DOCSLIB.ORG

State Courts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

s 985 . , I In the heart of the Bluegrass State, thoroughbred horses in rolling, . , white-fenced pastures, graze near . Lexington. Kentucky-bred racehorses are world-famous. fllusmm~onsbyPam Vat, public infmticn rupenriror for the Kentucky Adminismarice Office ofthe Coum 1985 Annual Meeting Library Notional Center for State Cdrts 30) Newport Ave. Wi!;*c:r.:iura-. \'A 231 s5 Lexington, Kentucky The Kentucky Judicial System The Commonwealth of Kentucky has a unified court system, instituted in 1976 after voters approved a new judicial article for the state’s 183-year-old constitution. Full imple- mentation of the system took effect in 1978, providing a four-tiered court of justice consist- ing of the supreme court, the court of appeals, the circuit court, and the district court. Kentucky’s supreme court is located in Frankfort, the state capital. The supreme court has appellate jurisdiction only, except that it has the power to issue all writs necessary in aid of its appellate jurisdiction, or the complete determination of any cause, or as may be re- quired to exercise control over the entire court of justice. Appeals from a circuit court judgment imposing a sentence of death, life imprisonment, or imprisonment for 20 years or more are taken directly to the supreme court. Decisions of the court of appeals may be ap- pealed to the supreme court if granted a discretionary review as prescribed by rule of court. A cause may be transferred from the court of appeals to the supreme court when the case is of great and immediate public importance. The supreme court establishes rules of practice and procedure for the entire court of justice, for the conduct of judges, and for procedures to be followed by all state court officials. Additionally, the supreme court controls admission to the bar and discipline of bar members. Seven justices, one from each of seven appellate districts, are elected to the supreme court for staggered terms of eight years. In order to qualify for nonpartisan election to the court, one must have been licensed to practice law for eight years and have lived in the appellate district for woyears. The chief justice of Kentucky is chosen for a four-year term by the supreme court associates. In addition to performing judicial duties, the chief justice serves as the executive head of the state’s court system, responsible for its management and operation. The state court administrator and administrative office of the courts serve as staff support for the chief justice, overseeing the judicial personnel system of more than 2,000 employees, preparing the judicial budget, conducting mandatory judicial education programs as well as other pro- fessional development, maintaining a statewide statistical information system, and adminis- tering clerical and fiscal procedures for court offices throughout the state. Additionally, the administrative office prepares the annual report, develops public education and information programs and materials, furnishes staff support to various commissions appointed by the chief justice, prepares fiscal notes for proposed legdation, provides statewide computer services, manages court facilities, and distributes and maintains all equipment and supplies for the court system. Statewide pretrial release services are also administered by the chief justice, as is the state law library. The court of appeals, Kentucky’s intermediate appellate court added by the 1976 judicial article, has appellate jurisdiction only, except that it may be authorized by rule to re- view directly decisions of the state’s administrative agencies, and to issue writs necessary in aid of its appellate jurisdiction. Kentucky’s constitution provides for one matter-of-right ap- peal from any judgment entered by a state court; therefore, one appeal, as a matter of right, may be taken from a judgment of the circuit court, the court of general jurisdiction, to the court of appeals. Decisions of the circuit court, when sitting on an appeal from district court, may he appealed to the court of appeals if granted a discretionary review as prescribed by rule of court. .J i t.. The court of appeals consists of 14 judges, two elected from each of seven appellate districts for terms of eight years. Candidates for election to the intermediate appellate court must have the same qualifications as required for the supreme court. The judges are divided into panels of not less than three, a majority of each panel concurring in the decision of a case. Panels are chosen on a rotational basis and move about the state to hear appeals. A chief judge, chosen from among and by the 14 associate judges, assigns judges to panels, assigns cases,and determines locations where each panel shall sit. The chief judge serves a term of four years as adrmrustrator in addition to performing regular judicial duties. The clerk of the supreme court, who also serves as the clerk of the court of appeals, is appointed. The clerk has charge of the clerical case