Extensions of Remarks

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Extensions of Remarks July 16, 1982 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 16679 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS THE ENTERPRISE ZONE The enterprise zone program will help chance to prove the worth of the experi­ PROPOSAL new businesses, primarily. It will give them ment. a chance to get started and the opportunity Applications which depend on the Federal to grow, providing two important ingredi­ incentives along will not compare favorably HON. WILLIS D. GRADISON, JR. ents to turning around a distressed area: with applications that cut redtape and taxes OF OHIO Create jobs within the most economically at the state and local level, involving neigh­ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES depressed areas, particularly for lower borhood groups in the program, and experi­ Thursday, July 15, 1982 income and minority workers, and ment with improving public service through Redevelop and revitalize these places of a greater involvement of the private sector. e Mr. GRADISON. Mr. Speaker, as decay and despair. I have been asked what factors I will one of the original cosponsors of H.R. The President's proposal for enterprise weigh when making my decisions, and what 6009, I have followed the progress of zones is a good one, and its chances for suc­ enterprise zone applications should contain, the enterprise zone proposal with par­ cess are excellent. Many earlier attempts to but I want to wait until the legislation is ticular interest. There is widespread solve the problems of physical decay and passed and signed by the President before I economic stagnation depended almost en­ speculate. In any case, I firmly believe the support in this House for innovative tirely on Federal grant programs. This pro­ creativity and innovation shown by so many methods to revitalize our decaying gram, to the contrary, seeks to get Govern­ state and local governments will guarantee inner cities. ment out of the way in order to stimulate far better proposals than any I might specu­ Because my district includes a large both private investment and local public ini­ late about now. inner city area, I have seen firsthand tiatives. I have said that I think there is a good the need for new approaches to aid Cities will be able to coordinate this pro­ chance for success with the program. Let urban areas. The direct spending poli­ gram with existing efforts now underway in me be clear that this is not the "be-ail-and­ cies of the past have been limited suc­ distressed sections. Enterprise zones will not end-all" for urban areas. There are no in­ cesses at best. While enterprise zones replace the Community Development Block stant solutions for these longstanding prob­ Grant or Urban Development Action Grant lems. Only a recovered nation's economy cannot perform miracles, nor can they programs, and in fact, both of these proven and the full success of the President's over­ stand alone as an urban policy, they programs can be used as a major stimulus in all program hold out long term, permanent offer a much-needed new dimension to a zone. solutions. our efforts to aid cities. The crux of This will not be a HUD-run program. But until that time, the idea of helping that new dimension is the emphasis on State and local governments will design and the people and places in greatest need is private sector job creation, a focus make their own contributions to enterprise something all of us in the Reagan Adminis­ which has been lacking from past pro­ zones and develop creative initiatives to tration feel deeply that we want to do. But grams and which is vital to the suc­ help new businesses take root and grow. instead of Government spending, inner-city The role of the Department of Housing and residents need opportunities. A job is the cessful revival of any urban area. Urban Development will be to select the best social program. In a recent article in the Cincinnati best applicants to participate in the pro­ This is the focus of the enterprise zone Herald, Samuel Pierce, Secretary of gram-up to 25 per year for 3 years. concept. The program will identify and Housing and Urban Development, The incentives in our proposed le~lation remove Government barriers to entrepre­ clearly and succinctly explains how en­ are substantial, whether the new business neurs who are capable of creating jobs and terprise zones will work, and how, in calls for a staff of one, or a factory force of economic growth. It will draw out and build conjunction with certain existing Fed­ 1,000. It allows state and local governments upon existing talents and abilities already eral programs, enterprise zones can be to balance incentives for employers, employ­ present in depressed areas. It will call for an important catalyst for urban devel­ ees, entrepreneurs, and neighborhood the kind of imagination and innovative local