DOCSLIB.ORG

Parasitology Meets Ecology on Its Own Terms: Margolis Et Al

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parasitology Meets Ecology on Its Own Terms: Margolis Et Al Parasitology Meets Ecology on Its Own Terms: Margolis et al. Revisited Author(s): Albert O. Bush, Kevin D. Lafferty, Jeffrey M. Lotz and Allen W. Shostak Source: The Journal of Parasitology, Vol. 83, No. 4 (Aug., 1997), pp. 575-583 Published by: The American Society of Parasitologists Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3284227 Accessed: 10-06-2015 22:17 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The American Society of Parasitologists is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Parasitology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.111.90.61 on Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:17:26 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions J. Parasitol., 83(4), 1997 p. 575-583 ? American Society of Parasitologists 1997 PARASITOLOGYMEETS ECOLOGYON ITS OWN TERMS: MARGOLISET AL. REVISITED* Albert O. Busht, Kevin D. Laffertyt, Jeffrey M. Lotz?, and Allen W. Shostakll Departmentof Zoology, BrandonUniversity, Brandon, Manitoba, Canada R7A 6A9 ABSTRACT:We consider 27 populationand communityterms used frequentlyby parasitologistswhen describingthe ecology of parasites.We provide suggestions for various terms in an attemptto foster consistent use and to make terms used in parasite ecology easier to interpretfor those who study free-living organisms.We suggest strongly that authors,whether they agree or disagree with us, provide complete and unambiguousdefinitions for all parametersof their studies. Clear and effective communication must be the primary goal Our approach will be to discuss, first, words and concepts as facing every scientist. The most significant discovery, the iden- human constructs (waxing philosophical if you will). Next, we tification of a fundamental theorem, or the test of some critical revisit general terms and terms applied to populations of para- hypothesis is meaningless if it is neither communicated nor un- sites, and we then discuss terms applicable to the community derstood. Unfortunately, effective communication can often be level. For the latter 2 topics, we provide, when relevant for undermined in some disciplines by "jargon." When 2 jargon- illustrative purposes, published examples of term use. Accept- prone disciplines such as parasitology and ecology meet, the ing the cliche that a "picture is worth a thousand words", we result may be confusion. Perhaps recognizing this, Elmer No- present several figures in an attempt to clarify our presentation ble, President of the American Society of Parasitologists in and amplify our discussion for some terms. Finally, we argue 1981, commissioned an ad hoc committee to comment on the now, and conclude emphatically, that what we offer are only use of ecological terms in parasitology. suggestions. We recognize there exist scientists who will dis- The resulting publication by Margolis et al. (1982) became agree (some vehemently so) with us. Whether others agree or a citation classic. Clearly, a need had been fulfilled, and wheth- disagree with our suggestions, we strongly urge them to define er or with authors agreed disagreed the proposed terminology, explicitly their intended meaning for specific terms. If this pa- there for the first a reference At the time existed, time, point. per serves as either a source of agreement or point of departure, the committee was the focus of commissioned, ecological par- as did the paper by Margolis et al. (1982), it will have served was asitology largely population biology. Understandably then, its utilitarian purpose. and its rather broad the et al. despite title, paper by Margolis We review all terms discussed originally in Margolis et al. was devoted to the use of terms as (1982) ecological they ap- (1982). Our choice of terms relating to communities is selec- to of Since that studies on plied populations parasites. time, tive. We discuss several general descriptive terms, some specific communities of have become common. parasites Recognizing terms that we feel are frequently used improperly, and other extant, and with terms perhaps impending, problems ecological terms that we feel warrant a departure from traditional ecolog- as to the of Gerald Esch, applied community ecology parasites, ical terminology. Editor of the Journal of Parasitology, asked one of us (A.O.B.) Although the distinction is not absolute, we consider 2 kinds to "assemble a team of to discuss the use of 'ecological types' of terms, observational (or objective) and theoretical (Hempel, terms as to the of com- ecological they apply ecology parasite 1965; Hull, 1974). Observational terms refer to something that munities." is the same to 2 independent observers and can be generally We perceived our goal as supplementing Margolis et al. understood without reference to a scientific theory. Therefore, (1982), not supplanting it. However, as ecologists, we recognize by observational terms, we mean words that stand for things that community ecology without population ecology is like con- (traits and objects) that can be seen (widely interpreted), are fession without sin: there really isn't much to talk about. Fur- and often can be measured, e.g., prevalence, diet, thermore, we are aware, from our work and from comments descriptive, range, diversity index, necrosis. Theoretical terms, on the