Parasitology Meets Ecology on Its Own Terms: Margolis et al. Revisited Author(s): Albert O. Bush, Kevin D. Lafferty, Jeffrey M. Lotz and Allen W. Shostak Source: The Journal of Parasitology, Vol. 83, No. 4 (Aug., 1997), pp. 575-583 Published by: The American Society of Parasitologists Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3284227 Accessed: 10-06-2015 22:17 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. The American Society of Parasitologists is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Parasitology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.111.90.61 on Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:17:26 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions J. Parasitol., 83(4), 1997 p. 575-583 ? American Society of Parasitologists 1997 PARASITOLOGYMEETS ECOLOGYON ITS OWN TERMS: MARGOLISET AL. REVISITED* Albert O. Busht, Kevin D. Laffertyt, Jeffrey M. Lotz?, and Allen W. Shostakll Departmentof Zoology, BrandonUniversity, Brandon, Manitoba, Canada R7A 6A9 ABSTRACT:We consider 27 populationand communityterms used frequentlyby parasitologistswhen describingthe ecology of parasites.We provide suggestions for various terms in an attemptto foster consistent use and to make terms used in parasite ecology easier to interpretfor those who study free-living organisms.We suggest strongly that authors,whether they agree or disagree with us, provide complete and unambiguousdefinitions for all parametersof their studies.