Original Article Role of RHOT1 on Migration and Proliferation of Pancreatic Cancer
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Am J Cancer Res 2015;5(4):1460-1470 www.ajcr.us /ISSN:2156-6976/ajcr0006366 Original Article Role of RHOT1 on migration and proliferation of pancreatic cancer Qingqing Li1*, Lei Yao2*, Youzhen Wei2, Shasha Geng1, Chengzhi He3, Hua Jiang1 Departments of 1Geriatrics, 2Research Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200120, China; 3Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Digestive Diseases, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China. *Equal contributors. Received January 26, 2015; Accepted March 12, 2015; Epub March 15, 2015; Published April 1, 2015 Abstract: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most malignant tumors. Rho GTPases can affect several types of hu- man cancers, including PC. In this study, we investigated the role of Ras homolog family member T1 (RHOT1), a new member of Rho GTPases in PC. IHC results showed that RHOT1 was expressed significantly higher in PC tissues than paracancerous tissues (P<0.01) and SMAD family member 4 (SMAD4) was expressed lower in PC tissues (P<0.01). RHOT1 was widely expressed in PC cell lines analyzed by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR), real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and western blotting (WB). SiRNA-RHOT1 significantly suppressed the proliferation and migration of SW1990 cells. Moreover, SMAD4 was identified as an effector of RHOT1. Our findings suggest that RHOT1 can regulate cell migration and proliferation by suppressing the expression of SMAD4 in PC, which may provide a novel sight to explore the mechanism and therapeutic strategy for PC. Keywords: RHOT1, SMAD4, proliferation, migration, pancreatic cancer Introduction and invasion ability of cancer cells [7]. The depletion of RhoB, another Rho family member, Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most malig- may lead to a decrease in migration and inva- nant tumors and ranks as the fourth leading sion of prostate cancer cells [8]. In this study, cause of cancer-related deaths [1]. In 2011, a we focused on the Ras homolog family member total of 44,030 new PC cases and 37,660 T1 (RHOT1), also named mitochondrial Rho PC-related deaths occurred in the United States (MIRO-1), which is a new member of Rho [2]. Due to its late diag nosis, highly aggressive GTPases and was reported to be involved in behavior and ineffective treatments, the 5-year mitochondrial transport [9], lymphocyte migra- survival rate of PC is less than 5% [3]. Therefore, tion and polarity [10]. Furthermore, mutations more accurate and reliable biological markers in the sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1) gene of need to be identified to facilitate earlier detec- Paget’s disease were associated with gene tion and better drug targets. Furthermore, ther- expression of RHOT1 which may contribute to apeutic strategies should be developed for dis- the over activity of osteoclasts [11]. However, ease treatment. The key to attaining these the role of RHOT1 in cancer is still elusive. objectives is to understand the molecular mechanisms related to the pathogenesis of PC. In the current work, we attempt to shed light on the molecular mechanism of RHOT1 in PC. Multiple key genetic mutations and environ- First, the expression level of RHOT1 was con- mental factors contribute to tumor initiation firmed in PC tissues and PC cell lines. Then, and progression, some proteins including Ras RHOT1 down-regulation assay was performed homolog family (Rho) GTPases have been iden- to detect proliferation and migration in the PC tified as crucial players in the proliferation, cell line. Finally, SMAD family member 4 invasion and survival of various cancer cells (SMAD4) was identified as one of the main [4-6]. RhoA, a Rho family member, plays impor- effectors of RHOT1. Our study provides new tant roles in the morphology, migration speed insights into the role of RHOT1 in PC and sug- Role of RHOT1 in pancreatic cancer Table 1. Primers used for RT-PCR and RT-qPCR analyses utes. Afterwards, the sections were in- cubated with antibodies against RHOT1 Forward primer (5’-3’) Amplicon Gene Ta (°C)a (1:15) or SMAD4 (1:15) respectively Reverse primer (5’-3’) size (bp) overnight. The sections were washed RHOT1 F: GGGAGGAACCTCTTCTGGA 60 105 with TBST and incubated with peroxi- R: ATGAAGAAAGACGTGCGGAT dase-conjugated affinipure goat anti- GAPDH F: TGCACCACCAACTGCTTAGC 60 87 rabbit antibody for 1 hour. Finally, the R: GGCATGGACTGTGGTCATGAG sections were incubated with 3, 3’-di- SMAD4 F: GCTGCTGGAATTGGTGTTGATG 60 108 aminobenzidine (DAB) chromogen and R: AGGTGTTTCTTTGATGCTCTGTCT counterstained with hematoxylin (Sig- P53 F: TCAACAAGATGTTTTGCCAACTG 60 118 ma, USA). Stained sections were visual- R: ATGTGCTGTGACTGCTTGTAGATG ized and photographed using a Leica P16 F: CCCTCGTGCTGATGCTACTG 60 72 microscope (Leica Microsystems, Ger- many). The IHC scoring systems was R: CATCATGACCTGGTCTTCTAGGAA used as previously described [12]. Two Kras F: ACAGAAGTGGAGGATGCTTT 60 100 pathologists scored the sections in a R: TTTCACACAGCCAGGAGTCTT double-blind manner. aannealing temperature for PCR amplification. Cell culture Table 2. Sequence of oligonucleotides