Kenney Had Numerous Strengths but the Critical One Was That He Got Along with Douglas Macarthur

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kenney Had Numerous Strengths but the Critical One Was That He Got Along with Douglas Macarthur hen the US Army needed too flamboyant. That was rich coming who had a reputation in the Air Corps for a new commander for air from MacArthur, who was famous far being outspoken and pugnacious. forces in the Southwest and wide for his egocentric style. When Kenney got to MacArthur’s WPacific in July 1942, Maj. Thus it came down to Kenney to replace headquarters in Australia, he confronted Gen. George C. Kenney was not the competent, easygoing Lt. Gen. George H. Sutherland first. Drawing a dot on first choice. Brett, who had clashed The Army’s first selection was Lt. with MacArthur and his Gen. Frank Andrews, but Andrews had heavy-handed chief of Kenney had numerous strengths previous knowledge of Gen. Doug- staff, Maj. Gen. Richard but the critical one was that he got las MacArthur, commander of Allied K. Sutherland. forces in that part of the world, and Lt. Gen. Henry H. along with Douglas MacArthur. detested him. He managed to evade “Hap” Arnold, com- the assignment. mander of the Army Air The Army’s second choice was Brig. Forces, said, “My God, if MacArthur can’t a piece of paper, he said, “This dot Gen. Jimmy Doolittle, hero of the air raid get along with Brett, how do you think he represents what you know about air on Tokyo, but MacArthur said he was can get along with Kenney?”—an airman operations, the entire rest of the paper 64 AIR FORCE M agazine / April 2015 of a man.” He stood five feet five-and-a- half inches tall and had a scar on his chin from an old aircraft accident. Kenney left MIT, “bored,” before graduation in 1911 and worked in con- By John T. Correll struction and civil engineering jobs until joining the aviation cadets when the US George Kenney (r) delivered results said he was. The two soon formed a entered World War I. He completed flight in the South Pacific, and the acer- mutual admiration society. training, flew 75 missions in France, shot bic Kenney and the temperamental N a t i n a l Arc h iAfter e s p o t o the war, MacArthur said, “Of all down two German airplanes, and was shot Douglas MacArthur (l) formed a the commanders of our major air forces down once himself. He ended the war as mutual admiration society. engaged in World War II, none surpassed a captain and remained in service, con- General Kenney in those three great es- centrating on aeronautical development sentials of successful combat leadership: and its application to warfare. aggressive vision, mastery over air strat- Kenney became known as an innovator. egy and tactics, and the ability to extract In 1924, he demonstrated that the fire- the maximum in fighting qualities from power of an airplane could be increased both men and equipment.” by installing machine guns on the wings. Of MacArthur, Kenney said, “This was Up to then, guns had been located only an able general, the most able general near the nose. we ever had, and one of the most able He was not part of the fraternity close generals the world has ever seen.” to Arnold—which notably included Carl A. “Tooey” Spaatz and Ira C. T H E I T L E U L L D O Eaker—in the 1920s and 1930s, nor Journalist Clare Boothe Luce fondly did he subscribe to their deep emphasis called Kenney a “scar-faced little bulldog on high-altitude strategic bombing. He what I know.” When Kenney suggested they take the question to MacArthur, Sutherland uncharacteristically backed down. A meeting with MacArthur was next. According to Kenney, he said that he knew how to run an air force, that he could produce results, and that he would be loyal to MacArthur. In return, “You be loyal to me and my gang and make this thing 50-50, or I’ll be calling you from San Francisco and telling you that I have quit.” Whatever was said exactly, MacArthur S t a f fm ab p yZ a u r E y l n b e k o v took a liking to Kenney, who fortunately turned out to be every bit as good as he AIR FORCE Magazine / April 2015 6 5 was the developer and champion of army general and the naval forces by a low-altitude attack. US admiral. His most effective forces, “I was the papa of attack aviation,” however, were the Allied air forces said Kenney, who was seldom modest. led by George Kenney—especially the “I wrote the textbooks on it, taught it, American component, Fifth Air Force, developed the tactics. When World War which Kenney also commanded. II broke out, by that time, I was the only By early 1942, the Japanese line of one