Protective Devices of the Carnivorous Butterfly, Spalgis Epius (Westwood) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Protective Devices of the Carnivorous Butterfly, Spalgis Epius (Westwood) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE Protective devices of the carnivorous butterfly, Spalgis epius (Westwood) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) The apefly, Spalgis epius is a rare butter- and hidden. Aitken6 described the larva leaf and pupates after firmly attaching on fly and an inhabitant of wooded areas. and pupa of S. epius. The larvae were its ventral side to the leaf. Usually most observers miss it due to its found feeding voraciously on the egg The length, width and height of the retiring nature, small size and rather drab masses, nymphs and adults of mealybugs. pupa are 5.0–6.1 mm (5.6 ± 0.44), 3.5– colour. The species is known to occur in As the young larvae of S. epius simulate 4.2 mm (3.90 ± 0.19) and 3.2–4.1 mm Sikkim, Kolkata, Malda, South India, mealybugs, it is difficult to recognize them (3.55 ± 0.32) respectively. The bold pat- Burma and Sri Lanka1–3. Lycaenids are amidst the host population. Similarly, the tern on the hard dorsal side of the pupa unique in their larval stage as they eat young larvae of S. lemolea (Holl.) in of S. epius resembles the face of a rhesus unrelated food, including flowering plants, Africa24 and S. substrigata (Snell) in Philip- monkey (Figure 2 b). The pupa shows fungi, lichens, cycads, ferns, conifers, ant pines25 are camouflaged with the mea- clear spots of eyes, nose, mouth, cheeks larvae and homopterans4,5. The larva of lybug population. The mature larva of and forehead on the dorsal side. S. epius S. epius has been recorded as a predator S. epius measures 14.5–19.0 mm (16.48 ± pupa is light brown on the dorso-lateral on various species of pseudococcids 1.66) in length and 5.08–6.50 mm (5.72 ± side and whitish-grey on the ventral side. (mealybugs)2,6–16 and coccids (scale in- 0.38) in width. It is known that many edible, unrelated sects)8,17,18. Recently, the larvae of this The red ant, Oecophylla smaragdina species avoid predation by mimicking butterfly were found on different species (F.) or the black ant, Crematogaster sp. the appearance of a dangerous or offen- of croton plants, Codiaeum spp. infested attends the mealybugs since they secrete sive species. Many lycaenid adults dis- with mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso) honeydew, as reported earlier26–29 (Fig- play patterns of colour, structure and (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) at the Jnana- ure 2 a). These ants, particularly O. sma- behaviour that are consistent with deflect- bharathi campus, Bangalore University. ragdina were found attacking the mature ing predator attacks towards a false pat- Though the butterfly is known to be a larvae of S. epius whenever they encoun- tern34. There is always a chance of pre- potential predator of different species of tered them. These larvae are much bigger dation of quiescent pupae of S. epius by mealybugs19–23, its activity is rarely noti- than the mealybugs and do not secrete predatory birds or by other natural ene- ced these days in the field wherever in- honeydew sought by the ants; thus ants mies that visit mealybugs. Though the secticides are used indiscriminately for interfere with the predatory activity of insect-predatory bird, dull green leaf war- the control of various insect pests, parti- the larvae. Crematogaster sp. was found bler, Phylloscopus trochiloides (Sunde- cularly homopterans. to be less hostile to S. epius caterpillars. vall) seldom visited the mealybug-infes- Except for being reported as a preda- However, both the ants did not attack ted bushes and devoured the crawling tor, not much information is available on young larvae of S. epius that look like mature S. epius larvae on the leaves, it the biology and behaviour of S. epius. mealybugs. Though most of the honey- Adult of S. epius is a small butterfly with secreting lycaenids are myrmecophilous dark brown wings above, and grey under- (associated with ants), either to protect side with dark striations. Forewing has themselves against larval and pupal ene- a small quadrate spot at the cell end in mies, especially parasitoids, or to feed on male (Figure 1 a), and larger and some- the larvae of ants4,8,24,27,29,30–33, a few lyca- what diffuse in female1,2. Dorsal side of enid homopterophagous aberrant genera the thorax is dark and glossy, encircled by such as Aslauga of subfamily Leptininae, tufts of white hair. Dorso-lateral region and Spalgis, Fenisca and Megalopalpus of abdomen is dark brown, whereas ven- of subfamily Lycaeninae are amyrmeco- tral side is covered with layers of white philous (not associated with ants). They hair. The body length and wingspan of defend themselves from the homopteran- the adult are 9.95–11.50 mm (10.63 ± associated ants by means other than honey 0.48) and 18.0–22.5 mm (20.83 ± 1.44) secretion and ants derive no benefit from respectively. The butterfly flies rapidly the presence of the lycaenin larvae8,28,32. and erratically in the vicinity of bushes Unlike other lycaenids, the larvae and infested with mealybugs and it swiftly pupae of these genera lack any sort of deposits eggs in the mass of the mea- organ that yields an ant confection, and lybugs. Occasionally, it has the habit of ants that visit honey-secreting homop- landing to rest persistently on its prefer- terans are hostile to the caterpillars8,32. red perch. Owing to the dull colour, rapid However, these are protected against ants and erratic flight, and swift egg deposi- either by their obscure position among or tion habits of adult S. epius females, it is beneath their host prey, by the thick difficult for the predators (birds, lizards, cuticle on the dorsal body wall, or by etc.) to attack them in the field. their bristly vestiture8. The mature larvae The larva of the butterfly has a pecu- of S. epius seem to protect themselves liar appearance and it is morphologically against the mealybug-attending ants by different from that of other species of maintaining an adequate distance from butterflies in general, being short, slug- them and by having hard, thick dorsal like and covered with white wax coating cuticle. S. epius larva headed for pupa- Figure 1. a, Male Spalgis epius butterfly. b, (Figure 1 b). Legs of the larva are short tion, crawls to the lower surface of the Fully grown larvae of S. epius. CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 87, NO. 5, 10 SEPTEMBER 2004 571 SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE avoided attacking the monkey-faced pupae ral enemies either by ants, which are 19. Chacko, M. J., Bhat, P. K. and Ramanara- that existed in the same bushes. However, attracted to pupal ant-gland, by camou- yan, E. P., J. Coffee Res., 1978, 7, 69–71. the birds were never found to attack the flage, or by making a creaking noise8,38. 20. Gowda, D. K. S., Manjunath, D., Pradip stationary larvae, probably since they re- As these features are not found in S. epius Kumar, Datta, R. K. and Kumar, P., Insect semble bird-droppings at a distance. Simi- pupae, the aposematic sign of the pupae Environ., 1996, 2, 87–88. larly, various lycaenid caterpillars are to predators perhaps has a great adaptive 21. Mani, M. and Krishnamoorthy, A., Ento- known to escape from bird predation35. value in protecting them in the sedentary mon., 1998, 23, 105–110. Moreover, the ants O. smaragdina and stage under vulnerable habitat. 22. Prakasan, C. B., J. Coffee Res., 1987, 17, Crematogaster sp. attending the mealy- It is generally agreed that the primitive 114–117. 23. Reddy, K. B., Bhat, P. K. and Naidu, R., bugs are common predators of insects members of lycaenids were plant-feeders, Pest Manage. Econ. Zool., 1999, 5, 119– that do not secrete honeydew8,27–29,36,37. and that homopterophagous (carnivorous) 121. Even the pupae of lycaenid, Iolaus spp. habit is a secondary specialization aris- 24. Lamborn, W. A., Trans. Entomol. Soc. are devoured by Crematogaster ants, which ing from association with ants39,40, which 35 London, 1914, 61, 438–524. conversely protect them as larvae . How- live in the vicinity of honeydew-secret- 25. Smith, H. S., Bull. St. Comm. Hort. Calif., ever, these ants never attacked amyrme- ing homopterans. Thus many species of 1914, 3, 26–29. cophilous S. epius pupae. Even though the Lycaenidae counter attack from natural 26. Anon., In Coffee Guide, Central Coffee pupa is small, it might scare away ene- enemies by associating with protective Research Institute, 1998. mies because of its appearance (monkey- ants. When many phytophagous–myrme- 27. Holldobler, B. and Wilson, E. O., In The faced). Balduf8 considers the monkey- cophilous/homopterophagous–myrmeco- Ants, The Belknap Press of Harvard Uni- faced appearance of some lycaenid pupae philous lycaenid genera get protection by versity Press, Cambridge, 1990. as a means of protection, but does not associating themselves with ants, why a 28. Wheeler, W. M., In Ants, Columbia Uni- clearly state its significance. Generally, few homopterophagous lycaenids, includ- versity Press, New York, 1960. lycaenid pupae are protected from natu- ing S. epius evolved as amyrmecophilous 29. Wilson, E. O., In The Insect Societies, type is not clearly understood. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1976. 1. Bingham, C. T., In The Fauna of British 30. Clark, G. C. and Dickson, C. G. C., In India Including Ceylon and Burma, But- Life Histories of South African Lycaenid terflies, Taylor and Francis, London, 1907, Butterflies, Purnell, Capetown, 1971. vol. II. 31. DeVries, P. J., Science, 1990, 248, 1104– 2. De Niceville, L., In Butterflies of India, 1106. Burma and Ceylon, The Calcutta Central 32.
