DOCSLIB.ORG

View Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
View Annual Report Financial Calendar Three-year overview of Fraport Group’s May 28, 2002: 1st Quarter Interim Report consolidated key performance data June 26, 2002: Annual General Meeting June 27, 2002: Dividend Payment Traffic figures Frankfurt Airport August 22, 2002: 1st Half Interim Report, 1999 2000 2001 2000/2001 Annual Report 2001 1 Press Conference, change in % Analysts Conference Passengers (millions) 45.9 49.4 48.6 – 1.6 Continuing Development and Growth Airfreight (thousand tonnes) 1,428.1 1,589.4 1,494.1 – 6.0 November 28, 2002: 3rd Quarter Interim Report Airmail (thousand tonnes) 138.9 141.0 141.1 0.1 Aircraft movements (thousands)2 439.1 458.7 456.5 – 0.5 MTOWs (thousand tonnes) 23,764.5 25,370.4 25,564.5 0.8 Seat load factor (in %) 68.4 69.8 68.2 1 Rate of change based on unrounded numbers. 2 Excluding military flights. Investor Relations Tel.: +49 (0) 69-690-74842 Fax: +49 (0) 69-690-74843 Revenues and profit Fraport Group E-Mail: [email protected] in € millions 1999 2000 2001 2000/2001 change in % www.fraport.de Revenues 1,374.9 1,536.2 1,580.6 2.9 Total revenues 1,415.2 1,620.8 1,713.8 5.7 EBITDA 440.3 533.5 507.2 – 4.9 EBIT 260.8 329.9 235.2 – 28.7 Profit from ordinary Imprint operations 198.8 265.9 170.2 – 36.0 Profit for the year 79.7 129.0 101.1 – 21.6 Publisher: Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide Press and Publications (VSP) Key profitability data Fraport Group 60547 Frankfurt am Main, Germany in % 1999 2000 2001 Text and design: Return on revenues 13.7 16.6 10.3 Charles Barker GmbH, EBITDA margin 32.0 34.7 32.1 Frankfurt am Main, Germany EBIT margin 19.0 21.5 14.9 English version: ROCE return on capital 12.6 14.8 8.2 Stephen Klain Equity ratio 31.4 31.0 52.5 Photography: Bernd Vogel, Köln Employees Fraport Group Mattias Heitmann, Hamburg Fraport AG (VSP) 1999 2000 2001 2000/2001 Production: change in % Fraport AG (VSP) Average number of employees 13,336 14,271 15,526 8.8 Typesetting and lithography: Layout Service Darmstadt GmbH MDDigitale Produktion, Maintal, Germany Printing: gzm Grafisches Zentrum Bödige und Partner GmbH, Mainz-Hechtsheim, Germany Printed in Germany Organizational structure Financial Calendar Three-year overview of Fraport Group’s May 28, 2002: 1st Quarter Interim Report consolidated key performance data June 26, 2002: Annual General Meeting June 27, 2002: Dividend Payment Traffic figures Frankfurt Airport August 22, 2002: 1st Half Interim Report, 1999 2000 2001 2000/2001 Annual Report 2001 1 Press Conference, change in % Analysts Conference Passengers (millions) 45.9 49.4 48.6 – 1.6 Continuing Development and Growth Airfreight (thousand tonnes) 1,428.1 1,589.4 1,494.1 – 6.0 November 28, 2002: 3rd Quarter Interim Report Airmail (thousand tonnes) 138.9 141.0 141.1 0.1 Aircraft movements (thousands)2 439.1 458.7 456.5 – 0.5 MTOWs (thousand tonnes) 23,764.5 25,370.4 25,564.5 0.8 Seat load factor (in %) 68.4 69.8 68.2 1 Rate of change based on unrounded numbers. 2 Excluding military flights. Investor Relations Tel.: +49 (0) 69-690-74842 Fax: +49 (0) 69-690-74843 Revenues and profit Fraport Group E-Mail: [email protected] in € millions 1999 2000 2001 2000/2001 change in % www.fraport.de Revenues 1,374.9 1,536.2 1,580.6 2.9 Total revenues 1,415.2 1,620.8 1,713.8 5.7 EBITDA 440.3 533.5 507.2 – 4.9 EBIT 260.8 329.9 235.2 – 28.7 Profit from ordinary Imprint operations 198.8 265.9 170.2 – 36.0 Profit for the year 79.7 129.0 101.1 – 21.6 Publisher: Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide Press and Publications (VSP) Key profitability data Fraport Group 60547 Frankfurt am Main, Germany in % 1999 2000 2001 Text and design: Return on revenues 13.7 16.6 10.3 Charles Barker GmbH, EBITDA margin 32.0 34.7 32.1 Frankfurt am Main, Germany EBIT margin 19.0 21.5 14.9 English version: ROCE return on capital 12.6 14.8 8.2 Stephen Klain Equity ratio 