DOCSLIB.ORG

Developing a Learning Environment for the Edwards Aquifer with a Base in Systems Thinking and Dynamics James Everette Simon III James Madison University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Developing a Learning Environment for the Edwards Aquifer with a Base in Systems Thinking and Dynamics James Everette Simon III James Madison University James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Masters Theses The Graduate School Summer 2013 Developing a learning environment for the Edwards Aquifer with a base in systems thinking and dynamics James Everette Simon III James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019 Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Simon, James Everette III, "Developing a learning environment for the Edwards Aquifer with a base in systems thinking and dynamics" (2013). Masters Theses. 326. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019/326 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Developing a Learning Environment for the Edwards Aquifer with a Base in Systems Thinking and Dynamics James E. Simon III A Thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Science Integrated Science and Technology August 2013 Table of Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................... vi Abstract .......................................................................................................................... xxvi I. Problem Statement and Context.....................................................................................1 a. History of the Edwards Aquifer .........................................................................2 b. Present State of the Edwards Aquifer ................................................................3 c. My Project ..........................................................................................................4 d. Justification ........................................................................................................5 e. Past Efforts at Modeling the Edwards Aquifer ..................................................6 f. Methodolgical Outline .......................................................................................7 g. Expected Results ................................................................................................9 II. Systems Thinking and Games as Learning Tools for Environmental Problems Facing the Edwards Aquifer ....................................................................................................10 a. Using Computers and Visualization to Aid in Education ................................11 b. What is “Systems Thinking?” .........................................................................12 i. What is Systems Thinking? ................................................................12 ii. What is a systems thinker? ..................................................................12 iii. Whatever system thinking tools? ........................................................12 iv. Five Systems Thinking concepts? .......................................................13 v. What is dynamic modeling? ................................................................13 c. Benefits of Using Systems Thinking in Education ..........................................14 d. Using Systems Thinking with Education about the Edwards Aquifer ............16 i. EcoFish ................................................................................................16 ii. Systems Thinking and Dynamic Modeling Deliver New Insights into Freshwater Systems .............................................................................17 iii. ALCES Landscape Model Informs Land Use Policies ........................18 iv. STELLA for Environmental Sciences: a Case Study on Depletion of the Ozone Layer ...................................................................................20 v. US-China Project Focuses International Student Teams on Real World Problems ..............................................................................................21 ii e. Are Games an Effective Learning Environment? ...........................................22 f. Examples of Learning Environments That Use Systems Thinking .................23 g. Best Practices ...................................................................................................25 i. the facilitator ........................................................................................25 ii. the game design....................................................................................25 iii. the learning environment .....................................................................25 III. Ecosystem Services and Endangered Species: Creating an Age Appropriate Storyline for Young People .........................................................................................................26 a. Ecosystem Services ..........................................................................................27 i. What Are Ecosystem Services? ..........................................................27 ii. Value of Ecosystem Services ...............................................................28 b. Edwards Aquifer Ecosystem Services .............................................................28 i. Drought and Flood Mitigation .............................................................29 ii. Cycling and Moving of Nutrients ........................................................29 iii. Waste Removal and Water Purification ...............................................29 iv. Biodiversity ..........................................................................................31 v. Pollination ............................................................................................32 vi. Fisheries Habitat ..................................................................................32 