DOCSLIB.ORG

Discussion: the Hiscock Site Archaeological Record

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Discussion: the Hiscock Site Archaeological Record /rum' R. S. Laub (ed.). 2003. me Hiscock Site: Late Pleicrocene and Holocene Paleoecology and Archaeology of Western New York State. Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences, vol. 37. DISCUSSION: THE HISCOCK SITE ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD National Park Service. Southea~tArchaeological Center, 2035 East Paul Dirac Drive, Box 7, Tallahassee, Florida 32310 What is remarkahle about the Hiscock Site found in the deposits may have been killed by archaeological record, above and beyond the these peoples, with caribou perhaps the largest important new insights that it offers about the prey species represented. Tomenchuk (this vol- Paleoindian occupation of the Great Lakes area, ume) convincingly demonstrates that at least some are the extensive and diversified research ap- of the mastodon bone and ivory and caribou antler proaches brought to bear in its interpretation. The found at the site was humanly modified. The well conceived and integrated multidisciplinary worked materials did not appear to be ancient, but team effort that has cycled between fieldwork, given the evidence for some weathering, staining, analysis and publication, with continual retine- and erosion, and an absence of butchering marks ment in approach and rethinking of ideas, is or cooking and processing surfaces, scavenging a model of collaborative research that all those rather than hunting is indicated, at least for the interested in exploring the past and maximizing mastodon remains. Whether Paleoindian peoples what we can leam from it should strive to emulate. and these soon-to-be-extinct animals were con- Hiscock shows how public involvement can be temporaneous cannot be determined, but given the used to further scientific research, simultaneously direct dating of three mastodon bone took to educating and developing a constituency for the between ca. 10,700 and 1 1,000 radiocarbon years enterprise. Hundreds of volunteers worked at B.P. (Laub et a/., 1996; Laub 2000; Laub & Hiscock down through the years, many for up- Spiess, this volume), they could vely well have ward of ten field seasons. Their dedication and been. Hiscock thus offers a somewhat nontradi- support has been crucial, and that the project was tional view of Paleoindian interaction with late organized in such a way as to maximize public Pleistocene fauna, one where scavenging car- involvement stands as another remarkahle accom- casses for useful raw materials was as important as plishment that should be widely adopted. Science killing these animals outright. advances as much from having good examples An association between the fluted point users of how to proceed as through good ideas and and mastodons, as well as other species of late accomplishments. This project succeeds admira- Pleistocene fauna, appears indisputable, however, bly in both areas. for a number of reasons. Even if the evidence for The work at Hiscock also highlights the hone and ivory working was ambiguous or absent, importance of long-term, multi-year field pro- the presence of four Ruted points and four other grams. It often takes a long time to understand the presumably contemporaneous stone tools in the information content and potential of complex same Fibrous Gravelly Clay deposit as the sites, to get a sense of what is present, the research mastodon remains, and a fifth Ruted point nearby, questions that can be asked, and the kind of is itself remarkable (Ellis, Tomenchuk & Holland, specialized samples that need to be collected and this volume). Only a few thousand fluted points analyses that should be undertaken. The first hone have ever been found and recorded in all of tool did not tum up until after almost a decade of eastem North America in over 75 years of in- fieldwork. As Storck and Holland (this volume) tensive search for these artifacts. To find four in note, our archaeological interpretations of His- direct association with mastodon remains strains cock would be far different had the work stopped coincidence. The absence of later diagnostics, after only one or two seasons. furthermore, indicates that the scavenging and Hiscock has been interpreted as a hone bed or working of the mastodon remains was by Paleo- "quany" and possible salt lick where the indian and not subsequent peoples. carcasses of deceased mastodon and quite likely Although not included in the volume, an ex- other species of animals were exploited by tensive archaeological survey of the