management portion of the courts’ busi- ness, keeping records and seals and maintaining facilities for collection and hemination of information, statistics, and fees. The clerk also serves as liaison between the supreme court and the state Board of Bar Examiners, is an ex officio member of the Appellate Civil Rules Committee, and conducts continuing legal education programs on appellate procedures. At the trial level, the circuit court is the court of general jurisdiction and hears all civil matters involving more than $2,500. It has jurdction of capital offenses and felonies, divorce, adoption, termination of parental rights, land title problems, and contested probate of wdk. The circuit court also has power to issue injunctions, writs of prohibition, and writs of mandamus. Its appellate jurisdiction is provided by law, and all appeals are on the record. Reviews of adrmnistrativeactions of state agencies constitute original actions and are not considered as appeals. Ninety-one circuit judges serve in fiftysix judicial circuits. To qualify to serve for an eight-year term, one must have been licensed to practice law for eight years and have lived in the circuit for two years before running for the nonpartisan election. The district court has limited judiction. Juvenile matters, city and county ordinances, mdemeanors, traffic offenses, probate of wills, felony preharies, and civil cases in which the amount in question is $2,500 or less; are all heard in district court. Guardianship and conservatorship for &bled persons are in district court, as are voluntary or involuntary mental commitments and cases relating to domestic violence and abuse. There is also a small claims division of dlstrict court to handle informally claims with a value of $1,OOO or less. Kentucky’s 120 counties are divided into 57 judcial districts incorporating 123 district judges. Nonpartisan candidates for district judge must have been licensed to practice law for two years, and must have lived in that dlstrict for two years prior to election to the four- year term. The chief justice has constitutional authority to assign any justice or judge to sit on another court when deemed necessary for the prompt disposition of causes. Such author- ity may be delegated, which the chief justice has done through the regional administration program. Appointed chief regional judges, both circuit and district, have the designated authority to assign judges in their regions to other courts to expedite disposition of litiga- tion by equalizing the regional caseload among judges, to promote uniform procedure and practice, and to provide for prompt substitution where a judge is disqualified or where there is a temporary vacancy. A vacancy that occurs during an unexpired judicial term is filled from a list of three names selected by a Judicial Nominating Commission, of which the chief justice is the chairman. The governor appoints one individual from the three names submitted by the appropriate nominating commission. Should the governor fail to act within 60 days, the chief justice would make the appointment. The appointee fills the vacancy until the next general election, at which time an individual must be elected to complete the term. A justice or judge may be retired for disability or suspended or removed for good cause by the Judicial Retirement and Removal Commission, which is composed of one judge from the court of appeals, one from the circuit court, and one from the district court. The commission members also include one member of the Kentucky bar and two persons, not members of the bench or bar, appointed by the governor. The actions of the commission may be reviewed by the supreme court. All compensation and necessary expenses for justices, judges, and other court person- nel, and for the operation of the entire court of justice, are paid out of the state treasury. Circuit court clerks are also elected officials of the court and are responsible for the custody, control, and safe storage of court records for both trial levels of court. Among the duties of the circuit clerks and their deputies are the receipt and recording of lawsuits and papers for the courts, attending trials, receiving fines, issuing drivers’ licenses, sched- uling juries, handling bond money, and operating the tape recording equipment to record district court proceedings. One clerk is elected on a partisan ticket in each county to serve a term of six years. Various organizations working to maintain and improve the quality of justice in Ken- tucky are the Kentucky Bar Association, the Circuit and District Judges’ Association, the Circuit Clerks’ Association, and the Court Reporters’ Association. These associations provide a means of communication among their respective members, as well as a unified effort in achieving effective administration of justice throughout the state. .. CONFERENCE OF CHIEFJUSTICES Board of Directors 1984-1985 President W. Ward Reynoldson, Iowa President-Ekct Edward F.
Recommended publications
  • Lord Chief Justice Delegation of Statutory Functions

