DOCSLIB.ORG

Cultural Heritage and Identities of Europe's Future

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cultural Heritage and Identities of Europe's Future Deliverable 6.1 Date: 18th June 2019 CHIEF (Cultural Heritage and Identities of Europe’s Future) Grant Agreement no: 770464 WP: 6 Qualitative Research in Heritage Sites Deliverable: 6.1 Mapping Reports of Cultural Heritage Authors Croatia: Marko Mustapić, Benjamin Perasović, Dino Vukušić Georgia: Tamar Khoshtaria, Meagan Neal, Rati Shubladze, Kristina Vacharadze Germany: Christiane Stahl, Cornelia Sylla, Elina Marmer, Louis Henri Seukwa India: Shailendra Kharat, Suhas Palshikar, Rajeshwari Deshpande, Priya Gohad Latvia: Irēna Saleniece, Anita Stašulāne Slovakia: Attila Kovács, Dušan Deák Spain/Catalonia: Marta Rovira, Mariona Ferrer-Fons Turkey: Saim Buğra Kurban, Yıldırım Şentürk, Ayça Oral UK: Anton Popov, Eleni Stamou Editors Dušan Deák, Anita Stašulāne Version 1.1 Date 18th June 2019 Work Package 6 Deliverable 6.1 Dissemination level Public WP Leaders Dušan Deák, Anita Stašulāne Deliverable Date 30th April 2019 Document history Version Date Comments Modified by 1.0 18/06/2019 KM 1.1 18/06/2019 Amendment to authors names KM This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme under Grant Agreement No 770464. CHIEF: 770464 http://chiefproject.eu 1 Deliverable 6.1 Date: 18th June 2019 Contents Overview ....................................................................................................................................5 About CHIEF ........................................................................................................................5 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................6 Tasks ......................................................................................................................................6 Method ...................................................................................................................................6 Findings – linking the policies and the offer.........................................................................7 Concluding Remarks ........................................................................................................... 10 References ............................................................................................................................ 11 Mapping Report of Cultural Heritage (Croatia) ................................................................... 12 1. Executive Summary......................................................................................................... 12 2. Method ............................................................................................................................. 12 3. Findings .......................................................................................................................... 15 4. Discussion ....................................................................................................................... 24 5. Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 27 6. References ........................................................................................................................ 29 7. Appendices ....................................................................................................................... 33 Mapping Report of Cultural Heritage (Georgia) ................................................................... 39 1. Executive Summary......................................................................................................... 39 2. Method ............................................................................................................................. 40 3. Findings .......................................................................................................................... 43 4. Discussion ....................................................................................................................... 55 5. Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 58 6. References ........................................................................................................................ 60 7. Appendices ....................................................................................................................... 62 Mapping Report of Cultural Heritage (Germany) ................................................................ 63 1. Executive Summary......................................................................................................... 63 2. Method ............................................................................................................................. 64 3. Findings ........................................................................................................................... 67 4. Discussion ........................................................................................................................ 76 5. Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 81 6. References ........................................................................................................................ 83 7. Appendices ....................................................................................................................... 85 CHIEF: 770464 http://chiefproject.eu 2 Deliverable 6.1 Date: 18th June 2019 Mapping Report of Cultural Heritage (India) ....................................................................... 86 1. Executive Summary......................................................................................................... 86 2. Method ............................................................................................................................. 87 3. Findings .......................................................................................................................... 90 4. Discussion ....................................................................................................................... 99 5. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 102 6. References ...................................................................................................................... 105 7. Appendices ..................................................................................................................... 