DOCSLIB.ORG

Esso Pipeline Replacement Project – Longford to Hastings: Flora and Fauna Survey and Impact Mitigation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Esso Pipeline Replacement Project – Longford to Hastings: Flora and Fauna Survey and Impact Mitigation Esso Pipeline Replacement Project – Longford to Hastings: Flora and fauna survey and impact mitigation Prepared for WorleyParsons 19 February 2014 © Biosis September 2012 – Leading ecology and heritage consultants 1 Document information Biosis offices AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY Report to: WorleyParsons Canberra Prepared by: Matthew Dell, Katrina Sofo, Anthony Byrne, Floor 1, Unit 3, 38 Essington Street Ian Smales Mitchell ACT 2911 Biosis project no.: 16955/16956 Phone: (02) 6241 2333 File name: 16955 EAPL pipeline ff final 190214.docx Fax: (03) 9646 9242 Email: [email protected] Citation: Biosis 2013. Esso Pipeline Replacement Project –Longford to Hastings: Flora and fauna survey and impact mitigation. Report to Worley NEW SOUTH WALES Parsons. Authors: Dell, M., Sofo, K., Byrne A. & Smales I. Biosis Pty Ltd, Sydney Melbourne. Project 16955/16956. Unit 14 17-27 Power Avenue Alexandria NSW 2015 Document control Phone: (02) 9690 2777 Fax: (02) 9690 2577 Version Reviewer Date issued Email: [email protected] Draft V1 JY (int.), TJ, MH (ext.) 10/01/14 Wollongong 8 Tate Street Draft V2 MDD (int.), TJ (ext.) 31/01/14 Wollongong NSW 2500 Final version IS (int.) 20/02/14 Phone: (02) 4229 5222 Fax: (02) 4229 5500 Acknowledgements Email: [email protected] Biosis acknowledges the contribution of the following people and organisations in QUEENSLAND undertaking this study: Brisbane Suite 4 First Floor, 72 Wickham Street WorleyParsons: Tony Judd, Michelle Hendricks and Gary Fiddes. Fortitude Valley QLD 4006 CNC Project Management for property access liaison. Phone: (07) 3831 7400 Department of Sustainability & Environment for access to the Victorian Fax: (07) 3831 7411 Biodiversity Atlas. Email: [email protected] The following Biosis staff were involved in this project: VICTORIA Rohan Simkin, Kirsty Kay, Mark Venosta, Daniel Gilmore, Clare McCutcheon, Felicity Ballarat Humann, Shona Arber, Monica Campbell, Kylie Reed, Anthony Steelcable & Rebecca 506 Macarthur Street Steer for assistance with field assessments. Ballarat VIC 3350 James Shepherd and Sally Mitchell for mapping. Phone: (03) 5331 7000 Fax: (03) 5331 7033 Ben Howells for planning assistance. Email: [email protected] Melbourne (Head Office) 38 Bertie Street Port Melbourne VIC 3207 Phone: (03) 9646 9499 © Biosis Pty Ltd Fax: (03) 9646 9242 Email: [email protected] This document is and shall remain the property of Biosis Pty Ltd. The document may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of the Wangaratta Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. 16 Templeton Street Wangaratta VIC 3677 Disclaimer: Phone: (03) 5721 9453 Biosis Pty Ltd has completed this assessment in accordance with the relevant federal, state Fax: (03) 5721 9454 and local legislation and current industry best practice. The company accepts no liability for Email: [email protected] any damages or loss incurred as a result of reliance placed upon the report content or for any purpose other than that for which it was intended. © Biosis 2014 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting www.biosis.com.au II Contents Summary ................................................................................................................................................................ VI 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project background ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of assessment ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Location of the study area ............................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Methods ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Literature and database review ................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Definitions of significance ............................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Stratification of survey sites – Preliminary assessment .......................................................................................... 6 2.3 Ecological Vegetation Class mapping .......................................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Field survey ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.4.2 Flora survey ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.4.3 Fauna survey ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.4.4 Determination of habitat suitability .......................................................................................................... 10 2.4.5 Likelihood of presence for significant species ........................................................................................ 11 2.5 Mapping units ............................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.5.2 Mapping limitations ...................................................................................................................................... 12 2.6 Survey qualifications .................................................................................................................................................... 