DOCSLIB.ORG

November, 1966

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
November, 1966 ~.1 ~ ! ; ' ·: .· . Your Vote Counts On Nov. 8 ·--------------------------------------------------------------------------- INEERS PUBLISHED TO PROM·OTE THIE GENERAL WIElFARE OF • &UAM, WHERE AMER ICA'S STATE OF HAWAII, NOR THERN CALIFORNIA, THE GOLDEN STATE NORTHERN NEVADA, UTAH, THE BEEH IVE STATE, DAY BEGINS TH E 50TH STATE THE SILVER STATE H EART OF THE ROCK I ES Vol. 25 - No. 11 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA November, 1966 ·LaJ Upholds the V to WASHINGTON - President Lyndon B. Johnson has upheld the veto of Gov. Manuel F. L. Guer­ rero, Guam, on the controversial "right-to-work" measure, passed by the Island's legislators. The issue, falling under control of Section 14 (b) of the Taft­ Hartley Act, would have become law if the 90-day period in which • the President had to act, would have run out. The President's reasons for up­ holding the veto were outlined in a letter to the governor. He said in the letter in his opinion the bill would inhibit development of the free collective bargaining neces­ sary to protect and advance the welfare of working men and women on Guam. The controversial measure had been passed by tl1e Territory's leg­ islature earlier this year, after which Gov. Guerrero immediately vetoed it, but the legislature over­ • rode his veto, making a final de­ cision necessary by the President. Johnson hailed Guerrero for his leadership and good judgment, which he said had "encouraged, supported and strengthened" the progress being made on Guam. The President's decision to take action and uphold Gov. Guer­ President Johnson has upheld Gov. Guerrero's (inset) veto of veto will permit co nti nued economic gains on th e island. Had rero's veto was strongly recom­ the right to wo rk bill passed by the Territory's leg islature. The the bill passed, Uni on shop would be outlawed there. mended by Secretary of the In­ terior Stewart L. Udall. fact grant anyone the right to Organized labor has continually benefits and other conditions as laws are an out-and-out fraud, Udall said that although the bill work. Nor would disapproval of charged that right to work legis­ dues-paying U nion members. But keeping wages and fringe benefits purported to guarantee the "right­ the bill result in depriving anyone lation gives non-Union workers it goes deeper than that. below livable standards in many •to-work ," its provisions did not in the right to work. the same benefits in wages, fringe Many leaders feel right to work See LBJ on Page 2 Brown's Rec rd eserves Your Vote November 8 will be a critical has in the past, beaten William Anderson, the most massive water day in the history of California, not Knowland and Richard Nixon. project in the histmy of the world only for members of organized His challenger this time is Actor has been undertaken, with the labor, b ut for all of California's Ronald Reagan, who bas attacked forecast that by 1990 some 90 people. Nov. 8 is the day voters the record of Pat Brown, which is million more acre feet of water will decide who will be the next a remarkably good one. will be needed to supply Califor­ governor of the largest and most Incumbent Brown's strongest nia's population in 1970. This gi­ rapidly growing state in the na­ case against his opponent is Rea­ gantic, multi-million dollar proj­ tion-when the voters will select gan's inexperience in government ect has provided hundreds of those men and women who will and the belief that the state's fu­ thousands of man-hours of work represent them for the next two­ ture would be unsafe if Reagan for the members of Local 3. to-four years in various segments were to win. This project will be under con­ of government. For the record, let's examine struction for some years to come, On the line is the two-term ten­ Incumbent Gov. Brown's record. providing even more work for the GOV. EDMUND G. BROWN ure and record of Incumbent Gov. Under his leadership and with Operating Engineers. LT. GOV. G LE NN AN DE RS ON ... record of note Edmund G. (Pat) Brown, who the assistance of Lt. Gov. Glenn See BROWN on Page 2 . rig ht- hand a id e • Page 2 ENGINEERS NEWS November, 1966• Ma ag r Clem Honored By nternational, Governor from the SAN FRANCISCO- Two re­ welfare for the men of the con­ - Operating Engineers Local cent honors were bestowed on struction industry. Retirement Union No. 3-for an outstand­ Manager~s AI Clem, business manager of benefits have long been the goal ing contribution to society in Desk the Operating Engineers Local of this able and dedicated inaugurating a remarkable Ap­ No. 3. The first was an appoint­ leader. In his drive to become prenticeship training program ment to the Board of Trustees the business manager of the and a Journeyman training pro­ on the International Pension largest building and construc­ gram whereby many of ou. Trust Fund, the second, a com­ tion trades local in the world, young men, some underem­ mendation by Gov. Edmund G. Brother Clem advocated that ployed, have an opportunity