Recent Developments in Arbitration & Mediation Law
2I RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN ARBITRATION & MEDIATION LAW A Review of Recent Cases, Statutes and Rules Affecting the Practice of Mediation, Arbitration and Settlement Negotiation for Attorneys Practicing in Southern California May 7, 2014 ARBITRATION PANEL Rex Heinke, Partner, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP Deborah Rothman, Mediator-Arbitrator-Arbitration Consultant MEDIATION PANEL Christopher Blank, Attorney-Mediator Stephen J. Kessler, Mediator Gail Killefer, ADR Director, U.S. District Court, Central District of California Michelle Reinglass, Mediator, Judicate West MODERATOR & ADR SECTION IMMEDIATE PAST CHAIR Rebecca Callahan, Attorney-Mediator-Arbitrator SEMINAR LOCATION Orange County Bar Association Building 4101 Westerly Place, Newport Beach, CA RECEPTION / PROGRAM SPONSORS Christopher Blank Rebecca Callahan Stephen J. Kessler Lance LaBelle TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. ARBITRATION – SIGNIFICANT CASES 19 A. ARBITRATOR DISQUALIFICATION – REQUIRED 19 DISCLOSURES AND EVIDENT PARTIALITY (1) Background Statement re Federal Disclosure Standard 19 (2) Background Statement re California Disclosure Standard 23 (3) Conclusion 26 (4) Cases – Federal 26 (a) Court Upbraids a Former Appellate Justice for 26 Rendering an Arbitration Award “in Retaliation” and Vacates the Award Due to Evident Partiality in the Way he Decided and Handled the Disqualification Challenge – Ruhe v. Masimo Corp., Case No. 8:11-cv-734-CYC (C.D.Cal., Apr. 3, 2014) (Appeal Taken to the Ninth Circuit) (b) Business Relationships Between Arbitrators and Related 27 Parties to the Arbitration are Expected and Tolerated as a Trade-Off for the Expertise and Informality Which Knowledgeable Arbitrators Lend to the Process – Painters District Council 16 Local Union 24 v. Color New Co., 2013 WL 3992128 (E.D.Cal., Aug.
[Show full text]