who believed in attack aviation.” conquest had reached the northern part of As historian Phillip S. Meilinger has New Guinea. Their stronghold was Rabaul said, Kenney’s name “infrequently ap- on the island of New Britain, northeast of pears in accounts of the great air events New Guinea. Rabaul had a deep harbor of the interwar years. He did not partici- with five airfields around it. The Japanese pate in the air refueling demonstrations, threatened to overrun the rest of the island long-range flights to Alaska and South and position themselves at Port Moresby America, or air races, or write inflam- on New Guinea’s southern coast, 300 miles matory articles from a desk at Maxwell across the Coral Sea from Australia. Field. Nevertheless, he was an excellent The most advanced Allied base was at officer with a solid combat record.” Port Moresby, where Kenney established Kenney managed to stay in the dog- the Advanced Echelon of Fifth Air Force, Kenney made the cover of both T im e house of Maj. Gen. Oscar M. Westover, commanded by his able subordinate, Brig. magazine and L IFE magazine in 1943. chief of the Air Corps, until Westover died Gen. Ennis C. Whitehead. in a 1938 aircraft accident and Arnold At the Arcadia conference in Decem- That brought the exceptional abilities became chief. Arnold rescued Kenney ber 1941, the United States and Britain of Kenney the innovator to the fore. from organizational purgatory and made had agreed to a “Germany First” policy Nobody was better at adapting what he him his troubleshooter. For the rest of his by which they would seek victory in had to fill his needs or at winning battles life, Kenney professed his friendship and Europe before making an all-out push with limited means. harmony with Arnold but he rarely passed in the Pacific. To the disgruntlement of Kenney began by getting rid of the dead up a chance to express his differences. MacArthur and Kenney, the Pacific was wood, although his claim that “within The two grated on each other regularly the second theater in more ways than the first week, I got rid of a couple of as the years went by. one, including a lower priority for forces major generals and a couple of brigadiers “Hap and I understood each other, we and resources. and about 40 colonels and lieutenant respected each other’s judgment and were strong personal friends of over 20 years’ standing,” Kenney said. “He called me almost daily about a multitude of matters, some big, some little, and sometimes, I suspected, just to blow off a little excess steam. Hap lived with the throttle well open most of the time.” Much the same could be said of Kenney. MACAR H U R S ACIFIC OMAI Before the war, MacArthur had been commander of US Army forces in the Far East with headquarters in the Philip- pines. In February 1942, just ahead of the Japanese takeover, President Roos- evelt ordered MacArthur to evacuate to Australia to be commander of the newly organized Southwest Pacific Area. Under the Allied division of respon- sibility in World War II, the Americans had command of the Pacific and the British had command of the Far East. The United States then split the Pacific into the Pacific Ocean Area, commanded by Adm. Chester W. Nimitz, and Mac- Arthur’s SWPA, which included the Philippines, the Dutch East Indies, New Guinea, and Australia. MacArthur set up his new headquarters in an insurance building in Brisbane. The Allied ground forces under his command were headed by an Australian S t a f f a p y a u r y l n b e k o v 6 6 AIR FORCE Magazine / April 2015 colonels and one captain” overstates inforce their remaining garrisons it somewhat. on New Guinea. In February He relied on Fifth Air Force as his main 1943, radio intercepts revealed striking arm, with the Australian Royal the Japanese would send a large Army Air Force concentrating on air convoy in early March from defense of Australia and anti submarine Rabaul across the Bismarck duties. In August 1942, Kenney’s total Sea to Lae on the eastern coast air strength was 517 combat aircraft, of New Guinea. but of those only 150 were combat ready Patrolling B-24s sighted a and most of the Australian aircraft were huge convoy off New Britain obsolete. March 1. US and Australian The Japanese offensive plan depended air forces struck the convoy on sea transport of troops, equipment, and promptly, before it could reach supplies from Rabaul, so Kenney applied the Vitiaz Strait leading into the his attack aviation tactics and improvisa- Solomon Sea and Lae. The most tion skills to sinking merchant shipping dramatic results were achieved and destroying Japanese airfields.
