DOCSLIB.ORG

PLUG-IN ELECTRIC VEHICLE DEPLOYMENT in the NORTHEAST a Market Overview and Literature Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PLUG-IN ELECTRIC VEHICLE DEPLOYMENT in the NORTHEAST a Market Overview and Literature Review PLUG-IN ELECTRIC VEHICLE DEPLOYMENT IN THE NORTHEAST A Market Overview and Literature Review By Charles Zhu and Nick Nigro Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES) Prepared for the Transportation and Climate Initiative, Georgetown Climate Center, and New York State Energy Research and Development Authority Funded by the U.S. Department of Energy September 2012 NOTICE This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number #DE-­‐EE0005586. This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government, the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, and the State of New York. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do notessarily nec state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Information and documents published under the name of the Transportation and Climate Initiative (TCI) represent work produced in support of the TCI or its projects. TCI materials do not necessarily reflect the positions of individual jurisdictions or agencies unless explicitly stated. Plug-­‐in Electric Vehicle Deployment in the Northeast: A Market Overview and Literature Review September 2012 2 Foreword Electric vehicles have the potential to decrease our nation’s dependence o oil an drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector. In an effort to stimulate economic growth, decrease the United States’ dependence o oil, and lessen the operating cost ofpersonal transportation, the federal government issued a final rule in 2012 requiring new cars to average 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025. This goal is ambitious and will be difficult to accomplish without significant numbers of alternative fuel vehicles. Several alternative fuels are currently available, but electric vehicles (EVs) are emerging as the predominant alternative for passenger vehicles. While EVsare hitting the market and offer numerous advantages, such as zero tailpipe emissions, lower fuel costs, andthe convenience of filling up at home, a number of barriers stand in the way of wide-­‐scale EV deployment. This literature review, prepared by the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, provides an overview of plug-­‐in electric vehicle (PEV) deployment in the Northeast and Mid-­‐Atlantic states. The report assesses current electric vehicle and electric vehicle charging station technology, looks at the state ofPEV markets, reviews the benefits of PEV deployment, and identifies the barriers and challenges to PEVs in gaining market acceptance. The literature reviewnded isinte to serve as a resource for consumers and policy makers who seek to better understand the nature of electric vehicle deployment in thisregion and related challenges. The Georgetown Climate Center commissioned and oversaw the preparation of this literature review on behalf of the Transportation and Climate Initiative (TCI), as part of its effort to assess and address barriers to EV deployment in the Northeast-­‐ and Mid Atlantic States. Georgetown Climate Center Director of Research and Policy, Kate Zyla, and EV Program Coordinator, Cassie Powers, managed the oversight and review process, which included incorporating input from theTCI. In addition, Georgetown Climate Center worked extensively with 16 of the region’s Clean Cities Coordinators, who provided local information and offered comments. Their expertise and hard work were invaluable and enhanced the scope and quality of this report. This work is one of series of products funded by Department of Energy Electric Vehicle Readiness Planning Grant, awarded to the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority on behalf of TCI. Additional information can be found at http://www.georgetownclimate.org/tci/ We are grateful for their support. The Georgetown Climate Center also appreciates the support of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Barr Foundation, which support our electric vehicles work, and our other transportation funders: the Emily Hall Tremaine Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, Oak Foundation, and Surdna Foundation. Vicki Arroyo, Executive Director Peter Byrne, Faculty Director Georgetown Climate Center Georgetown Climate Center Plug-­‐in Electric Vehicle Deployment in the Northeast: A Market Overview and Literature Review September 2012 3 Contents 1. Executive Summary and Background........................................................................................................................ 6 2. Plug -­‐in Electric Vehicle Technologies Overview........................................................................................................ 8 PEV Definitions and Comparisons............................................................................................................................. 