PUBLIC POLICY FORUM JANUARY 2017 the SHATTERED MIRROR News, Democracy and Trust in the Digital Age About the Public Policy Forum

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PUBLIC POLICY FORUM JANUARY 2017 the SHATTERED MIRROR News, Democracy and Trust in the Digital Age About the Public Policy Forum PUBLIC POLICY FORUM JANUARY 2017 THE SHATTERED MIRROR News, Democracy and Trust in the Digital Age About the Public Policy Forum The Public Policy Forum works with all levels of government and the public service, the private sector, labour, post-secondary institutions, NGOs and Indigenous groups to improve policy outcomes for Canadians. As a non-partisan, member-based organization, we work from “inclusion to conclusion,” by convening discussions on fundamental policy issues and by identifying new options and paths forward. For 30 years, the Public Policy Forum has broken down barriers among sectors, contributing to meaningful change that builds a better Canada. © 2017, Public Policy Forum Public Policy Forum 1400 - 130, Albert Street Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1P 5G4 Tel/Tél: 613.238.7160 www.ppforum.ca @ppforumca ISBN 978-1-927009-86-4 Table of Contents 2 Introduction 12 Section 1: Diagnostics 36 Section 2: News and Democracy 70 Section 3: What We Heard Section 4: Conclusions 80 and Recommendations Some Final Thoughts 95 Moving Forward 100 Afterword by Edward Greenspon 102 Acknowledgements In a land of bubblegum forests and lollipop trees, every man would have his own newspaper or broadcasting station, devoted exclusively to programming that man’s opinions and perceptions. The Uncertain Mirror, 1970 The Shattered Mirror: News, Democracy and Trust in the Digital Age When he made this fanciful remark in his landmark The Internet, whose fresh and diverse tributaries of report on the state of the mass media in this country, information made it a historic force for openness, now Senator Keith Davey was being facetious, not has been polluted by the runoff of lies, hate and the prophetic. He and his special Senate committee manipulations of foreign powers. The ‘truth neutrality’ were agitated by what they considered the ill-effects of the dominant digital platforms is incompatible of concentrated media ownership on Canadian with democracy. society. Proprietors of newspaper chains, they Meanwhile, much of the traditional media is hurtling argued, were making fat profits, but the mirror they toward an unhappy date with destiny, and digital-only held up to the communities in which they operated competitors remain journalistically under-developed. was inadequate. Their report lamented–as did that of the Kent commission in 1981 and a second Senate Today, we deal with a reality almost unimaginable inquiry in 2006–that, because the media rested back in 1970. The far-fetched bubblegum and lollipops in fewer and fewer hands, the quality of Canadian notion has come to pass: Every man–and woman–can journalism and the health of our democracy were now literally communicate his or her “opinions and being compromised. perceptions.” Blogs, social media feeds, podcasts and smartphones give citizens unprecedented voice, and In the decades since Senator Davey declared sometimes place them at the scene of breaking news the media mirror “uncertain,” it has cracked and that, in an earlier time, would have gone unreported. now appears shattered. The odd blend of content To lean in and engage publicly or lean back and fragmentation, revenue consolidation and indifference consume passively is a choice that now rests with to truth has overtaken simple concentration of individual citizens, not just media companies. ownership as the main threat to holding public officials to account and reflecting Canadian society The digital revolution has made for a more open and back to its citizens. diverse news ecosystem–and a meaner and less trustworthy one. It has also upended the model of 3 journalistic “boots on the ground” backed up by a The disruption of news media has been taking place second platoon in the office upholding such hallowed for a long time. But it has risen to an entirely new standards as verification and balance. plane with the shockingly sudden consolidation in unseen hands of both Internet ad revenues and Established news organizations have been left control of who sees what among the thousands gasping, while native digital alternatives have failed of competing political and social narratives. The to develop journalistic mass, especially in local loser is not just the incumbent news media, whose news. The financial degradation has been insidiously models and management have struggled to adapt. incremental, but one whose accumulation and now The question now before Canadian policy-makers acceleration has brought to the fore the issue of is whether democracy itself is being put at risk. As sustainability of newsgathering in our democracy. the authors of the FCC study observed, “Information Do the media, and particularly the civic function goods are public goods. The failure to provide them of journalism–the coverage of public institutions, is, in part, a market failure. But carefully crafted public public affairs and community–need a lifeline? If so, policy can address [the] gaps.” Similarly, a 2014 report how can we ensure that it does not lock in privilege, commissioned by a concerned Dutch government stifle innovation and weaken democracy itself? And found that the new media order looked incapable can accountability and commonweal continue to under most scenarios of “providing broad layers exist without compromising the media’s essential within society with reliable and completely factual and independence? relevant information”–what it termed the public role of “What happens to the catsup or roofing tile or widget journalism. “If we are increasingly beginning to doubt industry affects us as consumers,” Davey commented this, and we believe that quality journalism is a vital in his report. “What happens to the publishing part of a properly working democracy, then it is time business affects us as citizens.” to do something.” Imagine for a moment a community without news: When the Public Policy Forum (PPF) began thinking how atomized and dysfunctional it would be. about a study on the state of the news media in Canada, in early 2016, the headlines were all bad. In 2009, the Knight Commission on the Information Within a fortnight in January 2016 alone, Rogers Needs of Communities in a Democracy–a blue- Media and Postmedia announced new rounds of ribbon panel of U.S. media, policy and civic leaders– staff reductions, Torstar revealed plans to close its concluded that news is as vital to democracy as printing plant, and Confederation-era newspaper titles “clean air, safe streets, good schools and public in Guelph, Ont., and Nanaimo, B.C., were shuttered, health.” Three years later, a study for the U.S. Federal the first of six daily papers to close, merge or reduce Communications Commission (FCC) cited eight their publishing schedules before year’s end. The “critical information needs” the media help to provide, situation wasn’t much better on the broadcast news ranging from emergencies and other public risks to side, where revenues, especially in local television, health, education, the environment and economic followed the downward track of the newspaper opportunities to civic and political knowledge of policy industry, inducing the Canadian Radio-television and initiatives and the conduct of public officials and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) to step in. candidates for office. 4 News is as vital to democracy as “clean air, safe streets, good schools and public health” 5 A parliamentary committee was formed. News We reviewed the available literature, organized six companies and industry associations queued up roundtables across Canada, co-hosted a symposium with complaints of inequities in the marketplace. on digital-news innovation, sought out industry Some made requests for public assistance. leaders and experts domestically and abroad, commissioned our own research, and conducted The Government of Canada contracted with the PPF, four focus groups in English and two in French as a non-partisan and independent think-tank, to assess well as an online survey with a random sample of the situation and make recommendations on what, 1,500 respondents. if anything, should be done. The object was not to defend any mode of news delivery, but to evaluate the risk to democracy. PPF has devoted the past 30 years to working with partners on consequential issues. We brought publicly spirited backers into the tent–the McConnell, Atkinson and Max Bell foundations and CN, TD Bank Group, Ivanhoé Cambridge and Clairvest Group. We are grateful to all for their assistance. We also recruited a team of academics (Colette Brin of Université Laval, Christopher Dornan of Carleton University, Elizabeth Dubois of University of Ottawa, Taylor Owen of University of British Columbia), along with pollster Allan Gregg of Earnscliffe Strategy Group, and a loose band of other advisers. 6 To begin, we drafted three questions: Doesi. the deteriorating state of traditional media, particularly but not exclusively newspapers, put at risk the civic function of journalism and media and therefore the health of our democracy? Ifii. so, are new forms of digitally based media and communications filling the gap, or can they reasonably be expected to do so after a transition period? Ifiii. no, what is the role for public policy in ensuring the healthy flow of news and information deemed vital to our democracy, and what are the least intrusive and most efficacious ways of designing and delivering these policies? 7 In the summer, a fourth question became apparent funds were established after negotiations with in our conversations: Were algorithms that were Google. Germany is considering legislation to hold intended to tailor online information to individual Facebook to account for fake news that appears in its preferences instead segregating people in social feeds and then goes uncorrected. “filter bubbles” and thereby eroding a sense of Those who fear the state will take up residence in commonweal? By the time of the U.S. election the newsrooms of the nation should realize it has in November, filter bubbles and fake news had been well ensconced there for a long time–although moved from the sidelines to centre stage as a generally at a safe distance from the journalists.
