Lycaenidae): Phylogeny, Ecology, and Conservation John Mathew Old Dominion University

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lycaenidae): Phylogeny, Ecology, and Conservation John Mathew Old Dominion University Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations Biological Sciences Summer 2003 Aphytophagy in the Miletinae (Lycaenidae): Phylogeny, Ecology, and Conservation John Mathew Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Entomology Commons, and the Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Mathew, John. "Aphytophagy in the Miletinae (Lycaenidae): Phylogeny, Ecology, and Conservation" (2003). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), dissertation, Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/v7rh-mb21 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds/74 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. APHYTOPHAGY IN THE MILETINAE (LYCAENIDAE): PHYLOGENY, ECOLOGY, AND CONSERVATION by John Mathew B.Sc. June 1990, Madras Christian College M.Sc. June 1992, Madras Christian College M.Phil. May 1994, Madras University A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ECOLOGICAL SCIENCES OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 2003 Approved by: Deborah A. Waller (Co-Director) »mi E. Pierce (Co-Director) H. Savitzky (Member) Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT APHYTOPHAGY IN THE MILETINAE (LYCAENIDAE): PHYTOGENY, ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION John Mathew Old Dominion University, 2003 Co-Directors of Advisory Committee: Dr. Deborah A. Waller Dr. Naomi E. Pierce Less than 1% of all Lepidoptera are aphytophagous; of these, a considerable proportion is found in the family Lycaenidae. The aphytophagous Lycaenidae are believed to have arisen from a mutualistic template involving ant attendance. With this association firmly in place, it is a relatively simple shift to exploitation, either of the ants themselves, through active camivory on the brood/trophallactic feeding from adults, or by camivory on ant-tended homopterans, with little to no interference by the ants. Among lycaenids, aphytophagy has arisen several times; most spectacularly in the subfamily Miletinae, where all of the approximately 150 species are presumed or known to be aphytophagous. With the exception of the North American speciesFeniseca tarquinius, the subfamily is restricted to the Old World, in particular, Africa and South-East Asia. The focus of this study was a comprehensive review of aphytophagy in the Miletinae, viewed in light of phylogenetic and ecological patterns. A representative genus,Thestor, endemic to southern Africa, was chosen for intense phylogenetic study, where the relationships of nearly all 29 morphological species and subspecies were analyzed, employing the molecular genes Cytochrome Oxidase 1 (COl) and subunit 5 of nicotinamide dinucleotide (ND5). The resultant phylogenies generated were used to inform life-history characters where known. The enigmatic Nearctic species, Feniseca tarquinius, was studied for life-history traits in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Maine and New Bmnswick, with particular emphasis on diet and vibrational signaling. It was shown that the species produces the longest known acoustic pulse train of any lycaenid. SEM examination of final instar larvae was also undertaken for purposes of comparison with a close relative, the Palaearctic speciesTaraka hamada. An aphytophagous habit adds an extra dimension of complexity to a feeding habit, involving both the prey item Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. and its host-plant resource, rendering its practitioners immediately susceptible to extinction pressure. Conservation concerns for the Lycaenidae, with special emphasis on aphytophagous forms, were hence considered, from the perspective of IUCN Red Data listing, and suggested causes for decline, and appropriate conservation measures discussed, and applied to specific case studies Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. V Dedicated to my family, for accompanying me the length of the way; Deborah Waller, for permitting me to go, and Naomi Pierce, for allowing me to stay. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS As the inspired author, Vikram Seth, was once wont to say, “My debts are manifold and various,” and I take his words as my own in framing this heartfelt statement of gratitude. Seeing as the debt transcends borders both political and oceanic, I place my sentiments in order of temporal priority, beginning in India in the year 1995, continuing through Norfolk, Virginia (though prefixed with a detour to other parts of the United States), and concluding 8 years thence in Cambridge, Massachusetts. India My first acknowledgment of thanks must be laid at the feet of my parents, the geneticist Dr. Chona Mathew and the once historian and indefatigable advocate of the creative arts Mrs. Elizabeth Mathew, who made my path to academic achievement possible. To the first I attribute my love of biological process (the tantalizing possibilities of dihybrid test crosses) apart from an ingrained passion for cricket and chess, and to the latter, theatre, music, writing, literature, and spirituality, which have in such large measure, become a way of life. Their lasting support, even when they have not always found it easy to understand the choices their son has made, leaves me more grateful than I can say. Thank you. To my maternal grandmother, Mrs. K. V. John, the most cheerful nonagenarian I have ever known, I pay tribute. The unflinching faith she has displayed in the face of recurring adversity remains a lasting inspiration and I have imbibed much strength at her watering trough of generosity and love. Likewise, I thank my maternal aunt, Mrs. P. J. John, for her unwavering support when my own sense of self-belief flickered. Dr. P. Dayanandan, Dr. Leela Madhavan, Dr. K. Sunder Raj, and Mr. Samuel Sukumar, all professors at my Alma Mater, Madras Christian College, composed letters of recommendation that would eventually contribute to my gaining admittance to Old Dominion University. For their support, I remain beholden. The friends I made in India, too numerous to name, remain, outside of my family and select individuals in the United States, the bulwark upon which so much of my security has depended. I thank them. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. To Kerala, Tamil Nadu, India, and South Asia, I reaffirm my fealty. I have drawn upon these my native and adopted regions so much during my years in the United States for my sense of identity, and in turn I hope that I have been, in some wise, an ambassador, for them and for the developing world as a whole. They are the subjects of my visions, now and for the future, and It is my privilege to belong to them. The United States To my beloved sister, my confidante, and among my closest of friends, Rachel Mathew, I can never say thank you sufficiently. She has walked the hardest roads with me, supporting me at every turn. I could not have completed this journey without her. I love her and am beholden for the unconditional love that she has always made available to me. I am incredibly grateful to Raj Mysore, my brother-in-law, for his quiet, instrumental, and constant support over the years, and to Sangeeta Mysore, his sister, who paved the way to my arrival in the United States and spurred me on when my steps flagged. Eapen John, who is as much family today as friend, has, in similar vein, been a tower of strength and counsel. I shall never forget the generosity of those named here. I thank my cousin Champa Saigal for making possible for me so many varied glimpses of this incredible nation. My cousin Johnny John has outfitted me with support and shoes alike, over the years, and for both, and more, I am obliged. To the many family friends I have made in Connecticut, New York and New Jersey, I thank them for enduring moments of sunshine and laughter. My sojourn has consistently been brightened by friends who came before and after me from India and who, in hard places, kept the promise of shared experiences to come, worthwhile. I especially thank Siddharth Balachandran, Shylaja Rao, Peter and Susan D’Souza, Sudha Selva Fatima, Cynthia Isaac, Yohaan John, Meena Natarajan, Sheena Matheiken, and Deepa Ramasinghani. Norfolk, VA My heartfelt thanks redound to the Department of Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University for affording to me admission to the doctoral program in Ecological Sciences with a Special Doctoral Research Assistantship to make the opportunity financially possible. I remain indebted to Dr. Deborah Waller, my advisor, who took a chance on an unknown quantity from halfway across the world, and ensured that my presence at Old Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Dominion could indeed come to pass. Her unwavering backing and efforts on my behalf in registering me semester after semester for five years, and her astute editorial eye have helped keep my feet and my flights of otherwise fancy firmly grounded, and for this, I am profoundly grateful. I thank the other members of my guidance committee, Dr. Alan Savitzky, Dr. Charles Bell, Dr. Kerry Kilbum, and Dr. Rebecca Bray for so kindly taking me through the arduous process of my qualifying examination. I fondly acknowledge Dr. Lytton Musselman for his generosity in making me feel an immediate part of the department and larger community. I am grateful to Dr. Frank Day for his early direction as Graduate Program Director, and express my admiration to Dr. Savitzky for his unstinting support in the same capacity, as well for his being, simply, among the finest teachers I have ever encountered. I thank Dr.
Recommended publications
  • Frontiers in Zoology Biomed Central
    Frontiers in Zoology BioMed Central Research Open Access Does the DNA barcoding gap exist? – a case study in blue butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) Martin Wiemers* and Konrad Fiedler Address: Department of Population Ecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria Email: Martin Wiemers* - [email protected]; Konrad Fiedler - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 7 March 2007 Received: 1 December 2006 Accepted: 7 March 2007 Frontiers in Zoology 2007, 4:8 doi:10.1186/1742-9994-4-8 This article is available from: http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/4/1/8 © 2007 Wiemers and Fiedler; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: DNA barcoding, i.e. the use of a 648 bp section of the mitochondrial gene cytochrome c oxidase I, has recently been promoted as useful for the rapid identification and discovery of species. Its success is dependent either on the strength of the claim that interspecific variation exceeds intraspecific variation by one order of magnitude, thus establishing a "barcoding gap", or on the reciprocal monophyly of species. Results: We present an analysis of intra- and interspecific variation in the butterfly family Lycaenidae which includes a well-sampled clade (genus Agrodiaetus) with a peculiar characteristic: most of its members are karyologically differentiated from each other which facilitates the recognition of species as reproductively isolated units even in allopatric populations.
