DOCSLIB.ORG

Route 9 Corridor Study in Brookline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Route 9 Corridor Study in Brookline Route 9 Corridor Study in Brookline Route 9 Corridor Study in Brookline Project Manager Chen-Yuan Wang Project Principal Mark Abbott Data Analysts Chen-Yuan Wang Benjamin Erban Graphics Kenneth Dumas Kate Parker-O'Toole Kim DeLauri Cover Design Jane Gillis The preparation of this document was supported by the Federal Highway Administration through MPO Planning Contract #105757 and MPO §5303 Contract #102694 and #106374. Central Transportation Planning Staff Directed by the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization. The MPO is composed of state and regional agencies and authorities, and local governments. January 2020 (DRAFT) Route 9 Corridor Study in Brookline January 2020 To request additional copies of this document or copies in an accessible format, contact Central Transportation Planning Staff State Transportation Building Ten Park Plaza, Suite 2150 Boston, Massachusetts 02116 (857) 702-3700 (617) 570-9192 (fax) (617) 570-9193 (TTY) [email protected] ctps.org Page 2 of 92 Route 9 Corridor Study in Brookline January 2020 Abstract The Route 9 Corridor Study in Brookline is one in a series of studies supported by the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization that address safety, mobility, and access on the Boston region’s roadways. This report identifies specific transportation issues and concerns in the Route 9 corridor in Brookline, Massachusetts; presents an in-depth analysis of multiple transportation-related factors, such as bicycle accommodation and safety at pedestrian crossings; proposes short- and long-term improvements to address the problems; and provides a vision for the corridor’s long-term development. Page 3 of 92 Route 9 Corridor Study in Brookline January 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Executive Summary .............................................................................. 9 Chapter 1—Introduction ....................................................................... 11 1.1 Study Background ................................................................... 11 1.2 Study Objectives ..................................................................... 11 1.3 Selection Procedure ................................................................. 12 1.4 Study Area and Data Collection ................................................... 13 1.5 Study Advisory Committee Meetings .............................................. 13 Chapter 2—Existing Conditions and Issues .............................................. 15 2.1 Corridor Overview .................................................................... 15 2.2 Transit Service ....................................................................... 15 2.3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities .................................................. 16 2.4 Issues and Concerns ................................................................ 17 2.4.1 Pedestrian Accommodation and Safety ................................ 17 2.4.2 Bicycle Accommodation and Safety..................................... 18 2.4.3 Transit Access and Safety ................................................ 18 2.4.4 Traffic Congestion and Safety ........................................... 19 2.4.5 On-Street Parking Issues ................................................. 19 2.4.6 Emergency Response and Operations ................................. 20 2.4.7 Potential Future Developments .......................................... 20 Chapter 3—Roadway Operations Analysis ............................................... 21 3.1 Daily Traffic Volumes ................................................................ 21 3.2 Intersection Traffic, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Volumes .......................... 21 3.2.1 Intersection Traffic and Pedestrian Volumes .......................... 22 3.2.2 Pedestrian Crossings on Route 9 ....................................... 23 3.2.3 On-Road Bicycle Volumes ............................................... 23 3.2.4 Heavy Vehicle Volumes................................................... 23 3.3 Intersection Capacity Analyses .................................................... 24 3.4 Roadway Travel Speeds ............................................................ 25 3.5 On-Street Parking Inventory and Analysis ....................................... 