Dynamics September 6-4 1708.07400.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dynamics September 6-4 1708.07400.Pdf Dynamics of Current, Charge and Mass Bob Eisenberg Department of Applied Mathematics Illinois Institute of Technology USA Department of Physiology and Biophysics Rush University USA [email protected] Xavier Oriols Departament d’Enginyeria Electrònica, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, SPAIN [email protected] David Ferry School of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering Arizona State University USA [email protected] Available on arXivhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1708.07400 at September 6, 2017 ABSTRACT Electricity plays a special role in our lives and life. The dynamics of electrons allow light to flow through a vacuum. The equations of electron dynamics are nearly exact and apply from nuclear particles to stars. These Maxwell equations include a special term, the displacement current (of a vacuum). The displacement current allows electrical signals to propagate through space. Displacement current guarantees that current is exactly conserved from inside atoms to between stars, as long as current is defined as the entire source of the curl of the magnetic field, as Maxwell did. We show that the Bohm formulation of quantum mechanics allows the easy definition of current without the mysteries of the theory of quantum measurements. We show how conservation of current can be derived without mention of the polarization or dielectric properties of matter. We point out that displacement current is handled correctly in electrical engineering by ‘stray capacitances’, although it is rarely discussed explicitly. Matter does not behave as physicists of the 1800's thought it did. They could only measure on a time scale of seconds and tried to explain dielectric properties and polarization with a single dielectric constant, a real positive number independent of everything. Matter and thus charge moves in enormously complicated ways that cannot be described by a single dielectric constant, when studied on time scales important today for electronic technology and molecular biology. When classical theories could not explain complex charge movements, constants in equations were allowed to vary in solutions of those equations, in a way not justified by mathematics, with predictable consequences. Life occurs in ionic solutions where charge is moved by forces not mentioned or described in the Maxwell equations, like convection and diffusion. These movements and forces produce crucial currents that cannot be described as classical conduction or classical polarization. Derivations of conservation of current involve oversimplified treatments of dielectrics and polarization in nearly every textbook. Because real dielectrics do not behave in that simple way—not even approximately—classical derivations of conservation of current are often distrusted or even ignored. We show that current is conserved inside atoms. We show that current is conserved exactly in any material no matter how complex are the properties of dielectric, polarization, or conduction currents. Electricity has a special role because conservation of current is a universal law. Most models of chemical reactions do not conserve current and need to be changed to do so. On the macroscopic scale of life, conservation of current necessarily links far spread boundaries to each other, correlating inputs and outputs, and thereby creating devices. We suspect that correlations created by displacement current link all scales and allow atoms to control the machines and organisms of life. Conservation of current has a special role in our lives and life, as well as in physics. We believe models, simulations, and computations should conserve current on all scales, as accurately as possible, because physics conserves current that way. We believe models will be much more successful if they conserve current at every level of resolution, the way physics does. We surely need successful models as we try to control macroscopic functions by atomic interventions, in technology, life, and medicine. Maxwell’s displacement current lets us see stars. We hope it will help us see how atoms control life. 1 September 6, 2017 https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.07400 1. INTRODUCTION The dynamics of electrons allow us to hold a computer in our hand that detects signals of microvolts, from a 500 watt satellite source some 22,200 miles away. The computer in our hand makes logical decisions nearly a billion times a second, using some 1012 components, with hardly any errors. The fundamental laws that govern these phenomena are Maxwell’s equations. These laws are so general that they are often thought to have limited practical applicability: their application is often thought to depend on precise knowledge of the detailed properties of matter, knowledge that is often unknown, always hard to acquire. This paper is about a notable exception: conservation of current. Conservation of current is true universally, on all scales, independent of the detailed properties of matter. Kirchhoff’s current law illustrates the importance of conservation of current. Kirchoff’s laws use a set of currents and voltages to predict the performance of systems operating with currents ranging from femtoamps to kiloamps, with potentials from microvolts to hundreds of volts, in resistors ranging from tenths of an ohm to sometimes tens of gigohms. Kirchoff’s laws are simple, compact and easy to use. They are also exact in branched one dimensional systems, when current is defined to include displacement current. Electrical systems follow Kirchoff’s current law exactly because conservation of current is universal. Electricity is Different because few physical systems follow simple and compact laws with such precision. Electricity