to (Pat) Brown for Brother Clem's members of Local 3 be given become skilled or more skilled Fall is here again which is evident by the number of foresight and guidance in in­ such a program. At present, wage-earners. dispatches being issued from various offices. As always, augurating an effective Appren­ Local 3 has one of the most "These outstanding programs employers are trying to button up as much work as they ticeship and Joumeyman trainee effective retirement pension have also given those same can prior to the rainy season. program. trust funds in the entire labor young men a chance to become Brother Clem was made a movement. more useful citizens in our com­ We have been extremely busy during the past months member of the International Gov. Brown, in citing Brother munities. Without these pro­ negotiating various agreements covering shops and plants. Pension Trust Fund Board at Clem for his foresight and lead­ grams many workers would We have numerous organizing campaigns in progress from the convention held in Septem­ ership in establishing training have to look outside their inter­ Utah to Guam. There will be approximately eight National ber in Las Vegas. programs for future and present ests for employment, or would Labor Relation Board elections during November. His nomination was made by Engineers, said: have little opportunity to learn Newell Carman, General Secre­ "As governor of the great their chosen trade. Obviously this much interest by people who are unor­ tary-Treasurer of the Interna­ state of California and a long­ "To you, AI Clem, who saw the ganized confirms that your Local Union has a very good tional Union of Operating En­ time personal friend, it is my growing need for training oper-· reputation for negotiating fair agreements with a minimum gineers. sincere pleasure to honor you, ators and created these out­ amount of industrial strife. The appointment clearly es­ the officers and members of the standing programs, my sincere tablishes Brother Clem as an world's largest building and congratulations and heartfelt On October 8, a Business Agents meeting was held with outstanding leader in the area of construction trades local union thanks." 90 people in attendance, including all the Agents on the Mainland, as well as the dispatchers and apprenticeship Coordinators. This, I believe, was one of the most con­ structive and informative meetings conducted for quite Brown's Record Deserves A Vote some time. We anticipate holding these meetings from time Continued from Page I nation to time in order for Agents to be fully informed on what is , creating further work for proposed by Incumbent Gov. Pat In education, California need the men in the construction indus­ Brown. His foresight into future transpiring in the administrative offices of the Local Union. take a back seat to no one. There by. Our freeway system has been needs of California cannot be ar­ During the past month I was in Washington, D.C. attend­ are no tuition charges in any of hailed as an outstanding example gued. He is aware of the problems ing a meeting of the International Pension Trustees. While the state's institutions of higher of meeting the needs of the in the labor movement, in con­ there _I had an occasion to discuss with the General Presi­ learning, a record unmatched any­ mounting traffic problems m a ducting business, in providing am­ where in the world. rapidly growing state. ple housing and employment foila dent and the other Officers of our International, the prob­ Our state parks and recreational Let's also consider the Con­ the masses, and assuring th~ lems we have in Local 3, particularly pe1taining to jurisdic­ areas have been improved and ex­ sumer Advisory Counsel, which working man a chance to better tion. Juris diction is really the lifeblood of our organization panded, providing a retreat for has clone exhaustive research in himself. He has sought new in­ and when we talk about jurisdiction, we are talking about the busy working people of our the area of packaging uniformity dustry for the state, making it one job opportunities for the members of our union. I need not state. and merchandising in our retail of the most industrialized in the The conservation program in­ outlets. Through the efforts of the nation. If California were a na­ tell you that this is the subject we are all interested in and cluded in the parks and recrea­ counsel staff, selected by Incum­ tion, it would rank seventh in only by working together and keeping the lines of com­ tional programs has made Cali­ bent Brown, such things as the over-all production.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • H. Parks, Recreation and Open Space
