DOCSLIB.ORG

Military History Anniversaries 16 Thru 31 January

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Military History Anniversaries 16 Thru 31 January Military History Anniversaries 16 thru 31 January Events in History over the next 15 day period that had U.S. military involvement or impacted in some way on U.S military operations or American interests JAN 16 1776 – Amrican Revolutionary War: African-American Soldiers » It was an uncomfortable fact for many in the colonies that at the same time they were fighting the British for their liberty and freedom they were depriving slaves of that same opportunity. African-American soldiers, in fact, had participated in major Revolutionary War battles from its very start: around 5% of American forces at the battle of Bunker Hill were black. New England units were completely integrated with soldiers receiving the same pay regardless of color. Still, fears of a rebellion of armed slaves tempered official American recognition of the contribution of blacks. On this date General George Washington allowed for the first time for free blacks with military experience to enlist in the revolutionary army. A year later, as the American need for manpower increased, Washington dropped the military experience requirement, allowing any free black who so wishes to enlist. The Continental Congress tried to recruit more African-Americans by offering to purchase them from the Southern slaveholders. Unsurprisingly, few agreed. But enterprising states like Rhode Island made an end run around the slaveholders, announcing any slave who enlisted would immediately be freed. (Rhode Island compensated the slaveholder for the market value of their slave.) The “1st Rhode Island Regiment” was comprised mostly of those freed slaves, becoming the only Continental Army unit to have segregated units for blacks. JAN 16 1780 – American Revolutionary War: British Demonstrate Naval Supremacy in The Moonlight Battle » British Admiral Sir George Rodney, with 18 ships-of-the-line, engages an inferior Spanish squadron of 11 battleships commanded by Don Juan de Langara off the southwestern coast of Portugal at Cape St. Vincent, in what comes to be known as The Moonlight Battle. (Ships-of- the-line is the 18th century term for ships substantial enough to be used in a battle line, a tactic of war in which two lines of ships faced off against each other.) The Spanish, who were at war with the British because they had chosen to back the American rebels in the War for Independence, saw the British fleet in pursuit and attempted to retreat home to the port of Cadiz. As they fled, Rodney decided to ignore the accepted rules of naval engagement, which involved two lines of ships bombarding one another with cannon much like two lines of infantry confronting one another across a battlefield. Instead, he decided to attempt to overtake of the Spanish ships by giving orders of general chase–having each British ship chase the Spanish fleet to 1 | P a g e the best of its ability. The British hounded the Spanish until 2 a.m., when the Spaniards finally surrendered. Four Spanish battleships and two frigates escaped capture, but the British took De Langara’s flagship and five others before running into shoals and ending the chase. One Spanish ship with its entire crew was lost in battle. Thirty-two Britons died, and 102 were wounded. Credit for the British victory belongs not only to their greater number of ships and Admiral Rodney’s decision to give chase, but also to the British ships’ barnacle-free copper bottoms, which allowed them to outpace the less technologically advanced Spanish fleet. The fact that the two fleets engaged in battle overnight was an anomaly in 18th-century sea warfare, and earned the encounter the title The Moonlight Battle, and a painting by Francis Holman, despite its comparative insignificance in the Revolutionary War. JAN 16 1861 – Civil War: Crittenden Compromise is Killed in Senate » The last chance to keep North and South united, dies in the U.S. Senate. Proposed by Senator John J. Crittenden of Kentucky, the compromise was a series of constitutional amendments. The amendments would continue the old Missouri Compromise provisions of 1820, which divided the West along the latitude of 36 30′. North of this line, slavery was prohibited. The Missouri Compromise was negated by the Compromise of 1850, which allowed a vote by territorial residents (popular sovereignty) to decide the issue of slavery. Other amendments protected slavery in the District of Columbia, forbade federal interference with the interstate slave trade, and compensated owners whose slaves escaped to the free states. Essentially, the Crittenden Compromise sought to alleviate all concerns of the Southern states. Four states had already left the Union when it was proposed, but Crittenden hoped the compromise would lure them back. Crittenden thought he could muster support from both South and North and avert either a split of the nation or a civil war. The major problem with the plan was that it called for a complete compromise by the Republicans with virtually no concessions on the part of the South. The Republican Party formed in 1854 for the main purpose of opposing the expansion of slavery into the Western territories, particularly the areas north of the Missouri Compromise line. Just six years later, the party elected a president, Abraham Lincoln, over the opposition of the slave states. Crittenden was asking the Republicans to abandon their most key issues. 