LAKE NIPISSING SUMMIT 2012 REPORT

The following document outlines the discoveries after the-two day Summit including notes taken during the World Café regarding questions on the future of Lake Nipissing.

The 2012 Lake Nipissing Summit was a conference-style event designed to create an awareness and consensus on the need for shared ownership towards the future of Lake Nipissing. Bringing together members of the communities surrounding the lake, this event provided knowledge and background information on the lake and its current status, as well as provided a voice for all participants on the major issues of Lake Nipissing. The summit was focused on three major pillars: social, environmental and economic. The summit was the first step towards a brighter future of Lake Nipissing through shared accountability and collaborative efforts.

Included in this report you will find the demographics of those who attended the summit, responses and outcomes from the World Café and survey results of the effectiveness of the summit.

We would like to take this opportunity to thank all of the sponsors of the Lake Nipissing Summit for contributing to its success and helping start the conversation towards a brighter future for Lake Nipissing.

2

DEMOGRAPHICS All parties were invited to attend the Lake Nipissing Summit. Below outlines the demographics of the participants.

Leaders 19% 5% 8% Students 10% Education/Faculty 12% General Public 18% Tourism Industry 10% Economic Industry 8% 10% Environmental Industry Government

Examples of people/organizations that fall under the following categories:

Leaders Mayor from the communities surrounding Lake Nipissing Students Nipissing University/Canadore College students, high school students Education/Faculty Professors, Interim President of Nipissing University, Biological technologist General Public Retired public members, concerned citizens, other Tourism Industry Cottage association owners and operators, Resorts, Camp Directors Economic Industry Economic Partners Environmental Industry Conservation s Authority, Greening Nipissing, Ministry of the Environment FRi Ecological Services Government Ministry of Tourism, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, OPP, NOTO First Nations Chief, Councilors, Nipissing First Nation, Union of Indians,

3

WORLD CAFÉ

A World Café is a conference format that allows all participants a voice on the selected topic. It is founded on the assumption that people have the capacity to work together, no matter who they are and what backgrounds and knowledge they have.

We put leaders, stakeholders, tourism operators, general public and students into one room and gave them three questions surrounding Lake Nipissing to discuss at round tables. One person at each table was asked to volunteer to be the table ‘host’. The role of the host was crucial to the success of the World Café as their purpose was to efficiently take notes of the conversations that took place. Each of the three questions was given two rounds of 15 minutes each. Before the second round of each question, participants moved to a different table, except the ‘host’. The ‘host’ recapped what the previous group had discussed. In the end, the recorded conversations included everyone’s voice.

QUESTION 1 In order to benefit the future of Lake Nipissing from a social, economic and environmental standpoint, what opportunities can we see that would increase knowledge and awareness about the lake?

Themes that arose from this question are noted below and the number in brackets beside each topic indicate the number of participants that felt this was in their top 3 choices for most important of all the questions and themes.

Education: primary through to university (8) Central Data Warehouse available to all (10) Future Summits/Committees (3) Ministry of Natural Resources participation (6) Join the Eastern Fisheries Restoration Project (1)

4

What would increase knowledge and awareness? 12 10 10 8 8 6 6 4 3 2 1 0 Education Central Data Future Summits MNR Join EGBFRP

After a review of the comments from the World Café, it was clear that education and having information available to all was of main concern. Individuals not directly involved with the daily decisions and information about Lake Nipissing feel they are not educated enough to know what the real, and most immediate, needs are. On the other side, those that are aware of the issues feel they have no outlet to communicate this information to the public. Potentially including this information in the secondary and post-secondary schools curriculum was also discussed.

The media was another topic that was discussed and how they can play a role in the distribution of information.

While having future summits was among the top 5 themes, it was noted that there are issues that require immediate attention and don’t necessarily require ample discussions and debates with a large group, but rather actions among many smaller groups.

Overall, there was a general consensus that everyone wants to be more informed. From youth to retired professionals the feeling was that it is vital that we begin to share information and work together towards a brighter future for Lake Nipissing.

A complete list of notes from Question 1 can be found in Appendix A.

5

Question 2

In moving forward towards a brighter future for Lake Nipissing from a social, economic and environmental standpoint, what needs our immediate attention?