area around Paleoindian groups. Some of the smaller animals the Hiscock Site in the upper Spring Creek )I drainage was conducted under the direction of of thorough description, including raw material Kevin Smith, whose data were presented in sourcing and microwear studies, that should be preliminary fashion at the 2001 syn~posium.The standard for all Paleoindian assemblages. Man) Hiscock Site does not appear to have seen classic Paleoindian sites are all too poorly extended visitation during the Paleoindian era. reported. That is not the case with the anifacts or indeed at any time afterwards, and there are no from Hiscock, which are thoroughly described obvious Paleoindian base camps nearby. This is and interpreted from several author's perspec- not, however, particularly unusual or unexpected. tives, for which the overall proiect team should be The technological organization and mobility of commended. The box plots Ellis rr al. (this these early peoples was such that they could easily volume) present are a particulwly elegant way of have lived many miles away, checked out the expressing the variability within and between site Hiscock locale once a month or so as pwt of assemblages and, as they have done here, serve to normal foraging activity (perhaps as pan of placc the Hiscock fluted point assemblage in a routine round visiting many such locales), and a n~orphological continuum that suggests they then sent task groups to the area for short visits. resemble early Paleoindian points found at sites possibly even day trips, when a harvestable like Shoop in Pennsylvania and Paleo Cnissing in animal or other resource was present. While Ohio. Whether these points are more closely extensive later prehistoric use of the surrounding related to Gainey or subsequent Barnes forms, area is indicated, particularly during the Middle however, remains unclear (cf. Storck & Holland. and Late Archaic, therc is little evidence that the and Ellis el ul., this volume). If related to Gainey, Hiscock Site area itself was used, suggesting that these artifacts may have been used by people who the resources procurcd here during the Paleoin- were contemporaneou.s with living mastodons, dian period wclr no longer present or needed. The even if they perhaps didn't typically hunt them. If bone deposits that were a clear attraction were the Hiscock points are more closely related to likely long eroded away or buried hy natural de- Barnes foims, use of Hiscock prohably occu~red position by these times. This was fortunate, since somewhat after these animals became extinct, it meant that the late Pleistocene remains at His- which would fit inore closely with the scavenging cock were minin~allydisturbed by later peoples. hypothesis. These kmds of questions highlight the Human beings typically do not live right on top importance of dating as precisely as possible the of, or even overly close to, important water range of occurrence of fluled p(lint forms. sources or salt licks. The presence of people Tomenchuk's dctailed use-wear analyses con- would acare away game, for one thing. and they vince mc th:~t at least some of the reported bone might even get eaten themselves. Richard Laub tools :ire indeed just that. But the assemblage is (this volume) ohserved that a large carnivore, unusual. At several locations of a comparable age possihly a yrizzly. gnawed on some of the bones in Florida, fairly large numbers of unequivocal that were found at the site. It is likely that thc tools of bonc and ivmy have been found, fluted point peoples vihiting the site would want to including hafting foreshafts. scrapers, anvils and reduce their own possibility of being gnawed on. awls (Dunbar el a/, 1989; Dunbar & Webb, As Ellis, Tomenchuk and Holland (this vol- 1996). My own belief is that if the evidence for ume) ruperbly document, the fluled points found classifyin: something as an artifact is cquivocal, at Hiscock are extensively reworked. This is not we should he conservaLive and assume the the assemblage of :I kill site, where intact. well- negative, that it probably isn't. Some of the sharpened points are often found, nor is it large Hiscock items look like good tools to me; and and diversified enough to be from a habitation sile some don't. Aa Richard Lnub said, however. or base camp. It strikes me more :IS a collection of during the symposium question-and-answer pe- tools brought to the site for fairly limited and quite riod, while we may algue about individual pieces, likely highly specialized processing tasks, pcrhaps it is impossible to dismiss everything. I'd like to to extract specific resources, like hide, hair, ivory see more discusaion of what skeletal clements are or meat or possibly, as McAndrews (this volume) missing from the assemblage, that might have suggests, salt or other minerals. In later prehistory been lost to taphonomic processes, or removed to people went to it lot of trouble to obtain salt or other locations, as well as more evaluation of the gypsum: why not in Paleoindian times as well'! possibility that bone manufacturing debris was Christopher Ellis, John Tomenchuk and John present. One thing we have leamed in recent Holland's paper (this voluniel provides the kind years, however, is that wc have a long way to go .