vii. Recreation and Tourism .......................................................................32 viii. Education .............................................................................................33 c. Modeling Ecosystem Services .........................................................................34 i. Systems Modeling Concepts and Notation ..........................................34 ii. Variables ..............................................................................................34 iii. Delays ..................................................................................................35 iv. Causal Links and Link Polarity............................................................35 d. The Endangered Species of the Edwards Aquifer ...........................................36 i. Texas Wild Rice ...................................................................................39 ii. Texas Blind Salamander ......................................................................42 iii. Comal Springs Dryopid Beetle ............................................................43 iv. Comal Springs Riffle Beetle ................................................................45 iii v. Peck’s Cave Amphipod........................................................................45 vi. San Marcus Gambusia .........................................................................46 vii. Fountain Darter ....................................................................................47 viii. San Marcos Salamander .......................................................................48 e. Modeling the Endangered Species of the Edwards Aquifer ............................49 IV. Texas Water Policy and Its Impact on the Edwards Aquifer .......................................52 a. History of Texas Water Policy on the Edwards Aquifer .................................54 b. Texas Water Laws............................................................................................55 i. Prior Appropriation ..............................................................................55 ii. Groundwater Law and the Rule of Capture .........................................56 iii. Texas Senate Bill 1477 ........................................................................57 iv. The Endangered Species Act ...............................................................58 c. the Texas State Water Plan ..............................................................................58 d. Water Agencies in Texas .................................................................................58 i. US Army Corps of Engineers ..............................................................59 ii. Texas Water Development Board ........................................................59 iii. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality ....................................60 iv. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department .................................................60 v. Texas Railroad Commission ................................................................61 vi. The Edwards Aquifer Authority ..........................................................61 vii. River Authorities ..................................................................................64 e. Representing Water Policy in the Systems Model ...........................................66 i. Balancing vs. Reinforcing Feedback ...................................................66 ii. Water Restrictions and Artificial Water Storage .................................66
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Headstart 08/1994 Program (NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-OPR-3) TED Regulations for Shrimp Trawls 57 FR 57348 12/04/1992 Recovery Plan - U.S
    Fishing Permits Habitat Conservation Grants Fisheries Environmental Analyses Endangered Spec Search Go fish! nmlkji This si nmlkj All of NMFS Home Threatened and Endangered Species Divisions/Branches Lists What We Do Fishery Bulletins The following list of species under NMFS Fishery Quotas jurisdiction, listed as threatened or endangered, Fishery Regulations for each state and territory. Click on the state, News/Media territory or areas below to view a list of Species: National Employee 1. Southeast Region (North Carolina to Texas and Locator the Caribbean) FOIA Information 2. South Atlantic (North Carolina to Key West Public Records Florida) Request 3. Gulf of Mexico 4. Alabama 5. Florida - Atlantic Coast 6. Florida - Gulf Coast 7. Georgia 8. Louisiana 9. Mississippi 10. North Carolina 11. Puerto Rico 12. South Carolina 13. Texas 14. U.S. Virgin Islands Home · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer · About Us · Information Quality · Contact Us · Last Updated: February 2, 2010 NOAA Fisheries Office of Protected Resources OPR Home | About OPR | Species | Permits | Laws & Policies | Programs | Education | Publications Loggerhead Turtle (Caretta caretta) Species Marine Mammals Status | Taxonomy | Species Description | Habitat | Distribution | Cetaceans Population Trends | Threats | Conservation Efforts | Regulatory Overview | Pinnipeds Key Documents | More Info Marine Turtles Marine & Anadromous Fish Status Marine Invertebrates & ESA Threatened - throughout its range Plants Species of Concern Taxonomy Threatened & Endangered Kingdom: Animalia Species Phylum: Chordata Critical Habitat Maps Class: Reptilia Order: Testudines Loggerhead turtle hatchling (Caretta caretta) Family: Cheloniidae Contact OPR Photo: Mary Wozny, Broward Glossary Genus: Caretta County Florida Sea Turtle OPR Site Map Species: caretta Conservation Program Species Description Did You Know? Loggerheads were named for their relatively large heads, which support powerful jaws and enable them to feed on Search OPR hard-shelled prey, such as whelks and conch.
