DOCSLIB.ORG

Rosanna Station Development Combined Planning Scheme Amendment and Planning Permit Application Town Planning and Urban Context Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rosanna Station Development Combined Planning Scheme Amendment and Planning Permit Application Town Planning and Urban Context Report Rosanna Station Development Combined Planning Scheme Amendment and Planning Permit Application Town Planning and Urban Context Report Date prepared Prepared for Instructed by February 2021 Beetham Parade Pty Ltd SEMZ Property Advisory and Project Management Table of Contents Section Page No. ____________________________________________________________ 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Overview 3 1.2 Background 3 2 The Site and its Context 5 2.1 The Site 5 2.2 Wider Context 7 2.3 Opportunities and Constraints 8 3 Existing Planning Controls and Policy 9 3.1 Planning Controls and Provisions 9 3.2 Planning Policy Framework 11 3.3 Aboriginal Cultural Heritage 12 4 Planning Scheme Amendment 13 4.1 Overview of the Amendment 13 4.2 Proposed Zone 13 ratio:consultants pty ltd 4.3 Strategic Assessment 14 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced without written permission of ratio:consultants pty ltd. 5 Planning Permit Application 22 Disclaimer: neither ratio:consultants pty ltd nor any member or employee of 5.1 The Proposal 22 ratio:consultants pty ltd takes responsibility in anyway whatsoever to any person or 5.2 Assessment of the Permit Application Proposal 25 organisation (other than that for which this report is being prepared) in respect of the information set out in this report, including any errors or omissions therein. ratio:consultants pty ltd is not liable for errors in plans, specifications, documentation 6 Conclusion 39 or other advice not prepared or designed by ratio:consultants pty ltd. Appendices: Appendix A Clause 58 Assessment Rosanna Station development site – S96a Application Planning Report 2 1 Introduction 1.1 Overview development proposal in relation to relevant policies and provisions of the Banyule Planning Scheme. This report has been prepared on behalf of Beetham Parade Pty Ltd The report should be read in conjunction with: and accompanies a request for a combined Planning Scheme Amendment and Planning Permit Application (pursuant to Section ― The Architectural Plans prepared by C. Kairouz Architects (dated 96A of the Planning and Environment Act 1987) for land located on 5 February 2021) the eastern side of Beetham Parade, Rosanna. ― Landscape Plans prepared by Site Image Landscape Architects The land subject of this request (the subject site) has been identified ― Traffic Impact Assessment report prepared by Traffix Group as surplus to State Government requirements, following the removal ― Waste Management Report prepared by Leigh Design of the Lower Plenty Road Level crossing and the construction of the ― Acoustic Assessment Report prepared by Marshall Day new Rosanna Station. Acoustics Beetham Parade Pty Ltd has entered into a Development ― An Arboricultural Assessment prepared by Treelogic Agreement for the development of the subject site. ― ESD Report prepared by Ark Resources The combined amendment/application seeks to facilitate the ― Site Environmental Report prepared by Douglas Partners development of the subject site for a mixed-use building comprising ― Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Advice prepared by Andrew Long ground floor office and food and drink uses with residential and Associates apartments at the upper levels. ― A draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by Hellier McFarland More specifically: ― A draft planning permit prepared by Ratio Consultants ― Planning Scheme Amendment documents comprising an ― The Planning Scheme Amendment seeks to rezone the subject Explanatory Report, Instruction Sheet and Proposed Zone Map. site from the Public Use Zone (PUZ4) to the Commercial 1 Zone (C1Z) 1.2 Background ― The Planning Permit Application seeks approval for subdivision to excise the subject site from railway corridor land; construction The State Government is undertaking a substantial infrastructure of a 7-storey building, plus basement car park, comprising office, investment programme with the core aim of removing 75 level food and drink and residential uses (71 no. apartments); a crossings from Melbourne’s metropolitan rail network by 2025. reduction in car parking requirement; and creation of a light and As part of this programme, the project is identifying sites, where air easement. surplus land is suitable for development which can deliver housing This report provides an overview of the site’s physical and planning or commercial uses in proximity to public transport services and policy context and provides a strategic assessment of the proposed generate funds for re-investment in the transport network. planning scheme amendment and an assessment of the In Rosanna, the level crossing at Lower Plenty Road was removed by building a rail bridge over the road in 2018, along with the Rosanna Station development site – S96a Application Planning Report 3 