How the Jamaican Maroons Resisted British Colonization

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How the Jamaican Maroons Resisted British Colonization Unconquered: How the Jamaican Maroons Resisted British Colonization Dylan Siwicki History 4401: Senior Research Seminar Professor Joe Lunn December 12, 2017 Since Jamaica was one the world’s most productive sugar colonies, it wasn’t long until it captured the eyes of the British. The British then sent an Armada led by Oliver Cromwell and went on to defeat the Spanish in Jamaica. Following the British colonization of Jamaica in 1655, many of the Spanish slaves fled their plantations and moved away into the interior of the island. They became known as the “Jamaican Maroons,” as maroon means runaway. These Maroons often fought the British using guerrilla tactics and raided many plantations, disrupting the sugar economy for the British. The Jamaican Maroons continued to resist the British on the island for the next 84 years, until peace treaties were signed in 1738 and 1739. Since the Jamaican Maroons were never defeated on the battlefield by the British, the Maroons effectively earned the title of freedom fighters. However, while the Jamaican Maroons liberated themselves from plantations and established free communities in the middle of Britain’s most important sugar colony, they collaborated with the British colonial government after 1739 in crushing slave rebellions on the island, therefore the Maroons helped forestall the eventual downfall of slavery in Jamaica and were traitors of their own race. Beginning with Christopher Columbus’s discovery of the new world in 1492, Europeans began to set their sights on extracting wealthy resources, such as gold from the new world. Since Columbus sailed for King Ferdinand II and Queen Isabella of Spain, the Spanish were able to become one of the first primitive world powers to colonize the new world. In doing so, Jamaica was one of the islands in the Caribbean the Spanish colonized, but they quickly lost interest in the island when little to no gold was found. Although the Spanish never completely abandoned Jamaica, their interests was in gold and there was plenty of gold found on the continent of South American after the they defeated the Aztec, Mayan, and Inca empires. 1 The Spanish, however, was not the only European power to colonize the new world. Shorty after the Columbus’s discovery, other European powers, such as the English and French began colonizing new world land as well. The British and French was primarily interested in North America, along with the Caribbean, while the Spanish and Portuguese dominated South America. As European colonization continued in the new world, the Europeans relied on the natives as the primary labor force in extracting the wealth. The Europeans did not set their sights on exterminating the natives, but rather as enslaving them. However, disease ran rampant and affected both the Europeans and the Natives. Without immunity to European diseases, such as influenza, many natives were killed off and it led to a major labor shortage in the new world. Since Europeans did not have immunity to new world diseases like malaria, Europeans had to look elsewhere for labor. While the Europeans continued world colonization, Vasco da Gama led a Portuguese fleet around the West coast of Africa, while in route to the East Indies. The British, Spanish, French, German, and the Dutch soon followed with their own explorations. Although the Europeans found no gold in Africa, they discovered that Africans were immune to their diseases. In addition, the Europeans had many manufactured goods and weapons that the Africans did not have, but wanted. Therefore, the Europeans ability to cheaply trade with African Kingdoms, along with the Africans immunity to new world diseases made them the most profitable labor option for the Europeans in the new world. It became known as the TransAtlantic slave trade, where the Europeans traded weapons, textiles, and manufactured goods to the Africans for captured slaves within Africa, who then became slaves in the new world for the Europeans to extract wealthy resources that were sent back to Europe. The Portuguese dominated the TransAtlantic slave trade early on due to their 2 position on the Canary islands. Most of the African slaves were taken from West Africa and sent into the Caribbean or South America with many working on the sugar plantations. Although the Portuguese were a primitive new world power, the slave trade was eventually taken over by the French, British, and Dutch as they continued their growth in the new world. The Middle Passage, which was the voyage from West Africa to the Americas saw Africans endure inhumane and cruel conditions. The dehumanization process began as they were often chained and cramped tightly together. These harsh conditions along with low morale led to the death of many Africans during the voyage. Once they arrived, their dehumanization became reality as the sole purpose was to produce wealth for European colonies through enslavement.1 