26 Chapter 4— Crash Data Analysis ........................................................... 29 4.1 Crash Locations and Crash Clusters .............................................. 29 Page 4 of 92 Route 9 Corridor Study in Brookline January 2020 4.2 Corridor and Intersection Crash Rates ............................................ 30 4.3 Collision Diagrams ................................................................... 31 4.4 Pedestrian and Bicycle Crashes ................................................... 31 4.5 Highway Safety Manual Methodology: Expected Crashes ..................... 33 Chapter 5—Proposed Improvements ....................................................... 37 5.1 Corridor Accommodation Analysis and Proposed Improvement Alternatives .......................................................................................... 37 5.1.1 Corridor Accommodation Objectives and Design Strategies ........ 37 5.1.2 Separated Bike Lane Design Options .................................. 38 5.1.3 Corridor Improvement Alternatives ...................................... 40 5.2 Route 9 from Washington Street To Sumner Road ............................. 42 5.2.1 Issues and Concerns ...................................................... 43 5.2.2 Proposed Short-Term Improvements ................................... 44 5.2.3 Proposed Long-Term Improvements ................................... 45 5.3 Route 9 from Sumner Road to Chestnut Hill Avenue ........................... 46 5.3.1 Issues and Concerns ...................................................... 47 5.3.2 Proposed Short-Term Improvements ................................... 48 5.3.3 Proposed Long-Term Improvements ................................... 48 5.4 Route 9 from Chestnut Hill Avenue to Reservoir Road ......................... 49 5.4.1 Issues and Concerns ...................................................... 50 5.4.2 Proposed Short-Term Improvements ................................... 51 5.4.3 Proposed Long-Term Improvements ................................... 51 5.5 Route 9 from Reservoir Road to Hammond Street .............................. 52 5.5.1 Issues and Concerns ...................................................... 52 5.5.2 Proposed Short-Term Improvements ................................... 53 5.5.3 Proposed Long-Term Improvements ................................... 54 5.6 Route 9 from Hammond Street to Newton City Line ............................ 55 5.6.1 Issues and Concerns ...................................................... 55 5.6.2 Proposed Short-Term Improvements ................................... 57 5.6.3 Proposed Long-Term Improvements ................................... 57 5.7 Overview of Proposed Long-Term Improvements Under Projected 2030 Traffic Conditions .................................................................... 59 Chapter 6— Summary and Recommendations ........................................... 61 Page 5 of 92 Route 9 Corridor Study in Brookline January 2020 TABLES Table 1 Potential for Safety Improvement ............................................... 35 Table 2 Comprehensive Costs of Crashes .............................................. 36 Table 3 Feasibility Analysis of Separated Bike Lane Design Options ............... 40 Table 4 Proposed Components in Corridor Improvement Alternatives ............. 41 FIGURES Figure 1 Study Area Map ................................................................... 63 Figure 2 Transit Services and Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities ...................... 64 Figure 3 Daily Traffic Volumes ............................................................. 65 Figure 4 Weekday AM Peak Hour Traffic and Pedestrian Volumes at Major Intersections ....................................................................... 66 Figure 5 Weekday PM Peak Hour Traffic and Pedestrian Volumes at Major Intersections ....................................................................... 67 Figure 6 Saturday Peak Hour Traffic and Pedestrian Volumes at Major Intersections ....................................................................... 68 Figure 7 Pedestrian Crossings during Peak Traffic Periods ........................... 69 Figure 8 On-Road Bicycle Volumes during Peak Traffic Periods ..................... 70 Figure 9 Heavy Vehicle Percentage during Peak Traffic Periods ..................... 71 Figure 10 Weekday AM Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analyses .................. 