DOCSLIB.ORG

Molecular Phylogeny of Rodentia, Lagomorpha, Primates, Artiodactyla

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Molecular Phylogeny of Rodentia, Lagomorpha, Primates, Artiodactyla Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 87, pp. 6703-6707, September 1990 Evolution Molecular phylogeny of Rodentia, Lagomorpha, Primates, Artiodactyla, and Carnivora and molecular clocks (mammalian phylogeny/DNA sequence trees/branching dates) WEN-HSIUNG LI*t, MANOLO GOUY*t, PAUL M. SHARP§, COLM O'HUIGIN*, AND YAU-WEN YANG$ *Center for Demographic and Population Genetics, University of Texas, P.O. Box 20334, Houston, TX 77225; tLaboratoire de Biomdtrie, Universitd Lyon I, 69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France; §Department of Genetics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland; and IDepartment of Cell Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030 Communicated by Wyatt W. Anderson, May 14, 1990 (receivedfor review November 15, 1989) ABSTRACT Phylogenetic analysis ofDNA sequences from Lagomorpha was an outgroup to Primates and Rodentia in primates, rodents, lagomorphs, artiodactyls, carnivores, and Shoshani's (13) immunodiffusion comparisons. Finding the birds strongly suggests that the order Rodentia is an outgroup true evolutionary position of Lagomorpha has important to the other four mammalian orders and that Artiodactyla and implications not only for paleontology but also for molecular Carnivora belong to a superordinal clade. Further, there is evolution. Some authors (11, 14) have advocated the gener- strong evidence against the Glires concept, which unites Lago- ation-time effect because they found much higher rates of morpha and Rodentia. The radiation among Lagomorpha, nucleotide substitution in rodents than in humans. Under this Primates, and Artiodactyla-Carnivora is very bush-like, but hypothesis, substitution rates should also be high in rabbits there is some evidence that Lagomorpha has branched offfirst. because, like rodents, they have a short generation time. To Thus, the branching sequence for these five orders of mammals test this hypothesis, we need to determine the evolutionary seems to be Rodentia, Lagomorpha, Primates, Artiodactyla, position of Lagomorpha. and Carnivora. The branching date for Rodentia could be as early as 100 million years ago. The rate of nucleotide substi- DATA AND METHODS tution in the rodent lineage is shown to be at least 1.5 times The genes used (and their abbreviations) are apolipoprotein higher than those in the other four mammalian lineages. (Apo) Al, ApoB (3' part), ApoE, atrial natriuretic factor(ANF), A3/A1 /3-crystallin (BA3CRYST), Na',K+-ATPase a and (3 Despite the efforts of numerous comparative anatomists, subunits (ATPNKA and ATPNKB), brain and muscle creatine paleontologists, and molecular evolutionists (1-8), the kinases (CK-B and CK-M), glutathione peroxidase (GSHPX), branching order of the major eutherian lineages remains growth hormone (GH), hemoglobin a and ,3 (HBA and HBB), highly controversial. In fact, the prevailing view of eutherian interleukin la and and low evolution has always been a bush-like radiation (1, 2, 9). To insulin, 1,3 (ILlA IL1B), density untangle this phylogenetic knot, we have sequenced a num- lipoprotein receptor [LDLR (3' part)], luteinizing hormone ber of apolipoprotein (Apo) genes from several mammalian subunit P (LHB), lysozyme c (LYSOc), muscle nicotinic ace- orders and have compiled DNA sequences ofthese and other tylcholine receptor a subunit (MACHRA), c-myc oncogene genes from data banks and the literature. Our current focus (MYC), nerve growth factor (3 subunit [NGFB (3' part)], is on Primates, Rodentia, Lagomorpha, Artiodactyla, and parathyroid hormone (PTH), phospholipase A2 (PPLA2), pro- Carnivora because there are many more DNA sequence data lactin (PROLAC), protein kinase C subtypes a, (1II, and y from these five orders than from others. [PKINCA (internal part), PKINCB2, and PKINCG (internal Although Artiodactyla and Carnivora are commonly part); named according to ref. 15], proopiomelanocortin thought to have branched offprior to the primate-rodent split (POMC), protein phosphatase 2A catalytic subunit isotypes a (2, 5, 10), some authors (3, 4) maintain that Rodentia is an and ,( [PP2AA and PP2AB (3' part)], and transferrin (Transfer). outgroup