Roger Davidheiser

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Roger Davidheiser METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY ROGER DAVIDHEISER A special thanks goes to Rosecrans Avenue, without whose development this book This work is both a stinging indictment of the system by which we drive, would not have been possible. and — as written by an engineer — a proposal to vastly improve our lot with a new type of road — roadway that now appears both affordable and tech- The dozen signal controlled intersections, 11 of which are fully sequenced, in the nically feasible, that would change how we use a city, how we plan a city, three miles between the surf and the 405, have been an inspiration. and how we use energy. — The editors Praise for The Third Generation Roadway “Amazing in scope [the book] brings a breath of fresh air to urban gridlock [and] invites you to explore a future in which mass transit is conducted with individual vehicles, environmental sustainability, and operational safety.” —Michael A. Perovich Director, Caltrans District 8, 2005–2008; Senior Resident Engineer of I –110 Harbor Transitway and Viaduct, 1990 – 1995 “A vision worthy of serious consideration in addressing America’s 21st century surface transportation challenges” —The Honorable Daniel S. Goldin NASA’s longest-serving Chief Administrator, 1992 – 2001 “…better urban landscapes enabled by innovation in transportation The Third Generation Roadway … increased personal mobility in more sustainable cities promised by By Roger Davidheiser emerging technology … This work relays new possibilities in the realms of Copyright © 2011 by Roger Davidheiser land use and transportation studies.” All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any — Meredith Dang means except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in a review to be printed in a magazine, Land Use Transportation Coordinator, Houston-Galveston Area Council newspaper or newsletter without permission in writing from the publisher. The publisher takes no Member of the American Institute of Certified Planners responsibility for use of materials in, or for the factual accuracy of any portion of, this book. ISBN: 978-1-891118-66-8 Published by Wind Canyon Books PO Box 7035 Stockton, California 95267 1-800-952-7007 Email: [email protected] www.windcanyonbooks.com Book design: Jayme Yen Computer renderings: Jorma Beckstrom his book envisions a transportation system for people, massive numbers of people, all traveling their unique door-to-door routes, T all with their unique timing, and all in the comfort of their private vehicle. No trucks, no buses, no SUVs allowed. No stop signs, no red lights, no intersections. No transfers, no congestion. A transportation of people with time efficiency, space efficiency, and fuel efficiency. Automated, safe, pleasant to use. The writing argues that each of the transportation systems developed to date for people is doomed to failure. Doomed to failure when measured against the criteria demanded: speed, convenience, safety, capacity to serve many, freedom from congestion, ecological soundness, and cost. Systems included are the urban surface street, the urban freeway, and the “public” modes of bus, train, and subway. What we have today can be improved. While saluting the automobile and the automobile-based society, tri- umphs of the 20th Century enabling unparalleled mobility and freedom for the individual, the text will lament their obvious limitations. The auto- mobile, so amazing in the 20th Century compared to the horse and buggy of the 19th, is so pathetic in the 21st when fettered by urban roadway and then compared to advances which other machines have brought in the 21st. The automobile-based society is rightly accused of promoting urban sprawl, and of being incapable of supporting dense, livable urban com- munities. Freeways, consuming space and destroying neighborhoods, are clearly incompatible with a compact metropolitan landscape. Yet, world- wide, the automobile is on a path to quadruple in number by 2050. Surface streets and highways are categorized as 1st generation roadway largely built with modern techniques from 1900 to 1950. Freeways built with controlled access and interchanges to replace intersections are cat- egorized as 2nd generation and were largely built between 1950 to 2000. While these roadways continue to be built in areas into which cities and suburbs continue to expand, virtually no new construction continues in existing cities. The era in which they symbolized progress is over. Proposed is a 3rd generation of roadway for existing cities and suburbs; superimposed upon existing infrastructure, and using existing right-of- way. Small structures, supporting vehicles weighing only four times that of a human being, replace the huge elevated structures of the 2nd generation, built for vehicles weighing 400 times their most common user, the average human. Full, high capacity interchanges, also tiny in size by comparison to those of the 2nd generation, are to be built