Galilei-1632 Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Galilei-1632 Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems Galileo di Vincenzo Bonaulti de Galilei ([ɡaliˈlɛːo ɡaliˈlɛi]; 15 February 1564 – 8 January 1642) was an Italian astronomer, physicist and engineer, sometimes described as a polymath, from Pisa. Galileo has been called the "father of observational astronomy", the "father of modern physics", the "father of the scientific method", and the "father of modern science". Galileo studied speed and velocity, gravity and free fall, the principle of relativity, inertia, projectile motion and also worked in applied science and technology, describing the properties of pendulums and "hydrostatic balances", inventing the thermoscope and various military compasses, and using the telescope for scientific observations of celestial objects. His contributions to observational astronomy include the telescopic confirmation of the phases of Venus, the observation of the four largest satellites of Jupiter, the observation of Saturn's rings, and the analysis of sunspots. Galileo's championing of heliocentrism and Copernicanism was controversial during his lifetime, when most subscribed to geocentric models such as the Tychonic system. He met with opposition from astronomers, who doubted heliocentrism because of the absence of an observed stellar parallax. The matter was investigated by the Roman Inquisition in 1615, which concluded that heliocentrism was "foolish and absurd in philosophy, and formally heretical since it explicitly contradicts in many places the sense of Holy Scripture". Galileo later defended his views in Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems (1632), which appeared to attack Pope Urban VIII and thus alienated him and the Jesuits, who had both supported Galileo up until this point. He was tried by the Inquisition, found "vehemently suspect of heresy", and forced to recant. He spent the rest of his life under house arrest. While under house arrest, he wrote Two New Sciences, in which he summarized work he had done some forty years earlier on the two sciences now called kinematics and strength of materials GALILEO GALILEI Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems—Ptolemaic & Copernican translated by Stillman Drake, fore­ word by Albert Einstein SECOND EDITION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES 1967 Take note, theologians, that in your desire to make matters of faith out of propositions relat­ ing to the fixity of sun and earth you run the risk of eventually having to condemn as heretics those who would declare the earth to stand still and the sun to change position — eventually, I say, at such a time as it might be physically or F irst P rinting, 1953 F irst P aper-bound E dition (R evised), 1962 logically proved that the earth moves and the Second R evised E dition, 1967 sun stands still. Library of Congress Catalog Card N umber 53-11238 -Note added by Galileo in the preliminary leaves of his own copy of the Dialogue. UNIVERSITY o f CALIFORNIA PRESS, BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, LONDON, ENGLAND C o p y r ig h t , 1953, 1962, a n d 1967, b y t h e R e g e n t s o p t h e U n iv e r s it y o p C a l ip o r n u PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OP AMERICA DESIGNED BY JOHN B. GOETZ VORWORT FOREWORD GJ ALiLEOS Dialog iiber die beiden hauptsdchlichen Welt- ALiLEO^s Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World systeme ist eine Fundgrube fur jeden, der sich fur die Geistes- G Systems is a mine of information for anyone interested in the geschichte des Westens und fiir deren Riickwirkung auf die cultural history of the Western world and its influence upon okonomische und politische Entwicklung interessiert. economic and political development. Da offenbart sich ein Mann, der den leidenschaftlichen Willen, A man is here revealed who possesses the passionate will, the die Intelligenz und den Mut hat, sich als Vertreter des ver- intelligence, and the courage to stand up as the representative niinftigen Denkens der Schar derjenigen entgegenzustellen, die of rational thinking against the host of those who, relying on the auf die Unwissenheit des Volkes und die Indolenz der Lehren- ignorance of the people and the indolence of teachers in priest’s den in Priester- und Professoren-Gewande sich stiitzend, ihre and scholar’s garb, maintain and defend their positions of au­ Machtpositionen einnehmen und verteidigen. Seine ungewohn- thority. His unusual literary gift enables him to address the liche schriftstellerische Begabung erlaubt es ihm, zu den Gebilde- educated men of his age in such clear and impressive language ten seiner Zeit so klar und eindrucksvoll zu sprechen, dass er as to overcome the anthropocentric and mythical thinking of his das anthropozentrische und mythische Denken der Zeitgenossen contemporaries and to lead them back to an objective and causal iiberwand und sie zu einer objektiven, kausalen Einstellung zum attitude toward the cosmos, an attitude which had become lost Kosmos zuriickfuhrte, die mit der Bliite der griechischen Kultur to humanity with the decline of Greek culture. der Menschheit verloren gegangen