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quantifying Clovis Dynamics: Confronting Theory with Models and Data Across Scales
    QUANTIFYING CLOVIS DYNAMICS: CONFRONTING THEORY WITH MODELS AND DATA ACROSS SCALES by MARCUS JOHN HAMILTON B.Sc., Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 1998 M.S., Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, 2002 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ANTHROPOLOGY The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico August, 2008 Marcus J. Hamilton: Quantifying Clovis Dynamics ©2008, Marcus John Hamilton ii Marcus J. Hamilton: Quantifying Clovis Dynamics DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this dissertation to my wife, Ana Desiree Davidson, and the two halves of my family, the UK Hamilton side and the US Davidson side, for all their love and support. I would also like to dedicate this dissertation to two old friends who were instrumental in getting me interested in archaeology, Briggs Buchanan, and Wayne Warren Kinney, Jr. iii Marcus J. Hamilton: Quantifying Clovis Dynamics ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee for their advice and guidance over the years. They are co-chairs, Bruce Huckell and Jim Boone, 3rd department member Ozzie Pearson, and outside member Vance Holliday. Much of this dissertation would not have been possible without access to the Rio Grande Valley Clovis collections, granted by Dr. Robert H. Weber, of Socorro, New Mexico. Bob sadly died in February, 2008 after leading a long and productive life, very much in the tradition of classic Southwest scientists. Over his 80+ years Bob amassed an encyclopedic knowledge of the geology, geography, archaeology and history of the region, much of it on foot with a canteen and map.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions by Employer
    2/4/2019 CONTRIBUTIONS FOR HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT HOME / CAMPAIGN FINANCE REPORTS AND DATA / PRESIDENTIAL REPORTS / 2008 APRIL MONTHLY / REPORT FOR C00431569 / CONTRIBUTIONS BY EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS BY EMPLOYER HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT PO Box 101436 Arlington, Virginia 22210 FEC Committee ID #: C00431569 This report contains activity for a Primary Election Report type: April Monthly This Report is an Amendment Filed 05/22/2008 EMPLOYER SUM NO EMPLOYER WAS SUPPLIED 6,724,037.59 (N,P) ENERGY, INC. 800.00 (SELF) 500.00 (SELF) DOUGLASS & ASSOCI 200.00 - 175.00 1)SAN FRANCISCO PARATRAN 10.50 1-800-FLOWERS.COM 10.00 101 CASINO 187.65 115 R&P BEER 50.00 1199 NATIONAL BENEFIT FU 120.00 1199 SEIU 210.00 1199SEIU BENEFIT FUNDS 45.00 11I NETWORKS INC 500.00 11TH HOUR PRODUCTIONS, L 250.00 1291/2 JAZZ GRILLE 400.00 15 WEST REALTY ASSOCIATES 250.00 1730 CORP. 140.00 1800FLOWERS.COM 100.00 1ST FRANKLIN FINANCIAL 210.00 20 CENTURY FOX TELEVISIO 150.00 20TH CENTURY FOX 250.00 20TH CENTURY FOX FILM CO 50.00 20TH TELEVISION (FOX) 349.15 21ST CENTURY 100.00 24 SEVEN INC 500.00 24SEVEN INC 100.00 3 KIDS TICKETS INC 121.00 3 VILLAGE CENTRAL SCHOOL 250.00 3000BC 205.00 312 WEST 58TH CORP 2,000.00 321 MANAGEMENT 150.00 321 THEATRICAL MGT 100.00 http://docquery.fec.gov/pres/2008/M4/C00431569/A_EMPLOYER_C00431569.html 1/336 2/4/2019 CONTRIBUTIONS FOR HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT 333 WEST END TENANTS COR 100.00 360 PICTURES 150.00 3B MANUFACTURING 70.00 3D INVESTMENTS 50.00 3D LEADERSHIP, LLC 50.00 3H TECHNOLOGY 100.00 3M 629.18 3M COMPANY 550.00 4-C (SOCIAL SERVICE AGEN 100.00 402EIGHT AVE CORP 2,500.00 47 PICTURES, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleo-Indians
