DOCSLIB.ORG

Built Form Review: Victoria Street, Abbotsford & Richmond Heritage Analysis & Recommendations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Built Form Review: Victoria Street, Abbotsford & Richmond Heritage Analysis & Recommendations Level 3, 124 Exhibition Street [GPO Box 2634, Melbourne 3001] Melbourne, Victoria 3000 [email protected] +61 (03) 9115 6566 gjmheritage.com ABN: 62 348 237 636 ARBV: 51910 BUILT FORM REVIEW: VICTORIA STREET, ABBOTSFORD & RICHMOND HERITAGE ANALYSIS & RECOMMENDATIONS PREPARED FOR: City of Yarra DATE: 12 April 2021 FILE: 2020-052 © GJM Heritage (2021) All Rights Reserved This report is limited in its scope to consideration of post-contact cultural heritage and does not provide advice on any Aboriginal cultural heritage significance. The subject site forms part of the 37.5% of Victoria where there is currently no formally recognized Traditional Owner groups. Nonetheless, we acknowledge the Traditional Owners of the land at this place and pay our respects to their Elders past, present and emerging. For more information, please visit https://www.aboriginalvictoria.vic.gov.au PROJECT TEAM Jim Gard’ner | Director Renae Jarman | Director Ros Coleman | Senior Associate Jessi Briggs | Associate Jessica Hogg | Heritage Consultant Cover Image: Looking west down the northern side of Victoria Street from opposite the intersection of Lithgow Street, January 2021. GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS C1Z Commercial 1 Zone C2Z Commercial 2 Zone DDO Design and Development Overlay DELWP Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning GRZ General Residential Zone HO Heritage Overlay MAC Major Activity Centre MUZ Mixed Use Zone NAC Neighbourhood Activity Centre NRZ Neighbourhood Residential Zone PPN Planning Practice Note PUZ Public Use Zone SUZ Special Use Zone VHR Victorian Heritage Register All photos taken by GJM Heritage during 2017, 2018 and in January 2021 unless otherwise stated. DOCUMENT VERSIONS Project No. Version Issued To Date Issued 2020-008 1.0 City of Yarra 9 April 2021 1.1 City of Yarra 12 April 2021 Victoria Parade: Heritage Analysis & Recommendations | PAGE 2 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 6 PART I: THE PROJECT AND PLANNING FRAMEWORK...................................................... 8 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 9 1.1 YARRA’S HIGH STREETS…………………………………………………………………………………………………………9 1.2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE VICTORIA STREET STUDY AREA…………………………………………………9 1.3 BRIEF HISTORY OF VICTORIA STREET………………………………………………………………………………….10 1.4 SCOPE OF THE HERITAGE ANALYSIS & RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT……………………..…………12 1.5 METHODOLOGY………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….13 2.0 ANALYSIS OF THE PLANNING CONTEXT ............................................................................ 16 2.1 ACTIVITY CENTRE PLANNING AND HERITAGE……………………………………………………………………..16 2.2 YARRA PLANNING SCHEME – HERITAGE PROVISIONS…………………………………………………………18 2.2.1 Heritage Policy……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….19 2.2.2 Landmarks and Tall Structures……………………………………………………………………………………….22 2.2.3 Heritage Overlay…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….23 3.0 HERITAGE IN DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OVERLAYS – PANEL FINDINGS ......................... 25 3.1 YARRA PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C231 ............................................................... 25 3.2 YARRA PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C220 ............................................................... 26 3.3 YARRA AMENDMENT C191 ............................................................................................. 27 3.4 MORELAND AMENDMENT C134 ..................................................................................... 28 3.5 BOROONDARA AMENDMENT C108 ................................................................................. 28 3.6 WHITEHORSE AMENDMENT C175 ................................................................................... 29 3.7 STONNINGTON AMENDMENT C223 ................................................................................ 30 3.8 DAREBIN AMENDMENT C161.......................................................................................... 30 3.9 SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 31 4.0 MANDATORY AND DISCRETIONARY HEIGHT AND SETBACK CONTROLS............................. 34 PART II: HERITAGE ANALYSIS ....................................................................................... 36 5.0 STUDY AREA ANALYSIS .................................................................................................... 37 5.1 PRECINCT BOUNDARIES .................................................................................................. 37 5.2 HERITAGE CHARACTERISTICS .......................................................................................... 37 5.3 MUNICIPAL-WIDE LANDMARKS ....................................................................................... 40 5.3.1 St Ignatius Church ...................................................................................................... 41 Victoria Parade: Heritage Analysis & Recommendations | PAGE 3 5.3.2 Skipping Girl Sign ....................................................................................................... 