DOCSLIB.ORG

Bridging the Gaps in the Emerald Necklace: Route 9 to Brookline Avenue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bridging the Gaps in the Emerald Necklace: Route 9 to Brookline Avenue Bridging the Gaps in the Emerald Necklace: Route 9 to Brookline Avenue G.R.8 Engineers Inc. Tony Cennamo Allison Goulet Zach Shapiro Ryan St.Martin 1 BRIDGING THE GAPS IN THE EMERALD NECKLACE: Route 9 to Brookline Avenue Presented to: Peter Furth, Senior Design Project Professor April 2008 From: G.R.8. Engineers Inc. Tony Cennamo [email protected] Allison Goulet [email protected] Zach Shapiro [email protected] Ryan St.Martin [email protected] 2 Table of Contents List of Figures ........................................................................................................... ii Preface .....................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction .........................................................................................................3 2. Route Alternatives ...............................................................................................6 2.1 Netherlands Road.................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Brookline Avenue................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 River Road ............................................................................................................................. 9 2.4 Route 9 ................................................................................................................................ 11 3. Netherlands Road ..............................................................................................13 3.1 Traffic and Route Analysis................................................................................................... 14 3.2 Design of the Boston Side Path ........................................................................................... 15 3.3 Design of the Parkway Road Bike Paths.............................................................................. 17 3.4 Cost Estimate for Netherlands Area.................................................................................... 18 4. Crossing Brookline Avenue ................................................................................20 4.1 Traffic Analysis .................................................................................................................... 20 4.2 Design of Boston Side path.................................................................................................. 25 4.3 Design of Brookline Side path.............................................................................................. 26 4.4 Cost Estimate for Brookline Avenue .................................................................................... 26 5. River Road On/Off Ramp....................................................................................28 5.1 Traffic Analysis .................................................................................................................... 28 5.2 Design of River Road Path ................................................................................................... 30 5.3 Cost Estimate for River Road area....................................................................................... 32 6. Route 9...............................................................................................................33 6.1 Design of At‐Grade Path...................................................................................................... 33 6.2 Traffic Analysis for At Grade Path ....................................................................................... 35 6.3 Design of Footbridge over Route 9...................................................................................... 35 6.4 Design of Re‐Alignment of Curley Overpass........................................................................ 41 6.5 Traffic Analysis for Elevated Paths ...................................................................................... 43 6.6 Cost Estimate for At Grade crossing.................................................................................... 44 6.7 Cost Estimate for Footbridge............................................................................................... 44 6.8 Cost Estimate for Re‐Alignment of Curley Overpass ........................................................... 45 6.9 Cost Comparison for Route Alternatives ............................................................................. 