DOCSLIB.ORG

UK Secretary of State for Defence Ben Wallace Discusses Strategic Priorities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UK Secretary of State for Defence Ben Wallace Discusses Strategic Priorities American Enterprise Institute Web event — UK Secretary of State for Defence Ben Wallace discusses strategic priorities Introduction: Mackenzie Eaglen, Senior Fellow, AEI Remarks: Ben Wallace, Secretary of State for Defence, UK Ministry of Defence Discussion: Mackenzie Eaglen, Senior Fellow, AEI Ben Wallace, Secretary of State for Defence, UK Ministry of Defence Tuesday, July 13, 2021 12:00–1:00 p.m. Event page: https://www.aei.org/events/uk-secretary-of-state-for-defence-ben- wallace-discusses-strategic-priorities/ Mackenzie Eaglen: Good afternoon. Welcome to the American Enterprise Institute’s live web event on the strategic priorities for the United States and the United Kingdom. My name is Mackenzie Eaglen. I’m a resident fellow here on national security and military budget issues. It’s an honor and a privilege to be joined today by the United Kingdom’s Secretary of State for Defence Ben Wallace. We’re coming to you from the AEI library today here in Washington, DC. And it’s remarkable to meet again in person, sir, after so long of a break. The Right Hon. Ben Wallace MP was appointed secretary of state for defense in July of 2019. He started his career in the British army, commissioning from the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, and saw active service in Northern Ireland, Germany, Cyprus, and Central America. He was mentioned in dispatches while on operations in the 1990s. After leaving the army, Secretary Wallace joined the aerospace company QinetiQ, where he gained experience in the defense industry writ large. He first entered politics in 1999 as a member of the Scottish parliament before being elected to the UK House of Parliament in 2005. He served in a variety of government roles, including the UK’s longest-serving security minister. He was in that position during the terror attacks of 2017 and the Russian nerve agent attack in Salisbury in 2018. I’m glad to have the chance today to speak for a variety of reasons, and I want to highlight just a few of them. I am pleased and honored that you chose AEI for your public address this week in what is a very busy schedule packed with national security events. Earlier this year, as some of our audience knows who tunes in regularly for my events, in March, the United Kingdom released its Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy, followed by the Defence Command Paper, both agenda-setting documents that have a lot, I think, for the United States to learn — that aim to set out how the UK would engage and operate differently around the world, highlighting the armed forces will be more active and abroad. Then last month on the eve of the G7 summit, President Biden and Prime Minister Boris Johnson signed an update to the 80-year-old Atlantic Charter. Of course, the original charter was signed by Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill. This new agreement pledges our governments to work together on a range of issues, including the rules-based international order. Third, the United States is undergoing our own series of strategy reviews led by this new administration that I know are of great interest to our closest allies in the world, including the United Kingdom. So, the secretary’s first visit to the United States in a year and a half, almost, due to the pandemic is a very welcome visit. I know that yesterday, of course, he met with the Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin and will be headed to Fort Bragg and other places on the West Coast before headed to INDOPACOM theater of operations. I’m looking forward to our conversations. Our audience — just a quick logistical note — can submit their questions at any time this afternoon including now for the secretary. You can send them through an email account or use a hashtag on Twitter. The hashtag is #UKDefenseAEI. That’s defense with an S and not a C as our British counterparts might hope. If you would like to send questions via email, it’s also — that email is on my bio page, or it’s under [email protected] as in c-o-y-n-e. I will take a brief intermission after the secretary’s remarks. By brief, I mean mere seconds to change up the room to allow for our interview and then take your questions. And with that, Secretary Wallace, thank you. Ben Wallace: Thank you very much, and thank you for AEI to inviting me here today. So, it’s great to be back here. As you alluded to, I was here literally the week before lockdown in March last year. So, it’s great to come and see things coming back to life and to see Washington as it should be. New administration, new threats to tackle, and obviously new decisions to make. But the intervening period has taught all of us the new meanings of national security and the importance of national resilience. And it’s a huge pleasure to speak here at this enterprise institute, a place which has for nine decades been consistently and persuasively making the case for expanding freedom, opportunity, and enterprise. Last time I was in DC, I spoke publicly about the importance of such values and continuing to motivate and mobilize our shared efforts in an increasingly anxious world, and I explained how the UK was undergoing an integrated review of its foreign, security, defense, and development policy in order to do just that. I’m not going to rehearse the diagnosis of evolving security threats in the current strategic context. Instead, I’ll limit my remarks to what are, following the Integrated Review’s publication, my strategic priorities for improving our response to those threats and what more is needed if we are to reverse what I believe continues to be a deteriorating