Recommended publications
  • Variation in Butterfly Diversity and Unique Species Richness Along
    Check List 8(3): 432-436, 2012 © 2012 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution PECIES S OF Sanctuary,Variation in Tripura, butterfly northeast diversity India and unique species ISTS L richness along different habitats in Trishna Wildlife * Joydeb Majumder, Rahul Lodh and B. K. Agarwala [email protected] Tripura University, Department of Zoology, Ecology and Biodiversity Laboratories, Suryamaninagar – 799 022, Tripura, India. * Corresponding author. E-mail: Abstract: Quantification of butterfly diversity and species richness is of prime importance for evaluating the status of protected areas. Permanent line transect counts were used to record species richness and abundance of butterfly communities of different habitat types in Trishna wildlife sanctuary. A total of 1005 individuals representing 59 species in 48 genera belonging to five families were recorded in the present study. Of these, 23 species belonged to the family Nymphalidae and accounted for 38.98% of the total species and 45.20% of the total number of individuals. Mature secondary mixed moist deciduous forest showed the maximum diversity and species richness, while exotic grassland showed minimum diversity and species richness. Out of 59 species, 31 are new records for Tripura state, while 21 are unique species and nine are listed in the threatened category. This study revealed that mature secondary forests are more important for butterfly communities, while exotic grasslands have a negative impact on species composition. Introduction state of Tripura (10,490 sq km), in northeastern India In the humid tropics, due to deforestation of primary (Mandal et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 346 Genus Spalgis Moore
    AFROTROPICAL BUTTERFLIES 17th edition (2018). MARK C. WILLIAMS. http://www.lepsocafrica.org/?p=publications&s=atb Genus Spalgis Moore, 1879 Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1879: 137 (136-144). Type-species: Geridus epeus Westwood, by monotypy [extralimital]. The genus Spalgis belongs to the Family Lycaenidae Leach, 1815; Subfamily Miletinae Reuter, 1896; Tribe Spalgini Toxopeus, 1929. There is no other genus in the Tribe Spalgini in the Afrotropical Region. Spalgis (Harvesters) is a genus containing three Afrotropical and one Oriental species (the type species of the genus). None of the Afrotropical species has a distribution that extends extralimitally. Females oviposit among coccid prey. Oecophylla ants are thought to prevent egg-laying when they are attending coccids. Larvae live among colonies of prey which may be without ants or might be attended by a wide variety of different genera including Crematogaster, Oecophylla and Anaplocnemis. Larvae may actually enter Crematogaster nests to prey on intranidal coccids. Larvae are not apparently attended by ants and seem to be largely ignored by them. Usually larvae are covered with debris composed of the waxy secretions and the cuticles of prey that have become entangled in their setae. This covering apparently serves as a protection against ants since artificially denuded larvae are attacked when introduced into ant-tended colonies whereas larvae with their covering intact are not. A scarcity of larvae in Oecophylla attended coccid colonies is probably due to prevention of oviposition in the vicinity of these colonies. Larvae introduced into such colonies can survive and feed in them. The DNO and TOs are absent.
