DOCSLIB.ORG

11 18 Inventory.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
11 18 Inventory.Indd 2 •%DAY_OF_WEEK_DATE%% IInventorynventory – UU.S..S. ccarar aandnd llight-truck,ight-truck, oonn DDec.ec. 1 VVehiclesehicles aarere ddomesticomestic uunlessnless nnoted.oted. U.S. sales Days Days Days Days Days Days per franchise, Nov. supply supply supply supply supply supply Car Truck Total Total Inventory Dec. 1 Nov. 1 Inventory Dec. 1 Nov. 1 Inventory Dec. 1 Nov. 1 Nov. Nov. Nov. Oct. units 2018 2018 units 2018 2018 units 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 BMW car (I) ............... 31,000 63 49 Cascada (I) .................... 1,000 122 69 Odyssey ........................ 20,000 62 62 Toyota 45 87 132 136 BMW trk. (D/I) ............ 25,000 39 69 LaCrosse ....................... 6,000 220 153 Pilot ............................... 49,000 116 87 Lexus 33 78 111 95 Total BMW (D/I)........... 56,000 49 58 Regal ............................. 8,000 209 267 Ridgeline ....................... 15,000 155 135 Honda 47 54 101 104 Total Mini (I) .............. 9,000 64 74 Buick car (D).............. 14,000 214 214 Total Honda trk. .......... 172,000 76 71 Subaru 17 73 90 88 BMW OF N.A.†* ........... 65,000 51 60 Buick car (I)............... 1,000 122 69 Honda (D).................. 293,000 76 71 Nissan 31 58 89 91 200 ................................ 100 189 94 Total Buick car ........... 15,000 203 189 Honda (I)................... 36,000 88 74 Mercedes-Benz 39 47 86 84 300 ................................ 5,100 28 28 Enclave .......................... 18,000 111 74 Total Honda ............... 329,000 77 71 BMW 36 47 83 68 Total Chrysler car ........ 5,200 28 28 Encore (I) ...................... 32,000 98 133 Am. Honda car (D) ....... 134,000 78 73 Hyundai 36 32 68 63 Pacifica .......................... 31,100 91 86 Envision (I) .................... 18,000 188 217 Am. Honda car (I) ........ 37,000 89 76 Infiniti 18 49 67 56 Total Chrysler trk......... 31,100 91 86 Buick trk. (D) ............. 18,000 111 74 Am. Honda car ............ 171,000 80 73 Ford 11 50 61 60 Total Chrysler ............. 36,200 69 69 Buick trk. (I) .............. 50,000 119 154 Am. Honda trk. ........... 196,000 73 69 Kia 36 22 58 58 Challenger ..................... 17,000 85 84 Total Buick trk. ........... 68,000 117 121 AMERICAN HONDA* ...... 367,000 76 71 Audi 22 35 57 54 Charger ......................... 18,700 64 74 Buick (D) ................... 32,000 141 106 Total Genesis car (I)† .... 1,100 64 77 Chevrolet 12 43 55 55 Dart ............................... – 240 459 Buick (I) .................... 51,000 119 150 Hyundai car (D/I)......... 75,200 62 63 Acura 14 38 52 50 Viper .............................. – 525 – Total Buick ................. 83,000 126 130 Hyundai trk. (D/I) ........ 61,900 58 67 Land Rover – 50 50 46 Total Dodge car .......... 35,800 73 78 ATS ................................ 1,000 140 79 Total Hyundai (D/I)†...... 137,200 60 65 VW 22 19 41 44 Caravan ......................... 11,900 29 28 CT6 ................................ 2,000 64 101 Total Hyundai Motors (D/I)† 138,300 60 65 Mazda 11 24 35 31 Durango ........................ 19,900 99 100 CTS ............................... 3,000 101 95 Kia car (I) ................. 66,000 59 61 GMC – 31 31 27 Journey ......................... 26,200 116 121 XTS ............................... 