72 Figure 11 Weekday PM Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analyses .................. 73 Figure 12 Saturday Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analyses ........................ 74 Figure 13 Speed Regulations and Estimated 85th Percentile Speeds ................ 75 Figure 14 Crash Locations and Crash Clusters (MassDOT Crash Data 2013-15) .. 76 Figure 15 Separated Bike Lane Design Options .......................................... 77 Figure 16 Roadway Accommodation Improvement Alternatives: Route 9 between Washington Street and Cypress Street ........................................ 78 Figure 17 Roadway Accommodation Improvement Alternatives: Route 9 between Cypress Street and Sumner Road .............................................. 79 Figure 18-1 Roadway Accommodation Improvement Alternatives: Route 9 between Sumner Road and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Public Comments
    Arborway Parkways Improvement Project Public Comments Submitted via DCR Online Comment Portal deadline 11/6/2020 Time Comment First Last Address (City) State Zipcode 10/21/20 3:27 PM The 2 circles alternative is the one that I prefer (followed by the 1 circle, then no circle designs). Roundabouts are a safer intersection design compared to a signalized intersection and should be used to Domenic Privitera Boston MA 02120 improve the safety of the Arborway. 10/22/20 10:18 AM 1. The paths should not be shared use. With E‐bikes, micro mobility, cargo bikes, accessible conveyances, and pedestrians wearing ear buds and not able to hear an approaching bicyclist, there will be crashes if Anne Lusk Brookline MA 02445‐6756 it is shared use due to speed differentials and widths of cargo/Fun2Go/child carrier bikes. 2. Bicyclists should not be on a path beside the traffic while the pedestrians have paths with wide green spaces by the homes, trees, and lawns. Riding beside the sound, mobile source air pollution, and dust from fast moving vehicles is not pleasant or healthy, Also, on a two way path, bicyclists riding with approaching vehicular traffic on their right would not be comfortable. At night, the intense and direct‐beam LED bike lights would be confusing to drivers who would see a beam of light approaching on their right. 3. The bicyclists should be shaded by trees, especially with hot summers, and for 24 hour riding, have continuous lighting directly over the two way bike path. The lighting should not be from the tall cobra head for the road because tree limbs obstruct the light from reaching the bike path, creating light and dark sections on the pathway.
    [Show full text]
  • Brookline Compplan 0201.Qxd
    Brookline Comprehensive Plan 2005–2015 Town of Brookline CREDITS BOARD OF SELECTMEN PLANNING BOARD Robert L. Allen, Jr., Chair Kenneth Goldstein, Chair Joseph T. Geller Mark Zarillo, Clerk Gilbert R. Hoy, Jr. Linda Hamlin Michael Merrill Stephen Heiken Michael S. Sher Jerome Kampler Richard Kelliher, Town Administrator COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMMITTEE Joseph T. Geller, Co-Chair | Board of Selectman Robert L. Allen, Jr., Co-Chair | Board of Selectman Michael Berger | Advisory Committee, Town Meeting Member (TMM) Precinct 16 Dorothy Blom | Future Search/League of Women Voters of Brookline, TMM Precinct 10 Lawrence A. Chan | Citizen Suzanne de Monchaux | Future Search/League of Women Voters of Brookline Leslie Fabian | Brookline Housing Authority, TMM Precinct 11, Housing Advisory Board George Garfinkle | Preservation Commission Linda Hamlin | Planning Board Gary Jones | Board of Library Trustees, TMM Precinct 3 Jerry Katz | Chamber of Commerce Kevin Lang | School Committee, TMM Precinct 9 (former) Nancy Madden | Park & Recreation Commission, TMM Precinct 3 Shirley Radlo | Council on Aging, TMM Precinct 9 Michael Sandman | Transportation Board Roberta Schnoor | Conservation Commission, TMM Precinct 13 William L. Schwartz | Citizen, Transportation Board (former) Susan Senator | School Committee Martin Sokoloff | Citizen, Planning Board Member (former) Kathy A. Spiegelman | Housing Advisory Board Joanna Wexler | Conservation Commission (former), Greenspace Alliance Jim Zien | Economic Development Advisory Board FOCUS AREA WORK GROUPS MEMBERS Tony
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan for Planned Development Area No. 115