8 Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) Technology........................................................................................... 10 EVSE and Managed Charging .................................................................................................................................. 11 3. Market Potential and Overview.............................................................................................................................. 12 National PEV Market Growth and Potential ........................................................................................................... 12 Market Forecasts ................................................................................................................................................ 12 Consumer Demand ............................................................................................................................................. 14 Northeast and Mid-­‐Atlantic PEV Market Growth and Potential............................................................................. 15 4. PEV Benefits ............................................................................................................................................................ 17 Decreased Reliance on Oil ...................................................................................................................................... 17 Economic Growth ................................................................................................................................................... 19 Local Air Quality ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 Global Climate Change............................................................................................................................................ 23 5. PEV Deployment: Barriers and Options .................................................................................................................. 27 Vehicle Appeal ........................................................................................................................................................ 27 Capital Cost Reductions Needed for Vehicles ..................................................................................................... 27 Capturing and Presenting the Total Value Proposition........................................................................................... 31 Consumer Uncertainty and BEV Range Anxiety.................................................................................................. 35 Summary and Policy Options .............................................................................................................................. 37 Charging Build-­‐Out and Finance ............................................................................................................................. 40 EVSE Permitting and Inspection Process............................................................................................................. 41 Residential Consumer Charging .......................................................................................................................... 44 Workplace, Publicly Accessible & Commercial Charging .................................................................................... 46 Standards ............................................................................................................................................................ 49 Financing Charging Infrastructure....................................................................................................................... 50 Summary and Policy Actions............................................................................................................................... 53 Impacts on the Grid and Transportation Funds ...................................................................................................... 56 Grid Impacts.......................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • POSITION STATEMENT: UNFAIR TAXES for ELECTRIC VEHICLES This Position Is Supported by the Following Drive Electric Minnesota Policy Committee Members
    POSITION STATEMENT: UNFAIR TAXES FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES This position is supported by the following Drive Electric Minnesota Policy Committee members: Alliance for Transportation Electrification Minnesota Electric Vehicle Owners American Lung Association in Minnesota Minnesota Power City of Minneapolis Otter Tail Power Company Connexus Energy Plug In America Elk River Municipal Utilities Shift2Electric Fresh Energy Xcel Energy Great River Energy Electric vehicle (EV) users should pay their fair share for the use of Minnesota roads, but they should not pay MORE than owners of equivalent conventional vehicles or than their fair share. Upkeep for Minnesota’s roads relies significantly on the Highway Users Tax Distribution Fund, which