31.4 31.0 52.5 Photography: Bernd Vogel, Köln Employees Fraport Group Mattias Heitmann, Hamburg Fraport AG (VSP) 1999 2000 2001 2000/2001 Production: change in % Fraport AG (VSP) Average number of employees 13,336 14,271 15,526 8.8 Typesetting and lithography: Layout Service Darmstadt GmbH MDDigitale Produktion, Maintal, Germany Printing: gzm Grafisches Zentrum Bödige und Partner GmbH, Mainz-Hechtsheim, Germany Printed in Germany Organizational structure Fraport AG Contents Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide Executive Board (EB) 1 Profile VS VI VF VA VE 2 Letter from the Executive Board Chairman of the EB Member EB Member EB Member EB Member Executive Board Real Estate Finance Labor Relations Airport Development 5 Calendar of Events 2001 6Share VorstandsstäbeStaff functions reporting directly to the Executive Board 8 Group Strategy VSB Special Projects VIF Freight Logistics VAD Data Protection VEK Airport Expansion VSE External Relations Public Relations 10 Further Development VSI Investor Relations VIR Legal Affairs VAF Promotion of Equal of Core Expertise in Frankfurt VSP Press and Opportunities for 15 Growth in Frankfurt Publications Women and 22 External Growth VSQ Corporate Quality Families Management 25 Highly Qualified and Motivated Employees VSR Internal Auditing VAV Office for Reporting 27 Fraport Group and the Environment and Business Confidential Analysis Information 30 Group Management Report Strategic Business Divisions (SGB) 30 Market Environment and Development of Air Traffic 35 Business Strategy IFM IUK BV BVD BV VTM 37 Business Development Real Estate and Information Tech- Executive Vice Executive Vice 47 Risk Management President Traffic Facility Manage- nology and Tele- President Aviation 52 Significant Events after the Ground Services and Retail ment communications Balance Sheet Date and Logistics 53 Outlook Support Divisions (UB) 54 Consolidated Financial Statements of Fraport AG AUB CFR PSL APF 54 Consolidated Income Statement Global Investments Controlling, Human Resources Airport Expansion 55 Consolidated Balance Sheet and Management Finance, Program 56 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement Accounting 57 Development of the Consolidated Shareholders’ Equity 58 Consolidated Fixed-asset Movement Schedule USG ZEB 60 Segment Reporting Corporate Develop- Central Purchasing/ 61 Notes to the Consolidated ment, Organization- Construction Financial Statements al Structure, Boards Contracts 90 Executive Bodies of the Company and Committees 94 Auditor’s Report MAR 95 Report of the Supervisory Board Marketing 96 Economic Advisory Group 97 Glossary As of March 31, 2002 C3 Financial Calendar Fraport AG Contents Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide Executive Board (EB) 1 Profile VS VI VF VA VE 2 Letter from the Executive Board Chairman of the EB Member EB Member EB Member EB Member Executive Board Real Estate Finance Labor Relations Airport Development 5 Calendar of Events 2001 6Share VorstandsstäbeStaff functions reporting directly to the Executive Board 8 Group Strategy VSB Special Projects VIF Freight Logistics VAD Data Protection VEK Airport Expansion VSE External Relations Public Relations 10 Further Development VSI Investor Relations VIR Legal Affairs VAF Promotion of Equal of Core Expertise in Frankfurt VSP Press and Opportunities for 15 Growth in Frankfurt Publications Women and 22 External Growth VSQ Corporate Quality Families Management 25 Highly Qualified and Motivated Employees VSR Internal Auditing VAV Office for Reporting 27 Fraport Group and the Environment and Business Confidential Analysis Information 30 Group Management Report Strategic Business Divisions (SGB) 30 Market Environment and Development of Air Traffic 35 Business Strategy IFM IUK BV BVD BV VTM 37 Business Development Real Estate and Information Tech- Executive Vice Executive Vice 47 Risk Management President Traffic Facility Manage- nology