associated construction of a new elevated railway station with improved passenger accessibility and public realm works. The site the subject of this report was formerly an area of at-grade car parking associated with the station and was used as construction compound during the level crossing works and is now surplus to requirements for railway operations. It has been identified as an opportunity site with the potential for transit-oriented mixed-use development that can capitalise on the site’s excellent connectivity to the rail network and proximity to Rosanna Station and a range of services and facilities within the Rosana Neighbourhood Centre. The Land is currently located in the Public Use Zone (PUZ4 – Transport) and a rezoning is therefore required to facilitate mixed use development. Consideration of various planning approval pathways was undertaken in conjunction with DELWP officers and ultimately it was agreed that a combined Planning Scheme Amendment and Planning Permit Application was the most appropriate route for this site. Rosanna Station development site – S96a Application Planning Report 4 2 The Site and its Context 2.1 The Site ― To the south is the public access road to the Rosanna Station car park, which provides for a single lane of traffic in either The subject site is located on the eastern side of Beetham Parade, direction and no pedestrian footpaths. South of the access road approximately 145m south of Lower Plenty Road and opposite the is the southern part of the station car park, with an electricity intersection with Hillside Road. substation beyond. The site’s location is shown at Figure 1 and Figure 2 on the following To the east is the Rosanna Station car park which extends under pages. ― the elevated rail viaduct through to Turnham Avenue, as well as It currently forms part of a wider parcel known as Lot 2 on PS506016 pedestrian connections to the station itself. and its dimensions are shown on the provisional Plan of Subdivision To the west of the site is Beetham Parade, a local road which included in the application. ― connects the Rosanna Neighbourhood Centre with the The site is rectangular in shape, with a frontage to Beetham Parade residential area further south. North of Hillside Road, the west measuring 65.6m and a depth of 19.9m, giving an overall site area of side of Beetham Parade is developed with a series of single and 1,309sqm. There is a general fall across the site from west to east, double storey retail and commercial premises and some shop- with a drop of between 1.6m-2m from Beetham Parade to the top dwellings. South of Hillside Road, the west side of Beetham station car park. Parade is developed with a series of single dwellings and unit developments of one or two storeys. The site is not currently in use. It is fenced and is surfaced in a combination of ashhalt and gravel, with some small trees and shrubs located along the Beetham Parade boundary. No vehicle access is currently to the site from the road network. In terms of its immediate surrounds: ― To the north is a public footpath that provides a pedestrian connection between Beetham Parade and Rosanna Station and car park. North of this is a three-storey development comprising ground level retail tenancies fronting the street, with dwellings above. This building is located approximately 9m from the site’s northern boundary and addresses the pedestrian link with an end elevation comprising ground level parking grilles and windows to apartments at the levels above. Rosanna Station development site – S96a Application Planning Report 5 Figure 1 – Aerial photo of site location (source: Nearmap) Rosanna Station development site – S96a Application Planning Report 6 2.2 Wider Context In its wider context, the site is located at the southern end of the Rosanna Neighbourhood Centre identified in Council’s MSS (Clause 22.02 Strategic Framework) and approximately 1.4km north-east of the Heidelberg Major Activity Centre. The Rosanna centre is centred on the railway line and station and comprises a range of retail and commercial uses extending along Lower Plenty Road and Beetham Parade west of the railway and a series of community uses and facilities to the east along Turnham Avenue. It is a relatively compact centre which enjoys excellent public transport accessibility and provides for a range of services and facilities to serve the local community. These include an IGA supermarket, convenience and specialty shops, food and drink premises and commercial services. Community facilities along Turnham Avenue include the Rosanna Library, Heidelberg Theatre Company and a childcare centre. In addition, planning approval has been granted for the redevelopment of the former Council offices to accommodate a full-line Woolworths supermarket. In terms of transport connectivity: ― Rosanna Railway Station provides frequent rail services on the Hurstbridge line to higher order activity centre such as Heidelberg and Greensborough as well as to the Melbourne CBD. ― Bus Routes 513 and 517 operate from the eastern side of Rosanna Railway Station via Turnham Avenue. ― The site also has access to bicycle infrastructure with off-road shared paths extending to the north and south of the site alongside the railway line with a signalised crossing across Lower Plenty Road, as well as a number of off-road paths along the Rosanna Parklands and on-road bicycle lanes along Station Road.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 285. La Trobe
