(1840), Derjugin Way the Colchis Region Proper

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

April 1990 Asiatic Herpetological Research Vol. 3, pp. 67-84 On the Independence of the Colchis Center of Amphibian and Reptile Speciation BORIS S. TUNIYEV 1 ^Causasian State Biosphere Reserve, Sochi, USSR Abstract. -The Colchis region of Western Transcaucasia is characterized by a rather uniform thermal regimen, corresponding to a subtropical climate. The Colchis forests contain an extraordinary abundance and diversity of tree, shrub, and vine species. The herpetofauna of the Colchis forests is surprisingly poor, despite its uniqueness. Key Words: Amphibia, Reptilia, USSR, Caucasus, biogeography. Introduction Often they are inhabited by the same species. The question is whether this fauna The herpetofauna of Western has appeared from the west or is it the Transcaucasia is not homogeneous, due to remainder of the fauna that has populated the different age and genesis of the species densely the shores of the Black Sea at one distributions. Along with autochtonous time. It is impossible to answer these and endemic forms, one can find species questions at the present level of our whose main areas of distribution are in the knowledge. But even now I can definitely European part of the USSR and in the say that this fauna by its origin, has nothing Eastern Mediterranean. At the same time, a in common with the faunas in other regions number of species which have main of the Caucasus." distributional centers in the Colchis occur beyond the bounds of Western In 1912, Satunin divided the Caucasian Transcaucasia, in other parts of the Isthmus into five subregions and 11 Caucasian Isthmus. For these reasons, it is districts, including the Colchis in the West- necessary to define the Colchis Transcaucasian district of the Littoral herpetofauna and to determine its place in subregion. the fauna of reptiles and amphibians of the Caucasian Isthmus as a whole. Among other merits of this work by Satunin, one cannot but mention the fact Research on this issue started with the that for the first time, he defined in an exact works of Nordmann (1840), Derjugin way the Colchis region proper. He defined (1899), Silantyev (1903), Brauner (1905), the northern border as the spurs of the Main and Nesterov (1911). However, the first Caucasian Range up to the basin of the well-grounded definition of the fauna in Tuapse River, the southern border as the question from a zoogeographical point of Pontic Range, and the eastern border as the view was presented in the works of Arsijanskij Range. The valley of the Rioni Satunin (1912). Satunin wrote in 1910, River and the adjacent southern slopes of "So far I cannot say much about the genesis the Main Range were defined as the central of the fauna of this region called Western part of the region. Satunin emphasized the Transcaucasia. This country with its depauperate herpetofauna of this region on evergreen plants and scanty fauna one hand, and the presence of endemic resembles a piece of the Mediterranean in species such as Vipera kaznakowi and the narrow sense of the word. True, here Bufo verrucosissimus on the other hand. are endemic species and forms, but not a single genus of vertebrate is unrepresented Nikolsky (1911) assigned the entire in the countries of the Mediterranean. Caucasus, excluding eastern Precaucasia, © 1990 by Asiatic Herpetological Research Vol. 3, p. 68 Asiatic Herpetological Research April 1990 to the Mediterranean. However, he could Colchis, however, was not distinguished as not differentiate the forest and the alpine an independent center of speciation in this belts of the Greater Caucasus, because of work. the absence of data. Scherbak (1981) included the Colchis in Results and Discussion the Caucasian Region of the Mediterranean Province. He suggested that the typical Investigations of the last decades made it species of the region were Mertensiella possible to add the majority of the species caucasica, Pelodytes caucasicus, Lacerta of the Colchis herpetofauna to an overall saxicola-complex and others. However, picture of Colchis faunal distributions the Colchis proper was again not (Turov 1928; Bartenev and Reznikova distinguished as an independent center of 1935; Khozatsky 1941; Milyanovskiy herpetofaunal formation. 