46 7. Summary............................................................................................................47 References .............................................................................................................49 Acknowledgements................................................................................................50 Appendix A – Synchro Analysis ..............................................................................51 Appendix B – Footbridge........................................................................................72 Appendix C – Curley Overpass ...............................................................................80 Appendix D – Drawings..........................................................................................81 i List of Figures Figure 0.1 – Major bike paths in Boston .......................................................................................................1 Figure 0.2 – Existing paths along Riverway...................................................................................................2 Figure 1.1 – Breaks in the Emerald Necklace................................................................................................3 Figure 1.2 – Site map of major intersections................................................................................................4 Figure 2.1 – Route Alternatives for Netherlands Road Crossing ..................................................................6 Figure 2.2 – Olmsted’s historic staircase ......................................................................................................7 Figure 2.3 – Alternatives for crossing Brookline Avenue..............................................................................8 Figure 2.4 – Intersection of Parkway Road and Brookline Avenue...............................................................9 Figure 2.5 – Route Alternatives for River Road...........................................................................................10 Figure 2.6 – Riverway on/off ramps............................................................................................................10 Figure 2.7 ‐ Route 9 Alternatives ................................................................................................................11 Figure 2.8 – Existing crossing of Route 9 ....................................................................................................12 Figure 3.1 – Netherlands Road Final Design ...............................................................................................13 Figure 3.2 – AM and PM Peak Signalized Intersections..............................................................................14 Figure 3.3 – Existing Conditions and Proposed Design for Netherlands Road ...........................................15 Figure 3.4 – Chosen design for Netherlands Road......................................................................................16 Figure 3.5 – Side‐by‐side bike paths on Parkway Road ..............................................................................17 Figure 3.6 – Cost Estimate Chart for Netherlands Road Area Construction...............................................19 Figure 4.1 – Proposed Crossing for Brookline Avenue................................................................................20 Figure 4.2 – Improved Crossing at Brookline Avenue.................................................................................21 Figure 4.3 – Light Timing for Aspinwall Avenue and Parkway Road...........................................................22 Figure 4.4 – Light Stages for Brookline Avenue, Parkway Road, and Aspinwall Road................................23 Figure 4.5 – Time‐space Diagram for Brookline Avenue: Northbound and Southbound...........................24 Figure 4.6 – Final design for the Brookline Avenue crossings ....................................................................25 Figure 4.7 – Chart for cost estimate for Brookline Area Construction .......................................................27 Figure 5.1 – Proposed Path location...........................................................................................................28 Figure 5.2 – AM Peak Signalized Intersections for River Road ...................................................................29 Figure 5.3 – PM Peak Signalized Intersections for River Road....................................................................30 Figure 5.4 – AutoCAD or picture of River Road area ..................................................................................31 Figure 5.5 – Chart of estimated cost for River Road area construction .....................................................32 Figure 6.1 – AutoCAD of final design for the at Grade Path .......................................................................34 Figure 6.2 – Location of footbridge over Route
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Retail/Restaurant Opportunity Dudley Square
    RETAIL/RESTAURANT OPPORTUNITY 2262 WASHINGTON STREET DUDLEY ROXBURY, MASSACHUSETTS SQUARE CRITICALDates NEIGHBORHOODOverview MONDAY • DECEMBER 9, 2013 Distribution of Request for Proposals (RFP) • Located at the junction of Washington and Warren Streets with convenient access to Interstates 93 and 90 (Massachusetts Bid Counter • 26 Court Street, 10th floor Turnpike) Boston, MA • Dudley Square has a population of approximately 80,000 people and 28,000 households within a one mile radius • Retail demand and spending by neighborhood residents is upwards of $610 million annually TUESDAY • JANUARY 14, 2014 • Approximately $300 million in public/private dollars have been invested in the neighborhood since 2000 Proposer Conference • 2:00 P.M. Central Boston Elder Services Buliding • Dudley Square is within a mile of Boston’s Financial District, blocks away from the South End and is within walking distance to 2315 Washington Street Northeastern University, Roxbury Community College, Boston Medical Center and BU Medical School and in proximity to Mission Hill and WARREN STREET Roxbury, MA Jamaica Plain • Dudley Square Station is located adjacent to the site and provides local bus service that connects Dudley to the MBTA’s Ruggles Station MONDAY • FEBRUARY 10, 2014 Orange Line stop and Silver Line service to Downtown Boston. Dudley Square Station is the region’s busiest bus station and Completed RFP’s due by 2:00 P.M. averages 30,000 passengers daily SEAPORT BOULEVARD BACK BAY SUMMER STREET Bid Counter • 26 Court Street, 10th floor COMMONWEALTH
