DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report on the Industry Stakeholder Forums Regarding ICB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Report on the Industry Stakeholder Forums Regarding ICB A REPORT TO Canadian Vintners Association Final Report on the Industry 21 St. Clair Avenue East Stakeholder Forums Regarding Suite 800 Toronto, Ontario ICB/CIC Product Labelling M4T 1L9 Tel: 416‐975‐4465 Fax: 416‐975‐1883 www.thestrategiccounsel.com November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Summary of Discussion with Wine Producers in Ontario, Quebec, and Nova Scotia 3 2 Summary of Discussion with Wine Producers in British Columbia 10 3 Overall Summary and Recommendations 16 SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION WITH WINE PRODUCERS IN ONTARIO, QUEBEC, AND NOVA SCOTIA 3 Summary of Discussion with Wine Producers in Ontario, Quebec, and Nova Scotia Introduction The Toronto forum was attended by 18 participants, including 16 industry representatives (Ontario, Quebec and Nova Scotia) as well as one representative each from CFIA and the LCBO. Both VQA and VQA/ICB (CIC) producers took part in the session. The full day session consisted of three morning presentations, followed by Q’s & A’s, and discussion. Afternoon breakout sessions divided participants into two groups to discuss labelling and the differentiation of blended and VQA/100% Canadian wines. At the end of the day, each group reported on their discussions and points of view, and provided final comments. The three morning presentations included: • Overview of the key findings from the interviews undertaken by The Strategic Counsel of producers and retailers; • Overview by the Canada Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) on country of origin labelling for wines and the regulatory environment for food labelling; and • Statistics and trends in wine consumption in Ontario, presented by the LCBO Vice‐President, Products, Sales & Merchandising. THE STRATEGIC COUNSEL C O N F I D E N T I A L 4 Summary of Discussion with Wine Producers in Ontario, Quebec, and Nova Scotia (Cont’d) Key Points from Presentations The CFIA representative made the point that the Agency is undertaking a food labelling modernization review and encouraged input from the CVA process be submitted to CFIA for review and possible incorporation into the new framework. The new labelling regulations will be drafted in early 2017 with a goal of being incorporated into law in late 2018. The presentation of LCBO research made a number of points that participants found relevant to the discussion: • VQA and ICB/CIC wines do not compete with each other; buyers are very different in demographics and in consumption patterns; • Both VQA and ICB/CIC categories continue to deliver significant year over year increases, by volume and dollar sales –a trend LCBO would like to see continue; • Average VQA wine price is $14.16 compared to $7.72 for ICB/CIC products, with almost all VQA wines are sold above $10 and most ICB/CIC wines are sold below $10 per bottle; • VQA wines are sold in 750ml formats, while the vast majority of ICB/CIC wines are sold in formats of 1.5L or larger; • Local and quality are key determinants in the growth of VQA product sales in Ontario; and • Price and brand recognition are of uppermost importance to ICB/CIC consumers, with appellation not being a key influence in wine selection. THE STRATEGIC COUNSEL C O N F I D E N T I A L 5 Summary of Discussion with Wine Producers in Ontario, Quebec, and Nova Scotia (Cont’d) Key Points from Presentations (Cont’d) In the morning discussion, many participants made the point that the debate around ICB/CIC labelling needs to be resolved for two reasons: there are more important issues that the industry should be dealing with, and any negative publicity within the industry hurts the entire industry because it creates confusion and distrust among the wine buying public. All agreed that using media was not the way to deal with the ICB/CIC labelling issue as it damages the reputation of all wines produced in Canada in the mind of the wine consumer. It was agreed that when there are public questions about ICB/CIC wine, it is detrimental to the future of both VQA and non‐VQA wines. In the afternoon, two breakout sessions (A and B) were facilitated by The Strategic Counsel to engage participant discussion. There was broad agreement on the following points: • The LCBO research indicating that ICB/CIC and VQA wines and wine consumers were very different, and represented two distinct wine buying categories, was correct; • The terminology “Cellared in Canada” is outdated, unclear and should be amended; and • Listing all countries of origin on ICB/CIC wines was not workable/realistic and was rejected as an option. THE STRATEGIC COUNSEL C O N F I D E N T I A L 6 