42 5.4 LOCAL LANDMARKS ....................................................................................................... 43 6.0 VICTORIA STREET WEST- PRECINCT 1 ............................................................................... 46 6.1 DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................. 46 6.2 ZONING ......................................................................................................................... 47 6.3 HERITAGE STATUS .......................................................................................................... 47 6.4 POTENTIAL FUTURE CHARACTER CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................... 49 6.5 RECOMMENDED BUILT FORM PARAMETERS……………………………………………………………………..49 7.0 VICTORIA STREET CENTRAL - PRECINCT 2 ......................................................................... 52 7.1 DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................. 52 7.2 ZONING ......................................................................................................................... 53 7.3 HERITAGE STATUS .......................................................................................................... 54 7.4 POTENTIAL FUTURE CHARACTER CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................... 56 7.5 RECOMMENDED BUILT FORM PARAMETERS.................................................................... 56 8.0 NORTH RICHMOND STATION - PRECINCT 3 ...................................................................... 58 8.1 DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................. 58 8.2 ZONING ......................................................................................................................... 60 8.3 HERITAGE STATUS .......................................................................................................... 60 8.4 POTENTIAL FUTURE CHARACTER CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................... 61 8.5 RECOMMENDED BUILT FORM PARAMETERS.................................................................... 62 9.0 VICTORIA STREET EAST - PRECINCT 4 ............................................................................... 64 9.1 DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................. 64 9.2 ZONING ......................................................................................................................... 66 9.3 HERITAGE STATUS .......................................................................................................... 66 9.4 POTENTIAL FUTURE CHARACTER CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................... 68 9.5 RECOMMENDED BUILT FORM PARAMETERS.................................................................... 69 10.0 VICTORIA STREET END - PRECINCT 5 ................................................................................ 71 10.1 DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................. 71 10.2 ZONING ......................................................................................................................... 73 10.3 HERITAGE STATUS .......................................................................................................... 73 10.4 POTENTIAL FUTURE CHARACTER CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................... 75 10.5 RECOMMENDED BUILT FORM PARAMETERS.................................................................... 76 PART III: BUILT FORM RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................ 78 Victoria Parade: Heritage Analysis & Recommendations | PAGE 4 11.0 BUILT FORM TESTING ...................................................................................................... 79 12.0 BUILT FORM RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................. 80 12.1 RECOMMENDED DDO CONTROLS – PRECINCT 1 .............................................................. 80 12.2 RECOMMENDED DDO CONTROLS – PRECINCT 2 .............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 285. La Trobe
    In the matter of the NORTH EAST LINK PROJECT INQUIRY AND ADVISORY COMMITTEE SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF LA TROBE UNIVERSITY THE PROJECT ................................................................................................................................... 2 FRAMEWORK FOR THE INQUIRY ............................................................................................... 3 The IAC’s Terms of Reference ................................................................................................. 3 The EES Scoping Requirements ............................................................................................... 4 The IAC’s report ....................................................................................................................... 6 EVIDENCE......................................................................................................................................... 6 LA TROBE UNIVERSITY IS A SIGNIFICANT ASSET TO THE REGION ................................. 8 The University is one of the north’s largest employers ............................................................ 8 The University has significant plans to become the University City of the Future .................. 8 Kingsbury Drive is of significance to the University and the region ....................................... 9 THE UNIVERSITY SUPPORTS THE PROJECT .......................................................................... 13 THE PROJECT’S TREATMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT SHOULD BE IMPROVED .......... 14 Planning policy