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Exempt Property in Boston Analysis of Types, Uses, and Issues
    Tax Exempt Property in Boston Analysis of Types, Uses, and Issues THOMAS M. MENINO, MAYOR CITY OF BOSTON Boston Redevelopment Authority Mark Maloney, Director Clarence J. Jones, Chairman Consuelo Gonzales Thornell, Treasurer Joseph W. Nigro, Jr., Co-Vice Chairman Michael Taylor, Co-Vice Chairman Christopher J. Supple, Member Harry R. Collings, Secretary Report prepared by Yolanda Perez John Avault Jim Vrabel Policy Development and Research Robert W. Consalvo, Director Report #562 December 2002 1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................3 Ownership........................................................................................................................3 Figure 1: Boston Property Ownership........................................................................4 Table 1: Exempt Property Owners .............................................................................4 Exempt Land Uses.........................................................................................................4 Figure 2: Boston Exempt Land Uses .........................................................................4 Table 2: Exempt Land Uses........................................................................................6 Exempt Land by Neighborhood .................................................................................6 Table 3: Exempt Land By Neighborhood ..................................................................6 Table 4: Tax-exempt
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Redevelopment Authority D/B/A Boston Planning & Development Agency
    BOSTON REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY D/B/A BOSTON PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AGENCY SCOPING DETERMINATION 560-574 COMMONWEALTH AVENUE / 645-665 BEACON STREET (KENMORE HOTELS) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS FOR DRAFT PROJECT IMPACT REPORT (“DPIR”) PROPOSED PROJECT: 560-574 COMMONWEALTH AVENUE / 645-665 BEACON STREET (KENMORE HOTELS) PROJECT SITE: 1.07 ACRE AREA BOUNDED BY COMMONWEALTH AVENUE TO THE NORTH, BROOKLINE AVENUE TO THE SOUTHEAST, AND THE MASSACHUSETTS TURNPIKE TO THE SOUTH PROPONENT: MARK KENMORE LLC AND BUCKMINSTER ANNEX CORPORATION DATE: JUNE 20, 2018 The Boston Redevelopment Authority (“BRA”), d/b/a the Boston Planning & Development Agency (“BPDA”) is issuing this Scoping Determination pursuant to Section 80B-5 of the Boston Zoning Code (“Code”), in response to a Project Notification Form (“PNF”), which Mark Kenmore, LLC, and Buckminster Annex Corporation (the “Proponents”) filed on March 12, 2018 for the proposed 560-574 Commonwealth Avenue/645-665 Beacon Street project (the “Proposed Project”). Notice of the receipt by the BPDA of the PNF was published in the Boston Herald on March 12, 2018, which initiated a public comment period with a closing date of April 18, 2018. Pursuant to Section 80A-2 of the Code, the PNF was sent to the City’s public agencies/departments and elected officials on March 13, 2018. Hard copies of the PNF were also sent to all of the Impact Advisory Group (“IAG”) members. The initial public comment period was subsequently extended until May 1, 2018, through mutual consent between the BPDA and the Proponent to allow more time for the general public to provide comments and feedback. On May 30, 2017, in accordance with the BRA’s policy on mitigation as outlined in the Mayor’s Executive Order Relative to the Provision of Mitigation by Development Projects in Boston, Mark Development and Buckminster Annex Corporation submitted a Letter of Intent to redevelop properties at 560-574 Commonwealth Avenue and 645-665 Beacon Street.
    [Show full text]
  • But How Do We Get to the Greenway?