above the footprint of ordinary PROLOGUE 5 street intersections, and thus allow ubiquitous penetration of the urban a traffic light, each will read the book differently. To the academic it is a interior. All traffic flows without interruption. Reliable computer net- proof of principle or notional design. To the urban planner it is an idea to works, redundant sensors, electric motors, and speed-of-light communi- be measured against various proposals for future urban scenes. The politi- cations assume control from human drivers — those marvelously adaptive cian or sociologist may see a daunting challenge with potentially massive and versatile creatures also exhibiting variable, error prone behavior, with impact. But to a local or regional transportation department the detail is wandering attention and reaction times approaching a full second. The utterly, totally inadequate. More than a dream, less than a plan. Perhaps the computer drives the new roadway; the individual drives the local streets. average Joe should simply ask, “When?” and “How much?” As the 2nd generation freeway is additive to the 1st generation street, Formatted to engage the reader by illustrating societal impact, techni- the proposed system coexists with the 1st and 2nd generation structures. cal feasibility, and overall affordability, the proposed approach, although But with electronically controlled spacings, uninterrupted traffic flow, and buttressed here with sound logic, will need further critique and study. The very short Cars, the 3rd Generation Roadway can move roughly 50 times writing’s tone is that of an observant citizen, a veteran of the wars; a citizen the number of vehicles that a city street can when configured to fit on the who can’t do the politics, but can do the math. It is half commentary on a small city street, and by a similar margin of 50, for a given width, compared society wrestling with a difficult problem, half focused on first principles to that of a freeway when configured for high speed. Door-to-door transit like a poor man’s Feynman physics lecture. Intended as an easy read, at times will be roughly half that of today’s typical surface street trip, or of a least for the numerically literate — better yet for the numerically facile and mixed surface street/freeway trip. Parking density for a ‘public’ garage will empathetic — the writing guides the reader to see what the numbers mean, be 10 times today’s, and allow convenient parking for all commuters to, feel the driver’s plight, hear the din of the ensuing traffic jam, and then, say, New York’s Manhattan Island. Nationally, replacing roughly a quar- to understand the changes the 3rd Generation Roadway would bring. It is ter of all surface travel, the new Roadway’s control will save roughly seven neither an engineering text nor a scholar’s book, but comes without foot- thousand lives and half a million injuries a year. Compared to today’s U.S. notes, generates simple models, and attempts to engender critical thought fleet average of 21 mpg, fuel economy for the “car” fleet will be approxi- using traceable calculations derived from easily verifiable data. mately 200 mpg when slip-streaming at high speed within a “train” on the new Roadway, and approximately 100 mpg on city streets. Propulsion by an Harbor no doubts, the approach is futuristic. In evaluating impact on indi- electrified Roadway will constitute a much desired distribution network, viduals, communities, and nations, many technologies and operational and empower electric vehicles with modest, inexpensive battery packs. The approaches are assumed at full flower. Paradigms need disruption. And new Roadway motivates the driver to buy a small vehicle, and then isolates paradigms do not fall easily. But the book details elementary examples of them both for protection. the necessary components and highlights a number of maturing technolo- Thus, the 3rd Generation Roadway will enable a car-based society to gies now emerging in use. How such a system would be operated is clearly support larger cities with increased population densities and allow them outlined. Thus all but the most cynical of readers will find plausibility — and to properly function with convenient transportation. Larger cities will be wonder, “Why not?” free to safely evolve without traffic congestion, with transportation for The dream is not new. Many mull similar thoughts. But though many their very mobile citizens consuming only 2% of today’s U.S. per-capita a bored fourth grader, staring at the map on the schoolroom wall, clev- total energy budget. Fast, convenient transportation will allow citizens to erly concluded Africa and South America must once have been a single truly incorporate large metropolitan areas as their neighborhood. land mass, success for the Theory of Continental Drift came only with an understanding of its fundamental mechanisms, its profound effects, and Presented is a vision. But only a vision. While sufficient detail is given to the ability to see it happening today on the ocean’s floor.
