Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 184 / Friday, September 22, 1995 / Notices

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 184 / Friday, September 22, 1995 / Notices 49264 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 184 / Friday, September 22, 1995 / Notices Program Executive Offices from (9) Stratford Army Engine Plant, (Area code) commer- Aviation-Troop Command, St. Louis, Connecticut. Installation cial No. Missouri, to form the Aviation & Missile FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For Command. Savanna Army (13) Tobyhanna Army Depot, further information regarding these Depot Activity, IL . (815) 273±8701 Seneca Army Pennsylvania, receiving: core missile environmental impact analyses, please contact the Public Affairs Office of the Depot, NY ........... (607) 869±1235 guidance system workload from Sierra Army Depot, Letterkenny Army Depot, Pennsylvania; affected installations or the appropriate higher headquarters as indicated below: CA ....................... (916) 827±4343 and Common-Use Ground- Stratford Army En- Communication Electronics from (Area code) commer- gine Plant, CT ..... (810) 574±6584 McClellan Air Force Base, California. Installation cial No. Sudbury Training b. An Environmental Impact Annex, MA .......... (404) 669±5607/5686 Statement is planned for Fort Leonard Anniston Army Tobyhanna Army Wood, Missouri, receiving: U.S. Army Depot, AL ............ (205) 235±6281 Depot, PA ........... (717) 894±7308 Military Police School and U.S. Army Bayonne Military Chemical School from Fort McClellan, Ocean Terminal, Dated: September 19, 1995. Alabama. NJ ........................ (201) 823±6351 Raymond J. Fatz, c. Environmental Assessments are Bellmore Logistics Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Activity, NY ......... (404) 669±5607/5686 planned for property disposal actions at Army, (Environment, Safety and Big Coppett Key, FL (404) 669±5607/5686 Occupational Health) OASA (IL&E). the following closure locations: Camp Bonneville, [FR Doc. 95±23606 Filed 9±21±95; 8:45 am] (1) Bellmore Logistics Activity, New WA ...................... (404) 669±5607/5686 York; Camp Kilmer, NJ .... (404) 669±5607/5686 BILLING CODE 3710±08±M (2) Big Coppett Key, Florida; Camp Pedrick-town, (3) Camp Bonneville, Washington; NJ ........................ (404) 669±5607/5686 (4) Camp Kilmer, New Jersey; Defense Distribution DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (5) Camp Pedericktown, New Jersey; Ctr, Memphis, TN (901) 775±6753 (6) Defense Distribution Depot, Defense Distribution Draft Waste Management Ogden, Utah; Ctr, Odgen, UT ... (801) 399±7828 Programmatic Environmental Impact (7) Detroit Army Tank Plan, Michigan; Detroit Army Tank Statement Plant, MI .............. (810) 574±6584 (8) East Fort Baker, California; Detroit Arsenal, MI . (810) 574±6584 AGENCY: Department of Energy. (9) Fort Buchanan, Puerto Rico; East Fort Baker, CA (404) 669/5607/5686 ACTION: Notice of Availability. (10) Fort Dix, New Jersey; Fitzsimons Army (11) Fort Greely, Alaska; Medical Center, SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (12) Fort Holabird, Maryland; CO ....................... (303) 361±3192/3952 (DOE) announces the availability of the (13) Fort Missoula, Montana; Fort Belvoir, VA ...... (703) 805±5001 Draft Waste Management Programmatic (14) Fort Pickett, Virginia; Fort Bliss, TX .......... (915) 568±4505 Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) Fort Buchanan, PR . (404) 669±5607/5686 (15) Fort Totten, New York; for public review and comment. The (16) Hingham Cohassett, Fort Chaffee, AR .... (501) 484±2905 draft PEIS has been prepared in Massachusetts; Fort Detrick, MD ..... (301) 619±2018 accordance with the requirements of the (17) Kelly Support Center, Fort Dix, NJ ............ (404) 669±5607/5686 National Environmental Policy Act Pennsylvania; Fort Greely, AK ...... (907) 873±4661 Fort Holabird, MD ... (301) 677±1361 (NEPA) of 1969; Council on (18) Letterkenny Army Depot, Fort Huachuca, AZ . (602) 533±2752 Environmental Quality regulations Pennsylvania; Fort Jackson, SC .... (803) 751±7650 implementing NEPA, 40 CFR Parts (19) Recreation Center #2, North Fort Leonard Wood, 1500±1508; and DOE NEPA Carolina; MO ...................... (314) 563±4013 Implementing Procedures, 10 CFR Part (20) Red River Army Depot, Texas; Fort McClellan, AL .. (205) 848±3643/6716 1021. The draft PEIS evaluates waste (21) Rio Vista Army Reserve Center, Fort Meade, MD ..... (301) 677±1361 California; Fort Missoula, MT .. (404) 669±5607/5686 management strategies and siting (22) Seneca Army Depot, New York; Fort Monmouth, NJ (908) 532±6031 alternatives for each of five waste types: (23) Sierra Army Depot, California; Fort Pickett, VA ...... (404) 669±5607/5686 high-level waste; transuranic waste; and Fort Ritchie, MD ..... (301) 878±5729 low-level waste; low-level mixed waste; (24) Sudbury Training Annex, Foprt Totten, NY ..... (404) 669±5607/5686 and hazardous waste. The public is Massachusetts. Fort Wainwright, AK (907) 353±6706 invited to comment on the draft PEIS Hingham Cohassett, d. Environmental Impact Statements during a 90-day public comment