    [Show full text]
  • MEXICO Las Moras Seco Creek K Er LAVACA MEDINA US HWY 77 Springs Uvalde LEGEND Medina River
    Cedar Creek Reservoir NAVARRO HENDERSON HILL BOSQUE BROWN ERATH 281 RUNNELS COLEMAN Y ANDERSON S HW COMANCHE U MIDLAND GLASSCOCK STERLING COKE Colorado River 3 7 7 HAMILTON LIMESTONE 2 Y 16 Y W FREESTONE US HW W THE HIDDEN HEART OF TEXAS H H S S U Y 87 U Waco Lake Waco McLENNAN San Angelo San Angelo Lake Concho River MILLS O.H. Ivie Reservoir UPTON Colorado River Horseshoe Park at San Felipe Springs. Popular swimming hole providing relief from hot Texas summers. REAGAN CONCHO U S HW Photo courtesy of Gregg Eckhardt. Y 183 Twin Buttes McCULLOCH CORYELL L IRION Reservoir 190 am US HWY LAMPASAS US HWY 87 pasas R FALLS US HWY 377 Belton U S HW TOM GREEN Lake B Y 67 Brady iver razos R iver LEON Temple ROBERTSON Lampasas Stillhouse BELL SAN SABA Hollow Lake Salado MILAM MADISON San Saba River Nava BURNET US HWY 183 US HWY 190 Salado sota River Lake TX HWY 71 TX HWY 29 MASON Buchanan N. San G Springs abriel Couple enjoying the historic mill at Barton Springs in 1902. R Mason Burnet iver Photo courtesy of Center for American History, University of Texas. SCHLEICHER MENARD Y 29 TX HW WILLIAMSON BRAZOS US HWY 83 377 Llano S. S an PECOS Gabriel R US HWY iver Georgetown US HWY 163 Llano River Longhorn Cavern Y 79 Sonora LLANO Inner Space Caverns US HW Eckert James River Bat Cave US HWY 95 Lake Lyndon Lake Caverns B. Johnson Junction Travis CROCKETT of Sonora BURLESON 281 GILLESPIE BLANCO Y KIMBLE W TRAVIS SUTTON H GRIMES TERRELL S U US HWY 290 US HWY 16 US HWY P Austin edernales R Fredericksburg Barton Springs 21 LEE Somerville Lake AUSTIN Pecos
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist and Annotated Bibliography of the Subterranean Aquatic Fauna of Texas
    A CHECKLIST AND ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE SUBTERRANEAN AQUATIC FAUNA OF TEXAS JAMES R. REDDELL and ROBERT W. MITCHELL Texas Technological College WATER RESOURCES \ CENTER Lubbock, Texas WRC 69-6 INTERNATIONAL CENTER for ARID and August 1969 SEMI-ARID LAND STUDIES A CHECKLIST AND ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE SUBTERRANEAN AQUATIC FAUNA OF TEXAS James R. Reddell and Robert W. Mitchell Department of Biology Texas Tech University Lubbock, Texas INTRODUCTION In view of the ever-increasing interest in all studies relating to the water resources of Texas, we have found it timely to prepare this guide to the fauna and biological literature of our subterranean waters. The value of such a guide has already been demonstrated by Clark (1966) in his "Publications, Personnel, and Government Organizations Related to the Limnology, Aquatic Biology and Ichthyology of the Inland Waters of Texas". This publication dea ls primarily with inland surface waters, however, barely touching upon the now rather extensive literature which has accumulated on the biology of our subterranean waters. To state a n obvious fact, it is imperative that our underground waters receive the attention due them. They are one of our most important resources. Those subterranean waters for which biological data exi st are very un­ equally distributed in the state. The best known are those which are acces­ sible to collection and study via the entrances of caves. Even in cavernous regions there exist inaccessible deep aquifers which have yielded little in­ formation as yet. Biological data from the underground waters of non-cave rn­ ous areas are virtually non-existant.
    [Show full text]
  • View of the Abundance of Predators
    ********************************************************************* ********************************************************************* Document-ID: 2194356 Patron: Note: NOTICE: ********************************************************************* ********************************************************************* Pages: 10 Printed: 01-18-12 11:05:38 Sender: Ariel / Windows Journal Title: Texas Journal of Science 1/18/2012 7:45 AM (Please update within 24 hours) Volume: 27 Issue: 1 Call#: 01 .T4 MonthNear: 1976 Pages: 179-195 Location: evans Article Author: Tupa and Davis Not Wanted Date: 07/14/2012 Article Title: Population Dynamics of the San Marcos, Texas salamander Eurycea nana Status: T AES San Antonio Phone: 830-214-5878 Note: E-mail: [email protected] Name: Bandel, Micaela T AES San Antonio ,.. N z Address: 1- 2632 Broadway, Suite 301 South San Antonio, TX 78215 "Ccu ::::i ..J 178 THE TEXAS JOURNAL OF SC lENC£ appears to be less tolerant of arid conditions than B spec· . lOSUS and th spnng and summer of 1971 may have prevented this species f ' e dry ing in that year. rom reproduc- I wish to thank Dr. E. William Behrens for supplying the c1· data and the Port Aransas Police for their patience with my imatologica} pOPULATION DYNAMICS OF THE SAN MARCOS ditions. nocturnal expe. SALAMANDER, EURYCEA NANA BISHOP LITERATURE CITED by DIANNA DOWDEN TUPA 1 and WILLIAM K . DAVIS Blair, W. F., 1953 - Growth, dispersal, and age of sexual maturity of theM . Department of Biology, Southwest Texas State Untversity, San (Bufo val/iceps Weigmann). Copeia 1953: 20 . exican toad 8 212 Marcos 78666 Bragg, A. N. and C. C. Smith, 1943 - Observations on the ecology d 0; ~.nura. IV The ecological distribution of toads in Oklahoma~c;/~.;~~:s~1- ABSTRACT 0 Results of a study of the population ecology and demography of a paedogenetic spe­ Conant, R., 1958 - A Field Guide to the Reptiles and Amphibians H h .