    Paleo-Indians “Prehistory of the Americas” redirects here. For other 15 000 4500 aspects of the prehistory of the Americas, see History of 25 000 40 000 the Americas § Pre-colonization. 12 000 100 000 70 000 Paleo-Indians (Paleoindians) or Paleoamericans is a 200 000 30 000 1500 classification term given to the first peoples who entered, 50 000 Homo sapiens 1500 and subsequently inhabited, the American continents dur- Homo neanderthalensis Homo erectus ing the final glacial episodes of the late Pleistocene pe- riod. The prefix “paleo-" comes from the Greek ad- jective palaios (παλαιός), meaning “old”. The term Map of early human migrations based on the Out of Africa the- [7] “Paleo-Indians” applies specifically to the lithic period ory. in the Western Hemisphere and is distinct from the term "Paleolithic".[1] routes traveled, are subject to ongoing research and [8] Evidence suggests big-animal hunters crossed the Bering discussion. The traditional theory has been that these Strait from Eurasia into North America over a land early migrants moved into the Beringia land bridge be- and ice bridge (Beringia), that existed between 45,000- tween eastern Siberia and present-day Alaska around [9][10] 12,000 BCE (47,000-14,000 BP).[2] Small isolated 40,000 – 17,000 years ago, when sea levels were [11] groups of hunter-gatherers migrated alongside herds of significantly lowered due to the Quaternary glaciation. large herbivores far into Alaska. From 16,500-13,500 These people are believed to have followed herds of now- BCE (18,500-15,500 BP), ice-free corridors developed extinct pleistocene megafauna along ice-free corridors along the Pacific coast and valleys of North America.[3] that stretched between the Laurentide and Cordilleran ice [12] This allowed animals, followed by humans, to migrate sheets.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Survey of the Chesapeake Bay Shorelines Associated with Accomack County and Northampton County, Virginia
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE ATLANTIC COAST SHORELINES ASSOCIATED WITH ACCOMACK COUNTY AND NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Survey and Planning Report Series No. 7 Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond, VA 23221 2003 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE ATLANTIC COAST SHORELINES ASSOCIATED WITH ACCOMACK COUNTY AND NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Virginia Department of Historic Resources Survey and Planning Report Series No. 7 Author: Darrin L. Lowery Chesapeake Bay Watershed Archaeological Research Foundation 5264 Blackwalnut Point Road, P.O. Box 180 Tilghman, MD 21671 2003 ii ABSTRACT This report summarizes the results of an archaeological survey conducted along the Atlantic shorelines of both Accomack County and Northampton County, Virginia. Accomack and Northampton Counties represent the southernmost extension of the Delmarva Peninsula. The study area encompasses all of the lands adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean and shorelines associated with the back barrier island bays. A shoreline survey was conducted along the Atlantic Ocean to gauge the erosion threat to the archaeological resources situated along the shoreline. Archaeological sites along shorelines are subjected to numerous natural processes which hinder site visibility and limit archaeological interpretations. Summaries of these natural processes are presented in this report. The primary goal of the project was to locate, identify, and record any archaeological sites or remains along the Atlantic seashore that are threatened by shoreline erosion. The project also served as a test of a prehistoric site predictive/settlement model that has been utilized during other archaeological surveys along the Chesapeake Bay shorelines and within the interior sections of the Delmarva Peninsula. The prehistoric site predictive/settlement model is presented in detail using archaeological examples from Maryland and Virginia’s Eastern Shore.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleodemographic Modeling in the Lower Mississippi River Valley
    PALEODEMOGRAPHIC MODELING IN THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER VALLEY A Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy BY JEFFREY S. ALVEY Michael O’Brien & Karthik Panchanathan, Co-Dissertation Supervisors JULY 2019 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled PALEODEMOGRAPHIC MODELING IN THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER VALLEY presented by Jeffrey S. Alvey, a candidate for the degree of doctor of philosophy, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Michael J. O’Brien (co-chair) Karthik Panchanathan (co-chair) R. Lee Lyman Michael D. Glascock DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to Dr. Janet Rafferty for teaching me the meaning of dedication and for helping me to always see the bigger picture. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation represents the conclusion of my 14-year academic career. Countless individuals have contributed to this journey and I thank them all. My formative undergraduate years at Mississippi State University were spent under the mentorship of a number of dedicated professors including Janet Rafferty, Evan Peacock, Homes Hogue, Jimmy Hardin, Joe Seger, and Paul Jacobs. All of these individuals played critically important roles in my development as an archaeologist. During my time at the University of Missouri I had the great luck to study with a group of individuals whose work I had long admired. I thank my dissertation committee, Michael O’Brien, Karthik Panchanathan, Lee Lyman, and Michael Glascock, for their encouragement and guidance in navigating this long and stressful process.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoindian Economic Organization in the Lower Great Lakes Region: Evaluating the Role of Caribou As a Critical Resource
    PALEOINDIAN ECONOMIC ORGANIZATION IN THE LOWER GREAT LAKES REGION: EVALUATING THE ROLE OF CARIBOU AS A CRITICAL RESOURCE By Dillon H. Carr A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ANTHROPOLOGY 2012 ABSTRACT PALEOINDIAN ECONOMIC ORGANIZATION IN THE LOWER GREAT LAKES REGION: EVALUATING THE ROLE OF CARIBOU AS A CRITICAL RESOURCE By Dillon H. Carr There is a widespread perception that Rangifer tarandus (caribou) constitutes a critical resource for Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene hunter-gatherers inhabiting the lower Great Lakes region. However, this perception has not been formally tested using the regional archaeological record. To this end, this dissertation constitutes a formal test of the caribou hunting hypothesis utilizing archeological data from lower Great Lakes Paleoindian (ca. 11,500- 10,000 BP) sites. To formally test the hypothesis that caribou were the organizational focus of lower Great Lakes Paleoindian subsistence economies a heuristic model for a residentially mobile caribou hunting society is constructed from ethnographic and comparative archaeological data. Archaeological data from lower Great Lakes Paleoindians are compared against expected patterning derived from the residentially mobile caribou hunting model to evaluate the extent to which patterned variability in the Paleoindian archaeological record reflects an intensive caribou hunting society. This formal evaluation of the caribou hunting hypothesis indicates that certain aspects of the Paleoindian archaeological record support the idea that caribou were an important resource. In particular, there is some evidence to suggest that more standardized extractive implements and larger, multi-locus, Lake Algonquian coastal sites support an interpretation of intercept caribou hunting.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 the Late-Pleistocene Human Settlement of Interior North America: the Role of Physiography and Sea-Level Change
    The Late-Pleistocene Human Settlement of Interior North America: The Role of Physiography and Sea-Level Change 183 Chapter 11 The Late-Pleistocene Human Settlement of Interior North America: The Role of Physiography and Sea-Level Change David G. Anderson1, Thaddeus G. Bissett2, and Stephen J. Yerka3 ABSTRACT The colonization of interior North America during the late Pleistocene, ca. 20k–10k cal yr BP, would have been profoundly shaped by physiographic features early explorers and settlers encountered, such as the location of major river valleys, mountain ranges, deserts, pluvial and periglacial lakes, and ice-sheet margins, and in coastal areas by the dramatic changes in sea level that were occurring. An examination of the rela- tionship between changes in sea level and the extent of the Gulf and Atlantic Coastal Plains in the vicinity of the southeastern United States indicates that, because of the uneven topography of the now submerged continental shelf, sea-level rise or fall does not closely correspond to the area lost or gained. During some periods, notably MWP-1A (Meltwater Pulse 1A), only small areas of the Coastal Plain were lost, while in others, such as during the Younger Dryas and MWP-1B, much larger areas were affected. The widespread appearance of Clovis in the interior of the Southeast, and the apparent reduction or reorganization of im- mediate post-Clovis settlement in the Coastal Plain, and an increase in population—or at least no evidence for reduction—farther into the interior of the region may be related to these changes in sea level. Evaluating these ideas will require much new fieldwork and the collection, compilation, and public dissemination of primary archaeological data among the professional community.