13 3. Results ............................................................................................................................................................ 15 3.1 Vegetation ...................................................................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Scattered trees .............................................................................................................................................................. 19 3.3 Fauna habitat ................................................................................................................................................................ 19 3.4 Significant species and ecological communities ................................................................................................... 19 3.4.1 EPBC Act, FFG Act & DEPI Advisory listed species ................................................................................... 19 3.4.2 Significant ecological communities ............................................................................................................ 27 4. Mitigation options for significant biodiversity matters........................................................................ 29 4.1 General ........................................................................................................................................................................... 29 4.2 Native vegetation and threatened flora .................................................................................................................. 29 4.2.1 Pre-construction design phase ................................................................................................................... 29 4.2.2 Construction phase ....................................................................................................................................... 30 4.3 State and Federally listed threatened fauna .......................................................................................................... 31 4.3.1 Pre-construction design phase ................................................................................................................... 31 4.3.2 Construction ................................................................................................................................................... 31 4.3.3 Post-construction........................................................................................................................................... 32 4.4 General vegetation ....................................................................................................................................................... 32 © Biosis 2013 – Leaders in Ecology and Heritage Consulting III 4.4.1 Pre-construction design phase ................................................................................................................... 32 4.4.2 Construction phase ....................................................................................................................................... 32 4.4.3 Post-construction phase .............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reptiles and Amphibians of Otago
    Society for Research on Amphibians and Reptiles in New Zealand (SRARNZ) presents Reptiles and Amphibians of Otago Otago is a large (31,251 km2) and lightly populated region of the southern South Island of Aotearoa New Zealand, stretching from the eastern coastline west to the Southern Alps. The earliest humans, of East Polynesian origin, arrived about 700 years ago. The largest settlement today is the coastal city of Dunedin (pop. >127,000), which grew from a Scottish influx in the 1800s. The Otago Regional Council administers the region, and tribal authority (mana whenua) rests with the iwi of Ngāi Tahu. Climates in the Otago region (roughly 45°– leiopelmatid frogs survive elsewhere in 47°S) range from changeable, cool- New Zealand. Two species of introduced temperate conditions near the coast to frogs are present, but there are no the near-continental climates (baking hot crocodilians, salamanders, terrestrial summers, freezing winters) of the interior. snakes or turtles. Marine turtles (mainly The region provides varied habitats for leatherback turtles, Dermochelys coriacea) herp species, including sand-dunes, visit the coastal waters of Otago but do grasslands, shrublands, wetlands, forests, not nest here. rock structures and scree slopes, some occupied to at least 1900 m above sea level. Today’s herpetofauna is dominated by lizards (solely geckos and skinks), including about 10 described species. A further 12 or more undescribed taxa are recognised Otago by tag names for conservation purposes, and we follow that approach here. All lizards in Otago are viviparous and long- lived, and remain vulnerable to ongoing habitat loss and predation by introduced mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Document