    [Show full text]
  • EAHCP 2019 Annual Report
    Edwards Aquifer Habitat Conservation Plan 2019 Annual Report Prepared for The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service On behalf of The Edwards Aquifer Habitat Conservation Plan and Permittees Prepared by Blanton & Associates, Inc. March 27, 2020 EDWARDS AQUIFER HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN 2019 ANNUAL REPORT PAGE i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK EDWARDS AQUIFER HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN 2019 ANNUAL REPORT PAGE ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Edwards Aquifer Habitat Conservation Plan The Edwards Aquifer Habitat Conservation Plan (EAHCP) is the primary document that establishes the cooperative effort to protect the water of the Southern Segment of the Edwards Aquifer (“Edwards” or “Aquifer”) both for people in the region and the threatened and endangered species that inhabit the Aquifer, and aquatic spring environments whose water largely emanates from the Aquifer. This effort began when regional stakeholders and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) initiated the Edwards Aquifer Recovery Implementation Program (EARIP) in 2006. The Texas Legislature mandated participation in the process by the Edwards Aquifer Authority (EAA), Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Texas Department of Agriculture, Texas Parks & Wildlife Department (TPWD), and Texas Water Development Board (TWDB). The EARIP planning group led to the creation of the process known as the EAHCP Program, which has now been fully transitioned from the EARIP. The EAHCP was completed in November 2012 and led to the approval of an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) under the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) issued in February 2013 by the USFWS to be effective in March 2013. The ITP has been amended once. This Annual Report has been prepared for submittal to the USFWS, as required by the ITP.
    [Show full text]
  • San Marcos Recovery Plan
    ~""'.- San Marcos Recovery Plan U. • Fish & Wildlife Service Albu,querque, New Mexico .-1-934--- The San Marcos Recovery Plan FOR San Hareqs River, Endangered and Threatened Species San ,Marcos Gambusia (Gambusia georgei) Hubbs and Peden ~ountainDarter (Etheostoma fonticola) (Jordan and Gilbert) San Marcos Salamander (Eurycea nana) Bish~p Te1,Ca s Wildr ice" (Z.tzaniatexana}Hitchcock PREPARED BY THE SAN MARIDS REIDVERY TEAM Dr. Robert J. Edwards, Leader, Pan American University, Edinburg, Texas 78539 Mr. Harold E. Beaty, 3414 Forest Trail, Temple, Texas 76502 Dr. Glenn Longley, Southwest Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 78666 Mr. David H. Riskind, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin, Texas 78744 Dr. Dianna D.Tupa, center for Research and Water Resources, Unlvers1tyof Texas Balcones Research' Center, Austin, Texas 78758 Dr. Bobby G.Whites ide, Southwes t Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 78666 OONSULTANTS Mr. Harry Bishop, USFWS, Fish Cult. & Develop. Res. Center, San Marcos, Texas 78666 Dr. W. H. P. Emery, South~est Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 7e666 (Member 1981-82) Mr. Russell L. Masters, Edwards Underground Water District, San AntoniO, Texas 78205 Mr. William McPherson, Soil Conservation Service, Bastrop, Texas 78602 Mr. Floyd E. Potter, Jr., Texas Parks and lHl(,ili~~ Department, Austin, Texas 78759 i;:'y' , . // i f ,It . '1 ,/.' "V- Approved: '. ~ /-, j;t Regtaff'a i or, Region 2 U.S. Fi h, .. ' 'Wildlife Service Date: '/ .f --------~~~~~--------------------- SUMMARY 1 •. GOAL: Secure the survival and eventual recovery of the San Marcos .. gambusia, f01.nltain darter, San Marcos salamander, and Texas wildrice through protection of their natural ecosystem, the . San Marcos River.