2,000 26 25 Kia trk. (D/I) .............. 33,000 49 51 Jeep – 31 31 31 Total Dodge trk. .......... 58,000 70 69 Total Cadillac car ........ 8,000 56 58 Total Kia Motors (D/I)* .. 99,000 55 57 Porsche 12 18 30 26 Total Dodge ............... 93,800 71 72 Escalade ........................ 6,000 81 90 Hyundai-Kia car (D/I) .... 142,300 61 62 Mini 19 9 28 25 ProMaster ..................... 13,000 67 76 Escalade ESV ................. 4,000 82 93 Hyundai-Kia trk. (D/I) .... 94,900 54 60 Volvo 5 23 28 25 ProMaster City (I) .......... 4,800 113 124 XT4 ................................ 8,000 71 – HYUNDAI-KIA .............. 237,300 58 61 Ram – 24 24 23 Ram pickup ................... 229,600 110 116 Mitsubishi 4 17 21 22 XT5 ................................ 17,000 109 95 Total Jaguar car/trk. (I) .. 9,000 70 88 Ram trk. (D) ............... 242,700 107 113 Jaguar 6 14 20 16 Total Cadillac trk. ........ 35,000 89 115 Total Land Rover trk. (I) .. 16,000 47 56 Ram trk. (I) ................ 4,800 113 124 JAGUAR LAND ROVER N.A.†* 25,000 53 64 Cadillac 4 11 15 12 Total Ram trk. ............. 247,500 107 113 Total Cadillac ............. 43,000 80 94 Dodge 5 9 14 14 Bolt ................................ 7,000 85 105 Mazda car (D/I) ........... 23,200 91 94 Total Dodge/Ram ......... 341,300 94 98 Mazda trk. (I).............. 30,000 53 66 Alfa Romeo 6 6 12 11 500 ................................ 1,900 66 103 Camaro .......................... 18,000 124 111 Lincoln 2 8 10 9 Corvette ......................... 8,000 161 132 MAZDA N.A.† .............. 53,200 64 76 Spider (I) ....................... 2,800 355 355 Mercedes-Benz car (D/I) 28,000 47 50 Buick 1 7 8 8 Fiat car (D)................ 1,900 66 103 Cruze ............................. 30,000 71 58 Maserati 5 3 8 8 Mercedes-Benz trk. (D/I) 34,000 47 52 Fiat car (I) ................. 2,800 355 355 Impala ........................... 6,000 30 21 McLaren 7 – 7 7 MERCEDES-BENZ USA†‡* 62,000 47 51 Total Fiat car ............. 4,700 129 177 Malibu ........................... 32,000 73 69 Chrysler 2 4 6 6 Mirage (I) ...................... 5,000 81 56 500L (I) ......................... 600 309 146 Sonic ............................. 5,000 201 312 Ferrari 5 – 5 5 500X (I) ......................... 2,500 178 243 Spark (I) ........................ 10,000 236 212 Total Mitsubishi car (I) .. 5,000 81 56 Bentley 2 2 4 4 Total Fiat truck (I) ........ 3,100 193 220 Volt ................................ 3,000 45 79 Eclipse Cross (I) ............ 8,800 187 204 Fiat 2 1 3 3 Fiat (D) ..................... 1,900 66 103 Chevrolet car (D)......... 109,000 76 69 Outlander (I) .................. 14,000 145 149 Lamborghini 3 – 3 3 Fiat (I) ...................... 5,900 246 267 Chevrolet car (I).......... 10,000 236 212 Outlander Sport (I) ........ 9,700 94 94 Rolls-Royce 3 – 3 3 Total Fiat ................... 7,800 149 192 Total Chevrolet car ...... 119,000 81 73 Total Mitsubishi trk. (I) .. 32,400 131 136 Aston Martin 2 – 2 2 Cherokee ....................... 58,200 72 95 City Express .................. 1,000 238 172 MITSUBISHI MOTORS N.A. 37,400 121 119 Smart 2 – 2 2 Compass ....................... 44,500 95 89 Colorado ........................ 38,000 110 100 Infi niti car (I) ............. 7,800 51 65 Genesis 1 – 1 1 Grand Cherokee ............. 72,000 96 98 Equinox ......................... 72,000 55 68 Infi niti trk. (D/I) .......... 