    In the matter of the NORTH EAST LINK PROJECT INQUIRY AND ADVISORY COMMITTEE SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF LA TROBE UNIVERSITY THE PROJECT ................................................................................................................................... 2 FRAMEWORK FOR THE INQUIRY ............................................................................................... 3 The IAC’s Terms of Reference ................................................................................................. 3 The EES Scoping Requirements ............................................................................................... 4 The IAC’s report ....................................................................................................................... 6 EVIDENCE......................................................................................................................................... 6 LA TROBE UNIVERSITY IS A SIGNIFICANT ASSET TO THE REGION ................................. 8 The University is one of the north’s largest employers ............................................................ 8 The University has significant plans to become the University City of the Future .................. 8 Kingsbury Drive is of significance to the University and the region ....................................... 9 THE UNIVERSITY SUPPORTS THE PROJECT .......................................................................... 13 THE PROJECT’S TREATMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT SHOULD BE IMPROVED .......... 14 Planning policy
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Railways
    VICTORIA RAILWAYS - SL 120 13.11.18 page 1 of 20 PASSENGER STATIONS & STOPS Including lines in New South Wales and South Australia operated by Victorian Railways Based on Bradshaws Guide 1859 (x), Victorian Rlys (VR) Public TT (t) 1875 (y), Bradshaws Guide 1897 (z), Public TT 1912 (a), Bradshaws Guide 1924(b), Public TTs 1934 (c), 1954 (d), 1972 (e) & current TTs (f). Also 1880TT (n), Bradshaw 1930 (p), Public TTs 1941 (q), 1959 (r), 1967 (s), 1978 (t) & 1985 (u). Working TTs 1926 (v) & 1950/51 (w). a+: 1912t notes former name; a++: 1912t fares list (date)t/w other Public/Working TTs; P: 1909 Parliamentary paper with date renamed; k: 1940 TT notice # research by Langley & Whitehead, Guiney & Watson/Johnson map – date: cl/rn/rl; x-f = xyzabcdef etc. Former names: [ ]; Distances in Miles unless headed Km. Gauge 5’ 3” unless noted. R.M. : Rail Motor. op. opened; cl. closed; rn. renamed; rl. relocated; tm. terminus of service at date shown; pass?: passenger service? All dates refer to passenger services only. All locations served by passenger trains unless shown in italics in brackets, or noted. Passengers could also travel in goods trains on many lines both before and after withdrawal of advertised passenger services. 1. MELBOURNE - DENILIQUIN 82.7 Harcourt y-e + lowered into subway 2018 90.3 Ravenswood y-d 97.3 Kangaroo Flat (1st) # 1863 0.0 Melbourne (Southern Cross) f (23, 33,54, 85, 87) 97.7 Kangaroo Flat (2nd) yz.b-eu [Kangaroo a ] [Melbourne (VR) xy] 99.3 Golden Square z-e [Melbourne (Spencer Street) (rn.2005) z-e ] 100.7 Bendigo z-f [Sandhurst xy ] (11, 14, 56) 1.0 North Melbourne y-f (85, 87) 102.0 North Bendigo Junction a-e 2.3 South Kensington z-f [Bendigo Cattle Siding a+ ] 2.7 Saltwater River # 1867 104.3 Bendigo Racecourse w 3.5 Footscray (2nd) a-f (33) [Sandhurst Racecourse #1910 ] 3.7 Middle Footscray (1st) z [Footscray (1st) xy ] [Bendigo (Epsom) Racecourse a++ ] 3.8 Middle Footscray (2nd) ab 105.3 Epsom abcd.f [Epsom & Huntly 1865t ] 4.0 Middle Footscray (3rd) cdef 108.0 Huntly zabc 4.5 West Footscray a-f [Footscray West z ] 112.0 Bagshot z-e 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Built Form Review: Victoria Street, Abbotsford & Richmond Heritage Analysis & Recommendations
    Level 3, 124 Exhibition Street [GPO Box 2634, Melbourne 3001] Melbourne, Victoria 3000 [email protected] +61 (03) 9115 6566 gjmheritage.com ABN: 62 348 237 636 ARBV: 51910 BUILT FORM REVIEW: VICTORIA STREET, ABBOTSFORD & RICHMOND HERITAGE ANALYSIS & RECOMMENDATIONS PREPARED FOR: City of Yarra DATE: 12 April 2021 FILE: 2020-052 © GJM Heritage (2021) All Rights Reserved This report is limited in its scope to consideration of post-contact cultural heritage and does not provide advice on any Aboriginal cultural heritage significance. The subject site forms part of the 37.5% of Victoria where there is currently no formally recognized Traditional Owner groups. Nonetheless, we acknowledge the Traditional Owners of the land at this place and pay our respects to their Elders past, present and emerging. For more information, please visit https://www.aboriginalvictoria.vic.gov.au PROJECT TEAM