    [Show full text]
  • 286 Genus Alaena Boisduval
    AFROTROPICAL BUTTERFLIES 17th edition (2018). MARK C. WILLIAMS. http://www.lepsocafrica.org/?p=publications&s=atb Genus Alaena Boisduval, 1847 In: Delegorgue, A., Voyage dans l’Afrique australe 2: 591 (585-602). Type-species: Acraea amazoula Boisduval, by monotypy. The genus Alaena belongs to the Family Lycaenidae Leach, 1815; Subfamily Poritiini Doherty, 1886; Tribe Pentilini Aurivillius, 1914. The other genera in the Tribe Pentilini in the Afrotropical Region are Durbania, Durbaniella, Durbaniopsis, Ptelina, Pentila, Liptenara, Telipna, Ornipholidotos, Torbenia and Cooksonia. Alaena (Zulus) is a purely Afrotropical genus containing 25 species. *Alaena amazoula (Boisduval, 1847)# Yellow Zulu Male upperside (left) and female underside (right) of the Yellow Zulu ( Alaena amazoula). Images courtesy Raimund Schutte (left) and Steve Woodhall (right). Acraea amazoula Boisduval, 1847. In: Delegorgue, A., Voyage dans l’Afrique australe 2: 591 (585-602). Acraea amazoula Boisduval. Trimen, 1862c. Alaena amazoula Boisduval, 1847. Trimen & Bowker, 1887b. Alaena amazoula Boisduval. Swanepoel, 1953a. Alaena amazoula Boisduval, 1847. Dickson & Kroon, 1978. Alaena amazoula De Boisduval, 1847. Pringle et al., 1994: 126. Alaena amazoula Boisduval, 1847. d’Abrera, 2009: 604. Alaena amazoula amazoula. Male (Wingspan 25 mm). Left – upperside; right – underside. Port Edward, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. 2 January 2002. J. Dobson. Images M.C. Williams ex Dobson Collection. 1 Alaena amazoula amazoula. Female (Wingspan 30 mm). Left – upperside; right – underside. Port Edward, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. 2 January 2002. J. Dobson. Images M.C. Williams ex Dobson Collection. Type locality: [South Africa]: “Pays des Amazoulous”. Distribution: Kenya, Tanzania, Malawi, Democratic Republic of Congo, Zambia, Angola, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Botswana, Namibia?, South Africa, Swaziland. Habitat: Rocky grassland or rocky areas in grassy savanna.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the Aphnaeinae: Myrmecophilous African Butterflies
    Systematic Entomology (2015), 40, 169–182 DOI: 10.1111/syen.12098 Phylogeny of the Aphnaeinae: myrmecophilous African butterflies with carnivorous and herbivorous life histories JOHN H. BOYLE1,2, ZOFIA A. KALISZEWSKA1,2, MARIANNE ESPELAND1,2,3, TAMARA R. SUDERMAN1,2, JAKE FLEMING2,4, ALAN HEATH5 andNAOMI E. PIERCE1,2 1Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, U.S.A., 2Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, U.S.A., 3Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, 4Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, U.S.A. and 5Iziko South African Museum, Cape Town, South Africa Abstract. The Aphnaeinae (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) are a largely African subfamily of 278 described species that exhibit extraordinary life-history variation. The larvae of these butterflies typically form mutualistic associations with ants, and feed on awide variety of plants, including 23 families in 19 orders. However, at least one species in each of 9 of the 17 genera is aphytophagous, parasitically feeding on the eggs, brood or regurgitations of ants. This diversity in diet and type of symbiotic association makes the phylogenetic relations of the Aphnaeinae of particular interest. A phylogenetic hypothesis for the Aphnaeinae was inferred from 4.4 kb covering the mitochondrial marker COI and five nuclear markers (wg, H3, CAD, GAPDH and EF1) for each of 79 ingroup taxa representing 15 of the 17 currently recognized genera, as well as three outgroup taxa. Maximum Parsimony, Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference analyses all support Heath’s systematic revision of the clade based on morphological characters.
