DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix F. Airport Land Use Compatibility Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix F. Airport Land Use Compatibility Report AIRPORT LAND USE F COMPATIBILITY REPORT T OR ITY REP L TIBI A MP O ND USE C A T L OR P R APPENDIX F: AI Please see the next page. City of San Luis Obispo General Plan Update, Land Use & Circulation Element (LUCE) Airport Land Use Compatibility Report - DRAFT November 22, 2013 As updated June 2014 (see enclosed errata for overview of updates included) Intentionally Left Blank City of San Luis Obispo Airport Land Use Compatibility Report Errata Sheet This errata sheet describes modifications to the finalized Airport Land Use Compatibility Report that clarify information or update data. Editorial changes such as sentence structure, word choice, punctuation, use of acronyms, spacing, style, spelling and capitalization have also been made, but are not recorded. Page Description E‐1 Clarification regarding forecasts. 2 Clarification regarding Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP). 5 Update to Figure 1‐3 – Study Area. 6 Clarification regarding GIS mapping of Airport Land Use Commission’s (ALUC’s) Draft Dimensional Detail of Airport Safety Zones document and submittal and review of City’s General Plan by the ALUC. 11 Clarification of California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook safety zone configurations. 14 Clarification regarding density and intensity and compatibility with airport activities. 38 FAA Terminal Area Forecast (TAF) shown in Table 5‐1 was updated to reflect operational numbers released in January, 2014. 39 Forecast numbers updated in narrative to reflect FAA TAF operational numbers released in January, 2014. 41 FAA TAF numbers shown in Table 5‐2 were updated to reflect operational numbers released in January, 2014. 59 Update to Figure 8‐2 – Existing Land Uses. 66 Clarification regarding GIS mapping of ALUC’s Draft Dimensional Detail of Airport Safety Zones document. 67 Update to Figure 8‐4 – GIS‐Mapped ALUP Safety Zones Compared to Handbook Safety Zones. 68 Clarification regarding GIS mapping of ALUC’s Draft Dimensional Detail of Airport Safety Zones document. 70 Update to Table 9‐1 to reflect recommendation to use California Airport Land Use Handbook density and land use surrounding airport. Johnson Aviation 1 City of San Luis Obispo Airport Land Use Compatibility Report Intentionally Left Blank Johnson Aviation 2 City of San Luis Obispo Airport Land Use Compatibility Report - DRAFT Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 1 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Study Area ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Relationship to Airport Land Use Plan .......................................................................................... 6 2 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY CRITERIA ..................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Noise ............................................................................................................................................. 7 2.2 Safety ............................................................................................................................................ 9 2.3 Safety Compatibility Zones ......................................................................................................... 10 2.4 Density ........................................................................................................................................ 14 3 SAN LUIS OBISPO REGIONAL AIRPORT FACILITIES .............................................................................. 16 3.1 Existing Facilities ......................................................................................................................... 16 3.2 Planned Facilities ........................................................................................................................ 18 4 SAFETY AND AIRSPACE PROTECTION .................................................................................................. 23 4.1 Air Traffic Procedures at SBP ...................................................................................................... 27 4.2 Accidents at SBP .......................................................................................................................... 