    Proceedings of the Fábos Conference on Landscape and Greenway Planning Volume 4 Article 6 Issue 1 Pathways to Sustainability 2013 “But How Do We Get to the Greenway?”— A Multi-disciplinary, Multi-jurisdiction, Multimodal Strategy to Increase Connections to the Charles River Basin Cynthia Smith FASLA Vice President, Halvorson Design Partnership, Inc., Landscape Architecture and Planning, Boston MA Phil Goff EEDL AP Alta Planning + Design, Multi-modal Specialists, Boston, MA Christopher M. Greene RLA Senior Associates, Halvorson Design Partnership, Inc., Landscape Architecture and Planning, Boston MA Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/fabos Part of the Botany Commons, Environmental Design Commons, Geographic Information Sciences Commons, Horticulture Commons, Landscape Architecture Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, and the Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons Recommended Citation Smith, Cynthia FASLA; Goff, Phil LEED AP; and Greene, Christopher M. RLA (2013) "“But How Do We Get to the Greenway?”— A Multi-disciplinary, Multi-jurisdiction, Multimodal Strategy to Increase Connections to the Charles River Basin," Proceedings of the Fábos Conference on Landscape and Greenway Planning: Vol. 4 : Iss. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/fabos/vol4/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Fábos Conference on Landscape and Greenway Planning by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Smith et al.: Connections to the Charles River “But how do we get to the Greenway?”— a multi-disciplinary, multi-jurisdiction, multi- modal strategy to increase connections to the Charles River Basin Cynthia Smith, FASLA1, Phil Goff, LEED AP2, Christopher M.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Improvement Program Boston Water and Sewer Commission
    2017 - 2019 Capital Improvement Program Boston Water and Sewer Commission BOSTON WATER AND SEWER COMMISSION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2017-2019 Henry F. Vitale Executive Director November 2016 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Michael J. Woodall, Chair Muhammad Ali-Salaam, Commissioner Cathleen Douglas Stone, Commissioner Henry F. Vitale, Executive Director John P. Sullivan, P.E., Chief Engineer Paul Canavan, Director of Operations Stephen P. Shea, P.E., Director of Engineering Charlie Jewell, Director of Planning Irene McSweeney, P.E., Director of Construction Gerard Dwyer, Chief Administrative Officer Bonnie Gottschalk, General Counsel Nelson W. Piacenza, Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer Robert Capogreco, Director of Finance Prepared by the Finance Division ii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 1 DISCUSSION OF MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS .................................. 1 PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS ................................................................................................................. 5 PROJECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONSENT DECREE & WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS .... 6 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 9 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................. 9 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM EXPENDITURES ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Muddy River: a Century of Change
    The Muddy River: A Century of Change Tom Brady, Brookline Conservation Administrator, Tree Warden, Town Arborist 617-730-2088 or [email protected] Muddy River Flood Damage Reduction and Environmental Restoration Project A cooperative effort of the City of Boston, Town of Brookline, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Boston and Brookline, Massachusetts Emerald Necklace Parks Master Plan 1894 •Olmsted designed and built parks: Charlesgate, Back Bay Fens, Muddy River (now Riverway &Olmsted Park), and Franklin Park. •Olmsted designed and built Parkways:Fenway, Riverway, Jamaicaway, and Arborway. Sanitary Improvement of the Muddy River . to abate existing nuisances, avoid threatened dangers, and provide for the permanent, wholesome and seemly disposition of the drainage of the Muddy River Valley. and provide for Completing a Continuous Promenade from Boston Common to Jamaica Pond 1887 plan of the Back Bay Fens 1892 Plan of the Riverway shown over current conditions Developed by KZLA for the Emerald Necklace Conservancy Environmental Problems ∗ Accumulated sediment impacting aquatic and benthic habitats (High SOD, low DO). ∗ Contaminated sediments pose a risk to aquatic life and wildlife (metals, PCB’s, PAH’s). ∗ Invasive species (Phragmites) impacting riparian biodiversity and encroaching on open water. ∗ Aquatic weed (fanwort) infestation in the Fens. Flood Problems ∗ Widespread recent flooding - October 1996 and June 1998. ∗ Major damage to public and private buildings including flooding at numerous universities (Northeastern, Simmons, Emmanuel and Wentworth), the Museum of Fine Arts and many others. ∗ Major damage to the MBTA transit system. ∗ Primary causes are undersized culverts and channel restrictions. Kenmore Station closed for 2 months At peak in 1996 - river 11 feet higher than normal elevation.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Metropolitan Living Guide