is familiar as well as different because it is used so widely in our technology and life. Our society of information (with its internet of everything) is a practical application of the dynamics of electrons. Our technology would be impossible if Kirchoff’s laws were not accurate and easy to apply. Electricity is so widely used because it follows universal laws that can be easily applied. Compact and simple laws, like Kirchhoff’s laws, allow the use of mathematics to design devices with a wide range of properties (Gray, Hurst et al. 2001, Cressler 2005, Horowitz and Hill 2015) with reasonable realism. For example, the microchip in your laptop computer requires manufacturing precision to sub-nanometer accuracy across 300 millimeters of the semiconductor wafer in which the computer chip is formed. This accuracy is an incredible feat of today’s technology. Sciences that depend on less accurate, simple and compact laws are often forced to use models that are not ‘transferrable’ (as the word is used by chemists). We mean by ‘transferable’ that the same law—with the same numerical value of parameters—can be used in a multitude of conditions and systems and is not constrained to a single system and set of conditions. Non-transferrable models use parameters that change with conditions, often in ways that are hard to capture or predict. Devices become difficult to use when their parameters and properties vary in unpredictable ways. Nearly all systems — particularly liquids and ionic solutions so important in chemistry and biology — involve many types of forces and interactions. Interacting systems are particularly difficult to capture in simple and compact laws. Interactions make it difficult to find transferrable models, with one set of unchanging parameters valid for a 2 September 6, 2017 https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.07400 large range of conditions. The simple and compact transferable models valid for typical electronic technology cannot be automatically applied to biological systems because of their complex structure, but the electrical properties of individual nerve and muscle fibers can be expressed in terms of Kirchoff’s laws and little else, amazingly enough. (Hodgkin and Huxley 1952c, Hodgkin 1958, Hodgkin 1964, Hodgkin 1992, Weiss 1996, Huxley 2000, Huxley 2002, Prosser, Curtis et al. 2009, Gabbiani and Cox 2010). Even electrical syncytia like the heart, epithelia, lens of the eye, liver, and so on can be described quite well with modest generalizations of Kirchoff’s laws.(Tung 1978, Eisenberg, Barcilon et al. 1979, Mathias, Rae et al. 1979, Eisenberg and Mathias 1980, Mathias, Rae et al. 1981, Geselowitz and Miller 1983, Levis, Mathias et al. 1983) Nerve and muscle fibers live in salt solutions derived from seawater, as does nearly all of life. Many chemical systems and a great deal of our chemical technology involve these salt solutions. Interactions abound in salt solutions, and they occur between the different types of ions, and ions with the water. Seawater flows in pressure and temperature gradients, so many types of forces are involved. Electric fields are particularly important in these systems and they pose particular problems because electric fields are very strong and extend a very long way, coupling atomic and macroscopic length scales with one set of physical laws. Viewed physically, most biological systems of interest are macroscopic systems containing a huge number of fundamental particles with a fantastic number of interactions between pairs of particles. The number of interactions is orders of magnitude larger than Avogadro’s number or 1023 for the number of particles per mole. Even small systems contain millions of molecules, and larger systems contain 1017 molecules, pairwise interactions can dominate properties. The attempts to describe the system by computing the dynamics of each particle becomes, in general,
Recommended publications
  • HISTORICAL SURVEY SOME PIONEERS of the APPLICATIONS of FRACTIONAL CALCULUS Duarte Valério 1, José Tenreiro Machado 2, Virginia
    HISTORICAL SURVEY SOME PIONEERS OF THE APPLICATIONS OF FRACTIONAL CALCULUS Duarte Val´erio 1,Jos´e Tenreiro Machado 2, Virginia Kiryakova 3 Abstract In the last decades fractional calculus (FC) became an area of intensive research and development. This paper goes back and recalls important pio- neers that started to apply FC to scientific and engineering problems during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Those we present are, in alphabet- ical order: Niels Abel, Kenneth and Robert Cole, Andrew Gemant, Andrey N. Gerasimov, Oliver Heaviside, Paul L´evy, Rashid Sh. Nigmatullin, Yuri N. Rabotnov, George Scott Blair. MSC 2010 : Primary 26A33; Secondary 01A55, 01A60, 34A08 Key Words and Phrases: fractional calculus, applications, pioneers, Abel, Cole, Gemant, Gerasimov, Heaviside, L´evy, Nigmatullin, Rabotnov, Scott Blair 1. Introduction In 1695 Gottfried Leibniz asked Guillaume l’Hˆopital if the (integer) order of derivatives and integrals could be extended. Was it possible if the order was some irrational, fractional or complex number? “Dream commands life” and this idea motivated many mathematicians, physicists and engineers to develop the concept of fractional calculus (FC). Dur- ing four centuries many famous mathematicians contributed to the theo- retical development of FC. We can list (in alphabetical order) some im- portant researchers since 1695 (see details at [1, 2, 3], and posters at http://www.math.bas.bg/∼fcaa): c 2014 Diogenes Co., Sofia pp. 552–578 , DOI: 10.2478/s13540-014-0185-1 SOME PIONEERS OF THE APPLICATIONS . 553 • Abel, Niels Henrik (5 August 1802 - 6 April 1829), Norwegian math- ematician • Al-Bassam, M. A. (20th century), mathematician of Iraqi origin • Cole, Kenneth (1900 - 1984) and Robert (1914 - 1990), American physicists • Cossar, James (d.
