Verb Stem Alternation in Sizang Chin Narrative Discourse
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
7=SINO-INDIAN Phylosector
7= SINO-INDIAN phylosector Observatoire Linguistique Linguasphere Observatory page 525 7=SINO-INDIAN phylosector édition princeps foundation edition DU RÉPERTOIRE DE LA LINGUASPHÈRE 1999-2000 THE LINGUASPHERE REGISTER 1999-2000 publiée en ligne et mise à jour dès novembre 2012 published online & updated from November 2012 This phylosector comprises 22 sets of languages spoken by communities in eastern Asia, from the Himalayas to Manchuria (Heilongjiang), constituting the Sino-Tibetan (or Sino-Indian) continental affinity. See note on nomenclature below. 70= TIBETIC phylozone 71= HIMALAYIC phylozone 72= GARIC phylozone 73= KUKIC phylozone 74= MIRIC phylozone 75= KACHINIC phylozone 76= RUNGIC phylozone 77= IRRAWADDIC phylozone 78= KARENIC phylozone 79= SINITIC phylozone This continental affinity is composed of two major parts: the disparate Tibeto-Burman affinity (zones 70= to 77=), spoken by relatively small communities (with the exception of 77=) in the Himalayas and adjacent regions; and the closely related Chinese languages of the Sinitic set and net (zone 79=), spoken in eastern Asia. The Karen languages of zone 78=, formerly considered part of the Tibeto-Burman grouping, are probably best regarded as a third component of Sino-Tibetan affinity. Zone 79=Sinitic includes the outer-language with the largest number of primary voices in the world, representing the most populous network of contiguous speech-communities at the end of the 20th century ("Mainstream Chinese" or so- called 'Mandarin', standardised under the name of Putonghua). This phylosector is named 7=Sino-Indian (rather than Sino-Tibetan) to maintain the broad geographic nomenclature of all ten sectors of the linguasphere, composed of the names of continental or sub-continental entities. -
The Early Childhood Access and Participation Project: Talking with Chin Families from Burma About Early Childhood Services
THE EARLY CHILDHOOD ACCESS AND PARTICIPATION PROJECT: TALKING WITH CHIN FAMILIES FROM BURMA ABOUT EARLY CHILDHOOD SERVICES A GUIDE TO THE MODEL ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We wish to acknowledge the Chin advisers involved in the The Early Childhood Access and Participation Project: Talking with Chin Families from Burma about Early Childhood Services (ECAP), who generously contributed their stories of early childhood development services before arriving in Australia and their experiences after arrival. In the company of service providers, they respectfully aired the barriers they had faced in accessing early childhood services and suggested constructive strategies to make services more accessible to other Chin families in Brimbank. We also acknowledge the staff from early childhood services that enthusiastically entered into dialogue with Chin advisers, listened to their suggestions, and not only acknowledged ways in which services could change to better accommodate Chin families but also introduced those changes. Dialogue between service providers and Chin advisers would not have been possible without the skills and good humour of the interpreters, Thomas Mung and Za Tuahngur. Thanks are also extended to Nancy Shwe Kheitu and Par Hlei Sieng, who cared so well for the young children while parents participated in network discussions. The ECAP Project was funded by the Western Metropolitan Region of the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. Regional staff who contributed were Anne Butterworth, Jackie McWilliam and Deanne Scott. The department and staff are thanked for recognising and taking action on access issues experienced by Chin families and others from refugee backgrounds. Sunshine Harvester Primary School provided a venue and staff time for the project, and our thanks go to then principal Alan Dash, assistant principal Paul Griffin, early years coordinator Cecily Fry and multicultural education aide Thi Tha Zin. -
ED132833.Pdf