1957; Bannikov et al. 1977; Negmedzyanov and Bakradze 1977; Orlova For the analysis of the herpetofauna of 1973, 1978a, 1978b; Golubev 1980, 1985; the Colchis proper, it is necessary to Tuniyev 1983, 1985). In addition there has exactly define the term "the Colchis been a revision of the taxonomic status of phytolandscapes", and to decide what types such forms as Vipera kaznakowi of vegetation are universally recognized as (Vedmederja et al. 1986; Orlov and "Colchis types". Albov (1885) was the Tuniyev 1986a, 1990 this volume), Lacerta first to clearly depict plant landscapes of agilis (Peters 1960), L. derjugini the Colchis. He singled out a region, (Bartenev and Reznikova 1931; Orlova unique for Russia, of mountain limestone 1978a ; Bischoff 1982, 1984), L. saxicola flora which had been developing mainly (Darevsky 1967; Darevsky and Vedmederja autochthonously in a large refugium with 1977), Anguis fragilis colchicus (Lukina numerous endemic and relict species and 1965; Scherbak and Scherban 1980), and even genera. Kolakovskiy (1980) regarded others. the Colchis flora as basically forest and alpine-meadow, and suggested that its main Accumulation of this information along phytolandscapes had existed since old times with works on fossil amphibians and with changes only in the composition of reptiles of the Caucasus (Vekua et al. 1979; their edificators, except for the extinct Chkhikvadze 1981, 1983, 1984; Bakradze formation of evergreen subtropical forests and Chkhikvadze 1977; Zerova and in the lower mountain belt. The tertiary- Chkhikvadze 1984; Yefimov and relict character of the forest mesophile flora Chkhikvadze 1987) have made it possible and vegetation is fully revealed here due to to revise the zoogeography of the region. slight changes in this region's climatic conditions (Kuznetsov 1891). The most Darevsky (1957) singled out seven characteristic features of the tertiary-relict different groups of species and subspecies Colchis forest are: extraordinary of the herpetofauna in the Caucasus, based abundance and diversity of tree and shrub on their origin. Among the species species, impossibility of singling out the representatives of the region of interest to dominant species (which is also us, it is necessary to pay attention to characteristic of tropical forest with extreme Lacerta strigata (Asia Minor species), density of trees), abundance of vines and Emys orbicularis, Anguis fragilis, epiphytes, and almost total absence of grass Coronella austriaca, Elaphe quatuorlineates cover. All these attributes make the Colchis sauromates, Natrix natrix (European boreal forest similar in many aspects to a tropical species), Testudo graeca, Natrix tessellata rain forest (Pavlov 1984). According to (Mediterranean species), Pseudopus Sinskaya (1933), the Colchis forest apodus, Coluber najadum (east- vegetation underwent three main stages of Mediterranean species), and Lacerta development: the tropical forest; the forest saxicola, L. praticola, L. derjugini, L. of Colchis type, but rich and covering a media (autochthonous species). The wider area; and last, the modern Colchis April 1990 Asiatic Herpetological Research Vol. 3, p. 69 forest. grusinica, Natrix megalocephala, and Vipera kaznakowi are Colchis endemics in The Colchis type of vegetation includes a the broad sense of the word. number of phytocenoses differing in structure, composition, and ecological In addition to the Colchis endemics, peculiarities: it may be mixed there are three more ecological-geographical (polydominant), or may be presented by groups of amphibians and reptiles in the cenosis of one or two species, but the region. They have similar ecological common and obligatory attribute of characteristics (habitat first of all), and phytocenosis of the Colchis type is an overlapping geographic distributions. abundance of tertiary relicts. The area with Colchis type vegetation is characterized by 1. The East-Mediterranean group a rather monotonous thermal regimen, consists of Triturus cristatus karelini, to a corresponding subtropical climate, but Testudo graeca nikolskii (Fig. 1 ), Lacerta with highly diverse soils (Gulisashvili et al. media, L. praticola pontica, L. strigata, 1975). Pseudopus apodus tracius, Natrix tessellata, and Coluber najadum. This The herpetofauna of the Colchis forests group's distribution includes either the is surprisingly poor, despite its uniqueness. Balkans and the Caucasus or the Balkans, The species composition is different in the Crimea, and the Caucasus. According to southeastern and northwestern parts of the ecological characteristics, these are Colchis compared to the other portions of xeromesophiles or hemixerophiles whose its territory. Species such as Mertensiella spreading is related to dry foothills of caucasica, Lacerta clarkorum, L. parvula, Western Transcaucasia up to 200-300 m and L. mixta, whose distributions are above sea level with an annual sum of connected with forests growing on acid temperatures exceeding 5000°C. Thus, soils above volcanic rocks, are found on Testudo graeca, Pseudopus apodus, and the western slopes of the Adzharo- Coluber najadum occur in the Colchis on a Imeretinsky, Shavshetsky and Lazistansky narrow seaside strip of land with enclaves (Pontic) mountain ranges. Similarly, of Mediterranean vegetation from Tuapse to floristic endemics
Recommended publications
  • Funeral Customs of Caucasian Estonians