2 | P a g e The vote was 25 against the compromise and 23 in favor of it. All 25 votes against it were cast by Republicans, and six senators from states that were in the process of seceding abstained. One Republican editorial insisted that the party “cannot be made to surrender the fruits of its recent victory.” There would be no compromise; with the secession of states continuing, America marched inexorably towards civil war. JAN 16 1864 – Civil War: Battle of Dandridge (16-17 Jan) » With the onset of cold weather, the Confederates shifted their attention away from fighting and focused instead on building secure winter huts. The decision to suspend offensive operations proved prophetic as the most severe winter in decades roared into the mountains of East Tennessee. Temperatures dropped well below freezing for days on end, with both armies suffering the effects of the numbing cold, Wanting to push the Confederates out of their winter headquarters and having received reports of good forage south of the French Broad River, Union forces under Maj. Gen. John G. Parke advanced on Dandridge, near the East Tennessee & Virginia Railroad, on 14 JAN, with orders to cross the river and occupy the area for the Federals. This movement forced Confederate Lt. Gen. James Longstreet, who had been operating around Dandridge, to fall back beyond Kimbrough's Crossroads. Longstreet brought up reinforcements from Morristown on 15 JAN to meet the Federals and threaten the Union base at New Market. On 16 JAN, Brig. Gen. Samuel D. Sturgis, commanding the Cavalry Corps, Army of the Ohio, rode forward from Dandridge along the Morristown Road to occupy Kimbrough's Crossroads. As the Union cavalry neared the crossroads, they discovered and engaged one of Longstreet's infantry brigades with artillery that had arrived the day before. The brigade was composed of Alabama troops as well as others and was under the command of Brigadier General Micah Jenkins, a South Carolinian. At the same time Union cavalry under the command of Col. Frank Wolford engaged Confederate forces south and east of Dandridge on the bend of Chucky Road. The Union cavalry could not dislodge the Confederate troops and were compelled to retire to Dandridge. Around noon on 17 JAN, Sturgis received information that the Confederates were preparing for an attack, so he formed his men into lines of battle. About 4:00 p.m., the Confederates advanced towards Dandridge and the battle quickly turned to general fighting. The battle continued until after dark with the Union forces occupying roughly the same battle line as when the fighting started. Having failed to cross the river to the opposite bank, and fearing that Longstreet's entire force was in front of them, General Parke ordered the Federals to retreat to New Market and Strawberry Plains during the night. The Confederates pursued, but due to the lack of cannons, ammunition, and shoes, broke off and fell back to Dandridge. For the time being, the Union forces left the area. JAN 16 1865 – Civil War: Special Field Order No. 15 » Union General William T. Sherman issued the order which confiscated as Union property a strip of coastline stretching from Charleston, South Carolina, to the St. John's River in Florida, including Georgia's Sea Islands and the mainland thirty miles in from the coast. The order redistributed the roughly 400,000 acres of land to newly freed black families in forty-acre segments. Sherman's order came on the heels of his successful March to the Sea from Atlanta to Savannah and just prior to his march northward into South Carolina. 3 | P a g e The order explicitly called for the settlement of black families on confiscated land, encouraged freedmen to join the Union army to help sustain their newly won liberty, and designated a general officer to act as inspector of settlements. Inspector General Rufus Saxton would police the land and work to ensure legal title of the property for the black settlers. In a later order, Sherman also authorized the army to loan mules to the newly settled farmers. Jan 16 1916 – WWI Era: Montenegro Capitulates to Austro-Hungarian Forces » After an eight- day offensive that marked the beginning of a new, aggressive strategy in the region, Austro- Hungarian troops under commander in chief Franz Conrad von Hotzendorf take control of the Balkan state of Montenegro.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • This Copy of the Thesis Has Been Supplied on Condition That Anyone Who
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk 04 University of Plymouth Research Theses 01 Research Theses Main Collection 2014 The British Way of War in North West Europe 1944-45: A Study of Two Infantry Divisions Devine, Louis Paul http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/3014 Plymouth University All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the author's prior consent. 1 THE BRITISH WAY OF WAR IN NORTH WEST EUROPE 1944-45: A STUDY OF TWO INFANTRY DIVISIONS By LOUIS PAUL DEVINE A thesis Submitted to Plymouth University in partial fulfilment for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Humanities May 2013 2 Louis Paul Devine The British Way of War in North West Europe 1944-45: A Study of two infantry divisions Abstract This thesis will examine the British way of war as experienced by two British Infantry Divisions - the 43rd ‘Wessex’ and 53rd ‘Welsh’ - during the Overlord campaign in North West Europe in 1944 and 1945. The main locus of research centres on the fighting components of those divisions; the infantry battalions and their supporting regiments.