war. In speaking this way I notice that I, too, am falling in with Wenn ich dies so ausspreche, sehe ich zugleich, dass ich der the general weakness of those who, intoxicated with devotion, weitverbreiteten Schwache aller derer zum Opfer falle, die trun- exaggerate the stature of their heroes. It may well be that during ken von einer ubermassigen Verliebtheit die Statur ihrer Heroen the seventeenth century the paralysis of mind brought about by iibertrieben darstellen. Es mag sein, dass die Lahmung der Geis- the rigid authoritarian tradition of the Dark Ages had already ter durch starre autoritare Tradition des dunklen Zeitalters im so far abated that the fetters of an obsolete intellectual tradition siebzehnten Jahrhundert bereits so weit gemildert war, dass die could not have held much longer — with or without Galileo. Fesseln einer iiberlebten intellektuellen Tradition nicht mehr Yet these doubts concern only a particular case of the general fiir die Dauer standhalten konnten — mit oder ohne Galileo. problem concerning the extent to which the course of history Nun, dieser Zweifel betrifft ja nur einen Sonderfall der Frage, can be decisively influenced by single individuals whose qualities inwieweit der Verlauf der menschlichen Geschichte durch ein- impress us as accidental and unique. As is understandable, our V or- viii zelne Individuen und deren als zufallig und einmalig empfundene age takes a more sceptical view of the role of the individual than ix Fore­ Qualitaten entscheidend beeinflusst werden kann. Unsere Zeit did the eighteenth and the first half of the nineteenth century. wort word steht solchen Auffassungen skeptischer gegeniiber als das acht- For the extensive specialization of the professions and of knowl­ zehnte Jahrhundert und die erste Halfte des neunzehnten Jahr- edge lets the individual appear “replaceable,” as it were, like a hunderts — begreiflicherweise. Denn die weitgehende Spezi- part of a mass-produced machine. alisierung der Berufe und des Wissens lasst den Einzelnen Fortunately, our appreciation of the Dialogue as a historical gewissermassen als „auswechselbar“ erscheinen wie den Einzel- document does not depend upon our attitude toward such pre­ teil einer durch Massenfabrikation hergestellten Maschine. carious questions. To begin with, the Dialogue gives an ex­ Der Wert des Dialogs als Dokument ist gliicklicherweise tremely lively and persuasive exposition of the then prevailing von der Stellung zu solch prekaren Fragen unabhangig. Vor views on the structure of the cosmos in the large. The naive pic­ allem gibt der Dialog eine uberaus lebendige und iiberzeugende ture of the earth as a flat disc, combined with obscure ideas about Darstellung der herrschenden Ansichten uber den Bau des Kos- star-filled space and the motions of the celestial bodies, prevalent mos im Grossen, Die im friiheren Mittelalter herrschende kind- in the early Middle Ages, represented a deterioration of the much liche Auffassung der Erde als einer fiachen Scheibe, verkniipft earlier conceptions of the Greeks, and in particular of Aristotle’s mit ganz unklaren Ideen iiber den von den Sternen erfullten ideas and of Ptolemy’s consistent spatial concept of the celestial Raum und die Bewegung der Gestirne, waren langst durch das bodies and their motions. The conception of the world still pre­ Weltbild der Griechen, speziell durch Ideen des Aristoteles und vailing at Galileo’s time may be described as follows: durch die ptolemaische konsequente raumliche Auffassung der There is space, and within it there is a preferred point, the Gestirne und deren Bewegung verbessert. Das Weltbild, welches center of the universe. Matter — at least its denser portion — zur Zeit Galileos noch vorherrschte, war etwa folgendes: tends to approach this point as closely as possible. Consequently, Es gibt einen Raum, der einen bevorzugten Punkt, den Welt- matter has assumed approximately spherical shape (earth). mittelpunkt besitzt. Die Materie — wenigstens der dichtere Teil Owing to this formation of the earth the center of the terrestrial derselben — sucht sich diesem Punkt moglichst zu nahern. Sie sphere practically coincides with that of the universe. Sun, moon, hat demzufolge ungefahr Kugelgestalt angenommen (Erde). and stars are prevented from falling toward the center of the Vermdge dieser Entstehung der Erde f allt der Mittelpunkt dieser universe by being fastened onto rigid (transparent) spherical Erdkugel praktisch mit den Weltmittelpunkt zusammen. Sonne, shells whose centers are identical with that of the universe (or Mond und Sterne sind, damit sie nicht nach dem Weltmittel­ space). These spherical shells revolve around the immovable punkt fallen, auf (durchsichtigen) starren Kugelschalen befes- globe (or center of the universe) with slightly differing angular tigt, deren Mittelpunkt mit den Weltmittelpunkt (oder Raum- velocities. The lunar shell has the smallest radius; it encloses mittelpunkt) zusammenfallt. Diese Kugelschalen drehen sich everything “terrestrial.” The outer shells with their heavenly um den ruhenden Erdball (bezw. um den Weltmittelpunkt) mit bodies represent the “celestial sphere” whose objects are en­ etwas verschiedenen Winkelgeschwindigkeiten.