27 4.3 Safety Zone Adjustment Factors ................................................................................................. 33 5 AIRPORT OPERATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 35 6 AIRPORT NOISE ................................................................................................................................... 42 6.1 SBP Master Plan EA/EIR Noise Analysis Review .......................................................................... 43 6.2 Airport Land Use Plan Noise Analysis Review ............................................................................. 50 6.3 Existing and Projected Noise Environment at SBP ...................................................................... 51 7 AIR TRAFFIC OVER-FLIGHT .................................................................................................................. 53 8 ZONING AND LAND USE ...................................................................................................................... 57 8.1 Existing City Zoning and Land Use............................................................................................... 57 8.2 Existing Land Use within ALUP Safety Zones .............................................................................. 61 9 RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................................................................................... 68 Johnson Aviation i City of San Luis Obispo Airport Land Use Compatibility Report - DRAFT List of Figures Figure 1-1 – San Luis Obispo Regional Airport FAA-Approved Airport Layout Plan ..................................... 3 Figure 1-2 – Airport Area Specific Plan ......................................................................................................... 4 Figure 1-3 – Study Area ................................................................................................................................. 5 Figure 2-1 – California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook Safety Compatibility Zones for GA Runways .................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 2-2 – California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook Safety Compatibility Zones applied to SBP 13 Figure 3-1 - Existing Airport Facilities ......................................................................................................... 17 Figure 3-2 - Planned Airport Facilities ......................................................................................................... 19 Figure 3-3 – SBP Master Plan Update Capital Improvement Program ....................................................... 20 Figure 3-4 – Activity Levels Required for Development ............................................................................. 21 Figure 4-1 – Runway Safety Areas and Part 77 Surfaces ............................................................................ 26 Figure 4-2 - IFR Procedures at SBP .............................................................................................................. 30 Figure 4-3– Accident Locations at SBP ........................................................................................................ 32 Figure 5-1 – SBP Master Plan Update Forecast .......................................................................................... 36 Figure 5-2–SBPEA/EIR Annual Average Daily Aircraft Operations .............................................................. 37 Figure 5-3 – SBPEA/EIR Day/Evening/Night Split ........................................................................................ 37 Figure 5-4 – Comparison of Forecasts at SBP ............................................................................................. 39 Figure 6-1 - Caltrans Handbook Noise Compatibility Criteria Alternatives ................................................ 43 Figure 6-2 – SBPEA/EIR 2023 Proposed Action CNEL Noise Contours ........................................................ 46 Figure 6-3 – SBPEA/EIR 2004 and 2023 CNEL Noise Contours.................................................................... 47 Figure 6-4 - Roadways and Intersections within Airport Influence Area .................................................... 49 Figure 6-5 – Projected Noise Contours for the 60dbCNEL, 65dbCNEL, and 70dbCNEL .............................. 52 Figure 7-1 – SBP Departure Tracks used for EA/EIR Noise Modeling ......................................................... 55 Figure 7-2 – SBP Arrival Tracks used for EA/EIR Noise Modeling ..............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SERVICE (Aerospace Corp.', ,E'" Eduna-P AIR Clif.) 100. P HC A05/9
