Mcmurdo Regional Communications Infrastructure ~ 200 Mi

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mcmurdo Regional Communications Infrastructure ~ 200 Mi Mt. Brooke FP repeater Mt. Brooke Field Party Marble Point VHF Base Station HF Base Station (2) UHF Radiophone Lower Erebus Hut Network w/cloud VHF Base Station HF Base Station Wright Valley Hjorth Hill UHF Radiophone (3) UHF RadioPhone Field Party Cones Network w/cloud repeaters Fang Camp Cape Crozier FF repeater (Cones) (3) Network repeaters VHF Field Radio B-031 Ainley Network repeater HF Field Radio Mt. Newell Lake Fryxell Mt. Terror VHF Base Station FP repeater VHF Base Station (Wright Valley) Andrill (Coulman High) HF Base Station Field Party G-049 Rack UHF Radiophone Network w/hub Network w/cloud ConeZ VHF Base Station Flight Following Mt. Erebus Mt. Terror Lake Hoare FP repeater (Terror) VHF Base Station Cape Royds Field Party HF Base Station New Harbor B-031 Ainley UHF Radiophone VHFNew Base Harbor Station Network w/cloud Network w/cloud HF BaseVHF BaseStation Station UHF Radiophone Big Razorback UHFHF Radiophone Base Station B-009 Garrett NetworkUHF wRadiophone/cloud Network w/hub Network w/cloud UHF Radiophone Peak 1882 F6 UHF RadioPhone VHF Base Station Tent Island repeater HF Base Station Network repeater Network Repeater UHF Radiophone UHF Radiophone Lake Joyce Network w/cloud repeater G-441 Anderson Mt. Aztec FP repeater FF repeater Lake Bonney Mt. Voslips VHF Base Station UHF RadioPhone HF Base Station repeater UHF Radiophone Network Repeater Mt. Brooke Network w/cloud Taylor Glacier Field Party I-169 Severinghaus Mt. Coates VHF Base Station Mt. Brooke Mt. Coates FP repeater UHF Radiophone (Taylor Valley) Flight Following HFFlight Field RadioFollowing FF repeater (Mt. Taylor Valley Coates) Field Party Black Island VHF Base Station UHF Radiophone Network w/cloud Black Island FP repeater (Aurora Lower/Winter) Mt. Aurora FP repeater (Aurora) Mt. Discovery Network repeater Mt. Aurora Field Party Legend Established Base and Repeater Sites Established and Seasonal Camps Minna Bluff Annual Infrastructure Labels (Camps) FF repeater (Minna Bluff) Annual Infrastructure Labels (Repeaters) Annual and Seasonal Network Annual and Seasonal UHF Radiophone Minna Bluff Flight Following Minna Bluff A-127 Barwick McMurdo Regional Communications Infrastructure ~ 200 mi 100 mi 150 mi.
Recommended publications
  • The Antarctic Treaty
    The Antarctic Treaty Measures adopted at the Thirty-ninth Consultative Meeting held at Santiago, Chile 23 May – 1 June 2016 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty November 2017 Cm 9542 © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at Treaty Section, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, King Charles Street, London, SW1A 2AH ISBN 978-1-5286-0126-9 CCS1117441642 11/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majestyʼs Stationery Office MEASURES ADOPTED AT THE THIRTY-NINTH ANTARCTIC TREATY CONSULTATIVE MEETING Santiago, Chile 23 May – 1 June 2016 The Measures1 adopted at the Thirty-ninth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting are reproduced below from the Final Report of the Meeting. In accordance with Article IX, paragraph 4, of the Antarctic Treaty, the Measures adopted at Consultative Meetings become effective upon approval by all Contracting Parties whose representatives were entitled to participate in the meeting at which they were adopted (i.e. all the Consultative Parties). The full text of the Final Report of the Meeting, including the Decisions and Resolutions adopted at that Meeting and colour copies of the maps found in this command paper, is available on the website of the Antarctic Treaty Secretariat at www.ats.aq/documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Continental Field Manual 3 Field Planning Checklist: All Field Teams Day 1: Arrive at Mcmurdo Station O Arrival Brief; Receive Room Keys and Station Information
    PROGRAM INFO USAP Operational Risk Management Consequences Probability none (0) Trivial (1) Minor (2) Major (4) Death (8) Certain (16) 0 16 32 64 128 Probable (8) 0 8 16 32 64 Even Chance (4) 0 4 8 16 32 Possible (2) 0 2 4 8 16 Unlikely (1) 0 1 2 4 8 No Chance 0% 0 0 0 0 0 None No degree of possible harm Incident may take place but injury or illness is not likely or it Trivial will be extremely minor Mild cuts and scrapes, mild contusion, minor burns, minor Minor sprain/strain, etc. Amputation, shock, broken bones, torn ligaments/tendons, Major severe burns, head trauma, etc. Injuries result in death or could result in death if not treated Death in a reasonable time. USAP 6-Step Risk Assessment USAP 6-Step Risk Assessment 1) Goals Define work activities and outcomes. 2) Hazards Identify subjective and objective hazards. Mitigate RISK exposure. Can the probability and 3) Safety Measures consequences be decreased enough to proceed? Develop a plan, establish roles, and use clear 4) Plan communication, be prepared with a backup plan. 5) Execute Reassess throughout activity. 6) Debrief What could be improved for the next time? USAP Continental Field Manual 3 Field Planning Checklist: All Field Teams Day 1: Arrive at McMurdo Station o Arrival brief; receive room keys and station information. PROGRAM INFO o Meet point of contact (POC). o Find dorm room and settle in. o Retrieve bags from Building 140. o Check in with Crary Lab staff between 10 am and 5 pm for building keys and lab or office space (if not provided by POC).