    [Show full text]
  • Here Are Some Additional Notes I Was Jotting Down
    Growing Connections in Computational Neuroscience Report on a German-U.S. Collaborative Symposium Munich, June 8-11, 2008 Leo van Hemmen, Andreas Herz, Rob de Ruyter van Steveninck _____________________________________________________________ Julius Bernstein Kenneth Stewart Cole Cover pictures Portraits of Julius Bernstein and Kenneth Cole, and a key figure from a 1939 paper by Cole and Curtis. The figure demonstrates a dramatic increase in nerve membrane conductance during passage of an action potential. This result is a direct experimental confirmation of an essential feature of Bernstein’s theory of the action potential. Though their work was separated by a few decades, Cole’s studies in the United States were inspired by Bernstein’s work in Germany at the beginning of the 20th century. Cole, K.S. and Curtis, H.J., J Gen Physiol 22, 649-670 (1939) Acknowledgements The German-U.S. Collaborative Symposium, “Growing Connections in Computational Neuroscience,” was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF). 2 Contents Executive Summary............................................................................................................ 4 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 5 Scientific Background......................................................................................................... 5 Programmatic Background ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE ANNUAL MEETING of the SOCIETY the Forty-Eighth Annual
    THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOCIETY The forty-eighth Annual Meeting of the American Mathematical Society was held at Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, from Monday, December 29 to Wednesday, December 31, 1941, in conjunction with meetings of the Mathematical Association of Amer­ ica, the Association for Symbolic Logic, and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. There were two general and seven sectional sessions of the Society at which three addresses and seventy-nine research papers (forty- four in person) were given. All sessions were held in Packard Labora­ tory. Arrangements for the meetings were made by a committee of which Dean Tomlinson Fort was chairman and Professors Everett Pitcher, G. E. Raynor, and W. M. Smith were the local members. Through the generosity of Lehigh University, rooms were available in the University dormitories. The attendance was about three hundred fifty including the follow­ ing two hundred fifty-six members of the Society: C. R. Adams, R. B. Adams, R. P. Agnew, Leon Alaoglu, C. B. Allendoerfer, H. A. Arnold, H. P. Atkins, Frank Ayres, H. M. Bacon, N. H. Ball, I. A. Barnett, F. S. Beale, A. A. Bennett, Stefan Bergman, A. H. Black, W. A. Blankinship, Salomon Bochner, H. F. Bohnenblust, J. W. Bower, C. B. Boyer, J. W. Bradshaw, C. C. Bramble, R. W. Brink, H. W. Brinkmann, F. L. Brooks, R. H. Bruck, N. R. Bryan. S. S. Cairns, W. D. Cairns, P. A. Caris, M. E. Carlen, I. S. Carroll, W. F. Cheney, Claude Chevalley, D. E. Christie, Alonzo Church, Randolph Church, R. F. Clippinger I.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1780-2019 -- C
    C Caballero, Ricardo J. (1959-) Cabot, Godfrey Lowell (1861-1962) Cabot, Philip (1872-1941) Election: 2010, Fellow Election: 1941, Fellow Election: 1936, Fellow Affiliation at election: Massachusetts Affiliation at election: Godfrey L. Cabot, Affiliation at election: Harvard University Institute of Technology Inc. Residence at election: Milton, MA Residence at election: Cambridge, MA Residence at election: Boston, MA Career description: Company executive; Career description: Economist; Educator Career description: Company executive Educator Current affiliation: Same (manufacturing and energy) Cabot, Richard Clarke (1868-1939) Cabezon, Jose I. (1956-) Cabot, James Elliot (1821-1903) Election: 1931, Fellow Election: 2019, Fellow Election: 1866, Fellow Affiliation at election: Harvard Medical Affiliation at election: University of Affiliation at