Themes that arose from this question are noted below and the number in brackets beside each topic indicate the number of participants that felt this was in their top three choices for most important of all the questions and themes.

Regulations – e.g. fishing licenses, reduction of harvest, fisheries control (14) Educating the public, communicating – ACTION (18) Development of a communications plan (4) Funding more studies – e.g. Spiney flea, creel count, algae (10) Ministry of Natural Resources participation (9) Pollution Monitoring (1)

What needs our immediate attention? 20 18 16 18 14 12 14 10 10 8 9 6 4 4 2 1 0 Regulations Educating the Communications Funding Studies MNR Pollution Public Plan Monitoring

Although a different question was posed, conversations seemed to arise about educating the public and having a more transparent system when sharing information, which indicated its importance. Various potential solutions were discussed regarding altering regulations but they were generally outside the scope of the participants’ expertise to formulate an actionable item. It was clear that conversations needed to continue in an alternative environment with experts in order to reassess current regulations and how they are managed.

A complete list of notes from Question 2 can be found in Appendix B.

6

Question 3 How can we support each other in taking the next steps? What unique contribution can we each make?

Themes that arose from this question are noted below and the number in brackets beside each topic indicated the number of participants that felt this was in their top three choices for most important of all the questions and themes.

Set-up committee and additional summits (7) Outreach to stakeholders communicating the issues (9) Co-Management (18) Accountability – collaboration on Lake Nipissing Fisheries Management Plan (7) One voice (8) How can we support each other? 20 18 18 16 14 12 10

8 9 8 6 7 7 4 2 0 Committee Outreach Co-Management Accountability One Voice

Co-management was a strong theme for a response as to how the public will be able to support each other. Although, after the discussion on this topic it was clear that individuals have various interpretations of what the term ‘co-management’ means. Setting up a committee and having additional summits was among the top five themes from question three. Suggestions of having a group of individuals with representatives from each sector and department in order to get a truly informative and well rounded opinion of the health of the lake was another popular topic.

A complete list of notes from Question 3 can be found in Appendix C.

7

Overall Results

The following demonstrates the complete list of results from the World Café that were compiled and assessed:

100

90

80 86

70 73

60

50

40 40 40 30

20 23 20 18 10 15 12 12 13 5 5 0 A B C D E F G H I J K L M

Legend:

A Media Involvement B Education and Research (secondary, post-secondary and public) C Volunteers D Committee/Annual Meeting/Leadership Group needed E Environmental Issues F Enforcement/Management G Biology/Funding Studies H Regulations I Sharing Information/Accountability/Cooperation and Co-Management J Ministry of Natural Resources – More presence K Partnerships L Tourism M Communication Plan/Action Plan

8

Conclusion

With the overall analysis of the results, sharing information and co-management was the top reoccurring theme among all questions during the World Café. Participants each had their top concerns and immediate needs but without a clear overall awareness of the lake, decisions cannot be made. During discussions issues and topics were brought forth that many were unaware of, although extremely important.

It is clear that there is a common theme among participants – genuine concern of the health and future of Lake Nipissing. Immediate actions to improve the lake did not have a common theme however; creating committees that represent each sector equally in order to move actions forward was a common consensus among participants.

A survey was distributed to participants following the summit and results were positive and motivating as we move forward. A more complete analysis of results and the questions that were asked can be found in Appendix D.

The success of the Lake Nipissing Summit will be determined by how the information in this document is shared and acted on in the future. Chief Couchie closed the summit stating that, “We haven’t finished, we’ve just begun. I’ve witnessed us come together and have spoken about our heartfelt passions. There will be a report created from the Summit and in the immediate future we will call the leaders together and develop a suggested action plan and it send back to the group. We will commit to action.”

The plan moving forward is exactly what Chief Couchie said in her closing remarks. Actionable items will be determined that the leaders will then discuss and communicate to their regions. The strategy developed will bring together a variety of people and follow this report in order to address the issues that were of most concern to the public who attended the 2012 Lake Nipissing Summit. While it is in the beginning stages of action, it is a positive start in a brighter future for Lake Nipissing.

