Property Rental List 03-26-18.Xlsx

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Property Rental List 03-26-18.Xlsx PROPERTY RENTAL LIST Property Name Address Phone Number County Senior/Family Northern California 25 Sanchez 25 Sanchez Street (415) 522-0203 San Francisco Senior San Francisco, CA 94114 255 Woodside 255 Woodside Avenue (415) 682-7101 San Francisco Senior San Francisco, CA 94127 3850 18th Street 3850 18th Street (415) 872-9001 San Francisco Senior San Francisco, CA 94114 462 Duboce 462 Duboce Avenue (415) 703-0146 San Francisco Senior San Francisco, CA 94117 474 Natoma 474 Natoma Street (415) 541-9600 San Francisco Family San Francisco, CA 94103 Acorn Town Center & Couryards 1143 Tenth Street (510) 268-4917 Alameda Family Oakland, CA 94607 Alemany 938 Ellsworth Street (415) 285-2860 San Francisco Family San Francisco, CA 94110 Almaden Lake 978 Almaden Lake Drive (408) 323-8020 Santa Clara Family San Jose, CA 95123 Alta Torre 3895 Fabian Way (650) 493-4700 Santa Clara Senior Palo Alto, CA 94303 Alto Station Apts. 290 Camino Alto Court (415) 388 2337 Marin Family Mill Valley, CA 94941 Armstrong Place Senior 5600 3rd Street (415) 822-1260 San Francisco Senior San Francisco, CA 94124 Arroyo Point Apts. 1090 Jennings Avenue (707) 526-6141 Sonoma Family Santa Rosa, CA 95401 AvéVista Apartments 460 Grand Avenue (510) 628-0002 Alameda Family Oakland, CA 94610 Belvedere Place Apts. 162 Belvedere Street (415) 456-6243 Marin Family San Rafael, CA 94901 Casa Vista 55 Fairfax Street (415) 453-5531 Marin Family San Rafael, CA 94901 Centertown 855 C Street (415) 455-8141 Marin Family San Rafael, CA 94901 Chelsea Gardens Apts. 1220 McMinn Avenue (707) 526-6849 Sonoma Family & Senior Santa Rosa, CA 95407 Chestnut Creek Senior Apts. 65 Chestnut Avenue (650) 952-6679 San Mateo Senior South San Francisco, CA 94080 Property Name Address Phone Number County Senior/Family Chestnut Linden Court 1060 W Grand Avenue (510) 444-4335 Alameda Family Oakland, CA 94604 One Church Street Apts. One Church Street (415) 734-9150 San Francisco Family San Francisco, CA 94114 Coggins Square Apts. 1316 Las Juntas Way #108 (925) 945-6178 Contra Costa Family Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Coleridge Park Homes 190 Coleridge Street (415) 821-3363 San Francisco Senior San Francisco, CA 94110 Cottonwood Creek 202 Railroad Avenue (707) 436-9660 Solano Family Suisun City, CA 94585 Doretha Mitchell 52 Terrace Drive (415) 453-5531 Marin Family Marin City CA 94965 Emeryvilla Apts. 4320 San Pablo Avenue (510) 601-8235 Alameda Senior Emeryville, CA 94608 Fell Street Apts. 333 Fell Street (415) 522-0290 San Francisco Family San Francisco, CA 94102 Foothill Farms 5400 Auburn Blvd. (916) 334-2000 Sacramento Senior Sacramento, CA 95841 Geraldine Johnson Manor 5545 Third Street (415) 822-9501 San Francisco Senior San Francisco, CA 94124 Grand Oak Apts. 99 Oak Avenue, Suite 201 (650) 952-3727 San Mateo Family South San Francisco, CA 94080 Grayson Creek Apts. 100 Chilpancingo Parkway (925) 686-4000 Contra Costa Family Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Heritage Square Senior 762 N Fair Oaks Avenue (626) 535-0115 Los Angeles Senior Apartments Pasadena, CA 