and Tele- President Aviation 52 Significant Events after the Ground Services and Retail ment communications Balance Sheet Date and Logistics 53 Outlook Support Divisions (UB) 54 Consolidated Financial Statements of Fraport AG AUB CFR PSL APF 54 Consolidated Income Statement Global Investments Controlling, Human Resources Airport Expansion 55 Consolidated Balance Sheet and Management Finance, Program 56 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement Accounting 57 Development of the Consolidated Shareholders’ Equity 58 Consolidated Fixed-asset Movement Schedule USG ZEB 60 Segment Reporting Corporate Develop- Central Purchasing/ 61 Notes to the Consolidated ment, Organization- Construction Financial Statements al Structure, Boards Contracts 90 Executive Bodies of the Company and Committees 94 Auditor’s Report MAR 95 Report of the Supervisory Board Marketing 96 Economic Advisory Group 97 Glossary As of March 31, 2002 C3 Financial Calendar Profile 1 Strong performance. Profile. Growth power. Our Company’s strength results from decades of knowledge and experience as the operator of one of Europe’s leading air transport hubs. Our successful initial public offering (IPO) opened the door to greater entrepreneurial independence. We continue to develop our Frankfurt home base further and the capabilities that we acquire here – with a clear emphasis on innovation, commitment, and value orientation. This serves to highlight our profile wherever we seek out new opportunities. We have set the goal of strengthening and expanding our position as one of the three most competitive and profitable airport groups in the world. With this strategic orientation, we are also laying the groundwork for securing our growth and income in the future. We are on the right path with our strategy. 2 Letter from the Executive Board Dear Friends of Fraport, The year 2001 brought Fraport not only substantial We were also pleased that Fraport’s shares were progress but unexpected turbulence as well. included in the German mid-cap index, MDAX, as early as September 24 – an important step for a The beginning of the year was marked by the intro- newly listed share.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Presentation of the Traffic Results for 2020 and Outlook
    FLUGHAFEN WIEN AG Traffic Results 2020 and Business Outlook for 2021 Press Conference, 21 January 2021 2020: Most difficult year in the history of Vienna Airport – Upswing expected in 2021 Coronavirus pandemic comes close to bringing global flight operations to a standstill – passenger volumes down 60% across the globe (IATA estimate) 7.8 million passengers at Vienna Airport in 2020 (-75.3%) – like in the year 1994 The crisis has shown how indispensable air transport is: delivery of relief supplies, repatriation flights, Vienna Airport available 24/7 as part of the critical infrastructure Outlook for 2021: due to upturn in H2/2021 about 40% of pre-crisis level (12.5 million passengers) and expected consolidated net profit close to zero – short time work extended until March 2021 About 70% of pre-crisis level in 2022, approx. 80% in 2023 Vaccination will provide impetus to growth, but only with unified international and European travel regulations – digitalisation as a major opportunity (“digital vaccine certificate“) 2 Development in 2020 Traffic figures and influencing factors 3,500,000 PAX 2019 PAX 2020 14.4% 3,000,000 8.3% 2019 Deviation 2019/2020 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 -65.8% -74.7% -81.8% -81.1% -86.7% 500,000 -95.4% -93.4% -92.9% -99.5% -99.3% 2020 0 January February March April May June July August September October November December Begin of Travel warnings and 1st Insolvency First Passenger growth at restrictions on flight lockdown of Level Restart of “COVID- beginning of the year traffic Lauda Air Strongest Further tested “Lockdown End of Austrian Austrian and month travel flights“ light“, December: End of February: begin Repatriation flights, Airlines, Airlines Austrian thanks to warnings begin of beginning of first flight transport of relief Wizz Air resumes Airlines summer Antibody 2nd of 3rd cancellations (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Deutsche Bahn AG 2