9

Appendix A

Details on the findings from Question 1 in support of the key themes

EDUCATION Approach Cogeco, advertising – comments from these experts on the lake. People would learn from these individuals Take advantage from university, they are offering (expertise) for research Education plays a great factor, TV station also school Problem we have to re-educate homeowners – expansion of homes-trailers Lack of enforcement for owners contaminating Lake Integrated local education curriculum that explores resources, culture, history – provides context for creating solutions (open minds) Elementary school (GNSC) kits, build on this Ensure all Ontario Curriculum links all school boards and schools Education about need to clean boards, etc. (invasive species) at boat launches Fact sheet etc. @lodges, resorts, outfitters etc. What are some best practices in other places Should have sustainable fisheries agreement similar to forestry, user funded formula Everybody needs to cut back if you’re not willing to might as well cut summit short NFN commercial fishing awareness Educational tools – curriculum, target audience rec. anglers Tourism awareness Opportunities – operators, signage at access points Youth are concerned about the environment, their ears are open, they need a forum they have the voice – start education young (build on game presented) Knowledge of various communities, organizations and stakeholders both locally and provincially. Relationship building (Economical too) More media coverage to get message out (social) Tourism, new models for businesses More communication around lake Downloadable app Need to reach entire comm. Fun event, public education, interactive, involve youth, create multimedia, social network Gord Miller - Environmental Commissioner of Ontario Stewardship council stuff for kids – Adults Lake Nip. Mascot, Wally the Walleye, Winnie, “Pat” Pete the pickerel Festival

10

Tie in with Canoe Festival Awareness of Fishery and ecosystem Make a short film on issues, documentary/educational School groups, education/awareness Film series of different issues Canadore students to direct/produce ie You tube, social media Guided tours (talk, history, changes) Visual experience, 1st person, ie 1st nation water walkers, Josephine Mandaamin Environmental cleanups (shoreline) Media: fishing/angling # of fishermen vs. ice fishing Weekly guest column – Nugget, Nipissing Reader, Nipissing News – and rotate between social, environmental, economic Cogeco – weekly ½ hour show or monthly Webpage Facebook page Q’s and A’s This is 2nd summit – need a grass roots educational drive

CENTRAL DATA WAREHOUSE AVAILABLE TO ALL

Make it mandatory for septic system Raised on the French – cottages and other areas probably doing the same Looking at shoreline /habitat Building inspector but we have no one that really inspects where septic system Independent, mutually support biologists studying the lake (holistic, thorough) Signage about the issue on the lake Sharing of research and efforts more broadly Central Warehouse of information Timing of information. Data communication. Management Hands On Ecosystem Management Experiences Nipissing Univ. Involvement in scientific research Website – info sharing – communication tool – education Info needs to be tailored to specific audiences – need that communications flow to break barriers (social & economic) Social media!!! Using it to get the word out ..attractive to youth Establish a database of people who want to know what is happening and help Lake Nipissing Information: sharing info among agencies, more research and collaboration, paleolimnology – historic changes in organisms.

11

Fast track strategy for messaging United message around the lake Challenge with messaging because fishing will be good

FUTURE SUMMITS/COMMITTEES

Each group have meetings – exchange ideas Looking at maybe volunteer updating of system PLAN FOR FUTURE – weather Access to waterways Development of local regulations on the fishery Building regulations collaboratively Focus on mutual prosperity More collaboration between stakeholders Governing body involving different interest groups Sector focus, Agriculture, Tourism, Industry Yearly conference like this Utilization of stewardship councils Independent & funded assessment team made up fisheries experts (scientists) More interaction between stakeholders Restructuring/re-engagement of ADFC, Anishnabeck Ontario Fisheries Resource Centre Hard decisions must be made sooner than later Multi-faceted leadership group with representation from community Create own entity, lake wide above current political structure or bring players together (economic) Social – action plan to move forward from meetings like this! Ppls need to come together more often to gain a true holistic view of the lake, the knowledge isn’t out there, knowledge based curriculum, local. Build understanding. Timelines and organizational group Harness local passion, knowledge and experience fir well being of the lake (enviro & economic) Continue to bring people together to establish momentum to get political attention to deal with issues on Lake Nipissing Engage volunteer groups Utilize University support, connect to programs and research Town hall meetings spring – late aril on waster, festival, Union of Ontario Indians Water Walk Strategy to continue this formal summit. Balanced committee, pooled resources, research

12

Working with community organizations, management among regimes Responsibility (economic, environmental) Declare emergency – united communities Put agendas aside and create interest group who can decide needs Form a body to take ideas forward