environment for our shared interests and our shared values. Then I hope we can open up to a discussion and get some more detail on whatever issues are of most interest to you. Since the establishment of this institution, the world has experienced much turbulence. It is 80 years since the strategic shock of an attack on Pearl Harbor precipitated the US’ decisive entry into the Second World War. It’s just over 70 years since the US and British forces joined our allies in the Korean Peninsula to repel Communism at the earliest proxy skirmishes of the Cold War. It is now three decades since our tomahawks and tanks sped across the desert to free Kuwait from Saddam’s tyranny. And it is almost 20 years since 9/11, when global terrorism on an epic scale came to this continent — to this part of the world. The world has since been then thrown into more turmoil. We commemorate the service and sacrifice of each of those anniversaries, and I was humbled to visit the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier in Arlington Cemetery yesterday. But there is also much more that we — those charged to defending our nations — must learn from those anniversaries. There is currently a lesson on the impacts of technology development. There’s certainly lessons on the impact of technology developments and proliferation. Exploiting new technologies, especially in combination with wider innovation and strategic surprise, can provide significant advantage, but it is often fleeting and rarely decisive. That is because of an associated lesson that it is the actor’s underlying intent, creativity, and sheer willpower that ultimately determines the arc of history, not just technological superiority or capability advantages. Perhaps the most salient lesson of all, those anniversaries, is that the threat against which we defend that combination of intent and capability is constantly evolving, and if we are to do our job, so must we. Today we’ve entered a new competitive age, as it is referred to on our Integrated Review, an era of resurgent authoritarian states, with an ever more aggressive and regressive Russia and an economically and militarily expansionist China. But it is also an era of diversifying threats with nations like North Korea and Iran destabilizing their regional security. Violent extremism and terrorism not just enduring but evolving and increasing in lethality. Both state and non-state actors exploiting digital technologies to undermine the rule of law and societal cohesion, and as well as all the wider pressure on governments like climate change, global health, population growth, urbanization, and migration, all with their associated human security implications. The threats pile up. Put more succinctly, it’s an era of both the dragons and the snakes that James Woolsey described in all those years ago and David Kilcullen has most recently expanded on. And the methods these actors are employing bypass our strengths and exploit our weakness, enabling them to target everything from our satellites, computer networks, and critical natural infrastructure to our legal frameworks, political process, and societal cohesion. They constantly test our thresholds for armed response, avoiding open conflict, and in doing so blurring our self-imposed lines between home and abroad, friend and foe, peace and war. So how should we respond? Perhaps by listening to the wisdom of those who have wrestled with such challenges before, among them former AEI scholar, US Navy veteran of World War II, and your 38th president, Gerald Ford. President Ford saw his fair share of turbulence, too, and his approach was to always return to first principles of shared values. Setting out in his national security policy 45 years ago, he summed it up in three words: peace through strength. I would argue that today that means not just hard military strength but the strength of our values and the conviction of proactively promoting them and the strength of our partnerships, whether across government and society or between international allies and partners.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Honours and Awards- ANZAC Day
    Honours and Awards- ANZAC Day Today I will talk about the Honours and Awards that have been received by people who have lived in the District. 21 people who have lived in Mt Marshal have received various awards. The highest award available is the Victoria Cross. This is awarded for Valour. The next highest is the Distinguished Conduct Medal. This is regarded as an extremely high level award. It is awarded for gallantry in the field. There are three recipients of the DCM who have lived in the District. Two are buried in the Bencubbin Cemetery. The next highest awards are the Military Cross and the Military Medal. 12 people have been awarded these medals. The Military Medal is awarded for bravery in battle, acts of gallantry and devotion to duty under fire. The next medal is the Meritorious Service Medal. There have been three people with this award in the District. This medal can be awarded for meritorious service or gallantry. The last imperial award is the Mentioned in Dispatches. This requires having a noteworthy action published in the London or Commonwealth Gazette. There is no medal involved. The recipient receives a certificate. A bronze oak leave is sown on the campaign medal ribbon. There have been three recipients of this award There have been three foreign awards received: Two Belgium Croix de Guerres and one United States Silver Star. All of these medals were awarded during World War One except one Military Medal and the US Silver Star. These two medals were awarded during the Vietnam War. The three Citations for the DCMs follow: Cpl AG Forrester: “For conspicuous gallantry and devotion to duty whilst in charge of a stretcher bearer squad during an attack.