    SERVICE(NIASA-cx-152005) (Aerospace ACorp.', STUDY ,E'"OF OMMUIXeduna-P CAIR N7721l Clif.) 100. p HC A05/9; A04. SC 01C Uca G3/03 37064 / A • HEAEROSPACE CORPORATION NASA CR- 152005 A STUDY OF COMMUTER AIR SERVICE By F.W. Belina and L.R. Bush June 1977 f Distribution of this report is provided in the interest of information exchange. Responsibility for the contents resides in the author or organization that prepared it. Prepared under Contract No. NASZ-9380 by THE AEROSPACE CORPORATION El Segundo, California for AMES RESEARCH CENTER NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION REPRODUCED BY NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OFCOMMERCE SPRINGFIELD, V 22161M A STUDY OF COMMUTER AIR SERVICE Approved by S. Sokoisky, Director H. Bernstein, Group Director, Systems Planning Off e, Transportation Grou Transportation Group ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Appreciation is extended to Mr. Thomas Galloway, NASA Technical Monitor and Mr. Mark Waters, NASA Alternate Technical Monitor for their assistance and guidance during the study. Of special importance, however, were the contributions of Messrs. Tom Miles and Martin Macy of the Commuter Airline Association of America and the key personnel of the following commuter and certificated air carriers: Air Carolina Metro Airlines Air Midwest (Certificated) Midstate Airlines Air New England (Certificated) New England Airlines Air Wisconsin Pilgrim Airlines Alaska Aeronautical Puerto Rico International Airlines Altair Airlines Rio Airways Antilles Air Boats Rocky Mountain Airways Atlantic City Airlines Royal Hawaiian Airways Bar Harbor Airlines Scenic Airlines Cascade Airways Seaplane Shuttle Transport Catalina Airlines SMB Stagelines Cochise Airlines Swift Aire Lines Cumberland Airlines Sky West Aviation Execuair Airlines Suburban Airlines Florida Airlines Tyee Airlines Golden West Airlines Zia Airlines Without their excellent cooperation, this study would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Airline Distribution, 2016 - 2021
    The Future of Airline Distribution, 2016 - 2021 By Henry H. Harteveldt, Atmosphere Research Group CONTENTS 3 INTRODUCTION 5 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 HOW SHOULD AIRLINES PREPARE TO SERVE THE AIRLINE TRAVELER OF 2021? 26 TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION AND THE EVOLVING TECHNOLOGY LANDSCAPE 29 AIRLINE DISTRIBUTION IN 2021 70 CONCLUSION 72 ENDNOTES © 2016 International Air Transport Association. All rights reserved. 2 INTRODUCTION Introduction from Atmosphere Research Atmosphere Research Group is honored to have Airlines that want to become true retailers are once again been selected by IATA to prepare this well-positioned to do so. Carriers have an abun- report on the future of airline distribution. We dance of technologies, including cloud comput- believe that the five-year timeframe this report ing, artificial intelligence, and mobility, that they covers – 2016 to 2021 – will see the successful can use to help them bring their products to mar- introduction of true retailing among the world’s ket in more meaningful ways. IATA’s NDC, One airlines and their distribution partners. Order, and NGISS initiatives are being brought to market to help airlines be more successful busi- This report reflects Atmosphere Research’s in- nesses. As each airline independently contem- dependent and objective analysis based on our plates its distribution strategies and tactics, we extensive industry and consumer research (for hope this report will serve as a helpful resource. more information about how the research was conducted, please refer to the “Research Method- ology” section). © 2016 International Air Transport Association. All rights reserved. 3 Future of Distribution Report 2016-2021 Introduction from IATA In 2012 IATA commissioned Atmosphere Research Game changes are prompted by consumer needs, to conduct a survey on the Future of Airline Dis- or by the ability to offer new solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • SAP Crystal Reports