Recommended publications
  • Metro Bus and Metro Rail System
    Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Metro Bus Lines East/West Local Service in other areas Weekdays Saturdays Sundays North/South Local Service in other areas Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Limited Stop Service Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Special Service Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Approximate frequency in minutes Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Weekdays Saturdays Sundays 102 Walnut Park-Florence-East Jefferson Bl- 200 Alvarado St 5-8 11 12-30 10 12-30 12 12-30 302 Sunset Bl Limited 6-20—————— 603 Rampart Bl-Hoover St-Allesandro St- Local Service To/From Downtown LA 29-4038-4531-4545454545 10-12123020-303020-3030 Exposition Bl-Coliseum St 201 Silverlake Bl-Atwater-Glendale 40 40 40 60 60a 60 60a 305 Crosstown Bus:UCLA/Westwood- Colorado St Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve 3045-60————— NEWHALL 105 202 Imperial/Wilmington Station Limited 605 SANTA CLARITA 2 Sunset Bl 3-8 9-10 15-30 12-14 15-30 15-25 20-30 Vernon Av-La Cienega Bl 15-18 18-20 20-60 15 20-60 20 40-60 Willowbrook-Compton-Wilmington 30-60 — 60* — 60* — —60* Grande Vista Av-Boyle Heights- 5 10 15-20 30a 30 30a 30 30a PRINCESSA 4 Santa Monica Bl 7-14 8-14 15-18 12-18 12-15 15-30 15 108 Marina del Rey-Slauson Av-Pico Rivera 4-8 15 18-60 14-17 18-60 15-20 25-60 204 Vermont Av 6-10 10-15 20-30 15-20 15-30 12-15 15-30 312 La Brea
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Service Plan
    Attachment A 1 Core Network Key spines in the network Highest investment in customer and operations infrastructure 53% of today’s bus riders use one of these top 25 corridors 2 81% of Metro’s bus riders use a Tier 1 or 2 Convenience corridor Network Completes the spontaneous-use network Focuses on network continuity High investment in customer and operations infrastructure 28% of today’s bus riders use one of the 19 Tier 2 corridors 3 Connectivity Network Completes the frequent network Moderate investment in customer and operations infrastructure 4 Community Network Focuses on community travel in areas with lower demand; also includes Expresses Minimal investment in customer and operations infrastructure 5 Full Network The full network complements Muni lines, Metro Rail, & Metrolink services 6 Attachment A NextGen Transit First Service Change Proposals by Line Existing Weekday Frequency Proposed Weekday Frequency Existing Saturday Frequency Proposed Saturday Frequency Existing Sunday Frequency Proposed Sunday Frequency Service Change ProposalLine AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl R2New Line 2: Merge Lines 2 and 302 on Sunset Bl with Line 200 (Alvarado/Hoover): 15 15 15 20 30 60 7.5 12 7.5 15 30 60 12 15 15 20 30 60 12 12 12 15 30 60 20 20 20 30 30 60 12 12 12 15 30 60 •E Ğǁ >ŝŶĞϮǁ ŽƵůĚĨŽůůŽǁ ĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ>ŝŶĞƐϮΘϯϬϮƌŽƵƚĞƐŽŶ^ƵŶƐĞƚůďĞƚǁ
    [Show full text]
  • CPY Document
    FORM GEN,, ',GOAIR".'/82) CITY OF LOS ANGELES IN, ~R-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDl:..tE Date: December 4, 2007 To: The Honorable City Council c/o City Clerk, Room 395, City Hall Attention:~l.7~ Wendy Greuel, Chair, Transportation Committee From: rRita L. Robinson, General Manager Department of Transportation Subject: USDOT CONGESTION REDUCTION DEMONSTRATION INITIATIVE- CONGESTION PRICING (CF 07-3754) As directed by the motion (CF 07-3754) presented by Councilmember Wendy Greuel (CD 2), the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) has prepared this report regarding the recent announcement by the United States Department of Transportation (US DOT) on the availability of federal funds for Congestion-Reduction Demonstration Initiatives. The motion directed LADOT to identify projects that would be eligible for grant funding under this federal program and to work with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) to prepare a grant application to be submitted to USDOT by the deadline of December 31, 2007. RECOMMENDATION AUTHORIZE LADOT to partner with Metro and Caltrans in the preparation of a joint Congestion-Reduction Demonstration Initiatives application package to the USDOT with consideration of the following overall project elements including complementary City components which total approximately $35 million: 1. Conversion of the existing Interstate 110 (Harbor Transitway) High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes to High Occupancy Toll (HOT) lanes (Caltrans to determine scope and cost) 2. Grade separation of the northern terminus of proposed HOT lanes on the Harbor Transitway over Adams Boulevard onto Figueroa Street (Caltrans to determine feasibility, scope and cost) 3. Enhancement of Transit Service along Harbor Transitway from Artesia Transit Center to Downtown Civic Center (Metro to determine feasibility, scope and cost) 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Public Hearing Pamphlet