    [Show full text]
  • Uk Government and Special Advisers
    UK GOVERNMENT AND SPECIAL ADVISERS April 2019 Housing Special Advisers Parliamentary Under Parliamentary Under Parliamentary Under Parliamentary Under INTERNATIONAL 10 DOWNING Toby Lloyd Samuel Coates Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Deputy Chief Whip STREET DEVELOPMENT Foreign Affairs/Global Salma Shah Rt Hon Tobias Ellwood MP Kwasi Kwarteng MP Jackie Doyle-Price MP Jake Berry MP Christopher Pincher MP Prime Minister Britain James Hedgeland Parliamentary Under Parliamentary Under Secretary of State Chief Whip (Lords) Rt Hon Theresa May MP Ed de Minckwitz Olivia Robey Secretary of State INTERNATIONAL Parliamentary Under Secretary of State and Minister for Women Stuart Andrew MP TRADE Secretary of State Heather Wheeler MP and Equalities Rt Hon Lord Taylor Chief of Staff Government Relations Minister of State Baroness Blackwood Rt Hon Penny of Holbeach CBE for Immigration Secretary of State and Parliamentary Under Mordaunt MP Gavin Barwell Special Adviser JUSTICE Deputy Chief Whip (Lords) (Attends Cabinet) President of the Board Secretary of State Deputy Chief of Staff Olivia Oates WORK AND Earl of Courtown Rt Hon Caroline Nokes MP of Trade Rishi Sunak MP Special Advisers Legislative Affairs Secretary of State PENSIONS JoJo Penn Rt Hon Dr Liam Fox MP Parliamentary Under Laura Round Joe Moor and Lord Chancellor SCOTLAND OFFICE Communications Special Adviser Rt Hon David Gauke MP Secretary of State Secretary of State Lynn Davidson Business Liason Special Advisers Rt Hon Amber Rudd MP Lord Bourne of
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence Sub-Committee Oral Evidence: the Security of 5G, HC 201
    Defence Sub-Committee Oral evidence: The Security of 5G, HC 201 Tuesday 30 June 2020 Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 30 June 2020. Watch the meeting Members present: Mr Tobias Ellwood (Chair); Stuart Anderson; Sarah Atherton; Martin Docherty-Hughes; Richard Drax; Mr Mark Francois; Mr Kevan Jones; Mrs Emma Lewell-Buck; Gavin Robinson; Bob Seely; Derek Twigg. Questions 184 - 260 Witnesses I: The Rt Hon. Ben Wallace MP, Secretary of State for Defence, The Rt Hon. Oliver Dowden CBE MP, Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, and Ciaran Martin, Chief Executive Officer, National Cyber Security Centre. Written evidence from witnesses: The Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport and the Ministry of Defence Examination of witnesses Witnesses: Ben Wallace MP, Oliver Dowden MP and Ciaran Martin. Q184 Chair: Welcome to the fourth oral evidence session of our investigation into the study of 5G security in the UK. I am delighted to welcome to this hybrid session the right hon. Ben Wallace MP, Secretary of State for Defence, the right hon. Oliver Dowden, Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, and Ciaran Martin, chief executive of the National Cyber Security Centre. I am pleased that we have two Cabinet members in the room—I think that is a first—although they are at the other end of what is a huge room. You are very welcome indeed. Thank you very much for your time. Ciaran, you are joining us down the line, so hopefully you can hear us as well. We are very conscious that the Government are conducting their own study into the relationship with high-risk vendors, and that that will therefore frame some of your replies today, but I hope you will be as candid as possible, allowing us to explore the wider picture of our security and the development of 5G from a UK perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Canadians in the Air, 1914–1919, 1939–1945
