DOCSLIB.ORG

BJCP Exam Study Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BJCP Exam Study Guide BJCP BEER EXAM STUDY GUIDE Last Revised: December, 2017 Contributing Authors: Original document by Edward Wolfe, Scott Bickham, David Houseman, Ginger Wotring, Dave Sapsis, Peter Garofalo, Chuck Hanning. Revised 2006 by Gordon Strong and Steve Piatz. Revised 2012 by Scott Bickham and Steve Piatz. Revised 2014 by Steve Piatz Revised 2015 by Steve Piatz Revised 2017 by Scott Bickham Copyright © 1998-2017 by the authors and the BJCP CHANGE LOG January-March, 2012: revised to reflect new exam structure, no longer interim May 1, 2012: revised yeast section, corrected T/F question 99 August, 2012: removed redundant styles for question S0, revised the additional readings list, updated the judging procedure to encompass the checkboxes on the score sheet. October 2012: reworded true/false questions 2, 4, 6, 8, 13, 26, 33, 38, 39, 42, and 118. Reworded essay question T15. March 2014: removed the Exam Program description from the document, clarified the wording on question T13. October 2015: revised for the 2015 BJCP Style Guidelines. February, 2016: revised the table for the S0 question to fix typos, removed untested styles. September-October, 2017 (Scott Bickham): moved the BJCP references in Section II.B. to Section I; incorporated a study guide for the online Entrance exam in Section II; amended the rubric for written questions S0, T1, T3, T13 and T15; rewrote the Water question and converted the rubrics for each of the Technical and Brewing Process questions to have three components; simplified the wording of the written exam questions’ added an introduction to Section IV; added two paragraphs on fining in the Wort Production section (now IV.D); revised the description of phenols in Section IV.E (now IV.F); made substantial revisions and expansions of the off-flavor descriptions in the Troubleshooting section (now IV.G and entitled Beer Characteristics); the Hops Section (now IV.E) was also revised to include better descriptions of the classic hop varieties, and a paragraph on New World hops was added; errors in the Water section (now IV.B) were corrected, and the paragraph discussing the connection between the mineral content of the water and development of historical beer styles was expanded into a list to facilitate studying. December 2017 (Bruce Buerger and Scott Bickham): updated the BJCP Exam Study Course and added the final version of the Written Proficiency Exam questions as approved by the exam directorate. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 A. Additional Reading .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 General BJCP References ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Style Knowledge ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 Communicating About Beer .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Beer Judging Exam ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 Written Proficiency Exam ................................................................................................................................................. 4 II. BEER JUDGING AND THE BJCP EXAM ........................................................................................................................ 7 A. Beer Evaluation and the Judging Process ........................................................................................................................ 7 Beer Evaluation ................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Environment ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Equipment ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Presentation ...................................................................................................................................................................... 8 The Judging Process ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Procedure .......................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Notes on Smelling the Beer ............................................................................................................................................ 11 Notes on Tasting the Beer .............................................................................................................................................. 11 Notes on Making Comments about Beer ........................................................................................................................ 12 Other Considerations ...................................................................................................................................................... 12 References and Additional Reading ............................................................................................................................... 14 B. Three-Tier BJCP Exam Structure .................................................................................................................................. 15 Overview of the BJCP Entrance Exams ......................................................................................................................... 16 Exam Fees ...................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Registering for an Entrance Exam .................................................................................................................................. 17 Studying for the Entrance Exam ..................................................................................................................................... 18 Copyright Notice ............................................................................................................................................................ 18 C. BJCP Beer Judge Entrance Exam Study Guide ............................................................................................................. 18 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 18 References ...................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Question Types and Categories ...................................................................................................................................... 19 Questions on BJCP Ethics, Levels and the Judging Process .......................................................................................... 20 Questions on Beer Styles ................................................................................................................................................ 20 Questions on Beer Characteristics .................................................................................................................................. 