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Railways
    VICTORIA RAILWAYS - SL 120 13.11.18 page 1 of 20 PASSENGER STATIONS & STOPS Including lines in New South Wales and South Australia operated by Victorian Railways Based on Bradshaws Guide 1859 (x), Victorian Rlys (VR) Public TT (t) 1875 (y), Bradshaws Guide 1897 (z), Public TT 1912 (a), Bradshaws Guide 1924(b), Public TTs 1934 (c), 1954 (d), 1972 (e) & current TTs (f). Also 1880TT (n), Bradshaw 1930 (p), Public TTs 1941 (q), 1959 (r), 1967 (s), 1978 (t) & 1985 (u). Working TTs 1926 (v) & 1950/51 (w). a+: 1912t notes former name; a++: 1912t fares list (date)t/w other Public/Working TTs; P: 1909 Parliamentary paper with date renamed; k: 1940 TT notice # research by Langley & Whitehead, Guiney & Watson/Johnson map – date: cl/rn/rl; x-f = xyzabcdef etc. Former names: [ ]; Distances in Miles unless headed Km. Gauge 5’ 3” unless noted. R.M. : Rail Motor. op. opened; cl. closed; rn. renamed; rl. relocated; tm. terminus of service at date shown; pass?: passenger service? All dates refer to passenger services only. All locations served by passenger trains unless shown in italics in brackets, or noted. Passengers could also travel in goods trains on many lines both before and after withdrawal of advertised passenger services. 1. MELBOURNE - DENILIQUIN 82.7 Harcourt y-e + lowered into subway 2018 90.3 Ravenswood y-d 97.3 Kangaroo Flat (1st) # 1863 0.0 Melbourne (Southern Cross) f (23, 33,54, 85, 87) 97.7 Kangaroo Flat (2nd) yz.b-eu [Kangaroo a ] [Melbourne (VR) xy] 99.3 Golden Square z-e [Melbourne (Spencer Street) (rn.2005) z-e ] 100.7 Bendigo z-f [Sandhurst xy ] (11, 14, 56) 1.0 North Melbourne y-f (85, 87) 102.0 North Bendigo Junction a-e 2.3 South Kensington z-f [Bendigo Cattle Siding a+ ] 2.7 Saltwater River # 1867 104.3 Bendigo Racecourse w 3.5 Footscray (2nd) a-f (33) [Sandhurst Racecourse #1910 ] 3.7 Middle Footscray (1st) z [Footscray (1st) xy ] [Bendigo (Epsom) Racecourse a++ ] 3.8 Middle Footscray (2nd) ab 105.3 Epsom abcd.f [Epsom & Huntly 1865t ] 4.0 Middle Footscray (3rd) cdef 108.0 Huntly zabc 4.5 West Footscray a-f [Footscray West z ] 112.0 Bagshot z-e 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I Complementary Projects
    Appendix I Complementary Projects February 2018 B Contents Executive summary....................................................................................................................................... 3 Complementary projects ................................................................................................................................... 3 Recommendation .............................................................................................................................................. 4 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2 Scope framework ............................................................................................................................... 6 3 Complementary projects .................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Arterial road network improvement opportunities ........................................................... 7 3.1.1 E6 transport corridor ...................................................................................................................... 8 3.1.2 Rosanna Road upgrade ................................................................................................................. 11 3.1.3 Diamond Creek road upgrade ....................................................................................................... 12 3.1.4 Templestowe Road upgrade ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • East West Link (Eastern Section) Project
    I Major Transport Projects Facilitation Act 2009 East West Link (Eastern Section) Project Assessment Committee Report Volume 1 ‐ Report 30 May 2014 Major Transport Projects Facilitation Act 2009 Assessment Committee Report pursuant to Section 73 of the Act East West Link (Eastern Section) Project Kathryn Mitchell, Chair Nick Wimbush, Deputy Chair Lyn Denison, Member Des Grogan, Member Jim Holdsworth, Member William O’Neil, Member East West Link (Eastern Section) Project Assessment Committee Report 30 May 2014 Contents Page Executive Summary and Recommendations ......................................................................... i Part A: Background .............................................................................................................. 1 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 The Assessment Committee .................................................................................... 3 1.2 Terms of Reference and Role of the Committee .................................................... 3 1.3 Approach to this Report .......................................................................................... 5 1.4 Matters not Considered in Detail ............................................................................ 6 2 The Project.................................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Project Area Precincts ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Banyule Municipal Economic Information Base
