DOCSLIB.ORG

Fall 2007 Portico Welcome

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

university of michigan taubman college of architecture + urban planning fall 2007 portico welcome 01 letter from the dean 04 the michigan difference updates 06 college 08 faculty 14 student 18 A Unity of Purpose: June Manning Thomas 20 Connecting Present & Past: The Lorch Column Project 23 Building Addition & Renovation—preliminary proposal 29 class notes calendar On the Cover: Early sketch of proposed rooftop addition by Robert Hull of the Miller/Hull Partnership. letter from the dean Abuilding we go… Our college has lived in the Art and Architecture Building on North Campus since 974. That’s a full third of its century of existence. I’m told it took a new building to entice the faculty to leave Central Campus. Some people would still like the College to return, but it’s now clear we’re here to stay. And we’re determined to improve both the North Campus and the building. Over the years there have been numerous interventions in the building, too many to describe. In the last decade alone, we’ve spent some $3 million to upgrade the auditorium, a half-dozen classrooms, college gallery, computer labs, and many offices, as well as reconfigured the building to include a new, large classroom, Media Center, faculty/staff lounge, IT offices, four student lounges, and two digital fabrication labs. The third-floor design studio, the largest in the country we think, has been redesigned and equipped with over Dean Kelbaugh with professor Jim Chaffers at his 400 new workstations. FAIA investiture at the Alamo in San Antonio It might sound like we’ve done enough to accommodate the needs and desires of our students and faculty, which have each grown about 20% during that period. To the contrary, we are over-crowded, with tighter studio space, classrooms, and faculty offices. Three dozen faculty offices are only 95 square feet, and many of them are shared by two or three lecturers! Most of our faculty offices are below university standards, not to mention the large number that are windowless. So, build we must! After a year of faculty and staff discussions with the program chairs and me about our needs and desires, we have hired an architect to do schematic design for an expansion. Four firms were interviewed—Pugh + Scarpa of Los Angeles, Shigeru Ban of Tokyo, Vincent James of Minneapolis, and Miller/ Hull of Seattle—and Miller/Hull was the overwhelming first choice of the selection committee of six university and college representatives. I am happy to say that Heidi Oien, B.S.’95 is the project architect and Elizabeth Moggio, M.Arch.’06 is a member of the design team. They are working with University Architect Doug Hanna, B.Arch.’73, M.Arch.’73 and Associate University Architect Doug Koepsell, B.S.’72, M.Arch.’75 who is the project manager. Based on earlier studies done by PLY Architects (whose principals Craig Borum and Karl Daubmann are faculty members), the architects generated the conceptual design work presented in this issue’s centerfold. The design will go through two more Regental reviews and, if all goes well, construction may begin within a year. Early in the process, it was determined that building on the south roof above the high-bay space was the preferred strategy. It keeps our studio space and the bulk of our faculty offices together on the third floor, as well as affording good views and maximizing daylight and solar gain for energy-efficiency. This location also allows the addition to fold over the south façade and transform the appearance of the utilitarian rear of the A&A Building, befitting the fact that it has become its de facto front. We want the addition to be a model of carbon neutrality and to have a green roof, passive solar heating, as well as natural lighting, ventilation, and cooling. We hope to make it 00% energy efficient with a geothermal heat pump and photovoltaic solar cells providing electricity. There is also a lightweight green roof, which can be installed in modular pans, that The third construction project is the renovation of our decreases run-off by detaining storm water. And it adds courtyard. The original wood paving is being replaced with thermal and acoustic insulation, turning a built-up roof concrete unit pavers and new lighting is being installed, into something alive and green. as well as accessibility improvements. “Sparkle” mini- lights in the trees will brighten up our winter darkness, as We have identified enough funds from the college will the “Sensitiles,” which were invented and developed resources, along with a major commitment from the several years ago in our research laboratory by Abhi Lath University, that will allow us to undertake the $3 million (M.Arch.’03). These large, concrete paving stones will estimated cost of the project. We’ve also been able to be interspersed among the smaller pavers in a random save and set aside another $ million to reconfigure and pattern. (Sensitiles are award-winning pavers and tiles that renovate three dozen existing faculty offices in a second use fiber-optics in a unique way to create changing light phase of the project. (Phase III is a café/commons that patterns. They have been utilized by Zaha Hadid, Norman students would like to see built in the courtyard.) However, Foster, and other architects as indoor flooring or outdoor we have no college or university funds for the geothermal paving material. Visit www.sensitile.com to find out more) heat pump, green roof, or the photovoltaic solar array. For With this -2-3 punch, the college is better positioned these critical components, we need to raise another $2–3 to meet the demands, desires, and opportunities of the million. We are hoping alumni and friends of the college next century, with a nod to our past. These projects will will contribute to this environmental cause. physically enhance the front, rear, and middle of the A&A building. We will design and build them as well as we can, We hope you will consider underwriting these efforts befitting a college that is dedicated to the improvement of with a contribution. It would be very much appreciated the built environment. if your gift this year were directed toward this project. Without your help we will fall short on these features and This coming year will be my 0th and last as dean. I hope the larger environmental imperative that besets the built to ensure that the addition and other initiatives are left environment. If you’d rather contribute to another aspect in good stead. A committee will be appointed by Provost of the project, there are other items on the menu for your Teresa Sullivan to commence a search for my successor consideration on page 28. In any case, we need your help! this fall. It has been a high privilege and wonderful experience to lead this venerable college. Many have Although the addition is the most critical and ambitious asked about what I intend to do next. I plan to stay on as in the building’s history, it is not the only design and a professor, after an administrative leave. With the energy, construction project afoot. As you can see from the photos talent, and cooperation of our faculty, students, and staff, on page 20 and on our website, we have moved the large we shall leave the college in top academic, fiscal, and classical column from its original location behind Lorch physical shape, poised for a future that is sure to be both Hall to the front of our building. It not only honors the exciting and challenging. memory of our founding director, Emil Lorch, and marks the entrance to the building, but it also is meant to be As always, an historic icon for the North Campus. This is a project I proposed in my first Portico letter nine years ago! It has received enough financial support from alumni and emeritus faculty to be finally realized. The design was a collaborative effort ofPeter Osler and Harry Giles, both professors of practice in architecture. (Peter, a landscape architect and the project designer, is, remarkably, Emil Lorch’s grandson.) The firm of professor emeritusRobert Darvas provided engineering services, including some on a pro bono basis. This project would not have been possible without the P.S. In keeping with the college’s design mission, Portico has generous donations of the late Henry “Hank” Ruifrok been redesigned by M/DTW, a multi-disciplinary design (B.S.A.A.’38), and Dan Swartz (B.Arch.’7), as well as studio led by Christian Unverzagt (B.S.’94), who is a lecturer contributions from David and Connie Osler (Emil Lorch’s in the architecture program. Let us know what you think. daughter) and income from the Lorch Endowment Fund. There were over 60 other contributions from alumni, faculty, and emeritus faculty. Thank you all! 2 portico | fall 2007 Seattle Center Pavilion Sisson Residence Work Lofts Seattle Miller/Hull Partnership Miller/Hull was selected for their long-standing record of design excellence and substantial body of green design, as well as their record of working cooperatively with the client (who in this case will have more hands-on involvement!). The 50+ person Seattle firm has been doing energy- and environmentally- sensitive design work for decades, going back to passive solar work in the 970s. They’ve won over 68 local and national design awards, more than any firm in the Pacific Northwest, a region generally known more for its high average of architectural design than for its signature designers.
Recommended publications
  • The Past, Present, and Future of the Chinese Home an Architectural