to Artiodactyla, Carnivora, and Primates. The All sequence data are from GenBank Release 63 and the EMBL resolution of this issue has important consequences for data library as available by electronic mail, except for the molecular evolutionary studies. For example, using artiodac- following sequences: cow and dog ApoAl and ApoE (ref. 16; tyls and carnivores as outgroups to rodents and primates, Wu unpublished data), cow and mouse BA3CRYST (17), rat and Li (11) estimated that the rate of synonymous nucleotide PP2AA (18), and rabbit ApoE (19). substitution is -2 times higher in the rodent lineage than in We use only the coding regions of protein-coding genes the human lineage. This view was criticized by Easteal (12), because alignment for noncoding regions is difficult. Se- who argued that the rodents might be an outgroup to the other quence alignment was made at the amino acid level by a three orders. Should this be the case, the rate difference multiple alignment algorithm (20). Nucleotide alignment was between the rodent and human lineages would be reduced, then obtained according to the protein alignment. Regions although it is unlikely to be completely nullified. where alignment was uncertain were discarded. The evolutionary position of Lagomorpha has always been We use the method of Li et al. (21) to estimate the numbers controversial. Many paleontologists (4, 5) believe that Lago- of substitutions per synonymous site (Ks) and per nonsyn- morpha is closely related to Rodentia, whereas others (2, 10) onymous site (KA) between two genes. This method assumes think that it separated from Rodentia at the time of eutherian that both substitution rates are uniform over the coding radiation. Great uncertainties are also seen in molecular regions ofthe gene. This assumption may hold approximately studies (6, 7, 13). For example, Lagomorpha and Primates for the synonymous rate but is unlikely to hold well for the were put in one clade in the maximum parsimony analysis of nonsynonymous rate. Currently we are ignorant of how KA protein sequence data by Goodman et al. (6), whereas Abbreviations: Apo, apolipoprotein; MP method, maximum parsi- The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge mony method; ST method, method of Sattath and Tversky; Myr, payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" million years. in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. tTo whom reprint requests should be addressed. 6703 Downloaded by guest on September 27, 2021 6704 Evolution: Li et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87 (1990) varies among sites. Jin and Nei (22) have suggested the use also use the method of Sattath and Tversky (26) (the ST of the r distribution method), which is efficient (27) and is simple to use when only four taxa are involved. Let dij be the evolutionary distance f(A) = [pa/r(a)]e-AAa-1, [1] between taxa i and j. Then taxa 1 and 2 are neighbors (i.e., in one cluster), and so are taxa 3 and 4, if d12 + d34 is smaller where A is the substitution rate, f3 is a trivial scale parameter, than both d13 + d24 and d14 + d23. and a > 0 determines the shape and width ofthe distribution. The density f(A) is unbounded near the origin if a < 1, RESULTS decreases exponentially if a = 1, and becomes bell-shaped if a > 1. Following Jin and Nei (22) and using the two- Evidence Supporting Rodentia as an Outgroup to Primates, parameter method (23), we can show that the mean number Lagomorpha, Artiodactyla, and Carnivora. An important of substitutions per site is given by question concerning the evolutionary relationships among Rodentia, Primates, Lagomorpha, Artiodactyla, and Car- nivora is which order has branched off first? To address this Ka= [2(1-2P-Q 1/a + (1-2Q)-1/a-3], [2] question, we use a bird species (chicken) as an outgroup. To 4 maximize the use of sequence data, we consider only three of the five mammalian orders at one time. As no reliable estimate where P and Q are the proportions of transitional and of Ks can be obtained between a chicken and a mammalian transversional differences between the two sequences. If we gene, we use only KA in the following analysis. Also, in the MP use the one-parameter model, then analysis, we use only nonsynonymous changes. First, we infer the branching order of Rodentia, Primates, 3a and Artiodactyla, by