DOCSLIB.ORG

House of Lords Written Answers and Statements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
House of Lords Written Answers and Statements Session 2021-22 Thursday No. 22 24 June 2021 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) HOUSE OF LORDS WRITTEN STATEMENTS AND WRITTEN ANSWERS Written Statements ................................ ................ 1 Written Answers ................................ ..................... 5 [I] indicates that the member concerned has a relevant registered interest. The full register of interests can be found at http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/standards-and-interests/register-of-lords-interests/ Members who want a printed copy of Written Answers and Written Statements should notify the Printed Paper Office. This printed edition is a reproduction of the original text of Answers and Statements, which can be found on the internet at http://www.parliament.uk/writtenanswers/. Ministers and others who make Statements or answer Questions are referred to only by name, not their ministerial or other title. The current list of ministerial and other responsibilities is as follows. Minister Responsibilities Baroness Evans of Bowes Park Leader of the House of Lords and Lord Privy Seal Earl Howe Deputy Leader of the House of Lords Lord Agnew of Oulton Minister of State, Treasury and Cabinet Office Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon Minister of State, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office Lord Ashton of Hyde Chief Whip Baroness Barran Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Lord Benyon Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Baroness Berridge Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Education and Department for International Trade Lord Bethell Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health and Social Care Baroness Bloomfield of Hinton Whip Waldrist Lord Callanan Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Earl of Courtown Deputy Chief Whip Lord Frost Minister of State, Cabinet Office Baroness Goldie Minister of State, Ministry of Defence Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park Minister of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office Lord Greenhalgh Minister of State, Home Office and Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Lord Grimstone of Boscobel Minister of State, Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy and Department for International Trade Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay Whip Baroness Penn Whip Baroness Scott of Bybrook Whip Baroness Stedman-Scott Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Work and Pensions Lord Stewart of Dirleton Advocate-General for Scotland Lord True Minister of State, Cabinet Office Baroness Vere of Norbiton Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Transport Baroness Williams of Trafford Minister of State, Home Office Lord Wolfson of Tredegar Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice Viscount Younger of Leckie Whip © Parliamentary Copyright House of Lords 2021 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/ Written Statements 24 June 2021 Page 1 notice of her intention to do so. This is a right the United Written Statements Kingdom affords to Russia and other states in the context of the UK’s territorial waters, including the Dover TSS in Thursday, 24 June 2021 the English Channel. The Royal Navy, as well as other NATO and partner Exercises in the Black Sea nations, have enjoyed a routine maritime presence in the Black Sea for many years. At the time of this interaction, [HLWS115] there were both Dutch and US warships operating Baroness Goldie: My right hon. Friend the Secretary of elsewhere within the Black Sea. The Royal Navy’s State for Defence (The Rt Hon Ben Wallace MP) has presence is about cooperating with our partners and Allies made the following Written Ministerial Statement: to advance regional security, stability and freedom of On Wednesday 23 June 2021, HMS DEFENDER (a navigation. Type 45 Destroyer), left the Ukrainian port of Odesa en HMS DEFENDER continues with her planned route to the Georgian port of Batumi in the Black Sea. deployment and programme of visits. The Royal Navy HMS DEFENDER conducted innocent passage through will always uphold international law and will not accept Ukrainian territorial waters via a direct route using a unlawful interference with innocent passage. traffic separation scheme (TSS), as is the right of the United Kingdom (and all nations) under international FCDO Services Ministerial Targets 2021-22 maritime law. This TSS is governed by the International Maritime Organisation and is designed to assist vessels in [HLWS112] safely transiting congested waterways. The United Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon: FCDO Services operates Kingdom does not recognise any Russian claim to these as a trading fund of the Foreign, Commonwealth & waters, nor do we recognise