DOCSLIB.ORG

Natural Resourcevol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

the Maryland natural resourceVol. 11, No. 4 I Fall 2008 Martin O’Malley Governor Maryland Department of Natural Resources John R. Griffin Secretary The Maryland Natural Resource ...Your guide to recreation & conservation in Maryland Darlene Pisani Director Office of Communications John Cornell Managing Editor Wiley Hall Editor Peter Lampell Art Director/Layout & Design Tabitha Contee Circulation Editorial Support Donna Jones-Regan Barbara Rice • Kara Turner Darlene Walker Contributors Steve Bittner • Mike English Ross M. Kimmel • Steven W. Koehn Dana Limpert • Keith Lockwood Paul Peditto • Doug Wigfield The Maryland Natural Resource 580 Taylor Avenue, D-4 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Toll free in Maryland: 1-877-620-8DNR ext. 8009 Out of state call: 410-260-8009 Website: www.dnr.maryland.gov E-mail address: [email protected] ISSN 1521-9984 Tell us what you think! Please write or e-mail us at the above address, or fax us at: 410-260-8024 Observations, conclusions and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department. The facilities and services of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources are available to all without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, national origin or physical or mental disability. This document is available in alternative format upon request from a qualified individual with a disability. © 2008 Maryland Department of Natural Resources Ocean City Inlet Worcester County Mark Odell the Maryland natural resource On the cover: Sunrise at Battery Point Features Jason Schlosser 4 The Battle of North Point A Little-Known Battle from a Scarcely Remembered War 10 Maryland Hunters A Legacy of Support for Wildlife Conservation 12 Junior Wildlife Field Days Young People enjoy Buffet of Outdoor Activities 14 Tree Stand Safety A Simple Knot Can Prevent a Bad Fall Page 4 16 What’s Killing the Bats? Investigating Causes of Population Decline 18 Autumn Fishing on the Chesapeake Bay Anticipating the Annual Ballet of Nature 20 The Future of Maryland’s Working Forests Sustaining One of Our Most Precious Resources Page 10 22 River of Words® The Winners 25 Children in Nature National Coalition Supports Maryland Partnership 28 A Picture Perfect Finish The 2008 Maryland Fishing Challenge In Every Issue Page 12 2 The Common Good 3 Consider the Elements 24 Outdoors Maryland 26 Short Takes Page 18 Ocean City Inlet 29 DNR@Work Worcester County Mark Odell DNR-01-9292008-345 Printed on recycled paper 9/08 Fall 2008 I The Common Good e have made significant progress project through which pier owners along the Tred in meeting the challenges that lay Avon River in Talbot County are becoming caretakers before us on our path to a restored for thousands of young oysters during their first year WChesapeake Bay, but we also recognize that to reach of life. This project, which we plan to expand to that sustainable future for our natural and living other areas of the Chesapeake Bay next year, is the resources, our State government will not be able to first of several initiatives that bring citizens, State solve these challenges alone. agencies, and environmental groups together to Fortunately, as Marylanders, we share a belief that help us reach our natural resources goals. each of us has a personal responsibility to protect the The program will be managed by the Maryland health of our land, our air and our water and to pass Department of Natural Resources in collaboration on those precious resources to future generations in with the Oyster Recovery Partnership and the better condition than we received them. University of Maryland Center for Environmental Every day, we see ordinary people taking Science. This year, nearly 250 Talbot County extraordinary measures to support conservation in our residents will help grow thousands of oysters until State. All across Maryland, our neighbors and families they are large enough to be planted on local, are working hand in hand with both government and permanent sanctuaries. Talbot County has been private groups to improve our waterways and public a critical partner in helping us identify interested land. Together, we are moving towards sustainable homeowners. I’m also pleased to note that the lifestyles, and embracing energy efficiency to reduce 1,000 oyster cages for this project were built by our carbon footprint. individuals at the Eastern Correctional Institution So as we’ve worked together to secure the future in Somerset County. we prefer – a future where our streets are safe; a Through their action and commitment, our future where a quality education is a right and neighbors are setting a vital example of stewardship not a privilege; a future where we practice fiscal for our fellow Marylanders. Not only will more responsibility and make our government work for oysters be placed in the Chesapeake Bay as a result the people; and a future where our natural world of these efforts, but rejuvenated oyster reefs will thrives – we