DOCSLIB.ORG

Renold on Hildebrand, 'Women at War: Subhas Chandra Bose and the Rani of Jhansi Regiment'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Renold on Hildebrand, 'Women at War: Subhas Chandra Bose and the Rani of Jhansi Regiment' H-War Renold on Hildebrand, 'Women at War: Subhas Chandra Bose and the Rani of Jhansi Regiment' Review published on Thursday, October 17, 2019 Vera Hildebrand. Women at War: Subhas Chandra Bose and the Rani of Jhansi Regiment. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 2018. 344 pp. $29.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-1-68247-315-3. Reviewed by Leah Renold (Texas State) Published on H-War (October, 2019) Commissioned by Margaret Sankey (Air University) Printable Version: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=52575 In the years following WWII in India, stories abounded of the bravery of thousands of Indian women soldiers who courageously encountered the enemy in combat in the dense and sweltering jungles of Burma. It mattered little that the famed women of the Rani of Jhansi Regiment were said to have fought alongside the Japanese against the British Indian Army. To many Indians, the women were heroic nationalists in that they fought to gain independence for India from the British. The stories of the female soldiers were based largely on the accounts of Lakshmi Swaminathan Sahgal, generally referred to as “Captain Lakshmi,” who was the commander of the unit. Captain Lakshmi gave lecture tours in India after the war and wrote of her experiences with the regiment in her autobiography. Vera Hildebrand, who studied Indian history and culture at Georgetown University, and is now a senior research fellow at the Nordic Institute of Asian Studies at the University of Copenhagen, has gone to great lengths in her research to go beyond Captain Lakshmi’s hagiographical stories of her regiment. Women at War presents a fascinating account of the Rani of Jhansi Regiment, and the man behind the organization, Subhas Chandra Bose. The Rani of Jhansi Regiment (RJR), was formed in Singapore in 1943. The Russians had women serving as soldiers, but the women served in regiments that were predominantly male. The RJR was the first all-female regiment, composed of female Indian combat soldiers and a small number of weapons-trained nurses. These women were called Ranis, which translates as “queens.” Their regiment was part of the Indian National Army (INA). The founder and commander of the INA was Subhas Chandra Bose, a colleague of Mahatma Gandhi in the Indian nationalist movement, who saw Gandhi’s ideas of nonviolent resistance against British imperialism as naive. Bose left India and made his way to Germany in 1941, where he gained permission from the Germans to recruit captured members of the British Indian Army to fight against the Allied forces. After the Japanese began to take British-held areas in Asia, the Germans helped Bose to travel to Tokyo in 1942 in order to work with the Japanese. Subhas Chandra Bose believed that the Japanese would liberate India from British rule and grant India independence. When the large British military base at Singapore fell to the Japanese, thousands of Indian prisoners of war who had served faithfully in the British Indian Army on the side of the Allies were given the choice of suffering the hardships of Japanese camps or joining the INA. Over forty thousand Indians joined the INA to fight on the side of what was only recently the enemy. Subhas Chandra Bose now had a real army. It was also in Singapore that Bose announced the creation of an all-female regiment and began the recruitment of women. Citation: H-Net Reviews. Renold on Hildebrand, 'Women at War: Subhas Chandra Bose and the Rani of Jhansi Regiment'. H-War. 10-17-2019. https://networks.h-net.org/node/12840/reviews/5082392/renold-hildebrand-women-war-subhas-chandra-bose-and-rani-jhansi Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-War It is astounding for Bose to have had such an idea at a time in history when women’s roles were largely confined to the home. It is even more surprising that Bose had success in recruiting young women from wealthy, middle-class, and poor families, from well-educated women to illiterate ones. The majority of the women had not grown up in India. They came from Indian families living in British Malaya, Singapore, and Burma and joined for reasons ranging from patriotic zeal to wanting to escape hunger and abuse. All of the women were