    [Show full text]
  • SPRING/SUMMER 2000 Groun^F ^^^^K a R ( II ! O I 0 G Y a \ D E T II N O G R a PHY in Till PUBLIC I N I I R I Ds I
    commonEXPERIENCE YOUR AMERICA i SPRING/SUMMER 2000 groun^f ^^^^k A R ( II ! O I 0 G Y A \ D E T II N O G R A PHY IN Till PUBLIC I N I I R I dS I theamencans earliest .^s^ Common Ground has been in the shop this summer, getting a new coat of paint. This issue, the first in color, marks changes that have been on the boards for almost a year, including an overhaul of our web site to be unveiled this winter (previewed opposite). The shift acknowledges that communications today must be sophisticated in strategy to cut through the media clatter. The tack was timed to take advantage of the recent Harris poll on archeology, sponsored by the NPS Archeology and private sector. Through the web and other means, we'll be tak­ Ethnography Program-this magazine's publisher-and the ing that message to an even wider audience. nation's top archeological organizations. Over the coming year, In the last issue of Common Ground, Interior Secretary Bruce poll results in hand, we'll be spotlighting archeological projects Babbitt said public neglect was the number one threat to carried out thanks to preservation law-to heighten awareness archeological sites, but he could have been talking about any of of the profession and the fragile resources in our care. As report­ the resources under our stewardship. "Neglect feeds all the ed in the last issue, the poll shows that most Americans, other threats," he said. "If we don't have an interested and although they have a fairly good grasp of the discipline, have informed public, the loss goes by unnoticed." Message project major misconceptions as well.
    [Show full text]
  • 271.Pdf 271 by Guest on 25 September 2021 Research Paper
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Evidence for a late glacial advance near the beginning of the Younger Dryas in western New York State: An event postdating GEOSPHERE, v. 17, no. 1 the record for local Laurentide ice sheet recession https://doi.org/10.1130/GES02257.1 Richard A. Young1,*, Lee M. Gordon2,*, Lewis A. Owen3,*, Sebastien Huot4,*, and Timothy D. Zerfas5,* 1Department of Geological Sciences, 1 College Circle, State University of New York at Geneseo, Geneseo, New York 14454, USA 22 figures; 3 tables; 1 supplemental file 2New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, West Valley, New York, 14171, USA 3Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA 4 CORRESPONDENCE: [email protected] Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, Illinois 61820, USA 5Cattaraugus County Health Department, Olean, New York 14760, USA CITATION: Young, R.A., Gordon, L.M., Owen, L.A., Huot, S., and Zerfas, T.D., 2021, Evidence for a late glacial advance near the beginning of the Younger ABSTRACT younger than ca. 16,900 calendar year (cal yr) B.P. has prevented an accu- Dryas in western New York State: An event postdating rate correlation of the western New York history with the better established the record for local Laurentide ice sheet recession: Geosphere, v. 17, no. 1, p. 271–305, https://doi .org Widespread evidence of an unrecognized late glacial advance across pre- record exposed in the upper Great Lakes, including deposits such as the Two /10.1130 /GES02257.1. existing moraines in western New York is confirmed by 4014 C ages and six Creeks Forest Bed of Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • 1998 Midwest Archaeological Conference Program
    8661 3VH ua.:raJuo3 .iIDI 8661 i aso .1-:>o Ji'2-12 YNY lc:JNI ';11:>Nnw ARCHIVES Office ot the State Archaeologist The University of Iowa Iowa City, IA 52242 ~'r ~~~ "~\ "'t"=l ll' 43rd Midwest Archaeological Conference Muncie, Indiana - 21-24 October 1998 ~SNS~ AL INFO~M.A'TfON Conference Headquarters All conference sessions will be held at the Radisson Hotel Roberts in downtown Muncie, across the street from the Muncie Convention Center. The hotel is a Muncie landmark that has been extensively renovated to restore it to its original elegance. In addition to the hotel parking lot, participants may use the Convention Center parking lot across the street. Registration Registration tables will be set up in the lobby of the Radisson Hotel Roberts and manned from 3 to 6 p.m. on Wednesday, 21 October, and from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Thursday and Friday. Please check in when you arrive to