    Case Study : Deutsche Bahn AG Deutsche Bahn on the Fast Track to Fight Co rruption Case Study: Deutsche Bahn AG 2 Authors: Katja Geißler, Hertie School of Governance Florin Nita, Hertie School of Governance This case study was written at the Hertie School of Governanc e for students of public po licy Case Study: Deutsche Bahn AG 3 Case Study: Deutsche Bahn AG Deutsche Bahn on the Fast Track to Fight Corru ption Kontakt: Anna Peters Projektmanager Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung von Unternehmen/Corporate Soc ial Responsibility Bertelsmann Stiftung Telefon 05241 81 -81 401 Fax 05241 81 -681 246 E-Mail anna .peters @bertelsmann.de Case Study: Deutsche Bahn AG 4 Inhalt Ex ecu tive Summary ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 5 Deutsche Bahn AG and its Corporate History ................................ ............................... 6 A New Manager in DB ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 7 DB’s Successful Take Off ................................ ................................ ............................. 8 How the Corruption Scandal Came all About ................................ ................................ 9 Role of Civil Society: Transparency International ................................ ........................ 11 Cooperation between Transparency International and Deutsche Bahn AG .................. 12 What is Corruption? ................................ ................................ ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Alliances
    AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2011 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Open Skies • 1992 - the United States concluded the first second generation “open skies” agreement with the Netherlands. It allowed KLM and any other Dutch carrier to fly to any point in the United States, and allowed U.S. carriers to fly to any point in the Netherlands, a country about the size of West Virginia. The U.S. was ideologically wedded to open markets, so the imbalance in traffic rights was of no concern. Moreover, opening up the Netherlands would allow KLM to drain traffic from surrounding airline networks, which would eventually encourage the surrounding airlines to ask their governments to sign “open skies” bilateral with the United States. • 1993 - the U.S. conferred antitrust immunity on the Wings Alliance between Northwest Airlines and KLM. The encirclement policy began to corrode resistance to liberalization as the sixth freedom traffic drain began to grow; soon Lufthansa, then Air France, were asking their governments to sign liberal bilaterals. • 1996 - Germany fell, followed by the Czech Republic, Italy, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Malta, Poland. • 2001- the United States had concluded bilateral open skies agreements with 52 nations and concluded its first multilateral open skies agreement with Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore. • 2002 – France fell. • 2007 - The U.S. and E.U. concluded a multilateral “open skies” traffic agreement that liberalized everything but foreign ownership and cabotage. • 2011 – cumulatively, the U.S. had signed “open skies” bilaterals with more than100 States. Multilateral and Bilateral Air Transport Agreements • Section 5 of the Transit Agreement, and Section 6 of the Transport Agreement, provide: “Each contracting State reserves the right to withhold or revoke a certificate or permit to an air transport enterprise of another State in any case where it is not satisfied that substantial ownership and effective control are vested in nationals of a contracting State .