Africans resisted European enslavement from the moment they embarked on the ships transporting them to the Americas. Their resistance took many forms. One is they simply tried to escape the ships by throwing themselves and their companions into the Atlantic Ocean. In addition, many committed suicide during the voyage, as well as upon their arrival. Another form of resistance they took was that women would commit abortions and infanticide. While those are extreme forms of resistance, the most common resistance Africans took was to revolt and stir up rebellions on the plantations. This allowed them to escape en masses and become fugitive slaves or Maroons.2 Although Maroon societies emerged throughout the Americas, the Jamaican Maroons are one of the most well known. During the slave trade, most of the Africans imported to Jamaica were from West Africa. The Africans were from many different African ethnic groups, such as 1 Amanda Moore, “Maroon Societies in Brazil, Jamaica, and Mexico,” Sryacuse University Honors Program Capstone Project. (2005). Paper 710. 4-5. 2 Moore, “Maroon Societies,” 17-18. 3 Coromantee, Congos, Eboes, Mandingos, Pawpaws, and Nagos. The largest of these populations to inhabit Jamaica was the Coromantee, who were from Ghana and were Akan-speaking Africans. The English conquest of Jamaica in the mid-17th century allowed the opportunity for slaves to runaway, which many did. After the British routed the Spanish, pockets of ex-slaves scattered throughout the island. Although the Spaniards were unable to resist the English invasion because of the lack of weapons, many stayed and became rebels. Furthermore, the Spanish rebels went on to form collations with runaway slaves to put up a guerilla resistance against the British. However, the Spanish formally ceded Jamaica to the British in 1670 and many of rebels fled, but many slaves remained in the mountainous interior of Jamaica to continue resistance.3 Since the British demanded the Spanish to hand over all slaves, the Maroons had to secure protection from British invasion. The topography in Jamaica was very favorable to the Maroons, as the interior of Jamaica saw high mountains and many swaps that can help deter a British invasion. Although harsh environments, such as jungles, mountains, swaps, and valleys ensured tough living conditions, the Maroons had no choice but to acclimate themselves to them for protection. The relatively inaccessible mountains gave them a commanding view of the lowlands. By the beginning of the 18th century, two distinct Maroon communities emerged in Jamaica’s interior; the Leeward and Windward. The Leeward’s were based in the west and the Windward’s in the east. Even though both similarity planted crops and hunted for survival, they also had distinct differences. For example, the Leeward Maroons had a central leader that was elected and divided their villagers into politico-military units. The Windward community, on the 3 Moore, “Maroon Socities,” 28, and Vernot Satchell, “Jamaica,” The Retrospective history of Jamaica, World History Archive, Hartford Web Publishing, 1999. 4 other hand did not have central leader, but a loose federation of villages under smaller leadership.4 As the Maroon communities continued to grow to several hundred escaped slaves throughout the latter half of the 17th century, by 1700 the British began financing military campaigns against the Maroons because they saw the Maroons as a threat to English colonization. Since many of the Maroons are escaped slaves, the British believed the Maroon communities could influence future slaves desire to runaway, disrupting the plantation economy in Jamaica. As the British continued to try and suppress the Maroons through military might, the Maroon communities fought back and began to view themselves as freedom fighters. Even though the British were a superior military, the Maroons were familiar with the terrain of Jamaica and their their guerrilla warfare tactics proved quite costly to the British. After 85 years of fighting, the British were unable to subjugate the Maroons and were forced to sign separate peace treaties with the Windward’s and Leeward’s in 1738 and 1739. The treaty formally acknowledged the Maroons as free and independent, however the Maroons also had to collaborate with the British in suppressing any sort of slave revolt, as well as suppressing and capturing runaway slaves. Overall, the treaty was a British victory for the future of Jamaica.5 The Maroons proved that fighting the British is the best way to secure freedom. Although the Maroons never defeated the british on the battlefield, they were never defeated themselves; essentially fighting the British to a stalemate. So future slaves can capture the ideal of not having to defeat the British in battle, but by being able to escape and disrupt the economy can prove 4 Moore, “Maroon Societies,” 35, and Satchell, “Jamaica.” 5 Jonathan Brooks, “From Freedom to Bondage: The Jamaican Maroons, 1655-1770,” University of North Carolina Wilmington and Satchell “Jamaica.” 5 quite disastrous to the British.