22,200 54 72 Source: Automotive News Data Center Patriot ........................... 100 369 176 Express van ................... 17,000 57 60 Total Infi niti (D/I) ......... 30,000 53 70 Renegade (I).................. 37,200 130 124 Silverado ....................... 194,000 97 108 Nissan car (D/I) .......... 97,400 72 54 Wrangler ....................... 86,000 135 156 Suburban ...................... 14,000 90 55 Nissan trk. (D/I) .......... 164,200 66 78 Jeep trk. (D) ............... 260,700 98 107 Tahoe ............................. 28,000 96 97 Total Nissan ............... 261,500 68 68 Jeep trk. (I) ................ 37,200 130 124 Traverse ......................... 33,000 69 80 Nissan Group car (D/I) ... 105,100 70 55 Total Jeep trk. ............. 297,900 101 109 Trax ............................... 30,000 104 89 Nissan Group trk. (D/I) .. 186,400 64 78 FCA US car (D) ........... 42,800 61 67 Total Chevrolet trk. ...... 427,000 83 88 NISSAN GROUP† .......... 291,500 66 69 FCA US car (I) ............ 2,800 63 74 Chevrolet (D) .............. 536,000 81 84 Subaru car (D)............ 18,300 54 54 FCA US car ................ 45,600 61 67 Chevrolet (I) ............... 10,000 236 212 Subaru car (I)............. 3,800 40 37 FCA US trk. (D) ........... 592,400 97 102 Total Chevrolet ............ 546,000 82 84 Subaru car (D/I)........... 22,100 51 50 FCA US trk. (I) ............ 45,100 131 128 Acadia ........................... 30,000 72 128 Subaru trk. (D) ........... 22,300 29 33 FCA US trk. ................ 637,500 98 103 Canyon .......................... 11,000 103 110 Subaru trk. (I) ............ 19,900 19 18 FCA US ..................... 683,200 94 100 Savana van .................... 3,000 96 95 Subaru trk. (D/I) .......... 42,200 23 24 C-Max ............................ 100 33 21 Sierra............................. 76,000 95 97 SUBARU OF AMERICA† .. 64,300 28 29 Fiesta ............................. 19,500 93 85 Terrain ........................... 27,000 62 73 Lexus car (I) .............. 18,400 59 55 Focus............................. 15,700 88 106 Yukon ............................ 16,000 85 116 Lexus trk. (D/I) ........... 50,800 68 84 Fusion ........................... 31,800 48 55 Yukon XL ....................... 12,000 86 110 Total Lexus (D/I) .......... 69,100 65 74 Mustang ........................ 22,500 115 124 Total GMC trk. ............. 175,000 83 99 Toyota car (D/I) ........... 147,300 66 64 Taurus ........................... 9,500 87 95 GM car (D) ................ 131,000 80 73 Toyota trk. (D/I) .......... 233,600 54 59 Total Ford car ............. 99,100 73 80 GM car (I) ................. 11,000 259 239 Total Toyota/Scion (D/I) . 381,000 58 61 E-series van ................... 6,700 39 53 GM car ..................... 142,000 84 77 TOYOTA MOTOR N.A.† ... 450,100 59 62 EcoSport (I) ................... 23,000 98 130 GM trk. (D) ................ 655,000 84 92 Audi car
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Suzuki Announces FY2019 Vehicle Recycling Results in Japan