is funded through a combination of fuel tax revenue (including gasoline tax and $75 EV tax), license fees (including registration taxes), and motor vehicle sales taxes. Auto parts sales taxes and other sources also provide funding.1 Why is Drive Electric Minnesota concerned about unfair new taxes on EVs? • EVs already pay more than their fair share. EV drivers currently pay a $75 annual tax in lieu of a gas tax in addition to paying more in motor vehicle sales tax and registration tax than someone buying a comparable gasoline vehicle. In total highway taxes, EV owners already pay more over the life of the vehicle than the average gas vehicle driver, as shown in figure 1. • Inconsistent with the user-pays principle: The current gas tax model assesses a fee on a driver based on their vehicle’s fuel economy (miles per gallon) and how much they drive. Drivers of vehicles with low fuel economy (few miles per gallon) need to fuel their tank more, as do drivers that drive a lot.
    [Show full text]
  • One Million Electric Vehicles by 2015
    One Million Electric Vehicles By 2015 February 2011 Status Report 1 Executive Summary President Obama’s goal of putting one million electric vehicles on the road by 2015 represents a key milestone toward dramatically reducing dependence on oil and ensuring that America leads in the growing electric vehicle manufacturing industry. Although the goal is ambitious, key steps already taken and further steps proposed indicate the goal is achievable. Indeed, leading vehicle manufacturers already have plans for cumulative U.S. production capacity of more than 1.2 million electric vehicles by 2015, according to public announcements and news reports. While it appears that the goal is within reach in terms of production capacity, initial costs and lack of familiarity with the technology could be barriers. For that reason, President Obama has proposed steps to accelerate America’s leadership in electric vehicle deployment, including improvements to existing consumer tax credits, programs to help cities prepare for growing demand for electric vehicles and strong support for research and development. Introduction In his 2011 State of the Union address, President Obama called for putting one million electric vehicles on the road by 2015 – affirming and highlighting a goal aimed at building U.S. leadership in technologies that reduce our dependence on oil.1 Electric vehicles (“EVs”) – a term that includes plug-in hybrids, extended range electric vehicles and all- electric vehicles -- represent a key pathway for reducing petroleum dependence, enhancing environmental stewardship and promoting transportation sustainability, while creating high quality jobs and economic growth. To achieve these benefits and reach the goal, President Obama has proposed a new effort that supports advanced technology vehicle adoption through improvements to tax credits in current law, investments in R&D and competitive “With more research and incentives, programs to encourage communities to invest we can break our dependence on oil in infrastructure supporting these vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Na Plant Locations 092110 Lt Veh Only.Qxp
    North America car and truck assembly plants – 2010 & beyond AM GENERAL FORD T Mishawaka, Ind. – Ford Transit Connect electric Also see AutoAlliance (gliders, assembly only, production counted in Turkey) UNITED STATES B Chicago – Ford Explorer (new, November), Taurus; Lincoln MKS AUTOALLIANCE T Dearborn, Mich. – Ford F-150, Harley Davidson F-150 C Flat Rock, Mich. – Ford Mustang, Mazda Mazda6 sedan T Detroit Chassis Plant (Detroit) – Ford F-series chassis T Kansas City, Mo.: (One Plant) BMW SUV Plant – Ford Escape, Escape Hybrid; Mercury Mariner, Mariner Hybrid; Mazda Tribute B Spartanburg, S.C.† – BMW X3, X5, X6 Truck Plant – Ford F-150 Super Cab, Super Crew Cab, King Crew Cab T Kentucky Truck (Louisville, Ky.) – F-series Super Duty (F-250 - F-550), CAMI Expedition; Lincoln Navigator T Ingersoll, Ontario, Canada – Chevrolet Equinox, Equinox Sport; T Louisville, Ky. – Ford Escape (4th qtr‘11), Explorer (ends Dec. 16), GMC Terrain Explorer SportTrac (ends Oct. 26); Mercury Mountaineer (ends Sept .28) T Michigan Assembly (Wayne, Mich.) – changeover until Jan. 5, 2011 Ford Focus NOTE Per Renee at CAMI: CAMI became a wholly owned T Ohio Assembly (Avon Lake, Ohio) – E series vans, Transit (2013) subsidiary of GMCL on Dec. 10, 2009. CAMI is, however, still aseparate legal entity and its production numbers should, T Twin Cities (St. Paul, Minn.) – (permanent layoff Dec. 24, 2011) – therefore, be reported separately from GMCL. We do not Ford Ranger, Mazda B series expect the amalgamation of CAMI and GMCL to occur until at least Dec. 31, 2010 (maybe later). Once the amalgamation C Wayne, Mich. – (permanent layoff Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 ) FISKER AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS, INC., Et Al.,1 ) Case No