91103 Holly Courts 100 Appleton Ave (415) 206-1130 San Francisco Family San Francisco, CA 94110 Hunt's Grove Apts. 548 Hunt Avenue (707) 963-0557 Napa Family St. Helena, CA 94574 Ironhorse at Central Station 1801 14th Street (510) 839-5555 Alameda Family Oakland, CA 94607 Irvington Terrace 4109 Broadmoor Common (510) 979-1159 Alameda Family Fremont, CA 94538 Kentfield 4545 Kentfield Road (209)-952-7971 San Joaquin Family Stockton, CA 95207 La Pradera Apts. 38 Brannan Street (707) 942-6151 Napa Family Calistoga, CA 94515 Mabuhay Court 270 E. Empire Street (408) 885-0448 Santa Clara Senior San Jose, CA 95112 Property Name Address Phone Number County Senior/Family Magnolia Plaza Senior Apts. 630 Baden Drive (650) 588-8350 San Mateo Senior South San Francisco, CA 94080 Mandela Gateway 1400 7th Street (510) 451-1575 Alameda Family Oakland, CA 94607 Marea Alta 1400 San Leandro Blvd. (510) 686-9970 Alameda Family San Leandro, CA 94577 Marina Tower 601 Sacramento Street (707) 552-4422 Solano Senior Vallejo, CA 94590 Marina Tower Annex 575 Sacramento Street (707) 552-4422 Solano Senior Vallejo, CA 94590 Metro Center Senior Apts. 100 Village Lane (650) 349-9959 San Mateo Senior Foster City, CA 94404 Mission Dolores 1855 15th Street (415) 872-9455 San Francisco Senior San Francisco, CA 94103 Montevista 1001 South Main Street (408) 942-8829 Santa Clara Family Milpitas, CA 95035 Mural 3838 Turquoise Way (510) 985-6421 Alameda Family Oakland, CA 94609 North Beach Place 455 Bay Street (415) 346-9639 San Francisco Family & Senior San Francisco, CA 94133 Northpoint Village Apts. 2145 Stony Point Road (707) 569-9490 Sonoma Family Santa Rosa, CA 95407 Oak Circle Apts. 1410 Roberts Avenue (408) 971-9099 Santa Clara Senior San Jose, CA 95122 Ocean View Senior Apartments 555 Crespi Drive (650) 359-2114 San Mateo Senior Pacifica, CA 94044 Ohlone Court Apts. 5225 Terner Way (408) 264-5985 Santa Clara Family San Jose, CA 95136 Pacific Oaks Senior Apts. 750 Oddstad Boulevard (650) 359-7559 San Mateo Senior Pacifica, CA 94404 Peninsula Park Apts. 1977 Tate Street (650) 330-0899 San Mateo Family East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Pickleweed Apts. 651 Miller Avenue (415) 388-6829 Marin Family Mill Valley, CA 94941 Pinole Grove 800 John Street (510) 741-1900 Contra Costa Senior Pinole, CA 94564 Redwood Shores Senior 400 Redwood Street (707) 645-180 Solano Senior Vallejo, CA 94590 Richmond City Center Apts. 1000 Mac Donald Avenue (510) 236-4350 Contra Costa Family Richmond, CA 94801 Property Name Address Phone Number County Senior/Family Rotary Valley Senior Apts. 10 Jeannette Prandi Way (415) 479-3029 Marin Senior San Rafael, CA 94903-1100 San Rafael Commons 302 4th Street (415) 459-4020 Marin Senior San Rafael, CA 94901 Silverado Creek 3550 Villa Lane (707) 251-8077 Napa Family Napa, CA 94558 St. Joseph's Senior Apts. 2647 International Boulevard (510) 261-0808 Alameda Senior Oakland, CA 94601 Steamboat Point Apts. 800 The Embarcadero (415) 495-4019 San Francisco Family San Francisco, CA 94107 Strobridge Court Apts. 21000 Wilbeam Avenue (510) 728-9181 Alameda Family & Senior Castro Valley, CA 94546 Sycamore Place Apts. 35 Laurel Drive (925) 820-7160 Contra