    22 June 2020 Suzuki Announces FY2019 Vehicle Recycling Results in Japan Suzuki Motor Corporation has today announced the results of vehicle recycling for FY2019 (April 2019 to March 2020) in Japan, based on the Japan Automobile Recycling Law*1. In line with the legal mandate, Suzuki is responsible for promoting appropriate treatment and recycling of automobile shredder residue (ASR), airbags, and fluorocarbons through recycling fee deposited from customers. Recycling of these materials are appropriately, smoothly, and efficiently conducted by consigning the treatment to Japan Auto Recycling Partnership as for airbags and fluorocarbons, and to Automobile Shredder Residue Recycling Promotion Team*2 as for ASR. The total cost of recycling these materials was 3,640 million yen. Recycling fees and income generated from the vehicle-recycling fund totalled 4,150 million yen, contributing to a net surplus of 510 million yen. For the promotion of vehicle recycling, Suzuki contributed a total of 370 million yen from the above net surplus, to the Japan Foundation for Advanced Auto Recycling, and 20 million yen for the advanced recycling business of the Company. For the mid-and long-term, Suzuki continues to make effort in stabilising the total recycling costs. Moreover, besides the recycling costs, the Company bears 120 million yen as management-related cost of Japan Automobile Recycling Promotion Center and recycling-related cost of ASR. The results of collection and recycling of the materials are as follows. 1. ASR - 60,388.3 tons of ASR were collected from 450,662 units of end-of-life vehicles - Recycling rate was 96.7%, exceeding the legal target rate of 70% set in FY2015 since FY2008 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Study of Key Electric Vehicle (EV) Components, Technologies, Challenges, Impacts, and Future Direction of Development
    Review A Comprehensive Study of Key Electric Vehicle (EV) Components, Technologies, Challenges, Impacts, and Future Direction of Development Fuad Un-Noor 1, Sanjeevikumar Padmanaban 2,*, Lucian Mihet-Popa 3, Mohammad Nurunnabi Mollah 1 and Eklas Hossain 4,* 1 Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Khulna University of Engineering and Technology, Khulna 9203, Bangladesh; [email protected] (F.U.-N.); [email protected] (M.N.M.) 2 Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa 3 Faculty of Engineering, Østfold University College, Kobberslagerstredet 5, 1671 Kråkeroy-Fredrikstad, Norway; [email protected] 4 Department of Electrical Engineering & Renewable Energy, Oregon Tech, Klamath Falls, OR 97601, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.P.); [email protected] (E.H.); Tel.: +27-79-219-9845 (S.P.); +1-541-885-1516 (E.H.) Academic Editor: Sergio Saponara Received: 8 May 2017; Accepted: 21 July 2017; Published: 17 August 2017 Abstract: Electric vehicles (EV), including Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV), Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV), Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV), Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle (FCEV), are becoming more commonplace in the transportation sector in recent times. As the present trend suggests, this mode of transport is likely to replace internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles in the near future. Each of the main EV components has a number of technologies that are currently in use or can become prominent in the future. EVs can cause significant impacts on the environment, power system, and other related sectors. The present power system could face huge instabilities with enough EV penetration, but with proper management and coordination, EVs can be turned into a major contributor to the successful implementation of the smart grid concept.