    [Show full text]
  • Download City of San Marcos, TX
    Human Resources Director City of San Marcos, TX The Community San Marcos is a thriving, rapidly growing Texas community located on Interstate 35, named recently by Business Week Magazine as one of the “Top 10 Places to Raise Kids” in the U.S. The City occupies a strategic location in the heart of the Austin/San Antonio corridor, considered one of the top metropolitan economies in the nation. San Marcos, population 53,913, is home to Texas State University with an enrollment of more than 32,000 students. The University offers bachelors, masters and doctoral degree programs in a wide variety of fields. The natural Hill Country beauty of San Marcos, spring-fed river, popular outlet malls, and historic downtown make San Marcos one of the top ten destinations in Texas. The headwaters of the San Marcos River flow from the Edwards Aquifer, a high quality underground water source for much of South Central Texas. The exceptionally clear, cool river meanders through San Marcos past community parks and attracts thousands of residents and visitors to its banks year round. The springs and river provide habitat for eight threatened or endangered aquatic species. Known as the gateway to the Texas Hill Country, San Marcos lies at the juncture of the Hill Country with its scenic canyons and hills and the Blackland Prairie of Texas, a rich and fertile region stretching toward the gulf coast plains. The City has nearly 1,200 acres of well-maintained public parks that form greenbelts throughout the City. A City-owned recreation center and major athletic complexes provide top-notch recreational outlets.
    [Show full text]
  • Wonder World Master Plan
    Wonder World Drive Land Use Plan Prepared by Planning and Development Services Department City of San Marcos Adopted: January 14, 2002 CITY OF SAN MARCOS City Council David Chiu, Mayor Ed Mihalkanin, Place 1 Jacob Montoya., Place 2 Jane Hughson, Place 3 Joe B. Cox, Jr., Place 4 Paul Mayhew, Place 5 Martha Castex Tatum, Place 6 Planning and Zoning Commission Robert Thornton, Chair Chris North, Vice Chair Kevin Brumley Bill Desoto Irene Hindson Teresa Hobby Gilbert Natal William R. Rogers Scott Walker City Administration Larry D. Gilley, City Manager Laura Huffman, Assistant City Manager Contributing Planning and Development Services Department Ron F. Patterson, AIA, AICP, Director Jon C. James, AICP, Chief Planner San Marcos Horizons Wonder World Drive Land Use Plan Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 1 A. PLANNING AREA...................................................................................................... 1 B. PURPOSE & OBJECTIVE............................................................................................ 1 C. PLANNING PROCESS................................................................................................. 2 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS............................................................................ 3 A. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................ 3 B. EXISTING LAND USE...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Comments Presentations
    Commissioners Court October 20, 2020 NOTICE OF A MEETING OF THE COMMISSIONERS COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, TEXAS This Notice is posted pursuant to the Texas Open Meetings Act. (VERNONS TEXAS CODES ANN. GOV. CODE CH.551). The Hays County Commissioners Court will hold a meeting at 9:00 A.M. on the 20th day of October 2020, in the Hays County Courthouse, Room 301, San Marcos, Texas. An Open Meeting will be held concerning the following subjects: CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Pledge of Allegiance to the American Flag & Pledge of Allegiance to the Texas Flag ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENTS At this time 3-MINUTE comments will be taken from the audience on Non-Agenda related topics. To address the Court, please submit a Public Participation/ Witness Form to the County Clerk. Please Complete the Public Participation/ Witness Form in its Entirety. NO ACTION MAY BE TAKEN BY THE COURT DURING PUBLIC COMMENTS. PRESENTATIONS & PROCLAMATIONS Update from the County Judge and staff regarding the Local Disaster Declaration and COVID-19. 1 Possible discussion and action may follow. BECERRA 2 Adopt a Proclamation declaring October 30, 2020 as Weatherization Day. INGALSBE Presentation by Susan Dawson with Austin Area Research Organization (AARO) regarding Hays 3 County Breast Cancer Initiative. INGALSBE/SMITH CONSENT ITEMS The following may be acted upon in one motion. A Commissioner, the County Judge, or a Citizen may request items be pulled for separate discussion and/or action. 4 Approve payments of County invoices. VILLARREAL-ALONZO 5 Approve the payment of United Healthcare claims. VILLARREAL-ALONZO 6 Approve Commissioners Court Minutes of October 13, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesohabitat Associations of the Threatened San Marcos Salamander (Eurycea Nana) Across Its Geographic Range
