Feynman-Stueckelberg electroweak interactions and isospin entanglement A. F. Bennett∗ College of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences Oregon State University 104 CEOAS Administration Building Corvallis, OR 97331-5503, USA (Dated: April 30, 2020) Entanglement in Quantum Field Theory is restricted to spacelike separations to the order of the Compton wavelength ~/mc (e.g., S. J. Summers and R. Werner, J. Math. Phys., 28, 10,2440- 2447, (1987)). Yet spin entanglement of electrons across macroscopic distances has been observed by Hensen et al. (Nature, 526, doi:10.1038/nature/15759, (2015)). The parametrized relativistic quantum mechanics of Feynman and Stueckelberg admits spin singlets, across arbitrary separations, by providing a single covariant wave equation for tensor products of two Dirac spinors (A. F. Bennett, Ann. Phys. 345, 1-16 (2014)). The formalism is extended here from quantum electrodynamics to the electroweak interaction. A relativistic Bell’s inequality for Dirac spinors is extended here to weak isospin. INTRODUCTION The gauge bosons Wµ(x),Bµ(x) and the Higgs field Φ(x) are classical fields, all of which are independent of τ . Their Lagrange densities (x) and (x) are identical The parametrized relativistic quantum mechanics LG LHG (hereafter PM) of R. Feynman [1] and C. Stueckelberg to those of the SM. See [10, p60]. The notation therein [2] can with one exception represent every phenomenon is conventional and is closely followed here. For example, the Higgs self-interaction in is of Quantum Electrodynamics [3–6]. The sole exception LHG is anti-bunching in quantum optics at very low inten- V (Φ) = µ2Φ†Φ+ λ(Φ†Φ)2 . (1) sity [7, 8]. On the other hand PM, unlike Quantum Field − Theory (QFT), admits electron spin entanglement across The fermion wavefunctions Ψ(x, τ) are, as indicated, macroscopic proper distances as has now been observed dependent upon τ. Their Lagrange densities F (x, τ) [9]. PM is extended here to the electroweak interaction. are identical to those of the SM, see again [10, p60].L The The following sections include a brief statement of the fermion Lagrangians include averaging over τ, as well as Standard Model (SM) freely referring to a standard mod- summing over spacetime exactly as in the SM. That is, ern monograph [10] both for detail and for notation. The PM representation of the SM is identical to QFT, except (x)= (x)+ (x) LWS LG LHG that (i) the dependent variables are c-valued wavefunc- T/2 tions rather than fields of operators on Fock space, and 1 + lim F (x, τ)+ HF (x, τ) dτ . (2) (ii) the Feynman-Stueckelberg parameter is introduced T →∞ T Z−T/2L L into the Higgs-fermion couplings. The parameter τ has physical reality since it explains quantum interference in It follows immediately from (2) that the gauge fields and local coordinate time [11]. Finally, the Pauli-Lubanski the Higgs boson are supported by τ-averaged fermion matrices are used to extend the relativistic Bell’s inequal- currents. ity for Dirac spinors [6] to weak isospin. As will be seen in (4) below, the only departure from the SM is in the Lagrange density HF for the Higgs-fermion couplings. The Higgs groundL state op- erator i∂ replaces the Higgs ground state c-number THE ELECTROWEAK LAGRANGIAN − τ arXiv:1808.09798v2 [physics.gen-ph] 29 Apr 2020 v/√2 = µ/√2λ, in SM notation [10, p63] [12]. The c- number is not so replaced elsewhere. the Weinberg-Salam Lagrange density The representation here of the Standard Model is in gauge bosons the form of parametrized relativistic quantum mechan- ics. The wavefunctions for the fermions all depend upon The gauge bosons Wµ and Bµ , being independent of the same real parameter τ having the range < τ , are Standard. Their contributions to the mass La- −∞ τ < . For example, a Dirac 4–spinor wavefunc- grangian mass are Standard, as in [10, p62]. In particu- ∞ L ± tion becomes ψ(x, τ), where xµ (for µ = 0, 1, 2, 3) or lar, the bare mass MW of the charged vector bosons Wµ simply x is an event in spacetime. The Lorentz met- has the Standard value MW = g2µ/2√λ where g2 is the ric gµν = diag( 1, 1, 1, 1) is restricted to R4 , that is, it SU(2) coupling constant. The weak mixing angle θ is − L W does not include τ . Standard (tan θW = g1/g2, where g1 is the U(1) coupling 2 constant), as are the masses for the photon Aµ (Mγ = 0) In the case of the first