are relying on every Marylander to naturally become critical underwater ecosystems for help us build that better, more sustainable a rich diversity of aquatic life. future and to protect the resources that Working together, as One Maryland, we can real- support life on our planet. ize our shared goal of bringing about that cleaner, In September, we kicked off greener, more sustainable future all of us prefer – both Marylanders Grow Oysters, a pilot for ourselves, and for future generations. Martin O’Malley Governor Governor’s Office Governor’s 22 I IThe The Maryland Maryland Natural Natural Resource Resource Consider The elemenTs fter 16 months of study, the Maryland extremes and degradation of fishery, farm and forest Commission on Climate Change resources could wreak havoc on our economy. recently issued an action plan outlining Fortunately, these dire forecasts were offset by 60 Aa comprehensive strategy for reducing our State’s concrete steps that Maryland can – and must – take vulnerability to the effects of global warming. today to reduce not only greenhouse gas emissions Governor Martin O’Malley appointed the 24- but also, as importantly, our vulnerability to climate member panel in April 2007, charging agency heads change and its impacts. and legislators with addressing three questions. What Harnessing nature’s ability to adapt and heal itself, can the State’s scientists tell us about how and when we must plant more trees to help capture excessive climate change will affect Maryland’s citizens and carbon pollution. Restoring more wetlands and living natural resources? What can Maryland do to adapt to shorelines will help shield us from flooding and coastal the consequences of climate change? And, what can storms. And careful planning can help us reduce the Maryland do to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and vulnerability of our homes, our investments, and our the state’s carbon footprint to begin reversing global living resources from the impacts of sea level rise. warming trends? The Maryland Department of Natural Resources The commission found that, with our 3,000 is already working, both internally and with our miles of coastline, we are indeed “poised State agency partners, to implement many of the in a very precarious position.” Commission’s key recommendations. These include Along with the changing climate, crafting sea level rise planning guidance for Worcester, contributing to our vulnerability is Somerset and Dorchester Counties, and creating a the prospect of episodic storm events Climate Change Insurance Advisory Committee. We such as hurricanes and Nor’easters, are also developing standards to guide the location which can result in shore erosion, coastal and design of our facilities in vulnerable coastal areas, flooding, storm surge and sea level rise. and working to reduce our footprint by sequestering After careful analysis of the most carbon, planting trees, and improving the efficiency current scientific data available, the of our vehicle fleet. commission warned that Maryland Under the leadership of Governor O’Malley, could face an increase in dangerous Maryland is setting an example in the management summer heat waves by mid-century, of state lands and facilities and setting the stage for endangering a number of native other public and private entities to follow. Together species and vital habitat. Further, we can combat the causes of climate change and continuous blows from climate prepare for its consequences. John R. Griffin Secretary Governor’s Office Governor’s Fall 2008 I 4 I The Maryland Natural Resource Don Troiani is a military historyTroiani artist the 5th Infantry who painted Don at the Battle of North Point The Battle of North Point A Little-Known Battle from a Scarcely Remembered War By Ross M. Kimmel ost people can make a pretty good guess when the War of 1812 started. Some know about the bombardment of Fort McHenry, which inspired Francis Scott Key to write the Star-Spangled Banner. MAnd movie buffs no doubt recall mustachioed Yul Brunner as the pirate chieftain Jean Lafitte coming to the rescue of silver-haired, heavy-browed Charlton Heston as Andrew Jackson in The Buccaneer, an account of the Battle of New Orleans. Not as well known, perhaps, is the pivotal role that Maryland and the Chesapeake Bay played in the war. And even less well known is the Battle of North Point, a fierce engagement on the outskirts of Baltimore that helped turn the Chesapeake campaign against the British. But the Battle of North Point was a clash that pitted a disciplined, yet untested militia against battle-hardened British veterans. It saved Baltimore and helped boost the self-esteem of a young nation that had just seen its Capitol and many of its national buildings burned to the ground. FallFall 20082008 II 55 Major General Samuel Smith (left) was in overall command of the American defense of Baltimore.
Recommended publications
  • Fort Mchenry - "Our Country" Bicentennial Festivities, Baltimore, MD, 7/4/75 (2)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R