in awe of Subhas Chandra Bose, who was a charismatic father figure to them. As the book explained, Bose paid much attention to the welfare of the women, yet he warned them that their service to their country would require hardship and perhaps their lives. The regiment was named after Rani Lakshmibai of Jhansi, the widowed Hindu queen who died in battle against the British in the uprising of 1857 and became a heroine of Indian nationalism. Bose set up a training camp in Singapore, where the women lived in the most austere of conditions and began engaging in physical training and military drills. They learned to use rifles fitted with bayonets and were told that they would engage in combat at the front. The Japanese allowed the formation of the regiment, but they would not allow the female soldiers to fight alongside the Japanese troops. As the author discovered, Bose’s idea was to send the RJR to Burma, from where they would follow the male INA across the border into India. In May of 1944, Bose sent off the first group of Ranis on a treacherous journey to Burma, where they planned to join the INA in battle in northeastern India. Hildebrand goes into great detail on the daily life of the women in the Singapore camp and on the movements of those sent on to Burma, while also providing information concerning what was happening in the wider context of the war in the area. Hillebrand includes a chapter on the challenges she faced while doing research on the RJR, which is just as good a read as the rest of the book. The author gathered all the documents she could find on the INA from archives in India, Britain, Singapore, Japan, and Malaysia. She visited the Netaji Research Bureau, the archive of the Bose family in Kolkata, India, but the family would not allow her to see unpublished material. She had more success in the National Archives of India, where she found the Indian National Army Papers and the Indian Independence League Papers, which were very helpful. The author wanted to interview surviving members of the RJR, even though she only had their names and the names of the towns they were from when they enlisted. Hillebrand began her search for the women by looking through computerized telephone books in Malaysia and Singapore, going through lists of the last names until she at located a Rani. She went on to track down and have extensive interviews with twenty-two members of the regiment living in India, Malaysia, Singapore, and the United States. This was during the 1980s, when the women were elderly, yet the women were able to vividly recall their experiences. Amongst the women interviewed was Captain Lakshmi, who had spent years publicizing the accomplishments of the RJR. The author also interviewed INA soldiers. The author later learned that thousands of interrogations of the members of the INA were conducted by British intelligence after the war and that the reports were sent back to England. Hildebrand went to the British Library in London to search for the Interrogation Reports, but only found references to them. She left the library disappointed, only to receive an anonymous email telling her that the Interrogation Reports were indeed in the British Library and providing information on how the boxes containing the reports were labeled. Hildebrand returned to the British Library, and with the help of chief curator, Dr. Antonia Moon of the India Office Records, located the reports and became the first researcher to use the valuable information. Previous historical accounts of the INA devoted only a few lines to the RJR. The scant information available on the RJR until Hillebrand’s book was published has been largely based on the accounts of Citation: H-Net Reviews. Renold on Hildebrand, 'Women at War: Subhas Chandra Bose and the Rani of Jhansi Regiment'. H-War. 10-17-2019. https://networks.h-net.org/node/12840/reviews/5082392/renold-hildebrand-women-war-subhas-chandra-bose-and-rani-jhansi Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-War Captain Lakshmi. By combining the information from her various sources and comparing the accounts of the other members of the regiment, Hildebrand established that Captain Lakshmi had significantly exaggerated her stories of the regiment. Hildebrand found first that the number of members of the regiment was not in the thousands. Actually, there were only 450 soldiers, some of whom were nurses. The Ranis never got closer to the front than 250 miles and none of the women engaged in