other made by colleagues during the past decade, that some of the hand, apply to the more abstract and subjective concepts that a suggestions in Margolis et al. (1982) "just don't work." There- science, and its theories, are about, e.g., community, niche, hab- fore, in this paper, we revisit Margolis et al. (1982), suggest itat, diversity. Theoretical terms are often some major and minor modifications, and then expand our cov- species, population, not observable, and the words are dependent on sci- erage to a consideration of communities. directly entific theories for their meaning. For example, although 2 in- dividuals might recognize all living organisms found in some Received 9 September1996; revised 19 February1997; accepted 19 prescribed area as a community, they might disagree substan- February1997. tively on a theory of how that community is maintained through * Orderof authorshipis alphabeticaland does not reflect unequalcon- time. Because hold different tribution. ecological they theories, they one see a of t Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. "see" different things; might group independent $ Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, Cal- species, whereas the second might see a group of tightly inter- ifornia 93106. dependent species. Hence, the meaning of the word community ? University of Southern Mississippi, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, is the that each individual holds. In Box 7000, Ocean 39566-7000. dependent upon theory Springs, Mississippi can be reduced to observational Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, some cases, theoretical terms Alberta, Canada T6G 2E9. terms and thereby provide operational definitions of the theo- 575 This content downloaded from 128.111.90.61 on Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:17:26 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 576 THE JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY,VOL. 83, NO. 4, AUGUST 1997 retical terms (Hempel, 1965). For example, diversity is an im- proach to the niche and agree with Brown (1995), who notes, portant trait of biological communities, and a great deal of the- "Hutchinson's concept of niche thus implicitly stresses the ory has developed attempting to explain the diversity of com- uniqueness of species in their ecological relationships. The fact munities. In those theories, diversity remains rather vague; that species exhibit distinctive patterns of abundance and dis- however, in practice, several operational definitions of diversity tribution reflects their different requirements for environmental are used, e.g., species richness, Simpson's index. In our opinion, conditions. By Hutchinson's operational characterization, the the definitions of theoretical terms are often best left to the niche is an attribute of species, not of environments. Thus, al- science and its theoreticians (although we feel obliged to deal though extinct species had niches, there can be no unfilled nich- with some that are in very broad use in parasitology), whereas es." observational terms are more amenable to definition by con- Despite the above definition, and our reluctance to admit vention. empty niches, we recognize that the phrase "empty niche" has been, and will probably continue to be, used by parasite ecol- SOME GENERALTERMS ogists to refer to the absence of a species from a system under investigation when that species is known to be present in a Ecologists need the ability to describe an organism's sur- similar system elsewhere. The implication of such use is often roundings. Parasites are not fundamentally different from other that resources are therefore not limiting. This may or may not living organisms in this regard, but, because parasites often be true. Whether true or false, this claim is not relevant to our have complex life cycles, various descriptive terms can be rath-
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sociobiology and Conflict. Evolutionary Perspectives On
    S. Afr. J. Zool. 1992,27(2) 91 Book Reviews demonstration of heritability. If there is no heritable variance in a trait, selection cannot operate. Glib statements like the following: ' ... for any socially living mammalian species the competing sets of needs under discussion are very general and basic. We must there­ Sociobiology and Conflict. Evolutionary fore assume thal the varill1lce in the balance between tlwse sets of basic needs has strong genetic roots' (van der Molen, p. 65, my perspectives on competition, coopera­ emphasis) tion, violence and warfare. are inadequate. Without the demonstration of heritability, adapta­ tionist explanations remain 'just-so stories'. This point has been made many times in the past, but the message has still not been Edited by J. van der Dennen and V. Falger received and understood. It is 15 years since the pUblication of Published by Chapman and Hall, London Wilson's opus magnum, Sociobiology. Surely this is time enough 338 pages for workers who posit genetic explanations to begin to accumulate some genetic data? Some of us still like to believe that biology is a science - even when it is applied to the human species. A tho­ This book comprises 14 essays that explore the potential signifi­ rough scientific treatment demands critical examination of all prior cance of sociobiological theorising to an understanding of human assumptions. aggressive behaviour, 'in the hope that we might better understand Then there is the far more fundamental question as to whether and come to terms with the problems of human conflict' (p. 14). or not theories regarding the selective origin of I18gressive behavi­ The thesis advanced by the majority of the contributors is predica­ our in individuals - regardless of their merits and demerits - ted on the following notions: (i) that aggressive behaviour in can tell us anything whatsoever about the conduct of war between humans has a genetic basis which is sufficiently deterministic to nations.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Scope of Microbiology the Story of Invisible Organisms