Recommended publications
  • After the Treaties: a Social, Economic and Demographic History of Maroon Society in Jamaica, 1739-1842
    University of Southampton Research Repository Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis and, where applicable, any accompanying data are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non‐commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis and the accompanying data cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content of the thesis and accompanying research data (where applicable) must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder/s. When referring to this thesis and any accompanying data, full bibliographic details must be given, e.g. Thesis: Author (Year of Submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University Faculty or School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination. University of Southampton Department of History After the Treaties: A Social, Economic and Demographic History of Maroon Society in Jamaica, 1739-1842 Michael Sivapragasam A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History June 2018 i ii UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY Doctor of Philosophy After the Treaties: A Social, Economic and Demographic History of Maroon Society in Jamaica, 1739-1842 Michael Sivapragasam This study is built on an investigation of a large number of archival sources, but in particular the Journals and Votes of the House of the Assembly of Jamaica, drawn from resources in Britain and Jamaica. Using data drawn from these primary sources, I assess how the Maroons of Jamaica forged an identity for themselves in the century under slavery following the peace treaties of 1739 and 1740.
    [Show full text]
  • A Deductive Thematic Analysis of Jamaican Maroons
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Sinclair-Maragh, Gaunette; Simpson, Shaniel Bernard Article — Published Version Heritage tourism and ethnic identity: A deductive thematic analysis of Jamaican Maroons Journal of Tourism, Heritage & Services Marketing Suggested Citation: Sinclair-Maragh, Gaunette; Simpson, Shaniel Bernard (2021) : Heritage tourism and ethnic identity: A deductive thematic analysis of Jamaican Maroons, Journal of Tourism, Heritage & Services Marketing, ISSN 2529-1947, International Hellenic University, Thessaloniki, Vol. 7, Iss. 1, pp. 64-75, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4521331 , https://www.jthsm.gr/?page_id=5317 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/230516 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ www.econstor.eu Journal of Tourism, Heritage & Services Marketing, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • "Free Negroes" - the Development of Early English Jamaica and the Birth of Jamaican Maroon Consciousness, 1655-1670
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Theses Department of History 12-16-2015 "Free Negroes" - The Development of Early English Jamaica and the Birth of Jamaican Maroon Consciousness, 1655-1670 Patrick John Nichols Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses Recommended Citation Nichols, Patrick John, ""Free Negroes" - The Development of Early English Jamaica and the Birth of Jamaican Maroon Consciousness, 1655-1670." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2015. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses/100 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “FREE NEGROES” – THE DEVELOPMENT OF EARLY ENGLISH JAMAICA AND THE BIRTH OF JAMAICAN MAROON CONSCIOUSNESS, 1655-1670 by PATRICK JOHN NICHOLS Under the Direction of Harcourt Fuller, PhD ABSTRACT The English conquest of Jamaica in 1655 was a turning point in the history of Atlantic World colonialism. Conquest displaced the Spanish colony and its subjects, some of who fled into the mountainous interior of Jamaica and assumed lives in isolation. This project reconstructs the historical experiences of the “negro” populations of Spanish and English Jamaica, which included its “free black”, “mulattoes”, indigenous peoples, and others, and examines how English cosmopolitanism and distinct interactions laid the groundwork for and informed the syncretic identities and communities that emerged decades later. Upon the framework of English conquest within the West Indies, I explore the experiences of one such settlement alongside the early English colony of Jamaica to understand how a formal relationship materialized between the entities and how its course inflected the distinct socio-political identity and emergent political agency embodied by the Jamaican Maroons.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom As Marronage
    Freedom as Marronage Freedom as Marronage NEIL ROBERTS The University of Chicago Press Chicago and London Neil Roberts is associate professor of Africana studies and a faculty affiliate in political science at Williams College. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London © 2015 by The University of Chicago All rights reserved. Published 2015. Printed in the United States of America 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 1 2 3 4 5 ISBN- 13: 978- 0- 226- 12746- 0 (cloth) ISBN- 13: 978- 0- 226- 20104- 7 (paper) ISBN- 13: 978- 0- 226- 20118- 4 (e- book) DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226201184.001.0001 Jacket illustration: LeRoy Clarke, A Prophetic Flaming Forest, oil on canvas, 2003. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Roberts, Neil, 1976– author. Freedom as marronage / Neil Roberts. pages ; cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978- 0- 226- 12746- 0 (cloth : alk. paper) — ISBN 978- 0- 226- 20104- 7 (pbk : alk. paper) — ISBN 978- 0- 226- 20118- 4 (e- book) 1. Maroons. 2. Fugitive slaves—Caribbean Area. 3. Liberty. I. Title. F2191.B55R62 2015 323.1196'0729—dc23 2014020609 o This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48– 1992 (Permanence of Paper). For Karima and Kofi Time would pass, old empires would fall and new ones take their place, the relations of countries and the relations of classes had to change, before I discovered that it is not quality of goods and utility which matter, but movement; not where you are or what you have, but where you have come from, where you are going and the rate at which you are getting there.
