Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States

Home , Bobolice, Gaizinkalns, Grabowa (river), ISKA, Kerka, Narew National Park

Federation of Ecological A. Tabos photo © and Environmental Organisations in Cyprus

Status report and list of sites for

selected habitats and species

Covering the Czech Republic, Hungary, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia, and with status reports for Cyprus, Estonia and Latvia as well as Bulgaria and Romania

June 2004

Nature Trust (Malta)

Slovenian Society for Bird Research and Nature Protection Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States photo © WWF-Canon / M. Dépraz

1 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States

Table of contents

I. Introduction IV. National reports and maps of sites

Natura 2000: Stretching the EU’s safety net Czech Republic...... 28 for nature across the new Member States ...... 3 Hungary ...... 32 How does Natura 2000 work ...... 4 Lithuania ...... 36 Natura 2000 and the Malta ...... 40 new EU Member States ...... 5 Poland ...... 44 Natura 2000 status report Slovakia ...... 50 and NGO list of sites...... 6 Slovenia ...... 56 Cyprus...... 60 Estonia...... 64 Latvia ...... 68 II. Synthesis of national reports Bulgaria...... 72 Romania ...... 78 Status of official preparations in new Member States...... 9 Comments on national lists...... 10 Stakeholder involvement ...... 11 Annexes: Communications an awareness raising...... 11 Threats to Natura 2000 sites I: Selected habitats and species and integration into sectoral policies ...... 13 covered in this report ...... 86 Financing ...... 15 Management...... 18 II: List of sites per country...... 87 Conclusions...... 19 Summary for Romania and Bulgaria ...... 21 III: Links and information sources...... 121

III. Contacts

...... 23

1 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

A large number of people and organisations from across Europe have cooperated to make this report possible.

Authors of National Reports Project management Bulgaria, WWF-Danube Carpathian Programme, Pieter de Pous Vesselina Kavrakova and Ivan Hristov Cyprus, Federation of Ecological and Environmental Text Organisations in Cyprus, Antonia Theodosiou Pieter de Pous and Andreas Beckmann Czech Republic, Veronica – Czech Union for Nature Conservation, Mojmír Vlašín with input from Editing: a number of experts (listed in the country report) Andreas Beckmann; Sandra Jen Estonia, Estonian Fund for Nature, Kärg Kama Hungary, WWF-Hungary, Brigitta Bozsó, with GIS-work and data processing input from Judit Vörös (Hungarian Natural History Radim Machů, Veronica – Czech Union Museum), Jozsef L. Szentpeteri (Science University for Nature Conservation of Pécs) and Geza Kiraly (University of West Hungary), and based on a database received from Graphics and layout the Ministry of Environment and Water, Nature Michal Stránský | [email protected] Conservation Authority. Latvia, WWF-Latvia, Ints Mednis with assistance Printing from Ērika Kļaviņa Nature Conservation Board, NP Agentura, Staré Město, Czech Republic Otars Opermanis coordinator of Emerald project at (700 copies); Darudec, Edmunds Račinskis, Latvian Ornithological also available in electronic format as pdf from Society, project coordinator (birds), Liene Salmiņa, www.panda.org/epo (see: Natura 2000) Latvian Fund for Nature, project coordinator (habitats) This report and data sets are expected to be periodically added to and Lithuania, Lithuanian Fund for Nature improved. Toward this purpose, an interactive version is under develop- Pranas Mierauskas with input from Rimgaudas ment – please see www.panda.org/epo (under Natura 2000) for further Treinys and Danas Augutis information on this. Malta, Nature Trust Malta, Vincent Attard Poland, WWF-Poland, Katarzyna Nowak Romania, WWF-Danube Carpathian Programme Erika Stanciu, Maria Mihul, with input from Dan Published by Hulea of the Romanian Ornithological Society/ WWF through the 2 BirdLife Romania as well as the Romanian Ministry WWF EU Accession Initiative, 2004 3 of Waters and Environmental Protection Slovakia, Daphne Institute of Applied Ecology Rastislav Lasák, Eva Viestová, Ján Šeffer This project and publication hav been made Slovenia, Oikos, Both the Slovenian NGO List of possible by generous support from WWF-Austria. sites and the country report were compiled by Pieter de Pous using a Shadow List from Oikos with extensive input from Milan Vogrin, Slovenian Society for Bird Research and Nature Protection (DPPVN). For the country report valuable input was also provided by Mateja Nose and Luka Bozic, DOPPS/BirdLife Slovenia. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States I. Introduction

I. Introduction

Natura 2000:

Stretching the safety net for nature

across the new EU Member States

In 1992, in response to the significant and ongoing deterioration of many habitat types and the growing number of threatened or rare species, EU Member States adopted the Directive on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (CE/ 92/43), also known as the „Habitats Directive“. The Habitats Directive aims to contribute to the protection of biodiversity by setting up a European wide network of protected areas called Natura 2000 and by protect- ing threatened species in their natural range. It com- plements the 1979 Birds Directive, which establishes protected areas for threatened bird species.

WWF and its partners strongly support the implementation of the Habitats Directive and the establishment of Natura 2000 for the following reasons:

The Habitats Directive represents a real attempt to conserve Europe’s biodiversity based on sound scientific evidence. The sites will not just be a collection of national or regional parks designated for photo © J. Vysoký a variety of reasons; The sites to be designated under Natura 2000 are intended to protect a representative sample of all Europe’s most threatened habitats and species, as listed in the annexes of the Directives; The Habitats Directive does not seek to rule out 2 economic activities in Natura 2000 areas, but rather 3 aims to promote sustainable activity in support of the conservation objectives for these areas. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States I. Introduction

How does The implementation of the Natura 2000 network of nature conservation areas in the existing 15 EU Natura 2000 work? Member States has been plagued by difficulties and delays. Lack of information and explanation at The Natura 2000 site selection process national and local levels concerning the implications The selection of sites to be included in the Natura of Natura 2000 have provoked opposition that has 2000 network is a shared responsibility between the lead to blockages and delays at European level. Gov- EU’s new Member States and the European Commis- ernments largely underestimated the scientific work sion. By their date of accession1, acceding countries required to gather the necessary data to propose a co- must propose to the European Commission a list of herent list of sites for all the habitats and species listed sites (referred to as proposed Sites of Community in the Directive. Furthermore, there was reluctance at Importance, or pSCI) to protect those habitats and the beginning to involve nongovernmental organisa- species listed in the annexes of the Habitats Directive tions (NGOs) in the site selection process. However, and occurring in their territory. Once these national these difficulties should not detract from the tremen- proposals have been submitted, the Commission dous progress that has already been achieved through should evaluate them in order to adopt a final list of the implementation of Natura 2000 to date. In the EU- Sites of Community Importance (SCI). 15, although site selection is not yet quite complete, existing and proposed sites already represent some The Natura 2000 site selection process is based on 18 % of the Union’s territory (approximately 60 mil- biogeographic regions. The European Union is cur- lion hectares). rently divided into seven biogeographic regions, including the Alpine, Atlantic, Boreal, Continental, Implementation of Natura 2000 in the marine environ- Macaronesian, Mediterranean and – added as a result ment is still lagging behind, especially as regards off- of the present enlargement – Pannonian biogeo- shore areas. The Natura 2000 European Marine Expert graphic regions. With the future accession of Roma- Working Group established in 2003, is considering nia and Bulgaria, two more regions will be added to aspects of implementation of both directives in the this list: the Black Sea and the Steppic biogeographic marine environment in order to make concrete pro- regions. The evaluation of the new Member States posals to complete the network at sea, including area proposals should be carried out through a series of beyond territorial waters to the limit of the European seminars for each biogeographic region. In these Exclusive Economic Zone. seminars, representatives from the new Member States, the European Commission, environmental NGOs and independent experts assess whether the areas nominated by the national governments are sufficient and whether together they provide proper protection for all endangered species and habitats within the biogeographic region concerned

4 Ensuring 5 Favourable Conservation Status The aim of the Habitats Directive is to establish 1) May 1, 2004 for 8 countries in Central and Eastern Europe (Czech a ‘favourable conservation status’ for habitat types Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, and and species selected as being of Community Impor- Slovenia) and Cyprus and Malta in the Mediterranean; Bulgaria and tance. Favourable conservation status of habitats Romania are currently expected to join in 2007. Turkey has candidate and species is defined in Article 1 of the Directive. country status but has yet to open negotiations for membership in This is defined broadly for both habitats and species the EU. The European Commission has issued a positive opinion on by reference to factors such as species population Croatia’s application for membership that will be considered by the dynamics, trends in the natural range of species and European Council in mid-June 2004. habitats and the area of habitats remaining. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States I. Introduction

Natura 2000 The list of Sites of Community Importance that will together form the Natura 2000 network should host and the new EU Member States a sufficiently large sample of each habitat type and species to ensure that, through the implementation The extension of Natura 2000 to 12 additional coun- of the appropriate conservation measures, they will tries is a new challenge. These countries bring with be maintained in a favourable conservation status at them a prodigious store of natural wealth, including the EU and relevant biogeographic level. Europe’s last great wilderness areas and rich cultural landscapes. Unfortunately, extension of the Common Protection and Management of Natura Market to the east and south brings with it a myriad 2000 Sites of threats to these natural treasures, from increased According to the Common Position Papers, by date infrastructure development to intensified agricultural of accession the new member states must apply Arti- practices. Already, many of these valuable areas are cle 6 of the Habitats Directive to proposed Natura threatened if not already lost. 2000 sites. The new members must take appropriate steps to avoid the deterioration of the habitats and In order to join the European Union, new EU Member species for which the areas have been selected. States have had to transpose the requirements of the Birds and Habitats Directives into their national leg- While there are provisions for providing Community islation and prepare for the establishment of Natura support, including co-financing, the main responsi- 2000 on their territory by the date of accession. This bility for implementation of the Natura 2000 network includes submitting by May 1, 2004 their lists of pro- clearly lies with the Member States themselves. posed Sites of Community Importance (pSCI) to the Measures required to be taken in Natura 2000 areas European Commission. The lists of pSCI will then range from adopting management plans for each site be evaluated through a moderation process for each to avoid deterioration of habitats as well as distur- biogeographic region or through a bilateral process bance of the species for which the areas have been for certain countries. designated. In addition, all plans and projects likely to affect a Natura 2000 site should be subjected to an To avoid irreversible losses, it is imperative that the assessment of the implications for the conservation Natura 2000 network is implemented in the new objectives of the site. Member States effectively and without any delay, and that great care is taken in making development deci- However, the designation of a Natura 2000 site sions that could well have costly and irreversible con- should not lead to a total ban on development, pro- sequences for the EU’s common natural heritage. vided that this is ecologically sustainable and that is does not adversely affect the integrity of the site Implementation of the Habitats and Birds Directives in question, or the favourable conservation status should be seen as an opportunity to evaluate our store of the habitats and species present. Indeed, invest- of natural values, re-consider development plans, and ment in socio-economic development is urgently identify the best path for improving living standards needed in many of the larger Natura 2000 sites, in while ensuring the long-term preservation of our natu- 4 particular in some of the more marginal regions of ral resources. 5 the EU, where rural abandonment and unemployment present a genuine social problem. Natura 2000 is an opportunity to promote new models of development, which build on natural values rather then degrading them, and which enable the local population to benefit from their natural capital. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States I. Introduction

Natura 2000 status report

and NGO list of sites

The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of Natura 2000 in Future EU Member States, published the status of progress in identification and designation in January 20032, as well as a report and conference of the Natura 2000 network in the new Member States proceedings focussed on financing for Natura 2000 in and to create a common yardstick, applied across the the enlarged European Union.3 countries, to help gauge the relative quality of official preparations for site designation as well as to identify List of sites for selected habitats and species some of the remaining gaps in coverage. It is a joint NGO lists for selected habitats and species are pre- effort of eight nongovernmental organisations includ- sented for: ing: Czech Republic Daphne Institute of Applied Ecology, Slovakia Hungary Estonian Fund for Nature Lithuania Federation of Ecological and Environmental Organisations in Cyprus Malta

Lithuanian Fund for Nature Poland

Nature Trust Malta Slovakia and

Slovenian Society for Bird Research Slovenia and Nature Protection (DPPVN) It must be emphasised that the lists of sites proposed Veronica, Czech Union for Nature Conservation in the present report are limited to a selection of 24 habitats and 18 species and are by no means exhaus- WWF, including: WWF-Danube Carpathian Pro- tive. This exercise is not intended to replace or par- gramme, WWF-Hungary, WWF-Latvia, WWF- allel ongoing efforts of the respective governments, Poland, WWF-Baltic Ecoregion Programme, WWF- which carry the full responsibility for implementing European Endangered Seas Team and with support the Habitats and Birds Directives in their respective and assistance from WWF-Austria and WWF-Bel- countries. gium. Sites have been identified according to the best The present project builds on previous experience available information, and based on their relative with the WWF Initiative for a European Shadow List importance for the selected habitats and species from 6 of Natura 2000 Sites for the EU-15, which was pub- annexes I and II of the Habitats Directive (see table 1). 7 lished in June 2000. This earlier NGO contribution to This limited number of habitats and species have been the Natura 2000 site selection process in the EU-15 selected according to a number of criteria, including: together with subsequent work has proven to be a val- geographic and taxonomic distribution (including both uable tool for promoting effective implementation of species and habitats that are widely distributed and the Directives, helping to increase significantly the others that are endemic to specific countries); suitabil- scope and quality of the sites proposed. ity to serve as “keystones” covering a number of habitats and species; data availability; possibility of being This project also follows on previous reports of the neglected in political decision making on proposed partners in the acceding countries, including a status Natura 2000 sites; and organisational or conservation report on preparations for Natura 2000 in the future priorities of the respective partner organisations. EU Member States, Progress on Preparation for Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States I. Introduction

Table 1: List of selected habitats and species evaluated The other habitats and species of European importance across participating countries for this report. that are listed in Annexes I, II and IV of the Habitats Habitats code Directives have not been included in the scope of this Sandbanks which are slightly 1110 multi-country exercise. However, for some countries, covered by sea water all the time Coastal lagoons 1150 including the Czech Republic, Estonia, Malta, Poland, Reefs 1170 4 Slovakia , and Slovenia, a full list of sites based on Vegetated sea cliffs on the Atlantic and Baltic coast 1230 all relevant species and habitats of European impor- Shifting dunes along the shoreline with Ammophila arenaria (white dunes) 2120 tance has been or is being developed by NGOs at the Oligotrophic to mesotrophic standing waters 3130 national level. Reference to these full lists is included Natural dystrophic lakes and ponds 3160 in the individual country reports. Alpine rivers and its vegetation 3220 European dry heath on lowlands and mountains 4030 Bird species and the requirements of the Birds Direc- Xeric sand calcarous grasslands * 6120 Semi-natural dry grassland and scrubland facies tive are not included in this list, or only marginally, as on calcarous substrates (...) * 6210 they are already covered by the valuable work under- Sub-pannonic steppic grassland * 6240 taken by member organisations of BirdLife Interna- Lowland hay meadows * 6510 Fennoscandinavian wooded meadows a 6530 tional to identify Important Bird Areas. Active raised bogs * 7110 Transition mires and quaking bogs 7140 Petrifying springs with tufa formation (Cratonerion) * 7220 Caves not open to the public 8310 Natural old broad-leaved deciduous forests with epiphytes 9020 Tilio-Acerion forests of slopes, screes and ravines * 9180 Mixed ash-alder alluvial forests of temperate and Boreal Europe (..) 91E0 Riparian mixed forests of Quercus robur, Ulmus laevis (...) 91F0 Pannonian woods with Quercus pubescens * 91H0 Acidophilus Picea forests of the montane to alpine levels (Vaccinio-Picetea) 9410 2) Progress on Preparation for Natura 2000 in Future EU Member States: Synthesis and country reports for Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Species Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Romania, Fauna Slovakia, and Slovenia (WWF-European Policy Office/Accession Bombina bombina 1188 Cottus gobio 1163 Initiative, January 2003). Available at: www.panda.org/downloads/ Emys orbicularis 1120 europe/n2000progressmailing20030122.pdf. Lampetra planeri 1096 Lutra lutra 1355 3) Financing Natura 2000 in an Enlarged Europe – report from Lynx lynx 1361 Conference on Financing Natura 2000, Budapest, October 28, 2003 Maculinea nausithous 1061 (WWF-European Policy Office/Accession Initiative, December Margaritifera margaritifera 1029 Osmoderma eremita * 1084 2003). Available on the Internet at: www.panda.org/downloads/ 6 Pteromys volans a 1910 7 europe/n2000conferencereportfinal.doc. Rhinolophus hipposidererus 1303 Financing Natura 2000 in an Enlarged Europe – Synthesis and coun- Salmo salar 1106 try reports for the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithua- Spermophilus citellus 1335 nia, Malta, Poland, and Slovakia (WWF-European Policy Office/ Ursus arctos * 1354 Accession Initiative, December 2003). Available on the Internet at: Flora Cypripedium calceolus 1902 www.panda.org/about_wwf/where_we_work/europe/what_we_do/ Liparis loeselii 1903 policy_and_events/epo/initiatives/accession/downloads.cfm Pulsatilla patens 1477 Saxifraga hirculus 1528 4) For Malta and Slovakia, the full list, covering all relevant habitats and species, is included in annex 3 in this report. * asterisk denotes priority habitat or species a) occurs only in Estonia and Latvia and will be covered by a later report Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States I. Introduction

Natura 2000 The present list of sites, even for the limited number of species and habitats included here, is not intended in the Carpathians to be definitive. It is rather expected to be the starting point for a dynamic process of consultation and The Carpathian Mountains contain many of the most improvement among the partner organisations, other spectacular natural treasures now being brought into NGOs and experts leading up through the biogeo- the EU fold. The arc of low mountains stretching graphic seminars. Thus, this report and accompany- from the Czech Republic in the west to Romania in ing data sets are expected to be periodically added the southeast are Europe’s last bastion for large carni- to and improved. Toward this purpose, an interac- vores, including lynx, wolf, and bear, and home to the tive version is under development and will be made continent’s largest remaining areas of virgin forest. available either on Internet or CD-ROM. For further information, please see www.panda.org/epo (sec- Countries of the region have already committed to pre- tion on Natura 2000) or contact Andreas Beckmann, serving these unique natural riches in the Carpathian [email protected] Convention5, signed by national representatives during the 5th Ministerial Conference Environment Status reports for Europe in Kiev in May 2003. Effective implemen- Brief reports on current status of preparations for tation of the Natura 2000 network in the relevant EU Natura 2000 are included for all 10 new Member States Member States of the region will take an important that have joined the European Union on 1 May 2004. step towards putting the Convention into practice. Somewhat more detailed reports are also included for Bulgaria and Romania, which are currently expected to join the EU in 2007. Information is based on the experience of staff of WWF and partner organisations that have been closely monitoring and, in most cases, actively involved in preparations for Natura 2000 in the different countries.

The national reports and the synthesis presented below cover not only preparations of the lists of proposed Natura 2000 sites (pSCI), but also touch on other important aspects including communications (education and awareness raising), planning for future funding of the network, and current threats to potential sites.

photo © J. Vysoký We believe this synthesis and country reports provide a clear and concise snapshot of the progress that has been made to date in implementing the Habitats Direc- 8 tive across the12 new and future Member States. 9

5) Carpathian Convention text at: www.unece.org/env/documents/2003/ece/cep/ece.cep.104.e.pdf For further information on the Carpathians, see: www.carpathians.org Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States II. Synthesis of national reports

II. Synthesis of national reports

Status of official preparations

in new Member States

Most of the new Member States are expected to submit their list of proposed Sites of Community Importance within several weeks of their date of accession on May 1, 2004. At time of writing (mid-May), official lists of sites had been received by the European Com- mission for: Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Poland, and Slovakia; while those for Malta and Slovenia were reportedly on their way.

The greatest delays are expected with lists from Cyprus, the Czech Republic, and Hungary. The present status of the Cypriot list is presently unclear; at time of writing this report, there were no reports that the list would be sent any time soon. Czech authorities have been among the most thorough in their identification of sites, and a proposed list of sites does exist. But problems in gaining passage of the Act on Nature Conservation have led to delays in consultation of the list with relevant stakeholders. As a result, according to latest information, the Czech list of pSCI could be submitted to the European Commission by the end of the summer.

The case of Hungary is more disconcerting. The neces-

photo © M. Stránský sary amendments of the Act on Nature Conservation has still not been passed by Parliament. Optimistic estimates see passage of the law occurring in early 8 June; if everything goes smoothly with subsequent 9 consultation and processing, the list could theoreti- cally be sent to the European Commission by the end of June. A more sceptical, and perhaps more realistic, appraisal puts the estimated time of arrival at some time in early autumn or even later.

WWF and its partners call on the European Commis- sion to develop a clear calendar to ensure that the biogeographic seminars relevant for the new Member Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States II. Synthesis of national reports

States do take place in the course of 2005 and 2006, In most countries, the initial lists of proposed sites have and that the necessary steps to finalise the national pro- been subjected to extensive ‘pruning’ by various minis- posed lists are not further delayed. In addition, national tries, departments, and stakeholders. For example: authorities and the European Commission must ensure In Cyprus, the initial list of sites, identified through that no funds are allocated to infrastructure and other a LIFE project according to the scientific criteria of projects which endanger potential Natura 2000 sites. the Habitats and Birds Directives, covered 26 % of This may require delaying allocation of EU funds the island’s territory, but was cut down to 14 % by where the lists of pSCI are not yet complete. various ministries; it is now being further whittled by a stakeholder body. In Poland, the list published in May 2003, which covered some 18 % of the country’s territory, has Comments on national lists been halved to approximately 9 %, in part, appar- ently, because the Water Authorities fear loss of Some of the lists proposed are quite substantial, reflect- control over rivers when they are designated as ing the rich store of natural wealth in the region as well a Natura 2000 sites. It is worth remarking that the as relatively good site identification. Slovakia has pro- Polish Government has omitted from its proposal posed to designate 28.9 % of the country’s territory as two of the four pSCI that will be seriously affected Natura 2000, of which 11.72 % is according to the Habi- by the Białystok route favoured by the Polish Gov- tats Directive (pSCI) and remainder as bird areas desig- ernment for the Via Baltica motorway (see annex 1, nated according to the Birds Directive (SPA). Though sites n° PL 024, PL 137, PL 143, PL 130). impressive, the complete NGO list of sites included In Estonia, following a storm of criticism from land in this report suggests that the proposed pSCI will be owners, the Ministry of Environment decided not insufficient to protect Slovakia’s exceptional biodiver- to designate any sites on those private lands where sity, and that additional sites will need to be added. owners objected to this designation.

Scientific preparation for Natura 2000 in the newest Such problems echo those already faced – and in many Member States has been relatively good – indeed, cases still being faced – in the older EU countries. even brilliant if compared with the generally lacklus- Throughout the European Union, implementation of the tre progress that has marked implementation of Natura Natura 2000 network has required people to re-examine 2000 in the older EU Member States. Experience from plans and options, face restrictions but also new oppor- the EU Member States has shown that timely prepa- tunities. The example of the Lech in Austria (see boxed rations, though difficult in the short-term, cause less text page 12) shows that the process is not easy, but can problems in the longer-term. lead to new opportunities. And there are already many examples throughout the new Member States and can- In most countries, the agency or organisations charged didate countries that demonstrate a very practical vision with the compilation of the scientific list of pSCI have for local social and economic development that is based produced fairly comprehensive and complete lists of on and indeed profits from maintaining natural and cul- sites. Many of the countries, e.g. the Czech Republic, tural heritage (see boxed texts, pages 12, 14). 10 Slovakia and Hungary, have been able to build on 11 a relatively good existing base of scientific data and The newest Member States do have one great advan- expertise, and made concerted efforts to fill in gaps – in tage over their older neighbours in the Union: they the case of the Czech Republic, over 700 experts were can learn from previous experience and mistakes. involved in data collection for the pSCI at one point. Unfortunately, though much has been learned in terms of site identification, much less seems to have come There have been much greater problems when it has through with regard to gaining political and stake- come to finalisation of the pSCI. Moving from the holder support. At least a part of the problems now scientific work of site selection to gaining support and being faced probably could have been avoided given approval for these sites from political decision makers better preparation and timely action in terms of both and local stakeholders has been difficult. communications and financing for Natura 2000 (see separate items below). Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States II. Synthesis of national reports

Stakeholder involvement Communications

NGOs have been consulted on and in some cases even and awareness raising directly responsible for identification of the proposed Sites of Community Importance – as in the case of The experience of existing EU Member States has Slovakia, where the Daphne Institute of Applied Ecol- shown the importance of beginning as early as pos- ogy and a consortium of other NGOs and institutes sible to raise awareness and inform relevant stakehold- was responsible for preparing the scientific proposal ers of Natura 2000 and its various implications. All of pSCI. Throughout the countries, national partners EU members, including the newest Member States, of BirdLife have played a key role in identifying bird have endorsed the so-called El Teide declaration of areas (SPA). June 2002, Natura 2000: a Partnership for Nature, in which signatories committed to promoting awareness There are considerable differences in the level of and understanding of Natura 2000 as well as the devel- involvement of local stakeholders. Consultations opment of partnerships involving a broad range of with local stakeholders have been held for example in stakeholders in the management of Natura 2000 sites. Lithuania and Slovakia, where there is a legal obligation to consult local stakeholders on site boundaries.

Trans-European Networks for Transportation

In April 2004, the European Parliament approved revised guidelines for development of the Trans-European Networks for Transport (TEN-T), a network of pan-European transportation corridors to connect the enlarged EU from the Black Sea coast to the Cliffs of Moher. The guidelines include a list of 30 priority projects, including “removing bottlenecks on the Danube” as well as development of the Struma motorway, which is presently planned to pass through the Kresna Gorge in Bulgaria. How the projects are developed and evaluated will be of critical importance – official recommendations for the Danube have called for dredging to more than 2.7 meters, which could affect natural values along up to 1,000 km of the river, including large sections of the Danube in Hungary and the most valuable intact stretches along the lower Danube between Bulgaria and Romania. Under pressure from environmental groups, initial proposals put forward by the European Commission, which made little reference to the Habitats and Birds Directives, have been significantly improved, and provisions for environmental assessments strengthened.

These safety-catches should help. But the greater concern is that the rush to promote transportation links threatens to repeat the worst mistakes of existing EU member countries – building roads, rails, canals and airports for their own sake, without careful cost-benefit analysis that takes into account not only economic, but also 10 social and environmental costs. The commitment made by EU statesmen at Gothenburg in 2001 to sustainable 11 development, including breaking the link between (“de-coupling”) economic growth and further development of transportation infrastructure, is being put to a severe test. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States II. Synthesis of national reports

A new future for the Lech: Biebrza Wetlands, Poland: Natura 2000 Rural regeneration as opportunity through conservation

The Lech river in Tyrol in Austria is one of the last Many locals opposed protection of the spectacular remaining free-flowing Alpine rivers. When Austria Biebrza wetlands in the early 1990s, seeing establish- joined the EU in 1995, the river easily qualified for ment of the national park as harming their opportuni- designation as a Natura 2000 site. Unfortunately, des- ties to make a living in this poor area of north-eastern ignation conflicted with another planned use of the Poland. Local opinions have changed dramatically river for hydro-power. WWF and other NGOs cam- since then. The Park is increasingly seen as a chief paigned against the building of the planned dams and asset for development. For the past decade, WWF has hydropower stations, taking the case all the way to the been working with local residents and park authorities European Court of Justice – a case that they eventu- to develop eco-tourism services, local crafts and prod- ally won. Today, the Lech is protected as a Natura ucts; to promote and market high-value products from 2000 site. Local community leaders, many of which nature-friendly farming; develop sustainable energy supported construction of the hydropower plant as sources; and to revive local culture, traditions, and, a source of development for their communities, now ultimately, pride in this special region. support protection of the area’s natural qualities, which have become a point of pride for area residents and an attraction for tourists and recreationists.6 photo © W. Volkov photo © W.

12 13

6) For other examples where Natura 2000 support local and regional development, see Promoting the Socio-economic Benefits of Natura 2000 (IEEP/WWF, 2002), available as pdf at: www.panda.org/ downloads/europe/natura2000socioeconomicbenefitscolour.pdf Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States II. Synthesis of national reports

Nevertheless, most accession countries have been EU funds are likely to have a significant impact on relatively slow to inform key stakeholders and even Natura 2000 sites in the region – possibly positive, responsible authorities, let alone the general public, but quite probably negative, if applied inappropri- about Natura 2000, its implications and also benefits. ately. Most of the infrastructure projects that are being As a result, the ground often has been only poorly developed now or in future, including construction prepared when the time has come to gain political of motorways, development of shipping on inland approval for proposed sites, or when rumours have waterways, and flood defenses, will expect to receive spread concerning new demands from Brussels. Some significant support from EU Structural and Cohesion rather ad hoc communications activities have been Funds as well as the European Investment Bank. It is undertaken, ranging from publication of posters and essential that the European Commission ensures close brochures to development of websites. But what has co-ordination and supervision of EU funds and the been almost universally missing has been a more application of EU environmental legislation. strategic approach – a comprehensive communications strategy backed by serious financial support. The The European Commission has clearly stated on promising start taken in this direction in early 2003 numerous occasions that all EU funding must be made in the Czech Republic, where the Agency for Nature conditional on respecting the requirements of the EU Conservation planned an 18 million CZK (€ 550,665) Environmental Impact Assessment Directive as well communications campaign, seems to have gotten as the Habitats and Birds Directives, particularly the derailed. A portion of the funding and activities have conservation of Natura 2000 sites. Future decision been taken over by the Protected Landscapes Area making on projects including development of the Via Administrations, with uncertain results. In Hungary, Baltica motorway in Poland, the Struma motorway the government has provided € 20,000 in support for in Bulgaria, and shipping on the Danube will pro- communications efforts by a coalition of NGOs. As vide lithmus tests for these intentions in the newest mentioned in the section on stakeholder involvement Member States as well. further below, a number of countries have organised fairly extensive consultations with stakeholders at the It will be important to see not only whether or not an local level. environmental assessment has been undertaken, but what the quality of that assessment is, and whether it has indeed served as a firm basis for decision making. Particularly in this respect, the present situation with Threats to Natura 2000 sites regard to the Via Baltica is, again, unsettling: while the Polish government has committed to undertaking and integration into sectoral policies a Strategic Environmental Assessment for the motorway, including an examination of all alternatives, it All countries report threats to potential Natura 2000 nevertheless appears to be moving forward with con- sites. The threats range from construction of motor- struction of the Białystok route. Whatever its quality, ways, such as the planned Via Baltica motorway the Strategic Environmental Assessment will be little through the Biebrza National Park in Poland, to the more than a fig leaf for what is for all intents and pur- intensification of agricultural practices in Slovenia. poses a fait accompli. 12 In Estonia, there is discussion of two alternatives for 13 connecting Saaremaa Island with the mainland. The In order to ensure that the significant investments now choice is between building a bridge, which will seri- flowing into the new Member States indeed benefit ously impact Natura 2000 sites, or digging a tunnel, these countries over the long term, it is essential that which would probably be less environmentally dam- existing EU legislation on Strategic Environmental aging. In Slovakia, tourism is putting increasing pres- and Environmental Impact Assessments is fully and sure on the fragile ecosystems of the Tatra Mountains. meticulously applied. Also of critical long-term importance is the full integration of environmental concerns into decision making in all sectors, especially with regard to agriculture, transportation, energy, regional development and spatial planning, as called for by EU statesmen at the Gothenburg Summit in June 2002. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States II. Synthesis of national reports

White Carpathians, Unfortunately, relatively little progress has been made Czech Republic: in integrating environmental concerns in general, and requirements of the Habitats and Birds Directives in Cultivating local values particular, into sectoral policies and programming by the EU newcomers. Some progress has been made with A rather unusual coalition of environmental groups, regard to agriculture and rural development, where communities, local farmers and businesspeople have preparation of the Rural Development Plans, and joined forces to promote development, and conserva- especially agri-environmental measures, has forced tion, in the White Carpathians. The rolling, patchwork a certain measure of co-operation between authori- landscape stretched along the Czech-Slovak border ties responsible for agriculture and environment. But consists of a rich mixture of forests, orchards, fields no headway seems to have been made with regard and brilliant flowering meadows, home to the rare to infrastructure and regional development. Current orchids that are the region’s hallmark. The area is also plans of the Polish government for developing the Via one of the poorest in the Czech Republic, with a high Baltica motorway through the Biebrza National Park, rate of unemployment. The partners have developed or of the Bulgarian authorities for pushing the Struma a myriad of small-scale initiatives, ranging from devel- motorway through the spectacular Kresna Gorge, are opment of local products to landscape stewardship. symptomatic of a general approach that tends to disre- A small juicing plant has been established in the vil- gard natural capital, and pay little more than lip serv- lage of Hostětín, and provides an economic incentive ice to EU environmental requirements. The situation is for local people to care for the rich genofund of apples not helped by the fact that, even if the environmental and other fruit in the region. Environmental groups authorities are fully aware of their rights and respon- have teamed up with local farmers to return sheep sibilities, they tend to be on the bottom of the political and cattle to the area’s meadows, helping to restore totem pole. and maintain the rich meadow ecosystems. A range of public-private partnerships have also been established The challenge is to guide new developments and shape around the care of these areas. Taken together, these future patterns of investment and land use in a way that initiatives and many others are creating an alterna- uses and profits from natural capital without undermin- tive – and increasingly very practical – vision for ing or destroying it. Enlargement offers the European sustainable development in the region.7 Union an opportunity to put its paper commitments to sustainable development into actual practice.

14 15

7) There are a large number of similar initiatives throughout these countries – for further examples, see among others Rural Livelihoods for Sustainability: Stories of Rural Regeneration from Central Europe (Environmental Partnership, 2004); Caring for the Land: A Decade of photo © M. Stránský Promoting Landscape Stewardship in Central Europe (Environmental Partnership, 2000); or PAN Parks (www.panparks.org/), which pro- motes development for local communities through improved conservation of protected areas. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States II. Synthesis of national reports

Financing Cultural landscapes:

Community co-financing Hungarian puszta Article 8 of the Habitats Directive requires Member States to provide to the European Commission, in Many of the sites listed in this report reflect the rich- parallel with their lists of proposed sites for priority ness in biodiversity that is a ‘by product’ of traditional, habitats and species, estimates relating to the Com- extensive agricultural practices that are still wide- munity co-financing for these sites. Financing for the spread in the new Member States. A special example management and protection of the Natura 2000 sites is of this is the Hungarian Puszta, a semi-natural grass- a responsibility shared by national governments and land ecosystem stretched between the Alpine and Car- the European Community. pathian mountain ranges that is the result of centuries of extensive grazing by Hungarian grey cattle and In 2002, the European Commission established sheep. a working group (the so-called “Article 8 Working Group”) to explore solutions to the question of co- financing for the Natura 2000 network as a whole. Taking a conservative approach, the Working Group has estimated that for the EU-15, between € 3.4 and 5.7 billion (and possibly as much as € 8.8 billion) per year is needed between 2003 and 2013 for the implementation of Natura 20008. In addition, the report out- lined three options for financing Natura 2000:

1. the use of existing EU funding instruments (such as CAP or Regional funds);

2. the expansion of the EU LIFE Nature fund;

3. the establishment of a new independent, dedicated photo © Haraszty/WWF-Hungary Natura 2000 fund.

Following the stakeholder consultation, the European Commission was expected to publish its recommendation on Community co-financing for Natura 2000 in a Comminication to the European Parliament and the Council in Autumn 2003. At the time of writing this report in mid-May 2004 the Communication was still expected. 14 15 Recognising the importance of Natura 2000 to ensure the integration of environmental concerns in sectoral policies as well as the limited political support that a dedicated fund for Natura 2000 is likely to receive, 8) Final report on financing Natura 2000, Working Group on Article 8 WWF as well as other environmental organisations (cf of the Habitats Directive (November 2002), http://europa.eu.int/ joint BirdLife, EEB, WWF position paper on Financ- comm/environment/nature/final_report_en.pdf ing Natura 2000) have supported a position that would allow for a combination of the three alternatives. This ‘combined approach’ should make use of the Structural Funds, the Common Agricultural Policy and the exist- Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States II. Synthesis of national reports

ing funding possibilitites provided under the LIFE Green corridors fund, and can be summarised as follows:

Ensuring connections between individual sites will be Structural Funds. The Structural Funds account for essential for securing and maintaining favourable con- the second largest part of the EU budget. Until now, servation status for many of the habitats and species funding for regional development paid only little protected under the Habitats Directive. For this reason, attention to the protection and maintenance of the special attention has been paid in developing the NGO environment and natural resources, despite the fact list of proposed sites to ensuring links between sites, that they are of key importance for attaining harmo- either in the form of corridors or “stepping stones”, nious, sustainable development in the EU. Regions and especially in cross-border areas. Examples of this that are rich in biodiversity, such as Natura 2000 sites, are the Tatra Mountains, comprising connecting sites should be eligible for Structural Funds in order to in Poland and Slovakia; the Carpathians or Beskydy promote development, which respects and preserves Mountains in the Polish, Slovak and Czech Republic the regions’ natural resources for the benefit of present border region; and the corridor function that Slovenia and future generations. has for the Balkan and Alpine populations of brown bears (Ursus arctos). These mountain areas are still This is especially true for the new EU Member States covered to a remarkable extent by near natural and and candidate countries. A proportion of the Struc- even virgin forests. Also exceptional are the last tural Funds should therefore be dedicated to nature remaining stretches of virgin lowland forest, the most conservation, including funding for establishing and well-known being the Bialowieza forest on the Polish- maintaining infrastructure, facilitating training, educa- Belarussian border. tion and public awareness activities, land purchase and other essential investment activities on Natura 2000 sites. This could be achieved by including a new environment objective dedicated to maintaining natural resources as a basis for sustainable development.

WWF and its partner organisations welcome both the proposal put forward in the Third Cohesion Report for a thematic priority focussed on environment and risk prevention as well as the specific reference to Natura 2000 that has been included in the proposal for the Financial Perspectives for 2007-13. Neverthe- less, we believe that in order to effectively apply the integration principle – to ensure that environmental considerations are properly taken into account in all sectoral policy making – the EU’s main financing instruments must be legally required to support correct management of the Natura 2000 network. The 16 current approach of leaving this to the discretion of 17 the Member States has not worked.

Moreover, we believe that funding for Natura 2000 should be ring-fenced, i.e. clearly earmarked for support of Natura 2000, and rules be set to ensure that the planned expenditure is effectively targetted to achieve objectives for the network. Earmarking part of these funds for Natura 2000 will ensure that they are indeed used for this purpose, and will also make it easier to follow the amount of funds spent on the network of photo © WWF-Canon/V.Filonov Special Protection Areas. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States II. Synthesis of national reports

Common Agricultural Policy. There should also be Worth special mention is the Czech Republic, which an obligation that a proportion of the CAP budget has been particularly thorough in its identification of be allocated to the management of Natura 2000 sites Natura 2000 sites and, in contrast to a number of coun- through the proposed Rural Development Fund. This tries that have relied heavily on foreign support for the would make use of higher rates of modulation, allow preparatory work, has funded most activities from non-farmers to apply for rural development funds, its own state budget. A special team has now been and give greater incentives to Member States to use established within the Ministry of Environment that national options for farming that would enhance the is responsible for securing funding sources for Natura environment. 2000 in the country.

LIFE Nature. The EU LIFE Nature fund has been Main sources of funding, both today and in the next instrumental in the management and restoration of financial perspective 2007–13, lie in agricultural habitats on Natura 2000 sites, as well as for the conser- support and Structural Funds as well as related pro- vation of priority species of EU importance across the grammes at national level. There is ample evidence, EU and in third countries. There are many activities for example from the province of Lower Austria, that related to the management of Natura 2000 sites that substantial – if not entirely adequate – funding can be need a dedicated environment fund. Environmental mobilised even under current programmes for Natura NGOs therefore call for the maintenance of a substan- 2000, given the right conditions as well as a fair amount tially increased „LIFE fund“ to finance essential costs of creativity and determination10. Unfortunately, those not covered by the above policies. This fund would funds that do exist are not being fully used. Navigat- make it possible to guide management of Natura 2000 ing through the thicket of measures and programmes while covering substantial gaps in financing. is difficult enough, without facing established -priori ties and political interests. It will be essential in future National co-financing not only that funding opportunities are increased and Experience in the existing EU Member States has made easier to access, but that capacity is developed shown how inadequate attention to the issue of from national to local levels to actually grasp hold of financing can undermine the Natura 2000 process as these opportunities. a whole, causing unnecessary anxiety among various stakeholders. In some countries, competent authorities Generally, it seems that there is a great expectation that have been in a situation where they have been unable the bulk of support for Natura 2000 will come from EU to provide answers to questions of land owners and funds. These are, however, unlikely to cover all needs, land users that are concerned about the implications of and in any case require co-financing from national site designation and the lack of financial schemes for sources. Recognising the burden that implementation sites management. In many cases, this has affected the of Natura 2000 can place on Member States, article 8 consultation process as a whole and lead to opposition of the Habitats Directive provides for Community co- to Natura 2000 site designation. financing to shoulder some of this burden. But this does not detract from the fact that ultimate responsibility for Where it has not yet been done already, it is essential implementing the Habitats and Birds Directives clearly that the new Member States develop their plans for lies first and foremost with the Member States. 16 financing implementation of Natura 2000 as quickly 17 as possible in order to be able to effectively use existing opportunities to cover some of the current costs related to Natura 2000 through existing EU funding 9) See footnote 3), page 6. programmes, and to influence the negotiations on the EU’s next financial perspectives. National status 10) See for example results of a seminar organised by WWF reports show however that where financing plans exist, in co-operation with the Province of Lower Austria and the Austrian they are generally inadequate, with unrealistic estima- Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forests, Environment and Water tions of costs.9 Management: Implementation of Rural Development Plans in the CEE Accession Countries (November 24–25, 2003), available at: www.panda.org/downloads/europe/rdpseminarreport.pdf Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States II. Synthesis of national reports

Rivers: Blue life lines Management The ‘green backbones’ of mountainous and forested areas are complemented by the blue life lines, the For the areas that already enjoy protection under rivers that pass through the newest Member States. national law, management plans usually already exist The Danube is the most important artery, passing in one form or another. However, more often than not, through four and draining another three of the new these plans are not very detailed and miss any financial Member States and candidate countries. The river, basis. For some other countries, existing management its tributary the Tisza and their floodplains feature or spatial plans are not in line with securing favourable prominently particularly in the Hungarian NGO list of conservation status or the objective of a plan is not tar- sites. Also important are the Polish Vistula, Oder and geted to ensure protection of the species or habitats of Biebrza rivers; the Czech and Slovak Morava river; concern. and the Slovenian Mura, Sava, Drava, Soca and Kolpa rivers. All of these rivers play vital roles as both cor- However, a significant part of the Natura 2000- net ridors and core areas. work will consist of previously unprotected areas. Management of these lands will need to be carried out The Vistula, for example, often called the “Queen of by land owners or land users, be they farmers, forest- Polish Rivers”, supports 75 % of Polish breeding bird ers or hunters. Clarity must be provided by national species and is one of the most important corridors for authorities as to what is and is not permitted, and how migrant birds in Europe. In contrast to most other to receive compensation for additional cost incurred. rivers in Europe, which have been dammed and regu- Positive in this respect is that Slovakia increased its lated over the past decades and centuries, relatively budget for 2004 for compensation payments from large sections of Central and Eastern European rivers approximately € 250,000 to € 2,500,000 – though still still display natural processes, including meanders and insufficient, a significant increase nonetheless. formation of sand and gravel banks. Though sufficiently represented in the Natura 2000 network, many important habitat types, e.g. alkaline fens, wooded meadows, and semi-natural dry grasslands, suffer from abandonment or mismanagement. Delimitation of boundaries and formal nomination of sites is not an end of the process, but rather the beginning of the long-term duty of site protection and management in order to ensure the favourable conservation status as required by Article 1 of the Habitats Directive.

In addition, all plans and projects likely to affect a Natura 2000 site should be subject to an assessment 18 of the implications to the conservation objective of the 19 site (Articles 6.2–6.4). photo © WWF-Canon/F. F. Hazelhoff F. photo © WWF-Canon/F. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States II. Synthesis of national reports

Conclusions Baltic Sea

The Baltic Sea’s shallow areas, including coastal Compared to the significant delays in site designa- lagoons, shallow sandbanks, and both coastal and tion suffered in the older EU countries, the process is offshore reefs, serve importantly as spawning and relatively well on track in the 10 new Member States. nursery areas for fish as well as important feeding A number of the lists of pSCI have already been and wintering areas for large numbers of sea birds. received by the European Commission, and others The Baltic Sea is also home to harbour porpoises are expected to be on their way. Only in the case of (Phocoena phocoena) and large numbers of grey seals the Czech Republic, Hungary and possibly Cyprus are (Halichoerus grypus), ringed seals (Phoca hispida) there expected to be significant delays. and harbour seals (Phoca vitulina). Fish populations, including cod (Gadus morhua), represent an important In most cases, the scientific preparation, including value for fisheries. identification of sites, has been relatively good. But greater political will and commitment will be needed The shallow and largely enclosed Baltic Sea is by its for establishment of the network. Most if not all of very nature vulnerable, and the low diversity makes the the lists will require additions. In some cases, as with food chains very sensitive to disturbance. The sea sus- Poland or Cyprus, these additions will need to be sub- tains a heavy load of pollutants from bordering coun- stantial. Even the relatively solid Slovak list is missing tries and is subject to a high degree of human activity, a number of key natural values that will need to be including fishing, shipping, coastal exploitation and added. development of offshore wind power, etc. To prevent further habitat degradation, many habitats and species The challenge lies now in dealing with any insuffi- require urgent protection. Unfortunately, knowledge of ciencies – including not only those highlighted in this the distribution of many marine species and habitats is report – and moving quickly ahead to secure effective still limited, making it difficult to select Sites of Com- implementation of the Natura 2000 network. Secur- munity Importance and to define their borders. How- ing adequate financing, particularly at a time when ever, it is clear that as marine species and pollutants decisions are being made regarding future use of EU move over long distances, marine Sites of Community funds, will be critical to future implementation of the Importance generally need to be quite large. network. Here it is critical that funding opportunities are not only created at EU level, but also pulled through to practical implementation on the ground. Raising awareness and understanding of Natura 2000, its implications and benefits, will also be essential to developing understanding and support for the network among different stakeholders and the general public.

In light of national status reports and previous experi- 18 ence of Natura 2000 implementation process, WWF 19 and its partners recommend that: photo © WWF-Latvia Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States II. Synthesis of national reports

Site identification and designation Implementation

National authorities must not limit site identifica- Administrative and institutional capacity must be tion to already protected areas and must take into strengthened to ensure that the whole Natura 2000 full account all areas that fulfil the scientific criteria process can be handled as an opportunity for pro- of the Habitats Directive, with specific considera- moting nature conservation and sustainable rural tion to corridors, buffer zones and stepping stones. and regional development. To achieve this aim, It is essential that the areas designated form an eco- efforts for the implementation of Natura 2000 must logically coherent network, rather than a patchwork not be limited to the Ministry of Environment but of already protected areas that have been desig- must be brought to the attention of all other rel- nated according to various types of criteria. evant ministries and institutions. Countries must establish a process for reviewing and Where not done already, countries should submit to completing their lists of proposed sites at national the European Commission their estimated costs and level with the involvement of NGOs and on the basis needs for EU co-financing wihout further delay in of the scientific criteria set up in the Directive, with- order to ensure that these needs will be taken into out waiting for the European mitigation process. consideration in the forthcoming decision on EU Where insufficiencies have been identified in the financial perspective and co-financing scenarios for lists, further inventories and research must be Natura 2000. undertaken at national level in order to propose Financing for Natura 2000 must be made a clear additional sites, and without further delay. These priority both by the EU institutions and the new tasks should be prioritised for the allocation of EU Member States and candidate countries. Provi- funding under the LIFE programme for 2005–06. sions for adequate levels of co-financing for Natura The European Commission should develop a clear 2000 from Community sources must be included in calendar to ensure that the biogeographic seminars the next financial perspective (2007–13). Support relevant for the new Member States do take place should be earmarked for Natura 2000 in the Struc- in the course of 2005 and 2006, and that the nec- tural Funds, the Common Agricultural Policy, as essary steps to finalise the national proposed lists well as LIFE Nature or successor programme. are not further delayed. WWF and its partners call National governments must provide for adequate on the European Commission to develop a clear support for the Natura 2000 network, recognising calendar to ensure that the biogeographic seminars that this is not only required as co-financing for relevant for the new Member States do take place Community support, but also that responsibility for in the course of 2005 and 2006, and that the neces- implementation of Natura 2000 lies first and fore- sary steps to finalise the national proposed lists are most with the Member States themselves. not further delayed. In addition, national authorities In planning their support for the network, the new and the European Commission must ensure that Member States should not overlook the substan- no funds are allocated to infrastructure and other tial opportunities that already exist for drawing projects which endanger potential Natura 2000 down Community co-financing for implementation sites. This may require delaying allocation of EU of Natura 2000, including from agricultural and funds where the lists of pSCI are not yet complete. regional development funds. 20 It is essential that coastal states – Poland, the Baltic National authorities and the European Commis- 21 countries, Cyprus and Malta – take part in the work sion must ensure that no funds are allocated to of the Marine Natura 2000 expert group to also infrastructure and other projects which endanger facilitate their full implementation of the Birds and present or future Natura 2000 sites. Many potential Habitats Directives in the marine environment. Natura 2000 sites are already under threat. National Support should be made available to ensure the governments must ensure that all decisions on spa- transfer of relevant expertise and best practice from tial planning comply with the EU’s environmental EU countries and, especially, between the future Member States, particularly when considering biogeographic scales, such as the Carpathian mountains, which include the territory of several different countries. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States II. Synthesis of national reports

Summary of reports

acquis. In addition to the requirements set out by for Bulgaria and Romania articles 6.3 and 6.4 of the Habitats Directive, com- pliance with the obligations concerning environ- Like the new Member States, Bulgaria and Romania mental impact assessment, access to environmental must submit their lists of proposed Sites of Com- information, water protection as well as river basin munity Importance by their date of accession, which management is essential to ensure that new devel- for both countries is currently expected to be in 2007. opments and land use planning is done in a way Those responsible at the Ministries of Environment, that uses and profits from natural capital without although well aware of the enormity of their task, gen- undermining or destroying it. erally lack the capacity and the financial as well as the Substantially greater efforts are needed to raise human resources to meet the challenge of implement- awareness and understanding of Natura 2000, ing Natura 2000 in their countries. Preparations for including the implications it will have for land and Natura 2000 that are being undertaken by or on behalf resource use as well as the benefits and opportuni- of the Bulgarian and Romanian governments are ties that it can yield. Awareness raising and educa- largely financed from foreign sources and with- con tion is especially urgent among relevant authorities sultation and supervision from foreign experts, as has at regional and local levels; as well as special inter- been the case in some other countries such as Lithua- est groups such as farmers, land owners, business nia. In Bulgaria, the Danish aid programme DANCEE owners, hunters and fishermen. has been supporting a two-year project focussed on data compilation and site identification as well as capacity building. A similar project, financed by the Dutch agency Senter International, has just concluded the conception phase in Romania. NGO involvement in both projects is relatively strong.

In both Bulgaria and Romania, relevant legislation has been transposed into national law, though imper- fectly – in both cases, additional points or changes will still need to be incorporated into the national legislation. As in other countries, requirements of the Habi- tats and Birds Directives are scarcely taken note of in sectoral planning, especially with regard to regional and infrastructure development.

A very positive development in both countries has been the increasing activity of nongovernmental organisations. In Bulgaria, NGOs including WWF, Green Bal- kans, Balkani Wildlife Society, and BirdLife Bulgaria 20 have been closely involved in preparations, including 21 site designation, capacity building, and legal analysis of relevant legislation. Work by Bulgarian NGOs has for example led to the adoption of 15 new habitats to the working lists for pSCI identification. A national meeting of stakeholders, organised by the NGOs and with involvement of the Ministry of Environment, is scheduled for June 29, 2004. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States III. Synthesis of national reports

Activity among NGOs in Romania has gone from vir- There is generally a low level of awareness among tually nothing in September 2003 to a very substantial relevant actors of what the consequences are of imple- programme of activities today. The NGO Coalition menting Natura 2000, especially about the positive on Natura 2000 in Romania, which was established effects on rural development. Priority in the coming in October 2003, includes 32 active members that years should be given to capacity building in the rel- are involved in information gathering and evaluation, evant institutions, the organisation of broad consulta- capacity building, and awareness raising. Here too, tions involving all relevant stakeholders and securing a national stakeholder workshop was organised with financing both from national as well as EU sources. At involvement of the Romanian Ministry of Environ- the same time, it is imperative that threats to potential ment on May 22–23, 2004. Natura 2000 sites are dealt with at the earliest possible stage in order to ensure the long-term and sustainable Threats to potential Natura 2000 sites in Bulgaria and use of these countries’ prodigious natural capital. Romania are numerous and similar to the threats faced in the newest Member States. Improved navigation of the Danube, one of the priority projects planned by the EU as part of its Trans European Network for Trans- portation (TEN-T), could have far-reaching impacts not only on the river’s mid-section passing through Slovakia and Hungary, but also on the most valuable lower stretch between Bulgaria and Romania. Sig- nificant dredging and other modifications could have disastrous consequences for nature values within the Lower Danube Green Corridor, a series of protected areas and restoration projects that are being developed by Bulgaria, Romania, Moldova and Ukraine11.

Another priority project of the Trans-European Net- works for Transportation is the Struma motorway12, which according to current plans of the Bulgarian government will pass through – and destroy – the outstanding natural values found in the Kresna Gorge. As in other cases, such as the Via Baltica in Poland, viable alternatives exist; the question is not so much whether or not to build the motorway, but rather where it should be built and under what conditions. Smaller- scale infrastructure projects, which could have equally far-reaching consequences if poorly implemented, include construction of smaller hydro-power plants on 22 virtually every Bulgarian river. 23

11) See: www.panda.org/about_wwf/where_we_work/europe/where/ danube_carpathian/danube_river_basin/lower_danube_green_ corridor.cfm

12) See: www.kresna.org Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States III: Contacts

III. Contacts

22 23 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States III. Contacts

Bulgaria Estonia

WWF Danube – Carpathian Programme, Estonian Fund for Nature Bulgarian Country Office Kärg Kama, Natura 2000 Vesselina Kavrakova, Ivan Hristov Riia 185A, Tartu, Estonia Tcanko Tcerkovski Str. 67/3/3 P.O. Box 245, Tartu 50 002, Estonia 1421 Sofia, Bulgaria tel: +372 7 428 443 tel/fax: +359 2 964 05 45 fax: +372 7 428 166 tel: +359 2 964 05 46 [email protected] [email protected] www.elfond.ee [email protected] www.panda.org/about_wwf/where_we_work/europe/ Hungary where/danube_carpathian/ WWF-Hungary Cyprus Brigitta Bözsó, Natura 2000 Officer Németvölyi út 78/b, 1124 Budapest. Hungary Federation of Ecological and Environmental tel: +36 1 214 55 54 Organisations in Cyprus fax: +36 1 212 93 53 Antonia Theodosiou [email protected] 28, Athalassas Avenue, Strovolos 2012, www.wwf.hu Nicosia, Cyprus tel: +357 22 313750 Latvia fax: +357 22 879241 [email protected] WWF-Latvia Ints Mednis Czech Republic Elizabetes Str. 8-4, 1010 Riga, Latvia tel: +371 7 505 640, Fax: +371 505 651 Arnika [email protected] Vlastimil Karlik www.wwf.lv Hudečkova 1, 405 01 Děčín, Czech Republic tel: +420 412 510 650 Lithuania mobile: +420 737 55 11 08 [email protected] Lithuanian Fund for Nature Dr. Pranas Mierauskas, Executive Director Veronica Ecological Institute Algirdo St. 22-3 Dr. Mojmír Vlašín LT-03012 Vilnius Panská 9, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic tel: +370 5 2310700 tel: +420 542 422 775 fax: +370 5 2310441 24 fax: +420 542 422 752 [email protected]. 25 [email protected] www.glis.lt www.veronica.cz Malta

Nature Trust (Malta) Vincent Attard P.O. Box 9, Valletta CMR 01, Malta tel/fax: +356 21 313 150 [email protected] www.naturetrustmalta.org Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States III. Contacts

Poland General

WWF Poland WWF Accession Coordinator Katarzyna Nowak, Natura 2000 Officer Andreas Beckmann ul. Wisniowa 38 c/o WWF Austria 02 520 Warszawa Ottakringerstr. 114-116, A-1160 Wien, Austria tel: +48 22 849 84 69 tel: +43 1 48817 238 fax: +48 22 646 36 72 mobile: +43 676 83488 238 [email protected] fax: +431 48817 277 www.wwf.pl [email protected] www.panda.org/accession Slovakia WWF European Policy Office Daphne – Institute of Applied Ecology Sandra Jen Eva Viestova, Natura 2000 Officer WWF European Policy Office Podunajská 24, 821 06 Bratislava, Slovak Republic 36 avenue de Tervuren Box 12, 1040 Brussels, tel/fax: +421 2 455 240 19 Belgium [email protected] tel: +32 2 743 8813 www.daphne.sk fax: +32 2 743 8819 [email protected] Slovenia www.panda.org/epo

Slovenian Society for Bird Research and Nature BirdLife International Protection Zoltan Waliczky, Accession co-ordinator Milan Vogrin c/o RSPB, The Lodge Ptujska c. 91, SI-2327 Race, Slovenia Sandy, Bedfordshire, SG19 2DL, UK tel: +386 2 788 3050 tel: +44 1767 680551 [email protected] [email protected]

Romania CEEWEB Policy Office Dorottya Papp, Natura 2000 co-ordinator WWF Danube-Carpathian Programme, Ulloi ut 91/B, 1091 Budapest, Hungary Romanian office tel/fax: +36 1 217 0803 Erika Stanciu www.ceeweb.org Str. Lnuga 39 2200 Brasov, Romania tel/fax: +40 268477054 [email protected] 24 www.panda.org/about_wwf/where_we_work/europe/ 25 where/danube_carpathian/ Legend

Sites ...... Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Rivers and IV. National reports and lists of sites water bodies ...... Country borders ......

Land cover Agricultural land ...... Forests...... Urban areas ...... Water bodies...... Wetlands...... No data......

26 27 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites

IV. National reports and lists of sites

EU Member States Accession to EU on May 1, 2004 Accession to EU expected 2007 Expected to begin accession negotiations

26 27 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Czech Republic

Basic geography: © ESRI data & maps, 2002 | CORINE Landcover: © European Environmental Agency, 2000

Legend: Map of proposed sites

Czech sites with area less than 2 km2 ......

Czech sites larger than 2 km2 ......

Map with distribution of sites with Rhinolophus hipposideros

28 29 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Czech Republic

Czech Republic

Compiled by: Dr. Mojmír Vlašín, Comments on sites proposed by NGOs Veronica Ecological Institute, with support from 10 experts13 for selected habitats and species

Many of the Natura 2000 sites proposed for the Czech Country statistics Republic are located along the country’s borders. This reflects not only the richness of biodiversity found in Area: 78,866 km2 the low mountains that ring the country, but also the (approximately the size of Austria) relative state of preservation and limited development of this area, much of which was recently protected Terrain: Bohemia in the west consists of roll- within the folds of the Iron Curtain. ing plains, hills, and plateaus surrounded by low mountains; Moravia in the east consists of very The largest area proposed by NGOs for inclusion in the hilly country, bounded by the Carpathians in the Natura 2000 network consist of three connected sites east. The Vltava (Moldau) river flows south to stretched along the Czech-Slovak border up to Poland: north in the west, meeting the Labe (Elbe) river the White Carpathians, Hostýnské a Vizovické High- just north of Prague; the Morava (March) river lands and Beskydy Mountains. They are not only rich flows through Moravia in the east. in habitats but are also home to large carnivores such as the brown bear (Ursus arctos), lynx (Lynx lynx), Elevation extremes: lowest point – Elbe wolf (Canis lupus) and also the otter (Lutra lutra). River – 115 m, highest point – Sněžka in northern Together with the adjacent Slovak and Polish territo- Bohemia – 1,602 m. ries of the Carpathians (which are also proposed as Natura 2000 sites) they form an area that is of a vital Land use: arable land – 41 %, permanent crops – interest for the survival of these species. 2 %, permanent pastures – 11 %, forests and woodland – 34 %, other – 12 % (1993 est.). A similar situation exists on the German-Austrian border, along which there is a large area (mostly Protected areas: 4 National Parks (110,304 ha); within the Šumava National Park) bordering Natura 24 Protected Landscape Areas (1,041,565 ha) – 2000 sites in the neighbouring countries. Also very together comprise 14.6 % of Czech territory; valuable are sites that have been relatively preserved approximately 1,500 small sites protected as natu- within former and present military training areas ral reserves or monuments. including Stínava, Doupovské hory, Libavá, Boletice, and Mladá. Population: 10,264,212 (July 2001 est.). A complete list of sites proposed by NGOs, covering 28 Capital: Prague (1,181,000 inhabitants). all habitats and species on the annexes of the Habitats 29 Directive, will be available from June 1, 2004 on the Internet at: www.veronica.cz, or from Dr. Mojmír Vlašín of ČSOP Veronica ([email protected])

13) Doc. Karel Hudec DrSc; RNDr. Josef Chytil; Doc. Věra Zelená; RNDr. Martin Culek; Doc. Milan Chytrý PhD.; Dr. Květa Morávková; Doc. Vlastik Kostkan PhD.; Dr. Jan Farkač; Petr Filippov; Mirek Mikát. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Czech Republic

Current status of official preparations

Status of official list of sites Communications and awareness raising The Act on Nature Conservation needed for imple- A governmental communications strategy that was menting Natura 2000 in the Czech Republic failed to prepared by the Agency for Nature Conservation and pass Parliament by a single vote in the autumn 2003, submitted to the Ministry of Environment in Febru- but was finally adopted in April 2004. The law includes ary 2003 called for 18 million CZK (€ 540,000) in significant flaws that will need to be addressed, includ- funding for activities including a national awareness ing unclear responsibility. Late passage of the Act on raising campaign. Administration of the funds was Nature Conservation has delayed finalisation of the list unexpectedly taken over by the Protected Land- of pSCI for the Czech Republic. The preliminary list scapes Areas Administration, with uncertain results of pSCI is complete, but must still be consulted with and impact. A portion of the support went toward relevant stakeholders before being submitted to the a series of activities organised by the Czech Union European Commission, which is not expected to occur for Nature Conservation and other NGOs and target- until the end of summer 2004. ted both at the general public and certain stakeholder groups. Examples of these activities are excursions to The Czech Ministry of Environment, which is respon- potential Natura 2000 areas and the planned distribu- sible for Natura 2000 in the Czech Republic, charged tion of information brochures. Activities are running the Czech Agency for Nature Conservation and Land- from November 2003 through July 2004. A number scape Protection with collecting data and preparing of articles in newspapers and specialist magazines the official list of sites. The Protected Landscape have appeared and seminars organised for scientific Areas Administration and National Park Administra- experts and government officials. Two documentaries tion are also involved. on Natura 2000 have been produced; the first is being broadcast on Czech Television (Channel 2) at the end Financing of May. A total of approximately 200 million CZK or € 6 million to be used over a five-year period (1999-2004) Stakeholder involvement was available and used for Natura 2000 mapping and To date, consultation with stakeholders has only been creation of the first proposal, carried out by the Agency. organised for SPA, in the form of hearings financed Of the 200 million CZK, 5 million CZK or € 150,000 by the Government and organised by NGOs (Czech went to species mapping, the rest was used for habitat Ornithological Society, Czech Union for Nature Con- mapping and technical work. This amounts to an esti- servation – Veronica, etc). mated 75 % of the costs of implementing Natura 2000 all coming from a separate budget for Natura 2000 Co-operation between the Ministry of Environ- at the Ministry of Environment. In addition to this, ment and NGOs on preparation for Natura 2000 has an unknown portion of the budget of the Agency for been fair. From the beginning, NGOs including the Nature Conservation is also reserved for Natura 2000. Botanical Society, the Czech Society for Ornithology Certainly compared to the funds reserved for technical (Czech BirdLife partner), Czech Union for Nature environmental measures, such as water treatment and Conservation and Arnika, have been involved in site 30 clean air (20.l billion CZK or € 638 million in 2001, identification for Natura 2000. The Czech Society for 31 80.1 % of which was used for air pollution and clean- Ornithology has prepared, on behalf of the Ministry of ing of water), the budget is very small. Environment, a comprehensive and elaborate proposal of Special Protection Areas (SPA). Starting in 2001, NGOs have been working with the Ministry of Envi- ronment and Nature Conservation Agency in organisation of various workshops and seminars related to Natura 2000. An NGO coalition for Natura 2000 (Koa- lice Natura) was established in early 2003.2 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Czech Republic

Site management For two pilot areas management plans where written pSCI Labské pískovce, threatened by development during a project funded through the Dutch MATRA of the Elbe waterway from Hřensko to Mělník. programme that ran from 2001–2003. It was carried out by a consortium of Arnika and a number of foreign pSCI Pálava a Podluží, threatened by oil extraction consultancies such as DHV from the Netherlands. In near Břeclav as well as the SPA: Soutok-Tvrdon- January 2004, the Ministry of Environment together icko, Bzenecká Doubrava-Strážnické Pomoraví with the Ministry of Finance and with financial support from the European Commission – DG Environ- pSCI: Škařiny, Osypané břehy, Filena a Záhlinické ment put out a tender for a capacity building project rybníky, Zástudánčí, Slavíkovy ostrovy, Hrabanov- focusing on the implementation of Natura 2000 in ská černava, Poodří, Heřmanský stav-Odra-Poolží, 15 sites, including the development of management Litovelské Pomoraví a Labské Pískovce – all threa- plans. The tender has been won by a consortium of tened by planned construction of the Danube-Oder- Dutch, Danish and British companies together with -Elbe Canal. the Czech NGO Arnika and Palacký University in Olomouc. The project will run from April 2004 until pSCI Jeseníky, threatened by the construction of the end of September 2005. Apart from the activities the Nové Hermínovy dam. undertaken in the framework of these two projects, no management plans have yet been written. pSCI Šumava and SPA Boletice, threatened by the development of a ski resort. Threats to sites The following sites are currently under threat from In many cases, including the R52 and D8 motorways large infrastructure projects: as well as the Danube-Oder-Elbe canal, the projects in question will seek significant support from EU funds. pSCI České středohoří and Grünwald and SPA It is imperative that a full Strategic Environmental Východni Krušné hory, threatened by construction Assessment be conducted for each project before any of the D8 highway from Praha to Dresden. funding is provided, and that, if necessary, alternatives are followed, mitigation measures are undertaken, or pSCI Rozšířené Poodří as well as SPA Heřmanský projects even cancelled. stav-Odra-Poolží and Hraniční meandry Odry, threatened by the D47 highway from Lipník nad Bečvou to Katowice in Poland. Conclusions and priority actions SPA Pálava and pSCI Pálava a Podluží, threatened by the construction of the R52 motorway from Publish official list of pSCI and SPA. Pohořelice to Mikulov. Broad discussion with stakeholders (including NGOs). 30 SPA Bzenecká Doubrava-Strážnické Pomoraví, Preparation of good management plans. 31 threatened by the construction of the R55 motorway Establishing Natura 2000 sites (with wardens, clear borders SPA Komárov threatened by the construction of the and favourable conditions) R35 motorway Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States

Basic geography: © ESRI data & maps, 2002 | CORINE Landcover: © European Environmental Agency, 2000

Legend: Map of proposed sites Hungarian sites, size > 601 km2 ...... Hungarian sites, size 600–301 km2 ...... Hungarian sites, size 300–101 km2 ...... Hungarian sites, size <100 km2 ......

Map with distribution of sites with Lutra lutra

32 33 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Hungary

Hungary

Compiled by: Brigitta Bozsó, WWF-Hungary Comments on sites proposed by NGOs

for selected habitats and species

At the moment, approximately 10 % of the country’s Country statistics territory is protected. Extension of this protected area network through implementation of the Natura 2000 Area: 93,030 km2 (somewhat larger than Austria) network (resulting in roughly a doubling of area under protection) is a very important step and would be Terrain: mostly flat, with hills and low mountains a great achievement. to the western part of the country and along its border. The feet of the Carpathians and the Alps Thanks to better environmental conditions and tradi- stretch along the Slovak and Austrian border. Two tional farming practices, some species such as the otter main rivers run through the country: the Danube (Lutra lutra) and suslik (Spermophilus citellus) that and the Tisza. are rare in western countries are still quite common in Hungary. Lake Balaton, Central Europe’s largest lake, lies in the west; Lake Fertő (Neusiedler See) is in Hungary’s main rivers, including the Danube, Tisza, the northwest, divided by the Austro-Hungarian and Drava, are among the most important biodiver- border. sity corridors, providing living conditions for many freshwater species of European importance. Alluvial Elevation extremes: lowest point – Tisza River forests are potentially very valuable habitats, although 78 m, highest point – Kekes 1,014 m they have been significantly degraded as the result of intensive forestry practices. Remaining core habitats Land use: 51 % arable land, 3.6 % permanent are threatened in some cases with extinction. crops, 12.4 % pastures, 19 % forests and woodland 19 %, other – 14 % (1999) Cross-border sites are very important, as are grassland habitats, especially in view of rural development activ- Protected areas: 10 national parks (484,883 ha), ities. Border areas, such as the Northern Mountains 36 Protected Landscape Areas (309,817 ha), and are especially important for large carnivores. Most 142 Protected Sites (25,927 ha), Nature Reserves of these territories contain protected areas, includ- and Natural Monuments (together with locally pro- ing national parks, but the extension of the protected tected reserves ca. 10 % of the country’s territory). network is very important for species that need large areas and have complex habitat requirements. Population: 10,197,119 (2001) 32 Thanks to varying climatic and special soil condi- 33 Capital: Budapest (1,775,203 inhabitants, 2001) tions, the surroundings of Budapest, especially the Buda Hills, are among the most precious biodiversity areas. They are home to valuable habitats and species, including the endemic Dolomite flax (Linum dolo- miticum) or the yellow lady’s slipper (Cypripedium calceolus). Unfortunately, these areas are under strong pressure from urban and infrastructure development and other human pressure. Extension of the Natura 2000 network should help mediate needs for development without threatening the future survival of this outstanding natural heritage. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Hungary

Current status of official preparations

Status of official list of sites Communications and awareness raising The government’s list of proposed Sites of Community The Hungarian government does not have a compre- Importance (pSCI) is completed and available on the hensive communications strategy for Natura 2000. Ministry of Environment’s website (www.kvvm.hu/ A communications initiative on Natura 2000 is now dokumentum.php?content_id=426). In order to being undertaken by the Hungarian Natura 2000 NGO be officially adopted, however, the Law on Nature Con- working group with support of € 40.000 from the Hun- servation must first be amended. At the time of writing garian Ministry of Environment as well as additional mid-May), draft legislation had been submitted to the sources, including the EU PHARE programme. The Parliament, which was expected to vote on the amend- initiative, which was launched on May 6, 2004 and ments by their last session in early June. The amended will run for a couple months, will consist largely of law will give the Government the power to adopt by training and awareness raising for key stakeholders, governmental decree the list of pSCI and SPA. The including local governments and farmers, as well proposed list of sites must then be made available for as mobile exhibits on Natura 2000. The agreement consultation by local stakeholders for a period of 15 signed by the NGOs with the Hungarian Ministry also days. Comments and objections will be collected and mentions further cooperation on awareness raising for considered by the Ministry of Environment, though Natura 2000, support for which should come from the the authorities are not bound to respect these opinions. Central Environmental Fund. This all must take place before the final list of sites is agreed. Current planning sees these steps occurring in Stakeholder involvement very short order, so that the final list of pSCI and SPA Members of the NGO working group on Natura 2000 can be submitted to the European Commission by the (National Society of Conservationists, MME/BirdLife end of June. It is quite possible, however, that this pre- Hungary, CEEWEB and WWF-Hungary) were concise timeline will suffer delays, and the submission of sulted by the national authorities at an early stage of the list of sites will slip into autumn. preparation for Natura 2000. BirdLife Hungary has been closely involved in the creation of the official list Financing of Special Protection Areas (SPA). According to rough cost estimates for financing of Natura 2000 (based upon Article 8. Working Group The governmental decree that will publicise the list of report), the establishment and management of the proposed Sites of Community Importance also states network in Hungary would cost 2 billion HUF (ca. € 8 that the government must put a map with location million) per year. According to the National Conser- of the site on display at the local government office vation Plan ca. € 7 million should be spent for Natura together with the list of relevant species and habitats. 2000 (monitoring and research, reporting, communi- Further distribution of information is carried out by cations, management) in the first two years. However the town clerk according to local procedures. Local this amount is not secured and allocated in the state residents have the opportunity to express their opinion, budget yet. All financing options that to date have which should then be considered by the Conservation been planned to contribute to Natura 2000, including Authority, though they are not bound to follow these 34 the state budget, “Green source” Central Environmen- opinions. 35 tal Fund and national Agri-environmental Programme, are in flux following merging of the Central Environ- mental Fund with the Water Funds as well as general cuts in the state budget, which inevitably will affect support available for nature conservation. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Hungary

Site management The draft Natura 2000 legislation does not contain any Major transportation projects, such as development of provisions regarding site management. According to shipping along the Danube waterway transport corri- current legislation, when a site is designated as a pro- dor, also pose a serious threat. The Danube project is tected area, the authorities send the management plan one of 30 priority projects being promoted by the EU to land owners informing them of the measures that as part of the Trans-European Network for Transporta- must be taken and the possibilities to receive subsidies tion (TEN-T), and that are expected to enjoy priority or compensation. It is likely that the same procedure for funding from the EU as well as European Invest- will be followed with Natura 2000 sites, although the ment Bank. It is imperative that a full Strategic Envi- legislative and financial background for provisions ronmental Assessment is undertaken for these projects (e.g. compensation) has not yet been established. before any investment or work begins, in order to ensure that economic interests will not overrule envi- Apart from sites already protected like National Parks, ronmental legislation. no management plans have been written nor are they under development. The Conservation Authority will In Croatia, gravel mining in the Drava river and the kick off planning work after the sites are designated. planned construction of the Novo Virje hydropower dam will have a serious impact on the river and hydro- Threats to sites logical regime, not only in Croatia but also in Hungary Some sites that are proposed for the Natura 2000 net- as well – affecting valuable riparian areas including work are already deteriorating. Their current status is the Drava National Park. Gravel mining is also taking not protected, and it is likely that the valuable species place on a smaller-scale on the Hungarian side of the and habitats they contain are going to disappear before Drava river. Despite close monitoring of authorities the sites are even officially designated, let alone pro- and NGOs, in many cases information on the destruc- tected. Examples of such areas include clear fellings in tion of sites comes too late, after damage has already the Nagykőrös forest. An especially controversial case been done. is the planned – and already authorised – construction of a NATO radar on Zengő Hill.

Another typical threat is the urban sprawl that is espe- Conclusions and priority actions cially significant around Budapest. The Buda Hills are in fact one of the most important biodiversity hotspots Publication and communication of list of proposed of Hungary. It is likely that the short-term benefits of Sites of Community Importance. selling land for housing development will be claimed Capacity building (increase of staff and resources) as “overriding public interest” in the future, under- for relevant National Park administrations. mining the long-term public benefits of favourable Ensure proper financing for establishment of environmental conditions, rich in biodiversity. Many Natura 2000 network (including compensation fund, examples of this could be mentioned here, though one Hungarian agri-environmental programme, 34 in particular is the old clay-mine in Százhalombatta Central Environmental Fund, co-financing 35 that is surrounded by protected areas and a pSCI site. for LIFE-Nature). Update and collection of new scientific data. Strict implementation of conservation legislation, including governmental decree on Natura 2000 expected in early May, Strategic Environmental Assessments, etc. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Lithuania

Basic geography: © ESRI data & maps, 2002 | CORINE Landcover: © European Environmental Agency, 2000

Legend: Map of proposed sites Lithuanian sites, size > 601 km2 ...... Lithuanian sites, size 600–301 km2 ...... Lithuanian sites, size 300–101 km2 ...... Lithuanian sites, size <100 km2 ......

Map with distribution of sites with Active raised bogs – 7110

36 37 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Lithuania

Lithuania

Compiled by: Pranas Mierauskas, Comments on sites proposed by NGOs Lithuanian Fund for Nature for selected habitats and species

The selected sites are important in terms of breeding Country statistics: and feeding grounds, as well as stepping stones for migratory species. The main principle for selection Area: 65,200 km2 (roughly the size of Ireland). of sites was to suggest a relevant percentage of distribution of habitat types as well as population size of Terrain: alternation of lowlands with highlands, (especially priority) species, and to ensure favourable many scattered small lakes, fertile soil, Baltic coast conservation status. with sandy, stony bottoms and shallow areas. The proposed marine sites represent sea areas (coastal Elevation extremes: lowest point – Baltic Sea lagoons, sandbanks and reefs) that are important for 0 m, highest point – Juozapines/Kalnas 293.6 m. marine biodiversity in Lithuania and the Baltic Sea e.g. important spawning and nursery areas for fish and Land use: arable land – 39 %, permanent crops – feeding and wintering areas for sea birds. Knowledge 9 %, permanent pastures – 6 %, forests and wood- of the distribution of many marine species and habitats land – 31 %, other – 15 % (2001). in Lithuania is still insufficient, making it is difficult to select SCIs and to define the borders. Protected Areas: 5 National Parks (152,294 ha), 4 State Nature Reserves (23,805 ha), 30 Regional Parks (409,911 ha), 54 Landscape Reserves (58,428 ha). Current status of official preparations

Population: 3,610,535 (July 2001 est.). Status of official list of sites The Ministry of Environment adopted the first portion Capital: Vilnius (600,000 inhabitants). of 57 pSCI on March 2, 2004; additional sites were adopted by the ministry in April, bringing the total number of pSCI to 274. Lithuania’s list of pSCI was received by the European Commission in early May.

36 37 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Lithuania

Financing Stakeholder involvement The Lithuanian Government and the Ministry of Lithuania has strict procedures for establishing pro- Environment have no special budget for implement- tected areas and virtually always follows this pro- ing Article 6 of the Habitats Directive, which deals cedure. According to Lithuanian law, land owners, with site management. An estimated 5 million LTL municipal and governmental representatives should (€ 1.4 million) is however needed to carry out the agree with the establishment of a protected area, necessary management measures (habitats and spe- including future Natura 2000 sites. Plans to establish cies management). For information and recreation protected areas must be announced in advance, and facilities, on the other hand there an annual budget stakeholders invited to a public meeting at which they was allocated, though the exact amount varied every can express their opinion on site designation, site year. For 2004–2005 there are plans to get support boundaries, management regimes and conservation from EU structural funds: 2.3 million LTL (€ 0.66 mil- status. The government is then obliged to take into lion) for preparation or amendment of existing plan- account these local opinions, but is not obliged to ning schemes (spatial plans), 1.7 million LTL (€ 0.46 decide in their favour. Since it is required by law, in all million) for monitoring activities and necessary equip- cases meetings have been held with local stakeholders. ment, 10.5 million LTL (€ 3 million) for implementa- In the case when land owners and other stakeholders tion activities (building or restoration of information do not agree on the designation of sites, the areas are centres, museums, exhibitions, nature trails, and not designated and the State Protected Areas Service some amount for nature management), 3 million LTL removes this site from the Natura 2000 list. (€ 0.86 million) for removing of abandoned buildings in protected areas (e.g. collective farms, garages, Management plans former military camps and other buildings from the To date, no management plans have been prepared soviet times). Though the amount seems to be signifi- for pSCI. There are prepared planning schemes (ter- cant, the majority of resources would be allocated not ritorial or spatial plans), but they are not in line with for implementing article 6 of the Habitats directive, the Habitats directive article 6 requirements. There but for building and improvement of recreation and is a PHARE project for the preparation of 60 (40 for tourism information facilities with lower priority for pSCI and 20 for SPA) management plans. But it is no nature conservation. guarantee that plans will be developed as management plans. They could also develop as spatial planning Communications and awareness raising schemes which do not necessarily contribute to imple- A series of meetings have been held with local stake- mentation of Article 6 in the selected sites. The State holders to discuss sites designated for Natura 2000 Protected Areas Service is planning to develop new (see below, stakeholder involvement) In the past 2–3 or to amend existing planning schemes for a certain years numerous meetings and communication activi- amount of protected areas which are going to be des- ties such as newspaper articles and TV programmes ignated as Natura 2000. have been organised in Lithuania in the framework of a DANCEE project and carried out by a Danish consultancy. Unfortunately there are no plans for future 38 stakeholders’ involvement in the Natura 2000 imple- 39 mentation process. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Lithuania

Threats to sites Conclusions and priority actions Part of the forest in Europe’s Centre landscape reserve has been proposed as a pSCI. Unfortunately, the State Effectively implement relevant Protected Areas Service has made an agreement with nature conservation legislation. the county authorities and a number of private busi- Change the institutional structure by establishing nesses to turn the site into an entertainment area. a nature conservation agency or department within The State Protected Areas Service has also agreed the Environment Protection Agency; to decrease the total area of the landscape reserve in Change priorities at the Protected Areas Service order to accommodate more commercial interests, e.g. from facilities/visitors management golf fields. to nature management. Establish a monitoring system to estimate The Padauguvos and Babtai-Varluva forests qualify as the effectiveness of nature management pSCI, but the land owners do not agree to designate in protected areas. these as protected areas.

The Baltoji Voke fish pond is a very important area for breeding and migratory birds. It qualifies as an SPA, and has been nominated as a pSCI for certain amphibian species. However, land owners have objected to establishment of the Natura 2000 site. In fact, a majority of the fish ponds in Lithuania could be established as SPA, but the situation is the same – in many cases land owners do not agree with site designation as an SPA. According to Lithuanian law, it is very difficult to designate a protected area against the objections of land owners.

Development of the Warsaw-Kaunas railway, a priority project for the EU’s Trans-European Network for Transportation, could, depending on its routing, have a negative impact on potential Natura 2000 sites. A comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessment report has not been developed and made public.

38 39 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Malta

Basic geography: © ESRI data & maps, 2002 | CORINE Landcover data are not available

40 41 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Malta

Malta

Compiled by: Vincent Attard, Nature Trust Malta Comments on NGO List of sites

The Maltese islands feature some extraordinary natu- Country statistics ral areas of high ecological importance. Among examples are endemic fauna (lizards) and flora, important Total area: 316 km2 breeding grounds for birds on the western cliffs as well as typical Mediterranean habitats such as the Gar- Terrain: mostly low, rocky, flat to dissected rigue (a low-growing, secondary vegetation, whose plains; many coastal cliffs dominant plants are aromatic herbs and prickly dwarf shrubs). Many of Malta’s endemic species already Elevation extremes: lowest point – enjoy legal protection. Mediterranean Sea 0 m; highest point – Ta‘Dmejrek 253 m (near Dingli) Pressures on the land are high on the relatively small and densely populated islands that make up Malta. In Land use: arable land – 31.25 %, permanent February 2004, Nature Trust Malta submitted a list of crops – 3.13 %, other – 65.62 % (1998 est.) sites for Natura 2000 to the Malta Environment and Planning Authority. While creating this list Nature Population: 400,420 (July 2003 est.) Trust Malta was well aware of the existing pressures on the potential sites and therefore made sure that their Capital: Valletta proposal would ensure that a representative sample of the Maltese natural values would be preserved. This report includes the complete list of Natura 2000 sites that has been proposed by Nature Trust Malta. Their presentation is in a slightly different format from those given for other countries.

40 41 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Malta

Status of official preparations

Status of government list of sites Stakeholder involvement Responsibility for preparing a list of pSCI and SPA for Initially, the Maltese authorities called on environ- Malta lies with the Malta Environment and Planning mental organisations to propose sites for consideration Authority, which is under the charge of the Ministry of as part of the future Natura 2000 network. BirdLife Rural Affairs and Environment. The list of pSCI has Malta submitted its list of Important Bird Areas been completed, approved by the Ministry for Rural (IBA’s), while Nature Trust Malta submitted a list of Affairs and Environment, and sent to the European suggested areas for designation under the Habitats Commission. The list is available on the website Directive (pSCI). Apart from these initial consulta- of the Malta Environment and Planning Authority tions, there has not been any further involvement (www.mepa.org.mt). of environmental organisations in preparations for Natura 2000. Nature Trust Malta is also not aware Unfortunately, two of the most important sites have of any consultations that have taken place with other not been included in the government’s proposed list of stakeholders such as land owners or local authorities, sites. They are: despite provisions in the Environmental Protection Act that require nationwide public consultation. 1. The Ta‘ Cenc cliff area, which has long been an important bird area for various species such Financing as the rare Spectacled Warbler (Sylvia conspicil- No budget has been allocated for implementation of lata), the Corn Bunting (Miliaria calandra), the Natura 2000 in Malta. While the Government has set Blue Rock Thrush (Monticola solitarius) as well up an Environmental Fund, no funds have as yet been as holding one of the most impressive colonies of designated and no funding allocated for Natura 2000 Cory’s Shearwater (Calonectris diomedea) in the sites. Small Funding Grants from the Malta Environ- Maltese islands and a small colony of the other- ment and Planning Authority have been budgeted as wise elusive Storm Petrel (Hydrobates pelagicus). part of the Planning gain. This means that in case The area includes a rich plant biodiversity in its a project developer damages a site, the bank guarantee garigue and rupestral habitats with several rare of the developer can be used to finance repair activi- and/or endemic species such as: the National Plant ties. Only very limited support has been provided by Maltese Rock Centaury (Palaeocyanus crassifo- the authorities for work undertaken by NGOs. Nature lius), Ophrys lutea, Centaurea melitensis, Hyoseris Trust Malta has been awarded a LIFE grant (total of frutescens, Darniella melitensis. Needless to say, € 320,000, of which € 210,000 comes from the Euro- the area is also of great interest in terms of geol- pean Commission), which will be used for the protec- ogy, natural history, and archeology, and has a high tion of Dwejra, a proposed Natura 2000 and possible landscape value. UNESCO World heritage site. 2. The Qortin il_Kbir, Tal-Magun and ta‘ Isopu (and associated valleys) are all very ecologically rich garigue areas which should be afforded Level 1 protection status as they hold some very rare plant 42 species such as Iris pseudopumila, Cistus mon- 43 speliensis, Crepis pusilla, Althaea hirsute, Ononis ornithopodioides, Serapias vomeracea, Plantago bellardi, Romulea melitensis and Echinaria capi- tata. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Malta

Communications and awareness raising It is of crucial importance that the Environmental To date, the Government has not undertaken any com- Police Unit and the Environment Inspectors get more munications or awareness raising activities regarding staff (currently there are only 23 policemen who cover Natura 2000. We are not presently aware of any plans not only environmental crimes but also other crimes to do so in future. such as gambling and prostitution). In addition, more specialised Green Wardens are needed who can carry Nature Trust Malta has been doing considerable media out surveillance of areas. This is something Nature work focussed on Natura 2000, including regular Trust Malta has been lobbying for the last four years. press releases on potential Natura 2000 sites and the Some of the sites, such as the Bahrija valley and the Ta threats they face. We have also been preparing and Cenc Cliffs, are still deteriorating as a result of uncon- distributing publications documenting important sites. trolled human activities and tourism development. A mobile exhibition on nature protection organised by Nature Trust is also travelling from school to school. In Bird trapping has negative impacts, not only for the addition, Nature Trust Malta organises regular guided birds concerned, but also for the Garigue habitat in walks in various localities to raise public awareness which it takes place, mostly because of the use of her- on the importance of the Natura 2000 sites and why bicides to clear the vegetation in order to put up nets. locals should be proud and protect these areas in their localities. Nature Trust Malta also has a green line for There is a site at Xemxija where there are plans to con- people to report environmental damage happening in struct a road as part of the European Road Network. any area. Nature Trust Malta has asked the Malta Environmen- tal and Planning Authority if an Environmental Impact Management plans Assessment will be carried out for the project, but to Management Plans have been written or are being date no response has been received. written for those sites where NGOs are involved in management, including Dwejra, Wied Ghollieqa Nature Reserve, Marsaxlokk Salt marsh and White Tower Bay sand dunes. For other sites, no manage- Conclusions and priority actions ment plans have yet been developed. An adequate consultation process Threats to sites Proper law enforcement and allocation Most of the proposed Natura 2000 sites are under of human resources for wardening threat from intense pressure on the limited areas avail- Allocation of adequate funding able on the Maltese Islands. Strong pressure comes Development of management plans especially from agriculture and housing development. More human resources and greater political will Other threats come from illegal activities such as bird trapping, off-road driving in four-wheel vehicles and illegal dumping of waste. A key problem is that law 42 enforcement on the Islands is very weak. Another 43 example is the continuous burning by vandals, probably for land speculation, of a valley in the west of Malta which is home to endemic fauna. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Poland

Basic geography: © ESRI data & maps, 2002 | CORINE Landcover: © European Environmental Agency, 2000

Legend: Map of proposed sites Polish sites, size > 601 km2 ...... Polish sites, size 600–301 km2 ...... Polish sites, size 300–101 km2 ...... Polish sites, size <100 km2 ......

Map with distribution of sites with Mixed ashalder alluvial forests of tempertae and Boreal Europe – 91F0

44 45 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Poland

Poland

Compiled by: Katarzyna Nowak, WWF-Poland with Comments on sites proposed by NGOs input from Malgorzata Znaniecka, WWF-Poland, regarding the Via Baltica for selected species and habitats

The proposal indicates the size and number of sites Country statistics needed to adequately protect the species and habitats from the annexes of the Habitats Directive that have Area: 312,685 km2 (nearly the size of Germany). been selected for this exercise. The sites included in the first proposal elaborated by the National Founda- Terrain: mostly flat plain; mountains along south- tion on behalf of the Polish government, covering ern border (Carpathian, Jizera, and Eagle moun- some 18 % of the country’s total area, have been care- tains); Baltic Sea coast in the north (shallow areas fully analysed with regard to their natural value, and with sand, gravel and boulders). some additional sites proposed by NGOs. The boundaries and area of some sites from the first government Elevation extremes: lowest point – Raczki proposal have been either reduced or extended. Elblaskie -2 m, highest point – Rysy 2,499 m. The proposed marine sites represent sea areas, includ- Land use: arable land – 47 %, permanent crops – ing coastal lagoons, sandbanks and reefs, that are 1 %, permanent pastures – 13 %, forests and wood- important for the marine biodiversity in Poland and land – 29 %, other – 10 % (1993 est.). the Baltic Sea, e.g. important spawning and nursery areas for fish as well as feeding and wintering areas Protected areas: 23 National parks (3,442 km2), for sea birds. Knowledge of the distribution of many including e.g. Biebrza and Bialowieza National marine species and habitats in Poland is still insuffi- Parks; 120 Landscape Parks (25,692 km2); 1,346 cient, making it difficult to select SCIs and to define nature reserves (1,481 km2). borders.

Population: 38,633,912 (July 2001 est.).

Capital: Warsaw (1,610,000 inhabitants). Current status of official preparations

Status of official list of sites The official list of Special Protection Areas (SPA) and proposed Sites of Community Importance (pSCI), that was published on April 5, 2004, is a dramatically reduced version of the first list published in May 2003. 44 The total area proposed under Natura 2000 has been 45 cut from an initial 18 % to some 9 % of the country’s area. The initial list of 278 pSCI has been reduced to 184 sites covering 1,171,600 ha, or 3.7 % of the country’s area. The list includes eight marine sites ranging in size from approximately 1,000 to 40,000 hectares. Similarly, initial proposals for SPA have been cut from 114 to 72 sites (8.6 % of the country’s area). Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Poland

As a result of these site reductions, the present gov- The most dangerous decision of the Ministry of Envi- ernment list of pSCI does not sufficiently cover a rep- ronment is the elimination from the official list of 22 resentative part of Polish populations for numerous pSCI in major river valleys, especially sites along the species from Annex II and numerous habitats from Wisła (Vistula), Odra (Oder), and Warta river valleys. Annex I of the Habitats Directive. This will practically lead to the disappearance of precious European habitats like Rivers with muddy banks Of the 43 species of Annex II plants found in Poland, (3270), Mixed ash-alder alluvial forests of temperate only 8 species are adequately covered in the govern- and Boreal Europe (91E0*), Alluvial meadows of ment’s new proposal. For 6 plant species from Annex river valleys of Cnidion dubii (6440) and Riparian II, all Polish sites have been omitted entirely. Among mixed forests of Quercus robur, Ulmus laevis (91F0). them there are 2 endemic species of Poland (Galium A possible reason for eliminating pSCI from river val- cracoviense and Cochlearia polonica) that were leys is a lack of consensus both between the Depart- added to Annex II as the result of a Polish request. For ment of Nature Conservation and the Department of 12 plant species, the main Polish populations are not Water Resources within the Ministry of Environment. covered in the governmental proposal. The water authorities oppose the inclusion of sites from major river valleys into the Natura 2000 network With regard to animal species, all sites important for because they are afraid that Natura 2000 would hinder the fish Gobio albipinnatus (7 sites), the fish Gobio planned investments and cause threats of flooding. kessleri (3 sites) and butterfly Polyommatus eroides have been omitted. No one fish species is adequately Also most large forests have been eliminated from the covered; for the salmon (Salmo salar), 8 out of 11 sites official list, probably as a result of opposition from the have been crossed out. The most important Polish Polish State Forests (a governmental agency). This populations of the pond turtle (Emys orbicularis), is followed by inadequate coverage for animals con- wolf (Canis lupus), and brown bear (Ursus arctos) nected with bog forests (wolf, bear, bison), forest birds have been ommitted. Even the European bison (Bison and for some forest invertebrates (e.g. Lucanus cervus, bonasus), a priority species, will be protected in only Cerambyx cerdo and Osmoderma eremita). two out of the five sites where this species occurs. In short, the list of pSCI published April 5, 2004 is Bird areas proposed by the Polish goverment do not very inadequate. Altogether, about 60 important pSCI cover the single site in Poland for Tringa glareola and have been excluded from the present official list. The do not contain areas of key imporance for Haliaeetus content of the list will fail to meet not only the require- albicilla, Pandion haliaetus, Caprimulgus europaeus, ments of the Habitat Directive requirements but also Aegolius funereus, Tetrao tetrix, Milvus migrans, would affect the realisation of international commit- Milvus milvus, Bubo bubo and Dendrocopos medius. ments related to recommendation 44/1995 of the Bern Convention. With regard to habitats, the governmental proposal is also inadequate. For some habitats, such as European dry heaths (4030), Oligotrophic lakes (3110), Alkaline 46 fens (7230), Medio-European limestone beech forests 47 of the Cephalanthero-Fagion (9150) or Euro-Siberian steppic woods with Quercus spp. (91I0), the best Polish sites are not included in the proposal. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Poland

Financing Communications and awareness raising According to estimates made by the Ministry of Envi- The Ministry of Environment organised one interna- ronment (March 16, 2004), the cost of establishing tional seminar with NGO participation in the frame- SPA is 30 million PLN (ca € 6.35 million) per year for work of the PHARE twinning project (PL.0105.02) in five consecutive years. It is assumed that 70 % of this November 2003 where several examples of processes amount will be co-financed by the European Commis- of designation from Great Britain, the Netherlands, sion (21 million PLN or € 4.4 million). The National Germany, France and Finland were presented, though Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Manage- without comment on the current situation in Poland. ment and Ecofund will cover 20 % (6 million PLN or approximately € 1.2 million), and the national budget The Ministry of Environment organised public consul- will cover 10 % (3 million PLN or € 0.6 million). tations on the pSCI list in voivoidships in 2003, but stakeholders did not have free access to the Standard The cost of establishing sites according to the Habitats Data Forms and detailed maps for each proposed site. Directive, according to the Ministry of Environment, The governmental list was placed on the Ministry of will total 218 million PLN (about € 46.157 million) Environment’s website in summer 2003, but only for per year for five consecutive years. It is assumed that a few days. Since that time, there has been no precise the European Commission will co-finance 70 % (152.6 information available on the status of preparations of million PLN or € 32.4 million) and the National Fund the list of proposed Sites of Community Importance. for Environmental Protection and Water Management On March 16, 2004 the Ministry officially submitted and Ecofund would cover 20 % of costs (43.6 million the government proposal for public consultation. The PLN or € 9.2 million). From the national budget, 21.8 time for response and comments was only seven days, million PLN or € 4.6 million per year will be spent on which is far from sufficient to analyse such extensive establishment of Sites of Community Importance. material. Nevertheless, the Polish NGO Coalition on Natura 2000 submitted an analysis of the proposal. No The Polish NGO coalition on Natura 2000, however, response to this evaluation was received, and none of points out that the methodology used by the govern- the NGO recommendations were incorporated into the ment for estimating the costs is not clear, and the government’s final proposal. criteria used are not publicly known. Activities such as education, communication and promotion of the Stakeholder involvement Natura 2000 network have not been taken into con- A number of stakeholders have taken part in the proc- sideration. Generally, the impression is that too much ess of site designation: scientists, water authorities, money is reserved for the purchase of new equipment foresters, the general and regional directorates of the rather then spending it on much more needed conser- state forests, hunters, voivodships, nature conserva- vation measures. Moreover, it should be taken into tion authorities, local communities (gminas) and consideration that possible sources of national financ- environmental NGOs. The co-operation between ing are still not secured. NGOs and the Department of Nature Conservation in the Ministry of Environment responsible for the sites designation has been poor, hampered by a lack of transparency concerning the preparation of the pSCI 46 and SPA. In December 2003, the Polish NGO coali- 47 tion on Natura 2000 was established, consisting of the majority of the largest and most active environmental NGOs in Poland: the Polish Society for Nature Pro- tection „Salamandra“, the Polish Naturalist Club, and the Polish Society for Protection of Birds (BirdLife Poland), and WWF-Poland. The coalition co-operates with other NGOs such as the Polish Society of Friends of Wildlife, Pro Natura, and the Lower Silesian Foun- dation for Sustainable Development. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Poland

Threats to sites This NGO coalition is now developing a national All major river valleys and six other pSCI which pro- “Shadow List” of sites (i.e. a comprehensive list, tect important habitats from Annex I of the Habitat extending beyond the scope of this exercise), which Directive are not included in the official list of pro- will be submitted (probably in July) for consideration posed Sites of Community Importance (April 2004). to the Polish government as well as the European If the list remains in its current form, the likely result Commission. For more information please contact will be deterioration of riparian forests and other WWF-Poland (see contact list). In addition to this, the unique habitats of European importance. The same list can be used by the Polish Government during the applies to Special Protection Areas for birds, with biogeographic seminars to improve their official pro- omission from the government list of approximately posal of pSCI. The NGO Coalition is also evaluating 80 sites that meet the criteria for priority areas and in the government list of proposed sites and examining some cases represent areas that are significantly more the future Act on Nature Conservation with regard valuable than sites included on the list. The proposed to proper implementation of the Birds and Habitats list does not cover and protect to the same extent the Directives. particular bird species listed in the Birds Directive. For some species, the percentage proposed to be covered Members of the scientific community have been by Natura 2000 is too small for sufficient and effective working closely with the NGO Coalition to evalu- protection. ate the government’s list of proposed sites. Foresters, hunters and water authorities have generally opposed The Via Baltica. The Via Baltica expressway in Podla- the designation of Natura 2000 sites, and have been sie region is now planned to cut through the most valu- lobbying the Ministry of Environment for amendment able areas proposed for Natura 2000 sites and protected or removal of particular sites. under Polish law as well as international conventions. The expressway is part of the Trans-European Net- Management plans works for Transportation that is being promoted by the No management plans have been developed to date. EU (though not one of the present list of 30 priority However, an international tender supported through projects). Despite the existence of viable, and possibly a PHARE twinning project (PL.0105.02) is expected more economic alternative routes, the Polish govern- shortly to select authors of the management plans for ment continues to promote the route via the vicinity of seven pilot areas. Białystok which will cut through the following sites: Biebrza Valley (the Biebrza National Park, a Ramsar site, Important Bird Area, and a potential Natura 2000 site); Knyszyńska Primeval Forest (the Knyszyńska Forest Landscape Park, an Important Bird Area and potential Natura 2000 site); Augustowska Primeval Forest with unique Rospuda river valley (an Important Bird Area and potential Natura 2000 site); and in close proximity to the Narew National Park, an Important Bird Area and potential Natura 2000 site. 48 49 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Poland

Conclusions and priority actions Following intense pressure from WWF-Poland and other NGOs, the government decided in August 2003 Add additional sites to the present proposal in order to submit the entire corridor of the Via Baltica in to fully meet requirements of the Habitats and Poland to a Strategic Environmental Assessment. The Birds Directives Monitoring of implementation of tender for execution of the Strategic Environmental requirements of the Birds and Habitats Directives Assessment is expected soon. Despite this, the Min- in the Polish Act on Nature Conservation ister of Infrastructure stated during a press conference Develop a comprehensive communications in Białystok option for the Via Baltica would in any strategy on Natura 2000 case be constructed. Indeed, preparatory work to build Improve estimations of the costs the expressway near Białystok is well underway and of implementing Natura 2000 indicates that authorities are trying to push through Ensure that in follow up to the PHARE project their alternative by fait accompli. In this light, it which will develop management plans for 7 pilot seems more than coincidence that the Augustów and areas, management plans will be written Knyszyn primeval forests, two potential Natura 2000 for all relevant Natura 2000 sites. sites that will be heavily affected by the Białystok route, have been eliminated from the government’s proposed list of sites.

To date, no EU funds have been allocated for construction of the Via Baltica route via Bialystok, but the World Bank is reportedly seriously considering financing the project. Nevertheless, EU support through the PHARE programme is currently being used to upgrade an alternative route for the Via Baltica, route number 61 via Łomża – though, it must be added, not to the standard of an expressway, i.e. possible further sug- gestion that the Polish government is in effect planning a fait accompli in favour of the Białystok route.

Proposals for financing 15 projects within the framework of the Oder 2006 Investment Plan have been prepared for financing by the Cohesion Funds, including dams and large reservoirs at Raciborz and Kamieniec Zabkowicki. Together with the planned Danube-Oder- Elbe canal, these projects could threaten 26 potential Natura 2000 sites on the Polish side of the Oder river and at least 2 sites on the Czech side of the border.

48 Smaller but numerous projects of river regulation, con- 49 struction of dams and reservoirs are being prepared for support from EU funds. The projects could threaten ca. 50 potential Natura 2000 sites in small river valleys. The precious marine coastal habitats in the pSCI Puck Bay and Hel Peninsula (PLH220034) could be threatened by investment plans for construction of camping and parking areas. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Slovakia

Basic geography: © ESRI data & maps, 2002 | CORINE Landcover: © European Environmental Agency, 2000

Legend: Map of proposed sites

Slovak sites with area less than 2 km2 ......

Slovak sites larger than 2 km2 ......

Officially proposed sites ......

Additional sites (selected habitats and species)......

Additional sites (all other habitats and species) ......

Map with distribution of sites with Lynx lynx

50 51 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Slovakia

Slovakia

Compiled by: Rastislav Lasák, Eva Viestová, Comments on the full list of sites Ján Šeffer, Daphne Institute of Applied Ecology proposed by NGOs for Slovakia

The full list of sites presented here represents the Country statistics complete list of pSCI – i.e. not only the 24 habitats and 18 species that have been selected for comparison Area: 49,035 km2 across the newest Member States for this report, which are noted for purposes of comparison with other coun- Terrain: rugged mountains in the central tries. The NGO list, which has been developed and and northern part and lowlands in the south co-ordinated by Daphne, contains a total of 856 sites, which cover a total of 888,958 ha, covering a total of Elevation extremes: lowest point – Bodrog 18.20 % of the country’s territory. Comparing this list River 94 m, highest point – Gerlach Peak 2,655 m with the 382 pSCI, covering 11.72 % of the country, (High Tatra Mountains) that have already been approved by the Slovak government, a total of 474 sites must still be added to the Land use: 49 % of agricultural land, 41 % of for- government’s list in order to fully meet the require- ests land including temporary non-forested sites, ments of the Habitats Directive. 2 % of waters, 5 % of building areas and 3 % of other types of land (1998 est.) The most important comment to this NGO list of sites is that it is still not the final version. The present Protected areas: 9 National Parks, 14 Protected version has been prepared from data that is currently Landscape Areas, 197 Protected Sites, 397 Nature available from mapping, which is still ongoing and Reserves, 249 National Nature Reserves, 248 which will continue for the next few years – new data Nature Monuments and 62 National Nature Monu- will be necessary especially for non-forest habitats ments (all protected areas together currently cover (e.g., one-third of grasslands data is missing) as well about 23 % of Slovak territory) as species of fauna. (June 2003, 1st est.) Among the largest areas proposed are Slánske vrchy Population: 5,414,937 (July 2001 est.) (22,026 ha) and Kojšovská hoľa (17,921 ha). Worth mentioning are larger mountain areas that have impor- Capital: Bratislava (450,000 inhabitants) tant nature values but do not enjoy any form of protection. These include the Slánske vrchy, Spišská Magura, parts of Strážovské vrchy, the southern portion of the Malá Fatra, Kojšovská hoľa as a part of Volovské 50 vrchy, Považský Inovec as a part of Strážovské vrchy, 51 and others. The NGO list also includes valuable rivers which are missing in the government’s list: the Poprad, Hornád, Hnilec, Horná Topľa, Horná Ondava, the upper part of the Hron river, the Ipeľ, and other rivers. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Slovakia

Current status of official preparations

Status of official list of sites A number of valuable areas are not included in many The official list of proposed Sites of Community of the existing protected areas; they are now included Importance (pSCI) and Special Protection Areas in the NGO list. Among the additions proposed here: (SPA) for Slovakia has been received by the Euro- larger sites within the protected areas of the Malé pean Commission. The future Natura 2000 sites that Karpaty, Horná Orava, Ponitrie, Slovenský kras, Biele have been proposed by the Slovak government cover Karpaty, as well as smaller areas were included in some 28.9 % of the country’s territory. Much of this other already protected areas. With only few excep- substantial amount is made up of bird areas. Accord- tions (mostly small settlements located in mountain- ing to our analysis, a substantial number of areas – 474 ous areas), inhabited areas are excluded from the sites – are missing from the list of proposed Sites of Natura 2000 sites that we have proposed. Community Importance, which only covers 11.72 % of the country’s territory.

Proposed Special Protection Areas (SPA) were discussed with the relevant stakeholders prior to their approval by the Slovak Government on July 9, 2003. The list of bird sites includes a total of 38 SPA, covering 25.2 % of the Slovak territory. Some 55.15 % of the territory of the proposed SPA overlap with currently protected areas.

Proposed Sites of Community Importance (pSCI) were prepared and discussed with stakeholders in fall 2003 and submitted to the Slovak Government on December 17, 2003. Approval of the list by the government was delayed for a few months, mainly due to opposition from the Ministries of Agriculture, Economy and Finance. Only on March 17, 2004, after three months of media activities by NGOs, pressure from the Ministry of Environment, and, probably most importantly, pressure from the European Commission, which threatened to withhold Structural Funds if the country did not fully observe EU environmental legislation, did the Slovak government finally approve the list. Among the list of pSCI are 382 sites, covering 11.72 % of Slovak territory (86.1 % of the sites overlap 52 with existing protected areas). 53

The Slovak Ministry of Environment together with the State Nature Conservancy are responsible for the establishment of the Natura 2000 network in Slovakia. To date, more than 435 experts from 37 expert governmental and non-governmental organisations and institutions have worked on preparation of sites proposals. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Slovakia

Financing Communications and awareness raising Most of the activities related to preparing for the A first communications strategy for Natura 2000 in establishment of Natura 2000 in Slovakia have relied Slovakia was developed by the Awareness Team that on support from foreign sources, as funds made avail- was part of the “Establishment of the Natura 2000 able from the state budget were entirely inadequate network in Slovakia” project, which was co-ordinated for the task. Initial activities were based on existing by Daphne and financially supported by the Dutch data and additional inventories developed through the PIN MATRA programme. The proposed strategy was Dutch supported project “Establishment of Natura included in the annexes to the project results and sub- 2000 in Slovakia”. Bird areas (SPA) were identified mitted to the State Nature Conservancy and the Min- in parallel to the pSCI. Together with the implementa- istry of Environment. The basic outline of the strategy tion of Natura 2000, projects on specific habitat sites, was one of the materials used by the State Nature like the peatlands project (supported by the Danish Conservancy and Ministry of Environment to prepare government) and the grasslands project (supported a more detailed communications strategy, including by the Dutch government and GEF) have significantly specific activities and financial budget. The strategy, boosted conservation activities in Slovakia. which is to be implemented by the State Nature Con- servancy with several important stakeholders, was At present, a positive sign is the increase of support approved by the internal ministerial committee of available for compensation measures (from 10 mil- the Ministry of Environment in January 2004 but still lion SKK or € 0.24 million to 100 million SKK or awaits implementation. € 2.47 million for the year 2004), but this amount for compensation is still insufficient. The State Nature The Ministry of Environment together with the State Conservancy will need to have a clear strategy for the Nature Conservancy and several other organisations future regarding how to use EU sources and match and NGOs have prepared several information bro- these to domestic sources in order to ensure effective chures as well as a series of conferences and seminars nature protection in Slovakia. focussing on Natura 2000.

At the national level, three national conferences have been organised by for Natura 2000 (two for experts and one for stakeholders), and four types of brochures have been disseminated to the public. However, the topic of Natura 2000 has been insufficiently explained in the national media, especially regarding its implications. Efforts to prevent misunderstandings and fears have not had the necessary effect.