    Funeral Customs of Caucasian Estonians

    FUNERAL CUSTOMS OF CAUCASIAN ESTONIANS Marika Mikkor Introduction Customs characterising a nation or an ethnic group, depend on the stage of development of the society, dominant religion and ethnic environment. In an ethnological study of settlers their origin, time of emigration and national composition of settlements should be taken into account. Of the Estonian villages of Caucasia the village of Estonia was founded in 1882 by the Estonians from the province (guberniya) of Samara, who had left Estonia in the 1850-1860s. The villages of Salme and Sulevi were founded in 1884 and 1885, respectively, by the peasants of Harjumaa, the village of Punase-Lageda was founded in 1886 by Estonians from the North-Caucasian settlement of Esto-Haginsky, who had left Estonia in the 1870s *1 (Võime 1980, 16-18, 21; Võime 1974, 120, 121). In the second half of the past century, in the conditions of arising capitalism, the first settlers of the villages were peasants whose resettlement was favoured by the tsarist government. In addition to the first settlers, new emigrants kept coming both from different regions of Estonia and from other Estonian settlements in Russia. At the same time, there were also leavers. Within the boundaries of one village there lived, side by side, people from different parishes and counties. Parochial belonging of Estonian settlers would be a separate topic of research. For example, in the village of Sulevi descendants of the peasants from Kuusalu and Rõuge parishes married each other. Settlements were founded as a result of Russian-Turkish wars in the 1860-70s on the lands abandoned by Abkhazian and Circassian people (Chursin 1956, 194).
  • Problems with the Drawing a State Border Along the River Psou Section

    Problems with the Drawing a State Border Along the River Psou Section

    Earth Science s 2015; 4(5-1): 60-67 Published online July 12, 2015 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/earth) doi: 10.11648/j.earth.s.2015040501.21 ISSN: 2328-5974 (Print); ISSN: 2328-5982 (Online) Problems with the Drawing a State Border along the River Psou Section Dali Nikolaishvili 1, *, Revaz Tolordava 2, Davit Sartania 3, Lali Kutateladze 2 1Department of Geography, Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences,Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia 2Department of Geography, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Healthcare, Sokhumi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia 3Museum of TSU, Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia Email address: [email protected] (D. Nikolaishvili) To cite this article: Dali Nikolaishvili, Revaz Tolordava, Davit Sartania, Lali Kutateladze. Problems with the Drawing a State Border along the River Psou Section. Earth Sciences. Special Issue: Modern Problems of Geography and Anthropology. Vol. 4, No. 5-1, 2015, pp. 60-67. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.s.2015040501.21 Abstract: The work deals with analysis of problems with the drawing a state border along the River Psou Section. The problem is difficult to solute due to the modern complex geopolitical situation in the Caucasus region, wrong decisions of the past and historical documents and cartographic sources with the inadequately shown reality. One of the major hampering factors is the state practice of territorial spacing of the former Soviet republics implying giving the state borders of a country having lost its independence a status of administrative borders. The main purpose of the study is to give the geographical-cartometry analysis of the historical transformations of the River Psou section of the Georgian state border.
  • The Rise and Fall of Communism