Costa Senior Danville, CA 94526 Terraza Palmera at St. Joseph's 1272 26th Avenue (510) 261-7700 Alameda Family Oakland, CA 94601 The Arbors Apts. 100 Civic Drive (510) 799-6000 Contra Costa Senior Hercules, CA 94547 The Carquinez Senior Apts. 400 Harbour Way (510) 215-2850 Contra Costa Senior Richmond, CA 94801 The Coronet 3595 Geary Boulevard (415) 387-5100 San Francisco Senior San Francisco CA 94118 The Fountains 2005 San Ramon Avenue (650) 966-1060 Santa Clara Senior Mountain View, CA 94043 The Parkview 100 Valley Avenue (925) 461-3042 Alameda Senior - Pleasanton, CA 94566 Assisted Living The Rivermark 959 Bridge Street (916) 873-8620 Yolo Family West Sacramento, CA 95691 Trestle Glen 370 F Street (650) 992-5555 San Mateo Family Colma, CA 94014 Visitacion Gardens 8 Visitacion Avenue (415) 330-9252 San Mateo Senior Brisbane, CA 94005 Southern California Celadon at 9th & Broadway 929 9th Avenue (619) 955-8814 San Diego Family & Senior San Diego, CA 92101 Copper Creek Apts. 1730 Elfin Forest Road (760) 510-0210 San Diego Family San Marcos, CA 92078 Dove Canyon Apts. 16507 Dove Canyon Road (858) 521-0787 San Diego Family San Diego CA 92127 Property Name Address Phone Number County Senior/Family Ivy at College Park 5950 Notre Dame (909) 284-4002 San Bernardino Family Chino, CA 91710 Laguna Canyon Apts. 400 Limestone (949) 502-5424 Orange Family Irvine, CA 92603 Madera Vista 44153 Margarita Road (951) 302-7820 Riverside Family & Senior Temecula, CA 92592 Paseo at COMM22 2325 Commercial Street (619) 241-2727 San Diego Family San Diego, CA 92113 Poinsettia Station Apts. 6811 Embarcadero Lane (760) 438-8839 San Diego Family Carlsbad, CA 92011 Pottery Court 295 W Sumner Avenue (951) 471 8899 Riverside Family Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Sage Canyon Apts. 1020 Stephanie Court (760) 798-9113 San Diego Family San Marcos, CA 92078 Sage Park 1302 W. 177th Street (424) 286-1231 Los Angeles Family Los Angeles, CA 90248 San Paulo 100 Durazno Aisle (949) 756-0123 Orange Family Irvine, CA 92606 Santa Alicia Apts. 100 Santorini (949) 653-2995 Orange Family Irvine, CA 92606 Terra Cotta Apts. 523 Rush Drive (760) 471-6151 San Diego Family San Marcos, CA 92078 Torrey del Mar 13875 Carmel Valley Road (858) 780-8760 San Diego Family San Diego, CA 92130 Victoria at COMM22 690 Beardsley Street (619) 241-2725 San Diego Senior San Diego, CA 92113 Villa Loma Apts. 6421 Tobria Terrace (760) 929-7555 San Diego Family Carlsbad, CA 92011 Windrow Apts. 5300 Trabuco Road (949) 861-2470 Orange Family Irvine, CA 92620 Woodbury Walk 99 Talisman (949) 861-8914 Orange Family Irvine, CA 92620 Pacific Northwest Coronado Springs 1400 SW 107th Street (877) 711-7821 King Family Seattle, WA 98146 The Abigail 1650 NW 13th Avenue (503) 224-0789 Multnomah Family Portland, OR 97209 The Ramona 1550 NW 14th Avenue (503) 688-6008 Multnomah Family Portland, OR 97209 Property Name Address Phone Number County Senior/Family The Sitka Apartments 1115 NW Northrup Street (503) 306-3400 Multnomah Family Portland, OR 97209 Tressa 14200 Linden Avenue N (206) 364-3700 King Family Seattle, WA 98133 Woodland Park 280 SE 12th Avenue (503) 693-1416 Washington Family & Senior Hillsboro, OR 97123.