    African countries and neighbouring islands covered by the Synopsis. S T R E L I T Z I A 23 Synopsis of the Lycopodiophyta and Pteridophyta of Africa, Madagascar and neighbouring islands by J.P. Roux Pretoria 2009 S T R E L I T Z I A This series has replaced Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa and Annals of the Kirstenbosch Botanic Gardens which SANBI inherited from its predecessor organisations. The plant genus Strelitzia occurs naturally in the eastern parts of southern Africa. It comprises three arborescent species, known as wild bananas, and two acaulescent species, known as crane flowers or bird-of-paradise flowers. The logo of the South African National Biodiversity Institute is based on the striking inflorescence of Strelitzia reginae, a native of the Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal that has become a garden favourite worldwide. It sym- bolises the commitment of the Institute to champion the exploration, conservation, sustain- able use, appreciation and enjoyment of South Africa’s exceptionally rich biodiversity for all people. J.P. Roux South African National Biodiversity Institute, Compton Herbarium, Cape Town SCIENTIFIC EDITOR: Gerrit Germishuizen TECHNICAL EDITOR: Emsie du Plessis DESIGN & LAYOUT: Elizma Fouché COVER DESIGN: Elizma Fouché, incorporating Blechnum palmiforme on Gough Island PHOTOGRAPHS J.P. Roux Citing this publication ROUX, J.P. 2009. Synopsis of the Lycopodiophyta and Pteridophyta of Africa, Madagascar and neighbouring islands. Strelitzia 23. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria. ISBN: 978-1-919976-48-8 © Published by: South African National Biodiversity Institute. Obtainable from: SANBI Bookshop, Private Bag X101, Pretoria, 0001 South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Benchmarks Rainforest and Related Scrub
    Vegetation Benchmarks Rainforest and related scrub Eucryphia lucida Vegetation Condition Benchmarks version 1 Rainforest and Related Scrub RPW Athrotaxis cupressoides open woodland: Sphagnum peatland facies Community Description: Athrotaxis cupressoides (5–8 m) forms small woodland patches or appears as copses and scattered small trees. On the Central Plateau (and other dolerite areas such as Mount Field), broad poorly– drained valleys and small glacial depressions may contain scattered A. cupressoides trees and copses over Sphagnum cristatum bogs. In the treeless gaps, Sphagnum cristatum is usually overgrown by a combination of any of Richea scoparia, R. gunnii, Baloskion australe, Epacris gunnii and Gleichenia alpina. This is one of three benchmarks available for assessing the condition of RPW. This is the appropriate benchmark to use in assessing the condition of the Sphagnum facies of the listed Athrotaxis cupressoides open woodland community (Schedule 3A, Nature Conservation Act 2002). Benchmarks: Length Component Cover % Height (m) DBH (cm) #/ha (m)/0.1 ha Canopy 10% - - - Large Trees - 6 20 5 Organic Litter 10% - Logs ≥ 10 - 2 Large Logs ≥ 10 Recruitment Continuous Understorey Life Forms LF code # Spp Cover % Immature tree IT 1 1 Medium shrub/small shrub S 3 30 Medium sedge/rush/sagg/lily MSR 2 10 Ground fern GF 1 1 Mosses and Lichens ML 1 70 Total 5 8 Last reviewed – 2 November 2016 Tasmanian Vegetation Monitoring and Mapping Program Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment http://www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au/tasveg RPW Athrotaxis cupressoides open woodland: Sphagnum facies Species lists: Canopy Tree Species Common Name Notes Athrotaxis cupressoides pencil pine Present as a sparse canopy Typical Understorey Species * Common Name LF Code Epacris gunnii coral heath S Richea scoparia scoparia S Richea gunnii bog candleheath S Astelia alpina pineapple grass MSR Baloskion australe southern cordrush MSR Gleichenia alpina dwarf coralfern GF Sphagnum cristatum sphagnum ML *This list is provided as a guide only.
    [Show full text]
  • Lssn 0811-5311 DATE - SEPTEMBER 19 87
    lSSN 0811-5311 DATE - SEPTEMBER 19 87 "REGISTERD BY AUSTRALIA POST -, FTlBL IC AT ION LEADER : Peter Hind, 41 Miller stredt, Mt. Druitt 2770 SECRETARY : Moreen Woollett, 3 Curriwang Place, Como West 2226 HON. TREASURER: Margaret Olde, 138 Fmler ~oad,Illaong 2234 SPORE BANK: Jenny Thompson, 2a Albion blace, Engadine 2233 Dear Wers, I First the good ws. I ?hanks to the myme&- who pdded articles, umrmts and slides, the book uhichwe are produehg thraqh the Pblisw Secticm of S.G.A.P. (NSFi) wted is nearing c~np3etion. mjblicatio~lshkmger, Bill Payne has proof copies and is currm'tly lt-dhg firral co-m. !€his uill be *e initial. volume in ghat is expeckd to be a -1ete reference to &~~txalirrnferns and is titled "The Australian Fern Series 1". It is only a smll volm~hi&hcrpefully can be retailed at an afford& le price -b the majority of fern grcw ers. Our prl3 Emtion differs -Em maq rrgard&gr' b mks b-use it is not full of irrelevant padding, me -is has been on pm3uci.q a practical guide to tihe cultivation of particular Aus&dlian native ferns, There is me article of a technical nature based rm recent research, but al-h scientific this tm has been x ritten in simple tmm that would be appreciated by most fern grm ers, A feature of the beis the 1- nuher of striking full =lour Uus.hratims. In our next Wsletterge hope to say more &opt details of phlicatim EOODIA SP . NO. 1 - CANIF On the last page of this Newsletter there is d photo copy of another unsual and apparently attractive fern contributed by Queensland member Rod Pattison.