    The Rise and Fall of Communism

    The Rise and Fall of Communism archie brown To Susan and Alex, Douglas and Tamara and to my grandchildren Isobel and Martha, Nikolas and Alina Contents Maps vii A Note on Names viii Glossary and Abbreviations x Introduction 1 part one: Origins and Development 1. The Idea of Communism 9 2. Communism and Socialism – the Early Years 26 3. The Russian Revolutions and Civil War 40 4. ‘Building Socialism’: Russia and the Soviet Union, 1917–40 56 5. International Communism between the Two World Wars 78 6. What Do We Mean by a Communist System? 101 part two: Communism Ascendant 7. The Appeals of Communism 117 8. Communism and the Second World War 135 9. The Communist Takeovers in Europe – Indigenous Paths 148 10. The Communist Takeovers in Europe – Soviet Impositions 161 11. The Communists Take Power in China 179 12. Post-War Stalinism and the Break with Yugoslavia 194 part three: Surviving without Stalin 13. Khrushchev and the Twentieth Party Congress 227 14. Zig-zags on the Road to ‘communism’ 244 15. Revisionism and Revolution in Eastern Europe 267 16. Cuba: A Caribbean Communist State 293 17. China: From the ‘Hundred Flowers’ to ‘Cultural Revolution’ 313 18. Communism in Asia and Africa 332 19. The ‘Prague Spring’ 368 20. ‘The Era of Stagnation’: The Soviet Union under Brezhnev 398 part four: Pluralizing Pressures 21. The Challenge from Poland: John Paul II, Lech Wałesa, and the Rise of Solidarity 421 22. Reform in China: Deng Xiaoping and After 438 23. The Challenge of the West 459 part five: Interpreting the Fall of Communism 24.
  • Reflections on the Caucasus

    Reflections on the Caucasus

    REFLECTIONS ON THE CAUCASUS 21 MAY 1864 – 2010 CIRCASSIAN WORLD “I had a dream last night. I can’t tell it to you, because it was in Ubykh,” said the last speaker of the Ubykh language, Tevfik Esenç. When he passed away in 1992, the unique language of the the Ubykh people, the indigenous people of Sochi, where the 2014 Winter Olympic Games will be held, also died. This was one of the consequences of the fall of the Caucasus, which was celebrated by the Russian armies with triumphalism and a procession in the Valley of Kbaada, now called Krasnaya Polyana on May 21, 1864. What the 21st May brings to the mind of the Adyghes (Circassians), the Abkhazians, and the Ubykhs, who have been scattered all over the world and struggling to preserve their cultures and languages today, must be exile and genocide... But what do experts have to say about 21 May, about the Adyghes, Abkhazians and Ubykhs? And what are their thoughts? This project is the outcome of a desire of CircassianWorld.com, which has always tried to publicize academic works from the very day of its inception, to provide a platform for academics, researchers, politicians, journalists, and executives of NGOs from various countries to express their opinions about the 21st May, the North Caucasus, and its peoples. I would like wholeheartedly to thank all of the following people who have contributed to this project proferring their valuable thoughts for inclusion on this site. Metin Sönmez, CircassianWorld.com & AbkhazWorld.com Ed. The authors were given complete freedom regarding the content of their texts whose maximum length was specified as around one page.
  • Ventisettesima Riunione Del Consiglio Dei Ministri Seduta Di Apertura (Pubblica)

    Ventisettesima Riunione Del Consiglio Dei Ministri Seduta Di Apertura (Pubblica)