    [Show full text]
  • Check-List of the Butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in Western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea)
    Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 25 (4): 161–174 (2004) 161 Check-list of the butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) Lars Kühne, Steve C. Collins and Wanja Kinuthia1 Lars Kühne, Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany; email: [email protected] Steve C. Collins, African Butterfly Research Institute, P.O. Box 14308, Nairobi, Kenya Dr. Wanja Kinuthia, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 40658, Nairobi, Kenya Abstract: All species of butterflies recorded from the Kaka- list it was clear that thorough investigation of scientific mega Forest N.R. in western Kenya are listed for the first collections can produce a very sound list of the occur- time. The check-list is based mainly on the collection of ring species in a relatively short time. The information A.B.R.I. (African Butterfly Research Institute, Nairobi). Furthermore records from the collection of the National density is frequently underestimated and collection data Museum of Kenya (Nairobi), the BIOTA-project and from offers a description of species diversity within a local literature were included in this list. In total 491 species or area, in particular with reference to rapid measurement 55 % of approximately 900 Kenyan species could be veri- of biodiversity (Trueman & Cranston 1997, Danks 1998, fied for the area. 31 species were not recorded before from Trojan 2000). Kenyan territory, 9 of them were described as new since the appearance of the book by Larsen (1996). The kind of list being produced here represents an information source for the total species diversity of the Checkliste der Tagfalter des Kakamega-Waldschutzge- Kakamega forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Diversification of Chrysoritis Butterflies in the South African Cape
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 148 (2020) 106817 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Recent diversification of Chrysoritis butterflies in the South African Cape (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) T ⁎ ⁎ Gerard Talaveraa,b, ,Zofia A. Kaliszewskab,c, Alan Heathb,d, Naomi E. Pierceb, a Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-UPF), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 37, 08003 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain b Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States c Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States d Iziko South African Museum, Cape Town, South Africa ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Although best known for its extraordinary radiations of endemic plant species, the South African fynbos is home Butterflies to a great diversity of phytophagous insects, including butterflies in the genus Chrysoritis (Lepidoptera: Chrysoritis Lycaenidae). These butterflies are remarkably uniform morphologically; nevertheless, they comprise 43 cur- Fynbos rently accepted species and 68 currently valid taxonomic names. While many species have highly restricted, dot- Phylogeny like distributions, others are widespread. Here, we investigate the phylogenetic and biogeographic history un- Radiation derlying their diversification by analyzing molecular markers from 406 representatives of all described species Speciation Taxonomy throughout their respective ranges. We recover monophyletic clades for both C. chrysaor and C. thysbe species- groups, and identify a set of lineages that fall between them. The estimated age of divergence for the genus is 32 Mya, and we document significantly rapid diversification of the thysbe species-group in the Pleistocene (~2 Mya).
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance Document on the Strict Protection of Animal Species of Community Interest Under the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC
    Guidance document on the strict protection of animal species of Community interest under the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC Final version, February 2007 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 4 I. CONTEXT 6 I.1 Species conservation within a wider legal and political context 6 I.1.1 Political context 6 I.1.2 Legal context 7 I.2 Species conservation within the overall scheme of Directive 92/43/EEC 8 I.2.1 Primary aim of the Directive: the role of Article 2 8 I.2.2 Favourable conservation status 9 I.2.3 Species conservation instruments 11 I.2.3.a) The Annexes 13 I.2.3.b) The protection of animal species listed under both Annexes II and IV in Natura 2000 sites 15 I.2.4 Basic principles of species conservation 17 I.2.4.a) Good