    [Show full text]
  • Note: This English Translation Is for Reference Purposes Only. in The
    Note: This English translation is for reference purposes only. In the event of any discrepancy between the Japanese original and this English translation, the Japanese original shall prevail. We assume no responsibility for this translation or for direct, indirect or any other forms of damage arising from the translation. (Securities code: 7211) June 3, 2019 To our shareholders 3-1-21, Shibaura, Minato-ku, Tokyo MITSUBISHI MOTORS CORPORATION Chairman of the Board, CEO Osamu Masuko NOTICE OF THE 50TH ORDINARY GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS You are cordially invited to attend the 50th Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders of Mitsubishi Motors Corporation (“MMC”) to be held as described as below. If you are unable to attend, as described in the “Notice on Exercising Voting Rights” (P. 3 and P. 4), you may exercise your voting right(s) in writing or via the Internet. To do so, please review the “Reference Materials” for the Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders contained in this notice, and exercise your voting right(s) either by posting your voting form so that it arrives before 5:45 p.m. on Thursday, June 20, 2019 or inputting your vote on the website for exercising voting right(s) before the aforementioned date and time. 1. Date and time Friday, June 21, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. (Japan time) 2. Place 3-3-1 Shibakoen, Minato-ku, Tokyo Ho-O-No-Ma, 2F, Tokyo Prince Hotel (Please note that the place for this Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders differs from the one for the previous meeting.) 3. Purposes Matters to report 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Report 2020
    INTEGRATED REPORT 2020 For the year ended March 31, 2020 Contents Message from the CEO . 2 Contribution to Local Economy Message from the CFO . 4 through Business Activities . 31 New Mid-Term Business Plan. 6 Business and Financial Condition . 32 Introducing Our New Models . 10 Overview of Operations by Region . 32 Mitsubishi Motors’ History . 12 Consolidated Financial Summary . 36 Major Successive Models . 14 Operational Review . 37 Sales and Production Data . 16 Business-related risks . 38 Sustainability Management . 18 Consolidated Financial Statements . 42 Corporate Governance . 20 Consolidated Subsidiaries and Affiliates . 48 Management . 24 Principal Production Facilities . 50 The New Environmental Plan Package . 27 Investor Information . 51 Safety and Quality . 30 System for Disclosing Information Extremely high Extremely This z Integrated Report Report • Financial and non-financial information with a direct connection to the Company’s management strategy ・Focus on information that is integral and concise Stakeholders’ Concern Stakeholders’ z Sustainability Report • Sustainability (ESG) information • Focus on information that is comprehensive and continuous y Sustainability Report High https://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/en/sustainability/report/ High Impact on Management Extremely high y Global Website: “Investors” https://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/en/investors/ Forward-looking Statements Mitsubishi Motors Corporation’s current plans, strategies, beliefs, performance outlook and other statements in this annual report that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions drawn from current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections. These expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions that may cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in any forward-looking statement.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019 Tan Chong International Limited
    ANNUAL REPORT 2019 TAN CHONG INTERNATIONAL LIMITED (Incorporated in Bermuda陳唱國際有限公司 with limited liability) Stock code: 693 TAN CHONG INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT 2019 1 COMPANY OVERVIEW Tan Chong International Limited (Stock Code 693), listed on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited in 1998, is a major motor distribution, transportation, property and trading group. TABLE OF CONTENTS 02 Management Discussion and Analysis 04 Corporate Governance Report 08 Environmental, Social and Governance Report 12 Corporate Information 14 Directors and Senior Management Profile 18 Corporate Structure 20 Financial Highlights 21 Directors’ Report 29 Independent Auditor’s Report 35 Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss 36 Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income 37 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 40 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 42 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 44 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 123 Financial Summary 125 Group Properties Enclosures Proposed General Mandates to Issue Shares and Buy Back Shares and Re-election of Directors 1 Notice of Annual General Meeting 10 Form of Proxy MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENTS ANALYSIS As at 31 December 2019, the Group had investments in listed and unlisted equity securities amounting to HK2.277 billion designated as at fair value through other comprehensive income. RESULTS The majority of these investments are equity securities listed on The Group recorded revenue of HK$14.5 billion, a 7.6% decrease the Tokyo Stock Exchange and were accumulated over the years from that of year 2018. The decline was primarily due to sales as strategic long-term investments. Fair value gain of HK$309.8 volume reduction of 16% in our motor vehicle distribution million was recognised in other comprehensive income during and retail division.