Recommended publications
  • Canada's G8 Plans
    Plans for the 2010 G8 Muskoka Summit: June 25-26, 2010 Jenilee Guebert Director of Research, G8 Research Group, with Robin Lennox and other members of the G8 Research Group June 7, 2010 Plans for the 2010 G8 Muskoka Summit: June 25-26, Ministerial Meetings 31 2010 1 G7 Finance Ministers 31 Abbreviations and Acronyms 2 G20 Finance Ministers 37 Preface 2 G8 Foreign Ministers 37 Introduction: Canada’s 2010 G8 2 G8 Development Ministers 41 Agenda: The Policy Summit 3 Civil Society 43 Priority Themes 3 Celebrity Diplomacy 43 World Economy 5 Activities 44 Climate Change 6 Nongovernmental Organizations 46 Biodiversity 6 Canada’s G8 Team 48 Energy 7 Participating Leaders 48 Iran 8 G8 Leaders 48 North Korea 9 Canada 48 Nonproliferation 10 France 48 Fragile and Vulnerable States 11 United States 49 Africa 12 United Kingdom 49 Economy 13 Russia 49 Development 13 Germany 49 Peace Support 14 Japan 50 Health 15 Italy 50 Crime 20 Appendices 50 Terrorism 20 Appendix A: Commitments Due in 2010 50 Outreach and Expansion 21 Appendix B: Facts About Deerhurst 56 Accountability Mechanism 22 Preparations 22 Process: The Physical Summit 23 Site: Location Reaction 26 Security 28 Economic Benefits and Costs 29 Benefits 29 Costs 31 Abbreviations and Acronyms AU African Union CCS carbon capture and storage CEIF Clean Energy Investment Framework CSLF Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum DAC Development Assistance Committee (of the Organisation for Economic Co- operation and Development) FATF Financial Action Task Force HAP Heiligendamm L’Aquila Process HIPC heavily
    [Show full text]
  • Hot Docs 2016 Accredited Media Applicant: Account Name Applicant: Last Name Applicant: First Name Community Opt-In 24 Images
    Hot Docs 2016 Accredited Media Applicant: Account Name Applicant: Last Name Applicant: First Name Community Opt-In 24 images Selb Charlotte NO Accessible Media Inc. MacDonald Kelly NO Accessible Media Inc. Evans Simon NO Accessible Media Inc. Dudas Michelle NO Afisharu.com Zaslavsky Nina YES Air Canada Rep González Leticia NO Alternavox Magazine Saavedra Mikhail YES Arirang Korea TV Kim Mingu YES ATK Magazine Zimmer Cindy YES Balita/Filipino Web Channel Marquez Romy NO BanTOR Radio Qorane Nuruddin YES BanTOR Radio Mazzuca Ola YES Braidio, CKDU 88.1fm Simmonds Veronica YES Broadcaster Magazine Shane Myles NO Broadcaster Magazine Hiltz Jonathan NO Broken Pencil Magazine Charkot Richelle YES Broken Pencil Magazine Charkot Richelle YES Buffalo News, Buffalo Rising, Albany Times Union Francis Penders Carl NO ByBlacks.com Franklin Nicole YES Canada Free Press Anklewicz Larry NO Canadian Press Friend David YES CBC Dekel Jonathan NO CBC Mattar Pacinthe NO CBC Mesley Wendy NO CBC Bambury Brent NO Hot Docs 2016 Accredited Media CBC Tremonti Anna Maria NO CBC Galloway Matt NO CBC Pacheco Debbie NO CBC Berry Sujata NO CBC Deacon Gillian NO CBC Rundle Lisa NO CBC Kabango Shadrach NO CBC Berube Chris YES CBC Callender Tyrone YES CBC Siddiqui Tabassum NO CBC Mitton Peter YES CBC Parris Amanda YES CBC Reid Tashauna NO CBC Hosein Lise NO CBC Sumanac-Johnson Deana NO CBC Knegt Peter YES CBC Thompson Laura NO CBC Matlow Rachel NO CBC Coulton Brian NO CBC Hopton Alice NO CBC Cochran Cate YES CBC - Out in the Open Guillemette Daniel NO CBC / TVO Chattopadhyay Piya NO CBC Arts Candido Romeo YES CBC MUSIC FRENETTE BRAD NO CBC MUSIC Cowie Del NO CBC Radio Nazareth Errol NO CBC Radio Wachtel Eleanor NO Channel Zero Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Here's Your NTCI 2011 Newsletter
    Here’s Your NTCI 2011 Newsletter — But We Need Your Help To Go GREEN! 100 Years of Red & Grey Each year the NTCI Foundation spends over $4,000 on postage for mailing the attached newsletter to the 8,000 alumni in our database — money which could otherwise be used for student awards and grants to support extracurricular activities. Last year we asked you, our readers, to email us your email addresses and your agreement to receive future issues of the newsletter by email. Many of you responded but there are still almost 4,000 alumni in our database for whom we have no email addresses. This year we have transmitted copies to the 4,300 alumni whose email addresses we have by emailing instructions to download it from the Foundation’s website at www.ntcifoundation.ca. We intend to move almost entirely to email distribution, except we will continue to mail the newsletter by Canada Post to those who explicitly request it. This year (2011) for the last time we are also sending it by Canada Post to alumni who haven’t yet responded and for whom we have no email addresses. Our move to email will help use the Foundation’s limited resources more effectively and will also be more environmentally friendly. So, starting in May 2012, newsletters will be sent by email only unless you explicitly request a paper copy. To do this, please inform us by email or check the appropriate box on the tear-off sheet below and mail it (along with any other relevant response forms from the newsletter) to NTCI Foundation, 17 Broadway Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4P 1T7 by July 31, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberalism, Social Democracy, and Tom Kent Kenneth C