knowledge and surveillance of conservation status 17 I.2.4.b) Appropriate and effective character of measures taken 19 II. ARTICLE 12 23 II.1 General legal considerations 23 II.2 Requisite measures for a system of strict protection 26 II.2.1 Measures to establish and effectively implement a system of strict protection 26 II.2.2 Measures to ensure favourable conservation status 27 II.2.3 Measures regarding the situations described in Article 12 28 II.2.4 Provisions of Article 12(1)(a)-(d) in relation to ongoing activities 30 II.3 The specific protection provisions under Article 12 35 II.3.1 Deliberate capture or killing of specimens of Annex IV(a) species 35 II.3.2 Deliberate disturbance of Annex IV(a) species, particularly during periods of breeding, rearing, hibernation and migration 37 II.3.2.a) Disturbance 37 II.3.2.b) Periods
    [Show full text]
  • Fasanbi SHOWCASE
    Threatened Species Monitoring PROGRAMME Threatened Species in South Africa: A review of the South African National Biodiversity Institutes’ Threatened Species Programme: 2004–2009 Acronyms ADU – Animal Demography Unit ARC – Agricultural Research Council BASH – Big Atlassing Summer Holiday BIRP – Birds in Reserves Project BMP – Biodiversity Management Plan BMP-S – Biodiversity Management Plans for Species CFR – Cape Floristic Region CITES – Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species CoCT – City of Cape Town CREW – Custodians of Rare and Endangered Wildflowers CWAC – Co-ordinated Waterbird Counts DEA – Department of Environmental Affairs DeJaVU – December January Atlassing Vacation Unlimited EIA – Environmental Impact Assessment EMI – Environmental Management Inspector GBIF – Global Biodiversity Information Facility GIS – Geographic Information Systems IAIA – International Association for Impact Assessment IAIAsa – International Association for Impact Assessment South Africa IUCN – International Union for Conservation of Nature LAMP – Long Autumn Migration Project LepSoc – Lepidopterists’ Society of Africa MCM – Marine and Coastal Management MOA – memorandum of agreement MOU – memorandum of understanding NBI – National Botanical Institute NEMA – National Environmental Management Act NEMBA – National Environmental Management Biodiversity Act NGO – non-governmental organization NORAD – Norwegian Agency for Development Co–operation QDGS – quarter-degree grid square SABAP – Southern African Bird Atlas Project SABCA – Southern African
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of Pinal County, Arizona, United States
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • Stomach Contents of the Indian Pangolin Manis Crassicaudata (Mammalia: Pholidota: Manidae) in Tropical Forests of Southern India
    OPEN ACCESS The Journal of Threatened Taxa fs dedfcated to bufldfng evfdence for conservafon globally by publfshfng peer-revfewed arfcles onlfne every month at a reasonably rapfd rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org . All arfcles publfshed fn JoTT are regfstered under Creafve Commons Atrfbufon 4.0 Internafonal Lfcense unless otherwfse menfoned. JoTT allows unrestrfcted use of arfcles fn any medfum, reproducfon, and dfstrfbufon by provfdfng adequate credft to the authors and the source of publfcafon. Journal of Threatened Taxa Bufldfng evfdence for conservafon globally www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Onlfne) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Prfnt) Note Stomach contents of the Indfan Pangolfn Manfs crassfcaudata (Mammalfa: Pholfdota: Manfdae) fn tropfcal forests of southern Indfa Mohanarangan Ashokkumar, Dfpfka Valsarajan, M. Arjun Suresh, Anuraj R. Kafmal & George Chandy 26 May 2017 | Vol. 9| No. 5 | Pp. 10246–10248 10.11609/jot. 2873 .9. 5.10246-10248 For Focus, Scope, Afms, Polfcfes and Gufdelfnes vfsft htp://threatenedtaxa.org/About_JoTT For Arfcle Submfssfon Gufdelfnes vfsft htp://threatenedtaxa.org/Submfssfon_Gufdelfnes For Polfcfes agafnst Scfenffc Mfsconduct vfsft htp://threatenedtaxa.org/JoTT_Polfcy_agafnst_Scfenffc_Mfsconduct For reprfnts contact <[email protected]> Publfsher/Host Partner Threatened Taxa Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 May 2017 | 9(5): 10246–10248 Note Pangolins are scaly anteaters and Stomach contents of the are unique in being the world’s only Indian Pangolin Manis crassicaudata true scaly mammals, distributed in (Mammalia: Pholidota: Manidae) ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) Asia and Africa. Of the eight species in tropical forests of southern India ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) of pangolin, four species are found in Asia, the Chinese Pangolin Manis Mohanarangan Ashokkumar 1, Dipika Valsarajan 2, OPEN ACCESS pentadactyla, Indian Pangolin M.