election: Brookline, MA School California, Santa Barbara Residence at election: Brookline, MA Residence at election: Cambridge, MA Residence at election: Santa Barbara, CA Career description: Philosopher; Literary Career description: Physician; Educator; Career description: Religion scholar; editor Social worker Educator Current affiliation: Same Cabot, John Moors (1901-1981) Cabot, Samuel (1815-1885) Election: 1963, Fellow Election: 1844, Fellow Cabibbo, Nicola (1935-2010) Affiliation at election: U.S. Department of Affiliation at election: Boston, MA Election: 1981, FHM State Residence at election: Boston, MA Affiliation at election: Universita degli Residence at election: Washington, DC Career
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf/1607.06691
    Dynamics of Current, Charge and Mass Bob Eisenberg Department of Applied Mathematics Illinois Institute of Technology USA Department of Physiology and Biophysics Rush University USA [email protected] Xavier Oriols Departament d’Enginyeria Electrònica, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, SPAIN [email protected] David Ferry School of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering Arizona State University USA [email protected] Available on arXivhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1708.07400 at September 8, 2017 ABSTRACT Electricity plays a special role in our lives and life. The dynamics of electrons allow light to flow through a vacuum. The equations of electron dynamics are nearly exact and apply from nuclear particles to stars. These Maxwell equations include a special term, the displacement current (of a vacuum). The displacement current allows electrical signals to propagate through space. Displacement current guarantees that current is exactly conserved from inside atoms to between stars, as long as current is defined as the entire source of the curl of the magnetic field, as Maxwell did. We show that the Bohm formulation of quantum mechanics allows the easy definition of current without the mysteries of the theory of quantum measurements. We show how conservation of current can be derived without mention of the polarization or dielectric properties of matter. We point out that displacement current is handled correctly in electrical engineering by ‘stray capacitances’, although it is rarely discussed explicitly. Matter does not behave as physicists of the 1800's thought it did. They could only measure on a time scale of seconds and tried to explain dielectric properties and polarization with a single dielectric constant, a real positive number independent of everything.
    [Show full text]
  • Nber Working Paper Series of Mice and Academics
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES OF MICE AND ACADEMICS: EXAMINING THE EFFECT OF OPENNESS ON INNOVATION Fiona Murray Philippe Aghion Mathias Dewatripont Julian Kolev Scott Stern Working Paper 14819 http://www.nber.org/papers/w14819 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 March 2009 The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2009 by Fiona Murray, Philippe Aghion, Mathias Dewatripont, Julian Kolev, and Scott Stern. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Of Mice and Academics: Examining the Effect of Openness on Innovation Fiona Murray, Philippe Aghion, Mathias Dewatripont, Julian Kolev, and Scott Stern NBER Working Paper No. 14819 March 2009 JEL No. J30 ABSTRACT Scientific freedom and openness are hallmarks of academia: relative to their counterparts in industry, academics maintain discretion over their research agenda and allow others to build on their discoveries. This paper examines the relationship between openness and freedom, building on recent models emphasizing that, from an economic perspective, freedom is the granting of control rights to researchers. Within this framework, openness of upstream research does not simply encourage higher levels of downstream exploitation. It also raises the incentives for additional upstream research by encouraging the establishment of entirely new research directions.