109 Mapping Report of Cultural Heritage (Latvia) ................................................................... 110 1. Executive Summary....................................................................................................... 110 2. Method ........................................................................................................................... 111 3. Findings ......................................................................................................................... 114 4. Discussion ...................................................................................................................... 121 5. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 125 6. References ...................................................................................................................... 129 7. Appendices ..................................................................................................................... 132 Mapping Report of Cultural Heritage (Slovakia) ................................................................ 134 1. Executive Summary....................................................................................................... 134 2. Method ........................................................................................................................... 135 3. Findings ......................................................................................................................... 139 4. Discussion ...................................................................................................................... 148 5. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 151 6. References ...................................................................................................................... 154 Mapping Report of Cultural Heritage (Spain/Catalonia) ................................................... 158 1. Executive Summary....................................................................................................... 158 2. Method ........................................................................................................................... 159 3. Findings ........................................................................................................................ 162 4. Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 172 5. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 177 6. References .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Culture and the Structural Funds in Poland
    Culture and the Structural Funds in Poland by Dorota Ilczuk and Małgorzata Nowak, Pro Cultura Foundation EENC Paper, June 2012 1 Culture and the Structural Funds in Poland by Dorota Ilczuk and Małgorzata Nowak EENC Paper, June 2012 This document has been prepared by Dorota Ilczuk and Małgorzata Nowak on behalf of the European Expert Network on Culture (EENC). This paper reflects the views only of the EENC authors and the European Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. The EENC was set up in 2010 at the initiative of Directorate-General for Education and Culture of the European Commission (DG EAC), with the aim of contributing to the improvement of policy development in Europe. It provides advice and support to DG EAC in the analysis of cultural policies and their implications at national, regional and European levels. The EENC involves 17 independent experts and is coordinated by Interarts and Culture Action Europe. About the authors Dorota Ilczuk is a Professor of Economics and Cultural Management at Warsaw School of Social Sciences and Humanities. She has held a doctorate since 1995 on the topic of Institutional and Financial Analysis of Operational Opportunities for Cultural Activities in the Non-profit Sector, and a habilitated doctor degree since 2005. She is the founder and president of the Pro Cultura Foundation. In the years 2002-2007 she was the President of CIRCLE – Cultural Information and Research Centre Liaison in Europe. She is a member of the European Cultural Parliament. She co-operates with international organisations and science associations such as e.g.: European Institute for Comparative Cultural Research (ERICarts), Association of Cultural Economics International (ACEI) and International Society for Third Sector Research (ISTR).
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Value of Arts & Culture | the AHRC Cultural Value
    Understanding the value of arts & culture The AHRC Cultural Value Project Geoffrey Crossick & Patrycja Kaszynska 2 Understanding the value of arts & culture The AHRC Cultural Value Project Geoffrey Crossick & Patrycja Kaszynska THE AHRC CULTURAL VALUE PROJECT CONTENTS Foreword 3 4. The engaged citizen: civic agency 58 & civic engagement Executive summary 6 Preconditions for political engagement 59 Civic space and civic engagement: three case studies 61 Part 1 Introduction Creative challenge: cultural industries, digging 63 and climate change 1. Rethinking the terms of the cultural 12 Culture, conflict and post-conflict: 66 value debate a double-edged sword? The Cultural Value Project 12 Culture and art: a brief intellectual history 14 5. Communities, Regeneration and Space 71 Cultural policy and the many lives of cultural value 16 Place, identity and public art 71 Beyond dichotomies: the view from 19 Urban regeneration 74 Cultural Value Project awards Creative places, creative quarters 77 Prioritising experience and methodological diversity 21 Community arts 81 Coda: arts, culture and rural communities 83 2. Cross-cutting themes 25 Modes of cultural engagement 25 6. Economy: impact, innovation and ecology 86 Arts and culture in an unequal society 29 The economic benefits of what? 87 Digital transformations 34 Ways of counting 89 Wellbeing and capabilities 37 Agglomeration and attractiveness 91 The innovation economy 92 Part 2 Components of Cultural Value Ecologies of culture 95 3. The reflective individual 42 7. Health, ageing and wellbeing 100 Cultural engagement and the self 43 Therapeutic, clinical and environmental 101 Case study: arts, culture and the criminal 47 interventions justice system Community-based arts and health 104 Cultural engagement and the other 49 Longer-term health benefits and subjective 106 Case study: professional and informal carers 51 wellbeing Culture and international influence 54 Ageing and dementia 108 Two cultures? 110 8.