    The Past, Present, and Future of the Chinese Home an Architectural

    Te Past, Present, and Future of the Chinese Home An Architectural Study of the Relationship Between Politics, Culture, and Domestic Space By | Tina Huang | 黄维钰 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Afairs in partial fulfllment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Architecture Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario ©2021TinaHuang ABSTRACT his thesis analyzes the oscillating cause and effect between State, citizen, Tand architecture by studying the relationship between politics and domestic spaces in China. It explores the development of China from the beginning of the twentieth century through the present and into a speculative future to argue that wider socio-political changes are reflected in the detailed and intimate spaces of the home, and conversely, that the home can act as an agent of political resistance. The timeline in question represents a unique and tumultuous era in the development of modern China, one which dramatically changed the way people in China built their homes, and in turn, lived their lives. By imagining a speculative future condition in which China has undergone another major political and cultural shift, this thesis will consider the past in order to propose a speculative trajectory for the future of domestic Chinese architecture. II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to firstly thank my advisor Natalia for your patience and constant support during this past year, your encouragement throughout the writing of this thesis has been invaluable. To the staff and faculty at the Azrieli School of Architecture and Urbanism, thank you for making the last six years so wonderful. The guidance and support from everyone has been crucial to my educational growth.
  • Six Canonical Projects by Rem Koolhaas