    Canadians in the Air, 1914–1919, 1939–1945 Paul Goranson Anchoring the Kite cwm 19710261-3180 Beaverbrook Collection of War Art Canadian War Museum warmuseum.ca/learn Canadians in the Air 1 Canadians in the Air, 1914–1919, 1939–1945 Introduction Large-scale military aviation began with the First World War, not long after the 1909 flight of the Silver Dart marked the start of aviation in Canada. As no Canadian Air Force yet existed, thousands of Canadians fought the First World War in British flying units. Canadians first served with the Royal Flying Corps (rfc) or with the Royal Naval Air Service (rnas). These two services amalgamated on 1 April 1918 into the Royal Air Force (raf). In total, an estimated 13,000–22,000 individuals from Canada joined the British flying services. In 1924, the Royal Canadian Air Force (rcaf) was created. With the outbreak of war in September 1939, the rcaf was able to draw on an existing cadre of officers and airmen and also attracted experienced personnel from private enterprise. By 1945, close to 250,000 men and women had served in the rcaf at home and abroad. This guide will illustrate the process of researching an individual’s service, from the essential starting point of service documents to supporting resources for detail and further discovery. Helpful hint See lac’s Military Abbreviations used in Service Files page. warmuseum.ca/learn Canadians in the Air 2 Photo album of Flight Lieutenant William Burt Bickell, Royal Air Force cwm 19850379-001_p14 George Metcalf Archival Collection Canadian War Museum First World War, 1914–1919 While some recruitment and training were done Royal Flying Corps: For airmen who died or were in Canada, the flying services were British in discharged before 1 April 1918, their service records organization, administration, and operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Background, Brexit, and Relations with the United States
    The United Kingdom: Background, Brexit, and Relations with the United States Updated April 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33105 SUMMARY RL33105 The United Kingdom: Background, Brexit, and April 16, 2021 Relations with the United States Derek E. Mix Many U.S. officials and Members of Congress view the United Kingdom (UK) as the United Specialist in European States’ closest and most reliable ally. This perception stems from a combination of factors, Affairs including a sense of shared history, values, and culture; a large and mutually beneficial economic relationship; and extensive cooperation on foreign policy and security issues. The UK’s January 2020 withdrawal from the European Union (EU), often referred to as Brexit, is likely to change its international role and outlook in ways that affect U.S.-UK relations. Conservative Party Leads UK Government The government of the UK is led by Prime Minister Boris Johnson of the Conservative Party. Brexit has dominated UK domestic politics since the 2016 referendum on whether to leave the EU. In an early election held in December 2019—called in order to break a political deadlock over how and when the UK would exit the EU—the Conservative Party secured a sizeable parliamentary majority, winning 365 seats in the 650-seat House of Commons. The election results paved the way for Parliament’s approval of a withdrawal agreement negotiated between Johnson’s government and the EU. UK Is Out of the EU, Concludes Trade and Cooperation Agreement On January 31, 2020, the UK’s 47-year EU membership came to an end.