    Fort Mchenry - "Our Country" Bicentennial Festivities, Baltimore, MD, 7/4/75 (2)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R

    The original documents are located in Box 67, folder “Fort McHenry - "Our Country" Bicentennial Festivities, Baltimore, MD, 7/4/75 (2)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON '!0: Jack Marsh FROM: PAUL THEIS a>f Although belatedly, attached is some material on Ft. McHenry which our research office just sent in ••• and which may be helpful re the July 4th speech. Digitized from Box 67 of The John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library :\iE\10 R.-\~ D l. \I THE \\'HITE HOI.SE \L\Sllli"GTO:'\ June 23, 1975 TO: PAUL 'IHEIS FROM: LYNDA DURFEE RE: FT. McHENRY FOURTH OF JULY CEREMONY Attached is my pre-advance report for the day's activities. f l I I / I FORT 1:vlc HENRY - July 4, 1975 Progran1 The program of events at Fort McHenry consists of two parts, with the President participating in the second: 11 Part I: "By the Dawn's Early Light • This is put on by the Baltimore Bicentennial Committee, under the direction of Walter S.
  • Bodygrip Traps on Dryland: a Guide to Responsible Use

    Bodygrip Traps on Dryland: a Guide to Responsible Use

    2017 Bodygrip Traps on Dryland: A Guide to Responsible Use Furbearer Conservation Technical Work Group Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................. 2 Introduction ...................................................... 3 History: Bodygrip Trap or Conibear? .................................... 4 Trap Research .................................................... 6 Trap Set Location .................................................. 7 Bait and Lure Use .................................................. 9 Trap Size ....................................................... 10 Trigger Type, Position and Shape ...................................... 11 Trap Set Type. 13 Other Considerations .............................................. 17 Hunter Awareness ................................................ 18 Conclusion ...................................................... 18 References ...................................................... 19 Acknowledgements This document was produced by the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (AFWA) Furbearer Conservation Technical Work Group, in consultation with representatives from trapping organizations. We especially acknowledge Matt Peek of the Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks and Tourism for serving as primary author on this document. Significant contributions in authorship were also made by Dave Hastings of the Fur Takers of America and Matt Lovallo of the Pennsylvania Game Commission. We wish to acknowledge Bob Noonan for writing the history of the bodygrip
  • The War of 1812

    The War of 1812

    GRADE 2 Core Knowledge Language Arts® • New York Edition • Listening & Learning™ Strand Tell It Again!™ Read-Aloud Anthology Read-Aloud Again!™ It Tell The War of 1812 of War The The War of 1812 Tell It Again!™ Read-Aloud Anthology Listening & Learning™ Strand GRADE 2 Core Knowledge Language Arts® New York Edition Creative Commons Licensing This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You are free: to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work to Remix — to adapt the work Under the following conditions: Attribution — You must attribute the work in the following manner: This work is based on an original work of the Core Knowledge® Foundation made available through licensing under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. This does not in any way imply that the Core Knowledge Foundation endorses this work. Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. Share Alike — If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one. With the understanding that: For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Copyright © 2013 Core Knowledge Foundation www.coreknowledge.org All Rights Reserved. Core Knowledge Language Arts, Listening & Learning, and Tell It Again! are trademarks of the Core Knowledge Foundation. Trademarks and trade names are shown in this book strictly for illustrative and educational purposes and are the property of their respective owners.
  • Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’S Civil War Battlefields

    Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’S Civil War Battlefields

    U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service American Battlefield Protection Program Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields State of Maryland Washington, DC January 2010 Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields State of Maryland U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service American Battlefield Protection Program Washington, DC January 2010 Authority The American Battlefield Protection Program Act of 1996, as amended by the Civil War Battlefield Preservation Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-359, 111 Stat. 3016, 17 December 2002), directs the Secretary of the Interior to update the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission (CWSAC) Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields. Acknowledgments NPS Project Team Paul Hawke, Project Leader; Kathleen Madigan, Survey Coordinator; Tanya Gossett and January Ruck, Reporting; Matthew Borders, Historian; Kristie Kendall, Program Assistant. Battlefield Surveyor(s) Lisa Rupple, American Battlefield Protection Program Respondents Ted Alexander and John Howard, Antietam National Battlefield; C. Casey Reese and Pamela Underhill, Appalachian National Scenic Trail; Susan Frye, Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park; Kathy Robertson, Civil War Preservation Trust; John Nelson, Hager House Museum; Joy Beasley, Cathy Beeler, Todd Stanton, and Susan Trail, Monocacy National Battlefield; Robert Bailey and Al Preston, South Mountain Battlefield State Park. Cover: View of the sunken
  • Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett

    Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett

    Spring Grove Cemetery, once characterized as blending "the elegance of a park with the pensive beauty of a burial-place," is the final resting- place of forty Cincinnatians who were generals during the Civil War. Forty For the Union: Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett f the forty Civil War generals who are buried in Spring Grove Cemetery, twenty-three had advanced from no military experience whatsoever to attain the highest rank in the Union Army. This remarkable feat underscores the nature of the Northern army that suppressed the rebellion of the Confed- erate states during the years 1861 to 1865. Initially, it was a force of "inspired volunteers" rather than a standing army in the European tradition. Only seven of these forty leaders were graduates of West Point: Jacob Ammen, Joshua H. Bates, Sidney Burbank, Kenner Garrard, Joseph Hooker, Alexander McCook, and Godfrey Weitzel. Four of these seven —Burbank, Garrard, Mc- Cook, and Weitzel —were in the regular army at the outbreak of the war; the other three volunteered when the war started. Only four of the forty generals had ever been in combat before: William H. Lytle, August Moor, and Joseph Hooker served in the Mexican War, and William H. Baldwin fought under Giuseppe Garibaldi in the Italian civil war. This lack of professional soldiers did not come about by chance. When the Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia in 1787, its delegates, who possessed a vast knowledge of European history, were determined not to create a legal basis for a standing army. The founding fathers believed that the stand- ing armies belonging to royalty were responsible for the endless bloody wars that plagued Europe.
  • Development of Optical Trapping Techniques for in Vivo Investigations

    Development of Optical Trapping Techniques for in Vivo Investigations

    Development of optical trapping techniques for in vivo investigations Andrew C. Richardson Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervisor: Lene Oddershede Optical Tweezers Group The Niels Bohr Institute University of Copenhagen Denmark 31st of December 2008 I hereby declare that the content of this thesis is entirely my own work and contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at any University. The thesis comprises a discussion and summary of the work I carried out between September 2005 and September 2008 at the Niels Bohr institute as part of my PhD studies. To the best of my knowledge and belief, this dissertation contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made. —— The image on the front cover is of a ’Golden apple’ which is one of three such apples that levitate from the fountain at Gammeltorv in the centre of Copenhagen, on occasions such as the Queens birthday and Denmark’s constitutional day. Although the golden apples are not confined by optical forces like those used to trap gold nano-particles, it is a jovial and light hearted comparison to the microscopic equivalent. ii Contents Preface ix List of abbreviations xiii 1 Optical Trapping 1 1.1 Abriefhistoryofopticaltrapping . ..... 1 1.1.1 Opticaltweezing ............................. 2 1.2 Forcesinopticaltrapping . ... 3 1.2.1 Mieregime ................................ 3 1.2.2 Rayleighregime ............................. 6 1.2.3 Absorption ................................ 7 1.2.4 Intermediateregime ........................... 8 1.3 Calibration .................................... 8 1.3.1 Opticaltweezerssetup . 9 1.3.2 Calibration by power spectral analysis .
  • Downloadable from the Itunes Store As “Ihologram”

    Downloadable from the Itunes Store As “Ihologram”

    Three dimensional touch and vision for the micro-world Richard W. Bowman Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK October 12, 2012 Acknowledgements This thesis would not have come into being were it not for the help and sup- port of many wonderful people. Firstly I would like to thank my supervisor, Miles Padgett, for years of sage advice, knowing when to let me keep playing, and teaching me how to check my H-index. I’d also like to thank my second supervisor at the Institute of Photonics, Amanda Wright, for her guidance and support, and for introducing me to biology. The members of the Optics group past and present, have taught me much, endured many enthusiastic but silly questions, and made our corner of the basement a very fun place indeed. Thanks go to Johannes for talking physics whilst running up hills, Jonathan for teaching me never to forget the Jaffa cakes, Martin for many enjoyable arguments, Graham for giving me my first balldriver, Maria for ex- cellent cake, Arran for introducing us to ThorLabs, and Mike for admitting that a great many things aren’t his field. There are a few students and postdocs with whom I have worked particu- larly closely, and who have contributed to the work set out in the forthcoming chapters. Graham Gibson has taught me a great deal about how to build robust, stable optomechanics, and has assisted in the building of many of the experimental set-ups used during my PhD.
  • The Jacob Deal Half-Gambrel Frame House Common Name: 228 Richmond Street