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Sky Airlines
    GPS Support to the National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs 2001-2002 Season Report GPS Support to the National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs 2001-2002 Season Report April 15, 2002 Bjorn Johns Chuck Kurnik Shad O’Neel UCAR/UNAVCO Facility University Corporation for Atmospheric Research 3340 Mitchell Lane Boulder, CO 80301 (303) 497-8034 www.unavco.ucar.edu Support funded by the National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs Scientific Program Order No. 2 (EAR-9903413) to Cooperative Agreement No. 9732665 Cover photo: Erebus Ice Tongue Mapping – B-017 1 UNAVCO 2001-2002 Report Table of Contents: Summary........................................................................................................................................................ 3 Table 1 – 2001-2001 Antarctic Support Provided................................................................................. 4 Table 2 – 2001 Arctic Support Provided................................................................................................ 4 Science Support............................................................................................................................................. 5 Training.................................................................................................................................................... 5 Field Support........................................................................................................................................... 5 Data Processing ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United States Antarctic Program S Nm 5 Helicopter Landing Facilities 22 2010-11 Ms 180 N Manuela (! USAP Helo Sites (! ANZ Helo Sites This Page: 1
    160°E 165°E ALL170°E FACILITIES Terra Nova Bay s United States Antarctic Program nm 5 22 Helicopter Landing Facilities ms 180 n Manuela 2010-11 (! (! This page: USAP Helo Sites ANZ Helo Sites 75°S 1. All facilities 75°S 2. Ross Island Maps by Brad Herried Facilities provided by 3. Koettlitz Glacier Area ANTARCTIC GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION CENTER United States Antarctic Program Next page: 4. Dry Valleys August 2010 Basemap data from ADD / LIMA ROSS ISLAND Peak Brimstone P Cape Bird (ASPA 116) (! (! Mt Bird Franklin Is 76°S Island 76°S 90 nms Lewis Bay (A ! ay (ASPA 156) Mt Erebus (Fang Camp)(! ( (! Tripp Island Fang Glacier ror vasse Lower Erebus Hut Ter rth Cre (!(! Mt No Hoopers Shoulder (!M (! (! (! (! Pony Lake (! Mt Erebus (!(! Cape Cape Royds Cones (AWS Site 114) Crozier (ASPA 124) o y Convoy Range Beaufort Island (AS Battleship Promontory C SPA 105) Granite Harbour Cape Roberts Mt Seuss (! Cotton Glacier Cape Evans rk 77°S T s ad (! Turks Head ! (!(! ( 77°S AWS 101 - Tent Island Big Razorback Island CH Surv ey Site 4 McMurdo Station CH Su (! (! rvey Sit s CH te 3 Survey (! Scott Base m y Site 2 n McMurdo Station CH W Wint - ules Island ! 5 5 t 3 Ju ( er Stora AWS 113 - J l AWS 108 3 ge - Biesia Site (! da Crevasse 1 F AWS Ferrell (! 108 - Bies (! (! siada Cr (! revasse Cape Chocolate (! AWS 113 - Jules Island 78°S AWS 109 Hobbs Glacier 9 - White Is la 78°S nd Salmon Valley L (! Lorne AWS AWS 111 - Cape s (! Spencer Range m Garwood Valley (main camp) Bratina I Warren n (! (!na Island 45 Marshall Vall (! Valley Ross I Miers Valley (main
    [Show full text]
  • Mcmurdo Station Master Plan 2.1 December 16, 2015
    MCMURDO STATION MASTER PLAN 2.1 DECEMBER 16, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 GLOSSARY 14 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDING PRINCIPLES 18 FACILITY CONSIDERATIONS 22 FACILITIES PROGRAM 38 MCMURDO STATION MASTER PLAN 42 SOCIAL SPACES 70 MASTER PLAN FLOW DIAGRAMS 72 CIVIL SITE & UTILITY PLAN 78 ENERGY 84 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & TELECOMMUNICATIONS 98 FIRE PROTECTION STRATEGY 110 CONCLUSION 116 MCMURDO STATION MP 2.1 | DECEMBER 16, 2015 PG. 3 INTRODUCTION The McMurdo Master Plan 1.0 was completed in March of 2013. The purpose of that original plan was to provide an in-depth first look at the current layout of McMurdo, identify both constraints and opportunities for future redevelopment, and create a basic plan to serve as a guide for that development. That initial plan was intended to serve as a Master Plan “starting point” to generate substantive discussion. Not only did it generate that discussion, it also resulted in a