    MC(27).JOUR Organizzazione per la sicurezza e la cooperazione in Europa 3–4 December 2020 Consiglio dei ministri Tirana 2020 ITALIAN Original: ENGLISH VENTISETTESIMA RIUNIONE DEL CONSIGLIO DEI MINISTRI SEDUTA DI APERTURA (PUBBLICA) 1. Data: giovedì 3 dicembre 2020 Inizio: ore 10.15 Fine: ore 11.00 2. Presidenza: S.E. Edi Rama, Primo Ministro e Ministro per l’Europa e gli affari esteri dell’Albania, Presidente in esercizio dell’OSCE. 3. Questioni discusse – Dichiarazioni – Decisioni/Documenti adottati: Punto 1 dell’ordine del giorno: APERTURA UFFICIALE Il Presidente ha aperto ufficialmente la ventisettesima Riunione del Consiglio dei ministri dell’OSCE. Punto 2 dell’ordine del giorno: ADOZIONE DELL’ORDINE DEL GIORNO Presidenza L’ordine del giorno della ventisettesima Riunione del Consiglio dei ministri dell’OSCE è stato adottato ed è accluso al presente giornale (Annesso 1). Punto 3 dell’ordine del giorno: ALLOCUZIONE DEL PRESIDENTE IN ESERCIZIO DELL’OSCE S.E. Edi Rama, Primo Ministro e Ministro per l’Europa e gli affari esteri dell’Albania, ha rivolto un’allocuzione all’assemblea (MC.DEL/73/20 OSCE+). MC27IJ - 2 - MC(27).JOUR 3–4 December 2020 Punto 4 dell’ordine del giorno: ALLOCUZIONE DEL PRESIDENTE DELL’ASSEMBLEA PARLAMENTARE DELL’OSCE S.E. George Tsereteli, Presidente dell’Assemblea parlamentare dell’OSCE, ha rivolto un’allocuzione all’assemblea (MC.GAL/4/20). Punto 5 dell’ordine del giorno: RAPPORTO DEL SEGRETARIATO DELL’OSCE S.E. Tuula Yrjölä, Funzionario incaricato/Segretario generale dell’OSCE, ha rivolto un’allocuzione all’assemblea (MC.GAL/5/20). 4. Prossima seduta: giovedì 3 dicembre 2020, ore 11.00 via videoteleconferenza - 3 - MC(27).JOUR 3–4 December 2020 PRIMA SEDUTA PLENARIA (A PORTE CHIUSE) 1.
  • The Caucasus Globalization

    The Caucasus Globalization

    Volume 7 Issue 1-2 2013 1 THE CAUCASUS & GLOBALIZATION INSTITUTE OF STRATEGIC STUDIES OF THE CAUCASUS THE CAUCASUS & GLOBALIZATION Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies Volume 7 Issue 1-2 2013 CA&CC Press® SWEDEN 2 Volume 7 Issue 1-2 2013 THE CAUCASUS & GLOBALIZATION FOUNDED AND PUBLISHED BY INSTITUTE OF STRATEGIC STUDIES OF THE CAUCASUS Registration number: M-770 Ministry of Justice of Azerbaijan Republic PUBLISHING HOUSE CA&CC Press® Sweden Registration number: 556699-5964 Registration number of the journal: 1218 Editorial Council Eldar Chairman of the Editorial Council (Baku) ISMAILOV Tel/fax: (994 – 12) 497 12 22 E-mail: [email protected] Kenan Executive Secretary (Baku) ALLAHVERDIEV Tel: (994 – 12) 596 11 73 E-mail: [email protected] Azer represents the journal in Russia (Moscow) SAFAROV Tel: (7 – 495) 937 77 27 E-mail: [email protected] Nodar represents the journal in Georgia (Tbilisi) KHADURI Tel: (995 – 32) 99 59 67 E-mail: [email protected] Ayca represents the journal in Turkey (Ankara) ERGUN Tel: (+90 – 312) 210 59 96 E-mail: [email protected] Editorial Board Nazim Editor-in-Chief (Azerbaijan) MUZAFFARLI Tel: (994 – 12) 510 32 52 E-mail: [email protected] (IMANOV) Vladimer Deputy Editor-in-Chief (Georgia) PAPAVA Tel: (995 – 32) 24 35 55 E-mail: [email protected] Akif Deputy Editor-in-Chief (Azerbaijan) ABDULLAEV Tel: (994 – 12) 596 11 73 E-mail: [email protected] Volume 7 IssueMembers 1-2 2013 of Editorial Board: 3 THE CAUCASUS & GLOBALIZATION Zaza D.Sc. (History), Professor, Corresponding member of the Georgian National Academy of ALEKSIDZE Sciences, head of the scientific department of the Korneli Kekelidze Institute of Manu- scripts (Georgia) Mustafa AYDIN Rector of Kadir Has University (Turkey) Irina BABICH D.Sc.
  • The Abkhazia Border Within Russia According to 1989 Census Data and Politicized Linguistic Maps Prof