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Mexican Lives Through the Nineteenth Century
    Hannigan 1 “Overrun All This Country…” Two New Mexican Lives Through the Nineteenth Century “José Francisco Chavez.” Library of Congress website, “General Nicolás Pino.” Photograph published in Ralph Emerson Twitchell, The History of the Military July 15 2010, https://www.loc.gov/rr/hispanic/congress/chaves.html Occupation of the Territory of New Mexico, 1909. accessed March 16, 2018. Isabel Hannigan Candidate for Honors in History at Oberlin College Advisor: Professor Tamika Nunley April 20, 2018 Hannigan 2 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 2 I. “A populace of soldiers”, 1819 - 1848. ............................................................................................... 10 II. “May the old laws remain in force”, 1848-1860. ............................................................................... 22 III. “[New Mexico] desires to be left alone,” 1860-1862. ...................................................................... 31 IV. “Fighting with the ancient enemy,” 1862-1865. ............................................................................... 53 V. “The utmost efforts…[to] stamp me as anti-American,” 1865 - 1904. ............................................. 59 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................................. 72 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Military History Anniversaries 0101 Thru 0131
    Military History Anniversaries 1 thru 31 January Events in History over the next 30 day period that had U.S. military involvement or impacted in some way on U.S military operations or American interests Jan 00 1944 – WW2: USS Scorpion (SS–278). Date of sinking unknown. Most likely a Japanese mine in Yellow or East China Sea. 77 killed. Jan 00 1945 – WW2: USS Swordfish (SS–193) missing. Possibly sunk by Japanese Coast Defense Vessel No. 4 on 5 January or sunk by a mine off Okinawa on 9 January. 89 killed. Jan 01 1942 – WW2: The War Production Board (WPB) ordered the temporary end of all civilian automobile sales leaving dealers with one half million unsold cars. Jan 01 1945 – WW2: In Operation Bodenplatte, German planes attack American forward air bases in Europe. This is the last major offensive of the Luftwaffe. Jan 02 1777 – American Revolution: American forces under the command of George Washington repulsed a British attack at the Battle of the Assunpink Creek near Trenton, New Jersey. Casualties and losses: US 7 to 100 - GB 55 to 365. Jan 02 1791 – Big Bottom massacre (11 killed) in the Ohio Country, marking the beginning of the Northwest Indian War. Jan 02 1904 – Latin America Interventions: U.S. Marines are sent to Santo Domingo to aid the government against rebel forces. Jan 02 1942 – The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) convicts 33 members of a German spy ring headed by Fritz Joubert Duquesne in the largest espionage case in United States history-the Duquesne Spy Ring. Jan 02 1942 – WW2: In the Philippines, the city of Manila and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • STRIKE HISTORY (Citation’S and Awards)
    STRIKE Weekly History Est. 1941 January 17th – January 23rd, 2016 Issue: 39 nd nd Brief History of the 502 and 2 Brigade The 502nd, or “five-oh-deuce”, was activated July 1, 1941 at Fort Benning, Georgia as the 502nd parachute infantry battalion, as an experimental unit formed to test the doctrine and tactics of parachute assaults. The 502nd entered combat in World War II on June 6, 1944, by jumping into Normandy, with allied forces landing on D-Day and the Battle of Normandy. Between 1945 and 1964. A major reorganization took place on 3 February 1964, when the 2nd Brigade of the 101st Airborne was activated at Fort Campbell, replacing the 1st Airborne Battle Group, 501st Infantry Regiment. The reorganization from the battle groups to brigades and battalions placed two