period, MA ....................... (404) 669±5607/5686 which starts on the date of this Notice. are planned for property disposal Kelly Support Cen- actions at the following closure ter, PA ................. (404) 669±5607/5686 ADDRESSES: Requests for information locations: Letterkenny Army about and copies of the draft PEIS (1) Bayonne Military Ocean Terminal, Depot, PA ........... (717) 267±5102 should be directed to: Center for New Jersey; McAlester Army Environmental Management (2) Defense Distribution Depot, Ammo Plant, OK . (816) 421±2191 Information, P.O. Box 23769, Memphis, Tennessee; Oakland Army Washington, D.C. 20026±3769, 1±800± (3) Fitzsimons Army Medical Center, Base, CA ............. (510) 466±3021 736±3282 or in Washington, D.C.: 202± Recreation Center Colorado; # 863±5084. 2, NC ................. (404) 669±5607/5686 Written comments on the draft PEIS (4) Fort Chaffee, Arkansas; Red River Army (5) Fort McClellan, Alabama; Depot, TX ............ (903) 334±3143 should be mailed to the following (6) Fort Ritchie, Maryland; Redstone Arsenal, address: U.S. Department of Energy, (7) Oakland Army Base, California; Huntsville, AL ...... (205) 876±4161 Waste Management PEIS Comments, (8) Savanna Army Depot Activity, Rio Vista Army Re- P.O. Box 3790, Gaithersburg, MD Illinois; and serve Center, CA (404) 669±5607/5686 20885±3790. Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 184 / Friday, September 22, 1995 / Notices 49265 For information on the DOE National Alternatives Considered treatment because they most closely Environmental Policy Act process, The draft PEIS evaluates treatment, approximate DOE's proposed Site contact: Carol M. Borgstrom, Director, storage and/or disposal alternatives for Treatment Plans, under the Federal Office of NEPA Policy and Assistance five types of radioactive and/or Facility Compliance Act. However, (EH±42), U.S. Department of Energy, hazardous waste in DOE's existing ongoing negotiations with regulatory 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., inventory and waste to be generated authorities regarding the proposed Site Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586±4600 from DOE's operations over the next Treatment Plans may affect this or leave message at 1±800±472±2756. twenty years. Due to the complexity and preference. Availability of the draft PEIS: Copies unique management requirements of of the draft PEIS have been distributed Invitation To Comment each of the waste types, the draft PEIS to Federal, State, and local officials, as The public is invited to submit contains separate analyses of each waste well as agencies, organizations and written and oral comments on any or all type as follows: High-level waste; individuals who may be interested or portions of the draft PEIS. Example transuranic waste; low-level waste; low- affected. Copies of the draft PEIS and topics on which DOE welcomes level mixed waste (containing supporting technical reports are also comments include: the technical radioactive and hazardous components); available for public review at the adequacy of the document; what and hazardous waste. locations listed at the end of this Notice. alternatives DOE should select upon Four categories of management DATES: The comment period on the draft completion of the document; and what alternatives are considered. The No criteria DOE should use in making these PEIS will continue until December 21, Action (status quo) alternative would 1995. Comments postmarked after that selections. provide a baseline for comparing other DOE will hold a series of eleven date will be considered to the extent alternatives. The Decentralized practicable. public hearings according to the alternatives would maintain waste schedule provided at the end of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: management activities essentially at the section. In general, these meetings will sites of generation. The Regionalized Background be supported by a televideo link with alternatives would provide for fewer DOE Headquarters in Washington, D.C. On October 22, 1990, DOE issued a locations at which waste is managed, This approach will allow DOE Notice of Intent (55 FR 42633) to and the Centralized alternatives would Headquarters officials to efficiently prepare the Environmental Restoration consolidate waste management participate in the meetings in an and Waste Management Programmatic activities at one or two sites. Within interactive forum with the public. The Environmental Impact Statement. DOE each category, there are a number of session format will provide for identified the proposed action as subalternatives for each waste type. The collection of written and oral comments follows: ``to formulate and implement alternatives analyzed for each waste
Recommended publications
  • Download the Full Report 2007 5.Pdf PDF 1.8 MB