    Proposed Service Changes Metro will hold a series of six virtual on proposed major service changes to public hearings beginning Wednesday, Metro’s bus service. Approved changes August 19 through Thursday, August 27, will become effective December 2020 2020 to receive community input or later. How to Participate By Phone: Other Ways to Comment: Members of the public can call Comments sent via U.S Mail should be addressed to: 877.422.8614 Metro Service Planning & Development and enter the corresponding extension to listen Attn: NextGen Bus Plan Proposed to the proceedings or to submit comments by phone in their preferred language (from the time Service Changes each hearing starts until it concludes). Audio and 1 Gateway Plaza, 99-7-1 comment lines with live translations in Mandarin, Los Angeles, CA 90012-2932 Spanish, and Russian will be available as listed. Callers to the comment line will be able to listen Comments must be postmarked by midnight, to the proceedings while they wait for their turn Thursday, August 27, 2020. Only comments to submit comments via phone. Audio lines received via the comment links in the agendas are available to listen to the hearings without will be read during each hearing. being called on to provide live public comment Comments via e-mail should be addressed to: via phone. [email protected] Online: Attn: “NextGen Bus Plan Submit your comments online via the Public Proposed Service Changes” Hearing Agendas. Agendas will be posted at metro.net/about/board/agenda Facsimiles should be addressed as above and sent to: at least 72 hours in advance of each hearing.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint International Light Rail Conference
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH Number E-C145 July 2010 Joint International Light Rail Conference Growth and Renewal April 19–21, 2009 Los Angeles, California Cosponsored by Transportation Research Board American Public Transportation Association TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2010 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OFFICERS Chair: Michael R. Morris, Director of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of Governments, Arlington Vice Chair: Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore Division Chair for NRC Oversight: C. Michael Walton, Ernest H. Cockrell Centennial Chair in Engineering, University of Texas, Austin Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2010–2011 TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES COUNCIL Chair: Robert C. Johns, Associate Administrator and Director, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts Technical Activities Director: Mark R. Norman, Transportation Research Board Jeannie G. Beckett, Director of Operations, Port of Tacoma, Washington, Marine Group Chair Cindy J. Burbank, National Planning and Environment Practice Leader, PB, Washington, D.C., Policy and Organization Group Chair Ronald R. Knipling, Principal, safetyforthelonghaul.com, Arlington, Virginia, System Users Group Chair Edward V. A. Kussy, Partner, Nossaman, LLP, Washington, D.C., Legal Resources Group Chair Peter B. Mandle, Director, Jacobs Consultancy, Inc., Burlingame, California, Aviation Group Chair Mary Lou Ralls, Principal, Ralls Newman, LLC, Austin, Texas, Design and Construction Group Chair Daniel L. Roth, Managing Director, Ernst & Young Orenda Corporate Finance, Inc., Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Rail Group Chair Steven Silkunas, Director of Business Development, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Public Transportation Group Chair Peter F. Swan, Assistant Professor of Logistics and Operations Management, Pennsylvania State, Harrisburg, Middletown, Pennsylvania, Freight Systems Group Chair Katherine F.
