Class of 1862-1865

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Class of 1862-1865 570 GRADUATES OF THE NUMBER. 1862. CLASS RANK. CLASS OF 1862. ~967 . (Born N. Y.) . RANALD S. MACKENZIE". .(Ap'd at Large) .. ~ Military History.-Cadet at the U. S. Military Academy ft'om July I, 1858, to June 17,1862, when he was graduated and promoted in the Army to SECOND LIEUT., CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JUNE 17, 1862. Served during the Rebellion of the Seceding States, 1862-66: as Asst. En­ gineer. 9th Army Corps, July 10 to Aug. 29, 1862, in the Northern Virginia Campaign. being engaged in the Action of Kelly's Ford, Au'" 20, 1862,-and Battle of ~fanas sas, Aug. 29, 1862, where he was wounded; con sick leave of (BVT. FIRST LIEUT., AUG. 29, 1862, FOR GaLLaNT AND MERITORIOUS SERVICES AT THE BATTLE OF MANASSAS, VA.) absence, disabled by wound, Aug. 29 to Oct 19, 1862 ; attached to En­ gineer Battalion, Oct. 19 to Nov. 16, 1862, in the M.U'yland Campaign (Army of thePotoruae), being engaged in construeting. repairing, and gUllrd­ ing bridges; in the Rappahannock Campaign (Army of the Potomac), Dec., 1862-June, 1863, being eng'lged in the Battle of Fredericksburg, Dec. 13 (FIRST LmUT., CORPS OF ENGINEERS, MAR. 3, 1863) 1862 (as Engineer of General Sumucr's Grand Divisioll),--and B.tttle of Chan­ cellorsville, May 2-4, 1863; in the Pennsylvania Campaign, in command of (BVT. CAPT., MAY 3, 1863, FOll GALLANT AND ~IEllITORIOUS SERVICES AT THE BATTLE OF CHANc.:ELLORSVlLLE, VA.) Engineer Compllny (Army of the Potomac), June-July, 1863, being engaged in laying bridges oyer thu Occoquan, June 14. 1863, and across the Potomac at Edwllrds' Ferry, June 21, 1863,-Battle of Gettysburg, July 1- 3, 1863, - and (BVT. MAJOR, JULY 4, 1863, FOR GALLANT AND J\llEunoRIOUs SERVICES AT THE BATTLE OF GETTYSBURG, PA.) constructing bridge over the Potomnc, lit Berlin, Md., July 18, 1863; in the Rapidan Campaign (Army of the Potomac), being engaged in constructing, repairing, and guarding briuges over the Rappahannock, Aug. 1-23, and Sep. 1-22, over Bull Run, near BbckbU1"n's Ford, Oct. 17, IIcro s ~ the Rappahan­ (CAPTAIN, CoRPS OF ENGI:-fEERS, Nov. 6, 1863) nock, at Kelly's Ford, Nov. 7. and oyer the Rapid.\n, near Germania Ford, Nov. 26 -30, 1863,-and in milking roads and reconnoissances, building block­ houses, nnd ereeting defensive works, Aug., 1863-May, 1864; in the Rich)llond C,\mpaign, in command of Engineer Company (Army of the Potomac" May 4-J une 10, 1864, being engaged in building bridges, constructing rifle trenches, and repairing roads, - Battle of the Wilderness, ~'lay 5- G, 1864, -Combat of Todd's Tavern, MIIY 7, 1864--and Battles about Spottsyl­ vania, May 10-15, 1864; in commund of Regiment (Army of the Poto­ mac), in the Richmond Campaign, June 10-22, 1864, being engl1ged in the I:)iege of Petersburg, June 17-22, when he was wounded; on sick leave of ab­ (BVT. LIEUT.