opment. I wholeheartedly recommend groups, depending on local needs. leadership and private initiatives needed to Regulatory relief can also be substantial bring renewed hope for our ailing communi­ this article, which is printed below, to in an enterprise zone, depending once again ties throughout the Nation. all of my colleagues, but especially to on local needs. State and local governments With the cooperation of the Congress, those who have expressed reservations will be authorized to request relief from this idea will have a chance to prove its about enterprise zones. Secretary Federal regulatory agencies. However, no worth.e Pierce's description of the proposal rule will be lifted which would affect civil should provide answers to many of the rights protections, the public health, safety questions raised about this legisation. or welfare, or the minimum wage for zone FOREIGN POLICY AND ARMS The article follows: workers. CONTROL IMPLICATIONS OF A significant amount of regulatory relief CHEMICAL WEAPONS [From the Cincinnati Herald, June 5, 19821 will come at the State and local levels. In a AN AMERICAN REVOLUTION IN TROUBLED number of our recent cooperative efforts CITIES with local governments, we've seen that HON.CLEMENTJ.ZABLOC~ <By Samual Pierce, Jr.) local zoning laws, local building codes, and OF WISCONSIN For more than a generation, America has other local regulations can strangle econom­ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES struggled with the problems of restoring ic development. In many cases, Federal de­ vigor to its depressed cities and rural towns. regulation will be helpful, but in most cases, Thursday, July 15, 1982 Billions of dollars have been spent for one state and local efforts will make the big dif­ e Mr. ZABLOCKI. Mr. Speaker, this well-intentioned scheme after another. The ference in the success or failure of the en­ morning the Subcommittee on Inter­ results have been mixed at best, but the terprise zone. costs have grown intolerable. I hope that each and every one of them national Security and Scientific Af­ President Reagan has recommended an succeed, because the areas that are eligible fairs meets to examine the foreign experiment-based upon the idea that a to become enterprise zones have had chron­ policy and arms control implications "hand-up" is more helpful than a "hand­ ic problems with poverty, unemployment, of chemical weapons. out"-to stimulate private sector activity in population loss, and decay. Within the next few weeks the our cities. Compared to the past decades of Once an area meets the basic require­ House of Representatives will be faced ineffective Government grant-in-aid pro­ ments for eligibility and has been nominat­ with making a historic decision as to grams, the President's idea is revolutionary. ed for Federal approval by both the local whether the United States should It also offers hope that our most distressed and State governments, we at HUD will areas can reverse their present fate, and compare all the applications submitted. The resume production of chemical weap­ create opportunities for thousands of disad­ process is designed to be competitive be­ ons-after a 13-year moratorium on vantaged people. cause we want to give the best proposals a such production. e This "bullet" symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by the Member on the floor. 16680 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS July 16, 1982 Our colleagues in the other body and later transferred to Boston Uni­ ment? A search for power . perhaps. A have already expressed their concern versity where he graduated cum laude sense of dedication ... possibly. Or maybe over the binary chemical weapons pro­ in systematic theology. the sense of duty to respond to a call from gram by adopting an amendment to Dr. Anderson has always been a cou­ his President. the fiscal year 1983 Defense authoriza­ rageous civil rights fighter. He carried Robert P. Nimmo, Administrator of Veter­ tion bill which prohibits U.S. produc­ the struggle to Atlanta, Selma and ans Affairs, did not seek the position he holds. It sought him. Just as he did several tion of chemical weapons for our allies Montgomery, Ala. He participated times before as a soldier, he answered his in Europe unless those allies request with others in the march to integrate country's call. U.S. chemical weapons and agree to the Georgia State Legislature. Whether Robert Nimmo would answer the pre-position them on their territory. He served as director of public rela­ call if it came today is questionable. In spite This amendment, which passed by a tions for the Western Christian Lead­ of being a capable and effective Administra­ vote of 92-0, resulted from testimony ership Conference under the late Dr. tor, he has come under severe barrages. in the other body earlier this year that Martin Luther King. Later, he was ap­ Some criticism is warranted, much is not.