    [Show full text]
  • The General Court Dismisses the Actions Brought by the Airline Niki
    General Court of the European Union PRESS RELEASE No 54/15 Luxembourg, 13 May 2015 Judgments in Cases T-511/09 and T-162/10 Press and Information Niki Luftfahrt GmbH v Commission The General Court dismisses the actions brought by the airline Niki Luftfahrt against Lufthansa’s acquisition of Austrian Airlines and the restructuring aid granted by Austria to Austrian in that regard None of the arguments put forward by Niki is capable of casting doubt on the Commission’s authorisation of that concentration and that aid, which it granted subject to conditions Austrian Airlines is the largest Austrian airline.1 Its main hub is Vienna International Airport (Austria). Due to financial difficulties faced by Austrian Airlines, the Austrian State decided to privatise it in 2008 by selling its majority shareholding of 41.56%. The bid of Germany’s largest airline, Lufthansa, whose hubs are Frankfurt International Airport (Germany) and Munich airport (Germany), was retained.2 In exchange for the transfer of the shares held by the Austrian State, Lufthansa’s bid proposed (i) to pay a purchase price of €366 268.75, (ii) to grant a debtor warrant capable of giving rise to an additional payment of up to €162 million should Austrian Airlines’s financial situation improve and (iii) that the Austrian State3 pay Austrian Airlines a subsidy of €500 million by means of a securitisation structure to be used to increase the capital of Austrian Airlines. In addition, Lufthansa initiated a take-over bid for Austrian Airlines’s remaining floating shares, which more shareholders accepted than was required.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Statements of RWE AG for the Fiscal Year 1999/2000 Financial Statements of RWE AG
    Financial Statements of RWE AG for the Fiscal Year 1999/2000 Financial Statements of RWE AG The financial statements and the management report of RWE AG for the fiscal year 1999/2000 are published in the Bundesanzeiger and filed with the Commercial Register at the Essen Local Court, HRB 193.The RWE AG management report is combined with the Group’s management report. It is published on pages 28 to 51 in our Annual Report. A collective listing of the investments of the Group and of RWE AG in accordance with section 285, no. 11, and section 313, subsection 2, nos. 1 to 4, of the German Commercial Code is filed with the Commercial Register at the Essen Local Court. Financial Statements of RWE AG 2 Balance Sheet 2 Income Statement 3 Notes 4 Proposal for the Appropriation of Profit 15 1 Auditors’ Report 16 Principal Investments 18 The Boards 21 Balance Sheet as at June 30, 2000 ASSETS (cf. notes) 06/30/2000 06/30/1999 E million E million Fixed assets (1) Financial assets 9,951 10,104 Current assets Accounts receivable and other assets (2) Accounts receivable from subsidiaries 3,791 2,574 Accounts receivable from investees 89 • Other assets 120 14 Securities (3) 2,715 388 Cash and cash equivalents (4) 1,514 1,020 Prepaid expenses (5) 17 15 18,197 14,115 2 EQUITY AND LIABILITIES (cf. notes) 06/30/2000 06/30/1999 E million E million Equity (6) Subscribed capital Common shares 1,211 1,210 Preference shares 129 210 1,340 1,420 (authorized capital E 19 million) (contingent capital E 51 million) Capital reserve 1,697 1,617 Retained earnings 910 1,850 Distributable profit 523 556 4,470 5,443 Special reserves with an equity portion (7) • • Provisions (8) Provisions for pensions and similar obligations 3,634 3,458 Tax provisions 505 1,354 Other provisions 477 500 Liabilities (9) Accounts payable for supplies and services 12 9 Accounts payable to subsidiaries 4,715 3,220 Accounts payable to investees 4,271 – Other liabilities 113 131 18,197 14,115 •) negligible amount Income Statement for the year ended June 30, 2000 (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2000 Higher Transport Performance We Were Able to Increase Our Transport Performance in Passenger and Freight Transport Significantly in 2000