-COL., JUNE. 18, 1864, ForI GALL_~NT AND MERITORIOUS SERVICES BEFORE PETEllSBURG, VA.) Bence, disabled by wound. June 22-July 9, 1864; in command of Regiment, 6th Army Corps, in the Washington Cl1mpaign, July, 1864, being engaged in (COLONEL, 2D CONNECTICUT HEAVY ARTILLERY VOLUNTEERS, JULY 10, 1864) the Defense of the Capital, July 11-12, 1864; in command of Brigade, 6th Army Corps, in the Shenandoah Caml?aign, Aug. 15 to Oct. 19, 1864, being engaged in the Battle of Opequan, Sep. 19, 1864,-Batt,le of Fisher's Hill, • Son ot Commodore ALEXANDER SUDELL MACKE.~ZlE, U. S. Navy. U. S. lllILITARY ACADEMY. 571 NUMBER. 1862. CLASS RANK. Sep. 22, Hl64,-and Battle of Cedar Creek, Oct. 19, 1864, where he was (BVT. COLONEL, OCT. 19, 18M, FOR GALLANT AND MERITORIOUS SEUVICES AT THE BATTLE OF CEDAR CREEK, VA.) wounded; on sick leave of absence, disabled by wound, Oct. 19 to Nov., 1864; (BRIG.-GENERAL, U. S. VOLUNTEERS, OCT. 19, 18(4) in Siege of Petersburg, commanding Brigade, 6th Army Corps, Dec., 1864­ Mar., 1865; in command of Cavalry Division (Army of the James), Mar.­ (BVT. BRIG.-GENERAL, U. S. AmIY, MAR. 13, 1865, FOR GALLANT AND MERITORIOUS SERVICES IN THE FIELD DURING THE REBELLION) Apr., 1865, being engaged in the Battle of Five :Forks, Apr. 1, Hl65,-Pursuit (BVT. ~IA.r . -GENERAL, U. S. VOLUNTEERS, MAR. 31, 1865, FOR GALL.~NT AND MERrrORIOUS SERVICES DURING THE REBELLION) of General Lee's Rebel Army, Apr. 3-9, 1865,-and Skirmish and Capitulation of Appomattox C. H., Apr. 9, 1865; at Richmond, Va., commanding Cavalry Division, Apr.-Aug., 1865; in waiting oroers, Aug. 11, 1865, to Jan. 15, 1866; (MUSTERED OUT OF VOLUNTEER SERVICE, JAN. 15, 1866) on leave of absence, Jan. 15 to Feb. 28, 1866; as Asst. Engineer in the con­ struction of the Defenses of Portsmouth harbor, N. R ., Feb. 28, 1866, to May, 1867. CoLONEL, 41ST INFANTRY, MAll. 6, 1867. 1968.. (Bom Ten.) ...GEORGE L. GILLESPIE ........ (Ap'd Ten.) ..2 Military History.-Cadet at the U. S. Military Academy from July 1, 1858, to June 17, 1862, when he was graduated and promoted in the Army to SECOND LIEUT., CORPS OF ENGINEERS, .JUNE 17, 186\!. Served during the Rebellion of the Seceding States, 1862- 66: on Artillery duty, at the Military Academy, June 17 to Aug. 31, 1862; in command of EnO"ineer Company (Army of the Potomac), in the ~litryland Campaign, Sep­ No~., 1862, being engaged in the Battlc of Antictam, Scp. 17, 1862,-in build­ ing, guarding and repairinq Ponton Uridgcs across the Potomac and Shenan­ doah Rivers, at H,uper's Ferry and Berlin, Md., Sep. 21- Nov. 3, Hl62,-and onlllarch to Falmouth, Va., No,'., 18()2; in command of Engineer Company (Army of the Potomac), in the Rappahannock Camp'lign, Dec., 1862-June, 1863, being engaged in the Battle of Fredericksburg iu throwing Ponton Bridges for the advance and retreat of the Army of lhe Pntoml\C across the Rappahannock River, Dec. 11-16, 1862, - in disembr.rking and equipping Pon­ ton'l'rain at Belle Plain, and tmnRporting it to Falmouth, Va. , Jan. 15-19, 1863, - on the ,. Mud Marclt"' with Ponton Bridge for Banks' Ford, .Jan. 20- 26, 1863,- in constructing Field-worliR, making Surveys, guarding Bridges, &c., Feb.