At the local level, the most important awareness rais- 52 ing activities have been the meetings held during the 53 preparation phases in the proposed protected areas. These meetings provided an opportunity to explain in detail the reasons for and implications of the Natura 2000 network as well as potential opportunities and benefits. Unfortunately, not all protected area administrations used these opportunities fully. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Slovakia

Stakeholder involvement Management plans All relevant stakeholders from the proposed Natura The existing Slovak methodology for conservation 2000 sites were involved in the designation process. management planning was not comprehensive enough This is an obligation according to §27, section 3 of to support management planning for Natura 2000 sites. Act No. 543/2002 on Nature and Landscape Protec- Consequently, international standards have been used, tion. According to this paragraph, the Ministry of and management planning started with a review and Environment must involve owners, administrators, discussions of a few European conservation-oriented and tenants of lands nominated for protection under management-planning guidelines. At the same time, Natura 2000. The Ministry must explain the reason for new nature conservation legislation that was compat- including a site in a national list, define those activities ible with the EU Birds and Habitats Directives and that require approval of the nature protection body or other sites of international importance was being which are prohibited according to this Act, and inform drafted. A working group was established comprised of stakeholders of compensation available for restriction experts from the management teams of the GEF-sup- of common cultivation (§61). ported “Central European Grasslands – Conservation and Sustainable Use” project, the Dutch PIN MATRA To identify all stakeholders, an inventory of the land supported “Establishment of Natura 2000 Network in parcels was carried out and a database of owners, the Slovak Republic” project, and the DANCEE sup- administrators, and users of relevant lands was pre- ported project “Conservation and Sustainable Use of pared. A total number of 42,850 subjects on 67,605 Peatlands in Slovakia”, as well as further experts from parcels were identified. The number of parcels was the State Nature Conservancy. All of these projects obtained from the database of the cadastre offices were co-ordinated by Daphne. (April 2003). Altogether, 362 meetings were organised, involving 59 % of owners, administrators, and users The working group prepared draft guidelines, which of relevant lands participated. The meetings covered were discussed and modified several times. The final some 79.4 % of relevant lands. Of those who partici- draft of the management guidelines were submitted pated, 30.94 % approved the site designation, 15.77 % in December 2002 to the State Nature Conservancy. expressed conditional acceptance, 12.61 % expressed A modified set of guidelines has been approved by disapproval, 38.03 % refused to give an opinion, and the Ministry of Environment as obligatory guidelines 2.65 % requested additional time to decide. Most of for the development of management plans for Natura the disagreements were connected with doubts regard- 2000 sites as well as sites of international importance ing the ability of the State to pay compensation for (e.g. according to the Ramsar Convention or World restrictions. Heritage Convention). The guidelines have been incorporated into the new regulation of the Ministry of Environment which will serve as one of the administrative tools for implementatio of the new Act on Nature and Landscape Protection (No 543/2002).

54 55 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Slovakia

Threats to sites Conclusions, priority actions The greatest pressure is on the Tatra National Park and Záhorie Protected Landscape Area, which includes the The State Nature Conservancy should prepare Morava river, mainly from investments in tourism and a clear strategy on how to combine state budget industry. However, there are also some smaller activi- with the EU financial resources for proper nature ties (construction of tourism resorts, highways and protection not only in Natura 2000 sites. roads), which might influence several other protected The Ministry of Environment should actively areas and proposed Natura 2000 sites. These activi- explain and discuss the aim of the future Natura ties include smaller economic and industrial measures, 2000 network in Slovakia with other ministries and which may impact other Natura 2000 sites in Slovakia, authorities who are, one way or another, involved but whose effect is not yet known. Examples of these in the entire process of implementing Natura 2000. are water regime control, road and building construc- Continue co-operation between several governmen- tion, inappropriate forest management and construc- tal and non-governmental organisations involved tion of tourism infrastructure. in the preparing for Natura 2000 not only until the Slovakia’s entry into EU but also beyond. Local infrastructure, which means in fact different Control the proper implementation and designation projects but is related to overall economic develop- of Natura 2000 sites; monitor the influences and ment of the above-mentioned regions, is being co- threats on all sites. funded from EU Pre-Accession funds and is starting to be co-financed also from the Structural Funds.

54 55 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Slovenia

Basic geography: © ESRI data & maps, 2002 | CORINE Landcover: © European Environmental Agency, 2000

Legend: Map of proposed sites Slovenian sites, size > 601 km2 ...... Slovenian sites, size 600–301 km2 ...... Slovenian sites, size 300–101 km2 ...... Slovenian sites, size <100 km2 ......

Map with distribution of sites with brown bear (Ursus arctos)

56 57 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Slovenia

Slovenia

Compiled by: Pieter de Pous, WWF Accession Comments on sites proposed by NGOs Initiative on the basis of research by OIKOS, and with input from Milan Vogrin, Slovenian Society for selected habitats and species for Bird Research and Nature Protection (DPPVN) and Mateja Nose from DOPPS/BirdLife Slovenia Though small in area, Slovenia is one of the most densely forested countries in Europe. This and its geographical location make it an extremely important Country statistics habitat for large carnivores such as the brown bear (Ursus arctos), both as a core area and as a corridor Area: 20,253 km2 (half the size of Switzerland). between the Balkan Mountains and the Alps. This corridor function is reflected in the sites in this list. The Terrain: a short coastal strip on the Adriatic, an most important areas are in the south on the border alpine mountain region adjacent to Italy and Aus- with Croatia with two wide ‘corridors’, one pass- tria, mixed mountain and valleys with numerous ing Ljubljana on the west through the Sneznik and rivers to the east. Trnovski Gozd areas, and the other passing east of Ljubljana through the Slovenian Alps. Elevation extremes: lowest point – Adriatic Sea 0 m, highest point – Triglav 2,864 m. Apart from these large carnivores and their ecosystems, our selection of sites takes into consideration Land use: arable land – 12 %, permanent crops – special features such as the country’s intermittent 3 %, permanent pastures – 24 %, forests and wood- lakes and Karstic rivers. Large sections of the Drava, land – 54 %, other – 7 % (1996 est.). Mura, Soča, Kolpa and Sava rivers remain relatively preserved, flowing wild and unregulated. The Sava Protected Areas: 1 National Park (84,805 ha), river has been included as a whole. Because the most 2 Regional Parks (15,413 ha), 37 Landscape Parks valuable stretches are located in the upper and lower (60,298 ha), 49 Nature Reserves. parts of the river, designation for parts of the Sava include only the water body itself while for others the Population: 1,930,132 (July 2001 est.). larger floodplain of the river is included. In a number of cases, sites partially overlap. This is usually done to Capital: Ljubljana (270,000 inhabitants). ensure that certain small areas with special features are included in a larger area of protection. The list of sites in this report is a selection of a more elaborate NGO list of Natura 2000 which includes more species and habitats then just the 18 focal species and 24 habitats that were the focus of this report. This ‘full’ NGO list 56 was commissioned by the WWF-Alpine Programme, 57 produced by Oikos and can be found on the Internet at: www.panda.org/about_wwf/where_we_work/ europe/what_we_do/policy_and_events/epo/ initiatives/accession/downloads.cfm Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Slovenia

Current status of official preparations

Status of official list of sites Communications activities by the government The government’s list of pSCI has not yet been offi- On the web page of the Ministry of Environment there cialy submitted to the European Commission (mid- is information about Natura 2000, what it is and how May 2004). A map showing the proposed sites, which it works, as well as the areas proposed. Also leaflets cover approximately 35 % of the country’s territory, about each area are or will be published and put on the can be found at the Ministry of Environment’s web- Ministry’s website. The Ministry of Environment put site: www.sigov.si/mop. Data for this list, some of out a tender for NGOs for activities promoting Natura which can be found at www.natura2000.gov.si/ 2000 with a total budget for the year 2004 of about projektivec/pregled_nalog.htm, has been gath- € 21,000. ered from available literature and field mapping. Stakeholder involvement A few weeks before May 1, 2004, farmers and land The Ministry of Environment is responsible for the owners began realising that their lands had been proposed Natura 2000 sites in Slovenia. Also some nominated as Natura 2000 sites and the perceived other governmental stakeholders including regional consequences this could have. The protests they offices for nature conservation under the Ministry organised as a response were directed more at the site of Environment have been involved as well as other designation procedure rather than against the Natura Ministries (mostly from agriculture). Small expert 2000 network per say. In response to these protests, the NGOs have been consulted for specific informa- government sent a map to all municipalities (without tion and data. Designation of bird areas (SPA) has any additional information) and gave them six days to been undertaken by the Slovene BirdLife partner, reply. Shortly after the unofficial proposal was sent to Drustvo Za Opazovanje in Proucevanje Ptic Slovenije the Commission, around 50 communities announced (DOPPS)/BirdLife Slovenia. legal action against the designation of parts of their lands as Natura 2000. According to Slovene law, land owners and municipalities should agree to establishing a protected area Financing and the designation of protected areas should be According to recent comments in the media by the officially published. This is done for existing pro- Minister of Environment, Mr. Janez Kopac, the costs tected areas, but often leads to enormous delays in of establishing Natura 2000 in Slovenia will be 2 bil- the establishment. For example, attempts to designate lion Tolars or € 8.4 million per annum. In contrast, in Pohorje as a Regional Park have been going on for the 2004 a total of € 284,000 was available for financing last 15 years, so far unsuccessfully. Up to this point Natura 2000, which included money needed for co- few awareness raising activities have been undertaken financing LIFE projects as well as park management. by the government, and it seems that most stakehold- Strangely enough, the amount allocated for 2005 was ers, both land owners and local authorities, are simply a mere € 46,400. The money needed to collect the not informed about Natura 2000 and its implications, necessary data for the site designation was insufficient, nor whether their land has been designated as part of and only covered an inventory of already published the network. The recent signs of resentment coming 58 materials. At the moment, there is a small amount of from local communities is a direct consequnces of the 59 money available to cover basic needs for local promo- lack of a clear and effective strategy for stakeholder tion activities in the form of brochures or leaflets. involvement. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Slovenia

Management plans The responsibility for preparing management plans Lower parts of the Mura and Drava river are threat- lies with the Ministry of Environment. Management ened by changes in the border with Croatia as well as plans are under preparation, although still only at an gravel extraction. The lower Mura is also threatened early stage. For some areas that were already pro- by plans, although at this moment still in an early tected, like the Triglav National Park (although only stage, for a hydro-power plant. for a small part of it) and Secovje salina, management plans already exist in the form of general guidelines. Mass tourism, including skiing and rafting, is espe- For one SPA, Škocjanski zatok, which is managed by cially a problem in the Alpine region. For example, in DOPPS/BirdLife Slovenia, a plan has already been Pohorje (both SPA and pSCI), in a ski resort, part of developed. DOPPS/BirdLife Slovenia will prepare the infrastructure for snow cannons is already devel- management guidelines for at least three other SPA oped (including small artificial lakes), and there are within a LIFE project focussed on protection of the plans to further develop ski slopes and lifts. There are corncrake (Crex crex). also plans to upgrade the forest service road network for the establishment of a ‘panorama road’, which will Threats to sites have a serious impact on the region. Large infrastructure projects that impact Natura 2000 sites are taking place or in some cases have A special case is the Triglav National Park, which already been completed, for example the highway has been proposed in its entirety as a Natura 2000 E70 Ljubjana-Koper (already constructed) which cuts site. Legislation for a new national park law is now in through the Karst regional park. A highway still under parliament which, amongst other things, would greatly construction is the Maribor-Murska-Sobota, which reduce the core zone of the Triglav National Park and will affect a large area of Mura river floodplain soft- effectively open it for a range of developments that wood forest and hilly country in north-east Slovenia, will have a negative impact on the nature values of the which is both a proposed SPA and pSCI. The planned area. This would directly contravene the area’s pro- motorway will also affect the proposed SPA Drava posed Natura 2000 status, and call for infringement river (e.g. the spectacular Landscape Park Šturmovci, proceedings. already seriously deteriorated due to draining and the subsequent lowering of the ground water level by ten Intensive agriculture is already taking place in 50 % meters). of the proposed SPA, and this number is increasing. The total area of arable land is spreading at the In the energy sector, the controversial planned con- cost of grasslands. The remaining grasslands that are struction of the Moste II dam will, if carried out, have important, for example, for survival of the corncrake a severe impact on the Sava Dolinka river (pSCI). In (Crex crex) are under growing pressure from intensive the lower Sava river, extensive floodplain forests and agriculture. orchid meadows are threatened by the planned construction of two more hydro-power plants.

The planned construction of 85 wind turbines on Conclusions and priority actions 58 Mount Golič, Mount Vremščica and Mount Snežnik in 59 the Kras region will threaten a proposed SPA and pSCI, Awareness raising among local stakeholders, espe- the largest dry grassland area in Slovenia, which hosts cially land owners and local officials many rare large raptors as well as several endemic Dealing with threats to sites such insect and plant species and is a migration route for as on Mount Snežnik, Volovja reber. large carnivores. In fact, the proposed construction Ensure that all relevant sites are in fact site on Mount Snežnik, Volovja reber, has been omit- designated as Natura 2000 ted from the government proposal for Natura 2000 and Securing sufficient financing for implementation, authorisation for the construction has already been including development of management plans granted. Of similarly great importance and under simi- Development of a network of caretakers lar threat are the southern slopes of Trnovo forest and and setting up a regular monitoring scheme Nanos (also in the proposed Karst regional park). for sites and species Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Cyprus

Basic geography: © ESRI data & maps, 2002 | CORINE Landcover data are not available

60 61 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Cyprus

Cyprus

Compiled by: Antonia Theodosiou, Federation Current status of official preparations of Environmental and Ecological Organisations of Cyprus Status of official list of sites Between 1998–2001 a LIFE Third Countries project was carried out which identified the Natura 2000 sites Country statistics on the island of Cyprus. For the Turkish-occupied, northern areas of the island, the project relied on data Area: 9,250 km2 (of which 3,355 km2 are under from the national forest service and from the personal Turkish occupation) experience of various officials who had the chance to visit these areas recently and were able to cross-check Terrain: central plain with mountains to north old data and re-confirm their accuracy. Due to a halt and south; scattered but significant plains along to major building development in the greatest part of southern coast. The distance from the highest the Turkish-occupied areas, this data was still more or point and a certain part of the coastal area less valid. in only 50 kilometres. The LIFE project determined that approximately 26 % Elevation extremes: lowest point – Mediterra- of the island’s territory meets the scientific standards nean Sea 0 m; highest point – Olympus 1,951 m of the Habitats and Birds Directives for inclusion in the Natura 2000 network. The Ministry of Agriculture, Land use: arable land – 10.61 %, permanent Natural Resources and the Environment (MANRE) is crops – 4.65 %, other – 84.74 % (1998 est.) responsible for designating these areas to be included in the Natura 2000 network. The Ministry of Interior Nature protection: Troodos National is also involved in the process, responsible for desig- Forest Park (9000 ha) nation of birds’ sites and the Cyprus mouflon (Ovis orientalis ophion). Population: 771,657 (July 2003 est.) In the course of 2002, an ad-hoc committee composed Capital: Nicosia only of representatives of governmental departments, reduced – indiscriminately and without scientific basis – the area of sites allocated initially in the framework of the LIFE Third Countries project to about 14 % of the country’s territory. During this process, the Forestry Department also reduced many forest sites, particularly the Pafos forest (only a quarter of the area originally identified is now included), in order to main- 60 tain control and management of these sites as forest 61 areas. The Pafos forest, however, supports endemic birds and flora, found only in this site, as well as the endemic Cyprus mouflon(Ovis orientalis ophion). The Town Planning Department further reduced the scope of the proposed Natura 2000 network by claiming that some of these sites are ‘potential’ development sites. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Cyprus

Communications activities by the government The Cyprus Parliament has recently passed legisla- The Ministry of Agriculture, Natural Resources and tion to transpose the two EU Nature Directives into Environment has organised a number of seminars for national law. Under this legislation, two laws separate, public information. It has also organised meetings in without scientific basis, responsibility for species the area of proposed Natura 2000 sites and informed among two Ministries – the Ministry of Agriculture, the public and affected communities. Natural Resources and Environment on the one hand and the Ministry of Interior on the other. It also estab- Stakeholder involvement lishes a Scientific Committee to decide on areas and Governmental departments and academics created the boundaries of pSCI. Consultation with local commu- initial list of proposed Sites of Community Importance nities took place from January through mid-March. during the LIFE project mentioned earlier. NGOs were The Scientific Committee is now reducing the pro- not involved in this project. A governmental ad hoc posed sites even further. After the final decision of committee then made a first reduction of the list. the Scientific Committee is made, these sites will be published in the Government Gazette and there will The Scientific Committee established under the new be one month for filing any complaints. The Scientific national legislation will make a final decision regard- Committee, after taking into account these complaints, ing the list of pSCI. The Scientific Committee is com- will make its final decision on the proposed Sites of posed of twelve members: one representative each Community Importance to be sent to the European from the Environment Service, the Forestry Depart- Commission. At time of writing (mid-May) the status ment, the Fisheries Departments, the Agricultural of the government’s list of pSCI was unclear. Research Institute, the Game Fund, the Town Planning and Housing Department, the Union of Municipali- The continuing division of Cyprus presents a special ties, the Union of Communities, the Hunter’s Federa- situation for implementation of the Habitats and Birds tion, the Federation of Environmental and Ecological Directives on the island. The entire island is joining the Organisations, and two experts who are designated by EU, but the acquis communautaire is suspended in the the Minister of Agriculture, Natural Resources and northern part until such time as a settlement is found Environment. Unfortunately, the Scientific Committee for the division. Though the LIFE project mentioned is not taking into account the initial allocation of sites, above included mapping of sites in the north based on but rather the second, reduced one, i.e. they are start- historical data and incidental recent knowledge, there ing with a flawed approach for the final designation of is at present no way of enforcing EU legislation there. these sites. We are also concerned that some members of the Scientific Committee are not scientists with rel- Financing evant expertise, as prescribed by law. The national budget available for financing establishment of the Natura 2000 network in Cyprus is entirely Information meetings have been organised throughout inadequate. Only 250,000 CYP (€ 424,282.47) are in spring 2004 by the Ministry of Agriculture, Natural the budget for preparation of management plans. Since Resources and Environment in co-operation with no protected areas have had management plans so far affected communities and relevant governmental and there are no appropriate organisations to imple- departments. 62 ment them, it is difficult to make a reliable estimate of 63 what the financial needs in fact are. However, consid- Management plans ering the original 26 % of the country to be designated No management plans have yet been written apart as sites, one can assume the reserved 250,000 CYP from a preliminary plan for the Larnaka Salt Lake will not be sufficient to cover costs. (alykes). Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Cyprus

Threats to sites Conclusions and priority actions Nearly all of the originally proposed sites are under severe threat after the first governmental committee Creation of a full and complete list of proposed reduced the area to be designated from 26 % to 14 %. Sites of Community importance based on scientific As a result, most sites were either omitted, have been arguments. The area has already been reduced, for reduced in size, or had their boundaries redrawn, often various political reasons, from 26 % to about 14 % excluding vital parts. by an ad-hoc committee composed of government officials, and the Scientific Committee is now The following sites face the most serious threats: pressing for even further reductions in areas to be designated. Akamas – Tourism and resort development, indis- Ensure adequate financing. The Government has criminate access. not secured adequate funds for these sites. Co- Pafos Forest – Road construction, logging. financing should be made available by the Euro- Madari Papoutsa – Resort construction, pean Union. road construction. Communication between involved government Diarizos Valley – Road construction, departments to overcome conflicts. Intergovern- excess water drilling. mental Departments have serious disagreements Xeros River – Excess water drilling with each other regarding designation of these sites. in riverbed, road construction. Particularly the Forest Service, the Game Fund, the Alykes Lanakas (Salt lakes) – Housing Town Planning and Housing and the Environment construction, hunting and illegal hunting, airport, Service have disagreements on the approach and shooting range (last year 55 flamingo’s died procedures which have been followed to date. The from lead pollution) real reason is that designation as Natura 2000 will remove control over sites from some state authori- Nearly all of the areas that are close to the coastal zone ties and organisations, including the Forest Depart- (Periochi area, Polis-Yialia, Cha Potami, Periochi ment with regard to forested areas, the Game Fund Skoulli, Kavo Gkreko, Episkopi, Akamas) are severely and Hunters Association with regard to hunting threatened by uncontrolled development for tourism grounds, the Town Planning department with regard and residential housing. All forest sites (i.e. Pafos to development issues and zoning. The goal of forest, Dasos Lemesou, Machairas, Starvovouni) are these communication activities should be to ensure also threatened by indiscriminate road construction the correct, adequate and scientific designation of and increased public access. these sites. Communication with affected communities and Sites important for birds which will be designated land owners regarding the benefits of the Natura as Special Protection Areas (SPA) are threatened by 2000 sites in relation to sustainable development. excessive and illegal hunting (including trapping), use The public has not been adequately informed about of pesticides and housing construction. the real implications and potential benefits of the Natura 2000 network, causing unnecessary confu- Nearly all the sites are problematic because the size of sion and in some cases opposition. 62 the area which appears to be designated as Natura 2000 63 will not be sufficient for the adequate protection of the relevant species. Particularly problematic appears to be the area allocated for Akamas, Pafos forest, Dia- rizos Valley, Xeros River, Periochi area, Polis Yialia, Machairas forest. There are no specific projects yet for which EU support has been committed. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Estonia

Basic geography: © ESRI data & maps, 2002 | CORINE Landcover: © European Environmental Agency, 2000

64 65 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Estonia

Estonia

Compiled by: Kärg Kama, Estonian Fund for Nature Current status of official preparations

Status of official list of sites Country statistics Maps of the pre-selected sites have been published (most recently updated on February 26, 2004) on Area: 45,227 km2 (approximately the size the websites (http://maps.ekk.ee/natura) of the of The Netherlands or Denmark). Ministry of the Environment and the Estonian Land Board. Information given on the maps (March 2004) Terrain: marshy, lowlands; flat in the north, hilly includes the names and boundaries of the sites, but no in the south. Baltic Coast with archipelago of justification concerning values is included. Also, the islands and shallow areas with sand, maps cannot be downloaded. From February 12 to gravel and boulders. 27, 2004 the maps were publicly available for local land owners and other interest groups in local munici- Elevation extremes: lowest point – Baltic Sea palities. Any objections or proposals had to be filed by 0 m, highest point – Suur Munamägi 318 m. March 5. The number of objections received was high. As a result, the Ministry of Environment announced Land use: arable land – 25 %, permanent crops – they would not propose for Natura 2000 sites any 0 %, permanent pastures – 11 %, forests and wood- privately-owned lands, which owners have officially land – 48 %, mires: 7 %, others: 9 % (1996 est.). declared objection to. Integration of Natura 2000 into sectoral planning has been limited – to our knowledge, Protected areas: 4 National Parks (144,204 ha), consultation between government ministries has been 47 Nature Reserves (184,451 ha), 91 Protected limited to communication between the Ministry of Landscape Areas (145,100 ha), 221 other reserves Environment and the Ministry of Agriculture concern- (94,290 ha) – ca. 10.7 % of territory. ing the Rural Development Plan; no special inter-ministerial working group has yet been established. Most Population: 1,423,316 (July 2001 est.) – important marine areas will probably be a part of the approximately one tenth of that in The Nether- Natura 2000 network as SPA. lands. Population density ca. 33 km2, 69 % urban Financing Capital: Tallinn (365,305 inhabitants) Support for implementation of the Natura 2000 network has been earmarked from the State budget until 2007, as stated in the state programme Natura 2000 in Estonia for 2000–07. It appears that investments both for scientific research and communications activities have not been used effectively, though lack of 64 transparency in allocation of the funds makes clear 65 evaluation difficult. There is a clear need for increasing the rates and total amount of support available for management of semi-natural grasslands. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Estonia

Communications and awareness raising Other Ministries: there has not been any cooperation No targeted communications programme has been with ministries other than the Ministry of Agriculture, undertaken during the last phase of site designation despite the fact that the Ministry of Interior, the Min- in 2003–04. Items on Natura 2000 have appeared in istry of Defence and the Ministry of Economic Affairs national and local newspapers, TV and radio inter- and Communication are important stakeholders who views. Numerous leaflets and posters have been pub- should be involved. The co-operation between the lished and two video films produced featuring Natura Ministry of Environment and the Ministry of Agri- habitat types. Natura 2000 information days were held culture has focussed on development of the Rural with the support of the Baltic Environmental Forum Development Plan, the benefits of which for Natura (BEF) in 2000–01. The indicative boundaries of the 2000 sites are presently unclear. The communication sites have been available at the Ministry of Environ- was initiated by the Ministry of Agriculture, for exam- ment’s website. ple by involving representatives from the Ministry of Environment into working groups developing specific Stakeholder involvement measures of the national Rural Development Plan. Designation of Natura 2000 sites has taken place largely within the Ministry of Environment, without The only organised initiatives have been the above involvement of stakeholders. The Natura Council, mentioned Natura Council, which was established in which was formed four years ago to bring together 2000 and left unconsulted since the end of the same various stakeholders, has met only twice, the last time year, and the recent cycle of public hearings for land in November 2000. owners.

Land owners: distribution of information to land Management plans owners has largely been the responsibility of the Min- No management plans have been written specifically istry of Environment’s regional departments. Official for Natura 2000 sites, except for some forest sites. public hearings were organised at the last minute and Under the project Protection of priority forest habi- only three weeks given for review and comments. tat types in Estonia, financed by a grant from LIFE- Nature, 20 forest sites have been proposed as new Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs): the protected areas as well as Natura 2000 sites. The work Estonian Ornithological Society was contracted by with these forest sites has also involved the develop- the Ministry of Environment to analyse favourable ment of management plans. Some of the plans have conservation status of Annex I species as well as to been finalised and are waiting for approval; others are prepare documentation for Special Protection Areas still in the process of being written. No other manage- (SPA). Aside from a couple of environmental organi- ment plans for Natura sites have been initiated. sations which were contracted to provide information to the Ministry of Environment regarding specific Threats to sites habitat types (mainly grassland and water habitats), Väinameri pSCI and SPA and Küdema pSCI and SPA: involvement of NGOs in site designation for the Habi- There are two ongoing development projects – Saare- tats Directive has been very limited. maa bridge/tunnel on the eastern and Saaremaa harbour 66 on the western coast of Saaremaa island. Together, the 67 Academic institutions: Data and information for site two projects would create a new transit route across designation has largely come from experts from the the island and could have a negative impact on these University of Tartu, who also participated in Natura two potential Natura 2000 sites. 2000 field work and compiled the handbook on Natura 2000 habitats in Estonia (J. Paal, 2000). Scientific representivity of proposed Sites of Community Impor- tances has not been evaluated by academic institutions. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Estonia

The bridge/tunnel project will threaten the sites of Address discrepancies in the new Nature Conser- the Väinameri strait in case the construction will be vation Act. The new law will enable protection of a bridge, as the area is an intensively used migration newly selected pSCI, but the process is two years route for arctic waterfowl (North Atlantic Flyway) as behind schedule. The law was only approved by the well as for the local seal population. At the moment, government and submitted to Parliament in Febru- it seems that construction of a bridge is strongly pre- ary 2004. Nevertheless, in the rush to meet the May ferred by developers over construction of a tunnel, 1 deadline for submission of proposed sites, many which would probably have far less negative impact discrepancies are still contained within the draft on natural values. The harbour project may threaten legislation. As a result, there is much work to do at the breeding and wintering waterfowl populations. the level of Parliamentary committee before final approval of the Act. Number of pre-selected forest sites: There is strong Improve co-operation between the Ministry of opposition to Natura 2000 from the State Forest Man- Environment and different stakeholders (other Min- agement Centre, which is interested in maintaining istries, state agencies, academic institutions, NGOs) large forest areas for commercial production without from which future work with designation and man- any restrictions. At the moment, there are complicated agement of the sites and successful communication discussions going on between the Ministry of Envi- work would benefit considerably. ronment and the State Forest Management Centre Improve communication work targeted at land regarding the number and coverage of forest habitats owners and local communities. Widespread criti- which will be included in the Natura 2000 network. cism and opposition to the Natura 2000 network, including largely negative reports in the press, have The final feasibility study regarding the Saaremaa been almost inevitable given the hurried process of bridge/tunnel is being co-financed by the EU’s ISPA public consultation. Without improved communica- pre-accession programme. The harbour project is tions and awareness raising regarding Natura 2000, being financed by local companies, mainly Tallinn its implications and potential benefits, the process Harbour. of site designation and implementation in Estonia is likely to be as torturous as it has been in neighbouring Finland. Compilation and approval of management plans Conclusions and priority actions for all protected areas including existing reserves and pre-selected Natura 2000 sites. The Ministry Carry out scientific analysis regarding: the total of Environment is already facing serious problems coverage of each habitat and its the importance with approving management plans for existing within Estonia and the boreal biogeographic region; protected areas, although some of the plans have principles of selection of certain sites according to already been developed some years ago and there each habitat type (representativity analysis); need is already a need for revisions. Temporary legal for protection and comparison with existing levels protection for pSCI is planned to be approved all of protection (including both existing protected together in one legal act during 2004, but man- 66 areas and pSCI). Without such analysis, we cannot agement plans are expected to be prepared and 67 adequately evaluate whether the planned Natura approved one by one. The resulting lag in develop- measures will be sufficient. To date, such analysis ing and implementing management measures could has been conducted for the Birds but not for the result in serious damage to the sites before a clear Habitats Directive. With increasing criticism from understanding is reached regarding which actions land owners and encouraged by the media, such an are permitted on the sites and which are not. analysis is of vital importance for justifying site designation. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Latvia

Basic geography: © ESRI data & maps, 2002 | CORINE Landcover: © European Environmental Agency, 2000

68 69 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Latvia

Latvia

Compiled by: WWF-Latvia based on interviews with Status of official preparations the following experts: Ērika Kļaviņa, Nature Con- servation Board; Otars Opermanis, co-ordinator of Status of government list of sites Emerald project at Darudec; Edmundas Račinskis, Latvia was the first country to submit its list of pSCI project co-ordinator (for birds), Latvian Ornithologi- to the European Commission. At the beginning of cal Society; Liene Salmiņa, project co-ordinator (for April, the Latvian government adopted the list of new habitats), Latvian Fund for Nature. Protected Areas developed by the Ministry of Envi- ronment. After establishment of these new Protected Areas, the Minister of Environment formally nominated these areas as proposed Natura 2000 sites. Country statistics The official list of proposed Protected Areas, i.e. Natura Area: 64,589 km2 (about twice the size 2000 sites, comprises 336 sites (247 Nature Reserves, of Belgium) 4 State Reserves, 3 National Parks, 38 Nature Parks, 9 geological monuments, and 23 Micro-reserves) cov- Terrain: undulating plain with flat lowlands alter- ering altogether 11.9 % of the country’s land area. In nating with hills, with a mosaic of large forests total, 122 new sites are proposed and borders of 46 pre- alternating with fields, farmsteads, and pastures. viously protected areas will be harmonised.

Elevation extremes: lowest point – Baltic Sea Almost all currently protected sites are included in the 0 m, highest point – Gaizinkalns 311.6 m list of proposed Natura 2000 sites, e.g. National Parks and strictly protected parts of Biosphere reserve. It is Land use: Agricultural land – 38.5 %, forests – important to note though that only 4 marine areas have 45 %, lakes and rivers – 3.7 %, other – 12.8 % been included in the Natura 2000 network – and only as part of a larger Protected Area covering terrestrial areas. Protected Areas: 4 nature reserves, 3 national Nomination of other marine areas has been postponed parks containing reserves and restricted areas, until political issues at European level are resolved. 1 biosphere reserve, 211 restricted nature areas, New inventories, i.e. Latvian Breeding Bird Atlas and 22 nature parks, 6 protected landscape areas. Woodland Key Habitats Inventory have shown that still 8.7 % of Latvia’s territory has been classified new areas of high biodiversity value might be found as Special Protection Areas. outside the proposed Natura 2000 network.

Population: 2,346,000 (2002), Financing 37 inhabitants/km2. The real “bottleneck” for implementation of Natura 2000 in Latvia is an insufficient budget for the elaboration of 68 Capital: Riga (788,000 inhabitants). management plans as well as a lack of human resources. 69 It is estimated that by the end of 2004, roughly 100 proposed Natura 2000 sites might have management plans drawing on international and local financial sources. In terms of domestic support, most money for management comes from the Ministry of Environment and the Latvijas Valsts Mezi (LVM, the state body responsible for state forest management). In many cases, development of official management plans for Natura 2000 sites is not urgently needed as many sites are not presently facing serious threats to their integrity. This is the case for example of some raised bogs. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Latvia

Limited funding has clearly been a factor in the proc- the Nature Conservation Board (DAP) was appointed ess of identifying future Natura 2000 sites, influenc- to supervise and communicate project results and also ing both the scope of field work and the process of make a final delineation of proposed sites. This board site designation. For the time being, there are 9 LIFE included representatives from the Ministry of Agricul- projects that are either finished, planned or being ture and the State Forest Service (VMD) implemented. Some of these projects deal with management planning and implementation issues within For designation of bird areas (SPA), Darudec sub-con- existing Protected Areas; others, on the contrary, are tracted the Latvian Ornithological Society or Latvijas aimed at establishing new Protected Areas or ensur- Ornitologijas Biedriba (LOB/BirdLife Latvia). The ing management in numerous areas. The Nature Con- experts were responsible for the collection of data on servation Board outsourced funding from the State relevant species and identification of potential sites. budget for elaboration of 11 management plans for The final data sets, i.e. maps and databases, were Protected Areas in 2003. This year, State funding is submitted to the Latvian Environmental Agency (VA) available for development of management plans for which was responsible for information storage and two additional areas. database administration.

Communications and awareness raising For the designation of proposed Sites of Community The Ministry of Environment financed and organised Importance (pSCI), the Latvian Fund for Nature or a communications campaign targeted at the general Latvijas Dabas Fonds (LDF) was sub-contracted by public. The campaign, called “Propose a Protected Darudec. The experts involved were responsible for Area”, included calls, published in newspapers, for collecting data on habitats and species except birds, people to propose sites for new Protected Areas. In and designating potential Natura 2000 sites. The final response, at least 50 sites were proposed for protection. data sets, i.e. maps and database, were submitted to Also part of the campaign was publication and distribu- the Latvian Environmental Agency tion of booklets to private land owners describing the implications and benefits of the Natura 2000 network. The State Forest Service and JSC Latvijas Valsts Mezi (LVM) were involved in order to provide information Articles devoted to the Natura 2000 process have been where possible species or habitats might be found in published in local and regional newspapers. Within the forests. The representatives of the State Forest the framework of the DANCEE project, 5 seminars Service also participated in field work and further dis- were organised for staff of the State Forest Service, the cussions in the site designation process. Latvian Ministry of Environment, as well as officials from other public bodies. The Nature Conservation Board was also responsible for negotiating project results with local communities, In general, communication regarding Natura 2000 forest owners and other stakeholders affected by site still needs to be improved, with special focus placed designation. During local workshops, the implications on main stakeholders, i.e. local municipalities and of Natura 2000 were explained and land owners given land owners. This communication should be done in the opportunity to express their opinion on site desig- 70 a comprehensive and understandable manner. nation and boundaries. In some cases, the result was 71 a modification of boundaries of proposed Natura 2000 Stakeholder involvement sites, e.g. when a valuable tract of forest had already The process of identifying and designating Natura been logged after experts’ fieldwork. In most cases, 2000 sites has been the responsibility of the Ministry though, objections by land owners were not followed of Environment, which organised a special project, by the authorities in charge of site designation. Gener- running from 2001–2003, to take care of this work. ally, forest owners were less enthusiastic about site This was the Project Co-ordination of Latvia’s System designation than farmers and owners of agricultural of Special Protection Areas with the Emerald / Natura land, mostly because of lack of State support for the 2000 Network of Protected Areas funded by the Danish former. Following this series of local consultations, Aid Agency DANCEE and carried out by the Danish the final updated version of sites was submitted to the consultancy Darudec. After the first year of the project, Ministry of Environment. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Latvia

Management plans Conclusions and priority actions Management plans have not been developed for Natura 2000 sites in particular, but are being prepared for Pro- Elaboration of a common approach for ensuring tected Areas, of which more than 90 % have been nomi- favourable conservation status for Natura 2000 nated as Natura 2000 sites. Since 1999, more than 70 sites, ensuring their functioning as a network and management plans have been developed, of which more not as single sites for single species. This will than 50 % are now approved and are being implemented. require development of legislation and incorpora- The quality of the management plans is improving with tion in other sectors (land use, agriculture, spatial growing experience. In 2003, development began of 17 planning). Such legislation is needed to avoid management plans. The Nature Conservation Board major conflicts in future, e.g. infrastructure supervises development of management plans, which developments, etc. then must be approved by the Minister of Environment. Elaboration of management plans for proposed More than 10 existing management plans will expire in Natura 2000 sites where this is urgently needed. the next two years and need to be updated. Establishment of a supervising body that will ensure that in those Natura 2000 sites without an Threats to sites administration, such as farm and other private lands, A detailed analysis of current and forthcoming threats the appropriate measures are taken. This has also does not exist. Based on discussion with experts been suggested by representatives from the Nature involved in the Natura 2000 designation process and Conservation Board. representatives of state institutions, the following gen- Evaluation of the Natura 2000 network. There eral treats have been identified: are several steps to be taken in order to evaluate the quality of the Natura 2000 network in order Threats outside proposed Natura 2000 sites. to achieve the long-term favourable conservation This kind of threat covers a wide range of problems, status of habitats and species: including increased logging, intensive agriculture, Representativity analysis of different habitat and environmental pollution (local and cross-border), species in various geographical regions of Latvia; etc. It leads to the conclusion that it’s absolutely Gaps in protection, i.e. the extent to which respec- necessary that also outside the designated sites the tive habitats and species are presented in network appropriate measures for nature protection of existing SPA and SCI. are taken. Additional measures outside existing Natura 2000 Lack of management of particularly valuable network including restoration of degraded habitats grasslands. With changes in land use, natural suc- and establishment of key ecological processes, e.g. cession is taking place and the area of valuable introducing large herbivores for management of grasslands rapidly decreasing. Still it is not clear selected areas of high conservation value how much of these grasslands should be protected and what would be the most suitable/cost-effective management measures. Construction of new forest roads. There are plans 70 to renovate and develop new forest roads with 71 a total length of 3,000 km over the next five years on State Forest Land. Construction of highways, e.g. the Via Baltica and West-East highway is already being financed by the EU’s Cohesion Funds. Further support is expected from the Structural Funds (ERDF). Overgrowth of raised bogs, caused by drainage of adjacent areas. Development, especially building construction adjacent to river banks and coastal areas on privately owned land. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Bulgaria

Basic geography: © ESRI data & maps, 2002 | CORINE Landcover: © European Environmental Agency, 2000

72 73 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Bulgaria

Bulgaria

Compiled by: Ivan Hristov and Vesselina Kavrakova, Status of official preparations WWF-Danube Carpathian Programme Status of government list of sites The Bulgarian Ministry of Environment and Water and Country statistics its regional units, the Regional Inspectorates of Envi- ronment and Water and the Executive Environmental Area: 110,912 km2 (roughly half the size of the Agency, are in charge of developing the list of pro- United Kingdom). posed Sites of Community Importance for Bulgaria.

Terrain: mostly mountains with lowlands According to the Bulgarian Act on Biodiversity in the north and southeast. adopted in August 2002, the list of protected zones of the National Ecological Network (equivalent to the Elevation extremes: lowest point – Natura 2000 network) must be submitted to the Coun- Black Sea 0 m, highest point – Musala 2,925 m. cil of Ministers by 2006. The date of formal submission of the list of proposed Sites of Community Impor- Land use: arable land – 43 %, permanent tance (pSCI) to the European Commission depends on crops – 2 %, permanent pastures – 14 %, the date of accession to the European Union, which is forests and woodland – 38 %, other – 3 %. currently expected to take place in 2007.

Protected areas: 3 National Parks (193,048 ha), Bulgaria has a number of natural values that will be 11 Nature Parks (247,604 ha), 90 Reserves new to the European Union, including the Black Sea (81,496 ha), 146 Protected Sites (39,000 ha), biogeographic region, with new habitats and species, 473 Nature Monuments (23,318 ha) – total and beech forests. The WWF-Danube Carpathian of 5 % of the country’s territory. Programme has submitted documentation proposing the addition of two new habitat types and extension Population: 7,845,841 (2002 est.). of four existing habitat types in the annexes directly to the European Commission as well as the European Capital: Sofia (1,220,000 inhabitants). Topic Centre in Paris. However, an official request to add habitats and species to the annexes of the Directive must come from the Bulgarian authorities. Though no official deadline has yet been set for receiving additions to the annexes, this must occur relatively soon.

Availability of scientific information Certain progress in the development and update of 72 scientific information has been achieved through the 73 Ministry’s Natura 2000 project. Occasional updates of scientific information, mainly investigations into the distribution of certain species, have been carried out by NGOs such as Green Balkans, the Bulgarian Soci- ety for the Protection of Birds/Birdlife Bulgaria, the Bulgarian Herpetological Society, Balkani Wildlife Society, and others. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Bulgaria

Legislative gaps Overall, progress has been insufficient for adequate The Bulgarian Act on Biodiversity, adopted in August preparation of the list of pSCI. Given the present stage 2002, transposes the EU Habitats and Birds Directives of data availability and quality, a comprehensive list into national legislation. According to the previously of sites could be prepared only for less than one-third mentioned legal analysis, the Act on Biodiversity of the country’s territory. There is a serious lack of generally corresponds to the Directives and can serve information concerning the number, distribution, and as a sufficient basis for the creation of a National Eco- national coverage of habitat types in Bulgaria. There logical Network. Omissions identified by WWF con- are in particular gaps in knowledge about the habitat cern the Annexes of the Act listing habitat types and types of the Black Sea biogeographical region, some species to be protected under the National Ecological widespread habitats such as beech forests, but also Network. Certain habitat types included in the Habi- rare habitats with restricted distribution. Furthermore, tats Directive and occurring in Bulgaria are omitted the Institutes of the Bulgarian Academy of Science from the Biodiversity Act and some corrections for the have not been fully involved in the process, and their annexes of species are also necessary. capacities and resources not used efficiently. The co- ordination and information exchange between the The Natura 2000 requirements are practically not inte- Ministry of Environment and Water and other Minis- grated into sectoral policies and programming. Legis- tries concerning GIS models and maps of the country, lation and planning for other sectors have already been types of land use, types of property, forest cover, etc. developed and enforced. In addition, other sectors are is very inadequate. economically more powerful. Any significant changes arising from the introduction of new legislation in the Filling the gaps area of nature protection, and especially those related The only steps that have been undertaken by the Bul- to the establishment of a wider network of protected garian government to fill these gaps in information area (particularly one that has not involved consulta- have taken place within the framework of the Minis- tion with other sectors), will lead to conflicts. try’s Natura 2000 project. Financing To address some of the information and data gaps, For 2004 the Ministry of Environment and Water has WWF-Danube Carpathian Programme has undertaken allocated approximately 40,000 BGN (€ 20,000) from an analysis of available scientific information regard- its budget for preparation for Natura 2000. ing the distribution of habitat types and plant species from the Annexes to the Birds and Habitats Direc- At present the Ministry of Environment and Water is tives. Reports with proposals for amendments to the preparing an application to the PHARE National Pro- Annexes of the Biodiversity Act have been developed gramme to secure the continuation of activities after and distributed widely (available for downloading the end of the present Ministry’s Natura 2000 project. as pdf at: www.panda.org/downloads/europe/ If approved, the PHARE project is expected to start bgn2000report.pdf). In the beginning of 2004, in 2005. No detailed information about the scope of a discussion was initiated by the Ministry’s Natura activities and budget is available at the moment. 2000 project. This resulted in the acceptance of all pro- 74 posals and extensions put forth by the WWF-Danube The previously mentioned project, Conservation of 75 Carpathian Programme, which included an addition of Species and Habitats in Bulgaria: EU Approximation, 15 new Habitats to the working lists for pSCI identi- is funded by the Danish aid programme DANCEE fication. with a budget of € 520,000 for the period 2002–04. Expected outputs, as defined by the project, are: Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Bulgaria

A systematic network of candidate Natura 2000 Activities in 2004 will focus on: sites established in accordance with the criteria of the European Natura 2000 network. Improvement of the legal basis and available scien- Increased capacity of the Ministry of Environ- tific information regarding key habitat types. ment and Water, Ministry of Agriculture and For- Support for the process of developing the Bulgarian ests, their regional offices, scientific institutions list of pSCI. and NGOs to carry out inventories and to identify Capacity building and strengthening of institutions potential Natura 2000 sites. in charge of preparation for Natura 2000 and of Enhanced participation of local authorities and potential partners; raising the level of expert knowl- stakeholders in biodiversity planning and manage- edge. ment. Initiation of networking among major stakeholders. Raised awareness of conservation of biodiversity Ensuring public control of the processes; monitor- among public authorities and the general public. ing of the quality and efficiency of preparation for Natura 2000. There were significant difficulties in starting the project, which was postponed for almost a year. Due There are a number of ongoing projects devoted to to cuts in Danish funding, the duration of the project improving existing databases, preparation of propos- was reduced from 36 to 21 months, and the budget als for pSCI as well as mapping of bird populations was cut to a third of the original amount planned. As that are being implemented by NGOs, including the a result, not all outputs will be delivered. Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation, the Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds/BirdLife Bulgaria, The WWF-Danube Carpathian Programme is cur- the Balkani Wildlife Society, Green Balkans, and the rently implementing the project Natura 2000 in Bulgarian Herpetological Society. Bulgaria with support from the Austrian Ministry of Agriculture, Forests, Environment and Water Manage- Communications and awareness raising ment and WWF-Austria. The activities implemented The level of awareness of Natura 2000 at national, through this project in 2003 included: regional and local levels continues to be very poor. Relevant institutions are not sufficiently informed Study and evaluation of the distribution on national about the network, i.e. the changes and possible ben- level of habitat types and habitats of species from efits arising from its establishment, as well as future the Annexes to the Habitats Directive. Gap analysis procedures that will be implemented. Most people, of available scientific information, creation of an especially local communities around or in potential expert pool, initiation of expert networking. Natura 2000 sites or national protected areas, are not Comparative analysis of the lists of habitats and aware of the fact that the protected areas network may species of the Birds and Habitats Directives with present a sustainable source of income and do not see those included in the Bulgarian Act on Biodiversity; what possibilities exist in this regard. The reasons for elaboration of proposals for amendments and rec- insufficient development of the awareness are the ommendations for future steps. absence of a communication strategy, broad consulta- 74 Elaboration of proposals for amendments to the tions and information campaigns during last year. 75 Annexes to the EU Habitats Directive to be proposed by the Bulgarian government to the European There has been certain improvement in capacity and Commission. understanding of Natura 2000 at expert level in the National workshop “Proposals for Additions of Ministry of Environment and Water, several NGOs Habitat Types to the European Directives” with dis- and scientific institutions, mostly as a result of the cussions, co-ordination of efforts and planning of Ministry’s Natura 2000 project and other smaller NGO future activities. projects. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Bulgaria

No information regarding a governmental communica- habitat types from the Birds and Habitats Directives. tions and awareness raising strategy is available. Other The Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds/ communications activities related to Natura 2000 that BirdLife Bulgaria, for instance, has completed the have been undertaken to date include the following: Natura 2000 standard forms for two pSCI sites. Pro- posals from other organisations are under preparation. Natura 2000 Awareness Project South-East Europe implemented by the Carl Bro Group in 1998-99 and It is of great importance that key stakeholders are funded by the PHARE Multi-country programme – aware of the Natura 2000 network. This includes: Environment. This was a trans-boundary project between Bulgaria, Macedonia and Albania focussed Governmental institutions at national level: Min- on support for the protected areas network. Target istry of Environment and Water, Ministry of Agri- groups in Bulgaria were the national authorities, the culture and Forests, Ministry of Finance, Ministry Ministry of Environment and Water and the National of Regional Development and Public Works. Train- Park administrations. ing, capacity building and a communication strategy are urgently needed. This is especially impor- Assisting the preparation of Bulgaria to set out the tant for the Ministry of Environment and Water, Natura 2000 Network, carried out by the Bulgarian where beside the interim staff of the Ministry’s own Society for the Protection of Birds/BirdLife Interna- Natura 2000 project (3 persons) there is no ministe- tional in 2001-02. The project included an informa- rial officer responsible specifically for Natura 2000. tion campaign, “Natura 2000 – for people and birds”, Local stakeholders: State Forestry Units, local which was implemented in those regions hosting authorities, farmers and other land owners in poten- Important Bird Areas. tial Natura 2000 sites. Except for isolated cases, as in the Kresna Gorge, this group of stakeholders has Educational and awareness raising project Parks in not been targeted in information campaigns to date. Bulgaria – partnership for Europe, carried out by the Scientific institutions and NGOs: the resources Civil Society Development Foundation and funded by in these organisations are still not utilised effec- the PHARE Access programme in 2001. The project tively because of lack of awareness. Continuous targeted the Park directorates (both nature and national information campaign and networking is needed. parks) in the country. The standard Natura 2000 data National meetings of NGOs and key stakeholders forms and an instruction manual were translated into that are currently being planned with support from the Bulgarian language, and directorate staff trained in the MATRA-KNIP fund of the Royal Netherlands how to complete the forms. Embassy should help address these needs.

Stakeholder involvement Bottlenecks Consultations, involving NGO representatives, were The difficulties identified so far for the preparation of organised during the elaboration of the Act on Biodi- the pSCI list have not changed during last year. They versity. NGOs have been involved in preparation and are as follows: implementation of the Ministry’s Natura 2000 project 76 as well as in thematic seminars at the Ministry of Envi- Insufficient funding and lack of human capacity for 77 ronment and Water and its Regional Inspectorates. The mapping and field work. Advisory Board of the Ministry’s Natura 2000 project Conflict of interests (mainly with the economic includes two elected NGO representatives. sector). Lack of integration of nature protection issues with NGOs have supported the Ministry’s Natura 2000 other sectoral policies. The establishment of the project with data on biodiversity and capacity for car- Natura 2000 network is not reflected in planning rying out field inventories. NGOs have also started and programmes of other sectors, including agricul- a discussion about national populations of species and ture, transportation and regional development, and will lead to conflicts during implementation. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Bulgaria

Lack of public awareness and lack of adequate seven sections. Two of the sections have already been information among local communities – a negative completed in 2003. The project is managed by the approach and opposition of locals to the designa- Ministry of Regional Development and Public Works, tion of Natura 2000 sites can be expected. and financed by the European Investment Bank. No Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has been Threats to sites conducted for the project as it has had the status of Kresna Gorge – is threatened by current plans for the “emergency works“. construction of the Struma motorway. Recent recommendations, that the site needs to be protected and Current EU plans for development of the Trans-Euro- a negative impact must be prevented, from the Bern pean Networks for Transportation (TEN-T) are also Convention Committee to the Bulgarian Government ominous. “Removing bottlenecks along the Danube” are a positive development in this issue. has been included by the European Commission in a list of TEN-T priority projects of European impor- Pirin National Park – despite efforts of environ- tance. Considerably deepening and channelling of the mental NGOs, a ski zone, including various types of Danube, as called for in the Van Miert report released extensive ski facilities, was constructed in the heart in July 2003, would have a devastating impact on of the Park according to the investor’s plans and in potential Natura 2000 sites along the most valuable contradiction to national and international legislation sections of the Lower Danube. A feasibility study to on nature protection. this end has been carried out and funded by PHARE, but so far there have been no applications for EU Hydropower. There are new plans – already adopted funds for the implementation of this project. by the Ministry of Environment and Water – for the construction of about 1,000 small-scale hydropower stations on the middle and upper stretches of almost all Bulgarian rivers. Implementation of the scheme has Conclusions and priority actions already begun, and numerous hydropower stations are currently under construction. These plans will affect The priority actions needed for the establishment of practically all river-dependent habitats in the moun- Natura 2000 have not changed during the past period tainous and semi-mountainous areas of Bulgaria. The and are: investors in most cases are private companies from Bulgaria but also for example from Austria. Improve available scientific information – carrying out of inventories, field surveys, gap analysis, map- Wind farms. New too are plans for the construction of ping of habitats, preparation of maps, and improve- wind farms. There is a project for the construction of ment of GIS database. a wind farm next to the town of Balchik on the Black Capacity building for responsible institutions Sea coast. The project has been the subject of broad and their potential partners – raising the level of discussion during 2003. The wind farm is planned expert knowledge, training, issuing of specialised on a “bottle neck” of the Via Pontica, one of the two materials. 76 major bird migration routes in the country, and a po- Broad consultations between responsible institu- 77 tential Natura 2000 site. tions – NGOs, scientific institutions and other key stakeholders. Danube. The project Protection of the Danube and Awareness raising and broad public campaign, Black Sea Banks from Abrasion and Erosion, which work with the media, stakeholders, small-scale pilot falls under the National Programme for the Reinforce- projects in proposed sites, involvement of inter- ment of the Danube Banks, threatens the biological ested groups. integrity of valuable natural areas along the Lower Adequate funding for the implementation of the Danube. The project includes the construction of above activities and planning of mechanism for anti-erosion facilities along the Danube banks in financing the future Natura 2000 network in Bulgaria. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Romania

78 79 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Romania

Romania

Compiled by: Erika Stanciu and Maria Mihul, Status of official preparations WWF-Danube Carpathian Programme, with input from the Romanian Ministry of Waters After a brief period from July 2003 until April 2004 and Environmental Protection during which responsibility for the environment and nature conservation was incorporated into a ‘super Ministry’ responsible for Agriculture, Forests, Waters Country statistics and Environment, the Ministry of Environment and Waters has now been re-established as a separate and Area: 237,500 km2 (about the size independent Ministry, the Ministry of Environment of the United Kingdom). and Water Management.

Terrain: Mountains (31 %), hills and plateaus Despite this short institutional experiment, no changes (33 %), plains (36 %). The Romanian Carpathians, are foreseen in the timing for implementation of the with their three branches (Oriental, Southern and Natura 2000 network in Romania. Reference made Occidental Carpathians) separate the country into in this report to ‘the Ministry’ refer to the short-lived three main areas: Central Transylvanian Plateau, ‘super Ministry’ covering environment in addition to Moldavia and the Walachian Plain). Danube river agriculture, forests, and water management. and various tributaries. Black Sea coast in east. The Romanian Ornithological Society (SOR)/BirdLife Elevation extremes: lowest point – Black Sea Romania has signed a Memorandum of Understand- 0 m; highest point – Moldoveanu mountain peak – ing with the Ministry for cooperation on designat- 2,544 m in the Fargaras Mountians, ing bird areas (SPA). The list of SPA will be based Southern Carpathians. on information received from BirdLife Romania. A Ministry report shows that standard forms have Land use: Irrigated land: 31,020 km2 (1993 est.), been completed for 9 sites in Romania. Another 7 arable land – 41 % permanent crops – 3 %, perma- sites are described through the Emerald Network, 2 of nent pastures – 21 %, forests and woodlands: which already have management plans. In addition, 44 29 %, other – 6 % (1993 est.). Important Bird Areas have already been identified by BirdLife Romania, which is now collecting informa- Nature protection: Total of 845 protected areas, tion for another 73 possible sites with financial support including 9 national parks, 6 nature parks, as well from international sources. The Ministerial Order no as 3 UNESCO-designated biosphere reserves 850/27.10.2003 (Ministerial Journal 793/11.11.2003) (Danube Delta, Retezat, and Pietrosul Rodnei) – regarding the entrustment procedures for the adminis- altogether, ca. 5.4 % of the country’s territory. tration or custody of natural protected areas contains provisions that should assist the identification of pSCI. 78 Population: 22,395,848 (July 1998 est.). Administrators and custodians have the contractual 79 obligation to carry out an inventory of the habitats Capital: Bucharest (2,066,723 inhabitants). and species present in the protected areas according to the Natura 2000 standard data form and to develop management plans. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Romania

Availability of scientific information The Ministry is also developing Methodological No significant progress has been made on gathering Guidelines for identifying and inventorying Sites scientific information. Most of the existing data is in of Community Importance and Special Protection the property of institutions, organisations or individual Areas as well as for data reporting. The data-reporting specialists who are unwilling to provide the informa- format will adopt the standard data form for character- tion without payment. In addition, there is no com- izing Natura 2000 sites. prehensive inventory of studies, information or data that was developed with support from those financial Romania has a number of natural values that will sources that usually fund public studies. Therefore, the be new to the European Union. According to latest Ministry has no access even to information that should reports, the Romanian government has not yet submit- be public data. There is no capacity within the Minis- ted any proposal to nominate additional habitats and try to overcome this situation. species for inclusion in the annexes of the Habitats Directive. Filling gaps in scientific information As part of a larger project, Romanian Biodiversity Stakeholder involvement Conservation Management Project, supported by the No consultation on preparations for Natura 2000 has World Bank/GEF, a Biodiversity Information Manage- been organised at any level. The only NGO that has ment System has been designed under co-ordination of actively participated in the preparation process has the Ministry. The system has been developed should been BirdLife Romania, which has signed a partner- support co-operation and exchange of data between ship agreement with the Ministry. One LIFE-Nature institutions and organisations. The eventual result project developed by BirdLife has been co-financed should be a database and maps that can help identify by the Ministry. BirdLife Romania has also developed priority areas for biodiversity conservation. a proposal for a leaflet on Natura 2000 targeted at representatives of the Ministry at the county level, i.e. However, many specialists consider that the Biodiver- for the Environmental Protection Agencies, which it sity Information Monitoring System will only become has offered to co-finance together with the Ministry. fully operational in the long-term, with collection of No confirmation for the project has yet been received relevant data requiring years of intense work by vari- from the Ministry. ous institutions and organisations. Lack of financial resources to support institutions, organisations, and A major constraint for improving NGO involvement in specialists in their work may hinder the entire proc- the process of preparing for Natura 2000 is the fact that ess. the Ministry cannot offer funds for any NGO activity or project from its available budget. Another constraint is a lack of transparency within the Ministry.

A seminar on Natura 2000 organised by WWF in co-operation with the Romanian Environmental Partnership Foundation in October 2003 led to the 80 establishment of an NGO platform on Natura 2000. 81 The NGO Coalition on Natura 2000 in Romania currently includes 32 members, which are now undertaking a gap analysis of data available among NGOs as well as organising a range of capacity building and awareness raising activities, all focussed on preparing for Natura 2000 in Romania. The Ministry of Environ- ment has shown an interest in working together with the coalition. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Romania

Transposition of the Habitats Directive

into national legislation. Communications and awareness raising Legislative gaps Awareness of Natura 2000 even among relevant pub- Both the Birds and Habitats Directives have been lish authorities and most affected stakeholders at all transposed into the national legislation, i.e. into Law levels is minimal. There are currently no integrated no 263/2001 Regarding the Regime of Protected plans or actions developed to address this issue in Areas, Conservation of Natural Habitats, of Wild Flora Romania. and Fauna. However, several specialists have pointed to inconsistencies and gaps in the annexes, and these Members of the NGO Coalition on Natura 2000 in should be corrected. To date, the Romanian Govern- Romania have begun organising activities targeted at ment has taken no measures to address these gaps, but raising awareness and understanding of Natura 2000 the Ministry is planning a consultation process. with the Romanian NGO community. In January 2004, WWF, the Romanian Environmental Partnership Foun- Cross sectoral integration dation, and CEEWEB organised a Train-the-Trainers Sectoral policies, especially regarding agriculture, workshop for Romanian, Bulgarian, and Croatian regional and infrastructure development, do not prop- NGOs on the Birds and Habitats Directives and role erly integrate or take account of requirements of the of NGOs in securing their implementation. Additional Habitats and Birds Directives. An analysis and harmo- training organised by WWF and involving Romanian nisation process is needed to identify relevant gaps or NGOs has focussed on the biogeographic seminars as problems, and to propose amendments to the existing well as communications planning. Following on these legislation. To name but one problem as an example of workshops, a series of training and awareness raising many, the law that regulates hunting is not consistent activities are being developed under the project Natura with the Birds and Habitats Directives. 2000 in Romania – Role of Environmental NGOs in the implementation of the European Ecological Net- work in Romania. The project has been initiated with financial support from the EU’s PHARE pre-accession instrument by three NGOs, UNESCO Pro Natura, the Romanian Federation of Speleology, and BirdLife Romania, and in close co-operation with the NGO Coalition on Natura 2000. Several of the Coalition’s members have been publishing articles on EU conservation policy and Natura 2000 in their journals as well as the media.

The members of the NGO Coalition are now in the process of developing a communications strategy for communications and awareness raising related to 80 Natura 2000. At least partial support for implemen- 81 tation of this strategy is expected to come from the Romanian Government. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Romania

Future needs for stakeholder involvement 5. Conservation of Dolphins from Romanian Black Sea The development of a strategy for stakeholder Waters | National Institute for Marine Research and involvement is crucial. Such a strategy will identify Development “Grigore Antipa” | 07.2001–06.2004 key actors and ways of implementation of awareness raising activities. The NGO Coalition can play a major 6. In Situ Conservation of Large Carnivores in Vran- role in this process as well in implementing awareness cea County | Environmental Protection Inspectorate raising activities. The provisional list of key actors Vrancea | 09.2002–11.2005 would be: relevant Ministries and their representatives at the regional level, land owners and land owners 7. Restoration of Comana Wetland | Forest Research associations, administrators of natural resources (e.g. and Management Institute | 03.2002–06.2004 National Forest Administration), regional and local authorities. 8. Conservation of the Natural Wet Habitat of Satch- inez | Environmental Protection Inspectorate Timi- Ensuring adequate financial resources soara | 10.2002–10.2005 for the establishment of Natura 2000 In 2003, € 300,000 was allocated from the national 9. Natura 2000 Sites in the Piatra Craiului National budget for various kinds of studies related to Natura Park | Piatra Craiului National Park Administration | 2000. This is separate from the funds used for co- 08.2003–07.2006 financing the LIFE projects mentioned below. The amount allocated from the national budget for 2004 10. Restoration of Forested Habitats from Pietrosul is not yet known (proposals have been developed by Rodnei Biosphere Reserve | Forest Research and Man- the Ministry but not yet approved). Generally there is agement Institute, Bucharest | 06.2003–06.2007 a lack of transparency, both regarding the total amount of funding available as well as the way the available 11. Participatory Management of Măcin Mountains funding is distributed. Protected Area | Environmental Protection Inspector- ate Tulcea | 07.2003–06.2006 A mainstay of support for work related to implementation of Natura 2000 in Romania has come from the The EU’s PHARE Cross-Border Co-operation (CBC) EU’s LIFE-Nature financial instrument. The following pre-accession instrument has also been useful for sup- table provides an overview of past and ongoing LIFE porting preparations for implementation of the Birds projects in Romania: and Habitats Directives. Approved projects (2003) include: Project Title | Beneficiary | Duration Promotion of Sustainable Development and Conser- 1. In situ Conservation of the Romanian Meadow vation of Biodiversity in Bulgarian-Romanian Cross Viper (Vipera ursinii) | Danube Delta Research and Border Region (€ 2.25 million, project PHARE RO Design National Institute | 10.1999–01.2002 2003/005-701.04).

2. Iron Gates Natural Park – Habitat Conservation Romanian Hungarian Corridor for Biodiversity Con- 82 and Management | University of Bucharest/CCMESI servation (€ 1.95 million, project PHARE RO-2003/ 83 | 06.2001–11.2004 005-702.01).

3. Functional Ecological Network in Central Transyl- Protection of Wetlands of the Danube – a pilot project vania Plain | Environmental Protection Inspectorate, for Cama-Dinu islet area (RO0103.03) – begun in Cluj | 08.2001–11.2004 January 2004, will contribute to implementation of Natura 2000 by contributing to identification of poten- 4. Conservation Programme for Bats’ Underground tial Natura 2000 sites around the Cama-Dinu islets as Habitats in SW Carpathians | Green Cross Romania well as raising understanding and awareness of local and GESS | 08.2001–08.2004 stakeholders regarding the area’s biodiversity and Natura 2000. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites – Romania

Other financial sources Threats to sites A project financed by the Dutch government through The route of the Targu Mures-Dumbravita highway Senter International called Implementation of the initially was planned to pass through the Dumbravita EU Nature Conservation Legislation in Romania Important Bird Area. SOR/Birdlife Romania, the completed the conception phase in April 2001. It will Faculty of Forestry and the Romanian Academy have run for three years, is carried out by a consortium of managed to secure a change in the planned route that Dutch consultancies and WWF-Danube Carpathian would not affect this potential Natura 2000 site. Programme and has the following expected outcomes: There is currently no information available on major Institutional and organisational structure strength- plans or projects that could threaten possible Natura ened for the implementation of the Birds- and Habi- 2000 sites. In December 2003, the NGO Coalition tats Directive, including improved knowledge in requested the Romanian Government to provide a list the field of the EU Directive. of planned highway projects, but to date no reply to Relevant species and habitats for Romania selected, this request has been received. species distribution and habitat maps prepared. List of sites of Community Importance (SCI) and Apart from the IBAs identified by and available at Special Protection Areas (SPA) ready, described in SOR/BirdLife and 7 Emerald sites there is no estima- Standard Forms and inserted in the Database con- tion or map of potential Natura 2000 sites. With no form EU Directives. information about either infrastructural projects or the (Blueprint) management plan elaborated on N2000 location of potential Natura 2000 sites it is difficult to sites, if possible implementation with a pilot project identify threats at this point Information campaign developed for the public (and partly implemented) in the field of the mean- ing and the importance of Natura 2000. Conclusions and priority actions Bottlenecks Capacity at the level of the Ministry is extremely low Ensure adequate allocation of resources at the min- at the moment (only one person who spends part of istry level for implementation of Natura 2000. it’s time on Natura 2000). Three new experts will soon Develop and implement a strategy for awareness establish a national nature protection agency with 8 raising on Natura 2000 targeted at key stakeholders. regional offices which will have a department that will Identify existing information, gap analysis and pre- be responsible for implementing Natura 2000. liminary map of potential pSCI. Develop project proposals and identify funding for Lack of knowledge/awareness among stakeholders studying the identified priority areas and fill in the such as land owners, land users, local officials, espe- standard forms for those that qualify as pSCI. cially at the regional and local level.

The main problem is the non-transparent distribution of the existing (possibly scarce) funds. As a result of this 82 lack of transparency it is difficult to asses if the funding 83 is enough and if the distribution is done correctly.

Difficulty for NGOs and other stakeholders to access existing information and a general lack of transparency on the site designation process and the results.

Among promising steps is the fact that, since October 2003, NGOs, often consisting of ecological experts, have become much more active in preparing for Natura 2000 and are organising their contribution through the NGO Coalition on Natura 2000 in Romania. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States IV. National reports and lists of sites

84 85 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes

Annexes

I. Habitats and species covered in this report

II. Lists of sites per country

III. Links and information sources

84 85 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes

Annex I: Annex II: Selected habitats List of sites per country and species covered in this report

Code Habitats Prior- ity Key to tables 1110 Sandbanks slightly covered by sea water all the time Column Description 1150 Coastal lagoons Id Code of site 1170 Reefs Name of Site English and national names of site 1230 Vegetated sea cliffs separated by | 2120 Shifting dunes along the shoreline marine & shore Size size of the site in km2 3130 Oligotrophic to mesotrophic standing waters BG biogeographical region 3160 Natural dystrophic lakes and ponds 3220 Alpine rivers and its vegetation (see table below) freshwater 4030 European dry heath Longitude longitude of a centroid of the site

heats (degrees and minutes E) 6120* Xeric sand calcarous grasslands • Latitude latitude of a centroid of the site 6210* Semi-natural dry grassland/scrubland on calcareous substrates • (degrees and minutes N) 6240* Sub-pannonic steppic grassland • Hxxx habitats – presence indicated by • 6510* Lowland hay meadows • (see Annex I) 6530 Fennoscandinavian wooded meadows Sxxx species – presence indicated by • 7110* Active raised bogs • grasslands (see Annex I) 7140 Transition mires and quaking bogs 7220* Petrifying springs with tufa formation bogs • mires, 8310 Caves not open to the public Key to biogeographical regions rocks and caves Abbreviation Region 9020 Natural old broad-leaved deciduous forests with epiphytes A Alpine 9180* Tilio-Aceron forests of slopes, screes and B Boreal ravines • 91E0 Mixed ash-alder alluvial forests C Continental 91F0 Riparian mixed forests along the great rivers P Pannonic 91H0* Pannonian woods with Quercus pubescens • 9410 Acidophilus Picea forests

of the mountaine to alpine levels forests

Code Species Prior- ity 1188 Bombina bombina 1163 Cottus gobio 1902 Cypripedium calceolus 86 1120 Emys orbicularis 87 1096 Lampetra planeri 1903 Liparis loeselii 1355 Lutra lutra 1361 Lynx lynx 1061 Maculinea nausithous 1029 Margaritifera margaritifera 1084* Osmoderma eremita • 1910 Pteromys volans 1477 Pulsatilla patens 1303 Rhinolophus hipposideros 1106 Salmo salar 1528 Saxifraga hirculus 1335 Spermophilus citellus Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Czech Republic

Czech Republic

*ᤀ(ᜀᜀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀Ѐ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀&%$3؀ᘀᘀᬀ ฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ#" Ā Ā Ā ܀C$%5؀฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ܀'܀$ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀AЀఀ%Ѐ -&;ᄀ/%܀Ѐ܀-&;ᄀ/%܀AЀఀ%Ѐ "#ᘀᘀḀ ฀-ࠀጀ$%ጀ6܀Ԁ0&ᄀ܀'܀฀-ࠀጀ$%76܀Ԁ05ᄀ ᔀ(ἀᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᔀᬀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᘀ ܀'܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀4܀&Ԁࠀ%-ЀȀ܀؀0Ѐ%ࠀ6଀3%؀" ᘀᘀἀ#" Ԁࠀ%<ЀȀ& Ā Ā܀ࠀ6଀3%1%<0؀8 *ᔀᘀᜀᤀ(ᬀἀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᜀ ܀1%$؀8܀'܀Ȁࠀ,ࠀ-଀؀-ఀ$܀؀%$؀" ᘀᔀᰀ#" Ȁࠀ,ࠀఀ$ Ѐ$ ᔀᤀἀ(ᬀᰀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā-%܀5%$؀8܀'܀Ѐ-$ఀ%܀$Ѐ-%܀&%$؀" ᘀᔀᜀ#" ࠀ ᔀᰀἀ(ᤀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā%$؀%9ࠀ܀'܀ࠀ%$؀%ᘀᔀḀ 9ࠀ#" *ᨀᨀᘀ(ᤀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᘀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᜀ ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀ᘀᔀἀ 9ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%#" 9ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ἀ(ᰀᤀ : ᔀᬀ)ᨀᰀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᔀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀؀ࠀ.3%܀؀ᘀᤀᔀ 9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%#" Ā Ā Ā ؀ࠀ.3%܀9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%1 *᠀ᰀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀḀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ ܀&%ᄀ଀;&-܀؀Ѐ,0଀ᄀ଀3%#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀ᘀᤀᤀ !଀0#" Ā Ā Ā ܀0଀ᄀ଀3%1,<#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀଀0!܀'܀$ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ -&;ᄀ/%& "#ᘀᤀᨀ ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ܀'܀ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ ᬀᘀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᨀ)ᨀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀᤀᰀ ᐀ࠀ;$ࠀ6଀3%&܀-&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀ ᘀ(ᨀ᠀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* ᐀ࠀ;?ࠀ6଀3%5܀-&;ᄀ/% Ā "#ᘀᤀᜀ ᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ଀ᄀ$%Ѐ܀Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀ ᨀḀ(ἀᬀ : ᔀ᠀)ᘀ᠀* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* ᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ/ᄀ$%>܀Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ Ā *᠀ᨀᬀἀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀&,3-6܀؀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%܀Ѐ܀؀%$ᘀᤀ᠀ ᐀ࠀ$ఀ&ᄀ#" ᐀ࠀ$ఀ5ᄀ$%1܀Ѐ܀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%1܀6-3,& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā

*ᰀᜀ(ᘀᬀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ ܀'܀A0ЀȀЀ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀3܀ᘀᤀḀ ᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$%Ѐ#" A0ЀȀ> Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀C܀<᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$% *ᨀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀḀ ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀AЀ0$܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᨀᘀ A#" Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀?AЀ0܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀Ԁ *ᔀ(ᬀᜀ " ᔀḀ)ᤀᔀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀FȀ-Ѐ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᨀᔀ A#" FȀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀Ԁ "#ᘀᨀᨀ ",-଀;&܀,଀00$܀'܀",<଀;& ᔀḀᤀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀ᠀)ᔀ᠀* ᰀἀ)ᘀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *᠀ᜀ(ᘀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀ ܀Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%5=܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀&ᘀᨀᰀ =Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%#" .ࠀఀࠀ% Ā Ā Ā Ā ᔀ᠀ἀ(ᜀᨀ " ᔀᤀ)ᰀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā /;<>؀=܀'܀Ѐ;଀-؀= ᘀᨀᜀ#" ᄀ/%& Ḁᬀᨀ(᠀ᔀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀$؀=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%ᄀ଀؀$؀= ᘀᨀᬀ#" "#ᘀᨀḀ =଀-଀%ࠀ6$%&܀-&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀ ᘀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᨀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᰀ* =଀;<#܀Ѐ܀1%3؀2ࠀጀఀ܀'܀ЀȀࠀ4$؀Ԁ 0ࠀጀ%& "#ᘀᰀᨀ 2ࠀഀࠀ,0ጀȀ%&܀'܀2ࠀഀࠀ,07Ȁ%& ᘀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀἀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀᨀ* Ā Ā ᨀᘀᤀ(ᤀᤀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀?ࠀᄀࠀ%-2܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀؀$ᘀᰀᰀ 2-%ࠀᄀࠀ#" "#ᘀᰀᬀ 2-଀6ࠀ%0Ѐఀ$%ࠀ܀'܀2<଀6ࠀ%0>ఀ$%ࠀ ᬀᔀᜀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᨀ)ᜀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᨀᔀ᠀(᠀ᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᰀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀᤀ ܀'܀$؀ЀᄀȀ$ఀࠀᄀ$܀؀଀$%ࠀ63.܀؀%$;ᘀᰀ᠀ ကЀ#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ࠀ63%$/.܀ကЀ;$%1 "#ᘀᰀḀ က଀;Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀က଀;Ѐ6> ᰀᔀḀ(ᜀᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᰀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ἀᤀ(ᰀᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᘀᬀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᤀ ܀1%$0؀က଀ఀࠀ6܀'܀ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6଀:܀؀%$0؀ᘀᰀἀ က଀ఀࠀ6#" :ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6/ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ࠀఀࠀ% ᠀(ᜀᔀ " ᔀᤀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā.܀/ကጀ@ᄀ܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀ᘀᜀᔀ ကጀഀᄀ଀#" *᠀ᔀ(ἀἀ : ᔀᬀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀḀ)ᰀ ܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀D&9܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᤀ A#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀D&9 ᔀ(ᜀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᘀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀ȀЀ؀਀Ԁ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᨀ A#" ਀ԀBȀ1 87܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A 86 0ጀ,& ᔀᜀ(᠀ᘀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀἀ* Ā܀AB0ᄀ଀3%1܀'܀&,0ጀ܀؀0ᄀ଀3%؀ᘀᜀᰀ A#" *ᜀᨀ(ᤀḀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᜀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᔀ ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ࠀ6%Ѐ,3؀;က଀܀ࠀऀ܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀+ ᘀᜀᬀ#" :$ࠀ6%Ѐ܀'܀Aࠀ%<ЀȀ&܀က଀;B3,ࠀ6%&܀Ѐ܀ Ā Ā :?ࠀ6%& "#ᘀᜀ᠀ Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%&܀%-Ѐ$܀%Ѐ-$ఀ܀'܀Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%5܀ ᠀᠀(ᨀᜀ " ᔀᬀ)ᰀᨀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᔀ* %-Ѐ$ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 0Ѐ3,ఀB ᘀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā:܀Ѐ̀܀'܀؀0Ѐ3,ఀ:܀ᘀᜀḀ ̀Ѐ#" "#ᘀᬀᘀ ကጀ,Ѐ܀ЀᄀȀ܀G&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ܀'܀̀଀6Ѐ܀ ᔀ(᠀ᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᨀᜀ* ကጀ,&܀Ѐ܀.ࠀఀࠀ%Ѐ܀G&;ᄀ/% Ā *ḀḀ " ᔀᜀ)ᬀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ)᠀ ܀଀6Ѐ̀܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀F-0଀3܀ࠀऀ܀ᘀᬀᔀ !0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀F-0଀3 *ᔀᜀᬀ(ᘀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᤀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᰀ ܀'܀ࠀሀ;܀؀0଀ᄀ଀$ఀ؀$Ѐ-܀؀%$ᘀᬀᰀ ̀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ#" 0଀ᄀ଀?ఀB Ā Ā؀?Ѐ-܀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ$%1̀ *ἀᨀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀἀ ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀%$ᘀᬀᜀ ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ#" ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Czech Republic

؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ᐀ᔀᔀᔀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀᜀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀ᠀ᘀ ᐀ᔀᤀᨀᘀ ᐀ᤀᔀᤀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᨀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᬀᘀ ᐀ᨀᤀᤀᘀ ᐀ᰀᘀᨀᘀ ᐀ᬀᔀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᰀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᜀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᰀᘀ ᐀᠀ᤀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀Ḁᨀᔀᘀ ᐀ἀᘀᤀᘀ ᐀ἀᔀḀᘀᴀ ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ ᐀ἀᔀ!ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ᐀ᘀᴀ ᐀ἀᰀᔀᘀ ਀ᔀᘀᤀἀ ਀ᔀᘀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᘀḀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᘀἀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᘀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᤀᘀ ਀ᔀᔀᬀᨀ ਀ᔀᔀḀḀ ਀ᔀᨀᘀᨀ ਀ᔀᨀᨀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᰀ᠀᠀ ਀ᔀᜀᤀḀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᤀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᨀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ F0?଀ᄀЀ ᔀᤀᘀᔀ(ᨀ᠀ᰀ(ᤀᘀ " ᔀḀ)ᤀᤀ*ᔀᰀ)ᘀᬀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᜀ*ᰀḀ)ᰀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀'܀Ȁ&F0$଀ᄀЀ&%$؀฀܀'܀&Ȁ&%$؀ᘀᘀᔀ"#ᘀᬀ᠀ ฀#" *ᰀᘀ(Ḁᘀᤀᨀᘀ(ḀḀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᔀ*ᔀᬀ)ᤀᬀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀἀ*ᜀᘀ)ᔀᜀ᠀ ܀F-0଀3%1܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀2Ѐ-.Ѐఀ&F-0଀3%܀฀/01܀'܀$Ѐ-.Ѐఀ,଀Ѐᄀ"܀؀ᘀᘀᨀ"#ᘀᬀḀ +,଀ఀ#" ,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᨀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᨀ)ᜀḀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᬀ ؀฀0Ѐᄀ଀3܀'܀؀ᘀᘀᰀ ฀0Ѐᄀ଀3#" "#ᘀᬀἀ F$ఀ-Ѐ6$%ࠀ܀K܀;ࠀ,ጀԀ଀ᄀ$%Ѐ܀-&;ᄀ଀3ᄀ଀܀ ᨀ(Ḁᔀ " ᔀḀ)ᤀᔀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā *ᤀᔀᬀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᬀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᜀ $؀0܀฀0Ѐᄀ$%5܀'܀4ࠀࠀȀ0ЀᄀȀ܀$؀0܀&%$ᘀᘀᜀ ฀0Ѐᄀ#" $ࠀጀ$ఀЀ6Ѐ܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ$܀'܀F$ఀ-Ѐ6$%ࠀ܀K܀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ;ࠀ,ጀԀ/ᄀ$%>܀-&;ᄀ଀Cᄀ/܀$ࠀጀ$ఀЀ6Ѐ *ᤀ(ᜀᜀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀Ѐ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀&%$3؀ᘀᘀᬀ ฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ#" Ā Ā Ā ܀C$%5؀฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ܀'܀$ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀AЀఀ%Ѐ "#ᘀ᠀ᔀ -&:Ѐ0Ѐ;ᄀ/6Ѐ܀ЀᄀȀ%܀Ѐ܀-&;ᄀ܀:ࠀȀ/%܀A0ጀЀഀఀ଀%Ѐ܀'܀:>0Ѐ6Ѐ܀Ѐ܀ ᨀᘀḀ(ᘀᰀ : ᔀᬀ)ᰀᰀ* ᰀḀ)ᰀ᠀* :ࠀȀ0ጀ@/ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀᘀḀ ฀-ࠀጀ$%ጀ6܀Ԁ0&ᄀ܀'܀฀-ࠀጀ$%76܀Ԁ05ᄀ ᔀ(ἀᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* ᔀᘀ(᠀ᜀ " ᔀᜀ)ᔀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀$ЀȀ؀Ԁ܀&,0ጀ܀؀%$ЀȀ-;؀ᘀ᠀ᨀ :ࠀȀ#" ᔀᬀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀4܀&Ԁࠀ0ጀ,&%-ЀȀ܀܀1%$؀0Ѐ%ࠀ6B;-ЀȀ଀3%؀"ᘀᘀἀ :ࠀȀ#" Ԁࠀ%<ЀȀ& Ā Ā܀ࠀ6଀3%1%<0؀8 "#ᘀ᠀ᰀ :ࠀȀ&D଀܀'܀:ࠀȀ&D/ ᬀᔀ(ᔀᬀ : ᔀᬀ)ᘀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᔀ* ᔀᘀᜀᤀ(ᬀἀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀1%$؀8܀'܀Ȁࠀ,ࠀ-଀؀-ఀ$܀؀%$؀" ᘀᔀᰀ#" ᘀ(᠀ᤀ : ᔀᬀ)ᨀἀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀&;2ࠀ0܀K܀.؀ఀ$܀ />Ȁഀࠀ,ࠀȀ-Ѐᄀ$%Ѐ؀>ᘀ᠀᠀ :ࠀጀ$ఀ#" 2ࠀ0;& Ā܀K܀.؀ఀ$܀<%$ࠀጀഀȀ<Ѐᄀ: *Ѐ$ ᔀᤀἀ(ᬀᰀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ-%܀5%$؀8܀'܀Ѐ-$ఀ%܀$Ѐ-%܀&%$؀" ᘀᔀᜀ#" GЀD3,1<ࠀ6 ᤀᬀ(ᔀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᔀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀'܀ࠀ6-؀,ᘀ᠀ἀ GЀD3#" ࠀ ᔀᰀἀ(ᤀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā%$؀%9ࠀ܀'܀ࠀ%$؀%ᘀᔀḀ 9ࠀ#" ࠀࠀȀ/?Gࠀഀ܀'܀ࠀࠀȀ-଀:܀Ȁ؀ᘀḀᔀ ᄀ0Ѐ-ሀ#" ᨀᨀᘀ(ᤀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᘀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀ᘀᔀἀ 9ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%#" 9ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᘀ(ᰀ᠀ " ᔀḀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᤀ ܀%/G&;ᄀ܀'܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀Ѐᄀ.؀਀ఀ܀%ᘀḀᨀ G&;ᄀ଀#" ἀ(ᰀᤀ : ᔀᬀ)ᨀᰀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᔀ* Ā ܀'܀଀00$,܀؀ࠀ.3%܀؀ᘀᤀᔀ IఀB.>ᄀ9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%#" Ā Ā Ā ؀ࠀ.3%܀9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%1 *ᔀ(ᔀᰀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀᜀ 3؀Ѐ;଀ᄀ@؀H܀'܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀3؀ഀЀ;଀ᄀ؀ᘀḀᰀ G#" ᰀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀḀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀&%ᄀ଀;&-܀؀Ѐ,0଀ᄀ଀3%#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀ᘀᤀᤀ !଀0#" ᤀᰀ(ᰀᬀ : ᔀ᠀)ᘀᨀ* ᰀḀ)ᰀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā ܀0଀ᄀ଀3%1,<#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀଀0!܀'܀$਀%Ѐ<଀ᄀ&ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀&ᘀḀᜀ ਀%Ѐ-଀ᄀ#" *ᬀᘀᤀ(ᘀᔀ " ᔀᤀ)ᰀᜀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᰀ ܀'܀4ࠀࠀȀ0ЀᄀȀ܀$؀0܀&%$ &ᘀḀ᠀ ਀0Ѐ6-&;ᄀ/%ࠀ6%#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā $؀0܀਀0Ѐ6%ࠀ6$%5 "#ᘀᤀᨀ ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ܀'܀ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ ᬀᘀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᨀ)ᨀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᘀ* "#ᘀḀḀ ਀ࠀࠀ$܀'܀਀ࠀࠀ$ ᤀ(ᔀḀ " ᔀᤀ)ᤀᰀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀἀ* Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀᤀᰀ ᐀ࠀ;$ࠀ6଀3%&܀-&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀ ᘀ(ᨀ᠀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀἀᔀ ਀ఀ଀ᄀЀ6Ѐ܀'܀਀ఀ/ᄀЀ6Ѐ᐀ࠀ;?ࠀ6଀3%5܀-&;ᄀ/% ᰀḀ(ᘀᨀ " ᔀᬀ)ᜀᬀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀἀᤀ"#ᘀᤀᜀ ਀ఀ-Ѐഀ܀'܀਀ఀ->@᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ଀ᄀ$%Ѐ܀Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀ ᨀḀ(ἀᬀᜀᔀ(ᜀᤀ ": ᔀ᠀)ᘀ᠀*ᔀᨀ)ᘀᨀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ*ᜀᘀ)ᤀᰀ* ᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ/ᄀ$%>܀Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ Ā Ā Ā *ᔀᤀ(ᬀᜀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᨀᔀ ܀/Ȁᄀ؀>਀ఀ܀'܀&؀6Ѐ00܀36଀؀;ࠀ:܀ᄀఀ-Ѐ0؀" ᘀἀᰀ#" ᨀᬀἀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀଀00$,܀&,3-6܀؀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%܀Ѐ /܀؀%$C6&ᄀ؀ᘀᤀ᠀ ᐀:ࠀ;ࠀ$ఀ#" ᐀ࠀ$ఀ5ᄀ$%1܀Ѐ܀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%1܀6-3,& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀἀᬀ ਀ጀԀЀ6Ѐ܀'܀IጀԀЀ6Ѐ ᔀᔀᨀᨀ(ᰀἀ " ᔀᨀ)ᨀᔀ* ᰀἀ)ᘀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀἀ᠀ J-Ѐ6ᄀ଀܀Ȁ6ጀ-܀'܀J->6ᄀ/܀Ȁ67- ᨀ(ᨀᜀ : ᔀᬀ)ᤀᬀ* ᰀḀ)ᰀ᠀* ᰀᜀ(ᘀᬀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀A0ЀȀЀ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀3܀ᘀᤀḀ ᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$%Ѐ#" ᰀᰀ᠀(ᤀᬀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀἀ* ᰀḀ)ᬀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀Ѐ܀ ܀J܀'܀Ѐ;;ࠀᄀЀᄀࠀ$%6$%>ࠀ؀--ᘀἀḀ ᐀J#" 0଀ᄀ଀?ఀB Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀?Ѐ- *ᨀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀḀ ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀AЀ0$܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᨀᘀ A#" ᘀ(ᜀἀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᜀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀&؀6Ѐ00܀-؀଀6-܀0Ѐ؀฀؀?0܀AЀᄀЀȀ܀&-܀ЀᄀȀ3%Ѐ؀ᘀἀἀ Ԁ20ࠀ%ࠀ#" PȀࠀ0/܀20ࠀ%ࠀC%&܀Ѐ܀฀B01 Ā *ᔀ(ᬀᜀ " ᔀḀ)ᤀᔀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀FȀ-Ѐ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᨀᔀ A#" ᘀ(ᘀᜀ " ᔀᬀ)ᘀᨀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀5%3؀$Eࠀ܀'܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀%FȀ-&&;ᄀ଀܀-܀&-&ЀᄀȀ3%؀؀$ᔀᘀᤀ ԀEࠀ#" -&;ᄀ/% Ā Ā "#ᘀᨀᨀ ",-଀;&܀,଀00$܀'܀",<଀;& ᔀḀᤀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀ᠀)ᔀ᠀* ᰀἀ)ᘀḀ* "#ᔀᘀᜀ E&-ࠀ6%Ѐ܀'܀E5-ࠀ6%Ѐ ᘀ(ᘀᔀ : ᔀ᠀)ᨀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᜀ(ᘀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%5=܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀&ᘀᨀᰀ =Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%#" "#ᔀᘀ᠀ #Ѐ$ఀጀȀЀᄀ3଀܀'܀#>$ఀጀȀ>ᄀC/.ࠀఀࠀ% ᔀ(ᔀᨀ " ᔀ᠀)ᔀἀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᰀ* Ā Ā D-Ѐ0 ᔀ᠀ἀ(ᜀᨀᘀ(ᤀᤀ " ᔀᤀ)ᰀᨀ*ᔀᜀ)ᔀἀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᨀ*ᰀἀ)ᔀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀,#܀'܀D-Ѐ0؀,#/;<>؀=܀'܀Ѐ;଀-؀= ᘀᨀᜀ"#ᔀᘀḀ#" *Ḁᬀᨀ(᠀ᔀᔀᨀἀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀᘀ*ᔀᬀ)ᜀἀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ*ᰀἀ)ᘀᬀ ܀LȀ>ᄀ଀3%5܀'܀4ࠀࠀȀ0ЀᄀȀ܀$؀0܀&ᄀ/%&#ȀЀᄀ଀3%؀$؀=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%ᄀ଀؀$؀= ᘀᨀᬀ"#ᔀᘀἀ#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā $؀0 "#ᘀᨀḀ =଀-଀%ࠀ6$%&܀-&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀ ᘀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᨀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᰀ* Ā ᄀ/% ᨀᤀᰀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀᜀ)ᜀḀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā;&-܀Ȁ=଀ఀ$܀K܀LM>-$%ࠀ܀'܀-؀ᄀఀ؀3܀K܀ᔀᔀᘀ #ȀЀ-$%ࠀ#" *ᔀ᠀ᤀ(ᨀᤀ " ᔀᜀ)ᔀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀἀ &%-؀଀ഀ=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%-؀ᘀᨀἀ =଀ഀ#" ЀC%Ѐ ᤀ(ᤀᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀḀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā-;؀L܀'܀Ѐ3%Ѐ-;؀# ᔀᔀᔀ#" ᘀ(ᔀᤀ " ᔀᜀ)ᤀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀ᠀* Ā Ā ܀20ЀȀ଀ᄀ$%5܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀&%$ᘀᰀᘀ 20ЀȀ଀ᄀ#" ᤀ(ᜀᜀ " ᔀᜀ)ᔀἀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀἀ* Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀&%$ጀఀࠀ%ᄀ,؀ᔀᔀᤀ #.ࠀ#" ᄀ/% Ā;&-܀ጀO$%5,؀L *ᔀᨀ(ᬀἀ " ᔀḀ)ᘀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᜀ ܀&%0ࠀጀ܀؀%$ഀ؀-;Ѐ#܀Ѐ܀؀%3؀ᘀᰀᤀ 2ࠀጀఀ#" ᤀḀᔀ(ᜀḀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀἀ* Ā ܀܀ഀ$%1ᄀ1؀0؀L@؀>;<܀'#܀$ᄀ܀଀Ѐ܀ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ܀1%3؀2ࠀጀఀ܀'܀ࠀ-&4$,܀؀ЀȀࠀᄀ؀ഀ؀0؀#ᔀᔀᨀ Ԁ#" 0ࠀጀ,ࠀ-%&& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀᰀᨀ"#ᔀᔀḀ 2ࠀഀࠀ,0ጀȀ%&܀'܀2ࠀഀࠀ,07Ȁ%&9ഀ;Ѐᄀ܀'܀9@;>ᄀ Ḁἀ(ἀᰀᘀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀἀ*ᔀᨀ)ᜀᨀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀᨀ*ᜀᘀ)ᔀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā J5ᄀ଀?N$%ࠀ ᨀᘀᤀ(ᤀᤀᔀḀ(᠀ᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᘀ*ᔀᬀ)ᘀᜀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᨀ*ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀'܀J&ᄀ଀$ఀ$%ࠀ؀?ࠀᄀࠀ%-2܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀؀$ᘀᰀᰀ"#ᔀᔀἀ 2-%ࠀᄀࠀ#" *ᬀᔀᜀ(ᨀᨀᔀḀ(ᘀᨀ ": ᔀ᠀)ᤀᘀ*ᔀᨀ)ᜀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀḀ*ᜀᘀ)ᘀᘀ ܀ጀ܀,ကጀ܀'܀%؀$଀:܀&Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%܀&;܀,଀6ࠀ%0>ఀ$%ࠀကጀ>2܀'܀ᘀᰀᬀ"#ᔀᤀᘀ 2-଀6ࠀ%0Ѐఀ$%ࠀ#" Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%1,ࠀ܀:/$%ጀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᨀᔀ᠀(᠀ᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᰀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀᤀ ܀'܀$؀ЀᄀȀ$ఀࠀᄀ$܀؀଀$%ࠀ63.܀؀%$;ᘀᰀ᠀ ကЀ#" ᔀᜀ(Ḁᜀ " ᔀ᠀)ᨀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᰀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ఀЀ603%5$؀>:܀'܀ఀ$؀-ऀࠀ؀3܀$؀0܀Ѐ603%&$%ࠀ6/.܀ఀ;$%1$؀-:ᔀᤀᔀ ကЀ#" Ā Ā $؀0 "#ᘀᰀḀ က଀;Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀က଀;Ѐ6> ᰀᔀḀ(ᜀᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᰀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᘀ* ᄀ/% ᨀᨀ(ᰀᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᰀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᨀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀AЀ0܀'܀%ᄀ଀؀ᔀᤀᤀ AЀ0#" ἀᤀ(ᰀᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᘀᬀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀1%$0؀က଀ఀࠀ6܀'܀ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6଀:܀؀%$0؀ᘀᰀἀ က଀ఀࠀ6#" ਀ᄀB@ᄀ/%:ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6/ ἀᨀ(ᨀἀ " ᔀᬀ)ᜀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀Ѐ0଀3%5-2܀'܀%ഀᄀ଀؀਀ᄀ܀&ᔀᤀᨀ 2-Ѐ0଀3%#" *᠀ࠀఀࠀ% ᠀(ᜀᔀ " ᔀᤀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀ.܀/ကጀ@ᄀ܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀ᘀᜀᔀ ကጀഀᄀ଀#" ᤀḀ(ᨀᬀ " ᔀᬀ)ᤀḀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀4ࠀࠀȀ0ЀᄀȀ܀&$؀0܀ᔀᤀᰀ :ࠀȀ%ࠀԀࠀ-$%1#" ᔀ(ἀἀ : ᔀᬀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀḀ)ᰀ᠀* Ā ܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀D&$؀0܀1%$&9܀ࠀऀ܀$-ࠀ-؀ЀᄀȀ:ࠀȀ%ࠀԀ؀ᘀᜀᤀ A#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀D&9 *᠀ࠀఀࠀ% ᔀἀ(ᔀᜀ " ᔀᬀ)ᤀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ.܀฀/05܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀&ᔀᤀᜀ ฀଀0#" ᔀ(ᜀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᘀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀ȀЀ؀਀Ԁ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᨀ A#" ਀ԀBȀ1 ᔀᤀ(ᬀᔀ " ᔀᬀ)ᨀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᔀ* Ā܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀3A؀฀ጀ%ࠀ6܀'܀4ࠀࠀȀ0ЀᄀȀ܀3؀ᔀᤀᬀ ฀ጀ%ࠀ6#" *᠀ᬀᜀ(ᬀᤀᔀᜀ(᠀ᘀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ*ᔀᬀ)ᤀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀἀ*ᰀἀ)ᤀ ܀'܀଀ሀ,0ЀᄀȀ,܀ࠀ-ᄀЀఀ଀ᄀЀ,܀Ѐ%3؀0ጀ,&਀6-Ѐఀ܀AB0ᄀ଀3%1܀'܀&,0ጀ܀؀0ᄀ଀3%؀ᘀᜀᰀ"#ᔀᤀ᠀ A#" ࠀ-ᄀЀఀ଀ᄀЀ Ā Ā Ā Ā,܀<%3؀਀6-Ѐఀ ᜀᨀ(ᤀḀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᜀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᔀ* Ā Ā ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ࠀ6%Ѐ,3؀;က଀܀ࠀऀ܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀+ ᘀᜀᬀ#" ᔀᘀ(ᘀ᠀ " ᔀᬀ)ᨀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᜀ* Ā ܀Ѐ܀܀'&%܀଀ሀ,0Ѐᄀ,ࠀ6Ȁ,܀က଀;B3܀ఀ؀;-,܀&%$&Aࠀ%<ЀȀ܀'܀3ࠀ6%Ѐ؀;؀ᔀᤀἀ ᐀:$ࠀ6-#" ఀ 89؀;>,܀Cࠀ6%& $%5؀;؀>᐀:?ࠀ6 88 *ᨀᜀᰀ᠀(ᰀ᠀ " ᔀᬀ)ᰀᨀ*ᔀ᠀)ᘀἀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᔀ*ᰀἀ)ᔀᰀ)᠀᠀ ܀1%$܀ᄀ-Ѐ6C଀$%5؀က଀ఀAࠀ܀'܀'܀܀଀00$,܀Ѐ-$ఀ%&,3-6܀$Ѐ-%܀&Ѐ6$%܀؀ᄀ3଀3%؀ᘀᜀ᠀"#ᔀᨀᘀ Aࠀ-က଀ఀ#" %-Ѐ$6-3,& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᔀᤀ(ᰀᨀᘀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᜀᤀ*ᔀ᠀)ᤀᰀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ*ᰀἀ)ᘀᔀ ܀'܀ऀ0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ܀ᄀ଀6Ѐ܀ȀЀ%ࠀᄀ଀3%Ѐ؀0Ѐ3,ఀB̀:܀Ѐ̀܀'܀؀0Ѐ3,ఀ:܀ᘀᜀḀ"#ᔀᨀᔀ ̀Ѐ#" ᄀ଀6Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā܀<ȀЀ%ࠀᄀ଀3%؀̀ "#ᘀᬀᘀ ကጀ,Ѐ܀ЀᄀȀ܀G&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ܀'܀̀଀6Ѐ܀ ᔀ(᠀ᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā "#ᔀᨀᤀ ਀ఀ-Ѐ;଀$ࠀ6܀'܀਀ఀ-Ѐ;଀?ࠀ6ကጀ,&܀Ѐ܀.ࠀఀࠀ%Ѐ܀G&;ᄀ/% ᬀ(Ḁᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᔀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā *ᨀᘀ(Ḁᤀ᠀(ḀḀ " ᔀᜀ)ᬀᘀ*ᔀ᠀)ᔀᜀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ*ᰀἀ)ᜀᤀ ܀/Ȁࠀ0܀PЀ܀'܀଀6̀܀'܀-&؀6Ѐ00܀؀଀6-&܀؀F-0଀3܀ကࠀጀ3%ࠀऀ܀؀,ጀ܀90ࠀ0Ѐ଀ᄀ܀ᘀᬀᔀ"#ᔀᨀᜀ !Q0ࠀࠀȀ.Ȁࠀ0଀#" ကࠀጀC%& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀ ؀F-0଀90ࠀጀ,13 *ᔀᜀᬀ(ᘀᜀᔀᨀ(ᨀἀ " ᔀᨀ)ᤀᤀ*ᔀ᠀)ᤀᬀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᰀ*ᰀἀ)ᰀᔀ ܀/ࠀ0܀'܀ࠀሀ;܀؀PȀ܀'܀&؀0଀ᄀ଀$ఀ6Ѐ00؀$Ѐ-܀؀଀3܀؀%$-ȀࠀԀ฀&$ఀ܀ᘀᬀᰀ"#ᔀᨀᬀ ̀Qࠀ6ࠀȀࠀ0଀#" 0଀ᄀ଀?ఀB Ā Ā Ā؀?Ѐ-܀1%$ ؀฀&̀ࠀ6ࠀ$ఀ<଀ȀࠀԀ3 ἀᨀ(᠀ᤀᰀ᠀(᠀ᜀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᘀ*ᔀᬀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀἀ*ᰀἀ)ᘀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀%$Gࠀ%&ఀᄀ>̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ܀'܀ᘀᬀᜀ"#ᔀᨀ᠀ Gࠀ%&ఀᄀЀ#" *ᔀᨀ(᠀ᰀ " ᔀᬀ)ᔀᨀ* ᰀἀ)ᘀᬀ ܀/Ȁᄀ؀>਀ఀ܀'܀&؀6Ѐ00܀ࠀ-&଀,܀ࠀD଀,0Ѐ6:܀Ȁ,-ЀȀ$%1ᄀ଀؀ᔀᨀḀ ̀਀ఀ-ࠀ6ࠀ#" :ࠀD଀,0Ѐ6/ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᤀἀ(ᜀᜀ " ᔀᬀ)ᔀᰀ* ᰀἀ)ᘀἀ ܀'܀&؀6Ѐ00܀؀6ࠀDᄀ଀3,"܀Ѐ܀&F$0Ѐ6܀ᔀᰀᘀ QȀࠀ0଀#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀6ࠀDᄀ଀3,"܀Ѐ܀&F$0Ѐ6܀/PȀࠀ0 ἀ(ᘀ᠀ " ᔀᬀ)ᘀ᠀* ᰀἀ)ᜀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀AЀ?ఀЀ0܀'܀؀ᔀᰀᔀ AЀ$ఀЀ0#" Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Czech Republic

Hungary

᐀଀%%3 ᤀᨀᘀ-ᔀᨀ . ᔀḀ/ᜀᬀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᨀᤀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā܀฀ጀȀЀ܀,܀ሀ+39ሀ؀=)᐀"ᘀᨀḀ ฀ጀȀЀ଀ ᐀"ᘀᨀἀ ฀ጀ8ఀࠀ3଀܀=Ѐ%Ѐ3ఀЀ)Ѐ1܀,܀฀ጀ8ఀࠀ3଀܀ ᘀ-ᔀᘀ . ᤀᔀ/ᰀᰀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᜀḀ0 ऀ଀3=:ࠀᄀȀ3 Ā Ā ᐀"ᘀᰀᘀ ฀?11܀,܀฀ጀ11 ᔀḀᬀᜀ-ᰀἀ . ᤀᘀ/ᨀᔀ0 ᰀḀ/ᘀᨀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᔀ-ᨀἀ . ᤀᘀ/ᰀᔀ0 ᰀḀ/ᘀᜀ0 ܀฀ጀ11܀,܀ᄀఀ%&3ഀ%5B؀A฀?113ഀ܀᐀"ᘀᰀᔀ ฀?11 ᄀఀ%Ѐ3ഀ%ࠀB Ā Ā Ā؀A฀ጀ113ഀ ᔀ-ᜀᰀ . ᤀᘀ/ᰀᨀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᜀἀ0 ܀฀ጀ11܀,܀B؀+ሀ%*()؀A43଀ᄀሀ܀᐀"ᘀᰀᤀ ฀?11 B Ā؀+ሀ%*()؀A43଀ᄀሀ ᐀"ᘀᰀᨀ ฀?11܀A᐀52(:ЀఀЀ1B܀,܀฀ጀ11܀A᐀ࠀ2( ᔀ-ᰀ᠀ . ᤀᘀ/ᨀᨀ0 ᰀḀ/ᘀᤀ0 :ЀఀЀ1B Ā Ā ᐀"ᘀᰀᰀ ฀?11Ѐ%8Ѐ܀G܀6Ѐ2ᄀЀ()଀Ȁ91܀,܀฀ጀ11܀ ᜀᬀ᠀-ᰀᜀ . ᤀᘀ/ᨀᔀ0 ᰀḀ/ᘀᤀ0 !ࠀࠀఀ=଀%%3 Ā Ā Ā Ā ᐀଀ሀ=%ЀᄀȀ3 ἀ-ἀᬀ . ᤀᘀ/ᤀἀ0 ᰀḀ/ᘀᜀ0 Ā Ā Ā܀฀ጀ11܀,܀ᄀᄀ3@1؀᐀"ᘀᰀᜀ ฀?11(ऀ Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Hungary

؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ᐀ᔀᔀᔀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀᜀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀ᠀ᘀ ᐀ᔀᤀᨀᘀ ᐀ᤀᔀᤀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᨀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᬀᘀ ᐀ᨀᤀᤀᘀ ᐀ᰀᘀᨀᘀ ᐀ᬀᔀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᰀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᜀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᰀᘀ ᐀᠀ᤀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀Ḁᨀᔀᘀ ᐀ἀᘀᤀᘀ ᐀ἀᔀḀᘀᴀ ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ ᐀ἀᔀ!ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ᐀ᘀᴀ ᐀ἀᰀᔀᘀ ਀ᔀᘀᤀἀ ਀ᔀᘀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᘀḀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᘀἀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᘀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᤀᘀ ਀ᔀᔀᬀᨀ ਀ᔀᔀḀḀ ਀ᔀᨀᘀᨀ ਀ᔀᨀᨀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᰀ᠀᠀ ਀ᔀᜀᤀḀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᤀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᨀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ ࠀ ᔀᤀᘀᔀ(ᨀ᠀ᤀ-Ḁἀ ". ᔀḀ/ᨀᰀ0ᔀḀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀ᠀/ᤀᜀ0ᰀἀ)ᤀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā!܀43Ѐ:%Ѐ2܀,܀>2Ȁ؀)Ȁ&43Ѐ:%&2଀&%$؀฀܀'܀&Ȁ&%$؀ᘀᘀᔀ᐀"ᘀᰀᬀ ฀#" *ᰀᘀ(Ḁᘀᘀ-᠀ᘀ ". ᔀἀ/ᘀᨀ0ᔀ᠀)ᜀᔀ* ᰀ᠀/ᤀᨀ0ᰀḀ)ᜀἀ᠀ ܀%؀:؀43܀,܀FЀ)଀'3($&ᄀ+Ѐఀ5-%؀:؀2Ѐ-.Ѐఀ&43܀฀/01܀'܀$Ѐ-.Ѐఀ,଀Ѐᄀ"܀؀ᘀᘀᨀ᐀"ᘀᰀ᠀ +,଀ఀ#" ࠀᄀȀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā:܀଀ఀ:%؀(ሀ2Ѐ *ᨀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᨀ)ᜀḀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᬀ ؀฀0Ѐᄀ଀3܀'܀؀ᘀᘀᰀ ฀0Ѐᄀ଀3#" ᔀᘀᘀ-ᤀᤀ . ᤀᘀ/ᜀᘀ0 ᰀḀ/ᔀ᠀0 Ā Ā Ā ܀ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀Ѐఀ=؀2؀43܀,܀HF܀ఀ&=؀2؀᐀"ᘀᰀḀ 43 Ѐ3ఀB ᤀᔀᬀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᬀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀$؀0܀฀0Ѐᄀ$%5܀'܀4ࠀࠀȀ0ЀᄀȀ܀$؀0܀&%$ᘀᘀᜀ A3ࠀጀఀ=(฀0Ѐᄀ#" Ѐఀ ᰀᬀ᠀-ᤀᰀ . ᔀἀ/ᤀᬀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᜀᰀ0=2؀43܀,܀ఀ&=2؀᐀"ᘀᰀἀ 43 ᤀ(ᜀᜀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀Ѐ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀&%$3؀ᘀᘀᬀ ฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ#" ᨀᨀ-ᘀᜀ . ᔀᬀ/ᜀᘀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᘀᬀ0 Ā Ā Ā ܀,܀B܀ࠀᄀ+C$%5؀A਀5ఀȀЀᄀ܀,฀ࠀ>܀'+܀$ᄀ,.ࠀᄀȀ؀:2؀ऀ଀$2ᄀ*'(᐀܀᐀"ᘀᜀᘀ AЀఀ43*%Ѐ A+Ѐ*ఀ%Ѐ Ā܀%/ᄀ;&-܀ᄀЀ؀:2؀᐀)'*܀%ᄀ*2/ᄀ;3&4- ᔀ(ἀᤀᘀ-ᔀᘀ ". ᔀ᠀/ᔀᨀ0ᔀᰀ)ᰀᔀ* ᰀᬀ/ᨀᬀ0ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 1؀2؀$؀+2ᄀ*43܀,܀1؀2؀$؀+Ԁ05ᄀ43*2ᄀ܀฀-ࠀጀ$%76܀'܀Ԁ0&ᄀ܀ᘀᘀḀ᐀"ᘀᜀᔀ ฀-ࠀጀ$%ጀ6#" ᨀᘀἀ-ᘀᬀᔀᬀ(Ḁᨀ ". ᔀ᠀/ᔀḀ0ᔀᰀ)ᜀᤀ* ᰀᬀ/ᤀᤀ0ᜀᘀ)ᔀᘀ* Ā ܀'܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀4܀&Ԁࠀ%-ЀȀ܀؀0Ѐ%ࠀ6଀3%؀"਀ࠀጀఀ=(62Ѐᄀ3ȀЀᄀጀ$଀Ѐ܀,܀%ᘀᘀἀ᐀"ᘀᜀᤀ H9%(Hጀᄀ&ᄀఀK#" Ԁࠀ%<ЀȀ& Ā Ā܀ࠀ6଀3%1%<0؀8 ᐀"ᘀᜀᨀ H9%଀(฀Ѐ1ࠀᄀ+܀,܀਀ࠀጀఀ=(฀Ѐ1ࠀᄀ+ ᜀḀḀ-᠀ᔀ . ᔀ᠀/ᨀ᠀0 ᰀ᠀/ᘀᔀ0 ᔀᘀᜀᤀ(ᬀἀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀1%$؀8܀'܀Ȁࠀ,ࠀ-଀؀-ఀ$܀؀%$؀" ᘀᔀᰀ#" ਀ࠀጀఀ=( ᔀᘀᨀ-ᜀᤀ . ᔀ᠀/ᨀᨀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᜀᬀ0 Ā Ā܀,܀;(฀Ѐ%Ѐఀࠀᄀ(ऀ܀G܀+Ȁ(฀Ѐ1ࠀࠀ,ࠀ᐀"ᘀᜀᰀ H$ఀ9%଀ *ЀᄀȀ3 ᔀᤀἀ(ᬀᰀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ%:"܀฀Ѐ%Ѐఀࠀᄀ܀G܀+Ѐ$฀Ѐ1ࠀᄀ-%܀5%$؀8܀'܀Ѐ-$ఀ%܀$Ѐ-%܀&%$؀" ᘀᔀᜀ#" ᐀"ᘀᜀᜀ H9%଀(฀?11܀93܀฀?11Ѐ%8Ѐ܀,܀਀ࠀጀఀ=܀฀ጀ11܀ ᤀᰀ-ᬀᜀ . ᤀᘀ/ᨀᨀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᜀἀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *᠀ࠀ ᔀᰀἀ(ᤀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀ%$؀%9ࠀ܀'܀ࠀ%$؀%ᘀᔀḀ 9ࠀ#" ЀᄀȀ܀฀ጀ11܀!ࠀࠀఀ=଀%%3 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀᔀἀ ᨀᨀᘀ(ᤀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᘀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᜀ* ᘀ-Ḁᜀ . ᔀḀ/ᔀḀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᨀἀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀, ܀'܀ЀఀЀ܀$6܀Ԁࠀጀᄀఀ2ఀ5ЀB଀ᄀ܀&&ࠀ-Ԁࠀ'3,܀19ఀ܀܀AN؀%$6܀2ࠀጀ.ࠀ@ఀ<ఀ5؀᐀"ᘀᜀᬀ H9 69Ѐఀࠀጀ.ࠀЀ܀:ࠀ6$%1ᄀȀ3܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā *ᜀ-ᰀᜀἀ(ᰀᤀ .: ᔀḀ/ᨀᨀ0ᔀᬀ)ᨀᰀ* ᰀ᠀/ᔀᘀ0ᰀḀ)ᜀᔀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀؀ࠀ.3%܀؀A$ࠀሀB9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%܀2ఀࠀ؀ऀ܀3଀؀+H଀ᄀᄀ܀,܀>2ఀ؀᐀"ᘀᜀ᠀"#ᘀᤀᔀ H଀ᄀᄀ+93଀(ऀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ࠀ.3%܀9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%1 ᤀᤀ-ἀḀᰀ(ἀᰀ ". ᔀ᠀/ᨀᜀ0ᔀ᠀)ᤀḀ* ᰀᬀ/ᜀḀ0ᰀἀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā ܀&%AFЀ-&;ᄀ:ࠀ%'3(଀܀܀؀%3؀'ᄀ؀Ѐ,0଀ᄀ଀#܀Ѐ܀ȀЀ؀ᄀ*ሀȀ଀(Ԁ؀᐀"ᘀᜀḀ"#ᘀᤀᤀ H!଀0*2 Ā ܀Ѐ3଀ᄀ܀0଀ᄀ଀3%1$܀H*2*ሀ#>,Ȁ܀,܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀଀0!܀ᄀȀ*2*ሀȀB&܀'܀$6ऀ଀$,Ѐ%଀.ࠀᄀȀ AFЀ:ࠀ-&;ᄀ/%&%'3܀G܀6Ѐ%8ЀᄀȀ*2*ሀȀB ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ ἀᔀ-ᜀἀᬀᘀ(Ḁᨀ ". ᔀ᠀/ᤀᔀ0ᔀᨀ)ᨀḀ* ᰀᬀ/ᘀᘀ0ᜀᘀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀'܀2ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ؀(L଀܀H2Ѐ)Ѐ܀,܀᐀"ᘀᜀἀ"#ᘀᤀᨀ H2&)Ѐ ᔀᘀᘀ-ᘀᘀᘀ(ᨀ᠀ ". ᔀ᠀/ᨀᜀ0ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᰀᜀ/ᜀᬀ0ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* Ā ܀'܀܀H2Ѐ)ЀࠀᄀȀ܀,.,$଀܀ऀ܀%ሀᄀ଀&13;&@3-܀&6଀3%܀ᄀఀ଀؀Ԁ܀᐀"ᘀᬀᘀ"#ᘀᤀᰀ H᐀2ࠀ;$ࠀ&)Ѐ ᐀ऀ%ࠀࠀ;?ࠀࠀȀ:%Ѐᄀ6଀3%5܀଀3 -&;ᄀ/% Ā Ā *ᨀᨀ-ᰀᔀᨀḀ(ἀᬀ .: ᔀ᠀/ᰀᬀ0ᔀ᠀)ᘀ᠀* ᰀᜀ/ᜀᰀ0ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ ܀H2Ѐ)Ѐ܀,܀B؀ ܀'܀Ѐ6Ѐ-+%%؀AH2Ȁࠀ&)Ѐጀ;ऀࠀ1(਀܀܀᐀"ᘀᬀᔀ"#ᘀᤀᜀ H᐀2ࠀȀࠀᄀ&)Ѐ3@1଀ᄀ$%Ѐ B Ā Ā؀+%%؀਀܀Ѐ6ЀG-;܀Ȁࠀጀऀࠀ1܀A/ᄀ$%>H2Ѐ)Ѐ܀᐀:%ЀࠀȀࠀᄀ଀ᄀ3 *᠀ᨀᬀἀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀&,3-6܀؀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%܀Ѐ܀؀%$ᘀᤀ᠀ ᐀ࠀ$ఀ&ᄀ#" ᐀"ᘀᬀᤀ H᐀2ࠀ$ఀ&)5ᄀ$Ѐ3@1%1܀܀A਀Ѐ܀E଀ഀഀЀ:ࠀ2'Ѐ-ࠀ6଀3%1܀܀EЀఀఀ6-3+,B܀&,܀H2Ѐ)Ѐ܀ ᤀᜀ-ᤀḀ . ᔀḀ/ᔀᰀ0 ᰀᜀ/ᰀἀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā :%Ѐ଀ᄀ3܀A਀ഀЀ:ࠀ2'Ѐ-܀EЀఀఀ+B Ā *ᔀᔀᔀ-ᤀḀᰀᜀ(ᘀᬀ ". ᔀḀ/ᜀḀ0ᔀᰀ)ᜀᨀ* ᰀᬀ/ᰀᬀ0ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ ܀ἀఀఀ଀*܀'܀ഀA0ЀȀЀ*1܀ЀᄀȀ܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ6&2ࠀ3(.Ѐ13-؀3܀(HጀᄀЀ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$%ЀЀK8܀᐀"ᘀᬀᨀ"#ᘀᤀḀ H᐀-ጀᄀЀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā <܀AЀጀ8)0ЀȀЀ2ࠀ3܀Ѐ܀AHጀᄀЀ܀؀$ᄀЀ6ጀ-؀C܀HЀᄀ܀,܀<3ഀ᐀-ЀЀ;1ЀЀᄀࠀ3ഀЀ6$% Ѐ'=B؀3ఀ2܀Ѐ13.܀ЀᄀȀ *ᨀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀḀ ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀AЀ0$܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᨀᘀ A#" ἀᔀ-ᨀἀ . ᔀ᠀/ᤀᬀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᜀᰀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀,܀3ഀЀ1Ѐ3ഀЀ܀଀؀?AЀ1*ഀ0܀ఀ؀ЀᄀȀ-&଀ሀ؀3ഀ܀᐀"ᘀᬀᰀ HԀጀᄀЀ ሀ଀ࠀᄀB Ā Ā؀2܀ఀ1*ഀ؀A਀ഀ଀ሀ܀؀$HЀᄀጀ *ᔀ(ᬀᜀ " ᔀḀ)ᤀᔀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀FȀ-Ѐ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᨀᔀ A#" ᰀᰀ-ᬀḀ . ᔀḀ/ᰀᨀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᰀ᠀0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ഀ*ఀఀ଀*1܀2ሀࠀԀ؀FȀ-&&2ࠀԀ( 3ഀఀ܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀᐀"ᘀᬀᜀ ԀHጀᄀЀ(FࠀԀ Ā Ā Ā ܀ЀᄀȀ܀AFࠀԀЀ2ࠀԀ܀؀$HЀᄀጀ܀,܀3ഀЀ1Ѐ3ഀЀ Ѐ'=B ᔀḀᤀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀ᠀)ᔀ᠀* ᰀἀ)ᘀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀3ఀ2܀2ሀࠀԀ؀଀;& 3ഀఀ>,"܀'܀଀00$,܀&;ᘀᨀᨀ ",-଀#" *᠀ᜀ(ᘀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀ ܀Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%5=܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀&ᘀᨀᰀ =Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%#" .ࠀఀࠀ% Ā Ā Ā Ā ᨀᔀ-ᤀᬀ . ᔀḀ/ᤀᰀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᨀᘀ0 Ā ܀,܀ሀ+39ሀ؀=:᐀"ᘀᬀᬀ Hጀᄀ&ᄀఀK%଀(1*ഀ9 EࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ3 ᔀ᠀ἀ(ᜀᨀ " ᔀᤀ)ᰀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā܀62Ѐᄀ3ȀЀᄀጀ$଀Ѐᄀ/;<>؀=܀'܀Ѐ;଀-؀= ᘀᨀᜀ#" *Ḁᬀᨀ(᠀ᔀᤀᔀ᠀-ᘀᘀ ". ᔀἀ/ᤀᤀ0ᔀ᠀)ᤀᘀ* ᰀᬀ/ᜀᘀ0ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ ܀6଀3ഀЀ)؀$HЀᄀጀ܀,܀؀ᄀ/%&HጀᄀЀ(6଀3ഀЀ(1*ഀ؀$؀=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%ᄀ଀؀$؀= ᐀"ᘀᬀ᠀"#ᘀᨀᬀ 2ऀ%ጀ)଀Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀Āᄀఀ "#ᘀᨀḀ =଀-଀%ࠀ6$%&܀-&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀ ᘀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᨀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᰀ* Ā ᐀"ᘀᬀḀ M(฀Ѐ1ࠀᄀ+܀,܀฀Ѐ1ࠀᄀ+=଀;ఀ$%ࠀ ᬀᔀᜀ(ᨀᨀᤀ-᠀ᘀ ". ᔀ᠀/ᤀᔀ0ᔀᨀ)ᜀᔀ* ᰀ᠀/ᰀᔀ0ᜀᘀ)ᘀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā>2܀'܀଀6ࠀ%0Ѐఀ$%ࠀ-2؀ကЀ1܀2؀=؀!܀,܀A᐀Ѐᄀ3&ሀB܀ఀ5)92=؀! ᐀"ᘀ᠀ᨀ"#ᘀᰀᬀ *ᨀᔀ᠀(᠀ᨀᨀ-ᘀᘀ ". ᤀᔀ/ᰀᨀ0ᔀᰀ)ᔀᰀ* ᰀ᠀/ᤀ᠀0ᜀᘀ)ᜀᤀ ܀܀>'ഀ؀܀$؀ЀᄀȀ1*2ᄀ+$ఀࠀᄀ$܀93܀5܀ఀ&2ࠀഀ؀ഀ$%ࠀ63@(܀଀2ఀ5଀.܀؀%$;9=؀᐀"ᘀ᠀ᰀ"#ᘀᰀ᠀ !ကЀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ࠀ଀2(2؀3؀2܀2ఀࠀ؀=؀؀3!܀,܀ఀЀ)Ѐ$%ࠀ61/.܀1%$;܀3؀ကЀ3ഀ଀1 3؀Ѐ1%܀3ጀ22ࠀጀᄀȀ଀ᄀሀ܀ЀᄀȀ "#ᘀᰀḀ က଀;Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀က଀;Ѐ6> ᰀᔀḀ(ᜀᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᰀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᔀḀḀ-ᘀᨀἀᤀ(ᰀᬀ ". ᤀᔀ/ᜀᜀ0ᔀ᠀)ᘀᬀ* ᰀḀ/ᔀᜀ0ᰀἀ)ᰀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀1%$0؀က଀ఀࠀ6܀'܀ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6଀:܀؀%$0؀6଀3ഀЀက଀ఀࠀ6)2؀::"܀,܀ఀ଀3ഀЀ3ഀЀ1Ѐ3ഀ܀>3%؀! ᘀᰀἀ᐀"ᘀ᠀ᜀ#" ᰀ-᠀ᘀ . ᔀἀ/ᤀᬀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᜀᰀ0 )2؀::"܀,܀ఀЀ)Ѐ1܀1଀ࠀ-Ѐ631ጀ/ ᄀ3&ሀ଀)>3%؀᐀"ᘀ᠀ᬀ !:ࠀԀ Ā Ā 3؀Ѐ1%܀F଀31ጀᄀ3Ѐሀ ࠀఀࠀ% ᠀(ᜀᔀ " ᔀᤀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā.܀/ကጀ@ᄀ܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀ᘀᜀᔀ ကጀഀᄀ଀#" ᔀ(ἀἀᘀ-Ḁᘀ :. ᔀᬀ)ᔀᤀ*ᔀḀ/ᔀᜀ0 ᰀḀ)ᰀ᠀*ᰀ᠀/ᨀἀ0 Ā Ā ܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀D&9܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ࠀᄀȀ3A:܀3؀+ᄀ؀!܀,܀ऀࠀ22&3ఀЀ)Ѐ1܀3؀+ᘀᜀᤀ᐀"ᘀ᠀᠀ !9ᄀ#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀D&9 ᤀ-ᘀᰀ . ᔀᬀ/ᨀḀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᰀᤀ0 ܀*2ఀ؀!܀,܀91଀(ȀࠀԀ$3&ሀ%%؀2ఀ<(Ԁ؀! ᐀"ᘀ᠀Ḁ *ᔀ(ᜀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᘀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀἀ ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀ȀЀ؀਀Ԁ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᨀ A#" Ā 3%%؀!܀ሀ଀ࠀᄀ؀2 ਀ԀBȀ1 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A Ḁᰀ-ᨀᤀ . ᔀᬀ/ᰀᤀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᰀᔀ0 91 ؀ကЀ1܀*2ఀ؀!܀,܀؀ఀ؀%?2؀ఀ܀ЀഀЀ଀=܀2ఀ<(ఀ5؀! ᐀"ᘀ᠀ἀ 90 0ጀ,& ᔀᜀ(᠀ᘀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀἀ* Ā Ā Ā܀AB0ᄀ଀3%1܀'܀&,0ጀ܀؀0ᄀ଀3%؀ᘀᜀᰀ A#" ᜀᨀ(ᤀḀᔀ-ᘀᘀ ". ᤀᘀ/ᜀἀ0ᔀᰀ)ᨀᜀ* ᰀᬀ/ᜀᜀ0ᜀᘀ)ᨀᔀ* Ā Ā )2؀Ѐ3+܀Ѐᄀ!ࠀ%Ȁ܀,܀ሀ܀ࠀ6ഀጀ%Ѐ,3؀;଀%)Ѐ293ഀက଀܀਀ഀࠀऀ܀$ఀ0Ѐᄀ&392(Ȁ؀+%᐀"ᘀḀᘀ"#ᘀᜀᬀ !+ࠀ Ā ܀Ѐ܀&က଀;B3,ࠀ6%܀&ጀሀAࠀ%<ЀȀ܀'2ഀ؀܀਀ഀ:$ࠀ6଀%)Ѐ%Ѐ :?ࠀ6%& ᐀"ᘀḀᔀ !5ఀ-܀਀ࠀԀ%+5܀,܀!ࠀఀ܀G܀਀ࠀԀ%+ࠀ܀᐀଀%% ᤀ-Ḁᘀ . ᔀἀ/ᔀᤀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᨀḀ0 "#ᘀᜀ᠀ Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%&܀%-Ѐ$܀%Ѐ-$ఀ܀'܀Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%5܀ ᠀᠀(ᨀᜀ " ᔀᬀ)ᰀᨀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᔀ* Ā 3ఀ ᔀ᠀Ḁ-᠀ᨀ . ᔀḀ/ᜀᨀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᔀᜀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀ࠀ2!܀'ᄀ؀Ԁ؀ༀ܀,܀>2Ȁ؀܀ᄀ'଀؀Ԁ؀᐀"ᘀḀᤀ ༀ %-Ѐ$ Ā ᜀ᠀ᜀ-ᜀᨀ . ᔀḀ/ᨀᨀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᰀᘀ0 ؀3'؀2؀ༀ܀,܀؀3'؀2؀᐀"ᘀḀᨀ ༀ 0Ѐ3,ఀB ᘀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā:܀Ѐ̀܀'܀؀0Ѐ3,ఀ:܀ᘀᜀḀ ̀Ѐ#" ᨀἀ-ᔀᰀᔀ(᠀ᬀ ". ᔀḀ/ᨀḀ0ᔀ᠀)ᜀᜀ* ᰀ᠀/ᨀḀ0ᰀἀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā ܀଀6Ѐ܀Ѐᄀ̀Ȁ܀܀'܀Ȁ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ؀3'؀2؀ऀ0ࠀࠀༀ܀,܀؀ఀ؀܀%ༀ;ᄀ଀܀93܀؀3'؀G&2܀ЀᄀȀ܀Ѐ,؀ᘀᬀᘀ᐀"ᘀḀᰀ ကጀༀ#" G&;ᄀ/% Ā܀ࠀఀࠀ%Ѐ.܀Ѐ܀؀ကጀ,&ఀ؀ༀ Ḁᔀ-ᤀᘀ᠀(ḀḀ ". ᔀḀ/ᜀᔀ0ᔀᜀ)ᬀᘀ* ᰀ᠀/ᨀἀ0ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā ܀Ѐ܀଀6̀܀'-;ሀ=)܀Ȁ-଀&2؀଀6-܀؀ሀ0଀3؀D଀3܀--F܀଀%଀ࠀऀ3.܀0Ѐ଀ᄀ܀-؀3'؀0ࠀࠀȀ.2!؀ᘀᬀᔀ᐀"ᘀḀᜀ ༀ#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ሀ2ЀȀ؀଀%଀3(D଀3.)؀3'؀2؀ༀ܀,܀;Ѐ଀(=ሀ؀F-0଀฀ጀȀ3 ЀᄀȀ܀฀ጀȀЀ܀᐀଀%%3 *ᔀᜀᬀ(ᘀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᤀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᰀ ܀'܀ࠀሀ;܀؀0଀ᄀ଀$ఀ؀$Ѐ-܀؀%$ᘀᬀᰀ ̀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ#" ἀ-Ḁᬀ . ᔀ᠀/ᰀᜀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᔀᔀ0 Ā Ā ܀,܀A฀Ѐ1ࠀᄀ+B $9%B܀؀0଀ᄀ଀?ఀ؀?ሀ+-Ѐ%*܀1%$()؀'ᄀȀࠀԀ؀ࠀ6ࠀ2̀؀᐀"ᘀḀᬀ ༀ B Ā%؀$+A฀Ѐ1ࠀᄀ܀Ѐ3଀ᄀ$܀؀'ᄀ؀2؀ༀ *ἀᨀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀἀ ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀%$ᘀᬀᜀ ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ#" ᐀"ᘀḀ᠀ ༀ*Ȁ*%%<܀G܀Eࠀᄀࠀ2଀܀3ࠀԀ$3&ሀ܀,܀ ᤀᜀᤀ-᠀᠀ . ᔀἀ/ᨀᔀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᤀ᠀0 ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 3%%؀!܀Eࠀᄀࠀ2܀G܀*%%*ༀ*Ȁ ᨀḀ᠀-᠀ἀ . ᔀἀ/ᤀᔀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᨀᜀ0 Ā Ā 3%%؀!܀*%%*ༀ*Ȁ܀,܀;(᐀"ᘀḀḀ ༀ*Ȁ*%%<଀(Ȁ ᐀"ᘀḀἀ ༀ+*ᄀሀ+*3(:ЀఀЀ1܀AEࠀ%)&ᄀ+B܀,܀ ᠀-ᰀᬀ . ᔀ᠀/ᰀᰀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᘀᤀ0 AEࠀ%)Ѐᄀ+B Ā܀ЀԀ؀3ఀ2܀ༀ+*ᄀሀ+*3 ᨀ-ᜀᬀ . ᔀ᠀/ᜀἀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᘀḀ0 Ā 2؀᐀Ѐ8ԀЀ31܀,܀᐀"ᘀἀᘀ ᐀Ѐ8Ԁ&3192 ᐀"ᘀἀᔀ ᐀Ѐᄀ3&ሀ܀,܀᐀Ѐᄀ3Ѐሀ ᔀᬀ-ἀᘀ . ᔀ᠀/ᔀᬀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᰀᨀ0 Ā Ā Ā Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Hungary

؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ᐀ᔀᔀᔀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀᜀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀ᠀ᘀ ᐀ᔀᤀᨀᘀ ᐀ᤀᔀᤀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᨀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᬀᘀ ᐀ᨀᤀᤀᘀ ᐀ᰀᘀᨀᘀ ᐀ᬀᔀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᰀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᜀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᰀᘀ ᐀᠀ᤀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀Ḁᨀᔀᘀ ᐀ἀᘀᤀᘀ ᐀ἀᔀḀᘀᴀ ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ ᐀ἀᔀ!ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ᐀ᘀᴀ ᐀ἀᰀᔀᘀ ਀ᔀᘀᤀἀ ਀ᔀᘀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᘀḀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᘀἀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᘀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᤀᘀ ਀ᔀᔀᬀᨀ ਀ᔀᔀḀḀ ਀ᔀᨀᘀᨀ ਀ᔀᨀᨀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᰀ᠀᠀ ਀ᔀᜀᤀḀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᤀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᨀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ *ᔀᤀᘀᔀ(ᨀ᠀᠀-ᘀ᠀ ". ᔀḀ/ᨀᘀ0ᔀḀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀᜀ/ᜀᨀ0ᰀἀ)ᤀᜀ ܀,܀Ȁ&᐀Ѐ21&ᄀ+(̀Ѐሀ+ᄀ+&2&Ȁ଀(3@1&%$؀฀܀'܀&Ȁ&%$؀ᘀᘀᔀ᐀"ᘀἀᤀ ฀#" ᐀Ѐ21Ѐᄀ+(̀Ѐሀ+ᄀ+Ѐ2ЀȀ܀:%Ѐ଀ᄀ3 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *2Ѐ-.Ѐఀ& ᠀ᰀᘀ(Ḁᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀἀ܀฀/01܀'܀$Ѐ-.Ѐఀ,଀Ѐᄀ"܀؀ᘀᘀᨀ +,଀ఀ#" ᔀ-ᨀᨀ . ᔀἀ/ᨀᜀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᤀḀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀-؀ကЀ1܀᐀Ѐ21Ѐ܀,܀᐀"ᘀἀᨀ ᐀Ѐ21Ѐ(ఀ5OHࠀᄀሀ(92 ЀԀ ᨀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᨀ)ᜀḀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā؀3ఀ2܀Hࠀᄀሀ؀฀0Ѐᄀ଀3܀'܀؀ᘀᘀᰀ ฀0Ѐᄀ଀3#" ᤀᔀᬀ(ᨀᔀᬀᤀ-ᤀᰀ ". ᤀᘀ/ᔀᬀ0ᔀᰀ)ᔀᬀ* ᰀᬀ/ᜀᘀ0ᰀḀ)ᜀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀,܀3ഀЀ1Ѐ3ഀЀ܀ఀࠀ21ࠀ%Ѐఀ଀܀F*2*3܀᐀&2ԀЀ3$؀0܀฀0Ѐᄀ$%5܀'܀4ࠀࠀȀ0ЀᄀȀ܀$؀0܀&%$᐀"ᘀἀᰀ"#ᘀᘀᜀ ฀0Ѐᄀ Āᄀऀ%ጀ> Ā Ā܀23؀(L଀܀F*2*3 ᤀḀᔀ-ᔀᰀᤀ(ᜀᜀ ". ᔀḀ/ᜀᘀ0ᔀᜀ)ᰀᔀ* ᰀᬀ/ᘀ᠀0ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā ܀%਀ࠀጀఀ=(;ᄀ଀܀,&-܀Ѐ܀91܀%ᄀЀ()଀Ȁ;ᄀ଀&-܀&%$3؀Hጀᄀ)35%#܀᐀"ᘀἀᜀ"#ᘀᘀᬀ ᐀฀ࠀ,ЀഀȀЀЀ଀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀C$%5؀฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ܀'܀$ࠀᄀȀ., ؀$ऀ଀܀AЀఀHЀᄀጀ$%Ѐ -&;ᄀ/%܀Ѐ܀-&;ᄀ/%܀AЀఀ%Ѐ ᬀᰀ-ᘀ᠀ . ᤀᘀ/ᔀᘀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᤀἀ0 Ā Ā )2؀ကࠀ7܀,܀6଀3ഀЀ)଀Ȁ91)35%#܀᐀"ᘀἀᬀ ᐀ЀഀЀ଀ ሀ଀ࠀᄀ ᔀ(ἀᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā؀2܀Ԁ05ᄀ6଀3ഀЀ܀฀-ࠀጀ$%76܀'܀Ԁ0&ᄀ܀ᘀᘀḀ ฀-ࠀጀ$%ጀ6#" *ᔀᔀᬀ-ᘀ᠀ᔀᬀ(Ḁᨀ ". ᔀḀ/ᜀḀ0ᔀᰀ)ᜀᤀ* ᰀ᠀/ᔀᤀ0ᜀᘀ)ᔀᘀ ܀'܀$Ȁ)؀%ЀᄀE଀ȀȀ܀,܀ఀ01؀4܀&Ԁࠀ%-ᄀЀ()଀Ȁ9ЀȀ܀Hጀ):9؀%F*଀3ഀ܀0Ѐ%ࠀ6Ѐ଀؀᐀"ᘀἀ᠀"#ᘀᘀἀ ᐀"Ѐഀ ࠀԀࠀᄀ %<ЀȀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā܀ሀ%1଀؀଀32܀؀ࠀ6%<0؀$H8Ѐᄀጀ *ᔀᘀᜀᤀ(ᬀἀᔀᤀ-Ḁᰀ ". ᤀᘀ/ᘀἀ0ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᰀḀ/ᘀḀ0ᜀᘀ)ᨀᜀ ܀,܀ሀ&3܀1%$؀ࠀԀ$8܀'Ȁ܀ࠀ23ࠀȀ଀(Ȁࠀ,ࠀ-଀؀ఀ-฀$܀G܀3؀(؀܀؀%$؀ᘀᔀᰀ᐀"ᘀἀḀ "᐀#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 3%%؀!܀Ȁࠀ,ࠀ3(฀ࠀ2؀(؀ఀ᐀$ ᔀᤀἀ(ᬀᰀᘀ-ᜀᘀ ". ᤀᘀ/ᤀᔀ0ᔀᰀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀᬀ/ᤀᬀ0ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā %؀Ѐᄀᄀ='܀᐀ࠀȀఀࠀ଀܀,܀3Ѐఀࠀ2ᄀЀ'܀Ѐ$᐀5Ȁఀ5଀-%܀5%$؀8܀'܀Ѐ-$ఀ%܀$Ѐ-%܀&%$؀" ᘀᔀᜀ᐀"ᘀἀἀ#" *᠀ᔀᰀἀ(ᤀᨀḀ-ᰀᤀ ". ᤀᔀ/ᔀᘀ0ᔀᰀ)ᜀᘀ* ᰀ᠀/ᨀᬀ0ᜀᘀ)ᨀ ܀,܀Ѐሀ+1ጀᄀ3&ሀ̀܀93܀+ࠀ᐀ࠀ2ఀࠀ$&ሀ%$؀%9ࠀ܀'܀ࠀ%$؀%ᘀᔀḀ᐀"ᔀᘀᘀ 9ࠀ#" ᐀ࠀ2ఀࠀ$Ѐሀ+܀ЀᄀȀ܀̀Ѐሀ+1ጀᄀ3Ѐሀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᨀᨀᘀ(ᤀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᘀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᜀ ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀ᘀᔀἀ 9ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%#" ᐀"ᔀᘀᔀ 9᐀ࠀጀ.ࠀࠀ2ఀࠀ$&ሀ6$%1+܀=Ѐ%Ѐ3ఀ5܀܀,ࠀ-& ,܀᐀ࠀ2ఀࠀ$Ѐሀ+܀ ᤀᘀ-ᘀᘀ . ᤀᔀ/ᘀᘀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᨀᬀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ऀ଀3=:ࠀᄀȀ Ā Ā *ἀ(ᰀᤀ : ᔀᬀ)ᨀᰀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᔀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀؀ࠀ.3%܀؀ᘀᤀᔀ 9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%#" ᤀἀ-Ḁᤀ . ᔀἀ/ᘀἀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᤀᨀ0 Ā Ā Ā ܀ ؀3؀Ԁ؀2؀:܀ጀሀЀఀ%ࠀ.଀܀ᄀ+ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%1܀᐀"ᔀᘀᤀ 9Ā%%Ѐᄀ'3 Ā ܀,܀3ᄀ&Ȁ;B؀ȀԀ؀̀܀)A43&3ഀ&2ఀ*%ఀ93 *᠀ᰀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀḀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ ܀G܀3܀؀&%Ѐ2ఀ;ᄀ*%ఀ଀&-܀؀%A,0଀ᄀ଀433Ѐ3ഀ܀Ѐ%%Ѐᄀ'3#܀ĀЀ܀)܀ᄀЀ؀3ఀ؀ᘀᤀᤀ P!଀0#" Ā Ā Ā ܀0଀ᄀ଀3%1,<#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀3ᄀЀȀ!B଀0؀܀'܀$ȀԀ.ࠀᄀȀ؀,$ऀ଀̀ -&;ᄀ/%& Ѐ3଀ᄀ ᤀᤀ-ᤀḀ . ᔀḀ/ᰀḀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᜀḀ0$܀+%Ā:ࠀ܀,܀؀+ሀ%*(܀+%᐀"ᔀᘀᨀ Ā:ࠀ "#ᘀᤀᨀ ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ܀'܀ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ ᬀᘀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᨀ)ᨀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā ᰀᤀ-Ḁᔀ . ᔀἀ/ᤀᤀ0 ᰀḀ/ᘀᜀ0 Ā Ā Ā ܀+؀%%Ѐ(܀+%Ā:ࠀ܀,܀AĀ:ࠀ%+3ഀ*ሀB܀+᐀"ᔀᘀᰀ Ā:ࠀ%+()*%ሀ "#ᘀᤀᰀ AĀ᐀:ࠀ%+ࠀ;$ࠀ3ഀ6଀3%&*ሀB ܀-&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀ ᘀ(ᨀ᠀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* Ā Ā ᐀ࠀ;?ࠀ6଀3%5܀-&;ᄀ/% Ā ᤀἀ-ᬀᤀ . ᔀἀ/ᤀᤀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᰀḀ0 ؀ကЀ1܀Fࠀ%ࠀᄀ܀,܀Fࠀ%ࠀᄀ(ఀ5܀᐀"ᔀᘀᜀ Āഀ3&1଀ "#ᘀᤀᜀ ᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ଀ᄀ$%Ѐ܀Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀ ᨀḀ(ἀᬀ : ᔀ᠀)ᘀ᠀* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* Ā Ā ᐀"ᔀᘀᬀ ᐀Q&ࠀȀࠀᄀ3ഀ3&/ሀ܀ᄀ$%>3܀J܀ЀሀȀࠀጀ+);-Ѐ6ЀЀ(3@1܀,܀QЀ3ഀ3Ѐሀ܀ ᜀ-Ḁᬀ . ᤀᘀ/ᘀᤀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᤀᰀ0 Ā ЀᄀȀ܀JЀሀ+)Ѐ܀:%Ѐ଀ᄀ3 Ā *᠀ᨀᬀἀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀&,3-6܀؀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%܀Ѐ܀؀%$ᘀᤀ᠀ ᐀ࠀ$ఀ&ᄀ#" Qࠀ3)Ѐ-3,& ( ᬀ-᠀ᤀ . ᤀᘀ/ᨀᔀ0 ᰀḀ/ᤀ᠀0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀,6܀ऀ ᨀἀᨀ-᠀ᔀ . ᔀἀ/ᜀᨀ0 ᰀḀ/ᘀ᠀0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀G܀A'3܀Ѐ܀FЀ2ЀᄀЀ܀,܀3؀ᄀЀ6-؀C܀(Ȁ؀᐀"ᔀᘀἀ ᐀FЀ2Ѐᄀ-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ'3(6$%>E Ā Ā Ā 3؀(Ȁ؀E *ᨀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀḀ ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀AЀ0$܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᨀᘀ A#" ᰀ-ḀḀ . ᤀᘀ/ᨀ᠀0 ᰀᬀ/ᤀḀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀؀ကЀ1܀؀P=଀ఀ܀,܀ఀ5)2 ؀?9=؀Ѐ!0܀A଀܀&-ЀᄀȀ31Kఀ؀᐀"ᔀᔀᘀ ԀFЀ2Ȁࠀ Ѐఀ܀FЀ2Ȁࠀ31Kఀ Ā Ā *ᔀ(ᬀᜀ " ᔀḀ)ᤀᔀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀FȀ-Ѐ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᨀᔀ A#" Ѐ3ఀ( ᰀἀᰀ-ᨀᔀ . ᔀḀ/ᘀᜀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᔀᔀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀,܀F܀+H(฀Ѐ1ࠀᄀ܀G܀&-FȀ܀&+ЀᄀȀ-ᄀ؀᐀"ᔀᔀᔀ ԀF(฀Ѐ1ࠀ ฀Ѐ1ࠀᄀ+ Ā Ā "#ᘀᨀᨀ ",-଀;&܀,଀00$܀'܀",<଀;& ᔀḀᤀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀ᠀)ᔀ᠀* ᰀἀ)ᘀḀ* ᘀ-ᘀ᠀ . ᤀᘀ/ᜀᜀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᜀᬀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀,܀ࠀ%ఀ&ሀ=܀ሀ93ഀጀሀ଀؀3'؀᐀"ᔀᔀᤀ F ᜀ(ᘀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀ᠀* Ā ܀Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%5=܀'܀%؀؀ࠀ7$-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ>ࠀ܀ጀ.ሀ܀ሀ9$%3&ഀ؀3ᄀ%ࠀ6'؀ᘀᨀᰀ =ЀF#" .ࠀఀࠀ% Ā Ā Ā Ā ᰀ-ᘀᘀ . ᤀᔀ/ᬀᘀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᤀἀ0 Ā +؀%%Ѐ(܀FЀ%%5܀1؀F܀,܀+D*%ሀ܀F&%%5܀᐀"ᔀᔀᨀ F91 ᔀ᠀ἀ(ᜀᨀ " ᔀᤀ)ᰀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā /;<>؀=܀'܀Ѐ;଀-؀= ᘀᨀᜀ#" *Ḁᬀᨀ(᠀ᔀᔀᘀ-ᨀᨀ ". ᤀᘀ/ᤀᬀ0ᔀ᠀)ᤀᘀ* ᰀḀ/ᤀᘀ0ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ ܀2R؀Ԁ؀%؀F܀,܀ఀЀ)Ѐ1܀Eࠀ=ࠀ3܀Ԁ92଀؀%؀ᄀ/%&F؀$؀=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%ᄀ଀؀$؀= ᐀"ᔀᔀᰀ"#ᘀᨀᬀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 3؀Ѐ1%܀Eࠀ=ࠀ3 "#ᘀᨀḀ =଀-଀%ࠀ6$%&܀-&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀ ᘀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᨀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᰀ* Ḁ-ᘀᰀ . ᔀḀ/ᘀᜀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᔀᰀ0 Ā᠀ ܀,܀+M3ഀ/% Ѐ1଀(฀Ѐ1ࠀᄀ܀93܀ᄀ;&-܀+଀;<#܀Ѐ܀1%3؀2ࠀጀఀ܀'܀ЀȀࠀ4$؀Ԁ 0ࠀጀ%& "#ᘀᰀᨀ 2ࠀഀࠀ,0ጀȀ%&܀'܀2ࠀഀࠀ,07Ȁ%& ᘀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀἀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀᨀ* 21Ѐ( ᤀᨀ-Ḁᘀ . ᔀᬀ/ᨀᨀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᰀᔀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā؀F܀,܀ሀB؀3ഀఀ2؀A43܀؀ᄀఀ؀21Ѐ(Ԁ؀᐀"ᔀᔀḀ F ሀB ᨀᘀᤀ(ᤀᤀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀3ഀఀ2؀A43܀؀?ࠀᄀࠀ%-2܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀؀$ሀ଀ࠀᄀ2-%ࠀᄀࠀ؀ᘀᰀᰀ 2#" *ᬀᔀᜀ(ᨀᨀᤀἀ-Ḁᔀ ". ᔀᬀ/ᨀᜀ0ᔀᨀ)ᜀᔀ* ᰀᬀ/ᨀᰀ0ᜀᘀ)ᘀᘀ ܀ሀ଀ࠀᄀ؀21Ѐ(2؀F܀,܀AHࠀ$2଀B܀؀ᄀఀ؀21Ѐ(Ԁ؀଀6ࠀ%0>ఀ$%ࠀF>2܀'܀ᘀᰀᬀ᐀"ᔀᔀἀ 2-଀6ࠀ%0Ѐఀ$%ࠀ#" AHࠀ$2଀B Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᨀᔀ᠀(᠀ᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᰀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀᤀ ܀'܀$؀ЀᄀȀ$ఀࠀᄀ$܀؀଀$%ࠀ63.܀؀%$;ᘀᰀ᠀ ကЀ#" ᰀ-ᬀᬀ . ᔀ᠀/ᔀ᠀0 ᰀᬀ/ᰀḀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀+%؀=3ഀఀ؀F܀,܀39ሀ؀ሀ+3؀=)଀$%ࠀ6+%؀=ఀ/.܀3ഀကЀ;$%1؀᐀"ᔀᤀᘀ F ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀᰀḀ က଀;Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀က଀;Ѐ6> ᰀᔀḀ(ᜀᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᰀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᘀ* ฀Ѐ%Ѐఀࠀᄀ( ᬀᬀᰀ-ἀᰀ . ᔀ᠀/ᜀᘀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᜀḀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀G܀;ሀ+39ሀ؀=)଀+%؀=3ഀఀ؀᐀"ᔀᤀᔀ F ἀᤀ(ᰀᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᘀᬀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᤀ* Ā ܀+%؀=ఀ܀1%$0؀က଀ఀ3ࠀഀ6؀F܀܀',܀Ѐ܀ࠀԀࠀD&2:Ѐ%-ࠀЀఀ6଀:܀؀%$0܀G܀଀Ȁ91(%؀က଀ఀࠀ6؀ᘀᰀἀ ऀ#" Ԁ:ࠀԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ࠀ-Ѐ6ᄀ/܀G܀฀Ѐ%Ѐఀࠀᄀ(":%ЀᄀȀ3܀G܀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā DЀ2:Ѐ%ࠀఀЀ ࠀఀࠀ% ᠀(ᜀᔀ " ᔀᤀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā.܀/ကጀ@ᄀ܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀ᘀᜀᔀ ကጀഀᄀ଀#" ᜀἀᘀ-ᰀᨀᔀ(ἀἀ :. ᔀᬀ)ᔀᤀ*ᔀ᠀/ᘀᤀ0 ᰀḀ)ᰀ᠀*ᰀ᠀/ᤀᜀ0 Ā Ā ܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A܀'܀%%਀ԀЀ܀,܀܀-؀଀*%ሀ+6-܀()؀L&$ЀD&9܀ࠀऀ܀$܀G܀Ȁ-؀%ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᤀ᐀"ᔀᤀᤀ F଀3Ѐ%ऀ*A#" ऀ%ࠀࠀȀ:%Ѐ଀ᄀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀LЀ$Ѐ ؀D&܀G܀Ѐ଀ᄀ3%.9 ᔀᰀ᠀-ᰀᜀᔀ(ᜀᔀ ". ᔀ᠀/ᔀᤀ0ᔀᜀ)ᘀᤀ* ᰀᬀ/ᨀἀ0ᜀᘀ)ᜀἀ* Ā Ā ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀ȀЀ؀਀Ԁ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀਀ԀЀ%%(฀Ѐ%ЀఀࠀᄀA܀,܀ᘀᜀᨀ᐀"ᔀᤀᨀ F଀3(฀Ѐ%Ѐఀࠀᄀ#" ᰀ-᠀ᬀ . ᔀ᠀/ᰀᘀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᨀḀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀,܀IB̀܀+AF?%3ࠀ-&Ȁ,܀2؀)35%#؀%$ЀȀ-,܀-ሀ؀ᘀᬀᜀ᐀"ᔀᨀᤀ ̀F<3ഀࠀ6ࠀ#" ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā,܀3ఀ؀ЀȀ$%1!ࠀ2-,)2؀ကࠀ̀ࠀ6ࠀ7 ἀ-ᬀᘀ . ᔀᬀ/ᨀᘀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᤀᔀ0᠀ ܀᐀଀%%3܀ሀ؀F*3ഀ܀,܀ሀ+39ሀ؀=)ሀ଀؀᐀"ᔀᨀᨀ F<3ഀ ЀᄀȀ܀!ࠀࠀఀ=଀%%3 Ā Ā Ā Ā ἀᬀ-ᨀᔀ . ᔀḀ/ᰀᜀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᜀᨀ0 ܀,܀଀؀+3ഀ)*%ሀ*%܀ഀ<ऀ*%Ȁ؀᐀"ᔀᨀᰀ F*ഀ9:(E ഀ*ऀ*%Ȁ Ā؀E)؀%E଀ȀȀ 6଀3ഀЀ ᔀᬀ᠀-ᬀᰀ . ᤀᘀ/ᔀᜀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᔀᔀ0 Ā Ā)؀%E଀ȀȀ܀,܀᐀"ᔀᨀᜀ F*ഀ9:(6଀3ഀЀ Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Hungary

؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ᐀ᔀᔀᔀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀᜀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀ᠀ᘀ ᐀ᔀᤀᨀᘀ ᐀ᤀᔀᤀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᨀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᬀᘀ ᐀ᨀᤀᤀᘀ ᐀ᰀᘀᨀᘀ ᐀ᬀᔀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᰀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᜀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᰀᘀ ᐀᠀ᤀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀Ḁᨀᔀᘀ ᐀ἀᘀᤀᘀ ᐀ἀᔀḀᘀᴀ ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ ᐀ἀᔀ!ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ᐀ᘀᴀ ᐀ἀᰀᔀᘀ ਀ᔀᘀᤀἀ ਀ᔀᘀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᘀḀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᘀἀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᘀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᤀᘀ ਀ᔀᔀᬀᨀ ਀ᔀᔀḀḀ ਀ᔀᨀᘀᨀ ਀ᔀᨀᨀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᰀ᠀᠀ ਀ᔀᜀᤀḀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᤀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᨀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ *ᔀᤀᘀᔀ(ᨀ᠀ᨀᜀḀ-ᔀᘀ ". ᤀᘀ/ᤀᨀ0ᔀḀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀ᠀/ᔀḀ0ᰀἀ)ᤀᜀ ܀,܀JЀሀ+)Ѐ(3@1܀93܀Ȁ&F*ഀ9:(6଀3ഀЀ()଀Ȁ91&%$؀฀܀'܀&Ȁ&%$؀ᘀᘀᔀ᐀"ᔀᨀᬀ ฀#" Ѐ଀ᄀ3 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā%:܀JЀሀ+)Ѐ܀ЀᄀȀ܀6଀3ഀЀ)؀%E଀ȀȀ 2Ѐ-.Ѐఀ& ᠀ᰀᘀ(Ḁᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀฀/01܀'܀$Ѐ-.Ѐఀ,଀Ѐᄀ"܀؀ᘀᘀᨀ +,଀ఀ#" *ᨀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᨀ)ᜀḀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᬀ ؀฀0Ѐᄀ଀3܀'܀؀ᘀᘀᰀ ฀0Ѐᄀ଀3#" ਀ࠀԀࠀሀ+ ᨀḀ-ᨀᘀ . ᔀḀ/ᘀḀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᨀᰀ0 Ā Ā Ā܀2؀=Sጀఀ܀,܀+᐀"ᔀᨀ᠀ F?%3<(਀ࠀԀࠀሀ ᤀᔀᬀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᬀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᜀ* Ā Ā $؀0܀฀0Ѐᄀ$%5܀'܀4ࠀࠀȀ0ЀᄀȀ܀$؀0܀&%$ᘀᘀᜀ ฀0Ѐᄀ#" ᔀᤀᜀ-ᜀ᠀ . ᔀ᠀/ᜀᨀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᰀḀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀,܀؀293ഀ܀M̀+(଀܀+᐀"ᔀᨀḀ F?%3<(਀ࠀԀࠀሀ Ā ܀2ᄀ؀3ఀ؀Aᄀࠀ2ఀ=(7܀+਀ࠀԀࠀሀ܀2؀=Sጀఀ *ᤀ(ᜀᜀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀Ѐ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀&%$3؀ᘀᘀᬀ :Ѐ฀ࠀ,2ఀBȀЀᄀ#" Ā Ā Ā ܀C$%5؀฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ܀'܀$ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀AЀఀ%Ѐ ᔀἀ-ᔀᔀ . ᔀḀ/ᔀᰀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᨀᨀ0 ܀,܀ሀ+=&ఀ؀=܀Ѐ6ఀ%Ѐࠀ%ᄀЀ଀܀9A3܀܀%+/Ԁࠀሀ&;ᄀ-܀਀ࠀЀ)܀%/᐀"ᔀᨀἀ -&F?%3<;ᄀ ᐀଀%%3 Ā Ā܀6ࠀ%ᄀЀ܀ЀᄀȀ܀+਀ࠀԀࠀሀ)2؀=Sጀఀ "#ᘀᘀḀ ฀-ࠀጀ$%ጀ6܀Ԁ0&ᄀ܀'܀฀-ࠀጀ$%76܀Ԁ05ᄀ ᔀ(ἀᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* ᘀ-ᰀḀ . ᔀ᠀/ᜀᤀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᜀᜀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀؀ကЀ1܀2؀=Sጀఀ܀,܀A6଀=Ѐᄀ+B܀᐀"ᔀᰀᘀ F?%3<(ఀ5 ᔀᬀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᘀ* Ā Ā ܀'܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀4܀&Ԁࠀ%-ЀȀ܀؀0Ѐ%ࠀ6଀=Ѐᄀ+B଀3%؀"ᘀᘀἀ A6#" Ԁࠀ%<ЀȀ& Ā Ā܀ࠀ6଀3%1%<0؀8 ᄀȀ)Ѐ8Ѐ1Ѐ$ऀЀ Ḁ-ᰀᬀ . ᔀᬀ/ᤀ᠀0 ᰀᬀ/ᰀᘀ0 Ā؀က܀,܀ᄀȀ)Ѐ8Ѐ1Ѐ$ऀЀ؀᐀"ᔀᰀᔀ က ᔀᘀᜀᤀ(ᬀἀᤀ-ᘀᘀ ". ᔀ᠀/ᤀᨀ0ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᰀᬀ/ᰀḀ0ᜀᘀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀؀'ᄀ؀3؀က܀,܀܀1%$؀>ഀ8܀'܀ࠀ-଀؀Ȁࠀ,Ѐ3Ԁ؀-ᄀ&Ȁ$ఀ܀؀'ᄀ؀3܀؀%$؀"؀᐀"ᔀᰀᤀ"#ᘀᔀᰀ က Ȁࠀ,ࠀ3Ȁ؀؀ఀ2$ Ѐ$ ᔀᤀἀ(ᬀᰀᨀ-ᤀᔀ ". ᔀḀ/ᔀᜀ0ᔀᰀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀᬀ/ᔀᘀ0ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā-%܀5%$؀8܀'܀Ѐ-$ఀ%܀$Ѐ-%܀&%$؀"EЀᄀऀЀ܀,܀᐀"ᔀᰀᨀ"#ᘀᔀᜀ E&ᄀऀЀ ᔀᰀἀ(ᤀᨀᤀᰀ-ᜀᰀ ". ᤀᘀ/ᤀᤀ0ᔀᰀ)ᜀᘀ* ᰀᬀ/ᔀᰀ0ᜀᘀ)ᨀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀EЀ2ࠀ3܀,܀3ഀЀ1Ѐ3ഀЀ܀ఀࠀ21ࠀ%Ѐఀ଀܀ࠀEЀ2ࠀ3%$؀%9ࠀ܀'܀ࠀ%$؀%᐀"ᔀᰀᰀ"#ᘀᔀḀ 9ࠀ ᨀᨀᘀ(ᤀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᘀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀ ؀ࠀᄀ؀ഀ6$%܀<ᘀᔀἀ 9Āᄀࠀጀ.ࠀऀ%ጀ#" ᐀"ᔀᰀᜀ E&ఀ2Ѐ܀,܀EЀఀ2Ѐ9ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%1܀,ࠀ-& ᔀᨀᜀᨀ-Ḁᬀ . ᔀἀ/ᜀᜀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᜀᤀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᜀ-ᔀᤀἀ(ᰀᤀ .: ᔀἀ/ᜀᔀ0ᔀᬀ)ᨀᰀ* ᰀ᠀/ᜀᔀ0ᰀḀ)ᜀᔀ ܀EЀఀ2Ѐ܀,܀'܀଀B܀଀00$,܀؀ᄀሀ+%ࠀ.*3ࠀ2ࠀ3ഀ3*܀؀Aༀ+6଀3%܀᐀"ᔀᰀᬀ"#ᘀᤀᔀ 9E&ఀጀᄀЀDࠀ2Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀3ࠀ2ࠀ3ഀ%ࠀ.଀B3*܀9Aༀ+ጀᄀЀDࠀ*ᄀሀ+6଀3%1 *᠀ᔀἀ-ᨀᤀᰀ(ἀᰀ ". ᔀἀ/ᜀᰀ0ᔀ᠀)ᤀḀ* ᰀ᠀/ᜀᨀ0ᰀἀ)ᔀ ܀&%Ѐ( -&;ᄀ଀܀؀Ѐ&ఀ2,0଀ᄀ଀Ѐ=&ഀ3%#܀AEЀ܀Ѐ܀ᄀ2Ѐ؀᐀"ᔀᰀ᠀"#ᘀᤀᤀ !E&ఀ଀0 Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀0଀ᄀ଀3%1܀EЀఀ#>,2Ѐ܀,܀B܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀ᄀఀ଀!3ఀ)&ᄀ଀0؀2Ѐ3ഀ܀'܀$E&ఀऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ ᄀఀ଀3ఀ)ЀᄀB؀AE;ᄀЀఀ2/%&Ѐ=ЀഀЀ(EЀఀ2Ѐ3ഀ&- ᐀"ᔀᰀḀ"#ᘀᤀᨀ E&ఀ2Ѐ܀A.Ѐ2&ȀB܀,܀EЀఀ2Ѐ܀A.Ѐ2ЀȀBༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ܀'܀ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ ᬀᘀ(Ḁᨀᜀ-ᘀᰀ ". ᤀᘀ/ᘀᤀ0ᔀᨀ)ᨀḀ* ᰀ᠀/ᜀᨀ0ᜀᘀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᬀᤀᤀ-Ḁᜀᘀ(ᨀ᠀ ". ᔀἀ/ᰀḀ0ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᰀ᠀/ᜀᬀ0ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ఀ2Ѐ܀'܀ࠀᄀȀEЀ܀,܀2ऀ଀$,.=&ఀ؀43܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀)ఀ؀%؀F܀96଀3%&3܀᐀"ᔀᰀἀ"#ᘀᤀᰀ ᐀E&ఀࠀ;$ࠀ2Ѐ Ѐఀ-&;ᄀ/% Ā Ā=2؀3܀᐀ Ѐ3ఀ(ࠀ;?ࠀ46଀3%5 ฀?11( ᔀᰀḀ-ᜀ᠀ᨀḀ(ἀᬀ :. ᔀ᠀)ᘀ᠀*ᤀᘀ/ᘀᬀ0 ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ*ᰀḀ/ᘀᤀ0 ܀'܀-3؀܀Ȁ)6Ѐ؀E-Ѐ܀;FЀ2Ѐᄀ'3-Ȁࠀጀ܀଀ᄀ$%Ѐ܀-ᘀᤀᜀ᐀"ᔀᜀᘀ ᐀E&ఀࠀȀࠀᄀ2Ѐ#" Ā Ā ܀G܀FЀ2Ѐᄀ'3܀Ѐ6ЀG-;܀ЀȀࠀጀఀ2Ѐ܀ᄀ$%>E/܀,܀ࠀȀࠀᄀሀ+39ሀ؀=᐀ ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ3܀฀ጀ11܀G܀3؀(Ȁ؀E ᨀᬀἀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀଀00$,܀&,3-6܀؀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%܀Ѐ܀؀%$ᘀᤀ᠀ ᐀ࠀ$ఀ&ᄀ#" ᰀᤀᰀ-ᔀḀ . ᔀḀ/ᔀḀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᔀᘀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā &,3-6܀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%1܀Ѐ܀1᐀ࠀ$ఀ5ᄀ$%1؀3'؀E܀,܀1؀3'؀᐀"ᔀᜀᔀ E ᔀ᠀-ᜀᰀ . ᔀḀ/ᘀἀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᘀᬀ0 ܀1؀3'؀E܀,܀ሀ+B؀=)$AQЀ1Ѐ܀1؀3'؀᐀"ᔀᜀᤀ E ᰀᜀ(ᘀᬀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* Ā ܀'܀A0ЀȀЀ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀3܀ ᐀଀%%6$%ЀB܀ᘀᤀḀ AQЀ1Ѐ$᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ#" A0ЀȀ> Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀C܀<᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$% ᤀᰀᜀ-ᨀᬀ . ᔀḀ/ᤀἀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᔀᘀ0 Ā ܀,܀3Ȁ଀(ȀࠀԀ$3&ሀ؀2؀ༀ܀93܀1؀3'؀᐀"ᔀᜀᨀ E ᨀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-3%%؀!؀଀6܀3Ȁ؀-܀؀2Ѐ0$؀ༀ܀AȀ܀ࠀऀ܀$Ѐᄀ-؀܀1؀3'؀ЀᄀȀE؀ᘀᨀᘀ A#" ᔀḀ-ᬀᔀ . ᔀἀ/ᜀᨀ0 ᰀḀ/ᘀἀ0 Ā ܀3؀(Ȁ؀E܀,܀ࠀ31؀=܀'܀Ѐ;଀-؀=؀$Eࠀ3ࠀᄀ(HЀᄀጀ܀,܀HጀᄀЀ܀᐀"ᔀᜀḀ"#ᘀᨀᜀ Eࠀ3ࠀᄀ଀ ᄀ/%& Ḁᬀᨀ(᠀ᔀḀ-ἀᔀ ". ᔀᬀ/ᨀ᠀0ᔀ᠀)ᤀᘀ* ᰀᬀ/ᤀἀ0ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀$؀=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%ᄀ଀؀$؀=Eጀ2Ѐ2Ѐఀ1Ѐ܀,܀᐀"ᔀᜀἀ"#ᘀᨀᬀ Eጀ2Ѐ2&ఀ1Ѐ ᐀"ᔀᬀᘀ"#ᘀᨀḀ ̀&ȀЀ3%ЀȀ&ᄀ+܀,܀̀ЀȀЀ3Ȁ%ЀȀЀᄀ+=଀-଀%ࠀ6$%&܀-&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀ ᨀ-᠀ᰀᘀ(ᤀ᠀ ". ᔀḀ/ᔀᨀ0ᔀᜀ)ᨀᤀ* ᰀ᠀/ᘀᬀ0ᰀἀ)ᰀᰀ* =଀6܀᐀"ᔀᬀᔀ ̀&ȀЀ3%ЀȀ&ᄀ+଀ ᔀ᠀ᤀ(ᨀᤀ " ᔀᜀ)ᔀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 3؀Ԁ଀ᄀ܀Ѐఀ؀:܀+ЀȀЀ3Ȁ%ЀȀЀᄀ̀&%-؀଀ഀ=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%-؀ᘀᨀἀ =଀ഀ#" *᠀ᔀᜀ-ᨀ᠀ᘀ(ᔀᤀ ". ᤀᤀ/ᨀᨀ0ᔀᜀ)ᤀᘀ* ᰀḀ/ᘀᨀ0ᰀἀ)ᤀ ܀20ЀȀ଀ᄀ$%5܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀&%$1଀ᄀ؀2؀Ѐఀ(฀؀ༀ2܀,܀1؀2؀$)+ᘀᰀᘀ᐀"ᔀᬀᤀ 20ЀȀ̀Ѐሀ#" .ࠀఀࠀ% Ā Ā Ā Ā ᐀"ᔀᬀᨀ ̀Ѐሀ+=*2'3*1଀܀ఀЀ)Ѐ1܀,܀̀Ѐሀ+=*2'3*1܀ ᨀ-ᘀᘀ . ᔀḀ/ᨀᤀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᜀᜀ0 Ā Ā ᔀᨀ(ᬀἀ " ᔀḀ)ᘀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᜀ* Ā ܀&%0ࠀጀ܀؀%$ഀ؀-;Ѐ#܀Ѐ܀؀%3؀3ఀ؀ᘀᰀᤀ ကЀ2ࠀጀ1#" ᔀᔀ-ᔀᤀ . ᔀἀ/ᘀḀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᜀᘀ0 ܀1%$@؀>;<#܀Ѐ܀1%3؀2ࠀጀఀ܀'܀ЀȀࠀ4$؀Ѐ3ഀЀ%+Ԁ̀܀,܀+%&᐀"ᔀᬀᰀ ̀Ѐ3ഀ 0ࠀጀ%& Ā Ā Ā Ā ᘀ-ᘀᬀ . ᤀᤀ/ᨀᘀ0 ᰀḀ/ᔀᔀ0 ؀Ѐ1%܀3؀଀28+̀܀,܀3଀(ఀ5؀᐀"ᔀᬀᜀ ̀+@2 "#ᘀᰀᨀ 2ࠀഀࠀ,0ጀȀ%&܀'܀2ࠀഀࠀ,07Ȁ%& ᘀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀἀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀᨀ* Ā ሀ ᔀᔀᰀ-ᨀḀ . ᤀᤀ/ᘀᔀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᨀᬀ0 Ā Ā؀଀23+̀܀,܀᐀"ᔀᬀᬀ ̀+@239ሀ ᨀᘀᤀ(ᤀᤀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā ؀?ࠀᄀࠀ%-2܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀؀$ᘀᰀᰀ 2-%ࠀᄀࠀ#" ᐀"ᔀᬀ᠀ ̀+ጀሀЀఀ଀(܀93܀EЀሀЀ3(฀Ѐ1ࠀᄀ+܀,܀ ᜀᔀ-Ḁᘀ . ᔀ᠀/ᰀᔀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᘀᰀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀᰀᬀ 2-଀6ࠀ%0Ѐఀ$%ࠀ܀'܀2<଀6ࠀ%0>ఀ$%ࠀ ᬀᔀᜀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᨀ)ᜀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᘀ* Ā ฀Ѐ1ࠀᄀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā)2؀::"܀ЀᄀȀ܀)2ᄀ؀3ఀ؀P ᨀᔀ᠀(᠀ᨀ᠀ᜀ-ᔀᨀ ". ᔀᬀ/ᨀᘀ0ᔀᰀ)ᔀᰀ* ᰀᬀ/ᜀἀ0ᜀᘀ)ᜀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀$؀3ఀ($ఀࠀᄀ؀P܀,ЀᄀȀ$܀%܀ᄀఀK&؀଀ጀሀЀఀ଀(H$ጀᄀ%ࠀ63.܀؀%$;+᐀"ᔀᬀḀ"#ᘀᰀ᠀ ̀ကЀ Ā ؀ᄀ3ȀЀᄀጀ$଀Ѐ$%ࠀ63/.܀ကЀ62Ѐ;$%1 *ᰀᔀḀ(ᜀᘀḀᜀ-᠀ᜀ ". ᔀḀ/ᤀᤀ0ᔀ᠀)ᰀᘀ* ᰀᬀ/ᜀᰀ0ᰀἀ)ᰀᘀ ܀,܀଀؀+3ഀ)*%ሀ*%܀ഀ<ऀ*%Ȁ؀က଀;Ѐ6>̀+ጀሀЀఀ(E܀'܀᐀"ᔀᬀἀ"#ᘀᰀḀ က଀;Ѐ6Ѐ ഀ*ऀ*%Ȁ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀E܀)3ఀ؀P ἀᤀ(ᰀᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᘀᬀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀1%$0؀က଀ఀࠀ6܀'܀ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6଀:܀؀%$0؀ᘀᰀἀ က଀ఀࠀ6#" ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6/ ᔀᔀ-ᬀᬀ . ᔀ᠀/ᨀ᠀0 ᰀ᠀/ᘀᔀ0 Ā:؀ကЀ1܀Ѐఀ؀ༀ2܀T'3܀,܀Ѐሀ+(ఀ5̀܀᐀"ᔀ᠀ᘀ T'3଀ ࠀఀࠀ% ᤀ-ᜀᰀ᠀(ᜀᔀ ". ᔀᬀ/ᨀᜀ0ᔀᤀ)ᘀḀ* ᰀ᠀/ᤀᜀ0ᜀᘀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā.܀/ကጀ@ᄀ܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀Ȁကጀഀᄀ଀%؀ऀ଀܀S%ԀࠀȀ܀,܀᐀"ᔀ᠀ᔀ"#ᘀᜀᔀ U%Ԁ5Ȁ଀(29ఀ *᠀Ḁ-ᜀᤀᔀ(ἀἀ .: ᔀᬀ/ᰀḀ0ᔀᬀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀᬀ/ᨀᤀ0ᰀḀ)ᰀ ܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀D&9܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀A؀S%ఀЀ2'(DЀ2ऀ*%Ȁ܀,܀؀᐀"ᔀ᠀ᤀ"#ᘀᜀᤀ S%ఀ&2'(D&2ऀ*%Ȁ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀D&9 ᬀ-ᔀᤀ . ᤀᘀ/ᨀᬀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᜀ᠀0 ܀,܀Aက5ሀ5(:Ѐ2ఀB܀ᄀȀ؀3'؀2؀᐀"ᔀ᠀ᨀ SᄀሀЀ(F ᔀ(ᜀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᘀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀἀ* Ā ܀'B؀ࠀ(3=ࠀ2܀-؀଀6-܀AကࠀሀЀ܀Ȁ؀਀Ԁ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ᄀȀ؀3'؀2؀ЀᄀȀሀЀ(F؀ᘀᜀᨀ SᄀA#" ਀ԀBȀ1 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A ᔀἀ-ᘀᘀ . ᤀᔀ/ᘀᜀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᨀḀ0 Ā Ā ܀؀S%Ȁ(ကЀ1܀,܀A᐀ࠀ2ఀࠀ$&ሀ+B܀ሀ(ఀ5؀᐀"ᔀ᠀ᰀ T2 0ጀ,&A᐀ࠀ2ఀࠀ$Ѐሀ+B ᔀᜀ(᠀ᘀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀἀ* Ā܀AB0ᄀ଀3%1܀'܀&,0ጀ܀؀0ᄀ଀3%؀ᘀᜀᰀ A#" ᜀᨀ(ᤀḀᔀ-Ḁᔀ ". ᔀḀ/ᘀἀ0ᔀᰀ)ᨀᜀ* ᰀᬀ/ᘀḀ0ᜀᘀ)ᨀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ࠀ6%Ѐ,3؀;က଀܀ࠀऀ܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀+S2ऀጀ܀,܀ᘀᜀᬀ᐀"ᔀ᠀ᜀ S2ऀV#" ᔀᰀ-ᰀᤀ . ᔀᬀ/ᤀᬀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᜀᤀ0 ܀Ѐ܀&က଀;B3,ࠀ6%܀&Aࠀ%<ЀȀ܀'܀ሀ:$ࠀ6%Ѐ؀T23܀,܀93ഀЀ12ЀB܀AĀ3:&ᄀ1ఀ5%܀᐀"ᔀ᠀ᬀ W239ሀ 92 :?ࠀ6%& Ā 93 ᔀᰀᘀ-Ḁᔀ᠀᠀(ᨀᜀ ". ᔀᬀ/ᤀᰀ0ᔀᬀ)ᰀᨀ* ᰀᬀ/ᰀḀ0ᰀἀ)ᤀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ఀ93܀5%$؀᐀܀Aࠀ-Ѐ68-܀'܀؀Ѐ-$ఀༀ*'3%܀Ȁ()଀Ȁ91-܀$Ѐ-%܀ᄀ؀Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%&D܀-᐀"ᔀ᠀᠀"#ᘀᜀ᠀ W239ሀ Ā Ā Ā ܀G܀8؀ༀ*'3܀G܀ሀ଀ࠀᄀ؀2܀ᄀȀ؀D܀G܀ሀ؀T23܀,$Ѐ-% 3؀ఀ؀᐀ 0Ѐ3,ఀB ᘀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā:܀Ѐ̀܀'܀؀0Ѐ3,ఀ:܀ᘀᜀḀ ̀Ѐ#" ᔀ(᠀ᬀᰀ-ᜀᜀ ". ᔀᬀ/ᜀᰀ0ᔀ᠀)ᜀᜀ* ᰀᬀ/ᔀ᠀0ᰀἀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā Ā ܀଀6Ѐ̀܀'܀ऀ0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ܀%G&;ᄀ଀܀ЀᄀȀ܀Ѐ,3%%؀!܀T2ఀ଀%ࠀ3܀,܀ȀࠀԀ$3ࠀ2܀ᘀᬀᘀ᐀"ᔀ᠀Ḁ ကጀW2ఀ଀%ࠀ3଀#" G&;ᄀ/% ᘀ-ᤀᘀ . ᤀᔀ/ᤀᰀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᤀᬀ0 Ā܀ࠀఀࠀ%Ѐ.܀Ѐ܀&,ကጀ+%؀W3(F*3܀,܀+%؀᐀"ᔀ᠀ἀ W3(F*3 ᨀ-ᤀ᠀᠀(ḀḀ ". ᔀ᠀/ᰀᨀ0ᔀᜀ)ᬀᘀ* ᰀ᠀/ᨀᘀ0ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀଀6Ѐ̀܀'܀܀,-܀؀ሀ-଀6&3$܀؀F-0଀3܀ࠀऀ܀᐀"ᔀḀᘀ"#ᘀᬀᔀ .Ѐᄀ!0ࠀࠀȀ.ᄀࠀᄀ=Ѐ%Ԁ଀(ȀࠀԀ0Ѐ଀ᄀ Ā 3%%؀!܀ᄀࠀᄀ=Ѐ%Ԁ଀؀F-0଀.Ѐᄀ3 *ᔀᜀᬀ(ᘀᜀᤀ-ᤀᘀ ". ᔀἀ/ᜀᜀ0ᔀᨀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀᬀ/ᨀᜀ0ᜀᘀ)ᨀᰀ ܀'܀ࠀሀ;܀؀0଀ᄀ଀$ఀ؀$Ѐ-܀؀%$ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ̀؀ကЀ1܀2଀؀9ఀ.܀,܀ఀ5܀2଀؀᐀"ᔀḀᔀ"#ᘀᬀᰀ .9ఀ 0଀ᄀ଀?ఀB Ā Ā Ā Ā؀?Ѐ-܀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ$%1̀ Ḁ-ᬀἀ . ᔀᬀ/ᰀᜀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᜀἀ0 ܀,܀Ԁ:%ࠀԀ(ఀ5؀6܀-ఀ<Ԁ଀=&%+ऀЀ؀. ᐀"ᔀḀᤀ ἀᨀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀἀ* Ā ܀'܀$ఀԀࠀጀࠀԀ଀=ᄀఀЀ%+Ѐ଀ᄀऀЀ܀؀.܀&-ࠀ,܀Ѐఀ܀؀ကЀ1؀%$ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ܀='ᘀᬀᜀ 4̀=ጀ2#" ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᐀"ᔀḀᨀ .଀%଀3܀,܀.଀%଀3 ᔀᤀᤀ-᠀ᬀ . ᔀḀ/ᜀᨀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᰀᔀ0 Ā Ā ᔀᘀᬀᬀ-᠀᠀ . ᔀḀ/ᜀᨀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᨀᰀ0 ܀,܀;฀ጀȀЀ଀(=ሀ܀93܀)ሀ2&Ȁ଀؀D଀3܀G܀᐀"ᔀḀᰀ .଀%଀3 ᐀଀%%3 Ā Ā Ā܀฀ጀȀЀ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ሀ2ЀȀ؀଀%଀3(D଀3. ᐀଀%%3 ᤀᤀ-᠀ἀ . ᔀḀ/ᜀᰀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᰀᔀ0 Ā Ā܀଀%଀3.܀,܀ሀ+39ሀ؀=)᐀"ᔀḀᜀ .଀%଀3 ᐀"ᔀḀᬀ .ࠀሀ&ᄀ+-܀਀ഀ<19Ȁ܀,܀.ࠀሀЀᄀ+܀G܀ ᔀ-ᰀᘀ . ᔀḀ/ᔀᰀ0 ᰀᜀ/ᜀἀ0 Ȁ Ā؀਀ഀ*1 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Hungary

؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ᐀ᔀᔀᔀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀᜀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀ᠀ᘀ ᐀ᔀᤀᨀᘀ ᐀ᤀᔀᤀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᨀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᬀᘀ ᐀ᨀᤀᤀᘀ ᐀ᰀᘀᨀᘀ ᐀ᬀᔀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᰀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᜀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᰀᘀ ᐀᠀ᤀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀Ḁᨀᔀᘀ ᐀ἀᘀᤀᘀ ᐀ἀᔀḀᘀᴀ ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ ᐀ἀᔀ!ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ᐀ᘀᴀ ᐀ἀᰀᔀᘀ ਀ᔀᘀᤀἀ ਀ᔀᘀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᘀḀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᘀἀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᘀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᤀᘀ ਀ᔀᔀᬀᨀ ਀ᔀᔀḀḀ ਀ᔀᨀᘀᨀ ਀ᔀᨀᨀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᰀ᠀᠀ ਀ᔀᜀᤀḀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᤀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᨀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ *2଀ᄀ'଀:Ѐ%଀3( ᔀᤀᘀᔀ(ᨀ᠀ᔀᘀ-᠀ᬀ ". ᔀᬀ/ᜀἀ0ᔀḀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀᬀ/ᨀ᠀0ᰀἀ)ᤀᜀ.܀,܀Ȁ&ᄀ'଀:&%଀3('3Ѐఀࠀ2ᄀЀ&%$؀฀܀'܀&Ȁ&%$؀᐀"ᔀḀ᠀"#ᘀᘀᔀ .2଀฀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā %؀Ѐᄀᄀ=' *2Ѐ-.Ѐఀ& ᠀ᰀᘀ(Ḁᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀἀ܀฀/01܀'܀$Ѐ-.Ѐఀ,଀Ѐᄀ"܀؀ᘀᘀᨀ +,଀ఀ#" ᤀḀ-ᔀᘀ . ᔀᬀ/ᜀἀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᤀᔀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀,܀؀'ᄀ؀Ȁ؀EЀ2'Ѐ%(Ԁ܀93܀᐀"ᔀḀḀ L&$Ѐ1*ഀ ሀ଀ࠀᄀ ᨀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᨀ)ᜀḀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀2܀Ѐ$Ѐ؀฀0Ѐᄀ଀3܀'܀؀ᘀᘀᰀ L฀0Ѐᄀ଀3#" ᤀᔀᬀ(ᨀᔀᰀ-ᨀᬀ ". ᔀᬀ/ᨀᜀ0ᔀᰀ)ᔀᬀ* ᰀᬀ/ᬀᘀ0ᰀḀ)ᜀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀LЀ$Ѐ܀,܀ᄀȀB؀AF*2Ԁ܀؀ᄀఀ؀Ѐ(Ԁ$&$؀0܀฀0Ѐᄀ$%5܀'܀4ࠀࠀȀ0ЀᄀȀ܀$؀0܀&%$᐀"ᔀḀἀ"#ᘀᘀᜀ L฀0Ѐᄀ ᄀȀB Ā؀AF*2Ԁ܀ሀ଀ࠀᄀ؀2 ᔀἀ-ᬀḀᤀ(ᜀᜀ ". ᔀ᠀/ᔀᬀ0ᔀᜀ)ᰀᔀ* ᰀ᠀/ᤀᬀ0ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā ܀଀ᄀ3܀%ᄀ଀Ѐ;&-܀Ѐ%.܀LЀ$Ѐ܀%܀଀,܀ᄀB;+&-܀A਀ഀЀᄀ܀1&%$3؀᐀"ᔀἀᘀ"#ᘀᘀᬀ L฀ࠀ,&$Ѐ(3@ȀЀᄀ Ā ܀C$%5؀฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ܀'܀$ऀ଀$B ,.ࠀᄀȀ܀A਀ഀAЀఀЀᄀ+%Ѐ -&;ᄀ/%܀Ѐ܀-&;ᄀ/%܀AЀఀ%Ѐ ᐀"ᔀἀᔀ LЀ1Ѐ'Ѐ(਀ഀЀ%ࠀᄀᄀЀ܀,܀LЀ1Ѐ'Ѐ܀G܀ ᬀ-ᤀᘀ . ᤀᘀ/ᰀᜀ0 ᰀḀ/ᤀᬀ0 Ā "#ᘀᘀḀ ਀ഀ฀-ࠀጀ$%ጀ6܀Ԁ0&ᄀ܀'܀฀-ࠀጀ$%76܀Ԁ05ᄀЀ%ࠀᄀᄀЀ ᔀ(ἀᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᔀᘀ-ᨀ᠀ᔀᬀ(Ḁᨀ ". ᔀᬀ/ᜀ᠀0ᔀᰀ)ᜀᤀ* ᰀ᠀/ᤀᰀ0ᜀᘀ)ᔀᘀ ܀'܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀4܀&Ԁࠀ%-ЀȀ܀؀0Ѐ%ࠀ6଀3%؀"ሀ଀ࠀᄀ؀2܀؀':؀L܀,܀؀ᄀఀ؀Ԁ)؀':᐀"ᔀἀᤀ"#ᘀᘀἀ L9 Ԁࠀ%<ЀȀ& Ā Ā Ā܀ࠀ6଀3%1%<0؀8 ᐀"ᔀἀᨀ ਀&ሀ(=;܀,܀਀Ѐሀ܀᐀଀%% ᜀ-ᬀᤀ . ᔀ᠀/ᘀ᠀0 ᰀ᠀/ᔀᰀ0 ᔀᘀᜀᤀ(ᬀἀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā ܀1%$؀8܀'܀Ȁࠀ,ࠀ-଀؀-ఀ$܀؀%$؀" ᘀᔀᰀ#" ሀ଀ࠀᄀ ᤀᜀ-ᨀ᠀ . ᤀᔀ/ᘀᰀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᜀἀ0؀2܀਀Ѐ8ࠀ܀,܀᐀"ᔀἀᰀ ਀Ѐ85()଀Ȁ91 Ȁࠀ,ࠀఀ$ ᔀᰀ-Ḁᰀ . ᤀᘀ/ᔀᤀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᜀᬀ0 ܀3؀଀28+̀܀਀଀2ࠀ1R܀,܀ఀ5)3؀଀28+̀܀᐀"ᔀἀᜀ ਀଀2ࠀ1- *Ѐ$ ᔀᤀἀ(ᬀᰀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ-%܀5%$؀8܀'܀Ѐ-$ఀ%܀$Ѐ-%܀&%$؀" ᘀᔀᜀ#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ကЀ1 *᠀ࠀ ᔀᰀἀ(ᤀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀ%$؀%9ࠀ܀'܀ࠀ%$؀%ᘀᔀḀ 9ࠀ#" ᐀"ᔀἀᬀ ਀ࠀԀ%5܀,܀਀ࠀԀ%ࠀ܀᐀଀%% ᠀-Ḁᰀ . ᔀ᠀/ᤀᤀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᘀἀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀᔀἀ ᨀᨀᘀ(ᤀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᘀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᜀ* Ā Ā ᤀᬀ-᠀ᤀ . ᔀ᠀/ᔀᨀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᘀᬀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀$܀H2Ѐ)Ѐ଀ᄀЀ܀ጀᄀఀ,܀Ԁࠀ1܀&-@ࠀЀ(3,܀(&H2܀଀+؀᐀"ᔀἀ᠀ ਀ࠀԀ9ࠀጀ.ࠀࠀሀ6$% ሀ଀ࠀᄀ Ā Ā؀2܀+਀ࠀԀࠀሀ܀ &-؀=ఀ܀ᄀ,ࠀ܀଀6$%1܀ऀ%ࠀ9ࠀጀ.ࠀࠀȀ:%Ѐ଀ᄀ3 *ᬀἀ-ᜀᬀἀ(ᰀᤀ .: ᔀᬀ/ᨀ᠀0ᔀᬀ)ᨀᰀ* ᰀ᠀/ᰀᤀ0ᰀḀ)ᜀᔀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀؀ࠀ.3%܀؀਀ࠀ:2ࠀᄀ9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%܀,܀؀2ᄀ+91*1܀᐀"ᔀἀḀ"#ᘀᤀᔀ ਀ࠀ:2ࠀᄀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ࠀ.3%܀9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%1 ᔀ᠀-᠀ᜀ . ᔀᬀ/ᨀᰀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᰀᘀ0 ܀,܀ACሀऀЀ%)ЀB܀ሀ+39ሀ؀=)᐀"ᔀἀἀ ਀ࠀ:2ࠀᄀ଀ ᰀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀḀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā ܀&%ᄀ଀;&-܀؀Ѐ᐀଀%%3,0଀ᄀ଀3%#܀Ѐ܀ᄀ܀ᄀ2ࠀЀ؀ᘀᤀᤀ ਀ࠀ:!଀0#" Ā Ā Ā ܀0଀ᄀ଀3%1,<#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀଀0!܀'܀$ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ ᔀ-ᨀᤀ . ᔀᬀ/ᨀᘀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᨀᰀ0᠀ ܀਀ࠀ:2ࠀᄀ܀,܀;ሀ଀(=ሀ؀F<3ഀ܀-;᐀"ᤀᘀᘀ ਀ࠀ:-&;ᄀ2/ࠀ%&ᄀ଀(=ሀ ᐀଀%%3 Ā܀ሀ؀F*3ഀ܀G܀᐀଀%%3 "#ᘀᤀᨀ ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ܀'܀ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ ᬀᘀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᨀ)ᨀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᘀ* ᐀"ᤀᘀᔀ ਀531Kఀ܀,܀਀ࠀ31ጀఀ ᔀᬀ-ᘀᘀ . ᔀḀ/ᰀᨀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᤀᬀ0 Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀᤀᰀ ᐀ࠀ;$ࠀ6଀3%&܀-&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀ ᘀ(ᨀ᠀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* Ā ᄀ/% ᬀ-ᘀḀ . ᔀᬀ/ᨀḀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᰀᨀ0 Ā Ā;&-܀3ఀ᐀ࠀ;?ࠀ6଀3%5؀ࠀ2!܀਀ഀЀ2=Ѐ%Ԁ଀܀,܀>2Ȁ؀)᐀"ᤀᘀᤀ ਀ഀ&2=Ѐ%Ԁ଀ "#ᘀᤀᜀ ᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ଀ᄀ$%Ѐ܀Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀ ᨀḀ(ἀᬀ : ᔀ᠀)ᘀ᠀* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* ᤀ-ἀᜀ . ᔀ᠀/ᜀἀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᘀᤀ0 ܀,܀ᄀఀ1଀2&%+3ഀЀ$ЀȀ8Ѐ؀᐀"ᤀᘀᨀ ਀ഀ ᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ/ᄀ$%>܀Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ Ā ᄀఀ1଀2Ѐ%+3ഀЀ$ЀȀ8Ѐ Ā؀਀ഀ *᠀ᤀᤀḀ-ᤀᜀᨀᬀἀ(ἀᰀ ". ᔀ᠀/ᤀᜀ0ᔀ᠀)ᜀᤀ* ᰀ᠀/ᜀᤀ0ᰀἀ)ᔀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀&,3-6܀؀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%܀Ѐ܀؀%$ఀ1*ഀ᐀ࠀ$ఀ&ᄀ؀਀ഀ଀ሀ܀,܀ఀ1*ഀ؀᐀"ᤀᘀᰀ"#ᘀᤀ᠀ ਀ഀ଀ሀ ᐀ࠀ$ఀ5ᄀ$%1܀Ѐ܀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%1܀6-3,& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᬀ-Ḁᨀ . ᔀᬀ/ᨀᜀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᜀᰀ0 ܀؀'*਀ഀ܀,܀؀+ሀ%*(܀ЀఀЀ1:܀଀؀'>᐀"ᤀᘀᜀ ਀ഀ Ā +؀%%Ѐ(܀ЀԀ؀3ఀ2 ᰀᜀ(ᘀᬀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀A0ЀȀЀ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀3܀ᘀᤀḀ ᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$%Ѐ#" A0ЀȀ> ᠀-ᰀᬀ . ᤀᘀ/ᤀᜀ0 ᰀḀ/ᤀᨀ0 Ā܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀C܀<਀ഀጀ=Ѐऀ*᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$%܀,܀>᐀"ᤀᘀᬀ ਀ഀጀ=Ѐऀ Ḁἀᨀ(ᨀᨀ ". ᔀ᠀/ᨀᘀ0ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᰀᬀ/ᜀᔀ0ᰀḀ)ᨀḀ* Ā-᠀ ܀/ ܀ᄀ,܀3ഀЀᄀ଀C଀B-؀Ѐ1᐀܀'܀%-ጀ+؀Aༀ଀6܀-܀؀Ѐ0$؀'ᄀ؀AȀ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀؀ЀᄀȀЀ:ࠀ%'Ѐ଀(Ԁ؀᐀"ᤀᘀ᠀"#ᘀᨀᘀ 6A 3ഀ଀B Ā Ā Ā Ā؀Aༀ+ጀ%Ѐ1܀؀?AЀ଀0ᄀ܀&Ѐ3-$܀ЀᄀȀ%'Ѐ؀6ԀЀ:ࠀ ᔀᘀ-ᔀἀᔀ(ᬀᜀ ". ᔀ᠀/ᤀḀ0ᔀḀ)ᤀᔀ* ᰀᬀ/ᜀᤀ0ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā ܀,܀+ሀ؀=ఀЀᄀK܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6܀Ѐ܀93-܀܀Ѐ؀'ᄀ؀FȀ-Ȁ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀؀ЀᄀȀЀ:ࠀ%'Ѐ଀(Ԁ؀᐀"ᤀᘀḀ"#ᘀᨀᔀ 6A ᐀଀%% Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀6Ѐᄀጀ܀ЀᄀȀ܀FȀ-&଀ᄀ܀&Ѐ3-$܀ЀᄀȀ%'Ѐ؀6ԀЀ:ࠀ *ᔀḀᤀ(ᨀᨀᬀ-ᔀᘀ ". ᔀ᠀/ᜀᔀ0ᔀ᠀)ᔀ᠀* ᰀ᠀/ᘀᜀ0ᰀἀ)ᘀḀ ܀,܀Ԁࠀ3B&(3؀Ԁ؀À܀+ሀ%*()3؀2؀1؀&;଀>,"܀'܀଀00$,܀&;᐀"ᤀᘀἀ"#ᘀᨀᨀ 6",-଀ ЀԀࠀ3B Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā(3؀Ԁ؀À܀Ѐ3଀ᄀ$܀3؀2؀1؀6 *᠀ᜀ(ᘀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀ ܀Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%5=܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀&ᘀᨀᰀ =Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%#" ᐀଀ሀ=%ЀᄀȀ ᔀᨀ-ἀḀ . ᔀḀ/ᜀᨀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᤀᜀ0܀+ᄀ؀ఀ؀6܀,܀ᄀᄀ3@1؀᐀"ᤀᔀᘀ 69ఀ9ᄀ+଀(ऀ .ࠀఀࠀ% Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᔀ᠀ἀ(ᜀᨀ " ᔀᤀ)ᰀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᨀ /;<>؀=܀'܀Ѐ;଀-؀= ᘀᨀᜀ#" ᘀ-ᰀḀ . ᔀ᠀/ᜀᤀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᜀᜀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā )2؀=Sጀఀ܀+6଀=Ѐᄀ܀,܀F?%3<(ఀ5܀᐀"ᤀᔀᔀ 6଀=Ѐᄀ+଀ Ḁᬀᨀ(᠀ᔀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ᄀ/%&1؀$؀=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%ᄀ଀؀$؀=ᘀᨀᬀ ကЀ#" *ᜀ-ᤀᰀᘀ(ᤀ᠀ ". ᔀ᠀/ᜀᔀ0ᔀᜀ)ᨀᤀ* ᰀᬀ/ᜀᜀ0ᰀἀ)ᰀᰀ ܀'܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀&ᄀ଀ᄀ3ጀ%Ѐ=଀-଀%ࠀ6$%؀.܀+6଀=Ѐᄀ܀,܀ఀ؀᐀"ᤀᔀᤀ"#ᘀᨀḀ 6଀=Ѐᄀ+଀(ऀ9%3ഀ଀ሀ =଀;<)Ȁ#܀ࠀ1ࠀЀ܀16%3؀2ࠀጀఀ܀܀,܀2ሀࠀԀ؀3ഀ'ఀ ܀ЀȀࠀ(4$؀᐀"ᤀᔀᬀ 6Ԁࠀ1ࠀȀ 2ሀࠀԀ Ā؀&0ࠀጀ3ഀ%ఀ 2ࠀഀࠀ,07Ȁ%& ᔀ᠀Ḁ-ᬀἀᘀ(᠀ᤀ ". ᔀḀ/ᤀἀ0ᔀᰀ)ᨀἀ* ᰀᬀ/ᰀᘀ0ᰀἀ)ᔀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā܀'܀&%᐀଀%%32ࠀഀࠀ,0ጀȀ܀6ࠀ%ᄀЀ܀,܀ሀ+=&ఀ؀=)᐀"ᤀᔀ᠀"#ᘀᰀᨀ 6ࠀ%ᄀЀ଀ *ᨀᘀᤀ(ᤀᤀἀ-Ḁᨀ ". ᤀᘀ/ᘀᜀ0ᔀᜀ)ᰀᘀ* ᰀᬀ/ᨀᜀ0ᜀᘀ)ᰀᨀ ܀ఀ5܀1؀%؀43Ѐᄀ+ఀ܀93܀+Ԁ*219ᄀ*؀?ࠀᄀࠀ%-2܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀؀$᐀"ᤀᔀḀ"#ᘀᰀᰀ 62-%ࠀᄀࠀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ЀᄀȀ܀+Ԁ*219ᄀ*6܀,܀43Ѐ8(ఀ5-2؀ᄀȀ3ഀ؀2 "#ᘀᰀᬀ 2-଀6ࠀ%0Ѐఀ$%ࠀ܀'܀2<଀6ࠀ%0>ఀ$%ࠀ ᬀᔀᜀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᨀ)ᜀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᘀ* Ԁ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀3ఀ+3܀ࠀᄀȀ:܀1؀%؀43Ѐᄀ+ఀ *ᨀᔀ᠀(᠀ᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᰀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀᤀ ܀'܀$؀ЀᄀȀ$ఀࠀᄀ$܀؀଀$%ࠀ63.܀؀%$;ᘀᰀ᠀ ကЀ#" ᐀"ᤀᔀἀ ᔀᨀᤀ-ᨀᨀ . ᤀᘀ/ᜀᘀ0 ᰀḀ/ᤀᨀ0 Ԁ:%9ᄀ଀( Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀J܀-ఀ&=؀2؀3؀43܀-ࠀ63ഀఀ%$/.܀6ကЀࠀ2ᄀЀ଀(1Ѐ2;$%1 Ā ܀Ѐఀ=؀2؀43܀G܀FЀ23ഀఀ܀6ࠀ%ᄀЀ܀,܀ሀ+39ሀ؀= ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ3 ᰀᔀḀ(ᜀᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᰀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀ᄀ؀%:က଀;Ѐ6>Ԁ܀'܀က଀;Ѐ6Ѐ؀J܀ᘀᰀḀ G#" ἀᤀ(ᰀᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᘀᬀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀1%$0؀က଀ఀࠀ6܀'܀ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6଀:܀؀%$0؀ᘀᰀἀ က଀ఀࠀ6#" ᔀᰀ-ᔀᘀ . ᔀἀ/ᔀᨀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᔀ᠀0 Ā ܀ሀ଀ࠀᄀ؀2܀6ጀ8Ѐᄀ܀,܀AU'3ЀB܀᐀"ᤀᤀᘀ 6:ࠀԀጀ28&ࠀ-Ѐ6ᄀ)଀Ȁ9/ 1 *᠀ࠀఀࠀ% ᠀(ᜀᔀ " ᔀᤀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀ.܀/ကጀ@ᄀ܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀ᘀᜀᔀ AS'3ЀBကጀഀᄀ଀#" ᐀଀%%3 ᔀḀ-ᬀᨀ . ᤀᘀ/ᤀᰀ0 ᰀḀ/ᔀᔀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀+ࠀᄀ::"܀,܀ሀ+39ሀ؀=)᐀"ᤀᤀᔀ "::ࠀᄀ+଀ ᔀ(ἀἀ : ᔀᬀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀḀ)ᰀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀D&9܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᤀ A#" ᜀ᠀-ἀᔀ . ᔀἀ/ᔀᔀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᰀḀ0 Ā ؀ሀ଀ࠀᄀ9&D؀2܀'DЀ܀,܀؀2ᄀ+91*1܀'&᐀"ᤀᤀᤀ D *ᘀ-ᤀᘀᔀ(ᜀᔀ ". ᤀᔀ/ᰀᔀ0ᔀᜀ)ᘀᤀ* ᰀ᠀/ᤀ᠀0ᜀᘀ)ᜀἀ ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀ȀЀ؀਀Ԁ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀A؀ကЀ1܀2଀؀1؀D܀,܀2଀(ఀ5؀1؀᐀"ᤀᤀᨀ"#ᘀᜀᨀ D ਀ԀBȀ1 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A Ԁ ᰀ-ἀḀ . ᔀᬀ/ᤀἀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᤀᔀ0؀%؀D܀,܀Ԁ؀%؀᐀"ᤀᤀᰀ D 0ጀ,& ᔀᜀ(᠀ᘀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀἀ* Ā Ā Ā܀AB0ᄀ଀3%1܀'܀&,0ጀ܀؀0ᄀ଀3%؀ᘀᜀᰀ A#" ᔀᤀ-ᘀᘀ . ᔀḀ/ᨀᰀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᔀᤀ0 Ā ܀,܀ఀጀԀ&(2؀ഀ؀ԀЀȀ&22܀଀؀'ᄀ؀%؀᐀"ᤀᤀᜀ D ᜀᨀ(ᤀḀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᜀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ࠀ6%Ѐ,3؀;က଀܀ࠀऀ܀$Ȁ؀ကЀ1܀؀'ఀ0Ѐᄀᄀ؀+؀%؀ᘀᜀᬀ D#" :$ࠀ6%Ѐ܀'܀Aࠀ%<ЀȀ&܀က଀;B3,ࠀ6%&܀Ѐ܀ Ā Ā ᨀᰀ-ᘀᬀ . ᔀḀ/ᨀᬀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᔀᜀ0 ܀؀'ᄀ؀%؀D܀,܀ሀ+39ሀ؀=)଀؀'ᄀ؀%؀᐀"ᤀᤀᬀ D :?ࠀ6%& 94 EࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ Ā Ā Ā 95 *ᤀᰀ-ᘀᘀ᠀᠀(ᨀᜀ ". ᔀḀ/ᨀᬀ0ᔀᬀ)ᰀᨀ* ᰀ᠀/ᔀᤀ0ᰀἀ)ᤀᔀ ܀Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%5܀'܀Ѐ-$ఀ%܀$Ѐ-%܀&Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%؀ကЀ1܀଀؀'ᄀ؀%؀D܀,܀଀(ఀ5؀'ᄀ؀%؀᐀"ᤀᤀ᠀"#ᘀᜀ᠀ D %-Ѐ$ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ሀ଀ࠀᄀ ᔀᤀᘀ-᠀᠀ . ᔀᬀ/ᔀᤀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᜀᨀ0؀2܀ᄀȀ؀D܀,܀ᄀȀ)଀Ȁ91؀᐀"ᤀᤀḀ D 0Ѐ3,ఀB ᘀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā:܀Ѐ̀܀'܀؀0Ѐ3,ఀ:܀ᘀᜀḀ ̀Ѐ#" ᬀ-ᜀᜀ . ᔀᬀ/ᔀᰀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᜀᨀ0 Ā Ā Ā ܀X܀A#:&ఀ଀3ఀ)&ᄀऀЀ%)ЀB܀ᄀȀ)଀Ȁ91؀᐀"ᤀᤀἀ D "#ᘀᬀᘀ ကጀ,Ѐ܀ЀᄀȀ܀G&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ܀'܀̀଀6Ѐ܀ ᔀ(᠀ᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā Ā ܀ሀ଀ࠀᄀ؀2܀ᄀȀ؀D܀,܀1Ѐ:&%5ሀ+?Ԁ*%'3*3 A#:Ѐఀ଀ကጀ,&܀Ѐ܀3ఀ)Ѐᄀ.ࠀఀࠀऀЀ%)%Ѐ܀ЀBG&;ᄀ/% *ᰀᬀ᠀-ᘀἀ᠀(ḀḀ ". ᔀḀ/ᤀᰀ0ᔀᜀ)ᬀᘀ* ᰀ᠀/ᤀᬀ0ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ ܀଀6Ѐ̀܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀F-0଀3܀ࠀऀ܀᐀଀%%!0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ܀3؀2ఀ؀D܀,܀3؀᐀"ᤀᨀᘀ"#ᘀᬀᔀ D92ఀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀F-0଀3 ᰀᬀἀ-ᔀᜀ . ᔀḀ/ᔀἀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᤀ᠀0 ܀ЀᄀȀ܀3؀2ఀ؀D܀,܀3Ѐ%8Ѐ؀D92ఀ܀93܀3؀᐀"ᤀᨀᔀ D92ఀ ᔀᜀᬀ(ᘀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᤀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᰀ* Ā Ā ܀'܀ࠀሀ;܀؀0଀ᄀ଀$ఀ؀$ఀ=଀%%3-Ѐ܀؀%$ऀࠀࠀ܀ȀࠀԀ3؀2ఀ̀ࠀ6ࠀ؀ᘀᬀᰀ D#" 0଀ᄀ଀?ఀB Ā Ā؀?Ѐ-܀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ$%1̀ H9%ᄀ+ጀሀЀఀ( ᰀἀ-ᬀᬀ . ᔀḀ/ᤀᰀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᤀᬀ0܀93܀ሀ+39ሀ؀=)3؀᐀"ᤀᨀᤀ D92ఀ ἀᨀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀἀ* Ā ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀%$ᘀᬀᜀ ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ#" ਀ࠀጀఀ=( Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀ЀᄀȀ܀᐀଀%%3܀3؀2ఀ؀D܀,܀؀3'؀2؀ༀ &-ࠀ,܀؀3'؀ЀȀ$%1-,2؀ༀ܀3ఀ؀P̀ࠀ6ࠀ ᐀"ᤀᨀᨀ D଀%%&ᄀ+଀(=ሀ;܀,܀D଀%%Ѐᄀ+܀᐀଀%%3 ᔀᤀḀ-ḀḀ . ᔀḀ/ᔀ᠀0 ᰀᬀ/ᘀᔀ0 Ā Ā Ā Ā ᐀"ᤀᨀᰀ D଀%%&ᄀ+଀(=ሀ;܀AF଀3ఀ5ఀऀЀ%ጀB܀,܀D଀%%Ѐᄀ+܀ ᔀ-ᜀᬀ . ᔀḀ/ᤀᔀ0 ᰀᜀ/ᜀᰀ0 ᐀଀%%3܀AF଀3ఀࠀఀऀЀ%ጀB Ā ᐀"ᤀᨀᜀ D଀ᄀȀࠀ2ᄀ+Ѐऀࠀ1܀,܀D଀ᄀȀࠀᄀ+Ѐऀࠀ1 ᔀᨀ-᠀ᨀ . ᔀ᠀/ᘀἀ0 ᰀᬀ/ᜀᨀ0 Ā ᐀଀%% ᔀ᠀᠀-ᨀᬀ . ᔀḀ/ᜀᜀ0 ᰀ᠀/ᰀᜀ0 Ā܀ሀ2ЀȀ؀D଀3܀,܀ሀ+39ሀ؀=)ሀ2&Ȁ଀؀᐀"ᤀᨀᬀ D଀3 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Hungary