    Lord Chief Justice Delegation of Statutory Functions

    Delegation of Statutory Functions Lord Chief Justice – Delegation of Statutory Functions Introduction The Lord Chief Justice has a number of statutory functions, the exercise of which may be delegated to a nominated judicial office holder (as defined by section 109(4) of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (the 2005 Act). This document sets out which judicial office holder has been nominated to exercise specific delegable statutory functions. Section 109(4) of the 2005 Act defines a judicial office holder as either a senior judge or holder of an office listed in schedule 14 to that Act. A senior judge, as defined by s109(5) of the 2005 Act refers to the following: the Master of the Rolls; President of the Queen's Bench Division; President of the Family Division; Chancellor of the High Court; Senior President of Tribunals; Lord or Lady Justice of Appeal; or a puisne judge of the High Court. Only the nominated judicial office holder to whom a function is delegated may exercise it. Exercise of the delegated functions cannot be sub- delegated. The nominated judicial office holder may however seek the advice and support of others in the exercise of the delegated functions. Where delegations are referred to as being delegated prospectively1, the delegation takes effect when the substantive statutory provision enters into force. The schedule is correct as at 12 May 2015.2 The delegations are currently subject to review by the Lord Chief Justice and a revised schedule will be published later in 2015. 1 See Interpretation Act 1978, section 13. 2 The LCJ has on three occasions suspended various delegations in order to make specific Practice Directions.
  • The Joint Inspection of the Devon and Cornwall Criminal Justice Area

    The Joint Inspection of the Devon and Cornwall Criminal Justice Area

    THE JOINT INSPECTION cpsi OF THE H M Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate DEVON AND CORNWALL CRIMINAL JUSTICE AREA ON-SITE SEPTEMBER 2006 FEBRUARY 2007 HM Inspectorate of Court Administration THE JOINT INSPECTION cpsi OF THE H M Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate DEVON AND CORNWALL CRIMINAL JUSTICE AREA ON-SITE SEPTEMBER 2006 FEBRUARY 2007 HM Inspectorate of Court Administration THE JOINT INSPECTION OF THE DEVON AND CORNWALL CRIMINAL JUSTICE AREA ON-SITE SEPTEMBER 2006 FEBRUARY 2007 The Joint Inspection Report on the Devon and Cornwall Criminal Justice Area The Joint Inspection Report on the Devon and Cornwall Criminal Justice Area CONTENTS Preface 1. Introduction . .1 Devon, Cornwall and the Isle of Scilly . 1 Devon and Cornwall Criminal Justice Board. 1 Scope of inspection . 2 Methodology . 2 Structure of the report. 3 2. Executive Summary . .5 Overview. 5 Public confidence and community engagement . 6 Bringing offenders to justice . 6 Reducing ineffective trials. 7 The treatment of victims and witnesses. 8 The treatment of defendants . 8 The enforcement of community sentences . 8 Key performance results. 9 3. The governance and structure of the Devon and Cornwall Criminal Justice Board . 13 Overview. 13 Governance. 13 Structure . 15 Strategic plan and direction . 16 Accountability . 16 The criminal justice office. 18 4. Improving public confidence and community engagement . 19 Overview. 19 Improving public confidence. 19 Equality and diversity . 20 Strategic partnerships . 21 5. Bringing offenders to justice. .23 Overview. 23 Offences brought to justice . 23 Pre-charge advice and decision-making scheme . 25 The structure of the statutory charging scheme . 25 The operation of the scheme .
  • In the Service of Others: from Rose Hill to Lincoln Center

    In the Service of Others: from Rose Hill to Lincoln Center

    Fordham Law Review Volume 82 Issue 4 Article 1 2014 In the Service of Others: From Rose Hill to Lincoln Center Constantine N. Katsoris Fordham University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Constantine N. Katsoris, In the Service of Others: From Rose Hill to Lincoln Center, 82 Fordham L. Rev. 1533 (2014). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol82/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEDICATION IN THE SERVICE OF OTHERS: FROM ROSE HILL TO LINCOLN CENTER Constantine N. Katsoris* At the start of the 2014 to 2015 academic year, Fordham University School of Law will begin classes at a brand new, state-of-the-art building located adjacent to the Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts. This new building will be the eighth location for Fordham Law School in New York City. From its start at Rose Hill in the Bronx, New York, to its various locations in downtown Manhattan, and finally, to its two locations at Lincoln Center, the law school’s education and values have remained constant: legal excellence through public service. This Article examines the law school’s rich history in public service through the lives and work of its storied deans, demonstrating how each has lived up to the law school’s motto In the service of others and concludes with a look into Fordham Law School’s future.
  • No Justice in Utah's Justice Courts: Constitutional Issues, Systemic Problems, and the Failure to Protect Defendants in Utah's Infamous Local Courts Samuel P