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 132 833 FL 008 225 AUTHOR Johnson, Dora E.; And Others TITLE Languages of South Asia. A Survey of Materials for the Study of the Uncommonly Taught Languages. INSTITUTION Center for Applied Linguistics, Arlington, Va. SPONS AGENCY Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 76 CONTRACT 300-75-0201 NOTE 52p. AVAILABLE FROMCenter for Applied Linguistics, 1611 North Kent Street, Arlington, Virginia 22209 ($3.95 each fascicle: complete set of 8, $26.50) BDRS PRICE MF-$0.83 HC-$3.50 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adult Education; Afro Asiatic Languages; *Annotated Bibliographies; Bengali; Dialect Studies; Dictionaries; *Dravidian Languages; Gujarati; Hindi; Ind° European Languages; Instructional Materials; Kannada; Kashmiri; Language Instruction; Language Variation; Malayalam; Marathi; Nepali; Panjabi; Reading Materials; Singhalese; Sino Tibetan Languages; Tamil; Telugu; *Uncommonly Taught Languages; Urdu IDENTIFIERS Angami Naga; Ao Naga; Apatani; Assamese; Bangru; Bhili; Bhojpuri; Boro; Brahui; Chakesang Naga; Chepang; Chhatisgarhi; Dafla; Galiong; Garo; Gondi; Gorum; Gurung; Hindustani; *Indo Aryan Languages; Jirel; Juang; Kabui Naga; Kanauri; Khaling; Kham; Kharia; Kolami; Konda; Korku; Kui; Kumauni; Kurukh; Ruwi; Lahnda; Maithili; Mundari Ho; Oraon; Oriya; Parenga; Parji; Pashai; Pengo; Remo; Santali; Shina; Sindhi; Sora; *Tibet° Burman Languages; Tulu ABSTRACT This is an annotated bibliography of basic tools of access for the study_of the uncommonly taught languages of South Asia. It is one of eight fascicles which constitute a revision of "A Provisional Survey of Materials for the Study of the Neglected Languages" (CAI 1969). The emphasis is on materials for the adult learner whose native language is English. Languages are grouped according to the following classifications: Indo-Aryan; Dravidian; Munda; Tibeto-Burman; Mon-Khmer; Burushaski. -
Kin Numeratives in Monsang
================================================================== Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 Vol. 14:9 September 2014 ==================================================================== Kin Numeratives in Monsang Koninglee Wanglar, Ph.D. Scholar Manipur University [email protected] Abstract Kin numeratives (KN) are terms that list the birth-order of children. Monsang has a characteristic Kin Numerative (KN) naming system. The KN are non-numerical in type. Similar KN naming system of non-numerical type are also found in Anal, Lamkang, Maring, Moyon, and in the languages of southern Tangkhul villages namely Khasung, Nambashi, Sorbung, and Sorte. In this paper, the Kin Numerative (KN) naming system in Monsang, with some notes on related systems in the other languages of Manipur, is described. Keywords: Kin Numeratives, Numerical KN, Non-numerical KN, Monsang, Manipur. Introduction Monsang is a Tibeto-Burman language and one of the smallest Scheduled Tribes of Manipur. The people are known by the autonym ‘Sirti’. There are only six villages with a total population of 2130 (Census of India, 2001), all located within Chandel District of Manipur. Chandel District lies to the South-eastern region of Manipur, bordering Myanmar, and is host to the largest number of ethnic communities, viz. Anal, Aimol, Chothe, Kom, Lamkang, Maring, Mate, Monsang, Moyon, Tarao, Thadou and Zou. The speakers of these communities use Meiteilon or Manipuri to communicate with each other. They use Roman alphabet for writing but orthography is still an issue for most of them. In this paper, I attempt to describe the Kin Numerative (KN) naming system in Monsang, with some notes on related systems in other languages of Manipur. -
THE LANGUAGES of MANIPUR: a CASE STUDY of the KUKI-CHIN LANGUAGES* Pauthang Haokip Department of Linguistics, Assam University, Silchar
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area Volume 34.1 — April 2011 THE LANGUAGES OF MANIPUR: A CASE STUDY OF THE KUKI-CHIN LANGUAGES* Pauthang Haokip Department of Linguistics, Assam University, Silchar Abstract: Manipur is primarily the home of various speakers of Tibeto-Burman languages. Aside from the Tibeto-Burman speakers, there are substantial numbers of Indo-Aryan and Dravidian speakers in different parts of the state who have come here either as traders or as workers. Keeping in view the lack of proper information on the languages of Manipur, this paper presents a brief outline of the languages spoken in the state of Manipur in general and Kuki-Chin languages in particular. The social relationships which different linguistic groups enter into with one another are often political in nature and are seldom based on genetic relationship. Thus, Manipur presents