Summary of Discussion with Wine Producers in Ontario, Quebec, and Nova Scotia (Cont’d) Value Statement Both groups approached the label discussion differently. Group A agreed that “Blended and Bottled in Canada” was a statement of fact and, as such, was an honest and transparent statement. It also demonstrated the value that ICB/CIC wines provide to the Canadian economy. Group A participants discussed whether including “and Bottled” in the value statement was necessary. Some felt “Blended and/or Bottled” might be more appropriate, but it was raised that permitting “Bottled in Canada” could allow for the bottling of a wine from one country to be included for sale in the ICB/CIC category and was rejected as an option. Group A also discussed removing “Canada” from the value statement and simply having “Blended and Bottled by (name and address of winery).” This approach was dismissed by Group A on the grounds that the economic value was truthfully added in Canada. Group B agreed that the label value statement should be simplified to read “Blended from …” removing any reference to Canada as it was known to be a point of contention with some in the industry. The group believed that “blended” was an accurate description of the value‐added process and the term would be clear for consumers. There was further suggestion that another acceptable alternative was to change the statement to “Blend of…”, which was also viewed as being very clear. THE STRATEGIC COUNSEL C O N F I D E N T I A L 7 Summary of Discussion with Wine Producers in Ontario, Quebec, and Nova Scotia (Cont’d) Country of Origin Statement Group A and Group B agreed that the country of origin portion of the label claim should be “from imported and domestic wines” which confirmed that the wine was made up of both imported and domestic content. Group A recognized that Ontario has a regulated content requirement of 25% for ICB/CIC wines and that other provinces did not have the same content regulations. This led the discussion to the value of establishing a content threshold for use of the term “from imported and domestic wines” on the label and, if the Canadian content was below the threshold, the label would claim “from international wines”. Ontario representatives suggested their 25% content threshold for the use of “domestic wines”, but there was no agreement on this point. Nova Scotia stated that this was unfair as it would restrict producers outside of Ontario from communicating that their blended wines include Canadian content which is available to all other food products sold in Canada. Group B agreed that the country of origin portion of the label claim should be “from imported (or international) and domestic wines”. Participants in Group B did not feel it appropriate to discuss specific thresholds as it is a provincial consideration. During the discussion, there was a suggestion put forward to use “from international wines” when a notable percentage of “domestic” content was not used in the blend. The majority of Group B representatives felt that this failed to adequately recognize Canadian content and that there is no federal audit process to monitor and enforce content. Group B discussed the value of including a voluntary statement, such as “Blend of Imported and Domestic Wines” on the principle display panel as additional information for consumers to recognize that this is not a 100% Canadian wine. This would help differentiate brands that have similar VQA and ICB/CIC wines. It was suggested that having shelving and signage that reflected the value statement on the wines would also help with addressing consumer clarity. THE STRATEGIC COUNSEL C O N F I D E N T I A L 8 Summary of Discussion with Wine Producers in Ontario, Quebec, and Nova Scotia (Cont’d) Conclusion When both groups convened, there was general agreement that the value statement “Blended and Bottled in Canada” was truthful and acceptable. Although general acceptance of Group B’s suggested “Blended by” or “Blend of”, there was resistance from some industry members and the LCBO, who felt that “in Canada” was accurate, truthful and recognized the economic contribution of the wines. There was significant disagreement over regulating a Canadian content threshold in order for a wine label to use “from imported and domestic wine” versus “from international wines”. THE STRATEGIC COUNSEL C O N F I D E N T I A L 9 SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION WITH WINE PRODUCERS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA 10 Summary of Discussion with Wine Producers in British Columbia Introduction The Penticton forum was attended by 16 participants, including 14 industry representatives (British Columbia, National) as well as one representative each from CFIA and the BC Liquor Distribution Branch (BCLDB). Both VQA and VQA/ICB (CIC) producers