    [Show full text]
  • Priorities of a Boris Johnson Administration
    23 July 2019 PRIORITIES OF A BORIS JOHNSON ADMINISTRATION t last the speculation is over. His appointment will likely be accompanied by the traditional bounce in the polls, but the Boris Johnson has been confirmed honeymoon period is going to be extremely as Leader of the Conservative Party, short. voted in overwhelmingly, perhaps inevitably, by 92,153 of the party Indeed, there is every chance that his A faithful – vs 46,656 for Jeremy Hunt. premiership and commitments made during the campaign could be sabotaged within days. He will enter No. 10 faced with arguably the largest political and constitutional crisis of any Here we consider just some of the challenges Prime Minister in peacetime history. that the Boris Johnson administration faces over the coming months. Headland briefing | PRIORITIES OF A BORIS JOHNSON ADMINISTRATION | 01 GETTING HIS TEAM RIGHT With victory long expected, factions have All will vie with those expected to remain in cabinet established themselves amongst Boris (Matt Hancock, Michael Gove, Liz Truss and Sajid supporting MPs. Javid) and those Brexiteers who left it within the past year or so (Priti Patel, Esther McVey and Those who backed his faltering bid in 2016 Dominic Raab). (Nigel Adams, Jake Berry, Ben Wallace and Conor Burns) are competing for influence with those who This will start to come out in the wash from early are seen to have played a key role in navigating Wednesday evening. The civil service is pressing for the MPs leg of this contest (Gavin Williamson and the full cabinet to be appointed by nightfall though Grant Shapps), elder statesmen positioning it is not impossible that he chooses to split it over themselves for a comeback (Michael Fallon, Iain two days.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Affairs Digest a Daily Summary of Political Events Affecting the Jewish Community Scottish Council of Jewish Communities
    13 June 2017 Issue 1,454 Political Affairs Digest A daily summary of political events affecting the Jewish Community Scottish Council of Jewish Communities SCoJeC Contents Home Affairs Consultations Israel Home Affairs Downing Street: Ministerial Appointments Ministers of State Home Office Nick Hurd Ministry of Justice Dominic Raab Department for Education Anne Milton Robert Goodwill Department for Exiting the European Union Baroness Anelay Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Claire Perry HM Treasury: Financial Secretary Mel Stride Foreign and Commonwealth Office Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon Mark Field Department for Communities and Local Government Alok Sharma Ministry of Defence Mark Lancaster (Joint) Department for International Development & Foreign and Commonwealth Office Alistair Burt (Joint) Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy & Department for Education Jo Johnson Department for Education Nick Gibb 1 Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs George Eustice Department of Health Philip Dunne Foreign and Commonwealth Office Alan Duncan Home Office Ben Wallace Baroness Williams of Trafford Department for Culture Media and Sport Matt Hancock Department for International Trade Greg Hands (and also Minister for London) Lord Price Department for Transport John Hayes (Joint) Department for International Development & Foreign and Commonwealth Office Rory Stewart Department for International Development Lord Bates Department for Work and Pensions Damian Hinds Penny Mordaunt Ministry of Defence Earl
    [Show full text]
  • Henry Grace DCM Sergeant 6830, 1St Battalion Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire Light Infantry
    Henry Grace DCM Sergeant 6830, 1st Battalion Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire Light Infantry. Henry Grace was born in 1885 and baptised on 21 July in Amersham. He was the eldest son of Thomas and Frances Fanny Grace, formerly Eggleton, living at Washington Row, Amersham. Thomas was a general farm labourer but had previously served in the 10th Hussars during the Afghan and Egyptian Campaigns 1878 – 1880. His five sons all served in H.M.Forces during the 1914-18 war. Henry enlisted as a private in the regular army of the 1st Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire Light Infantry (OBLI) in 1901, in High Wycombe. His occupation was recorded as gardener’s labourer. At the time of the 1911 Census he was a Lance Corporal serving with the military in India. The 1st Battalion OBLI was part of the 17th Brigade, 6th Poona Division, and left India for Mesopotamia (now Iraq) in November 1914. There, the Battalion took part in the campaign against the Ottoman forces that ruled the country. Henry’s Medal Roll Index card showed that he entered the Asiatic theatre of war on 5 December 1914. In December Henry was mentioned in dispatches and nine months later, after promotion to a sergeant, he was awarded the Distinguished Conduct Medal for conspicuous gallantry at Kut-al-Amara (Mesopotamia). On the 28th September 1915, he sent messages to the artillery by heliograph under heavy fire, although he had to stand in full view of the enemy’s redoubts to do so. The British had taken Kut and advanced towards Baghdad but were stopped at Ctesiphon and forced to retreat.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Recipients of the Victoria Cross During The