    [Show full text]
  • Bugs R Al, No
    ISSN 2230 – 7052 Newsletter of the $WIU4#NNInvertebrate Conservation & Information Network of South Asia (ICINSA) No. 22, MAY 2016 C. Sunil Kumar Photo: CONTENTS Pages Authenc report of Ceresium leucosccum White (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Callidiopini) from Pune and Satara in Maharashtra State --- Paripatyadar, S., S. Gaikwad and H.V. Ghate ... 2-3 First sighng of the Apefly Spalgis epeus epeus Westwood, 1851 (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae: Milenae: Spalgini) from the Garhwal Himalaya --- Sanjay Sondhi ... 4-5 On a collecon of Odonata (Insecta) from Lonar (Crater) Lake and its environs, Buldhana district, Maharashtra, India --- Muhamed Jafer Palot ... 6-9 Occurrence of Phyllodes consobrina Westwood 1848 (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera) from Southern Western Ghats, India and a review of distribuonal records --- Prajith K.K., Anoop Das K.S., Muhamed Jafer Palot and Longying Wen ... 10-11 First Record of Gerosis bhagava Moore 1866 (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) from Bangladesh --- Ashis Kumar Daa ... 12 Present status on some common buerflies in Rahara area, West Bengal --- Wrick Chakraborty & Partha P. Biswas ... 13-17 Addions to the Buerfly fauna of Sundarbans Mangrove Forest, Bangladesh --- Ashis Kumar Daa ... 18 Study on buerfly (Papilionoidea) diversity of Bilaspur city --- Shubhada Rahalkar ... 19-23 Bio-ecology of Swallowtail (Lepidoptera:Papilionidae) Buerflies in Gautala Wildlife Sanctuary of Maharashtra India -- Shinde S.S. Nimbalkar R.K. and Muley S.P. ... 24-26 New report of midge gall (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) on Ziziphus xylopyrus (Retz.) Willd. (Rhamnaceae) from Northern Western Ghats. Mandar N. Datar and R.M. Sharma ... 27 Rapid assessment of buerfly diversity in a ecotone adjoining Bannerghaa Naonal Park, South Bengaluru Alexander R. Avinash K. Phalke S. Manidip M.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology, Predatory Activity and Peoples'perceptions Towards Apefly
    The Nelson Mandela AFrican Institution of Science and Technology NM-AIST Repository https://dspace.mm-aist.ac.tz Life sciences and Bio-engineering PhD Theses and Dissertations [LiSBE] 2020-05 Biology, predatory activity and peoples’perceptions towards apefly (spalgis spp.) in Tanzania Nasari, Sayuni P. https://dspace.nm-aist.ac.tz/handle/20.500.12479/927 Provided with love from The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology BIOLOGY, PREDATORY ACTIVITY AND PEOPLES’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARDS APEFLY (Spalgis spp.) IN TANZANIA Sayuni P. Nasari A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Life Sciences of the Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology Arusha, Tanzania May, 2020 ABSTRACT In June 2017, farmers in central and northern Tanzania reported the occurrence of what they called an unusual insect with a human-like facial appearance that they referred to as “Kidudu-mtu.” The reports prompted the need to assess the identity and occurrence of the insect in Tanzania. This research was conducted between March and August 2018 in Iringa, Morogoro, Shinyanga, Geita and Arusha regions. A total of 89 people in the study regions were purposely interviewed to determine their knowledge, perceptions and reactions towards the insect. Insect samples were collected and submitted to the Tropical Pesticide Research Institute (TPRI) for preliminary identification and toxicity test. Molecular identification was done at the Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NM-AIST) laboratory. The insect’s predatory activity against the papaya mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink) was assessed at Tanzania Agricultural Research Institute (TARI) Tengeru.
