arXiv:1808.09798v2 [physics.gen-ph] 29 Apr 2020 noteHgsfrinculns h parameter The couplings. introduced and Higgs-fermion space, is the Fock parameter into on Feynman-Stueckelberg operators the wavefunc- of (ii) c-valued fields are than variables rather except dependent tions QFT, to the identical (i) The is that SM notation. the for of and representation detail PM for the mod- both standard of [10] a monograph statement to ern referring brief freely (SM) a interaction. Model electroweak include Standard the sections to following here observed extended The been is now PM has [9]. as distances Field proper across Quantum inten- entanglement macroscopic unlike spin low PM, electron hand admits very other (QFT), the Theory at On optics 8]. [7, exception quantum sity sole in The anti-bunching phenomenon is [3–6]. every Stueckelberg Electrodynamics represent C. Quantum exception and of one [1] with Feynman can R. [2] of PM) (hereafter osntinclude not does ric simply t o ia pnr 6 owa isospin. weak to [6] spinors inequal- Dirac Bell’s Pauli-Lubanski for relativistic the the ity extend Finally, to used are [11]. matrices time in interference coordinate quantum explains local it since reality physical inbecomes tion < parameter upon τ real depend all same fermions the mechan- the for quantum wavefunctions relativistic The parametrized ics. of form the h aaerzdrltvsi unu mechanics quantum relativistic parametrized The h ersnainhr fteSadr oe sin is Model Standard the of here representation The g µν ∞ H LCRWA LAGRANGIAN ELECTROWEAK THE diag( = x h enegSlmLgag density Lagrange Weinberg-Salam the ena-teklegeetoekitrcin n isosp and interactions electroweak Feynman-Stueckelberg o xml,aDrc4sio wavefunc- 4–spinor Dirac a example, For . sa vn nsaeie h oet met- Lorentz The spacetime. in event an is ekisospin. weak pro Phys. tensor for equation Ann. wave s covariant spin single a admits providing Stueckelberg by and Feynman of mechanics quantum h lcrwa neato.Arltvsi elsinequa Bell’s relativistic A interaction. electroweak the 47 18).Ytsi nageeto lcrn cosma across electrons of entanglement spin Yet (1987)). 2447, yHensen by h opo wavelength Compton the ψ nageeti unu il hoyi etitdt space to restricted is Theory Field Quantum in Entanglement − ( ,τ x, τ 1 INTRODUCTION , . 1 ,where ), , 1 , )i etitdto restricted is 1) tal. et 345 τ -6(04) h omls setne eefo unu e quantum from here extended is formalism The (2014)). 1-16 , aigterange the having ( x Nature µ (for olg fErh ca n topei Sciences Atmospheric and Ocean Earth, of College ~ , /mc 526 µ 0 EA diitainBuilding Administration CEOAS 104 0 = o:013/aue179 21).Teprmtie re parametrized The (2015)). doi:10.1038/nature/15759, , R eg,S .SmesadR Werner, R. and Summers J. S. (e.g., ovli,O 73-53 USA 97331-5503, OR Corvallis, 4 hti,it is, that , , 1 rgnSaeUniversity State Oregon Dtd pi 0 2020) 30, April (Dated: , 2 −∞ , .F Bennett F. A. τ )or 3) has < r dnia otoeo h M e gi 1,p0.The p60]. [10, over again averaging see include SM, Lagrangians the fermion of those to identical are umn vrsaeieeatya nteS.Ta is, That SM. the in as exactly spacetime over summing eedn upon dependent Φ( otoeo h M e 1,p0.Tentto therein notation in example, The For self-interaction Higgs here. p60]. followed the [10, closely is See and SM. conventional is the of those to ubri o orpae elsewhere. replaced so not is number hi arnedensities Lagrange Their grangian τ a,tebr mass bare the lar, a h tnadvalue Standard the has SU density Lagrange the in is SM the from by supported are and currents. fields boson gauge the Higgs that the (2) from immediately follows It tnad(tan Standard v/ ig-emo opig.TeHgsgon tt op- state ground Higgs The erator couplings. Higgs-fermion r tnad hi otiuin otems La- mass the to contributions Their Standard. are , h emo aeucin Ψ( wavefunctions fermion The L h ag bosons gauge The h ag bosons gauge The swl ese n()blw h nydeparture only the below, (4) in seen be will As √ x (2) r lsia ed,alo hc r needn of independent are which of all fields, classical are ) S W = 2 iyfrDrcsiosi xeddhr to here extended is spinors Dirac for lity ∗ ut ftoDrcsios(.F Bennett, F. (A. spinors Dirac two of ducts L lim + − ( x opigcntn.Tewa iigangle mixing weak The constant. coupling rsoi itne a enobserved been has distances croscopic i T µ/ L = ) ∂ →∞ nlt,ars rirr separations, arbitrary across inglets, τ mass √ elcsteHgsgon tt c-number state ground Higgs the replaces L 2 V