-Apr., 1863,-in throwing Bridge below Fredcricksburg, Apr. 29, 1863,­ (FmRT LIEUT., CORPS OF ENGINEERS, MAR. 3, 18(3) at the Battle of Chaucellorsville, in constructing Defensive Works and Bridges, May 3- 6, 1863,-and in throwing a Bridge in the f.tee of the enemy at Frank­ lin's CroRsin" of the Rappahannock, June 5, 1863; ill thc Pennsylv,mia Cam­ paign, comu;'anding an Engineer Comp,my (At'my of the Potomflc), June-July, 1863, bein" engaged in laying Bridges over the Occoquan, June 14, 1863, and ncross the Potomac at Edwilrds' E'erry, June 21, 1863,-in building Defensive Works, &e., OJ;! the march through Pennsylvania, June- July, 18G3,-l1nd in constructin" Brid"e over the Potomac, fit Berlin, Md., .July 18, 1863; in the Rapidan Ca~npai~ (Army of the Po~o~ac), ~ug.-Nov., 1863, being engaged in constructing, gual'dmg and repamng Bridges over the Rappahannock, Aug. 1-23, and Sep. 1-22, and over Bull Run, near Blackburn's Ford, Oct. 7, 572 GRADUATES OF THE NU~IBEn. 1862. CLASS RANK. 1863; on Recruiting service for Engineer troops, Nov. 26, 1863, to May 29, (CAPT.U:<', CORPS.OF ENGINEERS, APR. 22, 18(4) 1864; in command of Engineer Company (Army of the Potomac). in the Rich­ mond C,.mpaign, May 31 to Oct. 30, 1864, being engaged in Sapping at the Battles of Cold Harbor, June 1- 11, 1864, - in throwing Bridge across the James River, June 15, 1864,--::md constructing Defen~ive Works about, n,nd at Siege of Petersburg, June 17- 0ct. 30, 186'1; as Asst. Engineer on the Staff' of (BVT. Muon, AUG. 1, 1864, FOR G,lLL.\NT AND ~IERITORIOUS SERVICES DURING 'l'HE CAMPAIGN BEFORE RICHMOND, VA.) Major-General Sheridan, Oct. 30, 1864, and Chief Engineer, Feb. 28, 1864, to June 1, 1865, being engaged in tbe Combat of Waynesboro', M,ll'. 2, 1865,­ Action of Ashhmd, MJlr. 14-15, 1865,-Battle of Dinwiddie C. H., Mar. 31, 1865,-Battle of Five Forks, Apr. 1, 1865,- Battle of Sailor's Creek, Apr. 6, lS65,-Action of Appomattox Station, Apr. 8, 1865,-and Capitulation of Appomattox C. H., Apr. 9, 1865; as Chief Engineer of the Military Division of (BV1.'. LIEU'l'.-COL" APR, 9, 1865, FOR GALLA~'T AND MERITORIOUS SEBVICES IN THE CAMPAIGN FROM WINCHESTER TO ApPOMATTOX C. H ., VA.) the South-west, June 3 to July 17, 1865, -of the ll-iilitmy Di vision of the Gulf, Jnly 17, 1865, to Aug. 11, 1866,-of tbe Deprntment of the Gulf, Aug. 11, 186f), to Mar. 6, 1867,-and of Fifth j)1ilitary Di~trict (Louisianu. and Texas), Mar. 6 to Aug. 22, 1867; as Asst. En15ineer in the constmction of the Defenses of Portsmouth hurbor, N. R ., Aug. :.::6, 1867, to 1969.. (BomN. J.) ....GEORGE BURROUGHS....... (Ap'd Mas.). ,3 Military History.-Cadet o.t the U. S. lVIilitary Academy from July 1, 1858, to June 17, 1862, when he was graduated [md promoted in the Army to SECOND LIEUT., CoRPS OF ENGINEEIlS, JUNE 17, 1862. Served during the Hebellion of the Seceding States, 1862- 66: as Asst. En­ gineer of Brig.-General G, W. Morgan's Division (Army of the Ohio), July 30 to Oct. 4, 1862, being engaged in Defense of Cumberland Gap, Eo.st Tennessee, .July 30-Sep. 17, 1862,·-and as Acting Aide-de-C,\mp to the Commanding General 011 the Retre,\t through Eastern Kentucky to the Ohio HiveI', Sep.