    [Show full text]
  • Driving Growth Towards the Future
    Head Office Jidosha Kaikan, Shiba Daimon 1-chome, Minato-ku Tokyo 105-0012 Japan Tel: +81-3-5405-6126 Fax: +81-3-5405-6136 DRIVING GROWTH http://www.jama.or.jp/ Singapore Branch North American Office 143 Cecil Street, 1050 17th Street, N.W., Suite 410 #09-03/04 GB Bldg. Washington, DC 20036-5518, USA TOWARDS THE FUTURE Singapore 069542 Tel: +1-202-296-8537 Tel: +65-6221-5057 Fax: +1-202-872-1212 Fax: +65-6221-5072 http://www.jama.org/ 2015 Beijing Representative European Office Office Avenue Louise 287 Unit 1001B, Level 10, 1050 Bruxelles, BELGIUM China World Office 2 Tel: +32-2-639-1430 No. 1 Fax: +32-2-647-5754 Jian Guo Men Wai Avenue Beijing, China 100004 Tel: +86-10-6505-0030 Fax: +86-10-6505-5856 KAWASAKI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD. SUZUKI MOTOR CORPORATION DAIHATSU MOTOR CO., LTD. Kobe Head Office: Head Office: Head Office: Kobe Crystal Tower, 1-3, Higashi 300, Takatsuka-cho, Minami-ku, 1-1, Daihatsu-cho, Ikeda, Osaka 563-8651 Kawasaki-cho 1-chome Chuo-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 432-8611 Tel: +81(72)751-8811 Kobe, Hyogo 650-8680 Tel: +81(53)440-2061 Tokyo Office: Tel: +81(78)371-9530 Tokyo Branch: Shinwa Bldg, 2-10, Nihonbashi Hon-cho, Tokyo Head Office: Suzuki Bldg, Higashi-shimbashi 2F, 2-Chome, Chuo-ku, 2-2-8 Higashi-shinbashi, Tokyo 103-0023 1-14-5, Kaigan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8315, Japan Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0021 Tel: +81(3)4231-8856 Tel: +81(3)5425-2158 http://www.daihatsu.com/ Tel: +81(3)3435-2111 http://www.khi.co.jp/ http://www.globalsuzuki.com/ FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • NVIDIA Success Story | Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
    SUCCESS STORY | MITSUBISHI MOTORS CORPORATION MITSUBISHI MOTORS ENGINEERING IT DEPARTMENT TRANSFORMS ITS WORKSTATION ENVIRONMENT WITH VIRTUAL GPUs NVIDIA Quadro Virtual Data Center Workstation deployment reduced IT management functions from two weeks to two hours. Image courtesy of Mitsubishi Motors Corporation Mitsubishi Motors adopted NVIDIA Quadro Virtual Data Center Workstation for its compatibility with over 200 design-related applications. INTRODUCTION Mitsubishi Motors manufactured Japan’s first mass-produced passenger car, the Mitsubishi Model A, in 1917. The company went on to produce hit models such as the Colt series in the 1960s and the Pajero and Delica in the 1980s. Since the 2000s, the company has expanded its lineup of crossover SUVs and other products. Mitsubishi Motors continues to create trend-setting cars for drivers who want to expand their horizons and take on new challenges. With “Drive your Ambition” as its brand message, Mitsubishi Motors boldly creates era-defining products for an automotive market that is constantly evolving. To provide unique products and services, the engineering IT department of the Global IT Division introduced NVIDIA virtual GPU (vGPU) technology into the automotive development and production technology departments. By virtualizing the design environment where tools such as Dassault Systèmes CATIA, a high- end 3D CAD software used on high-performance workstations, the department experienced a dramatic transformation in terms of flexible work styles and operational management. CUSTOMER PROFILE
    [Show full text]
  • Company Profile
    COMPANY PROFILE PYLES JAPAN Co,.LTD. PYLES JAPAN CO., LTD. COMPANY PROFILE OVERVIEW HISTORY PYLES products play a Pyles Japan Co., Ltd was established in February, 2001 by World Wide leading role in Co., Ltd. who used to involve the sales and after services of fluid handling equipment (Pyles products) imported from USA since 1960. automating fluid operation and contribute OUTLINE to the increase of quality assurance for the finished products COMPANY PYLES JAPAN CO,. LTD. processed by the automation. ESTABLISH FEBRUARY 8, 2001 Also, the material costs of fluids can be saved 3953-1 IKONOBE-CHO TSUDUKI-KU YOKOHAMA HEAD QUARTER considerably and labor's KANAGAWA 224-0053 JAPAN working conditions for TEL: +81-45-938-6801 fluid handling can be NISHISHIN-MACHI OTA