an intriguing area of research in that a researcher can end up making wrong conclusions about the relationships among the various linguistic groups, unless one thoroughly understands which groups of languages are genetically related and distinct from other social or political groupings. To dispel such misconstrued notions which can at times mislead researchers in the study of the languages, this paper provides an insight into the factors linguists must take into consideration before working in Manipur. The data on Kuki-Chin languages are primarily based on my own information as a resident of Churachandpur district, which is further supported by field work conducted in Churachandpur district during the period of 2003-2005 while I was working for the Central Institute of Indian Languages, Mysore, as a research investigator. -
“ a Sociolinguistic Profile of Kharam”
A Sociolinguistic Study of Kharam Kh. Dutta Singh, Ph.D. Scholar =================================================================== Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 Vol. 13:9 September 2013 =================================================================== Kharam male in indigenous Dress Kharam female in indigenous Dress Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 13:9 September 2013 Kh. Dutta Singh, Ph.D. Scholar A Sociolinguistic Study of Kharam 172 Abstract Kharam is one of the Government recognized scheduled tribes of Manipur having its distinct language, custom and ethnic identity. Kharam is the name of the language and the community that speak the language. The term Kharam itself is a compound word kha means ‘south’ and ram means ‘land’ or ‘place’ which literally means ‘Southland’. The Kharam is mainly spoken in Tuisemphai, Laikot Kharam, Laikot Phaijol, Purum Likli, Kharam Thadoi, Tampak Kharam, New Keithel Manbi and Kharam Khullen villages in the Senapati district of Manipur. The total number of Kharam speakers in Manipur is 1000 according to Tribal Research Institute, Manipur (2013). Interestingly, the Kharam is absent in any classification of Tibeto-Burman languages made by Grierson (1903), Benedict (1972), Matisoff (2000, 2003). In fact, the Kharam language is closely related to Purum, Kom, Koireng and Chothe. The present paper is an attempt to explore ‘A Sociolinguistic Study of Kharam’. 1.0 Introduction Kharam is the name of the language as well as the community that speak the language. The speakers of Kharam are mainly found in Senapati district of Manipur and their language belongs to the Tibeto-Burman family of the language. The term Kharam itself is a compound word kha means ‘south’ and ram means ‘land’ or ‘place’ which literally means ‘Southland’. -
Schiffman, Harold F. TITLE Language and Society in South Asia. Final Report
DOCUMEKT RESUNE ED 127 806 PL 007 948 AUTHOR Shapiro, Michael C.; Schiffman, Harold F. TITLE Language and Society in South Asia. Final Report. INSTITUTION Institute of International Studies (DHEW/OE), Washington, D.C. BUREAU NO BR-110012HH PUB DATE Sep 75 CONTRACT OEC-0-74-2093 NOTE 380p. EDRS PRICE MF-$C.83 Hc-$20.75 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Asian Studies; *Bilingualism; Burmese; Cultural Context; *Dialects; Dialect Studies; Dravidian Languages; Language Classification; *Language Variation; Linguistic Borrowing; Multilingualism; Regional Dialects; Social Dialects; *Sociolinguistics; Tibetan IDENTIFIERS *Asia (South); *Code Switching; Indo Aryan Languages; Munda Languages; Tibeto Burman Languages ABSTRACT This work attempts to provide an overview of liuguistic diversity in South Asia and to place this diversity in a cultural context. The work tries to describe the current state of knowledge concerning socially conditioned language variation in the subcontinent. Each of five major language families contains numerous mutually intelligible and unintelligible dialects. Different dialects of a language may be required for 'written and spoken use and for different social groups. Bilingualism and multilingualism are common for communication between groups. Language choice is important for education, politics, radio and television. Chapter 2 of this book enumerates criteria used in the taxonomy of language forms, discussing a number of theories of dialect formation from the points of view of linguistic innovation and diffusion of linguistic change. Chapter 3 surveys literature on classification of South Asian languages. Chapter 4 considers South Asia as a distinct linguistic area and Chapter 5 evaluates literature on South Asian social dialects. Chapter 6 examines linguistic codes encompassing elements from more than one autonomous language. -