Recommended publications
  • Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’S Civil War Battlefields
    U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service American Battlefield Protection Program Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields State of Maryland Washington, DC January 2010 Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields State of Maryland U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service American Battlefield Protection Program Washington, DC January 2010 Authority The American Battlefield Protection Program Act of 1996, as amended by the Civil War Battlefield Preservation Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-359, 111 Stat. 3016, 17 December 2002), directs the Secretary of the Interior to update the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission (CWSAC) Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields. Acknowledgments NPS Project Team Paul Hawke, Project Leader; Kathleen Madigan, Survey Coordinator; Tanya Gossett and January Ruck, Reporting; Matthew Borders, Historian; Kristie Kendall, Program Assistant. Battlefield Surveyor(s) Lisa Rupple, American Battlefield Protection Program Respondents Ted Alexander and John Howard, Antietam National Battlefield; C. Casey Reese and Pamela Underhill, Appalachian National Scenic Trail; Susan Frye, Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park; Kathy Robertson, Civil War Preservation Trust; John Nelson, Hager House Museum; Joy Beasley, Cathy Beeler, Todd Stanton, and Susan Trail, Monocacy National Battlefield; Robert Bailey and Al Preston, South Mountain Battlefield State Park. Cover: View of the sunken
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett
    Spring Grove Cemetery, once characterized as blending "the elegance of a park with the pensive beauty of a burial-place," is the final resting- place of forty Cincinnatians who were generals during the Civil War. Forty For the Union: Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett f the forty Civil War generals who are buried in Spring Grove Cemetery, twenty-three had advanced from no military experience whatsoever to attain the highest rank in the Union Army. This remarkable feat underscores the nature of the Northern army that suppressed the rebellion of the Confed- erate states during the years 1861 to 1865. Initially, it was a force of "inspired volunteers" rather than a standing army in the European tradition. Only seven of these forty leaders were graduates of West Point: Jacob Ammen, Joshua H. Bates, Sidney Burbank, Kenner Garrard, Joseph Hooker, Alexander McCook, and Godfrey Weitzel. Four of these seven —Burbank, Garrard, Mc- Cook, and Weitzel —were in the regular army at the outbreak of the war; the other three volunteered when the war started. Only four of the forty generals had ever been in combat before: William H. Lytle, August Moor, and Joseph Hooker served in the Mexican War, and William H. Baldwin fought under Giuseppe Garibaldi in the Italian civil war. This lack of professional soldiers did not come about by chance. When the Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia in 1787, its delegates, who possessed a vast knowledge of European history, were determined not to create a legal basis for a standing army. The founding fathers believed that the stand- ing armies belonging to royalty were responsible for the endless bloody wars that plagued Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Fought for the Union Which Represent 52% of the Sons of Harvard Killed in Action During This Conflict
    Advocates for Harvard ROTC . H CRIMSON UNION ARMY VETERANS Total served Died in service Killed in action Died by disease Harvard College grads 475 73 69 26 Harvard College- non grads 114 22 Harvard Graduate schools 349 22 NA NA Total 938 117 69 26 The above total of Harvard alumni who died in the service of the Union included 5 major generals, 3 Brigadier Generals, 6 colonels, 19 LT Colonels and majors, 17 junior officers in the Army, 3 sergeants plus 3 Naval officers, including 2 Medical doctors. 72% of all Harvard alumni who served in the Civil War fought for the Union which represent 52% of the sons of Harvard killed in action during this conflict. As result among Harvard alumni, Union military losses were 10% compared with a 21% casualty rate for the Confederate Army. The battle of Gettysburg (PA) had the highest amount of Harvard alumni serving in the Union Army who were killed in action (i.e. 11), in addition 3 Harvard alumni Confederates also died in this battle. Secondly, seven Crimson warriors made the supreme sacrifice for the Union at Antietam (MD) with 5 more were killed in the battles of Cedar Mountain (VA) and Fredericksburg (VA). As expected, most of the Harvard alumni who died in the service of the Union were born and raised in the Northeastern states (e.g. 74% from Massachusetts). However, 9 Harvard alumni Union casualties were from the Mid West including one from the border state of Missouri. None of these Harvard men were from southern states. The below men who made the supreme sacrifice for their country to preserve the union which also resulted in the abolition of slavery.