    Six Canonical Projects by Rem Koolhaas

    5 Six Canonical Projects by Rem Koolhaas has been part of the international avant-garde since the nineteen-seventies and has been named the Pritzker Rem Koolhaas Architecture Prize for the year 2000. This book, which builds on six canonical projects, traces the discursive practice analyse behind the design methods used by Koolhaas and his office + OMA. It uncovers recurring key themes—such as wall, void, tur montage, trajectory, infrastructure, and shape—that have tek structured this design discourse over the span of Koolhaas’s Essays on the History of Ideas oeuvre. The book moves beyond the six core pieces, as well: It explores how these identified thematic design principles archi manifest in other works by Koolhaas as both practical re- Ingrid Böck applications and further elaborations. In addition to Koolhaas’s individual genius, these textual and material layers are accounted for shaping the very context of his work’s relevance. By comparing the design principles with relevant concepts from the architectural Zeitgeist in which OMA has operated, the study moves beyond its specific subject—Rem Koolhaas—and provides novel insight into the broader history of architectural ideas. Ingrid Böck is a researcher at the Institute of Architectural Theory, Art History and Cultural Studies at the Graz Ingrid Böck University of Technology, Austria. “Despite the prominence and notoriety of Rem Koolhaas … there is not a single piece of scholarly writing coming close to the … length, to the intensity, or to the methodological rigor found in the manuscript
  • 190925 ACSA Creative Achievement Award Final

    190925 ACSA Creative Achievement Award Final

    ACSA Creative Achievement Award Submission: The Future of the Netsch Campus p1 of 20 The Future of the Netsch Campus Fall 2015 – Spring 2019 When it opened in January 1965, the Netsch Campus at then-University of Illinois Chicago Circle was a new model of public urban education. In pointed contradistinction to the pastoral forms of the traditionally rural public university, exemplified by Jefferson’s University of Virginia, Walter Netsch and his team from Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM) sought to materialize this new model through alternative forms of urban and architectural design. Conceptualized as a pebble dropped in a pond–aka “the drop of water scheme”–representing “knowledge spreading out,” the dense inner rings of campus contained the shared lecture halls and classroom buildings, flanked by the library and the student union, while outer rings contained discipline-specific buildings. The campus was connected throughout by raised walkways–human highways designed for a projected enrollment of 32,000 students within five years–that came together in a great public amphitheater called the Circle Forum at the literal and conceptual center. Hailed by the architectural press as a spectacular example of Brutalism, its reception on campus was decidedly more ambivalent. Diagrammatic Campus Plan, c1961 View of the Center of Campus, c1964 000-20-01.001, Photograph Subject File 086.Cabanban-20227.26, Photograph Subject File Both courtesy of the University Archives, University of Illinois at Chicago Library In the 1990s, the campus was irrevocably transformed by the addition of dormitories at the northeast corner and by the removal of the walkways and central amphitheater; reasons for the demolition included a lack of maintenance, a lack of accessibility, a perception of danger, and a lack of “green.” All of these issues were solvable, but the University chose not to do so.
  • Portico 2006/3

    Portico 2006/3

    PORTICO 2006/3 UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN TAUBMAN COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE + URBAN PLANNING Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS From the Dean .......................................................................................1 Letters .....................................................................................................3 College Update Global Place: practice, politics, and the polis TCAUP Centennial Conference #2 .....................................................4 <<PAUSE>> TCAUP@100 .....................................................................6 Centennial Conference #1 ................................................................7 Student Blowout ................................................................................8 Centennial Gala Dinner ....................................................................9 Faculty Update.....................................................................................10 Honor Roll of Donors ..........................................................................16 Alumni Giving by Class Year ..............................................................22 GOLD Gifts (Grads of the Last Decade) ...........................................26 Monteith Society, Gifts in memory of, Gifts in honor of ................27 Campaign Update................................................................................27 Honor Roll of Volunteers ....................................................................28 Class Notes ..........................................................................................31
  • School of Architecture 2001–2002