took part in the session. Key Points from Presentations The full day session consisted of three morning presentations, followed by Q & A’s, and discussions. The three morning presentations included: • Overview of the key findings from the interviews undertaken by The Strategic Counsel of producers and retailers; • Overview by the Canada Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) on country of origin labelling for wines and the regulatory environment for food labelling; and • Statistics and trends in wine consumption in British Columbia, presented by the BCLDB Executive Director of Retail Operations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Canadian Blended Wine Industry and Labelling Overview January 2017 There Are Two Types of Wines Primarily Produced in Canada
    Canadian Blended Wine Industry and Labelling Overview January 2017 There are two types of wines primarily produced in Canada: 100% Canadian (includes VQA and BC VQA) and International Canadian Blends. Together, they contribute an annual economic impact of $6.8 billion ($3.7B for 100% Canadian and $3.1B for blended wines). Blended wines are an important part of the Canadian wine industry, supporting over 10,000 jobs (direct and indirect) and purchasing more than 15,000 tonnes of Canadian grapes annually. International Canadian Blended (ICB) wines use the label “Cellared in Canada by (naming the company), (address) from imported and/or domestic wines” label designation must include domestic content to meet federal labelling requirements to ensure the label is not false, misleading or deceptive. Ontario regulations require that blended wines produced and sold in the province, contain a minimum 25% Ontario grape content. ICB wines are sold domestically to compete against imported wines in the value price category. For example, the LCBO reports that the average price of an ICB wine is $7.54, compared $13.25 for a VQA wine and $31.56 for a VQA wine in its specialty section, VINTAGES. Canada has a long history of blending domestic and imported wines. We are not unique, as blended wines are produced around the world, including major wine producing countries like Europe and the United States. Labelling of Wine in Canada Canada’s Food and Drug Act Regulations require wine labels to include “a clear indication of the country of origin,” while beer, spirits and all other food products can voluntarily indicate country of origin on the label.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory and Institutional Developments in the Ontario Wine and Grape Industry
    International Journal of Wine Research Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article OrigiNAL RESEARCH Regulatory and institutional developments in the Ontario wine and grape industry Richard Carew1 Abstract: The Ontario wine industry has undergone major transformative changes over the last Wojciech J Florkowski2 two decades. These have corresponded to the implementation period of the Ontario Vintners Quality Alliance (VQA) Act in 1999 and the launch of the Winery Strategic Plan, “Poised for 1Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Pacific Agri-Food Research Greatness,” in 2002. While the Ontario wine regions have gained significant recognition in Centre, Summerland, BC, Canada; the production of premium quality wines, the industry is still dominated by a few large wine 2Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of companies that produce the bulk of blended or “International Canadian Blends” (ICB), and Georgia, Griffin, GA, USA multiple small/mid-sized firms that produce principally VQA wines. This paper analyzes how winery regulations, industry changes, institutions, and innovation have impacted the domestic production, consumption, and international trade, of premium quality wines. The results of the For personal use only. study highlight the regional economic impact of the wine industry in the Niagara region, the success of small/mid-sized boutique wineries producing premium quality wines for the domestic market, and the physical challenges required to improve domestic VQA wine retail distribution and bolster the international trade of wine exports. Domestic success has been attributed to the combination of natural endowments, entrepreneurial talent, established quality standards, and the adoption of improved viticulture practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Wine Tourism Insight