battalions of the 502nd in different brigades of the 101st. The 2nd Battalion, 502nd Infantry was in the 1st Brigade with 1-327th and 2-327th Infantry. Which deployed to Vietnam and arrived at Cam Ranh Bay, Vietnam on 29 July 1965, they were commanded by the most notable commander LTC Hank “The Gunfighter” Emerson. The new 2nd Brigade’s original organic battalions were the 1st and 2d Battalions, 501st Infantry, and the 1st Battalion, 502nd Infantry. December 1967 the 501st, 502nd and 2nd Brigade deployed by C-141 aircraft and arrived at Bien Hoa Airbase on 13 December 1967. Over the next five years, Soldiers of the “Ready to Go” Brigade participated in twelve campaigns, compiling of a distinguished combat record as well as an enviable reputation for success in the rehabilitation of a war-torn nation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tet Offensive at Da Nang
    CHAPTER 8 The Tet Offensive at Da Nang Allied Dispositions—The Enemy Plans His Offensive—The Attack—The Fighting Continue s A Brief Lull and Renewed Fighting Allied Disposition s ion—Company L, 3d Battalion, 5th Marines and Company H, 2d Battalion, 7th Marines—to cover it s By the time of Tet, Operation Checkers had ende d extended area. l and at Da Nang the situation was precarious . With the A conglomeration of Marine support units, ARVN, departure of the 5th Marines, there was only on e Korean Marines, and two Marine infantry battalions Marine infantry regimental headquarters in the exten- attempted to secure the remaining area . In the Da sive Da Nang tactical area of operations . Colonel Ross Nang Vital Area, the artillery regiment, the 11th R. Miner's 7th Marines with all three of its battalion s Marines, continued to oversee the Northern Secto r had the responsibility for the northern, western, an d Defense Command and the 1st Tank Battalion, th e southwestern sectors . The 2d Battalion was in the Southern Sector Defense Command . In both these sec - north, the 1st Battalion was in the center, and the 3 d tors support troops doubled as infantry, manning fixe d Battalion was in the south . With the departure of the defensive positions and conducting patrols . Major 2d Battalion, 5th Marines in mid January for Phu Bai , General Donn J . Robertson, the 1st Marine Division the 3d Battalion, 7th Marines extended its area of oper- commanding general, kept under his direct control the ations to include An Hoa to the south .
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the 1St Canadian Armoured Personnel Carrier Regiment
    Canadian Military History Volume 4 Issue 2 Article 5 1995 “Kangaroos at War”: the History of the 1st Canadian Armoured Personnel Carrier Regiment John R. Grodzinski Royal Military College of Canada, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Recommended Citation Grodzinski, John R. "“Kangaroos at War”: the History of the 1st Canadian Armoured Personnel Carrier Regiment." Canadian Military History 4, 2 (1995) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Grodzinski: “Kangaroos at War” John R. Grodzinski he Second World War witnessed the marching in the open or being carried on vehicles development and large scale use of many new with limited protection had to change.2 Simonds T 3 weapons: aircraft, armoured vehicles, had studied this problem in 1938 and in 1944 communications systems and rockets are but a found a solution in employing discarded few. An equally important revolution occurred in armoured vehicles modified to carry infantry. He tactics, where all armies had to learn how to ordered the Priest self-propelled guns recently integrate and use these systems in battle. turned in by the artillery regiments of the 3rd Canadian Infantry Division to be converted to One innovation was the means by which infantry carriers. infantry was moved across the battlefield. The previous method of advancing in the open, On 31 July 1944, Brigadier CM. Grant, the "leaning into the barrage" had proven too costly.