    [Show full text]
  • East Gippsland, Victoria
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Oxycedrus Sieber Ex DC
    WATTLE Acacias of Australia Acacia oxycedrus Sieber ex DC. Source: Australian Plant Image Index (a.3454). Source: Australian Plant Image Index (a.31223). ANBG © M. Fagg, 1978 ANBG © M. Fagg, 2002 Source: Australian Plant Image Index Source: Australian Plant Image Index (a.12017). (dig.35574). ANBG © M. Fagg, 1997 ANBG © M. Fagg, 2014 Source: Australian Plant Image Index (a.19339). Source: Australian Plant Image Index ANBG © M. Fagg, 1989 (dig.35575). ANBG © M. Fagg, 2014 Source: Australian Plant Image Index Source: Australian Plant Image Index (a.31224). (dig.35576). ANBG © M. Fagg, 2002 ANBG © M. Fagg, 2014 Source: Australian Plant Image Index (a.31225). Source: Australian Plant Image Index (a.3455). Source: Australian Plant Image Index (a.3456). ANBG © M. Fagg, 1982 ANBG © M. Fagg, 1978 ANBG © M. Fagg, 1978 Source: Australian Plant Image Index (a.31227). ANBG © M. Fagg, 2001 Source: Australian Plant Image Index (a.31226). Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. ANBG © M. Fagg, 2001 Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com See illustration. Source: Australian Plant Image Index Source: Australian Plant Image Index (dig.18761). (dig.18762). ANBG © M. Fagg, 2010 ANBG © M. Fagg, 2010 Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com See illustration. See illustration. Acacia oxycedrus occurrence map. O ccurrence map generated via Atlas of Living Australia (https://w w w .ala.org.au). Common Name Spike Wattle Family Fabaceae Distribution Widespread in heathlands, woodlands and forests ranging from far south-eastern S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Muntries the Domestication and Improvement of Kunzea Pomifera (F.Muell.)