    IV. Environmental Setting and Impacts H. Parks, Recreation and Open Space Environmental Setting The San Francisco Recreation and Park Department maintains more than 200 parks, playgrounds, and open spaces throughout the City. The City’s park system also includes 15 recreation centers, nine swimming pools, five golf courses as well as tennis courts, ball diamonds, athletic fields and basketball courts. The Recreation and Park Department manages the Marina Yacht Harbor, Candlestick (Monster) Park, the San Francisco Zoo, and the Lake Merced Complex. In total, the Department currently owns and manages roughly 3,380 acres of parkland and open space. Together with other city agencies and state and federal open space properties within the city, about 6,360 acres of recreational resources (a variety of parks, walkways, landscaped areas, recreational facilities, playing fields and unmaintained open areas) serve San Francisco.172 San Franciscans also benefit from the Bay Area regional open spaces system. Regional resources include public open spaces managed by the East Bay Regional Park District in Alameda and Contra Costa counties; the National Park Service in Marin, San Francisco and San Mateo counties as well as state park and recreation areas throughout. In addition, thousands of acres of watershed and agricultural lands are preserved as open spaces by water and utility districts or in private ownership. The Bay Trail is a planned recreational corridor that, when complete, will encircle San Francisco and San Pablo Bays with a continuous 400-mile network of bicycling and hiking trails. It will connect the shoreline of all nine Bay Area counties, link 47 cities, and cross the major toll bridges in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Table S1: Developed Sites Comprising the 1998 Baseline and Subsequent Changes Last Updated: 3/31/2015
    Supplemental Table S1: Developed Sites Comprising the 1998 Baseline and Subsequent Changes Last Updated: 3/31/2015 Table S1. Developed sites (name and type) comprising the 1998 baseline and subsequent changes per Bear Management Subunit inside the Grizzly Bear Recovery Zone (Developed sites that are new, removed, or in which capacity of human-use has been modified since 1998 are highlighted and italicized). Bear Management Admin Name and type of developed sites subunit Unit Developed Campgrounds: Cave Falls. Trailheads: Coyote Meadows, Hominy Peak, S. Boone Creek, Fish Lake, Cascade Creek. Major Developed Sites: Loll Scout Camp, Idaho Youth Services Camp. Administrative or Maintenance Sites: Squirrel Meadows Guard Station/Cabin, Porcupine Guard Station, Badger Creek Seismograph Site, and Squirrel Meadows CTNF GS/WY Game & Fish Cabin. Other Developed Sites: Grassy Lake Dam, Tillery Lake Dam, Indian Lake Dam, Bergman Res. Dam, Loon Lake Disperse sites, Horseshoe Lake Disperse sites, Porcupine Creek Disperse sites, Gravel Pit/Target Range, Boone Creek Disperse Sites, Tillery Lake O&G Camp, Calf Creek O&G Camp, Bergman O&G Camp, Granite Creek Cow Camp, Poacher’s TH, Indian Meadows TH, McRenolds Res. TH/Wildlife Viewing Area/Dam. Bechler/Teton #1 Trailheads: 9K1 and Cave Falls. Administrative or Maintenance Sites: South Entrance and Bechler Ranger Stations. YNP Other Developed Sites: Union Falls and Snake River picnic areas. Developed Campgrounds: Grassy Lake Road campsites (8 individual car camping sites). Trailheads: Glade Creek, Lower Berry Creek, Flagg Canyon. Major Developed Sites: Flagg Ranch (lodge, cabins and Headwater Campground with camper cabins, remote cistern and sewage treatment plant sites). Administrative or Maintenance Sites: Flagg Ranch Ranger GTNP Station, Flagg Ranch employee housing, Flagg Ranch maintenance yard.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Fill in San Francisco: a History of Change
    SDMS DOCID# 1137835 BAY FILL IN SAN FRANCISCO: A HISTORY OF CHANGE A thesis submitted to the faculty of California State University, San Francisco in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Master of Arts By Gerald Robert Dow Department of Geography July 1973 Permission is granted for the material in this thesis to be reproduced in part or whole for the purpose of education and/or research. It may not be edited, altered, or otherwise modified, except with the express permission of the author. - ii - - ii - TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Maps . vi INTRODUCTION . .1 CHAPTER I: JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF SAN FRANCISCO’S TIDELANDS . .4 Definition of Tidelands . .5 Evolution of Tideland Ownership . .5 Federal Land . .5 State Land . .6 City Land . .6 Sale of State Owned Tidelands . .9 Tideland Grants to Railroads . 12 Settlement of Water Lot Claims . 13 San Francisco Loses Jurisdiction over Its Waterfront . 14 San Francisco Regains Jurisdiction over Its Waterfront . 15 The San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission and the Port of San Francisco . 18 CHAPTER II: YERBA BUENA COVE . 22 Introduction . 22 Yerba Buena, the Beginning of San Francisco . 22 Yerba Buena Cove in 1846 . 26 San Francisco’s First Waterfront . 26 Filling of Yerba Buena Cove Begins . 29 The Board of State Harbor Commissioners and the First Seawall . 33 The New Seawall . 37 The Northward Expansion of San Francisco’s Waterfront . 40 North Beach . 41 Fisherman’s Wharf . 43 Aquatic Park . 45 - iii - Pier 45 . 47 Fort Mason . 48 South Beach . 49 The Southward Extension of the Great Seawall .