    MILWAUKEE MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MONTHLY DATA - December 2019 PASSENGERS LNDG WT MAIL FREIGHT AIRLINE ENP DEP TOTAL SHARELANDGS INT'L OLTS SCREENED LBS SHARE ENP DEP TOTAL ENP DEP TOTAL ACP JETS 0 0 00.00% 0 0 0 0 00.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AERO WAYS, INC. 0 0 00.00% 1 0 0 0 15,7000.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AIR CANADA 1,224 1,153 2,3770.42% 35 2,377 0 1,224 1,645,0000.42% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AIR CARGO CARRIERS, IN 0 0 00.00% 26 0 0 0 678,0770.17% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALASKA AIRLINES, INC. 4,702 4,919 9,6211.71% 31 0 0 4,702 4,830,0001.24% 91 744 835 934 961 1,895 AMERICAN AIR CHARTER 0 0 00.00% 1 0 0 0 27,1000.01% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC 34,434 33,930 68,36412.16% 501 0 0 34,434 41,339,41210.65% 40,636 45,533 86,169 4,971 8,077 13,048 BERRY AVIATION, INC. 0 0 00.00% 2 0 0 0 51,5880.01% 0 0 0 0 0 0 CASTLE AVIATION 0 0 00.00% 2 0 0 0 7,4600.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 CHRONO AVIATION, INC. 0 0 00.00% 1 0 0 0 16,7650.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 CREAM CITY 0 0 00.00% 26 0 0 0 182,6240.05% 0 0 0 0 0 0 CSA AIR, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Charter Report - 2019 Prospectuses
    CHARTER REPORT - 2019 PROSPECTUSES Beginning Number of Type of Aircraft Charter Operator Carrier Origin Destination Date Ending Date Remarks/Indirect Carrier Flights & No. of Seats Embraer 135 19-001 Resort Air Services RVR Aviation (air taxi) DAL-89TE LAJ-DAL-89TE 2/22/2019 12/15/2019 94 w/30 sts New England Air Transport Inc. PILATUS PC-12 19-002 JetSmarter Inc. (air taxi) FLL MYN 2/8/2019 2/8/2019 1 w/6 guests Hawker 800 w/8 19-003 JetSmarter Inc. Jet-Air, LLC (air taxi) FLL HPN 3/3/2019 3/3/2019 1 guests Gulfstream G200 w/10 19-004 JetSmarter Inc. Chartright Air Inc. (air taxi) FLL YYZ 3/7/2019 3/7/2019 1 guests Domier 328 Jet Ultimate Jetcharters, LLC dba w/30sts/ Ultimate Jet Shuttle Public Ultimate JETCHARTERS, LLC Embraer 135 Jet 19-005 Charters Inc.(co-charterer) dba Ultimate Air Shuttle CLT PDK 2/25/2019 2/24/2020 401 w/30 sts Citation C J2 19-006 JetSmarter Inc. Flyexclusive, Inc. (air taxi) ORL TEB 3/30/2019 3/30/2019 1 w/6 guests Phenom 300 19-007 JetSmarter Inc. GrandView Aviation (air taxi) JAX MTN 3/24/2019 3/24/2019 1 w/7 guests Aviation Advantage/E-Vacations Corp Boeing 737-400 19-008 (co-charterer) Swift Air SJU-PUJ-POP-etc PUJ-SJU-CUN-etc 6/3/2019 8/3/2019 50 w/150 sts Boeing 737-400 19-009 PrimeSport Southwest Airlines BOS ATL 2/1/2019 2/4/2019 50 w/150 sts CHARTER REPORT - 2019 PROSPECTUSES Delux Public Charter, LLC EMB-135 w/30 19-010 JetBlue Airways Corporation dba JetSuite X (commuter) KBUR-KLAS-KCCR-etc KLAS-KBUR-KCCR-etc 4/1/2019 7/1/2019 34,220 sts Glulfstream IV- 19-011 MemberJets, LLC Prine Jet, LLC (air taxi) OPF-TEB-MDW--etc TEB-OPF-PBI-etc 2/14/2019 12/7/2019 62.5 SP w/10 sts Phenom 300 19-012 JetSmarter Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility of Establishing a Commuter Airline System in South Dakota
    South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Electronic Theses and Dissertations 1976 Feasibility of Establishing a Commuter Airline System in South Dakota Thomas C. Hruby Follow this and additional works at: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd Recommended Citation Hruby, Thomas C., "Feasibility of Establishing a Commuter Airline System in South Dakota" (1976). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 4950. https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/4950 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ESTABLISHING A COMMUTER FEASIBILITY OF AIRLINE SYSTEM SOUTH DAKOTA IN BY THOf!AS C. HRUBY A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science, !·!ajor in Economic�, South Dakota State University 1976 SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY ,,./ FEASIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING A COMi�UTER AI RLINE SYSTE1" IN SOUTH DAKOTA This thesis is approved as a creditable and independent investigation by a cand idate for the de�ee, Master of Science, and is acceptable for meeting the thesis requirements for this degree . Acceptan ce of this thesis does no t imply that the conclusions reached by the candidate are necessarily the conclusions of the major department. Thesis Adviser Date -- L/Afead , Economics D�tment Date ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would be terribly remiss if I didn't properly acknowledge some of the individuals who were instrumental in assisting me in the completion of this research .