combat. Though a small group of Ranis were sent to Burma to prepare to enter combat in India, the male members of the INA went into Indian state of Manipur first. Though the men had been well trained by the British military, Bose’s command and strategies were disastrous and it soon became evident that the INA was no match for the British Indian forces. Members of the INA began to surrender to the British. During the Ranis’ time in Burma, it also became apparent that Bose had not at all prepared them to deal with real combat situations of jungle warfare. Their training had consisted mostly of marches, the most rigorous of which was fortnightly overnight marches in full gear.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Note on Misleading and Factual Misrepresentation of the Current NCERT Textbooks: a Response to the Public Notice Issued by the Rajya Sabha Secretariat
    INDIAN HISTORY CONGRESS (Established, 1935) Note on Misleading and Factual Misrepresentation of the Current NCERT Textbooks: A Response to the Public Notice Issued by the Rajya Sabha Secretariat In a recent communication the Rajya Sabha Secretariat has called for ‘Reforms in the contents and designs of Text Books with focus on: a. removing references to un-historical facts and distortions about our national heroes from the text books b. ensuring equal or proportionate references to all periods of Indian history c. highlighting the role of great historic women heroes, including Gargi, Maitreyi, or rulers like Rani of Jhansi, Rani Channamma, Chand Bibi, Zhalkari Bai etc. While History itself is a discipline having its own internal dynamic and gets enriched by continuous research and rigorous debate and discussions within the scholarly domain, the Indian History Congress has examined the claims in the aforementioned notice in the light of the contents of the existing NCERT textbooks. A completely factual examination of the textbooks, with details presented in tabular form below, based on the points mentioned above, however, suggests that the call for the reform of textbooks is not based on any academic, pedagogic or factual detail. The table below presents the references to primary sources, proportionate representations to all periods of history, national heroes, and historical female figures in the NCERT textbooks of Classes VI to XII currently in use in the country. Textbook Primary Source References* References to Proportionate National Heroes** Great Historic Representation (Period/ Women Figures Region/ Language/ Traditions) Class VI Pp. 4-6, 13, 18, 19, 26, 27, 29, P.
    [Show full text]
  • HI234: Introduction to India and South Asia
    Professor Benjamin R. Siegel Lecture, Fall 2016: History Department, Boston University Tu / Th, 12:30 – 2:00, KCB 104 Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Tu / Th 10:30 – noon Office phone: 617-353-8316 226 Bay State Road, Room 205 HI234: Introduction to India and South Asia Map of British India, c. 1909 Map of South Asia, c. 1950 Course Description It is easy to think of the Indian subcontinent, home of nearly 1.7 billion people, as a region only now moving into the global limelight, propelled by remarkable growth against a backdrop of enduring poverty, and dramatic contestations over civil society. Yet since antiquity, South Asia has been one of the world’s most dynamic crossroads, a place where cultures met and exchanged ideas, goods, and populations. The region was the site of the most prolonged and intensive colonial encounter in the form of Britain’s Indian empire, and Indian individuals and ideas entered into long conversations with counterparts in Europe, the Middle East, East and Southeast Asia, and elsewhere. Since India’s independence and partition into two countries in 1947, the region has struggled to overcome poverty, disease, ethnic strife and political conflict. Its three major countries – India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh – have undertaken three distinct experiments in democracy with three radically divergent outcomes. Those countries’ large, important diaspora populations and others have played important roles in these nation’s development, even as the larger world grows more aware of how important South Asia remains, and will become. Benjamin Siegel – HI234: Introduction to India and South Asia This course is a survey of South Asian history from antiquity to the present, focusing on the ideas, encounters, and exchanges that have formed this dynamic region.