Recommended publications
  • Congressional -Record- House
    l912 . CONGRESSIONAL -RECORD- HOUSE. '8451 hi House bill 24023, relative to five-year tenure of office for Greailer New Y,ork, against passage of bills restricting immigra­ Go-v.ernment -employees; to the Committee on Appropda­ tion; to the :Committee on Immigration and Naturalization. · tions. Also, imemorial of United Garment Workers of America, favor­ By Mr. BARNHART: Memorial of St. Urban Society, No. , ing passage of the seamen's :om No. 22673, :celative to safety :fo--r 399, of Otis, Ind., against passage of bills restricting 'immigra­ crew m11d passengers on vessels ; to the Committee on the Mer­ tion; io the Committee on Immigration and Naturaliza­ chant l\larine and Fisheries. tion. By Mr. REILLY : Memorial of Trenton Chamber of Com­ By Mr. BROWN: Papers to accompany a bill for the relief merce, of Trenton, N. J., against passage of Senate bil1 5458. of the heirs of Bryson Hamilton; to the Committee on War relative to placing of bridge by Pennsylvania Railroad Co. 01er Claims. the Delaware lliver -near Trenton; to the Committee on Inter­ Also, papers to accompany bill for the relief of the heirs of state and 'Foreign Cammerce. Alexander Stolmaker; to the Committee on War Claims. Also, petition of citizens of Bridgeport, Conn., against passage By Mr. CANNON: Memorial of Polish-American citizens of of the Bmton-Littleto.ri bill relative to celebrating 100 years of Chicago, ID., and Polish National Alliance of the United Stutes peace with England; to the Committee on Industrial Arts and of America, against -pas"'age of bills restricting immigration; to Expositions.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Investigations: Subpoenas and Contempt Power
    Order Code RL31836 Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Congressional Investigations: Subpoenas and Contempt Power April 2, 2003 Louis Fisher Senior Specialist in Separation of Powers Government and Finance Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Congressional Investigations: Subpoenas and Contempt Power Summary When conducting investigations of the executive branch, congressional committees and Members of Congress generally receive the information required for legislative needs. If agencies fail to cooperate or the President invokes executive privilege, Congress can turn to a number of legislative powers that are likely to compel compliance. The two techniques described in this report are the issuance of subpoenas and the holding of executive officials in contempt. These techniques usually lead to an accommodation that meets the needs of both branches. Litigation is used at times, but federal judges generally encourage congressional and executive parties to settle their differences out of court. The specific examples in this report explain how information disputes arise and how they are resolved. For legal analysis see CRS Report 95-464A, Investigative Oversight: An Introduction to the Law, Practice, and Procedure of Congressional Inquiry, by Morton Rosenberg, and CRS Report RS30319, Presidential Claims of Executive Privilege: History, Law, Practice and Recent Developments, by Morton Rosenberg. A number of legislative tools, including subpoenas and contempt citations, are covered in CRS Report RL30966,
    [Show full text]
  • George Bush Library - Staff and Office Files) NLGB Control # White House Office White House Staff Member Document Type Subject Pages Restriction(S)