    The Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Directory of Columbia River Basin Tribes Council Document Number: 2007-05 Table of Contents I. Introduction 1 II. Tribes and Tribal Confederations 5 The Burns Paiute Tribe 7 The Coeur d’Alene Tribe 9 The Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation 12 The Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation 15 The Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation 18 The Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon 21 The Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation 23 The Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon 25 The Kalispel Tribe of Indians 28 The Kootenai Tribe of Idaho 31 The Nez Perce Tribe 34 The Shoshone Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation 37 The Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation 40 The Spokane Tribe of Indians 42 III. Canadian First Nations 45 Canadian Columbia River Tribes (First Nations) 46 IV. Tribal Associations 51 Canadian Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fisheries Commission 52 Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission 53 Upper Columbia United Tribes 55 Upper Snake River Tribes 56 The Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Tribal Directory i ii The Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Tribal Directory Introduction The Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Tribal Directory 1 2 The Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Tribal Directory Introduction The Council assembled this directory to enhance our understanding and appreciation of the Columbia River Basin tribes, including the First Nations in the Canadian portion of the basin. The directory provides brief descriptions and histories of the tribes and tribal confedera- tions, contact information, and information about tribal fi sh and wildlife projects funded through the Council’s program.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sacagawea Mystique: Her Age, Name, Role and Final Destiny Columbia Magazine, Fall 1999: Vol
    History Commentary - The Sacagawea Mystique: Her Age, Name, Role and Final Destiny Columbia Magazine, Fall 1999: Vol. 13, No. 3 By Irving W. Anderson EDITOR'S NOTE The United States Mint has announced the design for a new dollar coin bearing a conceptual likeness of Sacagawea on the front and the American eagle on the back. It will replace and be about the same size as the current Susan B. Anthony dollar but will be colored gold and have an edge distinct from the quarter. Irving W. Anderson has provided this biographical essay on Sacagawea, the Shoshoni Indian woman member of the Lewis and Clark expedition, as background information prefacing the issuance of the new dollar. THE RECORD OF the 1804-06 "Corps of Volunteers on an Expedition of North Western Discovery" (the title Lewis and Clark used) is our nation's "living history" legacy of documented exploration across our fledgling republic's pristine western frontier. It is a story written in inspired spelling and with an urgent sense of purpose by ordinary people who accomplished extraordinary deeds. Unfortunately, much 20th-century secondary literature has created lasting though inaccurate versions of expedition events and the roles of its members. Among the most divergent of these are contributions to the exploring enterprise made by its Shoshoni Indian woman member, Sacagawea, and her destiny afterward. The intent of this text is to correct America's popular but erroneous public image of Sacagawea by relating excerpts of her actual life story as recorded in the writings of her contemporaries, people who actually knew her, two centuries ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Road to Oregon Written by Dr
    The Road to Oregon Written by Dr. Jim Tompkins, a prominent local historian and the descendant of Oregon Trail immigrants, The Road to Oregon is a good primer on the history of the Oregon Trail. Unit I. The Pioneers: 1800-1840 Who Explored the Oregon Trail? The emigrants of the 1840s were not the first to travel the Oregon Trail. The colorful history of our country makes heroes out of the explorers, mountain men, soldiers, and scientists who opened up the West. In 1540 the Spanish explorer Coronado ventured as far north as present-day Kansas, but the inland routes across the plains remained the sole domain of Native Americans until 1804, when Lewis and Clark skirted the edges on their epic journey of discovery to the Pacific Northwest and Zeb Pike explored the "Great American Desert," as the Great Plains were then known. The Lewis and Clark Expedition had a direct influence on the economy of the West even before the explorers had returned to St. Louis. Private John Colter left the expedition on the way home in 1806 to take up the fur trade business. For the next 20 years the likes of Manuel Lisa, Auguste and Pierre Choteau, William Ashley, James Bridger, Kit Carson, Tom Fitzgerald, and William Sublette roamed the West. These part romantic adventurers, part self-made entrepreneurs, part hermits were called mountain men. By 1829, Jedediah Smith knew more about the West than any other person alive. The Americans became involved in the fur trade in 1810 when John Jacob Astor, at the insistence of his friend Thomas Jefferson, founded the Pacific Fur Company in New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho: Lewis Clark Byway Guide.Pdf