21 Questions on Ingredients and the Brewing Process ........................................................................................................ 21 During the Exam ............................................................................................................................................................. 21 After the Exam ............................................................................................................................................................... 22 Next Steps after Passing the Exam ................................................................................................................................. 22 Next Steps after Failing the Exam .................................................................................................................................. 22 D. BJCP Beer Judge Written Proficiency Examination ..................................................................................................... 22 Questions on BJCP Ethics, Levels and the Judging Process .......................................................................................... 22 The Essay Portion of the Written Proficiency Examination ........................................................................................... 30 Beer Style Questions .....................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Autochthonous Biological Resources for the Production of Regional Craft Beers: Exploring Possible Contributions of Cereals, Hops, Microbes, and Other Ingredients
    foods Review Autochthonous Biological Resources for the Production of Regional Craft Beers: Exploring Possible Contributions of Cereals, Hops, Microbes, and Other Ingredients Nicola De Simone 1 , Pasquale Russo 1, Maria Tufariello 2 , Mariagiovanna Fragasso 1, Michele Solimando 3, Vittorio Capozzi 4,* , Francesco Grieco 2,† and Giuseppe Spano 1,† 1 Department of Agriculture, Food, Natural Science, Engineering, University of Foggia, Via Napoli 25, 71122 Foggia, Italy; [email protected] (N.D.S.); [email protected] (P.R.); [email protected] (M.F.); [email protected] (G.S.) 2 Institute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Via Prov.le Lecce-Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy; [email protected] (M.T.); [email protected] (F.G.) 3 Rebeers, Microbrewery, Viale degli Artigiani 30, 71121 Foggia, Italy; [email protected] 4 Institute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council (CNR), c/o CS-DAT, Via Michele Protano, 71121 Foggia, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] † Both authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Selected biological resources used as raw materials in beer production are important Citation: De Simone, N.; Russo, P.; drivers of innovation and segmentation in the dynamic market of craft beers. Among these resources, Tufariello, M.; Fragasso, M.; local/regional ingredients have several benefits, such as strengthening the connection with territories, Solimando, M.; Capozzi, V.; Grieco, F.; enhancing the added value of the final products, and reducing supply costs and environmental Spano, G. Autochthonous Biological impacts. It is assumed that specific ingredients provide differences in flavours, aromas, and, more Resources for the Production of generally, sensory attributes of the final products.
    [Show full text]
  • EURAS 2018 Beer
    How One of The World’s Oldest Food Safety Standards Approaches Expiration – The Case of German Beer 1 Philipp Eble * Henk J. de Vries * ** * Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University [email protected] [email protected] ** Delft Univeristy of Technology, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management [email protected] Abstract The paper at hand contemplates the effect of a centuries-old national food safety standard on innovation in a globalizing market. To that end, the case of the German Beer Industry is analysed to explicate the relationship between a longstanding beer purity decree and brewing innovation. Over 500 years of existence the so-called “Reinheitsgebot”, now laid down in federal German law, has served to restrict variety and safeguard the quality of locally-produced beers. In turn, the standard prominently shaped the national image as well as consumer preferences across all regions in Germany. This research however demonstrates how this has overwhelmingly brought about adverse consequences for the international relevance of German beer in an increasingly globalised economy, which favours diversity in tastes. Due to changing consumption trends and the constricted innovative ability of German brewers, the findings inform government’s responsibility in standardisation for traditional consumer goods industries at a time of urgent need for action. Introduction Beer is widely celebrated for its association with culinary distinctiveness, traditional values and quality (Meussdoerffer 2009). As the most popular drink in the world, behind tea and water, the history of beer brewing dates back several thousands of years, from as early as the Neolithic period to the ancient civilisations of Egypt and Mesopotamia (Nelson 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • A Temperate and Wholesome Beverage: the Defense of the American Beer Industry, 1880-1920
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses Spring 7-3-2018 A Temperate and Wholesome Beverage: the Defense of the American Beer Industry, 1880-1920 Lyndsay Danielle Smith Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the United States History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Smith, Lyndsay Danielle, "A Temperate and Wholesome Beverage: the Defense of the American Beer Industry, 1880-1920" (2018). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 4497. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.6381 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. A Temperate and Wholesome Beverage: The Defense of the American Beer Industry, 1880-1920 by Lyndsay Danielle Smith A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Thesis Committee: Catherine McNeur, Chair Katrine Barber Joseph Bohling Nathan McClintock Portland State University 2018 © 2018 Lyndsay Danielle Smith i Abstract For decades prior to National Prohibition, the “liquor question” received attention from various temperance, prohibition, and liquor interest groups. Between 1880 and 1920, these groups gained public interest in their own way. The liquor interests defended their industries against politicians, religious leaders, and social reformers, but ultimately failed. While current historical scholarship links the different liquor industries together, the beer industry constantly worked to distinguish itself from other alcoholic beverages.