    [Show full text]
  • Dysdercus Cingulatus
    Prelims (F) Page i Monday, August 25, 2003 9:52 AM Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects D.F. Waterhouse (ACIAR Consultant in Plant Protection) Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Canberra 1998 Prelims (F) Page ii Monday, August 25, 2003 9:52 AM The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. Its primary mandate is to help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing country researchers in fields where Australia has special competence. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by the Centre. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This peer-reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or deemed relevant to ACIAR’s research objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on the Third World ©Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research GPO Box 1571, Canberra, ACT 2601. Waterhouse, D.F. 1998, Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects. ACIAR Monograph No. 51, 548 pp + viii, 1 fig. 16 maps. ISBN 1 86320 221 8 Design and layout by Arawang Communication Group, Canberra Cover: Nezara viridula adult, egg rafts and hatching nymphs. Printed by Brown Prior Anderson, Melbourne ii Prelims (F) Page iii Monday, August 25, 2003 9:52 AM Contents Foreword vii 1 Abstract 1 2 Estimation of biological control
    [Show full text]
  • Lycaenidae): Phylogeny, Ecology, and Conservation John Mathew Old Dominion University
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations Biological Sciences Summer 2003 Aphytophagy in the Miletinae (Lycaenidae): Phylogeny, Ecology, and Conservation John Mathew Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Entomology Commons, and the Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Mathew, John. "Aphytophagy in the Miletinae (Lycaenidae): Phylogeny, Ecology, and Conservation" (2003). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), dissertation, Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/v7rh-mb21 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds/74 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. APHYTOPHAGY IN THE MILETINAE (LYCAENIDAE): PHYLOGENY, ECOLOGY, AND CONSERVATION by John Mathew B.Sc. June 1990, Madras Christian College M.Sc. June 1992, Madras Christian College M.Phil. May 1994, Madras University A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ECOLOGICAL SCIENCES OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 2003 Approved by: Deborah A. Waller (Co-Director) »mi E. Pierce (Co-Director) H. Savitzky (Member) Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT APHYTOPHAGY IN THE MILETINAE (LYCAENIDAE): PHYTOGENY, ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION John Mathew Old Dominion University, 2003 Co-Directors of Advisory Committee: Dr. Deborah A. Waller Dr. Naomi E. Pierce Less than 1% of all Lepidoptera are aphytophagous; of these, a considerable proportion is found in the family Lycaenidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Selecting Flagships for Invertebrate Conservation
    Biodivers Conserv (2012) 21:1457–1476 DOI 10.1007/s10531-012-0257-7 ORIGINAL PAPER Selecting flagships for invertebrate conservation Maan Barua • Daniel J. Gurdak • Riyaz Akhtar Ahmed • Jatin Tamuly Received: 19 July 2011 / Accepted: 14 February 2012 / Published online: 4 March 2012 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Abstract Invertebrates have a low public profile and are seriously underrepresented in global conservation efforts. The promotion of flagship species is one way to generate interest in invertebrate conservation. Butterflies are frequently labeled invertebrate flag- ships, but clear definitions of the conservation actions they are meant to catalyze, and empirical assessments of their popularity amongst non-Western audiences are lacking. To improve the use of invertebrate flagships, we examine how butterflies compare with other taxa in terms of popularity. We then identify characteristics of individual species that are appealing and explore whether these may be used to derive a set of guidelines for selecting invertebrate flagships. We conducted questionnaire-based surveys amongst two target audiences: rural residents (n = 255) and tourists (n = 105) in northeast India. Inverte- brates that were aesthetically appealing, or those that provided material benefits or eco- logical services were liked. Butterflies were the most popular group for both audiences, followed by dragonflies, honeybees and earthworms. A combination of large size and bright colours led to high popularity of individual species, whilst butterflies with unique Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10531-012-0257-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. M. Barua School of Geography and the Environment, Dysons Perrins Building, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK e-mail: [email protected] D.