Recommended publications
  • Guide to the Doolittle Tokyo Raider Association Papers (1947
    Guide to the Doolittle Tokyo Raider Association Papers (1947 - ) 26 linear feet Accession Number: 54-06 Collection Number: H54-06 Collection Dates: 1931 - Bulk Dates: 1942 - 2005 Prepared by Thomas J. Allen CITATION: The Doolittle Tokyo Raiders Association Papers, Box number, Folder number, History of Aviation Collection, Special Collections Department, McDermott Library, The University of Texas at Dallas. Special Collections Department McDermott Library, The University of Texas at Dallas Contents Historical Sketch ................................................................................................................. 3 Sources ................................................................................................................................ 3 Additional Sources .............................................................................................................. 3 Series Description ............................................................................................................... 4 Scope and Content Note...................................................................................................... 5 Collection Note ................................................................................................................... 8 Provenance Statement ......................................................................................................... 8 Literary Rights Statement ................................................................................................... 8 2
    [Show full text]
  • JCLD Fall 2020
    )$// 92/80(_,668( (GLWRULQ&KLHI 'U'RXJODV/LQGVD\/W&RO 5HW 86$) &(17(5)25&+$5$&7(5 /($'(56+,3'(9(/230(17 EDITORIAL STAFF: EDITORIAL BOARD: Center for Creative Leadership Dr. Douglas Lindsay, Lt Col (Ret), USAF Dr. David Altman, Editor in Chief Dr. Marvin Berkowitz, University of Missouri- St. Louis Dr. John Abbatiello, Col (Ret), USAF Book Review Editor Dr. Dana Born, Harvard University (Brig Gen, USAF, Retired) Dr. Stephen Randolph Dr. David Day, Claremont McKenna College Profiles in Leadership Editor Dr. Shannon French, Case Western Julie Imada Associate Editor & CCLD Strategic Dr. William Gardner, Texas Tech University Communications Chief Mr. Chad Hennings, Hennings Management Corp JCLD is published at the United States Air Mr. Max James, American Kiosk Management Force Academy, Colorado Springs, Colorado. Articles in JCLD may be reproduced in whole Dr. Barbara Kellerman, Harvard University or in part without permission. A standard Dr. Robert Kelley, Carnegie Mellon University source credit line is required for each reprint or citation. Dr. Richard M. Lerner, Tufts University For information about the Journal of Character Ms. Cathy McClain, Association of Graduates and Leadership Development or the U.S. Air (Colonel, USAF, Retired) Force Academy’s Center for Character and Dr. Michael Mumford, University of Oklahoma Leadership Development or to be added to the Journal’s electronic subscription list, contact Dr. Gary Packard, University of Arizona (Brig Gen, us at: [email protected] USAF, Retired) Phone: 719-333-4904 Dr. George Reed, University of Colorado at The Journal of Character & Leadership Colorado Springs (Colonel, USA, Retired) Development The Center for Character & Leadership Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • OH-323) 482 Pgs
    Processed by: EWH LEE Date: 10-13-94 LEE, WILLIAM L. (OH-323) 482 pgs. OPEN Military associate of General Eisenhower; organizer of Philippine Air Force under Douglas MacArthur, 1935-38 Interview in 3 parts: Part I: 1-211; Part II: 212-368; Part III: 369-482 DESCRIPTION: [Interview is based on diary entries and is very informal. Mrs. Lee is present and makes occasional comments.] PART I: Identification of and comments about various figures and locations in film footage taken in the Philippines during the 1930's; flying training and equipment used at Camp Murphy; Jimmy Ord; building an airstrip; planes used for training; Lee's background (including early duty assignments; volunteering for assignment to the Philippines); organizing and developing the Philippine Air Unit of the constabulary (including Filipino officer assistants; Curtis Lambert; acquiring training aircraft); arrival of General Douglas MacArthur and staff (October 26, 1935); first meeting with Major Eisenhower (December 14, 1935); purpose of the constabulary; Lee's financial situation; building Camp Murphy (including problems; plans for the air unit; aircraft); Lee's interest in a squadron of airplanes for patrol of coastline vs. MacArthur's plan for seapatrol boats; Sid Huff; establishing the air unit (including determining the kind of airplanes needed; establishing physical standards for Filipino cadets; Jesus Villamor; standards of training; Lee's assessment of the success of Filipino student pilots); "Lefty" Parker, Lee, and Eisenhower's solo flight; early stages in formation