    Case 13-13087-KG Doc 157 Filed 12/13/13 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) FISKER AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS, INC., et al.,1 ) Case No. 13-13087 (KG) ) Debtors. ) (Jointly Administered) ) MOTION OF THE DEBTORS FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER (A) AUTHORIZING THE EMPLOYMENT AND RETENTION OF BEILINSON ADVISORY GROUP, LLC AS RESTRUCTURING ADVISORS FOR THE DEBTORS, EFFECTIVE NUNC PRO TUNC TO THE PETITION DATE AND (B) WAIVING CERTAIN TIME-KEEPING REQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 2016-2(H) The above-captioned debtors (collectively, the “Debtors”) file this motion (the “Motion”) for entry of an order, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Order”): (a) authorizing the Debtors’ employment and retention of Beilinson Advisory Group, LLC and its subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, and independent contractors (collectively, “BAG”), as their restructuring advisors in connection with these chapter 11 cases effective nunc pro tunc to the Petition Date (as defined below), including the engagement of Marc Beilinson as Chief Restructuring Officer; and (b) waiving certain time-keeping requirements pursuant to Local Rule 2016-2(h). In support of this Motion, the Debtors submit the Declaration of Marc Beilinson, the Debtors’ Chief Restructuring Officer (the “Beilinson Declaration”), attached hereto as Exhibit B. In further support of this Motion, the Debtors respectfully state as follows: 1 The Debtors, together with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, are: Fisker Automotive Holdings, Inc. (9678); and Fisker Automotive, Inc. (9075). For the purpose of these chapter 11 cases, the service address for the Debtors is: 5515 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Monthly Is Property of John Doe Total Toyota Brand
    A publication from April 2012 Volume 01 | Issue 02 global europe.autonews.com/globalmonthly monthly Your source for everything automotive. China beckons an industry answers— How foreign brands are shifting strategies to cash in on the world’s biggest auto market © 2012 Crain Communications Inc. All rights reserved. March 2012 A publication from Defeatglobal spurs monthly dAtA Toyota’s global Volume 01 | Issue 01 design boss Will Zoe spark WESTERN EUROPE SALES BY MODEL, 9 MONTHSRenault-Nissan’sbrought to you courtesy of EV push? www.jato.com February 9 months 9 months Unit Percent 9 months 9 months Unit Percent 2011 2010 change change 2011 2010 change change European sales Scenic/Grand Scenic ......... 116,475 137,093 –20,618 –15% A1 ................................. 73,394 6,307 +67,087 – Espace/Grand Espace ...... 12,656 12,340 +316 3% A3/S3/RS3 ..................... 107,684 135,284 –27,600 –20% data from JATO Koleos ........................... 11,474 9,386 +2,088 22% A4/S4/RS4 ..................... 120,301 133,366 –13,065 –10% Kangoo ......................... 24,693 27,159 –2,466 –9% A6/S6/RS6/Allroad ......... 56,012 51,950 +4,062 8% Trafic ............................. 8,142 7,057 +1,085 15% A7 ................................. 14,475 220 +14,255 – Other ............................ 592 1,075 –483 –45% A8/S8 ............................ 6,985 5,549 +1,436 26% Total Renault brand ........ 747,129 832,216 –85,087 –10% TT .................................. 14,401 13,435 +966 7% RENAULT ........................ 898,644 994,894 –96,250 –10% A5/S5/RS5 ..................... 54,387 59,925 –5,538 –9% RENAULT-NISSAN ............ 1,239,749 1,288,257 –48,508 –4% R8 ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plug-In Electric Vehicle Showcases: Consumer Experience and Acceptance
    Plug-In Electric Vehicle Showcases: Consumer Experience and Acceptance Mark Singer National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5400-75707 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC July 2020 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Plug-In Electric Vehicle Showcases: Consumer Experience and Acceptance Mark Singer National Renewable Energy Laboratory Suggested Citation Singer, Mark. 2020. Plug-In Electric Vehicle Showcases: Consumer Experience and Acceptance. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-5400-75707. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/75707.pdf NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5400-75707 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC July 2020 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NOTICE This work was authored by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Funding provided by U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Vehicle Technologies Office. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Tesla: Supercharging the Future by Akash G. Nandi an Honors Thesis