Recommended publications
  • Une Catalogne Indepéndante? European Geopolitics and The
    TEMPORARY EXHIBIT European Geopolitics and the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) ENGLISH Democratic Memorial June 2017 “Une Catalogne indépendante”? European Geopolitics and the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) Temporary Exhibit · Democratic Memorial · June 2017 1. EXHIBITION SCRIPT 0 . «Une Catalogne indépendante»? European Geopolitics and the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) 1. What never was. The crude realpolitik of international relations 2. The radical transformation of the map of Europe between World War I and II. 1919-1945 2.1. New borders, new countries 2.2.The idea of Europe 2.3. Diplomacy: A game? 2.4. Calling on France 3. Catalonia existed in the world; the world was present in Catalonia. 3.1. Catalonia as a subject 3.2. The Italian view. Mussolini’s policy of Mediterranean power 3.3. Foreigners in Catalonia 3.4. Barcelona was also a city of diplomats. 3.5. Barcelona, a great city of the Western Mediterranean. 4. A Catalan Maginot line? The importance of the third French front in a European war 4.1. The Pyrenees, the importance of the southern border to France 4.2. Franco before Stalin! Fear of communism. 4.3. The port of Barcelona, a desirable location 4.4. A View from Catalonia 5. A real debate amidst rumours. Catalan independence in an international Spanish Civil War 5.1. Madrid’s fate determines the future of Catalonia 5.2. A de facto independence 5.3. Catalonia or Spain, an unresolved dilemma (May 1937 - April 1939) 6. Why didn’t it occur? “Une Catalogne indépendante”? European Geopolitics and the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) Temporary Exhibit · Democratic Memorial · June 2017 0 .
    [Show full text]
  • Galileo Galilei Introduction Galileo Galilei (1564–1642) Was One of The
    Galileo Galilei Introduction Galileo Galilei (1564–1642) was one of the most significant figures of the Scientific Revolution. Galileo was involved in nearly all fields of natural philosophy, including astronomy, mathematics, and what we now term “physics.” He is rightly considered one of the founders of modern physics and astronomy, and one of the main originators of the modern scientific method. Galileo’s study of motion became the foundation for Newton’s laws of motion and the principles of inertia and gravity. His astronomical studies were instrumental in supporting the heliocentric model of the solar system first propounded by Copernicus. He should also be credited with making experimentation the basis of scientific study, and with the use of mathematics as the fundamental means for expressing and validating the findings of experimental investigation. Galileo’s application of mathematics to experimental results has become one of the most important aspects of modern science. Galileo made important improvements to the telescope, which enabled him to make great advances in astronomical observation. His observations emboldened him to become the most important advocate of Copernicanism—the astronomical system created by Nicolaus Copernicus (1473–1543)—and his support ultimately ushered in the Copernican revolution in astronomy. Copernicus had devised a heliocentric model in which he posited that the Earth revolved around the sun (in perfect circles). Contrary to the Ptolemaic system and Christian cosmology, Copernicus positioned the sun as a fixed center around which Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn orbited. Furthermore, Copernicus posited the diurnal rotation of the Earth on its own axis in addition to its annual revolutions around the sun.