    HARVARD university Master Plan for Planned Development Area No. 115 Submitted Pursuant to Article 80 of the Boston Zoning Code Harvard Enterprise Research Campus SubmiƩ ed to: Boston Redevelopment Authority d/b/a the Boston Planning & Development Agency SubmiƩ ed by: Harvard University With Technical Assistance From: DLA Piper Reed Hilderbrand VHB WSP ALLSTON CAMPUS December 2017 Master Plan for Planned Development Area No. 115 Submitted Pursuant to Article 80 of the Boston Zoning Code Harvard Enterprise Research Campus Submitted to: Boston Redevelopment Authority d/b/a the Boston Planning and Development Agency Submitted by: Harvard University With Technical Assistance From: DLA Piper Reed Hilderbrand VHB WSP December 2017 Table of Contents Page 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Relationship to Framework Plan .................................................................................................... 2 3.0 PDA Area Description ........................................................................................................................ 2 4.0 The Proposed Project ........................................................................................................................ 2 5.0 Planning Objectives and Character of Development .................................................................... 4 6.0 Project Benefits ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How to Find Us: by Car
    HOW TO FIND US: BY CAR Tufts Medical Center is easily accessible by car from the Massachusetts Turnpike (Route 90), the Central Artery and the Southeast Expressway (Route 93). The hospital is located in downtown Boston—in Chinatown and the Theater District—and within walking distance of the Boston Common, Downtown Crossing and many hotels and restaurants. The main entrance for patients and visitors at Tufts Medical Center is 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111. Floating Hospital for Children is located at 755 Washington Street. Emergency services for adult as well as pediatric patients are located at the North Building, 830 Washington Street. Telephone driving directions are available by calling 617-636-5000, ext. 5 or visit www.tuftsmedicalcenter.org/directions. By cab and train: The hospital is a 15-to-20-minute cab ride from Logan Airport and within walking distance of South from from New Hampshire 93 95 New Hampshire Station. 128 and Maine 2 From the north (I-93 southbound): from 95 Western MA » 1 Take Exit 20 A (South Station) onto Purchase Street. Continue along Purchase Street (this becomes the Logan International TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER Airport Surface Artery). & FLOATING HOSPITAL from New York FOR CHILDREN » Turn right onto Kneeland Street. Go straight several blocks. » Turn left onto Tremont Street. The hospital’s garage is on 90 Boston Harbor your left, just past the Wang Theatre/Boch Center. 95 From the south (I-93 northbound): 93 128 » Take Exit 20 (Exit 20 is a two-lane ramp for I-90 East & from West, and South Station). 3 Cape Cod from Providence, RI » Stay left, following South Station/Chinatown signs.
    [Show full text]
  • Time Line Map-Final
    RAILROAD/TRANSIT HIGHWAY/BICYCLE/AIRPORT LEGISLATIVE Green Line to Medford (GLX), opened 2021 2021 2020 2019 Mass Central Rail Trail Wayside (Wayland, Weston), opened 2019 Silver Line SL3 to Chelsea, opened 2018 2018 Bruce Freeman Rail Trail Phase 2A (Westford, Carlise, Acton), opened 2018 Worcester CR line, Boston Landing Station opened 2017 2017 Eastern Massachusetts Highway/Transit/Bicycle/Airport Timeline Fitchburg CR line (Fitchburg–Wachusett), opened 2016 2016 MassPike tollbooths removed 2016 2015 Cochituate Rail Trail (Natick, Framingham), opened 2015, Upper Charles Rail Trail (Milford, Ashland, Holliston, Hopkinton), opened 2015, Watertown Greenway, opened 2015 Orange Line, Assembly Station opened 2014 2014 Veterans Memorial Trail (Mansfield), opened 2014 2013 Bay Colony Rail Trail (Needham), opened 2013 2012 Boston to Border South (Danvers Rail Trail), opened 2012, Northern Strand Community Trail (Everett, Malden, Revere, Saugus), opened 2012 2011 2010 Boston to Border Rail Trail (Newburyport, Salisbury), opened 2010 Massachusetts Department of TransportationEstablished 2009 Silver Line South Station, opened 2009 2009 Bruce Freeman Rail Trail Phase 1 (Lowell, Chelmsford Westford), opened 2009 2008 Independence Greenway (Peabody), opened 2008, Quequechan R. Bikeway (Fall River), opened 2008 Greenbush CR, reopened 2007 2007 East Boston Greenway, opened 2007 2006 Assabet River Rail Trail (Marlborough, Hudson, Stow, Maynard, Acton), opened 2006 North Station Superstation, opened 2005 2005 Blackstone Bikeway (Worcester, Millbury, Uxbridge, Blackstone, Millville), opened 2005, Depressed I-93 South, opened 2005 Silver Line Waterfront, opened 2004 2004 Elevated Central Artery dismantled, 2004 1 2003 Depressed I-93 North and I-90 Connector, opened 2003, Neponset River Greenway (Boston, Milton), opened 2003 Amesbury Silver Line Washington Street, opened 2002 2002 Leonard P.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present
    Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Redevelopment Authority D/B/A Boston Planning & Development Agency
    BOSTON REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY D/B/A BOSTON PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AGENCY SCOPING DETERMINATION 560-574 COMMONWEALTH AVENUE / 645-665 BEACON STREET (KENMORE HOTELS) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS FOR DRAFT PROJECT IMPACT REPORT (“DPIR”) PROPOSED PROJECT: 560-574 COMMONWEALTH AVENUE / 645-665 BEACON STREET (KENMORE HOTELS) PROJECT SITE: 1.07 ACRE AREA BOUNDED BY COMMONWEALTH AVENUE TO THE NORTH, BROOKLINE AVENUE TO THE SOUTHEAST, AND THE MASSACHUSETTS TURNPIKE TO THE SOUTH PROPONENT: MARK KENMORE LLC AND BUCKMINSTER ANNEX CORPORATION DATE: JUNE 20, 2018 The Boston Redevelopment Authority (“BRA”), d/b/a the Boston Planning & Development Agency (“BPDA”) is issuing this Scoping Determination pursuant to Section 80B-5 of the Boston Zoning Code (“Code”), in response to a Project Notification Form (“PNF”), which Mark Kenmore, LLC, and Buckminster Annex Corporation (the “Proponents”) filed on March 12, 2018 for the proposed 560-574 Commonwealth Avenue/645-665 Beacon Street project (the “Proposed Project”). Notice of the receipt by the BPDA of the PNF was published in the Boston Herald on March 12, 2018, which initiated a public comment period with a closing date of April 18, 2018. Pursuant to Section 80A-2 of the Code, the PNF was sent to the City’s public agencies/departments and elected officials on March 13, 2018. Hard copies of the PNF were also sent to all of the Impact Advisory Group (“IAG”) members. The initial public comment period was subsequently extended until May 1, 2018, through mutual consent between the BPDA and the Proponent to allow more time for the general public to provide comments and feedback. On May 30, 2017, in accordance with the BRA’s policy on mitigation as outlined in the Mayor’s Executive Order Relative to the Provision of Mitigation by Development Projects in Boston, Mark Development and Buckminster Annex Corporation submitted a Letter of Intent to redevelop properties at 560-574 Commonwealth Avenue and 645-665 Beacon Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3—Existing Conditions: Bowker Overpass
    Massachusetts Turnpike Boston Ramps and Bowker Overpass Study December 2015 Chapter 3—Existing Conditions: Bowker Overpass 3.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the analysis of the Bowker Overpass sub-area of the Massachusetts Turnpike — Boston Ramps Study. As in Chapter 2, which discusses the larger study area, this section summarizes existing transportation conditions during a typical workday, emphasizing the peak-commuting hour. This section also reviews crash data and land use conditions. The Transit Data and Environmental Conditions provided in Chapter 2 apply to the Bowker Overpass sub-area of the study. 3.2 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Developing a base knowledge of current traffic conditions fosters an understanding of where congestion occurs now and where it likely would occur in the future. The first step in calculating traffic congestion requires using current or recent turning- movement and traffic counts. Traffic counts were obtained along the Massachusetts Turnpike between the Allston Tolls and Ted Williams Tunnel, and at specific intersections throughout the study area. The volumes used in this analysis are presented in Section 3.2.1. Section 3.2.2 summarizes system performance. 3.2.1 Existing (2010) Traffic Volumes The Bowker Overpass delineates the Back Bay and Fenway/Kenmore neighborhoods, and runs roughly along the Muddy Brook between the Emerald Necklace/Back Bay Fens and the Charles River Esplanade. It connects Boylston Street and Fenway with Storrow Drive over the Massachusetts Turnpike, Commonwealth Avenue, and Beacon Street (Figure 3-1). The Bowker is also known as the Charlesgate Overpass, as Charlesgate is the name of the roadway that the overpass carries.