    The Jacob Deal Half-Gambrel Frame House Common Name: 228 Richmond Street

    NOMINATION OF HISTORIC BUILDING, STRUCTURE, SITE, OR OBJECT PHILADELPHIA REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES PHILADELPHIA HISTORICAL COMMISSION SUBMIT ALL ATTACHED MATERIALS ON PAPER AND IN ELECTRONIC FORM ON CD (MS WORD FORMAT) 1. ADDRESS OF HISTORIC RESOURCE (must comply with an Office of Property Assessment address) Street address: 228 Richmond Street BRT/OPA Acct. No. 181306200 Postal code: 19125 Councilmanic District: 5 2. NAME OF HISTORIC RESOURCE Historic Name: The Jacob Deal Half-Gambrel Frame House Common Name: 228 Richmond Street 3. TYPE OF HISTORIC RESOURCE X Building Structure Site Object 4. PROPERTY INFORMATION Condition: excellent good fair poor ruins Occupancy: occupied vacant under construction unknown Current use: Dwelling 5. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION Please attach a plot plan and written description of the boundary. SEE ATTACHED SHEET. 6. DESCRIPTION SEE ATTACHED SHEET. Please attach a description of the historic resource and supplement with current photographs. 7. SIGNIFICANCE Please attach the Statement of Significance. [See Attached Sheet] Period of Significance (from year to year): from 1808 to 1898 Date(s) of construction and/or alteration: ca. 1808-1838 Architect, engineer, and/or designer: NA Builder, contractor, and/or artisan: NA Original owner: Jacob Deal (1794-1838) Other significant persons: Michael Hillegas (1729-1804) & Daniel Deal (1757-1819) CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION: The historic resource satisfies the following criteria for designation (check all that apply): X (a) Has significant character, interest or value as part
  • Aug. 8 & 15, 2016 Price $8.99 Aug. 8 & 15, 2016 Price $8.99

    Aug. 8 & 15, 2016 Price $8.99 Aug. 8 & 15, 2016 Price $8.99

    PRICE $8.99 AUG. 8 & 15, 2016 AUGUST 8 & 15, 2016 4 GOINGS ON ABOUT TOWN 19 THE TA L K OF THE TOWN Steve Coll on Russia’s election games; Gloria Allred; Morgan Freeman; pub rock; James Surowiecki on executive action. ANNALS OF POLITICS Jill Lepore 24 The War and the Roses The lessons of the party Conventions. SHOUTS & MURMURS Ian Frazier 33 Outdone THE SPORTING SCENE Sam Knight 34 Prance Master The star rider who is transforming dressage. A REPORTER AT LARGE Jon Lee Anderson 40 The Distant Shore What made an isolated Peruvian tribe kill? PERSONAL HISTORY Lauren Collins 52 Love in Translation Marriage to a Frenchman. SKETCHBOOK Barry Blitt 59 “Behind the Scenes at the D.N.C.” FICTION Te s s a Ha d l ey 62 “Dido’s Lament” THE CRITICS POP MUSIC Kelefa Sanneh 68 Gucci Mane’s “Everybody Looking.” BOOKS Adelle Waldman 72 Jay McInerney’s “Bright, Precious Days.” Dan Chiasson 75 Jana Prikryl’s “The After Party.” 77 Briefly Noted ON TELEVISION Emily Nussbaum 78 “BoJack Horseman.” THE CURRENT CINEMA Anthony Lane 80 “Jason Bourne,” “Little Men.” POEMS Nicole Sealey 31 “A Violence” James Richardson 47 “How I Became a Saint” COVER Mark Ulriksen “Something in the Air” DRAWINGS Paul Noth, Edward Steed, Jason Adam Katzenstein, Avi Steinberg, Sam Marlow, Roz Chast, Amy Hwang, Will McPhail, Darrin Bell, Liam Francis Walsh SPOTS Ben Wiseman THE NEW YO R K E R , AUGUST 8 & 15, 2016 1 CONTRIBUTORS Jill Lepore (“The War and the Roses,” Jon Lee Anderson (“The Distant Shore,” p.
  • Civil War Fought for the Union Which Represent 52% of the Sons of Harvard Killed in Action During This Conflict

    Civil War Fought for the Union Which Represent 52% of the Sons of Harvard Killed in Action During This Conflict