    Muntries The domestication and improvement of Kunzea pomifera (F.Muell.) A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation by Tony Page January 2004 RIRDC Publication No 03/127 RIRDC Project No UM-52A © 2004 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 0 0642 58693 4 ISSN 1440-6845 Muntries: The domestication and improvement of Kunzea pomifera (F.Muell) Publication No. 03/127 Project No: UM-52A The views expressed and the conclusions reached in this publication are those of the author and not necessarily those of persons consulted. RIRDC shall not be responsible in any way whatsoever to any person who relies in whole or in part on the contents of this report. This publication is copyright. However, RIRDC encourages wide dissemination of its research, providing the Corporation is clearly acknowledged. For any other enquiries concerning reproduction, contact the Publications Manager on phone 02 6272 3186. Researcher Contact Details Tony Page 500 Yarra Boulevard RICHMOND VIC 3121 Phone: 03 9250 6800 Fax: 03 92506885 Email: [email protected] In submitting this report, the researcher has agreed to RIRDC publishing this material in its edited form. RIRDC Contact Details Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Level 1, AMA House 42 Macquarie Street BARTON ACT 2600 PO Box 4776 KINGSTON ACT 2604 Phone: 02 6272 4539 Fax: 02 6272 5877 Email: [email protected]. Website: http://www.rirdc.gov.au Published in January 2004 Printed on environmentally friendly paper by Canprint ii Foreword Many Australian native plant foods have the potential to broaden the culinary and nutritional composition of the human diet, both in Australia and worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • BESS) Detailed Ecology Assessment Tilt Renewables Reference: 509891 Revision: 2 2021-02-22
    Latrobe Valley Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) Detailed Ecology assessment Tilt Renewables Reference: 509891 Revision: 2 2021-02-22 Document control record Document prepared by: Aurecon Australasia Pty Ltd ABN 54 005 139 873 Aurecon Centre Level 8, 850 Collins Street Docklands, Melbourne VIC 3008 PO Box 23061 Docklands VIC 8012 Australia T +61 3 9975 3000 F +61 3 9975 3444 E [email protected] W aurecongroup.com A person using Aurecon documents or data accepts the risk of: a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version. b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Aurecon. Document control Report title Detailed Ecology assessment Document code Project number 509891 File path Client Tilt Renewables Client contact Client reference Rev Date Revision Author Reviewer Verifier Approver details/status (if required) 0 2021-01-14 First Draft Justin Sullivan Brett Taylor Brett Taylor Greta Thraves 1 2021-02-04 Revised report to Justin Sullivan Greta Thraves respond to client comments 2 2021-02-22 Revised report to Justin Sullivan Greta Thraves respond to client comments Current revision 2 Approval Author signature Approver signature Name Justin Sullivan Name Greta Thraves Title Senior Consultant Title Manager, Planning and (Ecologist) Environment Project number 509891 File Latrobe Valley BESS – Detailed Ecology Assessment, 2021-02-22 Revision 2 ii Executive summary Aurecon was commissioned by Tilt Renewables (the Proponent) to undertake an ecological assessment to inform the design and planning approvals for a proposed Latrobe Valley Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) at Morwell in eastern Victoria (the Project).
    [Show full text]
  • SEPTEMBER 1987 “REGISTERED by AUSTRALIA POST —‘ PUBLICATION NUMBER Man 3809." J
    ISSN 0811—5311 DATE—‘ SEPTEMBER 1987 “REGISTERED BY AUSTRALIA POST —‘ PUBLICATION NUMBER man 3809." j LEADER: Peter Hind, 41 Miller Street, Mt. Druitt 2770 SECRETARY: Moreen Woollett, 3 Curra» ang Place, Como West 2226 HON. TREASURER: Margaret Olde, 138 Fan ler Road, Illaflong 2234 SPORE BANK: Jenny Thompson, 2a Albion flace, Engadine 2233 Dear Melbers, First the good nsvs. ‘Ihanks to the many matbers she provided articles, ocrrments and slides, the book which we are pmcing through the PLbliskfing Section of S.G.A.P. (NEW) Limited is nearing ompletion. Publications Manager, Bill Payne has proof copies and is currenfly maldng final corrections. This will be the initial volume inwhat is expected to be a oanplete reference to Australian fems and is titled "'lhe Australian Fern Series 1". It is only a small volunewhich hopefillly can be retailed at an affordab 1e price to the majority of fern growers. , Our pr lication differs from many "gardening" books because it is not full of irrelevant padding. 'Jhe emphasis has been on producing a practical guide to the cultivation of particuler Australian native ferns. 'Ihexe is one article of a tednfical nature based on recent research, but although scientific this too has been written in simple terms thatwouldbe appreciated by most fern growers. A feature of thebook is the large nunber of striking full colour illustrations. In our next Newsletter we hope to say more abqut details of plb lication * * * * * * * DOODIA sp. NO. 1 - CANE On the last page of this Newsletter there is alphoto copy of another unsual and apparently attractive fern contributed by Queensland member Rod Pattison.