Lithuania

؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ᐀ᔀᔀᔀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀᜀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀ᠀ᘀ ᐀ᔀᤀᨀᘀ ᐀ᤀᔀᤀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᨀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᬀᘀ ᐀ᨀᤀᤀᘀ ᐀ᰀᘀᨀᘀ ᐀ᬀᔀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᰀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᜀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᰀᘀ ᐀᠀ᤀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀Ḁᨀᔀᘀ ᐀ἀᘀᤀᘀ ᐀ἀᔀḀᘀᴀ ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ ᐀ἀᔀ!ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ᐀ᘀᴀ ᐀ἀᰀᔀᘀ ਀ᔀᘀᤀἀ ਀ᔀᘀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᘀḀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᘀἀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᘀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᤀᘀ ਀ᔀᔀᬀᨀ ਀ᔀᔀḀḀ ਀ᔀᨀᘀᨀ ਀ᔀᨀᨀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᰀ᠀᠀ ਀ᔀᜀᤀḀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᤀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᨀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ *ᔀᤀᘀᔀ(ᨀ᠀ᔀᨀ#᠀ᤀ "฀ ᤀᜀ%ᜀᔀ&ᔀḀ)ᤀᤀ* ᜀᜀ%ᔀᤀ&ᰀἀ)ᤀᜀ ܀ሀ଀0଀Ѐ܀ကЀ3Ѐᄀࠀ0ࠀ܀(܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀Ȁ&ကЀ3Ѐᄀࠀ0Ѐ2&%$؀฀܀'܀&Ȁ&%$؀ᘀᘀᔀက"ᘀᰀἀ ฀#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā .᠀-,؀27* *2Ѐ-.Ѐఀ& ᠀ᰀᘀ(Ḁᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀἀ܀฀/01܀'܀$Ѐ-.Ѐఀ,଀Ѐᄀ"܀؀ᘀᘀᨀ +,଀ఀ#" Ḁ. ᤀ#ᰀᬀ ฀ ᤀᜀ%ᰀᬀ& ᜀᜀ%ᔀᜀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā-,؀27*܀ကЀጀ1ЀሀЀ(଀2܀(܀က"ᘀᜀᘀ ကЀጀ1ЀሀЀ(଀2 ᨀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᨀ)ᜀḀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā ؀฀0Ѐᄀ଀3܀'܀؀ᘀᘀᰀ ฀0Ѐᄀ଀3#" ᤀ#ᤀḀ ฀ ᤀᜀ%ᰀ᠀& ᜀᜀ%ᔀᰀ& Ā Ā Ā ܀ကЀ3Ѐᄀࠀ0ࠀ܀(܀+؀))7Ѐ܀0؀0଀7܀က"ᘀᜀᔀ ကЀ3Ѐᄀࠀ0Ѐ2 ἀ. ᤀᔀᬀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᬀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā-,؀27*܀ᄀ଀2؀)2܀2؀ጀ5$؀0܀฀0Ѐᄀ$%5܀'܀4ࠀࠀȀ0ЀᄀȀ܀$؀0܀&%$ᘀᘀᜀ ฀0Ѐᄀ#" &ᨀᘀ#᠀ᔀ $ ᤀᤀ%ᤀᜀ& ᜀᜀ%ᘀḀ ܀(܀؀07؀2؀0܀؀ᄀЀఀጀ0܀2ఀ0଀;ఀ܀؀)27଀؀က"ᘀᜀᤀ :଀ ᤀ(ᜀᜀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā .܀%Ѐጀ-&;,-ᔀᄀ଀܀ఀЀ*܀%ᄀ଀;܀7ЀఀЀ2&-܀0؀ഀ؀0܀2&%$3؀ᄀ؀)27ȀЀ଀؀ᘀᘀᬀ ฀ࠀ,:଀#" Ā Ā Ā ܀C$%5؀฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ܀'܀$ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀AЀఀ%Ѐ &Ѐ *ఀЀጀ, ᘀ#ᤀᬀ $ ᤀᤀ%ᤀᬀ& ᜀᜀ%ᤀᘀ%܀Ԁ଀21Ѐ2܀฀଀6ࠀఀAЀఀጀ܀%/܀(܀ᄀ;&-܀2ఀЀ؀ऀࠀ0܀଀܀%က"ᘀᜀᨀ ฀଀6ࠀఀ-&;ᄀ/Ѐ -ᰀ. Ā "#ᘀᘀḀ ฀-ࠀጀ$%ጀ6܀Ԁ0&ᄀ܀'܀฀-ࠀጀ$%76܀Ԁ05ᄀ ᔀ(ἀᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* ᔀ#ᘀ᠀ ฀ ᤀᤀ%ᔀᨀ& ᜀᜀ%ᤀᔀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ᄀࠀ2؀1Ԁ=܀(܀-Ԁࠀጀఀ܀0؀0଀7܀ᄀЀ؀က"ᘀᜀᰀ =1Ԁ ᔀᬀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᘀ* Ā ܀'܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀4܀&ԀࠀЀጀ,%--Ѐᜀ.Ȁ܀ఀ*܀2؀ഀ଀ࠀఀ଀3+%܀2؀0Ѐ%ࠀ6؀ᘀᘀἀ "ጀ5#" Ԁࠀ%<ЀȀ& Ā Ā܀ࠀ6଀3%1%<0؀8 &ᤀ. ᘀ#᠀ᔀ ฀ ᤀᤀ%ᔀᬀ& ᜀᜀ%ᜀᘀ-,)؀ఀ*܀0Ѐ2؀ഀ؀܀਀Ѐ(ࠀఀࠀ܀(܀؀Ѐ1)܀က"ᘀᜀᜀ ਀Ѐ(ࠀఀЀ2 ᔀᘀᜀᤀ(ᬀἀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā ܀1%$؀8܀'܀Ȁࠀ,ࠀ-଀؀-ఀ$܀؀%$؀" ᘀᔀᰀ#" Ȁࠀ,ࠀఀ$ &ఀ0Ѐ,-ᔀᔀ. ᤀ#ᔀᰀ $ ᤀᰀ%ᨀḀ& ᜀᰀ%ᨀᨀ*܀2؀Ѐጀఀ଀21"܀(܀؀က"ᘀᜀᬀ "Ѐጀఀ଀21 Ѐ$ ᔀᤀἀ(ᬀᰀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā-%܀5%$؀8܀'܀Ѐ-$ఀ%܀$Ѐ-%܀&%$؀" ᘀᔀᜀ#" ᰀ#ᔀᰀ ฀ ᤀᜀ%ᘀᰀ& ᜀᰀ%ᰀᘀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀(܀Ȁ଀2ఀ0଀;ఀ܀2ఀ0+؀ऀࠀ0܀ᄀఀ7Ѐ0଀2؀က"ᘀᜀ᠀ က ఀ0Ѐ,-ᔀᤀ. ᔀᰀἀ(ᤀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā*܀ሀ଀0଀ᄀ଀ᄀ1଀6Ѐ܀ࠀᄀఀ7Ѐ0଀ࠀ%$؀%9ࠀ܀'܀ࠀ%$؀%9ࠀ؀ᘀᔀḀ က#" &ᨀᨀᘀ(ᤀᜀᬀ#ᔀᜀ "$ ᔀᨀ)ᘀ᠀*ᤀᰀ%ᨀᘀ& ᜀᘀ)ᔀᜀ*ᜀᰀ%ᤀḀ ܀'܀$܀Ԁ଀21Ѐ2܀Bጀ0ሀ଀ࠀᄀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ଀ጀ܀Ԁࠀ(܀܀&-ࠀ,܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀2+؀ᘀᔀἀက"ᘀᜀḀ 9Bጀࠀጀ.ࠀ0ሀ଀ࠀᄀ6$%#" *ఀ90Ѐ,ࠀጀ.ࠀ-ᜀ.6$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ἀ(ᰀᤀᘀ#ᨀ᠀ $: ᔀᬀ)ᨀᰀ*ᤀᰀ%ᰀᔀ& ᰀḀ)ᜀᔀ*ᜀᰀ%ᨀἀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀଀00$,܀؀ࠀ.3%܀؀ఀ0Ѐ,-ἀ.9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%*܀2؀଀21)؀Ԁ؀਀܀(܀2؀଀21)؀Ԁ؀ᘀᤀᔀက"ᘀᜀἀ ਀#" ᘀ#Ḁᔀ ฀ ᤀᰀ%ᨀᬀ& ᜀᜀ%ᔀᨀ& Ā ܀଀(Ѐ2଀ጀᄀጀ'؀3܀(܀.2ఀ%ࠀ؀ऀࠀ0܀Ѐ଀܀က"ᘀᬀᘀ 9'଀ጀᄀЀDࠀ(Ѐ2଀ጀᄀ6଀3%1 *᠀ᰀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀḀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ ܀&%ᄀ଀;&-܀؀Ѐጀ1Ԁ,-ᰀ.,0଀ᄀ଀3%#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀*܀ᘀᤀᤀ !Ԁ଀0଀21Ѐ2#" ᨀ#ᰀᰀ ฀ ᤀᜀ%ᔀᘀ& ᜀᜀ%ᔀᤀ& Ā Ā Ā ܀Ԁ଀21Ѐ2܀ጀ܀ᄀ>,0଀ᄀ଀3%1؀ကЀ#ጀԀ܀(܀2ఀ؀܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀ऀࠀ!0଀0܀ᄀЀ଀܀'܀$ࠀᄀȀ.؀က"ᘀᬀᔀ ကЀऀ଀$,ጀԀ *ጀ1Ԁ,-ᜀ-&;ᄀ/%& . Ā *ᬀᘀ(Ḁᨀᔀ#ᤀᨀ "฀ ᤀᜀ%ᨀᨀ&ᔀᨀ)ᨀḀ* ᜀᜀ%ᨀ᠀&ᜀᘀ)ᰀᘀ ܀#2؀BЀ;଀21܀(܀0؀0଀7܀ᄀఀࠀ6଀؀਀7܀#؀ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0ȀBЀ;଀21܀'܀ᘀᤀᨀက"ᘀᬀᤀ ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ#" ᰀ. Ā Ā Ā Ā-,؀ጀఀ*܀؀ጀ5܀ᄀఀࠀ2଀ࠀ2؀਀7 "#ᘀᤀᰀ ᐀ࠀ;$ࠀ6଀3%&܀-&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀ ᘀ(ᨀ᠀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* ᐀ࠀ;?ࠀ6଀3%5܀-&;ᄀ/% Ā &ᤀ#ἀἀ $ ᤀᰀ%ᨀᤀ& ᜀᰀ%ᘀᬀ ܀(܀؀07؀2؀0܀؀ᄀЀఀጀ0܀2ఀ0଀;ఀ܀က"ᘀᬀᨀ 8ࠀ7଀(ᄀ଀2 "#ᘀᤀᜀ ᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ଀ᄀ$%Ѐ܀Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀ ᨀḀ(ἀᬀ : ᔀ᠀)ᘀ᠀* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* 7Ѐ0,-ᤀ. Ā Ā*܀07ЀఀЀ2؀ഀ؀0܀8ࠀ7଀(ᄀ଀ࠀ ᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ/ᄀ$%>܀Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ Ā &᠀7଀1, ᔀ#ᤀᜀ $ ᤀᨀ%ᘀᘀ& ᜀᰀ%ᨀ*܀Ԁ଀21Ѐ2܀4ࠀ2଀6ࠀ2܀(܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀က"ᘀᬀᰀ ጀࠀ2଀6Ѐ ᨀᬀἀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā ܀'܀଀00$,܀&,3-6܀؀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%܀Ѐ܀؀%$ᘀᤀ᠀ -ᤀ᐀ࠀ$ఀ. &ᄀ#" ᐀ࠀ$ఀ5ᄀ$%1܀Ѐ܀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%1܀6-3,& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā &7଀1, ᘀ#Ḁᔀ $ ᤀᤀ%ᰀᬀ& ᜀᰀ%ᤀᰀ*܀Ԁ଀21Ѐ2܀଀ࠀ)؀)਀଀܀(܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀଀2)؀)က"ᘀᬀᜀ ਀଀ -ᰀ. Ā Ā *ᰀᜀ(ᘀᬀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ ܀'܀A0ЀȀЀ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀3܀ᘀᤀḀ ᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$%Ѐ#" က"ᘀᬀᬀ ਀ԀЀ(7ࠀ2܀)܀਀ԀЀ(7ࠀ2܀*ഀЀ0,-ᤀ. ᔀ᠀#᠀ᨀ ฀ ᤀᬀ%ᤀᨀ& ᜀᜀ%ᨀ᠀& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā A0ЀȀ> Ā Ā Ā܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀C܀<᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$% ᨀ(ᨀᨀᰀ#ᤀᔀ "฀ ᤀᬀ%ᔀḀ&ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᜀᜀ%ᨀ᠀&ᰀḀ)ᨀḀ* Ā ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀C*ഀЀ0,ᄀ܀0Ѐ2؀܀'܀-؀ഀ଀6؀܀ఀࠀ-܀؀ᄀЀ0$؀਀7܀(܀A܀ࠀऀ܀$؀Ѐ1)-؀܀ᄀఀЀ2؀ЀᄀȀ਀7؀ᘀᨀᘀက"ᘀᬀ᠀ A#" Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀?AЀ0܀&- .ЀᄀȀ؀ᨀԀ- ᔀ(ᬀᜀᘀ#ᨀ᠀ "฀ ᤀᤀ%ᰀᜀ&ᔀḀ)ᤀᔀ* ᜀᬀ%ᔀᬀ&ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā ܀଀21଀ࠀ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'ࠀԀ܀-؀Ȁ-଀6=܀܀(Ѐ܀2ఀ؀FȀ-ऀࠀ0܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀܀ЀᄀȀ=ȀࠀԀ଀21଀2؀ᘀᨀᔀက"ᘀᬀḀ A#" FȀ-&Ԁ,Ѐᔀ. Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀Ѐ1&-*܀ЀᄀȀ଀21Ѐ2؀Ԁ &ᔀ#ᬀᜀ ฀ ᤀᤀ%ᜀᜀ& ᜀᬀ%ᔀḀ ܀8Ѐ2Ѐ1Ѐ0ᄀ଀ጀ܀(܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀က"ᘀᬀἀ 8Ѐ2Ѐ1Ѐ0ᄀ଀Ѐ଀ "#ᘀᨀᨀ ",-଀;&܀,଀00$܀'܀",<଀;& ᔀḀᤀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀ᠀)ᔀ᠀* ᰀἀ)ᘀḀ* Ԁ଀21Ѐ2܀*Ѐ1Ԁ,Ѐᤀ. Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀᨀᰀ ᜀ(ᘀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀ᠀* ᔀ#ᜀḀ ฀ ᤀᨀ%ᘀᘀ& ᜀᬀ%ᤀᨀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀܀Ѐᄀ%ࠀԀ଀21Ѐ26$%5=܀܀ࠀ2'܀%؀؀ကጀࠀ1Ѐ7܀(܀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀&2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀က"ᘀ᠀ᘀ =Ѐကጀᄀ%ࠀ6ࠀ1Ѐ7$%Ѐ .ࠀ*Ѐ1Ԁ,Ѐᨀఀࠀ% . Ā *ᔀ᠀ἀ(ᜀᨀ " ᔀᤀ)ᰀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᨀ /;<>؀=܀'܀Ѐ;଀-؀= ᘀᨀᜀ#" ᘀ#ᘀ᠀ ฀ ᤀᬀ%ᘀᨀ& ᜀᜀ%ᤀᰀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀(܀؀Ѐ1)܀฀Ѐ(ጀࠀ2Ѐ2܀଀ᄀ܀଀(ЀᄀȀ܀؀)က"ᘀ᠀ᔀ Ā(Ѐሀ2Ѐ ଀ሀᄀ,Ѐᔀ. Ḁᬀᨀ(᠀ᔀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā*܀0Ѐ2؀ഀ؀܀฀Ѐ(ጀࠀ2ࠀ܀#؀)ᄀ/%&Ā(ሀЀ2Ѐ؀$؀=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%ᄀ଀؀$؀= ᘀᨀᬀ#" ᘀ(ᤀ᠀ᔀ#ᘀᜀ "฀ ᤀᬀ%ᘀᨀ&ᔀᜀ)ᨀᤀ* ᜀᜀ%ᤀᜀ&ᰀἀ)ᰀᰀ* Ā ܀؀1)؀5 ܀'܀2؀܀ऀ଀$,Bጀࠀ.ࠀᄀȀጀ5Ȁ܀%଀܀(܀ᄀԀ5;&-܀Ѐ<2܀؀&ᘀᨀḀက"ᘀ᠀ᤀ Bጀ=଀-଀ࠀȀጀ5%ࠀ6$%#" *଀=଀;<#܀Ѐ܀1%3؀2ࠀጀఀ܀'܀ЀȀࠀ4$؀Ԁ &᠀ᘀ#ἀᔀ $ ᤀᨀ%ᰀḀ& ᜀᰀ%ᔀ ܀2؀Ѐ3Ѐ(଀21:܀(܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀؀ &က"ᘀ᠀ᬀ 0ࠀጀ:Ѐ3%Ѐ(଀21 Ԁ଀21Ѐ2܀*(Ѐഀ,Ѐᔀ. Ā "#ᘀᰀᨀ 2ࠀഀࠀ,0ጀȀ%&܀'܀2ࠀഀࠀ,07Ȁ%& ᘀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀἀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀᨀ* Ā Ā &ᨀᘀᤀ(ᤀᤀᘀ#ᰀᨀ "$ ᔀᜀ)ᰀᘀ*ᤀᨀ%ᰀḀ& ᜀᘀ)ᰀᨀ*ᜀᰀ%ᔀᬀ ܀2؀਀ఀЀ;଀21܀(܀.2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀਀଀(Ѐ2*܀2؀਀ఀЀ;଀21؀?ࠀᄀࠀ%-2܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀؀$ᘀᰀᰀက"ᘀ᠀᠀ 2-%ࠀᄀࠀ#" *਀଀(ࠀ.܀Ԁ଀21Ѐ2܀*(Ѐഀ,Ѐᤀ. Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀᰀᬀ 2-଀6ࠀ%0Ѐఀ$%ࠀ܀'܀2<଀6ࠀ%0>ఀ$%ࠀ ᬀᔀᜀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᨀ)ᜀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᘀ* ᘀ#ᰀḀ ฀ ᤀᰀ%ᘀᤀ& ᜀᜀ%ᨀᨀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀Ԁ଀21Ѐ2܀਀1଀(7଀ࠀᄀ଀ጀ܀(܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀က"ᘀ᠀Ḁ ਀1଀(7ࠀᄀ+2 ᨀᔀ᠀(᠀ᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᰀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀᤀ* Ā ܀'܀$؀ЀᄀȀ$ఀࠀᄀ$܀؀଀,Ѐᔀ. $%ࠀ63.܀؀%$;ᘀᰀ᠀ *5ЀᄀကЀ#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ࠀ63%$/.܀ကЀ;$%1 ᔀ#ᤀḀ ฀ ᤀᰀ%ᘀᨀ& ᜀᜀ%ᰀᰀ& Ā ܀Ԁ଀21Ѐ2܀80Ѐᄀ଀ࠀᄀ଀ጀ܀(܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀က"ᘀ᠀ἀ 80Ѐᄀࠀᄀ+2 "#ᘀᰀḀ က଀;Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀က଀;Ѐ6>*5Ѐᄀ,Ѐᤀ. ᰀᔀḀ(ᜀᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᰀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ἀᤀ(ᰀᬀᘀ#Ḁἀ "฀ ᤀᰀ%ᘀᤀ&ᔀ᠀)ᘀᬀ* ᜀᜀ%ᰀᜀ&ᰀἀ)ᰀᤀ ܀0଀ࠀ܀1%$0؀က଀ఀȀ7Ѐࠀ6܀'܀ЀጀЀ6଀̀܀(-܀2ఀ؀ࠀԀࠀऀࠀ0:܀؀%$܀ЀጀȀ70Ѐ0଀2̀؀ᘀᰀἀက"ᘀḀᘀ က଀ఀࠀ6#" Ԁ:ࠀԀ଀21Ѐ2܀*ࠀ-Ѐ65Ѐ/ ᄀ,Ѐᨀ. Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ጀ,Ѐᤀ. ᠀(ᜀᔀᘀ#ᨀἀ "฀ ᤀᔀ%ᜀᤀ&ᔀᤀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᬀ%ᘀᨀ&ᜀᘀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā)5*܀؀)؀8Ѐ5(Ѐఀ܀(܀؀)؀ࠀఀࠀ%8Ѐ5(Ѐఀ.܀/ကጀ@ᄀ܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀ᘀᜀᔀက"ᘀḀᔀ ကጀഀᄀ଀#" ᔀ(ἀἀᰀ#ᔀ᠀ $: ᔀᬀ)ᔀᤀ*ᤀᰀ%ᤀᰀ& ᰀḀ)ᰀ᠀*ᜀᰀ%ᨀᨀ& Ā ܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀D&9܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀50଀,Ѐᔀ.A*܀2؀਀ఀЀᄀ଀ጀ(଀21܀(܀2؀ᘀᜀᤀက"ᘀḀᤀ ਀ఀЀᄀ଀ጀ(଀21#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀D&9 ᔀ(ᜀᔀᜀ#ᨀᔀ "฀ ᤀᜀ%ᨀḀ&ᔀᜀ)ᘀᤀ* ᜀᜀ%ᘀᔀ&ᜀᘀ)ᜀἀ* Ā ܀܀0Ѐ2؀'܀-؀଀6-܀ഀЀ؀܀8ጀ07଀ᄀࠀ܀(܀؀Ȁ(Ѐ1؀਀Ԁ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀܀ЀᄀȀ8ጀ07଀ᄀЀ2؀ᘀᜀᨀက"ᘀḀᨀ A#" ਀ԀBȀ1 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀&.-ЀᄀȀ؀ЀᤀA,؀27* ᔀᜀ(᠀ᘀᔀ#ᨀ᠀ "฀ ᤀᜀ%ᜀᔀ&ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᜀᜀ%ᘀᜀ&ᜀᘀ)ᔀἀ* 97 ܀2؀8Ѐ30ЀȀ܀(܀ሀ0ࠀጀᄀȀ܀Ԁ଀(଀ఀЀ0+܀0ጀ,&0ЀȀ2܀AB0ᄀ଀3%1܀'܀&,0ጀ܀؀0ᄀ଀3%؀ᘀᜀᰀက"ᘀḀᰀ 8Ѐ3A#" 96 Ѐᰀ. Ā Ā,؀27*܀5ࠀ(଀ሀࠀᄀЀ2 *ᜀᨀ(ᤀḀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᜀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᔀ ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ࠀ6%Ѐ,3؀;က଀܀ࠀऀ܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀+ ᘀᜀᬀ#" &ᘀ#ἀἀ ฀ ᤀᰀ%ᜀᨀ& ᜀᰀ%ᰀᨀ ܀2؀)฀0Ѐഀጀࠀ܀(܀+؀))7Ѐ܀0؀0଀7܀؀)က"ᘀḀᜀ ฀0Ѐഀጀࠀ :$ࠀ6%Ѐ܀'܀Aࠀ%<ЀȀ&܀က଀;B3,ࠀ6%&܀Ѐ܀ Ā Ā ఀ0Ѐ,Ѐ᠀. Ā Ā*܀ᄀ଀2؀)2܀2؀ጀ5 :?ࠀ6%& &ᘀ#ᨀᜀ $ ᤀᰀ%ᨀᘀ& ᜀᰀ%ᨀᨀ ܀Ѐ3Ѐ0Ѐጀ21ጀ>܀(܀؀7଀((Ѐሀ܀က"ᘀḀᬀ <Ѐ3Ѐ0Ѐጀ21Ѐ଀ "#ᘀᜀ᠀ 1ЀAࠀ-଀ԀЀЀ6$%&2܀*ఀ0܀Ѐ%-Ѐ$܀,ЀḀ.%Ѐ-$ఀ܀'܀Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%5܀ ᠀᠀(ᨀᜀ " ᔀᬀ)ᰀᨀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᔀ* Ā %-Ѐ$ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā &ᘀ#Ḁᘀ $ ᤀᰀ%ᤀἀ& ᜀᨀ%ᜀḀ ܀଀ጀ)؀51؀$܀(܀ĀĀ܀5Ѐ0ఀ܀ЀԀ5<2܀଀Ѐ଀)؀51؀$ ᠀က"ᘀḀ 0Ѐ3,ఀB ᘀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā:܀Ѐ̀܀'܀؀0Ѐ3,ఀ:܀ᘀᜀḀ ̀Ѐ#" 7Ѐ0,Ѐᤀ. Ā Ā Ā*܀07ЀఀЀ2؀ഀ؀0 *ᘀ#ᔀᨀᔀ(᠀ᬀ $" ᤀᰀ%ᘀᬀ&ᔀ᠀)ᜀᜀ* ᜀᰀ%ᔀᔀ&ᰀἀ)ᨀᜀ ܀଀6Ѐ܀(̀܀'܀଀ᄀ܀2؀ऀ0ࠀࠀȀ.7଀((0Ѐሀ܀ጀȀᄀ଀Ѐ?܀܀%ЀᄀȀ;ᄀ଀܀2ࠀ2؀G&଀܀ЀᄀȀ܀ఀ,Ѐ؀က"ᘀḀḀ"#ᘀᬀᘀ ကጀ̀ 7Ѐ0,Ѐᰀ. Ā Ā Ā*܀ᄀ1Ѐ଀ԀЀ/% ଀;܀G଀ࠀ&2܀ࠀጀȀᄀ%Ѐ?܀଀0ࠀఀ܀.܀Ѐ܀2ጀ؀ఀ,&଀؀ကጀ̀ ḀḀ " ᔀᜀ)ᬀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā)᠀ ܀଀6Ѐ̀܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀F-0଀3܀ࠀऀ܀ᘀᬀᔀ !0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ#" ᘀ#ᔀᬀ $ ᤀᰀ%ᤀᰀ& ᜀᰀ%ᘀḀ& Ā ؀7Ѐ0,Ѐᜀ.3*܀฀଀ഀЀ଀܀(܀က"ᘀḀἀ F-0଀฀଀ഀЀ଀ *ᔀᜀᬀ(ᘀᜀḀ#ἀᬀ "฀ ᤀᜀ%ᔀἀ&ᔀᨀ)ᤀᤀ* ᜀᰀ%ᰀ᠀&ᜀᘀ)ᨀᰀ ܀'܀ࠀሀ;܀؀0଀ᄀ଀$ఀ؀$Ѐ-܀؀%$7଀(,7ᔀ.̀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ*܀଀(ᄀ଀ጀ2:܀(܀က"ᘀἀᘀ"#ᘀᬀᰀ :଀(ᄀ଀ጀ2 0଀ᄀ଀?ఀB Ā Ā Ā؀?Ѐ-܀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ$%1̀ &ᔀ. ᨀᨀᨀ#᠀ᔀ ฀ ᤀᰀ%ᜀ᠀& ᜀᬀ%ᔀᬀ)*܀ሀ଀0଀Ѐ܀฀଀0ഀጀ܀(܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀က"ᘀἀᔀ ฀଀0ഀЀ଀ ἀᨀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀἀ* Ā ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀%$ᘀᬀᜀ ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ#" ᨀ. ᤀᰀᰀ#Ḁᬀ ฀ ᤀᜀ%ᔀᔀ& ᜀᜀ%ᨀἀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā)*܀ሀ଀0଀Ѐ܀਀଀Ԁࠀᄀ଀ጀ܀(܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀က"ᘀἀᤀ ਀଀Ԁࠀᄀ+2 ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā &ᔀᨀᜀ#Ḁ᠀ ฀ ᤀᜀ%ᨀᤀ& ᜀᬀ%ᘀᤀ ܀਀ጀ7Ѐ଀ᄀ଀C1଀ጀ܀(܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀က"ᘀἀᨀ ਀ጀ7Ѐ଀ᄀ଀21଀2 ሀ଀0଀Ѐ܀*(ᰀ. Ā ᜀ. ᰀᜀᬀ#᠀ᬀ $ ᤀᤀ%ᤀᬀ& ᜀᜀ%ᘀἀ& Ā)*܀ሀ଀0଀Ѐ܀Ѐ02ጀ7ࠀ2/܀(܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀က"ᘀἀᰀ /Ѐ02ጀ7Ѐ က"ᘀἀᜀ :଀Ȁഀሀ଀0଀2܀)܀:଀Ȁഀሀ଀0଀2܀*Ѐ(+,Ѐ0ᜀ. ᜀ#ᰀᤀ $ ᤀᰀ%ᘀᰀ& ᜀᰀ%ᤀᨀ& Ā Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Lithuania

؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ᐀ᔀᔀᔀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀᜀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀ᠀ᘀ ᐀ᔀᤀᨀᘀ ᐀ᤀᔀᤀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᨀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᬀᘀ ᐀ᨀᤀᤀᘀ ᐀ᰀᘀᨀᘀ ᐀ᬀᔀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᰀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᜀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᰀᘀ ᐀᠀ᤀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀Ḁᨀᔀᘀ ᐀ἀᘀᤀᘀ ᐀ἀᔀḀᘀᴀ ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ ᐀ἀᔀ!ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ᐀ᘀᴀ ᐀ἀᰀᔀᘀ ਀ᔀᘀᤀἀ ਀ᔀᘀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᘀḀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᘀἀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᘀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᤀᘀ ਀ᔀᔀᬀᨀ ਀ᔀᔀḀḀ ਀ᔀᨀᘀᨀ ਀ᔀᨀᨀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᰀ᠀᠀ ਀ᔀᜀᤀḀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᤀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᨀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ &ᔀᤀᘀᔀ(ᨀ᠀ᨀ#ᤀḀ "$ ᔀḀ)ᤀᤀ*ᤀᰀ%ᨀᜀ& ᰀἀ)ᤀᜀ*ᜀᰀ%ᜀᰀ ܀ကЀጀ1+2ఀࠀ2܀(܀5ࠀᄀȀ2܀ऀ଀2-܀Ȁ&ကЀጀ1+2ఀЀ&%$؀฀܀'܀&Ȁ&%$؀ᘀᘀᔀက"ᘀἀᬀ ฀#" 1Ѐ଀,Ѐ0ᔀᜀ. Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā*܀ᄀ1଀ᄀ଀Ѐ଀؀ఀ7܀2؀ഀጀ7଀ᄀ଀ᄀ1+2ఀ 2Ѐ-.Ѐఀ& ᠀ᰀᘀ(Ḁᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀฀/01܀'܀$Ѐ-.Ѐఀ,଀Ѐᄀ"܀؀ᘀᘀᨀ +,଀ఀ#" *ᨀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᨀ)ᜀḀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᬀ ؀฀0Ѐᄀ଀3܀'܀؀ᘀᘀᰀ ฀0Ѐᄀ଀3#" က"ᘀἀ᠀ ਀ఀ0ࠀ2଀ጀᄀЀ଀܀)܀਀ఀ0ࠀ2଀ጀᄀЀ଀܀*1Ѐ଀,Ѐ0Ḁ. ᤀἀ#ᰀᔀ $ ᤀᰀ%ᨀᤀ& ᜀᰀ%ᜀᘀ& Ā Ā Ā ᤀᔀᬀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᬀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᜀ* Ā Ā $؀0܀฀0Ѐᄀ$%5܀'܀4ࠀࠀȀ0ЀᄀȀ܀$؀0܀&%$ᘀᘀᜀ ฀0Ѐᄀ#" ᜀ#ᔀᜀ $ ᤀᰀ%ᨀḀ& ᜀᰀ%ᰀᜀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ఀЀ7଀21଀ጀ؀଀/܀(܀5ࠀᄀȀ2܀ऀ଀2-܀2؀ఀЀ7଀21؀က"ᘀἀḀ /଀ 1Ѐ଀,Ѐ0ἀ. Ā*܀ᄀ1଀ᄀ଀Ѐ଀؀ఀ7܀2؀ഀጀ7଀ᄀ଀ᄀ1+2ఀ *ᤀ(ᜀᜀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀Ѐ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀&%$3؀ᘀᘀᬀ ฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ#" Ā Ā Ā ܀C$%5؀฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ܀'܀$ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀AЀఀ%Ѐ &ᔀᔀ#ᘀᤀ $ ᤀᜀ%ᘀ᠀& ᜀᰀ%ᤀἀ ܀ऀ଀2-܀؀ࠀ1:܀A฀Ѐ(ఀЀఀ%Ѐࠀ6଀܀%/܀ᄀЀᄀȀ;&-܀Ѐ܀؀Ѐ1)܀%/܀က"ᘀἀἀ 8Ѐ5-&;ᄀ଀2 Ā ܀฀Ѐ(ఀࠀ2଀ࠀ2܀଀0܀@ഀ؀܀8Ѐ5଀ࠀ܀(܀5ࠀᄀȀ2 2Ѐ(,Ѐ0ᔀᘀ. ᔀ(ἀᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā*܀@ഀጀ7@ఀ7܀2؀Ԁ05ᄀ:ࠀ1܀฀-ࠀጀ$%76܀'܀Ԁ0&ᄀ܀ᘀᘀḀ ฀-ࠀጀ$%ጀ6#" *ᔀᬀ(Ḁᨀᜀ#ᘀᜀ $" ᤀᨀ%ᜀᜀ&ᔀᰀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᰀ%ᔀᔀ&ᜀᘀ)ᔀᘀ ܀'܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀4܀&Ԁࠀ%-ЀȀ܀؀0Ѐ%ࠀ6଀3%؀".Ѐഀ,Ѐ0ᤀ)*܀2؀ጀ;ጀ(଀21/܀(܀2؀က"ᔀᘀᘀ"#ᘀᘀἀ /ጀ;ጀ(଀21 Ԁࠀ%<ЀȀ& Ā Ā Ā܀ࠀ6଀3%1%<0؀8 &᠀Ѐഀ,Ѐ0ᨀ. ᠀#Ḁ᠀ $ ᤀᨀ%ᨀḀ& ᜀᰀ%ᘀ)*܀ఀ0ࠀ21Ѐ଀؀8܀(܀ఀ0ࠀ21Ѐ଀؀က"ᔀᘀᔀ 8 ᔀᘀᜀᤀ(ᬀἀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā ܀1%$؀8܀'܀Ȁࠀ,ࠀ-଀؀-ఀ$܀؀%$؀" ᘀᔀᰀ#" ᘀ#ᰀᬀ ฀ ᤀᨀ%ᔀᔀ& ᜀᬀ%ᔀḀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀Ԁ଀21Ѐ2܀2؀ЀሀЀ0>܀( />܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀؀Ȁࠀ,ࠀ0؀>က"ᔀᘀᤀ $ఀ<ЀሀЀ *6ࠀ଀,-ᜀ. Ā Ā *Ѐ$ ᔀᤀἀ(ᬀᰀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ-%܀5%$؀8܀'܀Ѐ-$ఀ%܀$Ѐ-%܀&%$؀" ᘀᔀᜀ#" 6ጀ0,-ᔀ. ᘀ#ᔀἀ $ ᤀᨀ%ᔀᜀ& ᜀᜀ%ᘀᜀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā*܀଀ጀࠀᄀЀ)؀:܀(܀଀ጀࠀᄀЀ)؀: က"ᔀᘀᨀ ࠀ ᔀᰀἀ(ᤀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀ᠀* Ā Ā%$؀%9ࠀ܀'܀ࠀ%$؀%ᘀᔀḀ 9ࠀ#" 6ጀ0,-ᨀ. ᘀ#ᔀ᠀ $ ᤀᨀ%ᤀᰀ& ᜀᜀ%ᘀᜀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā*܀Ȁഀ଀ጀ2؀0؀਀܀(܀Ȁഀ଀ጀ2؀0؀က"ᔀᘀᰀ ਀ ᨀᨀᘀ(ᤀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᘀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᜀ* Ā ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀ᘀᔀἀ 9ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%#" &ᘀ#ᬀᨀ ฀ ᤀᨀ%ᜀ᠀& ᜀᜀ%ᤀᜀ ܀2؀0ഀ؀Ѐ(ᄀЀ3/܀(܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀؀0ഀ؀က"ᔀᘀᜀ /Ѐ(ᄀЀ3 9ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ȁ,-ᤀ. Ā؀1*܀Ԁ଀21Ѐ2 &ᘀ#ᔀᜀἀ(ᰀᤀ $: ᔀᬀ)ᨀᰀ*ᤀᨀ%ᨀᰀ& ᰀḀ)ᜀᔀ*ᜀᨀ%ᜀḀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀؀ࠀ.3%܀؀Ѐഀ,-ᔀ.9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%)*܀਀ఀЀ(Ѐ଀܀(܀က"ᔀᘀᬀ"#ᘀᤀᔀ ਀ఀЀ(Ѐ଀ Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ࠀ.3%܀9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%1 &Ḁ#ᤀᔀ $ ᤀᰀ%ᰀᔀ& ᜀᰀ%ᨀᰀ ܀਀5଀ᄀȀഀ଀Ѐጀ2܀(܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀က"ᔀᘀ᠀ ਀5଀ᄀȀഀ଀ጀ2 ᰀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀḀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀&%ᄀ଀;&-܀؀Ѐఀ0Ѐ,-ᤀ.,0଀ᄀ଀3%#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀*܀ᘀᤀᤀ Ԁ!଀0଀21Ѐ2#" Ā Ā Ā ܀0଀ᄀ଀3%1,<#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀଀0!܀'܀$ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ 7Ѐ0,-ᔀ.-&;ᄀ/%& ᔀḀ#ᔀᨀ $ ᤀᰀ%ᔀ᠀& ᜀᰀ%ᘀᨀ& Ā Ā Ā*܀2؀Ѐ5଀ᄀ଀21/܀(܀2؀က"ᔀᘀḀ /Ѐ5଀ᄀ଀21 "#ᘀᤀᨀက"ᔀᘀἀ ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ܀'܀ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ8Ѐ7଀2ఀ+ఀ଀2܀)܀8Ѐ7଀2ఀ+ఀ଀2܀*7଀1,-᠀. ᬀᘀ(Ḁᨀᘀ#ᤀᜀ "$ ᔀᨀ)ᨀḀ*ᤀᤀ%ᰀ᠀& ᜀᘀ)ᰀᘀ*ᜀᰀ%ᤀᜀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀᤀᰀက"ᔀᔀᘀ ?Ѐ଀2଀Ѐ଀܀)܀?Ѐ2଀Ѐ଀܀*7଀1,-ᬀ.᐀ࠀ;$ࠀ6଀3%&܀-&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀ ᘀ(ᨀ᠀ᘀ#ᔀᜀ "$ ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ*ᤀᨀ%ᘀᜀ& ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ*ᜀᰀ%ᤀ᠀& Ā Ā ᘀ#ᔀᬀ ฀ ᤀᔀ%ᰀḀ& ᜀᬀ%ᘀᔀ& Ā ܀؀1)؀5܀ᄀ଀6ࠀ2؀)؀:%܀/(܀ЀԀ-&;ᄀ5<2܀Ѐ܀ࠀ;?ࠀᄀ଀66଀3%5؀)؀:က"ᔀᔀᔀ ᐀ "#ᘀᤀᜀ ᐀*5(ጀ,Ѐᔀ.ࠀȀࠀᄀ଀ᄀ$%Ѐ܀Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀ ᨀḀ(ἀᬀ : ᔀ᠀)ᘀ᠀* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* Ā Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ ᘀ#ᨀ᠀ ฀ ᤀᜀ%ᜀᤀ& ᜀᜀ%ᰀ᠀& Ā܀<%$ഀЀ0,Ѐᔀ.᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ/ᄀ*܀0Ѐ2؀ഀ؀܀Ā(ሀ଀ࠀ܀(܀؀Ѐ1)܀က"ᔀᔀᤀ Ā(ሀ଀2 *᠀ᨀᬀἀ(ἀᰀᔀ#Ḁᨀ $" ᤀᨀ%ᨀᔀ&ᔀ᠀)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᜀ%ᔀᨀ&ᰀἀ)ᔀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀&,3-6܀؀܀D܀E଀ഀ*Ԁࠀጀࠀ6ఀ଀3%-܀Ѐ܀0؀0଀7܀؀%$ᄀ܀က"ᔀᔀᨀ"#ᘀᤀ᠀ 9᐀ጀ3+ࠀ$ఀ&2Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀9ጀ36-3,&+2Ѐ܀(܀.؀ሀ܀7଀((ࠀЀ6଀3%1܀E଀ഀ2܀Ѐ܀᐀'Ѐ2(ࠀ$ఀ5ᄀ$Ѐጀ21଀21଀%1 *ഀ଀ࠀఀ+2܀D܀'Ѐ2(Ѐጀ21଀21଀2.܀*ഀ᠀. *ᤀᔀ#ᬀḀᰀᜀ(ᘀᬀ "฀ ᤀᜀ%ᰀᰀ&ᔀᰀ)ᜀᨀ* ᜀᰀ%ᜀᤀ&ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ ܀0଀2؀̀܀(܀.܀'܀ጀఀ-A0ЀȀЀ܀ԀࠀЀᄀȀ܀Ѐ܀D܀ᄀЀ60-؀3܀؀Ѐ*3ࠀ0Ȁ%$6܀0؀Ѐᄀࠀ0଀7܀0Ѐ;଀2؀-က"ᔀᔀᰀ"#ᘀᤀḀ ̀᐀ AഀḀ.0ЀȀ> Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀*܀Ѐ.܀1ԀЀ܀ᄀЀ6ᤀᨀᜀ-؀C܀2܀+᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$%>ഀ଀ࠀఀ܀D܀ᄀЀ؀2଀* ᨀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀AЀ0$܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᨀᘀ A#" ᜀ#ᘀἀ ฀ ᤀᰀ%ᜀᘀ& ᜀᜀ%ᔀᜀ& Ā ܀(܀.-Ԁࠀጀఀ ؀?0܀D܀ЀAЀ7Ѐ021Ѐ2/܀*&-܀ᄀఀࠀ6଀؀ЀᄀȀ؀က"ᔀᔀᜀ Ԁ਀7 *ഀἀ. ᔀ(ᬀᜀ " ᔀḀ)ᤀᔀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ*܀.܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀Ѐ021Ѐ2܀-؀଀6-܀Ѐ7/܀DЀ܀FȀ-ഀ଀ࠀఀ+2܀ࠀऀ܀$*-؀܀ᄀఀࠀ6଀؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᨀᔀ ਀7A#" FȀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀Ԁ *ᔀḀᤀ(ᨀᨀᘀ#ᔀᨀ "฀ ᤀᜀ%ᜀᰀ&ᔀ᠀)ᔀ᠀* ᜀᜀ%ᘀᘀ&ᰀἀ)ᘀḀ ܀.1Ԁ܀ᔀᘀ#ᔀ*܀؀ጀ5܀0ࠀ2؀'܀(܀0؀0଀7܀଀;&Ѐ>,"܀'܀଀00$,܀&;଀-,"0؀' ᘀᨀᨀက"ᔀᔀᬀ#" *ഀᔀᨀ. Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *᠀ᜀ(ᘀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀ ܀Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%5=܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀&ᘀᨀᰀ =Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%#" &ᘀ#ᘀḀ ฀ ᤀᜀ%ᜀᰀ& ᜀᜀ%ᘀᨀ ܀D܀؀7଀((Ѐሀ܀؀Ѐ07଀ᄀ/*܀0؀0଀7܀က"ᔀᔀ᠀ ਀Ѐ0଀Ѐ .ࠀఀࠀ% Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀D܀؀Ѐ07଀ᄀ/*܀؀ጀ5܀਀Ѐ0଀ࠀ2܀(܀.-Ԁࠀጀఀ ഀᔀᰀ. ᔀ᠀ἀ(ᜀᨀ " ᔀᤀ)ᰀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā*܀.ഀ଀ࠀఀ+2/;<>؀=܀'܀Ѐ;଀-؀= ᘀᨀᜀ#" *Ḁᬀᨀ(᠀ᔀᘀ#ᰀ᠀ "฀ ᤀᜀ%ᜀᰀ&ᔀ᠀)ᤀᘀ* ᜀᜀ%ᘀ᠀&ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ ܀.-Ԁࠀጀఀ܀D܀؀Ѐ1)܀ကЀ1Ѐ6Ѐ଀*܀0؀0଀7܀ᄀ/%&ကЀ1Ѐ6Ѐ؀$؀=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%ᄀ଀؀$؀= က"ᔀᔀḀ"#ᘀᨀᬀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀.ഀ଀ࠀ;଀ጀ܀଀1଀܀@ഀ؀܀ကЀ1Ѐ6ጀ܀ᄀጀࠀ*܀ကЀ1Ѐ6Ѐ܀( "#ᘀᨀḀ =଀-଀%ࠀ6$%&܀-&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀ ᘀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᨀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᰀ* *ഀᔀᜀ. =଀;<#9Ѐ܀Ѐ܀܀ᄀጀࠀ*܀1Ѐ%3؀2ࠀጀఀ܀'ༀ0ጀȀ܀(܀ЀȀࠀ4$؀܀.-Ԁࠀࠀጀఀ 0ࠀጀഀ଀ࠀ;଀ጀ.܀%& *ഀᤀᔀ. "#ᘀᰀᨀ 2ࠀഀࠀ,0ጀȀ%&܀'܀2ࠀഀࠀ,07Ȁ%& ᘀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀἀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀᨀ* ᔀ#ᘀḀ $ ᤀᰀ%ᤀḀ& ᜀᰀ%ᘀ᠀& Ā Ā Ā ܀Ѐ)4܀(܀.-Ԁࠀጀఀ܀D܀ጀȀᄀ଀Ѐ?*܀0؀0଀7܀က"ᔀᤀᤀ 4(Ѐ ഀᤀᤀ. ᨀᘀᤀ(ᤀᤀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā*܀.ഀ଀ࠀ;଀ጀ܀଀1଀܀ጀȀᄀ଀ࠀ2?܀ᄀጀࠀ*؀?ࠀᄀࠀ%-2܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀؀$ᘀᰀᰀ 2-%ࠀᄀࠀ#" ഀᤀᨀ. ᬀᔀᜀ(ᨀᨀᘀ#ᔀᤀ "$ ᔀᨀ)ᜀᔀ*ᤀᰀ%ᤀ᠀& ᜀᘀ)ᘀᘀ*ᜀᰀ%ᔀᤀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā*܀؀ጀ5܀2ᄀࠀ2؀0؀9܀(܀0؀0଀7܀ഀᄀЀ؀0؀଀6ࠀ%0>ఀ$%ࠀ9>2܀'܀ᘀᰀᬀက"ᔀᤀᨀ 2-଀6ࠀ%0Ѐఀ$%ࠀ#" *ᨀᔀ᠀(᠀ᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᰀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀᤀ ܀'܀$؀ЀᄀȀ$ఀࠀᄀ$܀؀଀$%ࠀ63.܀؀%$;ᘀᰀ᠀ ကЀ#" ᘀ#ᘀἀ $ ᤀᰀ%ᤀᤀ& ᜀᰀ%ᔀᨀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀(܀02؀0଀7܀ԀЀ0ᄀ଀Ѐ؀3=܀Ѐᄀ$%ࠀ6Ȁ܀؀/.܀Ȁ଀ᄀሀ;$%1؀က"ᔀᤀᰀ ကЀ̀ ഀᤀᰀ. Ā*܀2؀ጀ5܀ԀЀ0ᄀ଀ࠀ2=܀D܀2؀Ȁ଀ᄀሀ؀̀ "#ᘀᰀḀ က଀;Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀က଀;Ѐ6> ᰀᔀḀ(ᜀᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᰀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᘀ* ᘀ#ᘀἀ $ ᤀᰀ%ᤀᤀ& ᜀᰀ%ᔀᨀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ᄀጀࠀ*܀1Ѐ؀02؀:܀(܀0؀0଀7܀1Ѐ؀02؀: က"ᔀᤀᜀ ἀᤀ(ᰀᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᘀᬀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᤀ* Ā .܀1%$0؀ࠀഀᤀᜀ6*܀.က଀ఀ܀ጀ'܀ഀ-Ѐ଀ࠀ;଀6଀܀଀1଀܀@2@7܀ࠀԀࠀ଀ጀ:܀؀0ጀԀ଀ᄀ0$%/؀ᘀᰀἀ က଀ఀࠀ6#" :ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6/ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᰀᬀ#᠀ᘀ $ ᤀᨀ%ᨀᬀ& ᜀᜀ%ᘀᘀ& Ā ܀ᄀጀࠀ܀ԀጀᄀЀ2؀̀܀(܀0؀0଀7܀ԀጀᄀЀ2؀̀ က"ᔀᤀᬀ ഀᨀᨀ. ᠀(ᜀᔀ " ᔀᤀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā*܀@Ԁ܀ጀ02଀ጀ/܀଀1଀܀ࠀఀࠀ%/Ѐጀᄀࠀ.܀/ကጀ@ᄀ܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀ᘀᜀᔀ ကጀഀᄀ଀#" *᠀ᔀᜀᔀ(ἀἀ ฀: ᤀᔀ%ᤀᰀ&ᔀᬀ)ᔀᤀ* ᜀᜀ%ᜀᨀ&ᰀḀ)ᰀ#᠀ ܀܀ЀᄀȀ-&Ѐ2؀Aጀ2Ȁ0Ѐ7܀'਀Ѐ܀-؀6܀D܀଀-܀-؀ԀࠀጀఀD*܀0&9܀ࠀऀ܀$؀଀7-؀0܀ЀᄀȀᄀ଀6Ѐ؀က"ᔀᤀ᠀"#ᘀᜀᤀ '଀A Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀଀1଀܀ഀ଀ࠀ;଀ጀ܀ᄀጀࠀ܀଀ᄀ଀6Ѐ'܀(܀.܀ ؀D؀79଀&((Ѐሀ ਀Ѐጀ2Ȁ0Ѐ7ࠀ܀*ഀᨀ. *ᔀ(ᜀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᘀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀἀ ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀ȀЀ؀਀Ԁ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᨀ A#" ᔀ#ᬀᜀ ฀ ᤀᔀ%ᨀᬀ& ᜀᜀ%ᨀ᠀& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀(܀02؀0଀7܀؀਀Ѐ(5܀਀ԀЀᄀȀBȀ1܀܀଀7଀0ഀЀ-&2؀:ЀᄀȀ؀က"ᔀᤀḀ A ഀᰀ. Ā܀2؀ጀ5*܀2؀2Ѐ(5܀଀0܀଀7଀0ഀࠀ؀: *0ጀ,& ᔀᜀ(᠀ᘀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀἀ܀AB0ᄀ଀3%1܀'܀&,0ጀ܀؀0ᄀ଀3%؀ᘀᜀᰀ A#" ᔀ#ᬀᔀ $ ᤀᤀ%ᨀᤀ& ᜀᜀ%ᔀ᠀& Ā ܀2؀Ѐጀ0Ѐሀ"܀଀1଀܀؀ጀ5܀Bጀ0ࠀ2܀(܀0؀0଀7܀က"ᔀᤀἀ Bጀ0Ѐ ᜀᨀ(ᤀḀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᜀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᔀ* Ā ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ࠀ6%Ѐ,3؀;က଀܀ࠀऀ܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀.ᘀᜀᬀ +*ഀᬀ#" :$ࠀ6%Ѐ܀'܀Aࠀ%<ЀȀ&܀က଀;B3,ࠀ6%&܀Ѐ܀ Ā Ā ᜀ#ᬀᤀ $ ᤀᰀ%ᨀ᠀& ᜀᰀ%ᔀ᠀& 99 ܀(܀.-Ԁࠀጀఀ܀D܀0؀3ࠀ0Ȁ*܀0؀0଀7܀2&%+01؀'က"ᔀᨀᘀ :?ࠀ6 98 Ā Ā ܀ഀ଀ࠀ;଀ጀ܀଀1଀܀ᄀࠀ2؀2଀@7܀ᄀጀࠀ܀2+01؀' "#ᘀᜀ᠀ Aࠀ-*ഀᔀἀ.Ѐ6$%&܀%-Ѐ$܀%Ѐ-$ఀ܀'܀Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%5܀ ᠀᠀(ᨀᜀ " ᔀᬀ)ᰀᨀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᔀ* %-Ѐ$ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā &ᤀ#ᬀḀ ฀ ᤀᜀ%ᜀᰀ& ᜀᜀ%ᘀᜀ ܀D܀؀Ѐ1)܀ᄀ+2؀଀Ԁ؀>*܀0؀0଀7܀ᄀЀ؀଀Ԁ؀> က"ᔀᨀᔀ 0Ѐ3,ఀB ᘀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā:܀Ѐ̀܀'܀؀0Ѐ3,ఀ:܀ᘀᜀḀ ̀Ѐ#" Ā Ā Ā ܀ᄀ଀ࠀ؀଀Ԁ؀ഀ܀ᄀጀࠀ܀ᄀЀ؀଀Ԁ؀>܀(܀.-Ԁࠀጀఀ *ᔀ(᠀ᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᨀᜀ ܀଀6Ѐ̀܀'܀ᔀ. ऀ0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ܀%ഀᔀ;ᄀ଀*܀ഀ଀ࠀ܀଀1଀܀&G܀ЀᄀȀ܀ഀ@,Ѐ؀ᘀᬀᘀ ကጀ#" ကጀ,&܀Ѐ܀.ࠀఀࠀ%Ѐ܀G&;ᄀ/% Ā ଀ሀᄀ, ᘀ#Ḁἀ ฀ ᤀᬀ%ᘀḀ& ᜀᜀ%ᤀᬀ& Ā*܀؀1)؀5܀@ഀ؀܀ༀ଀(ጀ;଀ࠀ܀(܀؀Ѐ1)܀က"ᔀᨀᤀ ༀ଀(ጀఀ଀2 ḀḀ " ᔀᜀ)ᬀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā)᠀ ܀଀6Ѐ̀܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀F-0଀3܀ࠀऀ܀ᘀᬀᔀ Ѐᜀ!0ࠀࠀȀ.. 0Ѐ଀ᄀ#" ᘀ#ᨀἀ ฀ ᤀᜀ%ᜀ᠀& ᜀᜀ%ᤀᬀ& Ā ,؀ጀఀ*܀9Ѐጀᄀࠀ0଀Ѐ଀܀(܀ЀԀ5<2܀0଀Ѐ଀ ؀က"ᔀᨀᨀ F-0଀9Ѐጀᄀࠀ3 ᔀᜀᬀ(ᘀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᤀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᰀ* Ā Ā ܀'܀ࠀሀ;܀؀0଀ᄀ଀$ఀ؀$Ѐ-܀؀%$ᘀᬀᰀ ̀-ᔀࠀ6ࠀ. ȀࠀԀ#" 0଀ᄀ଀?ఀB ᨀᬀᘀ#ᬀᤀ ฀ ᤀᰀ%ᨀᬀ& ᜀᜀ%ᰀἀ& Ā؀?Ѐ-܀ᤀ.̀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ$%1)*܀ሀ଀0଀Ѐ܀Ѐ(଀ࠀ6଀>܀(܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀က"ᔀᨀᰀ <Ѐ(଀ࠀ6଀ *ἀᨀ(᠀ᤀᜀ#ᬀἀ $" ᤀᰀ%ᤀᤀ&ᔀᰀ)ᰀᘀ* ᜀᨀ%ᬀᘀ&ᰀḀ)ᨀἀ ܀'܀$ᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀଀ጀ)؀Ѐ3/܀(Ԁࠀጀ܀܀ࠀ-&ࠀᄀȀ2,܀5܀ऀ଀2-܀؀%$଀Ѐ଀,-ЀȀ)؀က"ᔀᨀᜀ"#ᘀᬀᜀ ̀/Ѐ3ࠀ6ࠀ ࠀ-&Ѐ0ᔀ᠀. Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā,܀,7Ѐ0*܀ᄀ1଀ᄀ,-ЀȀ$%1଀Ѐ଀؀ఀ̀7ࠀ6ࠀ &Ḁ#ἀᘀ ฀ ᤀᤀ%ᘀḀ& ᜀᜀ%ᤀᘀ ܀ᄀࠀ2଀ࠀ2+)8܀(܀؀07؀2؀0܀က"ᔀᨀᬀ 8(+ᄀࠀ6଀ Ȁ0Ѐጀ2ఀ଀ᄀ଀2܀*ఀЀጀ,-ᤀ. Ā Ā &ᰀ#ἀḀ ฀ ᤀᤀ%ᤀᰀ& ᜀᜀ%ᤀᰀ ܀(܀2+؀))7Ѐ܀02؀0଀7܀਀ጀᄀ଀6Ѐ܀D܀؀က"ᔀᨀ᠀ ?଀ᄀሀ ఀЀጀ,-ᬀ. Ā Ā Ā*܀਀ጀᄀ଀6Ѐ܀D܀؀଀ᄀሀ? &Ḁ#ᨀᰀ ฀ ᤀᬀ%ᰀᨀ& ᜀᜀ%ᔀᬀ ܀؀1)؀5܀Ȁጀఀ଀21଀ࠀ=܀(܀ЀԀ5<2܀က"ᔀᨀḀ =Ȁጀఀ଀21଀2 ᤀᤀ. Ā Ā-,؀27* က"ᔀᨀἀ ༀЀጀ6Ѐ܀)܀ༀЀጀ6Ѐ܀*2Ѐ(,-ᔀᘀ. ᤀ#ᔀᤀ $ ᤀᜀ%ᰀᘀ& ᜀᰀ%ᔀᔀ& Ā Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Lithuania

؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ᐀ᔀᔀᔀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀᜀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀ᠀ᘀ ᐀ᔀᤀᨀᘀ ᐀ᤀᔀᤀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᨀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᬀᘀ ᐀ᨀᤀᤀᘀ ᐀ᰀᘀᨀᘀ ᐀ᬀᔀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᰀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᜀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᰀᘀ ᐀᠀ᤀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀Ḁᨀᔀᘀ ᐀ἀᘀᤀᘀ ᐀ἀᔀḀᘀᴀ ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ ᐀ἀᔀ!ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ᐀ᘀᴀ ᐀ἀᰀᔀᘀ ਀ᔀᘀᤀἀ ਀ᔀᘀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᘀḀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᘀἀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᘀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᤀᘀ ਀ᔀᔀᬀᨀ ਀ᔀᔀḀḀ ਀ᔀᨀᘀᨀ ਀ᔀᨀᨀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᰀ᠀᠀ ਀ᔀᜀᤀḀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᤀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᨀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ 7଀ᄀ,-ᔀᨀ. ᔀᤀᘀᔀ(ᨀ᠀ᨀ#ᔀᬀ "฀ ᤀᜀ%ᔀἀ&ᔀḀ)ᤀᤀ* ᜀᰀ%ᰀ᠀&ᰀἀ)ᤀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā*܀01଀Ѐ଀؀:܀(܀01଀Ѐ଀؀:&Ȁ&%$؀฀܀'܀&Ȁ&%$؀ᘀᘀᔀက"ᔀᰀᘀ ฀#" &ᰀᘀ(Ḁᘀᔀᨀ#ᨀᜀ "$ ᔀ᠀)ᜀᔀ*ᤀᜀ%ᘀᬀ& ᰀḀ)ᜀἀ*ᜀᰀ%ᤀᰀ᠀ ܀ሀ଀0଀Ѐ܀ጀȀᄀ଀ᄀ1ጀ?܀(܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀2Ѐ-.Ѐఀ&?ጀȀᄀ଀ᄀ1Ѐ଀܀฀/01܀'܀$Ѐ-.Ѐఀ,଀Ѐᄀ"܀؀ᘀᘀᨀက"ᔀᰀᔀ +,଀ఀ#" *2Ѐ(,Ѐᤀ. Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᨀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᨀ)ᜀḀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᬀ ؀฀0Ѐᄀ଀3܀'܀؀ᘀᘀᰀ ฀0Ѐᄀ଀3#" ᘀ#ᬀᤀ $ ᤀᰀ%ᤀ᠀& ᜀᨀ%ᜀἀ& Ā Ā Ā ܀଀Ѐ଀)؀51؀$܀(܀5Ѐ0ఀ܀ЀԀ5<2܀଀Ѐ଀)؀51؀$ က"ᔀᰀᤀ 7Ѐ0,Ѐἀ. ᤀᔀᬀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᬀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā*$؀0܀฀0Ѐᄀ$%5܀'܀4ࠀࠀȀ0ЀᄀȀ܀$؀0܀&%$ᘀᘀᜀ ฀0Ѐᄀ#" က"ᔀᰀᨀ /0ጀࠀᄀ଀2܀)܀/0ጀࠀᄀ଀2܀*1Ѐ଀,Ѐᔀ. ᘀ#ᔀᘀ $ ᤀᰀ%ᔀᰀ& ᜀᰀ%ᰀᜀ& ᤀ(ᜀᜀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀Ѐ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀&%$3؀ᘀᘀᬀ ฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ#" ᤀ#ᬀᤀ $ ᤀᰀ%ᰀᔀ& ᜀᰀ%ᨀᜀ& Ā Ā Ā ܀#7Ѐ؀0܀਀ఀC$%5܀(܀ఀ؀2ȀЀᄀ؀฀ࠀ,ऀࠀ0܀'܀଀ጀ2܀$਀5଀ᄀ,.ࠀᄀȀഀȀ܀#܀ऀ଀$Ѐ܀Ѐ%7؀က"ᔀᰀᰀ AЀఀ਀ఀ0 -&਀5଀ᄀ;ᄀ/Ȁഀ%܀Ѐ܀-଀Ѐጀ2܀&;ᄀԀ/଀2%܀1ЀAЀ2܀ఀ%Ѐ*ఀ0Ѐ,Ѐἀ. Ā "#ᘀᘀḀ ฀-ࠀጀ$%ጀ6܀Ԁ0&ᄀ܀'܀฀-ࠀጀ$%76܀Ԁ05ᄀ ᔀ(ἀᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* ἀ#ᘀ᠀ ฀ ᤀᬀ%ᔀᘀ& ᜀᜀ%ᰀᘀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀Ԁ଀21Ѐ2܀2؀ༀ0Ѐഀጀఀ܀(܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀؀က"ᔀᰀᜀ ༀ0Ѐഀጀఀ ᔀᬀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᘀ* Ā ܀'܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀4܀&Ԁࠀ%-ЀȀ܀؀0Ѐ%ࠀ6Ѐ0,ЀḀ.଀3%؀ᘀᘀἀ "*ഀ#" Ԁࠀ%<ЀȀ& Ā Ā܀ࠀ6଀3%1%<0؀8 &ഀЀ0, ᘀ#ᤀᘀ ฀ ᤀᜀ%ᜀᨀ& ᜀᜀ%ᰀḀ*܀@ഀ؀܀ЀȀጀࠀ6+2>܀(܀؀Ѐ1)܀က"ᔀᰀᬀ <ЀȀጀࠀ6+2 ᔀᘀᜀᤀ(ᬀἀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā Ā ܀1%$؀8܀'܀Ȁࠀ,ࠀ-଀؀-ఀ$ .܀؀%$؀"᠀ᘀᔀᰀ Ѐ#" Ȁࠀ,ࠀఀ$ &᠀ഀЀ0,Ѐᬀ. ᘀ#᠀ἀ ฀ ᤀᜀ%ᜀᬀ& ᜀᜀ%ᰀ*܀@ഀ؀܀1ࠀ+:܀(܀؀Ѐ1)܀က"ᔀᰀ᠀ :+1Ѐ2 Ѐ$ ᔀᤀἀ(ᬀᰀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā-%܀5%$؀8܀'܀Ѐ-$ఀ%܀$Ѐ-%܀&%$؀" ᘀᔀᜀ#" ഀЀ0,Ѐᜀ. ᘀ#ᔀᬀ ฀ ᤀᜀ%ᜀᨀ& ᜀᜀ%ᰀᬀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā*܀@ഀ؀܀ሀ(଀ᄀ଀ࠀ ܀(܀؀Ѐ1)܀က"ᔀᰀḀ ሀ(଀ᄀ଀2 ࠀ ᔀᰀἀ(ᤀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀ᠀* Ā%$؀%9ࠀ܀'܀ࠀ%$؀%ᘀᔀḀ 9ࠀ#" ഀЀ0,Ѐᰀ. ᘀ#ᘀἀ ฀ ᤀᜀ%ᜀᨀ& ᜀᜀ%ᰀᬀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā*܀@ഀ؀܀฀Ѐ(ᄀ଀ࠀ܀(܀؀Ѐ1)܀က"ᔀᰀἀ ฀Ѐ(ᄀ଀2 ᨀᨀᘀ(ᤀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᘀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᜀ* Ā ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀ᘀᔀἀ 9ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%#" ᘀ#ᜀᘀ ฀ ᤀᜀ%ᘀᰀ& ᜀᜀ%ᤀἀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ᄀ+12;଀ጀ=܀(܀5Ѐ0ఀ܀ఀ&-2؀ࠀ0,܀1ऀࠀ%$6܀က"ᔀᜀᘀ 9=ᄀ+ࠀጀ.ࠀ12;଀Ѐ଀ Ѐᄀ+,Ѐᔀ. Ā*܀)21܀᠀ᨀ܀#@17܀ᔀᨀ܀଀2#)؀)2଀ *ἀ(ᰀᤀ : ᔀᬀ)ᨀᰀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᔀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀؀ࠀ.3%܀؀ᘀᤀᔀ 9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%#" က"ᔀᜀᔀ ᘀ#ᤀᜀ ฀ ᤀᜀ%ᜀᔀ& ᜀᜀ%ᘀᜀ& Ā Ā Ā ܀(܀3Ѐᄀ1܀2ఀ؀3؀<.ࠀ%܀#؀Ѐ1)܀6଀3%1܀9ጀᄀЀDࠀጀԀ3(଀ᄀ଀2 Ā Ā ܀10ЀᄀఀЀ2܀7Ѐ1Ѐ0଀ᄀ଀2܀@ഀ؀܀9ጀԀ3(଀ᄀ଀ࠀ *᠀ᰀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀḀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ ܀&%ᄀ଀;&-܀؀Ѐ. ,0଀ᄀ଀3%#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀Ѐ᠀!଀0,؀ᘀᤀᤀ *27#" Ā Ā Ā ܀0଀ᄀ଀3%1,<#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀଀0!܀'܀$ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ Ѐᬀ.-&;ᄀ/%& ᔀ#Ḁ᠀ ฀ ᤀᜀ%ᜀᔀ& ᜀᜀ%ᘀᰀ& Ā,؀27*܀؀ЀഀЀ(ࠀఀ'܀(܀؀က"ᔀᜀᤀ 'ЀഀЀ(ࠀఀ &Ѐᜀ. ᔀ#ἀᜀ ฀ ᤀᜀ%ᰀ᠀& ᜀᜀ%ᘀᨀ,؀27*܀؀8Ѐ30ЀȀ܀(܀؀က"ᔀᜀᨀ 8Ѐ30ЀȀ "#ᘀᤀᨀ ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ܀'܀ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ ᬀᘀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᨀ)ᨀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā က"ᔀᜀᰀ '଀(ሀЀጀȀഀ଀Ѐ଀܀)܀'଀(ሀЀጀȀഀ଀Ѐ଀܀*ఀЀጀ,-ᔀᬀ. ᘀ#ᰀᔀ $ ᤀᤀ%ᨀᨀ& ᜀᜀ%ᔀᜀ& Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀᤀᰀ ᐀ࠀ;$ࠀ6଀3%&܀-&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀ ᘀ(ᨀ᠀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* Ā ఀЀጀ, ᬀ#᠀ᜀ $ ᤀᤀ%ᨀᬀ& ᜀᜀ%ᔀἀ& Ā*܀2ጀ7଀2؀਀܀(܀ %/+؀))ᄀЀ;7܀&-0؀0଀7܀6଀3%5܀2ጀ᐀ࠀ;?ࠀ7଀2؀က"ᔀᜀᜀ ਀ -ᔀ᠀. Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀᤀᜀ ᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ଀ᄀ$%Ѐ܀Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀ ᨀḀ(ἀᬀ : ᔀ᠀)ᘀ᠀* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* Ā က"ᔀᜀᬀ ༀ0Ѐጀഀ଀Ѐ଀܀)܀ༀ0Ѐጀഀ଀Ѐ଀܀*ఀЀጀ,-ᔀᤀ᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ/ᄀ$%>܀Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ ᘀ#Ḁᨀ ฀ ᤀᤀ%ᤀᔀ& ᜀᜀ%ᤀᰀ& Ā *᠀ᨀᬀἀ(ἀᰀᘀ#ᬀᰀ "฀ ᤀᤀ%ᜀᬀ&ᔀ᠀)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᜀ%ᜀᤀ&ᰀἀ)ᔀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀&,3-6܀؀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%܀Ѐ܀؀%$ᜀ.᐀ࠀ$ఀ&ᄀ-,)؀1*܀଀Ѐጀ2Ѐ$܀(܀ᘀᤀ᠀က"ᔀᜀ᠀ $଀Ѐጀ2Ѐ#" ᐀ࠀ$ఀ5ᄀ$%1܀Ѐ܀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%1܀6-3,& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ఀЀጀ,-ᤀᔀ. ᘀ#ᰀἀ ฀ ᤀᤀ%ᘀ᠀& ᜀᜀ%ᔀἀ& Ā*܀؀9Ѐ30ጀ5଀ᄀ܀(܀؀က"ᔀᜀḀ 9Ѐ30ጀ5଀ᄀ က"ᔀᜀἀ "+0Ѐ(ጀ5଀2܀)܀"+0Ѐ(ጀ5଀2܀*ఀЀጀ,-ᤀᘀ. ᘀ#ᰀᬀ ฀ ᤀᤀ%ᘀᬀ& ᜀᜀ%ᔀἀ& ᰀᜀ(ᘀᬀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* Ā ܀'܀A0ЀȀЀ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀3܀ᘀᤀḀ ᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$%Ѐ#" ᘀ#᠀ᘀ ฀ ᤀᔀ%ᰀᔀ& ᜀᜀ%ᰀᘀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā <܀2؀A0ЀȀጀ5܀܀2؀5Ѐ)܀਀ЀЀ܀(܀ᄀЀ6-؀C܀+؀))7Ѐ<%$6܀0؀Ѐᄀࠀ0଀7܀؀;က"ᔀᬀᘀ ᐀਀Ѐ(5-Ѐ Ѐ,-Ḁ. Ā)1*܀ᄀ଀2؀)2 *ᨀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀḀ ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀AЀ0$܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᨀᘀ A#" Ḁ#ᘀᔀ ฀ ᤀᬀ%ᔀḀ& ᜀᜀ%ᤀᘀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀9଀Ȁഀ଀Ѐሀ଀0଀ࠀ܀(܀2ఀ؀؀?AऀࠀЀ00܀܀ЀᄀȀȀഀ଀Ѐሀ଀-&0଀2؀က"ᔀᬀᔀ Ԁ9଀ Ԁ଀21Ѐ2܀*଀ሀᄀ,7ᤀ. Ā *ᔀ(ᬀᜀ " ᔀḀ)ᤀᔀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀FȀ-Ѐ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᨀᔀ A#" ᬀ#ᔀḀ $ ᤀᰀ%ᘀἀ& ᜀᰀ%ᜀᘀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀Ԁ଀21Ѐ2܀9ጀ30Ѐ7ࠀ2܀(܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀFȀ-&0܀&܀ЀᄀȀ-Ѐ؀က"ᔀᬀᤀ Ԁ9ጀ30Ѐ7 *1Ѐጀ,7ᰀ. Ā "#ᘀᨀᨀ ",-଀;&܀,଀00$܀'܀",<଀;& ᔀḀᤀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀ᠀)ᔀ᠀* ᰀἀ)ᘀḀ* ᘀ#Ḁᰀ ฀ ᤀᜀ%ᔀᬀ& ᜀᜀ%ᨀἀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀଀;଀ࠀᄀ+2'܀Ѐ0؀ᄀ܀+؀))7Ѐ܀0؀0଀7܀ᄀఀࠀ6଀؀က"ᔀᬀᨀ ਀7 ᜀ(ᘀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀ᠀* Ā Ā ܀܀ᄀ଀2#6$%5؀)Ѐᄀ%ࠀ2=܀܀2'܀%؀ጀ5؀؀܀2-3܀%ᄀఀࠀఀࠀ2଀ࠀࠀ.܀؀਀&7%$܀(܀ᄀ%ࠀ6؀ᘀᨀᰀ 7=Ѐ଀((Ѐሀ#" '଀.ࠀ;଀ࠀᄀఀࠀ% +2܀*Ѐᄀ+,-ᬀ. Ā Ā Ā Ā ᔀ᠀ἀ(ᜀᨀᤀ#ᘀᤀ $" ᤀᨀ%ᰀᬀ&ᔀᤀ)ᰀᨀ* ᜀᰀ%ᔀ᠀&ᜀᘀ)ᤀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀Ԁ଀21Ѐ2܀਀଀07଀ᄀఀࠀ܀(܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀਀଀07଀ᄀఀЀ2/;<>؀=܀'܀Ѐ;଀-؀= က"ᔀᬀᰀ"#ᘀᨀᜀ *ᄀ/%&Ѐഀ,-ᤀᰀ. Ḁᬀᨀ(᠀ᔀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ؀$؀=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%ᄀ଀؀$؀=)* ᘀᨀᬀ#" ᔀ#ᘀᨀ $ ᤀᰀ%ᜀᜀ& ᜀᰀ%ᤀḀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀(܀+؀))7Ѐ܀0؀0଀7܀଀07଀6Ѐ$܀#؀7଀((Ѐሀ܀؀က"ᔀᬀᜀ BЀ(ࠀ7 "#ᘀᨀḀ =଀-଀%ࠀ6$%&܀-&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀ ᘀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᨀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᰀ* Ā ܀ᄀ଀2؀)2܀2؀ጀ5܀଀07଀6ࠀ2$܀@1Ԁ܀2؀BЀ(ࠀ7 =଀;<#܀Ѐ܀1%3؀2ࠀጀఀ܀'܀ЀȀࠀ4$؀Ԁ Ā ܀@)2܀@ጀ5܀2؀Ѐ(7>܀1Ѐ଀ԀЀ2#܀2؀8Ѐ1Ѐᄀ;଀ᄀ *ഀ0ࠀጀЀ0%,-ἀ& . "#ᘀᰀᨀ 2ࠀഀࠀ,0ጀȀ%&܀'܀2ࠀഀࠀ,07Ȁ%& ᘀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀἀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀᨀ* 0ࠀ1, ᔀ#ᤀᔀ ฀ ᤀᜀ%ᰀḀ& ᜀᜀ%ᰀḀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā*܀ሀ଀0଀Ѐ܀ఀጀ؀9ጀ2܀(܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀ఀࠀ2؀က"ᔀᬀἀ 9ጀ2 ᤀ. ᨀᘀᤀ(ᤀᤀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā-؀?ࠀᄀࠀ%-2܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀؀$ᘀᰀᰀ 2-%ࠀᄀࠀ#" *ᬀᔀᜀ(ᨀᨀᘀ#ᤀᰀ "฀ ᤀᔀ%ᨀᤀ&ᔀᨀ)ᜀᔀ* ᜀᜀ%ᜀἀ&ᜀᘀ)ᘀᘀ ܀2؀-;Ѐ؀0܀0؀<ࠀ)܀؀-ఀ*܀0؀0଀7܀଀6ࠀ%0>ఀ$%ࠀ਀Ѐ(ЀᄀఀЀ2>2܀'܀ᘀᰀᬀက"ᔀ᠀ᘀ 2-଀6ࠀ%0Ѐఀ$%ࠀ#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀Ԁጀ5଀ࠀ؀ഀ܀਀Ѐ(Ѐᄀఀࠀ܀(܀ĀĀ܀.0؀0଀7܀ࠀऀ *ᨀᔀ᠀(᠀ᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᰀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀᤀ ܀'܀$؀ᜀ$ఀ.ࠀᄀ-,؀ЀᄀȀ$܀10*܀@Ȁ0܀2؀଀0ࠀሀ0Ѐऀ଀ᄀ$଀%ࠀ63.܀؀%$;ᘀᰀ᠀ -଀ȀကЀ#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ࠀ63%$/.܀ကЀ;$%1 &᠀ᘀ#᠀ᨀ ฀ ᤀᔀ%ᨀᬀ& ᜀᬀ%ᘀ ܀Ȁഀ଀ࠀ؀ࠀ2'܀(܀2ጀ00ࠀጀᄀȀ଀ᄀሀ2܀Ȁ଀2؀က"ᔀ᠀ᔀ 'ࠀ2 21ጀ,-ᰀ. ᰀᔀḀ(ᜀᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᰀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā*܀Ȁጀ(+ᄀЀ2؀0଀܀2Ѐጀ1(଀ጀ܀@)က଀;Ѐ6>Ѐ5+܀'܀ᘀᰀḀ က଀;Ѐ6Ѐ#" ἀᤀ(ᰀᬀᘀ#ᨀᔀ "฀ ᤀᔀ%ᨀḀ&ᔀ᠀)ᘀᬀ* ᜀᬀ%ᘀḀ&ᰀἀ)ᰀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ᄀጀ؀ఀ܀1%$0؀ࠀࠀ6̀܀(က଀ఀ܀'܀ሀ2܀ࠀԀࠀ2ጀ00ࠀጀᄀȀ-଀Ѐᄀ6଀:܀؀%$܀ᄀ0Ѐ଀؀ࠀఀ؀က"ᔀ᠀ᤀ"#ᘀᰀἀ ̀က଀ఀࠀ6 21ጀ,-ᨀ. Ā*܀Ȁጀ(+ᄀЀ2؀0଀܀ጀ(Ѐ(଀/ ጀ/܀Ѐ5:ࠀԀ+(@ࠀ-Ѐ6 ᘀ#ᤀḀ᠀(ᜀᔀ "฀ ᤀᜀ%ᘀᤀ&ᔀᤀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᜀ%ᤀḀ&ᜀᘀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀؀07؀2؀0܀؀ЀᄀȀ2;Ѐ5)܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀ࠀఀࠀ%=ᄀ+12;଀Ѐ଀.܀/ကጀ@ᄀ܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀က"ᔀ᠀ᨀ"#ᘀᜀᔀ ကጀഀᄀ଀ *᠀ᔀ(ἀἀ : ᔀᬀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀḀ)ᰀ ܀.&-Ѐᄀ,-ᤀᤀȀ؀+A*Ѐᄀ܀'܀܀-؀@6Ȁ0܀@଀-܀؀10D܀଀ࠀ)؀)2଀&9܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀܀ᄀ+12;଀ጀ=܀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᤀ )A#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀D&9 ᔀ(ᜀᔀᔀ#ᔀἀ "฀ ᤀᜀ%ᔀἀ&ᔀᜀ)ᘀᤀ* ᜀᜀ%ᨀᔀ&ᜀᘀ)ᜀἀ* Ā ܀଀ࠀᄀ+2; ܀؀'ༀ܀܀-؀଀6-܀5Ѐ01#Ѐ܀)ሀ଀ࠀᄀЀ؀Ȁ0؀਀Ԁ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀܀ЀᄀȀ12;଀Ѐ଀؀ᘀᜀᨀက"ᔀ᠀ᰀ =ᄀ+A#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀଀ࠀᄀ଀ጀ;؀ༀ܀BȀ1 =?8܀(܀؀07؀਀Ԁ2܀؀?&-܀@;ЀᄀȀఀЀᄀ଀؀3ࠀA 3ࠀఀЀᄀ@܀Ȁ0Ѐጀ2ఀ଀ᄀ଀2܀*Ѐᄀ+,-ᔀἀ. 0ጀ,& ᔀᜀ(᠀ᘀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀἀ* Ā܀AB0ᄀ଀3%1܀'܀&,0ጀ܀؀0ᄀ଀3%؀ᘀᜀᰀ A#" ᜀᨀ(ᤀḀᘀ#ᔀᰀ "฀ ᤀᜀ%ᔀᬀ&ᔀᰀ)ᨀᜀ* ᜀᜀ%ᤀἀ&ᜀᘀ)ᨀᔀ* Ā Ā ܀Ȁ܀଀1଀Ѐ଀؀฀଀6Ѐᄀ܀܀ࠀ65Ѐ01#%Ѐ,3܀)Ѐ؀;က଀܀ሀ଀ࠀᄀ؀ࠀऀ0܀$0ЀᄀȀ܀ఀ12;଀Ѐ଀؀+က"ᔀ᠀ᜀ"#ᘀᜀᬀ +=ᄀ Ā . ܀ᔀḀЀ-,܀+&%Ѐᄀ*܀က଀;B31Ԁ@,ࠀ6܀܀଀1଀ጀ؀฀଀6܀Aࠀ%<ЀȀ&?8܀='܀(܀܀Ѐ%؀ࠀ6଀((Ѐሀ$:7 98 :?ࠀ6%& 99 က"ᔀ᠀ᬀ"#ᘀᜀ᠀ ਀1Ѐ଀2ఀ଀2܀)܀਀1Ѐ଀2ఀ଀2܀*Ѐᄀ+,-ᔀᘀ.Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%&܀%-Ѐ$܀%Ѐ-$ఀ܀'܀Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%5܀ ᠀᠀(ᨀᜀᤀ#ᘀᬀ "฀ ᤀᜀ%ᘀḀ&ᔀᬀ)ᰀᨀ* ᜀᜀ%ᨀᔀ&ᰀἀ)ᤀᔀ* %-Ѐ$ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā &Ѐഀ,-ᔀἀ. ᘀ#ᔀᨀ $ ᤀᨀ%ᰀ᠀& ᜀᰀ%ᔀᨀ)*܀؀)0Ѐ1Ѐ3Ѐ"܀(܀؀)က"ᔀ᠀᠀ "0Ѐ1Ѐ3Ѐ 0Ѐ3,ఀB ᘀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā:܀Ѐ̀܀'܀؀0Ѐ3,ఀ:܀ᘀᜀḀ ̀Ѐ#" ᘀ#᠀ᜀ $ ᤀᨀ%ᨀḀ& ᜀᰀ%ᘀḀ& Ā Ā Ā ܀(܀؀07؀2؀0܀؀ᄀЀఀጀ0܀2ఀ0଀;ఀ܀଀2)؀က"ᔀ᠀Ḁ က଀ጀ3 ᔀ(᠀ᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā ܀଀6Ѐ̀܀'܀Ѐഀ,-ᨀᨀ.ऀ0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ)*܀%ᄀ଀;܀@ഀ؀0܀଀ࠀ)؀G&3܀ЀᄀȀ܀ᘀᬀᘀ ကጀက଀ጀ,Ѐ#" ကጀ,&܀Ѐ܀.ࠀఀࠀ%Ѐ܀G&;ᄀ/% Ā &ᘀ#ᤀἀ $ ᤀᨀ%ᰀᘀ& ᜀᰀ%ᘀᜀ ܀9Ѐ7Ѐ଀ᄀ଀21଀Ѐ଀܀Ѐ0؀ᄀ܀ЀԀ5<2܀က"ᔀ᠀ἀ =ᄀ;଀Ѐ "#ᘀᬀᔀ ᠀(ḀḀ " ᔀᜀ)ᬀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀Ѐ܀଀6Ѐ7଀21଀ጀ̀܀଀'ᄀ܀-9Ѐ܀@؀Ȁ0-଀6܀܀؀F-10@0଀3܀ࠀऀ܀ᄀ;଀ࠀ2܀Ѐ=଀ᄀ܀(0܀؀଀0ࠀࠀȀ.((Ѐሀ!7 .Ѐഀ,-ᤀἀ)*܀؀F-0଀1Ԁ@3 ᔀᜀᬀ(ᘀᜀᘀ#ᘀḀ "฀ ᤀᬀ%ᘀἀ&ᔀᨀ)ᤀᤀ* ᜀᜀ%ᰀᔀ&ᜀᘀ)ᨀᰀ* Ā Ā ܀(܀ᄀȀ଀ᄀሀ2܀'܀ࠀሀ;܀؀0଀ᄀ଀$ఀ0ࠀጀ؀$2ጀ0-Ѐ܀؀7଀((Ѐሀ܀܀؀%$က"ᔀḀᘀ"#ᘀᬀᰀ ฀Ѐ0Ѐ7̀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ+1Ѐ଀ 0଀ᄀ଀?ఀ*ഀЀ0,-ᔀᰀB. Ā؀?Ѐ-܀@1Ԁ܀1%$܀฀Ѐ0Ѐ7̀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ+1ጀ *ἀᨀ(᠀ᤀᘀ#ᔀᨀ "฀ ᤀᬀ%ᘀḀ&ᔀᰀ)ᰀᘀ* ᜀᜀ%ᨀḀ&ᰀḀ)ᨀἀ ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀%$ഀЀ0,-ᤀᔀ.̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ*܀2؀଀(ఀ଀21"܀(܀2؀က"ᔀḀᔀ"#ᘀᬀᜀ "଀(ఀ଀21 ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā က"ᔀḀᤀ 9ጀ12ఀЀ2܀)܀9ጀ12ఀЀ2܀*଀ሀЀ,-ᔀᰀ. ᔀ#ᨀᬀ ฀ ᤀᬀ%ᤀᔀ& ᜀᜀ%ᨀᜀ& Ā က"ᔀḀᨀ /ࠀ5(+;1Ѐ(ᄀ଀2܀)܀/ࠀ5(+;1Ѐ(ᄀ଀2܀*(Ѐഀ, ᘀ#ᨀᨀ $ ᤀᨀ%ᨀᬀ& ᜀᰀ%ᔀ᠀& -ᤀᤀ. Ā &᠀ᜀ#ᔀᰀ ฀ ᤀᔀ%ᨀᨀ& ᜀᜀ%ᜀ ܀#3ጀ0଀Ѐ଀+9܀(܀0؀0଀7܀଀ᄀ଀6Ѐ'܀#က"ᔀḀᰀ 9+3ጀ0଀Ѐ଀ Ā Ā Ā Ā ,؀10*܀07ЀఀЀ2؀ഀ؀0܀ሀЀԀఀ଀ᄀ଀2܀଀ᄀ଀6ࠀ2' -ᨀ. &ᘀ#ᔀἀ ฀ ᤀᤀ%ᤀᰀ& ᜀᜀ%ᨀᰀ ܀Ԁ଀21Ѐ2܀8ጀᄀȀഀ଀ጀ܀(܀2ఀ؀ऀࠀ0܀က"ᔀḀᜀ 8ጀᄀȀഀ଀Ѐ଀ *2଀(,-ᔀ. Ā Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Lithuania

*ᰀᜀ(ᘀᬀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ ܀'܀A0ЀȀЀ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀3܀ᘀᤀḀ ᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$%Ѐ#" A0ЀȀ> Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀C܀<᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$% *ᨀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀḀ ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀AЀ0$܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᨀᘀ A#" Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀?AЀ0܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀Ԁ *ᔀ(ᬀᜀ " ᔀḀ)ᤀᔀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀FȀ-Ѐ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᨀᔀ A#" FȀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀Ԁ "#ᘀᨀᨀ ",-଀;&܀,଀00$܀'܀",<଀;& ᔀḀᤀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀ᠀)ᔀ᠀* ᰀἀ)ᘀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *᠀ᜀ(ᘀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀ ܀Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%5=܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀&ᘀᨀᰀ =Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%#" .ࠀఀࠀ% Ā Ā Ā Ā ᔀ᠀ἀ(ᜀᨀ " ᔀᤀ)ᰀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā /;<>؀=܀'܀Ѐ;଀-؀= ᘀᨀᜀ#" ᄀ/%& Ḁᬀᨀ(᠀ᔀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀$؀=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%ᄀ଀؀$؀= ᘀᨀᬀ#" "#ᘀᨀḀ =଀-଀%ࠀ6$%&܀-&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀ ᘀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᨀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᰀ* =଀;<#܀Ѐ܀1%3؀2ࠀጀఀ܀'܀ЀȀࠀ4$؀Ԁ 0ࠀጀ%& "#ᘀᰀᨀ 2ࠀഀࠀ,0ጀȀ%&܀'܀2ࠀഀࠀ,07Ȁ%& ᘀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀἀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀᨀ* Ā Ā ᨀᘀᤀ(ᤀᤀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀?ࠀᄀࠀ%-2܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀؀$ᘀᰀᰀ 2-%ࠀᄀࠀ#" "#ᘀᰀᬀ 2-଀6ࠀ%0Ѐఀ$%ࠀ܀'܀2<଀6ࠀ%0>ఀ$%ࠀ ᬀᔀᜀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᨀ)ᜀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᨀᔀ᠀(᠀ᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᰀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀᤀ ܀'܀$؀ЀᄀȀ$ఀࠀᄀ$܀؀଀$%ࠀ63.܀؀%$;ᘀᰀ᠀ ကЀ#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ࠀ63%$/.܀ကЀ;$%1 "#ᘀᰀḀ က଀;Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀က଀;Ѐ6> ᰀᔀḀ(ᜀᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᰀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ἀᤀ(ᰀᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᘀᬀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᤀ ܀1%$0؀က଀ఀࠀ6܀'܀ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6଀:܀؀%$0؀ᘀᰀἀ က଀ఀࠀ6#" :ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6/ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ࠀఀࠀ% ᠀(ᜀᔀ " ᔀᤀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā.܀/ကጀ@ᄀ܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀ᘀᜀᔀ ကጀഀᄀ଀#" *᠀ᔀ(ἀἀ : ᔀᬀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀḀ)ᰀ ܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀D&9܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᤀ A#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀D&9 *ᔀ(ᜀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᘀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀἀ ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀ȀЀ؀਀Ԁ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᨀ A#" ਀ԀBȀ1 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 101܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A 100 0ጀ,& ᔀᜀ(᠀ᘀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀἀ* Ā܀AB0ᄀ଀3%1܀'܀&,0ጀ܀؀0ᄀ଀3%؀ᘀᜀᰀ A#" *ᜀᨀ(ᤀḀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᜀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᔀ ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ࠀ6%Ѐ,3؀;က଀܀ࠀऀ܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀+ ᘀᜀᬀ#" :$ࠀ6%Ѐ܀'܀Aࠀ%<ЀȀ&܀က଀;B3,ࠀ6%&܀Ѐ܀ Ā Ā :?ࠀ6%& "#ᘀᜀ᠀ Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%&܀%-Ѐ$܀%Ѐ-$ఀ܀'܀Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%5܀ ᠀᠀(ᨀᜀ " ᔀᬀ)ᰀᨀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᔀ* %-Ѐ$ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 0Ѐ3,ఀB ᘀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā:܀Ѐ̀܀'܀؀0Ѐ3,ఀ:܀ᘀᜀḀ ̀Ѐ#" "#ᘀᬀᘀ ကጀ,Ѐ܀ЀᄀȀ܀G&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ܀'܀̀଀6Ѐ܀ ᔀ(᠀ᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᨀᜀ* ကጀ,&܀Ѐ܀.ࠀఀࠀ%Ѐ܀G&;ᄀ/% Ā *ḀḀ " ᔀᜀ)ᬀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ)᠀ ܀଀6Ѐ̀܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀F-0଀3܀ࠀऀ܀ᘀᬀᔀ !0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀F-0଀3 *ᔀᜀᬀ(ᘀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᤀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᰀ ܀'܀ࠀሀ;܀؀0଀ᄀ଀$ఀ؀$Ѐ-܀؀%$ᘀᬀᰀ ̀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ#" 0଀ᄀ଀?ఀB Ā Ā؀?Ѐ-܀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ$%1̀ *ἀᨀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀἀ ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀%$ᘀᬀᜀ ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ#" ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Malta

Malta Natura 2000 sites proposed by Nature Trust Malta, february 2004

Site name Site description Island 1. A candidate World Heritage Site and proposed as a marine reserve and National Park; rich in archaeological, historical, ecological, geological (exten- Gozo Dwejra sive fossil beds) and geomorphological features (amongst others, a triad of Miocene collapse depressions). An area of High Landscape Value and defined as a Coastline of International Value. Also a prime touristic and diving destination. Holds numerous endemic/rare and legally protected species. An islet in the area (Fungus Rock) also supports interesting flora as well as an endemic lizard. Also holds one of the few perennial freshwater pools of the islands. 2. Important for its ecologically rich rupestral habitats and considered as a site of scientific importance which is also of geological interest. The rare and Gozo San Dimitri endemic Cremnophyton lanfancoi grows along the cliffs. 3. The area, together with area 4, is of high landscape value and of geomorphological interest. This small river valley continues underwater and its Gozo Wied il-Ghasri mouth is characterised by a pebble beach (locally uncommon shore type). Maritime vegetation holds some rare plant species. 4. Area has historical tradition of salt pan industry. A site of great geomorphological interest both above land and underwater. Rare species of plants are Gozo Xwejni-Qbajjar area encountered. 5. Probably the best preserved site supporting a locally very rare type of habitat – sand dunes. Numerous rare, endangered and/or endemic species of Gozo Ramla l-Hamra plants and sand dune animals have been recorded here. Also a site of historical, hydrological and great scenic value. An area of heavy human pressure in summer months. 6. A system of valleys and coralline limestone plateaux hold what is probably the best local example of a mature garigue habitat with healthy popula- Gozo Qortin ta’ Isopu, tions of otherwise rare plants such as Cistus sp. and Iris pseudopumila. Under threat by nearby quarrying activities. Tal-Magun, Il-Kbir 7. A highly picturesque valley which is of great naturalistic value both as a habitat for maquis and garigue vegetation (with a good number of very rare Gozo Mgarr ix-Xini and Wied plants) as well as numerous bird species which find shelter here. Mgarr ix-Xini Bay is a suggestive diving site with its fjord-like appearance and Hanzira intricate system of underwater caves. 8. The Lower Coralline cliffs from Wied is-Sabbara all the way to Xlendi are of great scenic importance and of high ecological value supporting rupestral Gozo Ta’ Cenc Cliffs and garigue vegetation with several endemic plant species. It also supports the largest local colony of Cory’s Shearwater and is also one of the best breeding sites for other smaller birds. Under threat by a proposed golf course and by trapping and hunting activities. 9. The Xlendi-Lunzjata valley system is one of the most important on the islands having a permanent watercourse supporting an endemic freshwater Gozo Xlendi – Valley crab and other very rare freshwater organisms. The area is thus of great scientific and ecological value also due to the fact that several rare plant and Kantra area species have been recorded. The valley is also valuable for its bat populations and for giving temporary refuge to migrating birds. 10. Comino is officially a nature reserve where hunting cannot be practised. The Island is used as a base for international bird research of migratory Comino the islands species (operated by a local NGO). and of Comino Comino boasts a rich and mature garigue supporting some 10 endemic/sub-endemic plant species as well as other rare species with a restricted Cominotto and Cominotto distribution in the Mediterranean region or in the Maltese Islands. It also supports a small sand dune and remnants of a marshland (which could benefit greatly from ecological restoration). 11. Ecologically important a sit hosts one of the last remaining sand dunes on the Island with several species of scientific importance and of very Malta White Tower Bay restricted local distribution (sandy beaches make up less than 2.5 % of the coastline). Nature Trust is actively participating in the management and protection of the site. 12. An area which comprises several important habitats such as boulder scree, clay steppe maritime garigue, sandy beach and a small temporary saline Malta Rdum il-Qammieh/ marshland all of which are in a relatively pristine state and therefore giving shelter to a variety of species. The area is also a geological paradise with Rdum il-Qawwi/ clear examples of stratigraphy, scientifically important fossil beds and a large solution subsidence structure. Paradise Bay 13. One of the very few localities in the Maltese Islands which supports a healthy wild population of the Sandarac Gum Tree (Tetraclinis articulata) – the Malta Ta’Pennellu/Gnien National Tree – considered as rare on a European level and as such granted international protection. A population of the locally rare Iris pseudopum- Ingraw (Mellieha) ila and fine garigue is found near to Ta Pennellu whilst Gnien Ingraw is also important as it holds a permanent freshwater supply in its valley. 14. The rugged coast here holds a myriad of habitats such as a rare type of garigue dominated by Cistus species and harbouring numerous rare and Malta Selmun, Mgiebah endemic plants, boulder scree, coastal clay slopes, highly rare remnants of old oak woodland and associated species. towards Ghanj Zejtuna 15. The site at Wardija includes some fine and old Evergreen Oak trees (possibly over 900 years of age) – remnants of the original Mediterranean scle- Malta Wardija/San Martin rophyll woodland; as well as rare garigue and Mediterranean maquis species. San Martin’s permanent freshwater spring supports the rare endemic Maltese Freshwater Crab. 16. A sandy beach with a high degree of anthropogenic impacts. The site of a once more widespread sand dune Malta Ramla tal-Mixquqa (Golden Bay) 17. The bay (adjacent to No.16) is also a sandy beach with a sand dune and impressive clay slopes. Site of a current management project by a local Malta Ghajn Tuffieha NGO. 18. Unique headland of great scenic beauty and geomorphological interest. Also the type locality of an endemic pseudoscorpion. Malta Il-Karraba 19. Fomm ir-Rih Bay is located at the edge of the main Great Fault dividing Malta and exhibits interesting syncline features. Ecologically the bay is Malta Fomm ir-Rih Basy and unique for its pebble beach, its clay slopes and boulder scree habitats and pristine vegetation. Wied Gerzuma, Wied Wied Gerzuma and Wied Bahrija are within the same area and both are of high scientific and ecological importance for being the type localities of tal Bahrija several rare and endangered species. The Bahrija Valley supports the largest population of the Maltese Freshwater Crab as well as other freshwater species requiring a permanent spring. 20. One of the four localities supporting a few old Evergreen Oaks as well as rare maquis species. The site requires immediate protection which should Malta Ta’Baldzu/ Wied be considered a high priority also for the other sites holding copses of oak. Hazrun 21. This is practically the only semi-natural woodland of a comparatively large size and which represents a rare ecosystem in the local context. The Malta Buskett valley, Wied il-Luq, is one of the few riparian habitats and is ecologically important not just for supporting a good number of otherwise rare trees and Wied il-Luq (Poplar and Ash), but also the only local amphibian, freshwater species and a rare iris. The woodland is a highly important resting and feeding 100 ground for large numbers of migratory species – especially birds of prey whilst the higher rocky ground supports maquis and garigue which is largely 101 self-regenerating and which supports several rare species of orchids and other plants. 22. A valley supporting temporary freshwater habitats along the valley bed and a rich garigue/maquis along its sides. Several rare and/or endemic spe- Malta Wied il-Ghasel cies are found here including the National Tree (Tetraclinis articulata) and a number of freshwater organisms (especially in the karstic freshwater (and nearby Tal Wej) pools at Tal-Wej). The valley is endangered by encroaching development and quarrying activities. 23. The garigue at Pembroke has been recognized as a site of ecological importance as it supports several rare species (such as orchids) as well as Malta Pembroke garrigue maritime communities. and Wied Harq Wied Harq Hammiem is close to a main leisure and touristic resort but still harbours an interesting variety of very rare species such as Aristolochia Hammiem clusii. This valley also holds an underground freshwater cave which is unique in its kind for the Maltese Islands. Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Malta

24. All the coast from Ghar Lapsi to Maghlaq valley and towards Wied iz-Zurrieq can be considered as a coastline of great scientific and geological Malta Maghlaq valley importance. The rugged beauty of this coast is as yet quite free from major developments (although it ahs been propsed that a major landfill be sited and coast to Ras just next to Wied Maghlaq and close to a World Heirtage prehistoric temple site) and supports maritime communities as well as garigue which is fast il Hamrija regenerating after a great reduction of grazing activities with species such as Periploca angustifolia on the increase. The rare Scilla sicula (a sub- endemic) is also found in this area. 25. A highly interesting solution subsidence structure which was highlighted as one of the first known localities in the Maltese Islands where the rare Malta Il-Maqluba Sandarac Gum Tree (Tetraclinis articulata) was found growing wild along its cliff face which also supports an established population of the endemic Maltese Salt-Tree (Darniella melitensis) and serves as a breeding ground for the National Bird of Malta – the Blue Rock-thrush (Monticola solitarius). This is also one of the few localities where a copse of Bay Laurel grows wild. 26. This scenic valley is highly important for its rupestral and maquis/garigue habitats which comprise several species of rare distribution and of scientific Malta Wied Babu interest such as Coronilla valentina, a number of rare orchids, the National plant (Palaeocyanus crassifolius) etc. as well as established mature shrubs of Erica multiflora and Rosmarinus officinalis and large specimens of Ceratonia siliqua. 27. This islet is a nature reserve which is of great ecological and scientific importance both for its endemic forms as well as for its role as a major breed- Filfla Filfla ing site (on a Mediterranean scale) for the Storm Petrel (Hyrdobates pelagicus) as well as supporting other marine birds. An endemic lizard and two endemic land snails are only known from this islet. 28. The valley system leading to Marsaxlokk Bay supports a population of the very rare Wild Pear. Malta Wied Zembaq/Saptan 29. A restored saline marshland managed by Nature Trust. Although small in size, it is of great ecological and scientific value as it is one of the only two Malta Il-Maghluq ta’ Mxlokk similar habitats found in the South of the Islands and shows variation from the other (very few) saltmarsh localities in the North. This habitat is one of the rarest in the Maltese Islands (together with sand dunes) and holds some species which only survive in this marsh. This is also the type locality for an endemic brackish water snail. 30. The headland of Munxar is of geological interest for its locally unique cliffs and for its Pleistocene deposits. It supports a typical maritime garigue and Malta Munxar rupestral habitat with a thriving population of the endemic Darniella melitensis and also the site of endemic insects.

102 103 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Poland

Poland

؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ᐀ᔀᔀᔀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀᜀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀ᠀ᘀ ᐀ᔀᤀᨀᘀ ᐀ᤀᔀᤀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᨀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᬀᘀ ᐀ᨀᤀᤀᘀ ᐀ᰀᘀᨀᘀ ᐀ᬀᔀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᰀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᜀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᰀᘀ ᐀᠀ᤀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀Ḁᨀᔀᘀ ᐀ἀᘀᤀᘀ ᐀ἀᔀḀᘀᴀ ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ ᐀ἀᔀ!ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ᐀ᘀᴀ ᐀ἀᰀᔀᘀ ਀ᔀᘀᤀἀ ਀ᔀᘀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᘀḀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᘀἀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᘀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᤀᘀ ਀ᔀᔀᬀᨀ ਀ᔀᔀḀḀ ਀ᔀᨀᘀᨀ ਀ᔀᨀᨀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᰀ᠀᠀ ਀ᔀᜀᤀḀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᤀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᨀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ D1$5 ᔀᤀᘀᔀ(ᨀ᠀ᘀ'ᔀἀ "+ ᔀḀ)ᤀᤀ*ᤀᘀ)ᰀᔀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᜀ*ᜀᤀ)ᨀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀8ࠀ/଀ᄀЀ܀%܀5؀//Ѐ;܀Ȁ&D1$Ѐ&%$؀฀܀'܀&Ȁ&%$؀ᘀᘀᔀ"ကᘀᜀᰀ ฀#" B1଀ ᠀ᰀᘀ(Ḁᘀᔀἀ'ᨀᬀ "+ ᔀ᠀)ᜀᔀ*ᤀᔀ)ᰀᨀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀἀ*ᜀᔀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀/N-ࠀ܀8ࠀ/଀ᄀЀ܀%܀5؀//Ѐ;܀B1Ѐ؀/2Ѐ-.Ѐఀ&N-ࠀ܀฀/01܀'܀$Ѐ-.Ѐఀ,଀Ѐᄀ"܀؀ᘀᘀᨀ"ကᘀᜀᜀ +,଀ఀ#" *ᨀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᨀ)ᜀḀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᬀ ؀฀0Ѐᄀ଀3܀'܀؀ᘀᘀᰀ ฀0Ѐᄀ଀3#" ἀ'ᔀᬀ + ᔀἀ)ᰀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā ؀Cጀ$Ѐ<01଀܀8ࠀ/଀ᄀ1଀܀%܀50؀//Ѐ;܀ကᘀᜀᬀ Cጀ$Ѐ଀0଀6" ᤀᔀᬀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᬀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā $؀0܀฀0Ѐᄀ$%5܀'܀4ࠀࠀȀ0ЀᄀȀ܀$؀0܀&%$ᘀᘀᜀ ฀0Ѐᄀ#" *7Ȁ$Ѐ ᤀᨀ᠀'ᜀᔀ + ᔀᰀ)ᤀᰀ* ᜀᨀ)ᘀᨀ܀8ࠀ/ᄀЀ܀%܀7Ȁ$Ѐ܀$؀-ကᘀᜀ᠀ ကࠀ" ᤀ(ᜀᜀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀Ѐ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀&%$3؀ᘀᘀᬀ ฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ#" Ḁᜀ'᠀ᤀ + ᔀḀ)ᜀᔀ* ᜀᨀ)ᜀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā ܀C$%5؀฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ܀'܀$ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀D଀0,ЀAЀఀ%Ѐ܀8ࠀ/ᄀЀ܀%܀଀0ఀጀ/Ѐ;܀$؀-ကᘀᜀḀ ကࠀ" -&;ᄀ/%܀Ѐ܀-&;ᄀ/%܀AЀఀ%Ѐ Ā Ā Ā ഀ ᬀἀ'᠀ᘀ + ᤀᤀ)ᔀḀ* ᜀᔀ)ᨀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā$?؀D଀܀8ࠀ/ᄀ5܀%܀ഀ$?؀D଀܀$؀-ကᘀᜀἀ ကࠀ" ᤀḀᘀ'ᰀᘀᔀ(ἀᤀ +" ᔀᬀ)ᘀᔀ*ᔀᰀ)ᰀᔀ* ᜀᨀ)ᜀἀ*ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀؀6ഀ؀8ࠀ$ഀ܀%܀Ԁ؀਀50ఀ܀$؀଀9:܀Ԁ05ᄀ"Ѐ$0=ఀЀ܀฀-ࠀጀ$%76܀'܀Ԁ0&ᄀ܀ကᘀᬀᘀ"#ᘀᘀḀ ฀-ࠀጀ$%ጀ6" ᔀᬀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᘀ* Ā Ā ܀'܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀4܀&Ԁࠀ%-ЀȀ܀؀0Ѐ%ࠀ6଀3%؀"ᘀᘀἀ "Ѐ$0=ఀ5#" ᔀᨀ'ᜀᘀ + ᔀḀ)ᤀἀ* ᜀᨀ)ᘀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā ܀ࠀ-01Ѐ#85܀%܀&ЀȀ>%5؀//Ѐ;܀ԀࠀЀ/܀଀3଀0ఀ%1ጀ;܀-ࠀ6#ࠀ%<0؀ကᘀᬀᔀ 85" ᔀᘀᜀᤀ(ᬀἀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀1%$؀8܀'܀Ȁࠀ,5 ࠀ-଀,0؀D$ఀ-଀܀ࠀ/଀ᄀЀ܀؀%$؀ᘀᔀᰀ "8#" Ḁ'ᘀᜀ + ᔀᰀ)ᰀᔀ* ᜀᨀ)ᘀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā᠀ ܀%܀5؀//Ѐ;܀H5-Ѐ܀M܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ,ࠀကᘀᬀᤀ D$ఀ" *H5-5 ᔀᤀἀ(ᬀᰀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ܀8ࠀ/଀ᄀЀ܀଀܀ကЀ0܀Ѐ$8ഀ଀6ഀ5-%܀5%$؀8܀'܀Ѐ-$ఀ%܀$Ѐ-%܀&%$؀" ᘀᔀᜀ#" "ကᘀᬀᨀ ਀ЀᄀఀЀ܀(ᄀᄀЀ܀IࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀%܀ༀ&$Ѐ܀2-Q܀ ᜀᔀ'᠀ᜀ + ᔀḀ)ᔀᜀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *᠀ࠀ ᔀᰀἀ(ᤀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀ%$؀%9ࠀ܀'܀ࠀ%$؀%ᘀᔀḀ 9ࠀ#" (ᄀᄀ5 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀᔀἀ ᨀᨀᘀ(ᤀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᘀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᜀ* ᔀᜀ᠀'ᰀᜀ + ᔀᬀ)ᜀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᰀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀ᄀ଀1܀$LጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ؀2ᄀ଀܀ԀࠀM܀&܀ࠀఀ-Ѐ଀ᄀ0,܀Iࠀጀᄀ؀9ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%܀؀ကᘀᬀᰀ ฀଀Ѐ/01଀" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ༀ$ጀ?Ѐ܀଀܀؀฀-଀&Ѐ/01଀܀ࠀ,5܀$&ༀ܀%1%$6܀9ༀ$ࠀጀ?ࠀጀ.ࠀ *ἀ(ᰀᤀ : ᔀᬀ)ᨀᰀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᔀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀؀Ѐ %ࠀ.3܀؀9ጀᄀЀDࠀLᄀ଀16଀3%؀ᘀᤀᔀ 2ᄀ଀#" Ā Ā Ā ؀ࠀ.3%܀9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%1 *᠀ᰀᜀᜀ'ᤀ᠀ + ᔀᜀ)ᜀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᜀ ܀ࠀࠀఀ.଀//0!܀M܀IࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ0܀؀ကᘀᬀᜀ >Ѐ6ഀЀ-01଀" ᰀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀḀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀؀ᄀЀ-଀%&01଀;&-܀؀Ѐ6ഀ3%<܀؀ࠀሀ&,0଀ᄀ଀$ഀ"܀Ѐ#܀଀Ѐ܀܀ᄀЀ؀ༀ&$5଀0܀%! ᘀᤀᤀ#" Ā Ā Ā ܀0଀ᄀ଀3%1,<#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀଀0!܀'܀$ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ -&;ᄀ/%& ᰀᰀ'ᤀᰀ + ᔀ᠀)ᤀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀Ѐ-01଀?7܀ༀ&$5܀%܀IࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ0܀ကᘀᬀᬀ 7?Ѐ-Ѐ" "#ᘀᤀᨀ ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ܀'܀ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ ᬀᘀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᨀ)ᨀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā *ᜀᬀᤀ'ᜀᬀᘀ(ᨀ᠀ "( ᤀᤀ)ᤀἀ*ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᰀἀ)ᨀᨀ*ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ ܀'܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀&᐀ࠀ;$ࠀ6଀3%؀਀,ࠀᄀᄀ܀ༀ&$5܀%܀IࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ0܀؀ᘀᤀᰀ"ကᘀᬀ᠀ ਀,ࠀᄀᄀ#" ᐀ࠀ;?ࠀ6଀3%5܀-&;ᄀ/% Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ἀḀ'ᨀᤀ + ᔀᬀ)ᨀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀%܀IࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ0܀؀฀Ѐ$Ȁഀ1଀܀M܀؀ကᘀᬀḀ ਀ࠀ-଀" ᨀḀ(ἀᬀ : ᔀ᠀)ᘀ᠀* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* Ā ܀'܀6Ѐ؀Ȁࠀ฀Ѐ$Ȁഀጀ;-Ѐ1଀܀଀܀܀଀ᄀ$%Ѐ؀਀ࠀ-଀܀ᘀᤀᜀ ᐀ༀ&ࠀȀࠀᄀ$5#" Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ ᔀᘀἀ'Ḁᘀ + ᔀᬀ)ᤀᰀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀<%$᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ/ᄀ؀-਀ఀࠀ,ࠀ܀ༀ&$5܀%܀IࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ0܀؀-ကᘀᬀἀ ਀ఀࠀ,ࠀ" *᠀ᨀᬀἀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀&,3-6܀؀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%܀Ѐ܀؀%$ᘀᤀ᠀ ᐀ࠀ$ఀ&ᄀ#" ᤀᨀᬀ'ᜀἀ + ᔀἀ)ᰀᜀ* ᜀᨀ)ᔀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀%܀R؀/ &,?ࠀԀ+3-܀0ఀ6؀$ࠀ܀ࠀ!6଀3%1܀E଀ഀ#Ѐ$1܀က଀ȀഀЀ܀ကᘀ᠀ᘀ ᐀ༀ&ࠀ$ఀ$ഀ5ᄀ$ᄀࠀF%1" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀10؀/?ࠀԀ<܀B01ࠀFက଀Ȁഀ#Ѐ$01଀؀ༀ&$ഀᄀ଀ Oᄀ5؀က ᰀᜀ(ᘀᬀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀A0ЀȀЀ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀3܀ᘀᤀḀ ᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$%Ѐ#" ᔀ'ᬀᬀ + ᔀḀ)ᔀἀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀A$Ѐᄀ0ЀȀ଀>6ഀᄀ5܀Ѐༀ܀%܀$܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀C܀؀ЀᄀȀ؀I܀7Ȁ$6$%>Ѐ܀$Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ-؀ကᘀ᠀ᔀ ᐀฀ࠀ$Ȁ" *ᨀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀḀ ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀7Ȁ$5 Ѐ0$܀A܀ࠀऀ܀$$؀-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ЀᄀȀԀ؀ᘀᨀᘀ A#" ᬀἀ'ᰀᬀ + ᔀ᠀)ᔀἀ* ᜀᘀ)ᬀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀-܀ༀ$3Ȁ5܀%܀ ؀?5؀//Ѐ;܀AȀЀ$0Ѐ܀&-7܀଀ᄀ܀ЀᄀȀ؀ကᘀ᠀ᤀ ༀ$3Ȁ5Ԁ" 7Ȁ$5 Ā Ā Ā Ā܀؀8ࠀ/଀ᄀ଀ *ᔀ(ᬀᜀ " ᔀḀ)ᤀᔀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀FȀ-Ѐ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᨀᔀ A#" ᘀ'ᔀ᠀ + ᤀᤀ)ᘀᘀ* ᜀᔀ)ᤀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀-܀ༀ$ࠀఀ5܀%܀0؀Ѐ9+܀FȀ-&Ѐ܀ЀᄀȀࠀఀ-ᄀ&଀6؀.ကᘀ᠀ᨀ Ԁ฀ࠀ6" ฀ࠀ6.ࠀఀᄀ଀65 Ā "#ᘀᨀᨀ ",-଀;&܀,଀00$܀'܀",<଀;& ᔀḀᤀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀ᠀)ᔀ᠀* ᰀἀ)ᘀḀ* ఀЀ ᤀ'ᨀḀ + ᔀ᠀)ᤀᨀ* ᜀᰀ)ᔀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā$؀᐀܀%܀ఀЀ$؀ကᘀ᠀ᰀ ᐀" ᜀ(ᘀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀ᠀* Ā Ā ܀Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%5=܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀&ᘀᨀᰀ =Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%#" ᔀᜀ'ᨀᰀ + ᤀᨀ)ᘀἀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀Āഀ#଀61଀܀%܀؀ༀࠀ$ሀ܀ഀ$?؀D଀܀ကᘀ᠀ᜀ Ā.ࠀഀ#ఀ଀6ࠀ%Ѐ" ഀЀ Ā Ā Ā Ā$?؀D଀܀ࠀԀ,؀ഀ$" *ᔀ᠀ἀ(ᜀᨀ " ᔀᤀ)ᰀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᨀ /;<>؀=܀'܀Ѐ;଀-؀= ᘀᨀᜀ#" ฀Ѐሀᄀࠀ ᔀ'ᬀᤀ + ᔀᬀ)ᰀᨀ* ᜀᰀ)ᔀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā܀؀଀61଀-؀CЀᄀ଀܀%܀฀ࠀሀ܀؀଀6-؀ကᘀ᠀ᬀ CЀᄀ଀" ᄀ/%& Ḁᬀᨀ(᠀ᔀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀$؀=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%ᄀ଀؀$؀= ᘀᨀᬀ#" *ᘀ'Ḁᰀᘀ(ᤀ᠀ +" ᔀḀ)ᔀḀ*ᔀᜀ)ᨀᤀ* ᜀᰀ)ᔀḀ*ᰀἀ)ᰀᰀ ܀'܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀&ЀȀጀᄀ଀=଀-଀%ࠀ6$%:܀1଀؀ഀ:܀$CЀ܀%܀؀Ѐ9଀ᄀ:܀ကᘀ᠀᠀"#ᘀᨀḀ :ЀȀጀᄀ଀Ѐ" =଀;<#܀Ѐ܀%܀0؀1܀ကЀ܀1ഀ56Ѐ%3؀0ఀ$2ࠀጀఀ܀'܀ЀȀࠀ଀ЀF74$؀ကᘀḀᘀ :ԀЀȀጀᄀ" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀0ࠀጀ:ЀȀጀB%& 01ࠀF70ఀ$ഀ561଀ *ᔀἀ᠀'ᜀᘀᘀ(᠀ᤀ "+ ᔀᰀ)ᨀἀ*ᔀᬀ)ᨀἀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀᨀ*ᜀᨀ)ᰀἀ ܀ഀ଀ࠀ$Ѐ؀C܀%܀0؀ကЀ1܀1؀6଀ᄀ؀2ࠀഀࠀ,07Ȁ%&਀ഀ6ഀ܀'܀&%ᘀᰀᨀ"ကᘀḀᔀ 2ࠀഀࠀ,0ጀȀ#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀61଀؀6଀ᄀ؀਀ഀ6ഀ *ᨀᘀᤀ(ᤀᤀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᨀ ؀?ࠀᄀࠀ%-2܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀؀$ᘀᰀᰀ 2-%ࠀᄀࠀ#" ᔀᬀ'᠀᠀ + ᤀᨀ)ᘀᬀ* ᜀᔀ)ᤀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ഀ଀ࠀ$Ѐ؀C܀%܀0؀ကЀ1܀ഀ$؀ကᘀḀᤀ JO6଀-଀" ᬀᔀᜀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᨀ)ᜀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀01଀$؀଀6ࠀ%0>ఀ$%ࠀJO6଀-଀>2܀'܀ᘀᰀᬀ 2-଀6ࠀ%0Ѐఀ$%ࠀ#" ᔀᤀἀ'ᔀἀᨀᔀ᠀(᠀ᨀ +" ᔀ᠀)ᜀᬀ*ᔀᰀ)ᔀᰀ* ᜀᰀ)ᘀᔀ*ᜀᘀ)ᜀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀$؀ఀࠀᄀ$܀ഀ଀ࠀ$Ѐ؀ЀᄀȀC$܀܀%܀0؀Ѐ1؀က%ࠀ63$܀؀଀5Ȁഀ.܀؀%$;ကᘀḀᨀ"#ᘀᰀ᠀ DကЀȀഀ" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ࠀ63%$؀5Ȁഀ1଀/.܀ကЀDȀഀ;$%1 ᰀᔀḀ(ᜀᘀᔀ'ἀᨀ +" ᔀ᠀)ᰀᨀ*ᔀ᠀)ᰀᘀ* ᜀᰀ)ᔀᬀ*ᰀἀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ഀ଀ࠀ$1Ѐ؀C܀%܀0؀ကЀ1܀؀က଀;Ѐ6>+.ࠀOᄀ଀6܀'܀ကᘀḀᰀ"#ᘀᰀḀ က଀;Ѐ6Ѐ" ἀᤀ(ᰀᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᘀᬀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀1%$0؀က଀ఀࠀ6܀'܀Ѐ6଀- ؀ࠀԀࠀ଀61଀:܀؀ࠀOᄀ0$%.+؀ᘀᰀἀ က଀ఀࠀ6#" Ḁᘀ'ᨀᬀ + ᔀᰀ)ᨀἀ* ᜀᨀ)ᤀḀ* Ā Ā Ā ܀%܀؀ࠀ-Ѐ6/ I଀=Ȁഀ5ࠀȀ$ഀ܀M܀؀ကЀ1܀؀ကᘀḀᜀ 8:ࠀԀ3#଀" *᠀ᜀᔀ " ᔀᤀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀ)᠀ ܀؀I଀=Ȁഀ5ࠀȀ$ഀ܀଀܀؀଀#83܀ഀ଀ࠀ$ࠀ؀ࠀఀࠀ%C.܀/ကጀ@ᄀ܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀ᘀᜀᔀ ကጀഀᄀ଀#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀6଀B01଀؀਀ഀ6ഀ *᠀ᔀ(ἀἀ : ᔀᬀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀḀ)ᰀ ܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀D&9܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᤀ A#" ጀLᄀࠀ ᨀᔀ'᠀ᬀ + ᔀἀ)ᤀἀ* ᜀᰀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā$8܀ഀ଀ࠀ$ࠀ؀C܀%܀؀ကЀ1܀ကᘀḀᬀ 8$ጀLᄀࠀ" Ā Ā Ā ؀D&9 ᔀᨀᬀ'ᬀᘀᔀ(ᜀᔀ "+ ᔀᜀ)ᘀᤀ*ᔀḀ)ᤀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀἀ*ᜀᤀ)ᨀᰀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀ȀЀ؀਀Ԁ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ༀࠀ?,ࠀA܀ഀ଀ࠀ$ࠀ؀C܀%܀؀ကЀ1܀ᘀᜀᨀ"ကᘀḀ᠀ ༀࠀ?,ࠀ#" ਀ԀBȀ1 Ḁ'ᔀᬀ + ᔀἀ)ᤀἀ* ᜀᨀ)ᨀᰀ* Ā܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀Ѐ$ЀOA<܀ഀ଀ࠀ$ࠀ؀C܀%܀؀ကЀ1܀ကᘀḀḀ >Ѐ$ЀO" 0ጀ,& ᔀᜀ(᠀ᘀᔀ'Ḁᰀ +" ᔀᰀ)ᜀḀ*ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᜀᤀ)ᜀᤀ*ᜀᘀ)ᔀἀ* Ā Ā܀AB0ᄀ଀3%1܀'܀&,0ጀ܀؀0ᄀ଀3%؀A؀ࠀഀ଀<܀ഀ଀ࠀ$ࠀ؀C܀%܀؀ကЀ1܀؀ကᘀḀἀ"#ᘀᜀᰀ >ࠀഀ଀" *ᜀᨀ(ᤀḀἀ'Ḁ᠀ +" ᔀᬀ)ᘀᜀ*ᔀᰀ)ᨀᜀ* ᜀᤀ)ᰀᤀ*ᜀᘀ)ᨀᔀ ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ࠀ6%Ѐ,3؀;က଀܀ࠀऀ܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀+1؀#ጀ<܀ഀ଀ࠀ$ࠀ؀C܀%܀؀ကЀ1܀1؀#ကᘀἀᘀ"#ᘀᜀᬀ >ጀ" :$ࠀ6%Ѐ܀'܀Aࠀ%<ЀȀ&܀က଀;B3,ࠀ6%&܀Ѐ܀ Ā Ā Ā Ā *᠀ᔀᔀᔀ'᠀ᘀ + ᔀᜀ)ᜀᬀ* ᜀᨀ)ᤀ ܀%܀5؀//Ѐ;܀Ѐ-Ѐ$8܀M܀؀ကЀ1&%܀؀ကᘀἀᔀ ကጀ:?ࠀ6#଀" Ѐ-5 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 105$8܀8ࠀ/଀ᄀЀ܀଀܀؀ကጀ#଀܀ഀ଀ࠀ$ࠀ؀C 104 "#ᘀᜀ᠀ Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%&܀%-Ѐ$܀%Ѐ-$ఀ܀'܀Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%5܀ ᠀᠀(ᨀᜀ " ᔀᬀ)ᰀᨀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᔀ* *ᔀḀ'ᔀᬀ + ᔀᬀ)ᔀᬀ* ᜀᨀ)ᔀḀ ܀1଀/؀D଀܀ഀ଀ࠀ$ࠀ؀C܀%܀؀ကЀ1܀฀5ఀ5B܀Ѐఀ؀$ကᘀἀᤀ ༀ" %-Ѐ$ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ฀5ఀ5B Ā Ā Ā Ā *0Ѐ3,ఀB ᘀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ:܀Ѐ̀܀'܀؀0Ѐ3,ఀ:܀ᘀᜀḀ ̀Ѐ#" ᜀ'ᨀᤀ + ᔀᬀ)ᔀᬀ* ᜀᤀ)ᤀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā ܀ഀ଀ࠀ$ࠀ؀C܀%܀؀ကЀ1܀1؀ഀ5ᄀ$؀ကᘀἀᨀ Nሀ଀" ᔀ(᠀ᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀଀6Ѐ̀܀'܀ऀ0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ܀%ᄀ଀;؀61଀؀G&5ᄀ଀܀ЀᄀȀ܀ഀ,Ѐ$؀ᘀᬀᘀ ကጀNሀ଀#" ကጀ,&܀Ѐ܀.ࠀఀࠀ%Ѐ܀G&;ᄀ/% Ā ᘀ'ᘀᨀ + ᤀᘀ)ᔀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᔀ* Ā Ā 6؀Ѐ/଀ᄀЀFက଀0଀ᄀ଀<܀%܀6؀ကᘀἀᰀ >Ѐ/଀ᄀЀFက଀0଀ᄀ଀" ᨀᘀ'ᨀḀ᠀(ḀḀ +" ᔀᜀ)ᰀᨀ*ᔀᜀ)ᬀᘀ* ᜀᔀ)ᜀḀ*ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀଀6Ѐ̀܀%܀'܀-܀0$؀؀ЀᄀȀ-଀6؀܀؀F-I0଀3܀܀7ࠀऀȀ$Ѐ܀0Ѐ଀ᄀ܀ကᘀἀᜀ"#ᘀᬀᔀ >Ѐ$ሀࠀ!0ࠀࠀȀ.-Ѐ" 7Ȁ$5 Ā Ā Ā Ā܀NЀ1ࠀ/Ѐ܀؀01଀-؀F-0଀>Ѐ$ሀࠀ3 ᨀἀᔀ'᠀ᰀᔀᜀᬀ(ᘀᜀ +" ᔀᜀ)ᨀ᠀*ᔀᨀ)ᤀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀᘀ*ᜀᘀ)ᨀᰀ* Ā Ā ܀%܀ᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ0܀'܀ࠀሀ;܀؀Iࠀጀ܀Ѐ$؀0଀ᄀ଀$ఀĀഀ؀$Ѐ-܀M܀؀܀؀%$ကᘀἀᬀ"#ᘀᬀᰀ ̀>Ѐ$1ࠀᄀࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀࠀ0ഀ" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀B01଀$؀Āഀ܀0଀ᄀ଀?ఀ&$5؀?ༀ-Ѐ܀଀܀؀܀Ѐ$1ࠀᄀ̀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀࠀ0ഀ$%1< *ἀᨀ(᠀ᤀᘀ'ᔀ᠀ +" ᤀᨀ)ᘀḀ*ᔀᰀ)ᰀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᔀ*ᰀḀ)ᨀἀ ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀%$3ఀ5̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ<܀%܀ကᘀἀ᠀"#ᘀᬀᜀ >3ఀ5" ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᤀᬀ'ᘀᰀ + ᔀᜀ)ᨀᔀ* ᜀᨀ)ᜀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀5ԀЀB01଀:܀Ԁ5؀<܀%܀0؀ЀԀ<܀ကᘀἀḀ :5ԀЀB" ༀ$ࠀ#/଀ ᬀ'ᤀᨀ + ᤀᘀ)ᤀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā܀ࠀ,ࠀ<܀%܀ༀ$ࠀ#/Ѐ܀$Ѐ؀̀ ကᘀἀἀ" *Pᘀ'ᘀᔀ + ᔀᬀ)ᜀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᬀ ܀-܀؀ࠀ?Ѐ/ᄀ଀<܀%܀0؀I଀ᄀ܀਀ఀࠀ1܀ကᔀᘀᘀ N,ࠀఀ5" N,ࠀఀ5Ԁ܀਀ఀࠀ1ጀ Ā "ကᔀᘀᔀ >ࠀ0ఀ$ഀЀ܀%܀>ࠀ0ఀ$ഀЀ ᘀ'ᨀἀ ( ᤀᘀ)ᤀᨀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀ᠀* Ā *ᔀ᠀ᘀ'᠀ᤀ + ᔀᜀ)ᘀἀ* ᜀᤀ)ᘀᨀ ܀B01Ѐ؀ࠀOᄀ଀$<܀%܀5؀//Ѐ;܀7Ȁ$Ѐ܀ကᔀᘀᤀ >$ࠀ0ᄀࠀ" 8ࠀ/଀ᄀЀ܀7Ȁ$5 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Poland

؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ᐀ᔀᔀᔀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀᜀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀ᠀ᘀ ᐀ᔀᤀᨀᘀ ᐀ᤀᔀᤀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᨀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᬀᘀ ᐀ᨀᤀᤀᘀ ᐀ᰀᘀᨀᘀ ᐀ᬀᔀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᰀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᜀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᰀᘀ ᐀᠀ᤀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀Ḁᨀᔀᘀ ᐀ἀᘀᤀᘀ ᐀ἀᔀḀᘀᴀ ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ ᐀ἀᔀ!ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ᐀ᘀᴀ ᐀ἀᰀᔀᘀ ਀ᔀᘀᤀἀ ਀ᔀᘀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᘀḀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᘀἀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᘀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᤀᘀ ਀ᔀᔀᬀᨀ ਀ᔀᔀḀḀ ਀ᔀᨀᘀᨀ ਀ᔀᨀᨀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᰀ᠀᠀ ਀ᔀᜀᤀḀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᤀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᨀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ ฀Ѐሀᄀࠀ ᔀᤀᘀᔀ(ᨀ᠀ᤀ'Ḁᘀ "+ ᔀḀ)ᤀᤀ*ᤀᨀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᜀ*ᜀᔀ)ᤀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀؀ࠀ-଀$<܀%܀฀ࠀሀ܀؀Ȁ&>$ࠀ-଀&%$؀฀܀'܀&Ȁ&%$؀ᘀᘀᔀ"ကᔀᘀᨀ ฀#" ༀ$ഀ=Ȁ5 ᠀ᰀᘀ(Ḁᘀᔀᨀ'ᘀἀ "+ ᔀ᠀)ᜀᔀ*ᔀ᠀)ᜀἀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀἀ*ᜀᰀ)ᤀᰀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀؀ጀ$ഀ<܀%܀ༀ$ഀ=Ȁ5܀؀2Ѐ-.Ѐఀ&>ጀ$ഀ܀฀/01܀'܀$Ѐ-.Ѐఀ,଀Ѐᄀ"܀؀ᘀᘀᨀ"ကᔀᘀᰀ +,଀ఀ#" ᬀᜀ'ᘀᬀᨀ(ᤀ᠀ "+ ᔀᨀ)ᜀḀ*ᔀ᠀)ᨀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᬀ*ᜀᘀ)ᜀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀฀Ѐ$ጀ6଀61଀܀ကЀ05܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀؀฀Ѐ$ጀ6଀6؀฀0Ѐᄀ଀3܀'܀؀ᘀᘀᰀ"ကᔀᘀᜀ ฀0Ѐᄀ଀3#" *ᤀᔀᬀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᬀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᜀ $؀0܀฀0Ѐᄀ$%5܀'܀4ࠀࠀȀ0ЀᄀȀ܀$؀0܀&%$ᘀᘀᜀ ฀0Ѐᄀ#" ᔀᨀḀ'ᔀᜀ + ᔀᜀ)ᨀᰀ* ᜀᨀ)ᘀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ကЀ05܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀ഀ-ᄀ଀1$؀ကᔀᘀᬀ ฀଀" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ഀ-ᄀ଀61଀$؀฀଀ *ᤀ(ᜀᜀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀Ѐ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀&%$3؀ᘀᘀᬀ ฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ#" ᔀᰀ᠀'᠀ᜀ + ᤀᘀ)ᜀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā ܀05܀ကЀC$%5܀%܀؀0ఀȀЀᄀ؀$฀ࠀ,ࠀ܀!'܀ࠀ܀$ऀ଀$-ࠀF7$,.ࠀᄀ,ࠀ-଀ᄀȀ܀ကᔀᘀ᠀ AЀఀ+଀0ࠀ%Ѐ" Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀A଀BЀ01ఀ%Ѐ଀܀%/-ᄀ,ࠀ;&-܀Ѐ܀଀;ᄀ0ࠀ/-01ࠀF7$%&-+ *ᨀḀἀ'ᜀᘀᔀ(ἀᤀ "+ ᔀᰀ)ᰀᔀ*ᔀἀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ*ᜀᤀ)ᨀᨀ ܀ကЀ05܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀1؀-Ԁ05ᄀༀࠀ0ఀ5ᄀ଀ᄀFD,ࠀ6,Ѐ܀฀-ࠀጀ$%76܀'܀Ԁ0&ᄀ܀ᘀᘀḀ"ကᔀᘀḀ ฀-ࠀጀ$%ጀ6#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ༀࠀ0ఀ5ᄀ଀B01ࠀFD,ࠀ6,Ѐ-01଀ *ᔀᬀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᘀ ܀'܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀4܀&Ԁࠀ%-ЀȀ܀؀0Ѐ%ࠀ6଀3%؀" ᘀᘀἀ#" Ԁࠀ%<ЀȀ& ᤀᜀᤀ'᠀ἀ + ᔀἀ)ᨀᤀ* ᜀᨀ)ᰀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀ࠀ6଀3%1%<0؀8؀Ā,Ѐ-01଀܀ကЀ05܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀ကᔀᘀἀ Ā,Ѐ-Ѐ" ᔀᘀᜀᤀ(ᬀἀᬀᬀ'ᤀᔀ "+ ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ*ᤀᨀ)ᨀᰀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᜀ*ᜀᔀ)ᤀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀1%$؀8܀'܀Ȁࠀ,ࠀ-଀؀-ఀ$܀؀%$؀"؀਀ࠀ#଀#ࠀ$01଀܀ကЀ05܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀$&#ᘀᔀᰀ"ကᔀᔀᘀ ਀ࠀ#଀#" Ȁࠀ,ࠀఀ$ *ᔀἀ'᠀ᔀ + ᤀᘀ)ᘀἀ* ᜀᔀ)ᨀᤀ ؀਀?Ѐ/01଀܀ကЀ05܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀ကᔀᔀᔀ ਀?Ѐ,Ѐ" Ѐ$ ᔀᤀἀ(ᬀᰀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā-%܀5%$؀8܀'܀Ѐ-$ఀ%܀$Ѐ-%܀&%$؀" ᘀᔀᜀ#" ᔀἀᜀ'᠀ἀ + ᤀᘀ)ᤀᬀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ကЀ05܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀-&Ȁᄀ଀؀.ကᔀᔀᤀ ਀ጀ6" *᠀ࠀ ᔀᰀἀ(ᤀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀ%$؀%9ࠀ܀'܀ࠀ%$؀%ᘀᔀḀ 9ࠀ#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀Ȁᄀ଀ࠀ-01଀؀.਀ጀ6 "#ᘀᔀἀ ᨀᨀᘀ(ᤀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᘀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᜀ* ᜀᜀᘀ'ᨀᨀ + ᔀḀ)ᔀᔀ* ᜀᨀ)ᨀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ကЀ05܀%܀'܀0܀$଀ᄀ0ఀ؀$ࠀጀᄀఀЀ!܀Ԁࠀ0܀&-ࠀ,܀5؀//Ѐ;܀DȀЀ؀ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%܀M܀ကᔀᔀᨀ 9฀$ȀЀ" -܀9ࠀጀ.ࠀȀࠀ/଀ᄀЀ6.6$%1܀܀฀$Ȁ5,ࠀ-&܀଀܀DȀ5 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *᠀ᬀḀἀ'ᬀᘀἀ(ᰀᤀ +: ᔀᬀ)ᨀᰀ*ᔀᬀ)ᰀᤀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᔀ*ᜀᨀ)ᔀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀؀ࠀ.3%܀؀9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%؀61଀؀,DЀ܀ကЀ05܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀ကᔀᔀᰀ"#ᘀᤀᔀ DЀ,6ഀ" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ࠀ.3%܀9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%1 *ᤀ᠀ἀ'ᨀᘀ + ᔀᰀ)ᰀᜀ* ᜀᤀ)ᰀᜀ ܀ကЀ05܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀ကᔀᔀᜀ D଀ఀᄀ଀6ЀF8=#ᄀࠀ" ᰀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀḀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀&%ᄀ଀;&-܀؀%3؀B01଀؀Ѐ,0଀ᄀ଀ᄀ଀#܀Ѐ܀ᄀᄀ଀61ࠀF8=#Ѐ؀ᘀᤀᤀ D!଀0଀ఀ#" Ā Ā Ā ܀0଀ᄀ଀3%1,<#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀଀0!܀'܀$ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ *ᔀᔀᰀ'ᘀḀ + ᔀἀ)ᜀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀᨀ ܀ကЀ05܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀ကᔀᔀᬀ D-&;ᄀ,ࠀ0ഀ/%&6ഀࠀ-Ѐ" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀D,ࠀ0ഀ6ഀࠀ-01଀ "#ᘀᤀᨀ ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ܀'܀ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ ᬀᘀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᨀ)ᨀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᘀ* ᔀᘀᔀ'ᨀᔀ + ᔀ᠀)ᤀἀ* ᜀᤀ)ᘀἀ* Ā Ā Ā ܀ကЀ05܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀ࠀ-؀0ഀ؀F+ഀ-&1$؀ကᔀᔀ᠀ 4" ᘀ(ᨀ᠀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ؀01଀-؀܀%0ഀᄀ଀؀;ഀ&-܀&1ࠀ-01ࠀF+ࠀ;$ࠀ6଀3%$؀ᘀᤀᰀ 4᐀#" ᐀ࠀ;?ࠀ6଀3%5܀-&;ᄀ/% Ā *ᘀ'ᤀᜀ + ᔀἀ)ᰀᨀ* ᜀᔀ)ᔀᔀ ܀-܀31Ѐ@܀%܀-ЀȀࠀ؀I܀؀ကᔀᔀḀ ฀=6ഀ1ࠀ-଀6" "#ᘀᤀᜀ ᐀฀=6ഀࠀȀࠀᄀ1ࠀ-଀6Ѐ6.଀ᄀ$%Ѐ܀Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀ ᨀḀ(ἀᬀ : ᔀ᠀)ᘀ᠀* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā ᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ/ᄀ$%>܀Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ Ā *ᘀ'ᰀᘀ + ᤀᔀ)ᘀᜀ* ᜀᤀ)ᤀᤀ ܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀/ጀ9଀Ѐ//)܀਀ఀ$ጀሀЀ܀ကᔀᔀἀ +ഀЀ$ᄀЀ" ᨀᬀἀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā ܀'܀଀00$,܀&,3-6܀؀ E଀ഀ਀ఀ$ጀሀࠀ6଀3%଀܀Ѐ܀>؀ഀЀ$ᄀ܀؀%$ᄀ+&܀ᘀᤀ᠀ @=᐀ࠀ$ఀሀ଀#" ᐀ࠀ$ఀ5ᄀ$%1܀Ѐ܀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%1܀6-3,& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᔀᬀ᠀'ᘀᘀ + ᔀᬀ)ᤀḀ* ᜀᔀ)ᨀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀7Ȁ$ഀЀB01଀܀ሀ଀=@܀%܀ጀ9଀Ѐ/0//)܀ကᔀᤀᘀ 7Ȁ$Ѐ" *ᔀᘀ + ᔀᰀ)ᨀᨀ* ᜀᤀ)ᤀᤀ'᠀ ؀਀,ጀ#଀61଀܀ሀ଀=@܀%܀ጀ9଀Ѐ/0//)܀؀ကᔀᤀᔀ ਀,ጀ#଀6" ᰀᜀ(ᘀᬀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀A0ЀȀЀ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀3܀ᘀᤀḀ ᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$%Ѐ#" A0ЀȀ> ᜀᬀ'ᤀᬀ + ᤀᔀ)ᘀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀᤀ* Ā܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀C܀<50ࠀሀ&$5᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$%@܀%܀ကᔀᤀᤀ @50ࠀሀ&$5" ᜀ'ᜀᰀᨀ(ᨀᨀ "+ ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ*ᔀᬀ)ᰀᰀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀḀ*ᜀᘀ)ᜀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā᠀ ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀AЀ0$܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀L5=/2܀IЀ05-܀%܀؀IЀ00଀9܀ЀᄀȀ2/=LЀ؀ᘀᨀᘀ"ကᔀᤀᨀ A#" ᨀ'ᘀᘀ + ᔀḀ)ᔀᰀ* ᜀᰀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā Ā ܀IЀ-$ЀF฀Ѐሀᄀࠀ܀%܀฀ࠀሀ؀?0܀AЀ,Ѐ܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀ကᔀᤀᰀ IЀ-$ЀF฀଀Ԁ" ᔀ(ᬀᜀ " ᔀḀ)ᤀᔀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀FȀ-Ѐ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ ЀᄀȀ฀଀Ѐ,Ѐ؀ᘀᨀᔀ A#" ᘀ'ᬀᜀ + ᔀ᠀)ᰀ᠀* ᜀᰀ)ᔀᰀ* Ā Ā Ā ܀ࠀ-଀01Ѐ.6؀I܀%܀ᄀ0؀!&-FȀ܀ࠀ܀ЀᄀȀ6ഀ5-&ᄀ؀=/ကᔀᤀᜀ Ԁ਀ጀ" *ᔀḀᤀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀ᠀)ᔀ᠀* ᰀἀ)ᘀḀ ؀଀;&਀ጀ/=6ഀ5B01଀>,"܀'܀଀00$,܀&;ᘀᨀᨀ ",-଀#" ᘀ'ᔀᤀ + ᔀἀ)ᰀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 6؀I଀6.Ѐ,ࠀ-଀܀%܀6؀ကᔀᤀᬀ I଀6.Ѐ,ࠀ-଀" ᜀ(ᘀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%5=܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀&ᘀᨀᰀ =Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%#" ਀Ѐ$#01Ѐ.ࠀఀࠀ% ᔀᔀ'ᘀᬀ + ᔀ᠀)ᰀᤀ* ᜀᰀ)ᰀ᠀* Ā܀Ѐ>؀ഀ$؀I଀܀%܀$฀Ѐ܀ကᔀᤀ᠀ ਀Ѐ$#଀Ѐ" ᔀ᠀ἀ(ᜀᨀ᠀'ᨀᘀ +" ᔀ᠀)ᰀ᠀*ᔀᤀ)ᰀᨀ* ᜀᨀ)ᜀ᠀*ᜀᘀ)ᤀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā /;<>؀=܀'܀Ѐ;଀-؀=I,ࠀ0଀ᄀࠀ܀%܀ကᔀᤀḀ"#ᘀᨀᜀ I,ࠀ0଀ᄀࠀ" ᄀ/%& Ḁᬀᨀ(᠀ᔀᘀ'᠀ᨀ "( ᔀἀ)ᨀ᠀*ᔀ᠀)ᤀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᨀḀ*ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀$؀=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%ᄀ଀؀$؀=ࠀ/଀65"܀Ѐ̀܀%܀ကᔀᤀἀ"#ᘀᨀᬀ "ࠀ/଀6Ѐ" *ᨀ'ᜀᘀᘀ(ᤀ᠀ +" ᤀᤀ)ᜀᔀ*ᔀᜀ)ᨀᤀ* ᜀᨀ)ᘀᰀ*ᰀἀ)ᰀᰀ᠀ ܀'܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀&฀ЀሀᄀЀ=଀-଀%ࠀ6$%܀؀Ѐ$-଀ЀB01଀̀܀%܀ᄀ0؀!܀-؀$ကᔀᨀᘀ"#ᘀᨀḀ ̀Ѐ" =଀;<#܀Ѐ܀7Ȁ$5܀8ࠀ/଀ᄀЀ܀1%3؀2ࠀጀఀ܀'01Ѐ/܀ЀȀࠀ4$؀Ԁ̀ࠀ-ࠀ0ࠀ 0ࠀጀ%& ᔀ'ᜀᘀ + ᤀᘀ)ᔀᰀ* ᜀᨀ)ᘀᰀ* Ā ܀0ഀ5ᄀ5/7܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀$؀Ȁ/)܀ကᔀᨀᰀ :ጀԀࠀఀ" ᘀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀἀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀᨀ* Ā Ā ؀2ࠀഀࠀ,07Ȁ%&:ጀԀࠀ61଀܀'܀&%ᘀᰀᨀ 2ࠀഀࠀ,0ጀȀ#" *ᨀᘀᤀ(ᤀᤀᨀ᠀'ᰀᘀ "+ ᔀᜀ)ᰀᘀ*ᔀḀ)ᘀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᨀ*ᜀᘀ)ᤀᬀ ܀ࠀ/01Ѐ?7܀%܀5؀//Ѐ;܀7Ȁ$Ѐ܀؀/ࠀ؀?ࠀᄀࠀ%-2܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀؀$ᘀᰀᰀ"ကᔀᨀᜀ 7?2-%ࠀᄀࠀ#" 8ࠀ/଀ᄀЀ܀7Ȁ$5 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀᰀᬀ 2-଀6ࠀ%0Ѐఀ$%ࠀ܀'܀2<଀6ࠀ%0>ఀ$%ࠀ ᬀᔀᜀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᨀ)ᜀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᘀ* ᤀ'ᜀᜀ + ᔀḀ)ᘀἀ* ᜀᰀ)ᨀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀/$7܀%܀؀/ကᔀᨀᬀ 7$" ᨀᔀ᠀(᠀ᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᰀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀᤀ* Ā Ā ܀'܀$؀ЀᄀȀ$ఀࠀᄀ$܀؀଀$%ࠀ63.܀؀%$;ᘀᰀ᠀ ကЀ#" ἀᤀḀ'ᤀᜀ + ᤀᨀ)ᔀᜀ* ᜀᨀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%؀3܀؀ࠀ6਀଀ఀ%$܀-&ጀ0ఀ/.܀ကᔀᨀ᠀ ကЀ(ጀሀ;$%1" (ጀሀጀ0ఀࠀ-01Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀᰀḀ က଀;Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀က଀;Ѐ6> ᰀᔀḀ(ᜀᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᰀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᘀ* 61Ѐ ᤀᜀᤀ'ἀᔀ + ᤀᤀ)ᘀᬀ* ᜀᰀ)ᘀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀$฀ࠀ܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀ကᔀᨀḀ ฀ࠀ$1଀" ἀᤀ(ᰀᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᘀᬀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀1%$0؀က଀ఀࠀ6܀'܀ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6଀:܀؀%$0؀ᘀᰀἀ က଀ఀࠀ6#" *᠀ᔀᔀ'ᬀᘀ + ᔀḀ)ᜀᔀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀ ܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀؀ကᔀᨀἀ ༀࠀ6ഀЀ,1ࠀ-଀6" :ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6/ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ༀࠀ6ഀЀ,1ࠀ-଀61Ѐ Ā Ā Ḁᰀ'ᬀᜀ᠀(ᜀᔀ +" ᔀᰀ)ᰀἀ*ᔀᤀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᨀ)ᰀᔀ*ᜀᘀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀-&ᄀ଀؀/ࠀఀࠀ%ༀࠀ.܀/ကጀ@ᄀ܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀ကᔀᰀᘀ"#ᘀᜀᔀ ကጀഀᄀ଀" ᔀ(ἀἀ : ᔀᬀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀḀ)ᰀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀D&9܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ᄀ଀ࠀ-01Ѐ؀/ЀᄀȀༀࠀ؀ᘀᜀᤀ A#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀D&9 ༀࠀ$6ഀЀB01Ѐ ᔀḀᰀ'ᰀᜀ ( ᤀᘀ)ᔀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀؀ကᔀᰀᔀ ༀࠀ$6" *ᤀᘀἀ'ᔀᔀᔀ(ᜀᔀ "( ᤀᔀ)ᜀᔀ*ᔀᜀ)ᘀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᰀ*ᜀᘀ)ᜀἀ ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀ȀЀ؀਀Ԁ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀CЀO/଀01ЀA܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀ကᔀᰀᤀ"#ᘀᜀᨀ CЀO/଀01Ѐ" ਀ԀBȀ1 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A *ᄀ50ഀ5B01Ѐ ᠀ᨀᘀ'ᜀᜀ + ᤀᨀ)ᤀḀ* ᜀᨀ)ᔀᬀ<܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀ကᔀᰀᨀ >ᄀ50ഀ5ᄀ" 0ጀ,& ᔀᜀ(᠀ᘀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀AB0ᄀ଀3%1܀'܀&,0ጀ܀؀0ᄀ଀3%؀ᘀᜀᰀ A#" *ᔀἀᰀ'ᨀἀᜀᨀ(ᤀḀ "( ᤀᔀ)ᤀ᠀*ᔀᰀ)ᨀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀἀ*ᜀᘀ)ᨀᔀ ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ࠀ6%Ѐ,3؀;က଀܀ࠀऀ܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀+IЀሀጀ$01Ѐ܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀ကᔀᰀᰀ"#ᘀᜀᬀ IЀሀጀ$5" :$ࠀ6%Ѐ܀'܀Aࠀ%<ЀȀ&܀က଀;B3,ࠀ6%&܀Ѐ܀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ฀Ѐ$56ഀ3:?ࠀ6%& Ḁᜀᜀ'᠀ᘀ + ᔀ᠀)ᔀᨀ* ᜀᔀ)ᨀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 105܀ᄀЀȀ܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀ကᔀᰀᜀ ฀Ѐ$56ഀ" 104 "#ᘀᜀ᠀ Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%&܀%-Ѐ$܀%Ѐ-$ఀ܀'܀Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%5܀ ᠀᠀(ᨀᜀ " ᔀᬀ)ᰀᨀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᔀ* ЀȀ#ጀLЀB01Ѐ ᰀἀᨀ'Ḁᤀ + ᤀᤀ)ᨀᨀ* ᜀᤀ)ᤀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā̀܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀ကᔀᰀᬀ %-Ѐ$฀ጀሀ" *ЀȀ-Ѐ$6଀ЀB01Ѐ ᤀᬀἀ'ᨀᰀ + ᔀ᠀)ᜀḀ* ᜀᤀ)ᔀᔀ̀܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀ကᔀᰀ᠀ DЀ$ఀЀ" 0Ѐ3,ఀB ᘀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā:܀Ѐ̀܀'܀؀0Ѐ3,ఀ:܀ᘀᜀḀ ̀Ѐ#" "#ᘀᬀᘀ ကጀ,Ѐ܀ЀᄀȀ܀G&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ܀'܀̀଀6Ѐ܀ ᔀ(᠀ᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᨀᜀ* *ᔀἀἀ'ᔀᜀ + ᤀᘀ)ᰀᜀ* ᜀᨀ)ᤀḀ ܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀ကᔀᰀḀ ̀Ѐ?଀-ࠀȀЀF:ЀԀጀ1଀" ကጀ,&܀Ѐ܀.ࠀఀࠀ%Ѐ܀G&;ᄀ/% Ā ̀Ѐ?଀-ࠀȀഀ1ࠀF:ЀԀጀ61Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᤀ᠀ᨀ'ᤀᰀ᠀(ḀḀ +" ᤀᘀ)ᨀᔀ*ᔀᜀ)ᬀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᰀ*ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ ܀଀6Ѐ̀܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀F-0଀3܀ࠀऀ܀଀Ȁഀ଀ЀB01Ѐ!0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ̀܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀ကᔀᰀἀ"#ᘀᬀᔀ ̀଀ȀЀ" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀F-0଀3 *ᤀᤀ'ᰀḀ + ᔀἀ)ᔀᬀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᬀ ܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀-&$ကᔀᜀᘀ 7/0ഀఀ5ᄀFI଀" ᔀᜀᬀ(ᘀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᤀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᰀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀ࠀሀ;܀؀0଀ᄀ଀$ఀ؀$଀$ࠀ-01Ѐ-Ѐ܀؀%$ᘀᬀᰀ 7/0ഀ̀ࠀ6ࠀఀ5ȀࠀԀB01ࠀFI#" 0଀ᄀ଀?ఀB Ā Ā؀?Ѐ-܀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ$%1̀ *01Ѐ ᜀ᠀'ἀᜀ + ᤀᤀ)ᜀᜀ* ᜀᔀ)ᨀᤀ-؀Ѐ$6ഀ"܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀-؀ကᔀᜀᔀ "Ѐ$6ഀ" ἀᨀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀%$ᘀᬀᜀ ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ#" ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ଀01Ѐ ᜀᘀ᠀'Ḁἀ + ᤀᔀ)ᨀᤀ* ᜀᨀ)ᰀᰀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā"܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀ကᔀᜀᤀ "଀0ഀ" 01Ѐ ᔀᘀᔀ'Ḁᬀ + ᤀᨀ)ᔀᔀ* ᜀᔀ)ᤀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀/ࠀ"܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀؀0଀؀/ကᔀᜀᨀ "ࠀ" ࠀ?$ЀȀഀ1Ѐ ᜀᰀᘀ'ᰀᨀ ( ᤀᘀ)ᰀᬀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā"܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀ကᔀᜀᰀ "ࠀ?$ЀȀ" *ᔀᔀᜀ'ᤀᜀ + ᤀᘀ)ᘀᨀ* ᜀᔀ)ᘀᘀ ܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀Ȁ#&$ഀ؀ကᔀᜀᜀ "$ഀ" Ȁ#ࠀ$01Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀ഀ$" Ԁ501Ѐ ᨀḀᘀ'ᬀᰀ ( ᤀᤀ)ᨀḀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀ഀ$"܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀/Ԁ5O؀ကᔀᜀᬀ "$ഀ" Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Poland

؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ᐀ᔀᔀᔀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀᜀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀ᠀ᘀ ᐀ᔀᤀᨀᘀ ᐀ᤀᔀᤀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᨀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᬀᘀ ᐀ᨀᤀᤀᘀ ᐀ᰀᘀᨀᘀ ᐀ᬀᔀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᰀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᜀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᰀᘀ ᐀᠀ᤀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀Ḁᨀᔀᘀ ᐀ἀᘀᤀᘀ ᐀ἀᔀḀᘀᴀ ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ ᐀ἀᔀ!ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ᐀ᘀᴀ ᐀ἀᰀᔀᘀ ਀ᔀᘀᤀἀ ਀ᔀᘀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᘀḀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᘀἀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᘀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᤀᘀ ਀ᔀᔀᬀᨀ ਀ᔀᔀḀḀ ਀ᔀᨀᘀᨀ ਀ᔀᨀᨀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᰀ᠀᠀ ਀ᔀᜀᤀḀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᤀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᨀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ *ᔀᤀᘀᔀ(ᨀ᠀ᔀᤀᔀ'ᘀᬀ "+ ᔀḀ)ᤀᤀ*ᤀᘀ)ᜀ᠀* ᰀἀ)ᤀᜀ*ᜀᔀ)ᘀᔀ ܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀؀ЀȀࠀ-଀6$؀Ȁ&਀଀&%$؀฀܀'܀&Ȁ&%$؀ᘀᘀᔀ"ကᔀᜀ᠀ ฀#" ЀȀࠀ-଀61Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā$؀਀଀ *2Ѐ-.Ѐఀ& ᠀ᰀᘀ(Ḁᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀἀ܀฀/01܀'܀$Ѐ-.Ѐఀ,଀Ѐᄀ"܀؀ᘀᘀᨀ +,଀ఀ#" ਀ጀ-Ѐ/01Ѐ ᬀᤀ'ᬀἀ + ᤀᤀ)ᜀᔀ* ᜀᰀ)ᔀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀ကᔀᜀḀ ਀ጀ-Ѐ,1଀" ᨀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᨀ)ᜀḀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀฀0Ѐᄀ଀3܀'܀؀ᘀᘀᰀ ฀0Ѐᄀ଀3#" ᜀᬀ'ᰀᰀ + ᔀἀ)ᨀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā ܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀Cጀ$Ѐ܀؀/ကᔀᜀἀ I଀ȀȀ" ࠀȀ1ࠀ-ࠀ<ጀ$Ѐ<01Ѐ ᤀᔀᬀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᬀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā$2$؀0܀฀0Ѐᄀ$%5܀'܀4ࠀࠀȀ0ЀᄀȀ܀$؀0܀&%$ᘀᘀᜀ ฀0Ѐᄀ#" *᠀ᔀᘀᘀ'ᜀᨀ + ᔀᬀ)ᰀᬀ* ᜀᤀ)ᔀ ܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀1ࠀ?ࠀ/01Ѐ/؀ကᔀᬀᘀ D଀" ᤀ(ᜀᜀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀Ѐ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀ࠀ/01Ѐ?&%$3؀ȀЀ1ࠀᄀ/؀ᘀᘀᬀ D฀ࠀ,଀#" Ā Ā Ā ܀C$%5؀฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ܀'܀$ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀AЀఀ%Ѐ AЀఀ%Ѐ ᔀᜀᘀ'Ḁᜀ + ᤀᨀ)ᘀ᠀* ᜀᰀ)ᘀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀%/ᄀ;&-܀Ѐ܀%/01Ѐ-&;ᄀ$؀D଀ሀ଀܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀ကᔀᬀᔀ D଀ሀ$5" *ᰀἀ'ᨀᔀᔀ(ἀᤀ "+ ᔀᰀ)ᰀᔀ*ᔀἀ)ᤀᜀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ*ᜀᘀ)ᰀᔀ ܀70ఀࠀ<Ѐ܀%܀؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀఀࠀ1"܀Ԁ05ᄀN,ࠀఀ5܀฀-ࠀጀ$%76܀'܀Ԁ0&ᄀ܀ᘀᘀḀ"ကᔀᬀᤀ ฀-ࠀጀ$%ጀ6#" N,ࠀఀࠀ?ࠀఀࠀ61Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᔀᬀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᘀ ܀'܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀4܀&Ԁࠀ%-ЀȀ܀؀0Ѐ%ࠀ6଀3%؀" ᘀᘀἀ#" Ԁࠀ%<ЀȀ& ᔀᨀ'ᨀἀ + ᤀᔀ)ᘀἀ* ᜀᔀ)ᔀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā܀ࠀ6଀3%1%<0؀Ѐ1ࠀ0,Ѐ-8"܀%܀-ကᔀᬀᨀ "Ѐ1ࠀ0,Ѐ" "ကᔀᬀᰀ "Ѐ,ጀ1଀܀%܀"Ѐ,ጀ1଀ ᤀἀᰀ'ᬀᘀ + ᔀ᠀)ᰀḀ* ᜀᤀ)ᰀᤀ* ᔀᘀᜀᤀ(ᬀἀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀1%$؀8܀'܀Ȁࠀ,ࠀ-଀؀-ఀ$܀؀%$؀" ᘀᔀᰀ#" ᨀᔀ'ᤀᬀ + ᔀ᠀)ᜀḀ* ᜀᰀ)ᨀᤀ* Ā Ā ܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀.6؀؀฀܀ />Ȁࠀ,ࠀ5ᄀࠀ؀>ကᔀᬀᜀ "Ѐ$Ѐ0ഀ$ఀ" *฀ጀ6ഀ5ᄀ5 ᔀᤀἀ(ᬀᰀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ܀؀Ѐ$"Ѐ$Ѐ0ഀ5B01଀-%܀5%$؀8܀'܀Ѐ-$ఀ%܀$Ѐ-%܀&%$؀" ᘀᔀᜀ#" "ကᔀᬀᬀ >$ࠀ-଀Ѐ$1଀܀%܀"Ѐ0Ԁࠀ܀>$ࠀ-଀Ѐ$1଀ ᤀᜀ'ᔀᬀ + ᔀᬀ)ᰀᜀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ࠀ ᔀᰀἀ(ᤀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā%$؀%9ࠀ܀'܀ࠀ%$؀%ᘀᔀḀ 9ࠀ#" 6ഀᄀ଀6Ѐ ᤀ'᠀ᤀ + ᔀḀ)ᔀᜀ* ᜀᰀ)ᨀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā,؀"܀%܀6ഀᄀ଀6Ѐ,؀" ᠀ကᔀᬀ" ᨀᨀᘀ(ᤀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᘀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᜀ* Ā ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀ᘀᔀἀ 9ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%#" ᔀ'ᔀᘀ + ᔀᬀ)ᨀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᰀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀%܀ࠀ/Ѐᄀ଀6Ѐ"܀$Ѐ؀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀5؀//Ѐ;܀ᄀЀ9ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%1/؀1଀؀ကᔀᬀḀ "଀" ࠀ/Ѐᄀ଀65 Ā Ā Ā Ā"܀1ࠀ,ࠀ܀8ࠀ/଀ᄀЀ܀ᄀЀ/؀1଀؀଀" ἀ(ᰀᤀ : ᔀᬀ)ᨀᰀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀଀00$,܀؀ࠀ.3%܀؀ᘀᤀᔀ 9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%#" ᤀᨀ'ᰀᬀ ( ᤀᘀ)ᤀᰀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ࠀ.3%܀ᄀ଀ᄀ59ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%1؀଀"܀%܀ᄀ଀ᄀ5؀ကᔀᬀἀ "଀" *ᰀ(ἀᰀᘀ'Ḁᤀ "+ ᔀ᠀)ᤀḀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ᠀*ᜀᰀ)ᘀᜀ ܀܀%܀ᄀ଀%&1ࠀ-ࠀ;؀:܀&-$Ѐ؀ᄀ܀؀%3܀Ѐ0/Ѐᄀ,0଀ᄀ଀Ȁ0#܀ĀЀ܀଀ᄀሀ܀ᄀЀ؀ᘀᤀᤀ"ကᔀ᠀ᘀ !଀0/ࠀЀఀ#" Ԁ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀଀ᄀ଀3%1؀-1ࠀ؀0:܀,<#ࠀȀ?܀5?50܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀D!଀0܀؀Ѐ<36܀'܀$5ऀ଀$,-.ࠀᄀȀ," -&;ᄀ/%& ᤀᔀᜀ'ᘀᘀ + ᔀ᠀)ᤀᜀ* ᜀᰀ)ᰀᰀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀؀L؀ࠀ#$ഀ"܀%܀ࠀЀ0ఀ/ЀᄀȀ+܀؀ကᔀ᠀ᔀ ਀,ࠀ-଀ᄀ01଀" ᬀᘀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᨀ)ᨀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā ؀ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ଀B01଀܀'܀ᘀᤀᨀ ਀,ࠀ-ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ#" ᔀᬀᰀ'ᜀḀᘀ(ᨀ᠀ "+ ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ*ᔀἀ)ᤀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ*ᜀᨀ)ᤀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀؀ഀ܀'܀$؀ഀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ଀؀>ࠀ"܀%ऀ܀܀%ЀᄀȀ&;ᄀ଀/؀1-܀6଀3%&ကЀ܀ᘀᤀᰀ"ကᔀ᠀ᤀ ฀$ࠀȀᄀ᐀ࠀ;$ࠀ଀6Ѐ#" ᄀ/% Ā;&- ؀܀᐀฀$ࠀȀᄀࠀ;?ࠀ଀61଀6଀3%5 ᰀᔀᰀ'ᨀᘀᨀḀ(ἀᬀ +: ᔀ᠀)ᘀ᠀*ᔀᬀ)ᔀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ*ᜀᨀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀؀ഀ$؀଀ ܀'ഀ؀>ࠀ"܀܀6Ѐ%܀ЀᄀȀȀࠀጀ;-Ѐ/؀ကЀ1܀଀ᄀ$%Ѐ܀ᘀᤀᜀ"ကᔀ᠀ᨀ ᐀8$ࠀȀࠀᄀЀ-01ࠀ#" Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ Ā܀<%$ᄀ/؀᐀8$ࠀȀࠀᄀЀ-01଀ *ᨀᤀᨀ'ᰀᨀ + ᔀ᠀)ᜀᜀ* ᜀᤀ)ᨀᘀ ܀؀ഀ$؀ഀ଀؀>ࠀ"܀%܀ЀᄀȀ/؀ကЀ1܀ഀᄀࠀ؀ကᔀ᠀ᰀ ༀᄀ଀" *᠀ᨀᬀἀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀&,3-6܀؀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%܀Ѐ܀؀%$ᘀᤀ᠀ ᐀ࠀ$ఀ&ᄀ#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀B01଀؀Eᄀ଀؀ༀᄀ଀ ᐀ࠀ$ఀ5ᄀ$%1܀Ѐ܀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%1܀6-3,& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᔀ᠀᠀'ᬀᨀ + ᔀᜀ)ᨀᘀ* ᜀᨀ)ᤀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ĀB01଀܀؀ഀ$؀ഀ଀؀>ࠀ"܀%܀ЀᄀȀ/؀ကЀ1܀ကᔀ᠀ᜀ ĀB01ࠀ" *ᰀᜀ(ᘀᬀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ ܀'܀A0ЀȀЀ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀3܀ᘀᤀḀ ᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$%Ѐ#" ᤀᔀ᠀'ᰀḀ + ᔀᬀ)ᘀᬀ* ᜀᤀ)ᨀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀%܀A0ЀȀ>ᄀȀ܀Ѐ܀ЀЀ/؀ကЀ1܀-&ᄀЀ6Ѐ1-؀C܀$؀ကᔀ᠀ᬀ ᐀I଀-Ѐ;=ȀЀᄀࠀഀ56.&6$%>ȀF਀଀" I଀=Ȁഀ56.ࠀȀഀ1ࠀF Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀؀ഀ$؀ഀ଀؀>ࠀ" *ᨀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀḀ ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀Ѐ0$ ؀A܀ࠀऀ܀$01଀--؀Ѐ1ࠀ$؀ЀᄀȀ਀଀؀ᘀᨀᘀ A#" Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀?AЀ0܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀Ԁ *ᰀᤀ'᠀ᬀ + ᔀᰀ)ᜀᘀ* ᜀᨀ)ᘀᤀ ܀؀ഀ$؀ഀ଀؀>ࠀ"܀%܀ЀᄀȀ/؀ကЀ1܀ကᔀ᠀᠀ I5O/଀#&$ഀ" ᔀ(ᬀᜀ " ᔀḀ)ᤀᔀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀Ѐ ؀FȀ-଀܀ࠀऀ܀$01-؀$ЀᄀȀI5O/଀#ࠀ؀ᘀᨀᔀ A#" FȀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀Ԁ ᤀᘀἀ'ᰀ᠀ + ᔀᬀ)ᔀᜀ* ᜀᔀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀؀ഀ$؀ഀ଀؀>ࠀ"܀%܀ЀᄀȀ/؀ကЀ1܀ကᔀ᠀Ḁ ਀,Ѐ-Ѐ" ᔀḀᤀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀ᠀)ᔀ᠀* ᰀἀ)ᘀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀଀;&਀,Ѐ-01଀>,"܀'܀଀00$,܀&;ᘀᨀᨀ ",-଀#" *᠀Ḁᤀ'ᨀᨀᜀ(ᘀ᠀ +" ᤀᨀ)ᨀἀ*ᔀᜀ)ᤀᤀ* ᜀᔀ)ᤀᤀ*ᰀἀ)ᤀ ܀Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%5=܀'܀01Ѐ؀/ࠀ܀%"܀%؀؀܀-3܀%5ࠀ؀//ࠀఀ;Ѐ܀.܀&฀ጀሀ܀%$؀ᄀ%ࠀ60଀؀/ကᔀ᠀ἀ"#ᘀᨀᰀ =Ѐ"ࠀ" 8.ࠀࠀ/଀ఀࠀ%ᄀЀ܀฀ጀሀጀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᔀ᠀ἀ(ᜀᨀᔀ᠀Ḁ'ᤀᘀ +" ᔀἀ)ᤀᤀ*ᔀᤀ)ᰀᨀ* ᜀᤀ)ᘀᬀ*ᜀᘀ)ᤀᨀ ܀ЀȀࠀ/଀ᄀЀ$"܀%܀਀?଀//-Ѐ5܀$؀฀ഀጀ$ЀF̀/;<>؀=܀'܀Ѐ;଀-؀= ကᔀḀᘀ"#ᘀᨀᜀ" ጀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā$؀฀ഀጀ$5F̀ *ᄀ/%& Ḁᬀᨀ(᠀ᔀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ؀$؀=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%ᄀ଀؀$؀= ᘀᨀᬀ#" ᔀᘀᤀ'ᘀḀ + ᤀᔀ)ᰀḀ* ᜀᔀ)ᘀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀%܀؀ༀࠀ$ሀ܀଀0ఀጀ/Ѐ;܀ကᔀḀᔀ IЀ,ࠀ?ࠀ/01Ѐ" "#ᘀᨀḀ =଀-଀%ࠀ6$%&܀-&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀ ᘀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᨀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᰀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀IЀ,ࠀ?ࠀ/06܀-܀D଀0,5܀ࠀԀ,؀ഀ$" =଀؀ጀL561଀@܀505̀܀8ࠀ/଀ᄀЀ܀ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ,؀%ࠀ"$ഀఀࠀ. ᔀᨀ(ᬀἀ " ᔀḀ)ᘀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᜀ* Ā ܀&%0ࠀጀ܀؀%$ഀ؀-;Ѐ#܀Ѐ܀؀%3؀ᘀᰀᤀ 2ࠀጀఀ#" *ᤀ'ᨀᔀ + ᔀᬀ)ᔀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᜀᘀ ܀1%$܀%܀0଀3L@؀>;<<#܀Ѐ܀1%3؀2ࠀጀఀ܀'܀$Ѐ؀ᄀ܀0؀ༀࠀ$ሀ܀6Ѐ܀ЀȀࠀᄀ଀4$؀6ഀԀ,؀" ကᔀḀᰀ" Ԁ Ā Ā Ā؀0଀3L<܀ࠀȀ?܀6ഀᄀ଀65,؀"܀ࠀԀ& 5,؀%0ࠀጀ"$ഀ ᔀᜀ'᠀ἀᘀ(᠀ᤀ +" ᔀᬀ)ᰀᬀ*ᔀᰀ)ᨀἀ* ᜀᰀ)ᨀᨀ*ᰀἀ)ᔀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀؀ഀ5Ԁࠀ$01଀$"܀%܀฀ࠀሀ0܀2ࠀഀࠀ,07Ȁ%&+ࠀЀ0ఀ/ЀᄀȀ܀'܀&%ကᔀḀᜀ"#ᘀᰀᨀ 2ࠀഀࠀ,0ጀȀ" Ѐ ᨀᘀᤀ(ᤀᤀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀?ࠀᄀࠀ%-2܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀؀$ᘀᰀᰀ ฀,ࠀఀ2-%ࠀᄀࠀ#" *ᬀᔀᜀ(ᨀᨀᤀᘀ'ᘀ᠀ "+ ᔀᨀ)ᜀᔀ*ᔀἀ)ᨀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᘀ*ᜀᘀ)ᤀᔀ ܀ጀ0ఀ5ᄀ଀Ѐ"܀%܀ఀ$؀0؀8܀-&଀6ࠀ%0>ఀ$%ࠀ฀,=Ȁ>2܀'܀ᘀᰀᬀ"ကᔀḀᬀ 2-଀6ࠀ%0Ѐఀ$%ࠀ#" ฀,=Ȁࠀ-01Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᨀᔀ᠀(᠀ᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᰀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀᤀ ܀'܀$؀ЀᄀȀ$ఀࠀᄀ$܀؀଀$%ࠀ63.܀؀%$;ᘀᰀ᠀ ကЀ#" *ᤀᨀᬀ'ᤀ᠀ + ᔀᜀ)ᔀḀ* ᜀᤀ)ᜀᰀ ܀ጀ0ഀ6ഀЀ"܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀Ѐఀ؀$ༀ܀1؀ကᔀḀ᠀ ฀Ѐ$/଀ᄀ" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ࠀ63%$/.܀ကЀ;$%1 61Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀฀Ѐ$/଀ᄀ "#ᘀᰀḀ က଀;Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀က଀;Ѐ6> ᰀᔀḀ(ᜀᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᰀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᘀ* ᬀᤀἀ'ᤀᔀ + ᤀᨀ)ᰀ᠀* ᜀᤀ)ᰀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀/9Ѐ؀଀Ԁ$"܀LЀ؀ကᔀḀḀ ฀଀Ѐ,ࠀ-଀" ἀᤀ(ᰀᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᘀᬀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀1%$0؀က଀ఀࠀ6܀'܀Ѐ01Ѐ6଀-؀฀଀Ѐ,ࠀ-଀܀ࠀԀࠀЀ:܀؀6ഀ0$%؀ᘀᰀἀ "ጀ0ഀက଀ఀࠀ6#" :ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6/ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ἀ'ᜀᨀ + ᔀḀ)ᔀᔀ* ᜀᤀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā ܀ጀ0ഀ6ഀЀ"܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀Ѐఀ؀$ༀ܀-؀ᄀ଀0ഀ؀ကᔀḀἀ ฀଀" 01Ѐ ᠀(ᜀᔀ " ᔀᤀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā-؀ᄀ଀0ഀ؀ࠀఀࠀ%฀଀.܀/ကጀ@ᄀ܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀ᘀᜀᔀ ကጀഀᄀ଀#" ᔀ᠀ᤀ'᠀ᘀᔀ(ἀἀ +: ᔀᬀ)ᔀᤀ*ᤀᘀ)ᔀᰀ* ᰀḀ)ᰀ᠀*ᜀᤀ)ᘀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ ܀Ѐᄀ6ഀȀ-&Ѐ؀A"ጀ0ഀ܀'܀%܀܀-؀60ఀ؀଀-$܀؀ࠀD!܀Ѐఀ؀$ༀ&9܀ࠀऀ܀$܀--؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᤀ"ကᔀἀᘀ ฀ࠀ/଀Ԁ&A#" 01Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā- ؀9฀ࠀ/଀Ԁࠀ&D ἀᤀ᠀'ᰀᰀᔀ(ᜀᔀ "+ ᔀᜀ)ᘀᤀ*ᔀᜀ)ᜀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀἀ*ᜀᨀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀6ഀЀ܀'ጀ0ഀ"܀܀-؀଀6-%܀܀0ఀЀ؀$ࠀ!܀Ȁఀ؀਀Ԁ܀ࠀऀ܀$Ѐ؀$ༀ-؀܀ЀᄀȀ8$Ѐ-Ѐ؀ᘀᜀᨀ"ကᔀἀᔀ A#" ਀ԀBȀ1 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀&-ЀᄀȀ$Ѐ-01Ѐ؀8A *ᨀ᠀ᜀ'ᘀᨀᔀᜀ(᠀ᘀ "+ ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ*ᤀᘀ)ᨀᜀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀἀ*ᜀᤀ)ᤀᔀ ܀ጀ0ഀ6ഀЀ"܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀Ѐఀ؀$ༀ܀0ጀ,&?଀ᄀࠀ0܀AB0ᄀ଀3%1܀'܀&,0ጀ܀؀0ᄀ଀3%؀ᘀᜀᰀ"ကᔀἀᤀ >ЀԀA#" >ЀԀ?଀ᄀࠀ01Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᜀᨀ(ᤀḀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᜀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᔀ ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ࠀ6%Ѐ,3؀;က଀܀ࠀऀ܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀+ ᘀᜀᬀ#" *ᤀἀᬀ'᠀᠀ + ᤀᔀ)ᤀḀ* ᜀᔀ)ᨀᨀ ܀ጀ0ഀ6ഀЀ"܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀Ѐఀ؀$ༀ܀؀ᄀ଀6؀ကᔀἀᨀ >ࠀഀ଀" :$ࠀ6%Ѐ܀'܀Aࠀ%<ЀȀ&܀က଀;B3,ࠀ6%&܀Ѐ܀ Ā Ā ᄀ଀61Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀ࠀഀ଀< 106 :?ࠀ6%& 107 *ἀᤀ'Ḁᘀ + ᔀᰀ)ᔀ᠀* ᜀᤀ)ᜀᬀ ܀ጀ0ഀ6ഀЀ"܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀Ѐఀ؀$ༀ܀1؀ကᔀἀᰀ "଀Ѐ0" "#ᘀᜀ᠀ Aࠀ-"଀Ѐ01ࠀЀ6$%&-Ѐ܀%-Ѐ$܀%Ѐ-$ఀ܀'܀Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%5܀ ᠀᠀(ᨀᜀ " ᔀᬀ)ᰀᨀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā %-Ѐ$ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᔀᰀᬀ'ᤀᘀ + ᤀᤀ)ᨀᤀ* ᜀᰀ)ᤀᘀ ܀ጀ0ഀ6ഀЀ"܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀Ѐఀ؀$ༀ܀ကᔀἀᜀ :ࠀԀ଀ᄀఀ5" 0Ѐ3,ఀB ᘀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā:܀Ѐ̀܀'܀؀0Ѐ3,ఀ:܀ᘀᜀḀ ̀Ѐ#" :ࠀԀ଀ᄀ61Ѐ Ā Ā Ā ᔀᔀἀ'ἀᘀᔀ(᠀ᬀ +" ᔀᰀ)ᤀᤀ*ᔀ᠀)ᜀᜀ* ᜀᨀ)ᨀḀ*ᰀἀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā ܀଀6Ѐ̀܀Ѐ܀'܀Ȁ.ጀ0ഀ0Ѐ6ഀ଀ᄀ"܀%ऀ0ࠀࠀ܀%ᄀ଀;܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀Ѐఀ؀$ༀ܀G&Ѐ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ကᔀἀᬀ"#ᘀᬀᘀ ကጀD1$,Ѐ" Dကጀ1$,&ഀ܀ЀЀ܀B01Ѐ.ࠀఀࠀ%Ѐ܀G&;ᄀ/% Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ἀᔀᘀ'ᬀᘀ᠀(ḀḀ +" ᔀᜀ)ᔀᔀ*ᔀᜀ)ᬀᘀ* ᜀᔀ)ᤀᬀ*ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ ܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ܀଀6!Ѐ̀܀'܀-܀Ѐఀ؀$ༀ؀଀6-܀ᄀ଀6Ѐ܀؀F-0଀3܀ࠀऀ܀6ഀ0Ѐ଀ᄀ؀6F70଀؀/؀.ကᔀἀ᠀"#ᘀᬀᔀ N!ሀࠀ$ഀ0ࠀࠀȀ" 61ࠀF Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀/؀Nሀࠀ$ഀ܀6ഀЀ ؀ጀ0ഀ3"܀%F-0଀ 6ഀᄀ଀61Ѐ؀70଀ ᔀᜀᬀ(ᘀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᤀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᰀ* Ā Ā ܀'܀ࠀሀ;܀؀0଀ᄀ଀$ఀ؀$Ѐ-܀؀%$ᘀᬀᰀ ̀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ#" ᔀᘀḀ'ἀᬀ + ᔀ᠀)ᘀᔀ* ᜀᤀ)ᨀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀B"ጀ0ഀ6ഀЀ܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀0଀ᄀ଀?ఀ؀?Ѐఀ-Ѐ؀܀ༀ$ȀࠀԀ$%1܀ࠀ6ࠀࠀᄀ1Ѐ/؀ကᔀἀḀ Ǹ଀" *ἀᨀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀἀ ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀%$ࠀ6ࠀࠀᄀ1Ѐ,-ЀȀ/؀ᘀᬀᜀ ̀N଀#" ᔀᤀἀ'ᬀᔀ + ᔀᬀ)ᜀ᠀* ᜀᤀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ࠀሀЀ/଀B01Ѐ:܀%܀ &-ࠀ,܀5؀//Ѐ;܀Dࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ$%1Ѐ$ఀЀ܀ကᔀἀἀ :̀ࠀሀЀ/଀ᄀ" 8ࠀ/଀ᄀЀ܀DЀ$ఀ5 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *Ḁᰀ'Ḁᤀ + ᤀᨀ)ᘀᰀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᬀ ܀؀ࠀഀఀࠀ6ഀ:܀%܀؀ࠀഀఀࠀ6ഀ:܀؀/ကᤀᘀᘀ I଀ȀȀ" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀-2$ࠀȀ1ࠀ *Ḁᤀ'Ḁᜀ + ᔀᜀ)ᜀἀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀᘀ ܀ጀȀЀ-5:܀%܀ጀȀЀ-5:܀؀ကᤀᘀᔀ CЀᄀࠀ-଀6" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀CЀᄀࠀ-଀61଀ *ᤀ᠀'ᔀᜀ + ᔀᜀ)ᔀ᠀* ᜀᤀ)ᘀἀ ܀5ᄀᄀЀ:܀%܀5؀//Ѐ;܀ЀԀ؀$਀ఀ܀ကᤀᘀᤀ ༀ$5L5ᄀЀ" ࠀఀࠀ1ጀ Ā Ā Ā Ā"܀ሀࠀ؀ༀ$5L5B01଀ Ѐ0,=1Ѐ ᬀᔀ'ᔀᘀ + ᤀᘀ)ᘀἀ* ᜀᰀ)ᘀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā"܀1Ѐ؀ഀ:܀%܀$؀଀9:܀ကᤀᘀᨀ "Ѐ0,=1Ѐ" Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Poland

؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ᐀ᔀᔀᔀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀᜀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀ᠀ᘀ ᐀ᔀᤀᨀᘀ ᐀ᤀᔀᤀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᨀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᬀᘀ ᐀ᨀᤀᤀᘀ ᐀ᰀᘀᨀᘀ ᐀ᬀᔀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᰀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᜀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᰀᘀ ᐀᠀ᤀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀Ḁᨀᔀᘀ ᐀ἀᘀᤀᘀ ᐀ἀᔀḀᘀᴀ ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ ᐀ἀᔀ!ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ᐀ᘀᴀ ᐀ἀᰀᔀᘀ ਀ᔀᘀᤀἀ ਀ᔀᘀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᘀḀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᘀἀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᘀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᤀᘀ ਀ᔀᔀᬀᨀ ਀ᔀᔀḀḀ ਀ᔀᨀᘀᨀ ਀ᔀᨀᨀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᰀ᠀᠀ ਀ᔀᜀᤀḀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᤀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᨀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ ฀$Ȁ5 ᔀᤀᘀᔀ(ᨀ᠀᠀ᘀ'ᘀ᠀ "+ ᔀḀ)ᤀᤀ*ᔀ᠀)ᨀᰀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᜀ*ᜀᨀ)ᜀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀$਀ЀᄀȀ܀%܀Ѐ଀ᄀ/"܀.7ጀఀ-Ѐ0܀Ȁ&฀$ȀЀ&%$؀฀܀'܀&Ȁ&%$؀ᘀᘀᔀ"ကᤀᘀᰀ ฀#" ਀଀1&$ഀ ᠀ᰀᘀ(Ḁᘀᔀ'ᰀᨀ "+ ᔀ᠀)ᜀᔀ*ᔀἀ)ᨀᰀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀἀ*ᜀᤀ)ᨀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀%܀2Ѐ-.Ѐఀ&਀଀1&$ഀ܀฀/01܀'܀$Ѐ-.Ѐఀ,଀Ѐᄀ"܀؀ᘀᘀᨀ"ကᤀᘀᜀ +,଀ఀ#" ฀,ࠀఀࠀ ᨀ(ᤀ᠀ᤀ'ᤀᔀ "+ ᔀᨀ)ᜀḀ*ᔀᬀ)ᤀἀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᬀ*ᜀᰀ)ᤀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā܀؀਀,ࠀ-଀B01଀܀%܀฀ࠀሀ܀؀਀,ࠀ-଀ᄀ01଀؀฀0Ѐᄀ଀3܀'܀؀ᘀᘀᰀ"ကᤀᘀᬀ ฀0Ѐᄀ଀3#" *ᤀᔀᬀ(ᨀᔀ᠀ᤀ'᠀ᘀ "+ ᔀᰀ)ᔀᬀ*ᔀḀ)ᔀἀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᜀ*ᜀᨀ)ᔀᬀ ܀61Ѐ؀/਀ࠀ܀%܀5؀//Ѐ;܀଀0ఀጀ/Ѐ;܀6؀/਀ࠀ$؀0܀฀0Ѐᄀ$%5܀'܀4ࠀࠀȀ0ЀᄀȀ܀$؀0܀&%$ᘀᘀᜀ"ကᤀᘀ᠀ ฀0Ѐᄀ#" 8ࠀ/଀ᄀЀ܀D଀0,5 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᤀ(ᜀᜀḀ'ᜀᰀ "+ ᔀᜀ)ᰀᔀ*ᔀḀ)ᘀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ*ᜀᰀ)ᤀᨀ ܀؀01଀-؀܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀਀ఀЀᄀ଀0ഀЀ܀%܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀܀฀ࠀሀ܀؀01଀-؀&%$3؀ᘀᘀᬀ"ကᤀᘀḀ ฀ࠀ,਀ఀЀᄀ଀0ഀȀЀᄀ#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀C$%5؀฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ܀'܀$ऀ଀$ࠀ ,.ࠀᄀȀ܀AЀఀ฀,ࠀఀ%Ѐ -&;ᄀ/%܀Ѐ܀-&;ᄀ/%܀AЀఀ%Ѐ "ကᤀᘀἀ @=L6ഀࠀ1܀"ࠀᄀȀ0܀%܀਀ఀЀ-5܀@=L6ഀࠀ1 ᜀ'Ḁᨀ + ᔀḀ)ᔀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᘀḀ* Ā Ā 6ഀ&-F ᘀ'ᘀᬀᔀ(ἀᤀ +" ᤀᘀ)ᔀᘀ*ᔀᰀ)ᰀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᘀ*ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā$؀਀ఀ܀%܀6ഀ&-F26଀Ѐᄀ1Ѐ$؀Ԁ05ᄀ਀ఀ܀฀-ࠀጀ$%76܀'܀Ԁ0&ᄀ܀ကᤀᔀᘀ"#ᘀᘀḀ ฀-ࠀጀ$%ጀ6" ᔀᬀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᘀ* Ā Ā ܀'܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀4܀&Ԁࠀ%-ЀȀ܀؀0Ѐ%ࠀ61Ѐ଀3%؀ᘀᘀἀ "26଀Ѐᄀ#" ᔀ'ἀᘀ + ᔀ᠀)ᨀᰀ* ᜀᰀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā ܀؀ᄀ଀61଀؀Ȁ&਀ఀጀȀഀ଀܀%Ѐ>%܀Ԁࠀᄀ0܀1%؀!܀؀ᄀ଀3଀6؀ࠀ6଀%<0؀ကᤀᔀᔀ ਀ఀጀȀഀ8" ᔀᘀᜀᤀ(ᬀἀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀1%$؀8܀'܀Ȁࠀ,ࠀ-଀؀-ఀ$܀؀%$؀ᘀᔀᰀ "Hࠀ$ऀࠀ-଀01Ѐ#" Ȁࠀ,ࠀI,5ᄀ$ఀ܀਀ጀ6.5܀%܀//I଀܀ကᤀᔀᤀ ਀ጀ6.5" Ѐ$ ᔀᤀἀ(ᬀᰀᘀ'ᔀᨀ +" ᔀḀ)ᰀἀ*ᔀᰀ)ᔀᤀ* ᜀᔀ)ᘀᨀ*ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā-%܀5%$؀8܀'܀Ѐ-$ఀ%܀$Ѐ-%܀&%$؀"਀ഀЀ6.ࠀ-ᄀ଀6Ѐ܀%܀؀Ѐ9+܀ကᤀᔀᨀ"#ᘀᔀᜀ ਀ഀЀ6.ࠀ-ᄀ଀6Ѐ" *᠀ࠀ ᔀᰀἀ(ᤀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀ%$؀%9ࠀ܀'܀ࠀ%$؀%ᘀᔀḀ 9ࠀ#" "ကᤀᔀᰀ HЀఀ$Ѐ܀IࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ0܀%܀HЀఀ$5 ᤀᔀᘀ'᠀ᘀ ( ᔀἀ)ᜀ᠀* ᰀἀ)ᔀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᨀᨀᘀ(ᤀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᘀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀ᘀᔀἀ 9ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%#" ᤀᘀ'ᬀᤀ + ᤀᨀ)ᨀᬀ* ᜀᔀ)ᔀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀H-&ࠀ$ऀࠀ-଀01Ѐ܀%ࠀ,܀܀ᄀࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%10؀!܀Ԁ,؀.ကᤀᔀᜀ +9" Ā Ā Ā ؀Ԁ01଀,؀.+ *ἀ(ᰀᤀ : ᔀᬀ)ᨀᰀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᔀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀؀ࠀ.3%܀؀ᘀᤀᔀ 9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%#" ᨀ'Ḁᔀ ( ᔀἀ)ᰀᬀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā᠀ ܀%܀฀ࠀሀ0܀ሀ؀HЀ$3܀.ࠀ-5%ࠀ̀܀ကᤀᔀᬀ 97$Ѐ-ЀጀᄀЀDࠀF6଀3%1" Ā Ā ؀Ѐ-01ࠀF̀ࠀ-ࠀఀЀ$01଀$7܀Hࠀ$ऀࠀ-଀01Ѐ *᠀ᰀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀḀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ ܀&%ᄀ଀;&-܀؀Ѐ,0଀ᄀ଀3%#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀ᘀᤀᤀ !଀0#" ᜀ'ᰀᘀ + ᔀᜀ)ᘀᨀ* ᜀᤀ)ᜀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā ܀0଀ᄀ଀3%1,<#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀଀0!܀'܀$ࠀ?଀ᄀ5ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ,.+܀Hࠀ$ऀࠀ-଀01ࠀ܀%܀฀ࠀሀ܀ကᤀᔀ᠀ +.,ࠀ?଀ᄀ5" -&;ᄀ/%& Ā Ā Ā Ā I,ࠀȀᄀࠀ ᬀᘀ(Ḁᨀᤀ'ᘀᔀ "+ ᔀᨀ)ᨀḀ*ᔀᰀ)ᰀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᘀ*ᜀᤀ)ᘀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀Hࠀ$ऀࠀ-଀01ࠀ܀%܀ᄀ؀!܀ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0ȀI,ࠀȀᄀࠀ܀'܀ᘀᤀᨀ"ကᤀᔀḀ ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ#" ᘀ(ᨀ᠀ᤀ'ᘀἀ "+ ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ*ᔀᬀ)ᤀᜀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ*ᜀᘀ)ᤀᔀ* Ā Ā ܀ࠀȀ܀'܀?ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀Hࠀ$ऀࠀ-଀01ࠀ܀%ᄀ଀܀%;&܀ሀ-܀6଀3%&฀ࠀ܀6؀ᄀ଀؀ࠀ;$ࠀ/؀ᘀᤀᰀ"ကᤀᔀἀ ᐀N଀#" ᄀ/% Ā;&-܀Ԁ6଀3%5؀B6؀ࠀ;?ࠀ/؀᐀N଀ ᨀḀ(ἀᬀᔀḀ'ᬀᤀ +: ᔀ᠀)ᘀ᠀*ᔀᬀ)ᔀḀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ*ᜀᤀ)ᰀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀Ѐ6Ѐ-܀Hࠀ$ጀ;ऀࠀ-଀01ࠀ܀Ȁࠀ%܀฀ࠀሀ܀଀ᄀ$%Ѐ܀6଀ᄀ؀ᘀᤀᜀ"ကᤀᤀᘀ ᐀:ഀࠀȀࠀᄀ#" Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ Ā܀ ؀<%$6଀B01଀/ᄀ؀᐀:ഀࠀȀࠀᄀ *᠀ᘀ'ἀᬀ + ᤀᨀ)ᤀᰀ* ᜀᔀ)ᘀ ܀Hࠀ$ऀࠀ-଀01ࠀ܀%܀ᄀ؀!܀؀ကᤀᤀᔀ ਀ࠀ#ࠀ-଀6" *᠀ᨀᬀἀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀&,3-6܀؀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%܀Ѐ܀؀%$ᘀᤀ᠀ ᐀ࠀ$ఀ&ᄀ#" Ā Ā ؀਀ࠀ#ࠀ-଀6 ᐀ࠀ$ఀ5ᄀ$%1܀Ѐ܀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%1܀6-3,& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᘀ'ᔀᜀ + ᤀᨀ)ᨀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀἀ ܀Hࠀ$ऀࠀ-଀01ࠀ܀%܀ᄀ؀!܀؀ကᤀᤀᤀ 2ᄀ଀Ѐఀ56ഀ" Ā Ā Ā ؀2ᄀ଀Ѐఀ56ഀ܀؀-ሀ/Ѐᄀࠀ=- *ᰀᜀ(ᘀᬀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ ܀'܀A0ЀȀЀ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀3܀ᘀᤀḀ ᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$%Ѐ#" ᔀḀᔀ'ᬀᤀ + ᔀᜀ)ᔀᨀ* ᜀᰀ)ᘀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā <܀%܀ࠀЀA0ЀȀ0ఀ/ЀᄀȀ܀+Ѐ܀Ѐ܀ሀ؀ᄀЀ6ࠀ#$ഀ-؀ࠀ,C܀<଀ЀఀЀᄀࠀ&-6$%>F#؀;ကᤀᤀᨀ ᐀H$-ഀЀ" Ā Ā ܀Ѐ0"܀01଀؀଀Ѐఀࠀ-01ࠀF>ࠀ,ࠀ#$ഀ#؀H$ഀ *ᨀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀḀ ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀A଀ Ѐ0$܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ̀ЀȀԀࠀ$01؀ᘀᨀᘀ A#" Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀?AЀ0܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀Ԁ *I,5ᄀ5 ᠀'᠀ᔀ + ᔀḀ)ᔀᤀ* ᜀᰀ)ᰀᜀ܀H$ഀ5܀%܀I଀//0܀؀؀$.ကᤀᤀᰀ H" ᔀ(ᬀᜀ " ᔀḀ)ᤀᔀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀FȀ-Ѐ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᨀᔀ A#" FȀ-& ᠀'Ḁἀ + ᔀᰀ)ᨀἀ* ᜀᤀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀Ā/Ѐᄀ1଀Ԁ܀؀J,"܀'܀଀00$,܀&;ᘀᨀᨀ"ကᤀᤀᬀ ",-଀#" ᰀᰀḀ'ᘀᘀᜀ(ᘀ᠀ "+ ᔀᜀ)ᤀᤀ*ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀ᠀*ᜀᨀ)ᰀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀%܀5%$6܀က=Ѐᄀ%ࠀЀሀࠀࠀᄀ܀'܀%܀6଀ᄀ؀؀؀਀ഀ6ഀ-3܀%ࠀ܀ࠀఀM.܀&܀.I$%ࠀጀఀ܀ᘀᨀᰀ"ကᤀᤀ᠀ =Ѐ7Ȁᄀ%ࠀ6$Ѐ#" 6଀B01଀ Ā Ā Ā Ā؀਀ഀ6ഀ܀-؀/NЀ܀଀܀7ఀࠀ% Ȁ$5܀؀J.ࠀ؀=܀'܀Ѐ;଀-؀= ᘀᨀᜀ"ကᤀᤀḀ#" *᠀Ḁᬀᨀ(᠀ᔀᰀᤀ'ᨀἀ "+ ᔀ᠀)ᤀᘀ*ᤀᤀ)ᤀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ*ᜀᘀ)ᨀ ܀J$ࠀ6ഀ501Ѐ܀%܀0؀Ѐᄀሀ:܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀-&ᄀ/%&CЀᄀ؀$؀=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%ᄀ଀؀$؀= ᘀᨀᬀ"ကᤀᤀἀ#" ကЀ0&-܀CЀᄀࠀ-01଀6. Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀᨀḀ =଀-଀%ࠀ6$%&܀-&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀ ᘀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᨀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᰀ* ᔀᜀᨀ'ᰀᜀ + ᤀᨀ)ᘀᰀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᤀ* Ā ܀%܀0؀Ѐᄀሀ:܀ %/0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀Ѐఀ&;ᄀ؀-܀$ༀ܀ကᤀᨀᘀ ਀ࠀ/01Ѐ=଀؀਀ࠀ/01଀܀ጀ0ഀ6ഀ5"܀J$ࠀ6ഀ501Ѐ *ᔀ᠀ᤀ(ᨀᤀ " ᔀᜀ)ᔀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀἀ &%-؀଀ഀ=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%-؀ᘀᨀἀ =଀ഀ#" ᤀᜀ'Ḁᘀ + ᔀᰀ)ᨀἀ* ᜀᨀ)ᨀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀%܀0؀Ѐᄀሀ:܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀ᄀ଀6Ѐ?؀ကᤀᨀᔀ ਀ఀ" ᄀ଀61଀6. ᘀ(ᔀᤀ " ᔀᜀ)ᤀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā܀20ЀȀ଀ᄀ$%5?؀܀਀'ఀ܀%؀؀܀.0Ѐ6-3܀%ကЀࠀ܀ࠀఀ-.܀&܀ᘀᰀᘀ 20ЀȀJ$ࠀ6ഀ଀ᄀ5$%01Ѐ#" .ࠀఀࠀ% Ā Ā Ā "ကᤀᨀᤀ DЀ,5܀%܀DЀ,5 ᘀ'ᘀᬀ + ᤀᘀ)ᔀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᔀ* Ā *ᔀᨀ(ᬀἀᜀ'ᜀḀ +" ᔀᜀ)ᜀᬀ*ᔀḀ)ᘀᜀ* ᜀᰀ)ᘀἀ*ᰀἀ)ᜀᜀ ܀&%0ࠀጀ܀؀%$ഀ؀-;Ѐ#܀Ѐ܀؀%3؀฀Ѐሀᄀࠀ2ࠀጀఀ܀؀DЀ$ᄀ଀܀%܀฀ࠀሀ܀؀ကᤀᨀᨀ"#ᘀᰀᤀ DЀ$ᄀ଀" Ā Ā ܀1%$@؀>;<#܀Ѐ܀1%3؀2ࠀጀఀ܀'܀ЀȀࠀ4$؀Ԁ *ᔀ'᠀ᘀ + ᔀḀ)ᤀᔀ* ᜀᨀ)ᜀᘀ ܀1ࠀ,ࠀ܀DȀЀ܀%܀1଀?=$< &%܀$Ѐ؀ᄀ܀ကᤀᨀᰀ 0ࠀጀDȀЀ" Ā Ā 1؀?=$< "#ᘀᰀᨀ 2ࠀഀࠀ,0ጀȀ%&܀'܀2ࠀഀࠀ,07Ȁ%& ᘀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀἀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀᨀ* ᤀᨀᔀ'ḀḀ + ᔀᬀ)ᤀᰀ* ᜀᤀ)ᘀᜀ* Ā Ā ܀ሀ=@܀1଀/؀D଀܀%܀/ጀ9଀Ѐ//)܀Ѐ$#7܀Ѐఀ؀$ကᤀᨀᜀ ༀ" ᨀᘀᤀ(ᤀᤀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā ؀?ࠀᄀࠀ%-2܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀؀$ᘀᰀᰀ 2-%ࠀᄀࠀ#" 7#$ഀЀB01଀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ଀6ࠀ%0>ఀ$%ࠀ ᬀᔀᜀ(ᨀᨀᰀᘀ'ᤀᔀ +" ᤀᔀ)ᰀᜀ*ᔀᨀ)ᜀᔀ* ᜀᔀ)ᨀᨀ*ᜀᘀ)ᘀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā>2܀'܀ࠀȀ1ࠀ-Ѐ2-଀6ࠀ%0Ѐఀ$%ࠀ$2܀D଀0,Ѐ܀%܀଀0ఀጀ/Ѐ;܀؀/ကᤀᨀᬀ"#ᘀᰀᬀ I଀ȀȀ" *ᨀᔀ᠀(᠀ᨀᜀᬀ'ᘀᘀ +" ᔀḀ)ᜀἀ*ᔀᰀ)ᔀᰀ* ᜀᤀ)ᰀᬀ*ᜀᘀ)ᜀᤀ ܀'܀$؀܀%܀ఀ5ࠀᄀ$؀//ЀᄀȀ;Ѐ$܀܀ጀ/Ѐ؀଀0ఀ$%ࠀ63;܀1؀-଀Ѐ.܀؀%$;,ကᤀᨀ᠀"#ᘀᰀ᠀ DကЀ,ࠀ6" D଀0,5 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ࠀ63%$܀8ࠀ/଀ᄀЀ܀Ѐ-01Ѐ/.܀ကЀD,ࠀ6,;$%1 "ကᤀᨀḀ"#ᘀᰀḀ Dࠀ/଀ᄀ܀M܀JഀᄀЀԀ܀%܀Dࠀ/଀ᄀ܀଀܀JഀᄀЀԀက଀;Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀က଀;Ѐ6> ᨀᜀᘀ'ᜀᘀᰀᔀḀ(ᜀᘀ +" ᔀᰀ)ᨀᤀ*ᔀ᠀)ᰀᘀ* ᜀᨀ)ᜀᜀ*ᰀἀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᬀᬀ'ᘀ᠀ἀᤀ(ᰀᬀ +" ᔀᜀ)ᰀᔀ*ᔀ᠀)ᘀᬀ* ᜀᔀ)ᤀᬀ*ᰀἀ)ᰀᤀ ܀1%$0؀က଀ఀࠀ6܀'܀Ѐ6଀-܀%܀Ѐఀ./ЀᄀȀ؀ࠀԀࠀ᐀:܀؀%$܀-&Ԁ01؀؀ကᤀᨀἀ"#ᘀᰀἀ "$ഀက଀ఀࠀ6" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀Ԁ1ࠀ-01଀؀ഀ$ /"܀D:ࠀԀ$ഀࠀࠀ-Ѐ60ࠀ-଀01ࠀ *᠀ᤀᰀ᠀'᠀ᨀ᠀(ᜀᔀ +" ᔀᬀ)ᜀἀ*ᔀᤀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᔀ)ᜀἀ*ᜀᘀ)ᔀ ܀%܀ЀᄀȀ/؀ကЀ1܀ഀ5-଀ᄀ$<܀ᄀ$؀ࠀఀࠀ%Ѐ0ఀ.܀/ကጀ@ᄀ܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀ကᤀᰀᘀ"#ᘀᜀᔀ ကጀഀᄀ଀" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ഀ5-଀B01଀$<܀؀ഀ$؀ഀ଀؀>ࠀ"܀؀D06.ࠀȀᄀ଀ *᠀ᔀ(ἀἀ : ᔀᬀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀḀ)ᰀ ܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀D&9܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᤀ A#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀D&9 "ကᤀᰀᔀ ᰀ'Ḁᘀ + ᤀᔀ)ᤀ᠀* ᜀᤀ)ᨀᤀ* ᔀ(ᜀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᘀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀἀ* Ā ܀% ܀'܀0؀܀-؀଀6-܀8ጀᄀЀ܀6؀Ȁࠀ0ఀࠀ-଀؀਀Ԁ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ65ᄀ&-FI؀ᘀᜀᨀ ကጀA#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀61଀؀਀ԀBȀ1ᄀࠀ-01ࠀFIࠀ0ఀࠀ-଀܀ကጀ65&܀ЀᄀȀ5ȀԀ5-؀DA *0ጀ,& ᔀᜀ(᠀ᘀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀἀ܀AB0ᄀ଀3%1܀'܀&,0ጀ܀؀0ᄀ଀3%؀ᘀᜀᰀ A#" ᜀᤀ'ᤀᘀ + ᔀἀ)ᤀἀ* ᜀᰀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā ܀D50ࠀ6ഀ5ഀᄀЀ܀%܀Ѐጀ؀Ѐఀ/"܀ကᤀᰀᤀ /#/3ሀ" ᜀᨀ(ᤀḀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᜀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ࠀ6%Ѐ,3؀;က଀܀ࠀऀ܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᬀ +/#/301Ѐ#" :$ࠀ6%Ѐ܀'܀Aࠀ%<ЀȀ&܀က଀;B3,ࠀ6%&܀Ѐ܀ Ā Ā *ᔀᔀᬀ'ᜀᤀ + ᔀᰀ)ᰀᤀ* ᜀᨀ)ᔀḀ ؀-฀ጀ1ࠀ܀Dഀሀ&$ഀЀ܀%܀᐀଀//0܀؀-ကᤀᰀᨀ ฀ጀ1ࠀ" 106 :?ࠀ6%& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 107 *ᬀ'ᬀᬀ + ᤀᘀ)ᤀᰀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀḀ᠀ ܀Dഀሀ&$ഀЀ܀%܀᐀଀//0܀؀6/؀ကᤀᰀᰀ +.=6଀ᄀ5F>଀" ᨀᜀ " ᔀᬀ)ᰀᨀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā)᠀᠀ ܀Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%5܀'܀Ѐ-$ఀ%܀$Ѐ-%܀&Ѐ6$%؀61଀؀/؀ᘀᜀ᠀ +Aࠀ-.=6଀B01ࠀF>଀#" %-Ѐ$ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᰀᜀ'ᬀᔀ + ᔀᬀ)ᰀᰀ* ᜀᔀ)ᜀᜀ ܀%܀ЀᄀȀ/؀ကЀ1܀ഀ5-଀ᄀ$<܀ᄀ$؀0ఀ؀ကᤀᰀᜀ D" 0Ѐ3,ఀB ᘀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā:܀Ѐ̀܀'܀؀0Ѐ3,ఀ:܀ᘀᜀḀ ̀Ѐ#" Ā Ā Ā ؀ഀ5-଀B01଀$<܀؀ഀ$؀ഀ଀؀>ࠀ"܀؀NЀ6.ࠀȀᄀ଀ "#ᘀᬀᘀ ကጀ,Ѐ܀ЀᄀȀ܀G&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ܀'܀̀଀6Ѐ܀ ᔀ(᠀ᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā *ᔀᜀ'ᔀᰀ + ᤀᰀ)ᘀᰀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᔀ ܀%܀5؀//ᄀ/;%Ѐ;܀G฀&ጀሀ܀5B,܀ࠀఀDࠀࠀ%Ѐ܀.ᄀ$܀Ѐ؀܀&,0ఀ؀ကᤀᰀᬀ Dကጀ" ጀ ᠀(ḀḀ " ᔀᜀ)ᬀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀଀6฀ጀሀЀ̀܀܀Ѐ'܀଀ᄀ-/؀଀6-܀؀8ࠀ0଀3܀F-B01Ѐ܀ࠀऀࠀ,5܀ᘀᬀᔀ !N0ࠀࠀȀ.Ѐ6.ࠀȀᄀ଀ࠀ-0Ѐ଀ᄀ#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀F-0଀3 ᔀᬀᬀ'ᨀᬀ + ᔀἀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᨀ)ᤀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀1଀؀ഀ$܀؀/NЀ1ࠀ܀%܀$؀ЀᄀȀ؀I܀$؀଀9:܀/؀ကᤀᰀ᠀ D" ᔀᜀᬀ(ᘀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᤀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᰀ* Ā Ā ܀'܀ࠀሀ;܀؀0଀ᄀ଀$ఀ؀$Ѐ-܀؀%$ȀࠀԀ /؀ᘀᬀᰀ ̀Dࠀ6ࠀ#" ᰀᘀ᠀'ᨀ᠀ + ᔀἀ)ᤀᬀ* ᜀᰀ)ᤀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀%܀$฀Ѐ܀଀0ఀጀB/Ѐ;܀M܀0଀ᄀ଀?ఀ؀?ࠀࠀᄀ-Ѐ܀ကЀሀ$%1܀ကᤀᰀḀ ;଀0ఀ̀ࠀ6ࠀጀ/ȀࠀԀЀ" *ἀᨀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀἀ ܀'܀$DᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ଀O/ЀᄀЀ܀Ѐ>؀Ԁࠀጀ܀ഀ$؀I଀܀଀܀&-ࠀ,܀଀O/Ѐᄀ5؀%$Dࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ܀-؀/ᘀᬀᜀ ̀NЀ#" ἀᘀ'ᜀᜀ + ᔀḀ)ᰀᜀ* ᜀᔀ)ᘀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀NЀ,=6ഀЀB01଀܀%܀.6$)܀&-Ѐ,ࠀ܀DЀ$ఀ܀؀ကᤀᰀἀ ǸЀ,=6ഀࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ$%1" @ጀ1܀DЀ$ఀ5 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᰀᘀᘀ'ᘀᘀ + ᔀḀ)ᨀᰀ* ᜀᰀ)ᰀᔀ ܀NЀఀࠀ1Ѐ܀%܀ᄀ଀0ጀ/Ѐ؀"܀/؀᐀܀M܀฀Ѐ5܀ကᤀᜀᘀ "ጀ61" 01଀ Ā Ā Ā Ā/؀᐀܀?؀50-,&"܀଀܀ጀ61Ѐ" ᘀ'ᨀᜀ + ᤀᨀ)ᨀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᰀ* Ā Ā ؀4ጀ$Ѐ-6܀%܀؀ကᤀᜀᔀ 4ጀ$Ѐ-6" *ᔀᨀ'ᘀᨀ + ᤀᔀ)ᘀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ ܀-؀1଀$؀+܀%܀.ጀ$6.+܀ఀ.ࠀȀࠀR$7܀؀ကᤀᜀᤀ @ࠀ0଀" -܀@ࠀ0଀Ѐ6. Ā Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Poland

؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ᐀ᔀᔀᔀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀᜀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀ᠀ᘀ ᐀ᔀᤀᨀᘀ ᐀ᤀᔀᤀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᨀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᬀᘀ ᐀ᨀᤀᤀᘀ ᐀ᰀᘀᨀᘀ ᐀ᬀᔀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᰀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᜀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᰀᘀ ᐀᠀ᤀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀Ḁᨀᔀᘀ ᐀ἀᘀᤀᘀ ᐀ἀᔀḀᘀᴀ ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ ᐀ἀᔀ!ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ᐀ᘀᴀ ᐀ἀᰀᔀᘀ ਀ᔀᘀᤀἀ ਀ᔀᘀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᘀḀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᘀἀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᘀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᤀᘀ ਀ᔀᔀᬀᨀ ਀ᔀᔀḀḀ ਀ᔀᨀᘀᨀ ਀ᔀᨀᨀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᰀ᠀᠀ ਀ᔀᜀᤀḀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᤀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᨀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ *ᔀᤀᘀᔀ(ᨀ᠀Pᘀ'ᘀᔀ "+ ᔀḀ)ᤀᤀ*ᤀᔀ)ᔀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᜀ*ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ ܀-܀$&-8܀%܀ࠀጀ$ఀ+܀Ȁ&̀Ѐ-ࠀ<ࠀ-Ѐ&%$؀฀܀'܀&Ȁ&%$؀ᘀᘀᔀ"ကᤀᜀᨀ ฀#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā >؀-Ѐ-ࠀ<ࠀ̀ *2Ѐ-.Ѐఀ& ᠀ᰀᘀ(Ḁᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀἀ܀฀/01܀'܀$Ѐ-.Ѐఀ,଀Ѐᄀ"܀؀ᘀᘀᨀ +,଀ఀ#" Pᘀ'ᘀᔀ + ᤀᘀ)ᘀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā >؀ᄀ$؀ഀ+܀-܀$Ѐ0ഀఀࠀ/<܀%܀$؀ࠀ0ఀ/+܀ᄀЀ$؀ကᤀᜀᰀ +ഀ" ᨀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᨀ)ᜀḀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀฀0Ѐᄀ଀3܀'܀؀ᘀᘀᰀ ฀0Ѐᄀ଀3#" ᤀᔀᬀ(ᨀᔀPᘀ'ᘀᔀ "( ᤀᘀ)ᤀḀ*ᔀᰀ)ᔀᬀ* ᔀἀ)ᤀᬀ*ᰀḀ)ᜀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀-܀,&ࠀO6଀<܀%܀.ጀ$6.+܀਀ഀ6ഀЀ-ᄀ଀6Ѐ$؀0܀฀0Ѐᄀ$%5܀'܀4ࠀࠀȀ0ЀᄀȀ܀$؀0܀&%$ကᤀᜀᜀ"#ᘀᘀᜀ ฀0Ѐᄀ" ਀ഀ6ഀЀ-ᄀ଀65 Ā Pᘀ'ᘀᔀᤀ(ᜀᜀ +" ᔀἀ)ᤀᬀ*ᔀᜀ)ᰀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀḀ*ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā ܀-܀%ᄀ଀;܀,&ࠀO6଀&-܀<Ѐ܀%଀܀%܀.ᄀ$6;&-܀ጀ.+܀&%$3؀ȀЀༀ&$1଀ᄀ܀Ѐఀ؀$ကᤀᜀᬀ"#ᘀᘀᬀ ฀ࠀ,ༀ" Ā ܀C$%5؀฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ܀'܀$1଀6.Ȁ/؀D,.ࠀᄀ଀܀.ऀ଀$1Ѐ6܀AЀఀༀ&$%Ѐ -&;ᄀ/%܀Ѐ܀-&;ᄀ/%܀AЀఀ%Ѐ Pᘀ'ᘀᔀ + ᔀἀ)ᔀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᜀ* Ā ܀-܀,&ࠀO6଀<܀%܀.ጀ$6.+܀ࠀ-5.6؀ကᤀᜀ᠀ :ЀȀഀ଀" ࠀ-56. ᔀ(ἀᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā.6؀Ԁ05ᄀ:ЀȀഀ଀܀฀-ࠀጀ$%76܀'܀Ԁ0&ᄀ܀ᘀᘀḀ ฀-ࠀጀ$%ጀ6#" *Pᘀ'ᘀᔀᔀᬀ(Ḁᨀ +" ᤀᘀ)ᨀᘀ*ᔀᰀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀἀ*ᜀᘀ)ᔀᘀ ܀'܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀4܀&Ԁࠀ%-ЀȀ܀؀0Ѐ%ࠀ6଀3%؀"਀ഀ51ጀ܀-܀,&ࠀO6଀<܀%܀.ጀ$6.+܀ကᤀᜀḀ"#ᘀᘀἀ ਀ഀ51" Ԁࠀ%<ЀȀ& Ā Ā Ā܀ࠀ6଀3%1%<0؀8 *Pᘀ'ᘀᔀ + ᤀᘀ)ᔀἀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀḀ ܀Ѐ6ఀ-ࠀ?7܀%܀$؀ࠀ0ఀ/+܀ကᤀᜀἀ ਀ഀ6ഀ5$ഀ56" 56ጀ ᔀᘀᜀᤀ(ᬀἀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā܀1%$؀ഀ$8܀5'܀਀ഀࠀ-6ഀ଀܀-,Ȁࠀ܀؀-ఀ$-&0$؀0ఀ܀؀%$؀ᘀᔀᰀ +"5#" Ȁࠀ,ࠀఀ$ ᰀᤀᰀ'ᘀ᠀ + ᔀḀ)ᨀᔀ* ᜀᨀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀1ࠀ,ࠀ܀ကЀ05܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀ࠀ-ࠀ$؀.>؀ကᤀᬀᘀ D" ࠀ-Ѐ ᔀᤀἀ(ᬀᰀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā$؀.>؀Ѐ$D-%܀5%$؀8܀'܀Ѐ-$ఀ%܀$Ѐ-%܀&%$؀" ᘀᔀᜀ#" *଀-01ࠀF ᔀᰀἀ(ᤀᨀᬀᘀ'ᘀᘀ "+ ᔀᰀ)ᜀᘀ*ᔀḀ)ᤀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀ᠀*ᜀᰀ)ᨀᔀ/7܀ကЀ05܀%܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ!܀ࠀ7/଀-ЀF਀ࠀ?ࠀఀ%$؀%9ࠀ܀'܀ࠀ%$؀%ᘀᔀḀ"ကᤀᬀᔀ 9ࠀ#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀਀ࠀ?ࠀ61଀ ᨀᨀᘀ(ᤀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᘀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀ᘀᔀἀ 9ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%#" ࠀ-& Pᘀ'ᘀᔀ + ᔀἀ)ᤀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᨀ* Ā,܀OA6ጀ9ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%1$؀଀"܀-܀I,5ᄀ܀%܀//I଀܀6؀0଀$؀ကᤀᬀᤀ "଀" *ᔀᘀᨀ'᠀ᬀἀ(ᰀᤀ +: ᔀᬀ)ᨀᰀ*ᔀᬀ)ᜀᰀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᔀ*ᜀᤀ)ᨀᤀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀؀ࠀ.3%܀؀Ȁ$ጀ01ࠀ9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%؀฀଀܀%܀Ȁ$ጀ01ࠀ؀ᘀᤀᔀ"ကᤀᬀᨀ ฀଀#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ࠀ.3%܀9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%1 ᜀ + ᔀᬀ)ᤀᘀ* ᜀᨀ)ᤀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā᠀'᠀ ܀଀܀฀Ѐሀᄀࠀ܀%܀؀ကЀ1܀M܀฀ࠀሀ܀Ԁ଀ᄀࠀ؀ကᤀᬀᰀ +଀" ᰀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀḀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā ܀&%ᄀ଀;&-܀؀Ѐ,0଀ᄀ଀ࠀ3%#܀Ѐ܀Ԁ଀ᄀЀ؀଀+܀ᄀ଀ࠀ$ࠀ؀଀0ഀ؀ᘀᤀᤀ !C#" *ᤀḀ'ᔀᨀ + ᔀ᠀)ᨀᰀ* ᜀᰀ)ᔀᔀ ܀؀ఀࠀ-01଀܀฀50଀ᄀ଀3%1܀,<%#܀0؀ကЀ1܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀଀0!܀଀Ѐ/؀#ကࠀ܀܀'܀$ကᤀᬀᜀ ฀5ऀ଀$,ఀ&-.ࠀᄀȀ" Ā Ā Ā ؀-଀ࠀ/ &%/؀#ကࠀ܀ᄀഀ଀ࠀ$Ѐ;&-؀C ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ ᤀᜀ'ᜀᤀᬀᘀ(Ḁᨀ +" ᔀ᠀)ᜀᜀ*ᔀᨀ)ᨀḀ* ᜀᰀ)ᤀᤀ*ᜀᘀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀'܀ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ>؀਀ఀ$ࠀ?ᄀ܀8ࠀ/଀ᄀЀ܀%܀5؀//Ѐ;܀ကᤀᬀᬀ"#ᘀᤀᨀ ਀ఀ$ࠀ?ᄀЀ" *ᔀᤀ᠀'᠀ᘀᘀ(ᨀ᠀ +" ᔀᬀ)ᔀᘀ*ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᰀ)ᔀ᠀*ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ ܀8ࠀ/଀ᄀЀ܀'܀܀%܀5؀/ऀ଀$,.;Ѐ/ࠀᄀȀ܀ᄀ଀6Ѐ܀%ጀȀ;ᄀ଀&-܀਀ఀ܀M܀ഀ6଀3%&Ѐ$?؀ကᤀᬀ᠀"#ᘀᤀᰀ D᐀ࠀ;$ࠀ଀" ਀ఀጀȀ-&;ᄀᄀ଀65/% Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀଀܀5܀ഀ6଀3%5$?؀D᐀ࠀ;?ࠀ଀ *ᨀḀ(ἀᬀᤀḀ'᠀ἀ +: ᔀ᠀)ᘀ᠀*ᔀᬀ)ᔀἀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ*ᜀᰀ)ᤀᔀ ܀'܀Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ܀฀ጀ1ࠀ-ࠀ᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ଀ᄀ$%Ѐ܀ഀ଀ࠀ$ࠀ؀C܀%܀؀ကЀ1܀ကᤀᬀḀ"#ᘀᤀᜀ ฀ጀ1ࠀ-ࠀ" ᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ/ᄀ$%>܀Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᨀᨀ'᠀ᜀ + ᔀ᠀)ᤀᔀ* ᜀᰀ)ᘀᔀ ܀ഀ଀ࠀ$ࠀ؀C܀%܀؀ကЀ1܀ကᤀᬀἀ ฀ࠀ#=6଀ᄀࠀ" ᨀᬀἀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀଀00$,܀&,3-6܀؀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%܀Ѐ܀؀%$ᄀ&؀ᘀᤀ᠀ ฀ࠀ#᐀ࠀ$ఀ଀=6଀B01଀#" ᐀ࠀ$ఀ5ᄀ$%1܀Ѐ܀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%1܀6-3,& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā "ကᤀ᠀ᘀ >Ѐ$0଀#&$܀2-଀Ȁ-଀B01଀܀%܀>Ѐ$0଀#&$܀ Ḁ'ᔀᰀ + ᔀᬀ)ᜀᘀ* ᜀᨀ)ᰀᔀ* 2-଀Ȁ-଀B01଀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᰀᜀ(ᘀᬀᤀᬀ'ḀḀ +" ᔀ᠀)ᤀᬀ*ᔀᰀ)ᜀᨀ* ᜀᰀ)ᘀᜀ*ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ ܀'܀A0ЀȀЀ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀3܀᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$%Ѐ؀1ࠀ-01଀؀:܀ကЀ05܀%܀ఀ0؀$ࠀ!܀1ࠀ-ࠀ؀: ကᤀ᠀ᔀ"#ᘀᤀḀ" A0ЀȀ> Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀C܀<᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$% ᬀḀ'ἀᘀᨀ(ᨀᨀ +" ᔀᬀ)ᘀᬀ*ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᜀᰀ)ᘀᜀ*ᰀḀ)ᨀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀/ᄀ ܀ᄀ଀C%܀᐀-Ѐ܀'܀0ఀ؀$ࠀ-!؀଀6܀--܀؀Ѐ1ࠀЀ0$$<܀Ȁ/7܀A܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀M܀ЀᄀȀ਀,Ѐ-ᄀࠀ؀ကᤀ᠀ᤀ"#ᘀᨀᘀ A" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ ؀?AЀ0܀଀܀؀B01଀؀਀-,Ѐ&-଀܀ЀᄀȀ05؀ကЀԀ ؀਀ఀЀ$ࠀ1$Ѐ1ࠀ-01଀ ᔀ(ᬀᜀ " ᔀḀ)ᤀᔀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀FȀ-Ѐ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᨀᔀ A#" ᔀᨀ'ᬀᨀ + ᔀ᠀)ᘀ᠀* ᜀᰀ)ᘀᔀ* Ā Ā ܀؀61଀؀I଀Ѐ0ఀ܀%܀0؀ကЀ1܀଀Ѐ/؀#&-FȀ܀ကࠀ&-܀ЀᄀȀЀ0ఀ1ࠀ؀ကᤀ᠀ᨀ ԀI଀" ᔀḀᤀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀ᠀)ᔀ᠀* ᰀἀ)ᘀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀-଀ࠀ/؀#ကࠀ܀ഀ଀ࠀ$Ѐ؀଀;&C>,"܀'܀଀00$,܀&;ᘀᨀᨀ ",-଀#" ᜀ(ᘀ᠀ἀ'ᘀᘀ "+ ᔀᜀ)ᤀᤀ*ᔀᬀ)ᨀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀ᠀*ᜀᤀ)ᜀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%5=܀'܀%܀ᄀЀ؀$Iࠀ؀؀-3܀%ࠀ܀%܀؀ࠀఀࠀ$Ѐ଀ᄀ.܀&%$I܀-&ᘀᨀᰀ"ကᤀ᠀ᰀ =Ѐ+ഀᄀ%ࠀ6Ѐ$ᄀ1#" +.ࠀഀఀЀࠀ%$ᄀ1ࠀ-01Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā "ကᤀ᠀ᜀ ᰀ'ᤀᘀ + ᔀ᠀)ᘀ᠀* ᜀᰀ)ᔀᔀ* *ᔀ᠀ἀ(ᜀᨀ " ᔀᤀ)ᰀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᨀ ܀Hࠀ$ऀࠀ-଀01ࠀ܀%܀฀ࠀሀ܀଀ᄀࠀ/؀଀#؀H$ഀ/;<>؀=܀'܀Ѐ;଀-؀= ᘀᨀᜀ#" ଀ᄀࠀ Ā Ā Ā Ā/؀଀#؀H$ഀ *ᄀ/%& Ḁᬀᨀ(᠀ᔀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ؀$؀=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%ᄀ଀؀$؀= ᘀᨀᬀ#" ᬀᜀ'ᰀḀ + ᔀᬀ)ᰀᜀ* ᜀᨀ)ᤀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀1؀71ࠀᄀ܀M܀F਀ጀ/଀ᄀࠀ-ࠀ؀ကᤀ᠀ᬀ ฀ࠀ$ᄀ" ᘀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᨀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᰀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀ࠀᄀȀ.܀ഀऀࠀ଀$,0ࠀ-଀01Ѐ$܀%ᄀD଀;&-܀&%$܀%܀Ѐఀ%ࠀ6./ЀᄀȀ0؀ᘀᨀḀ ᐀=଀-଀#" 71ࠀᄀ1Ѐ Ā܀଀܀ᄀ/% Ѐ;&-܀଀&#N&%-؀଀ഀ=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%-؀ကᤀ᠀᠀"#ᘀᨀἀ =଀ഀ" ᄀ଀ጀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀ࠀ?଀@܀-܀61Ѐ؀>&#N *᠀ᘀ(ᔀᤀ " ᔀᜀ)ᤀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀ ܀20ЀȀ଀ᄀ$%5܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀&%$ᘀᰀᘀ 20ЀȀ଀ᄀ#" "ကᤀ᠀Ḁ ;଀//Ѐ܀.ࠀఀࠀ%IЀ$଀Ѐ܀଀ᄀ܀਀ഀ6ഀЀ-ᄀ଀6Ѐ܀%܀D଀//Ѐ܀ Pᘀ'ᘀᔀ ( ᤀᘀ)ᤀἀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā IЀ$଀Ѐ܀-܀਀ഀ6ഀЀ-ᄀ଀65 Ā *ᔀᨀ(ᬀἀ " ᔀḀ)ᘀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᜀ ܀&%0ࠀጀ܀؀%$ഀ؀-;Ѐ#܀Ѐ܀؀%3؀ᘀᰀᤀ 2ࠀጀఀ#" ᔀᔀᔀ'᠀ᔀ + ᔀ᠀)ᔀᘀ* ᜀᰀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā ܀1%$܀؀ᄀ@؀>;<#ԀЀ$଀܀K܀Ѐ܀܀10ఀ/ЀᄀȀ%3؀ࠀЀ2ࠀጀఀ+܀'؀଀܀ЀȀࠀ଀B014$؀ကᤀ᠀ἀ ਀,ࠀ-Ԁ" Ā Ā Ā ܀U6ഀ=OA܀؀਀,ࠀ-଀B01଀܀؀L؀ࠀ#$ഀ" &܀%܀0ࠀጀ?Ѐ$%ఀ Ԁࠀ$01ЀV "#ᘀᰀᨀ 2ࠀഀࠀ,0ጀȀ%&܀'܀2ࠀഀࠀ,07Ȁ%& ᘀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀἀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀᨀ* ᘀᘀ'ᘀᘀ + ᔀᰀ)ᤀᜀ* ᜀᰀ)ᔀἀ* Ā Ā᠀ ܀ఀࠀ܀Ѐ0؀$Ѐ܀ᄀఀ؀ЀȀ<Ѐ6܀ЀᄀȀ܀฀Ѐᄀ1܀ကᤀḀᘀ 7Ȁ$Ѐ" ᨀᘀᤀ(ᤀᤀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᨀ* Ā ؀?ࠀᄀࠀ%-2܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀؀$ᘀᰀᰀ 2-%ࠀᄀࠀ#" 7Ȁ$ഀЀB01Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀Ѐ-଀6Ѐ@܀%܀Ѐ0ఀ؀܀؀.ఀ "ကᤀḀᔀ"#ᘀᰀᬀ ਀/ጀ?01܀฀Ѐᄀ1܀%܀@Ѐ-଀6Ѐ܀਀,ጀ?01Ѐ2-଀6ࠀ%0Ѐఀ$%ࠀ܀'܀2<଀6ࠀ%0>ఀ$%ࠀ TᤀḀᘀ'ᘀᘀᬀᔀᜀ(ᨀᨀ +" ᔀᬀ)ᰀᘀ*ᔀᨀ)ᜀᔀ* ᜀᰀ)ᨀᰀ*ᜀᘀ)ᘀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᨀᔀ᠀(᠀ᨀᤀ'ᜀᘀ +" ᔀᬀ)ᔀᜀ*ᔀᰀ)ᔀᰀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀᨀ*ᜀᘀ)ᜀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀$؀ࠀᄀ܀K܀-&Ѐ/଀0ഀ$ЀᄀȀ$ఀ-܀.+܀K܀؀ഀ$%ࠀ63$؀଀଀.܀؀%$;ကᤀḀᤀ"#ᘀᰀ᠀ 8ကЀࠀ#$ࠀԀ" Ā ܀K܀ഀ$؀଀ ؀ࠀ68ࠀ#$ࠀԀ3%$܀%܀ጀ/଀ᄀ/.܀ကЀCЀ01;$%1 "#ᘀᰀḀ က଀;Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀က଀;Ѐ6>+.-Ѐ/଀0ഀ&-܀K܀CЀ01ጀ/଀ᄀ ᰀᔀḀ(ᜀᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᰀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ἀᤀ(ᰀᬀᔀ'ᜀᘀ "+ ᔀ᠀)ᘀᬀ*ᔀᬀ)ᰀᔀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᤀ*ᜀᘀ)ᤀἀ* Ā ܀ࠀԀ5,؀܀1%$0؀ഀࠀ6$"܀%က଀ఀ܀'܀Ѐ6଀-܀0؀ༀࠀ$ሀ܀ࠀԀࠀ1Ѐ:܀؀ࠀȀഀ0$%,<܀50Ѐ̀؀ᘀᰀἀ"ကᤀḀᨀ က଀ఀࠀ6#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā >؀ࠀȀഀ/ 1଀,<܀ࠀԀ505ࠀ-Ѐ6:̀ *ᜀᔀᘀ'ᤀᜀ "+ ᔀᤀ)ᘀḀ*ᔀᜀ)ᰀᬀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀ᠀*ᜀᘀ)ᘀᨀ)᠀ ܀%܀ࠀ#ࠀ0ഀ6ഀࠀ-01Ѐ$"܀ࠀఀࠀ%ഀ56Ѐ.܀/ကጀ@ᄀ܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀ᘀᜀᔀ"ကᤀḀᰀ 70ఀ$ကጀഀᄀ଀#" 70ఀ$ഀ56Ѐ܀"$ࠀ#ࠀ0ഀ6ഀࠀ-଀61Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *᠀ᔀ(ἀἀ : ᔀᬀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀḀ)ᰀ ܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀D&9܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᤀ A#" ᘀ'ᜀᘀ + ᔀᬀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀਀ఀࠀ1܀N/ࠀఀ5܀$Ѐ؀ᄀ܀؀Ѐ9଀ᄀ:܀ࠀఀࠀ1"܀5؀ကᤀḀᜀ 9N,ࠀఀ&D" Ā 109 ܀ሀࠀ؀N,ࠀఀ܀1Q܀ࠀఀࠀ1ጀ?܀ሀࠀ؀N,ࠀఀ܀D3-&ഀ܀% 108 *ᔀ(ᜀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᘀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀἀ ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀ȀЀ؀਀Ԁ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᨀ ਀ఀࠀ1ጀA#" ਀ԀBȀ1 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A ᔀ'ᜀᘀ + ᔀᬀ)ᔀᜀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᔀ* Ā ܀ༀ&$5܀%܀-Jᄀ଀0/Ѐ܀K܀Iఀ0Q܀؀.ကᤀḀᬀ ਀ጀ6" Jᄀ଀0,Ѐ- ᔀᜀ(᠀ᘀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀἀ* Ā܀K܀؀.0ጀ,&਀ጀ6܀AB0ᄀ଀3%1܀'܀&,0ጀ܀؀0ᄀ଀3%؀ᘀᜀᰀ A#" *ᜀᨀ(ᤀḀᔀ'ᜀᘀ +" ᔀᬀ)ᤀᔀ*ᔀᰀ)ᨀᜀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᤀ*ᜀᘀ)ᨀᔀ ܀ ܀Ѐᄀༀ&$5Ȁ܀%܀Ѐ%܀ༀ/ጀ0ഀ3,ࠀ656Ѐ؀;က଀܀܀K܀Iఀ0Qࠀऀ܀$Ȁ܀؀ఀ0Ѐᄀ؀.ကᤀḀ᠀"#ᘀᜀᬀ +਀ጀ6" Ā Ā Ā ܀Ѐ܀&က଀;B3,ࠀ6%܀ༀ,ጀ0ഀAࠀ%<ЀȀ&56Ѐ܀܀'K܀؀܀ࠀ6਀ጀ6.%Ѐ$: :?ࠀ6%& *ἀ'ᘀᘀ + ᔀᬀ)ᰀᜀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀἀ ܀ĀĀ܀؀฀Ѐ$Ȁഀ1଀܀ༀ&$5܀%܀ĀĀ܀Iఀ0܀؀ကᤀḀḀ ฀Ѐ$Ȁഀ1଀" "#ᘀᜀ᠀ Aࠀ-WᄀЀ܀Ѐ਀6$%& ܀ࠀȀ܀܀%-Ѐ$܀฀Ѐ$ȀЀ%Ѐ-$ఀV ܀'܀Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%5܀ ᠀᠀(ᨀᜀ " ᔀᬀ)ᰀᨀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᔀ* Ā %-Ѐ$ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᔀ'ᘀᘀ + ᔀᬀ)ᔀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀ᠀* Ā ܀IЀ05-܀%܀؀IЀ00଀9܀6؀Ԁ଀,؀.+ ကᤀḀἀ" Ԁ6Ѐ ᘀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā,؀.+0Ѐ3,ఀB:܀Ѐ̀܀'܀؀0Ѐ3,ఀ:܀ᘀᜀḀ ̀Ѐ#" ᔀ(᠀ᬀᘀ'᠀ᘀ "+ ᔀ᠀)ᜀᜀ*ᔀᬀ)ᜀᰀ* ᰀἀ)ᨀᜀ*ᜀᘀ)ᤀᤀ* Ā ܀଀6Ѐ̀܀'܀ᄀ܀%܀ကጀఀ5Ȁ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ଀Ѐ܀$ऀ0ࠀࠀЀ؀ᄀ܀܀%J$-଀01ࠀ;ᄀ଀܀؀G&Ѐ$ᄀ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ᘀᬀᘀ"ကᤀἀᘀ ကጀ+ഀ,Ѐ#" က/ጀఀ%5ᄀ଀ Ā܀1Q;ᄀ&܀଀01ࠀG܀Jࠀఀ$-ࠀ%Ѐ.܀؀܀Ѐ܀ကጀഀ,&Ѐ$ᄀ+ ᘀ'ᘀᘀ᠀(ḀḀ "+ ᔀᜀ)ᬀᘀ*ᔀᬀ)ᰀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ*ᜀᔀ)ᘀᘀ* Ā᠀ ܀%܀܀଀6Ѐ̀܀5؀//Ѐ;'܀-؀ሀࠀԀ1Ѐ-଀6؀܀؀F-$ഀ0଀3܀ࠀऀ਀ఀ܀Ѐ଀ᄀ܀M܀ᘀᬀᔀ"ကᤀἀᔀ ฀5!0ࠀࠀȀ.0ఀ$ഀ506Ѐ#" ሀࠀԀ1଀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀਀ఀ$ഀ܀଀܀฀50ఀ$ഀ565܀ᄀЀ؀F-0଀8ࠀ/଀3 *ᔀᜀᬀ(ᘀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᤀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᰀ ܀'܀ࠀሀ;܀؀0଀ᄀ଀$ఀ؀$Ѐ-܀؀%$ᘀᬀᰀ ̀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ#" 0଀ᄀ଀?ఀB Ā Ā؀?Ѐ-܀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ$%1̀ *ἀᨀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀἀ ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀%$ᘀᬀᜀ ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ#" ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Slovakia