the assertion from the Development Office (FCDO). I have set the following Russian Ministry of Defence that HMS DEFENDER was ambitious performance targets for 2021-2022: in violation of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1) An in-year surplus in excess of 0.0% before interest, (UNCLOS). tax and dividend; At 0950 BST, HMS DEFENDER entered the TSS, 2) Achievement of the return on capital employed inside Ukrainian territorial waters. At 1000 BST, a (ROCE) of at least 6.5% (weighted average); Russian coastguard vessel warned that Russian units 3) A productivity ratio of at least 82%, measuring would shortly commence a live fire gunnery exercise. At 1008 BST, HMS DEFENDER noted gunnery astern and actual billable hours versus available billable hours; out of range of her position. This posed no danger to 4) An in-year customer satisfaction rating average at HMS DEFENDER. During her transit, HMS least of 82%; DEFENDER was overflown by Russian combat aircraft at 5) An average Civil Service People Survey “Your Say” varying heights, the lowest of which was approximately score for ‘Employee Engagement’ of at least 61%; and 500 feet. These aircraft posed no immediate threat to 6) An average Civil Service People Survey “Your Say” HMS DEFENDER, but some of these manoeuvres were score for ‘My Manager’ of at least 65%. neither safe nor professional. HMS DEFENDER responded by VHF radio to the Russian units on several FCDO Services will report to Parliament on its success occasions and was, at all times, courteous and against these targets through its Annual Report and professional. Accounts for 2021-2022. FCDO Services is a Trading Fund of the FCDO. It HMS DEFENDER maintained a safe course throughout provides a range of integrated, secure services worldwide her innocent passage, on one occasion manoeuvring to to the FCDO and other UK Government departments, avoid a hazard presented by a Russian coastguard vessel supporting the delivery of government agendas. Services before re-assuming her intended course. HMS include protective security, estates and construction, cloud DEFENDER completed the passage safely and in computing, communications and monitoring, logistics, accordance with her intended route, departed Ukrainian translation and interpreting. This is combined with a territorial waters at 1026 BST. At no point were warning portfolio of global maintenance work. FCDO Services shots fired at HMS DEFENDER, nor bombs dropped in also manages the UK National Authority for Counter her path as has been asserted by the Russian authorities. Eavesdropping (UK NACE), helping protect UK assets Later on Wednesday 23 June 2021, the United from physical, electronic and cyber-attack. Kingdom’s Defence Attaché was invited to a meeting in the Russian Ministry of Defence at which he received a High Fat, Sugar and Salt Advertising note verbale. This will be considered and addressed in due course. Consultation Response Under Article 19 of UNCLOS, HMS DEFENDER had [HLWS117] the right to exercise innocent passage through Ukrainian Lord Bethell: My Hon Friend the Parliamentary Under territorial waters in the manner she did without giving any Secretary of State (Minister for Prevention, Public Health Page 2 24 June 2021 Written Statements and Primary Care) (Jo Churchill) has today made the ensure that brands are not pigeonholed as synonymous following written ministerial statement: with HFSS products and have the freedom to Today, I am pleased to announce that Government is reformulate and move towards offering healthier publishing the consultation response to both the 2019 and products. 2020 consultations. This outlines the final UK wide • Small Medium Enterprises (SME) (online & 9pm policy on restricting High Fat, Salt and Sugar (HFSS) watershed): Businesses with 249 employees or fewer, advertising which we intend to legislate for in the that pay to advertise HFSS products that they upcoming Health and Care Bill. manufacture and/or sell, will be exempt from the HFSS Covid-19 has brought the dangers of obesity into sharp restrictions and can continue to advertise. focus and highlighted that as a country we need to address • Audio (online only): As the impact and levels of child the risks obesity presents. The Prime Minister has been exposure to HFSS advertising on audio-only media (e.g. clear that helping the nation get fitter and healthier must podcasts, online only radio) remain unclear, these forms be a national priority and will make us more resilient to of media are not subject to restrictions. diseases in the future. • Business to Business (online only): Businesses can In 2018 Government set the ambition to halve continue to promote their products or services to other childhood obesity by 2030 and help adults reach a businesses, which we hope will prevent unintended healthier weight. As part of a suite of measures to meet consequences of impeding business activity where this ambition, is it important that we reduce children’s commerce is not with the purpose of encouraging exposure to advertising for products high in fat, sugar and children's consumption of HFSS food or drink. salt (HFSS) on TV and online. We want to ensure that the media our children engage with mostly promotes a • Transactional content (online only): To ensure that healthy diet.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • West Midlands' Circular Economy Routemap