    ECONOMIC INFORMATION BASE MUNICIPAL REPORT (FINAL) BANYULE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 2017 URBAN ENTERPRISE URBAN PLANNING LAND ECONOMICS TOURISM PLANNING INDUSTRY SOFTWARE 389 ST GEORGES RD NORTH FITZROY 3068 VIC | PH: (03) 9482 3888 | WWW.URBANENTERPRISE.COM.AU AUTHORS Paul Shipp Chris Funtera Brett Hannah URBAN ENTERPRISE URBAN PLANNING LAND ECONOMICS TOURISM PLANNING INDUSTRY SOFTWARE 389 ST GEORGES RD, FITZROY NORTH, VIC 3068| PH: (03) 9482 3888 www.urbanenterprise.com.au © Copyright, Urban Enterprise Pty Ltd, 2017 This work is copyright. Apart from any uses permitted under Copyright Act 1963, no part may be reproduced without written permission of Urban Enterprise Pty Ltd. FILENAME: Banyule Municipal Economic Information_June17_Final.docx VERSION: 2 DISCLAIMER Neither Urban Enterprise Pty. Ltd. nor any member or employee of Urban Enterprise Pty. Ltd. takes responsibility in any way whatsoever to any person or organisation (other than that for which this report has been prepared) in respect of the information set out in this report, including any errors or omissions therein. In the course of our preparation of this report, projections have been prepared on the basis of assumptions and methodology which have been described in the report. It is possible that some of the assumptions underlying the projections may change. Nevertheless, the professional judgement of the members and employees of Urban Enterprise Pty. Ltd. have been applied in making these assumptions, such that they constitute an understandable basis for estimates and projections. Beyond this, to the extent that the assumptions do not materialise, the estimates and projections of achievable results may vary. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Monday, 24 February 2020 7.00Pm
    Agenda Monday, 24 February 2020 7.00pm Ordinary Meeting of Council Olympia, Hawdon & Ibbott Rooms Level 4, 1 Flintoff Street, Greensborough Acknowledgement of the Traditional Custodians “Our meeting is being held on the Traditional Land of the Wurundjeri Woi-wurrung people and, on behalf of Banyule City Council, I wish to acknowledge them as the Traditional Custodians. I would also like to pay my respects to the Wurundjeri Woi- wurrung Elders, past, present and emerging, and to acknowledge other Aboriginal and Torres Strait Elders joining us today.” Apologies and Leave of Absence Confirmation of Minutes Ordinary Meeting of Council held 3 February 2020 and Special Meeting of Council held 10 February 2020. Disclosure of Interests 1. Urgent Business REPORTS: 2. Petitions Nil 3. People – Community Strengthening and Support 3.1 Himilo Community Connect - Request for Financial Support ......... 5 4. Planet – Environmental Sustainability Nil 5. Place – Sustainable Amenity and Built Environment 5.1 Bellfield Community Hub Concept Plan ...................................... 11 5.2 Hurstbridge Line Duplication - Stage 2 - Update ......................... 16 5.3 21 - 25 Bellevue Avenue, Rosanna - Proposed Child Care Centre - P954/2019 .................................................................................. 23 6. Participation – Community Involvement in Community Life Nil 7. Performance - Use Our Resources Wisely 7.1 Contract Award 1022-2020 Construction of Olympic Park Stage 2 ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rosanna Station Development Combined Planning Scheme Amendment and Planning Permit Application Town Planning and Urban Context Report
    Rosanna Station Development Combined Planning Scheme Amendment and Planning Permit Application Town Planning and Urban Context Report Date prepared Prepared for Instructed by February 2021 Beetham Parade Pty Ltd SEMZ Property Advisory and Project Management Table of Contents Section Page No. ____________________________________________________________ 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Overview 3 1.2 Background 3 2 The Site and its Context 5 2.1 The Site 5 2.2 Wider Context 7 2.3 Opportunities and Constraints 8 3 Existing Planning Controls and Policy 9 3.1 Planning Controls and Provisions 9 3.2 Planning Policy Framework 11 3.3 Aboriginal Cultural Heritage 12 4 Planning Scheme Amendment 13 4.1 Overview of the Amendment 13 4.2 Proposed Zone 13 ratio:consultants pty ltd 4.3 Strategic Assessment 14 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced without written permission of ratio:consultants pty ltd. 5 Planning Permit Application 22 Disclaimer: neither ratio:consultants pty ltd nor any member or employee of 5.1 The Proposal 22 ratio:consultants pty ltd takes responsibility in anyway whatsoever to any person or 5.2 Assessment of the Permit Application Proposal 25 organisation (other than that for which this report is being prepared) in respect of the information set out in this report, including any errors or omissions therein. ratio:consultants pty ltd is not liable for errors in plans, specifications, documentation 6 Conclusion 39 or other advice not prepared or designed by ratio:consultants pty ltd. Appendices: Appendix A Clause 58 Assessment Rosanna Station development site – S96a Application Planning Report 2 1 Introduction 1.1 Overview development proposal in relation to relevant policies and provisions of the Banyule Planning Scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget 2020/2021 Contents