    [Show full text]
  • EMERGENT FORMS of LIFE: Anthropologies of Late Or Postmodernities
    Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 1999. 28:455–78 Copyright © 1999 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved EMERGENT FORMS OF LIFE: Anthropologies of Late or Postmodernities Michael M.J. Fischer Science, Technology and Society Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139; e-mail: [email protected] Key Words: social theory and ethnography, science institutions, film and cyberspace, reconstruction after social trauma n Abstract Anthropologies of late modernity (also called postmodernity, postindustrial society, knowledge society, or information society) provide a number of stimulating challenges for all levels of social, cultural, and psycho- logical theory, as well as for ethnographic and other genres of anthropological writing. Three key overlapping arenas of attention are the centrality of science and technology; decolonization, postcolonialism, and the reconstruction of so- cieties after social trauma; and the role of the new electronic and visual media. The most important challenges of contemporary ethnographic practice include more than merely (a) the techniques of multilocale or multisited ethnography for strategically accessing different points in broadly spread processes, (b) the techniques of multivocal or multiaudience-addressed texts for mapping and ac- knowledging with greater precision the situatedness of knowledge, (c) the re- working of traditional notions of comparative work for a world that is increas- ingly aware of difference, and (d) acknowledging that anthropological repre- sentations are interventions within a stream of representations, mediations, and unequally inflected discourses competing for hegemonic control. Of equal im- by HARVARD UNIVERSITY on 09/21/10. For personal use only. portance are the challenges of juxtaposing, complementing, or supplementing other genres of writing, working with historians, literary theorists, media critics, novelists, investigative or in-depth journalists, writers of insider accounts (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Mapping
    Cultural Planning in The City of L’viv: Cultural Mapping 1 Centre for Cultural Management European Cultural Foundation (ECF) P. O. Box 5620 Jan van Goyenkade 5 Lviv 79067 1075 HN Amsterdam Ukraine The Netherlands www.kultura.org.ua www.eurocult.org Copyright 2008 Centre for Cultural Management 2 Contents Section I I. Forward 4 II. Acknowledgements 7 Section II III. Executive Summary 8 Section III IV. Introduction 10 V.The L’viv Context 11 VI. Information Collection 11 VII. Participants 13 VIII. The Cultural Map of L’viv 14 IX. Key Issues 19 X. Recommendations/conclusions 20 Section IV XI. Appendices 21 3 Cultural Planning in The City of L’viv: Cultural Mapping I. Foreward L’viv has great cultural potential to work within Europe. Philipp Dietachmair When beginning an initiative such as this one, the first dilemma is identifying a place to start. Usually one chooses an arbitrary commencement point that makes sense within the context. Our starting point was based in our individual experience, the interests of our funder, the interests of our City officials and the current reality of L’viv’s cultural community. These constitute a lot of variables, and we can rest assured that all of the designers of the project did not bring to the task the same set of assumptions around these variables or the same set of motivations. In the hope that transparency can support more effective communication with you, the reader, we would like to take a moment to explore and explain a few issues that frame what we have done and might impact your appreciation of this report, of our process and of our recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Mapping Findings
    Creative Together: A Cultural Plan for the City of Vaughan Cultural Mapping Findings Cultural mapping is a systematic approach to defining and recording a community’s cultural assets. In Ontario, municipalities having made commitments to building cultural mapping systems include Oakville, Hamilton, Vaughan and Durham Region. The City of Toronto has partnered with the Martin Prosperity Institute to establish Placing Creativity a group that brings together individuals from academic, government and community organizations to advance thinking and practice in cultural mapping. In August 2009, the Province of Ontario launched the Creative Community Prosperity Fund, a $9 million funding commitment with cultural mapping and municipal cultural planning forming key funding priorities. Cultural mapping as it is understood and practiced in Ontario has two dimensions – one tangible (or quantitative) the other intangible (or qualitative). 