    [Show full text]
  • Floral Ontogeny and Histogenesis in Leguminosae. Kittie Sue Derstine Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1988 Floral Ontogeny and Histogenesis in Leguminosae. Kittie Sue Derstine Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Derstine, Kittie Sue, "Floral Ontogeny and Histogenesis in Leguminosae." (1988). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 4493. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/4493 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photo­ graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the original text directly from the copy submitted. Thus, some dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from a computer printer. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyrighted material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are re­ produced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is available as one exposure on a standard 35 mm slide or as a 17" x 23" black and white photographic print for an additional charge. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy.
    [Show full text]
  • ARAZPA Amphibian Action Plan
    Appendix 1 to Murray, K., Skerratt, L., Marantelli, G., Berger, L., Hunter, D., Mahony, M. and Hines, H. 2011. Guidelines for minimising disease risks associated with captive breeding, raising and restocking programs for Australian frogs. A report for the Australian Government Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. ARAZPA Amphibian Action Plan Compiled by: Graeme Gillespie, Director Wildlife Conservation and Science, Zoos Victoria; Russel Traher, Amphibian TAG Convenor, Curator Healesville Sanctuary Chris Banks, Wildlife Conservation and Science, Zoos Victoria. February 2007 1 1. Background Amphibian species across the world have declined at an alarming rate in recent decades. According to the IUCN at least 122 species have gone extinct since 1980 and nearly one third of the world’s near 6,000 amphibian species are classified as threatened with extinction, placing the entire class at the core of the current biodiversity crisis (IUCN, 2006). Australasia too has experienced significant declines; several Australian species are considered extinct and nearly 25% of the remainder are threatened with extinction, while all four species native to New Zealand are threatened. Conventional causes of biodiversity loss, habitat destruction and invasive species, are playing a major role in these declines. However, emergent disease and climate change are strongly implicated in many declines and extinctions. These factors are now acting globally, rapidly and, most disturbingly, in protected and near pristine areas. Whilst habitat conservation and mitigation of threats in situ are essential, for many taxa the requirement for some sort of ex situ intervention is mounting. In response to this crisis there have been a series of meetings organised by the IUCN (World Conservation Union), WAZA (World Association of Zoos & Aquariums) and CBSG (Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, of the IUCN Species Survival Commission) around the world to discuss how the zoo community can and should respond.
    [Show full text]
  • Labiatae) in South-Eastern Australia
    319 Contributions to the systematics of Prostanthera (Labiatae) in south-eastern Australia Barry J. Conn Abstract Conn, B.J. (Royal Botanic Gardens, Mrs Macquaries Road, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia) 1997. Contributions to the systematics of Prostanthera (Labiatae) in south-eastern Australia. Telopea 7(4): 319–332. Prostanthera cuneata is regarded as endemic to mainland Australia, with the type material based on cultivated material grown in Formosa garden, Tasmania. The new species Prostanthera galbraithiae B.J.Conn is here formally described. A morphological re-evaluation of Prostanthera melissifolia concludes that this species is endemic to Victoria. Prostanthera melissifolia sensu Conn, from the Northern Tablelands of New South Wales, is P. caerulea R.Br., and Prostanthera sp. aff. melissifolia sensu Beauglehole, from East Gippsland (Victoria), probably is P. incisa R.Br. (s. lat.). A full description, habitat notes, distribution map and illustration of each of the first three species are provided. Introduction This paper presents the conclusions of revisionary studies into the genus Prostanthera section Prostanthera, arising particularly from work towards the preparation of an account of the genus for the forthcoming Flora of Victoria, volume 4. Terminology follows Conn (1984), except inflorescence terminology as modified by Conn (1995). Distribution information for Victoria follows Conn (1993). 1. Distribution of Prostanthera cuneata Benth. Previously, Prostanthera cuneata has been regarded as occurring in New South Wales, Tasmania and Victoria. Although the type specimen of this species (Gunn 725, 7 Dec. 1842) is stated to have been collected from the ‘South Esk’ River, south of Launceston in Tasmania, Buchanan (1988, 1990) states that Gunn actually collected from ‘Formosa’ garden, on the estate of W.E.
    [Show full text]