Recommended publications
  • H. Parks, Recreation and Open Space
    IV. Environmental Setting and Impacts H. Parks, Recreation and Open Space Environmental Setting The San Francisco Recreation and Park Department maintains more than 200 parks, playgrounds, and open spaces throughout the City. The City’s park system also includes 15 recreation centers, nine swimming pools, five golf courses as well as tennis courts, ball diamonds, athletic fields and basketball courts. The Recreation and Park Department manages the Marina Yacht Harbor, Candlestick (Monster) Park, the San Francisco Zoo, and the Lake Merced Complex. In total, the Department currently owns and manages roughly 3,380 acres of parkland and open space. Together with other city agencies and state and federal open space properties within the city, about 6,360 acres of recreational resources (a variety of parks, walkways, landscaped areas, recreational facilities, playing fields and unmaintained open areas) serve San Francisco.172 San Franciscans also benefit from the Bay Area regional open spaces system. Regional resources include public open spaces managed by the East Bay Regional Park District in Alameda and Contra Costa counties; the National Park Service in Marin, San Francisco and San Mateo counties as well as state park and recreation areas throughout. In addition, thousands of acres of watershed and agricultural lands are preserved as open spaces by water and utility districts or in private ownership. The Bay Trail is a planned recreational corridor that, when complete, will encircle San Francisco and San Pablo Bays with a continuous 400-mile network of bicycling and hiking trails. It will connect the shoreline of all nine Bay Area counties, link 47 cities, and cross the major toll bridges in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Table S1: Developed Sites Comprising the 1998 Baseline and Subsequent Changes Last Updated: 3/31/2015
    Supplemental Table S1: Developed Sites Comprising the 1998 Baseline and Subsequent Changes Last Updated: 3/31/2015 Table S1. Developed sites (name and type) comprising the 1998 baseline and subsequent changes per Bear Management Subunit inside the Grizzly Bear Recovery Zone (Developed sites that are new, removed, or in which capacity of human-use has been modified since 1998 are highlighted and italicized). Bear Management Admin Name and type of developed sites subunit Unit Developed Campgrounds: Cave Falls. Trailheads: Coyote Meadows, Hominy Peak, S. Boone Creek, Fish Lake, Cascade Creek. Major Developed Sites: Loll Scout Camp, Idaho Youth Services Camp. Administrative or Maintenance Sites: Squirrel Meadows Guard Station/Cabin, Porcupine Guard Station, Badger Creek Seismograph Site, and Squirrel Meadows CTNF GS/WY Game & Fish Cabin. Other Developed Sites: Grassy Lake Dam, Tillery Lake Dam, Indian Lake Dam, Bergman Res. Dam, Loon Lake Disperse sites, Horseshoe Lake Disperse sites, Porcupine Creek Disperse sites, Gravel Pit/Target Range, Boone Creek Disperse Sites, Tillery Lake O&G Camp, Calf Creek O&G Camp, Bergman O&G Camp, Granite Creek Cow Camp, Poacher’s TH, Indian Meadows TH, McRenolds Res. TH/Wildlife Viewing Area/Dam. Bechler/Teton #1 Trailheads: 9K1 and Cave Falls. Administrative or Maintenance Sites: South Entrance and Bechler Ranger Stations. YNP Other Developed Sites: Union Falls and Snake River picnic areas. Developed Campgrounds: Grassy Lake Road campsites (8 individual car camping sites). Trailheads: Glade Creek, Lower Berry Creek, Flagg Canyon. Major Developed Sites: Flagg Ranch (lodge, cabins and Headwater Campground with camper cabins, remote cistern and sewage treatment plant sites). Administrative or Maintenance Sites: Flagg Ranch Ranger GTNP Station, Flagg Ranch employee housing, Flagg Ranch maintenance yard.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Fill in San Francisco: a History of Change