    Wine Tourism Product BUILDING TOURISM WITH INSIGHT WINE October 2009 This profile summarizes information on the British Columbia wine tourism sector. Wine tourism, for the purpose of this profile, includes the tasting, consumption or purchase of wine, often at or near the source, such as wineries. Wine tourism also includes organized education, travel and celebration (i.e. festivals) around the appreciation of, tasting of, and purchase of wine. Information provided here includes an overview of BC’s wine tourism sector, a demographic and travel profile of Canadian and American travellers who participated in wine tourism activities while on pleasure trips, detailed information on motivated wine travellers to BC, and other outdoor and cultural activities participated in by wine travellers. Also included are overall wine tourism trends as well as a review of Canadian and US wine consumption trends, motivation factors of wine tourists, and an overview of the BC wine industry from the supply side. Research in this report has been compiled from several sources, including the 2006 Travel Activities and Motivations Study (TAMS), online reports (i.e. www.winebusiness.com), Statistics Canada, Wine Australia, (US) Wine Market Council, Winemakers Federation of Australia, Tourism New South Wales (Australia) and the BC Wine Institute. For the purpose of this tourism product profile, when describing results from TAMS data, participating wine tourism travellers are defined as those who have taken at least one overnight trip in 2004/05 where they participated in at least one of three wine tourism activities (1) Cooking/Wine tasting course; (2) Winery day visits; or (3) Wine tasting school.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Wine's Share of LCBO Sales 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Value Share 50.0% Volume Share 40.0% 30.0% Relative Price 20.0% 10.0% 0.0%
    AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF WINE ECONOMISTS AAWE WORKING PAPER No. 191 Economics THE COMPETITIVE POSITION OF ONTARIO’S WHITE TABLE WINES Paul R. Masson www.wine-economics.org Jan 2016 AAWE Working Papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been subject to a peer review process. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Association of Wine Economists AAWE. © 2016 by the author(s). All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. The Competitive Position of Ontario’s White Table Wines Paul R. Masson, Weatherstone Consulting and University of Toronto1 Abstract Canada has a small, but vibrant winemaking industry. Since the US-Canada Free Trade Agreement (FTA), which went into effect in 1987, growers have shifted to vinifera grapes and modern winemaking techniques and there has been an explosion in the number of wineries, which number about 150 in the Niagara peninsula alone. However, their share of the Ontario wine market, which fell with free trade, has continued to decline. This paper delves into the reasons for the downward trend. Ontario provides a unique source of data on the wine market, since a single price for each wine is enforced by the Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO). The paper analyses data downloaded from the LCBO’s website at the end of 2012 for all Ontario white table wines available for sale, and for wines from both “old world” (France and Italy) and “new world” (Argentina and Chile) wine producers.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion Paper Series
    Discussion Paper Series #2004-15 Learning, Innovation And Cluster Growth A Study Of Two Inherited Organizations In The Niagara Peninsula Wine Cluster Lynn K. Mytelka Haeli Goertzen July 2004 United Nations Un iversity, Institute for New Technologies, Keizer Karelplein 19, 6211 TC Maastricht, The Net1h erlands Tel: (31) (43) 350 6300, Fax: (31) (43) 350 6399, e-mail: [email protected], URL: http://www.intech.unu.edu LEARNING, INNOVATION AND CLUSTER GROWTH A STUDY OF TWO INHERITED ORGANIZATIONS IN THE NIAGARA PENINSULA WINE CLUSTER Lynn K. Mytelka Haeli Goertzen Abstract This paper applies an innovation system framework to analyze the development of a natural resource-based system of innovation within the wine cluster in the Niagara Peninsula in Canada. A variety of policies shape the parameters (financial, fiscal, legal) within which opportunities for innovation open or are constrained and choices are made. Two of these have led to inherited organizations that have created contradictory incentives for innovation and growth in the cluster. On the input side, it is often said that great wines are ‘grown in the vineyard’ and the demand for innovation in the grape sector, thus depends upon the relationship between clients, in this case, vintners and their suppliers of grapes. That relationship is a learned one and the interactions within the Ontario Grape Growers Marketing Board (OGGMB), now the Ontario Grape Growers (OGG) have had a powerful, and not always positive, impact on the innovation process. With regard to outputs, policies affecting the sale and distribution of wine as administered through the Liquor Control Board of Ontario have created a ‘glass ceiling’ that is a disincentive for growth and innovation among small wineries.