    [Show full text]
  • Rani of Jhansi
    The RANI OF JHANSI A Historical Play in four acts by PHILIP COX This is a reconstruction in dramatic form of the intensely moving story of the tragic young Hindu Princess, who was fated to take up arms against the British during the Indian Mutiny of 1857. There are 2 female and 12 male speaking parts, besides a crowd. The play is in eleven episodes and requires five sets of scenery. /--- - "" or not this arresting figure of a royal widow in revolt "'to Joan of Arc, her claim upon our notice is indis­ f?'·•e of the tribute paid to her by her chief military ·'" \. British side: "She was the best and bravest of ! /portrait has already secured some striking com· : George Bernard Shaw, who generously perused ~ the original :\IS., has said: "The Rani of Jhansi ..... .~ performed at an Indian Kational Theatre, as soon "' t'!iey :tave one." l\lr. William Armstrong of the Liverpool : e ~·<:rtory Theatre has stated: "You have written a most interest­ ,; ,. ;•l.,y and I enjoytd reading it very much. Sincere, dramatic, 1 • ,I cunstructtd and moYing." :\Ir. Ronald Ad.;~ms of the '1-ssy TLeatre, London, made this comment after reading the script: "This is a magnificent effurt." I :\DO~: GEORGE ALLEN (j UNWIN LTD The author has brought to this very fasci­ nating study of events and motives in a bygone age, the knowledge of a specialist supported by a varied general experience as advocate, administrator and educationist. During recent years his courses of lectures on India, delivered at Morley College, the Evening Institutes of the London County Cow1cil, Toynbee Hall and elsewhere, at-· tracted considerable attention.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mortal God: Imagining the Sovereign in Colonial India'
    H-Asia Imy on Banerjee, 'The Mortal God: Imagining the Sovereign in Colonial India' Review published on Saturday, October 26, 2019 Milinda Banerjee. The Mortal God: Imagining the Sovereign in Colonial India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. xviii + 435 pp. $120.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-1-107-16656-1. Reviewed by Kate Imy (University of North Texas)Published on H-Asia (October, 2019) Commissioned by Sumit Guha (The University of Texas at Austin) Printable Version: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=53810 Milinda Banerjee’s ambitious new study, The Mortal God: Imagining the Sovereign in Colonial India, analyzes the shifting meanings of kingship, rulership, and sovereignty in late colonial Bengal. The primary goal of the work is to “focus on varying ways in which multiple political actors in colonial India ascribed divine and kingly status to specific political forms and beings” (p. 5). He finds hints of this type of political formulation in political reforms as varied as human rights, education, territorial autonomy, and employment, which he argues reflects the “democratization of divinity” (p. 6). This proves to be a fruitful yet challenging, intellectual undertaking, bridging concerns of nationalist, princely, peasant, colonial, and postcolonial forms of political imagination. It opens up many new areas of inquiry for political theory, the history of religions, and the shared histories of colonialism and anti-colonialism. After an interesting discussion of the title’s debt to the seventeenth-century political theories of Thomas Hobbes, Banerjee situates his analysis firmly within the context of colonial Bengal while gesturing to broader dynamics across India.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDERSTANDING the SCENARIO of REVOLT of 1857:A REVIEWS Vivekyadav Independent Scholar JS University, Shikohabad
    IAETSD JOURNAL FOR ADVANCED RESEARCH IN APPLIED SCIENCES ISSN NO: 2394-8442 UNDERSTANDING THE SCENARIO OF REVOLT OF 1857:A REVIEWS VivekYadav Independent Scholar JS University, Shikohabad Abstract:Until the first half of the 19th century, East HazratMahal [Lucknow]. There was a India Company had kept India more and more in its deficiency of central leadership. control. After a hundred years after the Society of o The revolt was started due to the induction of Society, a cruel and brutal British government enfield riffles in the army. It was believed that became a form of anger resistance, which eliminated the cartridges used in the riffles were made of the basis of the British rule of India. Although the pig fat and cow fat which were restricted for British historians referred to this soldier controversy, the Muslims and Hindus respectively. They the Indian actor described it as the 1857 rebellion or protested against these. the first war of Indian independence. At the end of 18 o Lord canning was the governor general at that century, before the rebellion of the 1857, the riot time. started in different parts of the country. Sunni o The revolt was failed to spread across the rebellion in northern Bengal and the poplar rebellion India. Some epicenters of the revolt were- in Bihar and Bangladesh ended on Sunday at the end Kanpur, Lucknow, Aligarh, Agra, Arrah, of the century. There was a fierce movement of the Delhi, and Jhansi. Maldives and the farmers of Bangladesh's Muslim farmers. The first half of the nineteenth century also witnessed a number of tribal revolts.