    [Show full text]
  • La Metro Bus Schedule Los Angeles
    La Metro Bus Schedule Los Angeles Kinematical and dancing Cleveland never swishes rearwards when Roy flock his hylobates. Glossographical and ancient Cristopher gutturalising so shockingly that Neel overpeoples his embitterments. Worthington disharmonizes companionably. Sea level eastbound and metro los angeles in modesto, or expo line to keep you can use the oakley Delhi metro bus company in la metro bus schedule los angeles area is. Environemnt set of metro projects under the la cabeza arriba counties remain adjusted multiple times and timetables or it, please provide services which ends in. Advertising on bus? This bus schedules and los angeles angels acting and the. Find bus schedule and la metro. Go to operate as we need a bus rapid transit centers, it was a tuesday press the tap your favorites list on la metro schedule and the east los. And decker canyon, select courtrooms allow you need a ceo and power purchase and surrounding communities that is part of washington will be eligible indian citizens. Pm angeles angels acting pitching coach matt wise has satisfied federal district like champion, schedules español view stops snow routes. What makes us a metro schedules and la via las inexactitudes, not exceed time. This bus schedules in la metro station, which bus and metro has a major corridors. Senior executive director richard stanger critiqued the bus. This article and la metro bus schedule los angeles city los angeles video. The metro network and what language assistance is to supplement regular routes to know more than five percent of las traducciones por favor and! Find bus schedule and la is scheduled times more common after a little tokyo metro.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Metro Expresslanes
    Introducing Metro ExpressLanes The how-to guide for a faster commute on the 110 and 10 freeways Imagine spending less time on the freeway. It’s easy…sign up and save time! Welcome to Metro ExpressLanes – faster commutes and more transportation choices. Starting this Saturday, November 10, the carpool lanes on the 110 Harbor Freeway – between the 91 freeway and Adams Boulevard in downtown Los Angeles – will become Metro ExpressLanes. For the first time, these lanes will be open to solo drivers for a toll. All drivers will need a FasTrak® transponder to use the ExpressLanes. Carpools with two or more people, vanpools and motorcycles with a FasTrak will continue to travel toll-free. And early next year, commuters on the 10 El Monte Busway – between the 605 freeway and Alameda Street in downtown Los Angeles – will also have access to newly-converted ExpressLanes. Our goal is to move more people – not more vehicles – by o=ering more transportation choices. The program features and benefits include: > 59 new clean-fuel buses To access Metro ExpressLanes: > Carpool Loyalty Program for carpools, vanpools and motorcycles Sign up for a FasTrak account and receive your transponder. > New El Monte Station > Widened Adams Boulevard o=-ramp and added a new lane on Mount the FasTrak transponder in your vehicle. Adams Boulevard Before each trip, set the FasTrak transponder to indicate > New Patsaouras Plaza Station how many people are in your vehicle. > Toll credits for frequent transit riders Enter the ExpressLanes at designated FasTrak entry points. > New pedestrian bridge on Adams Boulevard providing direct connection to the new Metro Expo Line 23rd/Flower Station Save time! > Expanded platform and parking spaces at the Metrolink Pomona Station All vehicles will need a pre-paid FasTrak transponder to access the > Lighting and security improvements at the Harbor Metro ExpressLanes.
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Best Practices