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES PARTICIPATION

We need more volunteers – MOE used to do a sample – no more funding – stopped MNR needs to participate in events like this Local involvement from gov’t as participant not just enforcement Outreach from gov’t on ways for environmentally friendly ways of upkeeping/upgrading waterfront properties (proactive vs. reactive) MNR must be an active participant Need for MNR role, need more support. Unity provides argument for this, productivity (Economic) Utilize MNR to establish procedures, processes for Nipissing stakeholders to use MNR Statement? Seek gov’t funding Working with federal agencies Provincial engagement/enforcement

13

APPENDIX B

Findings from Question 2

REGULATIONS

Lottery for huts – ie tags, on deer/moose Fishing license allows you to catch a set number of fish More promotion of conservation licenses Close ice fishing Look at fisheries regulations and cut angling limit significantly The lake cannot support a commercial fisheries – redirect to tourism Rotate slotsize and seasons Need “neighbourhood watch” concept Tourist operations need to police selves, collect data and educate clients and to track data to assist MNR CO’s Hatchery made aware of restocking problem – can we do it – vicious circle – no solution – prioritize what needs to be done 1sst Tighter control of ice fishing – no over night Crisis – reduce harvest province – First Nation Need flexibility to act on regulations to deal with Lake status Quota and slot size must be addressed Walleye fishery needs to be addressed to protect spawning fish Action plan to execute ie; forest industry, compliance issues, for all industries – ie low water level – blue/green algae/septic tanks in cottages Legislation /enforcement Update laws and regs in the province to remove “top dog” logic “normal farming practice” Drainage act Follow Lake of the Woods project New management approach More responsible regulations Fisheries control General health of the lake “mandatory” reporting of harvest Regs to protect fish to reach spawning size and angling regs Inspections of shoreline septic systems, agricultural practices, etc – other discharger

14

EDUCATING THE PUBLIC

Look for other communities – Lake Simcoe and follow suit Promoting catch and release Inform public to accept the situation High years/low years Education Tourism/economics – focus Today is the 1st day of your life – make it count – work together Lake Nipissing ecosystem must be better understood Education of the community Educating people - broadcasting summit – going into schools – radio – Nugget, Social Media ie Facebook Look for comments from public Facebook

DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMUNICATIONS PLAN

Communication – PR – high profile and public awareness Information with respect to the state of the Lake Nipissing must be communicated to lake users and decision makers Communications committee Co-operation/communication between Lake Nipissing stakeholders Communications/education to agricultural community Next steps – who drives the bus? Commitment to management, joint – lake wide, immediate Need more comments, get ministries involved more between each other Keep all members around the lake in the loop Geographic cohesiveness, following of standard policies and regulations Regular column in paper ex Nugget Common – comprehensive consensus point of view – affects on –economic – socially as well Not all municipalities and reserves are here and should be from here out Alternate marketing campaign for fish species (diversify harvest)

15

FUNDING MORE STUDIES

Restoring fish population, alter harvest immediately – cut down harvest or close for certain timeframe Study spiny water flea – what to do about it and what we know so far Continue monitoring – spiny, BGA Creel count – find a better way Create value in other species Protect young walleye – find a solution could be reduction of # of young walleye that can be caught Blue green algae, spiny water flea and decline in mature walleye need an action plan to address must be developed and implemented Creel counts – log catch Agricultural prosperity adjacent to watershed Review MSY and Quotas Warm water outflow from harbor front (pollution, concentration) Small problems need to be fixed - large problems need to be addressed ie; # of fishes coming out of lake Need good science freely available to all – up to date – current – independent biologist including First Nation information collected all year round More broad based approach to research, produce management plans holistically Need to be addressed urban issues like storm overflow Storm water management – 2 day/rain – no swimming – salt? – necessary – there are solutions but problems still remain $$funding – need new ideas – foundation – community Watershed thinking

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES PARTICIPATION

Joint enforcement – stronger Provincial regulation to be looked at Economic partnership with organization – Chamber of Commerce – MOE – business – Big MNR enforcement – many young fish coming up now – slot size fish still being harvested – stricter penalties – repeat offender Greater MNR participation and collaboration