    [Show full text]
  • General Mitchell International Airport
    GENERAL MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MONTHLY DATA: JULY 2015 PASSENGERS LNDG WT SHARE MAIL FREIGHT AIRLINES ENP DEP TOTAL MKT SHR LANDGS INT'L OLTS SCREENED LBS % ENP DEP TOTAL ENP DEP TOTAL ACP JETS 0 0 0 0.00% 1 0 0 0 22,000 0.01% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AERO CHARTER 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AERODYNAMICS 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AEROMEXICO 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AIRCRAFT MGMT GROUP 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AIR GEORGIAN 1,344 1,474 2,818 0.46% 48 2,818 0 1,344 2,256,000 0.57% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AIR INDIA 0 0 0 0.00% 1 0 0 0 524,000 0.13% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AIR PARTNER 0 0 0 0.00% 1 0 0 0 31,800 0.01% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AITHERAS AVIATION 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALASKA AIRLINES 2,136 2,129 4,265 0.70% 31 0 0 2,136 2,323,667 0.59% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALBATROS AIRCRAFT CORP 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALLEGIANT 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AMERICAN AIR CHARTERS 0 0 0 0.00% 1 0 0 0 27,100 0.01% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AMERICAN AIRLINES 11,268 11,633 22,901 3.75% 91 0 0 11,268 11,844,000 2.98% 0 0 0 1,446 7,076 8,522 AMERICAN EAGLE/ENVOY 99 99 198 0.03% 2 0 0 99 85,098 0.02% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AMERICAN EAGLE/EXP JET 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AMERICAN EAGLE/MESA 2,065 2,108 4,173 0.68% 31 0 0 2,065 2,296,100 0.58% 0 0 0 9 0 9 AMERICAN EAGLE/REPUBLIC 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AMER EAGLE/SKYWEST 6,273 5,961 12,234 2.00% 147 0 0 6,273 6,909,000 1.74% 0 0 0 321 1,610 1,931 AMERISTAR JET CHARTER 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 AVCENTER INC 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Bell
    Flagstaff • Ash Fork • Cameron Camp Verde • Clarkdale • Cottonwood Grand Canyon • Gray Mountain • Jerome Page • Sedona * S^ligman • Williams Mountain Bell Telephone Dircck-ry Area Code 602 July 1971 Write in the telephone numbers you will need in emergency numbers case of emergency. Obtain your "fire," "police," and "sheriff" numbers from the list on this page. fit "=~7 fire police sheriff ^ or dial "OPERATOR" in any Dept. of Public Safety emergency and say for example Highway Patrol 774-4561 "I want to report a fire at —" or • to report an accident "I want a policeman at—." ask operator for Enterprise 123 If you cannot stay office at the telephone, doctor tell the "•PERATOR" home © the exact location where help is needed. ambulance - ^ O G1 Flagstaff 774-0631 > all other exchanges call directory assistance party line warning: It is unlawful under penalty offline or the use of a party line on pretext that an emergency exists. imprisonment for any person willfully to refuse to immediately The law defines an "emergency" as a situation in which prop• yield or surrender the use* of a party line to another person for erty or human life is in jeopardy and the prompt summoning the purpose of permitting such other person to report a fire of aid is essential. or summon police, medical or other aid in case of emergency. annoyance or malicious calls and improper language— Likewise, it is unlawful for any person to ask for or request see call-guide 8. n localities 1 localities -f %jJ*a/"^ fii»-tije-\x police sherifsheriff dial operator ask for Northern
    [Show full text]
  • Charters 2019.Xlsx