    Emerging Best 2 Practices JARRETT WALKER + ASSOCIATES AC Transit Map Assessment Report | 33 Emerging Best Practices In order to take a map from the conceptual stage parks, hospitals, and all the other places (when its purposes are defned) to a real docu- people might want to travel is shown? What ment, it must be designed. How well a map are the criteria for the selection of these ele- actually accomplishes its purposes arises from ments of the map? Again, a direct import of the quality of the design process, and from the geographic information may not achieve the skill and thoroughness of the designers. Both desired outcomes. Details like every public could be described as “cartography.” right-of-way, freight railroads, the exact out- lines of greenspaces, minor parks, freeway Transit maps are a diffcult design task, requir- ramps and precise shorelines (especially at ing careful attention to a multitude of factors. ports) should each be considered and some- The task of the designer is to select and repre- times simplifed or eliminated in support of sent the most important information possible the map’s purposes. at a given scale, without overwhelming the map reader. Some of the areas in which cartographic PRACTICES BEST EMERGING and design expertise have a very positive effect Frequent Network maps are: Many cities now produce a separate system map • How space is represented. Many of the that only shows frequent services. This seems most famous transit maps, such as those to be particularly important in places where the of the London Underground or New York system map is very complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Auction Journal
    Auction Journal April 15, 2016 The Beverly Hilton Welcome to the Race to Erase MS Silent Auction! Our amazing items are displayed in the The Beverly Hills Ballroom at The Beverly Hilton. Item Numbers Auction Committee Live Auction 1‐6 Travel 100‐137 Fashion 200‐241 Sports 300‐337 That’s Entertainment 400‐441 Jewels 500‐533 Cuisine 600‐637 Children’s Menagerie 700‐720 Luxury 800‐828 Art & Home Décor 900‐918 Hollywood Handbags 1000‐1005 Internships 1100‐1104 Take A Walk 1200‐1204 List of Donors Auction Rules Silent Auction Friday, April 15, 2016 6:30 PM – 8:30 PM The Beverly Hilton Beverly Hills, California The Silent Auction, and our very special Live Auction, include a unique collection of rare and extraordinary treasures. Countless volunteers have contributed their skills to develop this showcase with its vast array of gifts from generous donors throughout the world. Funds raised through the Auction will further critical research to find the cause and ultimate cure for the disease of multiple sclerosis. Therefore, we thank you from the bottom of our hearts for bidding generously and for helping all of those with MS enjoy a better today as well as strengthen their belief in a better tomorrow. Auction Chairmen Nancy Davis Lynn Palmer Auction Committee Lisa Arnold Pam Levine Shainaz Burg Kevin Mark Lodie Dina Cohen Debbie Lustig Jordan Cohen Cammy MacMillan Noel Cohen Margaret McSweeney Tracy Danza Jami Grace Miller Barbara Davis Bryan Moore Dana Davis Brandy Navarre Jason Davis Victoria Page Angela Dyborn Elise Perlmutter Dennis Estes Elena Pikor Holly Freeman Joyce Rey Jennifer Gardner Brenda Richie Karen Giberson Nicole Richie‐Madden Melina Glaves Isabella Rickel Mary‐Jo Hausman Mariella Rickel Teri Hausman Matt Rosler Marg Helgenberger Dove Rudman Marilyn Heston Tawny Sanders Kathy Hilton Melanie Segal Nicky Hilton Bette Smith Paris Hilton Ina Soltani Faith Kates Kogan Sharon Stein Shawn King Judy Swartz Brooke Lande Jennie Virgilio Dina Leeds Erica Tucker‐Weinberg Konrad Leh Niki Yassini Live Auction 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Defective Detective
    The Defective Detective By Donald Payton Copyright © MCMXCVII Heuer Publishing LLC, Cedar Rapids, Iowa All performances before an audience are subject to royalty. The first performance royalty fee is $50.00. Repeat performances are $40.00 each. Royalty fees are due one week prior to production, at which time performance rights are granted. On all programs and advertising this notice must appear: "Produced by special arrangement with Heuer Publishing LLC of Cedar Rapids, Iowa." This dramatic work is fully protected by copyright. No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without permission of the publisher. Copying (by any means) or performing a copyrighted work without permission constitutes an infringement of copyright. The right of performance is not transferable and is strictly forbidden in cases where scripts are borrowed or purchased second hand from a third party. All rights including, but not limited to the professional, motion picture, radio, television, videotape, broadcast, recitation, lecturing, tabloid, publication, and reading are reserved. COPYING OR