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION: MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 25: 307–321 (2015) Published online 19 March 2015 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI: 10.1002/aqc.2559 Mesohabitat associations of the threatened San Marcos salamander (Eurycea nana) across its geographic range PETER H. DIAZa, JOE N. FRIESb, TIMOTHY H. BONNERa, MARA L. ALEXANDERb and WESTON H. NOWLINa,* aDepartment of Biology, Aquatic Station, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 78666, USA bSan Marcos Aquatic Resource Center, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, San Marcos Texas 78666, USA ABSTRACT 1. Habitat loss is one of the most critical factors affecting the loss of species. However, habitat conservation of many threatened species is performed with incomplete information on habitat requirements and trophic ecology, thus presenting a challenge to designing and implementing recovery plans. 2. The San Marcos salamander (Eurycea nana) is a federally threatened spring-associated organism whose geographic distribution is limited to the headwaters of the San Marcos River in Texas, USA. Although its designated critical habitat includes the headwaters and the first 50 m of the river, little is known of its habitat requirements or co-occurrence with benthic macroinvertebrates and macrophytes. 3. This study examined mesohabitat associations of the salamander and patterns of co-occurrence with macrophytes and benthic invertebrates within its critical habitat. Surveys of mesohabitat characteristics were conducted during a one-year period and data were analysed to assess mesohabitat associations of the San Marcos salamander and patterns of co-occurrence with invertebrates and macrophytes. 4. Salamanders were distributed throughout the critical habitat, but were almost exclusively found in mesohabitats containing cobble and gravel with coverage of Amblystegium and filamentous algae.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Factors Potentially Affecting Eurycea Naufragia
    Report to the Williamson County Conservation Foundation Review of Research Literature Related to the Biology, Evolution, and Conservation of Georgetown Salamander, Eurycea naufragia Benjamin A. Pierce and Ashley Wall Department of Biology Southwestern University Georgetown, Texas 78626 June 22, 2011 1 The Georgetown Salamander The Georgetown salamander, Eurycea naufragia, is a spring and cave-dwelling salamander restricted to the San Gabriel River drainage of Williamson County, Texas. The species is known from only 15 sites occurring along the major tributaries of the upper San Gabriel River (South, Middle, and North forks and Berry Creek; Figure 1). At some of these sites, salamanders have not been observed in recent years and access to all sites is not available. All but two of the known sites are on privately-owned land. The entire range of the species occurs within the immediate vicinity of Georgetown, Texas, an area that is undergoing rapid urbanization (Figure 2), and nearly all known populations are at risk from urban development. The Georgetown salamander has been included as a candidate for listing as an endangered species (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2001) but is not currently protected by federal or state regulation. Candidate species are given a priority listing by the US Fish and Wildlife Service, which ranges from 1 to 12 and indicates the magnitude and immediacy of threats they face and their taxonomic uniqueness, with higher priority assigned to lower numbers. Largely because of the implementation of the Williamson County Regional Habitat Conservation Plan, the US Fish and Wildlife Service in 2008 reduced the listing priority number of the Georgetown salamander from 2 to 8 (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Hays County Regional Habitat Conservation Plan Final HCP
    APPENDIX A Mapping Potential Golden-cheeked Warbler Breeding Habitat Using Remotely Sensed Forest Canopy Cover Data Loomis Partners, Inc. (2008) Hays County Regional Habitat Conservation Plan Mapping Potential Golden-cheeked Warbler Breeding Habitat Using Remotely Sensed Forest Canopy Cover Data Prepared for: County of Hays 111 E. San Antonio Street San Marcos, Texas 78666 Prepared by: ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 3101 Bee Cave Road, Suite 100 Austin, TX 78746 512/327-1180 FAX: 512/327-4062 LAI Proj. No. 051001 August 12, 2008 Mapping Potential GCW Habitat LAI Proj. No. 051001 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................1 1.1 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES........................................................................................................................1 1.2 GOLDEN-CHEEKED WARBLER...................................................................................................................1 1.3 NATIONAL LAND COVER DATABASE 2001 ...............................................................................................3 2.0 METHODS .............................................................................................................................................3 2.1 HABITAT MAPPING ...................................................................................................................................3 2.2 PROBABILITY OF OCCUPANCY ANALYSIS .................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]