    CHARTER REPORT - 2019 PROSPECTUSES Beginning Number of Type of Aircraft Charter Operator Carrier Origin Destination Date Ending Date Remarks/Indirect Carrier Flights & No. of Seats Embraer 135 19-001 Resort Air Services RVR Aviation (air taxi) DAL-89TE LAJ-DAL-89TE 2/22/2019 12/15/2019 94 w/30 sts New England Air Transport Inc. PILATUS PC-12 19-002 JetSmarter Inc. (air taxi) FLL MYN 2/8/2019 2/8/2019 1 w/6 guests Hawker 800 w/8 19-003 JetSmarter Inc. Jet-Air, LLC (air taxi) FLL HPN 3/3/2019 3/3/2019 1 guests Gulfstream G200 w/10 19-004 JetSmarter Inc. Chartright Air Inc. (air taxi) FLL YYZ 3/7/2019 3/7/2019 1 guests Domier 328 Jet Ultimate Jetcharters, LLC dba w/30sts/ Ultimate Jet Shuttle Public Ultimate JETCHARTERS, LLC Embraer 135 Jet 19 -005 Charters Inc.(co-charterer) dba Ultimate Air Shuttle CLT PDK 2/25/2019 2/24/2020 401 w/30 sts Citation C J2 19-006 JetSmarter Inc. Flyexclusive, Inc. (air taxi) ORL TEB 3/30/2019 3/30/2019 1 w/6 guests Phenom 300 19-007 JetSmarter Inc. GrandView Aviation (air taxi) JAX MTN 3/24/2019 3/24/2019 1 w/7 guests Aviation Advantage Inc Boeing 737-400 19-008 E-Vacations Corp (co-charterer) Swift Air SJU-PUJ-POP-etc PUJ-SJU-CUN-etc 6/3/2019 8/3/2019 50 w/150 sts Boeing 737-400 19-009 PrimeSport Southwest Airlines BOS ATL 2/1/2019 2/4/2019 50 w/150 sts CHARTER REPORT - 2019 PROSPECTUSES Dulux Public Charter, LLC EMB-135 w/30 19-010 JetBlue Airways Corporation dba JetSuite X (commuter) KBUR-KLAS-KCCR-etc KLAS-KBUR-KCCR-etc 4/1/2019 7/1/2019 34020 sts Glulfstream IV- 19-011 MemberJets, LLC Prine Jet, LLC (air taxi) OPF-TEB-MDW--etc TEB-OPF-PBI-etc 2/14/2019 12/7/2019 62.5 SP w/10 sts Phenom 300 19-012 JetSmarter Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Chris Brady's Non-British Safety Card Collection Available for Trade For
    Chris Brady's Non-British Safety Card Collection List date: 19/05/2021 Available for trade for British Cards Total 2257 cards Aircraft type Code or description Year (un-named operator) 12 cards B 707 Nov 82 S.P.E.product 1982 BAe 111 200 B & W Beech 23, 24, 76 BO 105 11"x7.5" B&W laminated DC 6B N37571 DHC 6 6"x12" DHC 6 300 EC 155 25210 ©2005 Safeair Inc G-73 Mallard P180 Avanti REF.PGO-107-5-2-93 (CSI) 1993 PA 31 350 Navajo Typed on A4 paper S 76 Spirit CSI 1984 bifold 6.5"x11" 1984 (un-named operator) Canadien 1 cards BAe 748 Bifold card Typo-Press Timmins (un-named operator) German 1 cards GA Commander 862025-517F (10x17cm B&W card) Adria 2 cards CRJ DC 9 82 A4 Adria Airways 2 cards BAe 111 500 DC 9 30/50 bifold 1988 AeBal 1 cards DC 9 / B717 Bifold Aegean Airlines 1 cards Page 1 of 108 Aircraft type Code or description Year BAe 146 /RJ100 "Avro RJ 100" Aero Arctic Helicopter 3 cards Bell 204 REF B24-47-2-7-89 (CSI) 1989 Bell 206 JetRanger REF.206-47-11-7-89 (CSI) 1989 Bell 206L LongRanger REF. 26L-47-8-7-89 (CSI) 1989 Aero California 1 cards DC 9 10 Orig. 2/02 2002 Aero Continente s.a. 1 cards B 727 100 trifold 1999 Aero Lyon 1 cards DC 10 30 AEY-DOC-011 2001 Aero Peru 1 cards B 727 100 1.06.29.073.00/UG PL-CL 1999 Aero Virgin Islands 1 cards DC 3 Aeroflot 23 cards A 320 Valid from 17.01.2020 2020 A 330 Valid from 01.07.2016 2016 AN 2 tall vintage paper folder AN 24B tall vintage paper folder IL 62 A4 plastic red borders IL 62 white "3AO NPP" IL 86 6.5"x10" white IL 86 7"x11" white 2003 IL 86 A4 red & white IL 96 300 Skyteam 2003
    [Show full text]
  • Summer July 2015 #60
    1 15 YEARS WITHOUT A DELAY! A newsletter for the employees, families and friends of the Old Frontier Airlines We are FLamily! SUMMER JULY 2015 #60 The above item is from the May/June 1964 SUNLINER NEWS. It was preceded by an article in the October 1963 issue of the newsletter which detailed Joe’s courageous story. It is reprinted on page 3. Joe retired from Frontier in 1984 after 38 years of service as an aircraft mechanic in DEN. His story reminds us once again that life is full of heroes, often quiet and unassuming, but they are all around us - we need only stop and listen to find them. The Feb/Mar 1978 issue of the FRONTIER NEWS has another report on Joe: “I waited until I was blind before I learned to ski,” says Aircraft Technician Joe Pasqua, “and now I’m a champion.” In more ways than one. An employee of the company for 30 years, Pasqua is a man who’s good at his job (in the tire and wheel shop) and almost anything else he takes on. Through the efforts of the Denver International Airport Lions Club, a fund raising organization whose members are associated with Stapleton, he took up skiing four years ago at Loveland. See Page 5 2 The FRONTIER NEWS is published quarterly and dedicated to ex-employees, friends, family and fans of the “old” Frontier Airlines which “died” on August 24, 1986 and was “buried” on May 31, 1990. It is a non-profit operation. All income goes into keeping the NEWS going.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins of Airline Deregulation Act of 1978