    P-2/P-5 Document Report (George Bush Library - Staff and Office Files) NLGB Control # White House Office White House Staff Member Document Type Subject Pages Restriction(s) 7543 Cabinet Affairs, Office of Korfonta, Paul Memo with Attachment Jim Pinkerton, Hanns Kuttner, Claudia Cummins to 8 P-5 Roger Porter re: Fitness Update and Action Plan 7544 Domestic Policy Council DPC Files Memo w/ attachment From Ken Yale to Dick Thornburgh 10 P-5 RE: Proposed Working Group on Responsible Budget Reform 7546 Domestic Policy Council DPC Files Memo w/ attachment From John Schall to David Bates and Roger Porter 3 P-5 RE: Yesterday's Enhanced Rescission Meeting 7547 Domestic Policy Council DPC Files Memo w/ attachment From John Schall to David Bates 3 P-5 RE: Enhanced Rescission Update and Next Meeting 7548 Domestic Policy Council DPC Files Memo From John Schall to David Bates 1 P-5 RE: Final Budget Reform Package 7550 Domestic Policy Council DPC Files Memo From John Schall to Chriss Winston 1 P-5 RE: Enhanced Rescission Page 1 of 477 P-2/P-5 Document Report (George Bush Library - Staff and Office Files) NLGB Control # White House Office White House Staff Member Document Type Subject Pages Restriction(s) 7551 Domestic Policy Council DPC Files Memo From Ken Yale to John Schall 1 P-5 RE: Executive Authority 7552 Domestic Policy Council DPC Files Memo From John Schall to David Bates 1 P-5 RE: Enhanced Rescission Followup 7553 Domestic Policy Council DPC Files Memo w/ attachment From John Schall to David Bates 4 P-5 RE: OMB's Director's Review for HHS Programs
    [Show full text]
  • Reagan's Cabinet Appointments Get Positive Ratings from the Public
    The Harris Survey For Release: Thursday AM, January 22nd, 1981 1981 #7 ISSN 0273-1037 REAGAN'S CABINET APPOINTMENTS GET POSITIVE RATINGS FROM THE PUBLIC By Louis Harris A 52-34 percent majority of Americans gives President Ronald Reagan positive marks for his Cabinet appointments. The prevailing belief is that an incoming president should have a chance to name his own people to his team, and they should be permitted to try their hand at solving governmental problems over an initial period of time. Some partisan strains still carryover from the election, however, and the Reagan Cabinet will soon be subject to criticism if its performance does not meet the high expectations people have set for it. For example, those who voted for Carter in the last election give the new Cabinet negative marks by 49-38 percent, as do liberals by 50-37 percent. But the majority of Reagan voters, along with Republicans and independents, give the new President high scores on his overall Cabinet selections. There are some wide variations in the public response to the Cabinet, however, as shown by the results of this latest Harris Survey of 1,499 adults nationwide. Four appointments receive broad acceptance: --U.N. Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick's nomination leads the list, with a 57-27 percent majority that thinks her appointment was sound and right. This is a reflection of people's desire to have more women in prominent government positions. --A 55-27 percent majority gives President Reagan high marks for naming Samuel Pierce, a black New York lawyer, as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of Remarks
    422 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS January 25, 1984 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS A SALUTE TO THE HONORABLE and effectively increased the volume of dol· In Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and Los An­ SAMUEL R. PIERCE, JR. Iars available to the minority communities. geles, California, Secretary Pierce estab­ We decided to take a close look at the ac­ lished a program called "Operation Build." complishments, problems, failures or suc­ In this program rather than the mere dis­ HON. JERRY LEWIS cesses during the three years that Samuel bursal of funds, the Department of HUD OF CALIFORNIA Pierce will have completed as Secretary of has moved to impact upon the lies of the in­ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES HUD next month. Pierce, who