great deal of excitement. Since Master Plans are meant to be updated in light of evolving technologies and new requirements, this version was created. The Master Plan 2.0 was published on December 26, 2014. This version, Master Plan 2.1, refelects continued refinement with respect to, among other inputs, modified strategies for Traverse Operations, the IT&C Facility, as well as snow deposition modeling. PG. 4 MCMURDO STATION MP 2.1 | DECEMBER 16, 2015 INTRODUCTION GOALS OF MASTER PLAN 2.1 MISSION STATEMENT The infrastructure modernization will ensure that McMurdo Station remains a viable platform for supporting Antarctic science for the next 35 to 50 years, whereby this modernization will: • Result in comprehensive redevelopment of McMurdo Station, Antarctica, into a more energy and operationally-efficient station, optimized for support of local and deep field science.
    [Show full text]
  • Code of Conduct Mcmurdo Dry Valleys ASMA: Day Trips
    Code of Conduct McMurdo Dry Valleys ASMA: Day Trips Located on Ross Island at Hut Point Peninsula is McMurdo Station, which serves as a transportation and logistics hub for the National Science Foundation-managed United States Antarctic Program. Ross Island is also home to New Zealand’s Scott Base and nine Antarctic Specially Protected Areas, each with its own management plan. Approximately 50 miles northwest and across McMurdo Sound are the virtually ice-free McMurdo Dry Valleys, which were discovered in 1903 by British explorer Robert Falcon Scott. The Dry Valley Antarctic Specially Managed Area (or ASMA) was the first ASMA to be officially recognized under the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty. In June, 2004, the Area was formally designated as a Specially Managed Area. Managed Areas are used to assist in the planning and coordination of activities, to avoid conflicts and minimize environmental impacts. Whether this is your first trip to this important Area or you are a frequent visitor, environmental responsibility is your primary priority. Maintaining the ASMA in its natural state must take precedence. The Antarctic Specially Managed Area supports eleven established facilities and many tent camps each season. Established facilities include camps at Lake Hoare, Lake Bonney, Lake Fryxell, New Harbor, F-6, Bull Pass, Marble Point Refueling Station, Lake Vanda, Lower Wright Valley, the radio repeater stations at Mt. Newall and Cape Roberts. The McMurdo Dry Valleys ecosystem contains geological and biological features that are thousands and, in some cases, millions of years old. Microscopic life in the Dry Valleys constitute some of the most fragile and unique ecological communities on Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Station Openings
    Information Exchange Under United States Antarctic Activities Articles III and VII(5) of the Activities Planned for 2008- 2009 ANTARCTIC TREATY III. Stations III. Stations Section III of the 2008-2009 season plans lists the names, locations, and opening dates of the Party's bases and subsidiary stations established in the Antarctic Treaty Area, and whether they are for summer and/or winter operations. Year Round Stations McMurdo Station Location: Hut Point Peninsula on Ross Island in McMurdo Sound 77° 55'S Latitude 166° 39'E Longitude Annual Relief: 30 September 2008 Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station Location: 90° 00'S Latitude Annual Relief: 23 October 2008 Palmer Station Location: Anvers Island near Bonaparte Point 64° 46'S Latitude 64° 05'W Longitude Annual Relief: 19 September 2008 National Science Foundation Section III, page 1 Arlington, Virginia 22230 October 1, 2008 Information Exchange Under United States Antarctic Activities Articles III and VII(5) of the Activities Planned for 2008- 2009 ANTARCTIC TREATY III. Stations Austral Summer Camps Siple Dome Camp Location: 81° 39'S Latitude 149° 04'W Longitude Open: 25 October 2008 Close: 07 February 2009 WAIS Divide Camp Location: 79°40.87'S Latitude 112°5.16'E Longitude Open: 01 November 2008 Close: 07 February 2009 Lake Bonney Camp Location: 77°42'S Latitude 162°27'E Longitude Open: 10 October 2008 Close: 10 February 2009 Lake Hoare Location: 76°38'S Latitude 162°57'E Longitude Open: 10 October 2008 Close: 10 February 2009 National Science Foundation Section III, page 2 Arlington, Virginia 22230 October 1, 2008 Information Exchange Under United States Antarctic Activities Articles III and VII(5) of the Activities Planned for 2008- 2009 ANTARCTIC TREATY III.