    Boston Metropolitan Living Guide https://workandtravelgroup.com/stari/boston-massachusetts/ BOSTON LIVING ❏ Neighborhoods (City of Boston Official) ❏ A Guide to Boston's 23 Neighborhoods ❏ Boston Neighborhoods ❏ City of Boston (Livability) ❏ 9 Reasons to Move to Boston ❏ Cost of Living Calculator ❏ Tips for relocating to Boston TRANSPORTATION ❏ Getting Around (City of Boston Official) ❏ Boston-Plan Your Trip ❏ MBTA Public Transportation in Greater Boston ❏ MBTA Map ❏ Biking in Boston (City of Boston Official) FOOD ❏ Boston 50 Food Items Bucket List (Thrillist) ❏ 38 Essential Restaurants in Boston (Boston Eater) ❏ Highly rated fancy but affordable restaurants (Yelp) ❏ Best of Boston - 2018 Food (Boston Magazine) ❏ Coffee Lover’s Guide to Boston (Sprudge) ❏ Boston’s Best Breweries (Time Out) ❏ The Ultimate Boston Neighborhood Restaurant Guide (Boston.com) ENTERTAINMENT ❏ Boston Events ❏ Boston Calendar of Events ❏ Boston Central: Events for Kids and Families ❏ The Boston Calendar of Events That Don't Suck ❏ Boston Children’s Museum ❏ Time Out Boston Guide ❏ Boston Discovery Guide ❏ Asian in Boston ❏ Black in Boston ❏ Black Boston Events ❏ Caribbean in Boston ❏ Latino in Boston GET OUTSIDE! ❏ Blue Hills Reservation (hiking, biking, swimming, camping, boating, golfing, running, XC skiing, snowshoeing) ❏ Boston Nature Center and & Wildlife Sanctuary ❏ Boston Public Garden ❏ Canoe & Kayak on the Charles River ❏ Castle Island (historic Fort Independence, walking, biking, running, swimming, fishing) ​ ❏ Emerald Necklace Conservancy (Frederick
    [Show full text]
  • FENWAY Project Completion Report
    BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from Boston Public Library http://www.archive.org/details/fenwayprojectcomOObost 1983 Survey & Planninsr Grant mperty Of bGblu^ MT A.nTunKifv PART I -FENWAY Project Completion Report submitted August 31, 1984 to Massachusetts Historical Commission Uteary Boston Landmarks Commission Boston Redevelopment Authority COVER PHOTO: Fenway, 1923 Courtesy of The Bostonian Society FENWAY PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT Prepared by Rosalind Pollan Carol Kennedy Edward Gordon for THE BOSTON LANDMARKS COMMISSION AUGUST 1984 PART ONE - PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT (contained in this volume) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION Brief history of The Fenway Review of Architectural Styles Notable Areas of Development and Sub Area Maps II. METHODOLOGY General Procedures Evaluation - Recording Research III. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Districts National Register of Historic Places Boston Landmark Districts Architectural Conservation Districts B. Individual Properties National Register Listing Boston Landmark Designation Further Study Areas Appendix I - Sample Inventory Forms Appendix II - Key to IOC Scale Inventory Maps Appendix III - Inventory Coding System Map I - Fenway Study Area Map II - Sub Areas Map III - District Recommendations Map IV - Individual Site Recommendations Map V - Sites for Further Study PART TWO - FENWAY INVENTORY FORMS (see separate volume) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. METHODOLOGY General Procedures Evaluation - Recording Research III. BUILDING INFORMATION FORMS '^^ n •— LLl < ^ LU :l < o > 2 Q Z) H- CO § o z yi LU 1 L^ 1 ■ o A i/K/K I. INTRODUCTION The Fenway Preservation Study, conducted from September 1983 to July 1984, was administered by the Boston Landmarks Commission, with the assistance of a matching grant-in-aid from the Department of the Interior, National Park Service, through the Massachusetts Historical Commission, Office of the Secretary of State, Michael J.
    [Show full text]
  • Landmark Center Redevelopment 201 Brookline Avenue
    Landmark Center Redevelopment 201 Brookline Avenue Boston, Massachusetts Submitted to: Boston Civic Design Commission September 5, 2017 Proponent: Fenway Enterprises LLC on behalf of Landmark Center Ventures LLC Samuels & Associates 136 Brookline Avenue Boston, MA 02215 Prepared By: Elkus Manfredi Architects 25 Drydock Avenue Boston, MA 02210 Phase II Building Summary • Site Area: 383,072 sf • Gross Floor Area: 480,251 sf • Total Project Area: 1,896,507 sf (Includes above grade garage) • FAR: 4.95 • Building Height: 208’-6” • No. of Stories: 14 Stories • Shared Total Parking Spaces: Up to 1,500 +/- (Also serving 308,000 sf of retail and office in Landmark Center) SAMUELS & ASSOCIATES | ELKUS MANFREDI ARCHITECTS | SEPTEMBER 5, 2017 Back Bay Back Bay Site FULLERTON STREET PARK DRIVE BOYLSTON STREET Fenway/Kenmore South End BROOKLINE AVENUE Longwood Medical Area SAMUELS & ASSOCIATES | ELKUS MANFREDI ARCHITECTS | SEPTEMBER 5, 2017 BROOKLINE AVE. Site PARK DRIVE FULLERTON STREET SAMUELS SAMUELS & &ASSOCIATES ASSOCIATES | |ELKUS ELKUS MANFREDI MANFREDI ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTS | |SEPTEMBER SEPTEMBER 5, 5, 2017 2017 PAGE 3 Project History and Overview The Landmark project was previously reviewed and approval was granted in January 2014. Market conditions have changed considerably since 2014, prompting the proponent to reevaluate the previously approved project and propose changes to both the program and development plan. Portions of the project are moving forward as previously approved and are referred to as Phase I. The changes to the previously approved project being presented to BCDC in this submission are referred to as Phase II. A continuing main goal of the project is to enhance existing and create new pedestrian connections and experiences for the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston's Emerald Necklace Conservancy Announces Critical Restoration of Charlesgate Park As an Essential Link to Connect the E