1. Resource Mapping – identifying and recording tangible cultural resources usually making use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) tools and platforms; and, 2. Community Identity Mapping – exploring a community’s ‘intangible cultural resources’ – the unique stories and traditions that define a community’s identity and sense of place. 1. Cultural Resource Mapping Vaughan has established itself as a leading municipality nationally in entrenching a formal commitment to cultural mapping in the Official Plan. “Cultural mapping is a systematic approach to identifying and recording cultural resources. It can identify and record tangible cultural resources using GIS tools, but can also use community identity mapping to explore intangible cultural resources, such as unique histories, values, traditions and stories that combine to define a community’s identity and sense of place. Through multimedia enriched web-based maps, cultural mapping enhances access to information on local cultural resources for residents and visitors and provides a platform for marketing and promoting these resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Cultural Mapping
    1 Appendix I: Cultural Mapping Summary Report Introduction Cultural mapping was an essential step in the development of the Niagara Culture Plan. The cultural mapping work undertaken during the Culture Plan process built on the strong mapping work completed by the Cultural Asset Mapping Working Group struck by the Niagara Region Culture Committee in 2006 to begin a systematic process of identifying cultural assets in Niagara. Niagara was one of the earliest municipalities in Ontario to commit to undertaking cultural mapping work. Cultural mapping is a defining feature and foundation of municipal cultural planning approaches to local and regional cultural development. Both cultural mapping and municipal cultural planning are priorities for the Province of Ontario as evidenced by the launch in August 2009 of the Creative Community Prosperity Fund, a $9 million funding commitment in which cultural mapping and municipal cultural planning are key funding priorities. Municipalities in Ontario join leading municipalities across Canada in embracing cultural mapping as an essential planning and economic development tool. In Ontario, municipalities building cultural mapping systems include Oakville, Hamilton, Vaughan and Durham Region. The City of Toronto has partnered with the Martin Prosperity Institute to establish Placing Creativity. The group brings together individuals from academic, government and community organizations to advance thinking and practice in cultural mapping. This report summarizes the process and findings of the cultural mapping work of the Culture Plan and sets out a series of potential next steps in further developing cultural mapping systems and capabilities in Niagara. Defining Cultural Mapping Types of Mapping Cultural mapping as it is being understood and implemented in Ontario has two dimensions - one tangible (or quantitative), the other intangible (or qualitative).
    [Show full text]
  • Paths to Innovation in Culture Paths to Innovation in Culture Includes Bibliographical References and Index ISBN 978-954-92828-4-9
    Paths to Innovation in Culture Paths to Innovation in Culture Includes bibliographical references and index ISBN 978-954-92828-4-9 Editorial Board Argyro Barata, Greece Miki Braniste, Bucharest Stefka Tsaneva, Goethe-Institut Bulgaria Enzio Wetzel, Goethe-Institut Bulgaria Dr. Petya Koleva, Interkultura Consult Vladiya Mihaylova, Sofia City Art Gallery Malina Edreva, Sofia Municipal Council Svetlana Lomeva, Sofia Development Association Sevdalina Voynova, Sofia Development Association Dr. Nelly Stoeva, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski” Assos. Prof. Georgi Valchev, Deputy Rector of Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski” Design and typeset Aleksander Rangelov Copyright © 2017 Sofia Development Association, Goethe-Institut Bulgaria and the authors of the individual articles. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the publisher. Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction: Paths to Innovation in Culture ....................................................... 8 Digital and Tech Innovation in Arts and Culture Vladiya Mihaylova, Overview ...............................................................................15 Stela Anastasaki Use of Mobile Technologies in Thessaloniki’s Museums. An Online Survey 2017 ..................................................................................... 17 Veselka Nikolova Digital Innovation in Culture .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural and Spiritual Significance of Nature: Guidance for Protected and Conserved Area Governance and Management