    [Show full text]
  • The Morant Bay Rebellion in Jamaica
    timeline The Morant Bay Rebellion in Jamaica Questions A visual exploration of the background to, and events of, this key rebellion by former • What were the causes of the Morant Bay Rebellion? slaves against a colonial authority • How was the rebellion suppressed? • Was it a riot or a rebellion? • What were the consequences of the Morant Bay Rebellion? Attack on the courthouse during the rebellion The initial attack Response from the Jamaican authorities Background to the rebellion Key figures On 11 October 1865, several hundred black people The response of the Jamaican authorities was swift and brutal. Making Like many Jamaicans, both Bogle and Gordon were deeply disappointed about Paul Bogle marched into the town of Morant Bay, the capital of use of the army, Jamaican forces and the Maroons (formerly a community developments since the end of slavery. Although free, Jamaicans were bitter about ■ Leader of the rebellion the mainly sugar-growing parish of St Thomas in the of runaway slaves who were now an irregular but effective army of the the continued political, social and economic domination of the whites. There were ■ A native Baptist preacher East, Jamaica. They pillaged the police station of its colony), the government forcefully put down the rebellion. In the process, also specific problems facing the people: the low wages on the plantations, the ■ Organised the secret meetings weapons and then confronted the volunteer militia nearly 500 people were killed and hundreds of others seriously wounded. lack of access to land for the freed people and the lack of justice in the courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxing Jamaica: the Stamp Act of 1760 & Tacky's Rebellion
    eJournal of Tax Research (2014) vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 162 - 184 Taxing Jamaica: the Stamp Act of 1760 & Tacky’s rebellion Lynne Oats1*, Pauline Sadler2 and Carlene Wynter3 Abstract In 1760 the colonial assembly in Jamaica passed an act imposing stamp duties on the island colony as a response to increased costs in the wake of a slave rebellion. This article examines the conditions in Jamaica which led to the introduction of the 1760 stamp act, and discusses the provisions of the Jamaican act along with the reasons for its failure. This episode in eighteenth century taxation serves as a reminder of the importance of both the social context and political expediency in the introduction of new forms of taxation. 1 Professor of Accounting and Taxation, University of Exeter Business School. *Corresponding author: [email protected]. This article had its origins in a strand of research by Pauline Sadler with Lynne Oats, and which was incomplete at Pauline’s sudden and untimely death in April 2013. The remaining authors have brought this paper to fruition in Pauline’s memory and its inclusion in this special issue is particularly poignant given that Pauline was a regular attendee at, and contributor to, John Tiley’s Cambridge Tax History conferences. 2 Formerly Professor of Information Law, Curtin University of Technology. 3 PhD candidate in the Department of Accounting, University of Exeter Business School. 162 eJournal of Tax Research Taxing Jamaica: the Stamp Act of 1760 & Tacky’s rebellion 1 INTRODUCTION In December 1760, effective 1 March 1761, the colonial assembly in Jamaica passed an act imposing stamp duties on the island colony.