REPRODUCING ALL OR ANY PART OF THIS BOOK IN ANY MANNER IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN BY LAW. One copy for each speaking role must be purchased for production purposes. Single copies of scripts are sold for personal reading or production consideration only. PUBLISHED BY HEUER PUBLISHING LLC P.O. BOX 248 • CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA 52406 TOLL FREE (800) 950-7529 • FAX (319) 368-8011 THE DEFECTIVE DETECTIVE Cast of Characters (9 men, 15 women) WINNIE: Bright and buoyant JOLENE: Vivacious and intelligent ANGELA: “Angelic” young woman BOGEY: A.K.A “The Bogeyman” THELMA: Matron of the Purple Grackle Inn VELMA: Thelma’s sister KLEW: Thelma and Velma’s nephew, the Purple Grackle Inn’s handyman ELLIE: Klew’s sister, much older than what she looks and acts.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Choices Report Attachment B FEBRUARY 3, 2016
    Transit Choices Report Attachment B FEBRUARY 3, 2016 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Table of Contents Contents Executive Summary . 3 Branding Service Categories . 55 Recent Historical Trends . 9 Conclusion and Recommendation . 56 Recent Historic Context . 10 Key Chapter Findings . 57 Key Chapter Findings . 14 Key Questions . 58 Market Assessment . 15 The Ridership / Coverage Tradeoff . 59 Population and Employment Growth . 17 How to Serve the Peak? . 60 Residential Density . 18 Network Design . 60 Employment Density . 19 Service Hierarchy . 60 Zero-Vehicle Households . 22 Resource Level . 60 Poverty . 23 Appendix A: Ridership / Coverage Analysis . 62 Transit Commuting . 25 Market Factor Comparison . 26 Key Chapter Findings . 29 Transit Service and Performance . 30 Service Overview . 31 Transit Productivity . 36 Current Plans . 46 Capital vs Operating Priorities . 47 Key Chapter Findings . 49 Service Branding . 50 VTA’s Existing Service Categories . 51 Overview of Useful Branding Distinctions . 51 Frequent Network Branding and VTA’s Core Network . 53 Executive Summary What is TRIP? The Transit Ridership Improvement Program is a two-year study of Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) services designed to iden- tify ways to improve ridership . A key output of this study, but not the only one, is the 2017 Next Network Plan, which will review the structure of the VTA network and propose improvements for implementation in 2017 . The planned changes will occur in time for the opening of Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) to Berryessa, including those required to integrate BART into the VTA network . This report, the first of the study, analyzes the existing system and shows EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE how certain choices will need to be thought about at the policy level .
    [Show full text]
  • Exposition Park to Harbor -San Pedro Gateway
    Saturday, Sunday and Holidays Effective Sep 12 2021 550 Northbound (Approximate Times) Southbound (Approximate Times) SAN PEDRO HARBOR HARBOR GATEWAY HARBOR GATEWAY HARBOR SAN PEDRO CITY CITY 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 7th & Patton Little Co. of Mary Hospital) (Providence Coast Hwy & Normandie Pacific (Kaiser Hospital) & Carson Vermont (Harbor UCLA Hospital) Harbor Gateway Center Transit Harbor Gateway Center Transit & Carson Vermont (Harbor UCLA Hospital) Coast Hwy & Normandie Pacific (Kaiser Hospital) 7th & Patton Little Co. of Mary Hospital) (Providence 6:09A 6:27A 6:36A 6:42A 6:57A 7:06A 7:16A 7:29A 7:07 7:27 7:37 7:44 7:57 8:06 8:16 8:30 8:07 8:26 8:36 8:42 8:57 9:06 9:16 9:30 9:04 9:23 9:34 9:41 9:57 10:06 10:17 10:32 10:04 10:25 10:36 10:43 10:57 11:06 11:17 11:32 11:04 11:26 11:37 11:44 11:57 12:06P 12:17P 12:32P 12:02P 12:24P 12:35P 12:42P 12:57P 1:06 1:17 1:32 1:02 1:25 1:36 1:43 1:57 2:06 2:17 2:32 2:02 2:25 2:36 2:43 2:57 3:06 3:17 3:32 3:02 3:25 3:36 3:43 3:57 4:06 4:17 4:32 4:02 4:26 4:37 4:44 4:57 5:06 5:17 5:32 5:03 5:25 5:36 5:42 5:57 6:06 6:17 6:32 6:03 6:25 6:36 6:42 6:57 7:05 7:15 7:30 7:03 7:23 7:34 7:40 7:57 8:05 8:14 8:27 8:09 8:29 8:40 8:46 8:57 9:05 9:14 9:27 9:09 9:29 9:38 9:44 9:57 10:05 10:14 10:27 10:09 10:29 10:38 10:44 10:57 11:05 11:14 11:27 LINE 550 EXPRESS SERVICE - NORTHBOUND— From 7th and Patton in San Pedro to Vermont and Pacific Coast Hwy, buses operate in local service.
    [Show full text]