    [Show full text]
  • Assembling Life
    ASSEMBLING LIFE. Models, the cell, and the reformations of biological science, 1920-1960 Max Stadler Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine Imperial College, London University of London PhD dissertation 1 I certify that all the intellectual contents of this thesis are of my own, unless otherwise stated. London, October 2009 Max Stadler 2 Acknowledgments My thanks to: my friends and family; esp. my mother and Julia who didn't mind their son and brother becoming a not-so-useful member of society, helped me survive in the real world, and cheered me up when things ; my supervisor, Andrew Mendelsohn, for many hours of helping me sort out my thoughts and infinite levels of enthusiasm (and Germanisms-tolerance); my second supervisor, David Edgerton, for being the intellectual influence (I thought) he was; David Munns, despite his bad musical taste and humour, as a brother-in-arms against disciplines; Alex Oikonomou, for being a committed smoker; special thanks (I 'surmise') to Hermione Giffard, for making my out-of-the-suitcase life much easier, for opening my eyes in matters of Frank Whittle and machine tools, and for bothering to proof-read parts of this thesis; and thanks to all the rest of CHoSTM; thanks also, for taking time to read and respond to over-length drafts and chapters: Cornelius Borck; Stephen Casper; Michael Hagner; Rhodrie Hayward; Henning Schmidgen; Fabio de Sio; Sktili Sigurdsson; Pedro Ruiz Castell; Andrew Warwick; Abigail Woods; to Anne Harrington for having me at the History of Science Department, Harvard, and to Hans- Joerg Rheinberger for having me at the Max-Planck-Institute for the History of Science in Berlin; thanks, finally, to all those who in some way or another encouraged, accompanied and/or enabled the creation and completion of this thing, especially: whoever invented the internet; Hanna Rose Shell; and the Hans Rausing Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Interacting Ions in Biophysics: Real Is Not Ideal
    Biophysical Journal (2013) 104:1849 Interacting Ions in Biophysics: Real is not Ideal Bob Eisenberg Department of Molecular Biophysics Rush University Chicago IL 60612 USA and Department of Chemistry and Miller Institute University of California Berkeley CA 94720 USA May 1, 2013 Running Title: Ions in Solutions Interact File name is “Interacting Ions Real is not Ideal FINAL May 1-1 2013.docx” Ions in Solutions Interact Biophysical Journal (2013) 104:1849 Abstract Ions in water are important throughout biology, from molecules to organs. Classically, ions in water were treated as ideal noninteracting particles in a perfect gas. Excess free energy of each ion was zero. Mathematics was not available to deal consistently with flows, or interactions with other ions or boundaries. Non-classical approaches are needed because ions in biological conditions flow and interact. The concentration gradient of one ion can drive the flow of another, even in a bulk solution. A variational multiscale approach is needed to deal with interactions and flow. The recently developed energetic variational approach to dissipative systems allows mathematically consistent treatment of the bio-ions Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Cl− as they interact and flow. Interactions produce large excess free energy that dominate the properties of the high concentration of ions in and near protein active sites, ion channels, and nucleic acids: the number density of ions is often > 10 M. Ions in such crowded quarters interact strongly with each other as well as with the surrounding protein. Non-ideal behavior found in many experiments has classically been ascribed to allosteric interactions mediated by the protein and its conformation changes.
    [Show full text]
  • SOME PIONEERS of the APPLICATIONS of FRACTIONAL CALCULUS Duarte Valério, José Tenreiro Machado, Virginia Kiryakova
    SOME PIONEERS OF THE APPLICATIONS OF FRACTIONAL CALCULUS Duarte Val´erio, Jos´e Tenreiro Machado, Virginia Kiryakova Abstract In the last decades fractional calculus (FC) became an area of intensive research and development. This paper goes back and recalls important pio- neers that started to apply FC to scientific and engineering problems during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Those we present are, in alphabet- ical order: Niels Abel, Kenneth and Robert Cole, Andrew Gemant, Andrey N. Gerasimov, Oliver Heaviside, Paul L´evy, Rashid Sh. Nigmatullin, Yuri N. Rabotnov, George Scott Blair. Key Words and Phrases Fractional calculus, applications, pioneers, Abel, Cole, Gemant, Gerasimov, Heaviside, L´evy, Nigmatullin, Rabotnov, Scott Blair 1. Introduction In 1695 Gottfried Leibniz asked Guillaume l’Hˆopital if the (integer) order of derivatives and integrals could be extended. Was it possible if the order was some irrational, fractional or complex number? “Dream commands life” and this idea motivated many mathematicians, physicists and engineers to develop the concept of fractional calculus (FC). Dur- ing four centuries many famous mathematicians contributed to the theo- retical development of FC. We can list (in alphabetical order) some im- portant researchers since 1695 (see details at [1, 2, 3], and posters at http://www.math.bas.bg/∼fcaa): • Abel, Niels Henrik (5 August 1802 - 6 April 1829), Norwegian math- ematician • Al-Bassam, M. A. (20th century), mathematician of Iraqi origin • Cole, Kenneth (1900 - 1984) and Robert (1914 - 1990), American physicists • Cossar, James (d. 24 July 1998), British mathematician • Davis, Harold Thayer (5 October 1892 - 14 November 1974), Amer- ican mathematician • Djrbashjan, Mkhitar Mkrtichevich (11 September 1918 - 6 May 1994), Armenian (also Soviet Union) mathematician; family name transcripted also as Dzhrbashian, Jerbashian; short CV can be found in Fract.