    SDMS DOCID# 1137835 BAY FILL IN SAN FRANCISCO: A HISTORY OF CHANGE A thesis submitted to the faculty of California State University, San Francisco in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Master of Arts By Gerald Robert Dow Department of Geography July 1973 Permission is granted for the material in this thesis to be reproduced in part or whole for the purpose of education and/or research. It may not be edited, altered, or otherwise modified, except with the express permission of the author. - ii - - ii - TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Maps . vi INTRODUCTION . .1 CHAPTER I: JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF SAN FRANCISCO’S TIDELANDS . .4 Definition of Tidelands . .5 Evolution of Tideland Ownership . .5 Federal Land . .5 State Land . .6 City Land . .6 Sale of State Owned Tidelands . .9 Tideland Grants to Railroads . 12 Settlement of Water Lot Claims . 13 San Francisco Loses Jurisdiction over Its Waterfront . 14 San Francisco Regains Jurisdiction over Its Waterfront . 15 The San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission and the Port of San Francisco . 18 CHAPTER II: YERBA BUENA COVE . 22 Introduction . 22 Yerba Buena, the Beginning of San Francisco . 22 Yerba Buena Cove in 1846 . 26 San Francisco’s First Waterfront . 26 Filling of Yerba Buena Cove Begins . 29 The Board of State Harbor Commissioners and the First Seawall . 33 The New Seawall . 37 The Northward Expansion of San Francisco’s Waterfront . 40 North Beach . 41 Fisherman’s Wharf . 43 Aquatic Park . 45 - iii - Pier 45 . 47 Fort Mason . 48 South Beach . 49 The Southward Extension of the Great Seawall .
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3-‐1 Historic Resources Evaluation
    Appendix 3-1 Historic Resources Evaluation HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION SEAWALL LOT 337 & Pier 48 Mixed-Use Development Project San Francisco, California April 11, 2016 Prepared by San Francisco, California Historic Resource Evaluation Seawall Lot 337 & Pier 48 Mixed-Use Project, San Francisco, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 II. Methods ................................................................................................................................... 1 III. Regulatory Framework ....................................................................................................... 3 IV. Property Description ................................................................................................... ….....6 V. Historical Context ....................................................................................................... ….....24 VI. Determination of Eligibility.................................................................................... ……....44 VII. Evaluation of the Project for Compliance with the Standards ............................. 45 VIII. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 58 IX. Bibliography ........................................................................................................................ 59 April 11, 2016 Historic Resource Evaluation Seawall
    [Show full text]
  • DISTRICT RECORD Trinomial
    State of California & The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # DISTRICT RECORD Trinomial Page 1 of 32 *NRHP Status Code *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Potrero Point Historic District D1. Historic Name Potrero Point/Lower Potrero D2. Common Name: Central Waterfront *D3. Detailed Description (Discuss coherence of the district, its setting, visual characteristics, and minor features. List all elements of district.): The Potrero Point Historic District (also referred to as the Central Waterfront) is located in the Potrero Hill district of San Francisco on the western side of San Francisco Bay in the City of San Francisco between Mission Creek on the north and Islais Creek to the south. The approximately 500-acre area is more precisely described as a roughly rectangular district bounded by Sixteenth Street to the north, San Francisco Bay to the east, Islais Creek to the south, and U.S. Interstate 280 to the west. The area measures approximately 1.3 miles from north to south, and approximately 0.6 miles wide from east to west. (See Continuation Sheet, Pg. 2) *D4. Boundary Description (Describe limits of district and attach map showing boundary and district elements.): The Potrero Point (Central Waterfront) area is enclosed within a rectangle formed by the following streets and natural features: Beginning at the northwest corner of Pennsylvania and Sixteenth streets, the northern boundary of the area extends east along Sixteenth Street into San Francisco Bay. The boundary turns ninety degrees and heads south through the bay encompassing the entirety of Piers 70 and 80. At Islais Creek Channel, the boundary makes a ninety degree turn and heads west along the southern shore of the channel.