    [Show full text]
  • A Younger Perspective Seniors Share Their Thoughts on the Presidential Election, Pg
    october 26, 2012 Volume 76, Issue 3 1650 Ridgeview rd., uA, oH 43221 upper ArlIngton HIgH scHool a younger perspective seniors share their thoughts on the presidential election, pg. 17 differing districts student shares experience transferring from columbus to ua schools, pg. 6 Marching in the spotlight ua alum slated to take her bow in script ohio during final game of the OSU season, pg. 27 Media picks survey reveals students’ favorite aspects of social networking, pg. 25 www.arlingtonian.com advertisements Thanks to President Obama and Senator Sherrod Brown, • Pell Grant funding was doubled and a college tax credit was established, putting higher education within reach for millions more Americans. • The President successfully fought to prevent federal student loan interest rates from doubling for over 7 million students, and he capped federal student loan repayments. Mitt Romney’s plan to cut middle-class investments could slash Pell Grants for nearly 9.6 million students and would eliminate the President’s college tax credit. Romney would also roll back the President’s student loan reform - reforms that have saved over $60 billion and allowed investments in Pell Grants, community colleges and deficit reduction. He said that students who were unable to afford college or to start a business on their own should just “borrow money from your parents.” Thanks to President Obama and Senator Sherrod Brown, • Employers cannot deny you or your family members health care coverage due to pre-existing health conditions. • You will enjoy health coverage on your parents’ policy until age 26. • Your family will not be denied health coverage because you’ve reached a lifetime limit due to a family member’s chronic disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H10121
    October 8, 1998 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE H10121 Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance engaged, and we should not be leaving AUTHORIZING AWARD OF CON- of my time, and I move the previous until we deal with a couple of these GRESSIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR question on the resolution. critical issues. They are life-and-death TO THEODORE ROOSEVELT The previous question was ordered. issues. Mr. BUYER. Mr. Speaker, I move to The resolution was agreed to. Senator DODD and I had a meeting suspend the rules and pass the bill A motion to reconsider was laid on where one gentleman had a heart at- (H.R. 2263) to authorize and request the the table. tack. He was so anxious about his President to award the Congressional Mr. THOMAS. Mr. Speaker, pursuant health care policy and the company Medal of Honor posthumously to Theo- to House Resolution 580 just passed, I dropping him. dore Roosevelt for his gallant and he- call up the joint resolution (H.J. Res. Mr. Speaker, again, we have no objec- roic actions in the attack on San Juan 131) waiving certain enrollment re- tion to this particular provision, but Heights, Cuba, during the Spanish- quirements for the remainder of the we do have an objection to the way this American War. One Hundred Fifth Congress with re- Congress has been run and the little it The Clerk read as follows: spect to any bill or joint resolution has done to deal with the needs of the H.R. 2263 making general or continuing appro- American people.
    [Show full text]
  • 9/11 Report”), July 2, 2004, Pp
    Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page i THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page v CONTENTS List of Illustrations and Tables ix Member List xi Staff List xiii–xiv Preface xv 1. “WE HAVE SOME PLANES” 1 1.1 Inside the Four Flights 1 1.2 Improvising a Homeland Defense 14 1.3 National Crisis Management 35 2. THE FOUNDATION OF THE NEW TERRORISM 47 2.1 A Declaration of War 47 2.2 Bin Ladin’s Appeal in the Islamic World 48 2.3 The Rise of Bin Ladin and al Qaeda (1988–1992) 55 2.4 Building an Organization, Declaring War on the United States (1992–1996) 59 2.5 Al Qaeda’s Renewal in Afghanistan (1996–1998) 63 3. COUNTERTERRORISM EVOLVES 71 3.1 From the Old Terrorism to the New: The First World Trade Center Bombing 71 3.2 Adaptation—and Nonadaptation— ...in the Law Enforcement Community 73 3.3 . and in the Federal Aviation Administration 82 3.4 . and in the Intelligence Community 86 v Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page vi 3.5 . and in the State Department and the Defense Department 93 3.6 . and in the White House 98 3.7 . and in the Congress 102 4. RESPONSES TO AL QAEDA’S INITIAL ASSAULTS 108 4.1 Before the Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania 108 4.2 Crisis:August 1998 115 4.3 Diplomacy 121 4.4 Covert Action 126 4.5 Searching for Fresh Options 134 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Legion [Volume 124, No. 5 (May 1988)]