16

POLLUTION MONITORING

Pollution issues – sewage checks – also an enforcement issue

APPENDIX C

Question 3

SET-UP COMMITTEE AND ADDITIONAL SUMMITS Each talk to your community about what is happening to the lake Each group identify someone who can sit on a committee Each group identify a need to be addressed Each group should realize other group needs and decide what they are willing to give up for the lake Need coordinating body – anglers, scientific and government Political advisory group Set up advisory committee for education on issues Support consensus ie; cod population Stick to it Realize long term goals Find a way to engage Set goals and milestones All mayors/councils be brought on board in order to communicate and agree on changes we have to have meetings Summit is unique – it is starting a good example Sub committees – maintain respect when different points of view are share An unbiased fisheries specialist group (apolitical) Inform ourselves, our neighbours, our groups that we are involved in Keep momentum going Develop matrix of contacts – who’s who – resources – from this group – to draw on for area meetings , media, communications, scientific, etc Continue talking Social events (make issues personal) Education for tourism operators Ongoing summit to (1 day/year) to allow info to be updated to community Mayors and FN should formalize a Lake Nipissing Interest group Establish a lobby group to promote the interests of the lake A lake summit to be established on a routine basis (1/yr) to exchange info

17

Outreach to stakeholders that are interested in the well being of the lake

OUTREACH TO STAKEHOLDERS COMMUNICATING THE ISSUES Everyone understand the need for give and take – collaboration Take it as your personal task to help the lake each day Political group send letter to MNR requesting their participation Political group discuss with Vic Fedeli and Jay Aspin Meet with Ministry of Environment Take ownership of the problem before its irreversible Educate, enforce – long term, have pamphlets Promote sustainable – chemicals, detergents Less lighting around the lake for shadflies Drama – might be having a stronger messages People/organizations – be able to give – not always take Need a gathering place ie Facebook page Next steps – matching funds with initiative – user fees - $$$ Creating additional recreation activities on the lake Need to educate – re garbage – fishing regulations, septic systems, FN treaty rights, Municipalities send out info through tax bills Alternate revenue generation – does not exhaust resources – crown land use on atv – bicycle trails Implementation of fishery hatchery Reach out to rod and gun clubs to educate on rights, science Ensuring sustainable opportunities (harvesting) Look outside the province for other models Leadership from NFN

CO-MANAGEMENT Include all organization not just NFN/municipalities, stakeholders, Chamber of Commerce, Tourism, Camp holders, universities, research organizations, conservation authorization provincial bodies From west to east – biggest area of water – North Bay – should be a moderator and provide leadership to get it going NFN has the chance to be the leader in starting this change Encompass all people/groups in decision – making (meetings) from Callander to West Arm – Save our Lakes

18

Support each other – unique contributions Everyone has to be willing to make a contribution (MNR) Co-manage fishery with FN’s Support each other with a unique contribution Co-management model – Easter Georgian Bay model – include Nipissing Trust Education Partnerships NFN and tourism Crisis – fisheries and management Recognition of Management systems Education advisory committee – educate public about the lake – educate municipal leaders Information shared between parties MNR/Greater Nipissing/NFN/etc

ACCOUNTABILITY – COLLABORATION ON LAKE NIPISSING FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Municipals looking into Melbourne principles for sustaining cities and we should follow suit Volunteer reduction in catch – ongoing until formal regulations come into effect We have to get past the blame stage Science has to be providing some solutions with scientific details- personal involvement and experience of lake (new also) Barriers – politics - $$$ - equal partners – good faith – democracy needed for larger forum Ice fishing – all take/no give – user fees on commercial shacks – has to stay on lake Catch reporting forms mandatory reporting form – ice fishing harvest accuracy Highlight what everybody is already doing – any gaps? Ie opportunities to support – overall sharing Stage 2 – invite everybody who wasn’t there ie’ MNR This is a good 1st step – willing to participate Share information and responsibility for the problem Compromise and creativity No organic bait (artificial bait only) Show NFN’s leadership and initiative (public awareness strategies) We need to work together – stakeholders – tourism – MNR – FN – OPG – etc Share perspectives between tourism – First Nations – value of other species Publicize names – enforcement – “restorative justice” concept works well – need to find ways to work with offenders Environmental/cultural protection Cultural/social identity of lake – respect of surroundings Communicate to fellow fishermen of factors contributing to decline of Nipissing Fishery – do not blame natives for harvesting or wasting less marketable species Return to own home and act as individual with choice of change