    [Show full text]
  • TOPIC- 2 Uprising 1857 the Revolt of 1857 —The First War of Independence! by the First Half of the 19Th Century, the East Indi
    INDIAN HISTORY PAPER IV MODERN INDIAN HISTORY {PAPER CODE :- B L 4004} TOPIC- 2 Uprising 1857 The Revolt of 1857 —the First War of Independence! By the first half of the 19th century, the East India Company had brought major portions of India under its control. One hundred years after the Battle of Plassey, anger against the unjust and oppressive British Government took the form of a revolt that shook the very foundations of British rule in India. While British historians called it the Sepoy Mutiny, Indian historians named it the Revolt of 1857 or the First War of Indian Independence. The Revolt of 1857 had been preceded by a series of disturbances in different parts of the country from the late eighteenth century onwards. The Sanyasi Rebellion in North Bengal and the Chunar rebellion in Bihar and Bengal broke out in the late eighteenth century. There were several peasant uprisings in the mid- nineteenth century, the most important of which were those by the Moplah peasants of the Malabar and the Faraizi movement by Muslim peasants in Bengal. The first half of the nineteenth century also witnessed a number of tribal revolts. In this context, mention may be made of the rebellions of the Bhils of Madhya Pradesh, the Santhals of Bihar and the Gonds and Khonds of Orissa. However, all these disturbances were localized. Although serious and, in some cases, long drawn, these did not pose any serious threat to the existence of the British Empire. The Revolt of 1857: The first expression of organized resistance was the Revolt of 1857.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating 75 Years of Independence INDIAN INDEPENDENCE
    AJADI KA AMRUT MAHOTSAV Celebrating 75 Years of Independence INDIAN INDEPENDENCE India celebrates its Independence Day on 15th August every year. Independence day reminds us of all the sacrifices that were made by our freedom fighters to make India free from British rule. On 15th August 1947, India was declared independent from British colonialism and became the largest democracy in the world. Various parts of India was ruled by East Indian company from History 1757 to 1858 followed by the direct administration of united kingdom (British India) from 1858 to 1947. The lives of the of Indian people were miserable. Indians were treated as slaves and had no rights to say anything to them. Indian rulers were Independence mere puppets in the hands of British officers. Indian soldiers were treated inhumanely in British camps, and farmers were dying of starvation as they could not grow crops and had to pay heavy land taxes. Our freedom fighters struggled for India’s Independence. Famous leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Subhash Chandra Bose, Bhagat Singh, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Jawaharlal Nehru, Rani Lakshmi Bai, fought fearlessly against the Britishers. Many of them also sacrificed their lives to make India free from British rule. Their contribution and effort are remembered in India’s Independence history. Independence India achieved independence after years of struggle. India got complete freedom from the British and secured full after Struggle autonomy on 15th August 1947. That’s why the day holds great significance in the heart of every Indian citizen living in and Sacrifice India or abroad. India completed 73 years of freedom on 15h August 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Nordic South Asia Network
    Nordic South Asia Network My account j Log out Basic page Nordic newsletter 4 - 27 February 2017 has been updated. Nordic newsletter 4 - 27 February 2017 Navigation j View I ~ j Revisions 11 Nodequeue I o Add News item o Create new page admin o See content and pages o Create URL shortcut (alias) NORDIC SOUTH ASIA NETWORK o Broken link Report Subscribe to the newsletter by sending an e-mail to [email protected] Import o Imported From NIAS o Sammanstall ett nyhetsbrev o Skapa verksamhetsrapport o Open newsletter template Nordic and previous SASNET Newsletters Nordic newsletter 4 - 27 February 2017 Nordic newsletter 3 - 1 February 2017 Nordic newsletter 2 - 