    Budget 2020/2021 Contents MAYOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER INTRODUCTION ..... 3 EXECUTIVE BUDGET SUMMARY ....................................................... 6 BUDGET REPORTS .............................................................................. 14 1. LINKAGE TO THE COUNCIL PLAN ......................................................................... 14 2. SERVICES, INITIATIVES AND SERVICE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ....................... 22 3. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ........................................................................................ 58 4. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS COMPARISON ...................................... 64 5. CAPITAL WORKS PROGRAM AND INITIATIVES PROGRAM ..................................... 89 6. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ............................................................ 122 7. FEES AND CHARGES SCHEDULE (INCOME) .......................................................... 124 Banyule City Council Budget – 2020/2021 2 Mayor and Chief Executive Officer Introduction The preparation of this Budget started long before the arrival of COVID-19, yet we have seen how quickly this pandemic is having a devastating financial implication on many organisations and individuals. Banyule Council is adjusting its operations to address the situation. We are proposing a budget that looks to ensure the long-term financial sustainability of Council while providing substantial support to ratepayers, residents and businesses through this unprecedented health and economic crisis. Now, more than ever,
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    1976-77 VICTORIA COUNTRY ROADS BOARD SIXTY-FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT FOR YEAR ENDED 30th JUNE, 1977 PRESENTED TO BOTH HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT PURSUANT TO ACT No. 6229 By Amhority: F. D. ATKINSON, GOVERNMENT PRINTER, MELBOURNE No. 95-10584/77-PRICE $1.10 Country Roads Board Victoria Sixty-fourth Annual Report for year ended 30th June, 1977 Presented to both Houses of Parliament pursuant to Act No. 6229 R. E. V. Donaldson Chairman T. H. Russell Deputy Chairman W S. Brake Member Principal Officers Dr. K. G. E. Moody as at 30th June, 1977 Engineer in Chief N. L. Allanson Secretary R. G. Cooper Chief Accountant N. S. Guerin Deputy Engineer in Chief C. C. Liddell Deputy Secretary R. J. C. Bulman Deputy Chief Accountant Divisional Engineers and A. N. Jephcott Regional Divisional Offices Bairnsdale E. T. Oppy Ballarat R. R. Patterson Benalla T. M. Glazebrook Bendigo S.H.Hodgson Dandenong G. W. Marshallsea Geelong J. W Heid Hors ham L. M. Jones Cover: A range of locations showing the various Metropolitan uses the Board makes of plant growth on the roadside. The Board planted 129,246 Dr. D. T. Currie trees and shrubs throughout the State during 1976-77, at a cost of $46,813. Of Traralgon the total figure. 90,471 trees and shrubs were planted within the Board's two divisions which cover Metropolitan F. G. Lodge Melbourne and its surrounds. Warrnambool Pictured are (from top to bottom): 1. Trees now established on the Ovens Highway, near Tarrawingee. 2. Creek treatment and rest area, Princes Highway East near Rosedale.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Proposed Redistribution of Victoria Into Electoral Divisions
    The 2010 Proposed Redistribution of Victoria into Electoral Divisions Report of the Redistribution Committee Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 Section 68 Table of contents Executive summary 1 The 2010 Proposed Redistribution of Victoria Report of the Redistribution Committee 3 Representation of Victoria in the House of Representatives 3 Direction for a redistribution of Victorian electoral divisions 3 Quota 3 Enrolment projections 4 Appointment of the Redistribution Committee for Victoria 5 Invitations to submit public suggestions and comments 5 Statutory requirements for the making of a proposed redistribution 6 Technical procedures 8 Analysis of population trends 9 Enrolment in existing divisions as at 1 February 2010 10 Projected enrolment growth 12 Enrolment projections for existing divisions as at 17 June 2014 12 General strategy 17 Public suggestions and comments 18 Guidelines for the naming of divisions 20 Renaming of division 20 Proposed redistribution of Victoria – by division 22 Conclusion 45 Table 1 – Determination of the quota 4 Table 2 – Enrolment projections at 17 June 2014 5 Table 3 – Key themes 19 Table 4 – Divisions in order of discussion 22 Table 5 – Enrolment of existing divisions 46 Table 6 – Summary of proposed divisions 48 Table 7 – Summary of movement of electors between divisions 50 Table 8 – General description of how proposed divisions are constituted 51 Graph 1 – Variation from enrolment quota as at 1 February 2010 for existing divisions 11 Graph 2 – Variation from average projected enrolment as at 17 June 2014 for existing divisions 14 Map 1 – Projected enrolment for existing divisions – Provincial and rural Victoria 15 Map 2 – Projected enrolment for existing divisions – Metropolitan Victoria 16 Map 3 – Proposed Division of Burke – 1860 expedition camps 21 Enclosures Map 1 – Provincial and rural divisions Map 2 – Metropolitan divisions CD – Containing the public suggestions and comments received on those suggestions and maps.