    [Show full text]
  • Manufacturing 'Authenticity' a CASE STUDY of the NIAGARA WINE CLUSTER
    Manufacturing 'Authenticity' A CASE STUDY OF THE NIAGARA WINE CLUSTER Caroline Charest Interdisciplinary MA Program in Popular Culture Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts, Brock University © Caroline Charest, October 2009 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawaONK1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-64571-0 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-64571-0 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation. without the author's permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016-2017
    Annual Report 2016-2017 Table of Contents 3 4 6 7 7 8 11 13 15 16 17 CVA initiatives in support of Canadian winery success and prosperity All Canadian wineries and stakeholders are encouraged to share information on Canada’s Low‐Risk Drinking Guidelines (LRDG). CVA has developed the websites winemoderation.ca and vinmoderee.ca to provide consistent, wine‐specific LRDG information to the public. We strongly encourage your business to include a link to these sites from your website land media socia pages (custom images and buttons are available from CVA). Canadian Vintners Association Annual Report 2016-2017 2 The past year was very busy for the Canadian Vintners Association, as it continues to work hard to push forward the issues of critical importance to the Canadian wine industry. In an industry where there are often diverse interests, the CVA has worked hard to create unity and strives for consensus within the industry at all opportunities. Of primary importance was addressing how wine blended and bottled in Canada is labelled. An issue that has impassioned some for many years, the consultation that the CVA coordinated and facilitated has now resulted in a new designation “International blend from imported and domestic wines” under review by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency for implementation. I am proud to say that the CVA has experienced its largest ever growth in membership this past year, with 11 members joining in both in the winery and associate category. Many strategic objectives were addressed over the past year. Some of the
    [Show full text]
  • British Columbia Wine Institute
    British Columbia Wine Institute 2018 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS 1 A Message from the Chair and President/CEO 2 Vision, Mission, Core Values, Visionary Goals & Objectives 8 Membership & Industry Communications Objectives, Evaluations & Highlights 14 Marketing Objectives, Evaluations & Highlights 20 Tourism Objectives, Evaluations & Highlights 22 Media Objectives, Evaluations & Highlights 30 International Markets Objective, Evaluation & Highlights 32 Advocacy Objectives, Evaluations & Highlights 34 2017 Vintage Report 40 Category Update 42 BCWI Structure 44 BCWI Staff 46 BCWI Member Wineries 48 BC VQA Wine Stores A MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR AND PRESIDENT/CEO It is our pleasure to present the British Columbia Wine growing three times faster than the global average) are an Institute Fiscal 2018 Annual Report. The Wines of British ongoing reminder of the fierce competition our industry Columbia represent the diversity, passion, and vision of our faces. Currently, Canada has the lowest market sales share wineries and our wine regions evidenced by the data in this (32.6%) of any wine producing country. report. Wine production remains one the highest value-added This past year has been an incredible success for the commodities in BC agriculture; the economic impact of wine BC wine industry highlighted with ending the fiscal year is realized through the whole value chain from grapegrowing (March 2018) with market share for litres of BC VQA Wine to wine production to retail and tourism. It is another reason sold in the province at an all-time high of 18.19% - a 7.44% why we must remain resolute and focused on ensuring growth over same period the previous year.