    [Show full text]
  • India Basin Survey
    INDIA BASIN SURVEY SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA FINAL REPORT REPORT PREPARED FOR BAYVIEW HISTORICAL SOCIETY May 1, 2008 KELLEY & VERPLANCK HISTORICAL RESOURCES CONSULTING 2912 DIAMOND STREET #330, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94131 415.337.5824 // WWW.KVPCONSULTING.COM Historic Context Statement India Basin Survey San Francisco, California TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1 A. PURPOSE................................................................................................................................ 1 B. DEFINITION OF GEOGRAPHICAL AREA ................................................................................ 1 C. IDENTIFICATION OF HISTORIC CONTEXTS AND PERIODS OF SIGNIFICANCE .....................2 II. METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................................................. 3 III. IDENTIFICATION OF EXISTING HISTORIC STATUS............................................................... 4 A. HERE TODAY.........................................................................................................................4 B. 1976 CITYWIDE ARCHITECTURAL SURVEY ............................................................................4 C. SAN FRANCISCO ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE......................................................................4 D. ARTICLE 10 OF THE SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING CODE .......................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Central Waterfront Cultural Resources Survey Summary Report and Draft Context Statement
    Central Waterfront Cultural Resources Survey San Francisco Planning Department October 2000–September 2001, Page 1 Central Waterfront Cultural Resources Survey Summary Report and Draft Context Statement Figure 1: View from Jones and California Streets, looking toward Mission Bay, c. 1867. The activity which is the subject of this Cultural Resources Survey has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, through the California Office of Historic Preservation. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior or the California Office of Historic Preservation, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the California Office of Historic Preservation. October 2000 – October 2001 Prepared by: San Francisco Planning Department Acknowledging the contributions of: Central Waterfront Survey Advisory Committee San Francisco Architectural Heritage Dogpatch Neighborhood Association Page and Turnbull, Architects Central Waterfront Cultural Resources Survey San Francisco Planning Department October 2000–September 2001, Page 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Mayor Willie L. Brown, Jr. Planning Commission Anita Theoharis, President William Fay, Vice-President Roslyn Baltimore Hector Chinchilla Cynthia Joe Myrna Lim Jim Salinas, Sr. Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board Tim Kelley, President Suheil Shatara, Vice-President Ina Dearman Paul Finwall Nancy Ho-Belli
    [Show full text]
  • D. Cultural Resources Archeological Resources
    4. Environmental Setting and Impacts D. CULTURAL RESOURCES Section 4.D, Cultural Resources, considers both archeological resources, tribal cultural resources, and historic architectural resources. Archeological resources are discussed first, followed by a separate discussion of historic architectural resources that begins on p. 4.D.33. ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES This subsection assesses the potential for the presence of archeological resources within the project site, provides a context for evaluating the significance of archeological resources that may be encountered, evaluates the potential impacts (project and cumulative) of the Proposed Project on archeological resources, and provides mitigation measures that would avoid or reduce potential impacts on archeological resources. An independent consultant has prepared an Archeological Research Design and Treatment Plan (ARDTP) for the project site.1 The research and recommendations of the ARDTP are the basis for the information and conclusions of this EIR section with respect to archeological resources. The information in the ARDTP used in the preparation of this subsection was obtained from regional databases, plans, and reports relevant to the Proposed Project, including the San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park photographic collection; the San Francisco History Center at the San Francisco Public Library; Sanborn Fire Insurance maps;2 San Francisco newspapers; the California Digital Newspaper Collection, sponsored by the University of California, Riverside; the Online Archive of California; the Union Iron Works Historic District National Register Nomination Form; the Library of Congress; and the David Rumsey Map Collection, which also provided useful sources of online maps, including those from the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, U.S. Geological Survey, and official City and County survey maps.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 JUL 2021 Index Aaron Creek 17385 179 Aaron Island
    26 SEP 2021 Index 401 Angoon 17339 �� � � � � � � � � � 287 Baranof Island 17320 � � � � � � � 307 Anguilla Bay 17404 �� � � � � � � � 212 Barbara Rock 17431 � � � � � � � 192 Index Anguilla Island 17404 �� � � � � � � 212 Bare Island 17316 � � � � � � � � 296 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Ser- Bar Harbor 17430 � � � � � � � � 134 vice � � � � � � � � � � � � 24 Barlow Cove 17316 �� � � � � � � � 272 Animas Island 17406 � � � � � � � 208 Barlow Islands 17316 �� � � � � � � 272 A Anita Bay 17382 � � � � � � � � � 179 Barlow Point 17316 � � � � � � � � 272 Anita Point 17382 � � � � � � � � 179 Barnacle Rock 17401 � � � � � � � 172 Aaron Creek 17385 �� � � � � � � � 179 Annette Bay 17428 � � � � � � � � 160 Barnes Lake 17382 �� � � � � � � � 172 Aaron Island 17316 �� � � � � � � � 273 Annette Island 17434 � � � � � � � 157 Baron Island 17420 �� � � � � � � � 122 Aats Bay 17402� � � � � � � � � � 277 Annette Point 17434 � � � � � � � 156 Bar Point Basin 17430� � � � � � � 134 Aats Point 17402 �� � � � � � � � � 277 Annex Creek Power Station 17315 �� � 263 Barren Island 17434 � � � � � � � 122 Abbess Island 17405 � � � � � � � 203 Appleton Cove 17338 � � � � � � � 332 Barren Island Light 17434 �� � � � � 122 Abraham Islands 17382 � � � � � � 171 Approach Point 17426 � � � � � � � 162 Barrie Island 17360 � � � � � � � � 230 Abrejo Rocks 17406 � � � � � � � � 208 Aranzazu Point 17420 � � � � � � � 122 Barrier Islands 17386, 17387 �� � � � 228 Adams Anchorage 17316 � � � � � � 272 Arboles Islet 17406 �� � � � � � � � 207 Barrier Islands 17433
    [Show full text]
  • Papilio (New Series) #12, Some O
    (NEW Dec. 3, PAPILIO SERIES) 2008 GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION AND NEW TAXA OF WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLIES, ESPECIALLY FROM COLORADO By James A. Scott & Michaels. Fisher, with some parts by David M. Wright, Stephen M. Spomer, Norbert G. Kondla, Todd Stout, Matthew C. Garhart, & Gary M. Marrone Introduction and Abstract Michael Fisher is currently updating the 1957 book Colorado Butterflies, by F. Martin Brown, J. Donald Eff, and Bernard Rotger (Fisher 2005a, 2005b, 2006). This project has emphasized the necessity of naming certain butterflies in Colorado and vicinity that are distinctive, but currently have no name, as part of our goal of applying correct species/ subspecies names to all Colorado butterflies. Eleven of those distinctive butterflies are named here, in the genera Anthocharis, Neominois, Asterocampa, Argynnis (Speyeria), Euphydryas, Lycaena, and Hesperia. New life histories are reported for species or subspecies of Neominois & Oeneis & Euphydryas & Lycaena that were recently described or recently elevated in status. Lycaena jlorUs differs in hostplant, egg morphology, and somewhat in a seta on 151 -stage larvae. We also report the results ofresearch elsewhere in North America that was needed to determine which of the current subspecies names should be applied to other butterflies in Colorado, in the genera Anthocharis, Neominois, Apodemia, Callophrys, At/ides, Euphilotes, PlebeJus, Polites, & Hylephila. This research has added additional species to the total of Colorado butterflies. Nomenclatural problems in Colorado Lycaena & Calloph1ys are settled with lectotypes and designations of type localities and two pending petitions to suppress toxotaxa. Difficulties with the ICZN Code in properly applying names to clines are explored, and new terminology is given to some necessary biological solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Port of San Francisco