iesprtost h re of order the to separations like θ T λ G 1 W Φ = (Φ) nS oain[0 6][2.Tec- The [12]. p63] [10, notation SM in , r tnad si 1,p2.I particu- In p62]. [10, in as Standard, are ( .Mt.Phys. Math. J. Z x τ M = − + ) hi arnedensities Lagrange Their . T/ T/ W g W bosons gauge 2 W 1 2 − L ftecagdvco bosons vector charged the of /g µ µ HG M µ L L 2 2 ( nentanglement in and where , Φ F W G x ( etoyaisto lectrodynamics ( ) † x ( L ,τ x, B , + Φ x = ) HG and ) B , µ g µ + ) 28 2 ( λ ,τ x, x µ/ en needn of independent being , g is (Φ 10,2440- , n h ig field Higgs the and ) 1 lativistic L L 2 sthe is τ r,a indicated, as are, ) † √ HF HG Φ) aeae fermion -averaged λ ( 2 ( where ,τ x, x . U r identical are ) L τ 1 coupling (1) HF ) swl as well as , τ. dτ L g 2 o the for F sthe is µ W ( θ ,τ x, W (1) (2) τ ± is ) . 2 constant), as are the masses for the photon Aµ (Mγ = 0) In the case of the first quark generation, for example, (1) and the massive neutral boson Zµ (MZ = MW /θW ) [10, g = g is the diagonal matrix diag (gu,gd) . It follows p62-63]. from (8) that the invariant bilinear form Υ g Ψd 4x is independent of τ . The parametrized waveR equation for two fermion doublets is fermions D/ 1+1 D/ Θ(x, y, τ)+∂ g(1) g(2)Θ(x, y, τ) =0 , x⊗ ⊗ y τ ⊗ The Lagrange density for Higgs couplings to the first (9) generation of quarks and leptons is HF = Hq + Hl . where the wavefunction Θ(x, y, τ) is in general a sum For up and down quarks, L L L of tensor products of doublets such as the wavefunc- tions Ψ(x, τ) and Υ(y, τ). There are two coordinate times 0 0 Hq = guq ∆uR gdq ∆dR + h.c., (3) in (9), namely x and y . If the two-particle wavefunc- L − L − L tion Θ and hence (9) had not been parametrized, then e where integration with respect to either x0 or y0 would violate covariance. The parametrization of Θ , and integration of 0 ϕ+ ∆= + 0 , (4) (9) with respect to the parameter τ preserves covariance. i∂τ φ − where ϕ+ and ϕ0 are spin-zero Higgs wavefunctions “with τ IS PHYSICALLY REAL electric charge assignments as indicated”. [10], and where ∗ ∆ = iτ2∆ . Here, unfortunately, τ2 represents one of the three isospin matrices. Again, the Higgs vacuum oper- Consider the free propagation of, say, a massive elec- e ator i∂ in (4) replaces the Higgs vacuum c-number tron. That is, − τ ϑ v/√2 of the SM. The coupling constants gu and gd ≡ ′ ′ 1 0 ′ ′ are related to the rest masses of particles by m = g ϑ ψ(x , τ )= dx Γ (x x, τ τ)ψs(x, τ) (10) u u i Z + − − and m = g ϑ respectively. Combining and es- d d LF LHq tablishes that a free up-quark u, for example, obeys the 0 ′ ′ where Γ+(x x, τ τ) is the appropriate free influ- parametrized Dirac wave equation − − ence function [3, 13] for (5). Now suppose that ψs(x, τ) consists of two lobes in spacetime x, owing to passage ∂/ + g ∂ u =0 . (5) u τ through a slit. Then ψ(x′, τ ′) is the sum of contributions from the two lobes. If the lobes are coherent, then the For a plane wave u(x, τ)= u(0, 0) exp[i(p x + ̟pτ)], the 2 2 · contributions interfere. In particular, the spinor ampli- dispersion relation is p p = g ̟ . It is now assumed ′ ′ · − u p tude of ψ(x0 , x′, τ ′) will differ from that of ψ(y0 , x′, τ ′), √ that a fermion is “on shell” if ̟p = ϑ = v/ 2. Hence a and so there will be quantum interference in local coordi- free on-shell up-quark u(x, τ) satisfies the Dirac equation nate time [14]. Such interference has been observed in ex- periments with “double slits in time” [15]. As pointed out (i∂/ m )u =0 , (6) − u by Horwitz [11], the observations cannot be explained by integrating the conventional Schr¨odinger equation with where mu = guθ is the up-quark mass. Details of 0 the free wavefunctions, discrete symmetries and influ- respect to t = x as in [15] . If τ must be given a name then it should be “Newton’s universal time”, since it syn- ence functions may be found in [3]. The normalization factor here for the spinor amplitudes of a free electron chronizes events in spacetime rather than in space. 