    West Midlands’ Circular Economy Routemap Kickstarting the region’s journey to a green circular revolution DRAFT FOR REVIEW Baseline 1 Analysis DRAFT FOR REVIEW West Midlands’ Circular Economy Routemap DRAFT 2 Policy Analysis International Context A policy analysis was conducted to Paris Agreement and the Nationally Determined Contributions (2016) determine which international, national and Description: The Paris Agreement sets out a global framework to regional policies support a transition to the limit global temperature rise below 2°C, with a target of 1.5°C in circular economy and what are best practice accordance with the recommendations of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Signed by 175 countries, including examples for the West Midlands region. the UK, it is the first legally binding global climate change agreement and came into force in November 2016. The circular economy is one United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (2015) method for countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. Description: The United Nations (UN) set 17 goals for sustainable Focus on Circular Economy: Low development that were adopted by UN Member states in 2015. Impact: No significant impact on circular economy. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are intended to be achieved by 2030. SDG7 Affordable and Clean Energy, SDG8 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Decent Work and Economic Growth, SDG9 Industry, Innovation and Assessment Report AR5 (2018) Infrastructure, and SDG12 Responsible Consumption and Production are particularly relevant for the Circular Economy. Description: Since the Paris Agreement the IPCC have called for increased action to achieve net zero carbon by 2030, including Focus on Circular Economy: Medium placing a higher price on emissions, shifting investment patterns, Impact: Encourages consideration of circular economy concepts and accelerating the transition to renewable energy and enabling inter-connectivity with wider development goals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit Era
    Island Studies Journal, 15(1), 2020, 151-168 The sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit era Maria Mut Bosque School of Law, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Spain MINECO DER 2017-86138, Ministry of Economic Affairs & Digital Transformation, Spain Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London, UK [email protected] (corresponding author) Abstract: This paper focuses on an analysis of the sovereignty of two territorial entities that have unique relations with the United Kingdom: the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories (BOTs). Each of these entities includes very different territories, with different legal statuses and varying forms of self-administration and constitutional linkages with the UK. However, they also share similarities and challenges that enable an analysis of these territories as a complete set. The incomplete sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and BOTs has entailed that all these territories (except Gibraltar) have not been allowed to participate in the 2016 Brexit referendum or in the withdrawal negotiations with the EU. Moreover, it is reasonable to assume that Brexit is not an exceptional situation. In the future there will be more and more relevant international issues for these territories which will remain outside of their direct control, but will have a direct impact on them. Thus, if no adjustments are made to their statuses, these territories will have to keep trusting that the UK will be able to represent their interests at the same level as its own interests. Keywords: Brexit, British Overseas Territories (BOTs), constitutional status, Crown Dependencies, sovereignty https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.114 • Received June 2019, accepted March 2020 © 2020—Institute of Island Studies, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Priority Programmes South