    Annual Report 2000 Higher Transport Performance We were able to increase our transport performance in passenger and freight transport significantly in 2000. Positive Income Development Our operating income after interest improved by € 286 million. Modernization of Deutsche Bahn AG A comprehensive fitness program and the expansion of our capital expenditures will pave the way to our becoming an even more effective railway. Key figures Change in € million 2000 1999 in % Revenues 15,465 15,630 – 1.1 Revenues (comparable) 15,465 14,725 + 5.0 Income before taxes 37 91 – 59.3 Income after taxes 85 87 – 2.3 EBITDA 2,502 2,036 + 22.9 EBIT 450 71 + 533.8 Operating income after net interest 199 – 87 + 328.7 Return on capital employed in % 1.6 0.3 – Fixed assets 34,671 33,495 + 3.5 Total assets 39,467 37,198 + 6.1 Equity 8,788 8,701 + 1.0 Cash flow (before taxes) 2,113 2,107 + 0.3 Gross capital expenditures 6,892 8,372 – 17.7 Net capital expenditures 1) 3,250 3,229 + 0.7 Employees (as of Dec 31) 222,656 241,638 – 7.9 Performance figures Change Passenger Transport 2000 1999 in % Passengers DB Reise&Touristik million 144.8 146.5 – 1.2 DB Regio million 1,567.7 1,533.6 + 2.2 Total million 1,712.5 1,680.1 + 1.9 Passenger kilometers DB Reise&Touristik million pkm 2) 36,226 34,897 + 3.8 DB Regio million pkm 2) 38,162 37,949 + 0.6 Total million pkm 2) 74,388 72,846 + 2.1 Train kilometers DB Reise&Touristik million train-path km 175.9 177.5 – 0.9 DB Regio million train-path km 563.9 552.4 + 2.1 Total million train-path km 739.8 729.9 + 1.4 Freight Transport
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2004/2005
    DO & CO I THE GOURMET ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY ANNUAL REPORT 2004I 2005 Ladies and Gentlemen, I am pleased to present to you the DO & CO Annual International Event Catering also made a sterling Report for 2004/2005. Annual reports are not showing this past business year. The division put in normally what you would think of as entertaining an excellent performance in the Formula 1, one of reading. As “Gourmet Entertainers” we have tried to its culinary customers since 1992. It also managed change that by conveying as modern and “tasty” a the entire VIP hospitality operations at the European picture of our company group as possible. Soccer Championships in Portugal for the first time Business year 2004/2005 was one of the most in 2004. These highlights plus one or two other successful the DO & CO Group has ever had. Our prestigious sports events are featured on the total sales of over EUR 134 million set an all-time following pages, along with a host of private and sales record and boosted EBIT substantially over the corporate celebrations. year before, to EUR 3.45 million. The Division Restaurants & Bars is virtually on a We are clearly positioned on the market. The par with the other divisions. Of special note in this DO & CO Group brands stand for unsurpassed segment is the successful development of K.u.K. quality and innovative products. Our corporate Hofzuckerbäckerei Demel. With the restructuring of culture is flexible and is always open to new ideas. this legend long completed, the expansion phase These traits are probably what have enabled us to now begins.
    [Show full text]
  • Lauda Contrails Copy
    Three-time Formula One world champion Niki Lauda has tested himself as few have. On the racetrack. In the boardroom. In the sky. His is a will literally forged by fire. He knows what he wants and usually gets it. Whatever the obstacle. His high-profile journey has taken him to his present position as founder and CEO of Lauda Air. From its headquarters in Vienna, its leading-edge fleet provides scheduled flights to five continents and charter services to some of the world’s premier business and vacation destinations. As of April 2000, Lauda Air joins the 11-member Star Alliance Network, comprised of such well-known airlines as Air Canada, Lufthansa and United. So what’s left? “The next two years we really have to make the alliance work well, for us and for them,” Niki Lauda says. “Personally, as long as I’m enjoying myself and have new challenges, I’ll continue what I’m doing. If that changes, I will think of something else.” As he has before. Bombardier Contrails Magazine – March 2000 FORMULA ONE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS ’75 and ’77-Ferrari, ’84-McLaren GRAND PRIX WINS 3 South African GP (’76 and ’77-Ferrari, ’84-McLaren) 3 Dutch GP (’74 and ’77-Ferrari, ’85-McLaren) 3 British GP (’76-Ferrari, ’82 and ’84-McLaren) 2 Swedish GP (’75-Ferrari, ’78-Brabham) 2 Monaco GP (’75 and ’76-Ferrari) 2 French GP (’75-Ferrari, ’84-McLaren) Niki Lauda in his early 2 Belgian GP (’75 and ’76-Ferrari) 2 Italian GP (’78-Brabham, ’84-McLaren) 20s, prior to his 1975 s a young man, Niki Lauda to Formula One.