using chicken as an outgroup. We use K - [(1 4p/3)-1/ - 1], [3] 4 14 genes with a total of4347 codons (see footnote to Table 1). In the ST method we consider three conditions for KA: the where p is the proportion of nucleotide differences between nonsynonymous rate is uniform among the coding regions of the two sequences. For simplicity, we have used Eq. 3. a gene, and the rate follows a r distribution with a = 1 or a In phylogenetic analysis we consider four taxa at one time = 0.5. Under each condition, we compute first the KA value because this can greatly increase the number of genes for for each gene and then the weighted average over genes using analysis and therefore can increase the power of a statistical the number ofcodons in a gene as the weight. The results are test. We use the maximum parsimony (MP) method (24); we shown in Table 1, group I. Fig. 1 a-c shows that under all infer either the minimum number of nonsynonymous substi- three conditions, Rodentia is an outgroup to Primates and tutions or the minimum number of all substitutions. In the Artiodactyla and that the internal branch is fairly long. former case we infer the minimum number of nonsynony- In the MP method, there are 265 informative nonsynony- mous changes between two codons among all possible evo- mous sites, of which 136 sites support Rodentia as an lutionary paths. The computer program is a minor modifica- outgroup, whereas only 76 and 53 sites support, respectively, tion ofthe PROTPARS program ofthe PHYLIP package (25).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Learning About Mammals
    Learning About Mammals The mammals (Class Mammalia) includes everything from mice to elephants, bats to whales and, of course, man. The amazing diversity of mammals is what has allowed them to live in any habitat from desert to arctic to the deep ocean. They live in trees, they live on the ground, they live underground, and in caves. Some are active during the day (diurnal), while some are active at night (nocturnal) and some are just active at dawn and dusk (crepuscular). They live alone (solitary) or in great herds (gregarious). They mate for life (monogamous) or form harems (polygamous). They eat meat (carnivores), they eat plants (herbivores) and they eat both (omnivores). They fill every niche imaginable. Mammals come in all shapes and sizes from the tiny pygmy shrew, weighing 1/10 of an ounce (2.8 grams), to the blue whale, weighing more than 300,000 pounds! They have a huge variation in life span from a small rodent living one year to an elephant living 70 years. Generally, the bigger the mammal, the longer the life span, except for bats, which are as small as rodents, but can live for up to 20 years. Though huge variation exists in mammals, there are a few physical traits that unite them. 1) Mammals are covered with body hair (fur). Though marine mammals, like dolphins and whales, have traded the benefits of body hair for better aerodynamics for traveling in water, they do still have some bristly hair on their faces (and embryonically - before birth). Hair is important for keeping mammals warm in cold climates, protecting them from sunburn and scratches, and used to warn off others, like when a dog raises the hair on its neck.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Field Ornithologists the Colorado Field Ornithologists' Quarterly
    Journal of the Colorado Field Ornithologists The Colorado Field Ornithologists' Quarterly VOL. 36, NO. 1 Journal of the Colorado Field Ornithologists January 2002 Vol. 36, No. 1 Journal of the Colorado Field Ornithologists January 2002 TABLE OF C ONTENTS A LETTER FROM THE E DITOR..............................................................................................2 2002 CONVENTION IN DURANGO WITH KENN KAUFMANN...................................................3 CFO BOARD MEETING MINUTES: 1 DECEMBER 2001........................................................4 TREE-NESTING HABITAT OF PURPLE MARTINS IN COLORADO.................................................6 Richard T. Reynolds, David P. Kane, and Deborah M. Finch OLIN SEWALL PETTINGILL, JR.: AN APPRECIATION...........................................................14 Paul Baicich MAMMALS IN GREAT HORNED OWL PELLETS FROM BOULDER COUNTY, COLORADO............16 Rebecca E. Marvil and Alexander Cruz UPCOMING CFO FIELD TRIPS.........................................................................................23 THE SHRIKES OF DEARING ROAD, EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO 1993-2001....................24 Susan H. Craig RING-BILLED GULLS FEEDING ON RUSSIAN-OLIVE FRUIT...................................................32 Nicholas Komar NEWS FROM THE C OLORADO BIRD R ECORDS COMMITTEE (JANUARY 2002).........................35 Tony Leukering NEWS FROM THE FIELD: THE SUMMER 2001 REPORT (JUNE - JULY)...................................36 Christopher L. Wood and Lawrence S. Semo COLORADO F IELD O