    [Show full text]
  • PELLIZZARI-DISSERTATION-2020.Pdf (3.679Mb)
    A Struggle for Empire: Resistance and Reform in the British Atlantic World, 1760-1778 The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Pellizzari, Peter. 2020. A Struggle for Empire: Resistance and Reform in the British Atlantic World, 1760-1778. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37365752 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA A Struggle for Empire: Resistance and Reform in the British Atlantic World, 1760-1778 A dissertation presented by Peter Pellizzari to The Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2020 © 2020 Peter Pellizzari All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisors: Jane Kamensky and Jill Lepore Peter Pellizzari A Struggle for Empire: Resistance and Reform in the British Atlantic World, 1760-1778 Abstract The American Revolution not only marked the end of Britain’s control over thirteen rebellious colonies, but also the beginning of a division among subsequent historians that has long shaped our understanding of British America. Some historians have emphasized a continental approach and believe research should look west, toward the people that inhabited places outside the traditional “thirteen colonies” that would become the United States, such as the Gulf Coast or the Great Lakes region.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Encounters and the Archives Global Encounters a Nd the Archives
    1 Global Encounters and the Archives Global EncountErs a nd thE archivEs Britain’s Empire in the Age of Horace Walpole (1717–1797) An exhibition at the Lewis Walpole Library, Yale University October 20, 2017, through March 2, 2018 Curated by Justin Brooks and Heather V. Vermeulen, with Steve Pincus and Cynthia Roman Foreword On this occasion of the 300th anniversary of Horace In association with this exhibition the library Walpole’s birthday in 2017 and the 100th anniversary will sponsor a two-day conference in New Haven of W.S. Lewis’s Yale class of 2018, Global Encounters on February 9–10, 2018, that will present new and the Archives: Britain’s Empire in the Age of Horace archival-based research on Britain’s global empire Walpole embraces the Lewis Walpole Library’s central in the long eighteenth century and consider how mission to foster eighteenth-century studies through current multi-disciplinary methodologies invite research in archives and special collections. Lewis’s creative research in special collections. bequest to Yale was informed by his belief that “the cynthia roman most important thing about collections is that they Curator of Prints, Drawings and Paintings furnish the means for each generation to make its The Lewis Walpole Library own appraisals.”1 The rich resources, including manuscripts, rare printed texts, and graphic images, 1 W.S. Lewis, Collector’s Progress, 1st ed. (New York: indeed provide opportunity for scholars across Alfred A. Knopf, 1951), 231. academic disciplines to explore anew the complexities and wide-reaching impact of Britain’s global interests in the long eighteenth century Global Encounters and the Archives is the product of a lively collaboration between the library and Yale faculty and graduate students across academic disci- plines.
    [Show full text]
  • Dangerous Spirit of Liberty: Slave Rebellion, Conspiracy, and the First Great Awakening, 1729-1746
    Dangerous Spirit of Liberty: Slave Rebellion, Conspiracy, and the First Great Awakening, 1729-1746 by Justin James Pope B.A. in Philosophy and Political Science, May 2000, Eckerd College M.A. in History, May 2005, University of Cincinnati M.Phil. in History, May 2008, The George Washington University A Dissertation submitted to The Faculty of The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 31, 2014 Dissertation directed by David J. Silverman Professor of History The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University certifies that Justin Pope has passed the Final Examination for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 10, 2014. This is the final and approved form of the dissertation. Dangerous Spirit of Liberty: Slave Rebellion, Conspiracy, and the Great Awakening, 1729-1746 Justin Pope Dissertation Research Committee: David J. Silverman, Professor of History, Dissertation Director Denver Brunsman, Assistant Professor of History, Committee Member Greg L. Childs, Assistant Professor of History, Committee Member ii © Copyright 2014 by Justin Pope All rights reserved iii Acknowledgments I feel fortunate to thank the many friends and colleagues, institutions and universities that have helped me produce this dissertation. The considerable research for this project would not have been possible without the assistance of several organizations. The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History, the Maryland Historical Society, the Cosmos Club Foundation of Washington, D.C., the Andrew Mellon Fellowship of the Virginia Historical Society, the W. B. H. Dowse Fellowship of the Massachusetts Historical Society, the Thompson Travel Grant from the George Washington University History Department, and the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation Research Fellowship all provided critical funding for my archival research.