    School of Architecture 2001–2002

    School of Architecture 2001–2002 bulletin of yale university Series 97 Number 3 June 30, 2001 Bulletin of Yale University Postmaster: Send address changes to Bulletin of Yale University, PO Box 208227, New Haven ct 06520-8227 PO Box 208230, New Haven ct 06520-8230 Periodicals postage paid at New Haven, Connecticut Issued sixteen times a year: one time a year in May, October, and November; two times a year in June and September; three times a year in July; six times a year in August Managing Editor: Linda Koch Lorimer Editor: David J. Baker Editorial and Publishing Office: 175 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, Connecticut Publication number (usps 078-500) The closing date for material in this bulletin was June 20, 2001. The University reserves the right to withdraw or modify the courses of instruction or to change the instructors at any time. ©2001 by Yale University. All rights reserved. The material in this bulletin may not be repro- duced, in whole or in part, in any form, whether in print or electronic media, without written permission from Yale University. Open House All interested applicants are invited to attend the School’s Open House: Thursday, November 1, 2001. Inquiries Requests for additional information may be directed to the Registrar, Yale School of Architecture, PO Box 208242, 180 York Street, New Haven ct 06520-8242; telephone, 203.432.2296; fax, 203.432.7175. Web site: www.architecture.yale.edu/ Photo credits: John Jacobson, Sarah Lavery, Michael Marsland, Victoria Partridge, Alec Purves, Ezra Stoller Associates, Yale Office of Public Affairs School of Architecture 2001–2002 bulletin of yale university Series 97 Number 3 June 30, 2001 c yale university ce Pla Lake 102-8 Payne 90-6 Whitney — Gym south Ray York Square Place Tompkins New House Residence rkway er Pa Hall A Tow sh m u n S Central tree Whalley Avenue Ezra Power Stiles t Morse Plant north The Yale Bookstore > Elm Street Hall of Graduate Studies Mory’s Sterling St.
  • Faculty List 1

    Faculty List 1

    Faculty List 1 Faculty List Jay Lambrecht MS, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (Emeritus) Catherine Lantz MLIS, Dominican University University Library Deborah Lauseng AMLS, University of Michigan Benjamin Aldred MS, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, PhD, Carl Lehnen MS, PhD, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Indiana University Mingyan Li MLIS, University of Illinois Chicago Annie Armstrong MLS, University of Wisconsin–Madison Jeanne Link MLIS, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, MS, Iowa Felicia Barrett MLS, Indiana University State University Kathryn Carpenter MSLS, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Kavita Mundle MLS, Dominican University Deborah Blecic MS, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Kevin O’Brien MLS, Indiana University Elena Carrillo MLIS, Dominican University, MFA, University of Texas at Cleo Pappas MLIS, Dominican University (Emeritus) El Paso Scott Pitol MLIS, Dominican University Mary Case AMLS, University of Michigan, MA, Syracuse University Ryan Rafferty MLIS, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Maureen Clark MILS, Dominican University Rebecca Raszewski MLS, Drexel University Ian Collins MS, University of Texas at Austin Robert Sandusky MA, Northern Illinois University, PhD, University of John M. Cullars MLS, PhD, Indiana University (Emeritus) Illinois Urbana-Champaign Jane Darcovich MSLIS, MA, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Carol Scherrer MALS, Rosary College (Emeritus) Robert A. Daugherty MS, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Marsha Selmer MS, Western Michigan University (Emeritus) (Emeritus) Tracy Seneca MLIS, University of California, Berkeley, MA DePaul Sandra De Groote MLS, University of Western Ontario University Paula R. Dempsey MALIS, Dominican University, PhD, Loyola University Steven Smith MLIS, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Josephine L. Dorsch MALS, Rosary College (Emeritus) Ann C. Weller MA, University of Chicago (Emeritus) David Dror MA, University of Arizona Stephen E.
  • Papers Delivered in the Thematic Sessions of the 2016 Annual International Conference of the Society of Architectural Historians

    Papers Delivered in the Thematic Sessions of the 2016 Annual International Conference of the Society of Architectural Historians