    [Show full text]
  • 21-08-18 Beermenu Cape
    EST. 2010 Weiss Nix Weissbier A classic unfiltered Bavarian-style wheat beer, with an inviting fruity/ spicy aroma reminiscent of banana, citrus, and clove. 14 IBUs 5.3% abv Sister Golden Kölsch Crisp and refreshing German-style golden ale, with classic malt character and just a kiss of noble hops. McLovin Irish Red Ale Uncomplicated and easy-drinking. Our famous red ale boasts a deep copper color and smooth, toasty caramel malt character, with just a touch 20 IBUs 4.9% abv of roasted barley in the finish for an exceptionally easy-drinking pint. 21 IBUs 5.3% abv Diamond Star Halo Kettle Sour Ale Silver Medal - 2014 World Beer Cup® Crisp and quenching, tart and tangy kettle sour with Bronze Medal - 2012 World Beer Cup® notes of sourdough and citrus. Serious pucker-power! 7 IBUs 4.8% abv Mosasaur (aka “Mosey”) IPA We make gratuitous use of Mosaic hops, noted for Woodshed Oaked IPA tropical, citrus, and berry fruit notes in this India pale ale. Bitterness is mellow, hop flavor is abundant. Our flagship beer walks the line between tradition and invention. Inviting floral/citrus hop aromas and vanillin- 68 IBUs 6.9% abv rich French oak notes accent this perfectly balanced, Honored as one of Top 3 Wisconsin IPAs at the 2017 distinctive India pale ale. Wisconsin IPA Fest! 65 IBUs 6.5% abv Scaredy Cat Dedication Oatmeal Stout Abbey 'Extra' Dubbel A hearty and full-bodied dark beer with rich malt flavors Brewed in the tradition of the Trappist brewing monks of of molasses, cocoa, caramel, and espresso.
    [Show full text]
  • Lipid-Protein Interactions in Beer and Beer Foam Brewed with Wheat
    Lipid-Protein Interactions in Beer and Beer Foam Brewed with Wheat Flour1 Keith S. Morris, Pall Europe Ltd., Europa House, Havant Street, Portsmouth, POl 3PD England, and James S. Hough, British School of Malting and Brewing, Birmingham University, P.O. Box 363, Birmingham B15 2TT England ABSTRACT under an atmosphere of nitrogen gas there is a significant increase in the extractable bound lipid fraction, which has been shown to be Use of wheat flour as a brewing adjunct has been shown to enhance beer mainly caused by the nonselective binding of triglycerides by foam stability, as measured by the Rudin method, and also to give gluten proteins (1). Subsequent work by Frazier et al (2) involved protection against the adverse effects of added triolein on foam stability. The efficiency of this protective action is dependent on the contact time using radiolabeled triolein to follow the fate of triglycerides during between the lipid and the beer and is specific to triolein. The addition of dough development under nitrogen. A significant proportion of palmitic acid showed different effects on the foam stability of beer brewed the lipid was found to be stably bound to a protein derived from the using wheat flour. This effect was postulated to be caused by the specific acetic acid-soluble fraction of dough. The protein, named ligolin, binding of triolein to proteins derived from wheat flour. Interaction has a molecular weight of approximately 9,000-11,000 daltons and between triolein and beer proteins was identified by precipitation of is speculated to be of fundamental importance in the formation of radiolabeled lipid with trichloroacetic acid.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 World Beer Cup Style Guidelines