    [Show full text]
  • Genomic Analysis Reveals Hidden Biodiversity Within Colugos, the Sister Group to Primates Victor C
    Washington University School of Medicine Digital Commons@Becker Open Access Publications 2016 Genomic analysis reveals hidden biodiversity within colugos, the sister group to primates Victor C. Mason Texas A & M University - College Station Gang Li Texas A & M University - College Station Patrick Minx Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis Jürgen Schmitz University of Münster Gennady Churakov University of Münster See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/open_access_pubs Recommended Citation Mason, Victor C.; Li, Gang; Minx, Patrick; Schmitz, Jürgen; Churakov, Gennady; Doronina, Liliya; Melin, Amanda D.; Dominy, Nathaniel J.; Lim, Norman T-L; Springer, Mark S.; Wilson, Richard K.; Warren, Wesley C.; Helgen, Kristofer M.; and Murphy, William J., ,"Genomic analysis reveals hidden biodiversity within colugos, the sister group to primates." Science Advances.2,8. e1600633. (2016). https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/open_access_pubs/5209 This Open Access Publication is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons@Becker. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Becker. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Victor C. Mason, Gang Li, Patrick Minx, Jürgen Schmitz, Gennady Churakov, Liliya Doronina, Amanda D. Melin, Nathaniel J. Dominy, Norman T-L Lim, Mark S. Springer, Richard K. Wilson, Wesley C. Warren, Kristofer M. Helgen, and William J. Murphy This open access publication is available at Digital Commons@Becker: https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/open_access_pubs/5209 RESEARCH ARTICLE ZOOLOGICAL POPULATION GENETICS 2016 © The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix Lagomorph Species: Geographical Distribution and Conservation Status
    Appendix Lagomorph Species: Geographical Distribution and Conservation Status PAULO C. ALVES1* AND KLAUS HACKLÄNDER2 Lagomorph taxonomy is traditionally controversy, and as a consequence the number of species varies according to different publications. Although this can be due to the conservative characteristic of some morphological and genetic traits, like general shape and number of chromosomes, the scarce knowledge on several species is probably the main reason for this controversy. Also, some species have been discovered only recently, and from others we miss any information since they have been first described (mainly in pikas). We struggled with this difficulty during the work on this book, and decide to include a list of lagomorph species (Table 1). As a reference, we used the recent list published by Hoffmann and Smith (2005) in the “Mammals of the world” (Wilson and Reeder, 2005). However, to make an updated list, we include some significant published data (Friedmann and Daly 2004) and the contribu- tions and comments of some lagomorph specialist, namely Andrew Smith, John Litvaitis, Terrence Robinson, Andrew Smith, Franz Suchentrunk, and from the Mexican lagomorph association, AMCELA. We also include sum- mary information about the geographical range of all species and the current IUCN conservation status. Inevitably, this list still contains some incorrect information. However, a permanently updated lagomorph list will be pro- vided via the World Lagomorph Society (www.worldlagomorphsociety.org). 1 CIBIO, Centro de Investigaça˜o em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos and Faculdade de Ciˆencias, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vaira˜o 4485-661 – Vaira˜o, Portugal 2 Institute of Wildlife Biology and Game Management, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Str.