    [Show full text]
  • By Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of the Requirements for Degree of in in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY of CALIFORN
    The Brain Electric: A History of Neuroscientific Ideas About How We Change by Cristina Nigro DISSERTATION Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in History of Health Sciences in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO Approved: ______________________________________________________________________________Dorothy Porter Chair ______________________________________________________________________________Brian Dolan ______________________________________________________________________________Aimee Medeiros ______________________________________________________________________________Elizabeth Watkins ______________________________________________________________________________ Committee Members Copyright 2020 by Cristina Nigro ii Acknowledgements I have to start by thanking my dissertation advisor, Dorothy Porter, for her unwavering support and enthusiasm when I needed it most. Her guidance expanded my knowledge and understanding in so many ways and for that I will always be grateful. Dorothy’s influence runs throughout this dissertation and I simply cannot thank her enough. I also must thank my dissertation committee members Brian Dolan, Aimee Medeiros, and Liz Watkins for their sage advice and feedback on the many drafts of this dissertation as well as their expert tutelage throughout my graduate career. I have learned so much from all of them. I owe many thanks to my friend and colleague, Paxon Frady, who chatted with me about neuroscience and society over many happy hours, who pointed me in the right direction multiple times, and who provided constructive comments on nearly every aspect of this dissertation. I would also like to thank Andrea Tanner for welcoming me into her home during my research trip in London, and for introducing me to valuable resources and colleagues. And I extend my deepest gratitude to Greg Minah for his copy editing and emotional support in the final stretch.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenneth Stewart Cole 25 by Sir Andrew Huxley
    http://www.nap.edu/catalog/5406.html We ship printed books within 1 business day; personal PDFs are available immediately. Biographical Memoirs V.70 Office of the Home Secretary, National Academy of Sciences ISBN: 0-309-58935-5, 448 pages, 6 x 9, (1996) This PDF is available from the National Academies Press at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/5406.html Visit the National Academies Press online, the authoritative source for all books from the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Research Council: • Download hundreds of free books in PDF • Read thousands of books online for free • Explore our innovative research tools – try the “Research Dashboard” now! • Sign up to be notified when new books are published • Purchase printed books and selected PDF files Thank you for downloading this PDF. If you have comments, questions or just want more information about the books published by the National Academies Press, you may contact our customer service department toll- free at 888-624-8373, visit us online, or send an email to [email protected]. This book plus thousands more are available at http://www.nap.edu. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF File are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Distribution, posting, or copying is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. Request reprint permission for this book. Biographical Memoirs V.70 http://www.nap.edu/catalog/5406.html i NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES The National Academy Press was created by the National Academy of Sciences to publish the reports issued by the Academy and by the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Research Council, all operating under the charter granted to the National Academy of Sciences by the Congress of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenneth Cole, Known to His Wife As Ken but to All His Friends As Kacy, Was Born on 10 July 1900 at Ithaca, New York
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES K ENNET H S TE W A R T C OLE 1900—1984 A Biographical Memoir by S I R ANDREW H U X L E Y Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1996 NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS WASHINGTON D.C. KENNETH STEWART COLE July 10, 1900–April 18, 1984 BY SIR ANDREW HUXLEY ENNETH STEWART COLE’s training was in classical physics Kand electrical engineering but he turned his skills to the investigation of the electrical properties of living tis- sues. Through an impressive combination of theoretical and experimental approaches, he made major contributions to our understanding of the surface membranes of many types of cells, and especially of the changes undergone by the electrical properties of the membranes of excitable cells when activated. In particular, his demonstration in 1938 (with H.J. Curtis) of a large increase in membrane conduc- tance during the passage of a nerve impulse, without change of capacitance, was a major landmark. PERSONAL HISTORY Kenneth Cole, known to his wife as Ken but to all his friends as Kacy, was born on 10 July 1900 at Ithaca, New York. His father, Charles Nelson Cole, was at that time an instructor in Latin at Cornell University; two years later the family moved to Oberlin, Ohio, as his father took a post at Oberlin College, of which he later became Dean. Cole’s Reprinted with permission of the Royal Society, London, England.
    [Show full text]