    Liberalism, Social Democracy, and Tom Kent Kenneth C. Dewar Journal of Canadian Studies/Revue d'études canadiennes, Volume 53, Number/numéro 1, Winter/hiver 2019, pp. 178-196 (Article) Published by University of Toronto Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/719555 Access provided by Mount Saint Vincent University (19 Mar 2019 13:29 GMT) Journal of Canadian Studies • Revue d’études canadiennes Liberalism, Social Democracy, and Tom Kent KENNETH C. DEWAR Abstract: This article argues that the lines separating different modes of thought on the centre-left of the political spectrum—liberalism, social democracy, and socialism, broadly speaking—are permeable, and that they share many features in common. The example of Tom Kent illustrates the argument. A leading adviser to Lester B. Pearson and the Liberal Party from the late 1950s to the early 1970s, Kent argued for expanding social security in a way that had a number of affinities with social democracy. In his paper for the Study Conference on National Problems in 1960, where he set out his philosophy of social security, and in his actions as an adviser to the Pearson government, he supported social assis- tance, universal contributory pensions, and national, comprehensive medical insurance. In close asso- ciation with his philosophy, he also believed that political parties were instruments of policy-making. Keywords: political ideas, Canada, twentieth century, liberalism, social democracy Résumé : Cet article soutient que les lignes séparant les différents modes de pensée du centre gauche de l’éventail politique — libéralisme, social-démocratie et socialisme, généralement parlant — sont perméables et qu’ils partagent de nombreuses caractéristiques.
    [Show full text]
  • Debates of the Senate
    Debates of the Senate 2nd SESSION . 41st PARLIAMENT . VOLUME 149 . NUMBER 26 OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, December 11, 2013 The Honourable NOËL A. KINSELLA Speaker CONTENTS (Daily index of proceedings appears at back of this issue). Debates Services: D'Arcy McPherson, National Press Building, Room 906, Tel. 613-995-5756 Publications Centre: David Reeves, National Press Building, Room 926, Tel. 613-947-0609 Published by the Senate Available on the Internet: http://www.parl.gc.ca 722 THE SENATE Wednesday, December 11, 2013 The Senate met at 1:30 p.m., the Speaker in the chair. practice their independent religion or who are wrongfully convicted, as happened to Mr. Ghassemi-Shall, endure torture to elicit information or confessions, and then trial by a so-called Prayers. ``judiciary'' with virtually no protection of the right to a fair process. VISITORS IN THE GALLERY According to the Iran Human Rights Documentation Centre, The Hon. the Speaker: Honourable senators, I wish to draw over 600 people have been executed in Iran in 2013. Three your attention to the presence in the gallery of Hamid Ghassemi- hundred of those have been sent to their deaths after President Shall and his spouse, Antonella Mega. They are guests of the Rouhani assumed office in August. Since Rouhani's Honourable Senator Frum. inauguration, the number of prisoners being sent to the gallows has accelerated, not decreased. On behalf of all honourable senators, I welcome you to the Senate of Canada. It was during a visit to his mother in 2008 that Hamid Ghassemi-Shall was caught up in an Orwellian nightmare while Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pulitzer Prizes 2020 Winne