    Cultural and spiritual significance of nature: Guidance for protected and conserved area governance and conserved area management Guidance for protected Cultural and spiritual significance of nature: Cultural and spiritual significance of nature Guidance for protected and conserved area governance and management Bas Verschuuren, Josep-Maria Mallarach, Edwin Bernbaum, Jeremy Spoon, Steve Brown, Radhika Borde, Jessica Brown, Mark Calamia, Nora Mitchell, Mark Infield, Emma Lee Craig Groves, Series Editor Developing capacity for a protected planet Best Practice Protected Areas Guidelines Series No. 32 international council on monuments and sites IUCN WCPA’s BEST PRACTICE PROTECTED AREA GUIDELINES SERIES IUCN-WCPA’s Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines are the world’s authoritative resource for protected area managers. Involving collaboration among specialist practitioners dedicated to supporting better implementation of ideas in the field, the Guidelines distil learning and advice drawn from across IUCN. Applied in the field, they build institutional and individual capacity to manage protected area systems effectively, equitably and sustainably, and to cope with the myriad of challenges faced in practice. The Guidelines also assist national governments, protected area agencies, non-governmental organisations, communities and private sector partners in meeting their commitments and goals, and especially the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Programme of Work on Protected Areas. A full set of guidelines is available at: www.iucn.org/pa_guidelines Complementary resources are available at: www.cbd.int/protected/tools/ Contribute to developing capacity for a Protected Planet at: www.protectedplanet.net/ IUCN PROTECTED AREA DEFINITION, MANAGEMENT CATEGORIES AND GOVERNANCE TYPES IUCN defines a protected area as: A clearly defined geographical space, recognised, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values.
    [Show full text]
  • The Museum's Mission in Contemporary Social And
    M USEOLOGICA BRUNENSIA STUDIE/ARTICLES THE MUSEUM’S MISSION IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL AND CULTURAL REALITIES ELENA MASTENITSA – LYUDMILA SHLYAKHTINA https://doi.org/10.5817/MuB2017-2-2 ABSTRACT/ABSTRAKT: potřebu najít způsob a metody, The Museum’s mission is jak inovovat tradiční kulturní interpreted by modern researchers The rapid and irreversible changes instituce včetně muzeí. Autorky as “an intended purpose defined that occur in the contemporary článku se zaměřují na otázku as generating culture, both present world dictate the need to find the poslání muzea v kontextu and future, based on preservation ways and methods to renovate globálních změn a společensko- and maintenance of the most valued traditional cultural institutions kulturní transformace. Podle nich parts of all types of heritage, as [...] including the Museum. The authors se v současné době v oblasti vize a policy statement, which outlines of this article focus on the issues pro muzea objevují dva souběžné the main purpose of the Museum, its of the Museum’s mission in the trendy, které se navzájem doplňují: role and public nature”.1 According context of global challenges and sociální inkluze a potřeba zachovat to Tomislav Šola, “the Museum’s socio-cultural transformations. As status muzea jako místa, které mission, as before, is the commitment noted by the authors, two current představuje alternativu každodenní to the common well-being and trends coexist and complement the reality, což jej přesunuje ze unwavering dedication to the social Museum vision: social inclusion známého prostředí do paradoxního, idea based on humanistic ethics”.2 and retaining the Museum status ale zároveň reálného prostoru, as a place alternative to the kde se lze setkat s minulostí, které The Museum’s mission: mundane everyday life, excluding nese otisky dávných dob s jejich pro et contra it from the familiar environment typickými rysy.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture Management. Strategy and Marketing Aspects
    Łukasz Wróblewski Culture Management Strategy and Marketing Aspects Foreword by Bonita M. Kolb λογος Culture Management Strategy and marketing aspects λογος Logos Verlag Berlin – Academic Books for Sciences and Humanities 1 Łukasz Wróblewski: Culture Management. Strategy and marketing aspects 2 Logos Verlag Berlin – Academic Books for Sciences and Humanities Contents Łukasz Wróblewski Culture Management Strategy and marketing aspects Foreword by Bonita M. Colb ֍ Logos Verlag Berlin 2017 Logos Verlag Berlin – Academic Books for Sciences and Humanities 3 Łukasz Wróblewski: Culture Management. Strategy and marketing aspects Reviewer: Bonita M. Kolb, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus of Business