    [Show full text]
  • The Harper Anthology of Academic Writing
    The Harper P\(\·::�·::::: ...:.:: .� : . ::: : :. �: =..:: ..·. .. ::.:·. · ..... ·.' · .· Anthology of . ;:·:·::·:.-::: Academic Writing S T U D E N T A U T H 0 R S Emily Adams Tina Herman Rosemarie Ruedi Nicole Anatolitis Anna Inocencio Mary Ellen Scialabba Tina Anatolitis Geoff Kane Jody Shipka Mario Bartoletti David Katz Susan Shless Marina Blasi Kurt Keifer Carrie Simoneit Jennifer Brabec Sherry Kenney Sari Sprenger Dean Bushek Kathy Kleiva Karen Stroehmann Liz Carr Gail Kottke Heather To llerson Jennifer Drew-Steiner Shirley Kurnick Robert To manek Alisa Esposito Joyce Leddy Amy To maszewski Adam Frankel James Lee Robert Van Buskirk Steve Gallagher Jan Loster Paula Vicinus Lynn Gasier Martin Maney Hung-Ling Wan Christine Gernady Katherine Marek Wei Weerts ·:-::::·:· Joseph L. Hazelton Philip Moran Diana Welles Elise Muehlhausen Patty Werber Brian Ozog Jimm Polli Julie Quinlan Santiago Ranzzoni Heidi Ripley I S S U E V I I 1 9 9 5 The Harper Anthology of Academic Writing Issue VII 1995 \Y/illiam Rainey Harper College T h e Harper Anthology Emily Adams "Manic Depression: a.k.a. Bipolar Disorder" Table (Psychology) 1 Nicole Anatolitis, Tina Anatolitis, Lynn Gasier and Anna Inocencio "Study Hard" of (Reading) 7 Mario Bartoletti "Zanshin: Perfect Posture" Contents (English) 8 Marina Blasi "To Parent or Not to Parent ... That Is the Question (English) 11 Jennifer Brabec "Nature Journal" (Philosophy) 15 Dean Bushek "A Piece of My Life" (English) 17 Liz Carr "Betrayal" (English) 20 Jennifer Drew-Steiner "First Exam: Question Four" (Philosophy) 24 Alisa Esposito "The Trouble with Science" (English) 25 Adam Frankel "Form, Subject, Content" (Art) 27 Table of Contents Steve Gallagher Joyce Leddy "Galileo Galilei" "Is Good Design A Choice?" (Humanities) 28 (Interior Design) 62 Christine Gernady James Lee "Stresses of Office Work, Basic Causes "Scientific Integrity" and Solutions" (Physics) 63 (Secretarial Procedures) 34 Jan Loster Joseph L.
    [Show full text]
  • Grade 7 Work Packet
    Grade 7 Work Packet Student Name:_____________________________ Dear Student, The work in this packet will help you continue to practice what you have been learning in school. We recommend that you complete the assignments for each subject based on the schedule below. You can use the Table of Contents on the next page to quickly move through the packet. Packets are due completed to your teacher when you return to school. Thank You, Teaching and Learning Team Day Assignments Day 1/2 ● ELA: Text Reading and Questions ● Math: Fluency Practice and Mixed Practice ● Science: Earth’s Structure Reading and Questions Day 3/4 ● ELA: Text Reading and Questions ● Math: Fluency Practice and Mixed Practice ● Science: Changing Earth Reading and Questions Day 5/6 ● ELA: Text Reading and Questions ● Math: Fluency Practice and Mixed Practice ● Science: Energy Transformation Reading and Questions Day 7/8 ● ELA: Text Reading and Questions ● Math: Fluency Practice and Mixed Practice ● Science: Thermal Energy Transfer Part 1 Day 9/10 ● ELA: Text Reading and Questions ● Math: Fluency Practice and Mixed Practice ● Science: Thermal Energy Transfer Part 2 1 Table of Contents: ● ELA Day 1/2……………………………………………………………………………………….Page 3 ● Math Day 1/2………………………………………………………………………………………Page 6 ● Science Day 1/2…………………………………………………………………………………..Page 11 ● ELA Day 3/4……………………………………………………………………………………….Page 16 ● Math Day 3/4………………………………………………………………………………………Page 24 ● Science Day 3/4…………………………………………………………………………………..Page 29 ● ELA Day 5/6……………………………………………………………………………………….Page 35 ● Math
    [Show full text]
  • Galileo's Search for the Laws of Fall
    Phys. Perspect. 21 (2019) 194–221 Ó 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 1422-6944/19/030194-28 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00016-019-00243-y Physics in Perspective What the Middle-Aged Galileo Told the Elderly Galileo: Galileo’s Search for the Laws of Fall Penha Maria Cardozo Dias, Mariana Faria Brito Francisquini, Carlos Eduardo Aguiar and Marta Feijo´ Barroso* Recent historiographic results in Galilean studies disclose the use of proportions, graphical representation of the kinematic variables (distance, time, speed), and the medieval double distance rule in Galileo’s reasoning; these have been characterized as Galileo’s ‘‘tools for thinking.’’ We assess the import of these ‘‘tools’’ in Galileo’s reasoning leading to the laws of fall (v2 / D and v / t). To this effect, a reconstruction of folio 152r shows that Galileo built proportions involving distance, time, and speed in uniform motions, and applied to them the double distance rule to obtain uniformly accelerated motions; the folio indicates that he tried to fit proportions in a graph. Analogously, an argument in Two New Sciences to the effect that an earlier proof of the law of fall started from an incorrect hypothesis (v µ D) can be recast in the language of proportions, using only the proof that v µ t and the hypothesis. Key words: Galileo Galilei; uniformly accelerated fall; double distance rule; theorem of the mean speed; kinematic proportions in uniform motions. Introduction Galileo Galilei stated the proof of the laws of fall in their finished form in the Two New Sciences,1 published in 1638, only a few years before his death in 1642, and shortly before turning 78.
    [Show full text]
  • Galileo's Assayer
    University of Nevada, Reno Galileo's Assayer: Sense and Reason in the Epistemic Balance A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History. by James A Smith Dr. Bruce Moran/Thesis Advisor May 2018 c by James A Smith 2018 All Rights Reserved THE GRADUATE SCHOOL We recommend that the thesis prepared under our supervision by JAMES A. SMITH entitled Galileo's Assayer: Sense and Reason in the Epistemic Balance be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Bruce Moran, Ph.D., Advisor Edward Schoolman, Ph.D., Committee Member Carlos Mariscal, Ph.D., Committee Member Stanislav Jabuka, Ph.D., Graduate School Representative David W. Zeh, Ph.D., Dean, Graduate School May, 2018 i Abstract Galileo's The Assayer, published in 1623, represents a turning point in Galileo's philo- sophical work. A highly polemical \scientific manifesto," The Assayer was written after his astronomical discoveries of the moons of Jupiter and sunspots on a rotating sun, but before his mature Copernican work on the chief world systems (Ptolemaic versus Copernican). The Assayer included major claims regarding the place of math- ematics in natural philosophy and how the objects of the world and their properties can be known. It's in The Assayer that Galileo wades into the discussion about the ultimate constituents of matter and light, namely, unobservable particles and atoms. Galileo stressed the equal roles that the senses and reason served in the discovery of knowledge, in contradistinction to Aristotelian authoritarian dogma that he found to hinder the processes of discovery and knowledge acquisition.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermometer 1 Thermometer
    Thermometer 1 Thermometer Developed during the 16th and 17th centuries, a thermometer (from the Greek θερμός (thermo) meaning "warm" and meter, "to measure") is a device that measures temperature or temperature gradient using a variety of different principles.[1] A thermometer has two important elements: the temperature sensor (e.g. the bulb on a mercury thermometer) in which some physical change occurs with temperature, plus some means of converting this physical change into a numerical value (e.g. the scale on a mercury thermometer). A clinical mercury-in-glass thermometer There are many types of thermometer and many uses for thermometers, as detailed below in sections of this article. Temperature While an individual thermometer is able to measure degrees of hotness, the readings on two thermometers cannot be compared unless they conform to an agreed scale. There is today an absolute thermodynamic temperature scale. Internationally agreed temperature scales are designed to approximate this closely, based on fixed points and interpolating thermometers. The most recent official temperature scale is the International Temperature Scale of 1990. It extends from 0.65 K (−272.5 °C; −458.5 °F) to approximately 1358 K (1085 °C; 1985 °F). Thermometer Thermometer 2 Development Various authors have credited the invention of the thermometer to Cornelius Drebbel, Robert Fludd, Galileo Galilei or Santorio Santorio. The thermometer was not a single invention, however, but a development. Philo of Byzantium and Hero of Alexandria knew of the principle that certain substances, notably air, expand and contract and described a demonstration in which a closed tube partially filled with air had its end in a container of water.[2] The expansion and contraction of the air caused the position of the water/air interface to move along the tube.