    [Show full text]
  • NOVEMBER 1966 the International Fraternity of Delta Sigma Pi
    ~ -;.'.J.• . _: ...~II"_. 0 F D E L T A s G M A p I Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION FRATERNITY FOUNDED 1907 NOVEMBER 1966 The International Fraternity of Delta Sigma Pi Professional Commerce and Business Administration Fraternity Delta Sioma Pi was founded at New York Univer- ity, Sch~ol of Commerce, Accounts and Finance, on November 7, 1907, by Alexander F. Maka), Alfred Moysello, Harold V. Jacobs and H. Albert Tienken. Delta Sigma Pi is a professional frater· nity organized to foster the study ~f busi~ess in universities; to encourage scholarsh1p, soc1al ac· tivity and the association of students fo~ their mu­ tual advancement by research and practice; to pro­ mote closer affiliation between the commercial world and students of commerce, and to further a higher standard of commercial ethics and culture, and the civic and commercial welfare of the com­ munity. IN THE PROFESSIONAL SPOTLIGHT OUR PROFESSIONAL SPOTLIGHT focuse on a recent professional meeting of Gamm • Omega Chapter at Arizona State niver ity, "S hould any Action be Taken on Section J.J ·B of the Taft-Hartley Act." ~!embers of the panel are from left to right: Dr. Keith Da' i . professor of management, John Evans, state secretary of the AFL-CIO, Dr. Joseph Schabacker academic vice president Dan Gruender, former field attorney for the ational Labor Relations Board and Dr. John Lowe, associate professor of general business. November 1966 • Vol. LVI, No. 1 0 F D E L T A s G M A p Editor CHARLES L. FARRAR From the Desk of the Grand President .
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3-‐1 Historic Resources Evaluation
    Appendix 3-1 Historic Resources Evaluation HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION SEAWALL LOT 337 & Pier 48 Mixed-Use Development Project San Francisco, California April 11, 2016 Prepared by San Francisco, California Historic Resource Evaluation Seawall Lot 337 & Pier 48 Mixed-Use Project, San Francisco, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 II. Methods ................................................................................................................................... 1 III. Regulatory Framework ....................................................................................................... 3 IV. Property Description ................................................................................................... ….....6 V. Historical Context ....................................................................................................... ….....24 VI. Determination of Eligibility.................................................................................... ……....44 VII. Evaluation of the Project for Compliance with the Standards ............................. 45 VIII. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 58 IX. Bibliography ........................................................................................................................ 59 April 11, 2016 Historic Resource Evaluation Seawall
    [Show full text]
  • DISTRICT RECORD Trinomial
    State of California & The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # DISTRICT RECORD Trinomial Page 1 of 32 *NRHP Status Code *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Potrero Point Historic District D1. Historic Name Potrero Point/Lower Potrero D2. Common Name: Central Waterfront *D3. Detailed Description (Discuss coherence of the district, its setting, visual characteristics, and minor features. List all elements of district.): The Potrero Point Historic District (also referred to as the Central Waterfront) is located in the Potrero Hill district of San Francisco on the western side of San Francisco Bay in the City of San Francisco between Mission Creek on the north and Islais Creek to the south. The approximately 500-acre area is more precisely described as a roughly rectangular district bounded by Sixteenth Street to the north, San Francisco Bay to the east, Islais Creek to the south, and U.S. Interstate 280 to the west. The area measures approximately 1.3 miles from north to south, and approximately 0.6 miles wide from east to west. (See Continuation Sheet, Pg. 2) *D4. Boundary Description (Describe limits of district and attach map showing boundary and district elements.): The Potrero Point (Central Waterfront) area is enclosed within a rectangle formed by the following streets and natural features: Beginning at the northwest corner of Pennsylvania and Sixteenth streets, the northern boundary of the area extends east along Sixteenth Street into San Francisco Bay. The boundary turns ninety degrees and heads south through the bay encompassing the entirety of Piers 70 and 80. At Islais Creek Channel, the boundary makes a ninety degree turn and heads west along the southern shore of the channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Mauldin Cartoon Collection
