustirostris) and Pink-headed Duck (Rhodonessa caryophyllacea) also possess fenestrated bullae which are intermediate between the dabbling duck and pochard types.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FAMILY ANATIDAE Ernst Mayr 37
    J. Delacour THE FAMILY ANATIDAE Ernst Mayr 37 A LIST OF THE GENERA AND SPECIES OF ANATIDAE On the basis of the considerations in the above section of our paper, we propose the following list* of genera and species of Anatidae: I SUBFAMILY ANSERINAE 1. TRIBE ANSERINI. GEESE AND SWANS Bra&a canadensis, Canada Goose sandwicensis (“Nesochelz”), Hawaiian Goose leucopsis, Barnacle Goose bernicla, Brant rujcollis, Red-breasted Goose Anser cygnoides (“Cygnopsis”), Swan-goose jabalis (inc. neglectusand brachyrhynchus), Bean Goose, Sushkin’s Goose, and Pink-footed Goose albijrons, White-fronted Goose 1 erythropus, Lesser White-fronted Goose anser, Grey-Lag Goose indicus (“Eulabeia”), Bar-headed Goose canagicus (“Philucte”), Emperor Goose caerulescens(“Cherz”, inc. hyperboreusand atlanticus), Blue Goose, Lesser and Greater Snow Geese rossi (“Chen”), Ross’s Goose Cygnus columbianus (inc. bewicki), Whistling and Bewick’s Swans Cygnus (inc. buccinator), Whooper and Trumpeter Swans melanocoryphus, Black-necked Swan olor, Mute Swan stratus (“Chenopis”), Black Swan Coscoroba coscoroba,Coscoroba 2. TRIBE DENDROCYGNINI. WHISTLING DUCKS (TREE DUCKS) Dendrocygna arborea, Black-billed Whistling Duck g&tutu, Spotted Whistling Duck autumn&s, Red-billed Whistling Duck javanica, Indian Whistling Duck bicolor, Fulvous Whistling Duck 1 arcuata, Wandering Whistling Duck eytoni, Plumed Whistling Duck viduata, White-faced Whistling Duck 8Additional genera and speciesrecognized by Peters are given in parenthesis. Each pair or group of speciesunited by a bracket constitutesa
    [Show full text]