    [Show full text]
  • 350 Boylston Street
    Project Notification Form 350 BOYLSTON STREET Submitted to: BOSTON REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY City Hall Square, 9th Floor Boston, MA 02201 Submitted by: THE DRUKER COMPANY, LTD. 50 Federal Street Boston, MA 02110 December 18, 2007 Project Notification Form 350 Boylston Street Submitted to: BOSTON REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY One City Hall Square Boston, MA 02201 Submitted by: THE DRUKER COMPANY, LTD. Prepared by: In Association with: EPSILON ASSOCIATES, INC. Pelli Clarke Pelli Architects 3 Clock Tower Place CBT Architects, Inc. Suite 250 Goulston & Storrs, P.C. Maynard, MA 01754 Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Haley & Aldrich, Inc. Nitsch Engineering, Inc. Weidlinger Associates, Inc. Cosentini Associates, Inc. Moriarty & Associates December 18, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 SUMMARY 1-1 1.1 Project Identification 1-1 1.2 Project Summary 1-3 1.2.1 Project Site 1-3 1.2.2 Proposed Development 1-3 1.2.3 Design Objectives 1-3 1.2.4 Public Review 1-7 1.2.5 Public Benefits 1-7 1.3 Consistency with Zoning 1-8 1.4 Legal Information 1-9 1.4.1 Legal Judgments Adverse to the Proposed Project 1-9 1.4.2 History of Tax Arrears on Property 1-9 1.4.3 Evidence of Site Control/Nature of Public Easements 1-9 1.5 Public Agencies 1-9 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2-1 2.1 Existing Site 2-1 2.2 Proposed Development Program 2-1 2.2.1 Building Program 2-1 2.2.2 Approximate Dimensions 2-1 2.3 Determination of Alternative Considered / Project History 2-2 2.4 Schedule 2-2 3.0 ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMPONENTS 3-1 3.1 Transportation 3-1 3.1.1 Introduction 3-1 3.2 Environmental Protection 3-4 3.2.1 Wind 3-4 3.2.2 Shadow 3-4 3.2.3 Daylight 3-5 3.2.4 Solar Glare 3-5 3.2.5 Air Quality 3-5 3.2.6 Stormwater/Water Quality 3-5 3.2.7 Flood Hazard Zones/Wetlands 3-6 3.2.8 Geotechnical/Groundwater 3-6 3.2.8.1 Existing Site Conditions 3-6 3.2.8.2 Subsurface Soil and Bedrock Conditions 3-6 3.2.8.3 Groundwater 3-7 3.2.8.4 Proposed Foundation Construction 3-8 2099/PNF/350 Boylston Street Page i Table of Contents Epsilon Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridging the Gaps in the Emerald Necklace: Route 9 to Brookline Avenue
    Bridging the Gaps in the Emerald Necklace: Route 9 to Brookline Avenue G.R.8 Engineers Inc. Tony Cennamo Allison Goulet Zach Shapiro Ryan St.Martin 1 BRIDGING THE GAPS IN THE EMERALD NECKLACE: Route 9 to Brookline Avenue Presented to: Peter Furth, Senior Design Project Professor April 2008 From: G.R.8. Engineers Inc. Tony Cennamo [email protected] Allison Goulet [email protected] Zach Shapiro [email protected] Ryan St.Martin [email protected] 2 Table of Contents List of Figures ........................................................................................................... ii Preface .....................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction .........................................................................................................3 2. Route Alternatives ...............................................................................................6 2.1 Netherlands Road.................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Brookline Avenue................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 River Road ............................................................................................................................. 9 2.4 Route 9 ................................................................................................................................ 11 3. Netherlands Road ..............................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Other Public Transportation