    [Show full text]
  • Description and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Calycopidina (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Theclinae, Eumaeini): a Subtribe of Detritivores
    Description and phylogenetic analysis of the Calycopidina 45 Description and phylogenetic analysis of the Calycopidina (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Theclinae, Eumaeini): a subtribe of detritivores Marcelo Duarte1 & Robert K. Robbins2 1Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Nazaré 481, Ipiranga, 04263–000 São Paulo, SP, Brazil. [email protected] 2National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, P. O. Box 37012, NHB Stop 105, Washington, DC 20013–7012 USA. [email protected] ABSTRACT. Description and phylogenetic analysis of the Calycopidina (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Theclinae, Eumaeini): a subtribe of detritivores. The purpose of this paper is to establish a phylogenetic basis for a new Eumaeini subtribe that includes those lycaenid genera in which detritivory has been recorded. Morphological characters were coded for 82 species of the previously proposed “Lamprospilus Section” of the Eumaeini (19 of these had coding identical to another species), and a phylogenetic analysis was performed using the 63 distinct ingroup terminal taxa and six outgroups belonging to four genera. Taxonomic results include the description in the Eumaeini of Calycopidina Duarte & Robbins new subtribe (type genus Calycopis Scudder, 1876), which contains Lamprospilus Geyer, Badecla Duarte & Robbins new genus (type species Thecla badaca Hewitson), Arzecla Duarte & Robbins new genus (type species Thecla arza Hewitson), Arumecla Robbins & Duarte, Camissecla Robbins & Duarte, Electrostrymon Clench, Rubroserrata K. Johnson & Kroenlein revalidated status, Ziegleria K. Johnson, Kisutam K. Johnson & Kroenlein revalidated status, and Calycopis. Previous “infratribe” names Angulopina K. Johnson & Kroenlein, 1993, and Calycopina K. Johnson & Kroenlein, 1993, are nomenclaturally unavailable and polyphyletic as proposed. New combinations include Badecla badaca (Hewitson), Badecla picentia (Hewitson), Badecla quadramacula (Austin & K.
    [Show full text]
  • 1994 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals
    The lUCN Species Survival Commission 1994 lUCN Red List of Threatened Animals Compiled by the World Conservation Monitoring Centre PADU - MGs COPY DO NOT REMOVE lUCN The World Conservation Union lo-^2^ 1994 lUCN Red List of Threatened Animals lUCN WORLD CONSERVATION Tile World Conservation Union species susvival commission monitoring centre WWF i Suftanate of Oman 1NYZ5 TTieWlLDUFE CONSERVATION SOCIET'' PEOPLE'S TRISr BirdLife 9h: KX ENIUNGMEDSPEaES INTERNATIONAL fdreningen Chicago Zoulog k.J SnuicTy lUCN - The World Conservation Union lUCN - The World Conservation Union brings together States, government agencies and a diverse range of non-governmental organisations in a unique world partnership: some 770 members in all, spread across 123 countries. - As a union, I UCN exists to serve its members to represent their views on the world stage and to provide them with the concepts, strategies and technical support they need to achieve their goals. Through its six Commissions, lUCN draws together over 5000 expert volunteers in project teams and action groups. A central secretariat coordinates the lUCN Programme and leads initiatives on the conservation and sustainable use of the world's biological diversity and the management of habitats and natural resources, as well as providing a range of services. The Union has helped many countries to prepare National Conservation Strategies, and demonstrates the application of its knowledge through the field projects it supervises. Operations are increasingly decentralised and are carried forward by an expanding network of regional and country offices, located principally in developing countries. I UCN - The World Conservation Union seeks above all to work with its members to achieve development that is sustainable and that provides a lasting Improvement in the quality of life for people all over the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly Biodiversity in Singapore with Particular Reference to the Central
    Proceedings of the Nature Reserves Survey Seminar. 70re 49(2) (1997) Gardens' Bulletin Singapore 49 (1997) 273-296. ~ laysia and Butterfly Biodiversity in Singapore with Particular :ingapore. Reference to the Central Catchment Nature Reserve discovery, 1 2 ~y Bulletin. S.K. KHEW AND STEVEN S.H. NE0 1103, Tai Keng Gardens, Singapore 535384 re. In: L.M. 2Blk 16, Simei Street 1, #05-13, Melville Park, Singapore 529942 )f Zoology, Abstract Chin, R.T. A total of 381 butterfly species have now been recorded in Singapore of which 18 are new City: Bukit records since 1990. Of this total, 236 species (62%) were recorded during the present JOre. Suppl. survey. A U except 8 (3%) of these occur within the Nature Reserves and 148 (63%) were recorded only within the Nature Reserves. A total of 74 species (31%) within the Reserves were considered very rare. e Nee Soon ion: Marine Introduction l impact of The study of butterflies by amateurs is not new, and indeed, it is through onservation. the observations of these dedicated individuals that much important data have been accumulated over the years. The information on butterfly biodiversity in Singapore is, at most, sketchy. Most of the documentation ater prawn, of the species occurred done during the post-war years until the late 1960s. nidae) from From our literature research, two references stand out: W.A. Fleming's )gy. 43: 299- Butterflies of West Malaysia and Singapore (1991) and Steven Corbet and Maurice Pendlebury's Butterfli es of the Malay Peninsula (1992). Although the latest editions of the two reference books were published in the early ~amalph eops 1990s, most of the updates referred only to the Peninsular Malaysia.
    [Show full text]