    The Lewis and Clark Backcountry Byway AND ADVENTURE ROAD Tendoy, Idaho Meriwether Lewis’s journal entry on August 18, 1805 —American Philosophical Society The Lewis and Clark Back Country Byway AND ADVENTURE ROAD Tendoy, Idaho The Lewis and Clark Back Country Byway and Adventure Road is a 36 mile loop drive through a beautiful and historic landscape on the Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail and the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail. The mountains, evergreen forests, high desert canyons, and grassy foothills look much the same today as when the Lewis and Clark Expedition passed through in 1805. THE PUBLIC LANDS CENTER Salmon-Challis National Forest and BLM Salmon Field Office 1206 S. Challis Street / Salmon, ID 83467 / (208)756-5400 BLM/ID/GI-15/006+1220 Getting There The portal to the Byway is Tendoy, Idaho, which is nineteen miles south of Salmon on Idaho Highway 28. From Montana, exit from I-15 at Clark Canyon Reservoir south of Dillon onto Montana Highway 324. Drive west past Grant to an intersection at the Shoshone Ridge Overlook. If you’re pulling a trailer or driving an RV with a passenger vehicle in tow, it would be a good idea to leave your trailer or RV at the overlook, which has plenty of parking, a vault toilet, and interpretive signs. Travel road 3909 west 12 miles to Lemhi Pass. Please respect private property along the road and obey posted speed signs. Salmon, Idaho, and Dillon, Montana, are full- service communities. Limited services are available in Tendoy, Lemhi, and Leadore, Idaho and Grant, Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form 1
    NPS Form 10-900 (7-81) United States Department off the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections____^________ 1. Name historic Ross Fork Oregon Short Line Railroad Depot and/or common Fort Hall Oregon Short Line Railroad Depot 2. Location street & number Agency RgjjTd. dT4S R34E, Section 36, ST&; city, town Fort Hall H/A vicinity of state Idaho code 016 code Oil 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district X public occupied agriculture museum x building(s) private X unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object N/A in process yes: restricted government scientific N/A being considered X yes: unrestricted industrial transportation __ no military — X. other: vacant 4. Owner of Property name Shoshone/Bannock Tribes street & number N/A city, town Fort Hall N/A vicinity of state Idaho 83203 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Bingham County Courthouse street & number city, town Blackfoot state Idaho 6. Representation in Existing Surveys________ title Idaho State Historic Sites Inventory has this property been determined eligible? __ yes _X_ no date 1982 __federal X state __county __local city, town Boise state I daho 7. Description Condition Check one Check one __ excellent X deteriorated __ unaltered __ original site __ good __ ruins x altered J£_ moved date 1968______________ __ fair __ unexposed Describe the present and original (iff known) physical appearance The Ross Fork Oregon Short Line Railroad Depot is a one-and-one-half-story frame building of wood-stud construction with shiplap siding painted white and yellow.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpreting Cultural Resources at Craters of the Moon National Monument & Preserve
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Interpreting Cultural Resources at Craters of the Moon National Monument & Preserve Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………...3 Interpretive Themes……………………………………...……...4 Protecting Cultural Resources…………………………………..6 Native Americans……………………………………………….8 Fur Trade and Early Exploration………………………………12 Emigrants………………………………………………………13 Surveys, Mining, and Ranching………………………………..16 Robert Limbert……………………………………………....…18 Park Structures………………………………………………....21 The Apollo Astronauts…………………………………….…...23 Monument Expansion………………………………...….….…25 Appendix I: Timeline of Events……………………….……….26 Appendix II: Projectile Point Chronology………………….….31 Sources……………………………………………………..…..32 Page 2 Introduction Volcanic geology is what makes Craters of the sites once used by the Shoshone on their Moon a national monument. Every year travels through the area. Since then, most visitors are awed, inspired, and inquisitive travelers have done everything they could to about the vast volumes of blackened lava that avoid the uninviting lava fields. cover hundreds of square miles of Idaho’s However limited, the cultural record of the high desert. monument boasts an amazing range of groups The emphasis on the area’s volcanism as the and individuals that have alternately shunned reason for designating the area a monument is and embraced the harsh terrain over thousands clear in Calvin Coolidge’s 1924 proclamation, of years, and for a variety of reasons. It is this citing the “remarkable fissure eruption range of uses and emotions evoked by the together with its associated volcanic cones, terrain that makes understanding the cultural craters, rifts, lava flows, caves, natural past of Craters of the Moon so important in bridges, and other phenomena…of unusual relating a seemingly-dead environment to scientific value and general interest.” visitors today.