    2018 WORLD BEER CUP® COMPETITION STYLE LIST, DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS Category Name and Number, Subcategory: Name and Letter ...................................................... Page HYBRID/MIXED LAGERS OR ALES .....................................................................................................1 1. American-Style Wheat Beer .............................................................................................1 A. Subcategory: Light American Wheat Beer without Yeast .................................................1 B. Subcategory: Dark American Wheat Beer without Yeast .................................................1 2. American-Style Wheat Beer with Yeast ............................................................................1 A. Subcategory: Light American Wheat Beer with Yeast ......................................................1 B. Subcategory: Dark American Wheat Beer with Yeast ......................................................1 3. Fruit Beer ........................................................................................................................2 4. Fruit Wheat Beer .............................................................................................................2 5. Belgian-Style Fruit Beer....................................................................................................3 6. Pumpkin Beer ..................................................................................................................3 A. Subcategory: Pumpkin/Squash Beer ..............................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Gewinner 2009
    LAND / KAT. NAME / CATEGORY AWARD BRAUEREI / BREWERY ORT / LOCATION COUNTRY BIER / BEER WEBSITE Gold Hofbräuhaus Traunstein Josef Sailer KG Traunstein Germany Fürstentrunk www.hb-ts.de Festival Beer / Festbier Silber / Silver Brauhaus Faust OHG Miltenberg Germany Faust Festbier www.faust.de Bronze Brauerei Wiethaler Lauf-Neunhof Germany Wiethaler Goldstoff Hell www.brauerei-wiethaler.de Gold Camba Bavaria GmbH Truchtlaching Germany Trucht´linger Doppelbock www.cambabavaria.de German Style Stichting Noordhollandse Alternatieve Dark Bock / Dunkler Bock Silber / Silver Bierbrouwers Purmerend Netherlands YSBOK www.snab.nl Bronze Schlossbrauerei Autenried GmbH Ichenhausen Germany Leonhardi Bock www.autenrieder.de Gold Bürgerliches Brauhaus Saalfeld GmbH Saalfeld Germany Saalfelder Bock www.brauhaus-saalfeld.de German Style Pale and Amber Bock / Heller und Bernsteinfarbener Silber / Silver Brauerei-Gasthof Kundmüller KG Viereth-Trunstadt Germany Weiherer Bock www.kundmueller.de Bock Lurago Marinone Bronze Nuovo Birrificio Italiano s.r.l. (Como) Italy Bibock www.birrificio.it Private Landbrauerei Schönram A. Gold Oberlindober jun. Petting/Schönram Germany Schönramer Pils www.brauerei-schoenram.de German Style Privatbrauerei M. C. Wieninger GmbH & Pilsner Silber / Silver Co. KG Teisendorf Teisendorf Germany Wieninger Ruperti Pils www.wieninger.de Bronze Trumer Privatbrauerei Josef Sigl Obertrum am See Austria Trumer Pils www.trumer.at Gold Cervejaria Sudbrack Ltda. Blumenau-SC Brasil Eisenbahn Dunkel www.eisenbahn.com.br German Style Scheibenberg/ Schwarzbier Silber / Silver Fiedler-Bräu Erzgebirgsbier Oberscheibe Germany Magisterbräu Schwarzbier www.brauerei-fiedler.de Bronze FX Matt Brewing Company Utica, NY USA Saranac Black Forest www.saranac.com LAND / KAT. NAME / CATEGORY AWARD BRAUEREI / BREWERY ORT / LOCATION COUNTRY BIER / BEER WEBSITE Gold Brauerei Goss Deuerling Germany Goss-Märzen Milwaukee, Bavarian Style Silber / Silver Lakefront Brewing, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Commander's Guide to German Society, Customs, and Protocol