    A study material for M.Sc. Biochemistry (Semester: IV) Students on the topic (EC-1; Unit I) History and Scope of Microbiology The story of invisible organisms Dr. Reena Mohanka Professor & Head Department of Biochemistry Patna University Mob. No.:- +91-9334088879 E. Mail: [email protected] MICROBIOLOGY 1. WHAT IS A MICROBIOLOGY? Micro means very small and biology is the study of living things, so microbiology is the study of very small living things normally too small that are usually unable to be viewed with the naked eye. Need a microscope to see them Virus - 10 →1000 nanometers Bacteria - 0.1 → 5 micrometers (Human eye ) can see 0.1 mm to 1 mm Microbiology has become an umbrella term that encompasses many sub disciplines or fields of study. These include: - Bacteriology: The study of bacteria - Mycology: Fungi - Protozoology: Protozoa - Phycology: Algae - Parasitology: Parasites - Virology: Viruses WHAT IS THE NEED TO STUDY MICROBIOLOGY • Genetic engineering • Recycling sewage • Bioremediation: use microbes to remove toxins (oil spills) • Use of microbes to control crop pests • Maintain balance of environment (microbial ecology) • Basis of food chain • Nitrogen fixation • Manufacture of food and drink • Photosynthesis: Microbes are involved in photosynthesis and accounts for >50% of earth’s oxygen History of Microbiology Anton van Leeuwenhoek (1632-1723) (Dutch Scientist) • The credit of discovery of microbial world goes to Anton van Leeuwenhoek. He made careful observations of microscopic organisms, which he called animalcules (1670s). • Antoni van Leeuwenhoek described live microorganisms that he observed in teeth scrapings and rain water. • Major contributions to the development of microbiology was the invention of the microscope (50-300X magnification) by Anton von Leuwenhoek and the implementation of the scientific method.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Microbiology—The Science
    Chapter 1 Microbiology—The Science Terms Introduced in This Chapter After reading Chapter 1, you should be familiar with the following terms. These terms are defined in Chapter 1 and in the Glossary. Abiogenesis Mycology Antibiotic Nonpathogens Bacteriologist Obligate intracellular pathogens Bacteriology Opportunistic pathogens Biogenesis Paleomicrobiology Biology Parasites Bioremediation Parasitologist Biotechnology Parasitology Decomposers Pasteurization Etiologic agent Pathogens Etiology Petri dish Fastidious microorganisms Phycologist Genetic engineering Phycology In vitro Phytoplankton In vivo Plankton Indigenous microflora Protozoologist Infectious diseases Protozoology Koch's Postulates Pure culture Microbial ecology Saprophyte Microbial intoxications Toxin Microbiologist Ubiquitous Microbiology Virologist Microorganisms Virology Microscope Zoonoses (sing., zoonosis) Mycologist Zooplankton Insight Additional Careers in Microbiology Agricultural Microbiology Agricultural microbiology is an excellent career field for individuals with interests in agriculture and microbiology. Included in the field of agricultural microbiology are studies of the beneficial and harmful roles of microbes in soil formation and fertility; in carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur cycles; in diseases of plants; in the digestive processes of cows and other ruminants; and in the production of crops and foods. Many different viruses, bacteria, and fungi cause plant diseases. A food microbiologist is concerned with the production, processing, storage, cooking,
    [Show full text]
  • Parasitology
    Parasitology 020314TR Online Ordering Available Parasitology Table of Contents A Culture of Service™ 1 Books Headquarters 2 Parasitology Transports 1430 West McCoy Lane Santa Maria, CA 93455 800.266.2222 : phone 6 Total Fix Procedure 805.346.2760 : fax [email protected] 7 Fecal Concentrating Systems www.HardyDiagnostics.com 8 Centrifuge Tubes Distribution Centers Santa Maria, California 9 Stains and Reagents Olympia, Washington Salt Lake City, Utah Phoenix, Arizona 11 Staining Accessories Dallas, Texas Springboro, Ohio 12 Control Slides for Stains Lake City, Florida Albany, New York 13 Parasite Suspensions Raleigh, North Carolina 14 Culture Media 15 11 Ways to Make a Better Slide 17 Microscope Supplies 19 Rapid Tests The Quality Management System at the Hardy Diagnostics manufacturing facility is certified to ISO 13485. Copyright © 2014 Hardy Diagnostics Books Cases in Human Parasitology This book contains 62 case studies that focus solely on parasites which adversely affect humans. Challenging cases with details regarding non-parasitic infections whose symptoms closely resemble those of parasitic infections are included. By Judith S. Heelan, 256 pages, softcover, ASM Press, 2004, Each................................................................................5812961 Diagnostic Medical Parasitology This book contains updates and advances in the field of diagnostic medical parasitology and reports on the dramatic changes that have occurred in this field. Newly recognized parasites, alternative diagnostic techniques defined