    Foundation Priority Programmes West Midlands South Thank you for your interest in the Foundation Priority Programmes available in WM South. We have 15 programmes available offering experience in Medical Education, Leadership and Digital Innovation. I hope you will find the information below helpful and hope to see you working in WM South in August 2021. Further information regarding Foundation Priority programmes, including the application process can be found on the UKFPO website https://foundationprogramme.nhs.uk/programmes/2-year- foundation-programme/foundation-priority-programme-2/ The following table give an overview of the programmes we are offering in WM South. Employing Organisation FPP Post and Incentives Hereford County Hospital, Wye Valley x3 Education Foundation Posts NHS Trust ➢ Postgraduate Certificate in Education at F2 ➢ 80% clinical and 20% education at F2 University Hospitals Coventry and x6 Leadership Foundation Posts Warwickshire (UHCW), George Eliot ➢ Linked to Leadership Programme Hospital and South Warwickshire NHS ➢ Quality Improvement Project (QIP) Foundation Trust ➢ Peer Support and Management ➢ Undertaken during the F2 year x6 Digital Health Innovation Posts ➢ Links with Local Universities ➢ Develop skills for Delivering Care in a Digital World ➢ Six Workshops, Evaluative Project and Mentoring ➢ Course Certificate and Associate Membership of Faculty of Clinical Informatics ➢ Undertaken during the F1 year Education Foundation posts – Wye Valley NHS Trust – Hereford Hospital Following successful completion of
    [Show full text]
  • A Science & Innovation Audit for the West Midlands
    A Science & Innovation Audit for the West Midlands June 2017 A Science & Innovation Audit for the West Midlands Contents Foreword 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 2. Economic and research landscape .................................................................................... 4 3. The West Midlands SIA Framework ................................................................................. 15 4. Innovation Ecosystem ....................................................................................................... 18 5. Enabling Competencies .................................................................................................... 38 6. Market Strengths ................................................................................................................ 49 7. Key findings and moving forward .................................................................................... 73 Annex A: Case Studies ........................................................................................................ A-1 www.sqw.co.uk A Science & Innovation Audit for the West Midlands Foreword In a year of change and challenge on other fronts, this last year has also been one of quiet revolution. This year has seen a dramatic increase across the UK in the profile of science and innovation as a key driver of productivity and its potential to improve the way our public services are delivered. The potential has always
    [Show full text]
  • British Overseas Territories Law
    British Overseas Territories Law Second Edition Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson HART PUBLISHING Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Kemp House , Chawley Park, Cumnor Hill, Oxford , OX2 9PH , UK HART PUBLISHING, the Hart/Stag logo, BLOOMSBURY and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published in Great Britain 2018 First edition published in 2011 Copyright © Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson , 2018 Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson have asserted their right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identifi ed as Authors of this work. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. While every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of this work, no responsibility for loss or damage occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any statement in it can be accepted by the authors, editors or publishers. All UK Government legislation and other public sector information used in the work is Crown Copyright © . All House of Lords and House of Commons information used in the work is Parliamentary Copyright © . This information is reused under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 ( http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/ open-government-licence/version/3 ) except where otherwise stated. All Eur-lex material used in the work is © European Union, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/ , 1998–2018. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Secretary of State for Defence Ben Wallace Discusses Strategic Priorities
    American Enterprise Institute Web event — UK Secretary of State for Defence Ben Wallace discusses strategic priorities Introduction: Mackenzie Eaglen, Senior Fellow, AEI Remarks: Ben Wallace, Secretary of State for Defence, UK Ministry of Defence Discussion: Mackenzie Eaglen, Senior Fellow, AEI Ben Wallace, Secretary of State for Defence, UK Ministry of Defence Tuesday, July 13, 2021 12:00–1:00 p.m. Event page: https://www.aei.org/events/uk-secretary-of-state-for-defence-ben- wallace-discusses-strategic-priorities/ Mackenzie Eaglen: Good afternoon. Welcome to the American Enterprise Institute’s live web event on the strategic priorities for the United States and the United Kingdom. My name is Mackenzie Eaglen. I’m a resident fellow here on national security and military budget