    Headquarters Army in Europe United States Army, Europe, and Seventh Army Pamphlet 360-6* United States Army Installation Management Agency Europe Region Office Heidelberg, Germany 20 September 2005 Public Affairs Commanders Guide to German Society, Customs, and Protocol *This pamphlet supersedes USAREUR Pamphlet 360-6, 8 March 2000. For the CG, USAREUR/7A: E. PEARSON Colonel, GS Deputy Chief of Staff Official: GARY C. MILLER Regional Chief Information Officer - Europe Summary. This pamphlet should be used as a guide for commanders new to Germany. It provides basic information concerning German society and customs. Applicability. This pamphlet applies primarily to commanders serving their first tour in Germany. It also applies to public affairs officers and protocol officers. Forms. AE and higher-level forms are available through the Army in Europe Publishing System (AEPUBS). Records Management. Records created as a result of processes prescribed by this publication must be identified, maintained, and disposed of according to AR 25-400-2. Record titles and descriptions are available on the Army Records Information Management System website at https://www.arims.army.mil. Suggested Improvements. The proponent of this pamphlet is the Office of the Chief, Public Affairs, HQ USAREUR/7A (AEAPA-CI, DSN 370-6447). Users may suggest improvements to this pamphlet by sending DA Form 2028 to the Office of the Chief, Public Affairs, HQ USAREUR/7A (AEAPA-CI), Unit 29351, APO AE 09014-9351. Distribution. B (AEPUBS) (Germany only). 1 AE Pam 360-6 ● 20 Sep 05 CONTENTS Section I INTRODUCTION 1. Purpose 2. References 3. Explanation of Abbreviations 4. General Section II GETTING STARTED 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Bjcp Style Guidelines
    2008 BJCP STYLE GUIDELINES Beer Judge Certification Program (BJCP) Style Guidelines for Beer, Mead and Cider 2008 Revision of the 2004 Guidelines Copyright © 2008, BJCP, Inc. The BJCP grants the right to make copies for use in BJCP-sanctioned competitions or for educational/judge training purposes. All other rights reserved. See our website www.bjcp.org for updates to these guidelines. 2003-2004 BJCP Beer Style Committee: Gordon Strong, Chairman Ron Bach Peter Garofalo Michael L. Hall Dave Houseman Mark Tumarkin 2008 Contributors: Jamil Zainasheff, Kristen England, Stan Hieronymus, Tom Fitzpatrick, George DePiro 2003-2004 Contributors: Jeff Sparrow, Alan McKay, Steve Hamburg, Roger Deschner, Ben Jankowski, Jeff Renner, Randy Mosher, Phil Sides, Jr., Dick Dunn, Joel Plutchak, A.J. Zanyk, Joe Workman, Dave Sapsis, Ed Westemeier, Ken Schramm 1998-1999 Beer Style Committee: Bruce Brode, Steve Casselman, Tim Dawson, Peter Garofalo, Bryan Gros, Bob Hall, David Houseman, Al Korzonas, Martin Lodahl, Craig Pepin, Bob Rogers 48 i ilSot...................................................17 Stout rial Impe Russian 13F. Sot..............................................................17 Stout American 13E. pdate.................................46 U 2008 T, CHAR STYLE BJCP 2004 tra Stout........................................................16 tra Ex Foreign 13D. N/A N/A N/A 5-12% 0.995-1.020 1.045-100 Perry or Cider Specialty Other D. y Cider/Perry...........................................45 y Specialt Other 28D. tu ................................................................16 Stout l Oatmea 13C. ine......................................................................44 Applew 28C. tu ....................................................................15 Stout Sweet 13B. N/A N/A N/A 9-12% 0.995-1.010 1.070-100 Wine Apple C. ie .....................................................................44 Cider Fruit 28B. 3.DySot.......................................................................15 Stout Dry 13A. N/A N/A N/A 5-9% 0.995-1.010 1.045-70 Cider Fruit B.