    Papers Delivered in the Thematic Sessions of the 2016 Annual International Conference of the Society of Architectural Historians Pasadena/Los Angeles, California, 6–10 April 2016 Accounting for Mannerism in 20th-Century Architectural “Paul Chemetov and the Limits of an Open Industry,” Alison Fisher, Culture The Art Institute of Chicago Andrew Leach, Griffith University, and Martino Stierli, Museum “Combinatorial Gymnastics: Computational Optimization in Post- of Modern Art, Co-Chairs WWII Soviet Housing Design,” Evangelos Kotsioris, Princeton University “Ordering 1960s Architecture: C. Ray Smith’s Supermannerism,” “Climate Design Methods and the Weather of the Future in the Timothy Rohan, University of Massachusetts 1950s,” Daniel A. Barber, Princeton University “Architectural History without Mannerism? The French Case,” “Governing the Body: Race, Biopolitics, and the Making of Archi- Maarten Delbeke, Ghent University, Belgium tectural Standards,” Sujin Eom, University of California, “Relocating Mannerism to Swedish Architecture in the 1970s,” Berkeley Christina Pech, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden “Rowe’s Mannerist Constitution,” Scott Colman, Rice University The Cost of Architecture “Mannerism Ever After,” Robert Somol, University of Illinois at Claire Zimmerman, University of Michigan, Chair Chicago “Cost Structure and the Global Turn: A Study of Creole Dwellings,” Architectural Reverie Dwight Carey, University of California, Los Angeles Christy J. Anderson, University of Toronto, Canada, and David “The Influence of Cost Accounting
  • Strategies of Negation in Reflective Design As an Alternative to Critical Regionalism: a Study of Contemporary Architecture in China and Japan Since 1990

    Strategies of Negation in Reflective Design As an Alternative to Critical Regionalism: a Study of Contemporary Architecture in China and Japan Since 1990

    Strategies of Negation in Reflective Design as an Alternative to Critical Regionalism: A Study of Contemporary Architecture in China and Japan since 1990 By Lu ZHANG Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of: Doctor of Philosophy June 2019 Faculty of Architecture, Building, and Planning The University of Melbourne ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3265-7130 Abstract After a long period of westernisation and modernisation, East Asian countries had begun a common effort in regenerating indigenous cultural resources to shape their own versions of modernity in response to a globalising homogenisation in architecture. It firstly emerged in Japan with a rise of Metabolist movement since the 1960s. Benefited from the Chinese market economy and opening-up policy, it happened in China only from the 1990s, amongst some most reflective architects with independent thinking. This situation puts China and Japan into parallel and even comparable positions to examine East Asian approaches to respond the universalizing forces of globalisation. This is often viewed as attempts in ‘critical regionalism’, a concept developed in European and North American academic context using mainly western cases and concepts. This raises an issue as to if this western category is applicable to the cases in East Asia. However, there is no research done that addresses this issue using cases from China and Japan in a regional framework and adopting indigenous aesthetic categories in response to formulations from the west. To fill up this gap, this research conducts a region-based comparative study on the most recent reflective design practices in China and Japan.
  • Proceedings Viiith International Docomomo

    Proceedings Viiith International Docomomo

    international working party for documentation and conservation of buildings, sites and neighborhoods of the modern movement Proceedings VIIIth International Conference Import-Export: Postwar Modernism in a Expanding World, 1945-1975 Editors Theodore H.M. Prudon Hélène Lipstadt DOCOMOMO International DOCOMOMO US New York, 2008 In memory of Paul S. Byard (1939-2008) His enthusiastic support made this conference a success Contents The VIIIth International DOCOMOMO Conference Import-Export: Postwar Modernism in an Expanding World, 1945-1975 Preface Influence And Transformation: The Saskatchewan Power Theodore H. M. Prudon and Hélène Lipstadt ............................ 1 Corporation Headquarters Bernard Flaman ....................................................................... 67 DOCOMOMO US and Change in Preservation in America Theodore H. M. Prudon and Hélène Lipstadt ............................ 3 A Modern Museum in an Old House by the Sea: Lina Bo Bardi and the Modernism of Bahia The 2004 Conference Theme Silvana Rubino ........................................................................ 73 Hélène Lipstadt.......................................................................... 5 Augusto H. Álvarez: Pioneer and Innovator of Mexican Modernity María de Lourdes Cruz González Franco ............................... 79 INTERNATIONALIZATION ....................................................... 7 From International to National and Back: the heritage of Modern Jaqueline Tyrwhitt, Sandy Van Ginkel, Blanche Lemco and Movement in the new
  • Graduate Programs Guidebook