    No Justice in Utah's Justice Courts: Constitutional Issues, Systemic Problems, and the Failure to Protect Defendants in Utah's Infamous Local Courts Samuel P

    Utah OnLaw: The Utah Law Review Online Supplement Volume 2012 Article 2 2012 No Justice in Utah's Justice Courts: Constitutional Issues, Systemic Problems, and the Failure to Protect Defendants in Utah's Infamous Local Courts Samuel P. Newton Teresa L. Welch Neal G. Hamilton Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.law.utah.edu/onlaw Part of the Courts Commons, Judges Commons, and the Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Newton, Samuel P.; Welch, Teresa L.; and Hamilton, Neal G. (2012) "No Justice in Utah's Justice Courts: Constitutional Issues, Systemic Problems, and the Failure to Protect Defendants in Utah's Infamous Local Courts," Utah OnLaw: The Utah Law Review Online Supplement: Vol. 2012 , Article 2. Available at: https://dc.law.utah.edu/onlaw/vol2012/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Utah Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Utah OnLaw: The tU ah Law Review Online Supplement by an authorized editor of Utah Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NO JUSTICE IN UTAH’S JUSTICE COURTS: CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, SYSTEMIC PROBLEMS, AND THE FAILURE TO PROTECT † DEFENDANTS IN UTAH’S INFAMOUS LOCAL COURTS Samuel P. Newton,* Teresa L. Welch,** & Neal G. Hamilton*** [T]here’ll be no Justice of the Peace for you; just a big piece of justice.1 INTRODUCTION Justice courts2 could be called the most loved and hated court in the judicial system. The justices of the peace who preside over the courts are equally polarizing figures. The courts have been called “a powerful, multifaceted, local legal institution”3 which “helped design and weave together the social, economic, and political fabric”4 of American society.
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ______PETITION for a WRIT of CERTIORARI ______SCOTT L

    Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ______PETITION for a WRIT of CERTIORARI ______SCOTT L

    No. ______ In the Supreme Court of the United States __________________ GIANINNA GALLARDO, AN INCAPACITATED PERSON, BY AND THROUGH HER PARENTS AND CO-GUARDIANS PILAR VASSALLO AND WALTER GALLARDO, Petitioner, v. SIMONE MARSTILLER, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE FLORIDA AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. __________________ On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit __________________ PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI __________________ SCOTT L. NELSON BRYAN S. GOWDY PUBLIC CITIZEN LITIGATION Counsel of Record GROUP MEREDITH A. ROSS 1600 20th Street NW CREED & GOWDY, P.A. Washington, DC 20009 865 May Street (202) 588-1000 Jacksonville, FL 32204 (904) 350-0075 FLOYD FAGLIE [email protected] STAUNTON & FAGLIE, PL 189 E. Walnut Street Monticello, FL 32344 (850) 997-6300 Counsel for Petitioner March 9, 2021 Becker Gallagher · Cincinnati, OH · Washington, D.C. · 800.890.5001 i QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the federal Medicaid Act provides for a state Medicaid program to recover reimbursement for Medicaid’s payment of a beneficiary’s past medical expenses by taking funds from the portion of the beneficiary’s tort recovery that compensates for future medical expenses. ii PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS Petitioner Gianinna Gallardo, an incapacitated person, by and through her parents and co- Guardians Pilar Vassallo and Walter Gallardo, was the plaintiff-appellee below. Respondent Simone Marstiller is, in her official capacity, the current Secretary of the Florida Agency for Healthcare Administration. Her predecessors (Mary Mayhew, Justin Senior, and Elizabeth Dudek) were—during their respective tenures and in their official capacities as Secretaries of the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration—previously named as the defendant-appellant below.
  • Utah S Wyoming S��Colorado��S��Texas