Jim Gard’ner | Director Renae Jarman | Director Ros Coleman | Senior Associate Jessi Briggs | Associate Jessica Hogg | Heritage Consultant Cover Image: Looking west down the northern side of Victoria Street from opposite the intersection of Lithgow Street, January 2021. GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS C1Z Commercial 1 Zone C2Z Commercial 2 Zone DDO Design and Development Overlay DELWP Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning GRZ General Residential Zone HO Heritage Overlay MAC Major Activity Centre MUZ Mixed Use Zone NAC Neighbourhood Activity Centre NRZ Neighbourhood Residential Zone PPN Planning Practice Note PUZ Public Use Zone SUZ Special Use Zone VHR Victorian Heritage Register All photos taken by GJM Heritage during 2017, 2018 and in January 2021 unless otherwise stated. DOCUMENT VERSIONS Project No.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I Complementary Projects
    Appendix I Complementary Projects February 2018 B Contents Executive summary....................................................................................................................................... 3 Complementary projects ................................................................................................................................... 3 Recommendation .............................................................................................................................................. 4 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2 Scope framework ............................................................................................................................... 6 3 Complementary projects .................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Arterial road network improvement opportunities ........................................................... 7 3.1.1 E6 transport corridor ...................................................................................................................... 8 3.1.2 Rosanna Road upgrade ................................................................................................................. 11 3.1.3 Diamond Creek road upgrade ....................................................................................................... 12 3.1.4 Templestowe Road upgrade ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • East West Link (Eastern Section) Project
    I Major Transport Projects Facilitation Act 2009 East West Link (Eastern Section) Project Assessment Committee Report Volume 1 ‐ Report 30 May 2014 Major Transport Projects Facilitation Act 2009 Assessment Committee Report pursuant to Section 73 of the Act East West Link (Eastern Section) Project Kathryn Mitchell, Chair Nick Wimbush, Deputy Chair Lyn Denison, Member Des Grogan, Member Jim Holdsworth, Member William O’Neil, Member East West Link (Eastern Section) Project Assessment Committee Report 30 May 2014 Contents Page Executive Summary and Recommendations ......................................................................... i Part A: Background .............................................................................................................. 1 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 The Assessment Committee .................................................................................... 3 1.2 Terms of Reference and Role of the Committee .................................................... 3 1.3 Approach to this Report .......................................................................................... 5 1.4 Matters not Considered in Detail ............................................................................ 6 2 The Project.................................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Project Area Precincts ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Banyule Municipal Economic Information Base
    ECONOMIC INFORMATION BASE MUNICIPAL REPORT (FINAL) BANYULE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 2017 URBAN ENTERPRISE URBAN PLANNING LAND ECONOMICS TOURISM PLANNING INDUSTRY SOFTWARE 389 ST GEORGES RD NORTH FITZROY 3068 VIC | PH: (03) 9482 3888 | WWW.URBANENTERPRISE.COM.AU AUTHORS Paul Shipp Chris Funtera Brett Hannah URBAN ENTERPRISE URBAN PLANNING LAND ECONOMICS TOURISM PLANNING INDUSTRY SOFTWARE 389 ST GEORGES RD, FITZROY NORTH, VIC 3068| PH: (03) 9482 3888 www.urbanenterprise.com.au © Copyright, Urban Enterprise Pty Ltd, 2017 This work is copyright. Apart from any uses permitted under Copyright Act 1963, no part may be reproduced without written permission of Urban Enterprise Pty Ltd. FILENAME: Banyule Municipal Economic Information_June17_Final.docx VERSION: 2 DISCLAIMER Neither Urban Enterprise Pty. Ltd. nor any member or employee of Urban Enterprise Pty. Ltd. takes responsibility in any way whatsoever to any person or organisation (other than that for which this report has been prepared) in respect of the information set out in this report, including any errors or omissions therein. In the course of our preparation of this report, projections have been prepared on the basis of assumptions and methodology which have been described in the report. It is possible that some of the assumptions underlying the projections may change. Nevertheless, the professional judgement of the members and employees of Urban Enterprise Pty. Ltd. have been applied in making these assumptions, such that they constitute an understandable basis for estimates and projections. Beyond this, to the extent that the assumptions do not materialise, the estimates and projections of achievable results may vary. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Monday, 24 February 2020 7.00Pm