    [Show full text]
  • 2003-2004 Science Planning Summary
    2003-2004 USAP Field Season Table of Contents Project Indexes Project Websites Station Schedules Technical Events Environmental and Health & Safety Initiatives 2003-2004 USAP Field Season Table of Contents Project Indexes Project Websites Station Schedules Technical Events Environmental and Health & Safety Initiatives 2003-2004 USAP Field Season Project Indexes Project websites List of projects by principal investigator List of projects by USAP program List of projects by institution List of projects by station List of projects by event number digits List of deploying team members Teachers Experiencing Antarctica Scouting In Antarctica Technical Events Media Visitors 2003-2004 USAP Field Season USAP Station Schedules Click on the station name below to retrieve a list of projects supported by that station. Austral Summer Season Austral Estimated Population Openings Winter Season Station Operational Science Opening Summer Winter 20 August 01 September 890 (weekly 23 February 187 McMurdo 2003 2003 average) 2004 (winter total) (WinFly*) (mainbody) 2,900 (total) 232 (weekly South 24 October 30 October 15 February 72 average) Pole 2003 2003 2004 (winter total) 650 (total) 27- 34-44 (weekly 17 October 40 Palmer September- 8 April 2004 average) 2003 (winter total) 2003 75 (total) Year-round operations RV/IB NBP RV LMG Research 39 science & 32 science & staff Vessels Vessel schedules on the Internet: staff 25 crew http://www.polar.org/science/marine. 25 crew Field Camps Air Support * A limited number of science projects deploy at WinFly. 2003-2004 USAP Field Season Technical Events Every field season, the USAP sponsors a variety of technical events that are not scientific research projects but support one or more science projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Recovery of Desert Pavement Surfaces Following Impacts from Vehicle and Foot Traffic in the Ross Sea Region of Antarctica TANYA A
    Antarctic Science 25(4), 514–530 (2013) & Antarctic Science Ltd 2013 doi:10.1017/S0954102012001125 Visual recovery of desert pavement surfaces following impacts from vehicle and foot traffic in the Ross Sea region of Antarctica TANYA A. O’NEILL1, MEGAN R. BALKS1 and JERO´ NIMO LO´ PEZ-MARTI´NEZ2 1Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand 2Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Auto´noma de Madrid, Spain [email protected] Abstract: Sites of past human activity were investigated to assess the visual recovery of the desert pavement following impacts from human trampling and vehicle traffic. Visually disturbed and nearby control sites were assessed using comparative photographic records, a field-based Visual Site Assessment, and Desert Pavement Recovery Assessment. Sites included: vehicle and walking tracks at Marble Point and Taylor Valley; a campsite, experimental treading trial site, and vehicle tracks in Wright Valley; and vehicle and walking tracks at Cape Roberts. The time since last disturbance ranged from three months to over 50 years. This investigation also attempted to determine what has the greatest lasting visual impact on soil surfaces in the Ross Sea region: dispersed trafficking or track formation? Walking tracks remained visible in the landscape (due to larger clasts concentrating along track margins) long after the desert pavement surface had recovered. However, randomly dispersed footprints were undetectable within five years. For many sites, allowing widespread trampling will give lower medium-term visible impact than concentrating traffic flow by track formation. For steep slopes and sites where repeated visits occur, use of a single track is recommended. Some 1950s vehicle tracks remain visible in the Antarctic landscape, but where visually obvious impacts were remediated, evidence of former occupation was almost undetectable.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 147/Wednesday, July 30, 2008
    44290 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 147 / Wednesday, July 30, 2008 / Notices 901–8572, by fax at 520–670–5530, by e- reduction in cost figures from the designate Antarctic Specially Protected mail at [email protected]. previous ICR are due to use of current Areas. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Abstract: Bureau of Labor Statistics reports for The applications received are as The U.S. Institute is a federal program valuing time (civilian workers category follows: established by Congress to assist parties of ‘‘professionals and related 1. Applicant in resolving environmental, natural occupations’’: $44.78 per hour) rather resource, and public lands conflicts. than estimated contractor rates. Permit Application No. 2009–012, Judit Hersko, Visual and Performing The U.S. Institute serves as an impartial, Authority: 20 U.S.C. 5601–5609. Arts Department, California State non-partisan institution, and Dated the 24th day of July 2008. accomplishes much of its work by University—San Marcos, San Marcos, Ellen Wheeler, partnering, contracting with, or referral CA 92096–0001. Executive Director, Morris K. Udall to, experienced practitioners. In Scholarship and Excellence in National Activity for Which Permit Is Requested addition, the U.S. Institute maintains Environmental Policy Foundation, and Enter Antarctic Specially Protected the National Roster of Environmental Federal Register Liaison Officer. Areas. The applicant plans to enter Dispute Resolution and Consensus [FR Doc. E8–17426 Filed 7–29–08; 8:45 am] ASPA 121—Cape Royds, ASPA 131— Building Professionals (roster). The BILLING CODE 6820–FN–P Canada Glacier and Lake Fryxell, ASPA Application for the National Roster of 158—Hut Point Discovery Hut, ASPA Environmental Dispute Resolution and 157—Backdoor Bay, Cape Royds, and Consensus Building Professionals NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION ASPA 155—Cape Evans.