    [Show full text]
  • Predatory and Parasitic Lepidoptera: Carnivores Living on Plants
    Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 49(4), 1995, 412-453 PREDATORY AND PARASITIC LEPIDOPTERA: CARNIVORES LIVING ON PLANTS NAOMI E. PIERCE Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138, USA ABSTRACT. Moths and butterflies whose larvae do not feed on plants represent a decided minority slice of lepidopteran diversity, yet offer insights into the ecology and evolution of feeding habits. This paper summarizes the life histories of the known pred­ atory and parasitic lepidopteran taxa, focusing in detail on current research in the butterfly family Lycaenidae, a group disproportionately rich in aphytophagous feeders and myr­ mecophilous habits. More than 99 percent of the 160,000 species of Lepidoptera eat plants (Strong et al. 1984, Common 1990). Plant feeding is generally associated with high rates of evolutionary diversification-while only 9 of the 30 extant orders of insects (Kristensen 1991) feed on plants, these orders contain more than half of the total number of insect species (Ehrlich & Raven 1964, Southwood 1973, Mitter et al. 1988, cf. Labandiera & Sepkoski 1993). Phytophagous species are characterized by specialized diets, with fewer than 10 percent having host ranges of more than three plant families (Bernays 1988, 1989), and butterflies being particularly host plant-specific (e.g., Remington & Pease 1955, Remington 1963, Ehrlich & Raven 1964). This kind of life history specialization and its effects on population structure may have contributed to the diversification of phytophages by promoting population subdivision and isolation (Futuyma & Moreno 1988, Thompson 1994). Many studies have identified selective forces giving rise to differences in niche breadth (Berenbaum 1981, Scriber 1983, Rausher 1983, Denno & McClure 1983, Strong et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Bionomics of the African Apefly (Spalgis Lemolea)
    sustainability Article Bionomics of the African Apefly (Spalgis lemolea) as A Potential Natural Enemy of the Papaya Mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus) in Tanzania Sayuni P. Nasari 1,*, Anna C. Treydte 1, Patrick A. Ndakidemi 1 and Ernest R. Mbega 1 Department of Sustainable Agriculture, Biodiversity and Ecosystems Management, Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha P. O. Box 447, Tanzania * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 20 February 2020; Accepted: 2 April 2020; Published: 14 April 2020 Abstract: The African apefly (Spalgis lemolea Druce) is a potential natural enemy of the papaya mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink). We studied the life history of apeflies in the laboratory at a temperature of 25–27 ◦C and a relative humidity of 55%–65% under a 12 h photoperiod condition. The papaya mealybugs and apefly larvae were collected from papaya plants in Tengeru, Arusha, Tanzania. The papaya mealybugs were introduced and allowed to multiply on potted sprouting potato plants in screened cages. In order to study the life cycle and predation of apeflies, an apefly egg was placed on an open screen-covered petri dish containing a moist blotter paper and observed for larva emergence. After the apefly larva emergence, a mixture of mealybug eggs (up to 1500), nymphs (200–250) and adults (100–150) was introduced in the petri dish each day and the consumption rate by the apefly larvae was quantified until the larvae reached pupal stage. Then, the apefly adults were collected and put into cages 30 cm 30 cm 30 cm containing × × cotton wool soaked in water, for observation of pre-mating, mating, egg-laying and life span.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review, of Systematics of Western North American Butterflies
    (NEW Dec. 3, PAPILIO SERIES) ~19 2008 CORRECTIONS/REVIEWS OF 58 NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLY BOOKS Dr. James A. Scott, 60 Estes Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226-1254 Abstract. Corrections are given for 58 North American butterfly books. Most of these books are recent. Misidentified figures mostly of adults, erroneous hostplants, and other mistakes are corrected in each book. Suggestions are made to improve future butterfly books. Identifications of figured specimens in Holland's 1931 & 1898 Butterfly Book & 1915 Butterfly Guide are corrected, and their type status clarified, and corrections are made to F. M. Brown's series of papers on Edwards; types (many figured by Holland), because some of Holland's 75 lectotype designations override lectotype specimens that were designated later, and several dozen Holland