    MEDIA CONTACT: Edwina A. Klünder 617.888.5859 [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Boston’s Emerald Necklace Conservancy announces critical restoration of Charlesgate Park as an essential link to connect the Emerald Necklace parks, Charles River Esplanade and Commonwealth Avenue Mall This transformational project is being realized in partnership with Charlesgate Alliance, Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation and Massachusetts Department of Transportation Left drawing: Charlesgate Park lies at the juncture of several regional park systems, including the Emerald Necklace, the Charles River Esplanade and the Charles River Reservation. Right drawing: Proposed improvements to Charlesgate Park would directly connect regional park systems like the Emerald Necklace and the Charles River Esplanade for the first time in more than half a century. Photo credit: Landing Studio Boston, MA June 11, 2020 – The Emerald Necklace Conservancy is announcing the re-envisioning of Charlesgate Park in Boston. This critical project will be a major improvement for urban recreation and public health, including a universally accessible children’s play area, one of the largest dog parks in the city, new pathways for bike and pedestrian use, the implementation of green infrastructure and resilience throughout including the completion of a major transportation link. Charlesgate Park, located at the intersection of Boston’s Back Bay, Fenway and Kenmore neighborhoods, was designed by Frederick Law Olmsted as the first part of the Emerald Necklace, connecting the Charles River Esplanade, Commonwealth Avenue Mall, several neighborhoods and the five-mile, six-park linear park system known as the Emerald Necklace. In the 1950s and 1960s, prioritization of road construction over parkland (Storrow Drive) compromised this once-idyllic space, overshadowing it with a highway overpass (Bowker Overpass), and dividing it with new roads and on- ramps, ultimately increasing pollution of the Muddy River and deteriorating the park’s usability.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Conservation & Recreation, Boston, MA | 2014
    Department of Conservation and Recreation dC r NPDES Storm Water Management Program Permit Year 11 Annual Report Municipality/Organization: Department of Conservation and Recreation EPA NPDES Permit Number: MARO43001 MaDEP Transmittal Number: Annual Report Number & Reporting Period: No. 11: April 2013— March 2014 Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES P11 Small MS4 General Permit Annual Report ) Part I. General Information Contact Person: Robert Lowell Title: Environmental Section Chief Telephone #: (617) 626-1340 Email: [email protected] Certification: I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction olsupervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on myinquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathing the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant pealties for submitting false information, includin the possibility of fine and imprisonment r knowing violations. Signature: Printed Name: John P. Murray Title: Commissioner Date: 30 2o ‘— 5/1/2014 Pa2e2 Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) NPDES Storm Water Management Program Permit Year 11 Annual Report For Coverage Under National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) Department of Conservation and Recreation 251 Causeway Street Suite 600 Boston, MA 02114-2104 Submittal: May 1, 2014 5/1/2014 Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES Storm Water Management Program Permit Year 11 Annual Report Municipality/Organization: Department of Conservation and Recreation EPA NPDES Permit Number: MAR043001 MaDEP Transmittal Number: Annual Report Number & Reporting Period: No.
    [Show full text]
  • NPS Deferred Maintenance by State and Park
    Facility Management Software System Data as of September 30th, 2018 NPS Deferred Maintenance by State and Park State Park Deferred Maintenance AK - Alaska Alagnak Wild River (ALAG) $0 Alaska Public Lands (ANCH) $180,980 Aniakchak National Monument & Preserve (ANIA) $50,588 Bering Land Bridge National Preserve (BELA) $944,618 Denali National Park & Preserve (DENA) $51,784,800 Gates Of The Arctic National Park & Preserve (GAAR) $922,236 Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve (GLBA) $13,009,732 Katmai National Park & Preserve (KATM) $9,910,310 Kenai Fjords National Park (KEFJ) $1,678,524 Klondike Gold Rush National Historical Park (KLGO) $4,880,947 Lake Clark National Park & Preserve (LACL) $1,882,240 Sitka National Historical Park (SITK) $2,782,145 Western Artic National Parklands (WEAR) $443,809 Wrangell - St Elias National Park & Preserve (WRST) $16,980,269 Yukon - Charley Rivers National Preserve (YUCH) $1,253,236 Total ► $106,704,434 AL - Alabama Birmingham Civil Rights National Monument (BICR) $1,300,000 Freedom Riders National Monument (FRRI) $527,000 Horseshoe Bend National Military Park (HOBE) $4,564,267 Little River Canyon National Preserve (LIRI) $2,088,637 Natchez Trace Parkway (NATR) $8,988,740 Russell Cave National Monument (RUCA) $560,821 Selma To Montgomery National Historic Trail (SEMO) $4,569,417 Tuskegee Airmen National Historic Site (TUAI) $2,427,661 Tuskegee Institute National Historic Site (TUIN) $3,175,032 Total ► $28,201,575 AR - Arkansas Arkansas Post National Memorial (ARPO) $3,335,883 Buffalo National River (BUFF)
    [Show full text]