Administration Lycoming College in Pennsylvania, USA www.bonitakolb.com Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche National-bibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de. The electronic version of this book is freely available under CC BY-SA 4.0 licence, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched (KU). KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access for the public good. More information about the initiative and links to the Open Access version can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org. © Copyright Logos Verlag Berlin 2017 All rights reserved. ISBN 978-3-8325-4378-5 Cover photo: Hands of conductor in black and white #100922050 – Fotolia.com Logos Verlag Berlin Comeniushof, Gubener Str. 47, 10243 Berlin; Germany Tel.: +49 030 42 85 10 90 Fax: +49 030 42 85 10 92 INTERNET: http://www.logos-verlag.de 4 Logos Verlag Berlin – Academic Books for Sciences and Humanities Contents Contents Foreword …………………………………………….…………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • Culture to Be“ - Ideas of a Generation for Itself
    An empirical experiment: „Culture to be“ - Ideas of a generation for itself Prof. Dr. Susanne Keuchel Interaction between theory and practice Zentrum für Kulturforschung (ZfKf)/ Centre for culture research, Germany [email protected] The methodological background of the study It can often be observed that just a single methodological perspective is employed when collecting social and cultural data in the practice of empirical research, including research on culture and the arts. The exceptions to this rule very rarely cross the boundary between quantitative and qualitative methods.i A special case concerning theory construction involves studies using “grounded theory,” which was developed in Chicago in the early 1960s and which joins deductive and inductive methods in a bidirectional processii. The goal was to develop a realistic theory in order to make it applicable in practice, thereby reducing the gap between theory and practice. Even if “grounded theory” was developed primarily in the context of qualitative research, it is not a single method, but a series of methods interlocked with one another. Their focus is not on subjective observation or testing the validity of the theory, but rather on continuous, appropriate research on the topic in question by developing, testing and refining theories. This approach was the model for the Düsseldorf Youth Culture Concept. It attempted to identify appropriate concepts and basic insights for designing opportunities in “classic” cultural institutions targeted toward young people in their
    [Show full text]
  • Values in Heritage Management
    Values in Heritage Management Values in Heritage Management Emerging Approaches and Research Directions Edited by Erica Avrami, Susan Macdonald, Randall Mason, and David Myers THE GETTY CONSERVATION INSTITUTE, LOS ANGELES The Getty Conservation Institute Timothy P. Whalen, John E. and Louise Bryson Director Jeanne Marie Teutonico, Associate Director, Programs The Getty Conservation Institute (GCI) works internationally to advance conservation practice in the visual arts—broadly interpreted to include objects, collections, architecture, and sites. The Institute serves the conservation community through scientific research, education and training, field projects, and the dissemination of information. In all its endeavors, the GCI creates and delivers knowledge that contributes to the conservation of the world’s cultural heritage. © 2019 J. Paul Getty Trust Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Values in heritage management (2017 : Getty Conservation Institute), author. | Avrami, Erica C., editor. | Getty Conservation Institute, The text of this work is licensed under a Creative issuing body, host institution, organizer. Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- Title: Values in heritage management : emerging NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a approaches and research directions / edited by copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons Erica Avrami, Susan Macdonald, Randall .org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. All images are Mason, and David Myers. reproduced with the permission of the rights Description: Los Angeles, California : The Getty holders acknowledged in captions and are Conservation Institute, [2019] | Includes expressly excluded from the CC BY-NC-ND license bibliographical references. covering the rest of this publication. These images Identifiers: LCCN 2019011992 (print) | LCCN may not be reproduced, copied, transmitted, or 2019013650 (ebook) | ISBN 9781606066201 manipulated without consent from the owners, (epub) | ISBN 9781606066188 (pbk.) who reserve all rights.
    [Show full text]