    Tesla: Supercharging the Future by Akash G. Nandi An honors thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science Undergraduate College Leonard N. Stern School of Business New York University May 2013 Professor Marti G. Subrahmanyam Professor Joseph Foudy Faculty Adviser Thesis Adviser 1 I. Introduction...................................................................................................................Page 4 A. The Inefficiency of Cars Today B. Thesis Objective C. Thesis II. Research and Resources...............................................................................................Page 7 A. Research Framework B. Research Perspectives C. Resources and Data III. Tesla in Context.............................................................................................................Page 9 A. The Global Auto Industry B. Tesla: The Innovative Disrupter C. Sparking the Electric Revolution IV. The Man Behind the Machine...................................................................................Page 12 A. Elon Musk B. Entrepreneur from the Start C. Space X V. Tesla Motors Overview...............................................................................................Page 15 A. Company Offerings B. Phase I. Roadster C. Phase II. Models S and X 2 D. Phase III. Project BlueStar VI. How It Works: The Model S......................................................................................Page 18 A. The Design B. The Mechanics VII. How Did They Do It?..................................................................................................Page
    [Show full text]
  • Written Remarks
    Plug In America 6380 Wilshire Blvd Suite 1000 Los Angeles, CA 90048 323-372-1236 June 19, 2020 Nevada Legislative Committee on Energy 401 S. Carson Street Carson City, NV 89701-4747 Submitted via email to Assemblywoman Daniele Monroe-Moreno ([email protected]); Senator Chris Brooks ([email protected]); and Marjorie Paslov-Thomas ([email protected]) Re: SCR 3 Transportation Funding Solutions Dear Chair Monroe-Moreno and Vice-Chair Brooks: On behalf of the electric vehicle (EV) drivers in Nevada that we represent, Plug In America would like to thank you for your leadership with the Senate Concurrent Resolution 3 (SCR3) process, particularly given these challenging times. EVs provide significant benefits to all Nevadans, and we urge you to take these benefits into account as you finalize the report on alternative solutions for transportation funding in Nevada, including what fees – if any – should be assessed to EV drivers in Nevada. Plug In America is the nation’s leading independent consumer voice for accelerating the use of EVs in the United States to consumers, policymakers, auto manufacturers and others. Formed as a non-profit in 2008, Plug In America provides practical, objective information collected from our coalition of plug-in vehicle drivers through public outreach and education, policy work and a range of technical advisory services. Our expertise represents the world’s deepest pool of experience of driving and living with plug­ in vehicles.1 The solutions to solving the immediate transportation funding shortfalls in Nevada – and also nationwide – require major shifts in how the funding has historically been implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Drive by '25
    ELECTRIC DRIVE BY ‘25: How California Can Catalyze Mass Adoption of Electric Vehicles by 2025 September 2012 About this Report This policy paper is the tenth in a series of reports on how climate change will create opportunities for specific sectors of the business community and how policy-makers can facilitate those opportunities. Each paper results from one-day workshop discussions that include representatives from key business, academic, and policy sectors of the targeted industries. The workshops and resulting policy papers are sponsored by Bank of America and produced by a partnership of the UCLA School of Law’s Environmental Law Center & Emmett Center on Climate Change and the Environment and UC Berkeley School of Law’s Center for Law, Energy & the Environment. Authorship The author of this policy paper is Ethan N. Elkind, Bank of America Climate Policy Associate for UCLA School of Law’s Environmental Law Center & Emmett Center on Climate Change and the Environment and UC Berkeley School of Law’s Center for Law, Energy & the Environment (CLEE). Additional contributions to the report were made by Sean Hecht and Cara Horowitz of the UCLA School of Law and Steven Weissman of the UC Berkeley School of Law. Acknowledgments The author and organizers are grateful to Bank of America for its generous sponsorship of the workshop series and input into the formulation of both the workshops and the policy paper. We would specifically like to thank Anne Finucane, Global Chief Strategy and Marketing Officer, and Chair of the Bank of America Environmental Council, for her commitment to this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Motor Vehicle Make Abbreviation List Updated As of June 21, 2012 MAKE Manufacturer AC a C AMF a M F ABAR Abarth COBR AC Cobra SKMD Academy Mobile Homes (Mfd