    [Show full text]
  • Circular Administration
    Advisory US.Depanment 01 Tronsporlolion Federal Aviation Circular Administration Subject: A HAZARD IN AEROBATICS: Date: 2/28/84 At No: 91-61 EFFECTS OF G-FORCES ON PILOTS Initiated by: AFO- 800 ; Change: AAM-500; AAC-100 1. PURPOSE. Because aerobatic flying subjects pilots to gravitational effects (G's) that can impair their ability to safely operate the aircraft, pilots who engage in aerobatics, or those who would take up such activity, should understand G's and some of their physiological effects. This circular provides background information on G's, their effect on the human body, and their role in safe flying. Suggestions are offered for avoiding problems caused by accelerations encountered in aerobatic maneuvers. 2. BACKGROUND. Aerobatic flying demands the best of both aircraft and pilot. The aircraft must be highly maneuverable, yet tolerant of G-loads. The pilot must possess skill and physiological stamina. He or she must be daring, yet mindful of the aircraft's limitations as well as his or her own. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Advisory Circular No. 91-48, "Acrobatics-Precision Flying with a Purpose," dated June 29, 1977, discusses some of the airworthiness and operational aspects of aerobatics, but does not consider biomedical factors. The most important of these biomedical factors is the pilot's response to accelerations (or G-loading). The major physiological effects of G-loaaing vary from reduced vision to loss of consciousness. The pilot who understands these effects will be better able to cope with them so that he or she can continue the sport of aerobatic flying. J.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Historic Information the Doolittle Raid (Hornet CV-8) Compiled and Written by Museum Historian Bob Fish
    USS Hornet Sea, Air & Space Museum Additional Historic Information The Doolittle Raid (Hornet CV-8) Compiled and Written by Museum Historian Bob Fish AMERICA STRIKES BACK The Doolittle Raid of April 18, 1942 was the first U.S. air raid to strike the Japanese home islands during WWII. The mission is notable in that it was the only operation in which U.S. Army Air Forces bombers were launched from an aircraft carrier into combat. The raid demonstrated how vulnerable the Japanese home islands were to air attack just four months after their surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. While the damage inflicted was slight, the raid significantly boosted American morale while setting in motion a chain of Japanese military events that were disastrous for their long-term war effort. Planning & Preparation Immediately after the Pearl Harbor attack, President Roosevelt tasked senior U.S. military commanders with finding a suitable response to assuage the public outrage. Unfortunately, it turned out to be a difficult assignment. The Army Air Forces had no bases in Asia close enough to allow their bombers to attack Japan. At the same time, the Navy had no airplanes with the range and munitions capacity to do meaningful damage without risking the few ships left in the Pacific Fleet. In early January of 1942, Captain Francis Low1, a submariner on CNO Admiral Ernest King’s staff, visited Norfolk, VA to review the Navy’s newest aircraft carrier, USS Hornet CV-8. During this visit, he realized that Army medium-range bombers might be successfully launched from an aircraft carrier.
    [Show full text]
  • General Files Series, 1932-75
    GENERAL FILE SERIES Table of Contents Subseries Box Numbers Subseries Box Numbers Annual Files Annual Files 1933-36 1-3 1957 82-91 1937 3-4 1958 91-100 1938 4-5 1959 100-110 1939 5-7 1960 110-120 1940 7-9 1961 120-130 1941 9-10 1962 130-140 1942-43 10 1963 140-150 1946 10 1964 150-160 1947 11 1965 160-168 1948 11-12 1966 168-175 1949 13-23 1967 176-185 1950-53 24-53 Social File 186-201 1954 54-63 Subject File 202-238 1955 64-76 Foreign File 239-255 1956 76-82 Special File 255-263 JACQUELINE COCHRAN PAPERS GENERAL FILES SERIES CONTAINER LIST Box No. Contents Subseries I: Annual Files Sub-subseries 1: 1933-36 Files 1 Correspondence (Misc. planes) (1)(2) [Miscellaneous Correspondence 1933-36] [memo re JC’s crash at Indianapolis] [Financial Records 1934-35] (1)-(10) [maintenance of JC’s airplanes; arrangements for London - Melbourne race] Granville, Miller & DeLackner 1934 (1)-(7) 2 Granville, Miller & DeLackner 1935 (1)(2) Edmund Jakobi 1934 Re: G.B. Plane Return from England Just, G.W. 1934 Leonard, Royal (Harlan Hull) 1934 London Flight - General (1)-(12) London - Melbourne Air Race 1934 Cables General (1)-(5) [cable file of Royal Leonard, FBO’s London agent, re preparations for race] 3 London - Melbourne Air Race 1934 Cables Fueling Arrangements London - Melbourne Air Race 1934 Cables Hangar Arrangements London - Melbourne Air Race 1934 Cables Insurance [London - Melbourne Flight Instructions] (1)(2) McLeod, Fred B. [Fred McLeod Correspondence July - August 1934] (1)-(3) Joseph B.