    [Show full text]
  • Antietam Map Side
    ★ ANTIETAM CAMPAIGN SITES★ ★ Leesburg (Loudoun Museum) – Antietam Campaign To ur begins here, where Lee rested the Army of Northern MASON/DIXON LINE Virginia before invading Maryland. ★ Mile Hill – A surprise attack led by Confederate Col. Thomas Munford on Sept. 2, 1862, routed Federal forces. ★ White’s Ferry (C&O Canal NHP) – A major part of Lee’s army forded the Potomac River two miles north of this mod- ern ferry crossing, at White’s Ford. To Cumberland, Md. ★ White’s Ford (C&O Canal NHP) – Here the major part of the Army of Northern Virginia forded the Potomac River into Maryland on September 5-6, 1862, while a Confederate band played “Maryland! My Maryland!” ★ Poolesville – Site of cavalry skirmishes on September 5 & 8, 1862. 81 11 ★ Beallsville – A running cavalry fight passed through town Campaign Driving Route on September 9, 1862. 40 ★ Barnesville – On September 9, 1862, opposing cavalry Alternate Campaign Driving Route units chased each other through town several times. Rose Hill HAGERSTOWN Campaign Site ★ Comus (Mt. Ephraim Crossroads) – Confederate cavalry Cemetery fought a successful rearguard action here, September 9-11, Other Civil War Site 1862, to protect the infantry at Frederick. The German Reformed Church in Keedysville W ASHINGTON ★ Sugarloaf Mountain – At different times, Union and was used as a hospital after the battle. National, State or County Park Confederate signalmen atop the mountain watched the 40 I L InformationInformation or Welcome Center opposing army. Williamsport R A T ★ Monocacy Aqueduct (C&O Canal NHP) – Confederate (C&O Canal NHP) troops tried and failed to destroy or damage the aqueduct South Mountain N on September 4 & 9, 1862.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Heritage Area Management Plan
    Heart of the Civil War Heritage Area Application for Certification as a Maryland Heritage Area by Washington, Frederick, and Carroll Counties October 1, 2005 Heart of the Civil War Heritage Area Application for Certification as a Maryland Heritage Area by Washington, Frederick and Carroll Counties October 1, 2005 Cover: Antietam Battlefield Monument; photograph courtesy of the Tourism Council of Frederick County, Inc. Maryland Civil War Heritage Area Management Plan Heart of the Civil War Heritage Area: County Governments in Cooperation Carroll County Julia Gouge, President Dean L. Minnich, Vice President Perry L. Jones, Secretary Frederick County John L. Thompson, Jr., President Michael L. Cady, Vice President Jan H. Gardner John R. Lovell, Jr. Bruce L. Reeder Washington County Gregory I. Snook, President William J. Wivell, Vice President James F. Kercheval John C. Munson Doris J. Nipps 2 Contents CONTENTS….……………………………………………………………………………3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………….7 The Heritage Area…………………………………………………………………………7 Benefits of Participation…………………………………………………………………..8 A Broader Story………………………………………………………………………...…8 The Heart of the Civil War Heritage Area………………………………………………...9 VISION & GOALS………………………………………………………………………12 Vision…………………………………………………………………………………….12 Goals……………………………………………………………………………………..13 SIGNIFICANCE…………………………………………………………………………15 PLAN DEVELOPMENT………………………………………………...………………17 Approach………………………………………………………………………………....17 BOUNDARIES…………………………………………………………………………..19 RESOURCES.………………………………………………………………………….. 21 Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Heart of the Civil War Heritage Area Guide Page 1 on The
    Scots-Irish families moved into these PENNSYLVANIA Heart of the OH counties from the south. These settlers Mason-Dixon Line from southeastern portions of Maryland NJ Civil War MARYLAND assimilated smoothly with their DC Dutch brethren. Heritage WEST VIRGINIA DE Slavery was found throughout this Area Guide VIRGINIA region but took on new meaning after Pennsylvania abolished the institution in The HCWHA is ideally positioned to serve 1781. The western part of the Mason-Dixon as your “base camp” for driving the popular Line and the Ohio River became a border Maryland Civil War Trails and visiting the between free and slave states, although battlefields and sites of Antietam, Gettysburg, The Mason-Dixon Line Delaware remained a slave state. By the Monocacy, South Mountain, Harpers Ferry, The Heart of the Civil War Heritage Area is 1850s, the Mason-Dixon Line symbolically Baltimore, and Washington, D.C. adjacent to the Mason-Dixon Line, generally viewed as the dividing line between North became the cultural boundary between and South. This geographic location offers the Northern and Southern United States. opportunities to discuss both sides of the The Potomac River marked the southern monumental conflict and to examine the At the Heart of it All… boundary of Washington County While the word “heart” denotes the center unique experience of “border states” and and southwestern Frederick County. or core of some thing or place, it also relates individual communities that were divided This famed waterway became the true to three major Civil War themes found in loyalty. within this geographic area, exemplified dividing line between North and South by the images on this brochure’s cover.