    Transportation Research Record B03 1 Economic Regulation of Air Service to Small Communities: Origins of Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 SAMUEL EWER EASTMAN In 1-947 the Civil Aeronautics Board (CABI created a new class of certificated ship to these elements and to the character and air carriers subject to federal regulation of rates and routes and eligible for sub­ quality of the service produced. sidy-the feeder Oater to become local servicel air carriers. The purpose was to provide air service to small communities. During the years up to the passage Later, in the area cases that were concerned with of the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978, the CAB sought to balance pressure the actual award of feeder routes to particular car­ for more service and more points served against pressure to hold down rising riers, the CAB was to limit service eligible for subsidy costs. They did this by improving or strengthening the local's route mail pay subsidy to two round trips per day over the structure. In a parallel development to the creation of the local service carriers, route awarded, though the examiners had recommended in 1952 the CAB formalized the transportation provided by the thousands of fixed-base operators that provide on-demand charter service (and some sched­ against such a severe restriction (_£, pp. 1-3) • uled servicel to small communities by issuing Part 298 of its economic regula­ tions. Part 298 established air taxis as air carriers but exempted them from Aircraft Type rate and route regulation subject to a basic limitation that they could not op­ erate aircraft that exceeded 12 500 lb gross weight (about one-half the size of The examiners' report showed that the traffic poten­ a DC-3).
    [Show full text]
  • Use CTL/F to Search for INACTIVE Airlines on This Page - Airlinehistory.Co.Uk
    The World's Airlines Use CTL/F to search for INACTIVE airlines on this page - airlinehistory.co.uk site search by freefind search Airline 1Time (1 Time) Dates Country A&A Holding 2004 - 2012 South_Africa A.T. & T (Aircraft Transport & Travel) 1981* - 1983 USA A.V. Roe 1919* - 1920 UK A/S Aero 1919 - 1920 UK A2B 1920 - 1920* Norway AAA Air Enterprises 2005 - 2006 UK AAC (African Air Carriers) 1979* - 1987 USA AAC (African Air Charter) 1983*- 1984 South_Africa AAI (Alaska Aeronautical Industries) 1976 - 1988 Zaire AAR Airlines 1954 - 1987 USA Aaron Airlines 1998* - 2005* Ukraine AAS (Atlantic Aviation Services) **** - **** Australia AB Airlines 2005* - 2006 Liberia ABA Air 1996 - 1999 UK AbaBeel Aviation 1996 - 2004 Czech_Republic Abaroa Airlines (Aerolineas Abaroa) 2004 - 2008 Sudan Abavia 1960^ - 1972 Bolivia Abbe Air Cargo 1996* - 2004 Georgia ABC Air Hungary 2001 - 2003 USA A-B-C Airlines 2005 - 2012 Hungary Aberdeen Airways 1965* - 1966 USA Aberdeen London Express 1989 - 1992 UK Aboriginal Air Services 1994 - 1995* UK Absaroka Airways 2000* - 2006 Australia ACA (Ancargo Air) 1994^ - 2012* USA AccessAir 2000 - 2000 Angola ACE (Aryan Cargo Express) 1999 - 2001 USA Ace Air Cargo Express 2010 - 2010 India Ace Air Cargo Express 1976 - 1982 USA ACE Freighters (Aviation Charter Enterprises) 1982 - 1989 USA ACE Scotland 1964 - 1966 UK ACE Transvalair (Air Charter Express & Air Executive) 1966 - 1966 UK ACEF Cargo 1984 - 1994 France ACES (Aerolineas Centrales de Colombia) 1998 - 2004* Portugal ACG (Air Cargo Germany) 1972 - 2003 Colombia ACI
    [Show full text]