    ORIGINAL ARTICLES 8. Crawforo ES. Bomberger RA. Glaeser OH. et al. Ao_iliac occlusive disease. Factors influencing. survival and function following reronstructi.ve operation over a 2>year period. Surgery 1981; 90: HISTORY OF MEDICIl'iE 1055-1067. 11I.. 9. Nevelsteen A. Wourers L. Suv R. Aortofemoral Dacron reconstruction for aorto-iliac occlusive disease. A25-year survey. E';" JVase Su')I 1991; S, 179-186. 10. Reddy E. Robbs jY, Human RR. Rajaruthnam P. Early results of aortobifemoral bypass - a comparison between Black and wlUte patients. S AIr JSu')I 1982; 2ft 283-288. MEDICAL RECIPIENTS OF THE 11. Seftel He The rarity of coronary heart disease in South African blacks. S AIr Med J1978; ~ 9'J. 105. 12. Seeda. YK. Maye! FGH. Khan S. et al. Risk factors for coronary heart disease in the Indians of VICTORIA CROSS DURING THE Durban. S AIr Med J1990; 78, 447-454. 13. Seedat Yl<. Mayet FGH. Gouws E. Risk factors for coronary heart disease in the white ANGLO-BOER WAR, 1899 -1902 community in Durban. S AIr Med J1994; ~ 257·262. 14. Clarke RJ, Provan JL The Surgical treatment of aorto-iliac occlusion Br JSurg 1969; 56:: ~2.55. 15. Darling RC, Brewster DC, Hallet ]W, Darling RC ill. Aorta-iliac reconsl:ruction. SUTg CIin North Am 1979; 5~ 565-580. JC de Villiers, CV Small 16. Talkington CM. Thompson JE. Prevention and management of infected prostheses. Surg Clin North Am 1982; 6Z, 515-530. 17. Robbs jY, Reddy E, Ray R Antibiotic prophylaxis in aortic and peripheral arterial surgery in the presence of infected extremity lesions.
    [Show full text]
  • Tobias Ellwood MP
    Tobias Ellwood MP Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office Constituency: Bournemouth East, South West Majority: 7,728 Party: Conservative Westminster Tobias Ellwood MP House of Commons London SW1A 0AA Tel: 020 7219 4349 Fax: 020 7219 0946 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.tobiasellwood.com Relevant contributions A link to relevant contributions Tobias Ellwood has made can be found here. Ellwood has plenty of experience of the world, having served across the Middle East and Europe in the Green Jackets and has frequently pushed the government on military issues. He has regularly asked questions about Afghanistan, the military drawn down in that country and security across the Middle East. Recently Ellwood has questioned the government on policy in Ukraine and relations with Russia. Responsibilities Replacing Hugh Robertson, Ellwood will be responsible for; Middle East and North Africa, North America, counter terrorism, defence and international security. Parliamentary Career Opposition Whip 2005-07; Shadow Minister for Culture, Media and Sport 2007-10; PPS to: Liam Fox as Secretary of State for Defence 2010-11, David Lidington as Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office 2011-13, Jeremy Hunt as Secretary of State for Health 2013- Past Select committees Member: Environmental Audit 2005-06, Armed Forces Bill 2011 All-party groups (office-holding) Chair, Afghanistan Group 2010- Treasurer, Indonesia Group 2011- All-party groups (membership) Member, United Arab Emirates Group Member,
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Researching First World War Military Family History
    Norfolk Cultural Services First World War Research Guide A Guide to Researching First World War Military Family History What you can find at Norfolk Library and Information Service, Norfolk Record Office and the Royal Norfolk Regimental Museum 1 Norfolk Cultural Services First World War Research Guide Contents: Section Page Introduction 3 One Starting your research with Norfolk Library and Information Service 5 A guide to tracing family history 5 A guide to tracing military information 11 Two How Norfolk Record Office can help 15 Case Study: What can be found online 17 Adding to your story with local archives 25 Three What you can access at the Royal Norfolk Regimental Museum 29 Background information on the Norfolk Regiment 32 Information on the Norfolk Regiment in our collection 34 Information on each battalion in our collection 35 List of books and printed resources held at the RNRM 41 Useful websites 47 Contact information 50 2 Norfolk Cultural Services First World War Research Guide Introduction The centenary of the First World War has inspired many people to look back and trace those who served during 1914 – 1918. This guide shows how Norfolk Cultural Services can help researchers use and interpret online and archival resources to find out more information about individuals in the First World War. The first section gives an introduction to starting your research with the library. It highlights which helpful books are available for loan, and how to take advantage of Norfolk Library and Information Service’s subscription to the Ancestry website. This section also advises on other places and websites to start your search.
    [Show full text]