issues. It’s an honor and a privilege to be joined today by the United Kingdom’s Secretary of State for Defence Ben Wallace. We’re coming to you from the AEI library today here in Washington, DC. And it’s remarkable to meet again in person, sir, after so long of a break. The Right Hon. Ben Wallace MP was appointed secretary of state for defense in July of 2019. He started his career in the British army, commissioning from the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, and saw active service in Northern Ireland, Germany, Cyprus, and Central America. He was mentioned in dispatches while on operations in the 1990s. After leaving the army, Secretary Wallace joined the aerospace company QinetiQ, where he gained experience in the defense industry writ large. He first entered politics in 1999 as a member of the Scottish parliament before being elected to the UK House of Parliament in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands European Regional Development Fund Operational Programme
    Regional Competitiveness and Employment Objective 2007 – 2013 West Midlands European Regional Development Fund Operational Programme Version 3 July 2012 CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 – 5 2a SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS - ORIGINAL 2.1 Summary of Eligible Area - Strengths and Challenges 6 – 14 2.2 Employment 15 – 19 2.3 Competition 20 – 27 2.4 Enterprise 28 – 32 2.5 Innovation 33 – 37 2.6 Investment 38 – 42 2.7 Skills 43 – 47 2.8 Environment and Attractiveness 48 – 50 2.9 Rural 51 – 54 2.10 Urban 55 – 58 2.11 Lessons Learnt 59 – 64 2.12 SWOT Analysis 65 – 70 2b SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS – UPDATED 2010 2.1 Summary of Eligible Area - Strengths and Challenges 71 – 83 2.2 Employment 83 – 87 2.3 Competition 88 – 95 2.4 Enterprise 96 – 100 2.5 Innovation 101 – 105 2.6 Investment 106 – 111 2.7 Skills 112 – 119 2.8 Environment and Attractiveness 120 – 122 2.9 Rural 123 – 126 2.10 Urban 127 – 130 2.11 Lessons Learnt 131 – 136 2.12 SWOT Analysis 137 - 142 3 STRATEGY 3.1 Challenges 143 - 145 3.2 Policy Context 145 - 149 3.3 Priorities for Action 150 - 164 3.4 Process for Chosen Strategy 165 3.5 Alignment with the Main Strategies of the West 165 - 166 Midlands 3.6 Development of the West Midlands Economic 166 Strategy 3.7 Strategic Environmental Assessment 166 - 167 3.8 Lisbon Earmarking 167 3.9 Lisbon Agenda and the Lisbon National Reform 167 Programme 3.10 Partnership Involvement 167 3.11 Additionality 167 - 168 4 PRIORITY AXES Priority 1 – Promoting Innovation and Research and Development 4.1 Rationale and Objective 169 - 170 4.2 Description of Activities
    [Show full text]
  • 17 April 2020
    HOUSE OF LORDS BUSINESS 17 April 2020 Contents Tuesday 21 April 2020 at 1.00pm Future Business 2 †Lord Grimstone of Boscobel and Select Committee Reports 7 †Lord Greenhalgh will be introduced. Motions Relating to Delegated Legislation 8 †Business of the House (Virtual Proceedings and Topical Questions for Questions for Short Debate 8 Written Answer) The Lord Privy Seal (Baroness Evans of Bowes Park) to Bills in Progress 13 move that, until further Order– Statutory Instruments in Progress 15 1. The following proceedings of the House may take place as Virtual Committee Sheet 18 Proceedings: Oral Questions, Private Notice Questions, Ministerial Statements, debates (but not decisions) on Statutory Instruments, Questions for Short Debate and motions for debate; 2. The procedure in Virtual Proceedings shall follow, so far as practical, procedure in the House save that– (a) no member may participate unless admitted to the Virtual Proceedings; (b) the order of speaking in Virtual Proceedings shall be facilitated by the Chair; (c) the time allotted for Oral Questions shall be extended to 40 minutes to allow up to 10 minutes for each Oral Question; (d) the time allotted to business in Virtual Proceedings may be varied by unanimous agreement of members taking part in the Virtual Proceedings; and (e) Virtual Proceedings may be adjourned between items or classes of business at the discretion of the Chair; 3. A Virtual Proceeding may take place irrespective of whether the House is sitting that day; 4. A member may table one Topical Question for Written Answer in each week Items marked † are new or have been altered during which the House sits, and it is expected that it will be answered within [I] indicates that the member concerned has five working days; a relevant registered interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Uk Government and Special Advisers