    [Show full text]
  • From Freedom to Bondage: the Jamaican Maroons, 1655-1770
    From Freedom to Bondage: The Jamaican Maroons, 1655-1770 Jonathan Brooks, University of North Carolina Wilmington Andrew Clark, Faculty Mentor, UNCW Abstract: The Jamaican Maroons were not a small rebel community, instead they were a complex polity that operated as such from 1655-1770. They created a favorable trade balance with Jamaica and the British. They created a network of villages that supported the growth of their collective identity through borrowed culture from Africa and Europe and through created culture unique to Maroons. They were self-sufficient and practiced sustainable agricultural practices. The British recognized the Maroons as a threat to their possession of Jamaica and embarked on multiple campaigns against the Maroons, utilizing both external military force, in the form of Jamaican mercenaries, and internal force in the form of British and Jamaican military regiments. Through a systematic breakdown of the power structure of the Maroons, the British were able to subject them through treaty. By addressing the nature of Maroon society and growth of the Maroon state, their agency can be recognized as a dominating factor in Jamaican politics and development of the country. In 1509 the Spanish settled Jamaica and brought with them the institution of slavery. By 1655, when the British invaded the island, there were 558 slaves.1 During the battle most slaves were separated from their masters and fled to the mountains. Two major factions of Maroons established themselves on opposite ends of the island, the Windward and Leeward Maroons. These two groups formed the first independent polities from European colonial rule. The two groups formed independent from each other and with very different political structures but similar economic and social structures.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mighty Experiment: the Transition from Slavery To
    A MIGHTY EXPERIMENT: THE TRANSITION FROM SLAVERY TO FREEDOM IN JAMAICA, 1834-1838 by ELISABETH GRIFFITH-HUGHES (Under the Direction of Peter C. Hoffer) ABSTRACT When Britain abolished slavery, in 1834, it did not grant immediate freedom to the slaves, but put in place an apprenticeship period of four to six years depending upon occupation designation. This period, along with compensation of 6 million pounds, was awarded to the planters for their property losses. It was meant to be used to "socialize" the former slaves and convert them from enslaved to wage labor. The British government placed the task of overseeing the apprenticeship period in the hands of a force of stipendiary magistrates. The power to punish the work force was taken from the planters and overseers and given to the magistrates who ruled on the complaints brought by planters, overseers, and apprentices, meted out punishments, and forwarded monthly reports to the governors. Jamaica was the largest and most valuable of the British West Indian possessions and consequently the focus of attention. There were four groups all with a vested interest in the outcome of the apprenticeship experiment: the British government, the Jamaican Assembly, the planters, and the apprentices. The thesis of this work is that rather than ameliorating conditions and gaining the cooperation they needed from their workers, the planters responded with coercive acts that drove the labor force from the plantations. The planters’ actions, along with those of a British government loathe to interfere with local legislatures after the experience of losing the North American colonies, bear much of the responsibility for the demise of the plantation economy in Jamaica.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Hull Slave Rebellions in the Discourse Of
    The University of Hull Slave Rebellions in the Discourse of British Anti-Slavery being a Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Hull by Gelien Matthews - BA - History September 2002. I Acknowledgments I am indebted to many individuals in bringing this body of scholarshipto the stage at which it presently stands. First, I must express my deepest gratitude to my supervisor at the University of Hull, Professor David Richardson. His unfailing concern for my well being, his support of every academic adventureI embarked on during my three years at Hull, his patient, candid and useful criticism of the preparatory drafts of the thesis and his astute suggestionsfor surmounting the challenges that I faced as a research student have been noted and deeply appreciated.I am also grateful to the meticulous scrutiny with which my second supervisor, Professor David Eltis of QueensUniversity Canada,perused the early drafts of chaptersthat form the basis of the present thesis. To the two secretarieswho servedProfessor Richardson during my stay at Hull, the ever-efficient Gill Craig and the very pleasant and helpful Vikki Magee, I say thank you. I am also indebted to the University of Hull for the Black Diaspora Scholarship that maintained me financially during my three-year studentship and to the School of Economics, University of Hull, which also contributed to my financial support. I say thanks also to the Phillip Reckitt Trust Fund for sponsoringpart of my researchtrip to Barbados, Jamaica and Guyana at the end of my first year of postgraduatestudies in 2000 and to Arnold Matthew Publications who also contributed generously to that David Nicholls research trip.
    [Show full text]