CITY, GUNMA KITA KANTO improved. remarkably. PREFECTURE, 470-0113 JAPAN BRANCH TEL: +81-276-31-7012 4-1406 SAKAE NISSHIN CITY, AICHI PREFECTURE, NAGOYA BRANCH 470-0113 JAPAN TEL: +81-561-75-6535 CAPITAL STOCK 30,000,000JPY ◆ SALES & MANUFATURE OF FLUID PUMP, BUSINESS MEASURMENT, MIXING, AND GLUE DISPENCER. ◆ SALES & MANUFACTURE OF REFRIGERATOR, AIR CONDITIONAR TOOLS & MEASURMENT DEVICES. ◆ SALES & MANUFACTURE OF LABOR-SAVING DEVICES. ◆ OTHER RELATED BUSINESS. CORRESPONDENT MIZUHO BANK SHIBA BRANCH 6B ELEVATOR OFFICER PRESIDENT MR. AKIRA KOBAYASHI AFFILIATE WORLD WIDE CO., LTD. MAIN PRODUCDTS FLUID PUMP Nowadays, various fluids such as adhesive, grease, oils etc. are widely used for almost all of the industrial goods which are very familiar with us, such as automobiles, airplanes, sea vessels, buildings, roads, electric apparatus, furniture, sports goods, toys and many others. Pyles has a history going back a half of century, and supplies positive pressure fluid feeding pumps, metering and mixing MEASURING CYLINDER ASSY 514cc/shot devices and customs made fluid handling system and facilities .
    [Show full text]
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science
    The London School of Economics and Political Science Policy Networks in Japan: Case of the Automobile Air Pollution Policies Takashi Sagara A thesis submitted to the Department of Geography and Environment of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy i UMI Number: U615939 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615939 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 "KSCSES p m r . rrti - S • - g r t W - • Declaration I, Takashi Sagara, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Abstract The thesis seeks to examine whether the concept of the British policy network framework helps to explain policy change in Japan. For public policy studies in Japan, such an examination is significant because the framework has been rarely been used in analysis of Japanese policy. For public policy studies in Britain and elsewhere, such an examination would also bring benefits as it would help to answer the important question of whether it can be usefully applied in the other contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Renault-Nissan Alliance 014 the Renault-Nissan Alliance
    The Renault-Nissan Alliance 014 The Renault-Nissan Alliance Nissan has greatly increased its global footprint and achieved dramatic economies of scale through the Renault-Nissan Alliance, a unique and highly scalable strategic partnership founded in 1999. In 2011, 8.03 million cars* were sold by the Renault-Nissan Alliance, amounting to a 10.7% global share. We are marketing vehicles under the brands of Nissan, Infiniti, Renault, Renault Samsung Motors and Dacia. * This figure includes Lada sales (AvtoVAZ of Russia). The Alliance’s Vision Although it was initially considered a unique arrangement in the late 1990s, the Alliance quickly became a model for similar partnerships in the auto industry. The Alliance itself has entered cooperative relationships with Germany’s Daimler, China’s Dongfeng Motor Corp., Russia’s AvtoVAZ and others, and it continues to prove itself as the industry’s most enduring and successful partnership. The Alliance is based on the rationale that substantial cross-shareholding investments compel each company to act in the financial interest of the other, while maintaining individual brand identities and independent corporate cultures. Renault currently has a 43.4% stake in Nissan, and Nissan holds a 15.0% stake in Renault. The cross-shareholding arrangement requires mutual trust and respect, as well as a transparent management system focused on speed, accountability and performance. ＞ Please see our website for more information on the Renault-Nissan Alliance. http://www.nissan-global.com/EN/COMPANY/PROFILE/ALLIANCE/RENAULT01/index.html Alliance Objectives The Alliance pursues a strategy of profitable growth with three objectives: 1. To be recognized by customers as being among the best three automotive groups in the quality and value of its products and services in each region and market segment 2.