    The Port of San Francisco Caught Between Public Trust and Private Dollars June 2014 City and County of San Francisco Civil Grand Jury 2013-2014 City Hall 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Pl, San Francisco, CA 94102 Phone 415-554-6630 MEMBERS OF THE 2013-2014 CIVIL GRAND JURY CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Elena Schmid, Foreperson Robert van Ravenswaay, Foreperson Pro Tem Thomas Duda, Recording Secretary Maryta Piazza, Corresponding Secretary Larry Bush Hans Carter Daniel Chesir Barbara Cohrssen Mike Ege John Finnick Kai Forsley Charles Head David Hoiem Joseph Kelly Mazel Looney Claudia O’Callaghan Ernestine Patterson Michael Skahill ii THE CIVIL GRAND JURY The Civil Grand Jury is a government oversight panel of volunteers who serve for one year. It makes findings and recommendations resulting from its investigations. Reports of the Civil Grand Jury do not identify individuals by name. Disclosure of information about individuals interviewed by the jury is prohibited. California Penal Code, Section 929 STATE LAW REQUIREMENT California Penal Code, section 933.05 Each published report includes a list of those public entities that are required to respond to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court within 60- to 90 days, as specified. A copy must be sent to the Board of Supervisors. All responses are made available to the public. For each finding the response must: 1) agree with the finding, or 2) disagree with it, wholly or partially, and explain why. As to each recommendation the responding party must report that: 1) the recommendation has been implemented, with a summary explanation; or 2) the recommendation has not been implemented but will be within a set timeframe as provided; or 3) the recommendation requires further analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • November, 1966
    ~.1 ~ ! ; ' ·: .· . Your Vote Counts On Nov. 8 ·--------------------------------------------------------------------------- INEERS PUBLISHED TO PROM·OTE THIE GENERAL WIElFARE OF • &UAM, WHERE AMER ICA'S STATE OF HAWAII, NOR THERN CALIFORNIA, THE GOLDEN STATE NORTHERN NEVADA, UTAH, THE BEEH IVE STATE, DAY BEGINS TH E 50TH STATE THE SILVER STATE H EART OF THE ROCK I ES Vol. 25 - No. 11 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA November, 1966 ·LaJ Upholds the V to WASHINGTON - President Lyndon B. Johnson has upheld the veto of Gov. Manuel F. L. Guer­ rero, Guam, on the controversial "right-to-work" measure, passed by the Island's legislators. The issue, falling under control of Section 14 (b) of the Taft­ Hartley Act, would have become law if the 90-day period in which • the President had to act, would have run out. The President's reasons for up­ holding the veto were outlined in a letter to the governor. He said in the letter in his opinion the bill would inhibit development of the free collective bargaining neces­ sary to protect and advance the welfare of working men and women on Guam. The controversial measure had been passed by tl1e Territory's leg­ islature earlier this year, after which Gov. Guerrero immediately vetoed it, but the legislature over­ • rode his veto, making a final de­ cision necessary by the President. Johnson hailed Guerrero for his leadership and good judgment, which he said had "encouraged, supported and strengthened" the progress being made on Guam. The President's decision to take action and uphold Gov. Guer­ President Johnson has upheld Gov. Guerrero's (inset) veto of veto will permit co nti nued economic gains on th e island.
    [Show full text]