    [Show full text]
  • Punctuality Statistics Economic Regulation Group Aviation Data Unit
    Punctuality Statistics Economic Regulation Group Aviation Data Unit Birmingham, Edinburgh, Gatwick, Glasgow, Heathrow, London City, Luton, Manchester, Newcastle, Stansted Full and Summary Analysis December 2001 Disclaimer The information contained in this report will be compiled from various sources and it will not be possible for the CAA to check and verify whether it is accurate and correct nor does the CAA undertake to do so. Consequently the CAA cannot accept any liability for any financial loss caused by the persons reliance on it. Contents Foreword Introductory Notes Full Analysis – By Reporting Airport Birmingham Edinburgh Gatwick Glasgow Heathrow London City Luton Manchester Newcastle Stansted Full Analysis With Arrival / Departure Split – By A Origin / Destination Airport B C – E F – H I – L M – N O – P Q – S T – U V – Z Summary Analysis FOREWORD 1 CONTENT 1.1 Punctuality Statistics: Heathrow, Gatwick, Manchester, Glasgow, Birmingham, Luton, Stansted, Edinburgh, Newcastle and London City - Full and Summary Analysis is prepared by the Civil Aviation Authority with the co-operation of the airport operators and Airport Coordination Ltd. Their assistance is gratefully acknowledged. 2 ENQUIRIES 2.1 Statistics Enquiries concerning the information in this publication and distribution enquiries concerning orders and subscriptions should be addressed to: Civil Aviation Authority Room K4 G3 Aviation Data Unit CAA House 45/59 Kingsway London WC2B 6TE Tel. 020-7453-6258 or 020-7453-6252 or email [email protected] 2.2 Enquiries concerning further analysis of punctuality or other UK civil aviation statistics should be addressed to: Tel: 020-7453-6258 or 020-7453-6252 or email [email protected] Please note that we are unable to publish statistics or provide ad hoc data extracts at lower than monthly aggregate level.
    [Show full text]
  • World Timetable
    World timetable KLM & partners Book online at www.klm.com or call KLM Amsterdam + 31 20 4 747 747 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Important This timetable presents schedule data available on May 25, 2004 Schedule changes are likely to occur after this date. We recommend that you obtain confirmation of all flight details when making reservations for your personal itinerary. Book online at www.klm.com or call KLM Amsterdam +31 20 4 747 747 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Printing To print the page you are viewing, do NOT press the print button but go to the PRINT dialogue and select the page(s) you wish to print. If you do not do this, then the whole timetable will print out. Decoding Airline codes USA Two letter state codes AF Air France SB Air Caledonie International AK Alaska AM Aeromexico SU Aeroflot AL Alabama AS Alaska Airlines TA Taca International Airlines, S.A. AR Arkansas AT Royal Air Maroc TE Lithuanian Airline AZ Arizona AY Finnair Oyj TN Air Tahiti Nui CA California AZ Alitalia TU Tunis Air CO Colorado A5 Air Linair UU Air Austral CT Connecticut A6 Air Alps Aviation UX Air Europa DC District of Columbia BA British Airways VN Vietnam Airlines Corporation DE Delaware BD British Midland Airways Ltd VO Tyrolean Airways FL Florida BE British European WA KLM Cityhopper GA Georgia Bus Bus service WB Rwandair Express HI Hawaii CO Continental Airlines WX Cityjet dba Air France IA Iowa COe Continental Express XJ Mesaba Airlines (Northwest Airlink) ID Idaho CY Cyprus Airways XK Compagnie Aerienne Corse Mediterranee IL Illinois CZ China Southern Airlines XM Alitalia Express IN Indiana DB Brit Air dba Air France XT Air Exel dba KLM Exel KS Kansas DL Delta Air Lines YS Regional Airlines dba Air France KY Kentucky DM Maersk Air YW Air Nostrum L.A.M.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Airlines Codes