    [Show full text]
  • P Acific Ocean %
    ! Edmonton Columbia Basin British Alberta Columbia e Alberta ! Williams Lake Mica Montana Washington British 28 ! Calgary Golden Revelstoke Columbia 29 31 Oregon ! Idaho Kamloops 30 32 23 27 Duncan 21 ! 24 Vernon Lower and Kootenay Utah 20 Upper Nevada Canal Bonnington Project Okanagan Lake Slocan 25 18 Corra ! % Skaha Lake % Linn Cranbrook Vancouver Keenleyside Mission 16 Brilliant ! McIntyre ! Seven Trail Mile ! Creston 17 19 ! 22 26 % % Zosel Waneta Boundary % 12 Victoria Box Canyon Hungry ! Libby Priest Horse Lake 9 Albeni 4 Cabinet G orge % Falls 7 % Wells Nine Noxon Rapids % % Chief % % Mile Chelan Joseph Grand Spokane % Seattle Post Kerr Coulee Little % Thompson Kachess % ! Rocky Falls ! % Falls % Falls % Reach Long % Rock Lake Upper 14 % ean Keechelus Cle Elum Island Monroe Falls 10 Olympia Street ! % Washington Bumping Oc Lower ! Lake Wanapum Little % Lower Granite Missoula Monumental Goose Yaki m a Tieton Montana ! Priest % % Dworshak % Ice Rapids Harbor ! ! Lewiston 11 Astoria % 3 ific McNary 1 % Bonneville % % ! ac % Portland! John Pendleton 6 te R The Day Dalles P % Hells Canyon % Oxbow 2 Pelton Rereg % % Brownlee % Pelton Idaho Round Cascade Butte Deadwood Jackson % Bend Lake ! 5 Oregon Arrow rock Palisades % ! Owyhee % % Boise % Lucky Anderson Sw an% Peak % Ranch Falls American Falls CJ % Minidoka 15 Waterbody ! City % % Strike Upper Salmon Reservation State or Province % Milner Reserve Dam % 13 Columbia Basin 8 0 25 50 100 150 Miles Map Scale: 1:4,600,000 Map Date: May 2012 Utah T his map was produced by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission. It is meant for informational and display purposes only and was created with the Nevada best data availableCalifornia at the time of production.