    Motor Vehicle Make Abbreviation List Updated as of June 21, 2012 MAKE Manufacturer AC A C AMF A M F ABAR Abarth COBR AC Cobra SKMD Academy Mobile Homes (Mfd. by Skyline Motorized Div.) ACAD Acadian ACUR Acura ADET Adette AMIN ADVANCE MIXER ADVS ADVANCED VEHICLE SYSTEMS ADVE ADVENTURE WHEELS MOTOR HOME AERA Aerocar AETA Aeta DAFD AF ARIE Airel AIRO AIR-O MOTOR HOME AIRS AIRSTREAM, INC AJS AJS AJW AJW ALAS ALASKAN CAMPER ALEX Alexander-Reynolds Corp. ALFL ALFA LEISURE, INC ALFA Alfa Romero ALSE ALL SEASONS MOTOR HOME ALLS All State ALLA Allard ALLE ALLEGRO MOTOR HOME ALCI Allen Coachworks, Inc. ALNZ ALLIANZ SWEEPERS ALED Allied ALLL Allied Leisure, Inc. ALTK ALLIED TANK ALLF Allison's Fiberglass mfg., Inc. ALMA Alma ALOH ALOHA-TRAILER CO ALOU Alouette ALPH Alpha ALPI Alpine ALSP Alsport/ Steen ALTA Alta ALVI Alvis AMGN AM GENERAL CORP AMGN AM General Corp. AMBA Ambassador AMEN Amen AMCC AMERICAN CLIPPER CORP AMCR AMERICAN CRUISER MOTOR HOME Motor Vehicle Make Abbreviation List Updated as of June 21, 2012 AEAG American Eagle AMEL AMERICAN ECONOMOBILE HILIF AMEV AMERICAN ELECTRIC VEHICLE LAFR AMERICAN LA FRANCE AMI American Microcar, Inc. AMER American Motors AMER AMERICAN MOTORS GENERAL BUS AMER AMERICAN MOTORS JEEP AMPT AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION AMRR AMERITRANS BY TMC GROUP, INC AMME Ammex AMPH Amphicar AMPT Amphicat AMTC AMTRAN CORP FANF ANC MOTOR HOME TRUCK ANGL Angel API API APOL APOLLO HOMES APRI APRILIA NEWM AR CORP. ARCA Arctic Cat ARGO Argonaut State Limousine ARGS ARGOSY TRAVEL TRAILER AGYL Argyle ARIT Arista ARIS ARISTOCRAT MOTOR HOME ARMR ARMOR MOBILE SYSTEMS, INC ARMS Armstrong Siddeley ARNO Arnolt-Bristol ARRO ARROW ARTI Artie ASA ASA ARSC Ascort ASHL Ashley ASPS Aspes ASVE Assembled Vehicle ASTO Aston Martin ASUN Asuna CAT CATERPILLAR TRACTOR CO ATK ATK America, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • EV World Update
    http://evworld.com/newsletter/update_premium2008.cfm 10/1/09 3:54 PM EDITION: 9.40 | 27 Sep 2009 Platinum Sponsors INSIDER COMMENTARY Corporate Sponsorship Info CURRENTS Canadian Healthcare and Electric Cars The Canadian healthcare system didn't happen by fiat, it had to be fought for and the man leading the fight was a Saskatchewan minister turned politician. 30 Sep 2009 The Most Expensive Car on the Block He owns Toronto Electric, manufacturers of industrial cranes and electric motors. And now, after two years development, he also owns one of the neatest little EVs this side of the Canadian-U.S. border. 28 Sep 2009 Lithium From A Canadian Perspective Canadian Lithium Corp's Kerry Knoll discusses at PHEV'09 the prospects for lithium production as the auto industry moves to introduce electric cars requiring this lightest of all metals. 28 Sep 2009 PHOTO OF THE WEEK: Yike Bike has to be one of the most innovative electric bicycles yet developed. Constructed of carbon fiber, the electric bicycle weighs just 10 Of Dysprosium, Neodymium and kg (22 lbs). Powered by lithium ferrous phosphate batteries, the Yike has a top speed Other Wrinkles of 20 km/hr and range up to 10 km. Maximum carrying capacity is 100 kg (220 lbs). More than 40 electric cars debuted in Watch the YouTube Yike Bike video here. Frankfurt, a clear indication that we're on the road towards an EV World, but bumps, potholes and potential detours still lie ahead. 27 Sep 2009 In This Edition: My Montreal Keynote FEATURED THIS WEEK AONE Surprise Are We Ready for 2012? Detroit Moves
    [Show full text]
  • Take This Car and PLUG IT Eager Hybrid Owners Can’T Wait to Connect Their Cars to the Power Grid
    CHARGING: Makers of the hybrid-electric cars that are on the road today call them “grid independent,” but making them chargeable from the grid could enormously boost their gasoline fuel efficiency. S Take This Car And PLUG IT Eager hybrid owners can’t wait to connect their cars to the power grid A funny thing has happened on what University, in Cambridge, Mass.— W U.S. policy makers thought was going to who have made tinkering with hybrids be the high road to a hydrogen economy. their primary extracurricular activity. Initiatives aimed at putting hydrogen Now, a derivative of hybrids that fuel cell–powered cars on the road by will improve fuel economy even more 2020—visualized by President George by maximizing the use of the electric W. Bush in his 2003 State of the Union motor is poised to make what is already address as the centerpiece of his plans an undeniably attractive concept to wean the country from fossil fuels— downright irresistible. Some of the most are taking longer than promised. At the eager owners of the Prius, the world’s time of the speech, hybrid-electric cars, most popular hybrid, have been hacking which offer higher fuel efficiency than the cars, swapping their 1.3-kilowatthour regular cars because of electric motors battery packs for bigger ones with that help drive the wheels, were seen in capacities as large as 9 kWh. E the United States as but a minor detour The modifications also include the or way station en route to a world of addition of plugs so the new, bigger hydrogen fuel cells.
    [Show full text]