    [Show full text]
  • Pathogen Prevalence and Human Mate Preferences Steven W
    Pathogen Prevalence and Human Mate Preferences Steven W. Gangestad University of New Mexico David M. Buss University of Michigan Members of host species in pathogen-host coevolutionary races may be selected to choose mates who possess features of physical appearance associated with pathogen resistance. Human data from 29 cultures indicate that people in geographical areas carrying rela- tively greater prevalences of pathogens value a mate’s physical attractiveness more than people in areas with relatively little pathogen incidence. The relationship between pathogen prevalence and the value people place on physical attractiveness remained strong even after potential confounds such as distance from the equator, geographical region, and average income were statistically controlled for. Discussion focuses on poten- tial limitations of the data, alternative explanations for the findings, and the nature of adaptations to the problems posed by pathogen prevalence. KEY WORDS: Mate preferences; Physical attractiveness; Parasites; Host-parasite coevolution. athogens may profoundly affect the evolution of their hosts (e.g., Anderson and May 1982; Clarke 1976; Hamilton 1980, 1982; Hamil- ton and Zuk 1982; Tooby 1982). Pathogens with extremely short P intergenerational times have been claimed to be responsible for no less an evolutionary outcome than sexual reproduction (Hamilton 1980; Seger and Hamilton 1986). Pathogens that possess intermediate intergenera- tional times such that parasite-host coevolution maintains additive genetic variance in host fitness may influence sexual selection pressures (Hamilton and Zuk 1982). Specifically, heritable differences in pathogen resistance may prompt “good genes” sexual selection-selection for mate preferences based on mate qualities that discriminate individuals with regard to their pathogen resistance (e.g., Andersson 1986; Grafen 1990; Heywood 1989; Iwasa, Pomiankowski, and Nee 1991; Pomiankowski 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practice Guidelines for Studies of Parasite Community Ecology Cambridge.Org/Jhl
    Journal of Helminthology Best practice guidelines for studies of parasite community ecology cambridge.org/jhl R. Poulin Review Article Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand Cite this article: Poulin R (2019). Best practice Abstract guidelines for studies of parasite community ecology. Journal of Helminthology 93,8–11. In recent decades, parasite community ecology has produced hundreds of studies on an ever- https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X18000767 growing number of host species, and developed into an active sub-discipline of parasitology. However, this growth has been characterized by a lack of standards in the practices used by Received: 20 June 2018 researchers, with many common approaches being flawed, unjustified or misleading. Here, Accepted: 30 July 2018 in the hope of promoting advances in the study of parasite community ecology, I identify First published online: 24 August 2018 some of the most common errors or weaknesses in past studies, and propose ten simple Key words: rules for best practice in the field. They cover issues including, among others, taxonomic reso- community structure; experiments; lution, proper and justifiable analytical methods, higher-level replication, controlling for sam- hypotheses; replication; sampling effort; pling effort or species richness, accounting for spatial distances, using experimental taxonomic resolution approaches, and placing raw data in the public domain. While knowledge of parasite commu- Author for correspondence: nities has expanded in breadth, with more and more host species being studied, true progress R. Poulin, E-mail: [email protected] has been very limited with respect to our understanding of fundamental general processes shaping these communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control of Marine Pests Author(S): Kevin D
    Biological Control of Marine Pests Author(s): Kevin D. Lafferty and Armand M. Kuris Source: Ecology, Vol. 77, No. 7 (Oct., 1996), pp. 1989-2000 Published by: Ecological Society of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265695 Accessed: 10-06-2015 23:59 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Ecological Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ecology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.111.90.61 on Wed, 10 Jun 2015 23:59:30 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Ecology, 77(7), 1996, pp. 1989-2000 ? 1996 by the Ecological Society of America BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF MARINE PESTS1 KEVIN D. LAFFERTY AND ARMAND M. KURIS Department of Biological Sciences and Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106 USA Abstract. Biological control, as used in terrestrial systems, may hold promise for use against exotic marine species. We first review some marine pests, displaying their diversity, the damage they cause, and possible controls. We then contrast approaches for marine and terrestrial pest control, providing guidelines for adapting terrestrial controls to the marine environment.