    [Show full text]
  • A Traditional Use Study of the Hagerman
    A TRADITIONAL USE STUDY OF THE I HAGERMAN FOSSIL BEDS NATIONAL MONUMENT L.: AND OTHER AREAS IN SOUTHERN IDAHO Submitted to: Columbia Cascade System Support Office National Park Service Seattle, Washington Submitted by: L. Daniel Myers, Ph.D. Epochs· Past .Tracys Landing, Maryland September, 1998 PLEASE RETURN TO: TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER DENVER SERViCE CENTER NATIONAL PARK SERVICE TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ii List of Figures and Tables iv Abstract v CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION l OBJECTIVES l FRAMEWORK OF STUDY 2 STUDY AREAS 4 STUDY POPULATIONS 5 DESIGN OF SUCCEEDING CHAPTERS 5 CHAPTER TWO: PROTOCOL AND STRATEGIES. 7 OBJECTIVES 7 CONTACT WITH POTENTIAL CONSULTANTS 7 SCHEDULING AND APPOINTMENTS 8 QUESTIONNAIRE 8 INTERVIEW SPECIFICS 10 CHAPTER THREE: INTERVIEW DETAILS 12 OBJECTIVES 12 SELF, FAMILY, AND ANCESTORS 12 TRIBAL DISTRIBUTIONS AND FOOD-NAMED GROUPS 13 SETTLEMENT AND SUBSISTENCE 13 FOOD RESOURCES . 14 MANUFACTURE GOODS 15 INDIAN DOCTORS, MEDICINE, AND HEALTH 15 STORIES, STORYTELLING, AND SACRED PLACES 15 CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS AND ISSUES 16 CHAPTER FOUR: COMMUNITY SUMMARIES OF THE FIRST TIER STUDY AREAS 17 OBJECTIVES 17 DUCK VALLEY INDIAN RESERVATION 17 FORT HALL INDIAN RESERVATION 22 NORTHWESTERN BAND OF SHOSHONI NATION 23 CHAPTER FIVE: COMMUNITY SUMMARIES OF THE SECOND TIER STUDY AREAS 25 OBJECTIVES 25 DUCK VALLEY INDIAN RESERVATION 25 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Craters of the Moon 25 City of Rocks National Reserve and Bear River Massacre . 25 FORT HALL INDIAN RESERVATION 26 Craters of the Moon 26 City of Rocks . 28 Bear River Massacre ·28 NORTHWESTERN BAND OF SHOSHONI NATION 29 Craters of the Moon 29 City of Rocks . 29 Bear River Massacre 30 CHAPTER SIX: ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 31 OBJECTIVES 31 SUMMARY REVIEW 31 STUDY AREAS REVIEW 3 3 RECOMMENDATIONS 3 5 REFERENCES CITED 38 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 41 APPENDIX A 43 APPENDIX B 48 APPENDIX C 51 iii LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES Figure 1: Map of Southern Idaho showing Study Areas 3 Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Statements Showing I. Appropriations Made During the Second Session of the Thirty-Third Congress
    University of Oklahoma College of Law University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 4-19-1855 Statements showing I. Appropriations made during the second session of the Thirty-third Congress. II. Offices ecr ated and the salaries thereof. III. the offices theal s aries of which have been increased, with the amount of such increase, during the same period. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/indianserialset Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation S. Misc. Doc. No. 26, 33d Cong., 2nd Sess. (1855) This Senate Miscellaneous Document is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 by an authorized administrator of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 33n CoNGRESS, ~ SENATE. ~:Mrs. Doc. 2d Session. 5 ( No. 26. STATEMENTS ~H O WI NG I. APPROPRIATIONS 1\IADE DURING THE EECOND SESSION OF THE THIRTY-THIRD CONGRESS. II. OFFICES CREATED AND THE SALARIES THEREOF. lU. THE OFFICES THE SALARIES OF WHICH HAVE BEEN JNCREASED, WITH THE AMOUNT OF SUCH INCREASE, DURI TG THE SAME PERIOD. APRIL 19, 1855. PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SECRETARY OF THE SENATE AND THE CLERK OF THE II01JSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE SIXTH SECTION OF THE " ACT TO AUTHORIZE THE APPOINTMENT OF ADDITIONAL PAYMASTERS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES," APPROVED JULY 4, 1836.