    Agenda Monday, 24 February 2020 7.00pm Ordinary Meeting of Council Olympia, Hawdon & Ibbott Rooms Level 4, 1 Flintoff Street, Greensborough Acknowledgement of the Traditional Custodians “Our meeting is being held on the Traditional Land of the Wurundjeri Woi-wurrung people and, on behalf of Banyule City Council, I wish to acknowledge them as the Traditional Custodians. I would also like to pay my respects to the Wurundjeri Woi- wurrung Elders, past, present and emerging, and to acknowledge other Aboriginal and Torres Strait Elders joining us today.” Apologies and Leave of Absence Confirmation of Minutes Ordinary Meeting of Council held 3 February 2020 and Special Meeting of Council held 10 February 2020. Disclosure of Interests 1. Urgent Business REPORTS: 2. Petitions Nil 3. People – Community Strengthening and Support 3.1 Himilo Community Connect - Request for Financial Support ......... 5 4. Planet – Environmental Sustainability Nil 5. Place – Sustainable Amenity and Built Environment 5.1 Bellfield Community Hub Concept Plan ...................................... 11 5.2 Hurstbridge Line Duplication - Stage 2 - Update ......................... 16 5.3 21 - 25 Bellevue Avenue, Rosanna - Proposed Child Care Centre - P954/2019 .................................................................................. 23 6. Participation – Community Involvement in Community Life Nil 7. Performance - Use Our Resources Wisely 7.1 Contract Award 1022-2020 Construction of Olympic Park Stage 2 ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Banyule Bicycle Strategy
    Draft Strategy Banyule Bicycle Strategy Draft Strategy Banyule Bicycle Strategy V190811 Prepared for Banyule City Council 3 February 2021 3 February 2021 Cardno i Draft Strategy Banyule Bicycle Strategy Contact Information Document Information Cardno Victoria Pty Ltd Prepared for Banyule City Council ABN 47 106 610 913 Project Name Banyule Bicycle Strategy Level 4 File Reference V190811REP004F01.docx 501 Swanston Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Job Reference V190811 Australia Date 03/02/2021 www.cardno.com Version Number F01 Phone +61 3 8415 7777 Fax +61 3 8415 7788 Author(s): Joshua Hiscock (Engineer) Effective Date 3/02/2021 Callum Thomas (Project Engineer) Approved By: Matthew Mudge Date Approved 3/02/2021 Associate Transport Engineer Document History Version Effective Date Description of Revision Prepared by Reviewed by D01 18/08/2020 Draft Report Joshua Hiscock Matthew Mudge D02 01/01/2021 Draft Final report Callum Thomas Matthew Mudge D03 02/02/2021 Draft Final report Callum Thomas Matthew Mudge F01 03/02/2021 Final Report Callum Thomas Matthew Mudge © Cardno. Copyright in the whole and every part of this document belongs to Cardno and may not be used, sold, transferred, copied or reproduced in whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on any media to any person other than by agreement with Cardno. This document is produced by Cardno solely for the benefit and use by the client in accordance with the terms of the engagement. Cardno does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by any third party on the content of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget 2020/2021 Contents
    Budget 2020/2021 Contents MAYOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER INTRODUCTION ..... 3 EXECUTIVE BUDGET SUMMARY ....................................................... 6 BUDGET REPORTS .............................................................................. 14 1. LINKAGE TO THE COUNCIL PLAN ......................................................................... 14 2. SERVICES, INITIATIVES AND SERVICE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ....................... 22 3. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ........................................................................................ 58 4. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS COMPARISON ...................................... 64 5. CAPITAL WORKS PROGRAM AND INITIATIVES PROGRAM ..................................... 89 6. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ............................................................ 122 7. FEES AND CHARGES SCHEDULE (INCOME) .......................................................... 124 Banyule City Council Budget – 2020/2021 2 Mayor and Chief Executive Officer Introduction The preparation of this Budget started long before the arrival of COVID-19, yet we have seen how quickly this pandemic is having a devastating financial implication on many organisations and individuals. Banyule Council is adjusting its operations to address the situation. We are proposing a budget that looks to ensure the long-term financial sustainability of Council while providing substantial support to ratepayers, residents and businesses through this unprecedented health and economic crisis. Now, more than ever,