    [Show full text]
  • SC/BIOL 4360 3.00 Parasitology Winter 2021 Course Description
    Department of Biology Course Outline SC/BIOL 4360 3.00 Parasitology Winter 2021 Course Description Please note that this is a course that depends on remote teaching and learning. There will be no in-person interactions or activities on campus. This course will be delivered in a SYNCHRONOUS remote format using the recurring Zoom meeting link https://yorku.zoom.us/j/94401465350 Biology of animal parasites; developmental, structural and functional adaptations to the parasitic environments; immune and other responses of hosts; parasitic diseases. Three lecture hours per week. One term. Three credits. Prerequisites SC/BIOL 2030 4.00 Course Instructor and Contact Information Course Director - Dr. Spencer Mukai Office – 002 Farquharson (Keele Campus), 344 York Hall (Glendon Campus) Email – [email protected] Office hours – during lectures Monday 7:00-10:00 PM via Zoom Schedule Mondays 7:00-10:00 PM. Lectures will be recorded live on Zoom, then posted onto eClass https://passportyork.yorku.ca/ppylogin/ppylogin Please review the technology requirements and FAQs for Moodle eClass. https://lthelp.yorku.ca/95440- student-faq Pre-recorded lectures may also be posted on the course website and asynchronous meetings may be scheduled, if necessary. For all Zoom lectures and meetings, use the recurring Zoom meeting invite link https://yorku.zoom.us/j/94401465350 Evaluation Tests, Assignments and Grading: Mid-Term Exam (Feb. 22, 2021)…..…………………...........................................................................20% Parasite ID Test 1 (Feb. 8, 2021)-
    [Show full text]
  • On the Evolution of the Biological Framework for Insight
    philosophies Article On the Evolution of the Biological Framework for Insight Claudio Neidhöfer Institute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, University of Bonn, 52127 Bonn, Germany; [email protected] Abstract: The details of abiogenesis, to date, remain a matter of debate and constitute a key mystery in science and philosophy. The prevailing scientific hypothesis implies an evolutionary process of increasing complexity on Earth starting from (self-) replicating polymers. Defining the cut-off point where life begins is another moot point beyond the scope of this article. We will instead walk through the known evolutionary steps that led from these first exceptional polymers to the vast network of living biomatter that spans our world today, focusing in particular on perception, from simple biological feedback mechanisms to the complexity that allows for abstract thought. We will then project from the well-known to the unknown to gain a glimpse into what the universe aims to accomplish with living matter, just to find that if the universe had ever planned to be comprehended, evolution still has a long way to go. Keywords: evolutionary biology; astrobiology; philosophy of biology; epistemology 1. Introduction Citation: Neidhöfer, C. On the Our aim in this work is to approach the lead question of what the universe aims Evolution of the Biological to accomplish with living matter from an evolutionary biology perspective and, hence, Framework for Insight. Philosophies focus on the capacity of the human mind to handle the issue of the role of life in the 2021, 6, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/ universe. After addressing the question of the reducibility of biological phenomena, we philosophies6020043 will introduce some of the most important milestones in evolutionary history.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Parasitology Electron Theory of Small Molecules
    Nature Vol. 267 16 June 1977 653 panded with both sessile and planktonic stimulant for discussion and further Ecological marine animals. More such compari­ investigation. It is a little disappointing parasitology sons could have been enlightening. that in so extensive a series of reviews The great value of this book lies in there is a sad lack of coordinating Ecological Aspects of Parasitology. the descriptions of various organs from thought. Perhaps, though, that is what Edited by C. R. Kennedy. Pp. x+474. a parasitological viewpoint. Almost the book will help to produce. (North-Holland: Amsterdam and every author points out areas of ex­ R. W. Ashford Oxford, 1976.) Dfl 145; $57.95. tensive ignorance in his field, and it is clear that too few physiologists, bio­ chemists and physicians have a clear