    UK GOVERNMENT AND SPECIAL ADVISERS April 2019 Housing Special Advisers Parliamentary Under Parliamentary Under Parliamentary Under Parliamentary Under INTERNATIONAL 10 DOWNING Toby Lloyd Samuel Coates Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Deputy Chief Whip STREET DEVELOPMENT Foreign Affairs/Global Salma Shah Rt Hon Tobias Ellwood MP Kwasi Kwarteng MP Jackie Doyle-Price MP Jake Berry MP Christopher Pincher MP Prime Minister Britain James Hedgeland Parliamentary Under Parliamentary Under Secretary of State Chief Whip (Lords) Rt Hon Theresa May MP Ed de Minckwitz Olivia Robey Secretary of State INTERNATIONAL Parliamentary Under Secretary of State and Minister for Women Stuart Andrew MP TRADE Secretary of State Heather Wheeler MP and Equalities Rt Hon Lord Taylor Chief of Staff Government Relations Minister of State Baroness Blackwood Rt Hon Penny of Holbeach CBE for Immigration Secretary of State and Parliamentary Under Mordaunt MP Gavin Barwell Special Adviser JUSTICE Deputy Chief Whip (Lords) (Attends Cabinet) President of the Board Secretary of State Deputy Chief of Staff Olivia Oates WORK AND Earl of Courtown Rt Hon Caroline Nokes MP of Trade Rishi Sunak MP Special Advisers Legislative Affairs Secretary of State PENSIONS JoJo Penn Rt Hon Dr Liam Fox MP Parliamentary Under Laura Round Joe Moor and Lord Chancellor SCOTLAND OFFICE Communications Special Adviser Rt Hon David Gauke MP Secretary of State Secretary of State Lynn Davidson Business Liason Special Advisers Rt Hon Amber Rudd MP Lord Bourne of
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on Representation and Reform in the House of Lords
    Our House: Reflections on Representation and Reform in the House of Lords Edited by Caroline Julian About ResPublica ResPublica is an independent, non-partisan UK think tank founded by Phillip Blond in November 2009. In July 2011, the ResPublica Trust was established as a not-for-profit entity which oversees all of ResPublica’s domestic work. We focus on developing practical solutions to enduring socio-economic and cultural problems of our time, such as poverty, asset inequality, family and social breakdown, and environmental degradation. ResPublica Essay Collections ResPublica’s work draws together some of the most exciting thinkers in the UK and internationally to explore the new polices and approaches that will create and deliver a new political settlement. Our network of contributors who advise on and inform our work include leaders from politics, business, civil society and academia. Through our publications, compendiums and website we encourage other thinkers, politicians and members of the public to join the debate and contribute to the development of forward-thinking and innovative ideas. We intend our essay collections to stimulate balanced debate around issues that are fundamental to our core principles. Contents Foreword by Professor John Milbank and Professor Simon Lee, Trustees, 1 The ResPublica Trust 1. Introduction 4 Caroline Julian, ResPublica 2. A Statement from the Government 9 Mark Harper MP, Minister for Political and Constitutional Reform A Social Purpose 3. A Truly Representative House of Lords 13 The Rt Hon Frank Field, MP for Birkenhead 4. Association and Civic Participation 16 Dr Adrian Pabst, University of Kent 5. Bicameralism & Representative Democracy: An International Perspective 23 Rafal Heydel-Mankoo 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Accountability Mechanisms of the Bank of England and of The
    STUDY Requested by the ECON committee Monetary Dialogue Papers, September 2020 Accountability Mechanisms of the Bank of England and of the European Central Bank Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies Directorate-General for Internal Policies Author: Rosa M. LASTRA EN PE 652.744 - September 2020 Accountability Mechanisms of the Bank of England and of the European Central Bank Monetary Dialogue Papers September 2020 Abstract This paper analyses the accountability mechanisms of the European Central Bank and of the Bank of England and focuses on parliamentary accountability for the monetary policy functions. The paper suggests ways to improve the Monetary Dialogue between the ECB and the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (European Parliament). This document was provided by Policy Department A at the request of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON). This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. AUTHORS Rosa M. LASTRA, CCLS, Queen Mary University of London ADMINISTRATOR RESPONSIBLE Drazen RAKIC EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Janetta CUJKOVA LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR Policy departments provide in-house and external expertise to support EP committees and other parliamentary bodies in shaping legislation and exercising democratic scrutiny over EU internal policies. To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe for updates, please write to: Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies European Parliament L-2929 - Luxembourg Email: [email protected] Manuscript completed: September 2020 Date of publication: September 2020 © European Union, 2020 This document is available on the internet at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/econ/econ-policies/monetary-dialogue DISCLAIMER AND COPYRIGHT The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]