    The Abkhazia Border Within Russia According to 1989 Census Data and Politicized Linguistic Maps Prof

    Linguistic Situations in Conflict Regions – The Abkhazia Border within Russia according to 1989 Census Data and Politicized Linguistic Maps Prof. Dr. Tariel Putkaradze Before 1993 the majority of the autochthonous population of Abkhazia was Georgians. At the end of the 20th c. official and informal military troops of the Russian Federation expelled 350 000 Georgians and 30 000 Abkhaz from the autonomous republic. Some scholars try to provide the world with such linguistic maps of the site of this linguistic tragedy that suggest there are no and never had been any Georgian-speaking residents in Abkhazia. Below we provide the language situation description in north-west Georgia (We have referred to the official 1989 Soviet Union census data as basis for our argumentation). Keywords: Abkhazia, Linguistic Map, Linguistic Situation Abkhazia was historically a part of Georgia. Ten centuries ago it acted as a leading region for the development of the Georgian language spoken in united Georgia (Sakartvelo). Before 1993 the majority of the autochthonous population of Abkhazia was Georgians. Russia has always been interested in obtaining access to the Black Sea. That is why Russia has always tried to exile Georgians and Russian opponents from the historic territory of Georgia. The first ethnic cleansing took place in 1867 (nearly 40 000 Muslim Abkhazians were expelled in Turkey). The second cleansing occurred at the end of the 20th c. when 350 000 Georgians and 30 000 Abkhazians were driven out of the Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia. The presented problem is described based on the classification of the dialects of Georgians and those within their sphere of linguistic influence: Georgians have one centuries- old literary language – the Georgian/Kartvelian language – and more than ten varieties (dialects).
  • Обзорные Статьи ===Review Articles

    Обзорные Статьи ===Review Articles

    Nature Conservation Research. Заповедная наука 2021. 6(1) https://dx.doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2021.010 ============== REVIEW ARTICLES ================ ============= ОБЗОРНЫЕ СТАТЬИ =============== AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES IN THE CAVES OF THE GREATER CAUCASUS Boris S. Tuniyev1 , Alexander G. Koval2 , Robert S. Vargovitsh3 1Sochi National Park, Russia e-mail: [email protected] 2All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection, Russia e-mail: [email protected] 3I.I. Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology, Ukraine e-mail: [email protected] Received: 14.10.2020. Revised: 08.12.2020. Accepted: 10.12.2020. The present study is the first review of the recent herpetofauna of the Greater Caucasian caves. Also, it is worth noting some phossylous material on amphibians and reptiles (mainly Pleistocene remains) from the caves in this area. The goal of the study is to fill knowledge gaps and to present long-term data on the cave herpetofauna of the Greater Caucasus. In 1992–2019, amphibians and reptiles were found in 61 Greater Caucasian caves located in an altitude range from 55 m a.s.l. to 1300 m a.s.l. in Russia, Abkhazia, and Georgia. A total of 272 specimens representing ten species have been found. The most frequently observed species were Rana macrocnemis (39.0% of all recorded specimens), Pelodytes caucasicus (17.3%), Bufo verrucosissimus (11.0%), Darevskia brauneri (8.8%), Hyla orientalis (8.1%). The total proportion of the remaining five species Ommatotriton( ophryticus, Hyla savignyi, Pelophylax ridibundus, Anguis colchica, and Darevskia derjugini) was 15.8%. As a rule, representatives of the herpetofauna in the Greater Caucasian caves are quite rare and only single or few individuals are usually found.
  • Issues of State Language Teaching; Problems and Challenges