    Advocates for Harvard ROTC . H CRIMSON UNION ARMY VETERANS Total served Died in service Killed in action Died by disease Harvard College grads 475 73 69 26 Harvard College- non grads 114 22 Harvard Graduate schools 349 22 NA NA Total 938 117 69 26 The above total of Harvard alumni who died in the service of the Union included 5 major generals, 3 Brigadier Generals, 6 colonels, 19 LT Colonels and majors, 17 junior officers in the Army, 3 sergeants plus 3 Naval officers, including 2 Medical doctors. 72% of all Harvard alumni who served in the Civil War fought for the Union which represent 52% of the sons of Harvard killed in action during this conflict. As result among Harvard alumni, Union military losses were 10% compared with a 21% casualty rate for the Confederate Army. The battle of Gettysburg (PA) had the highest amount of Harvard alumni serving in the Union Army who were killed in action (i.e. 11), in addition 3 Harvard alumni Confederates also died in this battle. Secondly, seven Crimson warriors made the supreme sacrifice for the Union at Antietam (MD) with 5 more were killed in the battles of Cedar Mountain (VA) and Fredericksburg (VA). As expected, most of the Harvard alumni who died in the service of the Union were born and raised in the Northeastern states (e.g. 74% from Massachusetts). However, 9 Harvard alumni Union casualties were from the Mid West including one from the border state of Missouri. None of these Harvard men were from southern states. The below men who made the supreme sacrifice for their country to preserve the union which also resulted in the abolition of slavery.
  • Guide to the War of 1812 Sources

    Guide to the War of 1812 Sources

    Source Guide to the War of 1812 Table of Contents I. Military Journals, Letters and Personal Accounts 2 Service Records 5 Maritime 6 Histories 10 II. Civilian Personal and Family Papers 12 Political Affairs 14 Business Papers 15 Histories 16 III. Other Broadsides 17 Maps 18 Newspapers 18 Periodicals 19 Photos and Illustrations 19 Genealogy 21 Histories of the War of 1812 23 Maryland in the War of 1812 25 This document serves as a guide to the Maryland Center for History and Culture’s library items and archival collections related to the War of 1812. It includes manuscript collections (MS), vertical files (VF), published works, maps, prints, and photographs that may support research on the military, political, civilian, social, and economic dimensions of the war, including the United States’ relations with France and Great Britain in the decade preceding the conflict. The bulk of the manuscript material relates to military operations in the Chesapeake Bay region, Maryland politics, Baltimore- based privateers, and the impact of economic sanctions and the British blockade of the Bay (1813-1814) on Maryland merchants. Many manuscript collections, however, may support research on other theaters of the war and include correspondence between Marylanders and military and political leaders from other regions. Although this inventory includes the most significant manuscript collections and published works related to the War of 1812, it is not comprehensive. Library and archival staff are continually identifying relevant sources in MCHC’s holdings and acquiring new sources that will be added to this inventory. Accordingly, researchers should use this guide as a starting point in their research and a supplement to thorough searches in MCHC’s online library catalog.
  • Antietam Map Side

    Antietam Map Side

    ★ ANTIETAM CAMPAIGN SITES★ ★ Leesburg (Loudoun Museum) – Antietam Campaign To ur begins here, where Lee rested the Army of Northern MASON/DIXON LINE Virginia before invading Maryland. ★ Mile Hill – A surprise attack led by Confederate Col. Thomas Munford on Sept. 2, 1862, routed Federal forces. ★ White’s Ferry (C&O Canal NHP) – A major part of Lee’s army forded the Potomac River two miles north of this mod- ern ferry crossing, at White’s Ford. To Cumberland, Md. ★ White’s Ford (C&O Canal NHP) – Here the major part of the Army of Northern Virginia forded the Potomac River into Maryland on September 5-6, 1862, while a Confederate band played “Maryland! My Maryland!” ★ Poolesville – Site of cavalry skirmishes on September 5 & 8, 1862. 81 11 ★ Beallsville – A running cavalry fight passed through town Campaign Driving Route on September 9, 1862. 40 ★ Barnesville – On September 9, 1862, opposing cavalry Alternate Campaign Driving Route units chased each other through town several times. Rose Hill HAGERSTOWN Campaign Site ★ Comus (Mt. Ephraim Crossroads) – Confederate cavalry Cemetery fought a successful rearguard action here, September 9-11, Other Civil War Site 1862, to protect the infantry at Frederick. The German Reformed Church in Keedysville W ASHINGTON ★ Sugarloaf Mountain – At different times, Union and was used as a hospital after the battle. National, State or County Park Confederate signalmen atop the mountain watched the 40 I L InformationInformation or Welcome Center opposing army. Williamsport R A T ★ Monocacy Aqueduct (C&O Canal NHP) – Confederate (C&O Canal NHP) troops tried and failed to destroy or damage the aqueduct South Mountain N on September 4 & 9, 1862.