1 January 2017 Nordic newsletter 1 - 15 June 2016 Newsletter 186 - 13 April 2016 Newsletter 185 - 8 March 2016 Newsletter 184 - 18 February 2016 Newsletter 183 - 21 January 2016 Newsletter 182 - 22 December 2015 Newsletter 181 - 25 November 2015 Newsletter 180 - 28 October 2015 Newsletter 179 - 30 September 2015 Newsletter 178 - 2 September 2015 Newsletter 177 - 6 August 2015 Newsletter 176 - 3 June 2015 Newsletter 175 - 7 May 2015 Newsletter 174 - 15 April 2015 Newsletter 173 - 26 March 2015 Contents: Newsletter 172 - 12 February 2015 Newsletter 171 - 20 January 2015 Newsletter 170 - 18 December 2014 • Research Community News • Conferences and workshops in Scandinavia Newsletter 169 - 25 November 2014 • Educational News Newsletter 168 - 28 October 2014 • South Asia Newsletter 167 - 6 October 2014 • Conferences related Cu lture Newsletter 166 - 9 September 2014 and workshops outside Scandinavia Newsletter 165 - 21 August 2014 Newsletter 164 - 16 July 2014 Research Community News Newsletter 163 - 10 June 2014 • Danish researcher writes about Rani of Jhansi INA regiment Newsletter 162 - 20 May 2014 Newsletter 161 - 29 April 2014 Women at War: Subhas Chandra Newsletter 160 - 4 April 2014 Bose and t he Rani of Jhansi Newsletter 159 - 14 March 2014 Regiment by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indian Mutiny of 1857 and the Sikhs
    THE INDIAN MUTINY OF 1857 AND THE SIKHS By GANDA SINGH 1969 GURDWARA PARBANDHAK COMMITTEE SISGANJ, CHANDNI CHOWK DELHI Copyright GANDA SINGH 1969 Printed at the Gutenberg Printing Press, Connaught Circus, New Delhi-1 INTRODUCTORY The first part of the this paper on the Indian Mutiny of 1857 and the Sikhs was written for the Indian Freedom Struggle Centenary (1857-1957) Souvenir Committee, New Delhi, and was published in the Tribune, Ambala, on August 15, 1957. I had been asked by the Secretary to the 1 Committee in his letter No. AL/722 of June 13, 1957, to rebut, if I could, the charge that “Indian Struggle for freedom (1857) failed as the Sikhs betrayed and sided with the British”. The Indian people had for some time past been fed on the writings of the self-glorifying political propagandists, calling this uprising the First War of Indian Independence. And they were taken aback by the truthful statements contained in this paper. To them objective history was not palatable enough, nor was it easy for them to digest. The result was a number of letters that appeared in the Tribune during August and September 1957. Some of them raised points which, I felt, needed clarification for those who had not studied the subject from firsthand sources and had depended for their knowledge on non-historical literature. For them was written the second part of the paper which was published in the same journal on October 6, 1957. It is a great pity that in a spirit of misguided patriotism our countrymen—even the educated ones —are not unoften carried away by self-glorifying emotions, against which the venerable Acharya Kriplani cautioned them at the State History Congress at Bhopal in January 1968, with particular reference to the “Sepoy Mutiny of 1857, which has been glorified into the First War of Indian Independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideological History, Contested Culture, and the Politics of Representation in Amar Chitra Katha
    Nilakshi Goswami Boston University Ideological History, Contested Culture, and the Politics of Representation in Amar Chitra Katha Abstract The evolution of culture and societies through the course of history is not a priori but is discursively constructed by a constellation of beliefs and myths and is shaped by different ideological institutions. This paper addresses the historical narratives of Amar Chitra Katha (from now on ACK), the first indigenous children’s comics in India, which began publishing in 1967. Despite a growing body of research on the media landscape in postcolonial India, Indian children’s media culture continues to be underrepresented in the field of history and popular culture. When we engage with the world of comics and graphic novels, we realize how it shapes, and is shaped by, not just the minds of individuals but also the collective consciousness of communities and their (un)sung histories. ACK