    Graduate Programs Guidebook

    Graduate Programs Guidebook i ii University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago, perhaps the ur-American metropolis, provides the ideal launching pad for urban and architectural speculation. For students at the School of Architecture, direct access to this model of experimentation is coupled with the resources and opportunities generated by an especially active community of alumni, design practices, and architectural institutions. UIC is one of the country’s major urban public research universities, and it is from this context that the School of Architecture extends its three-part agenda: to condition the metropolis, construct new audiences, and circulate ideas. Established in 1965, UIC is now one of the top-200 research- funded institutions in the world. The School of Architecture benefits from its commitment to building a dynamic and diverse collection of faculty and intellectual, aesthetic, and cultural interests. The university campus and the A+D Studios building circa 1968. iii Contents Architecture at Chicago 1 Master of Architecture 3 MArch Curriculum 5 MA in Design Criticism 11 MAD-Crit Curriculum 13 Course Descriptions 17 Faculty Bios 21 School Culture 25 Events 27 Extracurricular Activities 30 Resources 31 Facilities 33 On Campus 36 In the City 37 Where are they now? 39 Alumni profiles University of Illinois at Chicago College of Architecture, Design, and the Arts School of Architecture 845 West Harrison Street 1300 A+D Studios, MC030 Chicago, Illinois 60607 web arch.uic.edu phone 312 996 3335 Setting up for the first year graduate final review iv v Architecture at Chicago The School of Architecture at UIC promotes architecture as a cultural practice of organizing information, of intelligently identifying and deploying patterns—conceptual, visual, structural, behavioral, and material—in the world.
  • EAHN 6Th International Meeting Conference Proceedings 2

    EAHN 6Th International Meeting Conference Proceedings 2

    EAHN 6th International Meeting Conference Proceedings 2 Credits Scientific Committee Organising Committee Richard Williams Richard Anderson University of Edinburgh University of Edinburgh Richard Anderson Richard Williams University of Edinburgh University of Edinburgh Mark Crinson Alex Bremner University of London University of Edinburgh Jorge Correia Peter Clericuzio University of Minho University of Edinburgh Andres Kurg Alistair Fair Estonian Academy of Arts University of Edinburgh Ola Uduku Clive Fenton Manchester Metropolitan University Docomomo Scotland Kathleen James-Chakraborty Tessa Giblin University College Dublin University of Edinburgh Matteo Burioni Miles Glendinning Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München University of Edinburgh Sabine Frommel John Lowrey Sorbonne University of Edinburgh Elizabeth Petcu University of Edinburgh Margaret Stewart University of Edinburgh Diane Watters Historic Environment Scotland 3 Contents Preface 5 Sessions and Papers 6 Parallel Papers 01 22 Parallel Papers 02 82 Parallel Papers 03 136 Parallel Papers 04 202 Parallel Papers 05 224 Index of Names 281 Acknowledgements 284 4 5 Preface The publication you are reading is a record of the EAHN2021 International Conference, hosted by the University of Edinburgh. The abstracts and papers included in this publication offer a perspective on the themes and questions that are driving architectural history today. The labour that has contributed to this event by the scientific and organising committees, session chairs, speakers, and support staff has been
  • Architecture Program Report

    Architecture Program Report

    Architecture Program Report Accredited Architecture Degree Programs Bachelor of Architecture Master of Architecture Illinois Institute of Technology College of Architecture 3360 South State Street Chicago, IL 60616 President John Anderson Provost Alan Cramb Dean Wiel Arets Associate Dean Robert Krawczyk [email protected] 312 567 3230 March 1, 2013 Architecture Program Report For Professional Degree Programs in Architecture Table of Contents Part One - Institutional Support and Commitment to Continuous Progress 1.1 Identity and Self-Assessment 1.1.1 History and Mission 1.1.2 Learning Culture and Social Equity 1.1.3 Response to the Five Perspectives 1.1.4 Long-Range Planning 1.1.5 Self-Assessment Procedures 1.2 Resources 1.2.1 Human Resources and Human Resource Development 1.2.2 Administrative Structure and Governance 1.2.3 Physical Resources 1.2.4 Financial Resources 1.2.5 Information Resources 1.3 Institutional Characteristics Statistical Reports 1.3.1 Statistical Reports 1.3.2 Annual Reports 1.3.3 Faculty Credentials, also see 4.3 Part Two – Educational Outcomes and Curriculum 2.1 Student Performance Criteria 2.2 Curricular Framework 2.2.1 Regional Accreditation 2.2.2 Professional Degrees and Curriculum 2.2.3 Curriculum Review and Development 2.3 Evaluation of Preparatory / Pre-professional Education 2.4 Public Information 2.4.1 Statement on NAAB-Accredited Degrees 2.4.2 Access to NAAB Conditions and Procedures 2.4.3 Access to Career Development Information 2.4.4 Public Access to APRs and VTRs 2.4.5 ARE Pass Rates Part Three – Progress