was identi­ dividual project resident youth and their Wednesday, January 25, 1984 fied as being from the "liberal wing of the families directly. The purpose of the impact party from New York State" as well as is to divert their interests and activities • Mr. LEWIS of California. Mr. being a black man suffered from some disad­ away from drug use, vandalism, and other Speaker, I have had the privilege of vantage at the beginning of his administra­ crime through a focus on development of serving on the Housing and Urban De­ tion. Much of the press coverage tended to self reliance, self respect, and skills of which velopment-Independent Agencies Sub­ seek to focus on the negative although he individuals can be proud. Adrianne Dove, committee of the Appropriations Com­ continued to move deliberately and consist­ the deputy director of the Los Angeles HUD ently to reshape his programs to optimize office, reported that the program is begin­ mittee this Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • AAA JOURNAL 2010 FINAL:Layout 1
    The Academy Journal Lawrence Academy/Fall 2010 INCLUDES THE REPORT ON ANNUAL GIVING SEE PAGES 68 – 88 Inside This Edition... Features 3-28 Making Connections with Asia 3-7 by Robinson C. Moore Trustees of Lawrence Trustees with 25 or More LA’s International Program 9-12 Academy Years of Service by Journal staff Albert B. Gordon Jr. ’59, President 1793–1827 Rev. Daniel Chaplin (34) Passion for People: A Profile 13-16 Lucy Abisalih ’76, Vice President 1793–1820 Rev. Phineas Whitney (27) of Tim Armstrong ’89 Geoffrey P. Clear, Treasurer 1793–1825 Rev. John Bullard (32) by Andrew Brescia Bruce M. MacNeil ’70, Secretary 1794–1827 Samuel Lawrence (33) 1795–1823 James Brazer (28) The Year of the Rooster: 18-21 Kevin A. Anderson ’85 1801–1830 Rev. David Palmer (29) LA’s First Chinese Students Ronald M. Ansin 1805–1835 Jonas Parker (30) compiled by Paul Husted ’64 Timothy M. Armstrong ’89 1807–1836 Caleb Butler (29) and Dick Jeffers Barbara Anderson Brammer ’75 1811–1839 Luther Lawrence (28) Ann N. Conway 1825–1854 Rev. George Fisher (29) The Adventures of 22-24 Kevin Cronin 1830–1866 Jonathan S. Adams (36) Captain Linear Patrick Cunningham ’91 1831–1860 Nehemiah Cutter (29) by Elana Cogliano ’05 Judi N. Cyr ’82 1831–1867 Joshua Green (36) Greta L. Donahue 1835–1884 Rev. Leonard Luce (49) The Senior Birdwalk 25-28 Charlotte Floyd 1849–1883 Agijah Edwin Hildreth (34) speech by Mark Haman Catherine J. Frissora 1863–1896 William Adams Richardson (33) Campus News 29-47 Bradford Hobbs ’82 1865–1893 Amasa Norcross (28) Jonathan Jodka ’79 1866–1918 Samuel A.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Cabinet Nominations President Jimmy Carter Through President George W
    Presidential Cabinet Nominations President Jimmy Carter through President George W. Bush Position President Nominee Announced Senate Received Confirmed Vote Secretary of Agriculture Carter Robert Bergland December 20, 1976 January 20, 1977 January 20, 1977 vv Reagan John Block December 23, 1980 January 20, 1981 January 22, 1981 98-0 rec. vote #9 Richard Lyng January 29, 1986 February 24, 1986 March 6, 1986 95-2 rec. vote #26 Bush Clayton Yeutter December 14, 1988 January 20, 1989 February 8, 1989 100-0 rec. vote #13 Edward Madigan January 25, 1991 February 19, 1991 March 7, 1991 99-0 rec. vote #24 Clinton Mike Espy December 24, 1992 January 20, 1993 January 21, 1993 UC Dan Glickman December 28, 1994 March 10, 1995 March 30, 1995 94-0 rec. vote #120 Bush Ann Veneman December 20, 2000 January 20, 2001 January 20, 2001 vv Mike Johanns December 2, 2004 January 4, 2005 January 20, 2005 vv Edward Schafer October 31, 2007 December 6, 2007 January 28, 2008 vv Attorney General Carter Griffin Bell December 20, 1976 January 20, 1977 January 25, 1977 75-21 rec. vote #10 1 Benjamin Civiletti July 19, 1979 July 20, 1979 August 1, 1979 94-1 rec. vote #245 Reagan William French Smith December 11, 1980 January 20, 1981 January 22, 1981 96-1 rec. vote #8 Edwin Meese III January 23, 1984 February 3, 1984* January 3, 1985 February 23, 1985 63-31 rec. vote #9 Richard Thornburgh July 12, 1988 July 25, 1988 August 11, 1988 85-0 rec. vote #310 Bush Richard Thornburgh November 21, 1988 Cont’d from previous admin.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Access and FOIA, FOIA Requests For