    [Show full text]
  • (Trematoda; Cestoda; Nematoda) Geographic Records from Three Species of Owls (Strigiformes) in Southeastern Oklahoma Chris T
    92 New Ectoparasite (Diptera; Phthiraptera) and Helminth (Trematoda; Cestoda; Nematoda) Geographic Records from Three Species of Owls (Strigiformes) in Southeastern Oklahoma Chris T. McAllister Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745 John M. Kinsella HelmWest Laboratory, 2108 Hilda Avenue, Missoula, MT 59801 Lance A. Durden Department of Biology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30458 Will K. Reeves Colorado State University, C. P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Fort Collins, CO 80521 Abstract: We are just now beginning to learn about the ectoparasites and helminth parasites of some owls of Oklahoma. Some recent contributions from our lab have attempted to help fill a previous void in that information. Here, we report, four taxa of ectoparasites and five helminth parasites from three species of owls in Oklahoma. They include two species of chewing lice (Strigiphilus syrnii and Kurodeia magna), two species of hippoboscid flies (Icosta americana and Ornithoica vicina), a trematode (Strigea elegans) and a cestode (Paruterina candelabraria) from barred owls (Strix varia), and three nematodes, Porrocaecum depressum from an eastern screech owl (Megascops asio), Capillaria sp. eggs from S. varia, and Capillaria tenuissima from a great horned owl (Bubo virginianus). With the exception of Capillaria sp. eggs and I. americana, all represent new state records for Oklahoma and extend our knowledge of the parasitic biota of owls of the state. to opportunistically examine raptors from the Introduction state and document new geographic records for their parasites in Oklahoma. Over 455 species of birds have been reported Methods from Oklahoma and several are species of raptors or birds of prey that make up an important Between January 2018 and September 2019, portion of the avian fauna of the state (Sutton three owls were found dead on the road in 1967; Baumgartner and Baumgartner 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Melo-Ferreira J, Lemos De Matos A, Areal H, Lissovski A, Carneiro M, Esteves PJ (2015) The
    1 This is the Accepted version of the following article: 2 Melo-Ferreira J, Lemos de Matos A, Areal H, Lissovski A, Carneiro M, Esteves PJ (2015) The 3 phylogeny of pikas (Ochotona) inferred from a multilocus coalescent approach. Molecular 4 Phylogenetics and Evolution 84, 240-244. 5 The original publication can be found here: 6 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790315000081 7 8 The phylogeny of pikas (Ochotona) inferred from a multilocus coalescent approach 9 10 José Melo-Ferreiraa,*, Ana Lemos de Matosa,b, Helena Areala,b, Andrey A. Lissovskyc, Miguel 11 Carneiroa, Pedro J. Estevesa,d 12 13 aCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, 14 InBIO, Laboratório Associado, Campus Agrário de Vairão, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal 15 bDepartamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, 4099-002 Porto, 16 Portugal 17 cZoological Museum of Moscow State University, B. Nikitskaya, 6, Moscow 125009, Russia 18 dCITS, Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias da Saúde, IPSN, CESPU, Gandra, Portugal 19 20 *Corresponding author: José Melo-Ferreira. CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e provided by Repositório Aberto da Universidade do Porto View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk CORE brought to you by 21 Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus Agrário de 22 Vairão, 4485-661 Vairão. Phone: +351 252660411. E-mail: [email protected]. 23 1 1 Abstract 2 3 The clarification of the systematics of pikas (genus Ochotona) has been hindered by largely 4 overlapping morphological characters among species and the lack of a comprehensive molecular 5 phylogeny.
    [Show full text]
  • Host and Viral Traits Predict Zoonotic Spillover from Mammals Kevin J
    LETTER doi:10.1038/nature22975 Host and viral traits predict zoonotic spillover from mammals Kevin J. Olival1, Parviez R. Hosseini1, Carlos Zambrana-Torrelio1, Noam Ross1, Tiffany L. Bogich1 & Peter Daszak1 The majority of human emerging infectious diseases are zoonotic, highest for Bunya-, Flavi- and Arenaviruses in rodents; Flavi-, Bunya- with viruses that originate in wild mammals of particular concern and Rhabdoviruses in bats; and Herpesviruses in non-human primates (for example, HIV, Ebola and SARS)1–3. Understanding patterns (Extended Data Fig. 2). Of 586 mammalian viruses in our dataset, of viral diversity in wildlife and determinants of successful cross- 263 (44.9%) have been detected in humans, 75 of which are exclu- species transmission, or spillover, are therefore key goals for sively human and 188 (71.5% of human viruses) zoonotic—defined pandemic surveillance programs4. However, few analytical tools operationally here as viruses detected at least once in humans and at exist to identify which host species are likely to harbour the next least once in another mammal species (Methods). The proportion human virus, or which viruses can cross species boundaries5–7. Here of zoonotic viruses is higher for RNA (159 of 382, 41.6%) than DNA we conduct a comprehensive analysis of mammalian host–virus (29 of 205, 14.1%) viruses. The observed number of viruses per wild relationships and show that both the total number of viruses that host species was comparable when averaged across orders, but bats, infect a given species and the proportion likely to be zoonotic are primates, and rodents had a higher proportion of observed zoonotic predictable.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal Fauna of Ihlara Valley (Aksaray, Turkey)