Slovakia

Sites for selected habitats nad species included in the Governmental proposal

ᔀᬀḀ)ᰀᘀ * ᤀᘀ+ᤀᔀ, ᰀḀ+ᜀᰀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀1Ѐ$ЀȀ଀7܀'਀4ࠀ0Ѐ܀/܀@Ѐ$܀>'ᄀ7؀਀"ᔀᔀᤀ ਀4ࠀ0 ਀"ᔀᔀᜀ ฀Ѐ=ᄀࠀ ᘀ)ᰀᔀ 1 ᔀ᠀+ᔀᬀ, ᰀḀ+ᨀ᠀, Ā ਀"ᔀᔀ᠀ *8$ࠀȀ ᔀ)ᬀᨀ 1 ᔀᬀ+ᬀᘀ, ᰀḀ+ᨀᤀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᘀ)ᜀᤀ 1 ᔀ᠀+ᘀἀ, ᰀḀ+ᨀᨀ, Ā Ā 109 ؀'.ᄀ2؀਀"ᔀᤀᘀ BЀ7 108 ,ᘀ)ἀᔀ 1 ᔀ᠀+ᘀᤀ, ᰀḀ+ᤀᜀ ܀D'.؀=$EЀ܀/܀)'8ᄀ9)$܀D'.؀=$਀"ᔀᤀᔀ EЀ ऀ଀7=%ࠀᄀȀ7 Ā Ā Ā ਀"ᔀᤀᰀ ฀ࠀሀȀЀ4଀.'<܀0$.=܀/܀฀ࠀሀȀЀ4଀.'<܀=଀44 ᘀ)ᜀ᠀ 1 ᔀᬀ+ᜀᰀ, ᰀḀ+ᤀᜀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā ਀"ᔀᤀᜀ ༀЀ@Ѐ$7'D܀Ѐ4H0଀ጀԀ܀Eࠀ$Ѐ0(܀/܀ ᔀᤀ)ᰀᘀ 1 ᔀᬀ+ᜀ᠀, ᰀḀ+ᨀᤀ, ༀЀ@Ѐ$7'D܀Ѐ44ጀ0଀ጀԀ܀ࠀऀ܀Eࠀ$Ѐ0Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ࠀ.' ᔀ)ᬀᰀ * ᔀḀ+ᤀἀ, ᰀḀ+ᜀᨀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā$܀2'67؀Ԁ؀#܀/܀Ѐ4Ѐ'7܀2'67؀Ԁ؀# ᠀਀"ᔀᤀ ਀"ᔀᤀḀ -ࠀ'ࠀ6 ᜀᬀ)Ḁᜀ * ᔀḀ+ᤀᜀ, ᰀḀ+ᰀᬀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ࠀ0଀ᄀЀ ᨀ)ᜀᰀ 1 ᔀḀ+ᰀᤀ, ᰀḀ+ᘀᨀ, Ā Ā$؀; ਀"ᔀᤀἀ ਀"ᔀᨀᘀ Fࠀ8ࠀ$7'D܀0$.=(܀/܀Fࠀ8ࠀ$7'D܀ ᔀἀ)ᘀᜀ * ᔀḀ+ᘀ᠀, ᰀḀ+ᤀᤀ, ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ7 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ਀"ᔀᨀᨀ ᐀G$'( ᘀ)Ḁᤀ * ᔀḀ+ᔀᔀ, ᰀḀ+ᤀἀ, Ā Ā Ā ,ᘀ)ᔀḀ * ᤀᘀ+ᤀᘀ, ᰀἀ+ᘀᤀ ܀)؀Ѐ44<܀/܀ࠀఀࠀ'Ѐ%܀ༀ2ᄀࠀ07'D=ࠀ܀਀"ᔀᨀἀ 3ࠀ4଀ᄀЀ ࠀऀ܀ༀ2ᄀࠀ07'<܀8$ࠀࠀ' Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ,ᘀ)ᤀᬀ * ᤀᘀ+ᔀᰀ, ᰀἀ+ᘀᤀ ܀/܀)74Ѐఀ଀ᄀ܀4଀.'D%؀਀"ᔀᰀᘀ ਀%଀67'ࠀఀ ᄀ7 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀ऀ܀4଀.'D%؀਀%଀67'ࠀఀ ᨀ)ᔀᨀ * ᔀἀ+ᰀḀ, ᰀἀ+ᘀᬀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 42؀฀܀$؀଀0-܀/܀42؀฀܀Ѐ'؀਀"ᔀᰀᔀ -଀ ਀"ᔀᰀᤀ ᐀(8଀.Ѐ ᘀ)ᘀḀ * ᔀἀ+ᜀᔀ, ᰀἀ+ᘀᰀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Slovakia

؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ᐀ᔀᔀᔀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀᜀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀ᠀ᘀ ᐀ᔀᤀᨀᘀ ᐀ᤀᔀᤀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᨀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᬀᘀ ᐀ᨀᤀᤀᘀ ᐀ᰀᘀᨀᘀ ᐀ᬀᔀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᰀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᜀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᰀᘀ ᐀᠀ᤀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀Ḁᨀᔀᘀ ᐀ἀᘀᤀᘀ ᐀ἀᔀḀᘀᴀ ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ ᐀ἀᔀ!ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ᐀ᘀᴀ ᐀ἀᰀᔀᘀ ਀ᔀᘀᤀἀ ਀ᔀᘀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᘀḀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᘀἀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᘀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᤀᘀ ਀ᔀᔀᬀᨀ ਀ᔀᔀḀḀ ਀ᔀᨀᘀᨀ ਀ᔀᨀᨀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᰀ᠀᠀ ਀ᔀᜀᤀḀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᤀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᨀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ Ȁ& ᔀᤀᘀᔀ(ᨀ᠀ᘀ)ᨀᰀ *" ᔀἀ+ᬀᘀ,ᔀḀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀἀ+ᘀᰀ,ᰀἀ)ᤀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā&%$؀฀܀'܀&Ȁ&%$؀฀=2<܀؀଀ఀ=:܀/܀=2<܀)4؀ᘀᘀᔀ਀"ᔀᰀᨀ ฀଀#" *ᰀᘀ(Ḁᘀᔀ)ᘀᔀ *" ᤀᘀ+ᤀᨀ,ᔀ᠀)ᜀᔀ* ᰀἀ+ᔀᨀ,ᰀḀ)ᜀἀ᠀ ܀؀'4଀Ѐᄀ7؀฀܀/܀)'4H܀&2Ѐ-.Ѐఀ܀฀/01܀'܀$Ѐ-.Ѐఀ,଀Ѐᄀ"܀؀଀ఀ,+؀'4଀Ѐᄀ7؀ᘀᘀᨀ਀"ᔀᰀᰀ ฀#" ሀ$Ѐ774ЀᄀȀ7 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᨀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᨀ)ᜀḀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᬀ ؀฀0Ѐᄀ଀3܀'܀؀ᘀᘀᰀ ฀0Ѐᄀ଀3#" 8ࠀ$Ԁ଀ ᘀ)ᘀᬀ * ᔀἀ+ᨀḀ, ᰀἀ+ᔀᬀ, Ā Ā Ā܀Ȁഀ଀؀਀"ᔀᰀᜀ E ᤀᔀᬀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᬀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā $؀0܀฀0Ѐᄀ$%5܀'܀4ࠀࠀȀ0ЀᄀȀ܀$؀0܀&%$ᘀᘀᜀ ฀0Ѐᄀ#" ਀"ᔀᰀᬀ ฀4Ѐఀ2 ᔀ)Ḁᜀ * ᤀᘀ+ᘀᤀ, ᰀἀ+ᘀᬀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᘀ)ᤀᘀᤀ(ᜀᜀ *" ᤀᘀ+ᘀᔀ,ᔀᜀ)ᰀᔀ* ᰀḀ+ᜀᔀ,ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ ܀/܀Ѐ6଀܀%ᄀ଀E܀@؀;&-'7܀Ѐ܀%4؀$1ࠀ=;ᄀ଀ࠀ&-܀܀଀$%܀଀7'ࠀ&%$3؀ᘀᘀᬀ਀"ᔀᜀᔀ >$.=ࠀ0฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ#" Ѐ6Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀EC$%5܀؀2ȀЀᄀ'47؀$,฀ࠀ܀'1ࠀ=ࠀ܀܀$ࠀᄀ8(Ȁ.,܀ऀ଀$8ࠀሀ܀Ѐ%܀Ȁ؀ЀAЀఀ଀7- -&;ᄀ/%܀Ѐ܀-&;ᄀ/%܀AЀఀ%Ѐ *ᰀ)ᜀᜀᔀ(ἀᤀ 1" ᔀḀ+ᘀḀ,ᔀᰀ)ᰀᔀ* ᰀ᠀+ᰀἀ,ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ ܀ࠀऀ܀44ጀ0଀ጀԀ*܀/܀)$଀ఀ̀܀@؀$਀ఀЀ܀Ԁ05ᄀ଀ጀԀ܀฀-ࠀጀ$%76܀'܀Ԁ0&ᄀ܀ᘀᘀḀ਀"ᔀᜀᜀ *4H0฀-ࠀጀ$%ጀ6#" ?4Ȁ܀̀଀ఀ$Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᔀᬀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᘀ* Ā Ā ܀'܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀4܀&Ԁࠀ%-ЀȀ܀؀0Ѐ%ࠀ6଀3%؀" ᘀᘀἀ#" Ԁࠀ%<ЀȀ& ᘀ)ᤀḀ 1 ᔀḀ+ᘀḀ, ᰀ᠀+ᜀᔀ, Ā Ā Ā܀ࠀ6଀3%1%<0؀J଀ఀЀ0Ѐ8܀ࠀऀ܀44ጀ0଀ጀԀ*܀/܀)J଀ఀЀ0܀਀"ᔀᜀἀ *4H0଀ጀԀ *ᔀᘀᜀᤀ(ᬀἀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᜀ ܀1%$؀8܀'܀Ȁࠀ,ࠀ-଀؀-ఀ$܀؀%$؀" ᘀᔀᰀ#" ᘀ)ᜀᬀ 1 ᔀᬀ+ᜀᤀ, ᰀḀ+ᤀᰀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀/܀؀਀ጀ.=ࠀ=$ЀȀ܀଀$%܀)ࠀ,ࠀEࠀ$਀"ᔀᬀᔀ *4H0$ఀ *44ጀ0଀ጀԀ܀ࠀऀ܀Eࠀ$Ѐ0Ѐ܀8(܀਀ጀ.=ࠀ=$ЀȀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ѐ$ ᔀᤀἀ(ᬀᰀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā-%܀5%$؀8܀'܀Ѐ-$ఀ%܀$Ѐ-%܀&%$؀" ᘀᔀᜀ#" *᠀ࠀ ᔀᰀἀ(ᤀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀ%$؀%9ࠀ܀'܀ࠀ%$؀%ᘀᔀḀ 9ࠀ#" ਀"ᔀᬀᨀ -ጀȀЀ0Ѐ ᤀᔀ)ᰀᰀ 1 ᔀ᠀+ᔀᬀ, ᰀḀ+ᨀᤀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᨀᨀᘀ(ᤀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᘀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀ᘀᔀἀ 9ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%#" ,7ఀ ᨀ)ᜀᔀ 1 ᔀᬀ+ᜀḀ, ᰀḀ+ᨀἀ؀$ऀࠀ܀)'Hఀ7"܀/܀7؀4܀)'਀"ᔀᬀᜀ "Hఀ7 9ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ਀"ᔀᬀᬀ ;଀ሀ42ఀ ᔀ)᠀ᔀ 1 ᔀᬀ+ᜀἀ, ᰀḀ+ᨀᰀ, ἀ(ᰀᤀ : ᔀᬀ)ᨀᰀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀଀00$,܀؀ࠀ.3%܀؀ᘀᤀᔀ 9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%#" ᬀ)ᰀᤀ 1 ᔀᬀ+ᜀᨀ, ᰀḀ+ᤀᔀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ࠀ.3%܀7ఀ9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%1؀$ऀࠀ܀$؀%%K܀/܀7؀4܀>਀"ᔀᬀḀ ᐀ࠀ$ᄀ *᠀Ḁ)ᬀᔀᰀ(ἀᰀ 1" ᔀ᠀+ᔀᨀ,ᔀ᠀)ᤀḀ* ᰀḀ+ᨀᤀ,ᰀἀ)ᔀ ܀&%ᄀ଀;&-܀؀Ѐ,0଀ᄀ଀3%#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀ᄀ଀7'ࠀ!଀0&؀ᘀᤀᤀ਀"ᔀ᠀ᤀ ฀#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀0଀ᄀ଀3%1,<#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀଀0!܀'܀$ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ ਀"ᔀ᠀ᨀ "ࠀఀ4଀ᄀЀ ᰀ)ἀᤀ 1 ᔀ᠀+ᤀᘀ, ᰀḀ+ᨀḀ, -&;ᄀ/%& Ā Ā Ā ਀"ᔀ᠀ᰀ က଀ᄀȀЀ0Ѐ ᨀ)᠀ᔀ 1 ᔀ᠀+ᤀᤀ, ᰀḀ+ᤀᤀ, "#ᘀᤀᨀ ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ܀'܀ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ ᬀᘀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᨀ)ᨀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā ᔀ)ᰀ᠀ 1 ᔀḀ+ᘀ᠀, ᰀḀ+ᔀᬀ, Ā Ā Ā ܀)'30ࠀ$I଀Ѐᄀ7܀/܀7؀4܀)'਀"ᔀ᠀ᬀ 30ࠀ$I଀Ѐᄀ7 ᘀ(ᨀ᠀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* Ā ܀'܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀&7ఀ 6଀3%؀$ᘀᤀᰀ ऀࠀ᐀ࠀ;$ࠀ#" ᐀ࠀ;?ࠀ6଀3%5܀-&;ᄀ/% Ā ,ᘀ)ᬀᬀ 1 ᔀᬀ+ᜀᜀ, ᰀḀ+ᤀᨀ ؀਀"ᔀ᠀᠀ LԀࠀ4ഀ଀ "#ᘀᤀᜀ ᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ଀ᄀ$%Ѐ܀Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀ ᨀḀ(ἀᬀ : ᔀ᠀)ᘀ᠀* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ ᰀ)ἀᤀ 1 ᔀ᠀+ᰀᰀ, ᰀ᠀+ᰀᬀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀<%$ЀȀ7᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ/ᄀ؀Ԁ܀CHIࠀ07'D܀/܀)=4ጀ܀਀"ᔀḀᤀ C9Iࠀ07'D *᠀ᨀᬀἀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀&,3-6܀؀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%܀Ѐ܀؀%$ᘀᤀ᠀ ᐀ࠀ$ఀ&ᄀ#" ᨀ)ᤀḀ 1 ᔀ᠀+ᜀᬀ, ᰀ᠀+ᰀᜀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀)'M'ࠀ6-34D4,&7؀<܀/܀܀ࠀ7ఀ$ࠀ0ࠀ6଀3%1܀E଀ഀ܀Ѐ܀M᐀ࠀ$ఀ'ࠀ4D47'(5ᄀ$%1؀< ਀"ᔀḀᨀ ଀74ЀᄀȀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᔀᜀ)ᘀᬀᰀᜀ(ᘀᬀ 1" ᔀḀ+ᰀḀ,ᔀᰀ)ᜀᨀ* ᰀ᠀+ᜀᘀ,ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀A0ЀȀЀ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀3܀ᘀᤀḀ਀"ᔀḀᰀ ฀ጀ$ȀЀ᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$%Ѐ#" ᤀ)ᔀḀ * ᔀἀ+ᔀᜀ, ᰀἀ+ᔀ᠀, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā <܀ࠀऀ܀A0ЀȀ7܀਀%$଀ᄀሀЀ܀Ѐ܀/܀)'ᄀЀ69ᄀ-؀6ఀC܀᐀$6$%>ጀ܀؀᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀᄀ؀਀"ᔀḀᜀ 1$ЀԀ ᨀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀AЀ0$܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀)'ЀᄀȀ9ᄀ؀ᘀᨀᘀ ᐀$ጀ6ఀA#" ᔀ)ᨀᤀ * ᔀἀ+ᔀᜀ, ᰀἀ+ᨀᘀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀/܀Ȁ>'7؀฀܀ ؀?AЀ?$Ѐ07'<.=0܀2'܀4଀ᄀ-଀&7؀ЀᄀȀ6؀਀"ᔀḀ᠀ -ЀԀ Ȁ( ᔀ(ᬀᜀ " ᔀḀ)ᤀᔀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀')'7؀฀܀-؀଀6-܀܀Ѐ0Ѐ7'D$?܀ࠀऀ܀-FȀ܀ࠀऀ܀$7-؀ЀᄀȀఀ4ЀᄀȀ؀ЀA؀ᘀᨀᔀ 1#" FȀ-& ᜀ)ᘀᜀ * ᔀἀ+ᨀᘀ, ᰀἀ+ᨀᰀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀଀44Ԁ=܀฀Ѐ8଀Ѐ܀/܀ࠀ$Ѐ=܀਀"ᔀḀἀ ฀Ѐ8଀Ѐ ਀"ᔀἀᘀ"#ᘀᨀᨀ ਀4Ѐᄀ2܀>ࠀȀЀ",-଀;&܀,଀00$܀'܀",<଀;& ᔀḀᤀ(ᨀᨀᤀ)ᤀᨀ *" ᔀἀ+ᨀᘀ,ᔀ᠀)ᔀ᠀* ᰀἀ+ᨀᤀ,ᰀἀ)ᘀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᘀ)ᨀἀᜀ(ᘀ᠀ *" ᔀἀ+ᔀ᠀,ᔀᜀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀἀ+ᤀḀ,ᰀἀ)ᤀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀5%$6 ܀/Ѐᄀ%ࠀ=܀܀')܀%؀؀Ѐ0$?-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ܀@؀4؀฀଀.܀&܀4଀ᄀ$%଀7'2؀਀"ᔀἀᔀ"#ᘀᨀᰀ -Ѐ=Ѐᄀ%ࠀ66 Ѐ0Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā$?܀؀଀ఀ=:܀ࠀऀ܀Ѐ.ࠀఀࠀ%ఀ4ЀᄀȀ7؀1 ᔀ᠀ἀ(ᜀᨀᤀᨀ)ᘀᘀ *" ᔀἀ+ᨀᘀ,ᔀᤀ)ᰀᨀ* ᰀἀ+ᔀᔀ,ᜀᘀ)ᤀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā /;<>؀=܀'܀Ѐ;଀-؀=IᄀD؀਀"ᔀἀᤀ"#ᘀᨀᜀ 1$ࠀ7 ᄀ/%& Ḁᬀᨀ(᠀ᔀᘀ)ᨀḀ *" ᔀἀ+ᰀᘀ,ᔀ᠀)ᤀᘀ* ᰀἀ+ᤀᰀ,ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀$؀=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%ᄀ଀؀$؀=)'਀"ᔀἀᨀ"#ᘀᨀᬀ F଀Ԁᄀ9 *ᜀ)ᬀ᠀ᘀ(ᤀ᠀ *" ᔀἀ+ᜀᨀ,ᔀᜀ)ᨀᤀ* ᰀἀ+ᘀᜀ,ᰀἀ)ᰀᰀ ܀'܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀&Ѐᄀ(ࠀᄀ=଀-଀%ࠀ6$%.܀᐀(8଀.'2܀/܀7AЀ0Ѐ؀ఀ଀܀਀"ᔀἀᰀ"#ᘀᨀḀ ᐀(8଀.'2 =଀;<#܀Ѐ܀1%3؀2ࠀጀఀ܀'܀ЀȀࠀ4$؀Ԁ ਀"ᤀᘀᜀ ᐀ጀ8'ࠀ020ࠀጀ%& ᤀḀ)ᜀᘀ * ᤀᔀ+ᜀᰀ, ᰀḀ+ᜀἀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 2ࠀഀࠀ,07Ȁ%& ᤀ)ᤀ᠀ᘀ(᠀ᤀ *" ᤀᔀ+ᜀ᠀,ᔀᰀ)ᨀἀ* ᰀḀ+ᜀᜀ,ᰀἀ)ᔀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀'܀&%ᄀ7'22ࠀഀࠀ,0ጀȀ؀਀"ᤀᘀᬀ"#ᘀᰀᨀ ᐀ጀԀ ᨀᘀᤀ(ᤀᤀᨀ)ᘀḀ *" ᤀᘀ+ᜀᬀ,ᔀᜀ)ᰀᘀ* ᰀἀ+ᘀᰀ,ᜀᘀ)ᰀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀?ࠀᄀࠀ%-2܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀؀$฀Ѐ8Ѐ2-%ࠀᄀࠀ܀ᄀᄀ2؀਀"ᤀᘀ᠀"#ᘀᰀᰀ "ЀԀ *ᬀᔀᜀ(ᨀᨀᤀ)ᘀἀ 1" ᤀᤀ+ᘀᜀ,ᔀᨀ)ᜀᔀ* ᰀḀ+ᰀᤀ,ᜀᘀ)ᘀᘀ ܀؀'ᄀ଀Ѐᄀ7؀਀܀/܀)'8ᄀ9)$܀؀'଀6ࠀ%0>ఀ$%ࠀ଀Ѐᄀ7>2܀'܀ᄀ2-଀6ࠀ%0Ѐఀ$%ࠀ؀਀"ᤀᘀḀ"#ᘀᰀᬀ ਀ ऀ଀7=%ࠀᄀȀ7 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᨀᔀ᠀(᠀ᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᰀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀$؀ЀᄀȀ$ఀࠀᄀ$܀؀଀$%ࠀ63.܀؀%$;ᘀᰀ᠀ ကЀ#" ᔀᬀᘀ)ᘀ᠀ * ᤀᤀ+ᔀᜀ, ᰀḀ+ᜀᘀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ࠀ63%$/.܀ࠀ'ࠀကЀ;$%1܀਀"ᤀᘀἀ Eࠀ$7'D ਀"ᤀᔀᘀ"#ᘀᰀḀ ਀ఀ଀ᄀ7'2က଀;Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀က଀;Ѐ6> ᰀᔀḀ(ᜀᘀᔀᜀ)ᤀᬀ *" ᤀᤀ+ᨀᘀ,ᔀ᠀)ᰀᘀ* ᰀḀ+ᬀᘀ,ᰀἀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ἀᤀ(ᰀᬀᔀ)ᘀ᠀ 1" ᔀ᠀+ᘀḀ,ᔀ᠀)ᘀᬀ* ᰀḀ+ᨀḀ,ᰀἀ)ᰀᤀ ܀1%$0؀က଀ఀࠀ6܀'܀ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6଀:܀؀%$0؀਀"ᤀᔀᨀ"#ᘀᰀἀ ༀЀഀЀ$'Ѐက଀ఀࠀ6 :ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6/ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ਀"ᤀᔀᬀ ਀଀ఀᄀࠀ ᠀)᠀ᨀ * ᔀḀ+ᜀᨀ, ᰀḀ+ᤀᰀ, ࠀఀࠀ% ᠀(ᜀᔀ " ᔀᤀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā.܀/ကጀ@ᄀ܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀ᘀᜀᔀ ကጀഀᄀ଀#" ਀"ᤀᔀḀ EࠀI଀Ѐ$'Ѐ ᤀ)ᤀᤀ 1 ᔀ᠀+ᘀᤀ, ᰀḀ+ᤀᤀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᔀ(ἀἀ : ᔀᬀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀḀ)ᰀ᠀* Ā Ā ܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀D&9܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᤀ A#" ਀"ᤀᔀἀ EЀ4଀ᄀЀ ᰀ)ᨀἀ 1 ᔀ᠀+ᘀᬀ, ᰀḀ+ᤀᜀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀D&9 ਀"ᤀᤀᔀ >Ѐ$9ᄀ'Ѐ ᔀ)ᤀᤀ * ᔀḀ+ᜀᬀ, ᰀἀ+ᔀᰀ, ᔀ(ᜀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᘀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀ȀЀ؀਀Ԁ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᨀ A#" ਀ԀBȀ1 ᘀ)ᬀ᠀ * ᔀἀ+ᰀᔀ, ᰀἀ+ᤀᰀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀6AЀA؀4؀਀"ᤀᤀᤀ B 0ጀ,& ᔀᜀ(᠀ᘀᔀ)ᨀ᠀ *" ᤀᘀ+ᰀᬀ,ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᰀḀ+ᜀḀ,ᜀᘀ)ᔀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀AB0ᄀ଀3%1܀'܀&,0ጀ܀؀0ᄀ଀3%؀AЀ6A؀$؀ᘀᜀᰀ਀"ᤀᤀᰀ B#" *ᤀᘀᤀ)ᤀᔀᜀᨀ(ᤀḀ *" ᔀἀ+ᬀᘀ,ᔀᰀ)ᨀᜀ* ᰀḀ+ᰀᬀ,ᜀᘀ)ᨀᔀ ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ࠀ6%Ѐ,3؀;က଀܀ࠀऀ܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀+4Ѐ଀ᄀ%܀Eጀ$2ᄀ7'Ѐ܀/܀4Ѐᄀ଀ᄀЀ%܀ᘀᜀᬀ਀"ᤀᤀᜀ Eጀ$2ᄀ7'Ѐ#" :$ࠀ6%Ѐ܀'܀Aࠀ%<ЀȀ&܀က଀;B3,ࠀ6%&܀Ѐ܀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 110 :?ࠀ6%& 111 ਀"ᤀᤀḀ L0଀=$ࠀ02 ᘀ)ᘀᬀ * ᔀἀ+ᰀᬀ, ᰀἀ+ᘀ᠀, Ā Ā Ā *ᤀἀᤀ)ᨀᘀ᠀᠀(ᨀᜀ *" ᤀᤀ+ᤀᤀ,ᔀᬀ)ᰀᨀ* ᰀἀ+ᘀᰀ,ᰀἀ)ᤀᔀ ܀Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%5܀'܀Ѐ-$ఀ%܀$Ѐ-%܀&ȀAࠀ-Ѐ6$%>'7؀਀"ᤀᤀἀ"#ᘀᜀ᠀ ฀ %-Ѐ$ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ,฀ࠀȀ$ࠀሀ ᔀ)ᔀᤀ 1 ᤀᔀ+ᰀ᠀, ᰀḀ+ᤀᰀ܀$؀଀0-܀/܀฀ࠀȀ$ࠀሀ܀Ѐ'؀਀"ᤀᨀᬀ -଀ 0Ѐ3,ఀB ᘀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā:܀Ѐ̀܀'܀؀0Ѐ3,ఀ:܀ᘀᜀḀ ̀Ѐ#" Ѐఀ$Ѐ ᰀᬀᨀ)ᬀᰀ * ᔀἀ+ᘀᜀ, ᰀḀ+ᜀἀ, Ā Ā Ā!܀M'2؀< ਀"ᤀᨀḀ "#ᘀᬀᘀ ကጀ,Ѐ܀ЀᄀȀ܀G&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ܀'܀̀଀6Ѐ܀ ᔀ(᠀ᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ਀"ᤀᰀᔀ ਀0$I଀ᄀᄀ9'ကጀ,&܀Ѐ܀.ࠀఀࠀ%Ѐ܀G&;ᄀ/% ᤀ)ᤀᘀ * ᔀḀ+ᬀᘀ, ᰀḀ+ᰀḀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᰀ)ᰀᜀ᠀(ḀḀ *" ᔀἀ+ᤀᔀ,ᔀᜀ)ᬀᘀ* ᰀἀ+ᔀᜀ,ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀଀6Ѐ̀܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀F-0଀3܀ࠀऀ܀Ѐ0Ѐ!0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ$?܀$؀଀0-܀/܀Ѐ0Ѐ$?܀Ѐ'؀ᘀᬀᔀ਀"ᤀᰀᨀ -଀#" ᔀ)ᬀḀ * ᔀἀ+ᘀᔀ, ᰀḀ+ᨀᰀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀਀"ᤀᰀᜀ ฀ࠀ'(F-0଀3 *ᔀᜀᬀ(ᘀᜀ᠀)ᘀἀ *" ᤀᔀ+ᜀᨀ,ᔀᨀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀḀ+ᜀᨀ,ᜀᘀ)ᨀᰀ ܀'܀ࠀሀ;܀؀0଀ᄀ଀$ఀ؀$Ѐ-܀؀%$਀"ᤀᜀᘀ"#ᘀᬀᰀ "$଀0ࠀ6ఀ଀Ѐᄀ'Ѐ̀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ 0଀ᄀ଀?ఀB Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀?Ѐ-܀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ$%1̀ ਀"ᤀᜀᔀ F2ഀ$଀07'D܀4Ѐഀ( ᤀἀ)ᰀᰀ * ᔀἀ+ᔀᘀ, ᰀἀ+ᔀ᠀, ἀᨀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀%$ᘀᬀᜀ ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ#" ਀"ᤀᜀᤀ EЀ42܀!Ѐఀ$Ѐ ᤀᤀᤀ)ᜀᔀ * ᔀἀ+ᘀᨀ, ᰀἀ+ᔀᔀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᤀ)ᔀ᠀ * ᔀἀ+ᔀᜀ, ᰀἀ+ᘀᬀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā =2<܀$؀଀0-܀/܀=2<܀Ѐ'؀਀"ᤀᜀᨀ -଀ ਀"ᤀᜀᰀ EࠀI଀Ѐ$ ᘀ)ᘀḀ * ᔀἀ+ᘀἀ, ᰀἀ+ᘀἀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ਀"ᤀᜀᬀ ਀ఀ$2&ࠀ07'D܀0$.=(܀/܀਀ఀ$2&ࠀ07'D܀ ᤀἀḀ)ḀḀ * ᔀḀ+ᤀ᠀, ᰀἀ+ᘀᘀ, ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ7 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ਀"ᤀᜀḀ #47ఀ<܀0$.=܀/܀#47ఀ<܀=଀44 ᔀᔀ)ᤀ᠀ * ᔀḀ+ᜀᤀ, ᰀḀ+ᔀḀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Slovakia

؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ᐀ᔀᔀᔀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀᜀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀ᠀ᘀ ᐀ᔀᤀᨀᘀ ᐀ᤀᔀᤀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᨀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᬀᘀ ᐀ᨀᤀᤀᘀ ᐀ᰀᘀᨀᘀ ᐀ᬀᔀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᰀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᜀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᰀᘀ ᐀᠀ᤀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀Ḁᨀᔀᘀ ᐀ἀᘀᤀᘀ ᐀ἀᔀḀᘀᴀ ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ ᐀ἀᔀ!ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ᐀ᘀᴀ ᐀ἀᰀᔀᘀ ਀ᔀᘀᤀἀ ਀ᔀᘀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᘀḀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᘀἀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᘀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᤀᘀ ਀ᔀᔀᬀᨀ ਀ᔀᔀḀḀ ਀ᔀᨀᘀᨀ ਀ᔀᨀᨀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᰀ᠀᠀ ਀ᔀᜀᤀḀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᤀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᨀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ Ȁ& ᔀᤀᘀᔀ(ᨀ᠀ᤀᬀ)ᨀᨀ *" ᔀḀ+ᜀᬀ,ᔀḀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀḀ+ᔀἀ,ᰀἀ)ᤀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā&%$؀฀܀'܀&Ȁ&%$؀ࠀ$Ѐ฀=܀਀4Ѐᄀ2܀/܀ࠀ$Ѐ=܀ᘀᘀᔀ਀"ᤀᜀἀ ਀ఀЀ$2#" 2Ѐ-.Ѐఀ& ᠀ᰀᘀ(Ḁᘀᤀ)ἀ᠀ *" ᔀἀ+ᘀᬀ,ᔀ᠀)ᜀᔀ* ᰀḀ+ᤀᰀ,ᰀḀ)ᜀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀฀/01܀'܀$Ѐ-.Ѐఀ,଀Ѐᄀ"܀؀8ࠀ'+,଀ఀ܀)'ᘀᘀᨀ਀"ᤀᬀᘀ EN7଀Ѐ$7#" ᔀᬀ)ᤀᤀᨀ(ᤀ᠀ *" ᔀḀ+ᨀᬀ,ᔀᨀ)ᜀḀ* ᰀḀ+ᤀᘀ,ᰀḀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀฀0Ѐᄀ଀3܀'܀؀4଀ऀऀ7฀0Ѐᄀ଀3.܀ࠀ07'D'@؀C܀/܀؀Ѐ4଀$8܀ࠀ07'D'@؀ᘀᘀᰀ਀"ᤀᬀᤀ C#" *ᤀᔀᬀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᬀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᜀ $؀0܀฀0Ѐᄀ$%5܀'܀4ࠀࠀȀ0ЀᄀȀ܀$؀0܀&%$ᘀᘀᜀ ฀0Ѐᄀ#" ਀"ᤀᬀᨀ ᐀ࠀȀ$ጀ67'2܀=ࠀ$ᄀЀఀ଀ᄀЀ܀/܀᐀ࠀȀ$ጀ67'2܀ ᔀᘀᤀ)ᜀ᠀ * ᔀḀ+ᰀᔀ, ᰀḀ+ᤀᨀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā =଀ሀ=4ЀᄀȀ7܀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᤀ(ᜀᜀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀Ѐ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀&%$3؀ᘀᘀᬀ ฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ#" ᤀᨀ)ᤀᜀ * ᔀḀ+ᰀ᠀, ᰀḀ+ᤀἀ, Ā Ā Ā ܀C$%5؀฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ܀'܀$ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀਀"ᤀᬀᰀ "4ࠀ'ࠀIAЀఀ%Ѐ -&;ᄀ/%܀Ѐ܀-&;ᄀ/%܀AЀఀ%Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ਀"ᤀᬀᜀ ਀ጀO ἀἀ)᠀ᬀ * ᔀḀ+ᜀᰀ, ᰀḀ+ᨀᤀ, "#ᘀᘀḀ ฀-ࠀጀ$%ጀ6܀Ԁ0&ᄀ܀'܀฀-ࠀጀ$%76܀Ԁ05ᄀ ᔀ(ἀᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ਀"ᤀᬀᬀ ਀'Ѐ4'Ѐ ᔀᘀᨀ)ἀᜀ * ᔀἀ+ᘀᔀ, ᰀḀ+ᤀἀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᔀᘀᔀ)ᰀᔀᔀᬀ(Ḁᨀ *" ᔀ᠀+ᔀἀ,ᔀᰀ)ᜀᤀ* ᰀḀ+ᤀḀ,ᜀᘀ)ᔀᘀ ܀'܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀4܀&Ԁࠀ%-ЀȀ܀؀0Ѐ%ࠀ6଀3%؀")$ࠀ=܀؀4؀਀"ᤀᬀ᠀"#ᘀᘀἀ ฀଀ Ԁࠀ%<ЀȀ& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀ࠀ6଀3%1%<0؀8 ਀"ᤀᬀἀ ?7ఀ$ࠀ0ᄀD܀4HI'( ᠀)ᘀᜀ 1 ᔀ᠀+ᔀᘀ, ᰀḀ+ᘀᨀ, ᔀᘀᜀᤀ(ᬀἀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀1%$؀8܀'܀Ȁࠀ,ࠀ-଀؀-ఀ$܀؀%$؀" ᘀᔀᰀ#" Ȁࠀ,ࠀഀȀ$&$ఀ܀਀"ᤀ᠀ᘀ ᐀$ጀ6ࠀ07'2 Ѐ$ ᔀᘀᘀ)ᬀᨀᔀᤀἀ(ᬀᰀ *" ᔀḀ+ᨀᜀ,ᔀᰀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀḀ+ᨀ᠀,ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā-%܀5%$؀8܀'܀Ѐ-$ఀ%܀$Ѐ-%܀&%$؀"'ᘀᔀᜀ਀"ᤀ᠀ᨀ >ఀ2Iᄀ଀#" ࠀ ᔀᰀἀ(ᤀᨀᰀᘀ)ᨀᨀ *" ᔀḀ+ᔀ᠀,ᔀᰀ)ᜀᘀ* ᰀḀ+ᜀᨀ,ᜀᘀ)ᨀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā%$؀%9ࠀ܀'܀ࠀ%$؀%9ࠀ؀'ᘀᔀḀ਀"ᤀ᠀ᰀ ฀Ѐ7#" *ᨀᨀᘀ(ᤀᜀᰀᤀ)ᤀ᠀ *" ᔀḀ+ᔀἀ,ᔀᨀ)ᘀ᠀* ᰀḀ+ᜀᘀ,ᜀᘀ)ᔀᜀ ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀7ఀG49ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%܀ᘀᔀἀ਀"ᤀ᠀ᜀ "AЀ&9#" 9ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ਀"ᤀ᠀ᬀ "ጀ.=(ᄀ7'2܀=ࠀ$ᄀЀఀ଀ᄀЀ܀/܀"ጀ.=(ᄀ7'2܀ ᨀᤀ)ᘀᔀ * ᔀ᠀+ᔀᨀ, ᰀḀ+ᤀᤀ, Ā Ā Ā *ἀ(ᰀᤀ : ᔀᬀ)ᨀᰀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᔀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀؀ࠀ.3%܀؀ᘀᤀᔀ =଀ሀ=4Ѐ9ጀᄀЀDࠀᄀȀ76଀3%#" Ā Ā Ā ؀ࠀ.3%܀9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%1 ᤀᬀ)ᨀᜀ * ᔀ᠀+ᨀᨀ, ᰀḀ+ᨀḀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ഀࠀ07'D؀$฀܀/܀)Ѐ$%Ѐఀ"܀ഀࠀ07'D؀$਀"ᤀ᠀Ḁ ฀ ᰀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀḀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā ܀&%ᄀ଀;&-܀؀Ѐᄀ7,0଀ᄀ଀3%#܀ఀ=଀ЀЀ܀ᄀ$%ЀЀ؀ᘀᤀᤀ ;Ѐ!଀0#" ,ᰀ)ᨀᜀ 1 ᔀ᠀+ᔀᰀ, ᰀḀ+ᔀᰀ ܀0଀ᄀ଀3%1,<#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀଀0!܀'܀$਀"ᤀ᠀ἀ LH$ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ -&;ᄀ/%& Ā Ā ,ࠀ8(4Ѐ ᬀ)ᰀᨀ 1 ᔀᬀ+ᬀᘀ, ᰀḀ+ᔀᔀ"܀09ᄀ7'Ѐ؀਀"ᤀḀᘀ 3 "#ᘀᤀᨀ ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ܀'܀ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ ᬀᘀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᨀ)ᨀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᘀ)ᤀἀ * ᔀἀ+ᜀἀ, ᰀḀ+ᰀᘀ, Ā Ā Ā ؀਀"ᤀḀᔀ #P7ఀ଀ "#ᘀᤀᰀ ᐀ࠀ;$ࠀ6଀3%&܀-&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀ ᘀ(ᨀ᠀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ਀"ᤀḀᤀ #଀7ࠀ07'<܀'$Ѐ7 ᔀᰀ)ᬀἀ * ᔀἀ+ᜀᰀ, ᰀḀ+ᰀᔀ, Ā ᐀ࠀ;?ࠀ6଀3%5܀-&;ᄀ/% Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᨀḀ(ἀᬀᘀ)Ḁᘀ *: ᤀᘀ+ᔀᨀ,ᔀ᠀)ᘀ᠀* ᰀḀ+ᜀᔀ,ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ࠀᄀ܀7 ܀'܀ጀ;-Ѐༀ$Ѐ774ЀᄀȀ6Ѐ܀/܀7ᄀ9Ȁࠀ'ጀ؀฀܀଀ᄀ$%Ѐ܀ᄀЀ܀)'ᘀᤀᜀ਀"ᤀḀᨀ ကH᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ#" Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ Ā܀<%$7ᄀ᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ9'/ᄀ؀฀ ᨀᬀἀ(ἀᰀᨀ)ᜀᜀ *" ᤀᘀ+ᔀ᠀,ᔀ᠀)ᜀᤀ* ᰀḀ+ᨀ᠀,ᰀἀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀଀00$,܀&,3-6܀؀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%܀Ѐ܀؀%$᐀ࠀ$ఀ&ᄀ؀7ఀ$2ᄀ܀4଀.'D%؀# ᘀᤀ᠀਀"ᤀḀᰀ#" ,᠀ᤀ)ᘀᘀ * ᤀᘀ+ᔀᜀ, ᰀḀ+ᨀ ܀$؀&଀0,-܀3-/6܀ఀࠀ'Ԁ଀܀9ࠀ6଀3%1$%܀7܀E଀ഀ܀ጀ$2AЀ܀5ᄀ$E%1܀᐀ࠀ$ఀ'Ѐ؀਀"ᤀḀᜀ -଀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 7؀ఀ$଀8ጀఀЀ$଀܀=5଀ఀ܀Eጀ$2A *ᨀᔀ)ᔀᰀᰀᜀ(ᘀᬀ *" ᤀᘀ+ᰀ᠀,ᔀᰀ)ᜀᨀ* ᰀḀ+ᜀᰀ,ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ ܀'܀A0ЀȀЀ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀3܀਀"ᤀḀ᠀"#ᘀᤀḀ ༀЀ4Ԁጀ7᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$%Ѐ A0ЀȀ> Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀C܀<᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$% ,ᬀἀ)ἀᰀ * ᔀḀ+ᜀḀ, ᰀἀ+ᤀᬀ ܀/܀Iᄀ଀.Ѐ؀଀-܀Ѐ܀)Ȁ)'7؀฀܀਀"ᤀḀḀ "(7ጀ.'D ᨀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-Iᄀ଀.Ѐ؀଀-܀؀ЀᄀȀ଀6܀)Ȁ-܀؀Ѐ0$)'7؀A܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀฀܀ЀᄀȀ7ጀ.'D؀ᘀᨀᘀ "(A#" Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀?AЀ0܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀Ԁ ,ᤀ)ᰀᨀ * ᤀᘀ+ᤀᨀ, ᰀḀ+ᜀἀ ܀ЀԀ؀$7ఀ܀$؀%%K܀/܀᐀ࠀ$ᄀ2Ȁጀ܀'ఀࠀ܀>਀"ᤀἀᘀ ᐀ࠀ$ᄀ ᔀ(ᬀᜀ " ᔀḀ)ᤀᔀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀FȀ-Ѐ܀ࠀऀ܀$Ȁ-؀᐀ࠀ$ᄀ2܀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᨀᔀ ࠀऀA#" FȀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀Ԁ ᰀ)ᬀᤀ 1 ᔀ᠀+ᰀᔀ, ᰀ᠀+ᰀ᠀, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀MHIࠀ07'D"܀/܀ᄀࠀ؀ЀԀ$܀਀"ᤀἀᨀ "MHIࠀ07'D Ѐ$Ԁ7 ᔀḀᤀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀ᠀)ᔀ᠀* ᰀἀ)ᘀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀$؀଀;&଀0>,"܀'܀଀00$,܀&;ᘀᨀᨀ $",-଀#" *᠀ἀ)ᔀᬀᜀ(ᘀ᠀ 1" ᔀ᠀+ᔀᔀ,ᔀᜀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀḀ+ᘀᜀ,ᰀἀ)ᤀ ܀Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%5=܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀&ЀȀ7=Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%؀Ԁ܀฀଀7'ጀ%଀.'D܀/܀)=4ጀ܀਀"ᤀἀᜀ"#ᘀᨀᰀ ฀଀7'ጀ%଀.'D .ࠀఀࠀ% Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᔀ᠀ἀ(ᜀᨀᘀ)ᘀḀ *" ᤀᘀ+ᔀᘀ,ᔀᤀ)ᰀᨀ* ᰀḀ+ᜀᔀ,ᜀᘀ)ᤀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā /;<>؀=܀'܀Ѐ;଀-؀=)'ഀ଀ᄀ؀$਀"ᤀἀ᠀"#ᘀᨀᜀ ฀ ᄀ/%& Ḁᬀᨀ(᠀ᔀḀ)ᬀᔀ *" ᔀἀ+ᘀḀ,ᔀ᠀)ᤀᘀ* ᰀḀ+ᰀ᠀,ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀$؀=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%ᄀ଀؀$؀=਀"ᤀἀἀ"#ᘀᨀᬀ ฀Ѐ$Ѐᄀࠀ0ࠀ *ᰀᰀᘀ)Ḁᨀᘀ(ᤀ᠀ *" ᔀἀ+ᤀ᠀,ᔀᜀ)ᨀᤀ* ᰀḀ+ᜀᜀ,ᰀἀ)ᰀᰀ ܀'܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀&Ѐఀ$(=଀-଀%ࠀ6$%#܀؀'9ഀ̀܀؀'7$؀਀"ᨀᘀᤀ"#ᘀᨀḀ QጀԀ8଀ =଀;<#܀Ѐ܀1%3؀2ࠀጀఀ܀'܀ЀȀࠀ4$؀਀"ᨀᘀ᠀ #Ѐఀ$(Ԁ ਀"ᨀᘀḀ EЀ.=(0ࠀጀ%& ᔀ)Ḁἀ * ᔀἀ+ᜀᰀ, ᰀἀ+ᘀ᠀, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 2ࠀഀࠀ,07Ȁ%& ᘀ)ᤀᘀᘀ(᠀ᤀ *" ᤀᘀ+ᔀᘀ,ᔀᰀ)ᨀἀ* ᰀἀ+ᘀᰀ,ᰀἀ)ᔀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀'܀&%1ࠀ%$ЀȀ2ࠀഀࠀ,0ጀȀ܀$؀଀0-܀/܀1ࠀ%$ЀȀ܀Ѐ'؀ᘀᰀᨀ਀"ᨀᘀἀ -଀#" ᨀᘀᜀ)ᔀᘀᨀᘀᤀ(ᤀᤀ *" ᔀἀ+ᜀἀ,ᔀᜀ)ᰀᘀ* ᰀḀ+ᜀᬀ,ᜀᘀ)ᰀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀?ࠀᄀࠀ%-2܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀؀$Ѐఀ$(2-%ࠀᄀࠀ#܀؀'9ഀ̀܀ᘀᰀᰀ਀"ᨀᔀᘀ "$2Mࠀ0ࠀ=ࠀM7'D#" ଀6ࠀ%0>ఀ$%ࠀ ᬀᔀᜀ(ᨀᨀᤀ)ᨀἀ 1" ᔀᬀ+ᜀ᠀,ᔀᨀ)ᜀᔀ* ᰀḀ+ᨀ᠀,ᜀᘀ)ᘀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā>2܀'܀ᄀ'(2-଀6ࠀ%0Ѐఀ$%ࠀ؀ᘀᰀᬀ਀"ᨀᔀᔀ "ЀI#" *ᨀᔀ᠀(᠀ᨀᔀ)ᬀᘀ 1" ᔀᬀ+ᜀḀ,ᔀᰀ)ᔀᰀ* ᰀḀ+ᔀᰀ,ᜀᘀ)ᜀᤀ ܀'܀$؀܀/܀)Eࠀ$Ѐ0$ఀࠀᄀ܀ЀᄀȀ$܀4H0଀ጀԀ؀Ѐ%ࠀ63$܀؀'଀09ᄀ7.܀؀%$;ကЀ؀ᘀᰀ᠀਀"ᨀᔀᤀ 3#" Eࠀ$Ѐ0Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀ࠀऀ܀଀ጀԀ؀ࠀ6Ѐ44ጀ03%$܀؀'09ᄀ7/.܀ကЀ;$%1؀3 က଀;Ѐ6> ᰀᔀḀ(ᜀᘀᔀᨀ)ᔀᨀ 1" ᔀᬀ+ᜀᜀ,ᔀ᠀)ᰀᘀ* ᰀḀ+ᔀḀ,ᰀἀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀'܀က଀;Ѐ6Ѐ؀'4Ѐ܀؀'09ᄀ7؀3܀/܀ࠀ$؀Ѐഀ@܀؀'09ᄀ7؀ᘀᰀḀ਀"ᨀᔀᨀ 3#" ἀᤀ(ᰀᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᘀᬀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀1%$0؀က଀ఀࠀ6܀'܀ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6଀:܀؀%$0؀ᘀᰀἀ က଀ఀࠀ6#" Eࠀ$Ѐ0Ѐ:ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6/ ᨀ)ἀᘀ 1 ᔀᬀ+ᜀᰀ, ᰀḀ+ᤀἀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀$؀଀0-܀/܀Eࠀ$Ѐ0Ѐ܀Ѐ'؀਀"ᨀᔀᰀ -଀ *᠀ᤀ)ᜀᔀ᠀(ᜀᔀ 1" ᔀ᠀+ᔀᔀ,ᔀᤀ)ᘀḀ* ᰀḀ+ᜀᔀ,ᜀᘀ)ᔀ ܀਀'Ѐ4଀.'D܀/܀)Eࠀ$Ѐ0܀ࠀఀࠀ%Ѐ4H0଀ጀԀ.܀/ကጀ@ᄀ܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀ကጀഀᄀ଀܀ᘀᜀᔀ਀"ᨀᔀᜀ ਀'Ѐ4଀.'D#" Ѐ44ጀ0଀ጀԀ܀ࠀऀ܀Eࠀ$Ѐ0Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᔀ(ἀἀ : ᔀᬀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀḀ)ᰀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀D&9܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᤀ A#" ᘀ)Ḁᨀ 1 ᔀᬀ+ᜀᰀ, ᰀḀ+ᤀᔀ, Ā Ā Ā ؀D&9.؀$਀"ᨀᔀ᠀ -ࠀഀ%ࠀ ᬀ)ᤀᬀᔀ(ᜀᔀ *" ᤀᔀ+ᜀᔀ,ᔀᜀ)ᘀᤀ* ᰀἀ+ᔀᜀ,ᜀᘀ)ᜀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀ȀЀ؀਀Ԁ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀4ࠀԀA؀C܀ᘀᜀᨀ਀"ᨀᔀḀ 1ࠀȀ#" ,਀ԀBȀ1 ᨀᘀ)᠀ᤀ * ᔀἀ+ᤀἀ, ᰀḀ+ᰀᔀ܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀਀"ᨀᔀἀ 1ࠀMЀᄀЀA 0ጀ,& ᔀᜀ(᠀ᘀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀AB0ᄀ଀3%1܀'܀&,0ጀ܀؀0ᄀ଀3%؀ᘀᜀᰀ A#" ਀"ᨀᤀ᠀ E଀4଀I ᰀἀ)ᜀᜀ * ᤀᔀ+ᤀḀ, ᰀḀ+ᨀᜀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᔀ)ᜀᘀᜀᨀ(ᤀḀ *" ᤀᔀ+ᘀἀ,ᔀᰀ)ᨀᜀ* ᰀḀ+ᜀᘀ,ᜀᘀ)ᨀᔀ᠀ ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ࠀ6%Ѐ,3؀;က଀܀ࠀऀ܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀+؀1ࠀ=ࠀ$ᄀ2Ȁ଀܀ȀᄀD؀$਀"ᨀᤀḀ"#ᘀᜀᬀ ਀ఀ :$ࠀ6%Ѐ܀'܀Aࠀ%<ЀȀ&܀က଀;B3,ࠀ6%&܀Ѐ܀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᔀ)ᜀἀ 1 ᤀᔀ+ᰀᨀ, ᰀḀ+ᤀᨀ, 111 ܀؀'ࠀ02I7"܀/܀)'4H܀ &%؀'਀"ᨀᤀἀ "ࠀ0:?ࠀ62I7 110 ሀ$Ѐ774ЀᄀȀ7 Ā Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀᜀ᠀ Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%&܀%-Ѐ$܀%Ѐ-$ఀ܀'܀Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%5܀ ᠀᠀(ᨀᜀ " ᔀᬀ)ᰀᨀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā E଀ᄀIࠀ4%-Ѐ$ ᰀᘀ)ᤀ᠀ * ᤀᔀ+ᘀᤀ, ᰀἀ+ᔀᰀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀>'ሀࠀ07$؀਀"ᨀᨀᔀ C 0Ѐ3,ఀB ᬀᨀ)ᘀᨀᘀ(ᨀᔀ *" ᤀᔀ+ᘀἀ,ᔀᜀ)ᜀᤀ* ᰀἀ+ᔀᔀ,ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā:܀Ѐ̀܀'܀؀0Ѐ3,ఀ:܀ሀࠀ0̀Ѐ$؀ᘀᜀḀ਀"ᨀᨀᤀ C#" ᘀ)ᜀᤀᔀ(᠀ᬀ *" ᤀᘀ+ᔀᨀ,ᔀ᠀)ᜀᜀ* ᰀἀ+ᤀᔀ,ᰀἀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀଀6Ѐ܀M'D̀؀<܀'܀0Ѐ଀ᄀ܀/܀ࠀ$؀.ЀഀȀ@܀ऀ0ࠀࠀ؀'7܀%ࠀ7ఀጀ$ᄀ଀Ѐᄀ;ᄀ଀܀G&'D܀ЀᄀȀ܀Mကጀ,Ѐ؀< ᘀᬀᘀ਀"ᨀᨀᰀ#" ᄀ/% Ā;&؀'ЀG܀4ࠀఀࠀ%Ѐ܀؀'Ѐ.ᄀ7܀Ѐ܀&,ࠀ7ఀጀ$ᄀ଀ကጀ ᘀ)ᘀḀ᠀(ḀḀ *" ᤀᘀ+ᔀᤀ,ᔀᜀ)ᬀᘀ* ᰀἀ+ᤀᘀ,ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā ܀Ѐ܀È଀6Ѐ4D܀/܀'܀܀2-$؀ഀ؀Ѐ-଀6@܀؀F-0଀3܀؀'ᄀ7܀ᄀࠀऀ଀Ѐ$܀ࠀ7ఀ0Ѐጀ଀ᄀ܀ᘀᬀᔀ਀"ᨀᨀᜀ E!0ࠀࠀȀ.Ѐ4D#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀'4Ѐ܀؀'Ѐᄀ7 ؀ࠀ7ఀጀ$ᄀ଀F-0଀3 ᔀᜀᬀ(ᘀᜀᔀᨀ)ᘀᘀ *" ᤀᘀ+ᤀᜀ,ᔀᨀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀἀ+ᤀᰀ,ᜀᘀ)ᨀᰀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀ࠀሀ;܀؀0଀ᄀ଀$ఀ؀$Ѐ-܀؀%$ᄀ଀ᄀ(̀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ؀ᘀᬀᰀ਀"ᨀᨀ᠀ 1଀#" 0଀ᄀ଀?ఀB ᔀᜀ)ᰀᔀ 1 ᤀᘀ+ᰀᨀ, ᰀḀ+ᨀᰀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀?Ѐ-܀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ$%1̀=.$0܀>਀"ᨀᰀᔀ 3ࠀ4ᄀ *ἀᨀ(᠀ᤀᤀ)ᤀᘀ *" ᤀᘀ+ᰀᔀ,ᔀᰀ)ᰀᘀ* ᰀḀ+ᨀḀ,ᰀḀ)ᨀἀ ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀%$ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ̀.؀Aࠀ0؀਀"ᨀᰀᤀ"#ᘀᬀᜀ 3$଀ ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᰀ)ᘀᤀ * ᤀᘀ+ᤀᰀ, ᰀḀ+ᨀᜀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀7ఀ$2ᄀ܀6଀07'D؀਀"ᨀᰀᨀ 14 4Ѐ%଀D7 ᨀ)ᜀᤀ 1 ᤀᘀ+ᨀᘀ, ᰀḀ+ᨀᘀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀Iࠀ07'D؀"܀/܀)%Ѐ$'6܀Iࠀ07'D؀" ਀"ᨀᰀᜀ AࠀԀ ᔀ)᠀Ḁ * ᤀᘀ+ᤀᨀ, ᰀḀ+ᨀᰀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀8؀$=܀਀ఀ$2&ᄀ(Ԁ܀਀"ᨀᰀᬀ 1ࠀȀ ਀"ᨀᰀ᠀ 3ࠀԀ଀.'D܀6'$Ѐ%(܀/܀3ࠀԀ଀.'D܀4Ѐ%଀D7 ᔀ)ᔀᔀ 1 ᤀᘀ+ᤀḀ, ᰀḀ+ᤀἀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Slovakia

؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ᐀ᔀᔀᔀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀᜀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀ᠀ᘀ ᐀ᔀᤀᨀᘀ ᐀ᤀᔀᤀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᨀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᬀᘀ ᐀ᨀᤀᤀᘀ ᐀ᰀᘀᨀᘀ ᐀ᬀᔀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᰀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᜀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᰀᘀ ᐀᠀ᤀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀Ḁᨀᔀᘀ ᐀ἀᘀᤀᘀ ᐀ἀᔀḀᘀᴀ ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ ᐀ἀᔀ!ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ᐀ᘀᴀ ᐀ἀᰀᔀᘀ ਀ᔀᘀᤀἀ ਀ᔀᘀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᘀḀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᘀἀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᘀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᤀᘀ ਀ᔀᔀᬀᨀ ਀ᔀᔀḀḀ ਀ᔀᨀᘀᨀ ਀ᔀᨀᨀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᰀ᠀᠀ ਀ᔀᜀᤀḀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᤀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᨀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ *ᔀᤀᘀᔀ(ᨀ᠀ᔀἀ)ᔀᔀ *" ᤀᘀ+ᰀḀ,ᔀḀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀḀ+ᰀᔀ,ᰀἀ)ᤀᜀ ܀ࠀऀ܀)؀Ѐ44<܀/܀)Eࠀ4ȀЀ0܀@؀ᄀ$؀C଀܀Ȁ&4଀ᄀЀ&%$؀฀܀'܀&Ȁ&%$؀ᘀᘀᔀ਀"ᨀᰀḀ 3ࠀ฀#" Eࠀ4ȀЀ0Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀ᄀЀ$؀C଀ *2Ѐ-.Ѐఀ& ᠀ᰀᘀ(Ḁᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀἀ܀฀/01܀'܀$Ѐ-.Ѐఀ,଀Ѐᄀ"܀؀ᘀᘀᨀ +,଀ఀ#" ਀"ᨀᰀἀ BЀ7ࠀ07'D܀Ȁጀ8଀ᄀ(܀/܀BЀ7ࠀ07'D܀ࠀЀ'܀ ᘀ)ᨀᜀ * ᤀᘀ+ᜀḀ, ᰀḀ+ᰀᔀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᨀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᨀ)ᜀḀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᬀ ؀฀0Ѐᄀ଀3܀'܀؀ᘀᘀᰀ ฀0Ѐᄀ଀3#" 5ࠀࠀȀ7 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᤀᔀᬀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᬀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᜀ $؀0܀฀0Ѐᄀ$%5܀'܀4ࠀࠀȀ0ЀᄀȀ܀$؀0܀&%$ᘀᘀᜀ ฀0Ѐᄀ#" ࠀ.'7 ᰀ)ᨀḀ * ᤀᘀ+ᤀἀ, ᰀḀ+ᨀᬀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā$܀؀'฀$ഀࠀఀ9ᄀ7܀/܀)Ѐ4'7܀؀'਀"ᨀᜀᘀ ฀$ഀࠀఀ9ᄀ7 *ᤀ(ᜀᜀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀Ѐ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀&%$3؀ᘀᘀᬀ ฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ#" ,ᘀ)ᰀᤀ 1 ᤀᘀ+ᨀḀ, ᰀḀ+ᨀᬀ ܀᐀$ጀ6ࠀ07'2܀/܀%؀7ࠀ7ఀ؀4܀਀"ᨀᜀᤀ ᐀$ጀ6ࠀ07'2 Ā Ā Ā ܀C$%5؀฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ܀'܀$ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀AЀఀ%Ѐ 5ࠀࠀȀ7 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀؀%%؀7ఀ -&;ᄀ/%܀Ѐ܀-&;ᄀ/%܀AЀఀ%Ѐ ,᠀4Ѐ଀ᄀ ᤀḀ)ᜀᨀ * ᤀᘀ+ᤀᬀ, ᰀḀ+ᨀ%܀6଀07'2؀14܀/܀4Ѐᄀ଀ᄀЀ%܀6଀07'2؀਀"ᨀᜀᨀ 14 "#ᘀᘀḀ ฀-ࠀጀ$%ጀ6܀Ԁ0&ᄀ܀'܀฀-ࠀጀ$%76܀Ԁ05ᄀ ᔀ(ἀᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᔀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᔀᬀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᘀ ܀'܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀4܀&Ԁࠀ%-ЀȀ܀؀0Ѐ%ࠀ6଀3%؀" ᘀᘀἀ#" ,ᘀ)ᜀᔀ * ᤀᘀ+ᨀᜀ, ᰀḀ+ᰀἀ ܀D'.؀᐀ᄀ଀4܀/܀4଀ᄀ଀7'2؀Ѐ6$܀D'.؀਀"ᨀᜀᰀ ᐀ᄀ଀4 Ԁࠀ%<ЀȀ& Ā Ā܀ࠀ6଀3%1%<0؀8 Ѐఀ4ЀᄀȀ7 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀% *ᔀᘀᜀᤀ(ᬀἀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᜀ ܀1%$؀8܀'܀Ȁࠀ,ࠀ-଀؀-ఀ$܀؀%$؀" ᘀᔀᰀ#" ਀"ᨀᜀᜀ !Ѐ8଀2ᄀ'Ѐ ᬀ)ᬀᤀ 1 ᤀᘀ+ᨀᨀ, ᰀḀ+ᨀᰀ, Ȁࠀ,ࠀఀ$ ਀"ᨀᜀᬀ ᐀ࠀ$ᄀ<܀0$.= ᬀᘀ)ᰀᰀ * ᤀᘀ+ᰀ᠀, ᰀḀ+ᨀἀ, Ѐ$ ᔀᤀἀ(ᬀᰀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā-%܀5%$؀8܀'܀Ѐ-$ఀ%܀$Ѐ-%܀&%$؀" ᘀᔀᜀ#" ᤀᜀ)Ḁᰀ 1 ᔀἀ+ᜀᰀ, ᰀḀ+ᔀᤀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀/܀)%8଀ࠀఀࠀ܀7ᄀD؀4܀R܀ࠀ0଀ᄀЀ=.$0܀ࠀ02$؀; ᠀਀"ᨀᜀ *᠀ࠀ ᔀᰀἀ(ᤀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀ%$؀%9ࠀ܀'܀ࠀ%$؀%ᘀᔀḀ 9ࠀ#" Ѐ8଀ఀЀఀ7 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā=܀7ఀ؀$ऀࠀ܀R܀ጀ%4ЀᄀȀ܀ࠀ02$؀; *ᨀᨀᘀ(ᤀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᘀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᜀ ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀ᘀᔀἀ 9ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%#" ,ᘀ)ᬀᤀ 1 ᔀἀ+ᬀᘀ, ᰀḀ+ᔀᘀ $9&؀4؀਀"ᨀᬀᘀ ฀ 9ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ਀"ᨀᬀᔀ >ࠀȀࠀ'26 ᔀ)ᨀ᠀ 1 ᤀᘀ+ᘀᘀ, ᰀḀ+ᔀᤀ, ἀ(ᰀᤀ : ᔀᬀ)ᨀᰀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᔀ* Ā Ā ܀'܀଀00$,܀؀ࠀ.3%܀؀ᘀᤀᔀ 9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%#" ᔀᜀ)ἀᘀ * ᤀᘀ+ᘀᜀ, ᰀḀ+ᨀᤀ, Ā Ā Ā ܀>'ᄀIЀᄀ7؀଀$3܀/؀3܀ࠀ.'$Ѐ7%܀>'ᄀ7܀ᄀIЀ9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%1؀਀"ᨀᬀᬀ 3$଀ 'Ѐ$7ఀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *᠀ᰀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀḀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ ܀&%ᄀ଀;&-܀؀Ѐ,0଀ᄀ଀3%#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀ᘀᤀᤀ !଀0#" ᨀἀ)ᘀᘀ * ᔀ᠀+ᰀ᠀, ᰀḀ+ᜀᤀ, Ā Ā Ā ܀0଀ᄀ଀3%1,<#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀଀0!܀'܀$ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ؀.ࠀ%Ѐᄀ଀'܀਀"ᨀᬀ᠀ ᐀ࠀ4ጀ8(=ࠀ -&;ᄀ/%& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᘀ)ᘀᨀ * ᔀḀ+ᘀἀ, ᰀἀ+ᘀᜀ, Ā Ā Ā ܀ഀࠀ07'2؀$฀܀/܀Ȁࠀ4଀ᄀЀ܀ഀࠀ07'2؀$਀"ᨀᬀḀ ฀ ᬀᘀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᨀ)ᨀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā )؀ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ44܀'܀ᘀᤀᨀ 0Ѐༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ#" "#ᘀᤀᰀ਀"ᨀᬀἀ 1Ѐ0H'ࠀ0܀@Ѐ$ࠀ'᐀ࠀ;$ࠀ6଀3%&܀-&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀ ᘀ)ᤀḀᘀ(ᨀ᠀ *" ᔀ᠀+ᰀᘀ,ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᰀḀ+ᰀᬀ,ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* ᐀ࠀ;?ࠀ6଀3%5܀-&;ᄀ/% Ā Ā ਀"ᨀ᠀ᔀ JЀ4ࠀ7ఀ଀ᄀ2 ᤀ)ᔀἀ * ᔀ᠀+ᤀᬀ, ᰀḀ+ᰀἀ, Ā Ā Ā Ā ᨀḀ(ἀᬀᘀ)ᘀᰀ *: ᔀḀ+ᘀḀ,ᔀ᠀)ᘀ᠀* ᰀἀ+ᘀᰀ,ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* Ā ܀؀'42ఀ7'܀'଀0ࠀ$܀Ѐ"6Ѐ-܀/܀;Ȁࠀ4H'(ጀ܀؀܀਀"ᨀ᠀ᤀ"#ᘀᤀᜀ "$଀᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ0ࠀ'42ఀ7'଀ᄀ$%Ѐ ሀ$Ѐ774ЀᄀȀ᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ/ᄀ$%>7 ܀Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ Ā Ā *᠀ᨀᬀἀ(ἀᰀᘀ)ᘀἀ *" ᔀ᠀+ᰀᔀ,ᔀ᠀)ᜀᤀ* ᰀḀ+ᜀᘀ,ᰀἀ)ᔀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀&,3-6܀؀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%܀Ѐ܀؀%$਀"ᨀ᠀ᰀ"#ᘀᤀ᠀ F2=$ЀȀ7'2᐀ࠀ$ఀ&ᄀ ᐀ࠀ$ఀ5ᄀ$%1܀Ѐ܀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%1܀6-3,& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ਀"ᨀ᠀ᜀ "$Ѐ79ᄀ ᘀ)ᬀᰀ * ᔀḀ+ᘀᘀ, ᰀḀ+ᜀḀ, Ā Ā ᰀᜀ(ᘀᬀᤀ)ᔀḀ *" ᔀḀ+ᘀἀ,ᔀᰀ)ᜀᨀ* ᰀἀ+ᘀᜀ,ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀A0ЀȀЀ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀3܀7᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$%Ѐ؀%%4଀'܀6Ѐఀ7'D$<܀/܀ЀȀ42$8܀ᘀᤀḀ਀"ᨀ᠀ᬀ >$6Ѐఀ7'D#" A0ЀȀ> Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀C܀<᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$% *ᤀᜀ)ᤀᨀᨀ(ᨀᨀ *" ᔀ᠀+ᜀᬀ,ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᰀḀ+ᰀᘀ,ᰀḀ)ᨀḀ ܀/Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ-܀؀'᐀ᄀ7܀'܀Ԁ-Ѐఀ9؀؀଀6#܀/܀-܀؀Ѐ0$)=.$0܀A܀ࠀऀ܀$؀'ᄀ7-؀ԀЀఀ9؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᨀᘀ਀"ᨀḀᘀ #A#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀?7AЀ0܀ЀᄀȀጀᄀఀЀ-଀&ᄀ؀ԀࠀԀ ᤀ)ᬀᰀᔀ(ᬀᜀ *" ᔀḀ+ᰀḀ,ᔀḀ)ᤀᔀ* ᰀḀ+ᜀᰀ,ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀FȀ-Ѐ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀฀4Ѐఀᄀ଀I଀Ѐᄀ'ЀA܀Ѐ܀.؀ᘀᨀᔀ਀"ᨀḀᤀ #ጀ$଀#" ᘀ)ᔀᨀ * ᤀᤀ+ᘀ᠀, ᰀἀ+ᘀḀ, Ā Ā ܀᐀ࠀ7ఀࠀ0଀.'D܀/܀)'FȀ-&4H܀&܀ЀᄀȀ7ఀࠀ0-଀.'D؀਀"ᨀḀᬀ ᐀ࠀԀ "#ᘀᨀᨀ ሀ$Ѐ774ЀᄀȀ",-଀;&܀,଀00$܀'܀",<଀;&7 ᔀḀᤀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀ᠀)ᔀ᠀* ᰀἀ)ᘀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᜀᰀ)ᔀᨀᜀ(ᘀ᠀ *" ᤀᤀ+ᘀᔀ,ᔀᜀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀἀ+ᔀᨀ,ᰀἀ)ᤀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%5=܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀&Ȁ=Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%)'7؀ᘀᨀᰀ਀"ᨀḀ᠀ ฀#" ਀"ᨀḀḀ >(Ȁ$଀.Ѐ.ࠀఀࠀ% ᘀ)ᘀ᠀ * ᔀ᠀+ᘀᬀ, ᰀḀ+ᔀᤀ, Ā Ā ᔀ᠀ἀ(ᜀᨀᘀ)ᬀᨀ 1" ᔀἀ+ᘀᘀ,ᔀᤀ)ᰀᨀ* ᰀḀ+ᔀᘀ,ᜀᘀ)ᤀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā /;<>؀=܀'܀Ѐ;଀-؀=7ఀ$2A܀ഀࠀ02؀$਀"ᨀἀᤀ"#ᘀᨀᜀ ฀ ᄀ/%& Ḁᬀᨀ(᠀ᔀᔀᨀ)ᤀᤀ 1" ᔀḀ+ᰀᰀ,ᔀ᠀)ᤀᘀ* ᰀ᠀+ᰀḀ,ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀$؀=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%ᄀ଀؀$؀=؀3Ѐᄀጀ8܀/܀@਀"ᨀἀᨀ"#ᘀᨀᬀ 3ጀᄀЀ *ᔀ)ᔀḀᘀ(ᤀ᠀ 1" ᔀḀ+ᔀ᠀,ᔀᜀ)ᨀᤀ* ᰀ᠀+ᰀᬀ,ᰀἀ)ᰀᰀ ܀'܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀&଀-଀%ࠀ6$%=؀8଀6ఀ؀$=਀"ᨀἀᜀ"#ᘀᨀḀ 1ࠀ =଀;<#܀Ѐ܀1%3؀2ࠀጀఀ܀'܀ЀȀࠀ4$؀Ԁ 0ࠀጀ%& "#ᘀᰀᨀ 2ࠀഀࠀ,0ጀȀ%&܀'܀2ࠀഀࠀ,07Ȁ%& ᘀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀἀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀᨀ* Ā Ā ᨀᘀᤀ(ᤀᤀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀?ࠀᄀࠀ%-2܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀؀$ᘀᰀᰀ 2-%ࠀᄀࠀ#" "#ᘀᰀᬀ 2-଀6ࠀ%0Ѐఀ$%ࠀ܀'܀2<଀6ࠀ%0>ఀ$%ࠀ ᬀᔀᜀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᨀ)ᜀᔀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᨀᔀ᠀(᠀ᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᰀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀᤀ ܀'܀$؀ЀᄀȀ$ఀࠀᄀ$܀؀଀$%ࠀ63.܀؀%$;ᘀᰀ᠀ ကЀ#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ࠀ63%$/.܀ကЀ;$%1 "#ᘀᰀḀ က଀;Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀က଀;Ѐ6> ᰀᔀḀ(ᜀᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᰀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ἀᤀ(ᰀᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᘀᬀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᤀ ܀1%$0؀က଀ఀࠀ6܀'܀ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6଀:܀؀%$0؀ᘀᰀἀ က଀ఀࠀ6#" :ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6/ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ࠀఀࠀ% ᠀(ᜀᔀ " ᔀᤀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā.܀/ကጀ@ᄀ܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀ᘀᜀᔀ ကጀഀᄀ଀#" *᠀ᔀ(ἀἀ : ᔀᬀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀḀ)ᰀ ܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀D&9܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᤀ A#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀D&9 ᔀ(ᜀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᘀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀ȀЀ؀਀Ԁ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᨀ A#" ਀ԀBȀ1 113܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A 112 0ጀ,& ᔀᜀ(᠀ᘀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀἀ* Ā܀AB0ᄀ଀3%1܀'܀&,0ጀ܀؀0ᄀ଀3%؀ᘀᜀᰀ A#" *ᜀᨀ(ᤀḀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᜀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᔀ ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ࠀ6%Ѐ,3؀;က଀܀ࠀऀ܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀+ ᘀᜀᬀ#" :$ࠀ6%Ѐ܀'܀Aࠀ%<ЀȀ&܀က଀;B3,ࠀ6%&܀Ѐ܀ Ā Ā :?ࠀ6%& "#ᘀᜀ᠀ Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%&܀%-Ѐ$܀%Ѐ-$ఀ܀'܀Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%5܀ ᠀᠀(ᨀᜀ " ᔀᬀ)ᰀᨀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᔀ* %-Ѐ$ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 0Ѐ3,ఀB ᘀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā:܀Ѐ̀܀'܀؀0Ѐ3,ఀ:܀ᘀᜀḀ ̀Ѐ#" "#ᘀᬀᘀ ကጀ,Ѐ܀ЀᄀȀ܀G&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ܀'܀̀଀6Ѐ܀ ᔀ(᠀ᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᨀᜀ* ကጀ,&܀Ѐ܀.ࠀఀࠀ%Ѐ܀G&;ᄀ/% Ā *ḀḀ " ᔀᜀ)ᬀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ)᠀ ܀଀6Ѐ̀܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀F-0଀3܀ࠀऀ܀ᘀᬀᔀ !0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀F-0଀3 *ᔀᜀᬀ(ᘀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᤀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᰀ ܀'܀ࠀሀ;܀؀0଀ᄀ଀$ఀ؀$Ѐ-܀؀%$ᘀᬀᰀ ̀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ#" 0଀ᄀ଀?ఀB Ā Ā؀?Ѐ-܀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ$%1̀ *ἀᨀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀἀ ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀%$ᘀᬀᜀ ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ#" ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Slovakia

Additional sites for selected habitats and species proposed by NGOs

؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ᐀ᔀᔀᔀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀᜀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀ᠀ᘀ ᐀ᔀᤀᨀᘀ ᐀ᤀᔀᤀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᨀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᬀᘀ ᐀ᨀᤀᤀᘀ ᐀ᰀᘀᨀᘀ ᐀ᬀᔀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᰀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᜀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᰀᘀ ᐀᠀ᤀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀Ḁᨀᔀᘀ ᐀ἀᘀᤀᘀ ᐀ἀᔀḀᘀᴀ ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ ᐀ἀᔀ!ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ᐀ᘀᴀ ᐀ἀᰀᔀᘀ ਀ᔀᘀᤀἀ ਀ᔀᘀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᘀḀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᘀἀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᘀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᤀᘀ ਀ᔀᔀᬀᨀ ਀ᔀᔀḀḀ ਀ᔀᨀᘀᨀ ਀ᔀᨀᨀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᰀ᠀᠀ ਀ᔀᜀᤀḀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᤀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᨀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ Ȁ& ᔀᤀᘀᔀ(ᨀ᠀ᔀᰀ(ᤀᜀ )" ᔀḀ*ᤀᰀ+ᔀḀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀḀ*ᜀᘀ+ᰀἀ)ᤀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā&%$؀฀܀'܀&Ȁ&%$؀ᘀᘀᔀ਀"ᬀḀᰀ "9଀ᄀᄀ'฀#" 2Ѐ-.Ѐఀ& ᠀ᰀᘀ(Ḁᘀᨀ(ᜀᤀ 4" ᔀ᠀*ᘀᨀ+ᔀ᠀)ᜀᔀ* ᰀḀ*ᰀᔀ+ᰀḀ)ᜀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀฀/01܀'܀$Ѐ-.Ѐఀ,଀Ѐᄀ"܀؀ᘀᘀᨀ਀"ᬀḀᜀ "Gఀ;+,଀ఀ#" ᘀ(ᤀἀᨀ(ᤀ᠀ )" ᔀḀ*ᰀᜀ+ᔀᨀ)ᜀḀ* ᰀἀ*ᔀḀ+ᰀḀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀฀0Ѐᄀ଀3܀'܀؀ఀࠀ฀0Ѐᄀ଀3%؀F܀ࠀ,7̀܀ᘀᘀᰀ਀"ᬀḀᬀ ";%ጀ-&7#" ᤀᔀᬀ(ᨀᔀᤀ(ᰀᜀ )" ᔀἀ*ᜀᔀ+ᔀᰀ)ᔀᬀ* ᰀἀ*ᘀᬀ+ᰀḀ)ᜀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā $؀0܀฀0Ѐᄀ$%5܀'܀4ࠀࠀȀ0ЀᄀȀ܀$؀0܀&%$ࠀ&Ѐ,Ѐ฀0Ѐᄀ"܀'&%,ᘀᘀᜀ਀"ᬀἀᨀ က଀@ఀࠀ#" ਀"ᬀἀᰀ က଀@ఀࠀ,%&'܀ကG6ᄀЀ Ḁ(Ḁᤀ ) ᔀἀ*ᤀᘀ+ ᰀḀ*ᜀ᠀+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᨀ(ᘀᜀᤀ(ᜀᜀ )" ᔀἀ*ᤀᘀ+ᔀᜀ)ᰀᔀ* ᰀἀ*ᘀᤀ+ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀Ѐ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀&%$3؀ఀ଀Ѐ,ᄀ଀-Ѐ฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ/܀'&%,਀"ᬀἀ᠀"#ᘀᘀᬀ က଀@ఀࠀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀C$%5؀฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ܀'܀$ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀AЀఀ%Ѐ AЀఀ%Ѐ ᠀(ᔀᜀ ) ᤀᘀ*ᘀᰀ+ ᰀḀ*ᜀḀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀%/ᄀ;&-܀Ѐ܀%/଀3&Ѐ-&;ᄀ$@؀?܀'&%,਀"ᬀἀḀ က଀@ఀࠀ "#ᘀᘀḀ਀"᠀ᘀᔀ က଀%&ࠀ,'฀-ࠀጀ$%ጀ6܀Ԁ0&ᄀ܀'܀฀-ࠀጀ$%76܀Ԁ05ᄀ ᔀ(ᨀ᠀ᔀ(ἀᤀ )" ᔀἀ*ᤀᘀ+ᔀᰀ)ᰀᔀ* ᰀἀ*ᘀᬀ+ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᔀᬀ(Ḁᨀᬀ(ᘀᘀ 4" ᔀἀ*ᘀᤀ+ᔀᰀ)ᜀᤀ* ᰀḀ*ᔀᤀ+ᜀᘀ)ᔀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀4܀&Ԁࠀ%-ЀȀ܀؀0Ѐ%ࠀ6଀3%؀"ᘀᘀἀ਀"᠀ᘀᤀ က଀ఀЀ,Ѐ#" +Ḁ(ᔀ᠀ ) ᔀ᠀*ᰀᔀ+ ᰀḀ*ᜀᔀ᠀ ܀<܀؀ࠀ&ࠀ$଀܀&ЀȀ؀-ЀᄀԀࠀ%<଀@܀଀3%1ࠀ&܀ࠀ6$ጀ1;Bࠀ%<0؀਀"᠀ᘀἀ ᐀ࠀ8 ࠀጀᄀȀ଀ᄀሀ ᔀᘀᜀᤀ(ᬀἀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀1%$؀ጀ22%܀8܀'؀-܀Ȁࠀ,ࠀ@Ѐᄀࠀ-଀଀؀-ఀ$&܀ጀ1;Bࠀ$܀؀%$؀"ᘀᔀᰀ ᐀ࠀ#" Ȁࠀ,ࠀఀ$ ਀"᠀ᔀᨀ ကጀ&Ѐ,଀-Ѐ ᨀ(ᰀḀ ) ᤀᔀ*ᔀḀ+ ᰀἀ*ᔀᬀ+ Ā Ā Ѐ$ ᔀᤀἀ(ᬀᰀᘀ(ἀ᠀ )" ᔀḀ*ᜀᘀ+ᔀᰀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀḀ*ᨀḀ+ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā-%܀5%$؀8܀'܀Ѐ-$ఀ%܀$Ѐ-%܀&%$؀"਀"᠀ᔀᜀ"#ᘀᔀᜀ ကጀఀ଀$Ѐ ࠀ ᔀᰀἀ(ᤀᨀᔀ(ḀḀ 4" ᔀḀ*ᜀḀ+ᔀᰀ)ᜀᘀ* ᰀḀ*ᔀᰀ+ᜀᘀ)ᨀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā%$؀%9ࠀ܀'܀ࠀ%$؀%9ࠀ؀Ȁࠀ,Ѐ2-؀਀"᠀ᤀ᠀"#ᘀᔀḀ F *ᨀᨀᘀ(ᤀᜀᔀ(ᬀἀ )" ᤀᘀ*ᤀᰀ+ᔀᨀ)ᘀ᠀* ᰀḀ*ᜀᔀ+ᜀᘀ)ᔀᜀ ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀਀"᠀ᨀᨀ"#ᘀᔀἀ F$;ᄀ&;9ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$% 9ࠀጀ.ࠀ6$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ਀"᠀ᨀἀ Fࠀ&2ЀȀ%&'܀᐀ࠀ<Ѐ ᰀ(Ḁἀ ) ᔀἀ*ᔀ᠀+ ᰀἀ*ᔀ᠀+ ἀ(ᰀᤀ : ᔀᬀ)ᨀᰀ* ᰀḀ)ᜀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀଀00$,܀؀ࠀ.3%܀؀ᘀᤀᔀ 9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%#" ਀"᠀ᰀᘀ Fࠀ9ጀ2ࠀ, ᠀(ᰀᰀ ) ᤀᔀ*ᔀᰀ+ ᰀἀ*ᘀḀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ࠀ.3%܀9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%1 ᨀ(ἀḀᰀ(ἀᰀ )" ᔀ᠀*ᤀᬀ+ᔀ᠀)ᤀḀ* ᰀḀ*ᰀᤀ+ᰀἀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀&%ᄀ଀;&-܀؀Ѐ,0଀ᄀ଀3%#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀ᘀᤀᤀ਀"᠀ᰀᨀ F;DЀ,!଀0#" +ᰀ(ᨀᬀ ) ᔀḀ*ᰀᰀ+ ᰀἀ*ᔀἀ ܀0଀ᄀ଀3%1,<#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀଀0!܀'܀$ጀ9Ѐऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ$%؀̀ ᠀਀"᠀ᰀ -&;ᄀ/%& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᨀᬀ(ḀḀ ) ᔀḀ*ᤀἀ+ ᰀḀ*ᜀᔀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀<܀2؀,؀%܀C܀HጀȀᄀࠀ܀؀&%਀"᠀ᰀἀ ̀଀ఀ2଀Ѐᄀ ᄀࠀ2ఀB ᬀᘀ(Ḁᨀ " ᔀᨀ)ᨀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā܀C܀HጀȀᄀࠀ܀؀&%ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ2଀Ѐᄀ܀'܀ᘀᤀᨀ ̀଀ఀༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ#" ਀"᠀ᜀᘀ"#ᘀᤀᰀ ̀଀,&;᐀ࠀ;$ࠀ6଀3%&܀-&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀ ᔀ(ἀᔀᘀ(ᨀ᠀ 4" ᔀ᠀*ᘀᨀ+ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᰀḀ*ᨀᤀ+ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* ᐀ࠀ;?ࠀ6଀3%5܀-&;ᄀ/% Ā Ā +᠀ᔀᘀᤀ(ᰀᔀ ) ᔀḀ*ᨀᬀ+ ᰀḀ*ᤀ -؀,Āᄀࠀ܀:&%਀"᠀ᜀᤀ 4ࠀB2ࠀᄀ "#ᘀᤀᜀ ᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ଀ᄀ$%Ѐ܀Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀ ᨀḀ(ἀᬀ : ᔀ᠀)ᘀ᠀* ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ ᰀ(ᔀἀ 4 ᔀḀ*ᤀḀ+ ᰀḀ*ᔀᬀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā܀<%$ࠀ,᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ/ᄀ&؀?܀:,਀"᠀ᜀᰀ ̀ࠀ +᠀ᄀ଀-Ѐ ᰀ(ἀḀ ) ᔀἀ*ᤀᰀ+ ᰀἀ*ᤀ؀%EЀ܀'&%,਀"᠀ᬀᤀ J2Ѐ ᨀᬀἀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀଀00$,܀&,3-6܀؀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%܀Ѐ܀؀%$ᘀᤀ᠀ ᐀ࠀ$ఀ&ᄀ#" ᨀᰀ(ᔀᨀ ) ᔀἀ*ᔀ᠀+ ᰀἀ*ᤀᤀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā &,3-6܀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%1܀Ѐ܀ᄀ'᐀ࠀ$ఀ5ᄀ$%1%؀က܀'&%,਀"᠀ᬀᨀ J2Ѐ ਀"᠀ᬀᰀ J2Ѐ,%&'܀4ࠀ$Bࠀ2Ѐ ᤀ(ᨀᜀ ) ᔀἀ*ᤀᜀ+ ᰀἀ*ᨀᨀ+ "#ᘀᤀḀ ᰀᜀ(ᘀᬀ " ᔀᰀ)ᜀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā +ᘀ(ᜀᤀ ) ᔀἀ*ᤀᨀ+ ᰀἀ*ᨀᘀ ܀'܀A0ЀȀЀ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀3܀7᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$%Ѐ$؀%؀#܀਀"᠀ᬀᜀ J2Ѐ,%&7 A0ЀȀ> Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀C܀<᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$% ਀"᠀ᬀ᠀ J%ఀ2'܀ကG&Ѐ ᬀ(ᨀᘀ ) ᔀἀ*ᘀᜀ+ ᰀḀ*ᨀᨀ+ ᨀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀AЀ0$܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᨀᘀ A#" ᨀ(ᨀἀ 4 ᤀᔀ*ᘀᨀ+ ᰀḀ*ᰀᘀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀?AЀ0܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀Ԁ؀-,਀"᠀᠀ᤀ 4Ѐ0ࠀ ᤀ(Ḁἀᔀ(ᬀᜀ )" ᔀḀ*ᰀ᠀+ᔀḀ)ᤀᔀ* ᰀḀ*ᔀḀ+ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀FȀ-Ѐ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀A؀-ᄀ଀؀3؀ᘀᨀᔀ਀"᠀᠀ᬀ 4#" +FȀ-& ᰀ(ᔀḀ ) ᤀᔀ*ᘀᬀ+ ᰀἀ*ᤀᬀ܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀ఀ2ࠀ,'Ԁ؀਀"᠀᠀᠀ 4 "#ᘀᨀᨀ ",-଀;&܀,଀00$܀'܀",<଀;& ᔀḀᤀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀ᠀)ᔀ᠀* ᰀἀ)ᘀḀ* Ā Ā Ā ਀"᠀Ḁᘀ 4.$Ѐ܀@2଀܀KЀ2ᄀࠀ,଀-଀ ἀ(ᜀᰀ ) ᔀḀ*ᨀᬀ+ ᰀḀ*ᨀᨀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *᠀ᘀᤀᜀ(ᘀ᠀ )" ᔀḀ*ᜀᬀ+ᔀᜀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀḀ*ᨀ᠀+ᰀἀ)ᤀ)᠀ ܀Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%5=܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀&ࠀ,'=Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%$؀਀"᠀Ḁᨀ"#ᘀᨀᰀ 4଀ఀ .ࠀఀࠀ% Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā +ᨀ(ᨀᘀ 4 ᔀḀ*ᜀḀ+ ᰀḀ*ᔀᘀ ؀-,਀"᠀Ḁᰀ 4$'9Lࠀ ᔀ᠀ἀ(ᜀᨀ " ᔀᤀ)ᰀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā /;<>؀=܀'܀Ѐ;଀-؀= ᘀᨀᜀ#" ᘀ(ᘀᔀ ) ᔀ᠀*ᔀḀ+ ᰀḀ*ᨀᨀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā 2؀ఀ؀4܀:&-؀,਀"᠀Ḁᜀ 4$Ѐ ᄀ/%& Ḁᬀᨀ(᠀ᔀ " ᔀ᠀)ᤀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā؀$؀=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%ᄀ଀؀$؀= ᘀᨀᬀ#" ᤀᔀ(ᨀᤀ ) ᤀᘀ*ᤀᬀ+ ᰀḀ*ᨀᬀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā -؀,9଀؀਀"᠀Ḁᬀ 4$ "#ᘀᨀḀ =଀-଀%ࠀ6$%&܀-&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀ ᘀ(ᤀ᠀ " ᔀᜀ)ᨀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᰀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ਀"᠀Ḁ᠀ 4$ࠀ%&7܀ᄀЀȀ܀?ࠀ2;%ࠀጀ=଀;<#܀Ѐ܀1%3؀2ࠀጀఀ܀'܀ЀȀࠀ4$؀Ԁ ᤀ0ࠀጀ%& ᤀ(ᘀᬀ ) ᤀᘀ*ᤀᔀ+ ᰀἀ*ᘀᬀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā܀4ࠀ@2ЀȀ܀2؀,H଀܀<܀ᤀ܀4ࠀ@2ЀȀ܀Ѐ&؀਀"᠀ἀᬀ H଀ "#ᘀᰀᨀ਀"Ḁᘀᨀ HЀ13Ѐ2ࠀഀࠀ,0ጀȀ%&܀'܀2ࠀഀࠀ,07Ȁ%& ᘀ(ᔀ᠀ᘀ(᠀ᤀ )" ᔀἀ*ᤀḀ+ᔀᰀ)ᨀἀ* ᰀἀ*ᤀἀ+ᰀἀ)ᔀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᔀ(ᘀᘀ ) ᔀἀ*ᨀᔀ+ ᰀἀ*ᨀᤀ+ Ā Ā ؀-਀"Ḁᘀᰀ HЀ13଀ ᨀᘀᤀ(ᤀᤀ " ᔀᜀ)ᰀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᰀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀?ࠀᄀࠀ%-2܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀؀$ᘀᰀᰀ 2-%ࠀᄀࠀ#" "#ᘀᰀᬀ਀"Ḁᘀᬀ HЀȀ,Ѐ0܀ᄀЀȀ܀8ጀᄀЀDࠀԀ2-଀6ࠀ%0Ѐఀ$%ࠀ܀'܀2<଀6ࠀ%0>ఀ$%ࠀ ᬀᔀᜀ(ᨀᨀᘀ(ᤀᘀ 4" ᔀḀ*ᤀᘀ+ᔀᨀ)ᜀᔀ* ᰀ᠀*ᰀᬀ+ᜀᘀ)ᘀᘀ* Ā ਀"ḀᘀḀ HЀ&ࠀ,' ᘀ(ᔀᔀ ) ᔀḀ*ᰀᜀ+ ᰀἀ*ᤀᬀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᨀᔀ᠀(᠀ᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᔀᰀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀$؀ЀᄀȀ$ఀࠀᄀ$܀؀଀$%ࠀ63.܀؀%$;ᘀᰀ᠀ ကЀ#" ᔀᜀ(ᬀᤀ 4 ᔀ᠀*ᘀ᠀+ ᰀḀ*ᤀᬀ+ Ā Ā ؀ࠀ63%$/.܀਀"Ḁᔀᰀ H଀ЀȀࠀ&ကЀ;$%1 က଀;Ѐ6> ᰀᔀḀ(ᜀᘀᘀ(ᤀḀ )" ᤀᔀ*ᜀᔀ+ᔀ᠀)ᰀᘀ* ᰀἀ*ᔀᰀ+ᰀἀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀'܀က଀;Ѐ6Ѐ؀-,਀"Ḁᔀᜀ"#ᘀᰀḀ Hࠀ9&ࠀ *ἀᤀ(ᰀᬀᤀ(ᔀᨀ )" ᤀᘀ*ᰀᤀ+ᔀ᠀)ᘀᬀ* ᰀḀ*ᜀᤀ+ᰀἀ)ᰀᤀ ܀1%$0؀က଀ఀࠀ6܀'܀ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6଀:܀؀%$0؀਀"ḀᔀḀ"#ᘀᰀἀ HጀȀ0Ѐᄀ;က଀ఀࠀ6 :ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6/ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ਀"Ḁᤀᤀ Hጀ6଀ᄀ' ᠀(ᤀ᠀ ) ᔀἀ*ᨀᤀ+ ᰀḀ*ᤀᜀ+ ࠀఀࠀ% ᠀(ᜀᔀ " ᔀᤀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā.܀/ကጀ@ᄀ܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀ᘀᜀᔀ ကጀഀᄀ଀#" 2ࠀ& ᔀᨀ(ᤀἀ ) ᔀἀ*ᔀ᠀+ ᰀἀ*ᘀᤀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀਀"Ḁᤀᨀ Hጀ6ࠀԀ1 ᔀ(ἀἀ : ᔀᬀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀḀ)ᰀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀D&9܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᤀ A#" +ᄀ7 ᘀ(ᘀ᠀ ) ᔀἀ*ᤀᰀ+ ᰀἀ*ᨀᤀ$؀਀"Ḁᨀᘀ ਀଀B Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀D&9 ਀"Ḁᨀᔀ ਀଀B$Ѐ ᘀ(ᜀᘀ ) ᔀἀ*ᨀḀ+ ᰀḀ*ᰀᔀ+ ᔀ(ᜀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᘀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᜀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀ȀЀ؀਀Ԁ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᨀ A#" ਀ԀBȀ1 ᨀ(ᘀᨀ 4 ᤀᘀ*ᨀᤀ+ ᰀḀ*ᨀᰀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀਀"Ḁᨀᤀ ਀଀$଀-ЀA 0ጀ,& ᔀᜀ(᠀ᘀᨀ(ᰀἀ 4" ᤀᘀ*ᨀᘀ+ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᰀḀ*ᨀᤀ+ᜀᘀ)ᔀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀AB0ᄀ଀3%1܀'܀&,0ጀ܀؀0ᄀ଀3%؀ഀࠀ,'A؀฀2܀'&-ᘀᜀᰀ਀"Ḁᨀᨀ ਀଀$଀#" ᜀᨀ(ᤀḀᘀ(ἀᬀ )" ᔀḀ*ᘀᰀ+ᔀᰀ)ᨀᜀ* ᰀḀ*ᜀᜀ+ᜀᘀ)ᨀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ࠀ6%Ѐ,3؀;က଀܀ࠀऀ܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀+ᘀᜀᬀ਀"Ḁᨀᜀ ਀&Ѐ$Ѐ#" ਀"Ḁᨀᬀ ਀&Ѐ$଀ఀ7:$ࠀ6%Ѐ܀'܀Aࠀ%<ЀȀ&܀က଀;B3,ࠀ6%&܀Ѐ܀ Ḁ(ᨀᔀ ) ᔀḀ*ᜀᬀ+ ᰀἀ*ᨀᔀ+ 114 :?ࠀ6%& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 115 +ᄀ7 ᘀ(ᨀᤀ ) ᔀḀ*ᰀḀ+ ᰀḀ*ᰀἀ؀$&਀"ḀᨀḀ ਀ "#ᘀᜀ᠀ Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%&܀%-Ѐ$܀%Ѐ-$ఀ܀'܀Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%5܀ ᠀᠀(ᨀᜀ " ᔀᬀ)ᰀᨀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ѐ%ఀ%-Ѐ$ ᤀḀ(ᤀἀ ) ᔀḀ*ᨀᘀ+ ᰀḀ*ᨀᨀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀܀C܀3؀2.1?܀<܀BࠀȀ-:,܀C܀3؀਀"Ḁᨀἀ ?2.1 *ᤀ(ᬀᔀᘀ(ᨀᔀ 4" ᤀᘀ*ᔀἀ+ᔀᜀ)ᜀᤀ* ᰀḀ*ᤀᜀ+ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ ܀2؀ࠀI$܀C܀'਀$Ѐᄀ܀<܀&ఀࠀ܀:Ȁࠀ$ᄀ܀C܀'0Ѐ3,ఀB:܀Ѐ̀܀'܀؀0Ѐ3,ఀ:܀ᘀᜀḀ਀"Ḁᰀᘀ ਀$Ѐᄀ̀Ѐ#" ЀԀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀ఀ2% "#ᘀᬀᘀ ကጀ,Ѐ܀ЀᄀȀ܀G&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ܀'܀̀଀6Ѐ܀ ᔀ(᠀ᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā G&;ᄀ/% ᤀᤀᘀ(ᤀᬀ ) ᤀᔀ*ᤀἀ+ ᰀḀ*ᜀᘀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀ࠀఀࠀ%Ѐ.܀Ѐ܀&,ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ%ကጀ܀؀&%਀$'ᄀ܀<܀;B-2,܀؀&%਀"Ḁᰀᔀ ਀$'ᄀ ḀḀ " ᔀᜀ)ᬀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā)᠀ ܀଀6Ѐ̀܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀F-0଀3܀ࠀऀ܀ᘀᬀᔀ !0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ#" ᔀ(ᨀἀ ) ᤀᘀ*ᤀḀ+ ᰀḀ*ᨀᰀ+ Ā Ā Ā ؀F-0଀3&؀%਀"Ḁᰀᤀ ༀࠀԀ1Ѐ ᔀᜀᬀ(ᘀᜀᔀᜀ(᠀ἀ )" ᔀḀ*ᰀḀ+ᔀᨀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀἀ*ᔀᬀ+ᜀᘀ)ᨀᰀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀ࠀሀ;܀؀0଀ᄀ଀$ఀ؀$Ѐ-܀؀%$6ᄀ଀-Ѐ̀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ؀ᘀᬀᰀ਀"Ḁᰀᬀ ਀ᄀ#" 0଀ᄀ଀?ఀB ᘀ(ᘀᬀ 4 ᤀᔀ*ᔀᰀ+ ᰀḀ*ᨀᬀ+ Ā؀?Ѐ-܀਀"ḀᰀḀ ਀ࠀ&ࠀ<Ѐᄀ;̀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ$%1 *ἀᨀ(᠀ᤀᤀ(ᰀᨀ )" ᤀᘀ*ᨀᨀ+ᔀᰀ)ᰀᘀ* ᰀḀ*ᜀᜀ+ᰀḀ)ᨀἀ ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀%$ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ̀%؀#܀',ࠀ̀܀'&਀"Ḁᜀᘀ"#ᘀᬀᜀ ਀@଀9% ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ਀"Ḁᜀᜀ ਀ఀЀᄀ&ࠀ,Ѐᄀ; ᔀἀ(ᜀᰀ ) ᔀἀ*ᔀᔀ+ ᰀἀ*ᔀᘀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ਀"Ḁᜀᬀ ਀ఀЀ2'܀฀;%ఀ2଀-Ѐ ᘀ(ᘀᜀ ) ᔀḀ*ᜀ᠀+ ᰀἀ*ᤀᔀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā ਀"Ḁᜀ᠀ ကG3Ѐᄀ%&'܀FЀ$'܀!Ѐఀ2Ѐ ᔀᨀᨀ(ᘀᤀ ) ᔀḀ*ᰀᜀ+ ᰀἀ*ᘀᤀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᄀ' ᘀ(ἀᜀ ) ᤀᘀ*ᤀᔀ+ ᰀḀ*ᜀᔀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀਀"ḀᜀḀ ਀ఀ2Ѐఀ Ѐఀ2ЀԀ଀ ᘀ(ᤀᘀ ) ᤀᘀ*ᤀᘀ+ ᰀἀ*ᘀᨀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā?܀ࠀȀ@܀؀਀"Ḁᜀἀ ਀ఀ2'6 Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Slovakia

؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ᐀ᔀᔀᔀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀᜀᘀ ᐀ᔀᔀ᠀ᘀ ᐀ᔀᤀᨀᘀ ᐀ᤀᔀᤀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᨀᘀ ᐀ᨀᔀᬀᘀ ᐀ᨀᤀᤀᘀ ᐀ᰀᘀᨀᘀ ᐀ᬀᔀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᤀᰀᘀᴀ ᐀ᬀᜀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᔀᘀᴀ ᐀᠀ᔀᰀᘀ ᐀᠀ᤀᤀᘀᴀ ᐀Ḁᨀᔀᘀ ᐀ἀᘀᤀᘀ ᐀ἀᔀḀᘀᴀ ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ ᐀ἀᔀ!ᘀ ᐀ἀᔀ᐀ᘀᴀ ᐀ἀᰀᔀᘀ ਀ᔀᘀᤀἀ ਀ᔀᘀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᘀḀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᘀἀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᘀᬀ ਀ᔀᔀᤀᘀ ਀ᔀᔀᬀᨀ ਀ᔀᔀḀḀ ਀ᔀᨀᘀᨀ ਀ᔀᨀᨀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᰀᴀ ਀ᔀᨀᜀᜀ ਀ᔀᨀᬀᔀ ਀ᔀᰀ᠀᠀ ਀ᔀᜀᤀḀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᤀ ਀ᔀἀᘀᨀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ Ȁ& ᔀᤀᘀᔀ(ᨀ᠀ἀ(ᜀᤀ 4" ᔀḀ*ᜀᘀ+ᔀḀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀḀ*ᔀᜀ+ᰀἀ)ᤀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā&%$؀฀܀'܀&Ȁ&%$؀฀؀-,ᘀᘀᔀ਀"Ḁᬀ᠀ ਀GȀࠀ#" 2Ѐ-.Ѐఀ& ᠀ᰀᘀ(Ḁᘀᔀ(ᰀᤀ 4" ᔀ᠀*ᤀ᠀+ᔀ᠀)ᜀᔀ* ᰀḀ*ᤀᰀ+ᰀḀ)ᜀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀฀/01܀'܀$Ѐ-.Ѐఀ,଀Ѐᄀ"܀؀4Ѐ2ᄀࠀጀ+,଀ఀ܀ᄀЀȀ܀'ᘀᘀᨀ਀"ḀᬀḀ ਀ጀ-B#" ᘀ(ᘀᤀᨀ(ᤀ᠀ )" ᔀḀ*ᤀᜀ+ᔀᨀ)ᜀḀ* ᰀἀ*ᔀἀ+ᰀḀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀฀0Ѐᄀ଀3܀'܀؀ᘀᘀᰀ਀"Ḁ᠀ᬀ /ఀ଀Ѐ,ᄀ଀&฀0Ѐᄀ଀3#" ᤀᔀᬀ(ᨀᔀᤀ(Ḁᰀ )" ᤀᘀ*ᘀᬀ+ᔀᰀ)ᔀᬀ* ᰀḀ*ᜀᘀ+ᰀḀ)ᜀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā $؀0܀฀0Ѐᄀ$%5܀'܀4ࠀࠀȀ0ЀᄀȀ܀$؀0܀&%$ᘀᘀᜀ਀"Ḁ᠀Ḁ /ጀԀ଀Ѐ-฀0Ѐᄀ#" ᨀ(ᰀἀ ) ᤀᘀ*ᤀᔀ+ ᰀἀ*ᘀᔀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀-,਀"Ḁ᠀ἀ /,'1ࠀ *ᜀᰀᤀ(ᜀᜀ )" ᤀᘀ*ᔀᨀ+ᔀᜀ)ᰀᔀ* ᰀḀ*ᜀᔀ+ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ)᠀ ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀Ѐ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀&%$3؀ሀ'2ఀ฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ$؀? ਀"ḀḀᔀ"#ᘀᘀᬀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀C$%5؀฀ࠀ,ȀЀᄀ܀'܀$ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀AЀఀ%Ѐ AЀఀ%Ѐ ᔀᨀ(ᤀᤀ ) ᔀḀ*ᜀᜀ+ ᰀḀ*ᤀἀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀%/ᄀ;&-܀Ѐ܀%/ᄀ;&-'$@؀? ਀"ḀḀᤀ Ԁ05ᄀ ᤀᰀ(Ḁᨀᔀ(ἀᤀ )" ᔀἀ*ᘀᰀ+ᔀᰀ)ᰀᔀ* ᰀἀ*ᔀ᠀+ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀฀-ࠀጀ$%76܀'܀Ԁ0&ᄀ܀Bࠀ,'฀-ࠀጀ$%ጀ6-2؀? ᘀᘀḀ਀"ḀḀᨀ#" ᔀᬀ(ᜀᨀᔀᬀ(Ḁᨀ )" ᔀἀ*ᘀᔀ+ᔀᰀ)ᜀᤀ* ᰀḀ*ᨀᬀ+ᜀᘀ)ᔀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀4܀&Ԁࠀ%-ЀȀ܀؀0Ѐ%ࠀ6଀3%؀"᐀ࠀ2Ѐ܀',ᘀᘀἀ਀"Ḁἀᔀ ?2ᄀЀ#" +ᔀᘀ(ἀᬀ ) ᤀᔀ*ᜀᬀ+ ᰀḀ*ᜀᔀ ܀C܀ЀȀ&"2଀,ࠀ9ఀ଀Ѐᄀ%&Ѐ>%܀<܀DጀB܀ԀࠀC܀1%܀ࠀ6,ࠀ9ఀ଀Ѐ଀3ᄀ&Ѐ%<0؀਀"Ḁἀᤀ "2଀8 ᔀᘀᜀᤀ(ᬀἀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᜀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀1%$؀8܀'܀Ȁࠀ,ࠀ-଀؀-ఀB $ఀ܀؀%$؀"ᘀᔀᰀ %ࠀጀ#" Ȁࠀ,ࠀఀ$ ਀"Ḁἀᨀ ?2ᄀࠀ,7 ᔀ(ᘀᘀ ) ᔀḀ*ᰀἀ+ ᰀἀ*ᔀᔀ+ Ā Ā Ѐ$ ᔀᤀἀ(ᬀᰀᘀ(ᨀᰀ )" ᔀἀ*ᨀᬀ+ᔀᰀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀἀ*ᤀ᠀+ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā-%܀5%$؀8܀'܀Ѐ-$ఀ%܀$Ѐ-%܀&%$؀"'ᄀ؀਀"Ḁἀᰀ"#ᘀᔀᜀ ?2%ఀ ᔀᰀἀ(ᤀᨀᰀ(ᤀᬀ 4" ᤀᔀ*ᔀἀ+ᔀᰀ)ᜀᘀ* ᰀḀ*ᨀᰀ+ᜀᘀ)ᨀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀<܀᐀ࠀ2ᄀ'Ȁጀ܀ఀࠀ&ጀ܀Ȁࠀ$ᄀ7Bࠀ܀؀ЀᄀȀ2؀ࠀ%$؀%9ࠀ܀'܀ࠀ%$؀%਀"Ḁἀᜀ"#ᘀᔀḀ F9ࠀ *ᨀᨀᘀ(ᤀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᘀ᠀* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᜀ ܀ࠀऀ ܀'܀Ԁ܀$Ѐᄀ؀ጀᄀఀ%ఀЀ଀2܀2؀Ԁࠀ$ࠀI܀&-܀؀ࠀఀB,܀ऀ܀ࠀ܀%2؀%$6؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᔀἀ F9ࠀጀ.ࠀ#" ᐀ࠀ9ࠀጀ.ࠀ2ᄀ'Ȁ6$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *ᔀᬀἀ(ᰀᤀ ): ᔀἀ*ᤀḀ+ᔀᬀ)ᨀᰀ* ᰀḀ*ᤀᬀ+ᰀḀ)ᜀᔀ)᠀ ܀'܀଀00$,܀؀ࠀ.3%܀؀ᘀᤀᔀ਀"Ḁἀᬀ ?ጀB'29ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀ࠀ.3%܀9ጀᄀЀDࠀ6଀3%1 ਀"Ḁἀ᠀ ?ጀ2Ѐᄀ; ἀ(ᤀᨀ ) ᔀἀ*ᘀᤀ+ ᰀἀ*ᘀḀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *᠀ᘀ(᠀ᨀᰀ(ἀᰀ )" ᔀḀ*ᤀᘀ+ᔀ᠀)ᤀḀ* ᰀḀ*ᨀᜀ+ᰀἀ)ᔀ ܀&%ᄀ଀;&-܀؀Ѐ,0଀ᄀ଀3%#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀਀"ḀἀḀ"#ᘀᤀᤀ ?ጀ23଀Ѐᄀ&;!଀0 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀0଀ᄀ଀3%1,<#܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ؀଀0!܀'܀$ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ ਀"ἀᘀᰀ #Ѐ$&ࠀ,-&;ᄀ/%& ᘀ(ᤀᤀ ) ᤀᔀ*ᨀἀ+ ᰀἀ*ᘀᰀ+ Ā Ā Ā ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ ᬀᘀ(Ḁᨀᬀ(ᬀἀ )" ᔀἀ*ᜀ᠀+ᔀᨀ)ᨀḀ* ᰀἀ*ᘀᜀ+ᜀᘀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀'܀ༀ-ጀᄀ4Ѐ0Ȁ-؀ᘀᤀᨀ਀"ἀᘀᜀ #Ѐ6#" ᨀ(ᔀ᠀ ) ᔀḀ*ᔀᬀ+ ᰀḀ*ᤀᬀ+ Ā Ā Ā ؀-3଀$؀#܀C܀3؀਀"ἀᘀ᠀ ?2.1 "#ᘀᤀᰀ ᐀ࠀ;$ࠀ6଀3%&܀-&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀'܀ ᘀ(ᨀ᠀ " ᔀᰀ)ᘀḀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ᄀ/% Ḁ(ᨀᘀ ) ᤀᘀ*ᤀᬀ+ ᰀἀ*ᤀᘀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā;&-܀ᄀ'᐀ࠀ;?ࠀ6଀3%5%؀က܀'&>؀# ਀"ἀᘀἀ *ᨀḀ(ἀᬀᘀ(ἀ᠀ 4: ᔀḀ*ᔀḀ+ᔀ᠀)ᘀ᠀* ᰀḀ*ᔀᘀ+ᰀḀ)ᜀᨀ ܀'܀Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ܀FЀ0Ѐ᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ଀ᄀ$%Ѐ܀'&>؀# ਀"ἀᔀᘀ"#ᘀᤀᜀ ᐀ࠀȀࠀᄀ/ᄀ$%>܀Ȁࠀጀ;-Ѐ6Ѐ Ā Ā Ā Ā +ᘀ(ᨀᔀ ) ᔀḀ*ᘀἀ+ ᰀḀ*ᰀᘀ ؀᐀ࠀ%ఀ܀7&>؀# ਀"ἀᔀᔀ ᨀᬀἀ(ἀᰀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᤀ* ᰀἀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā ܀'܀଀00$,܀&,3-6܀؀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%܀Ѐ܀؀%$ᘀᤀ᠀ ᐀ࠀ$ఀ&ᄀ#" ᘀ(ᰀ᠀ 4 ᔀḀ*ᰀᤀ+ ᰀḀ*ᘀᰀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā &,3-6܀E଀ഀࠀ6଀3%1܀Ѐ܀᐀ࠀ$ఀ5ᄀ$%1&؀%؀4܀:&>؀# ਀"ἀᔀᜀ ᤀ(ᨀᤀ ) ᔀḀ*ᰀḀ+ ᰀἀ*ᔀᘀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀3ᄀ؀਀ఀ2܀2଀@܀਀"ἀᔀἀ #଀90ࠀ,7 *ᨀ᠀(ᘀᬀᰀᜀ(ᘀᬀ )" ᤀᘀ*ᰀᬀ+ᔀᰀ)ᜀᨀ* ᰀḀ*ᜀᔀ+ᜀᘀ)ᔀᬀ ܀'܀A0ЀȀЀ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀3܀਀$ࠀ,଀ᄀ&;᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$%Ѐ܀਀"ἀᤀᜀ"#ᘀᤀḀ #;9ᄀ7 A0ЀȀ> Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀Ѐ܀ᄀЀ6Ѐ-؀C܀<᐀-Ѐ;Ѐᄀࠀ6$% ਀"ἀᤀ᠀ #;9ᄀ:܀਀$Ѐ,&ࠀ, ᠀(ᔀᔀ ) ᤀᘀ*ᜀᰀ+ ᰀἀ*ᘀᰀ+ ᨀ(ᨀᨀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀AЀ0$܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᨀᘀ A#" +ࠀ3଀ ᔀ(᠀᠀ ) ᤀᘀ*ᨀἀ+ ᰀἀ*ᘀᰀ,؀က܀2଀@܀਀"ἀᨀᘀ M',ЀȀЀ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀?AЀ0܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀Ԁ +ᰀ(᠀᠀ ) ᤀᘀ*ᨀ᠀+ ᰀḀ*ᜀᤀ ؀,ࠀ&@؀$'̀܀2଀@܀਀"ἀᨀᤀ M',ЀȀ&Ѐ ᔀ(ᬀᜀ " ᔀḀ)ᤀᔀ* ᰀἀ)ᜀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀/᐀-Ѐᄀ଀Cᄀ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀FȀ-Ѐ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᨀᔀ A#" FȀ-& ᨀᰀ(ᰀᤀ ) ᔀḀ*ᔀ᠀+ ᰀḀ*ᨀᔀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀਀"ἀᨀ᠀ M$ЀఀᄀࠀԀ "#ᘀᨀᨀ਀"ἀᨀḀ Mࠀ1ࠀ2",-଀;&܀,଀00$܀'܀",<଀;& ᔀḀᤀ(ᨀᨀᘀ(ᤀᔀ )" ᔀḀ*ᘀᜀ+ᔀ᠀)ᔀ᠀* ᰀḀ*ᤀᘀ+ᰀἀ)ᘀḀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā *᠀ᔀᔀ(ᔀᬀᜀ(ᘀ᠀ )" ᔀḀ*ᰀᔀ+ᔀᜀ)ᤀᤀ* ᰀḀ*ᤀḀ+ᰀἀ)ᤀ ܀Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%5=܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀&Ѐᄀ%ࠀ6$%=؀ఀ2'ᄀ%܀ᘀᨀᰀ਀"ἀᰀᤀ KЀ2ᄀࠀ,଀-&7#" .ࠀఀࠀ% Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ਀"ἀᰀ᠀ ਀ఀ2'6ࠀ,%&7܀#2-B;܀ഀ'@ЀȀ܀>܀ ᔀᰀᬀ(ᬀᬀ ) ᔀḀ*ᔀᰀ+ ᰀḀ*ᜀᜀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ఀ ᔀ᠀ἀ(ᜀᨀ " ᔀᤀ)ᰀᨀ* ᜀᘀ)ᤀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā%؀I܀%ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀6ࠀ,%&7'2/;<>؀=܀'܀Ѐ;଀-؀=ᘀᨀᜀ ਀ఀ#" ᄀ/%& ᔀᘀἀ(ḀᤀḀᬀᨀ(᠀ᔀ )" ᔀ᠀*ᔀᜀ+ᔀ᠀)ᤀᘀ* ᰀḀ*ᤀᨀ+ᜀᘀ)ᘀᬀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā؀$؀=܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&%ᄀ଀؀$؀=;Ѐ2@Ѐఀ"܀ᘀᨀᬀ਀"ἀᰀḀ FЀ$7#" *ᰀᬀ(ᤀᤀᘀ(ᤀ᠀ )" ᤀᔀ*ᜀᰀ+ᔀᜀ)ᨀᤀ* ᰀἀ*ᘀᜀ+ᰀἀ)ᰀᰀ ܀'܀ऀ଀$,.ࠀᄀȀ܀%ᄀ଀;&-܀&ကЀ1ࠀ2-ࠀԀ=଀-଀%ࠀ6$%܀ᄀЀȀ܀-؀,ᘀᨀḀ਀"ἀᰀἀ ᐀2Ѐ1ࠀ#" =଀;<#܀Ѐ܀1%3؀2ࠀጀఀ܀'܀ЀȀࠀ4$؀Ԁ ᤀ0ࠀጀ%& ᔀᘀ(᠀ᔀ ) ᤀᘀ*ᨀᘀ+ ᰀἀ*ᤀᨀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀;ᄀ଀ᄀ؀਀"ἀᜀᬀ 4଀ 2ࠀഀࠀ,07Ȁ%& ᔀᘀ(Ḁ᠀ᘀ(᠀ᤀ )" ᤀᔀ*ᘀᬀ+ᔀᰀ)ᨀἀ* ᰀἀ*ᔀḀ+ᰀἀ)ᔀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀'܀&%Bࠀ2Ѐ2ࠀഀࠀ,0ጀȀ܀',2଀"܀C܀,2ሀࠀ؀ᘀᰀᨀ਀"ἀᜀḀ 5#" ᨀᘀᤀ(ᤀᤀᔀ(ᘀᰀ )" ᤀᘀ*ᨀἀ+ᔀᜀ)ᰀᘀ* ᰀḀ*ᰀᰀ+ᜀᘀ)ᰀᨀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀?ࠀᄀࠀ%-2܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀؀$ᘀᰀᰀ਀"ἀᬀᘀ NBࠀ2ᄀ'2-%ࠀᄀࠀ#" ଀6ࠀ%0>ఀ$%ࠀ ᬀᔀᜀ(ᨀᨀᨀᰀ(ᤀᜀ )" ᤀᘀ*ᰀᤀ+ᔀᨀ)ᜀᔀ* ᰀḀ*ᨀḀ+ᜀᘀ)ᘀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā>2܀'܀ᤀ2-଀6ࠀ%0Ѐఀ$%ࠀ܀%2Ѐ"܀:&%ᄀ؀,ᘀᰀᬀ਀"ἀᬀᤀ ਀$ࠀ#" ᨀᔀ᠀(᠀ᨀᰀ(Ḁᨀ )" ᔀἀ*ᨀἀ+ᔀᰀ)ᔀᰀ* ᰀḀ*ᨀᨀ+ᜀᘀ)ᜀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀'܀$؀ЀᄀȀ$ఀࠀᄀ$܀؀଀$%ࠀ63.܀؀%$;ᘀᰀ᠀਀"ἀᬀᨀ က'ఀ&;ကЀ#" ᔀḀ(ᰀᔀ ) ᔀἀ*ᰀᨀ+ ᰀἀ*ᘀḀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀4ࠀȀఀЀఀ2Ѐᄀ%&7܀<܀ ؀ࠀ6$G&;3%$܀ఀЀఀ2Ѐᄀ%&7/.܀਀"ἀᬀᰀ 4ࠀȀကЀ;$%1 ሀ2Ѐ%%$ЀᄀȀ% Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā "#ᘀᰀḀ က଀;Ѐ6Ѐ܀'܀က଀;Ѐ6> ᰀᔀḀ(ᜀᘀ " ᔀ᠀)ᰀᘀ* ᰀἀ)ᰀᘀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ἀᤀ(ᰀᬀᔀ(ᘀᜀ )" ᤀᘀ*ᔀᘀ+ᔀ᠀)ᘀᬀ* ᰀἀ*ᘀᰀ+ᰀἀ)ᰀᤀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀1%$0؀က଀ఀࠀ6܀'܀ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6଀:܀؀%$0؀12ࠀࠀ&က଀ఀࠀ6܀;&%᐀Ѐሀ'ᄀ܀<܀&ࠀఀࠀ@܀;&%ᘀᰀἀ਀"ἀᬀᜀ ᐀Ѐሀ'ᄀ#" :ࠀԀࠀ-Ѐ6/ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ࠀఀࠀ% ᰀ(ᔀḀ᠀(ᜀᔀ )" ᤀᘀ*ᔀᔀ+ᔀᤀ)ᘀḀ* ᰀἀ*ᘀᨀ+ᜀᘀ)ᔀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā.܀/ကጀ@ᄀ܀'܀%؀؀-3܀%ࠀఀࠀ.܀଀-Ѐကጀഀᄀ଀$@؀?܀'&ᘀᜀᔀ਀"ἀᬀᬀ ਀@଀9%#" ᤀ(᠀ἀᔀ(ἀἀ ): ᤀᘀ*ᔀᤀ+ᔀᬀ)ᔀᤀ* ᰀἀ*ᘀᘀ+ᰀḀ)ᰀ᠀* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀D&9܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀ᘀᜀᤀ਀"ἀᬀḀ "2Ѐ,Ѐᄀ;A#" ᘀ᠀ 4 ᤀᘀ*ᨀᬀ+ ᰀḀ*ᨀᰀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā)᠀ ؀EЀ1$ࠀᄀ଀-Ѐ9&D܀'&-਀"ἀᬀἀ ਀଀$଀ *ᔀᬀ(ἀᨀᔀ(ᜀᔀ )" ᤀᘀ*ᰀᜀ+ᔀᜀ)ᘀᤀ* ᰀḀ*ᰀᤀ+ᜀᘀ)ᜀἀ ܀'܀-؀଀6-܀ȀЀ؀਀Ԁ܀ࠀऀ܀$-؀ЀᄀȀ؀਀Ԁࠀ$ᄀ.&A܀Ѐ܀%਀"ἀ᠀ᘀ"#ᘀᜀᨀ /ఀO ਀ԀBȀ1 Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀&-ЀᄀȀ؀A ਀"ἀ᠀ᔀ "ࠀD9ࠀ,%&'܀Bࠀ<Ѐ ᔀ᠀ἀ(ᤀᔀ ) ᤀᘀ*ᜀᜀ+ ᰀḀ*ᰀᬀ+ 0ጀ,& ᔀᜀ(᠀ᘀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀἀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀AB0ᄀ଀3%1܀'܀&,0ጀ܀؀0ᄀ଀3%؀ᘀᜀᰀ A#" ᄀ-$ࠀ,' ᔀ(ᤀ᠀ ) ᤀᘀ*ᨀᬀ+ ᰀḀ*ᰀᬀ+ Ā؀਀"ἀ᠀ᨀ ᐀ ᜀᨀ(ᤀḀ " ᔀᰀ)ᨀᜀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀ЀᄀȀ܀ࠀ6%Ѐ,3؀;က଀܀ࠀऀ܀$ఀ0ЀᄀȀ؀+ ᘀᜀᬀ#" ᤀᬀ(ᘀᬀ ) ᤀᘀ*ᰀ᠀+ ᰀἀ*ᘀḀ+ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ܀7 ܀Ѐ܀&ࠀ3%&%,؀က܀<ࠀ6,܀က଀;B3ࠀȀ܀B-:,܀&Aࠀ%<ЀȀ܀';B-2#܀7&%܀ࠀ6,ࠀ3%Ѐ$:؀਀"ἀ᠀ᰀ က Ѐ%ఀ 115؀܀%Ԁࠀ:?ࠀ6ጀᄀఀ%&Ѐ଀ᄀ 114 "#ᘀᜀ᠀ Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%&܀%-Ѐ$܀%Ѐ-$ఀ܀'܀Aࠀ-Ѐ6$%5܀ ᠀᠀(ᨀᜀ " ᔀᬀ)ᰀᨀ* ᰀἀ)ᤀᔀ* %-Ѐ$ Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 0Ѐ3,ఀB ᘀ(ᨀᔀ " ᔀᜀ)ᜀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ* Ā Ā Ā:܀Ѐ̀܀'܀؀0Ѐ3,ఀ:܀ᘀᜀḀ ̀Ѐ#" "#ᘀᬀᘀ ကጀ,Ѐ܀ЀᄀȀ܀G&;ᄀ଀%܀ऀ0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ܀'܀̀଀6Ѐ܀ ᔀ(᠀ᬀ " ᔀ᠀)ᜀᜀ* ᰀἀ)ᨀᜀ* ကጀ,&܀Ѐ܀.ࠀఀࠀ%Ѐ܀G&;ᄀ/% Ā *ḀḀ " ᔀᜀ)ᬀᘀ* ᜀᘀ)ᔀᔀ)᠀ ܀଀6Ѐ̀܀'܀-؀଀6-܀؀F-0଀3܀ࠀऀ܀ᘀᬀᔀ !0ࠀࠀȀ.0Ѐ଀ᄀ#" Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ؀F-0଀3 *ᔀᜀᬀ(ᘀᜀ " ᔀᨀ)ᤀᤀ* ᜀᘀ)ᨀᰀ ܀'܀ࠀሀ;܀؀0଀ᄀ଀$ఀ؀$Ѐ-܀؀%$ᘀᬀᰀ ̀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ#" 0଀ᄀ଀?ఀB Ā Ā؀?Ѐ-܀ࠀ6ࠀȀࠀԀ$%1̀ *ἀᨀ(᠀ᤀ " ᔀᰀ)ᰀᘀ* ᰀḀ)ᨀἀ ܀'܀$ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀ܀&-ࠀ,܀؀%$ᘀᬀᜀ ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ#" ̀ࠀ6ࠀ,-ЀȀ$%1܀,ࠀ-& Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Slovakia

Complete shadow list of sites Proposed by Slovak NGOs – addition to Governmental proposal ؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀sites from previous table are shaded). ਀଀ഀ) $&ᬀ ᰀᴀḀᔀᴀ Ḁᔀ& ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᔀᰀ$ᰀ !"#$ %ᴀ!ᘀ%$% !ᔀ᠀؀฀܀ᜀЀ᠀Ѐᤀᨀᬀ؀ᬀ ᰀᴀḀᔀᴀᘀḀ&ᰀ /ἀ ᰀ !ᔀᴀ$!"#$ % !ᰀ#$!ᔀ&$ ਀᐀#"&਀᐀ᔀᘀᘀ C43᠀؀฀܀਀᐀ᔀ#ᘀ਀᐀ᔀᘀᘀ >ࠀԀЀᄀ,ᨀ4ᜀЀ᠀Ѐᤀᨀᬀ $&ᰀḀᔀᔀ"ᰀḀᔀ" ἀ ᰀ)!ᔀ&$""!ᘀᰀ$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ"$ !ᔀ" ؀)'ἀȀ଀Ȁࠀ؀)7଀᠀؀ᰀḀᔀ"ᘀḀ) ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ&$""!ᘀᰀ$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ"$ !ᔀ&$ ਀᐀#"%਀᐀ᔀᘀᰀ :+ࠀ(+ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ;ᜀ" ؀)'਀᐀ᔀ#ᰀ਀᐀ᔀᘀᰀ >ࠀᄀࠀ'Ѐ᠀4ἀȀ଀Ȁࠀ $#"!$#ἀᄀఀࠀ᠀ ᰀḀᘀḀ"% ᔀ /ἀ "ᘀ!ᰀᘀ$ᰀ !ᔀ)$ % !ᰀ)؀਀᐀ᔀ#"਀᐀ᔀᘀ" >ࠀ'Ѐ᠀ࠀ'ࠀἀᄀఀࠀ᠀ ᰀḀ&#ᘀḀ"% ἀ ᰀᴀ!%ᴀ$ᰀ !ᔀ)$ %ᴀ!ᘀ%$% !"#$ ਀᐀#"ᔀ਀᐀ᔀᘀ" :+1ᬀԀ ؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ $਀᐀ᔀ#&਀᐀ᔀᘀ& >1Ѐ+0ࠀ'฀Ѐ(*(+ ᘀḀ"&ᰀḀᰀ& /ἀ "ᰀ!ᔀᴀ$ᰀᴀ!%)$ % !&ᔀ$!ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀#"#਀᐀ᔀᘀ& :+'ࠀ6ᄀ଀(Ѐ฀Ѐ(*(+ #ᰀḀᰀ%ᰀḀᰀ& ἀ ᰀ)!"%$ᰀᴀ!%)$ % !%)$!ᔀᘀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ $฀ЀȀ,ᄀ "ᘀḀ)Ḁ%ᴀ # ἀ "ᘀ!ᰀ"$ᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$ % !%"$!%ᰀ܀E܀ᄀ2.4+:܀I܀Ѐᄀ଀ᄀЀ᠀8܀7ᄀЀ฀ЀȀ,ᄀ ᘀḀᘀᰀ)Ḁ%ᴀ ἀ "ᰀ!%ᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$ $ %ᴀ!ᰀᴀ$% !%ᰀ$ ਀᐀#")਀᐀ᔀᘀ% ?ጀ1ᬀᄀᤀᨀЀ؀ᬀ ᰀᴀḀᔀᴀ ἀ ᰀ !"#$ % !ᔀ&$ ਀᐀ᔀ#%਀᐀ᔀᘀ% >1଀᠀؀฀܀਀᐀ᔀᘀᘀ ᜀЀ᠀Ѐᤀᨀᬀ $#"! % $&ᄀ2 )Ḁ%ᴀ ἀ ᰀ !ᔀ.4+:܀I܀Ѐ଀ᄀ᠀8܀ఀ଀Ѐ'ᄀ଀(Ѐ?ጀ1ᬀᄀᤀᨀЀ-܀ఀ଀Ѐ'ᄀ଀(Ѐ ᘀḀ)ᰀ)Ḁ%ᴀ ἀ "ᘀ!ᘀᔀ$ᰀ !ᔀ&$ % !"ᴀ$!"#$ ਀᐀ᔀᘀᔀ ฀Ѐᄀᤀᨀᬀ-܀ᄀ7Ѐᄀ4฀Ѐᄀᤀᨀᬀ؀ᰀḀᔀ" ἀ ""!ᘀᰀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ"$ ਀᐀ᔀ#ᔀ਀᐀ᔀᘀᔀ >1଀" ؀)'਀᐀ᔀᘀᰀ ἀȀ଀Ȁࠀ $ᄀࠀ'฀Ѐ.Ѐᄀఀᄀ଀(Ѐ ᘀḀ""ᘀḀ%# ἀ/ "ᰀ!ᰀᰀ)!ᘀ%$ $ % !ᔀ"$!"ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᘀ#਀᐀#" ฀Ѐ.Ѐᄀఀᄀ଀(ЀĀ+1ᬀ7 ᘀḀ%#ᘀḀ#" /ἀ ᰀ)!ᘀ%$ᰀ !ᔀ $ % !"ᰀ$!&ᴀ؀਀᐀ᔀᘀ" ἀᄀఀࠀ᠀ ᘀḀ"% ἀ ᰀ !ᔀ)$ % !"#$ ਀᐀ᔀ##਀᐀ᔀᘀ# >1଀ $ᔀḀᘀ)ᘀḀ) ἀ ""!"ᰀ$"ᘀ!&ᰀ$ % !%ᴀ$!ᔀᴀ ؀)'0Ѐఀ଀ᄀЀĀ᠀଀Ѐ9ࠀ؀0Ѐఀ଀ᄀЀ "#Ḁᔀ)ᔀḀᘀ) ἀ "ᘀ!ᔀ%$""!"ᰀ$ % !&ᴀ$!%ᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᘀ)਀᐀#"ᴀ ฀؀฀܀਀᠀ࠀ'Ѐᨀ܀E܀ࠀȀ+)='܀I܀ᨀ1Ѐᤀ܀=ᄀᤀᨀ؀'਀᐀ᔀᘀ& ฀Ѐ(*(+ ᰀḀᰀ& ἀ ᰀᴀ!%)$ % !ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ#)਀᐀ᔀᘀ) ਀᠀ࠀ $ᘀḀ"&ᘀḀᘀᰀ ἀ/ "ᘀ!&%$ᰀ !ᘀ)$ %%)!ᔀ&$ !%ᔀ 5؀ఀ᠀଀Ѐ1ĀԀ؀Ѐᤀఀ ᘀḀ"& ἀ "ᘀ!&%$ % !%ᔀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᘀ਀᐀#&ᘀ ฀؀܀I܀ఀ᠀଀Ѐ1ᨀЀ1ᤀఀ؀਀᐀ᔀᘀ% ฀ЀȀ,ᄀ )Ḁ%ᴀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$ % !%ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᘀ ฀ $ᘀḀᰀ#ᘀḀ%& / ᰀᰀᴀ!ᘀᰀ$ !%ᘀ$ %)!ᔀ#$% !ᘀᔀ ؀ȀԀࠀᤀఀ଀؀1/܀5ᤀᨀ2؀਀'଀Ȁᄀ,ᨀጀ ᘀḀᰀ#"Ḁ&) /ἀ ᰀ"ᰀ!" !%ᘀ$ $ %)!ᔀ#$%ᴀ!"ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᘀᴀ਀᐀#&ᰀ ฀,0ЀĀ8܀81଀܀ఀ଀Ѐ'ᄀ଀(Ѐ )Ḁ%ᴀ ἀ ᰀ !ᔀ&$ % !"#$ ਀᐀ᔀᘀᴀ਀᐀ᔀ# ฀,0Ѐ>ጀ3ࠀ'ᬀ-܀਀᐀ᔀᘀᔀ ฀Ѐᄀᤀᨀᬀ $L5Ѐᄀ4 #Ḁ%"ᰀḀ#% / ""!ᘀᔀ$ᰀᴀ!ᘀ&$ % !%ᰀ$!ᘀᴀ܀5ᤀᨀ2؀Ā8"܀ᄀᄀ2؀31Ѐ'4 #Ḁ%"ᰀḀᰀ# /ἀ ""!ᘀᔀ$ᰀᴀ!"%$ % !%ᰀ$!&#$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀᘀ਀᐀#&" ਀*<"܀ᄀᄀ2؀਀᐀ᔀᘀ# ฀Ѐ.Ѐᄀఀᄀ଀(Ѐ ᘀḀ%# / ᰀ)!ᘀ%$ % !"ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀᘀ਀᐀ᔀ#ᴀ ਀ $%&!$(ࠀఀࠀᨀ ᰀḀᔀ&&Ḁᘀ /ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᔀᰀᴀ!%&$ $ % !ᰀ/܀=5ᤀᨀ؀Ā8؀)'ᤀ ᰀḀᔀ&ᰀḀ%ᘀ /ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᔀ"ᰀ!"ᘀ$ $ % !ᰀ)$!ᔀ#$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀᰀ਀᐀#&& ฀᠀+ࠀ؀ᜀ܀ጀ᠀ࠀ'Ѐ<؀)'0Ѐఀ଀ᄀЀ ᔀḀᘀ) ἀ ""!"ᰀ$ % !%ᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀᰀ਀᐀ᔀ)ᘀ ฀᠀+ࠀ؀਀᐀ᔀᘀ) ฀ $ࠀఀЀ ᘀḀᰀ&ᘀḀ&ᘀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!"ᰀ !%#$ $ %ᴀ!ᘀ)$% !&ᴀ+؀က܀ఀ᠀଀Ѐ1 ᘀḀ"& ἀ "ᘀ!&%$ % !%ᔀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ"਀᐀ᔀ)ᰀ ฀ࠀ31ࠀ'ᄀ,ᨀ>'ࠀ1ᄀ,ᨀ4 ᘀḀᰀ&ᘀḀᰀ% ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!"ᰀ)!%#$ $ %ᴀ!ᘀ)$% !""$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ"਀᐀#&% ฀ࠀ31ࠀ'ᄀ,ᨀDЀᄀࠀ'Ѐ؀਀᐀ᔀᘀ ฀ $&&! %$ᤀ ᘀḀᘀ#ᘀḀ # /ἀ ᰀ)!"ᴀ$ᰀ !ᰀᴀ$ %)!ᔀᔀ؀ᜀ܀ᘀḀᘀ#ᘀḀ&ᘀ /ἀ ᰀ)!"ᴀ$"ᘀ!ᰀᴀ$ %)!ᔀᔀ$%ᴀ!ᘀᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ&਀᐀#&ᔀ ฀ࠀȀ,ᨀ4DЀᄀࠀ'Ѐ ؀)਀᐀ᔀᘀᴀ ฀,0Ѐ ᘀḀᰀ# / ᰀ !%ᘀ$ %)!ᔀ#$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ&਀᐀ᔀ)" ฀ࠀȀ,ᨀ4F଀᠀଀ $5ࠀ'DЀ1Ѐ3଀ᄀЀ ᘀḀᰀᴀᰀḀᰀᘀ /ἀ ᰀ)!%ᰀ$"ᘀ!%ᰀ$ %)!ᔀ%$%ᴀ!"ᰀ؀+5Ѐᄀ4 ᰀᘀḀᴀ)ᘀḀᰀᴀ /ἀ ᰀ)!%ᰀ$ᰀ !ᔀᰀ$ %)!ᔀ%$%ᴀ!ᰀ%$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ%਀᐀#&# ฀ࠀ؀5ࠀ'ༀ3؀+Ḁ%" / ""!ᘀᔀ$ % !%ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ%਀᐀ᔀ)& ฀ࠀ# "܀ᄀᄀ2؀਀᐀ᔀᰀᘀ ਀ $ $ᘀḀᘀḀ)" % ἀ/ "ᰀ!ᔀ%$ᰀ)!ᘀ#$ %ᴀ!ᰀ% !ᘀᔀ ؀)'ᘀḀᰀḀ%& % ἀ/ "ᰀ!ᔀ%$ᰀ !"ᴀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ%)!ᔀᰀ$ $ ਀᐀ᔀᰀᔀ਀᐀#&) ฀ࠀ1ࠀ'DЀ1ࠀ ؀)᠀؀ᰀḀᔀ& / ᰀᴀ!ᔀ $ % !ᰀ)$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀᔀ਀᐀ᔀ)% ฀ࠀ1ࠀ'ༀ3 ؀)'਀᐀ᔀᰀᰀ ฀᠀+ࠀ $ᄀࠀ'2 "ḀᔀᴀᘀḀ## /ἀ "ᘀ!ᘀᴀ$ᰀ !&)$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ)$ !ᰀᴀ؀ḀᔀᴀᘀḀ"ᰀ / "ᘀ!ᘀᴀ$ᰀ)!ᘀᔀ$ % !ᰀᴀ$!%"$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ#਀᐀#& ฀ࠀఀఀࠀ'ࠀDЀᤀ" 4᠀؀਀᐀ᔀᰀ" ฀ࠀ31ࠀ'ᄀ,ᨀ ᘀḀᰀ& ἀ ᰀᴀ!" $ %ᴀ!ᘀ)$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ#਀᐀ᔀ)ᔀ ฀ࠀఀఀࠀ'ࠀༀ3 $CG1ᨀЀ ᰀ#ḀᴀᴀᘀḀ%# ἀ/ "ᘀ!"ᰀ$"ᘀ!"&$ % !%#$!&"$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ)਀᐀#&ᴀ ฀1Ȁᬀ1ᨀЀDЀᤀఀ1Ѐ3ᬀ ᰀ#ḀᴀᴀᘀḀ%& ἀ "ᘀ!"ᰀ$ᰀ !ᔀ)$ % !%#$!&ᴀ܀1ᤀᨀᬀ؀Ԁ؀਀᐀ᔀᰀ& ฀ࠀȀ,ᨀ4 ᘀḀᘀ# / ᰀ)!"ᴀ$ %)!ᔀᔀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ)਀᐀ᔀ)# ฀1Ȁᬀ1ᨀЀༀ $᐀ࠀᤀఀࠀ5Ѐᄀ4 "Ḁ#&ᴀḀ%ᘀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀ#$ᰀ !&ᰀ$ % !ᔀᘀ$!"ᴀ܀Ȁ5ࠀ'2؀D؀)'6ࠀ؀ఀ؀ᘀḀᴀᴀ"Ḁ#& ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀ#$"ᘀ!")$ % !ᔀᘀ$!%ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ਀᐀#%ᘀ ฀1" ܀E܀؀ᨀࠀఀ᠀଀ᄀ܀6؀ࠀ.0Ѐ'ᤀᨀ@܀'܀ᨀᬀ)؀Aጀ1؀)'6ࠀ؀ఀ؀5ࠀ' ᘀḀᰀᴀ / ᰀ)!%ᰀ$ %)!ᔀ%$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ਀᐀ᔀ)) ฀1؀+਀᐀ᔀᰀ% ฀ࠀ 3Ѐᤀ଀ᄀ܀ࠀ.0Ѐ'ᤀᨀᬀ@܀଀ᄀ܀ᨀᬀ)؀Aጀ1 $%"!$ᘀḀᘀ&ᘀḀᰀᰀ /ἀ "ᘀ!"ᰀ$ᰀ !ᰀᰀ$ % !&ᘀ )؀ᄀ؀᠀؀ఀᨀЀD؀ఀᨀЀ ᘀḀᘀ& / "ᘀ!"ᰀ$ % !&ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀᴀ਀᐀#%ᰀ ฀1؀਀᐀ᔀᰀᔀ ฀ࠀ1ࠀ' ᘀḀ % ἀ "ᰀ!ᔀ%$ %ᴀ!ᰀ $ ਀᐀ᔀᰀᴀ ฀1 $(ᄀᤀᨀ2 %Ḁᘀ"ᘀḀ"ᴀ / ᰀᴀ!%%$"ᘀ!ᘀ&$ % !"%$!ᰀ؀ᤀ؀ഀᄀ଀7ᨀЀD؀Ḁᘀ"ᘀḀᘀᔀ / ᰀᴀ!%%$"ᘀ!ᘀ"$ % !"%$!ᰀ&$ ਀᐀ᔀ"ᘀ਀᐀#%" ฀1% ؀ఀᬀ1+)؀<܀1ᤀᨀ2؀Ԁ؀ഀᄀ଀7ᨀЀༀ؀਀᐀ᔀᰀ# ฀ࠀఀఀࠀ'ࠀ "Ḁᔀᴀ / "ᘀ!ᘀᴀ$ % !ᰀᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"ᘀ਀᐀ᔀ) ฀1 $ $&ḀᘀᘀᰀḀ%% ἀ/ ᰀ"ᘀ!ᘀ%$ !%ᴀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ% !ᰀ" ؀)ᤀఀ଀؀ࠀఀЀD+؀က܀ࠀఀЀༀࠀ7ࠀ'ࠀ "ḀᘀᘀᔀḀᘀ ἀ ᰀ"ᘀ!")$ !%ᴀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ% !%ᔀ$ $ ਀᐀ᔀ"ᰀ਀᐀#%& ฀ጀȀЀఀ,ᄀᤀᨀЀ+؀က܀਀᐀ᔀᰀ) ฀1Ȁᬀ1ᨀЀ ᰀ#Ḁᴀᴀ ἀ "ᘀ!"ᰀ$ % !%#$ ਀᐀ᔀ"ᰀ਀᐀ᔀ)ᴀ ฀ጀȀЀఀ,ᄀᤀᨀЀ $"%! $(1ᤀᨀࠀ )ᘀḀᔀ"ᘀḀ"ᔀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀᘀ$"ᘀ!"ᰀ$ %%ᴀ!ᰀ؀ഀ؀D܀I܀Ѐሀጀ1Ѐ?܀᐀ࠀ9଀(଀Ѐ(+਀8଀9ᤀᨀᬀ܀81଀܀)؀'᐀ࠀ9଀(଀Ѐ(+CЀ7Ѐ'Ѐ ᘀḀ"ᔀᘀḀᔀ& ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀᘀ$"ᘀ!ᔀᰀ$ % !%"$!%ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ""਀᐀#%% ฀ጀᨀࠀ܀81଀܀)؀'Ḁ#& ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀ#$ % !ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ""਀᐀ᔀ ᘀ ฀ጀᨀࠀ" ؀)'6ࠀ؀ఀ؀਀᐀ᔀᰀ ฀1 $Ḁᰀᔀ Ḁ&ᘀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀ%$ᰀ)!#ᘀ$ %ᴀ!"%$% !%ᔀ%#& ܀=ࠀ'Ѐ.ᤀᨀ/܀E܀1؀'؀ᤀ܀)؀'Āᄀࠀ܀=ఀᨀЀ ᘀḀᘀ& / "ᘀ!"ᰀ$ % !&ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"&਀᐀ᔀ ᰀ ฀ጀᤀࠀ'CЀᄀ଀ᤀᨀЀECЀᄀ଀ᤀᨀᬀ & ᰀḀᘀᘀḀ&ᘀ ἀ/ "ᰀ!ᰀ%$ %ᴀ!"%$% !& $ ਀᐀ᔀ"&਀᐀#%ᔀ ฀ጀᤀࠀ'/ࠀ'Ѐ.ᤀᨀ؀਀᐀ᔀᰀᴀ ฀1 +ᄀࠀ1ఀ܀)؀'Āᄀࠀ $ᰀ&ᰀḀᔀ%ᰀḀᴀ& /ἀ "ᰀ!ᘀ)$ᰀᴀ!ᘀ&$ % !&ᰀ$!%#$ ਀᐀ᔀ"% ฀ጀഀ଀(Ѐ ᰀḀᴀ& / "ᰀ!ᘀ)$ % !&ᰀ ܀Ԁᄀ଀(ᨀ2؀᐀1܀I܀ഀᬀ8ЀȀ܀ࠀ14+܀ഀᄀ଀7ᨀЀ %Ḁᘀ" / ᰀᴀ!%%$ % !"%$ ਀᐀ᔀ"%਀᐀ᔀ " ฀ጀഀ଀(Ѐ਀ఀЀ12؀਀᐀ᔀ"ᘀ ฀1 $"ᄀ଀(Ѐ ᘀḀᰀ ἀ "ᘀ!ᔀ $ %ᴀ!ᰀ؀਀᐀#%# ᐀ЀԀ ܀I܀ᤀఀ؀K܀ࠀ14+܀਀ఀЀ12܀E܀ࠀఀЀ "Ḁᘀᘀ ἀ ᰀ !%ᴀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ $ '1(+4+؀က܀਀᐀ᔀ"ᰀ ฀ጀȀЀఀ,ᄀᤀᨀЀ $ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀᤀ฀4ᤀఀ1଀7Ѐᄀ4 ᰀḀ&ᰀ ἀ ᰀ !&ᘀ$ % !%ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"ᔀ ฀4ᤀఀ1଀7Ѐᄀ4 ᰀḀ&ᰀ ἀ ᰀ !&ᘀ$ % !%ᰀ܀Ԁᄀ଀(ᨀ2؀਀᐀ᔀ"ᔀ ᐀1 $଀1ࠀ(+ࠀጀ ᘀḀ%)ᰀḀ%& ἀ ᰀ""!ᘀᰀ$ !%ᔀ$ % !&ᰀ$!ᔀᔀ:܀ᄀЀȀ܀ᄀ଀(Ѐ؀ᄀ଀(Ѐ᐀ЀԀ؀ᄀ଀(Ѐ ᘀḀ%) ἀ ᰀ !%ᔀ$ % !&ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"#਀᐀#%) ฀ഀ؀᐀ࠀ9଀(଀Ѐ(+ ᘀḀ"ᔀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀᘀ$ % !%"$ ਀᐀ᔀ"# ฀ഀ܀81଀܀)؀'਀᐀ᔀ"" ฀ጀᨀࠀ $ᨀЀ ᘀḀ"ᰀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀ $ %ᴀ!"ᰀ᠀؀'਀᐀ᔀ & CЀ1 $("! $ᄀ଀7ᄀᬀ ᰀḀᰀ#ᰀḀ"ᴀ / "ᰀ!%#$ᰀ !ᘀ&$ %%)!ᔀᘀ؀6ᨀࠀ'᐀ЀԀ؀: %#6ᨀࠀ' ᰀḀᰀ# / "ᰀ!%#$ % !")$ ਀᐀ᔀ")਀᐀؀: ("਀᐀ᔀ"& ฀ጀᤀࠀ' & Ḁ&ᘀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀ%$ %ᴀ!"%$ ਀᐀ᔀ ਀᐀ᔀ % CЀ.,ᄀ܀ᄀЀȀ܀:଀1ࠀ(+ࠀጀ ᰀḀᰀᰀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᔀ)$ % !ᔀᔀ$ $ᄀᨀЀ ᘀḀ&ᰀᰀḀᘀ" ἀ ᰀ)!"%$"ᘀ!&%$ %%ᴀ!"ᰀ$ !&ᔀ؀ᤀᨀࠀ'2᐀ЀԀ଀؀1ࠀ'ᬀ;က଀؀: ᤀᨀࠀ'2 ᘀḀ&ᰀ ἀ ᰀ)!"%$ % !&ᔀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"਀᐀#ᔀᘀ؀1ࠀ'ᬀ;က଀؀: "਀᐀ᔀ"% ฀ጀഀ଀(Ѐ ᰀḀᴀ& / "ᰀ!ᘀ)$ % !&ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ $Ḁ)ᰀ ἀ "ᘀ!ᔀ"$ % !ᔀᰀ ؀)'ԀЀᄀࠀ)᠀؀਀᐀ᔀ ᔀ C $#%!$7Ѐᄀ4 ᰀᘀḀ"Ḁᰀ# # ἀ ᰀᴀ!&ᴀ$"ᰀ!ᰀ"$ % !"ᴀ؀'਀᐀ᔀ"ᔀ ฀4ᤀఀ1଀7Ѐᄀ4 ᰀḀ&ᰀ ἀ ᰀ !&ᘀ$ % !%ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"ᴀ :଀ᄀࠀ3Ѐ0Ѐ ᰀᘀḀ # ἀ ᰀᴀ!&ᴀ$ % !"ᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"ᴀ਀᐀#ᔀᰀ :଀ᄀࠀ3Ѐ0Ѐ᐀Ѐ $%Ѐ1ఀࠀ' ᔀḀ)ᘀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᘀᴀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ'1؀਀᐀ᔀ # C $ᨀ5Ѐᄀ4 ᰀᰀḀ)&ᰀḀᰀᘀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᔀ"ᰀ!"%$ $ %ᴀ!ᰀ"$% !ᔀᘀ؀/܀1ࠀ'ᤀᨀ2؀)؀᐀؀)'ᰀᰀḀ)& ἀ "ᰀ!ᔀ $ %ᴀ!ᰀ"$ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᘀ਀᐀#ᔀ" <Ѐ3Ѐ᠀ࠀ ؀)'ᄀ଀(Ѐ ᘀḀ%) ἀ ᰀ !%ᔀ$ % !&ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᘀ <Ѐ3Ѐ᠀ࠀ؀਀᐀ᔀ"# ฀ഀ $ᘀḀᘀᔀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᰀᴀ$ % !%ᴀ 5؀਀᐀ᔀ ) C଀ЀȀ $ $7ࠀ'ࠀ ᘀḀ"ᰀ"Ḁ&ᴀ ἀ/ ᰀ"ᘀ!"ᴀ$ !ᔀᰀ$ %ᴀ!"% !&ᘀ؀6ᨀࠀ' ᰀḀᰀ# / "ᰀ!%#$ % !")$ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᰀ <ЀȀ(Ѐ ᘀḀ"ᰀ ἀ ᰀ !ᔀᰀ$ %ᴀ!" $ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᰀ਀᐀#ᔀ& <ЀȀ(Ѐ᐀؀: ("਀᐀ᔀ ਀᐀ᔀ Cᄀ଀᠀7,ᨀ ᰀḀ#ᴀ ἀ "ᘀ!&&$ % !ᔀᰀ$ $&&!$#ᘀḀ")ᰀḀᰀ / ᰀ"ᰀ!ᰀ)$ !ᘀ"$ % !ᰀ )؀ᄀ+)؀ᤀᨀࠀ'2 ᘀḀ&ᰀ ἀ ᰀ)!"%$ % !&ᔀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&" <ᬀ8ࠀ1 ᘀḀ") / ᰀ !ᘀ"$ % !ᰀ#$ ਀᐀ᔀ&"਀᐀#ᔀ% <ᬀ8ࠀ1᐀؀1ࠀ'ᬀ;က଀؀: "਀᐀ᔀ $ᰀᰀḀ ᔀ ἀ "ᘀ!ᔀ&$ % !ᔀᘀ )؀᠀਀᐀ᔀ ᴀ Cᄀ଀ $ᨀ4 #Ḁ%#ᘀḀ ) ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$ᰀ !& $ % !ᘀᴀ$!&ᔀ*᠀܀I܀᐀5Ѐᨀ؀)'ࠀ᠀؀> Ḁ%# ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$ % !ᘀᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&&਀᐀#ᔀᔀ# ؀)'ࠀ᠀؀> &&਀᐀ᔀ"ᴀ :଀ᄀࠀ3Ѐ0Ѐ ᰀᘀḀ # ἀ ᰀᴀ!&ᴀ$ % !"ᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ $&ᘀḀᘀ& / ᰀ !ᔀ)$ % !ᰀ ؀ᤀᬀ1؀A܀؀਀᐀ᔀᴀᘀ Cࠀᄀఀ଀Ѐᄀᤀᨀ $ࠀԀ ᰀḀᘀ"&Ḁ%ᔀ ἀ "ᰀ!%ᴀ$ᰀ !%%$ %ᴀ!"ᰀ$% !ᔀᴀ'؀Mᄀ଀܀8ࠀȀ܀1ఀ଀.ᄀ2᐀᠀ᬀ9ఀࠀ1؀> #1ఀ଀.ᄀ2 ᰀḀᘀ" ἀ "ᰀ!%ᴀ$ %ᴀ!"ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&%਀᐀#ᔀ؀> %&ᰀᰀḀ)& ἀ "ᰀ!ᔀ $ %ᴀ!ᰀ"$ ਀᐀ᔀ ؀)'਀᐀ᔀ&ᘀ <Ѐ3Ѐ᠀ࠀ ਀᐀ᔀᴀᰀ Cࠀ1ᄀᬀ܀?Ѐ1଀ᨀࠀ'ᬀ ᰀ"Ḁ)ᔀ ἀ ᰀ !ᰀᴀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ $ $"&! %$ᤀ ᘀḀᘀᴀᘀḀᔀ" ἀ ᰀ !ᰀᘀ$!ᰀ)$ %ᴀ!ᘀᔀ؀ᜀ܀ࠀ'ᬀ̀܀0᐀᠀ᬀఀࠀ'Ѐ؀᐀ЀԀ܀=ᄀ؀'1؀> (ᘀḀᘀᴀ ἀ ᰀ !ᰀᘀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀᔀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᔀ਀᐀#ᔀ 0؀᐀ЀԀ܀=ᄀ؀'1؀> ਀᐀ᔀ&ᰀ <ЀȀ(Ѐ ᘀḀ"ᰀ ἀ ᰀ !ᔀᰀ$ %ᴀ!" $ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᔀ ਀᐀ᔀᴀ" Cࠀ1ᄀᬀ܀HᄀȀЀ'Ѐ "Ḁᔀ# ἀ "ᰀ!& $ %ᴀ!ᰀ&$ $᐀᠀7ࠀ' ᘀḀᘀ%ᘀḀ)ᘀ ἀ ᰀ"ᘀ!&ᴀ$ !% $ %ᴀ!&ᘀ$%ᴀ!ᘀᰀ؀1ᄀ؀ᘀḀᘀ% ἀ ᰀ !% $ %ᴀ!&ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&#਀᐀#ᔀ <଀ ؀1ᄀ؀਀᐀ᔀ&" <ᬀ8ࠀ1 ᘀḀ") / ᰀ !ᘀ"$ % !ᰀ#$ ਀᐀ᔀ&# <଀ ਀᐀ᔀᴀ& Cࠀ1ᄀᬀ܀਀*7Ѐ "Ḁ%) ἀ ᰀ)!ᔀ $ %ᴀ!ᘀᘀ$ $฀Ѐ᠀ࠀሀ᐀᠀,. ᔀḀᘀ%ᘀḀ") ἀ ᰀᴀ!%ᔀ$ᰀ !"%$ % !%ᘀ$!&ᰀ܀1ᄀ4؀฀Ѐ᠀ࠀሀ ᔀḀᘀ% ἀ ᰀᴀ!%ᔀ$ % !%ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&)਀᐀#ᔀᴀ <଀܀1ᄀ4؀Ḁ%# ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$ % !ᘀᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&) <଀# ؀)'ࠀ᠀؀> &&਀᐀ᔀ ਀᐀ᔀᴀ% Cࠀ1ᄀᬀ܀Aࠀ85Ѐ &Ḁᴀᘀ ἀ "ᰀ!")$ %ᴀ!ᰀ"$ $#Ԁᬀ ᘀḀ")ᘀḀ)ᰀ / ᰀᰀ)!ᔀᘀ$ !"ᔀ$ %%)!%ᔀ$ !ᰀ؀̀܀᐀᠀,.ᤀᨀЀ؀ᘀḀ") / ᰀ !"ᔀ$ % !ᰀ#$ ਀᐀ᔀ&਀᐀##ᘀ <଀ऀᬀ1 ؀1ఀ଀.ᄀ2 ᰀḀᘀ" ἀ "ᰀ!%ᴀ$ %ᴀ!"ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ& <଀ऀᬀ1؀> %&਀᐀ᔀ ਀᐀ᔀᴀᔀ Cࠀ1ᄀᬀ܀A1ᄀᬀ'ᨀЀ ᘀḀ") ἀ ᰀ !%#$ % !&ᔀ$ $"&!$ᘀḀ&&ᰀḀᘀᔀ /ἀ "ᘀ!"&$ᰀ !"%$ % !&ᘀ ؀C1ЀȀ଀9ఀ܀؀ᘀḀᘀᴀ ἀ ᰀ !ᰀᘀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀᔀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᴀ <ࠀ᠀ఀࠀ'ࠀ ᘀḀ&& / "ᘀ!"&$ % !&ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᴀ਀᐀##ᰀ <ࠀ᠀ఀࠀ'ࠀ᐀᠀,.ᤀᨀ 0؀᐀ЀԀ܀=ᄀ؀'1؀> ਀᐀ᔀ&ᔀ ਀᐀ᔀᴀ# Cࠀ1ᄀᬀ܀BȀЀ0Ѐ ᰀḀ"ᴀ ἀ ᰀ !%%$ % !&ᔀ$ $Ԁࠀ9ᄀ2᐀᠀ࠀᨀࠀ7ࠀ' ᘀḀ""ᰀḀᰀ ἀ ᰀ !ᔀ%$!&#$ %%ᴀ!&ᘀ$ !ᔀᘀ؀Ԁࠀ9ᄀ2 ᘀḀ"" ἀ ᰀ !ᔀ%$ % !ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ%ᘀ਀᐀##" <1؀ᘀḀᘀ% ἀ ᰀ !% $ %ᴀ!&ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ%ᘀ <1 ؀1ᄀ؀਀᐀ᔀ&# <଀ ਀᐀ᔀᴀ) Cࠀ1ᄀᬀȀ )Ḁ " ἀ "ᘀ!ᔀ)$ % !ᔀᔀ$ $(฀Ѐ᠀ࠀሀ ᔀḀᘀ% ἀ ᰀᴀ!%ᔀ$ % !%ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ%ᰀ <ጀᄀࠀ'ࠀ "Ḁ"ᔀ / ᰀ)!ᰀ&$ % !ᘀ"$ ਀᐀ᔀ%ᰀ਀᐀##& <ጀᄀࠀ'ࠀ᐀5*7ࠀ'2 "Ḁ"ᔀᰀḀᘀ" /ἀ ᰀ)!ᰀ&$ᰀ !ᘀᔀ$ % !ᘀ"$!ᔀ܀1ᄀ4؀਀᐀ᔀ&) <଀ $Ḁ)" ἀ ᰀ !%ᘀ$ % !&ᰀ& ؀CᬀԀ1܀਀᐀ᔀᴀ Cࠀ1ᄀ2 $ᔀḀᴀ#ᘀḀ"% ἀ/ "ᰀ!&#$ᰀ)!%ᰀ$ %%)!%)$ !ᔀᘀ& )؀'ᘀḀ") / ᰀ !"ᔀ$ % !ᰀ#$ ਀᐀ᔀ%" >Ѐ'଀Ȁࠀ' ᘀḀ"% ἀ "ᰀ!&#$ % !ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ%"਀᐀##% >Ѐ'଀Ȁࠀ'᐀5*7ࠀ ؀਀᐀ᔀ& <଀ऀᬀ1 $ᘀḀᰀᔀ ἀ ᰀ !% $ % !"ᰀ ؀)'DЀ3᠀ࠀ0ࠀ܀਀᐀ᔀᴀᴀ Cࠀ1ᄀ2 $#᐀᠀ጀᨀᄀЀ'Ѐ %%Ḁᘀ%ᰀḀ ᔀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᘀᘀ$"ᘀ!ᔀᴀ$ % !&ᴀ$!ᔀ܀E܀฀ࠀȀ'4܀ఀࠀᨀጀ܀Ȁᄀ2+ࠀ؀ᤀఀ1܀؀ᰀḀ ᔀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᘀᘀ$ % !&ᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ%&਀᐀##ᔀ /ࠀ'ࠀȀ଀ ܀E܀฀ࠀȀ'4܀ఀࠀᨀጀ܀Ȁᄀ2+ࠀ؀ᤀఀ1܀؀਀᐀ᔀ&ᴀ <ࠀ᠀ఀࠀ'ࠀ ᘀḀ&& / "ᘀ!"&$ % !&ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ%& /ࠀ'ࠀȀ଀ $(ᰀ"Ḁᰀᰀ ἀ "ᰀ!&"$ %ᴀ!ᘀ ؀)᐀ࠀ34᠀ᄀ଀܀ࠀऀ܀8Ѐ1ఀ܀؀᠀Ԁ଀ȀȀ܀؀+ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀3Ѐᤀ଀ᄀ܀1؀'Ḁᴀᘀ ἀ ᰀ !""$ %ᴀ!ᘀ)$ ਀᐀### @଀" ؀)'᐀ࠀ7ᨀࠀ܀Cࠀ1ᄀ2܀ࠀऀ܀8Ѐ1ఀ܀؀᠀Ԁ଀ȀȀ܀؀+ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀3Ѐᤀ଀ᄀ܀1؀'Ԁࠀ9ᄀ2 ᘀḀ"" ἀ ᰀ !ᔀ%$ % !ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀#ᘀᘀ @଀؀਀᐀ᔀ%ᘀ <1 $(฀ࠀȀ'Ѐ ᘀḀᰀᘀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀᴀ$ % !ᔀ؀)'ఀࠀ ᘀḀᘀ" / ᰀ)!%&$ % !ᘀᰀ$ ਀᐀##) ᐀ࠀᨀࠀ9ࠀ=?܀਀᐀ᔀ%ᰀ <ጀᄀࠀ'ࠀ "Ḁ"ᔀ / ᰀ)!ᰀ&$ % !ᘀ"$ ਀᐀#ᘀ" ฀ࠀȀ'ЀCࠀ1ᄀ2 $"Ȁ଀ᄀᨀ4 ᘀḀᔀ)ᘀḀᰀᔀ ἀ ᰀ"ᘀ!"%$ !"#$ % !&%$!ᔀ؀<ᘀḀᰀᔀ#Ḁᰀᔀ ἀ/ "ᘀ!"%$ᰀᴀ!&ᰀ$ % !ᔀ"$!ᰀᰀ$ ਀᐀##਀᐀ᔀ%% ᐀ࠀ᠀Ѐ7ᄀࠀ ؀8ࠀ଀8᠀଀܀Ȁ଀ᄀᨀ4Cࠀ1ᄀ2؀< &਀᐀ᔀ%" >Ѐ'଀Ȁࠀ' ᘀḀ"% ἀ "ᰀ!&#$ % !ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ%%਀᐀#ᘀ $#&!$ఀ'Ѐ ᰀḀᴀᴀ"Ḁ " /ἀ ᰀᰀᴀ!"ᔀ$ !ᰀᰀ$ % !"ᰀ؀<਀Ѐ᠀଀34 "ḀᘀḀᘀᰀ " ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!"ᔀ$ᰀ)!%"$ % !&#$!ᘀ)$ ਀᐀##ᴀ਀᐀ᔀ%ᔀ ᐀ࠀ᠀,0Ѐᄀ4܀ఀ'ЀCࠀ1ᄀ2؀< %ᰀḀ ᔀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᘀᘀ$ % !&ᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ%ᔀ਀᐀#ᘀ ܀E܀฀ࠀȀ'4܀ఀࠀᨀጀ܀Ȁᄀ2+ࠀ؀ᤀఀ1܀؀਀᐀ᔀ%& /ࠀ'ࠀȀ଀ $ᄀ ᘀḀᘀ#ᘀḀᰀ% / ᰀᰀ#!#ᘀ$ !"#$ % !ᘀ"$!ᰀᘀ,'؀<ᘀḀᰀ%"Ḁ)ᰀ /ἀ ᰀ#!#ᘀ$ᰀ !ᘀ&$ %%ᴀ!ᘀᰀ$ !ᰀᘀ$ ਀᐀#)ᘀ਀᐀ᔀ%# ᐀ࠀ᠀ఀЀ ؀਀1ᄀ଀܀ᄀCࠀ1ᄀ2,'؀< ਀᐀ᔀ%#਀᐀#ᘀᔀ ܀ࠀऀ܀8Ѐ1ఀ܀؀᠀Ԁ଀ȀȀ܀؀+ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀3Ѐᤀ଀ᄀ܀1؀'଀@ ฀ࠀȀ'Ѐ $"ᤀ ᰀḀᘀḀᰀ" ᴀ ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ%$ᰀ)!ᘀᘀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀᴀ$% !ᰀ؀ᜀ܀ࠀ'ᬀ̀܀ᄀᤀᨀЀ,'؀<ᘀḀᰀ""Ḁ#ᰀ /ἀ ᰀ)!ᘀᘀ$ᰀᴀ!"%$ % !ᰀ"$!ᰀ#$ ਀᐀#)ᰀ਀᐀ᔀ%) ᐀ࠀԀ6Ѐఀᄀᬀ ؀਀ఀ1+ᬀ1܀ᤀCࠀ1ᄀ2؀ᜀ܀ࠀ'ᬀ̀܀ᄀᤀᨀЀ,'؀< #਀᐀ᔀ%)਀᐀#ᘀ ᤀ ᰀḀ%ᰀᰀḀᔀᰀ ἀ/ ""!ᰀ#$"ᘀ!")$ % !%)$!&ᘀ$ 117؀ᜀ܀Aࠀ8ࠀ5ᄀ,ᨀ4 ᰀᘀḀᰀḀᔀᰀ ᘀ / "ᘀ!")$ᰀ)!ᔀᰀ$ %%)!ᔀ !&ᘀ$ $ ਀᐀#)"਀᐀ᔀ% ᐀ࠀ0ጀ9>᠀+ᬀ܀ᤀCࠀ1ᄀ2؀ᜀ܀Ȁ଀ᄀᨀ4 ᘀḀᰀᔀ ἀ "ᘀ!"%$ % !ᔀ"$ ਀᐀ᔀ%਀᐀#ᘀ) >᠀+ᬀ؀< %%਀᐀ᔀ 116 $#"! $"ᘀḀ##ᘀḀ% ἀ ᰀ"ᘀ!&ᰀ$ !%ᴀ$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ ؀.਀ఀ1ᬀ܀2+᠀<؀)ᜀЀȀ଀7ࠀ' ᘀḀ%ᴀḀᰀᔀ ἀ "ᘀ!&ᰀ$ᰀ !ᔀ%$ %ᴀ!ᘀ"$%ᴀ!ᰀ#$ ਀᐀#)&਀᐀ᔀ%ᴀ ᐀ࠀ8Ѐᄀ଀܀=Cࠀ1ᄀ؀.਀ఀ1ᬀ܀ఀ'Ѐ "Ḁ " ἀ ᰀᴀ!"ᔀ$ % !&#$ ਀᐀ᔀ%ᴀ਀᐀#ᘀ >᠀+2؀< ਀᐀ᔀ%ᔀ $ᄀ ᘀḀᰀ% / ᰀ#!#ᘀ$ % !ᰀᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᔀᘀ਀᐀#ᘀᴀ >ࠀ39଀ᄀᬀCࠀ19Ѐ " &Ḁᔀ"Ḁᘀᔀ ἀ/ "ᘀ!ᰀᴀ$ᰀ !%"$ % !%ᴀ$!ᰀ%$ ਀᐀#)%਀᐀ᔀᔀᘀ ᐀ࠀ87Ѐᄀ4>ࠀ39଀ᄀᬀ " &Ḁ%#Ḁᘀᔀ /ἀ ᰀ)!ᘀ%$"ᘀ!ᰀᴀ$ % !%ᔀ$!%ᴀ,'؀< #%਀᐀ᔀ $଀7଀ᄀᬀ %Ḁ##ᘀḀᘀ# ἀ "ᰀ!%)$ᰀᴀ!ᰀ&$ %ᴀ!ᰀ"$% !%ᰀ?܀ᘀḀᘀ#ᔀḀᘀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ&$ᰀ !"ᘀ$ % !%ᰀ$!")$ ਀᐀#)ᔀ਀᐀ᔀᔀᰀ ᐀ࠀ1ጀᄀᨀࠀ'ᬀ>ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ ؀)'CࠀᤀJࠀ܀I܀7؀଀7଀ᄀᬀA1,3?܀ᤀ ᘀḀᰀ" / ᰀ)!ᘀᘀ$ % !ᰀ"$ ਀᐀ᔀᔀᰀ਀᐀#ᰀᘀ >ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ؀ᜀ܀ࠀ'ᬀ̀܀ᄀᤀᨀЀ,'؀< (%਀᐀ᔀ $ ଀ԀЀ'Ѐ ᘀḀ""Ḁᔀ% ἀ/ ᰀ)!ᔀᴀ$"ᘀ!ᰀᘀ$ % !ᔀ&$!ᰀ@܀ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ<؀7଀؀Mᬀ1଀܀;܀Ḁᔀ%ᘀḀᘀ" /ἀ "ᘀ!ᰀᘀ$"ᘀ!"%$ %%ᴀ!ᘀᰀ$ !ᰀ $ ਀᐀#)#਀᐀ᔀᔀ" ᐀ࠀᤀఀࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ" ؀ࠀ81ЀȀ/܀81଀܀଀ԀЀ'ЀCG1ᨀЀ@܀ᤀ ᰀḀᔀᰀ / "ᘀ!")$ % !&ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᔀ"਀᐀#ᰀᰀ >ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ؀ᜀ܀਀᐀ᔀ% >᠀+ᬀ $A଀.଀ᄀЀ ᘀḀᔀ&ᘀḀ"& /ἀ ᰀ)!")$ᰀ !ᔀᔀ$ %%ᴀ!ᰀ&$ !ᰀᘀ܀ጀᄀЀ6଀>ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ<܀81଀܀A଀.଀ᄀЀC1Ѐ3଀7ࠀ' ᰀᘀḀ"ᘀᘀḀ"& ἀ ᰀ !ᔀᔀ$!%"$ %ᴀ!ᰀ&$% !&&$ ਀᐀#))਀᐀ᔀᔀ& ᐀ࠀᤀఀࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ܀ᘀḀ% ἀ "ᘀ!&ᰀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ"$ ਀᐀ᔀᔀ&਀᐀#ᰀ" >ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ ؀.਀ఀ1ᬀ܀਀᐀ᔀ%ᴀ >᠀+2 $"&! %$BȀЀ0Ѐ &ḀᘀḀ"" ἀ "ᰀ!%ᰀ$ᰀ !%#$ %ᴀ!"ᘀ܀1ᄀࠀ>ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ؀଀>܀ᘀḀ""ᘀḀᔀᘀ ἀ ᰀ"ᘀ!"ᔀ$ !%#$ % !&"$!ᔀᴀ$ ਀᐀#)਀᐀ᔀᔀ% ᐀1Ѐ6ᄀ2 ؀)BȀЀ0ЀC1Ѐ3ጀ9଀܀਀᐀ᔀᔀᘀ >ࠀ39଀ᄀᬀ " Ḁᘀᔀ ἀ "ᘀ!ᰀᴀ$ % !%ᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᔀ%਀᐀#ᰀ& >ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ $ "!$"ᘀḀᰀ%ᘀḀᔀ% ἀ ᰀ !ᰀ%$!%#$ % !ᔀ ؀CᬀԀ1܀ᤀ>ࠀ᠀ᄀ2؀ᜀ܀C13ࠀ᠀ఀࠀ'ᬀ ᘀḀᔀ%%Ḁ&) ἀ ᰀᰀᴀ!ᰀ#$ !%#$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ)$ !" $ ਀᐀#)ᴀ਀᐀ᔀᔀᔀ ᐀1ᬀᤀᄀЀ؀CᬀԀ1܀଀7଀ᄀᬀ ᘀḀᘀ# ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ&$ % !%ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᔀᔀ਀᐀#ᰀ% >ࠀ᠀ᄀ2?܀਀᐀ᔀᔀᰀ >ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ $ᘀḀᴀᘀḀ#ᰀ ἀ "ᘀ!&%$ᰀ !%ᴀ$ % !&)$!ᰀᴀ ؀)'DЀ3᠀ࠀ0ࠀ܀က*ᨀЀ>ࠀ᠀ᄀ2܀ᬀ+᠀<܀C1଀0ࠀ'ᬀ ᰀᘀḀ%ᔀᘀḀ#ᰀ ἀ ᰀᰀᴀ!" !%ᴀ$ $ % !ᰀᴀ$!&#$ ਀᐀#਀᐀ᔀᔀ# ᘀ ᐀1ᬀᤀᄀࠀ+ࠀ1ᤀᨀᬀ؀)'DЀ3᠀ࠀ0ࠀ܀଀ԀЀ'Ѐ "Ḁᔀ% / "ᘀ!ᰀᘀ$ % !ᰀ $ ਀᐀ᔀᔀ#਀᐀#ᰀᔀ >ࠀ᠀ᄀ2@܀਀᐀ᔀᔀ" >ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ $#ᰀḀᘀᰀᘀḀ ) ἀ ᰀᰀᴀ!"%$ !ᔀᴀ$ % !""$!ᰀ ؀਀ఀ1+ᬀ1܀C1ࠀ(+ࠀJ ᘀḀᔀḀ&" ) ἀ ᰀᴀ!"%$ᰀᴀ!"#$ % !ᰀ#$!%ᘀ$ ਀᐀#਀᐀ᔀᔀ) ᰀ ᐀1ᄀ଀9ࠀ'>ࠀ᠀ᄀ2؀਀ఀ1+ᬀ1܀A଀.଀ᄀЀ ᘀḀ"& ἀ ᰀ !ᔀᔀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ&$ ਀᐀ᔀᔀ)਀᐀#ᰀ# >ࠀ᠀ᄀ2܀਀᐀ᔀᔀ& >ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ ਀᐀ᔀᔀ% >ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ܀BȀЀ0Ѐ ᘀḀ"" ἀ ᰀ !%#$ % !&"$ ਀᐀ᔀᔀ਀᐀#ᰀ) >ࠀ᠀ᄀ=܀ᜀЀȀ଀7ࠀ'C1ࠀᄀ ᰀḀ"%&Ḁᘀ& ἀ ᰀᰀᴀ!ᰀ !ᔀᰀ$ $ %ᴀ!ᰀ)$% !%)$ ਀᐀#਀᐀ᔀᔀ " ᐀1ጀ8଀ᄀЀ>ࠀ᠀ᄀ=܀ᜀЀȀ଀7ࠀ' #ḀᔀᰀḀ"% ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀ&$ᰀ !ᔀᰀ$ %%ᴀ!ᰀ)$ !"%$ $ᜀ଀ᄀࠀȀࠀ᠀ "&Ḁ#ᘀᘀḀᰀᔀ ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ)$ᰀ !ᰀ%$ %ᴀ!"%$% !ᰀᰀ܀=ఀᄀ଀(Ѐ>ࠀ᠀ᄀ؀ᘀḀᰀᔀᰀḀ&ᰀ /ἀ ᰀᰀᴀ!&%$ !ᰀ%$ % !ᰀᰀ$!% $ ਀᐀#਀᐀ᔀᔀᴀ & ᐀1ጀ9 )؀ᜀ଀ᄀࠀȀࠀ᠀C1ࠀᄀ܀=ᘀḀᔀ% ἀ ᰀ !%#$ % !" $ ਀᐀ᔀᔀᴀ਀᐀#ᰀ >ࠀ᠀ᄀ ؀CᬀԀ1܀਀᐀ᔀᔀᔀ >ࠀ᠀ᄀ2 $0ЀȀ଀ᨀ ᘀḀ"ᔀ ἀ ᰀ !&%$ % !"ᰀ$ ਀᐀# % ᐀9଀ᄀᄀᬀ ᰀ%Ḁ"ᔀ ἀ ᰀ !"%$ % !ᔀᘀ؀฀܀=ᘀḀ#ᰀ ἀ ᰀ !%ᴀ$ % !ᰀᴀ$ ਀᐀#ᰀᴀ C1ࠀᄀᤀᨀ ؀)'DЀ3᠀ࠀ0ࠀ܀਀᐀ᔀᔀ# >ࠀ᠀ᄀ2 $ᘀḀ ) ἀ ᰀᴀ!"%$ % !ᰀ#$ ਀᐀#"ᘀ C1ጀ9ࠀ'ࠀ ᘀḀ#% ἀ "ᘀ!ᘀ&$ % !&ᰀ$ ਀᐀# ᔀ ᐀*ఀ4 &Ḁᔀ" / ᰀ)!ᘀ&$ % !%ᰀ ؀਀ఀ1+ᬀ1܀਀᐀ᔀᔀ) >ࠀ᠀ᄀ2 $ ᤀఀࠀ ᘀḀ"ᴀ ἀ ᰀ !%ᔀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ؀?܀ࠀ'2̀܀ᜀЀȀ଀7ࠀ' ᰀḀ"% ἀ ᰀ !ᔀᰀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ)$ ਀᐀#"ᰀ Cጀ3ࠀ'ᬀ ᰀḀ"" ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ"$ %ᴀ!ᘀ)$ ਀᐀# # ᐀4ᤀጀ(ᨀ2܀=਀᐀ᔀᔀ >ࠀ᠀ᄀ $ᄀᄀ2 ᰀḀ"ᘀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᔀ%$ % !ᔀ $ ਀᐀# ) ကЀ7ᄀࠀ' ᰀḀᔀ& ἀ "ᘀ!ᔀ#$ %ᴀ!ᘀᔀ؀ᜀ଀ᄀࠀȀࠀ᠀ ᘀḀᰀᔀ / ᰀ !ᰀ%$ % !ᰀᰀ$ ਀᐀#"" CጀԀ܀=਀᐀ᔀᔀᴀ >ࠀ᠀ᄀ Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Slovakia

؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ $&ᬀ ᰀᴀḀᔀᴀᘀḀᔀᴀ ἀ ""!ᰀ#$ᰀ !"#$ % !ᔀᔀ$!ᔀ᠀؀฀܀ᬀ ᰀᴀḀᔀᴀ Ḁᔀ& ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᔀᰀ$ᰀ !"#$ %ᴀ!ᘀ%$% !ᔀ&$ ਀᐀#਀᐀ᔀᘀᘀ ကЀȀࠀԀ଀1ࠀ'ᜀЀ᠀Ѐᤀᨀᬀ᠀؀฀܀ᜀЀ᠀Ѐᤀᨀᬀ؀਀᐀#"&਀᐀ᔀᘀᘀ C43 $(ᰀḀᔀ"ᰀḀᰀ" ἀ ᰀ""!ᘀᰀ$ !ᔀ&$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ"$ !ᰀ" ؀)'ᰀḀᔀᔀ"ᰀḀᔀ" ἀ ᰀ)!ᔀ&$""!ᘀᰀ$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ"$ !ᔀ&$ ਀᐀#਀᐀ᔀᘀᰀ ᴀ ကЀȀഀЀᄀ4ἀȀ଀Ȁࠀ" ؀)'ἀȀ଀Ȁࠀ؀)7଀᠀؀਀᐀#"%਀᐀ᔀᘀᰀ :+ࠀ(+ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ;ᜀ $#"! %$(Ѐᨀ4ఀࠀጀἀᄀఀࠀ᠀ ᘀḀᔀ&ᘀḀ"% ἀ ᰀ !ᰀ%$!ᔀ)$ %ᴀ!ᰀ?܀8ࠀȀ܀ἀᄀఀࠀ᠀ ᰀḀᘀḀ"% ᔀ /ἀ "ᘀ!ᰀᘀ$ᰀ !ᔀ)$ % !ᰀ#$!"#$ ਀᐀#ᴀᘀ਀᐀ᔀᘀ" ကЀഀ4)؀਀᐀#"ᔀ਀᐀ᔀᘀ" :+1ᬀԀ $᐀᠀ᬀ9ఀࠀ1฀Ѐ(*(+ ᘀḀ%"ᰀḀᰀ& ἀ "ᘀ!"#$ᰀᴀ!%)$ %ᴀ!"&$% !ᔀᘀ܀=ᄀ؀'1؀> &਀᐀#"#਀᐀ᔀᘀ& :+'ࠀ6ᄀ଀(Ѐ฀Ѐ(*(+ #ᰀḀᰀ%ᰀḀᰀ& ἀ ᰀ)!"%$ᰀᴀ!%)$ % !%)$!ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀#ᴀᰀ਀᐀ᔀᘀ $1଀฀ЀȀ,ᄀ ᰀḀ)Ḁ%ᴀ ᘀ ἀ "ᘀ!ᘀ%$ᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$ % !&"$!%ᰀ؀Ԁ؀ༀ܀'܀)؀'ᘀḀ)Ḁ%ᴀ # ἀ "ᘀ!ᰀ"$ᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$ % !%"$!%ᰀ$ ਀᐀#ᴀ"਀᐀ᔀᘀ% က଀8ࠀ" ܀E܀ᄀ2.4+:܀I܀Ѐᄀ଀ᄀЀ᠀8܀਀᐀#")਀᐀ᔀᘀ% ฀ЀȀ,ᄀ?ጀ1ᬀᄀᤀᨀЀ ਀᐀ᔀᘀᔀ ฀Ѐᄀᤀᨀᬀ܀-ఀ଀Ѐ'ᄀ଀(Ѐ?ጀ1ᬀᄀᤀᨀЀ܀8᠀Ѐ଀ᄀ܀I܀:+4.ᄀ2 )Ḁ%ᴀ ἀ ᰀ !ᔀ&$ % !"#$ ਀᐀#ᴀ&਀᐀ᔀᘀᔀ က଀8ఀࠀ'ᤀᨀᬀ܀᐀ࠀᨀЀ'Ѐ฀Ѐᄀᤀᨀᬀ܀-ఀ଀Ѐ'ᄀ଀(Ѐ "Ḁ%ᔀ)Ḁ%ᴀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᔀᰀ$ᰀ !ᔀ&$ %ᴀ!ᘀ#$% !"#$ ਀᐀ᔀᘀ#਀᐀#" ฀Ѐ.Ѐᄀఀᄀ଀(ЀĀ+1ᬀ7 ᘀḀ%#ᘀḀ#" /ἀ ᰀ)!ᘀ%$ᰀ !ᔀ $ % !"ᰀ$!&ᴀ$ ਀᐀#ᴀ%਀᐀ᔀᘀ# က଀8ఀࠀ'ᤀᨀᬀ܀က*.ᄀЀ฀Ѐ.Ѐᄀఀᄀ଀(Ѐ ᘀḀ%#Ḁ " ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!"ᘀ$ᰀ)!ᘀ%$ % !ᔀ)$!"ᰀ$ $0Ѐఀ଀ᄀЀ "Ḁᘀ"ᔀḀᘀ) ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ#$""!"ᰀ$ % !ᔀ#$!%ᴀ؀HᤀЀȀЀ฀܀ᔀḀᘀ)ᘀḀ) ἀ ""!"ᰀ$"ᘀ!&ᰀ$ % !%ᴀ$!ᔀᴀ$ ਀᐀#ᴀᔀ਀᐀ᔀᘀ) က଀8ఀࠀ'ᤀᨀᬀ ؀)'0Ѐఀ଀ᄀЀĀ᠀଀Ѐ9ࠀ؀਀᐀ᔀᘀ)਀᐀#"ᴀ ฀ $ఀ᠀଀Ѐ1 ᰀḀ%#ᘀḀ"& ἀ ᰀᴀ!%%$"ᘀ!&%$ %ᴀ!ᘀᘀ$% !%ᔀ؀ࠀ1*3ᨀЀ฀/܀ᘀḀ"&ᘀḀᘀᰀ ἀ/ "ᘀ!&%$ᰀ !ᘀ)$ %%)!ᔀ&$ !%ᔀ$ ਀᐀#ᴀ#਀᐀ᔀᘀ က଀8ఀࠀ'ᤀᨀᬀ 5؀ఀ᠀଀Ѐ1ĀԀ؀਀᐀ᔀᘀ਀᐀#&ᘀ ฀ $#ఀ଀Ѐ'ᄀ଀(Ѐ฀,0Ѐ &ḀᘀᔀᘀḀᰀ# ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!"ᘀ$ᰀ !%ᘀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ"$%)!ᔀ-܀ᘀḀᰀ#ᘀḀ%& / ᰀᰀᴀ!ᘀᰀ$ !%ᘀ$ %)!ᔀ#$% !ᘀᔀ$ ਀᐀#ᴀ)਀᐀ᔀᘀᴀ က଀8ఀࠀ'ᤀᨀᬀ ؀ȀԀࠀᤀఀ଀؀1/܀5ᤀᨀ2؀਀᐀ᔀᘀᴀ਀᐀#&ᰀ ฀,0ЀĀ8 $ $Ḁᰀᔀ#Ḁ%" ἀ/ "ᘀ!ᘀ%$""!ᘀᔀ$ % !ᔀ!%ᰀ( "܀ᄀᄀ2؀଀7ᨀЀ਀᠀8؀A܀L5Ѐᄀ4 #Ḁ%"ᰀḀ#% / ""!ᘀᔀ$ᰀᴀ!ᘀ&$ % !%ᰀ$!ᘀᴀ$ ਀᐀#ᴀ਀᐀ᔀᰀᘀ က଀8ఀࠀ'ᤀᨀᬀ܀5ᤀᨀ2؀Ā8"܀ᄀᄀ2؀਀᐀ᔀᰀᘀ਀᐀#&" ਀ $(Ḁᰀ&ᰀḀᔀ& ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!ᰀᘀ$ᰀᴀ!ᔀ $ % !ᔀ#$!ᰀ& ؀)'฀᠀+ࠀ؀)*'؀@܀ࠀఀࠀᨀ ᰀḀᔀ&&Ḁᘀ /ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᔀᰀᴀ!%&$ $ % !ᰀ)$!&%$ ਀᐀#ᴀᴀ਀᐀ᔀᰀᰀ က଀8ఀࠀ'ᤀᨀ2/܀=5ᤀᨀ؀Ā8؀)'਀᐀ᔀᰀᰀ਀᐀#&& ฀᠀+ࠀ $(Dᬀᄀ฀ࠀ31ࠀ'ᄀ,ᨀ ᰀḀ""ᘀḀᰀ& ἀ ᰀᴀ!%ᘀ$ᰀᴀ!" $ %ᴀ!ᘀ&$%ᴀ!ᘀ܀=ࠀఀЀ ᘀḀᰀ&ᘀḀ&ᘀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!"ᰀ !%#$ $ %ᴀ!ᘀ)$% !&ᴀ$ ਀᐀)ᘀᘀ਀᐀ᔀᰀ" က଀8ఀࠀ'ᤀᨀ+؀က܀਀᐀ᔀᰀ"਀᐀#&% ฀ࠀ31ࠀ'ᄀ,ᨀDЀᄀࠀ'Ѐ $ᤀ ᘀḀᘀ#ᘀḀ # /ἀ ᰀ)!"ᴀ$ᰀ !ᰀᴀ$ %)!ᔀᔀ$% !&&$ ਀᐀)ᘀᰀ਀᐀ᔀᰀ& က଀ᤀᨀࠀ'ᬀ฀ࠀȀ,ᨀ4 ᰀḀ&)ᘀḀᘀ# ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!"ᘀ$ᰀ)!"ᴀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ#$%)!ᔀᔀ؀ᜀ܀਀᐀ᔀᰀ&਀᐀#&ᔀ ฀ࠀȀ,ᨀ4DЀᄀࠀ'Ѐ $"5ࠀ' #ḀᘀᘀᘀḀᰀᴀ / ᰀᴀ!ᘀ"$ᰀ)!%ᰀ$ %%)!ᔀ%$ !ᰀ؀+5ࠀ'DЀ1Ѐ3଀ᄀЀ ᘀḀᰀᴀᰀḀᰀᘀ /ἀ ᰀ)!%ᰀ$"ᘀ!%ᰀ$ %)!ᔀ%$%ᴀ!"ᰀ$ ਀᐀)ᘀ"਀᐀ᔀᰀ% က଀ఀЀ'Ѐ฀ࠀ؀+਀᐀ᔀᰀ%਀᐀#&# ฀ࠀ $ ᘀḀᘀḀ)" % ἀ/ "ᰀ!ᔀ%$ᰀ)!ᘀ#$ %ᴀ!ᰀ% !ᘀᔀ$ $ ਀᐀)ᘀ&਀᐀ᔀᰀᔀ က଀ఀԀЀᄀࠀ'ᬀ฀ࠀ1ࠀ' ᰀḀ#ᴀᘀḀ % ἀ "ᘀ!&#$"ᰀ!ᔀ%$ %ᴀ!"&$%ᴀ!ᰀ ؀)'਀᐀ᔀᰀᔀ਀᐀#&) ฀ࠀ1ࠀ'DЀ1ࠀ $ᄀࠀ'2 "ḀᔀᴀᘀḀ## /ἀ "ᘀ!ᘀᴀ$ᰀ !&)$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ)$ !ᰀᴀ$ ਀᐀)ᘀ%਀᐀ᔀᰀ# ကࠀȀᄀࠀ฀ࠀఀఀࠀ'ࠀ ᘀḀ"Ḁᔀᴀ " ἀ/ ᰀ"ᘀ!ᘀᴀ$ !ᔀ"$ %ᴀ!"ᘀ$% !ᰀᴀ؀਀᐀ᔀᰀ#਀᐀#& ฀ࠀఀఀࠀ'ࠀDЀᤀ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ)਀᐀#&ᴀ ฀1Ȁᬀ1ᨀЀDЀᤀఀ1Ѐ3ᬀ ᰀ#ḀᴀᴀᘀḀ%& ἀ "ᘀ!"ᰀ$ᰀ !ᔀ)$ % !%#$!&ᴀ$ ਀᐀)ᘀᔀ਀᐀ᔀᰀ) ကࠀ'7Ѐ฀1Ȁᬀ1ᨀЀ ᰀ#ḀᴀᴀᰀḀᘀᰀ ἀ ᰀ"ᘀ!"ᰀ$ !%ᴀ$ % !&%$!%#$ $Ḁᴀᰀ"Ḁ#& ἀ ᰀ"ᰀ!ᰀ#$ !%%$ % !&ᴀ$!ᔀᘀ" ؀)'6ࠀ؀ఀ؀᐀ࠀᤀఀࠀ5Ѐᄀ4 "Ḁ#&ᴀḀ%ᘀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀ#$ᰀ !&ᰀ$ % !ᔀᘀ$!"ᴀ$ ਀᐀)ᘀ#਀᐀ᔀᰀ ကࠀ'7଀(Ѐ฀1܀Ȁ5ࠀ'2؀D؀)'6ࠀ؀ఀ؀਀᐀ᔀᰀ਀᐀#%ᘀ ฀1 $ఀᨀЀ ᘀḀᘀḀᘀ& ᔀ / ᰀ"ᘀ!"ᰀ$ !&)$ %)!ᔀᰀ$% !&ᘀ؀ᘀḀᘀ&ᘀḀᰀᰀ /ἀ "ᘀ!"ᰀ$ᰀ !ᰀᰀ$ % !&ᘀ$!"%$ ਀᐀)ᘀ)਀᐀ᔀᰀᴀ Nጀ3ᬀ฀1 )؀ᄀ؀᠀؀ఀᨀЀD؀਀᐀ᔀᰀᴀ਀᐀#%ᰀ ฀1 $%"!$"%! % $%%!ഀᄀ଀7ᨀЀ ᘀḀ"#%Ḁᘀ" ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!")$ᰀᴀ؀ఀࠀ'ᬀ฀1؀ᄀᤀᨀ2 %Ḁᘀ"ᘀḀ"ᴀ / ᰀᴀ!%%$"ᘀ!ᘀ&$ % !"%$!ᰀ)$ ਀᐀)ᘀ਀᐀ᔀ"ᘀ Nጀ3଀؀ᤀ؀ഀᄀ଀7ᨀЀD؀਀᐀ᔀ"ᘀ਀᐀#%" ฀1 $ $ࠀఀЀ ) "ḀᘀᘀḀᰀ) ἀ ᰀ)!%ᰀ$ᰀ !%ᴀ$ %%ᴀ!ᰀ !ᔀᰀ+؀က܀฀ጀȀЀఀ,ᄀᤀᨀЀ܀E܀؀ࠀᨀࠀ᠀଀܀؀)ᨀࠀ8Ѐᄀ଀܀ḀᘀᘀᰀḀ%% ἀ/ ᰀ"ᘀ!ᘀ%$ !%ᴀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ% !ᰀ&$ $ ਀᐀)ᘀᴀ਀᐀ᔀ"ᰀ Cࠀ᠀ጀ34+ࠀ" ؀)ᤀఀ଀؀ࠀఀЀD+؀က܀਀᐀ᔀ"ᰀ਀᐀#%& ฀ጀȀЀఀ,ᄀᤀᨀЀ $"%! % $ᤀጀ11ࠀጀᄀȀ଀ᄀሀ ᘀḀ"ᔀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀᘀ܀؀)ᨀࠀ8Ѐᄀ଀܀᐀ࠀ9଀(଀Ѐ(+Cࠀ᠀ጀ34+ࠀ܀81଀܀)؀'1ᤀᨀࠀ )ᘀḀᔀ"ᘀḀ"ᔀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀᘀ$"ᘀ!"ᰀ$ %%ᴀ!ᰀ)$ !%"$ ਀᐀ᔀ"" ฀ጀᨀࠀ؀ഀ؀D܀I܀Ѐሀጀ1Ѐ?܀᐀ࠀ9଀(଀Ѐ(+਀8଀9ᤀᨀᬀ܀81଀܀)؀'਀᐀ᔀ""਀᐀#%% ฀ጀᨀࠀ $7ᨀЀ & ᘀḀᘀᔀḀ&ᘀ ἀ/ "ᰀ!ᰀ%$ᰀᴀ!&ᰀ$ %ᴀ!"%$% !ᰀᔀ؀Ḁᰀᔀ& Ḁ&ᘀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀ%$ᰀ)!#ᘀ$ %ᴀ!"%$% !%ᔀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"&਀᐀)ᰀᘀ ฀ጀᤀࠀ'Nጀ3ࠀ1଀%# ܀=ࠀ'Ѐ.ᤀᨀ/܀E܀1؀'؀ᤀ܀)؀'Āᄀࠀ܀=਀᐀ᔀ"&਀᐀#%ᔀ ฀ጀᤀࠀ'/ࠀ'Ѐ.ᤀᨀ +ᄀࠀ1ఀ܀)؀'Āᄀࠀ $ᰀḀᴀ&#Ḁ&ᴀ / "ᰀ!ᘀ)$ᰀᴀ!& $ % !&ᰀ$!ᰀᴀ )؀ᄀ؀਀᐀ᔀ"% ฀ጀഀ଀(Ѐ ᰀḀᴀ& / "ᰀ!ᘀ)$ % !&ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"%਀᐀)ᰀᰀ ฀ጀഀ଀(Ѐကጀ7 $ᄀ଀(Ѐ ᰀḀ&ᰀᘀḀᰀ ἀ ᰀ"ᘀ!ᔀ !&ᘀ$ $ %%ᴀ!ᰀ"$ !%ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"ᔀ਀᐀)ᰀ" ฀4ᤀఀ1଀7Ѐᄀ4က*ᨀЀ ᰀḀ&ᰀᘀḀᘀᔀ ἀ ᰀᰀ)!ᔀ%$ !&ᘀ$ % !%ᰀ$!%ᘀ؀਀᐀ᔀ"ᔀ਀᐀#%# ฀4ᤀఀ1଀7Ѐᄀ4᐀ЀԀ $ᄀ଀(ЀကጀᨀЀ'଀(Ѐ ᘀḀ%)&Ḁ% ἀ ᰀ"ᰀ!ᰀ !%ᔀ$ $ %%ᴀ!ᰀ#$ !&ᰀ؀଀1ࠀ(+ࠀጀ ᘀḀ%)ᰀḀ%& ἀ ᰀ""!ᘀᰀ$ !%ᔀ$ % !&ᰀ$!ᔀᔀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"#਀᐀)ᰀ& ฀ഀ:܀ᄀЀȀ܀ᄀ଀(Ѐ؀ᄀ଀(Ѐ᐀ЀԀ؀਀᐀ᔀ"#਀᐀#%) ฀ഀ $("! $"6ᨀࠀ'Nጀ87଀ЀᄀᨀЀ ᰀḀᰀ#ᘀḀ%ᰀ /ἀ "ᰀ!%#$ᰀᴀ!"%$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ؀: %ᄀ଀7ᄀᬀ ᰀḀᰀ#ᰀḀ"ᴀ / "ᰀ!%#$ᰀ !ᘀ&$ %%)!ᔀᘀ$ !")$ ਀᐀ᔀ")਀᐀)ᰀ؀6ᨀࠀ'᐀ЀԀ؀: %#਀᐀ᔀ")਀᐀ $ &!$ᤀᨀࠀ'2ကጀఀ଀᠀Ѐ ᘀḀ&ᰀᘀḀᴀ) ἀ ᰀ)!"%$ᰀ !ᔀᘀ$ % !&ᔀ؀1ࠀ'ᬀ;က଀؀: ᄀᨀЀ ᘀḀ&ᰀᰀḀᘀ" ἀ ᰀ)!"%$"ᘀ!&%$ %%ᴀ!"ᰀ$ !&ᔀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"਀᐀)ᰀᔀ؀ᤀᨀࠀ'2᐀ЀԀ଀؀1ࠀ'ᬀ;က଀؀: ਀᐀ᔀ"਀᐀#ᔀᘀ $7Ѐᄀ4 ᰀᘀḀ"Ḁᰀ# # ἀ ᰀᴀ!&ᴀ$"ᰀ!ᰀ"$ % !"ᴀ$!%#$ ਀᐀ᔀ"ᴀ਀᐀)ᰀ# :଀ᄀࠀ3Ѐ0Ѐက4ᤀ଀(Ѐ ᰀᘀḀᘀḀ%ᔀ # ἀ ᰀᴀ!&ᴀ$ᰀ !ᔀᔀ$ %%ᴀ!ᰀᔀ$ !"ᴀ؀'਀᐀ᔀ"ᴀ਀᐀#ᔀᰀ :଀ᄀࠀ3Ѐ0Ѐ᐀Ѐ $ "! %$"Ѐ᠀Ѐ(ᨀ4 ᰀᰀḀ)&ᘀḀᰀ& ἀ/ "ᰀ!ᔀᰀ)!ᘀ"$ $ %ᴀ!ᰀ?؀)'ᨀ5Ѐᄀ4 ᰀᰀḀ)&ᰀḀᰀᘀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᔀ"ᰀ!"%$ $ %ᴀ!ᰀ"$% !ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᘀ਀᐀)ᰀ) <Ѐ3Ѐ᠀ࠀ؀/܀1ࠀ'ᤀᨀ2؀)؀᐀؀)'਀᐀ᔀ&ᘀ਀᐀#ᔀ" <Ѐ3Ѐ᠀ࠀ $ $7ࠀ'ࠀ ᘀḀ"ᰀ"Ḁ&ᴀ ἀ/ ᰀ"ᘀ!"ᴀ$ !ᔀᰀ$ %ᴀ!"% !&ᘀ$ $ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᰀ਀᐀)ᰀ <ЀȀ(Ѐ?Ѐ᠀(ࠀ' ᘀḀ"ᰀᰀḀᘀᘀ ἀ ᰀ"ᰀ!ᘀᰀ$ !ᔀᰀ$ %ᴀ!"%ᴀ!"ᘀ؀਀᐀ᔀ&ᰀ਀᐀#ᔀ& <ЀȀ(Ѐ᐀ $%&!$#ᘀḀ")ᘀḀ#ᰀ / ᰀ"ᰀ!%ᴀ$ !ᘀ"$ % !ᰀ ؀)ᘀḀ")ᰀḀᰀ / ᰀ"ᰀ!ᰀ)$ !ᘀ"$ % !ᰀ#$!&&$ ਀᐀ᔀ&"਀᐀)ᰀᴀ <ᬀ8ࠀ1?Ѐ᠀7଀ )؀ᄀ+)؀਀᐀ᔀ&"਀᐀#ᔀ% <ᬀ8ࠀ1᐀ $ࠀ'ᬀ #Ḁ%#ᘀḀ"ᰀ ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$ᰀ !ᰀ $ %%)!%ᔀ$ !ᘀᴀ᠀؀)Ѐ1?؀)'ࠀ᠀؀> ᨀ4 #Ḁ%#ᘀḀ ) ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$ᰀ !& $ % !ᘀᴀ$!&ᔀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&&਀᐀)"ᘀ*᠀܀I܀᐀5Ѐᨀ؀)'ࠀ᠀؀> ਀᐀ᔀ&&਀᐀#ᔀᔀ $&%! %$1ఀ଀.ᄀ2?Ѐ1ᨀጀ9ᨀЀ ᰀḀᘀ"ᘀḀᴀ ἀ "ᰀ!%ᴀ$"ᘀ!"ᘀ$ %ᴀ!"ᰀ؀> ࠀԀ ᰀḀᘀ"&Ḁ%ᔀ ἀ "ᰀ!%ᴀ$ᰀ !%%$ %ᴀ!"ᰀ$% !ᔀᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&%਀᐀)"ᰀ'؀Mᄀ଀܀8ࠀȀ܀1ఀ଀.ᄀ2᐀᠀ᬀ9ఀࠀ1؀> #਀᐀ᔀ&%਀᐀#ᔀ $ᨀ ᘀḀᘀᴀᰀḀᘀᴀ ἀ ᰀᰀᴀ!"ᘀ$ !ᰀᘀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀᔀ؀Ѐ1ఀ଀ᄀ7?0؀᐀ЀԀ܀=ᄀ؀'1؀> ""(ᤀ ᘀḀᘀᴀᘀḀᔀ" ἀ ᰀ !ᰀᘀ$!ᰀ)$ %ᴀ!ᘀᔀ$% !&"$ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᔀ਀᐀؀ᜀ܀ࠀ'ᬀ̀܀0᐀᠀ᬀఀࠀ'Ѐ؀᐀ЀԀ܀=ᄀ؀'1؀> (਀᐀ᔀ&ᔀ਀᐀#ᔀ $"ᘀḀᘀ%ᘀḀᘀᰀ ἀ/ ᰀ !%!ᘀ)$ $ %ᴀ!&ᘀ$%)!ᔀ ؀)'Ѐ1ఀࠀ?؀1ᄀ؀᐀᠀7ࠀ' ᘀḀᘀ%ᘀḀ)ᘀ ἀ ᰀ"ᘀ!&ᴀ$ !% $ %ᴀ!&ᘀ$%ᴀ!ᘀᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&#਀᐀)"& <଀؀1ᄀ؀਀᐀ᔀ&#਀᐀#ᔀ <଀ $Cࠀ1ᄀᬀȀࠀԀ ᔀḀᘀ%ᘀḀᴀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!%ᔀ$"ᘀ!%ᰀ$ % !%ᘀ$!ᔀᔀ܀ᄀЀȀ܀؀)'6ࠀ؀฀Ѐ᠀ࠀሀ?Ѐఀ܀1ᄀ4؀฀Ѐ᠀ࠀሀ᐀᠀,. ᔀḀᘀ%ᘀḀ") ἀ ᰀᴀ!%ᔀ$ᰀ !"%$ % !%ᘀ$!&ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&)਀᐀)"% <଀܀1ᄀ4؀਀᐀ᔀ&)਀᐀#ᔀᴀ <଀ $#ᘀḀ")ᘀḀᔀ /ἀ ᰀ"ᘀ!"ᘀ$ !"ᔀ$ %%ᴀ!"ᰀ$ !ᰀ ؀)'Ѐఀ଀Ѐ9ࠀ?؀Ԁᬀ ᘀḀ")ᘀḀ)ᰀ / ᰀᰀ)!ᔀᘀ$ !"ᔀ$ %%)!%ᔀ$ !ᰀ#$ ਀᐀ᔀ&਀᐀)"ᔀ <଀ऀᬀ1؀̀܀᐀᠀,.ᤀᨀЀ؀਀᐀ᔀ&਀᐀##ᘀ <଀ऀᬀ1 $ᘀḀ&&ᰀḀᘀᔀ /ἀ "ᘀ!"&$ᰀ !"%$ % !&ᘀ$!&"$ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᴀ਀᐀)"# <ࠀ᠀ఀࠀ'ࠀ?Ѐఀ4ᤀࠀ'ᬀ ᘀḀ&&ᘀḀ&" /ἀ "ᘀ!"&$"ᘀ!%%$ %%ᴀ!"ᘀ$ !&ᘀ ؀C1ЀȀ଀9ఀ܀؀਀᐀ᔀ&ᴀ਀᐀##ᰀ <ࠀ᠀ఀࠀ'ࠀ᐀᠀,.ᤀᨀ $%ᘀḀ""ᰀḀ ἀ/ ᰀ !ᔀ%$!ᔀ $ % !ᔀᘀ$!ᰀ ؀)Ȁࠀ'Ѐ1؀?Ԁࠀ9ᄀ2؀Ԁࠀ9ᄀ2᐀᠀ࠀᨀࠀ7ࠀ' ᘀḀ""ᰀḀᰀ ἀ ᰀ !ᔀ%$!&#$ %%ᴀ!&ᘀ$ !ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ%ᘀ਀᐀)") <1؀਀᐀ᔀ%ᘀ਀᐀##" <1 $"ȀഀЀᄀ4 "Ḁ"ᔀᘀḀ)) /ἀ ᰀ)!ᰀ&$"ᰀ!ᰀᘀ$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ&$ !ᘀ؀?਀᐀ᔀ%ᰀ਀᐀##& <ጀᄀࠀ'ࠀ᐀5*7ࠀ'2 "Ḁ"ᔀᰀḀᘀ" /ἀ ᰀ)!ᰀ&$ᰀ !ᘀᔀ$ % !ᘀ"$!ᔀ)$ ਀᐀ᔀ%ᰀ਀᐀)" <ጀᄀࠀ'ࠀ $"%!$ᘀḀ"%ᘀḀᘀᴀ ἀ "ᰀ!&#$"ᘀ!ᔀ%$ % !ᔀᘀ '؀Ȁഀ؀?'ᔀḀᴀ#ᘀḀ"% ἀ/ "ᰀ!&#$ᰀ)!%ᰀ$ %%)!%)$ !ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ%"਀᐀)"ᴀ >Ѐ'଀Ȁࠀ& )؀'਀᐀ᔀ%"਀᐀##% >Ѐ'଀Ȁࠀ'᐀5*7ࠀ $଀ЀఀЀ ᰀḀᘀḀ)) ᔀ ἀ/ "ᰀ!ᘀᘀ$"ᘀ!"ᘀ$ % !&ᴀ$!&ᘀ᠀؀?܀E܀฀ࠀȀ'4܀ఀࠀᨀጀ܀Ȁᄀ2+ࠀ؀ᤀఀ1܀؀Ḁᘀ%ᰀḀ ᔀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᘀᘀ$"ᘀ!ᔀᴀ$ % !&ᴀ$!ᔀ#$ ਀᐀ᔀ%&਀᐀)&ᘀ /ࠀ'ࠀȀ଀%% ܀E܀฀ࠀȀ'4܀ఀࠀᨀጀ܀Ȁᄀ2+ࠀ؀ᤀఀ1܀؀਀᐀ᔀ%&਀᐀##ᔀ ᐀᠀ጀᨀᄀЀ'Ѐ/ࠀ'ࠀȀ଀ $%Ḁᘀ% ἀ ""!"ᘀ$ % !ᔀ" ܀ࠀऀ܀8Ѐ1ఀ܀؀᠀Ԁ଀ȀȀ܀؀+ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀3Ѐᤀ଀ᄀ܀1؀'ᰀ"Ḁᰀᰀ ἀ "ᰀ!&"$ %ᴀ!ᘀ)$ ਀᐀)&ᰀ ?଀(+Ѐ6᠀ࠀ'@଀ ܀ࠀऀ܀8Ѐ1ఀ܀؀᠀Ԁ଀ȀȀ܀؀+ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀3Ѐᤀ଀ᄀ܀1؀'଀@؀)਀᐀### ᐀ࠀ34᠀ᄀ଀ ฀ࠀȀ'Ѐ ฀ࠀȀ'Ѐ $ᘀḀᰀᘀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀᴀ$ % !ᔀ)$ ਀᐀)&" ?଀1ࠀ5Ѐ Ḁ & ἀ "ᰀ!%%$ %ᴀ!"ᘀ ؀)'਀᐀##) ᐀ࠀᨀࠀ9ࠀ $"Ȁ଀ᄀᨀ4 ᰀḀ#ᴀᘀḀᰀᔀ ἀ "ᘀ!"%$ % !ᔀᰀ$!ᔀ؀<Ȁ଀ᄀᨀ4 ᘀḀᔀ)ᘀḀᰀᔀ ἀ ᰀ"ᘀ!"%$ !"#$ % !&%$!ᔀ"$ ਀᐀)&&਀᐀ᔀ%% ?᠀4ᄀᨀ4؀<਀᐀##਀᐀ᔀ%% ᐀ࠀ᠀Ѐ7ᄀࠀ $#&! %$(%!(% $ఀ'Ѐ ᘀḀ"ᘀ"Ḁ " /ἀ ᰀᰀᴀ!"ᔀ$ !"ᔀ؀<ఀ'Ѐ ᰀḀᴀᴀ"Ḁ " /ἀ ᰀᰀᴀ!"ᔀ$ !ᰀᰀ$ % !"ᰀ$!&#$ ਀᐀)&%਀᐀ᔀ%ᔀ ?ࠀ7Ѐ؀<਀᐀##ᴀ਀᐀ᔀ%ᔀ ᐀ࠀ᠀,0Ѐᄀ4 $ᄀ ᘀḀᰀᰀᘀḀᰀ% / ᰀ)!ᔀ%$ᰀ#!#ᘀ$ % !ᰀ&$!ᰀᘀ,'؀<ᄀࠀᨀ؀ᄀ ᘀḀᘀ#ᘀḀᰀ% / ᰀᰀ#!#ᘀ$ !"#$ % !ᘀ"$!ᰀᘀ$ ਀᐀)&ᔀ਀᐀ᔀ%# ?ࠀ7,'؀<਀᐀#)ᘀ਀᐀ᔀ%# ᐀ࠀ᠀ఀЀ $"ᤀ &ḀᘀḀᰀ" ᘀ ἀ/ ᰀᰀ)!ᘀᘀ$ !ᔀ)$ % !&&$!ᰀ؀ᜀ܀ࠀ'ᬀ̀܀ᄀᤀᨀЀ,'؀<ᨀ4*᠀܀؀ᤀ ᰀḀᘀḀᰀ" ᴀ ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ%$ᰀ)!ᘀᘀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀᴀ$% !ᰀ"$ ਀᐀)&#਀᐀ᔀ%) BЀᨀ=᠀ᤀᨀ؀ᜀ܀ࠀ'ᬀ̀܀ᄀᤀᨀЀ,'؀<਀᐀#)ᰀ਀᐀ᔀ%) ᐀ࠀԀ6Ѐఀᄀᬀ ᤀ ᘀḀ)&ᰀḀᔀᰀ ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!"ᘀ$"ᘀ!")$ % !ᰀᔀ$!&ᘀ$ 117؀ᜀ܀ᬀ+᠀<0؀᐀ЀԀ܀=ᤀ ᰀḀ%ᰀᰀḀᔀᰀ ἀ/ ""!ᰀ#$"ᘀ!")$ % !%)$!&ᘀ$ ਀᐀)&)਀᐀ᔀ% ?ࠀȀ1؀ᜀ܀਀᐀#)"਀᐀ᔀ% ᐀ࠀ0ጀ9>᠀+ᬀ 116 $#Ḁ#ᴀᘀḀ% /ἀ ᰀ"ᘀ!&ᰀ$ !"ᔀ$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ"$ !ᰀ# ؀.਀ఀ1ᬀ܀2+᠀<؀)'ᘀḀ##ᘀḀ% ἀ ᰀ"ᘀ!&ᰀ$ !%ᴀ$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ"$ !"#$ ਀᐀)&਀᐀ᔀ%ᴀ ?ࠀ(+ࠀ ؀.਀ఀ1ᬀ܀2+᠀<؀)਀᐀#)&਀᐀ᔀ%ᴀ ᐀ࠀ8Ѐᄀ଀ ਀᐀#)%਀᐀ᔀᔀᘀ ᐀ࠀ87Ѐᄀ4>ࠀ39଀ᄀᬀ " &Ḁ%#Ḁᘀᔀ /ἀ ᰀ)!ᘀ%$"ᘀ!ᰀᴀ$ % !%ᔀ$!%ᴀ$ ਀᐀)&ᴀ਀᐀ᔀᔀᘀ ?ࠀᨀ1ЀȀᤀᨀᬀ܀Cࠀ5Ѐ>ࠀ39଀ᄀᬀ " %ḀḀᘀᔀ ᴀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ)$"ᘀ!ᰀᴀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ)$% !%ᴀ$ ਀᐀#)ᔀ਀᐀ᔀᔀᰀ ᐀ࠀ1ጀᄀᨀࠀ'ᬀ>ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ܀?଀7଀ᄀᬀ %Ḁ##ᘀḀᘀ# ἀ "ᰀ!%)$ᰀᴀ!ᰀ&$ %ᴀ!ᰀ"$% !%ᰀ$ ਀᐀)%ᘀ਀᐀ᔀᔀᰀ ?ࠀ9ጀ1ࠀ'>ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ܀?଀7଀ᄀᬀ )Ḁ%%ᘀḀᘀ# ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀ%$ᰀᴀ!ᰀ&$ %ᴀ!ᘀ% !%ᰀ$ $ $ ଀ԀЀ'Ѐ ᘀḀ&%"Ḁᔀ% ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!ᰀᰀ$"ᘀ!ᰀᘀ$ % !ᔀᰀ$!ᰀ@܀଀ԀЀ'Ѐ ᘀḀ""Ḁᔀ% ἀ/ ᰀ)!ᔀᴀ$"ᘀ!ᰀᘀ$ % !ᔀ&$!ᰀ $ ਀᐀)%ᰀ਀᐀ᔀᔀ" ?ࠀఀ47ᨀ4>ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ@܀ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ<؀7଀؀Mᬀ1଀܀;܀਀᐀#)#਀᐀ᔀᔀ" ᐀ࠀᤀఀࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ ਀᐀#))਀᐀ᔀᔀ& ᐀ࠀᤀఀࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ܀81଀܀>ጀᄀЀ6଀>ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ܀A଀.଀ᄀЀ ᘀḀᔀ&ᘀḀ"& /ἀ ᰀ)!")$ᰀ !ᔀᔀ$ %%ᴀ!ᰀ&$ !ᰀᘀ$ ਀᐀)%"਀᐀ᔀᔀ& ?ጀ.᠀Ѐ>ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ܀A଀.଀ᄀЀ ᘀḀ%ᘀḀ"& /ἀ ᰀ !&ᔀ$!ᔀᔀ$ %)!%%ᴀ!ᰀ&$ $ $"&!$"%! % $#%! BȀЀ0Ѐ &ḀᴀᘀḀ"" ἀ ᰀ)!"#$ᰀ܀BȀЀ0Ѐ &ḀᘀḀ"" ἀ "ᰀ!%ᰀ$ᰀ !%#$ %ᴀ!"ᘀ$% !&"$ ਀᐀)%&਀᐀ᔀᔀ% ?46Ѐ'>ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ܀1ᄀࠀ>ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ؀଀>܀਀᐀#)਀᐀ᔀᔀ% ᐀1Ѐ6ᄀ2 $ "! %$%ᘀḀ)ᔀᘀḀᔀ% ἀ ""!ᘀ#$ᰀ !%#$ %ᴀ!ᘀ ؀CᬀԀ1܀ࠀ᠀଀ЀᄀᨀЀ>ࠀ᠀ᄀ2/܀ᬀ᠀ࠀ'Ѐ'+)؀̀ ᘀḀᰀ%ᘀḀᔀ% ἀ ᰀ !ᰀ%$!%#$ % !ᔀ"$!" $ ਀᐀)%%਀᐀ᔀᔀᔀ ؀CᬀԀ1܀ᤀ>ࠀ᠀ᄀ2؀ᜀ܀਀᐀#)ᴀ਀᐀ᔀᔀᔀ ᐀1ᬀᤀᄀЀ $ᘀḀᘀᴀᘀḀ#ᰀ ἀ ᰀ !ᘀ#$!%ᴀ$ % !%ᰀ$!ᰀᴀ ؀)'DЀ3᠀ࠀ0ࠀ܀7ᨀ4>ࠀ᠀ᄀ2؀Ԁ؀̀ #ᘀḀᴀᘀḀ#ᰀ ἀ "ᘀ!&%$ᰀ !%ᴀ$ % !&)$!ᰀᴀ$ ਀᐀)%ᔀ਀᐀ᔀᔀ ؀)'DЀ3᠀ࠀ0ࠀ܀က*ᨀЀ>ࠀ᠀ᄀ2܀ᬀ+᠀<܀਀᐀#਀᐀ᔀᔀ# ᘀ ᐀1ᬀᤀᄀࠀ+ࠀ1ᤀᨀᬀ $#ᘀḀᰀᴀᘀḀ ) ἀ "ᘀ!%ᰀ$ᰀᴀ!"%$ %ᴀ!ᘀᰀ$% !ᰀ ؀਀ఀ1+ᬀ1܀9Ѐᄀ4>ࠀ᠀ᄀ2؀Ԁ؀̀ (ᰀḀᘀᰀᘀḀ ) ἀ ᰀᰀᴀ!"%$ !ᔀᴀ$ % !""$!ᰀ#$ ਀᐀)%#਀᐀ᔀᔀ ؀਀ఀ1+ᬀ1܀਀᐀#਀᐀ᔀᔀ) ᰀ ᐀1ᄀ଀9ࠀ'>ࠀ᠀ᄀ2 $(ᜀЀȀ଀7ࠀ' %Ḁ&#ᰀḀ"% ἀ ᰀ !%%$!ᔀᰀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀᴀ$%ᴀ!ᰀ܀=ᤀ᠀ጀ9Ѐ>ࠀ᠀ᄀ؀̀ ᜀЀȀ଀7ࠀ' #ḀᔀᰀḀ"% ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀ&$ᰀ !ᔀᰀ$ %%ᴀ!ᰀ)$ !"%$ ਀᐀)%)਀᐀ᔀᔀ܀=਀᐀#਀᐀ᔀᔀ " ᐀1ጀ8଀ᄀЀ>ࠀ᠀ᄀ $ᜀ଀ᄀࠀȀࠀ᠀ ᘀḀᰀ"ᘀḀᰀᔀ / ᰀ !ᘀᴀ$!ᰀ%$ %)!ᔀ#$% !ᰀᰀ܀=ᤀ'ЀȀ4>ࠀ᠀ᄀ؀̀ ᜀ଀ᄀࠀȀࠀ᠀ "&Ḁ#ᘀᘀḀᰀᔀ ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ)$ᰀ !ᰀ%$ %ᴀ!"%$% !ᰀᰀ$ ਀᐀)%਀᐀ᔀᔀᴀ܀=ఀᄀ଀(Ѐ>ࠀ᠀ᄀ؀਀᐀#਀᐀ᔀᔀᴀ & ᐀1ጀ9 $Ḁ ἀ ᰀ !"ᴀ$ % !ᔀᰀ#& ܀E܀1؀'؀ᤀ܀I܀ጀȀᄀࠀ@܀؀਀᐀# % ᐀9଀ᄀᄀᬀ ᰀ%Ḁ"ᔀ ἀ ᰀ !"%$ % !ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀)%ᴀ ̀଀ఀ1଀Ѐᄀᤀᨀ +ᄀࠀ1ఀ܀I܀ጀȀᄀࠀ@܀؀਀᐀# ᔀ ᐀*ఀ4 &Ḁᔀ" / ᰀ)!ᘀ&$ % !%ᰀ$ ̀଀ఀ1଀Ѐᄀᤀᨀ $"&! % $&ᤀఀࠀ ᘀḀ"ᴀ ἀ ᰀ !%ᔀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ $ ਀᐀)ᔀᘀ ̀଀'ᨀ4 ᰀḀᴀᰀ / ᰀ)!ᘀ؀?܀ࠀ'2̀܀਀᐀# # ᐀4ᤀጀ(ᨀ2 ਀᐀# ) ကЀ7ᄀࠀ' ᰀḀᔀ& ἀ "ᘀ!ᔀ#$ %ᴀ!ᘀᔀ$ ਀᐀)ᔀᰀ ̀଀.ᄀ=܀H1᠀,ᨀ ᘀḀ"# ἀ "ᰀ!&"$ %ᴀ!"ᘀ$ Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Slovakia

؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ $&ᬀ ᰀᴀḀᔀᴀ)Ḁᔀ% ἀ "ᘀ!ᰀ&$ᰀ !"#$ % !ᔀᰀ$!ᔀ᠀؀฀܀ሀᬀ1ఀᜀЀ᠀Ѐᤀᨀᬀ᠀؀ᬀ ᰀᴀḀᔀᴀᰀḀ# ἀ "ᘀ!&%$ᰀ !"#$ % !%ᔀ$!ᔀ&$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀᘀ ᰀ A᠀؀฀܀ᬀ ᰀᘀ"Ḁ%ᰀᰀᴀḀᔀᴀ ἀ ᰀ !&#$!"#$ % !")$!ᔀ&$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀᘀ ᰀ) @ࠀ.0Ѐ'ЀᜀЀ᠀Ѐᤀᨀᬀ᠀؀฀܀ᜀЀ᠀Ѐᤀᨀᬀ)؀'Āᄀࠀ܀=਀᐀)ᔀ"਀᐀ᔀᘀᘀ /ࠀ+1ࠀᄀᤀᨀ $ᰀ&Ḁ"""ᰀḀᔀ" ἀ ᰀ""!ᘀᰀ$ !ᔀᔀ$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ"$ !"ᴀ ؀)'ᬀἀȀ଀Ȁࠀ᠀8؀ᰀḀᔀ""Ḁᰀ& ἀ "ᘀ!%"$""!ᘀᰀ$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ"$ !ᔀ"$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀᰀ " A" ؀)'ᰀḀᔀ"&Ḁᘀᴀ ἀ ""!&ᰀ$""!ᘀᰀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ&$%ᴀ!ᘀ"$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀᰀ ᰀ @ጀȀ0Ѐᄀ4ἀȀ଀Ȁࠀ" ؀)'Ȁ᠀଀(ЀἀȀ଀Ȁࠀ؀਀܀਀᐀)ᔀ&਀᐀ᔀᘀᰀ ̀ࠀ'ᬀ $#"! %$(ࠀ'ᬀἀᄀఀࠀ᠀ "%ḀᘀḀ"% & ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀ%$ᰀ !ᔀ)$ %ᴀ!ᰀ+)1؀ᤀἀᄀఀࠀ᠀ ᘀḀᘀ"ᘀḀ"% ἀ "ᰀ!"ᰀ$ᰀ !ᔀ)$ % !ᔀᴀ$!"#$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀ" & A؀ᜀ܀ࠀ'ᬀ̀܀ᨀࠀ'ἀᄀఀࠀ᠀ %ḀᰀᴀᘀḀ"% /ἀ ᰀ !"!ᔀ)$ $ % !ᰀ#$!"#$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀ" ᰀᴀ @ጀᤀᨀᬀ؀A܀='਀᐀)ᔀ%਀᐀ᔀᘀ" ̀ࠀ $9Ԁᬀᨀ฀Ѐ(*(+ ᘀḀ"%ᰀḀᰀ& /ἀ ᰀᰀᴀ!%)$ !#ᘀ$ % !ᘀ#$!ᔀᘀ؀ᜀࠀ5Ѐ฀Ѐ(*(+ ᰀḀ)&ᰀḀᰀ& ἀ "ᰀ!&ᔀ$ᰀᴀ!%)$ %ᴀ!ᘀ#$% !ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀ& % A܀਀᐀)ᔀᔀ਀᐀ᔀᘀ& H3ࠀ1Ѐ฀Ѐ(*(+ &Ḁ)#ᰀḀᰀ& /ἀ ᰀ)!ᘀᰀᴀ!%)$ $ % !"ᴀ$!ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀ& "ᘀ @ጀᤀᨀᬀ $฀ЀȀ,ᄀ ᰀḀᔀ%)Ḁ%ᴀ ἀ ""!"ᰀ$ᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$ % !ᔀᰀ$!%ᰀ$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀ% ᔀ AࠀԀᬀ9଀ᨀࠀ'ࠀ฀ЀȀ,ᄀ ᘀḀᘀ%)Ḁ%ᴀ /ἀ ᰀ)!%ᘀ$ᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$ % !ᘀᔀ$!%ᰀ)؀'C1Ѐ3ࠀ܀=฀ЀȀ,ᄀ %Ḁ%ᴀ)Ḁ%ᴀ ἀ ᰀᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$ !")$ % !"!%ᰀ$ $ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀ% "ᰀ @ጀᤀᨀ؀)਀᐀)ᔀ#਀᐀ᔀᘀ% H34 ਀᐀)ᔀ)਀᐀ᔀᘀᔀ H7ࠀ'ᬀ฀Ѐᄀᤀᨀᬀ܀-ఀ଀Ѐ'ᄀ଀(Ѐ ᰀḀᴀ&)Ḁ%ᴀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!"ᔀ$ᰀ !ᔀ&$ % !&!"#$ $ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀᔀ "" @ጀ.଀ᄀᬀ฀Ѐᄀᤀᨀᬀ܀-ఀ଀Ѐ'ᄀ଀(Ѐ )Ḁ"))Ḁ%ᴀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!&"$ᰀ !ᔀ&$ % !"ᔀ$!"#$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀᔀ # AࠀԀᬀ9ࠀ'ᬀ฀Ѐᄀᤀᨀᬀ܀-ఀ଀Ѐ'ᄀ଀(Ѐ "Ḁ)&)Ḁ%ᴀ /ἀ ᰀᴀ!#ᘀ$ᰀ !ᔀ&$ % !""$!"#$ $฀Ѐ.Ѐᄀఀᄀ଀(Ѐ ᘀḀ&ᴀᘀḀ%# ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!&ᰀ)!ᘀ%$ $ % !"&$!"ᰀ؀)'1ࠀᨀ฀Ѐ.Ѐᄀఀᄀ଀(Ѐ ᰀ&Ḁ"ᴀᘀḀ%# ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ)$ᰀ)!ᘀ%$ %ᴀ!ᘀ"$% !"ᰀ$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀ# ) AࠀԀᬀ9ࠀ؀฀Ѐ.Ѐᄀఀᄀ଀(Ѐ ᰀḀᰀ#ᘀḀ%# ἀ/ "ᰀ!%ᰀ$ᰀ)!ᘀ%$ %ᴀ!ᰀ% !"ᰀ$ $ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀ# "& @ጀ.ࠀԀ3؀'ༀ1଀3ࠀ܀81଀܀਀᐀)ᔀ਀᐀ᔀᘀ# H59Ѐ'ᨀЀ $0Ѐఀ଀ᄀЀ "Ḁ&ᘀᔀḀᘀ) ἀ ""!"ᰀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ&$% !%ᴀ؀0Ѐఀ଀ᄀЀ ᘀḀᰀ&ᔀḀᘀ) ἀ "ᘀ!ᘀ)$""!"ᰀ$ % !&"$!%ᴀ$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀ) Aࠀ8ࠀ5Ѐ฀؀Aጀ1(ࠀԀ฀܀ᄀЀȀ܀0Ѐఀ଀ᄀЀ ᘀḀ"ᰀᔀḀᘀ) /ἀ ᰀ""!"ᰀ$ !ᰀᰀ$ % !ᘀ)$!%ᴀ$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀ) "% @43ᄀ,ᨀ؀਀᐀)ᔀᴀ਀᐀ᔀᘀ) HᄀȀ1ࠀ(+ࠀ'฀ $ఀ᠀଀Ѐ1 ᘀḀᰀ&ᘀḀ"& /ἀ ᰀ)!%%$"ᘀ!&%$ %)!ᔀ%$% !%ᔀ؀฀؀ఀ᠀଀Ѐ1 "Ḁ&ᴀᘀḀ"& /ἀ ᰀ"ᘀ!&%$ !%"$ %)!ᔀ&$% !%ᔀ$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀ ᴀ AGᄀ؀Ā฀܀ఀ᠀଀Ѐ1 ᘀḀ&)ᘀḀ"& /ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ)$"ᘀ!&%$ % !ᘀ!%ᔀ$ $ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀ "ᔀ ਀Ѐ᠀ᨀЀ؀ᤀ฀؀ᜀ܀ࠀ'ᬀ̀܀਀᐀)#ᘀ਀᐀ᔀᘀ H8Ѐఀࠀ'ᤀᨀᬀ $Mᬀ'ЀȀЀ฀,0Ѐ ᴀḀ&)ᘀḀᰀ# ἀ/ ᰀ !ᘀ&$!%ᘀ$ %%)!ᔀ#$ !#ᘀ܀ᄀ7଀ЀᄀᤀᨀЀ؀฀,0Ѐ ᰀḀ")ᘀḀᰀ# ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ#$ᰀ !%ᘀ$ %%)!ᔀ#$ !%"$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀᴀ "# ਀ᬀᤀЀ฀,0Ѐ ᘀḀ))ᘀḀᰀ# ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!ᘀ)$ᰀ !%ᘀ$ %%)!ᔀ#$ !"#$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀᴀ ᴀᘀ A1؀)'਀᐀)#ᰀ਀᐀ᔀᘀᴀ H1Ѐ $ᰀ#Ḁᔀ&#Ḁ%" ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!ᘀᰀ$""!ᘀᔀ$ % !&#$!%ᰀ "܀ᄀᄀ2؀Cࠀ1Ѐ਀܀ᘀḀ%ᰀ#Ḁ%" ἀ/ ᰀ""!ᘀᔀ$ !ᔀ#$ % !ᰀ!%ᰀ$ $ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᰀᘀ ᴀᰀ A1ᄀЀ'ᬀ "܀ᄀᄀ2؀34਀؀᠀+)؀3؀Ḁᴀ#Ḁ%" ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!"%$""!ᘀᔀ$ %ᴀ!")$% !%ᰀ$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᰀᘀ ") ਀% "܀ᄀᄀ2؀ᄀ଀(Ѐ਀؀DЀᤀ܀਀᐀)#"਀᐀ᔀᰀᘀ H1Ѐ'ᤀᨀᬀ $(ᰀᘀḀᴀ#ᰀḀᔀ& ἀ/ "ᰀ!ᔀ#$ᰀᴀ!ᔀ $ % !ᔀᰀ$!ᰀ ؀)'฀᠀+ࠀ܀I܀᐀1଀'ࠀ9ఀ଀ЀᄀᤀᨀЀ܀E܀+6ጀ܀I܀Ḁᴀ#ᰀḀᔀ& ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!ᰀᰀ$ᰀᴀ!ᔀ $ % !%)$!ᰀ)$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᰀᰀ ᴀ" ᐀1଀'ࠀ9ఀ଀ЀᄀᨀЀ" ؀)'฀᠀+ࠀ؀)᠀؀Ḁᰀ&ᰀḀᔀ& ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ)$ᰀᴀ!ᔀ $ %ᴀ!""$% !ᰀ)$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᰀᰀ " ਀%& ؀)'ᤀᄀᬀ฀᠀+ࠀ؀က܀਀᐀)#&਀᐀ᔀᰀᰀ H1Ѐ'ᤀᨀᬀ $(ᄀ଀(Ѐ฀ࠀ31ࠀ'ᄀ,ᨀ ᘀḀ#ᘀḀᰀ& ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀ&$ᰀᴀ!" $ %%ᴀ!ᘀ)$ !%ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ" ฀ࠀ31ࠀ'ᄀ,ᨀᤀࠀጀఀ+ ᘀḀᰀ& ἀ ᰀᴀ!" $ %ᴀ!ᘀ᠀؀ࠀ᠀+ࠀ1Ѐ฀ࠀ31ࠀ'ᄀ,ᨀ "Ḁ&ᔀᘀḀᰀ& ἀ ᰀᴀ!"ᔀ$ᰀᴀ!" $ %ᴀ!&&$%ᴀ!ᘀ)$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᰀ" "ᴀ ਀଀/܀਀᐀)#%਀᐀ᔀᰀ" H1Ѐ'ᤀᨀᬀ $ᄀ2฀ࠀȀ,ᨀ4 ᘀḀᘀ)ᘀḀᘀ# ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!"%$ᰀ)!"ᴀ$ %ᴀ!&"$%)!ᔀᔀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ&਀᐀ ᴀ& ฀ࠀȀ,ᨀ4A1ᄀࠀ'2 ᘀḀᘀ#ᰀḀᘀᘀ /ἀ ᰀ)!"ᴀ$ᰀ !%ᴀ$ %)!ᔀᔀ$%ᴀ!ᰀᰀ᠀؀+2฀ࠀȀ,ᨀ4 ᘀḀᔀ"ᘀḀᘀ# ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!"&$ᰀ)!"ᴀ$ %ᴀ!&ᘀ$%)!ᔀᔀ$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᰀ& &ᘀ ਀଀᠀؀ᤀ؀ᜀ܀਀᐀)#ᔀ਀᐀ᔀᰀ& H1Ѐ'ᤀᨀ2 $("!ᄀᬀ ᘀḀᰀᴀᘀḀ&% /ἀ ᰀ)!%ᰀ$ᰀᴀ!&#$ %)!ᔀ%$%ᴀ؀5ࠀ'A1ᤀఀ؀+5ࠀ' ᘀḀᔀᘀᘀḀᰀᴀ ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!&ᰀ)!%ᰀ$ $ %%)!ᔀ%$ !%ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ%਀᐀ ᴀ% ฀ࠀ؀+5ࠀ' "ḀᔀᘀᘀḀᰀᴀ ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!&"$ᰀ)!%ᰀ$ %%)!ᔀ%$ !%%$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᰀ% &ᰀ ਀଀+᠀Ѐ฀ࠀ؀+฀ࠀ؀਀᐀)##਀᐀ᔀᰀ% Hᤀ13᠀଀ $ $%&! %Ḁ"#ᘀḀ % ἀ/ "ᰀ!ᔀ%$"ᰀ!ᰀᴀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ% ܀E܀Cࠀ1ᄀᬀȀጀ܀ఀࠀᨀጀ܀Ȁࠀ᠀ᄀ2+ࠀ܀؀ЀᄀȀ1؀?'က*ᨀЀ฀ࠀ1ࠀ' #Ḁ&ᘀᘀḀ % ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀᔀ$"ᰀ!ᔀ%$ %%ᴀ!ᰀ !&&$ $ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᰀᔀ &" ਀଀᠀଀(Ѐ฀ࠀ1ࠀ' &Ḁᘀ&ᘀḀ % /ἀ "ᘀ!&"$"ᰀ!ᔀ%$ %%ᴀ!ᰀ !&%$ $ ਀᐀ᔀᰀᔀ਀᐀ ᴀᔀ ฀ࠀ1ࠀ܀਀᐀)#)਀᐀ᔀᰀᔀ Hᤀఀ1ᬀ ܀ࠀऀ܀ЀԀ؀ᤀఀ1܀1؀ࠀK᠀܀؀+ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀1ᤀ؀ЀᄀȀ؀? $ഀࠀ'ᬀ฀ࠀఀఀࠀ'ࠀ &Ḁ%ᴀ"Ḁᔀᴀ / "ᘀ!&ᘀ$"ᘀ!ᘀᴀ$ % !&"$!ᰀᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ# ฀ࠀఀఀࠀ'ࠀ "Ḁᔀᴀ / "ᘀ!ᘀᴀ$ % !ᰀᴀ؀฀1܀਀᐀)#਀᐀ᔀᰀ# Hᤀఀጀ10Ѐ฀ࠀఀఀࠀ'ࠀ #Ḁ)%"Ḁᔀᴀ ἀ/ "ᘀ!ᰀ#$"ᘀ!ᘀᴀ$ %ᴀ!"ᰀ$% !ᰀᴀ$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᰀ# && ਀଀᠀଀(ᨀᬀ Cࠀ1ᄀᬀȀ $#%! % $GఀᨀЀ฀1Ȁᬀ1ᨀЀ ᰀ#ḀᴀᴀᰀḀ"ᔀ ἀ ᰀ"ᘀ!"ᰀ$ !ᔀ $ % !ᰀᴀ$!%#$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ) ฀1Ȁᬀ1ᨀЀ ᰀ#Ḁᴀᴀ ἀ "ᘀ!"ᰀ+؀က܀਀᐀)#ᴀ਀᐀ᔀᰀ) H97ЀȀᄀ଀(Ѐ฀1Ȁᬀ1ᨀЀ ᰀ#ḀᴀᴀᘀḀ% ἀ ᰀ"ᘀ!"ᰀ$ !ᔀ#$ %ᴀ!"ᔀ$% !%#$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᰀ) &% ਀଀ఀᄀ଀ЀᄀᤀᨀЀ ਀᐀ ᴀ# Aጀ+ᬀ1 )Ḁᰀ# ἀ ᰀᴀ!" $ % !"#$ $Ḁ#& ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀ#$ % !ᔀᘀ" ؀)'6ࠀ؀ఀ؀ᘀḀᴀ#"Ḁ#& ἀ ᰀ"ᰀ!ᰀ#$ !ᘀ%$ % !ᔀᔀ$!ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ ฀1 ؀)'6ࠀ؀ఀ؀ᘀḀ""Ḁ#& /ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᔀᰀ$"ᰀ!ᰀ#$ % !"%$!ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᰀ &ᔀ ਀ᨀЀ᠀Ѐ฀1 ؀)'6ࠀ؀ఀ؀਀᐀))ᘀ਀᐀ᔀᰀ H.OЀᄀ4฀1 ਀᐀ ᴀ) Aጀ1Ѐᄀ4 ᴀḀ"& ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀ"$ %ᴀ!ᘀ $ $ఀᨀЀ ᘀḀᘀ& / "ᘀ!"ᰀ$ % !&ᘀ؀ఀᨀЀ ᘀḀᘀ&Ḁ&ᰀ ἀ/ ᰀ"ᘀ!"ᰀ$ !ᔀ#$ %ᴀ!&ᰀ$% !&ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀᴀ ฀1؀ఀᨀЀ ᘀḀ))ᘀḀᘀ& / ᰀᴀ!&"ᘀ!"ᰀ$ $ % !ᰀ!&ᘀ$ $ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᰀᴀ &# ਀ᨀЀ᠀଀ఀ2฀1؀฀1؀)'1Ѐ<܀਀᐀))ᰀ਀᐀ᔀᰀᴀ /Ѐᄀ଀(ᨀ2 ਀᐀ ᴀ Aጀ17଀Ѐᄀᨀ4 ᘀḀ)& ἀ ᰀ !"ᘀ$ % !&ᔀ$ $%"! % $%%!ഀᄀ଀7ᨀЀ %Ḁᘀ" / ᰀᴀ؀ഀᄀ଀7ᨀЀ ᘀḀ%Ḁᘀ" % ἀ/ "ᰀ!"ᔀ$ᰀᴀ!%%$ % !&)$!"%$ ਀᐀ᔀ"ᘀ ฀1؀ഀᄀ଀7ᨀЀ &Ḁ&ᴀ%Ḁᘀ" / "ᰀ!ᘀ&$ᰀᴀ!%%$ % !%ᘀ$!"%$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀ"ᘀ &) ਀ᨀᬀ1ࠀ9฀1؀฀1؀)'਀᐀))"਀᐀ᔀ"ᘀ /Ѐ0ࠀ $"ᘀḀ%ᘀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$ % !ᔀ ؀FЀఀ1܀6؀5ᨀ؀ᜀ܀ࠀ'܀ᨀᬀ)؀਀᐀ ᴀᴀ Aጀ1 $ ࠀఀЀ "Ḁᘀᘀ ἀ ᰀ !%ᴀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ+؀က܀ࠀఀЀ ᘀḀ&""Ḁᘀᘀ ἀ ᰀ !%!%ᴀ$ $ %%ᴀ!ᰀ !%ᴀ$ $ ਀᐀ᔀ"ᰀ ฀ጀȀЀఀ,ᄀᤀᨀЀ+؀က܀ᄀ2฀ጀȀЀఀ,ᄀᤀᨀЀ؀᠀ࠀఀЀ ᘀḀᰀ#"Ḁᘀᘀ ἀ ""!ᘀ%$ᰀ !%ᴀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ)$%ᴀ!ᰀ $ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀ"ᰀ & ਀ᨀ+؀က܀਀᐀))&਀᐀ᔀ"ᰀ /Ѐ8,ᄀ฀ጀȀЀఀ,ᄀᤀᨀЀ $(ᘀḀ)" ἀ ᰀ !%ᔀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ ؀਀᐀ᴀᘀᘀ Aጀ1଀ $"%! % $᐀ࠀ9଀(଀Ѐ(+ ᘀḀ"ᔀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀᘀ܀81଀܀)؀'᐀ࠀ9଀(଀Ѐ(+ " ᘀḀ"ᔀḀ"ᴀ ἀ ᰀ"ᰀ!ᰀᘀ$ !&ᘀ$ % !&&$!%"$ ਀᐀ᔀ"" ฀ጀᨀࠀ܀81଀܀)؀'Ѐᤀఀ฀ጀᨀࠀ؀܀I܀7؀A1,3܀E܀ࠀȀ+)='܀܀I܀7؀᐀ࠀ9଀(଀Ѐ(+ ᘀḀᰀᴀᘀḀ"ᔀ /ἀ ᰀ"ᰀ!ᰀᘀ$ !ᰀ#$ %)!%%$% !%"$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀ"" &ᴀ A1,3܀81଀܀)؀'฀ጀᨀࠀ؀)਀᐀))%਀᐀ᔀ"" /Ѐఀ଀ᄀ ਀᐀ᴀᘀᰀ Aጀ10Ѐ܀ᄀЀȀ܀฀ࠀȀ'ࠀጀ ᘀḀ"ᴀ ἀ "ᘀ!ᔀ"$ % !&#$ $%"!฀ጀᤀࠀ' & "Ḁ#ᰀḀ&ᘀ /ἀ "ᘀ!ᰀᴀ$"ᰀ!ᰀ%$ %%ᴀ!"%$ !"ᔀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"& ฀ጀᤀࠀ' & Ḁ&ᘀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀ%$ %ᴀ܀1؀ࠀK᠀܀I܀਀᠀Ѐᄀᬀ܀E܀ఀࠀᨀ܀=Ȁࠀ᠀ᄀ܀I܀P+ࠀԀ฀ጀᤀࠀ' & ᘀḀḀ&ᘀ & /ἀ ""!ᘀ)$"ᰀ!ᰀ%$ %%ᴀ!"%$ !&)$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀ"& %ᘀ ਀᠀Ѐᄀᬀ܀ᄀЀȀ܀؀)'਀᐀))ᔀ਀᐀ᔀ"& /Ѐ'᠀ࠀ ਀᐀ᴀᘀ" PȀ଀7Ѐ ᰀḀ%ᴀ ἀ ᰀ !""$ %ᴀ!ᘀᴀ$ $ЀԀ ᰀḀᴀ& / "ᰀ!ᘀ)$ % !&ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"% ฀ጀഀ଀(Ѐ ᰀḀᴀ& / "ᰀ!ᘀ)$ % !&ᰀ؀฀ጀഀ଀(Ѐ "ḀᰀḀᴀ& ᴀ ἀ/ ᰀ"ᰀ!ᘀ)$ !%)$ % !ᰀ!&ᰀ$ $ ਀᐀ᔀ"% ฀ጀഀ଀(Ѐᤀఀ1؀)ᄀ଀؀7؀/ %"਀᐀))#਀᐀ᔀ ਀᐀ᴀᘀ& ᜀЀ᠀Ѐᤀᨀᬀ܀>ጀ3ࠀ'ᬀ ᰀḀᰀᰀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ $ %ᴀ!ᘀ $ $ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀᤀ ""ᘀḀ"#ᰀḀ&ᰀ ἀ ᰀ"ᰀ!"ᴀ$ !&ᘀ$ % !%ᰀ$!ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"ᔀ ฀4ᤀఀ1଀7Ѐᄀ4 ᰀḀ&ᰀ ἀ ᰀ !&ᘀ$ % !%ᰀ܀؀਀᠀ᬀᄀᤀᨀ܀E܀4+)1'܀؀ఀ1ࠀ'ᬀ฀4ᤀఀ1଀7Ѐᄀ4 %ḀᰀᰀḀ&ᰀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᘀ#$ᰀ !&ᘀ$ %ᴀ!"#$% !%ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"ᔀ਀᐀ %ᰀ ฀4ᤀఀ1଀7Ѐᄀ4਀᠀ᬀᄀᤀᨀ؀/ ਀᐀)))਀᐀ᔀ"ᔀ ਀᐀ᴀᘀ% ᜀЀ᠀ᨀࠀ' ᘀḀ"" ἀ "ᰀ!&ᴀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ%$ $ᄀ଀(Ѐ ᘀḀ%) ἀ ᰀ !%ᔀ$ % !&ᰀ؀ᄀ଀(Ѐ ᘀḀ%) ἀ ᰀ !%ᔀ$ % !&ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"# ฀ഀ؀ᄀ଀(Ѐ "ḀᔀᘀḀ%) ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀᰀ !%ᔀ$ $ % !ᔀ%$!&ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"# ฀ഀ؀ఀ1ࠀ'Ѐᄀ4฀ഀ؀/ #"਀᐀))਀᐀ᔀ $Ḁ#ᴀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᔀ)$ %ᴀ!ᘀᔀ# )؀.਀᐀ᴀᘀᔀ ᜀЀ $("! % $#%!6ᨀࠀ' ᰀḀᰀ# / "ᰀ؀: ("ᨀ ᰀḀᰀ#ᰀḀ&ᴀ /ἀ "ᰀ!%#$"ᘀ!" $ % !")$!&%$ ਀᐀ᔀ؀6ᨀࠀ'ༀࠀԀ3Ѐᤀ؀: "% 6ᨀࠀ' ᘀḀᔀ%ᰀḀᰀ# / "ᘀ!ᘀ&$"ᰀ!%#$ % !ᰀ&$!")$ ਀᐀ᔀ")਀᐀؀:؀)'ఀ1ࠀ؀/ ("਀᐀))ᴀ਀᐀ᔀ $&"! % $ᘀḀᘀ# / "ᘀ!ᰀᴀ ؀)଀ᄀ᠀؀਀᐀ᴀᘀ# ᜀ7 $ᤀᨀࠀ'2 ᘀḀ&ᰀ ἀ ᰀ)!"%$ % !&ᔀ؀1ࠀ'ᬀ;က଀؀: "ᘀḀ&ᰀᘀḀᰀ% ἀ/ ᰀ)!"%$"ᰀ!ᔀᔀ$ % !&ᔀ$!&)$ ਀᐀ᔀ ؀)'ᤀᨀࠀ'2਀᠀Ѐ'ᨀࠀ؀1ࠀ'ᬀ;က଀؀: &% ᤀᨀࠀ'2 ᴀḀᔀ%ᘀḀ&ᰀ ἀ ᰀᰀ)!"%$ !&#$ % !&&$!&ᔀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"਀᐀؀1ࠀ'ᬀ;က଀؀:BЀ1ᄀࠀ'଀(଀܀81଀܀਀᐀)਀᐀ᔀ" ᘀ /,᠀Ѐ $#"! % $#Ḁᰀ) ἀ ᰀ !ᰀ& ؀)7଀᠀؀ᜀ܀I܀7؀਀᐀ᴀᘀ) A1,3 $Nጀ87Ѐ ᰀᘀḀᰀḀᘀᰀ # ἀ ᰀᴀ!&ᴀ$ᰀᴀ!ᰀ#$ % !"ᴀ$!%#$ ਀᐀ᔀ"ᴀ :଀ᄀࠀ3Ѐ0Ѐ ᰀᘀḀ # ἀ ᰀᴀ!&ᴀ$ % !"ᴀ܀ᄀᤀᨀᬀ؀'਀᐀)਀᐀ᔀ"ᴀ ᰀ /଀᠀+ࠀ':଀ᄀࠀ3Ѐ0Ѐ ᰀᘀḀ"Ḁ#" # ἀ "ᘀ!%ᰀ$ᰀᴀ!&ᴀ$ %ᴀ!"%$% !"ᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"ᴀ਀᐀ %% :଀ᄀࠀ3Ѐ0Ѐ਀᠀ࠀ $(଀7ᄀᬀ ᰀ%Ḁᴀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ%$ %ᴀ!ᰀ᠀؀਀᐀ᴀᘀ ᜀ $"ᰀᰀḀ)& ἀ "ᰀ!ᔀ $ %ᴀ!ᰀ ؀)'ᤀ ᰀᰀḀ)&ᰀḀ # ἀ "ᰀ!ᔀᰀ)!"#$ $ %ᴀ!ᰀ"$% !"ᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᘀ <Ѐ3Ѐ᠀ࠀ؀ᜀ܀ࠀ'ᬀ̀܀ᄀ଀(ᨀᬀ؀᠀਀Ԁࠀ؀)'ᰀᰀḀ)&ᰀḀᰀ" /ἀ ᰀᴀ!%)$"ᰀ!ᔀ $ %%ᴀ!ᰀ"$ !"ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᘀ਀᐀ %ᔀ <Ѐ3Ѐ᠀ࠀ ؀)'਀᐀)਀᐀ᔀ&ᘀ " /଀ᄀ(଀ᄀᬀ<Ѐ3Ѐ᠀ࠀ $ᤀᄀᬀ Ḁ&ᘀ ἀ "ᘀ!"#$ %ᴀ!"ᘀ؀က܀5ᨀᬀ؀਀᐀ᴀᘀᴀ ᜀ $ "!ᄀ଀(Ѐ ᰀᔀḀ)ᴀᘀḀ"ᰀ ἀ ᰀ !ᔀᰀ$!% $ %ᴀ!"%ᴀ!ᰀ#$ $ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᰀ <ЀȀ(Ѐ ᘀḀ"ᰀ ἀ ᰀ !ᔀᰀ$ %ᴀ.؀ࠀ'ᬀ<ЀȀ(Ѐ )Ḁᘀ"ᘀḀ"ᰀ ἀ ᰀ !ᔀ#$!ᔀᰀ$ %%ᴀ!" !&)$ $ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᰀ਀᐀ %# <ЀȀ(Ѐ਀ᄀ᠀؀਀᐀)਀᐀ᔀ&ᰀ & /଀ఀ $Ѐ0Ѐ ᘀḀᴀ) / ᰀ !ᰀ $ % !ᰀᘀ?܀5ᨀᬀ؀਀᐀ᴀᰀᘀ ᜀ $#ᬀ8ࠀ1 &Ḁ&ᘀᘀḀ") / ᰀ !ᔀ!ᘀ"$ $ % !ᰀᘀ$!ᰀ#$ ਀᐀ᔀ&"਀᐀ %) <ᬀ8ࠀ1਀ᄀ଀ᄀЀ ᘀḀ")ᘀḀ&ᰀ /ἀ ᰀ""!ᰀᰀ$ !ᘀ"$ %%ᴀ!ᘀᰀ$ !ᰀ#$ ਀᐀ᔀ&" <ᬀ8ࠀ1 ᘀḀ") / ᰀ !ᘀ"$ % !ᰀ>؀)'਀᐀)਀᐀ᔀ&" % /᠀ᬀ9Jࠀ $ᘀḀ&ᰀ ἀ ᰀ !ᘀᴀ$ % !%ᘀ ؀Cࠀᤀఀ܀5ᨀ2؀਀᐀ᴀᰀᰀ ᜀ $Ḁ%# ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$ % !ᘀᴀ# ؀)'ࠀ᠀؀> &&਀ࠀᨀࠀ5Ѐᄀ4 #Ḁ%#ᘀḀᘀ# ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$"ᰀ!ᰀ%$ % !ᘀᴀ$!&#$ ਀᐀ᔀ؀)'ࠀ᠀؀> % ᘀḀᘀᰀ#Ḁ%# ἀ ᰀ)!ᰀᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$ $ % !&&$!ᘀᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&&਀᐀ ؀)'ࠀ᠀؀>1؀ఀ؀/܀=ᨀ)؀'਀᐀)਀᐀ᔀ&& ᔀ /᠀Ѐ $%ᰀḀ%% / ᰀ !"&$ % !ᘀ ؀)'ကࠀ܀5ᨀ2؀਀᐀ᴀᰀ" ᜀ $1ఀ଀.ᄀ2 ᰀḀᘀ" ἀ "ᰀ!%ᴀ$ %ᴀ!"ᰀ؀> %&ᬀ ᰀḀᘀ"ᘀḀᘀᔀ ἀ "ᰀ!%ᴀ$"ᘀ!" $ %ᴀ!"ᰀ$%ᴀ!ᰀ"$ ਀᐀ᔀ᠀؀฀܀1ఀ଀.ᄀ2਀8଀9ᤀᨀᬀ؀> 1ఀ଀.ᄀ2 "ᰀḀ&"ᰀḀᘀ" ἀ "ᘀ!"#$"ᰀ!%ᴀ$ %%ᴀ!"ᰀ$ !&#$ ਀᐀ᔀ&%਀᐀ %ᴀ؀>)؀'9଀؀᠀/ # %&਀᐀)਀᐀ᔀ $ &! % $(%!(ᘀḀᰀ& ἀ ᰀ ؀H1'଀9ఀ܀5ᨀ2؀਀᐀ᴀᰀ& ᜀ $ᘀḀᘀᴀ ἀ ᰀ !ᰀᘀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀᔀ 0؀᐀ЀԀ܀=ᄀ؀'1؀> ᤀ ᘀḀᘀᴀ"Ḁ%& ἀ ᰀ"ᘀ!&&$ !ᰀᘀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀᔀ$% !ᔀᔀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᔀ؀ᜀ܀ࠀ'ᬀ̀܀0਀8଀9ᤀᨀᬀ؀᐀ЀԀ܀=ᄀ؀'1؀> Ḁᴀ)ᘀḀᘀᴀ ἀ "ᰀ!"ᰀ$ᰀ !ᰀᘀ$ %%ᴀ!ᘀᔀ$ !%)$ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᔀ਀᐀ ᔀᘀ& 0؀᐀ЀԀ܀=ᄀ؀'1؀>Aࠀ14ᤀࠀጀ܀ᄀЀȀ܀਀᐀)਀᐀ᔀ&ᔀ ) /᠀ࠀᤀᨀ2 ਀᐀ᴀᰀ% -ࠀ᠀ఀ4ᤀЀ %Ḁᴀ" ἀ "ᘀ!"ᴀ$ %ᴀ!"ᰀ$ $ᘀḀᘀ% ἀ ᰀ !% $ %ᴀ!&ᘀ ؀1ᄀ؀ᤀ ᘀḀᘀ%ᰀḀᘀ) ἀ ᰀ"ᘀ!"ᰀ$ !% $ %ᴀ!&ᘀ$%ᴀ!"&$ ਀᐀ᔀ&# <଀؀ᜀ܀਀ఀЀ1ᬀ܀਀8଀9ᤀᨀᬀ؀1ᄀ؀ᘀḀᔀ)ᘀḀᘀ% ἀ ᰀ !ᘀ"$!% $ %%ᴀ!&ᘀ$ !&ᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&#਀᐀ ᔀᰀ <଀ ؀1ᄀ؀଀>؀਀᐀)਀᐀ᔀ&# /ࠀȀ+1ЀȀ଀ $%ᨀ ᘀḀ%) / ᰀ !%"$ % !ᘀ؀ᤀ؀/܀=5ᨀ؀਀᐀ᴀᰀᔀ ᜀ $฀Ѐ᠀ࠀሀ ᔀḀᘀ% ἀ ᰀᴀ!%ᔀ$ % !%ᘀ܀1ᄀ4؀ᜀ᠀Ѐ(+4 ᔀḀᘀ%ᰀḀᘀᘀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!%ᔀ$"ᘀ!%)$ % !%ᘀ$!ᔀ $ ਀᐀ᔀ&) <଀܀฀Ѐ᠀ࠀሀ਀8଀9ᤀᨀ2܀1ᄀ4؀฀Ѐ᠀ࠀሀ ᰀᰀḀᰀᘀᔀḀᘀ% ἀ ᰀᰀᴀ!%ᔀ$ !%ᘀ$ % !%ᰀ$!%ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&)਀᐀ ᔀ" <଀܀1ᄀ4؀ࠀ'ᬀᨀࠀ(+<଀̀܀81଀܀؀਀᐀)਀᐀ᔀ&) ᴀ /ࠀȀ+1ЀȀ଀ $&Ѐ1଀9 ᘀḀ ᰀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀᰀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ-܀=5ᨀ؀਀᐀ᴀᰀ# ᜀ $#ᘀḀ") / ᰀ !"ᔀ$ % !ᰀ ؀਀ఀЀᨀ7,ᄀ ᘀḀ")%Ḁ & /ἀ ᰀ""!ᰀ&$ !"ᔀ$ % !ᰀ#$!ᔀ)$ ਀᐀ᔀ& <଀ऀᬀ1؀ᘀḀ&ᴀᘀḀ") ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!ᰀᔀ$ᰀ !"ᔀ$ % !%ᴀ$!ᰀ#$ ਀᐀ᔀ&਀᐀ ᔀ& <଀ऀᬀ1 ؀଀ऀᬀ1>؀)਀᐀)ᴀᘀ਀᐀ᔀ& /ࠀȀᨀࠀᄀ଀ $1ᄀᬀ1 ᘀḀ# ἀ "ᘀ!ᰀ%$ % !ᔀᔀ؀਀᐀ᴀᰀ) ᜀ $ࠀഀఀࠀᨀЀ ᘀḀ&&ᰀḀᘀ /ἀ "ᘀ!"&$""!ᰀ)$ %%ᴀ!ᘀᘀ$ !&ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᴀ <ࠀ᠀ఀࠀ'ࠀ ᘀḀ&& / "ᘀ!"&$ % !&ᘀ@܀ࠀ᠀ఀࠀ'ࠀ ᘀḀ%ᘀḀ&& ἀ/ "ᘀ!&"$"ᘀ!"&$ %ᴀ!ᰀ)$% !&ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᴀ਀᐀ ᔀ% <ࠀ᠀ఀࠀ'ࠀ਀ఀЀᨀ7,ᄀᤀᨀЀ>)؀਀᐀)ᴀᰀ਀᐀ᔀ&ᴀ /ࠀȀࠀ᠀,ᄀ ਀᐀ᴀᰀ ᜀ,ሀ5Ѐ9 ᘀḀᔀ) ἀ ᰀᴀ!"&$ % !&&$ $Ԁࠀ9ᄀ2 ᘀḀ"" ἀ ᰀ !ᔀ%$ % !ᔀᘀ؀Ԁࠀ9ᄀ2਀ఀЀᄀᨀࠀ'Ѐᄀ4 ᰀᴀḀᔀ%ᘀḀ"" ἀ ᰀᰀᴀ!ᰀᰀ$ !ᔀ%$ %%ᴀ!ᰀᘀ$ !ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ%ᘀ <1؀Ԁࠀ9ᄀ2 ᰀḀ&ᰀᘀḀ"" ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᔀᘀ$ᰀ !ᔀ%$ % !ᔀ"$!ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ%ᘀ਀᐀ ᔀᔀ <1؀਀᐀)ᴀ"਀᐀ᔀ%ᘀ /ࠀ᠀ࠀԀᨀЀ<1 $Ḁ&" ἀ ᰀ !% $ %ᴀ!ᰀᘀ" ؀7ᄀ؀਀ఀ1܀81଀܀਀᐀ᴀᰀᴀ ᜀ଀90ࠀ'2 $"฀4ᤀఀ1଀(Ѐ "Ḁ"ᔀᘀḀᘀᔀ /ἀ ᰀ)!ᰀ&$ᰀ !ᔀ)$ %%ᴀ!"ᰀ$ !ᘀ"$ ਀᐀ᔀ%ᰀ <ጀᄀࠀ'ࠀ "Ḁ"ᔀ / ᰀ)!ᰀ&$ % !ᘀ܀Ѐ67Ѐᄀᨀࠀጀ<ጀᄀࠀ'ࠀ %Ḁᔀ""Ḁ"ᔀ ἀ/ ᰀᰀ)!ᰀ&$ !%"$ %ᴀ!ᘀᴀ$% !ᘀ"$ ਀᐀ᔀ%ᰀ਀᐀ ᔀ# <ጀᄀࠀ'ࠀ਀ఀЀ1ᬀ@܀ᄀЀȀ܀؀਀᐀)ᴀ&਀᐀ᔀ%ᰀ /ࠀ᠀ጀ'ᤀ଀ ਀᐀ᴀ"ᘀ ᜀࠀ60Ѐᄀ4 ᰀḀᴀᰀ ἀ "ᘀ!")$ %ᴀ!ᰀᔀ$ $FЀఀ1Ѐ ᰀ&&Ḁᘀ"ᘀḀ"% ἀ "ᰀ!&#$ᰀ !%ᔀ$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ"$ !ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ%" >Ѐ'଀Ȁࠀ' ᘀḀ"% ἀ "ᰀ!&#$ % !ᔀᘀ܀Ѐ᠀ᬀ?܀ࠀᨀ>Ѐ'଀Ȁࠀ' ᘀḀ%ᔀᘀḀ"% ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᔀᰀ$"ᰀ!&#$ % !")$!ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ%"਀᐀ ᔀ) >Ѐ'଀Ȁࠀ'က*7Ѐᄀᤀᨀᬀ᠀؀਀᐀)ᴀ%਀᐀ᔀ%" /ࠀᄀȀ $Ḁ"# ἀ ᰀ !% $ % !&ᰀ" ؀਀᐀ᴀ"ᰀ ᜀ4+ᄀ $ᰀḀ ᔀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᘀᘀ$ % !&ᴀ ܀E܀฀ࠀȀ'4܀ఀࠀᨀጀ܀Ȁᄀ2+ࠀ؀ᤀఀ1܀؀ᄀᬀ ᰀḀᘀḀᴀᔀ ᔀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᘀᘀ$"ᘀ!"ᰀ$ % !&ᴀ$!ᔀᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ%& /ࠀ'ࠀȀ଀؀਀ఀ1Ѐఀ܀E܀฀ࠀȀ'4܀ఀࠀᨀጀ܀Ȁᄀ2+ࠀ؀ᤀఀ1܀؀ᰀḀᰀḀ#) ᔀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!"&$"ᰀ!ᘀᘀ$ % !%ᰀ$!&ᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ%&਀᐀ ᔀ /ࠀ'ࠀȀ଀ ܀E܀฀ࠀȀ'4܀ఀࠀᨀጀ܀Ȁᄀ2+ࠀ؀ᤀఀ1܀؀਀᐀)ᴀᔀ਀᐀ᔀ%& /ࠀᄀ଀ᨀ4/ࠀ'ࠀȀ଀ $(ᜀ=1Ѐ'Ѐ &Ḁ#" ἀ "ᰀ!ᔀ#$ %ᴀ!ᘀ܀I܀)؀਀᐀ᴀ"" ကЀ3ࠀ1 ܀ࠀऀ܀8Ѐ1ఀ܀؀᠀Ԁ଀ȀȀ܀؀+ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀3Ѐᤀ଀ᄀ܀1؀'AЀఀ1ЀԀ଀ ᘀḀ"ᘀ ἀ "ᘀ!"ᘀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ&$ @଀܀8ࠀȀ܀؀.਀ఀ1ᬀ܀ࠀऀ܀8Ѐ1ఀ܀؀᠀Ԁ଀ȀȀ܀؀+ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀3Ѐᤀ଀ᄀ܀1؀'Ḁᘀ# ἀ "ᘀ!"ᰀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ#$ ਀᐀ ᔀᴀ @଀" ܀ࠀऀ܀8Ѐ1ఀ܀؀᠀Ԁ଀ȀȀ܀؀+ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀3Ѐᤀ଀ᄀ܀1؀'଀@"܀ࠀ81ЀȀ/܀1؀'଀@܀E܀"܀ࠀ81ЀȀ/܀ᨀЀ؀਀᐀)ᴀ# @଀ $3Ѐᤀఀࠀ'ᬀ฀ࠀȀ'Ѐ ᘀḀᘀ% ἀ "ᰀ!"ᰀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀᰀ؀-܀฀ࠀȀ'Ѐ ฀ࠀȀ'Ѐ ਀᐀ᴀ"& ᜀ49ᄀᬀ $7ᄀࠀ ᘀḀᰀᴀ ἀ ᰀ !ᔀ%$ %ᴀ!ᰀᘀ؀਀᐀)ᴀ) /ࠀ9Ѐ ᰀḀᔀ" ἀ "ᰀ!% $ % !ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀ #ᘀ ਀ఀ1 $&Ḁ # ἀ "ᘀ!%ᘀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ& ؀8Ѐ9؀@܀਀᐀ᴀ"% ᜀ49ᄀ2 $"Ȁ଀ᄀᨀ4 ᘀḀᰀᔀ ἀ "ᘀ!"%$ % !ᔀ؀< %%Ȁ଀ᄀᨀ4 &Ḁ)&ᘀḀᰀᔀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ)$"ᘀ!"%$ % !ᰀ#$!ᔀ"$ ਀᐀ᔀ؀<؀)Ѐ(+ఀ଀ᄀ᠀/܀Ȁᄀ2؀Ȁ଀ᄀᨀ4 "Ḁ&ᘀᘀḀᰀᔀ ἀ ᰀ"ᘀ!"%$ !ᔀᰀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ% !ᔀ"$ $ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀ%% #ᰀ ਀ఀ1؀<਀᐀)ᴀ਀᐀ᔀ%% /ࠀ'଀ᄀЀ ਀᐀ᴀ"ᔀ ᜀ49ᄀ2܀਀᠀ࠀ'଀ᄀᨀ4 &)Ḁᘀ# ἀ "ᘀ!%#$ % !ᔀᰀ$ $#&! % $ఀ'Ѐ "Ḁ " ἀ ᰀᴀ!"ᔀ؀< ఀ'Ѐ ᴀḀ#""Ḁ " ἀ ᰀᴀ!"ᔀ$ % !%"$!&#$ ਀᐀ᔀ%ᔀ؀<ᄀ,ᨀ4᠀؀ఀ'Ѐ ᘀḀ#ᴀ"Ḁ " ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ&$ᰀᴀ!"ᔀ$ % !%)$!&#$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀ%ᔀ #" ਀ఀ1؀<ࠀȀ+)؀਀᐀)ᴀᴀ਀᐀ᔀ%ᔀ /1଀ ਀᐀ᴀ"# ᜀ49ᄀ=܀฀᠀+ ᘀḀ#" ἀ "ᘀ!ᘀ $ % !" $ $ᄀ ᘀḀᰀ% / ᰀ#!#ᘀ$ % !ᰀᘀ,'؀< #%ᄀ ᘀḀ&ᴀᘀḀᰀ% / "ᰀ!ᔀᰀ#!#ᘀ$ $ % !&!ᰀᘀ$ $ ਀᐀ᔀ,'؀<ఀЀ'Ѐ؀ᄀ ᘀḀ&#ᘀḀᰀ% ἀ/ ""!ᰀ)$ᰀ#!#ᘀ$ % !%ᔀ$!ᰀᘀ$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀ%# #& ਀ఀ1,'؀<ᨀࠀ8Ѐ؀਀᐀਀᐀ᔀ%# ᘀᘀ /1଀ ਀᐀ᴀ") ᜀ49ᄀ=܀਀᠀Ѐ'ᨀࠀ' )Ḁᰀᰀ ἀ "ᘀ!ᔀ%$ %ᴀ!ᘀ%$ $"ᤀ ᘀḀᰀ" / ᰀ)!ᘀᘀ$ % !ᰀ؀ᜀ܀ࠀ'ᬀ̀܀ᄀᤀᨀЀ,'؀< (%ᤀ ᘀḀ&ᰀᘀḀᰀ" / "ᰀ!#ᘀ$ᰀ)!ᘀᘀ$ % !&)$!ᰀ"$ ਀᐀ᔀ؀ᜀ܀ࠀ'ᬀ̀܀ᄀᤀᨀЀ,'؀<ఀЀ'ᨀЀ؀ᤀ ᘀḀᘀ#ᘀḀᰀ" ἀ/ ᰀ)!ᰀᰀ)!ᘀᘀ$ $ % !&&$!ᰀ"$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀ%) #% ਀ఀ1؀ᜀ܀ࠀ'ᬀ̀܀ᄀᤀᨀЀ,'؀<Ѐ᠀4'؀਀᐀਀᐀ᔀ%) ᘀᰀ /1଀ $(ᘀḀᘀ% / ᰀᴀ!ᰀᴀ$ % !ᘀ ؀)਀᐀ᴀ" Mᬀ+ࠀ1 ᤀ ᰀḀᔀᰀ / "ᘀ!")$ % !&ᘀ$ 119؀ᜀ܀ᤀ ᘀḀᰀ#ᰀḀᔀᰀ ἀ/ ""!ᰀ#$"ᘀ!")$ % !ᔀ%$!&ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ% >᠀+ᬀ؀ᜀ܀ᬀ+᠀<؀)'ᤀ ᰀḀᔀ)ᰀḀᔀᰀ ἀ/ ᰀ"ᘀ!")$ !%&$ % !&#$!&ᘀ$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀ% #ᔀ ਀ఀ1଀+ࠀ؀ᜀ܀਀᐀਀᐀ᔀ% ᘀ" /1ࠀ(+ࠀఀ>᠀+ᬀ 118 ਀᐀ᴀ"ᴀ Mᬀ'ЀȀЀ܀81଀܀:+1JЀᄀࠀ(+ ᰀḀ#" ἀ ᰀᴀ!"ᴀ$ % !ᰀ $ $"ᘀḀ% ἀ "ᘀ!&ᰀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ ؀.਀ఀ1ᬀ܀ᘀḀᰀᴀᘀḀ% ἀ ᰀ)!ᘀ&$"ᘀ!&ᰀ$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ"$ !ᰀ#$ ਀᐀ᔀ%ᴀ >᠀+2 ؀.਀ఀ1ᬀ܀ᘀḀᰀ)ᘀḀ% ἀ ᰀᴀ!""ᘀ!&ᰀ$ $ %ᴀ!"ᴀ$%ᴀ!ᘀ"$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀ%ᴀ ## ਀ఀጀ8Ѐ'Ѐ>᠀+2 ؀.਀ఀ1ᬀ܀਀᐀਀᐀ᔀ%ᴀ ᘀ& @Ѐ37Ѐ>᠀+2 $%ࠀ7଀ ᰀḀ)) ἀ "ᘀ!&ᴀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ'؀က܀81଀܀਀᐀ᴀ&ᘀ Mᬀ'ЀȀЀ $ࠀ39଀ᄀᬀ " ᴀḀᔀ"Ḁᘀᔀ /ἀ ᰀ"ᘀ!ᰀᴀ$ !ᔀᘀ$ % !ᰀᔀ$!%ᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᔀᘀ >ࠀ39଀ᄀᬀ " Ḁᘀᔀ ἀ "ᘀ!ᰀᴀ$ % !%ᴀ<؀)'ࠀ39଀ᄀᬀ " ᰀḀᘀᘀḀᘀᔀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!&ᰀ$"ᘀ!ᰀᴀ$ %ᴀ!&"$% !%ᴀ$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᔀᘀ #) ਀*Ȁࠀ<؀)਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᔀᘀ ᘀ% @Ѐ37଀ ਀᐀ᴀ&ᰀ Mᬀ'ЀȀᨀЀ܀ᄀЀȀ܀C1ࠀᄀࠀԀ "Ḁ%# ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᔀ)$ % !%ᴀ$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᔀᰀ ᘀᔀ @ЀȀࠀ5Ѐ>ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ܀?଀7଀ᄀᬀ ᰀḀᔀᘀḀᘀ# ἀ ᰀᰀᴀ!ᰀ&$ !% $ %ᴀ!ᰀ)$% !%ᰀ$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᔀᰀ # ਀ጀ(+ᬀ܀ᄀЀȀ܀/Ѐ1ᄀࠀጀ>ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ܀?଀7଀ᄀᬀ ᰀḀ%"ᘀḀᘀ# /ἀ ᰀ)!")$ᰀᴀ!ᰀ&$ % !"%$!%ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᔀᰀ >ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ܀?଀7଀ᄀᬀ ᘀḀᘀ# ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ&$ % !%ᰀ$ $"Ḁ)) ἀ "ᘀ!&)$ % !ᔀ% ؀'8ᨀࠀ؀᠀ᬀ̀܀81଀܀਀᐀ᴀ&" Mᬀ'ЀȀᨀЀ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᔀ" ᘀ# @ЀȀ'Ѐ0܀ᄀЀȀ܀>ጀᄀЀ6ࠀԀ>ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ܀@଀ԀЀ'Ѐ ᘀḀ"ᘀ"Ḁᔀ% / ᰀ"ᘀ!ᰀᘀ$ !"ᘀ$ %)!%#$% !ᰀ $ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᔀ" #ᴀ ਀*5ࠀ';C1ЀȀᄀᬀ>ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ܀@଀ԀЀ'Ѐ ᘀḀᰀ"Ḁᔀ% ἀ/ ᰀ"ᘀ!ᰀᘀ$ !&ᔀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ)$% !ᰀ $ ਀᐀ᔀᔀ" >ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ܀@଀ԀЀ'Ѐ "Ḁᔀ% / "ᘀ!ᰀᘀ$ % !ᰀ $ $"%! % $#&!0ࠀ' ᘀḀ)ᘀ / "ᰀ+؀਀᐀ᴀ&& M3 ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᔀ& ᘀ) @ᬀᨀࠀ9>ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ܀A଀.଀ᄀЀ ᘀḀᴀᔀᘀḀ"& ἀ "ᰀ!"#$ᰀ !ᔀᔀ$ %%ᴀ!ᰀ&$ !&ᴀ$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᔀ& )ᘀ ਀'଀Ȁᄀ,ᨀ>ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ܀A଀.଀ᄀЀ ᘀḀ%ᴀᘀḀ"& ἀ "ᰀ!&ᔀ$ᰀ !ᔀᔀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀᴀ$%ᴀ!ᰀ&$ ਀᐀ᔀᔀ& >ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ܀A଀.଀ᄀЀ ᘀḀ"& ἀ ᰀ !ᔀᔀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ&$ ਀᐀ᴀ&% M3ࠀ6ᄀ2 ᰀḀ"ᘀ ἀ ""!ᘀᰀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ $ $"&! % $#%! BȀЀ0Ѐ ᘀḀ"" ἀ ᰀ܀BȀЀ0Ѐ %Ḁ)ᘀḀ"" ἀ "ᰀ!""$ᰀ !%#$ %ᴀ!"ᘀ$% !&"$ ਀᐀ᔀᔀ% >ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ܀ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ<؀1ᄀ؀଀>܀BȀЀ0Ѐ ᘀḀᰀᰀᘀḀ"" ἀ ᰀ !%ᔀ$!%#$ %ᴀ!"#$% !&"$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᔀ% )ᰀ -Ѐ1଀9ᤀᨀ2܀਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᔀ% ᘀ @Ѐᨀࠀ'ᬀ>ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ ਀᐀ᴀ&ᔀ M3ࠀ1Ѐ )Ḁ%% ἀ ᰀ !ᰀ $ %ᴀ!ᰀ"$ $ "! % $#%! ᘀḀᔀ% ἀ ᰀ ؀CᬀԀ1܀ᘀḀᘀᘀḀᔀ% /ἀ ᰀ)!ᘀ)$ᰀ !%#$ % !&#$!" $ ਀᐀ᔀᔀᔀ >ࠀ᠀ᄀ2 ؀CᬀԀ1܀ᰀḀᘀᴀᘀḀᔀ% ἀ "ᰀ!%ᴀ$ᰀ !%#$ % !%#$!" $ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᔀᔀ )" -Ѐ9ఀ,ᄀ>ࠀ᠀ᄀ2 ؀CᬀԀ1܀HᄀȀЀ'ࠀጀ>ࠀ᠀ᄀ2܀ᄀЀȀ܀)؀'਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᔀᔀ ᘀᴀ @Ѐᨀࠀ ਀᐀ᴀ&# M340ࠀ' ᰀḀ ᴀ ἀ ᰀ !&ᴀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ $ $ᘀḀ#ᰀ ἀ ᰀ !%ᴀ$ % !ᰀᴀ ؀)'DЀ3᠀ࠀ0ࠀ܀ᘀḀ""ᘀḀ#ᰀ /ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᔀᘀ$ᰀ !%ᴀ$ % !ᰀᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᔀ# >ࠀ᠀ᄀ2 ؀)'DЀ3᠀ࠀ0ࠀ܀Ḁᰀ)ᘀḀ#ᰀ ἀ "ᘀ!")$ᰀ !%ᴀ$ % !&ᴀ$!ᰀᴀ$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᔀ# )& -ᬀ'ࠀ5>ࠀ᠀ᄀ2" ؀)'DЀ3᠀ࠀ0ࠀ܀਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᔀ# ᰀᘀ @Ѐᨀࠀ'ᄀ଀(Ѐ>ࠀ᠀ᄀ2 ਀᐀ᴀ&) M᠀Ѐఀᄀࠀ &%Ḁ%" ἀ ᰀ !ᰀ)$ % !&ᰀ$ $#ᘀḀ ) ἀ ᰀᴀ!"%$ % !ᰀ ؀਀ఀ1+ᬀ1܀Ḁ%&ᘀḀ ) ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀ"$ᰀᴀ!"%$ %ᴀ!ᰀ&$% !ᰀ#$ ਀᐀ᔀᔀ) >ࠀ᠀ᄀ2& ؀਀ఀ1+ᬀ1܀ᘀḀᘀ%ᘀḀ ) ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀ)$ᰀᴀ!"%$ %ᴀ!"ᔀ$% !ᰀ#$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᔀ) )% -଀3Ѐ>ࠀ᠀ᄀ2 ؀਀ఀ1+ᬀ1܀ఀࠀ'ᨀЀ>ࠀ᠀ᄀ2؀ሀ؀@ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᔀ) ᰀᰀ ਀᐀ᴀ& Mࠀ3ࠀ1 ᘀḀ"ᰀ ἀ ᰀ !ᘀᔀ$ % !"ᘀ$ $(ᜀЀȀ଀7ࠀ' ᰀḀ"% ἀ ᰀ !ᔀᰀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ܀=ᜀЀȀ଀7ࠀ' ᘀḀᘀᴀᰀḀ"% ἀ ᰀ !ᰀᘀ$!ᔀᰀ$ %%ᴀ!ᰀ)$ !%ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᔀ >ࠀ᠀ᄀ܀=ᜀЀȀ଀7ࠀ' ᰀḀ#&ᰀḀ"% /ἀ "ᰀ!ᘀ"$ᰀ !ᔀᰀ$ %%ᴀ!ᰀ)$ !&"$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᔀ )ᔀ -଀9ࠀ'>ࠀ᠀ᄀ܀=9଀(Ѐ>ࠀ᠀ᄀ؀@ "਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᔀ ᰀ $%&! % $#ᰀḀ)ᰀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀ ؀.਀ఀ1ᬀ܀I܀ᄀ؀᠀਀᐀ᴀ&ᴀ M'ࠀ $ᜀ଀ᄀࠀȀࠀ᠀ ᘀḀᰀᔀ / ᰀ !ᰀ%$ % !ᰀᰀ܀=ᜀ଀ᄀࠀȀࠀ᠀ ᘀḀᘀ"ᘀḀᰀᔀ ἀ/ ᰀ !"ᔀ$!ᰀ%$ %ᴀ!ᰀᴀ$% !ᰀᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᔀᴀ >ࠀ᠀ᄀ܀=ᜀ଀ᄀࠀȀࠀ᠀ ᰀḀ)&ᘀḀᰀᔀ ἀ/ ᰀ !%&$!ᰀ%$ % !&ᰀ$!ᰀᰀ$ ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᔀᴀ )# -ఀ଀Ѐ'ᄀ଀ᨀ>ࠀ᠀ᄀ܀=ࠀ᠀ᄀ<؀ࠀȀഀᬀԀ7଀/܀଀9ఀᤀᨀ2'؀@ &਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᔀᴀ ᰀ $&%! % $ᰀᔀḀᰀ" ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᰀᰀ 1؀'؀ᤀ܀ᨀࠀఀ᠀଀ᄀЀ܀ᄀᤀᨀᬀ؀᠀਀᐀ᴀ%ᘀ M'ࠀ ਀᐀ ᰀ% @଀ЀȀࠀᨀ ᰀᔀḀ#" / ᰀ)!ᘀ)$ % !"#$ ਀᐀ )) -ఀ13Ѐ ᰀḀᔀᴀ ἀ "ᘀ!ᘀ&$ %ᴀ!ᘀ"$ ਀᐀ᴀ%ᰀ BЀ᠀ࠀ3,ᄀ ᰀᘀḀᴀ" ἀ "ᰀ!%#$ % !ᔀ $ $ᘀḀ" ἀ "ᰀ!ᔀᰀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ%$ ਀᐀ ) -ጀԀ଀Ѐ( "Ḁ % ἀ "ᘀ!ᘀ#$ % !ᔀᘀ ؀)'਀᐀ ᰀᔀ @ࠀ9ᨀࠀ $ "! % $ᰀᰀḀᰀ# ἀ ᰀ !%ᰀ ؀ᤀఀ1ᬀᄀ܀਀᐀ᴀ%" BЀ1ᄀࠀ'଀(ᨀ2 $Ḁ%ᴀ ἀ "ᘀ!"ᰀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀᰀ& ؀)'PȀЀ'ࠀጀ ᘀḀ" ἀ "ᰀ!#ᘀ$ % !ᔀᴀ$ ਀᐀ )ᴀ -'ᬀ3ࠀ܀ᄀЀȀ܀਀᐀ ᰀ# @ࠀ'ᄀ2 $ഀᄀ଀(Ѐ ᰀḀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀᰀ$ % !&ᴀ؀฀1܀ഀᄀᬀ؀᠀؀ഀᄀ଀(Ѐ ᘀḀ"ᴀ ἀ ᰀ !& $ % !"&$ ਀᐀ᴀ%& B؀฀1܀ᨀࠀ'ᤀᨀᬀ؀਀᐀ ᘀ A Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Slovakia

؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ؀਀଀ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀؀ĀȀ ̀ЀԀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ ؀ကЀఀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀฀ༀ ကࠀᄀሀ଀ఀጀȀ ؀਀଀ഀ $&ᬀ ᰀᴀḀᔀᴀᰀḀ"ᰀ ἀ ᰀ !ᔀ"$!"#$ % !&#$!ᔀ᠀؀฀܀C1ࠀᄀࠀԀᜀЀ᠀Ѐᤀᨀᬀ܀ᄀЀȀ܀ᬀ ᰀᴀḀᔀᴀ)Ḁᔀ% ἀ "ᘀ!ᰀ&$ᰀ !"#$ % !ᔀᰀ$!ᔀ&$ ਀᐀ᴀ%%਀᐀ᔀᘀᘀ B଀Ѐ1᠀؀฀܀ሀᬀ1ఀᜀЀ᠀Ѐᤀᨀᬀ᠀؀਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀᘀ ᰀ A $(%! $"ᰀ"Ḁ%ᔀ"ᰀḀᔀ" ἀ "ᰀ!")$""!ᘀᰀ$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ ؀)'Ѐᄀᨀࠀ'ᤀᨀ2ἀȀ଀Ȁࠀ@܀Ѐ܀ࠀ+؀଀Ѐᄀᤀᨀ᠀1؀C܀؀ᰀ&Ḁ"""ᰀḀᔀ" ἀ ᰀ""!ᘀᰀ$ !ᔀᔀ$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ"$ !"ᴀ$ ਀᐀ᴀ%ᔀ਀᐀ᔀᘀᰀ /ࠀ'ࠀȀ଀ ؀)'ᬀἀȀ଀Ȁࠀ᠀8؀਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀᰀ " A $#"! % $(ࠀ'ᬀἀᄀఀࠀ᠀ "%ḀᘀḀ"% & ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀ%$ᰀ !ᔀ)$ %ᴀ!ᰀ)$% !"#$ ਀᐀ᔀᘀ" ἀᄀఀࠀ᠀ ᘀḀ"% ἀ ᰀ !ᔀ+)1؀਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀ" & A $9Ԁᬀᨀ฀Ѐ(*(+ ᘀḀ"%ᰀḀᰀ& /ἀ ᰀᰀᴀ!%)$ !#ᘀ$ % !ᘀ#$!ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᘀ&਀᐀ᴀ%# ฀Ѐ(*(+Bጀ8ᨀࠀ' ᰀḀᰀ&ᘀḀ)ᔀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!%)$ᰀ !&ᴀ$ % !ᔀᘀ$!&ᰀ؀਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀ& % A ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀ% ᔀ AࠀԀᬀ9଀ᨀࠀ'ࠀ฀ЀȀ,ᄀ ᘀḀᘀ%)Ḁ%ᴀ /ἀ ᰀ)!%ᘀ$ᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$ % !ᘀᔀ$!%ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᘀ%਀᐀ᴀ%) ฀ЀȀ,ᄀ਀ఀ1ᬀ.ࠀ'ᤀᨀ2܀ᜀ1(+4܀ഀᬀ8ЀȀ܀E܀ ᰀ%#Ḁ##)Ḁ%ᴀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$ᰀ !ᰀ%$ % !%ᰀ$!ᔀᔀ$ ᤀఀ؀K܀ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀᤀ܀਀ఀ1ᬀ.ࠀ'ᤀᨀ2 ਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀᔀ # AࠀԀᬀ9ࠀ'ᬀ฀Ѐᄀᤀᨀᬀ܀-ఀ଀Ѐ'ᄀ଀(Ѐ "Ḁ)&)Ḁ%ᴀ /ἀ ᰀᴀ!#ᘀ$ᰀ !ᔀ&$ % !""$!"#$ ਀᐀ᔀᘀᔀ ฀Ѐᄀᤀᨀᬀ܀-ఀ଀Ѐ'ᄀ଀(Ѐ )Ḁ%ᴀ ἀ ᰀ !ᔀ&$ % !"#$ $&"!$᐀Ѐ18Ѐఀ4 ᰀᘀᴀḀᘀḀ%# " /ἀ ᰀ)!ᘀ%$ᰀ)!ᰀᔀ$ % !"ᰀ܀฀Ѐ.Ѐᄀఀᄀ଀(Ѐ ᘀḀ&ᴀᘀḀ%# ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!&ᰀ)!ᘀ%$ $ % !"&$!"ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᘀ#਀᐀ᴀ% ฀Ѐ.Ѐᄀఀᄀ଀(Ѐ?Ѐ᠀2؀)'਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀ# ) AࠀԀᬀ9ࠀ $ကЀ3ࠀ1(ࠀԀ %#Ḁ""ᔀḀᘀ) ἀ ""!"ᰀ$"ᰀ!ᔀ%$ %%ᴀ!ᘀᔀ$ !%ᴀ܀ᄀЀȀ܀)؀'0Ѐఀ଀ᄀЀC1Ѐ3ࠀ؀0Ѐఀ଀ᄀЀ "Ḁ&ᘀᔀḀᘀ) ἀ ""!"ᰀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ&$% !%ᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᘀ)਀᐀ᴀ%ᴀ ฀؀਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀ) Aࠀ8ࠀ5Ѐ฀ $ᤀᨀ4Ȁ4 ᰀ"Ḁ&&ᘀḀ"& ἀ "ᘀ!&%$"ᰀ!"&$ %%ᴀ!"#$ !%ᔀ؀฀܀ఀ᠀଀Ѐ1Mᬀ8ЀȀᄀ2؀ఀ᠀଀Ѐ1 ᘀḀᰀ&ᘀḀ"& /ἀ ᰀ)!%%$"ᘀ!&%$ %)!ᔀ%$% !%ᔀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᘀ਀᐀ᴀᔀᘀ ฀؀฀؀਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀ ᴀ AGᄀ $(ᰀᔀḀ&&ᘀḀᰀ# /ἀ ᰀ""!ᘀ"$ !%ᘀ$ %)!ᔀ#$%ᴀ!ᰀ "܀Mᬀ'ЀȀЀ฀,0Ѐ ᴀḀ&)ᘀḀᰀ# ἀ/ ᰀ !ᘀ&$!%ᘀ$ %%)!ᔀ#$ !#ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᘀᴀ਀᐀ᴀᔀᰀ ฀,0Ѐ>Ѐᄀࠀ'Ѐ܀ᄀ7଀ЀᄀᤀᨀЀ؀਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᘀᴀ ᴀᘀ A1 $଀ఀ1଀(ࠀጀ ᰀ#Ḁᘀᰀ#Ḁ%" /ἀ ""!ᘀᔀ$ᰀ !" $ % !%ᰀ̀܀ᄀЀȀ܀ࠀ1ᄀ,ᨀ4'<"܀ᄀᄀ2؀ᰀ#Ḁᔀ&#Ḁ%" ἀ/ ᰀᴀ!ᘀᰀ$""!ᘀᔀ$ % !&#$!%ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀᘀ਀᐀ᴀᔀ" ਀ "܀ᄀᄀ2؀Cࠀ1Ѐ਀܀਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᰀᘀ ᴀᰀ A1ᄀЀ'ᬀ $(Ḁ#%ᰀḀᔀ& /ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᔀᰀ !ᔀ&$ $ %%ᴀ!ᘀᴀ$ !ᰀ& ܀ࠀऀ܀+ᜀᬀ܀E܀ᨀࠀఀ᠀଀ᄀ4܀6؀Aጀ17଀Ѐᄀᤀᨀ܀+ᜀᬀ؀)'ᰀᘀḀᴀ#ᰀḀᔀ& ἀ/ "ᰀ!ᔀ#$ᰀᴀ!ᔀ $ % !ᔀᰀ$!ᰀ)$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀᰀ਀᐀ᴀᔀ& ฀᠀+ࠀ ܀I܀᐀1଀'ࠀ9ఀ଀ЀᄀᤀᨀЀ܀E܀+6ጀ܀I܀᐀1଀'ࠀ9ఀ଀ЀᄀᨀЀ؀)'਀᐀਀᐀ᔀᰀᰀ ᴀ" ฀᠀+ࠀ Aጀ17଀ЀᄀᤀᨀЀ܀3Ѐᤀ଀ᄀ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ" ฀ࠀ31ࠀ'ᄀ,ᨀᤀࠀጀఀ+ ᘀḀᰀ& ἀ ᰀᴀ!" $ %ᴀ!ᘀ)$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ" ฀ࠀ31ࠀ'ᄀ,ᨀ ᘀḀᰀ& ἀ ᰀᴀ!" $ %ᴀ!ᘀ)$ ਀᐀ᴀᔀ% CЀᄀȀ᠀ࠀ'ᬀ &"Ḁᔀ& ἀ ᰀ !%%$ % !% $ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ&਀᐀ ᴀ& ฀ࠀȀ,ᨀ4A1ᄀࠀ'2 ᘀḀᘀ#ᰀḀᘀᘀ /ἀ ᰀ)!"ᴀ$ᰀ !%ᴀ$ %)!ᔀᔀ$%ᴀ!ᰀᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ& ฀ࠀȀ,ᨀ4 ᘀḀᘀ# / ᰀ)!"ᴀ$ %)!ᔀᔀ$ $"&! % $ᄀࠀ1ఀ+ &ᰀḀᘀ) ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀᴀ܀I܀؀DЀ'ࠀ1଀܀E܀1؀'؀ᤀ܀I܀؀਀᐀ᴀᔀᔀ DЀ'ࠀ1଀ $%5ࠀ' ᘀḀᰀᴀ / ᰀ)!%ᰀ$ %)!ᔀ؀+ᄀᬀ ᘀḀᰀᴀᘀḀ&% /ἀ ᰀ)!%ᰀ$ᰀᴀ!&#$ %)!ᔀ%$%ᴀ!")$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ% ฀ࠀ؀5ࠀ'A1ᤀఀ؀+਀᐀ᔀᰀ%਀᐀ ᴀ% ฀ࠀ $ Ḁ"#ᘀḀ % ἀ/ "ᰀ!ᔀ%$"ᰀ!ᰀᴀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ% !&%$ $ ਀᐀ᔀᰀᔀ ฀ࠀ1ࠀ' ᘀḀ % ἀ "ᰀ!ᔀ%$ %ᴀ!ᰀ% ܀E܀Cࠀ1ᄀᬀȀጀ܀ఀࠀᨀጀ܀Ȁࠀ᠀ᄀ2+ࠀ܀؀ЀᄀȀ1؀?'਀᐀ᔀᰀᔀ਀᐀ ᴀᔀ ฀ࠀ1ࠀ $&"!ᰀᘀḀ)ᰀ ἀ "ᘀ!&ᘀ$ %ᴀ "܀ᄀ଀ᄀ4؀਀᐀ᴀᔀ# /଀ ܀ࠀऀ܀ЀԀ؀ᤀఀ1܀1؀ࠀK᠀܀؀+ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀1ᤀ؀ЀᄀȀ؀? ਀᐀ᔀᰀ# ฀ࠀఀఀࠀ'ࠀ "Ḁᔀᴀ / "ᘀ!ᘀᴀ$ % !ᰀᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ# ฀ࠀఀఀࠀ'ࠀ "Ḁᔀᴀ / "ᘀ!ᘀᴀ$ % !ᰀᴀ$ Cࠀ1ᄀᬀȀ ਀᐀ᴀᔀ) Aࠀ85Ѐ܀I܀ကጀᨀࠀ' ᘀḀ& ἀ "ᰀ!ᘀ#$ %ᴀ!ᰀ#$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ) ฀1Ȁᬀ1ᨀЀ ᰀ#Ḁᴀᴀ ἀ "ᘀ!"ᰀ$ % !%#$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ) ฀1Ȁᬀ1ᨀЀ ᰀ#Ḁᴀᴀ ἀ "ᘀ!"ᰀ$ % !%#$ $ ࠀ1Ѐ ᰀᘀḀ ) ἀ "ᰀ!ᘀ#$ %ᴀ!ᰀ+܀᐀1଀'ᬀ܀I܀'1ሀࠀ؀> ਀᐀ ᴀ# Aጀ+ᬀ1 )Ḁᰀ# ἀ ᰀᴀ!" $ % !"#$ ਀᐀ᴀᔀ $Ḁ#& ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀ#$ % !ᔀᘀ" ؀)'6ࠀ؀ఀ؀Ḁ#& ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀ#$ % !ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀ ฀1" ؀)'6ࠀ؀ఀ؀਀᐀ᔀᰀ ฀1 ਀᐀ ᴀ) Aጀ1Ѐᄀ4 ᴀḀ"& ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀ"$ %ᴀ!ᘀ $ ਀᐀ᴀᔀᴀ /ࠀȀ܀DЀԀ଀ᄀࠀጀ ᘀḀᰀ) ἀ "ᘀ!& $ % !%ᔀ$ $ఀᨀЀ ᘀḀᘀ& / "ᘀ!"ᰀ$ % !&ᘀ؀ఀᨀЀ ᘀḀᘀ& / "ᘀ!"ᰀ$ % !&ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᰀᴀ ฀1؀਀᐀ᔀᰀᴀ ฀1 ਀᐀ ᴀ Aጀ17଀Ѐᄀᨀ4 ᘀḀ)& ἀ ᰀ !"ᘀ$ % !&ᔀ$ ਀᐀ᴀ#ᘀ L+ࠀ1ᄀᬀ ᰀḀᘀ% ἀ "ᘀ!&ᴀ$ % !%%$ $%"! % $%%!ഀᄀ଀7ᨀЀ %Ḁᘀ" / ᰀᴀ؀ഀᄀ଀7ᨀЀ %Ḁᘀ" / ᰀᴀ!%%$ % !"%$ ਀᐀ᔀ"ᘀ ฀1؀਀᐀ᔀ"ᘀ ฀1 $ᰀḀ% / "ᘀ!%"$ % !&ᔀ "܀+)1'܀=ᘀḀ%ᘀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$ % !ᔀ"$ ਀᐀ᴀ#ᰀ >ࠀ᠀ᄀ ؀FЀఀ1܀6؀5ᨀ؀ᜀ܀ࠀ'܀ᨀᬀ)؀਀᐀ ᴀᴀ Aጀ1 $ ࠀఀЀ "Ḁᘀᘀ ἀ ᰀ !%ᴀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ+؀က܀ࠀఀЀ "Ḁᘀᘀ ἀ ᰀ !%ᴀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ $ ਀᐀ᔀ"ᰀ ฀ጀȀЀఀ,ᄀᤀᨀЀ+؀က܀਀᐀ᔀ"ᰀ ฀ጀȀЀఀ,ᄀᤀᨀЀ $ &! % $"%!Ḁ"ᔀ ἀ "ᘀ%& "܀᐀1Ѐᤀ܀=ᄀᤀᨀ؀'ᘀḀ)" ἀ ᰀ !%ᔀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ)$ ਀᐀ᴀ#" ਀᠀ࠀ ؀਀᐀ᴀᘀᘀ Aጀ1଀ $"%! % $᐀ࠀ9଀(଀Ѐ(+ ᘀḀ"ᔀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀᘀ܀81଀܀)؀'᐀ࠀ9଀(଀Ѐ(+ ᘀḀ"ᔀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀᘀ$ % !%"$ ਀᐀ᔀ"" ฀ጀᨀࠀ܀81଀܀)؀'਀᐀ᔀ"" ฀ጀᨀࠀ ਀᐀ᴀᘀᰀ Aጀ10Ѐ܀ᄀЀȀ܀฀ࠀȀ'ࠀጀ ᘀḀ"ᴀ ἀ "ᘀ!ᔀ"$ % !&#$ ਀᐀ᴀ#& ကᬀఀᨀ4 %Ḁ & ἀ ᰀᴀ!&ᴀ$ % !&&$ ਀᐀ᔀ"& ฀ጀᤀࠀ' & Ḁ&ᘀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀ%$ %ᴀ!"%$ ਀᐀ᔀ"& ฀ጀᤀࠀ' & Ḁ&ᘀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀ%$ %ᴀ!"%$ ਀᐀ᴀᘀ" PȀ଀7Ѐ ᰀḀ%ᴀ ἀ ᰀ !""$ %ᴀ!ᘀᴀ$ ਀᐀ᴀ#% /ࠀȀఀЀఀ1Ѐᄀᤀᨀ2܀᠀*ᨀ4܀E܀/ࠀȀఀЀఀ1Ѐᄀᤀᨀ2܀ ᰀ Ḁ%ᰀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!%&$ %ᴀ!ᘀ $ ਀᐀ᔀ"% ฀ጀഀ଀(Ѐ ᰀḀᴀ& / "ᰀ!ᘀ)$ % !&ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"% ሀ1Ѐᤀᤀ᠀ЀᄀȀᤀ฀ጀഀ଀(Ѐ ᰀḀᴀ& / "ᰀ!ᘀ)$ % !&ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᴀᘀ& ᜀЀ᠀Ѐᤀᨀᬀ܀>ጀ3ࠀ'ᬀ ᰀḀᰀᰀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ $ %ᴀ!ᘀ $ ਀᐀ᔀ"ᔀ ฀4ᤀఀ1଀7Ѐᄀ4 ᰀḀ&ᰀ ἀ ᰀ !&ᘀ$ % !%ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"ᔀ ฀4ᤀఀ1଀7Ѐᄀ4 ᰀḀ&ᰀ ἀ ᰀ !&ᘀ$ % !%ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᴀᘀ% ᜀЀ᠀ᨀࠀ' ᘀḀ"" ἀ "ᰀ!&ᴀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ%$ ਀᐀ᴀ#ᔀ CЀሀᬀᄀᤀᨀ4܀8ࠀఀࠀᨀ܀E܀CЀሀᬀᄀᤀᨀ4܀31ࠀࠀᨀ ᰀḀᘀᔀ ἀ "ᘀ!ᰀᘀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ%$ $ᄀ଀(Ѐ ᘀḀ%) ἀ ᰀ !%ᔀ$ % !&ᰀ؀ᄀ଀(Ѐ ᘀḀ%) ἀ ᰀ !%ᔀ$ % !&ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ"# ฀ഀ؀਀᐀ᔀ"# ฀ഀ $Ḁ#ᴀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᔀ)$ %ᴀ!ᘀᔀ# )؀.਀᐀ᴀᘀᔀ ᜀЀ $("! %$&6ᨀࠀ' %ḀᰀᰀḀᰀ# ἀ/ "ᘀ!ᰀᰀ$"ᰀ!%#$ %ᴀ!ᘀ؀:଀(Ѐ᠀8؀A܀6ᨀࠀ' ᰀḀᰀ# / "ᰀ!%#$ % !")$ ਀᐀ᴀ##਀᐀ᔀ") ਀8଀9ᤀᨀᬀ؀: ("਀᐀ᔀ $&"! % $ᘀḀᘀ# / "ᘀ!ᰀᴀ ؀)଀ᄀ᠀؀਀᐀ᴀᘀ# ᜀ7 $ $ᤀᨀࠀ'2 "Ḁ%)ᘀḀ&ᰀ ἀ "ᘀ!ᰀᘀ$ᰀ)!"%$ % !ᔀ!&ᔀ؀1ࠀ'ᬀ;က଀؀:ᤀᨀࠀ'2 ᘀḀ&ᰀ ἀ ᰀ)!"%$ % !&ᔀ$ ਀᐀ᴀ#)਀᐀ᔀ" ฀4ᤀఀ1ᬀ؀1ࠀ'ᬀ;က଀؀: "਀᐀ᔀ $#"! % $#Ḁᰀ) ἀ ᰀ !ᰀ& ؀)7଀᠀؀ᜀ܀I܀7؀਀᐀ᴀᘀ) A1,3 ਀᐀ᔀ"ᴀ :଀ᄀࠀ3Ѐ0Ѐ ᰀᘀḀ # ἀ ᰀᴀ!&ᴀ$ % !"ᴀ$ ਀᐀ᴀ#਀᐀ᔀ"ᴀ ᐀1Ѐ'Ѐᄀ4:଀ᄀࠀ3Ѐ0Ѐ ᰀᘀḀ"Ḁ)ᴀ # ἀ "ᘀ!ᰀ"$ᰀᴀ!&ᴀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀᘀ$% !"ᴀ$ $(଀7ᄀᬀ ᰀ%Ḁᴀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ%$ %ᴀ!ᰀ᠀؀਀᐀ᴀᘀ ᜀ $%&! $"ᰀᰀḀ)&)Ḁᘀ) /ἀ "ᘀ!&#$"ᰀ!ᔀ $ %%ᴀ!ᰀ ؀)'DЀ3᠀ࠀᄀ଀(Ѐ<Ѐ3Ѐ᠀ࠀ܀ᰀᰀḀ)& ἀ "ᰀ!ᔀ $ %ᴀ!ᰀ"$ ਀᐀ᴀ#ᴀ਀᐀ᔀ&ᘀ ਀଀᠀଀(ᨀᬀ ؀)'਀᐀ᔀ&ᘀ <Ѐ3Ѐ᠀ࠀ $ᤀᄀᬀ Ḁ&ᘀ ἀ "ᘀ!"#$ %ᴀ!"ᘀ؀က܀5ᨀᬀ؀਀᐀ᴀᘀᴀ ᜀ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᰀ <ЀȀ(Ѐ ᘀḀ"ᰀ ἀ ᰀ !ᔀᰀ$ %ᴀ!" $ ਀᐀ᴀ)ᘀ਀᐀ᔀ&ᰀ -ఀQᤀ܀Ѐ܀਀Ԁࠀ᠀ᄀ,ᨀ<ЀȀ(Ѐ ᰀ#Ḁᴀ&ᘀḀ"ᰀ ἀ "ᘀ!%ᔀ$ᰀ !ᔀᰀ$ %%ᴀ!" !%"$ $ $Ѐ0Ѐ ᘀḀᴀ) / ᰀ !ᰀ $ % !ᰀᘀ?܀5ᨀᬀ؀਀᐀ᴀᰀᘀ ᜀ ਀᐀ᔀ&" <ᬀ8ࠀ1 ᘀḀ") / ᰀ !ᘀ"$ % !ᰀ#$ ਀᐀ᴀ)ᰀ਀᐀ᔀ&" ᐀ࠀ69ࠀ'ᤀᨀᬀ܀+ࠀ5Ѐ<ᬀ8ࠀ1 ᰀ)ᴀḀ"ᰀᘀḀ") ἀ/ "ᘀ!ᔀᔀ$ᰀ !ᘀ"$ % !%#$!ᰀ#$ $ᘀḀ&ᰀ ἀ ᰀ !ᘀᴀ$ % !%ᘀ ؀Cࠀᤀఀ܀5ᨀ2؀਀᐀ᴀᰀᰀ ᜀ $ᔀḀ%#Ḁ%# ἀ "ᘀ!&ᴀ$ᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$ % !%#$!ᘀᴀ ؀)'ࠀ᠀؀>"܀Ȁ᠀଀ᄀ4؀6܀Ḁ%# ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$ % !ᘀᴀ$ ਀᐀ᴀ)"਀᐀ᔀ&& ਀ఀЀ1ࠀ'ࠀȀᤀᨀ2# ؀)'ࠀ᠀؀> &&਀᐀ᔀ $%ᰀḀ%% / ᰀ !"&$ % !ᘀ ؀)'ကࠀ܀5ᨀ2؀਀᐀ᴀᰀ" ᜀ $#%! $1ఀ଀.ᄀ2 ᰀḀ")ᰀḀᘀ" ἀ "ᘀ!&#$"ᰀ!%ᴀ$ %%ᴀ!"ᰀ؀>ᄀ(᠀ࠀ'ᬀ؀1ఀ଀.ᄀ2 ᰀḀᘀ" ἀ "ᰀ!%ᴀ$ %ᴀ!"ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᴀ)&਀᐀ᔀ&% C؀> %&਀᐀ᔀ $ &! % $(%!(ᘀḀᰀ& ἀ ᰀ ؀H1'଀9ఀ܀5ᨀ2؀਀᐀ᴀᰀ& ᜀ $ $Ḁᘀ#ᘀḀᘀᴀ ἀ "ᘀ!%)$ᰀ !ᰀᘀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ%ᴀ!ᘀᔀ#" 0؀᐀ЀԀ܀=ᄀ؀'1؀>܀ࠀ7ᤀᨀ2'؀က܀E܀ࠀȀ+)='܀ᜀ1(+4܀ࠀ7ᤀᨀ2'؀ᘀḀᘀᴀ ἀ ᰀ !ᰀᘀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀᔀ$ ਀᐀ᴀ)%਀᐀ᔀ&ᔀ က 0؀᐀ЀԀ܀=ᄀ؀'1؀> ਀᐀ᔀ&ᔀ ਀᐀ᴀᰀ% -ࠀ᠀ఀ4ᤀЀ %Ḁᴀ" ἀ "ᘀ!"ᴀ$ %ᴀ!"ᰀ$ $Ѐᤀఀ ᘀḀᘀ% ἀ ᰀ !% $ %ᴀ!&ᘀ؀܀ԀࠀጀᄀఀЀ଀ᄀᤀ؀1ᄀ؀ᘀḀᘀ% ἀ ᰀ !% $ %ᴀ!&ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&# <଀ ؀1ᄀ؀਀᐀ᔀ&# <଀ $%ᨀ ᘀḀ%) / ᰀ !%"$ % !ᘀ؀ᤀ؀/܀=5ᨀ؀਀᐀ᴀᰀᔀ ᜀ $฀Ѐ᠀ࠀሀ %Ḁ)ᔀḀᘀ% ἀ "ᰀ!%&$ᰀᴀ!%ᔀ$ %ᴀ!"%$% !%ᘀ܀1ᄀ4؀଀>"܀฀Ѐ᠀ࠀሀ ᔀḀᘀ% ἀ ᰀᴀ!%ᔀ$ % !%ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᴀ)ᔀ਀᐀ᔀ&) >ጀᨀ᠀Ѐ܀1ᄀ4؀਀᐀ᔀ&) <଀ $&Ѐ1଀9 ᘀḀ ᰀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᰀᰀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ-܀=5ᨀ؀਀᐀ᴀᰀ# ᜀ $#ᘀḀ") / ᰀ !"ᔀ$ % !ᰀ ؀ᘀḀ") / ᰀ !"ᔀ$ % !ᰀ#$ ਀᐀ᔀ& <଀ऀᬀ1 ؀਀᐀ᔀ& <଀ऀᬀ1 $1ᄀᬀ1 ᘀḀ# ἀ "ᘀ!ᰀ%$ % !ᔀᔀ؀਀᐀ᴀᰀ) ᜀ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᴀ <ࠀ᠀ఀࠀ'ࠀ ᘀḀ&& / "ᘀ!"&$ % !&ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ&ᴀ <ࠀ᠀ఀࠀ'ࠀ ᘀḀ&& / "ᘀ!"&$ % !&ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᴀᰀ ᜀ,ሀ5Ѐ9 ᘀḀᔀ) ἀ ᰀᴀ!"&$ % !&&$ $Ԁࠀ9ᄀ2 ᘀḀ"" ἀ ᰀ !ᔀ%$ % !ᔀᘀ؀Ԁࠀ9ᄀ2 ᘀḀ"" ἀ ᰀ !ᔀ%$ % !ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ%ᘀ <1؀਀᐀ᔀ%ᘀ <1 $Ḁ&" ἀ ᰀ !% $ %ᴀ!ᰀᘀ" ؀7ᄀ؀਀ఀ1܀81଀܀਀᐀ᴀᰀᴀ ᜀ଀90ࠀ'2 ਀᐀ᔀ%ᰀ <ጀᄀࠀ'ࠀ "Ḁ"ᔀ / ᰀ)!ᰀ&$ % !ᘀ"$ ਀᐀ᔀ%ᰀ <ጀᄀࠀ'ࠀ "Ḁ"ᔀ / ᰀ)!ᰀ&$ % !ᘀ"$ ਀᐀ᴀ"ᘀ ᜀࠀ60Ѐᄀ4 ᰀḀᴀᰀ ἀ "ᘀ!")$ %ᴀ!ᰀᔀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ%" >Ѐ'଀Ȁࠀ' ᘀḀ"% ἀ "ᰀ!&#$ % !ᔀᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ%" >Ѐ'଀Ȁࠀ' ᘀḀ"% ἀ "ᰀ!&#$ % !ᔀᘀ$ $Ḁ"# ἀ ᰀ !% $ % !&ᰀ" ؀਀᐀ᴀ"ᰀ ᜀ4+ᄀ $ᰀḀ ᔀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᘀᘀ$ % !&ᴀ ܀E܀฀ࠀȀ'4܀ఀࠀᨀጀ܀Ȁᄀ2+ࠀ؀ᤀఀ1܀؀ᰀḀ ᔀ ἀ "ᰀ!ᘀᘀ$ % !&ᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ%& /ࠀ'ࠀȀ଀ ܀E܀฀ࠀȀ'4܀ఀࠀᨀጀ܀Ȁᄀ2+ࠀ؀ᤀఀ1܀؀਀᐀ᔀ%& /ࠀ'ࠀȀ଀ ܀ࠀऀ܀8Ѐ1ఀ܀؀᠀Ԁ଀ȀȀ܀؀+ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀3Ѐᤀ଀ᄀ܀1؀'Ḁ#" ἀ "ᰀ!ᔀ#$ %ᴀ!ᘀ)$ @଀& ܀ࠀऀ܀8Ѐ1ఀ܀؀᠀Ԁ଀ȀȀ܀؀+ఀ܀ࠀऀ܀3Ѐᤀ଀ᄀ܀1؀'ᜀ=1Ѐ'Ѐ@଀܀I܀)؀਀᐀ᴀ"" ကЀ3ࠀ1 3Ѐᤀఀࠀ'ᬀ฀ࠀȀ'Ѐ ᘀḀᘀ% ἀ "ᰀ!"ᰀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀᰀ$ ฀ࠀȀ'Ѐ؀-܀਀᐀ᴀ"& ᜀ49ᄀᬀ $"Ȁ଀ᄀᨀ4 ᘀḀᰀᔀ ἀ "ᘀ!"%$ % !ᔀ؀< %%ᘀḀᰀᔀ&Ḁ # ἀ "ᘀ!"%$"ᘀ!%ᘀ$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ&$ !ᔀ"$ ਀᐀ᔀ ؀8Ѐ9؀@܀Ȁ଀ᄀᨀ4ᜀ49ᄀ2؀< %"਀᐀ᔀ%%਀᐀ᴀ $#&! % $ఀ'Ѐ "Ḁ " ἀ ᰀᴀ!"ᔀ؀< ਀᠀ࠀ'଀ᄀᨀ4 &)Ḁᘀ#"Ḁ " ἀ ᰀᴀ!"ᔀ$"ᘀ!%#$ % !&#$!ᔀᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀ%ᔀ܀ఀ'Ѐᜀ49ᄀ2؀< ਀᐀ᔀ%ᔀ਀᐀ᴀ"ᔀ $ᄀ ᘀḀᰀ% / ᰀ#!#ᘀ$ % !ᰀᘀ,'؀< #%฀᠀+ ᘀḀᰀ%ᘀḀ#" /ἀ ᰀ#!#ᘀ$"ᘀ!ᘀ $ % !ᰀᘀ$!" $ ਀᐀ᔀ܀=ᄀᜀ49ᄀ,'؀< #"਀᐀ᔀ%#਀᐀ᴀ $"ᤀ ᘀḀᰀ" / ᰀ)!ᘀᘀ$ % !ᰀ؀ᜀ܀ࠀ'ᬀ̀܀ᄀᤀᨀЀ,'؀< (%਀᠀Ѐ'ᨀࠀ' ᘀḀᰀ")Ḁᰀᰀ /ἀ ᰀ)!ᘀᘀ$"ᘀ!ᔀ%$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ%$ !ᰀ"$ ਀᐀ᔀ܀=ᤀᜀ49ᄀ؀ᜀ܀ࠀ'ᬀ̀܀ᄀᤀᨀЀ,'؀< ("਀᐀ᔀ%)਀᐀ᴀ ᤀ ᰀḀᔀᰀ / "ᘀ!")$ % !&ᘀ$ 119؀ᜀ܀ᰀḀᔀᰀᘀḀᘀ% / "ᘀ!")$ᰀᴀ!ᰀᴀ$ % !&ᘀ$!ᘀ)$ ਀᐀ᔀ% >᠀+ᬀ ؀)ᤀMᬀ+ࠀ1؀ᜀ܀਀᐀ᔀ%਀᐀ᴀ" >᠀+ᬀ 118 $"ᘀḀ% ἀ "ᘀ!&ᰀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ ؀.਀ఀ1ᬀ܀1JЀᄀࠀ(+ ᘀḀ%ᰀḀ#" ἀ "ᘀ!&ᰀ$ᰀᴀ!"ᴀ$ %ᴀ!ᘀ"$% !ᰀ $ ਀᐀ᔀ%ᴀ >᠀+2+:܀81଀܀Mᬀ'ЀȀЀ؀.਀ఀ1ᬀ܀਀᐀ᔀ%ᴀ਀᐀ᴀ"ᴀ >᠀+2 $ࠀ7଀ " ᰀḀ))Ḁᘀᔀ ἀ "ᘀ!ᰀᴀ$"ᘀ!&ᴀ$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ%$ !%ᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᔀᘀ >ࠀ39଀ᄀᬀ " Ḁᘀᔀ ἀ "ᘀ!ᰀᴀ$ % !%ᴀ'؀က܀81଀܀਀᐀ᔀᔀᘀ਀᐀ᴀ&ᘀ >ࠀ39଀ᄀᬀMᬀ'ЀȀЀ ਀᐀ᔀᔀᰀ਀᐀ᴀ&ᰀ >ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ܀?଀7଀ᄀᬀMᬀ'ЀȀᨀЀ܀ᄀЀȀ܀C1ࠀᄀࠀԀ ᘀḀᘀ#"Ḁ%# ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ&$ᰀᴀ!ᔀ)$ % !%ᰀ$!%ᴀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᔀᰀ >ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ܀?଀7଀ᄀᬀ ᘀḀᘀ# ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᰀ&$ % !%ᰀ$ $ ଀ԀЀ'Ѐ "Ḁᔀ% / "ᘀ!ᰀᘀ$ % !ᰀ@܀Ḁᔀ%%Ḁ)) /ἀ "ᘀ!ᰀᘀ$"ᘀ!&)$ % !ᰀ!ᔀ"$ $ ਀᐀ᔀᔀ" >ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ" ؀'8ᨀࠀ؀᠀ᬀ̀܀81଀܀଀ԀЀ'ЀMᬀ'ЀȀᨀЀ@܀਀᐀ᔀᔀ"਀᐀ᴀ&" >ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ $&A଀.଀ᄀЀ ᘀḀ"& ἀ ᰀ !ᔀᔀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ܀0ࠀ' ᘀḀ"&ᘀḀ)ᘀ ἀ/ ᰀ"ᰀ!&#$ !ᔀᔀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ&$% !%"$ ਀᐀ᔀᔀ& >ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ+؀A଀.଀ᄀЀM3܀਀᐀ᔀᔀ&਀᐀ᴀ&& >ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ ਀᐀ᔀᔀ%਀᐀ᴀ&% >ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ܀BȀЀ0ЀM3ࠀ6ᄀ2 ᘀḀ""ᰀḀ"ᘀ ἀ ᰀ""!ᘀᰀ$ !%#$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ !&"$ $ ਀᐀ᔀᔀ% >ࠀ᠀ᄀᬀ܀BȀЀ0Ѐ ᘀḀ"" ἀ ᰀ !%#$ % !&"$ $ "! % $#%! ᘀḀᔀ% ἀ ᰀ ؀CᬀԀ1܀M3ࠀ1Ѐ ᘀḀᔀ%)Ḁ%% ἀ ᰀ !%#$!ᰀ $ %%ᴀ!ᰀ"$ !" $ ਀᐀ᔀᔀᔀ >ࠀ᠀ᄀ2؀CᬀԀ1܀਀᐀ᔀᔀᔀ਀᐀ᴀ&ᔀ >ࠀ᠀ᄀ2 $ᘀḀ#ᰀ ἀ ᰀ !%ᴀ$ % !ᰀᴀ ؀)'DЀ3᠀ࠀ0ࠀ܀M340ࠀ' ᘀḀ#ᰀᰀḀ ᴀ ἀ ᰀ !%ᴀ$!&ᴀ$ %%ᴀ!ᘀ !ᰀᴀ$ $ ਀᐀ᔀᔀ# >ࠀ᠀ᄀ2؀)'DЀ3᠀ࠀ0ࠀ܀਀᐀ᔀᔀ#਀᐀ᴀ&# >ࠀ᠀ᄀ2 $#ᘀḀ ) ἀ ᰀᴀ!"%$ % !ᰀ ؀਀ఀ1+ᬀ1܀M᠀Ѐఀᄀࠀ &%Ḁ%"ᘀḀ ) ἀ ᰀᴀ!"%$ᰀ !ᰀ)$ % !ᰀ#$!&ᰀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᔀ) >ࠀ᠀ᄀ2؀਀ఀ1+ᬀ1܀਀᐀ᔀᔀ)਀᐀ᴀ&) >ࠀ᠀ᄀ2 ਀᐀ᔀᔀ਀᐀ᴀ& >ࠀ᠀ᄀ=܀ᜀЀȀ଀7ࠀ'Mࠀ3ࠀ1 ᰀḀ"%ᘀḀ"ᰀ ἀ ᰀ !ᔀᰀ$!ᘀᔀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ)$% !"ᘀ$ ਀᐀ᔀᔀ >ࠀ᠀ᄀ=܀ᜀЀȀ଀7ࠀ' ᰀḀ"% ἀ ᰀ !ᔀᰀ$ %ᴀ!ᰀ)$ $ᜀ଀ᄀࠀȀࠀ᠀ ᘀḀᰀᔀ / ᰀ !ᰀ%$ % !ᰀᰀ܀=ᘀḀᰀᔀᰀḀ)ᰀ /ἀ ᰀᰀᴀ!ᘀ#$ !ᰀ%$ % !ᰀᰀ$!&%$ ਀᐀ᔀᔀᴀ >ࠀ᠀ᄀ ؀.਀ఀ1ᬀ܀I܀ᄀ؀᠀ᜀ଀ᄀࠀȀࠀ᠀M'ࠀ܀=਀᐀ᔀᔀᴀ਀᐀ᴀ&ᴀ >ࠀ᠀ᄀ $&%! % $ᰀᔀḀᰀ" ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᰀᰀ 1؀'؀ᤀ܀ᨀࠀఀ᠀଀ᄀЀ܀ᄀᤀᨀᬀ؀᠀਀᐀ᴀ%ᘀ M'ࠀ ਀᐀ᴀ%ᰀ BЀ᠀ࠀ3,ᄀ ᰀᘀḀᴀ" ἀ "ᰀ!%#$ % !ᔀ $ $ "! % $ᰀᰀḀᰀ# ἀ ᰀ !%ᰀ ؀ᤀఀ1ᬀᄀ܀਀᐀ᴀ%" BЀ1ᄀࠀ'଀(ᨀ2 $ഀᄀ଀(Ѐ ᰀḀ ἀ ᰀᴀ!ᘀᰀ$ % !&ᴀ؀฀1܀ഀᄀᬀ؀᠀؀਀᐀ᴀ%& B Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes – Lists of sites per country – Slovenia

Slovenia

B,Ѐ+Ѐ ᔀḀ"ᘀᘀ 3 ᔀᜀ$ᜀᤀ% ᰀᬀ$ᤀᜀ% Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā܀-܀,؀+଀,܀B,Ѐ+Ѐ܀؀&਀ĀᘀḀᔀ ఀ ᤀ"ᤀᘀ 3 ᔀᨀ$ᰀᘀ% ᰀᜀ$ᜀ᠀% Ā Ā /؀+Ѐᄀࠀ<܀-܀ࠀࠀȀ=܀/؀+Ѐᄀࠀ<܀؀&' ਀ĀᘀḀᨀ %ᬀᔀ"ᘀᘀ 3 ᔀᜀ$ᰀᜀ% ᰀᬀ$ᔀᬀ ܀-܀؀଀Ȁሀ,܀ሀࠀ,Ѐ܀BࠀᄀЀ/)Ѐ܀C܀/฀ࠀ܀؀&' ਀ĀᘀḀᬀ ฀ࠀ/܀C܀BࠀᄀЀ/)Ѐ܀ሀࠀ,Ѐ Ā Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Annexes

Annex III: Links and information sources

General Links Environment in the accession countries

European Commission – Natura 2000: Large Carnivore Initiative for Europe (LCIE): europa.eu.int/comm/environment/nature/themes.htm large-carnivores-lcie.org/ europa.eu.int/comm/environment/nature/natura.htm Carpathian Ecoregion Initiative: European Topic Centre www.carpathians.org on Nature Protection and Biodiversity: nature.eionet.eu.int/ Baltic States’ Regional Preparation for Natura 2000 (BANAT): European Environment Agency: www.bef.lv/nature/index.htm www.eea.eu.int Baltic Sea region: European Community Biodiversity www.helcom.fi/environment.html clearing house – portal to information relevant to the Convention on Biodiversity: Baltic Sea Environment Home Page: biodiversity-chm.eea.eu.int www.envir.ee/baltics/

Danube Environmental Forum: www.de-forum.org/ NGOs Danube River: WWF Accession Initiative: archive.panda.org/livingwaters/danube/index.cfm www.panda.org/accession

European Centre for Nature Conservation – “Establishing Natura 2000 in EU Accession Coun- tries” www.ecnc.nl/doc/ecnc/publicat/natu2000.html

The Central and East European Working Group 120 for the Enhancement of Biodiversity (CEEWEB): 121 www.ceeweb.org/

BirdLife International: www.birdlife.org

European Environmental Bureau (EEB): www.eeb.org

The World Conservation Union IUCN: www.iucn.org Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States

Accession Countries

Bulgaria Hungary

Ministry of Environment and Water: Ministry of Environment and Water: www.moew.government.bg www.ktm.hu/index_uk.htm

The Ministry’s Biodiversity Portal: Hungarian National Parks: http://chm.moew.government.bg www.madartavlat.hu/saj1e.htm

National Forestry Board at the Ministry WWF Hungary: of Agriculture and Forests: www.wwf.hu www.nug.bg Latvia BlueLink – Portal of the Bulgarian Environmental NGO’s: Latvian Environment Agency: www.bluelink.net www.lva.gov.lv/eng/

Portal of the National WWF Latvia: and Nature Parks in Bulgaria: www.wwf.lv www.bg-parks.net Lithuania Cyprus Natura 2000: Cyprus Governmental website: www.natura2000.lt www.cyprus.gov.cy Lithuanian Ministry of Environment: Czech Republic www.am.lt

Natura 2000 website: Lithuanian Fund for Nature: www.natura2000.cz www.glis.lt

Ministry of the Environment: Lithuanian Ornithological Society: www.env.cz/ www.birdlife.lt

Czech Agency for Nature Conservation Malta and Landscape Protection: www.nature.cz/ Nature Trust (Malta): www.naturetrustmalta.org 122 Estonia III The Malta Ecological Foundation: Estonian Ministry of the Environment: www.ecomalta.org www.envir.ee Malta Environment and Planning Authority: Estonian Environment Information Centre: www.mepa.org.mt www.envir.ee/itk

Estonian Fund for Nature: www.elfond.ee Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States Natura 2000 in the New EU Member States

Poland

Ministry of the Environment: www.mos.gov.pl/

WWF Poland: www.wwf.pl

Romania

Ministry of Waters and Environment Protection: www.mappm.ro/

Slovakia

Slovak Ministry of Environment (in Slovak): www.lifeenv.gov.sk/minis/

Daphne Institute of Applied Ecology: www.daphne.sk

Slovenia

Ministry of the Environment, Spatial Planning and Energy: www.sigov.si/mop/en/index.htm

Birdlife Slovenia/DOPPS www.birdlife.net/worldwide/national/slovenia

122 III www.panda.org/accession

WWF’s mission is to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment WWF European Policy Office and to build a future in which human live in harmony with nature, by: Avenue de Tervuren, 36 Box 12 • conserving the world’s biological diversity 1040 Brussels • ensuring that the use of renewable natural resources is sustainable Belgium • promoting the reduction of pollution and wasteful consumption tel.: +32 2 743 8800