    Case Id Date Received Date Closed Requester Name Subject Disposition Description Department of Justice (DOJ) Case File 169-26-1, Section 1 in box 28 of 48885 Jan/04/2016 Jan/20/2016 Ahmed Young Class 169: Desegregation of Public Education Total grant 48886 Jan/04/2016 Jan/21/2016 Jared Leighton Mark Clark, 44-HQ-44202, 157-SI-802 Request withdrawn Other all FBI personnel and case records for retired Special Agenct Edmund F. 48891 Jan/05/2016 Jan/12/2016 Devin Murphy Murphy who served in DC, NC, Missouri field offices Other Other 48893 Jan/05/2016 Jan/22/2016 (b) (6) (b) (6) Partial grant 48894 Jan/05/2016 Feb/03/2016 Jared McBride IRR files Total grant 48895 Jan/05/2016 Jun/09/2016 Conor Gallagher FBI file numbers 100-AQ-3331 regarding the Revolutionary Union Request withdrawn Other FBI Field Office case files regarding the Revolutionary Union 100-RH-11090 Springfield 100-11574 Richmond 100-11090 48896 Jan/05/2016 Conor Gallagher Dallas 100-12360 FBI file numbers regarding the October League aka Communist Party (Marxist-Leninist) New York 100-177151 Detroit 100-41416 48897 Jan/05/2016 Conor Gallagher Baltimore 100-30603 FBI Case Number 100-HQ-398040, 100-NY-109682, 100-LS-3812. Leon 48900 Jan/06/2016 Jan/26/2018 Parker Higgins Bibb Partial grant FBI Case File 100-CG-42241, 100-NY-151519, 100-NY-150205, 100-BU- 48902 Jan/06/2016 Kathryn Petersen 439-369. FBI Case File 100-HQ-426761 and 100-NY-141495. Nonviolent Action 48903 Jan/06/2016 Mar/02/2016 Mikal Jakubal Against Nuclear Weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Defense Funds and Other Ways That Government Officials Pay Their Lawyers
    Paying the Price for Heightened Ethics Scrutiny: Legal Defense Funds and Other Ways That Government Officials Pay Their Lawyers Kathleen Clark* This article takes a comprehensive look at a problem of growing signifi- cance for government officials: how to pay the legalfees they incur when they or their colleagues are investigatedfor wrongdoing. Since Watergate, an in- creasing number of government officials have had to hire attorneys when called before grandjuries and legislative committees or subjected to internal admin- istrative investigations. Their legalfees often outstrip their government salaries or even their net worth. This article examines three existing mechanisms for government reimbursement of legal fees-Justice Department regulations, the Independent Counsel statute, andprivate legislation-andidentifies the short- comings of each. It then explores the legal status of legal defensefunds, which top officials have used to raise millions of dollars to pay their legalfees. Fi- nally, the article identifies several reforms that would treat government officials much morefairly andprotect against corruptinginfluences. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 67 I. THE PROBLEM: GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS INCURRING MASSIVE LEGAL FEES ...........................................................................................69 II. THE INADEQUACY OF GOVERNMENT REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAMS ..... 72 A. Justice DepartmentRegulations ..................................................... 72
    [Show full text]
  • Yale University: a Devil’S Workshop?