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment IV Stakeholder Consultation Report CONSULTATION REPORT IV - STAKEHOLDER Header
    Environment Effects Statement Attachment IV Stakeholder consultation report CONSULTATION REPORT IV - STAKEHOLDER Header Table of Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 About this report ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Project planning and approvals ................................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Scoping requirements .................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Technical Reference Group ........................................................................................................................................ 4 2 About North East Link .................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Project overview ............................................................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Project benefits ..............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    1976-77 VICTORIA COUNTRY ROADS BOARD SIXTY-FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT FOR YEAR ENDED 30th JUNE, 1977 PRESENTED TO BOTH HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT PURSUANT TO ACT No. 6229 By Amhority: F. D. ATKINSON, GOVERNMENT PRINTER, MELBOURNE No. 95-10584/77-PRICE $1.10 Country Roads Board Victoria Sixty-fourth Annual Report for year ended 30th June, 1977 Presented to both Houses of Parliament pursuant to Act No. 6229 R. E. V. Donaldson Chairman T. H. Russell Deputy Chairman W S. Brake Member Principal Officers Dr. K. G. E. Moody as at 30th June, 1977 Engineer in Chief N. L. Allanson Secretary R. G. Cooper Chief Accountant N. S. Guerin Deputy Engineer in Chief C. C. Liddell Deputy Secretary R. J. C. Bulman Deputy Chief Accountant Divisional Engineers and A. N. Jephcott Regional Divisional Offices Bairnsdale E. T. Oppy Ballarat R. R. Patterson Benalla T. M. Glazebrook Bendigo S.H.Hodgson Dandenong G. W. Marshallsea Geelong J. W Heid Hors ham L. M. Jones Cover: A range of locations showing the various Metropolitan uses the Board makes of plant growth on the roadside. The Board planted 129,246 Dr. D. T. Currie trees and shrubs throughout the State during 1976-77, at a cost of $46,813. Of Traralgon the total figure. 90,471 trees and shrubs were planted within the Board's two divisions which cover Metropolitan F. G. Lodge Melbourne and its surrounds. Warrnambool Pictured are (from top to bottom): 1. Trees now established on the Ovens Highway, near Tarrawingee. 2. Creek treatment and rest area, Princes Highway East near Rosedale.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Proposed Redistribution of Victoria Into Electoral Divisions
    The 2010 Proposed Redistribution of Victoria into Electoral Divisions Report of the Redistribution Committee Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 Section 68 Table of contents Executive summary 1 The 2010 Proposed Redistribution of Victoria Report of the Redistribution Committee 3 Representation of Victoria in the House of Representatives 3 Direction for a redistribution of Victorian electoral divisions 3 Quota 3 Enrolment projections 4 Appointment of the Redistribution Committee for Victoria 5 Invitations to submit public suggestions and comments 5 Statutory requirements for the making of a proposed redistribution 6 Technical procedures 8 Analysis of population trends 9 Enrolment in existing divisions as at 1 February 2010 10 Projected enrolment growth 12 Enrolment projections for existing divisions as at 17 June 2014 12 General strategy 17 Public suggestions and comments 18 Guidelines for the naming of divisions 20 Renaming of division 20 Proposed redistribution of Victoria – by division 22 Conclusion 45 Table 1 – Determination of the quota 4 Table 2 – Enrolment projections at 17 June 2014 5 Table 3 – Key themes 19 Table 4 – Divisions in order of discussion 22 Table 5 – Enrolment of existing divisions 46 Table 6 – Summary of proposed divisions 48 Table 7 – Summary of movement of electors between divisions 50 Table 8 – General description of how proposed divisions are constituted 51 Graph 1 – Variation from enrolment quota as at 1 February 2010 for existing divisions 11 Graph 2 – Variation from average projected enrolment as at 17 June 2014 for existing divisions 14 Map 1 – Projected enrolment for existing divisions – Provincial and rural Victoria 15 Map 2 – Projected enrolment for existing divisions – Metropolitan Victoria 16 Map 3 – Proposed Division of Burke – 1860 expedition camps 21 Enclosures Map 1 – Provincial and rural divisions Map 2 – Metropolitan divisions CD – Containing the public suggestions and comments received on those suggestions and maps.
    [Show full text]