    Other Public Transportation SCM Community Transportation Massachusetts Bay Transportation (Cost varies) Real-Time Authority (MBTA) Basic Information Fitchburg Commuter Rail at Porter Sq Door2Door transportation programs give senior Transit ($2 to $11/ride, passes available) citizens and persons with disabilities a way to be Customer Service/Travel Info: 617/222-3200 Goes to: North Station, Belmont Town Center, mobile. It offers free rides for medical dial-a-ride, Information NEXT BUS IN 2.5mins Phone: 800/392-6100 (TTY): 617/222-5146 Charles River Museum of Industry and Innovation grocery shopping, and Council on Aging meal sites. No more standing at (Waltham), Mass Audubon Drumlin Farm Wildlife Check website for eligibility requirements. a bus stop wondering Local bus fares: $1.50 with CharlieCard Sanctuary (Lincoln), Codman House (Lincoln), Rindge Ave scmtransportation.org when the next bus will $2.00 with CharlieTicket Concord Town Center Central Sq or cash on-board arrive. The T has more Connections: Red Line at Porter The Ride Arriving in: 2.5 min MBTA Subway fares: $2.00 with CharlieCard 7 min mbta.com/schedules_and_maps/rail/lines/?route=FITCHBRG The Ride provides door-to-door paratransit service for than 45 downloadable 16 min $2.50 with CharlieTicket Other Commuter Rail service is available from eligible customers who cannot use subways, buses, or real-time information Link passes (unlimited North and South stations to Singing Beach, Salem, trains due to a physical, mental, or cognitive disability. apps for smartphones, subway & local bus): $11.00 for 1 day $4 for ADA territory and $5 for premium territory. Gloucester, Providence, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • G Vp How to Find Us: Public Transportation (Mbta)
    HOW TO FIND US: PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION (MBTA) STATE HOUSE PARK STREET BEACON STREET 93 SUMMER STREET RY TE DOWNTOWN CROSSING BOSTON CHARLES STREET T COMMON STREE TREMONT CENTRAL AR SOUTH WASHINGTON STREET STATION ESSEX STREET 90 BOYLSTON CHINATOWN PUBLIC GARDENS MASS TURNPIKE YLSTON STREET STREET CENTRAL AR BO KNEELAND HARRISON T STREET STUAR TREMONT STREET FLOATING HOSPITAL AVENUE TERY ARLINGTON STREET G TUFTS VP MEDICAL CENTER OAK STREET 93 90 MASS TURNPIKE The Tufts Medical Center Orange Line stop is located across from the main Tufts Medical Center entrance at 800 Washington Street. Other nearby MBTA stops are Downtown Crossing or South Station (Red Line) and Boylston (Green Line). We are also conveniently located within walking distance to bus lines 9, 11, 43, 55, and the Silver Line. By cab + train For transportation information online, Tufts Medical Center is a 15- to- 20-minute visit any of the following web sites: cab ride from Logan Airport and within • www.mbta.com : Complete listing of walking distance of South Station and the public transportation resources, including Back Bay train stations. Subway maps, bus schedules and maps or call Customer and commuter rail schedules are available Service at 617-222-3200. online at www.mbta.com. • www.smartraveler.com : Real-time traffic and transit information. 10714 012317 GETTING AROUND THE HOSPITAL CAMPUS CHINATOWN T T To South Station, Route 93 and Mass Pike Stuart Street T Kneeland Street To 75 Kneeland Street THEATRE DISTRICT Tufts 7th TUPPER 10th 35 KNEELAND University 15 KNEELAND et d e Dental R re eet Wilbur Theatre HNRC Av 711 WASHINGTON School St.
    [Show full text]