0 wavefunction is (Ep + mp)/2gemp where Ep = p and mp = ge̟p . A freep particle on mass shell propagates on WEAK ISOSPIN ENTANGLEMENT mass shell. If an initial particle in a scattering process is on mass shell (̟p = ϑ) then, as a consequence of the scattering field being independent of τ, the final particle The relativistic Bell’s inequality for an singlet of Dirac is also on mass shell. spinors is an elementary paraphrase [6] of the non- For any same-generation fermion doublets Ψ(x, τ) and relativistic development for a singlet of Pauli spinors [16, 12.2]. The covariant spin operator for Dirac spinors is Υ(x, τ) satisfying § γ a/ where aµa = 1, replacing the Pauli spin operator 5 µ − σj aj where aj aj = 1. The relativistic Bell’s inequality D/ + g ∂τ Ψ(x, τ)= D/ + g ∂τ Υ(x, τ)=0 , (7) for weak isospin requires only the definition of a covariant operator for weak isospin. The definition is as follows. it may be shown that The isospin doublets Ψ(x, τ) and Υ(x, τ) for same- ∂ ∂ generation fermions must respect their spin-statistics, (ΥγµΨ)+ Υ g Ψ=0 . (8) ∂xµ ∂τ that is, a two-doublet wavefunction Θ must be of the 3 form [1] E. T. Garcia Alvarez and F. H. Gaioli, Found. Phys. 28, 1529 (1998). 1 Θ(x, y, τ)= Ψ(x, τ) Υ(y, τ) Υ(x, τ) Ψ(y, τ) . [2] J. Lacki, H. Ruegg, and G. Wanders, E. C. G. Stueck- √2 ⊗ − ⊗ elberg, A Unconventional Figure of Twentieth Century (11) Physics (Birk¨auser, 2009). The two-doublet state is manifestly entangled in space- [3] A. F. Bennett, Ann. Phys. 345, 1 (2014). time, and the parametrized wave equation (9) in no way [4] A. F. Bennett, Found. Phys. 45, 370 (2015). restricts the separation x y of this entanglement. The [5] A. F. Bennett, Found. Phys. 46, 1090 (2016). [6] A. Bennett, “First quantized pair interactions, fermion loops and entanglement.” SU(2) spinor basis is τ µ−= 1, τ , τ , τ where again { 1 2 3} (2015), http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2310. the τj for j =1, 2, 3 are the Pauli isospin matrices. The µ [7] J. J. Thorn, M. S. Neel, V. W. Donato, G. S. Bergreen, dual basis isτ ˆ = 1, τ1, τ2, τ3 . An invariant inner R. E. Davies, and M. Beck, Amer. J. Phys. 72, 1210 { − − − } 4 product is provided, again, by ΨgΥd x for all positive- (2004). energy isospin doublets Ψ(x, τR) and Υ(x, τ) . The two [8] M. Fox, Quantum Optics, Oxford Master Series in Dirac spinor components of the doublets transform in- Atomic, Optical and Laser Physics (Oxford University dependently and covariantly in the usual way [17, Ch2], Press, New York, NY, 2006). while the doublets transform in the SU(2) representa- [9] B. Hensen, H. Bernien, A. E. Dr´eau, A. Reiserer, N. Kalb, M. Blok, J. Ruitenberg, R. F. L. Vermeulen, R. N. tion. Next, the Dirac matrices γµ are replaced with the µ µν Schouten, C. Abelle´an, W. Amaya, V. Pruneri, M. W. Pauli-Lubanski matrices X (p) = iL pν , where the ob- Mitchell, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, D. Elkouss, µν µ ν ν µ jects L = (i/4)(τ τˆ τ τˆ ) generate the SU(2) repre- S. Wehner, T. H. Taminuau, and R. Hanson, Nature − sentation of the Lorentz group [18]. The isospin operator 526 (2015). µ is then (2/mp)aµX (p), for any a such that p a = 0 [10] J. F. Donoghue, E. Golowich, and B. R. Holstein, Dy- and a a−= 1 . · namics of the Standard Model, 2nd ed., Cambridge Mono- The· spatial− extent of a static vector boson is its Comp- graphs on Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmol- ogy No. 35 (Cambridge University Press, 2014). ton wavelength and so the feasibility of a “weak Stern- [11] L. P. Horwitz, Phys. Lett. A 355, 1 (2006). Gerlach apparatus” seems remote, but parametrized rel- [12] v = M1/√h in the notation of [19]. ativistic quantum mechanics does admit unrestricted en- [13] A. F. Bennett, “First quantized electrodynamics,” tanglement of left-handed fermion doublets. (2014), http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.0750. [14] L. P. Horwitz and Y. Rabin, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 17, 501 (1976). CORRIGENDA [15] F. Lindner, M. G. Sch¨atzel, H. Walther, A. Baltuˇska, E. Goulielmakis, F. Krausz, D. B. Miloˇsevic, D. Bauer, W. Becker, and G. G. Paulus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, The DKP five-spinor preceding equation (78) in [5] 040401 (2005). should be [16] S. Weinberg, Lectures on Quantum Mechanics (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, ψ = (∂ ρ, ∂ ρ, ∂ ρ, ∂ ρ, mρ) , (12) 0 1 2 3 − 2013). [17] J. D. Bjorken and S. D. Drell, Relativistic Quantum Me- while equation (86) there should read chanics, International Series in Pure and Applied Physics (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1964). i [18] C. Itzykson and J.-B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory O(s, ξ) = exp ξγ0γ5/s . (13) 2 (Dover, Mineola, NY, 2005). [19] S. Weinberg, Phy. Rev. Lett. 19, 1264 (1967).
REFERENCES