    [Show full text]
  • 2-Minute Stories Galileo's World
    OU Libraries National Weather Center Tower of Pisa light sculpture (Engineering) Galileo and Experiment 2-minute stories • Bringing worlds together: How does the story of • How did new instruments extend sensory from Galileo exhibit the story of OU? perception, facilitate new experiments, and Galileo and Universities (Great Reading Room) promote quantitative methods? • How do universities foster communities of Galileo and Kepler Galileo’s World: learning, preserve knowledge, and fuel • Who was Kepler, and why was a telescope Bringing Worlds Together innovation? named after him? Galileo in Popular Culture (Main floor) Copernicus and Meteorology Galileo’s World, an “Exhibition without Walls” at • What does Galileo mean today? • How has meteorology facilitated discovery in the University of Oklahoma in 2015-2017, will History of Science Collections other disciplines? bring worlds together. Galileo’s World will launch Music of the Spheres Galileo and Space Science in 21 galleries at 7 locations across OU’s three • What was it like to be a mathematician in an era • What was it like, following Kepler and Galileo, to campuses. The 2-minute stories contained in this when music and astronomy were sister explore the heavens? brochure are among the hundreds that will be sciences? Oklahomans and Aerospace explored in Galileo’s World, disclosing Galileo’s Compass • How has the science of Galileo shaped the story connections between Galileo’s world and the • What was it like to be an engineer in an era of of Oklahoma? world of OU during OU’s 125th anniversary.
    [Show full text]
  • Galileo's Two New Sciences: Local Motion
    b. Indeed, notice Galileo’s whole approach here: put forward a hypothesis, develop a mathe- matical theory yielding striking predictions that are amenable to quasi-qualitative tests! c. But the experiments were almost certainly too difficult to set up in a way that would yield meaningful results at the time G. Mersenne's Efforts and the Lacuna: 1633-1647 1. Mersenne, perhaps provoked by a remark in Galileo's Dialogue, sees a different way of bridging any lacuna in the evidence for claims about free-fall: measure the distance of fall in the first second -- in effect g/2 -- the constant of proportionality in s î t2 a. Galileo's remark: objects fall 4 cubits in first sec, which Mersenne knew to be way too small b. Galileo himself calls attention to a lacuna in the argument for the Postulate in the original edition of Two New Sciences [207] c. If stable value regardless of height, and if it yields reasonable results for total elapsed times, then direct evidence for claim that free fall uniformly accelerated 2. Fr. Marin Mersenne (1588-1648) a professor of natural philosophy at the University of Paris, a close friend of Gassendi and Descartes, and a long time correspondent and admirer of Galileo's a. Deeply committed to experimentation, and hence naturally tried to reproduce Galileo's exper- iments, as well as to conduct many further ones on his own, in the process discovering such things as the non-isochronism of circular pendula b. Relevant publications: Les Méchanique de Galilée (1634), Harmonie Universelle (1636), Les nouevelles pensées de Galilée (1639), Cogitata Physico-Mathematica, Phenomena Ballistica (1644), and Reflexiones Physico-Mathematica (1647) c.