    [Show full text]
  • June 23, 2010
    ANDREW PELLER LIMITED ANDREW PELLER LIMITÉE ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM JUNE 23, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM # ITEM PAGE 1 FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION 3 2 CORPORATE STRUCTURE 3 3 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS 4 4 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS 5 5 DIVIDEND POLICY 13 6 DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE 13 7 MARKET FOR SECURITIES 13 8 DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS 14,15 9 TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR 15 10 INTEREST OF EXPERTS 15 11 REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE 15 12 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 16 13 SCHEDULE “A” 17 2 FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION Certain statements in this Annual Information Form (“AIF”) may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of applicable securities laws, including the “safe harbour” provisions of the Securities Act (Ontario) with respect to Andrew Peller Limited (“APL” or the “Company”) and its subsidiaries. Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements about the growth of the business in light of the Company’s acquisitions; its launch of new premium wines; sales trends in foreign markets; trends in capital expenditures and sales and marketing expenses of the Company; its investments in vineyards; its supply of domestically grown grapes; international grape surplus and price discounting; consumer demand; and current economic conditions. These statements are subject to certain risks, assumptions and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements. The words “believe”, “plan”, “intend”, “estimate”, “expect” or “anticipate” and similar expressions, as well as future or conditional verbs such as “will”, “should”, “would” and “could” and similar verbs often identify forward-looking statements.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the LCBO and the Ontario Wine Industry
    1 Going Local: An Examination of the LCBO and the Ontario Wine Industry Winemaking and the wine industry has seen many evolutions and revolutions since its first appearance in early civilization. From the mastery and history of the Old World in Europe to the high-tech artistry of the New World, like Australia and California, to amateur winemakers working out of their basements, the wine industry has taken many different forms. It is a cultural and economic driver and its deep connections to regions and appellations instill pride amongst local inhabitants. Many studies on the wine industry revolve around its transition into the New World and the global acceptance of New World wines. Others focus on the marketing and promotional tactics utilized by small, family operated wineries. While these studies provide great insight, there has been little work regarding specific unique factors that some wine regions face exclusively. The Ontario wine industry in Canada is part of the New World of wineries and is amassed with many small operations; however it is a unique topic amongst wine research with unique problems unlike that of any other region. Once thought of as a region that would never be able to produce quality wine from its own land, the Ontario wine industry has seen many evolutions, just as the global wine industry has. Ontario wines have since proven the naysayers of the Old World wrong as they have received overwhelming amounts of international awards and accolades for its traditional varietals, its unique hybrids, and its highly sought after Icewines. However, Ontario residents still seem to be reluctant to put their faith in the local industry as Ontario wines only represent 42% of Ontario wine sales, with the remaining 58% being controlled by a highly competitive import market.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wine Industry in British Columbia: Issues and Potential
    AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF WINE ECONOMISTS AAWE WORKING PAPER No. 89 Business THE WINE INDUSTRY IN BRITISH COLUMBIA: ISSUES AND POTENTIAL Andy Hira and Alexis Bwenge August 2011 www.wine-economics.org The Wine Industry in British Columbia: Issues and Potential by Andy Hira and Alexis Bwenge Simon Fraser University, Dept. of Political Science Contact: [email protected] August 2011 1 Table of Contents Contents Executive Summary............................................................................................................ 4 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 5 The Recent Creation of the OKV Wine Industry- Market Trends and Policy Responses.. 6 Map of Okanagan Valley............................................................................................ 6 Transformation through the NAFTA............................................................................ 16 Support Institutions........................................................................................................... 19 Current Industry Issues ..................................................................................................... 23 Introduction................................................................................................................... 23 Market Conditions and Vulnerabilities......................................................................... 25 Figure Growth in BC and National Demand ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Segmenting Wine Market: California Red and White Wine Retail Prices in British Columbia
    1 Segmenting Wine Market: California Red and White Wine Retail Prices in British Columbia R.Carew1, W. J. Florkowski2 and T. Meng3 1Agriculture and Agri-food Canada, Pacific Agri-food Research Centres, Summerland, British Columbia (Retired); E-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Griffin Campus, Georgia, United States of America; E-mail: [email protected] 3 Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); E- mail: [email protected] Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the 2016 Agricultural & Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting, Boston, Massachusetts, July 31-August 2 Copyright 2016 by Richard Carew, Wojciech. J. Florkowski and Ting Meng. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. 2 Abstract Previous hedonic wine studies have employed conventional regression models to show the effects of objective and subjective attributes such as sensory characteristics, expert quality panel assessments, and regional reputation on wine prices. This paper employs a market segmentation approach based on price to show how lower, mid-priced and higher priced California red and white wines sold in British Columbia (BC) are influenced by objective attributes including geographical origin, grape variety, family brand names, alcohol content, and volume sales. Results show that red and white wine prices are segmented differently and the price segments for either wine type vary from those reported by earlier studies. Also, the effects of numerous attributes on wine prices vary significantly across wine types and price segments.
    [Show full text]