    Mauldin Cartoon Collection NMAH.AC.0307 Frank R. Jenkins 2003 Archives Center, National Museum of American History P.O. Box 37012 Suite 1100, MRC 601 Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 [email protected] http://americanhistory.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 2 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 3 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 4 Series 1: Artwork and Articles, 1946-1987............................................................... 4 Series 2: Biographical Information, 1960-1970; undated....................................... 21 Series 3: Other Artwork, 1959-1961...................................................................... 22 Mauldin Cartoon Collection NMAH.AC.0307 Collection Overview Repository: Archives Center, National Museum
    [Show full text]
  • November 1966 '-2001
    20¢ IN THIS ISSUE... BLACK POWER SUPPLEMENT OAKLAND FREEDOM SCHOOLS MISSION REDEVELOPMENT FIGHT NOVEMBER 1966 '-2001. VOL; 2 NO. 10 ARVIN WORKERS WIN RIGHT TO 01 GIORGIO ELECTION FARM WO'RKERS, LABOR OFFICIALS, SNCC EDITOR ARRESTED SAN FRANCISCO - Workers at the Di Giorgio ranch in Arvin, California won a major victory here-the right to an election-by picketing the rna in offices of the Di Giorgio Corporation. Di Giorgio gave in and are permitting an election to be held, They had refused up to now. OUTSIDE DI GIORGIO OFFICE, Luis Valdez of UFWOC addresses picket line. by Terence Cannon Six farm workers that they were being arrested, ordered dez, UFWOC organizer, who acted as in­ the camp manager, for talking in favor from the Arvin, California ranch of the Di them to get in the elevators, led them terpreter, and Stuart Weinberg, their of UFWOC. "You're a liar'" yelled Di Giorgio Corporation, six labor officials, into the street, and then released them. lawyer. Giorgio. Then he calmed down and told and the editor of THE MOVEMENT were When the workers found they had been The building was being run like a Chavez he would 'investigate' the firing. arrested here October 20 and 21. tricked, they went back up. They were stockade: the elevators were guarded. Later on he lost his cool again when the The workers deleg~ti(;m~ led by Mack ejected again, and this time the elev­ Anyone who looked like a farmworker or workers told him they had been paid Lyons from Bakersfield, had driven up ator operators would not let them return demonstrator was not even allowed in the 29¢ an hour on a piece rate at the ranch.
    [Show full text]
  • India Basin Survey
    INDIA BASIN SURVEY SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA FINAL REPORT REPORT PREPARED FOR BAYVIEW HISTORICAL SOCIETY May 1, 2008 KELLEY & VERPLANCK HISTORICAL RESOURCES CONSULTING 2912 DIAMOND STREET #330, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94131 415.337.5824 // WWW.KVPCONSULTING.COM Historic Context Statement India Basin Survey San Francisco, California TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1 A. PURPOSE................................................................................................................................ 1 B. DEFINITION OF GEOGRAPHICAL AREA ................................................................................ 1 C. IDENTIFICATION OF HISTORIC CONTEXTS AND PERIODS OF SIGNIFICANCE .....................2 II. METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................................................. 3 III. IDENTIFICATION OF EXISTING HISTORIC STATUS............................................................... 4 A. HERE TODAY.........................................................................................................................4 B. 1976 CITYWIDE ARCHITECTURAL SURVEY ............................................................................4 C. SAN FRANCISCO ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE......................................................................4 D. ARTICLE 10 OF THE SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING CODE .......................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Central Waterfront Cultural Resources Survey Summary Report and Draft Context Statement