    [Show full text]
  • BJCP Beer Fault List
    BBEEEERR FFAAUULLTT LLIISSTT AHA/BJCP Sanctioned Competition Program See http://www.bjcp.org/faults.php for a complete list http://www.bjcp.org Copyright © 2012 — BJCP, Inc. http://www.homebrewersassociation.org Characteristic Possible Solutions Acetaldehyde Make sure fermentation is vigorous using healthy yeast. Allow full attenuation. Leave beer on yeast longer. Oxygenate fresh cut green apples wort fully. Try another yeast strain. Make sure sufficient yeast nutrients are available. Let beer age longer. Alcoholic/Hot Lower fermentation temperature. Use a less attenuative yeast strain. Check yeast health. Use less fermentables. Use spicy, vinous, warming from less sugary adjuncts. Check for possible infection. Raise mash temperature. Let beer age longer before consuming. Ethanol and higher alcohols Astringent Don’t oversparge. Don’t overcrush grain. Don’t boil grain. Don’t sparge with water above 170°. Don’t sparge with Mouth-puckering, lingering water with a high pH (over 6). Use water with lower sulfate content. Use less dark grains (especially black malt). Use harshness, husk-like graininess less whole hops (especially high-alpha hops or simply large quantities of hops). Avoid use of raw spices, fruit pith and fruit skins. Diacetyl Try another yeast strain. Oxygenate wort before fermentation. Reduce primary fermentation temperature. Use a Buttery, Butterscotch, Movie warmer/longer secondary fermentation. Use healthy yeast in sufficient quantity. Make sure sufficient yeast nutrients Popcorn are available (including reducing adjunct use). Check for infection. Allow beer to rest on yeast until fully attenuated. Don’t rack, filter or fine too early. Don’t crash-cool yeast. If lager, raise temperature for a diacetyl rest at end of fermentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Drink List Drink List Proudly Serving Baltimore’S Finest Lunches, Dinners and Brunches for More Than 30 Years
    DRINK LIST DRINK LIST PROUDLY SERVING BALTIMORE’S FINEST LUNCHES, DINNERS AND BRUNCHES FOR MORE THAN 30 YEARS. BEER WINE Miller Lite Sam Smith’s Oatmeal Stout Budweiser ShockTop WHITE Bud Light Yuengling Chardonnay, Smoking Loon “Steelebird” Unoaked, CA _________________________ 7/21 Coors Light Yuengling Light Medium bodied wine with a floral bouquet and notes of apricot, pear and honeysuckle nectar Bud Light Lime Sierra Nevada Chardonnay, Sonoma Cutrer, CA _________________________________________________12/40 Heineken Anchor Steam Bright vibrant flavors of green apple and citrus lemon cream are accented by subtle oak Heineken Light Dogfish Head 60 Min IPA Chardonnay, La Crema, Monterey ____________________________________________________ 45 Natural Light (Grenades) Blue Moon Lively citrus, subtle toasted oak and butterscotch with a lovely vibrancy National Premium Allagash White Pinot Grigio, Ecco Domani, Italy ___________________________________________________ 8/24 Natty Boh Magic Hat – Circus Boy Well balanced and clean with soft flavors that are indicative of the refreshing fruit style Rolling Rock Woodchuck Cider Sauvignon Blanc, Oyster Bay, NZ __________________________________________________ 8/24 Corona Xtra Michelob Light Always crisp and refreshing, zesty and aromatic with lots of lively fruit characters Corona Light Michelob Ultra Sauvignon Blanc, Heritage, CA ____________________________________________________12/40 Amstel Light Boddingtons Refreshing combo of fresh berry with a touch of tropical & fig fragrance Red Stripe
    [Show full text]
  • Shropshire Tales Ad OL EMAIL
    FREE Issue 8 Spring 19 Inside... Mild in May Passport Pub, Club and Brewery of the Year Results CAMRA West Midlands Regional Awards 2018 Pub and Brewery News Shropshire's Real Heritage Pubs www.tes.camra.org.uk Telford & East Shropshire CAMRA Offi cial magazine of Telford & East Shropshire and Shrewsbury & www.saws.camra.org.uk Shrewsbury & West Shropshire CAMRA West Shropshire branches of CAMRA Editor's Welcome Main Contents Hello and welcome to Issue 8 of A word from T.E.S CAMRA Chairman 4 A word from S.W.S CAMRA Chairman 4 So the votes have been cast and counted A word from our Market Drayton sub-branch 5 and we now have the results from both Pub of the Season - Spring2018 5 Shropshire branches for Pub, Club and Brewery News 7-8 Brewery of the Year for each area, see the results later in this issue. Pub News 10 CAMRA West Midlands Regional Awards 12-13 There has been some exciting news from 2018 West Midlands CAMRA as our region will TES Pub, Club & Brewery of the Year 15 be hosting the Great British Beer Festival Results Winter in Birmingham from 2020 until Mild in May 17-24 2022. This is great for us as a region SWS Pub & Club of the Year Results 26-27 and more details will be announced Notices & Emails 27 throughout the coming year. Awards presented to Shropshire pubs 28-29 Finally we are pleased to announce that & breweries Mild in May has returned to Shropshire Shropshire's Real Heritage Pubs - 30-31 this year and you can fi nd your Mild in Loggerheads, Shrewsbury May Passport in the middle of this issue Beer Festivals 2019 34 of Shropshire TAles.
    [Show full text]