    Issues of State Language Teaching; Problems and Challenges

    saxelmwifo enis swavlebis sakiTxebi: problemebi da gamowvevebi Issues of State Language Teaching; Problems and Challenges 225 saxelmwifo enis swavlebis sakiTxebi: problemebi da gamowvevebi Issues of State Language Teaching; Problems and Challenges SHOTA RUSTAVELI NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Issues of State Language Teaching; Problems and Challenges International Conference IVANE JAVAKHISHVILI TBILISI STATE UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR CIVIL INTEGRATION AND INTER-ETHNIC RELATIONS Tbilisi / Batumi 14-15 July, 2011 225 saxelmwifo enis swavlebis sakiTxebi: problemebi da gamowvevebi Issues of State Language Teaching; Problems and Challenges Ekaterina Protassova University of Helsinki, Finland Multilingual Education in Finland (with a special focus on the Russian language) ABSTRACT The present article tries to connect the language education policy in Finland with its historical devel- opment. Finland has always been a multilingual country, and the combination of languages in the school curriculum followed the necessities of power and economics. The numerous successes in the in- ternational PISA competitions are explained through teaching of languages and mathematics at school. The current state of foreign and second language acquisition is demonstrated in depth through example of Russian in education. The historical perspective The first settlers came to Finland approximately 8.000 B.C., supposedly, following the melting snow of the ice age. The Finno-Ugric people arrived from the Ural area between Europe and Asia, and there were Bal- tic and Germanic speakers arriving from the shores of the Baltic Sea. The Swedes lived on the modern terri- tory of Finland for more than eight centuries, and vice versa, Finnish-speaking peoples moved to Sweden. Finland was part of Sweden until 1809, for 600 years.
  • Jemal Gamaxaria.Indd

    Jemal Gamaxaria.Indd

    SUPREME COUNCIL OF THE AUTONOMOUS REPUBLIC OF ABKHAZIA/GEORGIA In Hallowed Memory of All the Peaceful People Got Killed on the Both Sides in the Armed Confl ict INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY TO BRING A VERDICT ON THE TRAGEDY OF ABKHAZIA/GEORGIA Tbilisi – 2015 1 uak 32 (479.224) 34(479.224) I -69 Author of the project and Chief Editor - Jemal Gamakharia Editorial Board: Ketevan Chigogidze, Giorgi Dgebuadze, Tamar Japaridze, Anzor Latsuzbaia, Givi Lominadze, Tamar Sarjveladze, Mer- ab Turava. Consultant - Mindia Ugrekhelidze Reviewer - Anzor Tsotsonava Book Artist – Nugzar MgalobliShvili Editor-Publisher - Khvicha Kardava The materials refl ecting the ethnic cleansing and genocide against the peaceful Georgian population having place in the Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia/Georgia during and after the war of 1992 -1993 are published together with the relevant appraisals. In the book will be presented a list of names of innocent people (among them children, women and elderly people) being mercilessly and brutally killed by the Abkhazian occupants and separatists. Brief review of the political history of the Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia and processes having place there before and after the war are also included into the book. Legislative analyses of the crime being committed in Abkhazia against humanity using the medieval cen- tury methods is made on the basis of the Norms of the International Leg- islation and National Legislation. The psychological analyses describing the real reasons of genocide and mechanisms of cruelty and arbitrariness is also included in the present book. © Jemal Gamakharia, 2015. Technucal editor and image processing Levan Titmeria, Davit Chedia ISBN 978-9941-461-12-5 2 Contents Tragedy of Abkhazia/ Georgia - Holocaust N2 is still running on.
  • Amphibia: Anura)

    Amphibia: Anura)