    Central Waterfront Cultural Resources Survey San Francisco Planning Department October 2000–September 2001, Page 1 Central Waterfront Cultural Resources Survey Summary Report and Draft Context Statement Figure 1: View from Jones and California Streets, looking toward Mission Bay, c. 1867. The activity which is the subject of this Cultural Resources Survey has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, through the California Office of Historic Preservation. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior or the California Office of Historic Preservation, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the California Office of Historic Preservation. October 2000 – October 2001 Prepared by: San Francisco Planning Department Acknowledging the contributions of: Central Waterfront Survey Advisory Committee San Francisco Architectural Heritage Dogpatch Neighborhood Association Page and Turnbull, Architects Central Waterfront Cultural Resources Survey San Francisco Planning Department October 2000–September 2001, Page 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Mayor Willie L. Brown, Jr. Planning Commission Anita Theoharis, President William Fay, Vice-President Roslyn Baltimore Hector Chinchilla Cynthia Joe Myrna Lim Jim Salinas, Sr. Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board Tim Kelley, President Suheil Shatara, Vice-President Ina Dearman Paul Finwall Nancy Ho-Belli
    [Show full text]
  • D. Cultural Resources Archeological Resources
    4. Environmental Setting and Impacts D. CULTURAL RESOURCES Section 4.D, Cultural Resources, considers both archeological resources, tribal cultural resources, and historic architectural resources. Archeological resources are discussed first, followed by a separate discussion of historic architectural resources that begins on p. 4.D.33. ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES This subsection assesses the potential for the presence of archeological resources within the project site, provides a context for evaluating the significance of archeological resources that may be encountered, evaluates the potential impacts (project and cumulative) of the Proposed Project on archeological resources, and provides mitigation measures that would avoid or reduce potential impacts on archeological resources. An independent consultant has prepared an Archeological Research Design and Treatment Plan (ARDTP) for the project site.1 The research and recommendations of the ARDTP are the basis for the information and conclusions of this EIR section with respect to archeological resources. The information in the ARDTP used in the preparation of this subsection was obtained from regional databases, plans, and reports relevant to the Proposed Project, including the San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park photographic collection; the San Francisco History Center at the San Francisco Public Library; Sanborn Fire Insurance maps;2 San Francisco newspapers; the California Digital Newspaper Collection, sponsored by the University of California, Riverside; the Online Archive of California; the Union Iron Works Historic District National Register Nomination Form; the Library of Congress; and the David Rumsey Map Collection, which also provided useful sources of online maps, including those from the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, U.S. Geological Survey, and official City and County survey maps.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 JUL 2021 Index Aaron Creek 17385 179 Aaron Island
    26 SEP 2021 Index 401 Angoon 17339 �� � � � � � � � � � 287 Baranof Island 17320 � � � � � � � 307 Anguilla Bay 17404 �� � � � � � � � 212 Barbara Rock 17431 � � � � � � � 192 Index Anguilla Island 17404 �� � � � � � � 212 Bare Island 17316 � � � � � � � � 296 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Ser- Bar Harbor 17430 � � � � � � � � 134 vice � � � � � � � � � � � � 24 Barlow Cove 17316 �� � � � � � � � 272 Animas Island 17406 � � � � � � � 208 Barlow Islands 17316 �� � � � � � � 272 A Anita Bay 17382 � � � � � � � � � 179 Barlow Point 17316 � � � � � � � � 272 Anita Point 17382 � � � � � � � � 179 Barnacle Rock 17401 � � � � � � � 172 Aaron Creek 17385 �� � � � � � � � 179 Annette Bay 17428 � � � � � � � � 160 Barnes Lake 17382 �� � � � � � � � 172 Aaron Island 17316 �� � � � � � � � 273 Annette Island 17434 � � � � � � � 157 Baron Island 17420 �� � � � � � � � 122 Aats Bay 17402� � � � � � � � � � 277 Annette Point 17434 � � � � � � � 156 Bar Point Basin 17430� � � � � � � 134 Aats Point 17402 �� � � � � � � � � 277 Annex Creek Power Station 17315 �� � 263 Barren Island 17434 � � � � � � � 122 Abbess Island 17405 � � � � � � � 203 Appleton Cove 17338 � � � � � � � 332 Barren Island Light 17434 �� � � � � 122 Abraham Islands 17382 � � � � � � 171 Approach Point 17426 � � � � � � � 162 Barrie Island 17360 � � � � � � � � 230 Abrejo Rocks 17406 � � � � � � � � 208 Aranzazu Point 17420 � � � � � � � 122 Barrier Islands 17386, 17387 �� � � � 228 Adams Anchorage 17316 � � � � � � 272 Arboles Islet 17406 �� � � � � � � � 207 Barrier Islands 17433
    [Show full text]