    Airlines codes Sorted by Airlines Sorted by Code Airline Code Airline Code Aces VX Deutsche Bahn AG 2A Action Airlines XQ Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Acvilla Air WZ Denim Air 2D ADA Air ZY Ireland Airways 2E Adria Airways JP Frontier Flying Service 2F Aea International Pte 7X Debonair Airways 2G AER Lingus Limited EI European Airlines 2H Aero Asia International E4 Air Burkina 2J Aero California JR Kitty Hawk Airlines Inc 2K Aero Continente N6 Karlog Air 2L Aero Costa Rica Acori ML Moldavian Airlines 2M Aero Lineas Sosa P4 Haiti Aviation 2N Aero Lloyd Flugreisen YP Air Philippines Corp 2P Aero Service 5R Millenium Air Corp 2Q Aero Services Executive W4 Island Express 2S Aero Zambia Z9 Canada Three Thousand 2T Aerocaribe QA Western Pacific Air 2U Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Amtrak 2V Aeroejecutivo SA de CV SX Pacific Midland Airlines 2W Aeroflot Russian SU Helenair Corporation Ltd 2Y Aeroleasing SA FP Changan Airlines 2Z Aeroline Gmbh 7E Mafira Air 3A Aerolineas Argentinas AR Avior 3B Aerolineas Dominicanas YU Corporate Express Airline 3C Aerolineas Internacional N2 Palair Macedonian Air 3D Aerolineas Paraguayas A8 Northwestern Air Lease 3E Aerolineas Santo Domingo EX Air Inuit Ltd 3H Aeromar Airlines VW Air Alliance 3J Aeromexico AM Tatonduk Flying Service 3K Aeromexpress QO Gulfstream International 3M Aeronautica de Cancun RE Air Urga 3N Aeroperlas WL Georgian Airlines 3P Aeroperu PL China Yunnan Airlines 3Q Aeropostal Alas VH Avia Air Nv 3R Aerorepublica P5 Shuswap Air 3S Aerosanta Airlines UJ Turan Air Airline Company 3T Aeroservicios
    [Show full text]
  • May 2003 the SARS Effect CONTENTS Analysis Irst, the Good News
    Aviation Strategy Issue No: 67 May 2003 The SARS effect CONTENTS Analysis irst, the good news. Traffic rebounded after the end of the, rel- Fatively short, Iraq war. AEA monitoring shows growth rates of 11% on the North The SARS effect 1-2 Atlantic in late April - tentative evidence for our contention (Aviation Widebody deliveries 2 Strategy, April 2003) that the fundamental links between economic activity and air travel have not been demolished by September 11. Asia’s emerging Now, the bad news, SARS is proving to be a biological (or psy- chological) weapon of mass destruction for the airline industry. low cost carriers 3-5 Asian airlines are regularly reporting annual falls in traffic of 30- 50%, while European and US carriers' traffic is down 20-30% on BA and the LCCs 6 Far East and transpacific routes. Narrowbody deliveries 6 Probably the most dramatic illustration of the SARS effect is the traffic reported by the Japanese airlines for Golden Week, the tra- ditional holiday at the end of April/beginning of May when it seems US Majors: “third major every single Japanese travels somewhere. JAL and ANA each shakeout since deregulation” faced a halving in international passengers, with their load factors 7-10 plummeting to 41%. Rumours have circulated that Cathay Pacific, losing HK$23m Briefing (US$3m) a day, was going to ground its entire fleet. These have subsequently been refuted by Cathay, but the projected losses for Austrian Airlines: Europe’s ideal AEA MEMBERS’ YEAR ON YEAR niche airline? 11-15 % RPK % CHANGE 2003/2002 20 Databases
    [Show full text]