has been an important cultural institution that has played a significant role in defining, for several generations of Indian readers, what it means to be Hindu and Indian. In the process, the comics tradition seems to portray a delimited world view of India, often erasing non-Hindu subjects and lower caste strata of the society from India’s history. While the research will focus on reformist and revisionist impulses that ACK carries, it will also engage in the way these historical parables of India are narrated, the stories that are chosen to be told, the faces and the voices that are prioritized (or obliterated) for the purpose, and the collaboration of literary and visual image on which they rely to accomplish their re-presentation of history.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reorganization of Political Power 2
    Contents Preface xxv Acknowledgments xxix A Note on Transliteration xxxi Chronology xxxiii Thematic Table of Contents xli List of Maps lvii 1. The Eighteenth Century: Ferment and Change 1 The Reorganization of Political Power 2 Aurangzeb: Letters to His Sons 4 Shah Wali-Allah: The Urgency of Political Instability 5 Iradat Khan: Decay at the Center of the Empire 7 Rebelling Against the Mughals: The Sikhs 8 Muhammad Qasim on Banda Bahadur’s Sikh Army 9 The Sikh Religious Code: Lives of Discipline and Devotion 10 Marathas: Courtiers, Rebels, Raiders, and State Builders 11 The History of Khafi Khan and the Story of Tara Bai 12 Ahilya Bai Holkar: A Maratha Woman Ruler 13 vi Contents The Marathas as Raiders: A Bengali Perspective 14 Forts and War: The Essential Features of Any Kingdom 15 The Reality of War for a Common Soldier 16 The Chronicle of Bhausahib: Defeat in 1761 of the Marathas at Panipat 16 Tipu Sultan: Visionary Ruler of Mysore 18 The Infl uence of Commerce 20 Bankers and Traders: The Powers Behind the Thrones 21 “Business Men are the Glory and Ornament of the Kingdom” 22 Ananda Ranga Pillai: Merchant and Agent of the French 23 Ghulam Husain Khan: The Nawab of Bengal, the Marathas, and the Jagat Seths 24 Abu Talib: Cultural Comparisons, India Versus the West 26 On the Margins of Power 27 The Sannyasi Uprising 28 Himmat Bahadur, the People’s Hero 29 Religious Expressions, Devotional and Intellectual 30 Ramprasad Sen: Singing to the Goddess in Bengal 31 The Poetry of Nagaridas: Krishna Devotion in Vrindavan 33 Tyagaraja: Telegu Composer
    [Show full text]
  • Singh, Harleen. "India's Rebel Queen: Rani Lakshmi Bai and the 1857 Uprising."
    Singh, Harleen. "India’s Rebel Queen: Rani Lakshmi Bai and the 1857 Uprising." Women Warriors and National Heroes: Global Histories. .. London,: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020. 23–38. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 29 Sep. 2021. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350140301.ch-002>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 29 September 2021, 08:27 UTC. Copyright © Boyd Cothran, Joan Judge, Adrian Shubert and contributors 2020. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 1 India’s Rebel Queen: Rani Lakshmi Bai and the 1857 Uprising Harleen Singh Considered the “most dangerous of all the Indian leaders,” the Queen of Jhansi, Rani Lakshmi Bai, challenged the might of the British Empire in the Uprising of 1857 and died on the battlefield with her soldiers.1 Known as the greatest heroine of Indian history, represented variously in folk song, poetry, novel, and film, and commemorated with postage stamps and statues, the Rani (Hindi for Queen) of Jhansi is a contradictory figure in British history as both worthy foe and rapacious whore. My work looks at the historical and literary representations of a woman warrior to flesh out the myriad and conflicting, and yet often coterminous, narratives surrounding women in the public sphere.2 For example, Indian mythology has numerous Goddess figures who are invoked in the realm of war, and yet widespread understanding of women’s roles in India continues to stem from, and is limited to, the domestic. Similarly, even as Queen Victoria ruled England at the time of the rebellion in 1857, Indian queens were rarely entitled to occupy a parallel position of authority in British policies.
    [Show full text]