    Last Chance Final Year for this Incredible Low Price on the Most Popular Summer Shirt in America! Men, if you act at once while my one remaining boatload of genuine imported Guayabera Summer Shirts is still in stock, I promise you will be the Best Dressed, Smartest, Coolest, Most Comfortable man around town this summer and still pay only • 4 POCKETS ! • Tailored to Fit! • NO JACKET REQUIRED! Details! Details! Details! Real f a button side vents, f ® JOW YOU MUST HURRY! 1: Quality like this probably will cost twice ^the price anywhere else, but I bought these Wfearfy and my ship has just come in. All sizes, all colors in cool, crisp, polyester/cotton I NO IRON summer shirting. BUT HURRY! Once these are gone, there are no more at this price ever! Use this coupon: /A quality Haband Import 'Shirts 3for NO-IRON for W MM 37.25 4/49.50 Summer Shirts SAVE $2: All 5 for $60.35 ^ HABANDuAQAiin COMPANYrn SIZES: S(14-14y2) M(15-15'/2) 265 N. 9th Street L(16-16y2) XL(17-17'/2) Paterson, N.J. 07530 PLEASE ADD $2.50 PER SHIRT FOR 2XL(18-18'/2)* 3XL(19-19y2)* Si, Senor! Send _ shirts COLOR SIZE? QTY.7 GUARANTEE: If I do not choose ^ _A_ WHITE to wear the shirts, I may return them within 30 days for a full B BLUE refund of every penny I paid you. _c_ TAN lament enclosed or _f_ YELLOW Charge: DVisa DMC _L BURGUNDY PRICE Exp. Date: / POSTACE/HANDUNC $ 2.75 Acct.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Rd Battalion Royal Australian Regiment
    3rd Battalion Royal Australian Regiment In 1945 Australia sent three units to Japan as part of the British Commonwealth Occupation Force (BCOF). Originally known as the 65th, 66th and 67th Infantry Battalions, they were raised from Australian Divisions stationed in New Guinea at the end of the Second World War. On 23 November 1948, the battalions were renamed the First, Second and Third Battalions, The Australian Regiment, respectively. The prefix “Royal” was granted by King George VI on 31 March 1949. 3RAR was stationed at Woodside in South Australia when it was committed to the Vietnam War. It arrived in South Vietnam throughout December, 1967. Its arrival brought the 1st Australian Task Force (1ATF) up to three-battalion strength. On 29 January, C Company was placed under the command of 7RAR for Operation Coburg (24 January – 1 March 1968). The operation was carried out on the Bien Hoa–Long Khanh border. C Company rejoined 3RAR on February 10, when the battalion relieved 7RAR. 3RAR was joined by W1 Company, Royal New Zealand Infantry Regiment (RNZIR), from 2RAR for the remainder of the operation. It returned to Nui Dat on 1 March. 3RAR next operated outside of Phuoc Tuy during Operation Toan Thang (21 April – 7 June). Toan Thang aimed to block the communist withdrawal following the Tet Offensive. 3RAR was stationed on the Bien Hoa–Bien Nuong border. On 13 May it occupied Fire Support Base Coogee, before moving 5 kilometres north on 24 May to establish Fire Support Base Balmoral. The first attack on Balmoral occurred on 26 May.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School REMEMBERING JIMMY CARTER THE RHETORICAL EVOCATIONS OF PRESIDENTIAL MEMORIES A Thesis in Communication Arts and Sciences by Brandon M. Johnson 2020 Brandon M. Johnson Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts August 2020 The thesis of Brandon M. Johnson was reviewed and approved by the following: Mary E. Stuckey Professor, Communication Arts and Sciences Thesis Advisor Stephen H. Browne Liberal Arts Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences Michael J. Steudeman Assistant Professor of Rhetoric and Director of CAS100A Denise H. Solomon Head and Liberal Arts Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences iii ABSTRACT This thesis is an analysis of the public memory of Jimmy Carter and the way the historical resources of his presidency (including his perceived moral character) are interpreted and evoked as a shorthand for presidential failure by associating him with a rhetoric of weakness. Broadly, I consider the nature of presidential memory, asking how a presidency passes from history to memory. I suggest that presidential histories serve as inventional resources in the present, with rhetors evoking interpretations of the past as rhetorical appeals. These appeals are acts of memory, and analyzing how they function discursively and are deployed strategically draws out how presidential memory works and what implications it has to presidential rhetoric. The different strategies used in remembering the presidency of Jimmy Carter are useful texts for rhetorically critiquing this process because Carter is often deployed as a rhetorical shorthand, providing a representative example of interpreting presidential pasts. I begin by considering the evolving scholarship and historiography on Carter and conceptualizing how presidential pasts can be interpreted in the present through acts of remembering.
    [Show full text]