    [Show full text]
  • Thinking Outside the Sphere Views of the Stars from Aristotle to Herschel Thinking Outside the Sphere
    Thinking Outside the Sphere Views of the Stars from Aristotle to Herschel Thinking Outside the Sphere A Constellation of Rare Books from the History of Science Collection The exhibition was made possible by generous support from Mr. & Mrs. James B. Hebenstreit and Mrs. Lathrop M. Gates. CATALOG OF THE EXHIBITION Linda Hall Library Linda Hall Library of Science, Engineering and Technology Cynthia J. Rogers, Curator 5109 Cherry Street Kansas City MO 64110 1 Thinking Outside the Sphere is held in copyright by the Linda Hall Library, 2010, and any reproduction of text or images requires permission. The Linda Hall Library is an independently funded library devoted to science, engineering and technology which is used extensively by The exhibition opened at the Linda Hall Library April 22 and closed companies, academic institutions and individuals throughout the world. September 18, 2010. The Library was established by the wills of Herbert and Linda Hall and opened in 1946. It is located on a 14 acre arboretum in Kansas City, Missouri, the site of the former home of Herbert and Linda Hall. Sources of images on preliminary pages: Page 1, cover left: Peter Apian. Cosmographia, 1550. We invite you to visit the Library or our website at www.lindahlll.org. Page 1, right: Camille Flammarion. L'atmosphère météorologie populaire, 1888. Page 3, Table of contents: Leonhard Euler. Theoria motuum planetarum et cometarum, 1744. 2 Table of Contents Introduction Section1 The Ancient Universe Section2 The Enduring Earth-Centered System Section3 The Sun Takes
    [Show full text]
  • A Phenomenology of Galileo's Experiments with Pendulums
    BJHS, Page 1 of 35. f British Society for the History of Science 2009 doi:10.1017/S0007087409990033 A phenomenology of Galileo’s experiments with pendulums PAOLO PALMIERI* Abstract. The paper reports new findings about Galileo’s experiments with pendulums and discusses their significance in the context of Galileo’s writings. The methodology is based on a phenomenological approach to Galileo’s experiments, supported by computer modelling and close analysis of extant textual evidence. This methodology has allowed the author to shed light on some puzzles that Galileo’s experiments have created for scholars. The pendulum was crucial throughout Galileo’s career. Its properties, with which he was fascinated from very early in his career, especially concern time. A 1602 letter is the earliest surviving document in which Galileo discusses the hypothesis of pendulum isochronism.1 In this letter Galileo claims that all pendulums are isochronous, and that he has long been trying to demonstrate isochronism mechanically, but that so far he has been unable to succeed. From 1602 onwards Galileo referred to pendulum isochronism as an admirable property but failed to demonstrate it. The pendulum is the most open-ended of Galileo’s artefacts. After working on my reconstructed pendulums for some time, I became convinced that the pendulum had the potential to allow Galileo to break new ground. But I also realized that its elusive nature sometimes threatened to undermine the progress Galileo was making on other fronts. It is this ambivalent nature that, I thought, might prove invaluable in trying to understand crucial aspects of Galileo’s innovative methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Vision of the Senses in the Work of Galileo Galilei
    Perception, 2008, volume 37, pages 1312 ^ 1340 doi:10.1068/p6011 Galileo's eye: A new vision of the senses in the work of Galileo Galilei Marco Piccolino Dipartimento di Biologia, Universita© di Ferrara, I 44100 Ferrara, Italy; e-mail: [email protected] Nicholas J Wade University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland, UK Received 4 December 2007 Abstract. Reflections on the senses, and particularly on vision, permeate the writings of Galileo Galilei, one of the main protagonists of the scientific revolution. This aspect of his work has received scant attention by historians, in spite of its importance for his achievements in astron- omy, and also for the significance in the innovative scientific methodology he fostered. Galileo's vision pursued a different path from the main stream of the then contemporary studies in the field; these were concerned with the dioptrics and anatomy of the eye, as elaborated mainly by Johannes Kepler and Christoph Scheiner. Galileo was more concerned with the phenomenology rather than with the mechanisms of the visual process. His general interest in the senses was psychological and philosophical; it reflected the fallacies and limits of the senses and the ways in which scientific knowledge of the world could be gathered from potentially deceptive appearances. Galileo's innovative conception of the relation between the senses and external reality contrasted with the classical tradition dominated by Aristotle; it paved the way for the modern understanding of sensory processing, culminating two centuries later in Johannes Mu« ller's elaboration of the doctrine of specific nerve energies and in Helmholtz's general theory of perception.
    [Show full text]