    Nature Conservation Research. Заповедная наука 2018. 3(Suppl.1): 51–60 DOI: 10.24189/ncr.2018.053 DISTRIBUTION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF THE CAUCASIAN PARSLEY FROG, PELODYTES CAUCASICUS (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Spartak N. Litvinchuk1, Artem A. Kidov2 1Institute of Cytology of RAS, Russia e-mail: [email protected] 2Russian State Agrarian University – K.A. Timiryazev Moscow Agricultural Academy, Russia Received: 13.03.2018 Pelodytes caucasicus inhabits Turkey, Georgia, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Azerbaijan, and six regions of Russia (226 localities). The forest cutting strongly threatens its populations. Therefore, the frog is listed in Red Data Books of Georgia, South Ossetia, Azerbaijan, and the Russian Federation. Additional factors influencing the de- cline of P. caucasicus populations are destruction and contamination of suitable water bodies, clearing of forests from fallen trees, destroying of litter, mortality on roads, and preying by the introduced North American raccoon. Using of MaxEnt, we developed a species distribution model based on climate, landscape and land cover data to estimate the potential distribution range, ecological preferences and conservation status of P. caucasicus. Two precipitation parameters, annual precipitation and precipitation seasonality, had the highest contribution percent- age to the model (52% and 11% respectively). As a rule, suitable habitats for the species located in woodland mountain areas with annual precipitation ranged from 513 mm to 2376 mm. Drier regions to the north and south of the Caucasus limit its distribution. Key words: Caucasus, GIS modelling, MaxEnt, Pelodytidae Introduction the range of Mertensiella caucasica (Waga, 1876) The Caucasian parsley frog, Pelodytes cauca- in the Minor and Turkish Caucasus is basically coin- sicus Boulenger, 1896 (Fig.
  • Full Article in PDF Format

    Full Article in PDF Format

    Acta Historica Tallinnensia, 2019, 25, 37–68 https://doi.org/10.3176/hist.2019.1.03 SUUR TERROR JA ABHAASIA EESTLASED Aivar JÜRGENSON Tallinna Ülikooli Humanitaarteaduste Instituut, Narva mnt 29, 10120 Tallinn, Eesti; [email protected] Abhaasias rajati 1880. aastatel eesti külad Salme, Sulevi, Alam- ja Ülem-Linda ning Estonia. Peamiselt puu- ja teraviljakasvatusega jõuti kiiresti majanduslikult heale järjele. 1920. aastate algul opteerus suurem osa sealsetest eestlastest Eesti kodakondsusse, kuid vaid vähesed siirdusid Eestisse. 1937. ja 1938. aastal toimusid Nõukogude Liidus massirepressioonid, mille hammasrataste vahele jäid ka Abhaasias elanud eestlased. Artiklis on näidatud, missuguste operatsioonide käigus eestlasi süüdi mõisteti, mis olid peamised süüdistused ja kuidas neid ellu viidi. 20. sajandist jäid Euroopa ja maailma ajalukku mitmed oma kodanikke massiliselt represseerinud totalitaarsed režiimid. Hitlerliku Saksamaa, stalinliku Nõukogude Liidu, maoistliku Hiina või punaste khmeeride Kambodža hirmuteod oma rahva vastu on selles nimekirjas ilmekaimad. Stalini Nõukogude Liit ei saa- nud absoluutarvudes oma represseeritute osas vastu küll Hiinale, kuid suutis mitu aastakümmet külvata oma elanike seas hirmu, teadmatust ja segadust ning ruineerida ja hävitada omaenda kodanikke. Kui Hitleri Saksamaal olid repres- sioonid suunatud eelkõige juutide, slaavlaste, mustlaste, kommunistide jt konk- reetsete sihtrühmade vastu, siis Stalin kasutas terrorit valitsemise instrumen- dina, tema ainuisikuline võim oli suunatud Nõukogude riigi praktiliselt kõikide ühiskonnakihtide vastu, sõltumata nende nomenklatuursest, parteilisest või eriala- sest staatusest.1 Võimu hammasrataste vahele jäid ka Nõukogude Liidus elanud eestlased. Artiklis on vaatluse all repressioonid Abhaasia eestlaste kallal 1937. ja 1938. aasta massioperatsioonide käigus. Eesmärgiks on NKVD toimikutele, kirja- likele ja suulistele mälestustele tuginedes analüüsida repressioonide käiku, nende ulatust ning iseärasusi. 1 Тушурашвили О., Алавердашвили Д., Луарсабишвили Вл.