    [Show full text]
  • North East Link (NEL) Traffic and Transport Review Expert Evidence Statement
    North East Link (NEL) Traffic and Transport Review Expert Evidence Statement Prepared by: GTA Consultants (VIC) Pty Ltd for North East Link Project on 15/07/19 Reference: V153791 Issue #: Final North East Link (NEL) Traffic and Transport Review Expert Evidence Statement Client: North East Link Project Instructed by: Clayton Utz Hearing Date: 25/07/19 Report Date: 15/07/19 Reference: V153791 Issue #: Final © GTA Consultants (VIC) Pty Ltd [ABN 34 137 610 381] 2019 The information contained in this document is confidential and intended solely for the use of the client for the purpose for which it has been prepared and no representation is made or is to be implied as being made to any third party. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part Melbourne | Sydney | Brisbane without the written permission of GTA Consultants constitutes an infringement of copyright. The intellectual property contained in this Adelaide | Perth document remains the property of GTA Consultants. CONTENTS Introduction 1 1.1. Introduction 1 1.2. Qualifications and Experience 1 1.3. Relationship to Applicant 1 1.4. GTA Peer Review of the TTIA 1 1.5. Further Work Since Preparation of the GTA Peer Review Report 2 1.6. Expert Evidence Statement Scope & Purpose 3 1.7. References 6 1.8. Consideration of Submissions 6 1.9. Summary of Key Issues, Opinions and Recommendations 6 1.10. Declaration 13 Project Background 14 2.1. Introduction 14 2.2. Project Rationale 14 2.3. Key Transport Issues Sought to be Resolved by NEL 18 2.4. Public Works Order 23 2.5.
    [Show full text]
  • A Transport System for Melbourne's East That Won
    EASTERN METRO RAPID BUS NETWORK THE GREENS PLAN TO GET PEOPLE MOVING ACROSS MELBOURNE’S EAST A TRANSPORT SYSTEM FOR MELBOURNE’S EAST THAT WON’T TAKE DECADES TO BUILD dependence and congestion. And it can be If you live in Melbourne’s East, from Box Hill to deployed within a couple of years – not 10 Croydon, Eltham to Ferntree Gully, you know years like the construction of the proposed toll that congestion on our roads is getting worse. road. You also know that while you may have a train station near you, it only goes in one direction: THE GREENS PLAN towards the city. Our plan will build on our existing transport There are very few options for getting around network by adding a new Rapid Bus Network to the East. Which is a massive problem: students provide better transport choices for those who that study at Monash University or La Trobe want them. This will reduce demand for limited University have no reliable public transport to road space on every congested road in the get there. Workers trying to get across to a region. workplace in the East have no option but to drive. Nearly all trips default to car trips Providing rapid transit links within the region will because there is no alternative. make it easier to reduce traffic congestion, and increase local economic activity by reducing Every morning peak travel times become more transport costs for those who would prefer to unreliable, forcing people to get up earlier just spend their money on other things. in case the traffic is bad.
    [Show full text]