    [Show full text]
  • F-4-119 Joseph Gaber (Gaver) Farm
    F-4-119 Joseph Gaber (Gaver) Farm Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 11-21-2003 Survey # F-4-119 Approximate date September 14. 1962 Joseph Gaber (Gaver) Farm Street Address: Frostown and Dahlgren Roads Town, State: Middletown vicinity, MD _private _x_, public This property is included in the survey of resources associated with the Civil War Battle of South Mountain, which occurred on September 14, 1862. The Joseph Gaber building complex is centered on the 2 1/2 story dwelling of log and stone construction. The house, with its large exterior stone chimney is in remarkably intact condition. Probably built early in the 19th century, most of the original exterior features have been retained and maintained.
    [Show full text]
  • Newcomer House Signing Ceremony Media
    Media Kit Newcomer House Ceremony Welcome to the Heart of the Civil War Heritage Area! The Heart of the Civil War Heritage Area (HCWHA) is an area rich in history, covering portions of Carroll, Frederick and Washington Counties. It is located just below the Mason-Dixon Line, generally viewed as the dividing line between North and South. With one foot in the north, and one foot in the south, the story of the Civil War, its causes, battles, heroes and villains … its very meaning can be told nowhere better than in this part of Maryland. The HCWHA is ideally positioned to serve as “base camp” for driving the popular Civil War Trails and visiting the battlefields and sites of Antietam, Gettysburg, Monocacy, South Mountain, Harpers Ferry, Baltimore and Washington, D.C. The mission of the Heart of the Civil War Heritage Area is to promote the stewardship of our historic, cultural, and natural Civil War resources, encourages superior visitor experiences, and stimulates tourism, economic prosperity, and educational development, thereby improving the quality of life in our community for the benefit of both residents and visitors. HCWHA became certified as part of the Maryland Heritage Areas Program in July 2006. It is an independent nonprofit organization guided by a Board of Directors and an Advisory Council comprised of representatives of local government units, state and national parks, private organizations and businesses, and individuals from all three counties in the Heritage Area. The staff of the Heritage Area includes Executive Director Elizabeth Scott Shatto and Assistant Auni Gelles. 2 Today’s Program Representatives from the National Park Service, the Heart of the Civil War Heritage Area, and the Hagerstown-Washington County Convention and Visitors Bureau will sign a new, five-year cooperative agreement to continue operations at the Newcomer House at Antietam National Battlefield.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resourcevol
    the Maryland natural resourceVol. 11, No. 4 I Fall 2008 Martin O’Malley Governor Maryland Department of Natural Resources John R. Griffin Secretary The Maryland Natural Resource ...Your guide to recreation & conservation in Maryland Darlene Pisani Director Office of Communications John Cornell Managing Editor Wiley Hall Editor Peter Lampell Art Director/Layout & Design Tabitha Contee Circulation Editorial Support Donna Jones-Regan Barbara Rice • Kara Turner Darlene Walker Contributors Steve Bittner • Mike English Ross M. Kimmel • Steven W. Koehn Dana Limpert • Keith Lockwood Paul Peditto • Doug Wigfield The Maryland Natural Resource 580 Taylor Avenue, D-4 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Toll free in Maryland: 1-877-620-8DNR ext. 8009 Out of state call: 410-260-8009 Website: www.dnr.maryland.gov E-mail address: [email protected] ISSN 1521-9984 Tell us what you think! Please write or e-mail us at the above address, or fax us at: 410-260-8024 Observations, conclusions and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department. The facilities and services of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources are available to all without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, national origin or physical or mental disability. This document is available in alternative format upon request from a qualified individual with a disability. © 2008 Maryland Department of Natural Resources Ocean City Inlet Worcester County Mark Odell the Maryland natural resource On the cover: Sunrise at Battery
    [Show full text]
  • Western Maryland Room Vertical File Collection Catalog