LCSH Section I
I(f) inhibitors I-270 (Ill. and Mo. : Proposed) I Ho Yüan (Peking, China) USE If inhibitors USE Interstate 255 (Ill. and Mo.) USE Yihe Yuan (Beijing, China) I & M Canal National Heritage Corridor (Ill.) I-270 (Md.) I-hsing ware USE Illinois and Michigan Canal National Heritage USE Interstate 270 (Md.) USE Yixing ware Corridor (Ill.) I-278 (N.J. and N.Y.) I-Kiribati (May Subd Geog) I & M Canal State Trail (Ill.) USE Interstate 278 (N.J. and N.Y.) UF Gilbertese USE Illinois and Michigan Canal State Trail (Ill.) I-394 (Minn.) BT Ethnology—Kiribati I-5 USE Interstate 394 (Minn.) I-Kiribati language USE Interstate 5 I-395 (Baltimore, Md.) USE Gilbertese language I-10 USE Interstate 395 (Baltimore, Md.) I kuan tao (Cult) USE Interstate 10 I-405 (Wash.) USE Yi guan dao (Cult) I-15 USE Interstate 405 (Wash.) I language USE Interstate 15 I-470 (Ohio and W. Va.) USE Yi language I-15 (Fighter plane) USE Interstate 470 (Ohio and W. Va.) I-li Ho (China and Kazakhstan) USE Polikarpov I-15 (Fighter plane) I-476 (Pa.) USE Ili River (China and Kazakhstan) I-16 (Fighter plane) USE Blue Route (Pa.) I-li-mi (China) USE Polikarpov I-16 (Fighter plane) I-478 (New York, N.Y.) USE Taipa Island (China) I-17 USE Westway (New York, N.Y.) I-liu District (China) USE Interstate 17 I-495 (Mass.) USE Yiliu (Guangdong Sheng, China : Region) I-19 (Ariz.) USE Interstate 495 (Mass.) I-liu Region (China) USE Interstate 19 (Ariz.) I-495 (Md. -
Myanmar Languages | Ethnologue
7/24/2016 Myanmar Languages | Ethnologue Myanmar LANGUAGES Akeu [aeu] Shan State, Kengtung and Mongla townships. 1,000 in Myanmar (2004 E. Johnson). Status: 5 (Developing). Alternate Names: Akheu, Aki, Akui. Classi囕cation: Sino-Tibetan, Tibeto-Burman, Ngwi-Burmese, Ngwi, Southern. Comments: Non-indigenous. More Information Akha [ahk] Shan State, east Kengtung district. 200,000 in Myanmar (Bradley 2007a). Total users in all countries: 563,960. Status: 3 (Wider communication). Alternate Names: Ahka, Aini, Aka, Ak’a, Ekaw, Ikaw, Ikor, Kaw, Kha Ko, Khako, Khao Kha Ko, Ko, Yani. Dialects: Much dialectal variation; some do not understand each other. Classi囕cation: Sino-Tibetan, Tibeto-Burman, Ngwi-Burmese, Ngwi, Southern. More Information Anal [anm] Sagaing: Tamu town, 10 households. 50 in Myanmar (2010). Status: 6b (Threatened). Alternate Names: Namfau. Classi囕cation: Sino-Tibetan, Tibeto-Burman, Sal, Kuki-Chin-Naga, Kuki-Chin, Northern. Comments: Non- indigenous. Christian. More Information Anong [nun] Northern Kachin State, mainly Kawnglangphu township. 400 in Myanmar (2000 D. Bradley), decreasing. Ethnic population: 10,000 (Bradley 2007b). Total users in all countries: 450. Status: 7 (Shifting). Alternate Names: Anoong, Anu, Anung, Fuchve, Fuch’ye, Khingpang, Kwingsang, Kwinp’ang, Naw, Nawpha, Nu. Dialects: Slightly di㨽erent dialects of Anong spoken in China and Myanmar, although no reported diഡculty communicating with each other. Low inherent intelligibility with the Matwang variety of Rawang [raw]. Lexical similarity: 87%–89% with Anong in Myanmar and Anong in China, 73%–76% with T’rung [duu], 77%–83% with Matwang variety of Rawang [raw]. Classi囕cation: Sino-Tibetan, Tibeto-Burman, Central Tibeto-Burman, Nungish. Comments: Di㨽erent from Nung (Tai family) of Viet Nam, Laos, and China, and from Chinese Nung (Cantonese) of Viet Nam. -
Download (4MB)
North East Indian Linguistics Volume 3 Edited by Gwendolyn Hyslop • Stephen Morey. Mark W. Post EOUNDATlON® S (j) ® Ie S Delhi· Bengaluru • Mumbai • Kolkata • Chennai • Hyderabad • Pune Published by Cambridge University Press India Pvt. Ltd. under the imprint of Foundation Books Cambridge House, 438114 Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi 110002 Cambridge University Press India Pvt. Ltd. C-22, C-Block, Brigade M.M., K.R. Road, Iayanagar, Bengaluru 560 070 Plot No. 80, Service Industries, Sbirvane, Sector-I, Neru!, Navi Mumbai 400 706 10 Raja Subodb Mullick Square, 2nd Floor, Kolkata 700 013 2111 (New No. 49), 1st Floor, Model School Road, Thousand Lights, Chcnnai 600 006 House No. 3-5-874/6/4, (Near Apollo Hospital), Hyderguda, Hyderabad 500 029 Agarwal