    BITLIS EREN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 7(2) (2017) 108–114 Available online at www.dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/beuscitech/ Journal of Science and Technology E-ISSN 2146-7706 Mammal fauna of Ihlara Valley (Aksaray, Turkey) Kubilay Toyran a,* , Tarkan Yorulmaz b , Serdar Gözütok c a Bitlis Eren University, Faculty of Science and Arts, Department of Biology, Bitlis, Turkey b Çankırı Karatekin University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Çankırı, Turkey c Abant İzzet Baysal Universty, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, Department of Wildlife and Ecology, Bolu, Turkey A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: This study was conducted between 2010 and 2011. The goal of study is to identify mammal species in Received 16 November 2017 the area and determine factors threatening these species. As a result of field studies, totally 20 species Received in revised form 28 November were identified from the orders Eulipotyphla, Chiroptera, Lagomorpha, Rodentia, Carnivora, and 2017 Artiodactyla of Mammal class. Factors that threaten mammal species and protective measures were Accepted 29 November 2017 given. Keywords: Mammal species Distribution Ihlara Valley Turkey © 2017. Turkish Journal Park Academic. All rights reserved. being about 14 km long also has a microclimate property due 1. Introduction to its position. When considering these characteristics, it is important to identify mammal species in the valley and to Turkey is considerably rich in elements of fauna and flora due determine the activities threatening these species. to its geographical location. Ecological, geological, and climatic differences of the country play an important role in 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology of Rodents and Lagomorphs
    Taxonomy of rodents Biology of rodents and lagomorphs Class : Mammalia (mammals) Order: Rodentia (rodents) Family : Muride (rats and mice) Joanna Godawa Stormark Sub-family: Murinae Genus: Mus Species: Mus musculus Linnaeus, 1758 Genus: Rattus Species: Rattus norvegicus (Berkenhout, 1769) Rodent features Rodent origin and distribution 2 pairs of incisors in the upper and lower jaw Rodent are monophyletics Behind the incisors is a large gap in the tooth rows The sub-family Murinae emerged in Southeastern called diastema Asia at the end of the oligocene and the start of the miocene periodes (25-20 mill. years ago) Most species are nocturnal Occurs throughout the world, excluding Most species are continuously polyoestrous Antartica The mouse Rodent diet Most species are herbivores, some are omnivores and insectivores Herbivore rodents are coprophagous Mouse breeding Mouse breeding The modern laboratory mouse is a hybrid of three sub-species: Mus musculus musculus , M. m. domesticus and M. m. castaneus The gestation period is 20 days Lifespan is 1-2 years The average litter size is 10-12 Mouse as all rodents is polyoestrouse Sexual cycle lasts 5 (4-7) days The pups weigh 0.5 to 1.5 grams at birth The Whitten effect occurs – the synchronization of the estrous cycles of female exposed to the pheromones of a male Pups are weaned at 3 weeks of age The Bruce effect occurs - the exposure of a recently bred mouse to the pheromones of a strange male mouse prevent implantation or produce pseudopregnancy Lee Boot effect occurs Mouse behaviour Mouse
    [Show full text]
  • A New Leporine (Lagomorpha: Leporidae) from Wisconsinan Deposits of the Chihuahuan Desert
    A NEW LEPORINE (LAGOMORPHA: LEPORIDAE) FROM WISCONSINAN DEPOSITS OF THE CHIHUAHUAN DESERT BRETT D. RUSSELL AND ARTHUR H. HARRIS Laboratory for Environmental Biology, University of Texas at EI Paso, EI Paso, TX 79968 ABSTRACT.-A new genus and species of rabbit is described from late Pleistocene (mid-Wis­ consinan) deposits of Dry Cave, southeastern New Mexico. Additional specimens are known from Anthony Cave, south-central New Mexico and adjacent Texas; V-Bar Cave, extreme southwestern New Mexico; and Jimenez Cave, southern Chihuahua, Mexico. This rabbit is characterized by its small size, nearing that of the dwarf rabbit, Sylvilagus leonensis Cushing; P, enamel pattern with similarities to that of Nekrolagus progressus (Hibbard); heavily crenulated reentrant folds on the lower dentition; long mandibular diastema with incisor terminating well anterior to P3 ; and limb proportions that imply a cursorial habit similar to that of Lepus caiijornicus. A close affinity with N. progressus is indicated by characters of P3 ; however, other features in the lower dentition could imply affinity with Eurasian taxa. The purpose of this paper is to describe a new genus and species of fossil rabbit from the Chihuahuan Desert of North America. During a series of excavations conducted between 1965 and 1971, remains of a small rabbit were recovered from mid-Wisconsinan deposits of Dry Cave, 24 km W of Carlsbad, New Mexico, at an elevation of 1,280 m (see Harris, 1970, for description of Dry Cave and the local environment). Due to insufficient material, its affinities remained a mystery until January of 1982, when further excavations uncovered the first mandibles with dentition.