register or, if preregistered, to pick up your registration packet. Paper Sessions Conference papers will be presented in concurrent sessions on the mezzanine floor of the Radisson Hotel Roberts running from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Thursday and Friday and from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon on Saturday. Special Sessions A day-long preconference workshop on Midwest Protohistoric Ceramics (Penelope Drooker) will be held on Wednesday at Ball State's Kitselman Conference Center (3401 W. University Ave.). At the conference itself, five symposia have been arranged: Computer-Assisted Archaeology (John Staeck), Ohio and Pennsylvania in Later Prehistory (David M.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter No. 4, October 1990
    SOCIETY OF AVIAN PALEONTOLOGY AND EVOLUTION INFORMATION LETTER n° 4, October 1990 Secretary : Cecile Mourer-Chauvire Depanement des Sciences de la Terre 27-43 Boul. du 11 Novembre 69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, FRANCE Fate of The Natural History Museum, London formerly British.Museum (Natural History) On Monday 23rd April The Natural History Museum announced that 60 posts will be cut from the current staff of 780 by 1992-93. Most of the lost posts will be in the Science Departments. Some will be lost by retirement but the majority of the cuts will be made by compulsory early retirement and redundancy. Additionally, there will be a revolutionary restructuring of the Museum's scientific activities and the terms of employment for the remaining staff. As scientists we are deeply concerned for the future of our disciplines within the Museum and our contribution to the scientific community, both national and international. The problems we face are caused externally by lack of Government funding and, internally by failure to recognise the fundamental importance of collection-based research. The Museum's plan is to concentrate our research in six areas; biodiversity, environmental quality, living resources, mineral resources, human health and human origins. These fields obviously imply an attempt to raise funds from sponsorship and grants in short-term, contract-based research, with less emphasis on the fundamental taxonomic research for which the Museum has established its international reputation. The impact on the scientific community will be far-reaching, and threatens our identity for basic taxonomic work. Despite the aim to continue studying diversity , the Museum is closing down research on Recent and fossil mammals, testate amoebae, sponges, diatoms and bryophytes, taxonomic computing, fossil plants and fossil birds, modern bees and wasps, hemiptera (heteroptera) and weevils, building stones and gemstones amongst others.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeologist Volume 43 No.4 Fall 1993
    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 43 NO.4 FALL 1993 Published by THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF OHIO The Archaeological Society of Ohio MEMBERSHIP AND DUES Annual dues to the Archaeological Society of Ohio are payable on the first of January as follows: Regular membership $17.50; husband and TERM wife (one copy of publication) $18.50; Life membership $300.00. EXPIRES A.S.O. OFFICERS EXPIRES Subscription to the Ohio Archaeologist, published quarterly, is included in 1994 President Larry L. Morris, 901 Evening Star Avenue SE, East the membership dues. The Archaeological Society of Ohio is an incor­ Canton, OH 44730, (216) 488-1640 porated non-profit organization. 1994 Vice President Stephen J. Parker, 1859 Frank Drive, BACK ISSUES Lancaster, OH 43130, (614) 653-6642 1994 Exec. Sect. Donald A. Casto, 138 Ann Court, Lancaster, OH Publications and back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist: 43130,(614)653-9477 Ohio Flint Types, by Robert N. Converse $10.00 add $1.50 P-H 1994 Recording Sect. Nancy E. Morris, 901 Evening Star Avenue Ohio Stone Tools, by Robert N. Converse $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H Ohio Slate Types, by Robert N. Converse $15.00 add $1.50 P-H SE, East Canton, OH 44730, (216) 488-1640 The Glacial Kame Indians, by Robert N. Converse.$20.00 add $1.50 P-H 1994 Treasurer Don F. Potter, 1391 Hootman Drive, Reynoldsburg, 1980's&1990's _...$ 6.00 add $1.50 P-H OH 43068, (614) 861-0673 1970's $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H 1998 Editor Robert N.
    [Show full text]