19

Responsibility on user Possible re-branding “managing in harmony with F.N.” – bring special attention – co management – info flow – try and change mentalities – re fisheries, rights Review regulations for next year – needs to be done now – this summer Collaboration on info – encourage participation by providing an economic, social benefit Accountability and publicity – positive support Surrounding communities need to respect self governing laws, regulations MNR transparency How is technology impacting lake

ONE VOICE Establish website, good science, interactive to add content, to see data (MNR) Each one/teach one Loud, united voice consensus and communication plan – proper representation Recognize the princiiple values Trust – education Pride in our lake Bridge the gap Best practice – who leads We must all take responsibility for the better good of the lake

20

APPENDIX D

Survey given to participants

1. What days did you attend? 2. How did you hear about this event? 3. How easy was the registration process for the summit? 4. Overall, are you satisfied with the online registration? Would you like to see other methods of registration in the future? 5. Did the World Cafe format make you feel like part of the conversation towards the future of the lake? (knowing that the report is soon to follow) 6. What would you consider was the most effective aspect of the Lake Nipissing Summit? 7. What could be done to improve the overall experience of the Lake Nipissing Summit? 8. Would you attend this event again? 9. Overall, were you satisfied with the conference, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied with it, or dissatisfied with it? 10. Comments?

Survey Results

A survey was distributed to all participants asking for their feedback on the organization and overall effectiveness of the summit. From those who responded the following was discovered:

62% of participants attended both days of the summit. Reasons for not attending both were mainly work related and prior commitments. Over half of the participants found out about the summit through word of mouth Almost 95% of participants found the World Café format effective in allowing everyone to have a voice. All but 1 person said that they would attend the Lake Nipissing Summit again Overall, 93.1% of participants were moderately to extremely satisfied with the overall format of the summit

When asked what the most effective aspect of the Lake Nipissing Summit was, the follow were among some of the responses:

Making people aware of the issues related to the lake and the viability of the fish populations. The World Cafe was great because it gave people an opportunity to be engaged in the discussion. The comments were displayed and open to all. I enjoyed the ability of the facilitator to keep the discussion on track, as this issue can sometimes be somewhat confrontational, especially between First Nations who are rights holders and priority users and local anglers/tourists.

21

Important to have both the research and the opinion side of the discussions to engender lively discussion of views at the world cafe. Hearing a variety of sources that ranged from academic scientific research presentations to anecdotal. The "World Cafe" was interesting and valuable. I like the way the groups were pre- structured by the organizers to include a diverse group. Good dialogue resulted between FN and non-FN. All Components of value I believe that the bringing together of different user groups so that each could hear the other's viewpoints and concerns about the lake was very important. This I believe is a very effective, and maybe the only, way, for people to understand how others utilize resources in and around the lake. The world cafe was an effective tool as well to allow everyone to have their say regarding what they feel are the most time-sensitive issues facing the health of the lake.

When asked what could be done to improve the Lake Nipissing Summit, the following comments were made: MNR involvement. Another Summit in one years time. more small group interaction Perhaps next year, the days could be blocked into themes, with both the talks and world cafe discussions following each "set of presentations" All stakeholders involved The discussion at the end could have been longer and maybe directed by topic (i.e. breaking down the issues and discussing issue by issue). Could the summit address other concerns regarding water quality and biodiversity as well as how to achieve a balanced approach for Lake Nipissing?

When asked for any additional comments, the following were some of the responses: It is an event that engages people about the health of our lake and opportunities to discuss some of the problems that need to be addressed. I hope that we will be able to make progress if all involved take a united stance. Chief Marianna and Mayor Al McDonald should be commended for organizing this important summit I enjoyed the summit, but there is still much work to be done, and action plans need to be established. While I felt the summit was an excellent start, I think the general public needs to be heard from---even if it might prove to be rather contentious. The public needs to see the whole

22

picture, not just their own point of view. That won't happen unless data (and the seriousness of the situation) is made public. The speakers were very educational and very competent especially Richard Rowe and Phil Hall . Mr. Reynolds, the tourism man had some constructive ideas about providing more activities for tourists besides fishing so as to have activities that would be of interest to all members of a family

23