lectotype designations are added to the J. Pelham Catalogue. Type locality designations are corrected/defined here (some made by Brown, most by others), for numerous names: aenus, artonis, balder, bremnerii, brettoides, brucei (Oeneis), caespitatis, cahmus, callina, carus, colon, colorado, coolinensis, comus, conquista, dacotah, damei, dumeti, edwardsii (Oarisma), elada, epixanthe, eunus, fulvia, furcae, garita, hermodur, kootenai, lagus, mejicanus, mormo, mormonia, nilus, nympha, oreas, oslari, philetas, phylace, pratincola, rhena, saga, scudderi, simius, taxiles, uhleri. Five first reviser actions are made (albihalos=austinorum, davenporti=pratti, latalinea=subaridum, maritima=texana [Cercyonis], ricei=calneva). The name c-argenteum is designated nomen oblitum, faunus a nomen protectum. Three taxa are demonstrated to be invalid nomina nuda (blackmorei, sulfuris, svilhae), and another nomen nudum ( damei) is added to catalogues as a "schizophrenic taxon" in order to preserve stability. Problems caused by old scientific names and the time wasted on them are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncovering Host-Microbiome Interactions In
    F1000Research 2020, 9:1478 Last updated: 02 SEP 2021 SOFTWARE TOOL ARTICLE Uncovering host-microbiome interactions in global systems with collaborative programming: a novel approach integrating social and data sciences [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations] Jenna Oberstaller1, Swamy Rakesh Adapa1, Guy W. Dayhoff II1, Justin Gibbons1, Thomas E. Keller1, Chang Li1, Jean Lim 1, Minh Pham 1, Anujit Sarkar1, Ravi Sharma1, Agaz H. Wani1, Andrea Vianello 1, Linh M. Duong1, Chenggi Wang1, Celine Grace F. Atkinson1, Madeleine Barrow1, Nathan W. Van Bibber1, Jan Dahrendorff1, David A. E. Dean1, Omkar Dokur1, Gloria C. Ferreira1, Mitchell Hastings1, Gregory S. Herbert 1, Khandaker Tasnim Huq1, Youngchul Kim1,2, Xiangyun Liao3, XiaoMing Liu1, Fahad Mansuri1, Lynn B. Martin1, Elizabeth M. Miller 1, Ojas Natarajan 1, Jinyong Pang1, Francesca Prieto1, Peter W. Radulovic1, Vyoma Sheth1, Matthew Sumpter 1, Desirae Sutherland1, Nisha Vijayakumar1, Rays H. Y. Jiang1 1University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA 2Moffit Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA 3Texas A&M, College Station, TX, USA v1 First published: 17 Dec 2020, 9:1478 Open Peer Review https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.26459.1 Latest published: 17 Dec 2020, 9:1478 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.26459.1 Reviewer Status Invited Reviewers Abstract Microbiome data are undergoing exponential growth powered by 1 rapid technological advancement. As the scope and depth of microbiome research increases, cross-disciplinary research is urgently version 1 needed for interpreting and harnessing the unprecedented data 17 Dec 2020 report output. However, conventional research settings pose challenges to much-needed interdisciplinary research efforts due to barriers in 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacterial Communities Within Phengaris (Maculinea) Alcon
    Received: 26 November 2018 | Revised: 30 January 2019 | Accepted: 1 February 2019 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5010 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Bacterial communities within Phengaris (Maculinea) alcon caterpillars are shifted following transition from solitary living to social parasitism of Myrmica ant colonies Mark A. Szenteczki1 | Camille Pitteloud1 | Luca P. Casacci2,3 | Lucie Kešnerová4 | Melissa R.L. Whitaker5 | Philipp Engel4 | Roger Vila6* | Nadir Alvarez1,7* 1Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland 2Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland 3Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy 4Department of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Switzerland 5Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 6Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC‐UPF), Barcelona, Spain 7Unit of Research and Collections, Museum of Natural History, Geneva, Switzerland Correspondence Mark A. Szenteczki, Laboratory of Functional Ecology, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland. Email: [email protected] Nadir Alvarez, Unit of Research and Collection, Museum of Natural History, Geneva, Switzerland. Email: nadir.alvarez@ville‐ge.ch Present Address Camille Pitteloud, Department of Environmental Systems Sciences, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, ETHZ, Zürich, Switzerland Funding information AEI/FEDER, UE, Grant/Award Number: Abstract CGL2016‐76322‐P; Université de Bacterial symbionts are known
    [Show full text]