used in Human PC cell lines AsPC-1, BxPC-3, CFPAC-1, this study PANC-1 and SW1990 were purchased from the Oligonucleotides Sequence (5’-3’) Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China. Cell lines Capan- siRNA1-RHOT1-S GCACUACUGAAUUAAAUCAdTdT 2 and JF305 were obtained from the Tumor siRNA1-RHOT1-AS UGAUUUAAUUCAGUAGUGCdTdT Marker Research Center, Beijing, China. AsPC- siRNA2-RHOT1-S CACGACUUAUUUAGAUGUAdTdT 1, BxPC-3, Capan-2, JF305 and SW1990 were siRNA2-RHOT1-AS UACAUCUAAAUAAGUCGUGdTdT all cultured in RPMI 1640 (GIBCO, USA). PANC-1 siRNA3-RHOT1-S CAACACUUUAUGGACAGCAdTdT and CFPAC-1 were cultivated in high glucose siRNA3-RHOT1-AS UGCUGUCCAUAAAGUGUUGdTdT DMEM (GIBCO, USA) and IMDM (GIBCO, USA), siRNA-NC-S UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUdTdT respectively. All media were supplemented with siRNA-NC-AS ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAAdTdT 10% fetal bovine serum (GIBCO, USA), and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (GIBCO, USA). The cell lines were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 and gests RHOT1 may be a potential target for the sub-cultured when the cells reached 80%-90% diagnosis and treatment of PC. confluence. Otherwise, the media were repl- aced every 2 days. Materials and methods RNA extraction, reverse transcription PCR and Samples collection and immunohistochemistry quantitative PCR (IHC) All volunteers for this study were recruited with Total RNA from PC cells was extracted using informed consent. Moreover, this study was Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) under RNase- approved by the committee on ethics of bio- free conditions, according to the manufactur- medicine research at Shanghai East Hospital, er’s instructions. All qualified RNA were reverse Tongji University. A total of 221 paraffin-embed- transcribed using the first strand cDNA synthe- ded pancreatic cancer tissues and paracancer- sis kit (CWBIO, CHINA). Reverse transcription ous tissues were selected from Shanghai Ea- PCR (RT-PCR) with Taq MasterMix (CWBIO, stern Hospital and Biobank Center of National CHINA) and real-time quantitative PCR (RT- Engineering Center for Biochip at Shanghai. For qPCR) with SYBR Green Master Mix (TOYOBO, IHC staining, the tissue sections were first JAPAN) assays were conducted to detect the dewaxed in xylene and then rehydrated with mRNA levels of target genes. All primers and graded alcohol solutions. Antigen retrieval was annealing temperatures are listed in Table 1. per formed by microwave heating the sections Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase in sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 10 min- (GAPDH) was used as the housekeeping gene. 1461 Am J Cancer Res 2015;5(4):1460-1470 Role of RHOT1 in pancreatic cancer Figure 1. The expression levels of RHOT1 in PC tissues. A. Characteristics of the 221 patients with PC. B. Samples paired T test was performed to analyze different expression of RHOT1 between cancer tissues and paracancerous tissues. **P<0.01, statistically significant. C. Immunohistochemical staining of RHOT1 in four patients. a, c, e and g showed the positive cytoplasmic expression of RHOT1 in cancer tissues; b, d, f and h showed the negative cyto- plasmic expression of RHOT1 in paracancerous tissues. All the four patients were in stage II. No. 1, 2, 4 patients are males, No.3 is female. Survival time of all these patients was less than 15 months after surgery. Each sample was performed in triplicate. Re- Small interfering RNA (siRNA) assay lative expression quantification analysis relied on the classical delta-delta-Ct method [13]. In order to choose the best effector, three can- didate siRNA pairs for human RHOT1 gene and Western blotting (WB) a negative control (NC) were designed and chemically synthesized by Biotend Biotech- Total protein from human PC cells was extract- nology Co., Ltd (Shanghai). All siRNA sequences ed, quantified, and subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE are shown in Table 2. SW1990 cells were trans- under denaturing conditions. The samples were fected with a candidate siRNA (final concentra- transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride mem- tion 50 nM) or a negative control using Lipo- branes (Millipore, USA). Membranes were blo- fectamine 2000 Transfection Reagent (Invi- cked for 1 h with TBS-T buffer (with 10% non-fat trogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s dried milk). Afterwards, membranes were incu- instructions. Then, RT-qPCR and WB were used bated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies to analyze the knock-down efficiency at various against RHOT1 (1:1000), β-actin (1:2000), or time points. SMAD4 (1:500). Then, membranes were washed 3 times with PBS-T buffer, followed by Cell proliferation and migration assays incubation in goat anti-rabbit secondary anti- body conjugated with horseradish peroxidase To assess the role of RHOT1 in cell prolifera- (1:5000; Life Science, USA) for 1 h at room tem- tion, SW1990 cells were plated in 96-well pla- perature. After washing with PBS-T 3 times, tes at a density of 1×105 cells in each well and immunoreactive proteins were detected using silenced with siRNAs. The number of cells was an eECL Western Blot kit (CWBIO, CHINA).