    WINNERS AND FINALISTS 1917 TO PRESENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Excerpts from the Plan of Award ..............................................................2 PULITZER PRIZES IN JOURNALISM Public Service ...........................................................................................6 Reporting ...............................................................................................24 Local Reporting .....................................................................................27 Local Reporting, Edition Time ..............................................................32 Local General or Spot News Reporting ..................................................33 General News Reporting ........................................................................36 Spot News Reporting ............................................................................38 Breaking News Reporting .....................................................................39 Local Reporting, No Edition Time .......................................................45 Local Investigative or Specialized Reporting .........................................47 Investigative Reporting ..........................................................................50 Explanatory Journalism .........................................................................61 Explanatory Reporting ...........................................................................64 Specialized Reporting .............................................................................70
    [Show full text]
  • Prime Ministers
    Board of Directors 25TH ANNUAL TESTIMONIAL DINNER Chair Larry Murray Vice Admiral (Ret’d) & HONOURING CANADA’s former Deputy Minister Ian Bird President and CEO Community Foundations of Canada PRIME MINISTERS Francine Blackburn Canada’s Public Policy Forum pays tribute to our living former Prime Ministers Executive Vice President, Regulatory & Corporate Affairs and the role of the highest office in Canada’s system of governance. RBC Ken Delaney Former Executive Assistant to the National Director of the Steelworkers Union Richard Dicerni Deputy Minister Industry Canada Bruce Drysdale Principal Drysdale-Forstner-Hamilton Public Affairs Doug Emsley President Emsley & Associates Inc. The Right Hon. The Right Hon. The Right Hon. Judy Fairburn Paul Martin Jean Chrétien Kim Campbell Executive Vice-President Environment and Strategic Planning, Cenovus Energy Anne-Marie Hubert Managing Partner, Advisory Services Ernst & Young LLP Marcel Lauzière President & CEO Imagine Canada Mark Lievonen President Sanofi Pasteur Ltd. David J. Mitchell The Right Hon. The Right Hon. The Right Hon. President and CEO Brian Mulroney John Turner Joseph Clark Public Policy Forum Karen Oldfield President & CEO The 25th Annual Testimonial Dinner will take place on The Public Policy Forum is an independent, not-for-profit organization Halifax Port Authority May 3, 2012 at the Metro Toronto Convention Centre. dedicated to improving the quality of government in Canada through Stephen J. Toope enhanced dialogue among the public, private and voluntary sectors. President and Vice-Chancellor For additional information or to purchase a table of tickets: At the Forum we believe that good government, robust public policy University of British Columbia Kelly Cyr 613-238-7858 x248 [email protected] and strong democratic institutions depend on the contributions of all Ilse Treurnicht sectors of society.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Community Our Water Engagement Report
    Our Community, Our Water engagement report February 14, 2020 Welcome message Guelph residents should be proud of the well- giving residents in-person and online deserved reputation our community has for opportunities to share their thoughts, ask putting the environment first. From protecting questions and learn more about the benefits local waterways, parks and forests to taking and challenges of the proposed solution. action against climate change right here in our own backyard, we are environmental leaders Over the course of nine weeks, hundreds of that other municipalities look up to. local residents—from both the city and the Guelph-Eramosa Township—joined City staff at Last year’s proposed solution to protect the open houses, pop-up information sessions and long-term quality and quantity of Guelph’s online to have their say. There was active drinking water while revitalizing the Dolime interest in the proposed solution, which we Quarry site reinforces these values. After years attribute to the important stewardship role our of exploring numerous solutions, this was a citizens play in ensuring a healthy and major step forward that could allow our sustainable city. community to address longstanding concerns about our drinking water. City staff have captured and summarized community feedback in this public report. If accepted by Guelph City Council and the Council will consider this report alongside Province of Ontario, the proposal would see the water, financial, technical and planning aspects existing Dolime Quarry closed and revitalized of the proposed solution when making its into a new mixed-use residential decision. neighbourhood with much anticipated trail connections.