    [Show full text]
  • FY2016 Speech Script(PDF:132KB)
    Briefing for Institutional Investors June 2017 1. Greeting The first two items on the agenda of this meeting are presenting the business report and consolidated financial statements for the 94th fiscal period from April 1, 2016 to March 31, 2017, and also reporting on the other financial statements for this period. 2.The current First, within the current status of the Nissan corporate group, I will outline Nissan status of the Shatai’s business activities and results for this period. Nissan corporate group In the fiscal year under review, the Japanese economy maintained its gradual recovery due to the continuous effects of economic policies and monetary easing. However, the outlook remained uncertain for several reasons including fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and stock prices, as well as concerns over the effects of an economic downturn in China and other emerging countries in Asia. The volume of In such an economic climate, the volume of orders of passenger vehicles from Nissan orders Motor Co., Ltd. decreased for the Quest for North America, and for the Patrol (Y61) ① Passenger and other vehicles for export. Despite this, orders increased for the Armada for vehicles North America, which started production in June 2016. As a result of these and other factors, the sales volume increased by 17.2% year-on-year to 120,272 units, and net sales increased by 23.3% to 365.5 billion yen. ② Light For light commercial vehicles, a fall in production of the Patrol Pickup for export commercial and other factors resulted in the sales volume remaining largely flat from the vehicles previous fiscal year at 86,729 units, while net sales decreased by 3.2% to 125.9 billion yen.
    [Show full text]
  • 1998 the Unique Trajectory of Mitsubishi
    1 Chapter 6 THE UNIQUE TRAJECTORY OF MITSUBISHI MOTORS In Freyssenet M., Mair A., Shimizu K., Volpato G. (eds), One Best Way? Trajectories and Industrial Models of the World's Automobile Producers, New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1998, 476 p. Koichi Shimizu and Koichi Shimokawa The Mitsubishi Motors Corporation (MMC) is a member of the Mitsubishi group (formerly zaibatsu), so most of the company's investments have been financially supported by members of the group. However, this means that interest payments have sometimes weighed heavily on MMC's profitability. MMC produces all types of vehicles: passenger cars, commercial vehicles and industrial vehicles as well as minicars. The company's diversity saved MMC when it ran into difficulties during the transition to mass production of passenger cars. From the latter half of the 1980s, MMC pursued a balanced course of development having at last discovered how to combine technological and commercial innovation in the design of its products so as to meet market demands. 6.1. MMC PRIOR TO THE FIRST OIL CRISIS Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) had begun building automobiles in 1918, when it made 21 units adapted from Fiat's Tipo model. The zaibatsu's companies produced tanks, battleships, bombers and fighters during World War II. These facts accounted for the dismantling of the Mitsubishi zaibatsu following Japan's defeat, with MHI being divided into three companies, each sited in a different region. Two of the companies focused on the automotive industry. Mitsubishi Nippon Heavy Industries, sited in the East, produced trucks and buses under the marque Fuso, while New Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (NMHI), sited in the central region, produced scooters, three-wheelers, automobiles, Willis Jeeps, and commercial vehicles in its two factories at Nagoya and Mizushima, and Mitsubishi engines at its Kyoto factory.
    [Show full text]