    [Show full text]
  • FORT HALL on the SAPTIN RIVER* Embraced in the Component Parts
    FORT HALL ON THE SAPTIN RIVER* Embraced in the component parts of modern civilization there are three potent factors :-eivil government, commerce and religion. These elements are frequently symbolized by the flag, the dollar mark and the Cross respectively. Their advent into the territory that now con­ stitutes the state of Idaho occurred when the limits of Old Oregon extended from the Pacific ocean, along the 42nd parallel to a point 18 miles northeast of Rawlins, Wyo., thence along the continental divide to the Arctic ocean. Their coming was hand in hand, the first and last under the protection of the second, a relative position, some contend, that they occupy even to this day. They made their first stand on the east bank of the Saptin, afterwards known as the Lewis, and now by the name of Snake river,l at a point six miles above the mouth of the Portneuf, 20 miles above American Falls, and 1,288 miles out of Independence, Mo., on the Oregon Trail. Strictly speaking, both the flag and sign of commerce had been seen before in Idaho, but here was the first manifestation of the Christian faith in all the vast territory of old Oregon. The first American flag to enter the state of Idaho was a small one borne by George Drewyer (Drouillard), the interpreter of the Lewis and Clark expedition, who, together with Captain Meriwether Lewis, and John Shields, entered what is now the state of Idaho, about 4 o'clock in the afternoon of Monday, Aug. 12, 1805. Not only was this the first flag, but it was the first foot print to be made by a white man in the state, and the place of this interesting event appears to have been at a point about 12 miles east of Sunfield, Lemhi county.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation in Support of Petitioner ————
    No. 17-532 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ———— CLAYVIN B. HERRERA, Petitioner, v. STATE OF WYOMING, Respondent. ———— On Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Wyoming, Sheridan County ———— BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES OF THE FORT HALL RESERVATION IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER ———— DOUGLAS B. L. ENDRESON WILLIAM F. BACON ANNE D. NOTO Counsel of Record FRANK S. HOLLEMAN, IV MONTE GRAY SONOSKY, CHAMBERS, SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES SACHSE, ENDRESON 306 Pima Dr. & PERRY, LLP Fort Hall, ID 83203 1425 K St., N.W. Suite 600 (208) 478-3822 Washington, DC 20005 [email protected] (202) 682-0240 Counsel for Amicus Curiae September 11, 2018 WILSON-EPES PRINTING CO., INC. – (202) 789-0096 – WASHINGTON, D. C. 20002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ................................ ii INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ..................... 1 STATEMENT OF FACTS ................................... 3 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ............................. 5 ARGUMENT ........................................................ 7 I. RACE HORSE AROSE FROM THE MURDER OF BANNOCK INDIANS BY SETTLERS, NOT FROM A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE INDIANS’ TREATY RIGHTS AND STATE CONSERVATION INTERESTS .............................................. 7 A. The Murders ........................................ 8 B. The Conspiracy .................................... 10 II. THE MILLE LACS DECISION ESTAB- LISHES RACE HORSE HAS NO CONTINUING LEGAL FORCE .............. 16 III. APPLYING THE RULES OF TREATY CONSTRUCTION SET FORTH IN MILLE LACS CONFIRMS THAT THE TRIBES RETAIN THEIR RIGHTS UNDER ARTICLE 4 OF THE 1868 TREATY .................................................... 18 IV. THE TRIBES EXERCISE CO- MANAGEMENT OF THEIR OFF- RESERVATION TREATY HUNTING AND FISHING RIGHTS ............................ 26 CONCLUSION .................................................... 29 (i) ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Page(s) Antoine v. Washington, 420 U.S. 194 (1975) ................................... 17 Brown v. Bd. of Educ., 347 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem-Based Function Integration Into the Columbia River Treaty
    Ecosystem-Based Function Integration Into the Columbia River Treaty ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ Columbia Basin Tribes’ Concept to Modernize the Columbia River Treaty Columbia River Gorge. Photo Laura Gephart COLUMBIA BASIN TRIBES Burns Paiute Tribe s implemented in 1964, the Columbia River Coeur d’Alene Tribe ATreaty (Treaty) addresses two primary purposes Confederated Salish and Kootenai – hydropower and flood risk management. During the Tribes of the Flathead Nation Confederated Tribes of the Colville Sovereign Participation Process, the Columbia Basin Reservation tribes (tribes) proposed integrating ecosystem-based Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation function operations into Columbia River flood risk and Confederated Tribes and Bands of hydropower management under a modernized Treaty. the Yakama Nation This proposal was adopted by regional sovereigns and Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon stakeholders in the U.S. as integral to modernizing the Cowlitz Indian Tribe Treaty and is a principle element of the U.S. Entity Kalispel Tribe of Indians Regional Recommendation on the Future of the Columbia Kootenai Tribe of Idaho Nez Perce Tribe River Treaty after 2024. To implement this paradigm shift, Fort McDermitt Paiute Shoshone the tribes also propose changes to Treaty governance, Tribe adaptations for climate change and structural upgrades for Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation projects to better protect and enhance the tribes’ trust and Shoshone Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Indian Reservation treaty rights and resources, rights and resources that were Spokane Tribe of Indians neglected when the Treaty was developed. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ INTERTRIBAL ORGANIZATIONS Columbia River Inter-Tribal Upper Columbia United Tribes Upper Snake River Tribes Fish Commission 25 W.
    [Show full text]