    [Show full text]
  • SLS 171ES-25 ORIGINAL 2017 First
    SLS 171ES-25 ORIGINAL 2017 First Extraordinary Session SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 5 BY SENATOR PEACOCK COMMENDATIONS. Commends the United States Eighth Air Force on the occasion of its seventy-fifth anniversary. 1 A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 2 To commend and congratulate the commanders, officers, and airmen of the United States 3 Eighth Air Force, Barksdale Air Force Base, upon the occasion of its seventy-fifth 4 anniversary celebration. 5 WHEREAS, throughout history, whether in peace time or during war, the Eighth Air 6 Force has maintained a sterling reputation for its prompt action when a call to arms was 7 required in foreign locales and was delivered with the utmost professionalism; and 8 WHEREAS, known as "The Mighty Eighth," this combat-ready military organization 9 headquartered at Barksdale Air Force Base in Bossier City, Louisiana, safeguards American 10 interests at home and throughout the world with its capacity for strategic deterrence and 11 global combat; and 12 WHEREAS, the men and women of The Mighty Eighth, both past and present, have 13 proudly served on every continent in thousands of air campaigns from its activation in 1942 14 during World War II in the European Theater while still a part of the United States Army Air 15 Corps, and the Eighth Air Force has actively served continuously through historic conflicts 16 in Southeast Asia, the Persian Gulf, and Afghanistan; and 17 WHEREAS, presently, leadership for the Eighth Air Force lies in the capable hands 18 of Major General Thomas A. Bussiere who follows in the footsteps of extraordinary Page 1 of 3 SLS 171ES-25 ORIGINAL SCR NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Cincinnati's Doolittle Raider at War
    Queen City Heritage Thomas C. Griffin, a resident of Cincinnati for over forty years, participated in the first bombing raid on Japan in World War II, the now leg- endary Doolittle raid. (CHS Photograph Collection) Winter 1992 Navigating from Shangri-La Navigating from Shangri- La: Cincinnati's Doolittle Raider at War Kevin C. McHugh served as Cincinnati's oral historian for "one of America's biggest gambles"5 of World War II, the now legendary Doolittle Raid on Japan. A soft-spoken man, Mr. Griffin Over a half century ago on April 18, 1942, characteristically downplays his part in the first bombing the Cincinnati Enquirer reported: "Washington, April 18 raid on Japan: "[It] just caught the fancy of the American — (AP) — The War and Navy Departments had no confir- people. A lot of people had a lot worse assignments."6 mation immediately on the Japanese announcement of the Nevertheless, he has shared his wartime experiences with bombing of Tokyo."1 Questions had been raised when Cincinnati and the country, both in speaking engagements Tokyo radio, monitored by UPI in San Francisco, had sud- and in print. In 1962 to celebrate the twentieth anniversary denly gone off the air and then had interrupted program- of the historic mission, the Cincinnati Enquirer highlight- ming for a news "flash": ed Mr. Griffin's recollections in an article that began, Enemy bombers appeared over Tokyo for the "Bomber Strike from Carrier Recalled."7 For the fiftieth first time since the outbreak of the current war of Greater anniversary in 1992, the Cincinnati Post shared his adven- East Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Up from Kitty Hawk Chronology
    airforcemag.com Up From Kitty Hawk Chronology AIR FORCE Magazine's Aerospace Chronology Up From Kitty Hawk PART ONE PART TWO 1903-1979 1980-present 1 airforcemag.com Up From Kitty Hawk Chronology Up From Kitty Hawk 1903-1919 Wright brothers at Kill Devil Hill, N.C., 1903. Articles noted throughout the chronology provide additional historical information. They are hyperlinked to Air Force Magazine's online archive. 1903 March 23, 1903. First Wright brothers’ airplane patent, based on their 1902 glider, is filed in America. Aug. 8, 1903. The Langley gasoline engine model airplane is successfully launched from a catapult on a houseboat. Dec. 8, 1903. Second and last trial of the Langley airplane, piloted by Charles M. Manly, is wrecked in launching from a houseboat on the Potomac River in Washington, D.C. Dec. 17, 1903. At Kill Devil Hill near Kitty Hawk, N.C., Orville Wright flies for about 12 seconds over a distance of 120 feet, achieving the world’s first manned, powered, sustained, and controlled flight in a heavier-than-air machine. The Wright brothers made four flights that day. On the last, Wilbur Wright flew for 59 seconds over a distance of 852 feet. (Three days earlier, Wilbur Wright had attempted the first powered flight, managing to cover 105 feet in 3.5 seconds, but he could not sustain or control the flight and crashed.) Dawn at Kill Devil Jewel of the Air 1905 Jan. 18, 1905. The Wright brothers open negotiations with the US government to build an airplane for the Army, but nothing comes of this first meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • AFA's Air Warfare Symposium