    [Show full text]
  • Miss World 1970 by Jennifer Hosten, Coming Spring 2020 About Sutherland House
    MISS WORLD 1970 BY JENNIFER HOSTEN, COMING SPRING 2020 ABOUT SUTHERLAND HOUSE Founded in 2017 by Canadian author and publishing executive Kenneth Whyte, Sutherland House is a new Toronto-based publisher of non-fiction books for global English-language audiences. Sutherland House specializes in narrative works of biography, memoir, history, business, culture, and current affairs. Aiming for high-quality and broad appeal, it published eight books in 2019 and will deliver nine in 2020. Each volume will be commissioned and edited by Mr. Whyte. All of our publications will bear the unique aesthetic of the Sutherland House brand, and be subjected to rigorous market testing from conception to launch. By maintaining a low overhead, the company is dedicating an unusually high portion of its resources to the promotion and mar- keting of its titles, which will be managed by our international network of service providers. Our Sutherland Classics series, which began in 2019 with the republication of Bernard Crick’s definitive George Orwell: A Life, is indicative of our commitment to quality non-fiction. We will reprint one or two masterpieces of biography, memoir, or character-driven history every year under the Sutherland Classics imprint. CONTACT INFORMATION CONTACT PUBLICITY SPRING 2020 THE SUTHERLAND HOUSE INC. [email protected] 416 Moore Ave, Suite 205 Toronto, ON M4G 109 RIGHTS INQUIRIES [email protected] MATTHEW BUCEMI [email protected] ORDERING INFORMATION CANADA WORLD UNIVERSITY OF BAKER AND TAYLOR TORONTO PRESS PUBLISHING SERVICES 5201 Dufferin Street 30 Amberwood Parkway Toronto, ON M3H 5T8 Ashland, OH 44805 Email: utpbooks@utpress. Tel: (888) 814-0208 utoronto.ca Email: [email protected] Misbehaviour, a major motion picture based on To be the luckiest kid in America, he first had to the author’s life and starring Keira Knightley and be the unluckiest.
    [Show full text]
  • Nurturing Media Vitality in Quebec's English-Speaking Minority
    Brief to the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage Nurturing Media Vitality in Quebec’s English-speaking Minority Communities Presented by the Quebec Community Groups Network April 12, 2016 Introduction The Quebec Community Groups Network, or QCGN, is a not-for-profit representative organization. We serve as a centre of evidence-based expertise and collective action. QCGN is focused on strategic issues affecting the development and vitality of Canada’s English linguistic minority communities, to which we collectively refer as the English-speaking community of Quebec. Our 48 members are also not-for-profit community groups. Most provide direct services to community members. Some work regionally, providing broad-based services. Others work across Quebec in specific sectors such as health, and arts and culture. Our members include the Quebec Community Newspaper Association (QCNA). English-speaking Quebec is Canada’s largest official language minority community. A little more than 1 million Quebecers specify English as their first official spoken language. Although 84 per cent of our community lives within the Montreal Census Metropolitan Area, more than 210,000 community members live in other Quebec regions. Media Landscape English-speaking Quebecers have consistently signalled that access to information in their own language is both a need and a priority (CHSSN-CROP survey, various years). This may seem a bit of a contradiction in a world awash in English language information through CNN, Time magazine and Hollywood movies galore. The important nuance is that English- speaking Quebecers need information in their own language about their own local and regional communities, something that is increasingly hard to access on a consistent basis in a context of the francization of daily life in Quebec and the demise of traditional community media.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    "The House of the Irish": Irishness, History, and Memory in Griffintown, Montreal, 1868-2009 John Matthew Barlow A Thesis In the Department of History Present in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada March 2009 © John Matthew Barlow, 2009 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-63386-1 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-63386-1 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Nnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre im primes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Forward Looking Statements
    TORSTAR CORPORATION 2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM March 20, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS ....................................................................................................................................... 1 I. CORPORATE STRUCTURE .......................................................................................................................................... 4 A. Name, Address and Incorporation .......................................................................................................................... 4 B. Subsidiaries ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 II. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS ....................................................................................................... 4 A. Three-Year History ................................................................................................................................................ 5 B. Recent Developments ............................................................................................................................................. 6 III. DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS .............................................................................................................................. 6 A. General Summary................................................................................................................................................... 6 B.
    [Show full text]