    Utah S Wyoming SColoradoSTexas

    Fall 2016 Dewhirst DolvenLLC Attorneys at Law Legal Update Utah s Wyoming sColoradosTexas Plaintiffs appealed, seeking a trial de novo Utah at the district court. At trial, Defendant in brief stressed the multiple inconsistencies in Plaintiffs’ medical records as to how the DEWHIRST & DOLVEN accident occurred and as to the alleged UTAH OBTAINS THREE DEFENSE injuries. Upon bench trial, the district court • The Utah Supreme Court VERDICTS IN A TRIAL DE judge also held that the alleged injuries did judicially adopted a new cause of NOVO not match the vehicle’s minor scrape mark. action for filial consortium for Salt Lake City County: Dewhirst & As such, the judge rendered “no cause of losses sustained from a Dolven attorney Kyle Shoop obtained action” as to all three of the Plaintiffs’ minor-child’s serious injury. In three defense verdicts upon a trial de actions. adopting the cause of action, the novo to the bench. This matter involved Damian v. Nesbit, Court held that the same statutory alleged personal injuries from three Case No. 168900005, requirements for a spousal loss of Plaintiffs, who were brothers, after an Salt Lake County, Utah. consortium claim must be met. alleged impact between Plaintiffs’ .....................................Page 2 vehicle and a semi tractor-trailer driven by Defendant Ryan Nesbit. COLORADO In a construction defect case, the Plaintiffs initially filed their actions • against Defendant Nesbit in small claims Colorado Court of Appeals court. They alleged that the rear interpreted when “substantial driver-side of Defendant’s trailer completion” of a contractor’s impacted their vehicle as the truck made In This Issue work occurs under the builder’s a right turn onto northbound Bangerter statute of repose.
  • Proposal on the Provision of Courts Services in Wales

    Proposal on the Provision of Courts Services in Wales

    Proposal on the provision of courts services in Wales Consultation Paper CP15/10 Published on 23 June 2010 This consultation will end on 15 September 2010 Proposal on the provision of courts services in Wales A consultation produced by Her Majesty's Courts Service, part of the Ministry of Justice. It is also available on the Ministry of Justice website at www.justice.gov.uk Proposal on the provision of courts services in Wales Contents The HMCS national estates strategy 3 Introduction 5 Magistrates’ courts in Dyfed Powys 7 Magistrates’ courts in Gwent 17 Magistrates’ courts in South Wales 23 Magistrates’ courts in North Wales 32 County courts in Wales 39 Annex A – Map of proposals 47 Questionnaire 49 About you 54 Contact details/How to respond 55 The consultation criteria 57 Consultation Co-ordinator contact details 58 1 Proposal on the provision of courts services in Wales 2 Proposal on the provision of courts services in Wales The HMCS national estates strategy HMCS is committed to providing a high quality courts service within a reasonable travelling distance of the communities that use it, while ensuring value for money for taxpayers. HMCS currently operates out of 530 courthouses – 330 magistrates’ courts, 219 county courts and 91 Crown Court centres.1 However, the number and location of these does not reflect changes in population, workload or transport and communication links over the years since many of them were opened. This has resulted in some courts sitting infrequently and hearing too few cases. Some buildings do not provide suitable facilities for those attending or are not fully accessible for disabled court users.
  • Pattern Criminal Jury Instructions for the District Courts of the First Circuit)

    Pattern Criminal Jury Instructions for the District Courts of the First Circuit)