    [Show full text]
  • Colugos: Obscure Mammals Glide Into the Evolutionary Limelight Robert D Martin
    BioMed Central Minireview Colugos: obscure mammals glide into the evolutionary limelight Robert D Martin Address: Department of Anthropology, The Field Museum, Chicago, IL 60605-2496, USA. Email: [email protected] Published: 1 May 2008 Journal of Biology 2008, 7:13 (doi:10.1186/jbiol74) The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at http://jbiol.com/content/7/4/13 © 2008 BioMed Central Ltd Abstract Substantial molecular evidence indicates that tree-shrews, colugos and primates cluster together on the mammalian phylogenetic tree. Previously, a sister-group relationship between colugos and primates seemed likely. A new study of colugo chromosomes indicates instead an affinity between colugos and tree-shrews. Colugos, constituting the obscure and tiny order Dermop- shrews, tree-shrews, colugos, bats and primates. However, tera, are gliding mammals confined to evergreen tropical Simpson’s ensuing influential classification of mammals [1] rainforests of South-East Asia. There are two extant species, rejected this assemblage. Subsequently, prompted by Butler now placed in separate genera: Galeopterus variegatus [4], the superorder Archonta was progressively resuscitated, (Malayan colugo, formerly known as Cynocephalus variegatus) although most authors emphatically excluded elephant- and Cynocephalus volans (Philippine colugo). Their most shrews (for example [5,6]). A quite recent major classifi- obvious hallmark is a gliding membrane (patagium) cation of mammals [7] united tree-shrews, colugos, bats surrounding almost the entire body margin. Colugos are and primates in the grand order Archonta. also called ‘flying lemurs’, but - as Simpson aptly noted [1] - they “are not lemurs and cannot fly”. They differ from other This whole topic has been reinvigorated by molecular gliding mammals (certain rodents and marsupials) in that evidence indicating that tree-shrews, colugos and primates, the patagium also extends between the hind limbs and the at least, may be quite closely related.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are the Keys to the Adaptive Success of European Wild Rabbit (Oryctolagus Cuniculus) in the Iberian Peninsula?
    animals Review What Are the Keys to the Adaptive Success of European Wild Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in the Iberian Peninsula? Pablo Jesús Marín-García 1,2,* and Lola Llobat 2,* 1 Institute for Animal Science and Technology, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain 2 Department of Animal Production and Health, Veterinary Public Health and Food Science and Technology (PASAPTA), Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, 46113 Valencia, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] (P.J.M.-G.); [email protected] (L.L.) Simple Summary: Why might a species both be seriously threatened and pose an overpopulation problem in introduced locations? The aim of this review was to understand the keys to the adaptive success of the wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in order to establish its strengths and weaknesses for the management of this keystone species in Mediterranean ecosystems. This work highlights the need to create specific conservation programs for this species. Abstract: The European wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) plays an important ecological role in the ecosystems of the Iberian Peninsula. Recently, rabbit populations have drastically reduced, so the species is now considered endangered. However, in some places, this animal is considered a pest. This is the conservation paradox of the 21st century: the wild rabbit is both an invasive alien and an endangered native species. The authors of this review aimed to understand the keys to the adaptive success of European rabbits, addressing all aspects of their biology in order to provide the keys to the ecological management of this species.
    [Show full text]