    [Show full text]
  • Sulfur Cycling in a Permanently Ice-Covered Amictic Antarctic Lake
    to additional dry valley sites and systems. Analysis of soils Freckman, D.W. 1982. Parameters of the nematode contribution to returned to the United States for physical and chemical prop- ecosystems. In D.W. Freckman, (Ed.), Nematodes in soil ecosystems. erties will allow us to identify the soil factors that best explain Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press. nematode abundance, distribution, and community structure Freckman, D.W., and R.A. Virginia. 1989. Plant-feeding nematodes in the McMurdo Dry Valleys. in deep-rooting desert ecosystems. Ecology, 70(6), 1,665-1,678. This work was supported by National Science Foundation Maslen, N.R. 1981. The Signy Island terrestrial reference sites: XII. grants DPP 88-18049 and DPP 89-14655. Population ecology of nematodes with additions to the fauna. British Antarctic Survey Bulletin, 53, 57-75. References Timm, R.W. 1971. Antarctic soil and freshwater nematodes from the McMurdo Sound region. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Block, W. 1984. Terrestrial microbiology, invertebrates and ecosys- Washington, 38(1), 42-52. tems. In R.M. Laws, (Ed.), Antarctic ecology. New York: Academic Vincent, W.F. 1988. Microbial ecosystems of Antarctica. Cambridge: Cam- Press. bridge University Press. Sulfur cycling lake area), we are in the process of constructing a sulfur balance for the lake. The goals of this effort are to determine: in a permanently ice-covered • the long-term fate of sulfur entering the lake, particularly if amictic antarctic lake, a sulfate sink exists within the lake as is suggested from estimates of stream input into the closed basin (Green et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Recovery of Desert Pavement Surfaces Following Impacts from Vehicle and Foot Traffic in the Ross Sea Region of Antarctica TANYA A
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Commons@Waikato Antarctic Science 25(4), 514–530 (2013) & Antarctic Science Ltd 2013 doi:10.1017/S0954102012001125 Visual recovery of desert pavement surfaces following impacts from vehicle and foot traffic in the Ross Sea region of Antarctica TANYA A. O’NEILL1, MEGAN R. BALKS1 and JERO´ NIMO LO´ PEZ-MARTI´NEZ2 1Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand 2Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Auto´noma de Madrid, Spain [email protected] Abstract: Sites of past human activity were investigated to assess the visual recovery of the desert pavement following impacts from human trampling and vehicle traffic. Visually disturbed and nearby control sites were assessed using comparative photographic records, a field-based Visual Site Assessment, and Desert Pavement Recovery Assessment. Sites included: vehicle and walking tracks at Marble Point and Taylor Valley; a campsite, experimental treading trial site, and vehicle tracks in Wright Valley; and vehicle and walking tracks at Cape Roberts. The time since last disturbance ranged from three months to over 50 years. This investigation also attempted to determine what has the greatest lasting visual impact on soil surfaces in the Ross Sea region: dispersed trafficking or track formation? Walking tracks remained visible in the landscape (due to larger clasts concentrating along track margins) long after the desert pavement surface had recovered. However, randomly dispersed footprints were undetectable within five years. For many sites, allowing widespread trampling will give lower medium-term visible impact than concentrating traffic flow by track formation.
    [Show full text]