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE 2019 REVISIONS TO PATTERN CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE DISTRICT COURTS OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT DISTRICT OF MAINE INTERNET SITE EDITION Updated 6/24/19 by Chief District Judge Nancy Torresen PATTERN CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT Preface to 1998 Edition Citations to Other Pattern Instructions How to Use the Pattern Instructions Part 1—Preliminary Instructions 1.01 Duties of the Jury 1.02 Nature of Indictment; Presumption of Innocence 1.03 Previous Trial 1.04 Preliminary Statement of Elements of Crime 1.05 Evidence; Objections; Rulings; Bench Conferences 1.06 Credibility of Witnesses 1.07 Conduct of the Jury 1.08 Notetaking 1.09 Outline of the Trial Part 2—Instructions Concerning Certain Matters of Evidence 2.01 Stipulations 2.02 Judicial Notice 2.03 Impeachment by Prior Inconsistent Statement 2.04 Impeachment of Witness Testimony by Prior Conviction 2.05 Impeachment of Defendant's Testimony by Prior Conviction 2.06 Evidence of Defendant's Prior Similar Acts 2.07 Weighing the Testimony of an Expert Witness 2.08 Caution as to Cooperating Witness/Accomplice/Paid Informant 2.09 Use of Tapes and Transcripts 2.10 Flight After Accusation/Consciousness of Guilt 2.11 Statements by Defendant 2.12 Missing Witness 2.13 Spoliation 2.14 Witness (Not the Defendant) Who Takes the Fifth Amendment 2.15 Definition of “Knowingly” 2.16 “Willful Blindness” As a Way of Satisfying “Knowingly” 2.17 Definition of “Willfully” 2.18 Taking a View 2.19 Character Evidence 2.20 Testimony by Defendant
  • Alabama Office of the Attorney General Functional Analysis & Records Disposition Authority

    Alabama Office of the Attorney General Functional Analysis & Records Disposition Authority

    Alabama Office of the Attorney General Functional Analysis & Records Disposition Authority Revision Presented to the State Records Commission April 24, 2019 Table of Contents Functional and Organizational Analysis of the Alabama Office of the Attorney General .... 3 Sources of Information ................................................................................................................ 3 Historical Context ....................................................................................................................... 3 Agency Organization ................................................................................................................... 3 Agency Function and Subfunctions ............................................................................................ 4 Records Appraisal of the Alabama Office of the Attorney General ........................................ 7 Temporary Records ..................................................................................................................... 7 Permanent Records .................................................................................................................... 11 Permanent Records List ............................................................................................................ 15 Alabama Office of the Attorney General Records Disposition Authority ............................. 16 Explanation of Records Requirements ...................................................................................... 16 Records
  • Jjcl I Nøw1æ ~(M

    Jjcl I Nøw1æ ~(M

    'ê~"C7. .. II ii 'I 'i ~ 'I \ II ll I II II ~ II o II II II ii II ll ..JJCl i _nøW1æ ~(m iI II .. ~ ii .e n g II II := Justice A.H. Ellett 7 Working Through Utah's Agency Disclosure Law 11 Amending Utah's Immunity Statute 14 . UTAH BAR JOURAL Published by Vol. 1, NO.2 October, 1988 The Utah State Bar 645 South 200 East Salt Lae City, Utah 84111 Telephone (801) 531-9077 President Kent M. Kasting Question of the Month 4 President-Elect Hans Q. Chamberlain President's Message 6 Executive Director Justice A.H. Ellett 7 Stephen F. Hutchinson By Justice J. Allen Crockett, Retired Board of Bar Commissioners / H. James Clegg Working Through Utah's Agency Disclosure Law 11 James Z. Davis By David W. Johnson, Esq. Randy L. Dryer Hon. Pamela T. Greenwoo Stewar M. Hanson Jr, Amending Utah's Immunity Statute 14 James R. Holbrook By David J. Schwendiman and Jackson B. Howard Hon. Gordon J. Low Creighton C. Horton II, Assistant Attorney General Anne M. Stirba Exoffcio Members State Bar News 16 Bruce C. Hafen Norman S. Johnson Reed L. Marineau Case Summaries 23 Edward D. Spurgeon By Wiliam D. Holyoak and Clark R. Nielsen Young Lawyers Section President Jerr D. Fenn Jr. Legislative Report 27-. Bar Journal Committee CLE Calendar 29 and Editorial Board Editor Calvin E. Thorp Classified Ads 30 Assiate Editors Randall L. Romrell David B. Enckson C" Letters Editor Nann Novinski-Durando Articles Editors Leland S. McCullough Jr. Glen W. Roberts Views from the Bench Cover: Photograph of Utah Supreme Court Justice Albert H.
  • Please Pull My Nightgown Down When You Are Through: Marital Rape Activism, Opposition, and Law, 1974-1989