    Yale University: A Devil’s Workshop? By William P. Litynski “FOR GOD, FOR COUNTRY, AND FOR YALE…” Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. partners appear for a formal portrait in 1959. E. Roland Harriman, former Secretary of Defense Robert A. Lovett, Knight Woolley, John B. Madden, and Stephen Y. Hord were members of SKULL & BONES. John C. West was a member of SCROLL & KEY. Moreau D. Brown and Thomas McCance were members of WOLF’S HEAD. (Source: Fleshing Out Skull & Bones by Kris Millegan) Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. partners (from left to right) Thatcher M. Brown, Ray Morris, H. D. Pennington, Prescott S. Bush, Thomas McCance, and Knight Woolley pose for the camera at their office in New York City in July 1945. Ray Morris, Prescott S. Bush, and Knight Woolley were members of SKULL & BONES at Yale University. Thatcher M. Brown and Thomas McCance were members of WOLF’S HEAD at Yale University. (Photo: Herbert Gehr/Time Life) Yale graduates include George H.W. Bush, Porter Goss, and R. James Woolsey (graduate of Yale Law School). (Source: At the Center of the Storm: My Years at the CIA by George Tenet) Former CIA Director R. James Woolsey (left) listens as U.S. Senator Joe Lieberman (D-CT) talks to the press on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. on July 20, 2004. Woolsey is a graduate of Yale Law School. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images) Averell Harriman (left) and Secretary of Defense Robert A. Lovett (center) chat with Secretary of State Dean Acheson in January 1951. (Photo by Lisa Larsen/Time Life Pictures/Getty Images) New York City Mayor Robert F.
    [Show full text]
  • January 16-31, 1972
    RICHARD NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL RECORD DOCUMENT DOCUMENT SUBJECT/TITLE OR CORRESPONDENTS DATE RESTRICTION NUMBER TYPE 1 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 1/16/1972 A Appendix “A” 2 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 1/20/1972 A Appendix “C” 3 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 1/21/1972 A Appendix “B” 4 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 1/23/1972 A Appendix “A” 5 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 1/27/1972 A Appendix “B” 6 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 1/28/1972 A Appendix “A” 7 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 1/29/1972 A Appendix “A” COLLECTION TITLE BOX NUMBER WHCF: SMOF: Office of Presidential Papers and Archives RC-9 FOLDER TITLE President Richard Nixon’s Daily Diary January 16, 1972 – January 31, 1972 PRMPA RESTRICTION CODES: A. Release would violate a Federal statute or Agency Policy. E. Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or B. National security classified information. financial information. C. Pending or approved claim that release would violate an individual’s F. Release would disclose investigatory information compiled for law rights. enforcement purposes. D. Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy G. Withdrawn and return private and personal material. or a libel of a living person. H. Withdrawn and returned non-historical material. DEED OF GIFT RESTRICTION CODES: D-DOG Personal privacy under deed of gift --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on the Differences Between Prosecuting for a United States Attorney's Office and an Office of Independent Counsel*
    WEARING A BULL'S EYE: OBSERVATIONS ON THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PROSECUTING FOR A UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND AN OFFICE OF INDEPENDENT COUNSEL* Roscoe C. Howard, Jr.** The servants of the nation are to render their services without any taking of presents. The disobedient shall, if convicted, die with- out ceremony. Plato1 I. INTRODUCTION Public servants respond to a higher calling. In deciding to enter public service, individuals agree to forsake personal rewards, to ignore the personal pleas of friends, acquaintances, and special in- terests, and to work for the common good of the community. Federal public servants work for the good of the entire nation, not for the individual interests of a person or a narrow constituency. When a public servant ignores an oath to uphold and abide by * © Roscoe C. Howard, Jr., 1999. All rights reserved. ** Professor of Law, The University of Kansas. A.B., Brown University, 1974; J.D., University of Virginia, 1977. Professor Howard is a former Assistant United States At- torney for the District of Columbia and the Eastern District of Virginia, as well as a former Associate Independent Counsel under the Honorable Arlin M. Adams, investigat- ing former Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., and under the Honorable Donald C. Smaltz, investigating former Secretary of Agriculture A. Michael Espy. Professor Howard would like to thank his law faculty colleague, Michael Kautsch, for his contributions to this Article, and his former prosecutorial colleague, Barry Coburn, for sharing some of his observations on prosecuting in the offices dis- cussed in this Article.
    [Show full text]