    Western Maryland Room Vertical File Collection Page 1 Inventoried in 1999, and updated May 2009, by Marsha L. Fuller,CG. Updated July 2013 by Klara Shives, Graduate Intern. Catalog: File Name Description Date Orig Cross Reference AAUW Allegany Co., MD Growing Up Near Oldtown 2000 Deffinbaugh Memoirs Allegany Co., MD The War for The British Empire in Allegany County 1969 x Allegany Co., MD Pioneer Settlers of Flintstone 1986 Allegany Co., MD Ancestral History of Thomas F. Myers 1965 x Allegany Co., MD Sesquicentennial - Frostburg, MD 1962 x Allegany Co., MD Harmony Castle No.3 - Knights of the Mystic Chains 1894 x Midland, MD Allegany Co., MD (Box) Ashmon Sorrell's Tombstone 2007 Civil War Allegany Co., MD (Box) The Heart of Western Maryland Allegany Co., MD (Box) Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. 1962 Allegany Co., MD (Box) Ku Klux Klan 2008 Albert Feldstein Allegany Co., MD (Box) LaVale Toll House Allegany Co., MD (Box) List of Settlers in Allegany County 1787 Allegany Co., MD (Box) Mills, Grist and Flour Allegany Co., MD (Box) Miscellaneous clippings 1910-1932 Allegany Co., MD (Box) Names of towns, origin Allegany Co., MD (Box) National Highway - colored print Allegany Co., MD (Box) Old Allegany - A Century and A Half into the Past 1889 Allegany Co., MD (Box) Old Pictures of Allegany Co. 1981 Allegany Co., MD (Box) Ordeal in Twiggs Cave 1975 Allegany Co., MD (Box) Photographs of Western Maryland 1860-1925 1860-1925 Allegany Co., MD (Box) Piedmont Coal and Iron Company, Barton, MD (6) 1870s x Allegany Co., MD (Box) Pioneer log cabin Allegany
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Robert E. Lee and His Corps Commanders in the Civil War
    CHAIN OF COMMAND: AN ANALYSIS OF ROBERT E. LEE AND HIS CORPS COMMANDERS IN THE CIVIL WAR Aaron D. Lewis A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2016 Committee: Benjamin Greene, Advisor A. Dwayne Beggs Michael E. Brooks © 2016 Aaron Lewis All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Benjamin Greene, Advisor Robert E. Lee remains a mythical figure within the culture of the southern United States. Proponents of the Southern “Lost Cause of the Confederacy” argued that he embodied the idea of Southern morality and toughness. Lee’s accomplishments on the battlefield are what brought him such admiration in the south. The Confederate cause of “freedom,” Southerners believed, was still attainable as long as Marse Robert commanded the Army of Northern Virginia. Lee frequently led his undersized and under-equipped army to victory over the Union armies of the Eastern Theatre during the first half of the Civil War. Using a wide variety of primary sources, from the Official Records to the personal letters and memoirs of Civil War commanders, I argue that Lee directly benefitted from the abilities of Stonewall Jackson, and once he died, Lee’s ability to win on the battlefield greatly diminished. Victories at Antietam and Chancellorsville were the product of Lee’s quick-thinking, boldness, and a clear explanation of what he expected of his commanders, as well as the incompetence of the Union commanders he faced. Lee’s defeat at Gettysburg, however, is the product of poor clarification by Lee as to what he expected of his commanders, and his inability to consider the input of his subordinates.
    [Show full text]
  • September 14, 2006, the One Hundred and Forty-Fifth Year of the Civil War
    Old Baldy Civil War Round Table of Philadelphia September 14, 2006, The One Hundred and Forty-Fifth Year of the Civil War The President’s Letter We had another fine turnout to hear an enjoyable and informative program by our good friend Jay Jorgensen of the R. E. Lee CWRT of Central New Jersey. Jay talked about leadership at the battle of Gettysburg from a lawyer’s standpoint (Jay is an attorney). There were plenty of heroes and goats but importantly, we learned of some heroes and goats not familiar to the average buff. We want to thank Jay and Matt Borowick for making the trip down. We hope they enjoyed their visit as much as we enjoyed seeing them again. We have another old friend of the Old Baldy CWRT in September. Roger Arthur has presented several pro- grams to our group in the past. Roger is probably the most active student of the war in the Delaware Valley. He takes and teaches classes at several area universities and colleges. He has presented programs at about every Photos: LOC Photos: Civil War round table in the area. He has received several The Northern Command: awards for his efforts in Civil War history and historic preservation. Again we will hear some lessons in leader- Why the Grant, Sherman, and ship on the Union side. The topic this month will be, The Sheridan Alliance Worked Northern Command: Why the Grant, Sherman, and Sheridan Alliance Worked. Don’t miss this one. As September 14th Thursday Meeting usual, we urge you to bring and friend or family member – or two! The September 14th Meeting of the Old Baldy Civil War We are firming up our 30th Anniversary Dinner on Round Table will start at 7:30 pm on Thursday at the Saturday January 20, 2007.
    [Show full text]