quark generation, for example, (1) and the massive neutral boson Zµ (MZ = MW /θW ) [10, g = g is the diagonal matrix diag (gu,gd) . It follows p62-63]. from (8) that the invariant bilinear form Υ g Ψd 4x is independent of τ . The parametrized waveR equation for two fermion doublets is fermions D/ 1+1 D/ Θ(x, y, τ)+∂ g(1) g(2)Θ(x, y, τ) =0 , x⊗ ⊗ y τ ⊗ The Lagrange density for Higgs couplings to the first (9) generation of quarks and leptons is HF = Hq + Hl . where the wavefunction Θ(x, y, τ) is in general a sum For up and down quarks, L L L of tensor products of doublets such as the wavefunc- tions Ψ(x, τ) and Υ(y, τ). There are two coordinate times 0 0 Hq = guq ∆uR gdq ∆dR + h.c., (3) in (9), namely x and y . If the two-particle wavefunc- L − L − L tion Θ and hence (9) had not been parametrized, then e where integration with respect to either x0 or y0 would violate covariance. The parametrization of Θ , and integration of 0 ϕ+ ∆= + 0 , (4) (9) with respect to the parameter τ preserves covariance. i∂τ φ − where ϕ+ and ϕ0 are spin-zero Higgs wavefunctions “with τ IS PHYSICALLY REAL electric charge assignments as indicated”. [10], and where ∗ ∆ = iτ2∆ . Here, unfortunately, τ2 represents one of the three isospin matrices. Again, the Higgs vacuum oper- Consider the free propagation of, say, a massive elec- e ator i∂ in (4) replaces the Higgs vacuum c-number tron. That is, − τ ϑ v/√2 of the SM. The coupling constants gu and gd ≡ ′ ′ 1 0 ′ ′ are related to the rest masses of particles by m = g ϑ ψ(x , τ )= dx Γ (x x, τ τ)ψs(x, τ) (10) u u i Z + − − and m = g ϑ respectively. Combining and es- d d LF LHq tablishes that a free up-quark u, for example, obeys the 0 ′ ′ where Γ+(x x, τ τ) is the appropriate free influ- parametrized Dirac wave equation − − ence function [3, 13] for (5). Now suppose that ψs(x, τ) consists of two lobes in spacetime x, owing to passage ∂/ + g ∂ u =0 . (5) u τ through a slit. Then ψ(x′, τ ′) is the sum of contributions from the two lobes. If the lobes are coherent, then the For a plane wave u(x, τ)= u(0, 0) exp[i(p x + ̟pτ)], the 2 2 · contributions interfere. In particular, the spinor ampli- dispersion relation is p p = g ̟ . It is now assumed ′ ′ · − u p tude of ψ(x0 , x′, τ ′) will differ from that of ψ(y0 , x′, τ ′), √ that a fermion is “on shell” if ̟p = ϑ = v/ 2. Hence a and so there will be quantum interference in local coordi- free on-shell up-quark u(x, τ) satisfies the Dirac equation nate time [14]. Such interference has been observed in ex- periments with “double slits in time” [15]. As pointed out (i∂/ m )u =0 , (6) − u by Horwitz [11], the observations cannot be explained by integrating the conventional Schr¨odinger equation with where mu = guθ is the up-quark mass. Details of 0 the free wavefunctions, discrete symmetries and influ- respect to t = x as in [15] . If τ must be given a name then it should be “Newton’s universal time”, since it syn- ence functions may be found in [3]. The normalization factor here for the spinor amplitudes of a free electron chronizes events in spacetime rather than in space. 0 wavefunction is (Ep + mp)/2gemp where Ep = p and mp = ge̟p . A freep particle on mass shell propagates on WEAK ISOSPIN ENTANGLEMENT mass shell. If an initial particle in a scattering process is on mass shell (̟p = ϑ) then, as a consequence of the scattering field being independent of τ, the final particle The relativistic Bell’s inequality for an singlet of Dirac is also on mass shell. spinors is an elementary paraphrase [6] of the non- For any same-generation fermion doublets Ψ(x, τ) and relativistic development for a singlet of Pauli spinors [16, 12.2]. The covariant spin operator for Dirac spinors is Υ(x, τ) satisfying § γ a/ where aµa = 1, replacing the Pauli spin operator 5 µ − σj aj where aj aj = 1. The relativistic Bell’s inequality D/ + g ∂τ Ψ(x, τ)= D/ + g ∂τ Υ(x, τ)=0 , (7) for weak isospin requires only the definition of a covariant operator for weak isospin. The definition is as follows. it may be shown that The isospin doublets Ψ(x, τ) and Υ(x, τ) for same- ∂ ∂ generation fermions must respect their spin-statistics, (ΥγµΨ)+ Υ g Ψ=0 . (8) ∂xµ ∂τ that is, a two-doublet wavefunction Θ must be of the 3 form [1] E. T. Garcia Alvarez and F. H. Gaioli, Found. Phys. 28, 1529 (1998). 1 Θ(x, y, τ)= Ψ(x, τ) Υ(y, τ) Υ(x, τ) Ψ(y, τ) . [2] J. Lacki, H. Ruegg, and G.