Pride, 'A' Wing, 1308 Kasba Peth, Near Surya Hospital, :"Pune 411 011 © Cambridge Universiry Press India Pvt. Ltd. First Published 20 II ISBN 978-81-7596-793-9 All rights reserved. No reproduction of any part may take place without the written pennission of Cambridge University Press India Pvl. Ltd., subject to statutory exception and to the provision of relevant collective licensing agreements. Cambridge" Universiry Press India Pvl. Ltd. has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-parry internet websites referred to in this book, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. Typeset at SanchauLi Image Composers, New Deihi. Published by Manas Saikia for Cambridge University Press India Pvl. Ltd. and printed at Sanat Printers, Kundli. Haryana Contents About the Contributors v Foreword Chungkham Yashawanta Singh ix A Note from the Editors xvii The View from Manipur 1. -
UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Essays on Development and Political Economy Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/38x1c5hw Author Di Miceli, Andrea Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Essays on Development and Political Economics A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Management by Andrea Di Miceli 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Essays on Development and Political Economy by Andrea Di Miceli Doctor of Philosophy in Management University of California, Los Angeles, 2017 Professor Romain T. Wacziarg, Chair My dissertation studies the determinants of conflict and state formation as well as how national identities influence individuals’ decisions. It consists of three chapters. The first, “Chasing the Key Player: A Network Approach to the Myanmar Civil War” studies the determinants of civil conflict in Myanmar. As governments in weak states often face several armed groups, they have to allocate resources to fight a subset of them strategi- cally. I use a simple model to embed heterogeneity among rebel groups stemming from their network of alliances and enmities. The key insight is that, by attacking a group, the Myanmar army weakens its allies. Therefore, the model predicts that the Myanmar army strategically targets armed groups who are central in the network of alliances. To test the model’s predictions, I collect a new data set on rebel groups’ locations, alliances, and enmities for the period 1989-2015. Using geo-referenced information on armed groups attacked by the Myanmar army, the empirical evidence strongly supports the predictions ii of the model. -
Towards Universal Education in Myanmar's Ethnic Areas
Strength in Diversity: Towards Universal Education in Myanmar’s Ethnic Areas Kim Jolliffe and Emily Speers Mears October 2016 1 Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank all of the ethnic basic education providers that have worked for many years to serve their communities. In particular, the Karen Education Department, Karen Teacher Working Group, Mon National Education Committee and Department, and the Rural Development Foundation of Shan State and associates, all gave their time, resources, advice and consideration to make this report possible. Additionally, World Education, Myanmar Education Consortium, UNICEF, Child’s Dream, Save the Children, and all at the Education Thematic Working Group have been instrumental in the development of this work, providing information on their programs, making introductions, discussing their own strengths and challenges, providing feedback on initial findings, and helping to paint a deeper picture of what international support to ethnic basic education looks like. In particular, big thank yous to Dr. Win Aung, Aye Aye Tun, Dr. Thein Lwin (formerly worked for the Ministry of Education), Craig Nightingale, Amanda Seel, Catherine Daly, and Andrea Costa for reviewing early drafts of the paper and providing invaluable feedback, which has helped the report grow and develop considerably. About the Authors Having worked in Southeast Asia for over eight years, Kim Jolliffe is an independent researcher, writer, analyst and trainer, specializing in security, aid policy, and ethnic politics in Myanmar/Burma. He is the lead researcher on the Social Services in Contested Areas (SSCA) research project. Emily Speers Mears is a researcher and policy adviser specializing in education and conflict in fragile states.