    April 2015/$10 AFA’s Air Warfare Symposium War and Budgets p . 22 & 28 Bolstering Europe p . 38 Mobility Creativity p . 36 AFSOC Renaissance p . 33 Also Bud Wassom George Kenney SAC’s Bombers April 2015, Vol. 98, No. 4 FEATURES 4 Editorial: Forgotten, But Not Gone By Adam J. Hebert It is time to prioritize the nuclear deter- rent. 22 The Air Force at War By Marc V. Schanz USAF must prepare for high-end con- fl ict while already engaged worldwide. 28 The $10 Billion Gamble By John A. Tirpak USAF can’t execute the national military strategy with sequester-level budgets. 33 AFSOC Renaissance By Aaron M. U. Church The command is working hard to mod- ernize, recapitalize, and stay out front. 36 Mobility Creativity By Michael C. Sirak AMC’s commander stresses innovation in future tankers and the next Air Force One. 22 38 Bolstering Europe By Amy McCullough USAF is moving to counter Russian aggression and uncertainty. 40 Nuclear Force Improvement By Amy McCullough The Force Improvement Program promises grassroots fi xes for USAF’s nuclear forces. 46 An Airman in a Storm By Autumn A. Arnett MSgt. Bud Wassom gave his life protecting his daughter from a deadly tornado. 50 SAC’s Heyday Photos from the collection of Warren Thompson Strategic Air Command’s airborne arsenal is showcased in these rare color photos. About the cover: An E-3 Sentry returns to 58 Watershed Air War Nellis AFB, Nev., after a training mission By Daniel L. Haulman at the Nevada Test and Training Range.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fighting Five-Tenth: One Fighter-Bomber Squadron's
    The Fighting Five-Tenth: One Fighter-Bomber Squadron’s Experience during the Development of World War II Tactical Air Power by Adrianne Lee Hodgin Bruce A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama December 14, 2013 Keywords: World War II, fighter squadrons, tactical air power, P-47 Thunderbolt, European Theater of Operations Copyright 2013 by Adrianne Lee Hodgin Bruce Approved by William Trimble, Chair, Alumni Professor of History Alan Meyer, Assistant Professor of History Mark Sheftall, Associate Professor of History Abstract During the years between World War I and World War II, many within the Army Air Corps (AAC) aggressively sought an independent air arm and believed that strategic bombardment represented an opportunity to inflict severe and dramatic damages on the enemy while operating autonomously. In contrast, working in cooperation with ground forces, as tactical forces later did, was viewed as a subordinate role to the army‘s infantry and therefore upheld notions that the AAC was little more than an alternate means of delivering artillery. When President Franklin Delano Roosevelt called for a significantly expanded air arsenal and war plan in 1939, AAC strategists saw an opportunity to make an impression. Eager to exert their sovereignty, and sold on the efficacy of heavy bombers, AAC leaders answered the president‘s call with a strategic air doctrine and war plans built around the use of heavy bombers. The AAC, renamed the Army Air Forces (AAF) in 1941, eventually put the tactical squadrons into play in Europe, and thus tactical leaders spent 1943 and the beginning of 1944 preparing tactical air units for three missions: achieving and maintaining air superiority, isolating the battlefield, and providing air support for ground forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the James H. Doolittle Papers
    Guide to the James H. Doolittle Papers (1896 - 1993) 78 linear feet Accession Number: 21-95-14-93-3 Collection Number: CA21-95-14-93-3 Collection Dates: 1913 - 2007 Bulk Dates: 1925 - 1996 Prepared by ( Thomas J. Allen CITATION: The James H. Doolittle Papers, Box number, Folder number, HistOlY of Aviation Collection, Special Collections Department, McDermott Library, The University of Texas at Dallas. Special Collections Depaliment McDermott Library, The University of Texas at Dallas Contents Biographical Sketch: ........................................................................................................... 3 Sources: ............................................................................................................................... 4 Additional Sources: ............................................................................................................. 4 Series Description ............................................................................................................... 4 Scope and Content Note...................................................................................................... 7 Collection Note ................................................................................................................. 10 Provenance Statement ....................................................................................................... 10 Literary Rights Statement ................................................................................................. 10 Container list
    [Show full text]