    Please Pull My Nightgown Down When You Are Through: Marital Rape Activism, Opposition, and Law, 1974-1989

    Sarah Lawrence College DigitalCommons@SarahLawrence Women's History Theses Women’s History Graduate Program 5-2019 Please Pull My Nightgown Down When You Are Through: Marital Rape Activism, Opposition, and Law, 1974-1989 Katherine Swartwood Sarah Lawrence College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.slc.edu/womenshistory_etd Part of the Women's History Commons Recommended Citation Swartwood, Katherine, "Please Pull My Nightgown Down When You Are Through: Marital Rape Activism, Opposition, and Law, 1974-1989" (2019). Women's History Theses. 44. https://digitalcommons.slc.edu/womenshistory_etd/44 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Women’s History Graduate Program at DigitalCommons@SarahLawrence. It has been accepted for inclusion in Women's History Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@SarahLawrence. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Please Pull My Nightgown Down When You Are Through: Marital Rape Activism, Opposition, and Law, 1974-1989 Katherine Swartwood Submitted in partial completion of the Master of Arts Degree at Sarah Lawrence College May 2019 Swartwood 1 Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my graduating Sarah Lawrence College Women’s History cohort for helping me develop my project over the last two years: Cristina Tanzola, Caitlin O’Keefe, Katya Duncan, Fareeha Rashid, T.C. Mann, and Cara Schooley, as well as other Women’s History students, Kat Sturgill and Marian Phillips. I also want to thank the faculty that made this thesis possible. To my thesis advisor, Nadeen Thomas and the director of the Women’s History Program, Mary Dillard, along with Visions/Revisions professor, Lyde Sizer for helping shape my thesis from its origins.
  • Vs - CHRISTOPHER GORDY, Warden, Donaldson Correctional Facility, and CYNTHIA STEWART, Warden, Holman Correctional Facility, Respondents

    Vs - CHRISTOPHER GORDY, Warden, Donaldson Correctional Facility, and CYNTHIA STEWART, Warden, Holman Correctional Facility, Respondents

    No. 19- IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES MICHAEL BRANDON SAMRA, Petitioner - vs - CHRISTOPHER GORDY, Warden, Donaldson Correctional Facility, and CYNTHIA STEWART, Warden, Holman Correctional Facility, Respondents ON PETITION FOR AN ORIGINAL WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN A CAPITAL CASE APPENDIX Volume 1 STEVEN R. SEARS ALAN M. FREEDMAN 655 Main Street Counsel of Record P.O. Box 4 CHRISTOPHER KOPACZ Montevallo, AL 35115 Midwest Center for Justice, Ltd. (205) 665-1211 P.O. Box 6528 [email protected] Evanston, IL 60204 (847) 492-1563 N. JOHN MAGRISSO (pro bono) [email protected] Attorney-At-Law 525 Florida St., Ste. 310 Baton Rouge, LA 70801 (225) 338-0235 [email protected] Counsel for Petitioner APPENDIX Appendix A Order of the Alabama Supreme Court setting execution date of May 16, 2019 (April 11, 2019) Appendix B State of Alabama’s motion to set an execution date (March 20, 2019) Appendix C Samra’s objection to the State’s motion to set an execution date (March 26, 2019) Appendix D State of Alabama’s response to Samra’s objection to the State’s motion to set an execution date (April 1, 2019) Appendix E Samra’s reply to the State’s motion to set an execution date (April 2, 2019) Appendix F Samra’s second successive state Rule 32 post-conviction petition, which raises Eighth Amendment claim (March 26, 2019) Appendix G Order of the Shelby County Circuit Court dismissing Samra’s second successive state Rule 32 post-conviction petition (April 10, 2019) Appendix H Samra’s re-filed second successive state Rule 32 post-conviction petition, which raises Eighth Amendment claim (April 29, 2019) Appendix I Samra’s motion for a stay of execution in the Alabama Supreme Court (April 29, 2019) Appendix J Samra’s motion for a stay of execution in the Shelby County Circuit Court (April 29, 2019) Appendix K Opinion of the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals affirming Samra’s conviction and sentence, Samra v.