R. W. Ashford is Senior Lecturer in the PARASITISM is an ecological term, and Department of Pathology, University of idea of what ecology is about. The Papua, New Guinea. on secondment from parasitology is essentially an ecological book will surely be useful as a study. Some aspects of parasite ecology the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine. have received extensive coverage for many years, especially those related to qualitative and quantitative epidemio­ for which he gives no references more logy, where the unit of study is the Electron theory recent than 1967. Indeed, if one looks infection rather than the parasite. through the text one gains the The stated object of this book is to of small molecules impression that the phrase "recent remedy the situation whereby some Introduction to the Electron Theory work" should really be synonymous aspects have received little attention.
    [Show full text]
  • (Macro-) Evolutionary Ecology of Parasite Diversity: from Determinants of Parasite Species Richness to Host Diversification Serge Morand *
    International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 4 (2015) 80–87 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijppaw (macro-) Evolutionary ecology of parasite diversity: From determinants of parasite species richness to host diversification Serge Morand * CNRS ISEM – CIRAD AGIRs, Centre d’Infectiologie Christophe Mérieux du Laos, Vientiane, Lao Democratic People’s Republic ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: The present review summarized the factors or determinants that may explain parasite diversity among Received 30 October 2014 host species and the consequences of this parasite diversity on the evolution of host-life history traits. Revised 3 January 2015 As host–parasite interactions are asymmetrical exploited–exploiter relationships, ecological and epide- Accepted 6 January 2015 miological theories produce hypotheses to find the potential determinants of parasite species richness, while life-history theory helps for testing potential consequences on parasite diversity on the evolution Keywords: of hosts. This review referred only to studies that have specifically controlled or took into account phy- Parasite diversity logenetic information illustrated with parasites of mammals. Several points needing more investigation Species richness Mammals were identified with a special emphasis to develop the metabolic theory of epidemiology. Latitudinal gradient © 2015 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Australian
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Diet and Parasite Load on Female Phonotaxis in the Texas Field Cricket, Gryllus Integer
    1 The Effect of Diet and Parasite Load on Female Phonotaxis in the Texas Field Cricket, Gryllus integer by Donald Allen MacDougall A Thesis submitted to the Department of Biological Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science January 1996 Brock University St. Catharines, Ontario © Donald A. MacDougall, 1996 2 ABSTRACT Female crickets respond selectively to variations in species-specific male calling songs. This selectivity has been shown to be age-dependent; older females are less choosy. However, female quality should also affect female selectivity. The effect of female quality on mate choice was examined in Gryllus integer by comparing the phonotactic responses of females on different diets and with different parasite loads to various synthetic models of conspecific calling song. Test females were virgin, 11-14 days old, and had been maintained on one of five diets varying in protein and fat content. Phonotaxis was quantified using a non-compensating Kugel treadmill which generates vector scores incorporating the speed and direction of movement of each female. Test females were presented with four calling song models which differed in pulse rate, but were still within the natural range of the species for the experimental temperature. After testing, females were dissected and the number of gregarine parasites within the digestive tract counted. There were no significant effects of either diet or parasitism on female motivation to mate although the combined effects of these variables seem to have an effect with no apparent trend. Control females did not discriminate among song types, but there was a trend of female preferences for lower pulse rates which are closest to the mean pulse rate for the species.
    [Show full text]